Next Article in Journal
Phytochemicals and Vitamin D for a Healthy Life and Prevention of Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Mucoadhesive Mesoporous Silica Particles as Versatile Carriers for Doxorubicin Delivery in Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Whole Transcriptome Analysis of Substantia Nigra in Mice with MPTP-Induced Parkinsonism Bearing Defective Glucocerebrosidase Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Non-Modified as Well as Surface-Modified SiO2 Nanoparticles on Red Blood Cells, Biological and Model Membranes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nanostructured Aluminum Oxyhydroxide—A Prospective Support for Functional Porphyrin-Based Materials

by
Stepan M. Korobkov
1,2,
Kirill P. Birin
1,*,
Anatole N. Khodan
1,
Oleg Yu. Grafov
1,
Yulia G. Gorbunova
1,3 and
Aslan Yu. Tsivadze
1,3
1
Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky pr., 31, bldg 4, 119071 Moscow, Russia
2
Faculty of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, 1-3 Leninskiye Gory, 119991 Moscow, Russia
3
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky pr., 31, 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(15), 12165; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512165
Submission received: 22 June 2023 / Revised: 21 July 2023 / Accepted: 26 July 2023 / Published: 29 July 2023

Abstract

:
A method for the grafting of unsymmetrical A2BC-type 5,15-bis(4-butoxyphenyl)-10-(4-carboxyphenyl)-20-(phenanthrenoimidazolyl)-porphyrin onto the surface of nanostructured aluminum oxyhydroxide modified with a single SiO2 layer (NAOM) was successfully developed. A straightforward procedure towards surface modification of NAOM allowed us to prepare a new porphyrin-containing hybrid material. The obtained 3D heterostructure was extensively characterized using XPS, TEM and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Structural and morphological peculiarities of the inorganic support before and after the immobilization procedure were studied and discussed in detail. The stability of the material against leaching and the porphyrin immobilization ratio ca. 14% by weight were also revealed.

1. Introduction

Porphyrin chemistry is a rapidly expanding field of research. These unique macrocyclic compounds were proven to be promising molecules in multiple application fields [1], namely photodynamic therapy [2,3,4], dye-sensitized solar cells [5,6], nonlinear optics [7,8], catalysis [9,10], etc. Various existing synthetic approaches [11,12,13,14,15] towards different structural types of tetrapyrrolic compounds have determined the enormous diversity of this class of molecules. In this respect, further achievements in porphyrin chemistry were attained with the development of porphyrin-based functional materials [16,17,18] in the past decade. The term “functional” is used to outline specific properties of the obtained material, such as luminescence [19], gas storage and separation [20,21], catalytic activity [22,23], etc. Progress in the development of hybrid functional materials is outlined in several comprehensive reviews [24,25,26,27]. Porphyrin chemistry is not outside this trend and recent advances in the development of porphyrin-based functional materials [10,23,28,29,30,31] has received growing attention in this field.
The development of porphyrin-based functional materials originates from the aim to utilize the outstanding physicochemical properties of these macrocyclic compounds in a convenient form. Notably, the majority of porphyrin-based functional materials belong to the family of covalent (COF) and metal–organic (MOF) frameworks [31,32,33,34]. However, the development of COFs and MOFs imposes some notable restrictions on the structure of the molecules and their functional groups. Consequently, it forces one to use only certain symmetrical types of porphyrins for the preparation of the abovementioned frameworks. It is possible to overcome this structural limitation with the immobilization strategy. This strategy implies surface modification of the inorganic support with porphyrin molecules bearing anchoring groups. In this case, porphyrin covers the surface of the inert supporting material, while in COFs and MOFs, porphyrin acts as a linker fragment and is distributed throughout the volume. In turn, the surface distribution is favored for the development of heterogeneous catalytic materials since the inner porphyrin molecules in the frameworks are typically less accessible for the reagents. Despite the advantages of the immobilization technique, the application of this method is still limited [18,23,35,36]. Nevertheless, a variety of anchoring groups are reported in literature [37] and some of them were comparatively analyzed [38,39]. Among them, the carboxylic group may serve well because of its stability and inertia.
Herein, we report the first example of the surface modification of SiO2-modified nanostructured aluminum oxyhydroxide (NAOM) with porphyrin molecules. While different studies of typical tetraarylporphyrins on the surfaces of such materials as SiO2 and SiO2/ZnO are reported to date [40,41], the novelty of the present work consists both in the application of a scarcely studied fibrillar extremely porous Al2O3-based support and an unsymmetrical A2BC-type porphyrin, allowing further modification of the resulting hybrid material. For this purpose, an unsymmetrical porphyrin of A2BC type containing a bulky peripheral polyaromatic unit and an anchoring carboxy group at the opposite position of the macrocycle was designed (Chart 1). Nickel(II) as a metal center in the porphyrin macrocycle was selected in order to enhance the photostability of the molecule and to simplify the interpretation of the immobilization results. The opposite imidazophenanthrene unit was used as a model of a functional polyaromatic fragment with promising photophysical properties as well as a fragment closely related to a phenanthroline moiety. The 4-butoxyphenyl groups at meso-positions were used in order to enhance the solubility of the target molecule in organic media since the peripheral polyaromatic fragments have been previously found to decrease the solubility of porphyrins [42].

2. Results and Discussion

The synthesis of the functionalized A2BC-type porphyrin began with the corresponding meso-formyl porphyrin (Ni-1), which was transformed into Ni-5 in a multistep procedure (Scheme 1) [43]. The polyaromatic fragment was introduced to the porphyrin using the Debus–Radziszewski reaction of Ni-1 with phenantrene-9,10-dione in the presence of an excess of ammonium acetate. The reaction product was alkylated with benzyl chloride to provide Ni-3. In turn, this product was subsequently brominated with NBS and applied to a Suzuki cross-coupling reaction with 4-methoxycarbonylphenylboronic acid in the presence of a Pd(Ph3P)4 catalyst. With the obtained porphyrin in hand, we proceeded to the hydrolysis stage which allowed the preparation of the target molecule Ni-6 with almost quantitative yield. The porphyrin bearing an anchoring group was subsequently used in the immobilization stage.
The photostability of the prepared Ni-5 was tested by irradiation of its solutions with a 3W blue LED, namely the conditions of photobleaching of photoactive porphyrins reported previously [44,45]. Three different solvents were chosen (CCl4, toluene and CH2Cl2) for the tests, which differ in reported lifetimes of singlet oxygen. In contrast to photoactive compounds, Ni-5 showed less than 1% degradation in all cases, detected by decreases in the Soret band in UV–Vis spectra of solutions. It should be mentioned that the observed variation in Soret band absorption is comparable with the baseline drift in spectra and, thus, could not be severely analyzed.
Nanostructured aluminum oxyhydroxide (NAO) is a low-density porous material with fibrillar structure. Its chemical formula can be designated as Al2O3×nH2O, where n ~3.6. The NAO samples were grown in climatic chambers at 25 °C in air atmosphere with 70–75% humidity by the surface oxidation of a thin liquid alloy Hg(Al) layer deposited on an aluminum plate [46]. Treatment of NAO samples with saturated vapor of methyltrimetoxysilane (MTMOS) at room temperature led to hydrolysis and the formation of chemically adsorbed groups on the surface: [=Al–O–]Si–(CH3)|surf] [47]. Further annealing of the sample at 1000 °C allowed us to obtain a NAOM sample with a SiO2 layer of ca. single monolayer thickness. It should also be mentioned that the selected annealing temperature is the optimal balance between the enhancement of the mechanical durability and the unavoidable decrease in the porosity of the material [48,49]. Previously, it was shown that immobilization of a crown-substituted phthalocyanine molecule on the surface of NAOM is characterized by stronger binding compared to its non-modified analogue [47], while the annealing stage is essential in improving mechanical durability of the inorganic support in order to simplify its handling.
The immobilization was performed by treatment of the annealed NAOM sample with the solution of Ni-6 in CH2Cl2. The prolonged exposure of NAOM in the solution containing Ni-6 resulted in a drastic change in color of the material from white to deep red (Figure 1) while the solution was considerably decolorized. The prepared material was repeatedly washed with CH2Cl2 in 24 h intervals until leaching was not observed and the washings were colorless. The analysis of the washings with UV–Vis allowed us to evaluate the amount of recovered Ni-6 and, thus, to analyze the ratio of porphyrin in the prepared hybrid material, which was found to be ca. 14% by weight. The prolonged exposure of the obtained material in CH2Cl2 did not reveal further leaching of the porphyrin.
Along the immobilization, the tendency of the monolithic NAOM sample to fall into fibrillary pieces and powder-like particles was observed. This behavior of NAO and NAOM materials could be reasonably attributed to their low mechanical strength which is insufficient to survive the surface tension and capillary effects of the solvents. The observed behavior of the material is in consistency with previously reported peculiarities [47].
The prepared hybrid Ni-6@NAOM material was characterized by a set of applicable physicochemical methods. First, the diffuse reflectance spectrum was acquired for the prepared material using an integrating sphere (Figure 2). The Soret band at 432 nm and Q bands at 543 and 576 nm were observed in the UV–Vis spectrum of Ni-6 in CHCl3 solution. In turn, the diffuse reflectance spectrum of Ni-6@NAOM demonstrates a similar set of bands with a significant broadening in comparison with the spectrum in solution. Such broadening is typical for solid materials. The absence of any considerable shifts of bands within the spectra upon immobilization allows us to assume the absence of any specific interactions between the porphyrin molecules at the surface of NAOM and, thus, its monomeric state.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to characterize the surface of the hybrid material. This method was widely used previously for the characterization of a variety of free-base porphyrins and metal complexes [50,51,52], including Ni(II) porphyrinates [53,54]. Grafting of the free-base and Cu(II) porphyrinates to TiO2 (anatase) with subsequent characterization by means of XPS can also also found in literature [55]. The prepared hybrid material is inhomogeneous; therefore, quantitative analysis based on peak intensities may lead to overestimation of porphyrin loading [56]. In this study, we use XPS to prove the elemental composition of the hybrid material and to observe changes in the composition of the inorganic support after each modification procedure.
XPS spectra were recorded for raw NAO samples before and after modification with MTMOS, after annealing at 1000 °C and after immobilization of Ni-6. Changes in the composition of the inorganic support during the abovementioned procedures could be observed in the low-binding-energy region (Figure 3). Treatment of the NAO samples with MTMOS expectedly led to the appearance of Si2s and Si2p peaks in the XPS spectrum of NAOM. Annealing at 1000 °C of the NAOM sample and further immobilization of porphyrin Ni-6 did not result in any notable changes in the mentioned XPS region. Indeed, silicon and aluminum ratios did not reveal considerable changes after the modification procedures. The O2s peak remained virtually unchanged after the annealing stage despite the removal of the adsorbed water. As was noted above, surface inhomogeneity of the material complicates quantitative analysis of the sample; therefore, peak intensities cannot provide reliable information about the composition of the material.
The expected Ni2p3/2 peak was observed in the XPS spectrum of Ni-6@NAOM, confirming the successful immobilization of the porphyrin on the surface of NAOM along with the abovementioned diffuse reflectance spectrum (Figure 4). The binding energy of the Ni2p3/2 peak is in agreement with the reported data [52]. The N1s peak in the XPS spectrum of Ni-6@NAOM was successfully deconvoluted into four peaks, corresponding to a pyrrolic fragment (C-N=C, 398.3 eV), coordination center (N-Ni-N, 399.4 eV), benzylic fragment (C-N-Bn, 400.8 eV) and shake-up satellite (401.9 eV). Unfortunately, the deconvolution of the C1s peak could not be performed since hydrocarbon contaminants were present in NAOM sample before the immobilization procedure.
Figure 5 shows TEM images of a NAO sample and the Ni-6@NAOM hybrid. The initial NAO sample can be described as a porous material consisting of a 3D grid of interweaved fibrils. After all modification procedures, the porous material notably changed its morphology. Annealing at 1000 °C caused shrinkage of fibrils along with the beginning of crystallization of amorphous alumina to θ-Al2O3 [46]. These processes are the main contributors to the changes in the morphology.

3. Materials and Methods

All used reagent-grade chemicals were purchased from commercial suppliers, unless otherwise stated. The solvents have been purified according to conventional methods [57].
MALDI TOF mass spectra were recorded using a Ultraflex spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Switzerland) in positive ions mode using 2,4,6-Trihydroxyacetophenone (THAP) as a matrix. UV–Vis spectra were recorded using an Evolution 200 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, MA USA) in rectangular quartz cells with a 0.1–10 mm optical path or with ISA-220 diffuse reflectance accessory in a 250–900 nm range. NMR spectra were recorded using a Avance III (Bruker, Fällanden, Switzerland) spectrometer with 600.13 MHz proton frequency in CDCl3 at ambient temperature with the use of the residual solvent signal as an internal reference.
The morphology of NAO samples and the porphyrin-containing hybrid was examined using the TEM method on a JEM 1210 electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies were performed using an ESCA+ spectrometer (OMICRON, Berlin, Germany) with an aluminum anode equipped with an AlKα XM1000 monochromatic X-ray source (with an emission energy of 1486.6 eV and a power of 252 W). The pressure in the analyzer chamber was kept no higher than 8 × 10−10 mbar and the analyzer’s pass energy was 20 eV. To allow for sample charging, the position of XPS peaks was standardized relative to the C 1s peak of hydrocarbon contaminants (adsorbed impurities from the atmosphere), the bonding energy of which was assumed to be 285.0 eV. The spectra were decomposed using the UNIFIT 2009 program after subtracting a background determined according to Shirley [58]. Peak positions were determined with an accuracy of ±0.1 eV.
The growth of the aluminum oxyhydroxide was performed in a WK3-180/40 climatic chamber (Weiss Umwelttechnik GmbH, Reiskirchen, Germany).
Chromatographic purification was performed using Macherey-Nagel Silica 60, 0.063–0.2 mm. Merck aluminum plates (TLC Silica 60 F254) were used for TLC analysis with hexane/CH2Cl2 and CH2Cl2/MeOH mixtures as eluents. Gel permeation chromatography was performed with Bio-Beads SX-1 sorbent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in a CHCl3:MeOH (98:2) mixture.
Nickel(II) 5-formyl-10,20-di(4-butoxyphenyl)porphyrin Ni-1 was prepared following the reported procedure [59]. Porphyrins Ni-2Ni-5 were prepared from Ni-1 as reported previously [43,60]. The detailed synthetic procedures and spectral characteristics of all compounds used in the study (Figures S1–S24) can be found in ESI.
[5-benzylimidazophenantrene-10,20-di(4-butoxyphenyl)-15-(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrinato]nickel(II) Ni-6. Ni-5 (0.047 mmol, 52 mg) was dissolved in THF (25.2 mL). Sodium hydroxide (4.7 mmol, 188 mg) was dissolved in water (2.1 mL) and added to the THF solution. The mixture was refluxed for 21 h upon stirring and then quenched with HCl (38%, 570 μL). Then, CHCl3 (100 mL) and water (100 mL) were added. The organic layer was separated and evaporated to dryness. The solid residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and applied to a short plug of silica packed in CH2Cl2. A mixture of CH2Cl2 and MeOH (0→5% of MeOH) was further used as eluent. The obtained fraction was purified with size-exclusion chromatography producing 98% (50 mg) of pure compound.
1H NMR (600 MHz; CDCl3/MeOD (85/15); δ, ppm; J, Hz): 9.17 (d, 1H, 3J = 7.9, HPhen), 8.93 (d, 1H, 3J = 8.7, HPhen), 8.88–8.84 (m, 3H: 2Hβ, HPhen) 8.79 (d, 2H, 3J = 4.9, Hβ), 8.75 (d, 2H, 3J = 4.9, Hβ), 8.57 (d, 2H, 3J = 4.9, Hβ), 8.20–8.11 (br m, 3H: 2HCarboxy-Ph, HPhen), 8.07–7.67 (br m, 4H, HAr), 7.85 (t, 1H, 3J = 7.5, HPhen), 7.77 (t, 1H, 3J = 7.8, HPhen), 7.62 (t, 1H, 3J = 7.8, HPhen), 7.46 (t, 1H, 3J = 7.6, HPhen), 7.18 (d, 4H, 3J = 7.7, HAr), 6.98–6.89 (m, 3H, HBn), 6.73 (d, 2H, 3J = 7.4, HBn), 5.51 (s, 2H, HBn), 4.17 (t, 4H, 3J = 6.5, HO-Bu), 1.92 (quint, 4H, 3J = 6.8, HO-Bu), 1.62 (sext, 4H, 3J = 7.4, HO-Bu), 1.07 (t, 6H, 3J = 7.4, HO-Bu).
MALDI TOF MS: m/z calculated for C69H54N6NiO4 1088.36, found 1089.38 (MH+).
UV–Vis (CHCl3; λmax/nm; log ε): 268 (4.80), 292sh (4.35), 316sh (4.21), 432 (5.18), 543 (4.12), 576 (3.70).
Preparation of modified nanostructured aluminum oxyhydroxide (NAOM). The procedures for the preparation of nanostructured aluminum oxyhydroxide (NAO) and its further modification were similar to those previously reported [46,47,61]. A 10 × 10 mm high-purity aluminum plate (A-5N aluminum) was rinsed with isopropanol and the surface of the plate was treated with 2 M KOH solution for 10 min. Afterwards, the plate was treated with 2 M HNO3 solution containing 0.1 M Hg(NO3)2 and 0.05 M AgNO3 for 10 min. The plate was subsequently dried, fixed in a holder and placed on a cooler (20 °C) in the climatic chamber (70% humidity, 25 °C). The growth rate was ca. 1 cm/h. The grown fibrillar monolith (95 mg) was further used for the preparation of modified NAO (NAOM). NAO samples were placed in a desiccator at ambient temperature and treated with saturated vapor of methyltrimethoxysilane (MTMOS). After 4 h, the NAOM samples (105 mg) were removed from the desiccator. The samples were annealed at 1000 °C for 4 h so the resulting mass of the samples was 61 mg.
Immobilization of Ni-6. Porphyrin Ni-6 (10 mg) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and added to the annealed NAOM sample (58 mg). After 10 min of stirring, the solid material was centrifuged and washed with 30 mL of CH2Cl2. The centrifugation and washing procedure was repeated 5 times with 24 h intervals between each procedure. Liquid phase was removed with a pipette and the solid material was left at ambient temperature to remove residual solvent.

4. Conclusions

The present work demonstrates the first example of the surface modification of NAOM with a porphyrin bearing an anchoring group, providing a hybrid material with a porphyrin ratio ca. 14% by weight. The prepared novel-type hybrid material was characterized with a set of physicochemical methods to obtain insight into its composition and morphology. Thus, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy along with XPS served as reliable proof of the composition of the hybrid material while transmission electron microscopy demonstrated the evolution of the morphology of the porous material upon modification procedures. Concluding, this research forms the basis for the upcoming development of a new generation of macroscopic porphyrin-based hybrid materials for further application in heterogeneous catalysis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241512165/s1. Reference [60] is cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.P.B. and A.N.K.; methodology, K.P.B. and A.N.K.; validation, K.P.B., A.N.K. and O.Y.G.; formal analysis, K.P.B. and S.M.K.; investigation, S.M.K.; resources, A.Y.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.K.; writing—review and editing, K.P.B. and Y.G.G.; visualization, K.P.B. and S.M.K.; supervision, Y.G.G. and A.Y.T.; project administration, K.P.B.; funding acquisition, K.P.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 23-23-00542.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

The physical–chemical measurements were made using the equipment of the Centre for collective use of IPCE RAS. TEM images were acquired by V.V. Matveev (IPCE RAS).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Koifman, O.I.; Ageeva, T.A.; Beletskaya, I.P.; Averin, A.D.; Yakushev, A.A.; Tomilova, L.G.; Dubinina, T.V.; Tsivadze, A.Y.; Gorbunova, Y.G.; Martynov, A.G.; et al. Macroheterocyclic Compounds—A Key Building Block in New Functional Materials and Molecular Devices. Macroheterocycles 2020, 13, 311–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tsolekile, N.; Nelana, S.; Oluwafemi, O.S. Porphyrin as Diagnostic and Therapeutic Agent. Molecules 2019, 24, 2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Tian, J.; Huang, B.; Nawaz, M.H.; Zhang, W. Recent Advances of Multi-Dimensional Porphyrin-Based Functional Materials in Photodynamic Therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 420, 213410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Koifman, O.I.; Ageeva, T.A.; Kuzmina, N.S.; Otvagin, V.F.; Nyuchev, A.V.; Fedorov, A.Y.; Belykh, D.V.; Lebedeva, N.S.; Yurina, E.S.; Syrbu, S.A.; et al. Synthesis Strategy of Tetrapyrrolic Photosensitizers for Their Practical Application in Photodynamic Therapy. Macroheterocycles 2022, 15, 207–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wei, T.; Sun, X.; Li, X.; Ågren, H.; Xie, Y. Systematic Investigations on the Roles of the Electron Acceptor and Neighboring Ethynylene Moiety in Porphyrins for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 21956–21965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zeng, K.; Tong, Z.; Ma, L.; Zhu, W.-H.; Wu, W.; Xie, Y. Molecular Engineering Strategies for Fabricating Efficient Porphyrin-Based Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 1617–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Annoni, E.; Pizzotti, M.; Ugo, R.; Quici, S.; Morotti, T.; Bruschi, M.; Mussini, P. Synthesis, Electronic Characterisation and Significant Second-Order Non-Linear Optical Responses of Meso-Tetraphenylporphyrins and Their Zn II Complexes Carrying a Push or Pull Group in the β Pyrrolic Position. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 2005, 3857–3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tessore, F.; Biroli, A.O.; Di Carlo, G.; Pizzotti, M. Porphyrins for Second Order Nonlinear Optics (NLO): An Intriguing History. Inorganics 2018, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wei, L.; Marissa, L.; Colin, G.; Jesus, A.; David, M. A Biomimetic SH2 Cross-Coupling Mechanism for Quaternary Sp3 -Carbon Formation. Science 2021, 4322, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  10. Abdulaeva, I.A.; Birin, K.P.; Bessmertnykh-Lemeune, A.; Tsivadze, A.Y.; Gorbunova, Y.G. Heterocycle-Appended Porphyrins: Synthesis and Challenges. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 407, 213108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Senge, M.O. Stirring the Porphyrin Alphabet Soup—Functionalization Reactions for Porphyrins. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 1943–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Grzegorzek, N.; Zieleniewska, A.; Schür, A.; Maichle-Mössmer, C.; Killian, M.S.; Guldi, D.M.; Chernick, E.T. Electronically Tuned Asymmetric Meso-Substituted Porphyrins for p-Type Solar Cells. Chempluschem 2019, 84, 766–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Marschner, S.M.; Haldar, R.; Fuhr, O.; Wöll, C.; Bräse, S. Modular Synthesis of Trans-A2B2-Porphyrins with Terminal Esters: Systematically Extending the Scope of Linear Linkers for Porphyrin-Based MOFs. Chem. A Eur. J. 2021, 27, 1390–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fujimoto, K.; Yorimitsu, H.; Osuka, A. Facile Preparation of β-Haloporphyrins as Useful Precursors of β-Substituted Porphyrins. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 972–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Beletskaya, I.P.; Tyurin, V.S.; Uglov, A.; Stern, C.; Guilard, R. Survey of Synthetic Routes for Synthesis and Substitution in Porphyrins. In Handbook of Porphyrin Science; Guilard, R., Kadish, K.M., Smith, K.M., Eds.; World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2012; pp. 81–279. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pereira, C.F.; Figueira, F.; Mendes, R.F.; Rocha, J.; Hupp, J.T.; Farha, O.K.; Simoães, M.M.Q.; Tomé, J.P.C.; Paz, F.A.A. Bifunctional Porphyrin-Based Nano-Metal-Organic Frameworks: Catalytic and Chemosensing Studies. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 3855–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lin, Q.; Mao, C.; Kong, A.; Bu, X.; Zhao, X.; Feng, P. Porphyrinic Coordination Lattices with Fluoropillars. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 21189–21195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Birin, K.P.; Abdulaeva, I.A.; Polivanovskaya, D.A.; Sinel’shchikova, A.A.; Demina, L.I.; Baranchikov, A.E.; Gorbunova, Y.G.; Tsivadze, A.Y. Immobilization of Heterocycle-Appended Porphyrins on UiO-66 and UiO-67 MOFs. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 66, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, L.; Ye, J.W.; Wang, H.P.; Pan, M.; Yin, S.Y.; Wei, Z.W.; Zhang, L.Y.; Wu, K.; Fan, Y.N.; Su, C.Y. Ultrafast Water Sensing and Thermal Imaging by a Metal-Organic Framework with Switchable Luminescence. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Liu, W.; Jiang, S.D.; Yan, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, J.; Leng, K.; Japip, S.; Liu, J.; Xu, H.; Liu, Y.; et al. A Solution-Processable and Ultra-Permeable Conjugated Microporous Thermoset for Selective Hydrogen Separation. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Morris, R.E.; Wheatley, P.S. Gas Storage in Nanoporous Materials. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4966–4981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, X.; Zhao, H.; Liang, J.; Luo, Y.; Chen, G.; Shi, X.; Lu, S.; Gao, S.; Hu, J.; Liu, Q.; et al. A-Site Perovskite Oxides: An Emerging Functional Material for Electrocatalysis and Photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 6650–6670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abdulaeva, I.A.; Birin, K.P.; Chassagnon, R.; Bessmertnykh-Lemeune, A. Hybrid Materials Based on Imidazo[4,5-b]Porphyrins for Catalytic Oxidation of Sulfides. Catalysts 2023, 13, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sanchez, C.; Julián, B.; Belleville, P.; Popall, M. Applications of Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 3559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gómez-Romero, P.; Sanchez, C. (Eds.) Functional Hybrid Materials; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003; ISBN 9783527304844. [Google Scholar]
  26. Goesmann, H.; Feldmann, C. Nanoparticulate Functional Materials. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1362–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Thomas, A. Functional Materials: From Hard to Soft Porous Frameworks. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8328–8344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tanaka, T.; Osuka, A. Conjugated Porphyrin Arrays: Synthesis, Properties and Applications for Functional Materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 943–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yi, J.D.; Xu, R.; Chai, G.L.; Zhang, T.; Zang, K.; Nan, B.; Lin, H.; Liang, Y.L.; Lv, J.; Luo, J.; et al. Cobalt Single-Atoms Anchored on Porphyrinic Triazine-Based Frameworks as Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction and Hydrogen Evolution Reactions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 1252–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, M.; Ishihara, S.; Ji, Q.; Akada, M.; Hill, J.P.; Ariga, K. Paradigm Shift from Self-Assembly to Commanded Assembly of Functional Materials: Recent Examples in Porphyrin/Fullerene Supramolecular Systems. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2012, 13, 053001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gorbunova, Y.G.; Enakieva, Y.Y.; Volostnykh, M.V.; Sinelshchikova, A.A.; Abdulaeva, I.A.; Birin, K.P.; Tsivadze, A.Y. Porous Porphyrin-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis, Structure, Sorption Properties and Application Prospects. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2022, 91, RCR5038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wei, S.; Zhang, F.; Chen, Z.; Ding, J.; Xue, B.; Lu, C. Porous Carbons Embedded with Nitrogen-Coordinated Cobalt as an Exceptional Electrochemical Catalyst for High-Performance Zn–Air Batteries. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 12850–12856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hao, W.; Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xing, G.; Li, J.; Chen, L. Facile Synthesis of Porphyrin Based Covalent Organic Frameworks via an A 2 B 2 Monomer for Highly Efficient Heterogeneous Catalysis. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 8100–8105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jahan, M.; Bao, Q.; Loh, K.P. Electrocatalytically Active Graphene-Porphyrin MOF Composite for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6707–6713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Won, D.I.; Lee, J.S.; Ba, Q.; Cho, Y.J.; Cheong, H.Y.; Choi, S.; Kim, C.H.; Son, H.J.; Pac, C.; Kang, S.O. Development of a Lower Energy Photosensitizer for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction: Modification of Porphyrin Dye in Hybrid Catalyst System. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 1018–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Birin, K.P.; Shlykov, I.V.; Senchikhin, I.N.; Demina, L.I.; Gorbunova, Y.G.; Tsivadze, A.Y. An Approach towards Modification of UiO-Type MOFs with Phosphonate-Substituted Porphyrins. Polyhedron 2022, 219, 115794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, L.; Cole, J.M. Anchoring Groups for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 3427–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stern, C.; Lemeune, A.B.; Gorbunova, Y.; Tsivadze, A.; Guilard, R. Effect of the Anchoring Group in Porphyrin Sensitizers: Phosphonate versus Carboxylate Linkages. Turkish J. Chem. 2014, 38, 980–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, F.; Li, X.; Hihath, J.; Huang, Z.; Tao, N. Effect of Anchoring Groups on Single-Molecule Conductance: Comparative Study of Thiol-, Amine-, and Carboxylic-Acid-Terminated Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15874–15881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Krishnakumar, B.; Ravikumar, S.; Pandiyan, V.; Nithya, V.; Sylvestre, S.; Sivakumar, P.; Surya, C.; John, N.A.A.; Sobral, A.J.F.N. Synthesis, Characterization of Porphyrin and CdS Modified Spherical Shaped SiO2 for Reactive Red 120 Degradation under Direct Sunlight. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1210, 128021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Krishnakumar, B.; Balakrishna, A.; Nawabjan, S.A.; Pandiyan, V.; Aguiar, A.; Sobral, A.J.F.N. Solar and Visible Active Amino Porphyrin/SiO2ZnO for the Degradation of Naphthol Blue Black. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2017, 111, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Abdulaeva, I.A.; Birin, K.P.; Michalak, J.; Romieu, A.; Stern, C.; Bessmertnykh-Lemeune, A.; Guilard, R.; Gorbunova, Y.G.; Tsivadze, A.Y. On the Synthesis of Functionalized Porphyrins and Porphyrin Conjugates via β-Aminoporphyrins. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 5758–5774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Korobkov, S.M.; Birin, K.P.; Gorbunova, Y.G.; Tsivadze, A.Y. A2BC-Type Meso-Imidazolylporphyrins—New Class of Prospective Polyfunctional Molecules. Dyes Pigment. 2022, 207, 110696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shremzer, E.S.; Polivanovskaia, D.A.; Birin, K.P.; Gorbunova, Y.G.; Tsivadze, A.Y. π-Expanded Pyrazinoporphyrins for Photocatalysis: How Many Rings Are Required? Dyes Pigment. 2023, 210, 110935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Polivanovskaia, D.A.; Abdulaeva, I.A.; Birin, K.P.; Gorbunova, Y.G.; Tsivadze, A.Y. Diaryl-Pyrazinoporphyrins—Prospective Photocatalysts for Efficient Sulfoxidation. J. Catal. 2022, 413, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khodan, A.; Nguyen, T.H.N.; Esaulkov, M.; Kiselev, M.R.; Amamra, M.; Vignes, J.-L.; Kanaev, A. Porous Monoliths Consisting of Aluminum Oxyhydroxide Nanofibrils: 3D Structure, Chemical Composition, and Phase Transformations in the Temperature Range 25–1700 °C. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2018, 20, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Martynov, A.G.; Bykov, A.V.; Gorbunova, Y.G.; Khodan, A.N.; Tsivadze, A.Y. New Hybrid Materials Based on Nanostructured Aluminum Oxyhydroxide and Terbium(III) Bis(Tetra-15-Crown-5-Phthalocyaninate). Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surfaces 2018, 54, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khodan, A.N.; Bykov, A.V.; Kiselev, M.R. The Effect of Chemical Modification of the Surface by Oxysilanes on Changes in the Structural and Phase States of Highly Porous Aluminum Oxyhydroxides at Annealing up to 1200 °C. Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surfaces 2023, 59, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Khodan, A.; Kanaev, A.; Esaulkov, M.; Kiselev, M.; Nadtochenko, V. Effects of Surface Chemical Modification by Ethoxysilanes on the Evolution of 3D Structure and Composition of Porous Monoliths Consisting of Alumina Hydroxide Nanofibrils in the Temperature Range 25–1700 °C. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Herritsch, J.; Luy, J.-N.; Rohlf, S.; Gruber, M.; Klein, B.P.; Kalläne, M.; Schweyen, P.; Bröring, M.; Rossnagel, K.; Tonner, R.; et al. Influence of Ring Contraction on the Electronic Structure of Nickel Tetrapyrrole Complexes: Corrole vs Porphyrin. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 061005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Johnson, P.S.; García-Lastra, J.M.; Kennedy, C.K.; Jersett, N.J.; Boukahil, I.; Himpsel, F.J.; Cook, P.L. Crystal Fields of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines from Polarization- Dependent 2p-to-3d Multiplets. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 114706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Berríos, C.; Cárdenas-Jirón, G.I.; Marco, J.F.; Gutiérrez, C.; Ureta-Zañartu, M.S. Theoretical and Spectroscopic Study of Nickel(II) Porphyrin Derivatives. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 2706–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Krasnikov, S.A.; Preobrajenski, A.B.; Sergeeva, N.N.; Brzhezinskaya, M.M.; Nesterov, M.A.; Cafolla, A.A.; Senge, M.O.; Vinogradov, A.S. Electronic Structure of Ni(II) Porphyrins and Phthalocyanine Studied by Soft X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. 2007, 332, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Enakieva, Y.Y.; Sinelshchikova, A.A.; Grigoriev, M.S.; Chernyshev, V.V.; Kovalenko, K.A.; Stenina, I.A.; Yaroslavtsev, A.B.; Gorbunova, Y.G.; Tsivadze, A.Y. Highly Proton-Conductive Zinc Metal-Organic Framework Based On Nickel(II) Porphyrinylphosphonate. Chem. A Eur. J. 2019, 25, 10552–10556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mele, G.; Del Sole, R.; Vasapollo, G.; Marcì, G.; Garcìa-Lòpez, E.; Palmisano, L.; Coronado, J.M.; Hernández-Alonso, M.D.; Malitesta, C.; Guascito, M.R. TRMC, XPS, and EPR Characterizations of Polycrystalline TiO2 Porphyrin Impregnated Powders and Their Catalytic Activity for 4-Nitrophenol Photodegradation in Aqueous Suspension. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 12347–12352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tougaard, S. Practical Guide to the Use of Backgrounds in Quantitative XPS. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2021, 39, 011201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Armarego, W.L.F.; Chai, C.L.L. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals; Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; ISBN 9781856175678. [Google Scholar]
  58. Shirley, D.A. High-Resolution x-Ray Photoemission Spectrum of the Valence Bands of Gold. Phys. Rev. B 1972, 5, 4709–4714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Birin, K.P.; Gorbunova, Y.G.; Tsivadze, A.Y. New Approach for Post-Functionalization of Meso-Formylporphyrins. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 67242–67246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Linstead, R.P.; Doering, W.E. The Stereochemistry of Catalytic Hydrogenation. II. The Preparation of the Six Inactive Perhydrodiphenic 1 Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 64, 1991–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vignes, J.L.; Frappart, C.; Di Costanzo, T.; Rouchaud, J.C.; Mazerolles, L.; Michel, D. Ultraporous Monoliths of Alumina Prepared at Room Temperature by Aluminium Oxidation. J. Mater. Sci. 2008, 43, 1234–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chart 1. The substitution pattern of the porphyrin under investigation.
Chart 1. The substitution pattern of the porphyrin under investigation.
Ijms 24 12165 ch001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of functionalized porphyrin Ni-6. i: phenanthrene-9,10-dione, NH4OAc, CHCl3/AcOH, reflux; ii: BnCl, DMF, K2CO3, 100 °C; iii: NBS, Py, CHCl3, −60 °C→r.t.; iv: 4-(methoxycarbonyl)phenylboronic acid, Pd(PPh3)4, Na2CO3, Tol/EtOH, reflux; v: NaOH, THF/H2O (12/1), reflux, 21 h.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of functionalized porphyrin Ni-6. i: phenanthrene-9,10-dione, NH4OAc, CHCl3/AcOH, reflux; ii: BnCl, DMF, K2CO3, 100 °C; iii: NBS, Py, CHCl3, −60 °C→r.t.; iv: 4-(methoxycarbonyl)phenylboronic acid, Pd(PPh3)4, Na2CO3, Tol/EtOH, reflux; v: NaOH, THF/H2O (12/1), reflux, 21 h.
Ijms 24 12165 sch001
Figure 1. Prepared NAOM sample (left) and a fragment of a hybrid material (right).
Figure 1. Prepared NAOM sample (left) and a fragment of a hybrid material (right).
Ijms 24 12165 g001
Figure 2. Normalized UV–Vis spectrum of Ni-6 in CHCl3 solution and diffuse reflectance spectrum of Ni-6@NAOM.
Figure 2. Normalized UV–Vis spectrum of Ni-6 in CHCl3 solution and diffuse reflectance spectrum of Ni-6@NAOM.
Ijms 24 12165 g002
Figure 3. Stacked XPS spectra (low binding energy region).
Figure 3. Stacked XPS spectra (low binding energy region).
Ijms 24 12165 g003
Figure 4. Ni2p3/2 peak (left) and deconvolution of N1s peak (right) in XPS spectrum of Ni-6@NAOM.
Figure 4. Ni2p3/2 peak (left) and deconvolution of N1s peak (right) in XPS spectrum of Ni-6@NAOM.
Ijms 24 12165 g004
Figure 5. TEM images of raw NAO sample (left) and Ni-6@NAOM (right).
Figure 5. TEM images of raw NAO sample (left) and Ni-6@NAOM (right).
Ijms 24 12165 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Korobkov, S.M.; Birin, K.P.; Khodan, A.N.; Grafov, O.Y.; Gorbunova, Y.G.; Tsivadze, A.Y. Nanostructured Aluminum Oxyhydroxide—A Prospective Support for Functional Porphyrin-Based Materials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512165

AMA Style

Korobkov SM, Birin KP, Khodan AN, Grafov OY, Gorbunova YG, Tsivadze AY. Nanostructured Aluminum Oxyhydroxide—A Prospective Support for Functional Porphyrin-Based Materials. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(15):12165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512165

Chicago/Turabian Style

Korobkov, Stepan M., Kirill P. Birin, Anatole N. Khodan, Oleg Yu. Grafov, Yulia G. Gorbunova, and Aslan Yu. Tsivadze. 2023. "Nanostructured Aluminum Oxyhydroxide—A Prospective Support for Functional Porphyrin-Based Materials" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 15: 12165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512165

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop