Next Article in Journal
DeepSATA: A Deep Learning-Based Sequence Analyzer Incorporating the Transcription Factor Binding Affinity to Dissect the Effects of Non-Coding Genetic Variants
Next Article in Special Issue
Drug Development from Natural Products Based on the Pathogenic Mechanism of Asthma
Previous Article in Journal
The Transcriptome Landscape of the In Vitro Human Airway Epithelium Response to SARS-CoV-2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Photoprotective Effects of Dendrobium nobile Lindl. Polysaccharides against UVB-Induced Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis in HaCaT Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Blackberries and Mulberries: Berries with Significant Health-Promoting Properties

by
Mariana S. Martins
1,
Ana C. Gonçalves
1,2,
Gilberto Alves
1 and
Luís R. Silva
1,3,4,*
1
CICS-UBI—Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
2
CIBIT—Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
3
CPIRN-UDI/IPG—Center of Potential and Innovation of Natural Resources, Research Unit for Inland Development (UDI), Polytechnic Institute of Guarda, 6300-559 Guarda, Portugal
4
Chemical Process Engineering and Forest Products Research Centre, Department of Chemical Engineering, Pólo II—Pinhal de Marrocos, University of Coimbra, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(15), 12024; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512024
Submission received: 27 June 2023 / Revised: 17 July 2023 / Accepted: 21 July 2023 / Published: 27 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Natural Products in Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy)

Abstract

:
Blackberries and mulberries are small and perishable fruits that provide significant health benefits when consumed. In reality, both are rich in phytochemicals, such as phenolics and volatile compounds, and micronutrients, such as vitamins. All the compounds are well-known thanks to their medicinal and pharmacological properties, namely antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, antiviral, and cardiovascular properties. Nevertheless, variables such as genotype, production conditions, fruit ripening stage, harvesting time, post-harvest storage, and climate conditions influence their nutritional composition and economic value. Given these facts, the current review focuses on the nutritional and chemical composition, as well as the health benefits, of two blackberry species (Rubus fruticosus L., and Rubus ulmifolius Schott) and one mulberry species (Morus nigra L.).

1. Introduction

Fruit consumption is promoted globally, being considered an essential part of any diet because it helps people to ingest more vitamins, minerals, dietary fiber, and phytochemicals. Therefore, it should not be surprising that recent epidemiological and clinical studies have shown the importance of a fruit-rich diet for the prevention of many illnesses, including cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and metabolic disorders [1,2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that individuals have a minimum intake of 400 g of fruits (five servings) per day in order to prevent chronic diseases and other illnesses, as well as to prevent micronutrient deficiencies [1,3].
All fruits have gained in appeal and interest over the past few decades. Among them, red fruits from many families, such as Rosaceae (strawberry, raspberry, blackberry, and sweet cherry), Ericaceae (blueberry, cranberry), and Moraceae (mulberry) have received special attention, due to their high nutritive value, distinctive taste, flavor, and nutraceutical properties, as well as their health-promoting properties [4].
Vitamins A, C, and E, minerals (calcium, phosphorus, iron, magnesium, potassium, sodium, manganese, and copper), dietary fiber, and phenolics are just a few of the bioactive compounds and nutrients found in these fruits. Among them, this last subclass has undergone extensive research mainly due to its notable anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties [5,6]. Indeed, phenolics are considered the main factors responsible for the health benefits attributed to these berries, and stand out due to their capacity to prevent cardiovascular diseases [7], reduce inflammation [8], improve neurological function and boost immune system [9], and offer resistance against oxidative stress (Figure 1) [10].
As well as those of other fruits and vegetables, the contents of red fruits also differ in terms of their nutritional value, consumer acceptability, and qualitative and quantitative composition depending on the species, cultivar, genotype, maturity stage, agricultural practices, environmental factors, soil conditions, and subsequent storage conditions [4,11].
In light of these facts, as well as the rising economic value of red fruits, the current review focuses on the nutritional and chemical composition, as well as the health benefits, of two blackberry species (Rubus fruticosus L.) and (Rubus ulmifolius Schott) and one mulberry species (Morus nigra L.).

2. Rubus fruticosus, Rubus ulmifolius and Morus nigra

Focusing on R. fruticosus L. and R. ulmifolius, both are semi-prostrate erect, scrambling, and perennial deciduous prickly fruits whose shrubs grow up to 3 m at a rapid rate [12]. Their stems are up to 7 m long and are stretched out nearly upright with leaves [6]. Unlike R. ulmifolius, Rubus fruticosus is a cultivated shrub with no thorns. In addition, R. ulmifolius is widespread in forests, hedges, and deserted fields, and along water lines, walls, and fences, and its stems are thorny (Figure 2A,B) [13].
Blackberries are the red fruits of this shrub. This species, a drupe-like aggregate fruit composed of numerous drupelets, belongs to the Rosaceae family, subfamily Rosoideae and genus Rubus, and has a morphology similar to that of raspberries. Rubus has over 740 species and 12 subgenera worldwide [6,7,16].
There are presently around 40 distinct species of blackberries worldwide, but regions with mild winters and long temperate summers are better suited for their development [17,18]. It is believed that this plant originates from Armenia. On a worldwide basis, blackberries are becoming increasingly popular, and are mostly farmed in North America, Europe, Asia, South America, Central America, and Africa [14,17]. The main blackberry-growing regions in Europe are Serbia and Hungary, with Serbia accounting for 90% of processed and exported production [19]. Furthermore, the yield of wild blackberries is significant, accounting for 154,000 tonnes in 2005 [20]. The United States of America is the world’s top producer of blackberries, with a production that, in 2017, reached a value of USD 31 million [21]. In 2020, Portugal exported around 29,848 tonnes of raspberries, strawberries, and mulberries [22]. In fact, the world production of these small fruits is growing due to the new trend towards biological products and the growing interest in their nutritional characteristics. They are rich in antioxidants and fiber, vitamins A, B, C, E, and K, calcium, magnesium, and potassium, and are beneficial to promoting health status at many levels [23,24,25].
Commonly, blackberry fruits have been typically consumed fresh or frozen/processed, including when made as jams, juices, syrups, and wines [24,25].
Another factor that influences phenolic concentrations is the food processing method used to produce a product that customers will want to buy. The antioxidant potential significantly decreases as a consequence of jam manufacturing. The principal cause of these declines is the inclusion of glucose-fructose syrup. Total phenolic compounds, total flavonoids and monomeric anthocyanins, and total antioxidant capacity values were found to be lower (between 76–89%) after the addition of glucose-fructose syrup than those recorded in the frozen sample [26].
In addition to its versatility, blackberry fruit is particularly valuable to producers due to its low cost of production and cultivation [27]. Since the fruit’s external appearance and internal quality are directly linked to the amount of primary and secondary metabolites present, fruit quality is crucial to both consumers and the food industry. It is also essential to remember that fruit with higher quality has a higher market value. Smaller fruits are firmer because they have the same number of cells as larger fruits, giving a higher density to the plant tissue. Fruit size is typically negatively correlated with firmness and berry phenolic content [18,19].
This fruit has the highest quality and flavor when it is fully ripe. From a business perspective, the color of the fruit and juice is crucial, because customers evaluate products based on their visual appearance. The color of blackberry fruits is influenced by a number of variables, including genotype, production conditions, fruit ripening stage, harvesting time, climate, soil, and storage conditions [28,29]. In terms of climate, some environmental elements influence the fruit composition, which is defined by the presence of substances known as nutraceuticals, which offer health advantages and assist in the treatment of disorders [30].
Blackberries and their by-products have been used since ancient times in traditional medicine, but recently the knowledge concerning their health-promoting components has received a lot of attention, particularly due to their richness in different bioactive compounds, with the presence of vitamins, minerals, fiber, and phenolic compounds standing out [19,23,25,31]. Therefore, it is not surprising that consumers favor the nutritional and antioxidant qualities associated with these fruits [4]. These characteristics depend on the region, variety, and time of harvest [32,33]. Additionally, blackberry phenolic content can also be affected by soil composition, which, in turn, results in variations between cultivars produced in the same area [5,18].
The fruit of M. nigra, a member of the Moraceae family and the genus Morus, is frequently compared with that of R. fruticosus and R. ulmifolius (Figure 2A–C) [25,26]. Although these three species have comparable appearances and chemical properties, and are consumed fresh, as well as processed to make jam, marmalade, syrup, a variety of soft beverages, and traditional items, M. nigra develops from trees that can reach a height of 10–13 m and exhibits higher potential for adaptation to diverse soil and environmental conditions [21,22]. Their origin was India and China, but nowadays, they are commonly found in Asia, Europe, America, and Africa [21,24]. They have a wide range of varieties; however, the three most popular types are black mulberry (M. nigra), white mulberry (M. alba), and red mulberry (M. rubra) [33]. Among these, the black mulberry is an edible fruit that is 2–3 cm long, with a complex cluster of several tiny drupes, and is dark purple, almost black, when completely mature. In Xinjiang, a region of China, and Eastern Anatolia, a region of Turkey, black mulberry fruits are used as a traditional medicine for the prevention and treatment of hypertension, tonsillitis, sore throat, anemia, and iron deficiency [34,35]. According to recent studies, black mulberries have more flavonoids, anthocyanins, and antioxidant abilities than red or white mulberries [26,32]. Since this fruit has a high concentration of naturally occurring phenolic compounds, such as phenolic acids, flavonols, and anthocyanins, it shows a wide range of biochemical activities, including antioxidant, anti-hyperlipidemia, and anticancer properties [33,36,37].

3. Nutritional and Chemical Composition

Berries, including blackberries and mulberries have high nutritional content, including of fatty and organic acids, minerals (Mg, Fe, K, and Ca), vitamins (A, B, C, K, and E), proteins and amino acids, and carbohydrates (sugars, and fiber) [16,24,27,32]. In addition, and focusing on blackberries and mulberries, they are also a great source of bioactive compounds with pharmaceutical potential, including phenolics (e.g., anthocyanins, hydroxycinnamic acids, and flavonols) and volatiles [13,25,30,33,35,36]. As already mentioned, and like other fruits, the nutritional content and quality of blackberries and mulberries are influenced by their chemical composition [37]. Additionally, the physiological age of red fruits at harvest has a significant impact on post-harvest quality, having noticeable variations in colour, hardness, acidity, and TSS as both berries grow [24,30,37,38]. Several studies identified several characteristics of farmed and wild blackberry fruits [17,38]. In general, the majority of quality assessments are based on the sugar/acid ratio level, calculated from total soluble solid (TSS; °Brix) and titratable acidity (TA). The TSS parameter indicates sugar content in fruits, while pH and TA represent total acids that contribute to sweetness and acidity, respectively, of fruits and related products [39,40].
Berry weight ranges from 1.2 g to 5.4 g for cultivated blackberries, such as R. fruticosus, whereas in wild blackberries, e.g., R. ulmifolius, it varies from 0.4 g to 1.2 g. This indicates that cultivated berries have a higher mean weight compared to wild genotypes. A similar trend is observed for length and width. However, TSS values are lower in cultivated fruits (8.6%–14.1%) than in wild genotypes (12.9%–22.3%). The mean TSS of wild genotypes is around 20%, whereas the mean pH of the wild genotypes is higher than that of the cultivated genotypes [38]. Concerning ash content, R. ulmifolius possesses around 0.58 g per 100 g fresh weight (fw). A higher degree of moisture was found for wild blackberries, with a value of 70 g per 100 g fw [13].
The weight of M. nigra ranges from 4.18 g to 5.55 g, while moisture content is around 78.03 fw and is the highest found on the Morus species [30,35,41]. Total ash content is around 0.50 g per 100 g dry weight (dw), whereas pH values range from 3.43 to 4.78 [35,42] and TA between 0.17% and 1.97% [43,44]. Recently, it was reported, in Chinese mulberries, TA values were between 5.82 and 48.49 mg citric acid per g fw [37]. The TSS content fluctuates between 6.20 to 19.43 °Brix [37,44].

3.1. Macronutrients

Macronutrients are chemicals that humans ingest in large quantities and are the primary body source of energy. The most well-known are carbohydrates, proteins, and organic and fatty acids (Figure 3). Among these, carbohydrates are considered the main source of energy used by human organisms. However, all of them are considered vital for preserving our health and life [45,46].

3.1.1. Carbohydrates

Sugars are essential to a fruit’s general taste character, nutritional value, and caloric density. They are the primary result of photosynthesis, and are required for the development of plant cell walls, energy production, and the formation of a number of signaling molecules at cellular and tissue levels, participating in the formation of aroma compounds [41]. Since most customers prefer sweet fruits, a higher fructose concentration is preferred because fructose is typically sweeter than glucose and sucrose [24].
Fructose, glucose, sucrose, trehalose, and raffinose are found in R. fruticosus and M. nigra. Comparing both, M. nigra contains more total and reduced sugars, but lower levels of saccharose (Table 1) [25,41,47,48,49].
The carbohydrates most found in blackberries and mulberries are glucose and fructose. Among these, fructose is the most abundant [47,48].

3.1.2. Proteins and Amino Acids

Proteins are chains of amino acids linked together by peptide linkages. Proteins are essential in the human organism. They can heal cells and structures, providing structural support, and contribute to pH and fluid equilibrium. They also enhance the immune system by transporting and storing nutrients and providing energy when needed [45]. Although fruits are not considered an excellent source of proteins, these berries present considerable amounts of proteins when compared to other fruits, with amounts around 1.39–2.4 proteins per 100 g for blackberries and about 1.44 g per 100 g for mulberries (Table 1) [47,48].

3.1.3. Fiber

Fiber is classified into (i) water-soluble fiber and (ii) insoluble fiber. Soluble fiber delays digestion and improves nutrient uptake. By restricting the enterohepatic circulation of cholesterol, soluble and insoluble fibers improve gut health and reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases [45].
Dietary fiber is a non-caloric carbohydrate that human small intestines cannot process or ingest. Fruits contain dietary fiber, particularly soluble fiber, in quantities higher than 7%, and, therefore, they can reduce the risk of cardiovascular and coronary heart diseases. Thus, the primary nutritional reason for including fruits in a healthy diet is due to their fiber content, principally due to their gastrointestinal regulatory abilities, which contribute to human health maintenance. Additionally, fiber works together with vitamins, increasing the biological activities of foods [45].
Among berries, blackberries present the higher fiber content (approximately 5.3 g per 100 g) (Table 1). On the other hand, black mulberries only possess around 1.7 g per 100 g [47,48].

3.1.4. Fatty Acids

Fatty acids are part of triglycerides, and are the principal form in which fat occurs. Fatty acids can exist naturally, presenting different chain lengths and double bonds. They may be saturated, monounsaturated, or polyunsaturated. Fatty acids are required for the formation and reparation of cell structures, including cell walls. In addition, they are crucial to human well-being [45].
Blackberries have extremely little fatty acid content, with saturated fats making up about 0.014 g per 100 g, monounsaturated fats around 0.047 g per 100 g, and polyunsaturated fats approximately 0.28 g per 100 g of fruit (Table 1) [47,48]. Concerning M. nigra, they contain oleic acid (26.0%), palmitic acid (23.8%), and linoleic acid (23.1%) [34]. However, their percentages are widely variable. For example, Jiang and Nile [30] reported that the average linoleic acid concentration is 4.1 times higher than that of palmitic acid and 4.8 times higher than that of oleic acid of M. nigra from Xinjiang, a province of China. These variations could be attributed to different cultivars, as well as the ecological circumstances under which the species are produced [30,34,35].

3.1.5. Organic Acids

Organic acids are primary metabolites found in abundance in all plants, particularly in fruits and vegetables. The most well-known include citric, malic, and galacturonic acids. These compounds have a significant impact on the organoleptic properties of fruits and vegetables, particularly flavour, colour, and aroma [13,36]. When the fruit is immature, it has a greater acid content, which decreases with the harvest. Organic acids are available in free form and help to stabilise anthocyanins [50].
These primary metabolites can also inhibit the development of microorganisms in fruit juices, thereby improving product quality preservation [45].
The total quantity of organic acids found in several species of berries has been reported to range from 21.5 to 235 mmol/kg. The R. fruticosus species is the one that presents the highest content (45.1 mmol/kg) [51].
Rubus ulmifolius presents oxalic, quinic, malic, shikimic, ascorbic, and fumaric acids (Table 2), accounting for around 238 mg per 100 g fw. Quinic acid is the compound with the highest concentration (119 mg per 100 g fw), followed by oxalic (71 mg per 100 g fw), malic (29 mg per 100 g fw), shikimic (11.33 mg per 100 g fw), and ascorbic acids (6.66 mg per 100 g fw); fumaric acid is only detected in trace amounts [13]. On the other hand, the organic acids found in R. fruticosus are citric, oxalic, malic, ascorbic, and fumaric acids. Malic acid is predominant (5706.37 mg per 100 g dw), while ascorbic acid is the lowest (6.00 mg per 100 g dw). Other organic acids, namely, quinic, shikimic, tartaric, and succinic acids, have not been identified [52].
Relative to black mulberry fruits, these contain a variety of organic acids (Table 2). To date, citric, tartaric, malic, and succinic acids are the only organic acids detected in M. alba, M. nigra, and M. rubra species [36].

3.2. Micronutrients

Although micronutrients (e.g., vitamins and minerals) are consumed in small amounts, they are essential for health and vital functions [45]. They are essential elements that the organism requires to stay healthy (Figure 3). This requirement is determined by each person’s unique needs, varying according to various metabolic circumstances throughout the life cycle (age, lifestyle, hormonal activity, exercise, etc.) [53]. All of the essential micronutrients cannot be synthesized within the body, and are supplied by the diet. As a result, a diverse range of foods is important in our nutrition [48].

3.2.1. Minerals

A sufficient mineral intake is needed for good nutrition and food quality, and to avoid chronic nutrition-related illnesses. Certain elements, such as calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn), are deficient in certain populations [48]. Fruit mineral composition is affected by growth circumstances, such as soil and geographical location, as well as species or varieties [41].
A total of ten minerals have been reported in raw blackberries, namely, Ca, Fe, magnesium (Mg), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), sodium (Na), Zn, copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), and selenium (Se) [47,48]. Black mulberry possesses all the minerals mentioned above (Table 1), with K, P and Ca found in higher concentrations [30,34,42,47,48]. In particular, Ca is necessary for the growth of bones and muscles, while Fe is required for the formation of hemoglobin, and to help oxygen and electron transfer [45,54].

3.2.2. Vitamins

Vitamins are complex organic essential compounds that are classified into two types: (i) fat-soluble and (ii) water-soluble [55]. They are required for the organism’s functions and normal growth. Each vitamin serves a particular purpose in regular metabolism, development, vitality processes, and energy transformation. Furthermore, some of them are antioxidants. Fruits are without a doubt the most significant source of vitamins in the human diet [45].
In particular, blackberries have higher levels of vitamins C and K. Vitamin C is a water-soluble vitamin that is present in higher amounts in fruits and vegetables, which contain up to 50% [54]. It is known that blackberries contain around 21 mg per 100 g of vitamin C, whereas black mulberries contain 17.41–28.33 mg per 100 g of fruit [30,33,41,43,56,57]. The amount of vitamin K in blackberries is approximately 19.79 mg per 100 g (Table 3) [47]. This vitamin can help the human body to fight against free radicals. Furthermore, blackberries contain approximately 1.17 mg of vitamin E per 100 g (Table 1) [47]. This vitamin can serve as a safeguard and protect the human body from free radicals, as well as strengthening the immune system and retarding skin aging. Finally, diets with higher amounts of vitamin C may reduce the risk of acquiring various types of malignancies, e.g., cardiovascular diseases and sicknesses caused by environmental factors [54,55].

3.2.3. Tocopherols

Vitamin E consists of the generic denomination of eight liposoluble compounds, alpha (α), beta (β), gamma (γ) and delta (δ)-tocopherols, each of which has specific biological activities. Among these, α-tocopherol is the compound with the highest antioxidant capacity [13]. The function of vitamin E as an antioxidant in the peroxidation of cell membranes occurs by supplying a hydrogen atom to the peroxide radical formed, acting as a scavenger of free radicals, hence protecting cell membranes from possible damage. Vitamin E is mainly found in products rich in fat, such as almonds, vegetable oils, and some fruits and vegetables. Blackberry exhibits very small amounts of tocopherols which can be explained by the low amounts of fat found in this fruit [58]. Blackberry fruit contains all of the tocopherols’ isoforms, with γ-and δ-tocopherol being present at higher concentrations.
Tocopherols found in R. ulmifolius are described in Table 4. Isoforms, namely, α-, β-, γ-, and δ-tocopherol are present, representing quantities of 5.1–13.48 mg per 100 g fw [13]. γ-Tocopherol was highlighted as a major isoform present, with a concentration ranging from 1.34 to 3.73 mg per 100 g fw, followed by δ-tocopherol and α-tocopherol with similar contents (0.9–3.69 and 1.15–3.38 mg per 100 g fw, respectively) [13,58]. β-Tocopherol is detected at low concentrations (values of 0.020–0.24 mg per 100 g fw) [13].
In R. fruticosus, only α-tocopherol was found, in a concentration of 610 mg per 100 g. On the other hand, M. nigra shows nearly seven times more α-tocopherol than R. fruticosus. Additionally, in M. nigra, the four isoforms were found (Table 4), with the prevalence of α-tocopherol (4300 mg per 100 g), followed by γ-tocopherol (1250 mg per 100 g). δ-Tocopherol (550 mg per 100 g) and β-tocopherol (127 mg per 100 g) were less abundant [49,58].
In a general way, γ-tocopherol has been shown to be a highly effective molecule in postponing arterial thrombus development, lowering LDL oxidation and superoxide production, and avoiding lipid peroxidation. It has also been mentioned that regular consumption of food rich in this isoform reduces the risk of myocardial infarction and death from ischemic heart disease. Regarding antioxidant and protective effects of tocopherols, many studies focus primarily on α-tocopherol, which is the main form of vitamin E, in over-the-counter supplements [13,58].

3.3. Phytochemicals

Phytochemicals are non-nutrient bioactive plant molecules found in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and other plant foods [45,54]. Blackberries have a high amount of environmental variation due to their extensive geographic distribution, which influences their physical and chemical characteristics, and, hence, the profiles of bioactive substances, including anthocyanins, flavonoids, and carotenoids (Figure 4) [4,11,38]. Rubus berries are thought to be an abundant source of phytochemicals that play an important role in the prevention of modern chronic illnesses [19,36]. The physicochemical characteristics of mulberry cultivars are essential for economic and dietary benefits [19,20,21].
Phytochemicals are important antioxidants, having a positive impact on human health, particularly in the prevention of cardiovascular, inflammatory, and cancer diseases. Therefore, it is essential to identify and quantify the bioactive constituents of plant extracts because they are mainly responsible for the biological and pharmacological actions exhibited by foods [26,32,45].

3.3.1. Carotenoids

Carotenoids are a class of fat-soluble natural pigments that have a variety of health benefits. These natural pigments metabolized by plants are responsible, along with anthocyanins, for the yellow, orange, and red colours in fruits and vegetables. The term carotenoid refers to a family of structurally similar pigments found primarily in plants [59]. Based on their functional groups, carotenoids are classified into two groups: (i) xanthophylls, which contain oxygen as a functional group (e.g., lutein and zeaxanthin), and (ii) carotenes, which contain only the parent hydrocarbon chain and no functional group, such as α-carotene, β-carotene, and lycopene [45].
Their content and types in plants are affected by several pre- and post-harvesting variables, genotype, ripening time, cultivation technique, climatic conditions, and processing methods [59]. Additionally, different parts of the same plant may also contain varying types and quantities of carotenoids. For example, the peel of fruits is typically higher in carotenoids than the pulp. Climate and growth circumstances can also have an impact on the quantity of carotenoids in plants. According to these findings, fruits exposed to higher temperatures and more sunlight may boost carotenoid production in order to defend the plant from photo-oxidation [45].
The daily ingestion of carotenoids is important to increase antioxidant activity, intercellular communication, gene regulation, and immune system activity. Indeed, carotenoid-rich diets have been linked to a lower incidence of many types of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, age-related macular degeneration, and cataract formation [45,48].
Unfortunately, when compared to other red fruits, such as blueberries and raspberries, the quantity of carotenoids in blackberries is small: 128 µg per 100 g of fruit (β-carotene) (Table 5) [13,47,60].

3.3.2. Volatile Compounds

Flavour and aroma are two of the most essential aspects of fruits’ excellence and acceptance. The aroma of some fruits has been linked to their concentration of volatile organic compounds. They derive from fatty acids, amino acids, carotenoids, and phenolics [45]. Additionally, the metabolism of fruits produces volatile compounds during the ripening, harvesting, post-harvesting, and storage. As a result, the volatile composition of blackberries is affected by the genotype, origin, technological treatment (freezing, drying, among others), ripening stage, harvest, and storage conditions [61,62,63,64]. Therefore, the analysis of volatile compounds is critical for understanding the components responsible for their flavour and aroma, as well as the best harvest period for higher quality and phytosanitary qualities [4,61].
Although several volatile compounds exist, regarding blackberry fruits, aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, esters, hydrocarbons, terpenoids, furanones, and sulfur compounds are the main contributors to their aroma [8,65]. Hence, terpenoids (75.38%) are the most abundant chemical category of volatile chemicals in R. fruticosus, whereas aldehydes (0.53%) are the least abundant [65].
On the other hand, R. ulmifolius possesses around 33 different volatile compounds: nine aliphatic alcohols, three branched alcohols, six aldehydes, two ketones, six terpenoid compounds (including β-myricene, D-limonene, β-linalool, L-α-terpineol, sulcatol, and sulcatone), four compounds containing a benzene-ring (including methoxyphenyl oxime, methyl salicylate, benzyl alcohol, and phenylethyl alcohol), and ethyl octanoate (an ester), 2-methylbutanoic acid (a carboxylic acid), and 2-ethylfuran (a cyclic ether). This species of blackberry contains high amounts of benzenoids, aldehydes, and alcohols (Table 6) [62,66].
Focusing on M. nigra, a previous study determined the presence of 67 volatiles: five acids, twenty-five alcohols, two aldehydes, twenty-six esters, five hydrocarbons, one ketone, and three phenols. The most prevalent chemicals in samples were aliphatic alcohols, which accounted for 47.5% of the total volatile component. The majority of the alcohol was ethanol (82.3%). Furthermore, ten aliphatic alcohols (ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-butanol, 2,3-butanediol, 2-methyl-1-propanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, benzyl alcohol, phenylethyl alcohol, and terpene-4-ol) were also found. Surprisingly, although aldehydes are abundant in many fruits, only two aldehydes (acetaldehyde and benzaldehyde), accounting for only 2.1% of the total volatile compounds, were detected. Relative to M. alba, esters are largely found, representing 36.3% of all volatile compounds found in this mulberry. In addition, isovaleric acid (94.4%) was revealed to be the most abundant fatty acid [64].
Finally, using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, 45 volatile compounds have been reported in R. fruticosus. Terpenoids made up the vast majority (97.7%), with limonene being the most frequent compound. The discovered volatiles extracted with hexane were largely hydrocarbons, whereas those extracted with acetone were furans and pyrans. Hexane-extracted volatiles were also identified, with the majority of the compounds being the aliphatic ones, and just 13% were aromatic. The identified compounds accounted for 82% of the overall peak area in the acetone extract chromatogram. Altogether, the most essential volatile components responsible for the blackberry flavor are heptanol and p-cymen-8-ol [65].

3.3.3. Phenolic Compounds

Phenolic compounds can be classified into (i) non-flavonoids and (ii) flavonoids. Phenolic acids, coumarins, and tannins are examples of non-flavonoids. Flavonoids are further classified into five main subgroups: (i) anthocyanidins and their glycosides anthocyanins, (ii) flavan-3-ols, (iii) flavones, (iv) flavonols, and (v) flavanones (Figure 4). They are regarded as non-nutrient physiologically active molecules capable of functioning as free radical scavengers [45].
This subclass is composed of secondary metabolic products found in fruits, vegetables, leaves, nuts, seeds, flowers, and barks which are kept in cell structures of the fruit skin, pulp, and seeds of fruits [67]. They are essential for plant reproduction, development, and metabolism, as well as for defence against pathogenic viruses and infections [11,12]. In addition to their activities in plants, in our diet, phenolics may lower the risk of chronic illnesses, such as cancer, heart disease and diabetes [31,36,45,67]. As mentioned above, their content in berries may be influenced by genotype, geographic region, storage conditions, ripeness, and climate, among others [11,33,39,41,43]. According to a previous study, polyphenols steadily rise throughout the last phase of maturity in blackberry and mulberry fruits [34].
Table 7 lists the concentrated phenolic compounds from the three blackberry species reported in the literature.

Phenolic Acids

Phenolic acids are frequent and widespread bioactive molecules in nature. They are commonly found in bound forms, such as amides, esters, or glycosides, with the exception of caffeic and ferulic acids, which are mainly sterified with other molecules such as carbohydrates and organic acids [6].
There are two major groups of phenolic acids: hydroxybenzoic acid derivatives and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives [45].
Hydroxycinnamic acids are composed of a nine-carbon structure (C6-C3) with a side-chain double bond (with cis or trans configuration). The most prevalent hydroxycinnamic acids are caffeic, o-coumaric, p-coumaric, m-coumaric, and ferulic acids [73,74].
In a general way, caffeic, ferulic, chlorogenic and p-coumaric acids were the main ones identified and quantified in both berries (Figure 5) [37,44,69,70]. Ferulic acid is predominately found in R. ulmifolius (388.59 µg per 100 g dw) (Table 7) [69]. Comparative to other red fruits, strawberries present higher amounts of p-coumaric acid (concentrations around 0.7–4.1 mg per 100 g fw, double that reported in R. fruticosus) [75].
Hydroxybenzoic acid is generated from cinnamic acid and is commonly found in food as esters with quinic acid or glucose. This subgroup of phenolic acids is produced from benzoic acid and has a typical common structure of C6-C1. p-Hydroxybenzoic, protocatechuic, vanillic, syringic, tannic, and gallic acids are the principal ones reported [45]. They form components of complex structures, such as lignins and hydrolysable tannins, and contribute to formation of cell walls and proteins [76]. In comparison to hydroxycinnamic acids, hydroxybenzoic acids are present in relatively modest concentrations in red fruits. Gallic acid is present in M. nigra, R. fruticosus, and R. ulmifolius in higher concentrations (21.83 to 40.90 mg per 100 g fw, 145.85 mg per 100 g fw, and 268.72 mg per 100 g fw, respectively) [44,65,68]. Comparing the three species, R. ulmifolius showed the largest level of this hydroxybenzoic acid. Relative to other red fruits, sweet cherries possess amounts fluctuating from 0.73 to 10.64 mg per 100 g of fw, and this concentration is much lower than that of blackberries and mulberries [77].
Concerning M. nigra, the major hydroxybenzoic acid present in this fruit is gallic acid (21.83 to 40.90 mg per 100 g fw), followed by ellagic acid (1.36 to 6.32 mg per 100 g fw) [44].
Although the precise role of phenolic acids is uncertain, it is known that they help with food intake, structural support, enzyme activity, protein synthesis, photosynthesis, and allelopathy. Phenolic acids are also the ancestor of bioactive compounds used in food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries [74]. According to research, in individuals, this subclass of fruit compounds has the potential to improve brain function, protect against heart disease, and stop the growth of some cancers [73,74,78].

Flavonoids

Flavonoids are a subgroup of phenolic compounds that fall into several groups, such as anthocyanidins, flavan-3-ols, flavones, flavonols, and flavanones (Figure 4) [45].
The total flavonoid content in M. nigra fruit is around 254.0 mg catechin equivalent per 100 g fw [79]. The predominant flavonoids reported in black mulberry fruits are rutin, quercetin, and (+)-catechin (Figure 6), with values varying from 32.06 to 133.60 mg per 100 g fw for rutin, followed by quercetin (2.33 to 11.25 mg per 100 g fw) and catechin (2.28 to 10.54 mg per 100 g fw) (Table 7) [29,41].
The total flavonoids of R. fruticosus fruit fluctuating from 30.4 to 82.2 mg catechin equivalent per 100 g of fw, with quercetin, rutin, (+)-catechin, (−)-epicatechin, and myricetin the most abundant [65,68,69,80]. In particular, the level of quercetin in blackberries (20.62 mg per 100 g) is significantly higher than that in black mulberries (2.33 to 11.25 mg per 100 g) (Table 7) [44,65].
Other flavonoids found in both berries are anthocyanins. These are considered the primary factor responsible for the color of many fruits and vegetables. Anthocyanins can be found in the cell at locations known as anthocyanoplasts, which are vacuole sites [81], and are responsible for the red, purple, and black pigments of fruits and vegetables, as well as being recognized for their notable health benefits [45]. The colors produced by anthocyanins depend on pH, light, and temperature, appearing reddish in more acidic conditions and turning blue as the pH rises [82].
The blackberry is an excellent source of natural antioxidants. Indeed, the total anthocyanin content in R. fruticosus ranges from 70 to 180 mg per g fw [83,84], while in R. ulmifolius, the total anthocyanin content ranges from 5.87 to 35.55 mg per g fw [85].
Blackberry anthocyanins in R. fruticosus are mostly cyanidin derivatives (Figure 7). Cyanidin 3-O-glucoside is the most abundant anthocyanin found in blackberry at the ripened stage (92.3 to 335.6 mg per 100 g), followed by cyanidin 3-O-dioxalylglucoside (16.9–107.5 mg per 100 g) [39]. Other anthocyanins found in blackberry fruit include cyanidin 3-O-xyloside, cyanidin 3-O-dioxaloylglucoside, cyanidin 3-O-(6-malonyl)-glucoside, pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside, malvidin 3-O-glucoside, cyanidin 3-O-arabinoside, cyanidin 3-O-xyloside, cyanidin 3-O-dioxalylglucoside, and cyanidin-3-O-glucoside acylated with malonic acid [13,37,39,86]. Anthocyanins such as cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (92.3-335.6 mg per 100 g fw) and cyanidin 3-O-dioxalylglucoside (16.9-107.5 mg per 100 g fw) were also detected in R. ulmifolius [71].
On the other hand, mulberries present anthocyanin levels ranging from 184.3 to 227.0 mg per 100 g of fruit [87]. Among anthocyanins, cyanidin 3-O-glucoside, cyanidin 3-O-rutinoside, pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside, and pelargonidin 3-O-rutinoside are abundant in M. nigra [47].
According to research, the anthocyanin contents of blackberries vary depending on variety, environmental conditions, cultivation site, degree of ripeness, and processing. Fruit maturation is reported to influence the total amount of anthocyanin in blackberries. The antioxidant capacity peaks in some species at early stages of development. However, from a practical perspective, berries should be harvested when fully ripe because the maturity stage has a significant impact on their flavour and taste [11,33,39,41,49].
Regarding anthocyanins’ biological potential, it was reported that these phenolics have notable antioxidant abilities and capacity to induce enzyme activation, and hence inhibit possible DNA damage by carcinogens, reduce body inflammation, protect brain health, and enhance cognitive function [6].
According to existing data, the antioxidant potential of wild berries is higher than that of domesticated and genetically modified crops when comparing R. fruticosus and R. ulmifolius. In terms of anthocyanin content and antioxidant capacity, wild species are highly impressive. Anthocyanins are the main phenolic subclass found in R. ulmifolius fruits (23.8 mg per g extract), representing about 35% of the total phenolic compounds identified in them [13].
Evidence that anthocyanin values found in these fruits are higher when compared to other small fruits supports the enormous potential of blackberry and mulberry fruits as natural colour additives in the food, drug, nutraceuticals, and cosmetic industries, and their incorporation in pharmaceutics [83,84,86,88,89,90].

4. Health Benefits

Many studies have shown that the daily consumption of blackberries is an exceptionally essential source of health-promoting substances. Dietary improvements, particularly increased consumption of plant-based foods, may prevent more than 30% of all fatalities [91]. Blackberry fruit has been the subject of extensive research due to its high antioxidant content, which can normalize stress oxidative and inflammatory levels, as well as reduce cancer risk and cardiovascular complications, and has demonstrated biological activity against esophageal, colon, and oral cancers [24,92]. According to recent research, mulberries have positive biological properties that can help in the prevention of chronic diseases, such as cancer, neurotoxicity, obesity, diabetes, and memory loss [37,90,93].
The application in pharmaceutical sectors is critical for improving health naturally and without side effects. As far as we know, no negative effects of the administration of blackberries or mulberries have been observed, making it a feasible and potentially effective dietary strategy to improve disease prognosis [94].

4.1. Antidiabetic Properties

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic endocrine condition in which the pancreas either stops producing insulin or produces inadequate insulin. Diabetes affects about 425 million people globally and is defined by a rise in blood glucose concentration (>7 mmol/L) [95]. It has been associated with the development of various significant problems at cardiovascular, neurological, and renal levels, leading to increased morbidity and mortality [93]. The International Diabetes Federation anticipated that, by 2030, there will be 552 million diabetics globally [96].
To establish glycemic control, diabetics use insulin and other therapy drugs, such as metformin, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide 1 [97]. Before the development of insulin, medicinal plants were used to treat this condition. Because of their low cost, availability, and lack of negative effects, the use of natural plants was and still is an alternative for many people. Various plant genera and phytochemical constituent types with anti-diabetic properties have been used in this context [31,45,97,98]. Therefore, it is not surprising that formulations using anti-diabetic plant extracts or phytocompounds have been derived. Additionally, nowadays, systems such as “Herbal-based anti-diabetic drug delivery systems” are largely used to provide herbal medicines to treat diabetes [98].
Certain regions of the world employ black mulberry leaves, fruits, and barks as anti-diabetic medications, believing in their efficacy in lowering blood glucose levels [31,99,100,101,102]. In accordance with this, Morus nigra has been shown to have a wide range of biological and pharmacological therapeutic benefits, including antidiabetic, anti-obesity, and anti-hyperlipidemic effects [103]. Hydroethanolic freeze-dried extracts of this fruit revealed potential for inhibiting pancreatic lipase, displaying a half maximal inhibitory concentration of 6.32 mg/mL [104].
Among both berries’ constituents, quercetin has been demonstrated to have considerable antioxidant and anti-inflammatory characteristics and the ability to interfere with a variety of antidiabetic activities, including insulin secretion and sensitization, glucose level improvement, and inhibition of intestinal glucose absorption. By activating adenosine monophosphate and preventing lipid peroxidation, this phenolic molecule promotes glucose transporter 4, the principal facilitative mediator of glucose uptake in skeletal muscles, adipose tissues, and other peripheral tissues. Given that, it is not surprising that quercetin can be used to stabilize blood glucose and body weight [105,106]. Furthermore, a single oral dosage of quercetin (400 mg) decreased α-glucosidase activity and reduced postprandial hyperglycemia in rats with type 2 diabetes [107].
Ferulic acid, another berry phenolic component, at 1000 mg per day for six weeks, showed the capacity to decrease total cholesterol, malonylaldehyde, TNF-α, and triglycerides by 8.1, 24.5, 13.1, and 12.1%, respectively, and increase HDL cholesterol by 4.3% [108]. These findings suggested that ferulic acid can also help diabetic patients with hyperlipidemia. Ferulic acid was found to be generally safe, with LD50 values of 2445 mg /kg in male rats and 2113 mg /kg in female rats [109].
Additionally, diabetic male Wistar rats received injections of black mulberry fruit extracts at 150 and 300 mg/kg body weight for 4 weeks. After this time, microalbuminuria, albumin, glucose, insulin, creatinine, and creatine levels in the serum were measured. The study discovered that diabetic animals considerably improved in all of the measures tested. The activity of catalase activity was also improved. Furthermore, the histological examination of their kidney tissues revealed a significant reduction in degenerative anomalies and glomerular sclerosis. TNF-α, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and fibronectin mRNA expression were all downregulated in treated rats [101]. Therefore, the downregulation of TNF-α, VCAM-1, and fibronectin levels in diabetic rats avoids, or retards, the development of diabetic nephropathy. Altogether, these data support the evidence that mulberry fruit extract may be a potential agent in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy [103].

4.2. Antimicrobial Properties

Plant-derived antimicrobial chemicals may limit the development of bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa by different processes from those utilized by synthetic antimicrobials, and thus exhibit substantial therapeutic benefit in the treatment of resistant microbial strains. The antimicrobial activity of an agent is generally due its potential to chemically interfere with the manufacture or function of key components of bacteria and/or evade established antibacterial resistance mechanisms [45,110,111].
The majority of phytochemicals with therapeutic value found in fruits are secondary metabolites. Their antimicrobial activity varies depending on the structure, number, and position of substituent groups, the presence of glycosidic linkages, and the alkylation of hydroxyl groups [111,112]. As expected, blackberries’ antimicrobial properties differ among cultivars and ambient and soil factors. Furthermore, it is important to note that it is not possible to associate the antimicrobial activity with a specific compound due to the capacity of phenolic compounds to act synergistically [31,89,92,113,114,115,116,117,118].
Recent research has revealed that blackberries and mulberries have notable antimicrobial properties. The antimicrobial activity of different R. fruticosus extracts was investigated against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, B. subtilis, B. mojavensis, Salmonella Hartford, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas baetica, Micrococcus luteus, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The inhibition zone diameter (mm) was measured, revealing that the ethanolic extracts are more competitive than the crude extracts, and show a notable antimicrobial potential against Proteus vulgari (20.53 mm). The lowest activity was observed against S. Hartford bacteria (9.54 mm). In this study, minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) were not calculated [113].
Additionally, hydroethanolic extracts of R. ulmifolius proved to have bacteriostatic effects against three Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli, Morganella morganii, and P. mirabilis), four Gram-positive bacteria (MRSA-methicillin-resistant S. aureus, MSSA-methicillin susceptible S. aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Enterococcus faecalis), and one fungus (Candida albicans). The results obtained in this work revealed activity in some tested strains, with MIC values ranging between 5 and >20 mg/mL. To inhibit the growth of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a concentration above 20 mg/mL was necessary. For the remaining Gram-negative strains, the most effective results were shown against M. morganii (MIC = 5 mg/mL) and E. coli (MIC = 5 mg/mL), followed by P. mirabilis (10 mg/mL) (Table 8) [13]. In another study, methanolic extracts of R. ulmifolius showed antimicrobial potential against two Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium), three Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus, Enterococcus feacium, Streptococcus agalactiae) and one fungus (Candida albicans). The most notable values were observed against S. agalactiae and E. coli bacteria (Table 8) [114].
The antimicrobial effects of M. nigra were also evaluated, especially in S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli, where the ability of its extracts to inhibit the production of proinflammatory cytokines and interfere with iNOS and NF-κB pathways was observed [114]. Considering the higher content of anthocyanins in this species, these effects could be attributed to these compounds. In fact, anthocyanins have potent antiviral and antibacterial properties, being already known for their antimicrobial potential against K. pneumonia, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, E. coli, H1N1, SARS-CoV-2, and rabies and herpes simplex virus [45,112,114].
Additionally, the antibacterial efficacy of mulberry total flavonols was assessed against three bacteria (E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus), revealing interesting MBC results against S. aureus and E. coli (Table 8) [115]. Another investigation demonstrated the potential of M. nigra ethanolic extracts to be used in acne-treatment beauty care products given their capacity to inhibit S. epidermis and P. acnes growth, revealing MIC values of 2.5% for both bacteria, and MBC scores of 2.5% and 5% against S. epidermidis and P. acnes, respectively [116].
Black mulberry juice also has antibacterial properties, with its ability against three Gram-negative strains (E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and S. typhimurium) and five Gram-positive strains (Bacillus spizizenii, B. subtilis, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Enterococcus. faecalis, and S. aureus) being previously reported. The maximum zone of inhibition was against P. aeruginosa (19.87 mm), followed by Bacillus spizizenii (19.68 mm) and B. subtilis (18.46 mm). The minimum zone of inhibition was obtained against E. coli (9.98 mm). Among the Gram-positive species, Bacillus species exhibited the highest zones of inhibition while, regarding Gram-negative bacteria, P. aeruginosa had higher inhibition than S. typhimurium and E. coli [117].

4.3. Antioxidant Activity

Reactive species are products of normal cellular metabolism and play key roles in signal transduction pathways, growth regulation, gene expression, and immune responses. In the human body, various mechanisms are necessary to maintain redox homeostasis [45,119]. These mechanisms include non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidant defenses created in the body (endogenous), as well as those given by the food (exogenous). However, the overproduction and accumulation of free radicals can lead to oxidative damage [6]. This biological condition may be caused by a lack of antioxidant defense mechanisms, excessive reactive species production, and excessive activation of their systems, increasing aging and the pathology of many chronic diseases, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, inflammation, diabetes, and Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease [45,120]. Therefore, it is essential to reduce their levels. Flavonoids, stilbenes, and tannins are examples of exogenous antioxidants. For example, scavenging and detoxifying radical oxygen species and preventing their production, influencing the cell cycle, avoiding tumor suppression, and modulating signal transduction, apoptosis events, and metabolism, are all biologically relevant mechanisms attributed to phenolic compounds [11,45,58,72,121,122,123,124]. Their antioxidant diversity and concentration are greatly dependent on the species and cultivars. Pre-harvest practices, environmental conditions, harvest ripeness, postharvest storage, and processing operations are also key drivers of phytochemical profiles [11,17,40].
Blackberries are considered one of the richest sources of natural antioxidants due to their high content of phenolic compounds, such as anthocyanins, ellagitannins, flavonols, and flavanols [13,41,44,49,51,62]. In fact, they present an extraordinary capacity to scavenge chemically generated radicals, thus preventing a wide range of human disorders and maintaining a healthy balance between free radicals and antioxidant systems. In particular, blackberries have notable antioxidant abilities against superoxide radicals (O2●−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radicals (OH), and singlet oxygen (1O2) [123].
The antioxidant capacity of blackberries was previously determined by in vitro assays, by the lipid peroxidation inhibition assays (TBARS), oxidative reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS), hemolysis inhibition assay, the ORAC method, 2,2′-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS•+), the ferric-reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) method, 2,2-diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assay [23,37,39,49,52,56,71,89,89,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132].
In the TBARS experiment, R. fruticosus extract revealed a high antioxidant activity, displaying an IC50 value of 100 ug/mL, which is substantially lower than that obtained with the positive control, Trolox (139 ug/mL) [49]. Additionally, using FRAP assay, ABTS•+, and DPPH, the obtained results were between 4.45–14.16 for FRAP, 2.28–8.89 for ABTS•+, and 2.63–9.35 mmol Trolox equivalents per⋅100 g fw for DPPH [71].
Furthermore, methanolic extracts of M. nigra at 76 µg showed the capacity to inhibit lipid oxidation by 28.7%, while ethanolic extracts exhibited lower inhibitory capacity (23.7–47.6%) [125]. The antioxidant abilities of its aqueous extracts were also evaluated, revealing lower abilities than the methanolic ones; at 100 µg/mL, the values obtained were 1.1% and 7.1% for aqueous and methanolic extracts, respectively, whereas at 300 µg/mL, the corresponding values were 7.1% and 21.6%, respectively [125].
However, when comparing wild blackberries (R. ulmifolius) with the cultivated ones (R. fruticosus), substantial differences were found, with the latter having higher antioxidant content [126].
To summarize, mulberries have lately gained a large amount of interest as prospective sources of functional foods due to a variety of biological benefits [103,133]. The obtained findings on the antioxidant activity of mulberry fruits support their incorporation in biological applications [100,103,125,130].

4.4. Anti-Inflammatory Properties

Inflammation is the immune system’s reaction to potentially damaging stimuli such as infection or injury. In the presence of stressors, immune cells release inflammatory substances, such as inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and interleukins (IL)-6 and 10, leading to increased nitric oxide (NO) levels and prostaglandins via the catalysis of cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox2) and NF-κB pathways [45,134,135]. Blackberry freeze-dried powders are capable of reducing mRNA expression of NF-kB and COX-2 in the liver [136].
A healthy lifestyle that includes physical activity, stopping smoking, and moderate alcohol intake, associated with a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, decreases the risk of developing chronic diseases. As expected, phenolic compounds, carotenoids, vitamins, and dietary fiber contribute to the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of fruits and vegetables [45,48,137,138,139]. In particular, high quantities of dietary anthocyanins may be viewed as a feasible nutraceutical in the context of inflammatory disease. Among these, cyanidin 3-O-glucoside can reduce cytokine-induced inflammation in intestinal cells by inhibiting the production of NO, PGE2, and IL-8, and the expression of iNOS and COX-2 [112,138,139,140].
Focusing on blackberries and mulberries, anthocyanin-enriched fractions from fermented blueberry and blackberry beverages inhibited dipeptidyl peptidase-IV activity in LPS-stimulated murine macrophages. Computational docking demonstrated that this effect could be mainly attributed to delphinidin 3-O-arabinoside, which effectively inactivates dipeptidyl peptidase-IV by binding with a low interaction energy (−3228 kcal/mol). Additionally, anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins (100 µM cyanidin 3-O-glucoside and epicatechin equivalents, respectively) extracted from them reduced LPS-induced inflammatory response in mouse macrophages by stopping the NF-κB pathway [140]. Another study that used RAW 264.7 macrophages stimulated with LPS demonstrated that blackberry anthocyanin extract (0–20 µg/mL)-treated macrophages presented lower levels of IL-1 and TNF-α [141]. Once again, this reduction is mainly associated with the ability of anthocyanins to interfere with NF-κB signaling [140], particularly of cyanidin 3-O-glucoside, which previously showed potential to decrease pro-inflammatory mediators NO, PGE2, COX-2, and IL-8 generated by cytokine-stimulated HT-29 cells [139]. In accordance with this, R. fruticosus also showed capacity to inhibit the secretion of pro-inflammatory IL-8 cytokines in two cellular models (HT-29 and T-84 cells) in a dose dependent-manner in both cell lines [92].
Ellagitannins are another significant polyphenol that has displayed anti-inflammatory properties. Previous research [142] examined their anti-inflammatory efficacy of TNF-α, IL-1B, IL-8, and NF-κB on the AGS gastric cell line. Ellagitannins extracted from R. fruticosus suppressed TNF-α, showing an IC50 value of 0.67–1.73 mg/mL. At 2 mg/mL, ellagitannins inhibited TNF-α and NF-κB nuclear translocation by 57% and 67%, respectively. At lower doses, ellagitannins reduced IL-8 secretion, revealing an IC50 ranging between 0.7 and 4 mg/mL. Moreover, in a rat model of ethanol-induced stomach lesions, the protective effect of ellagitannins was also tested. Ellagitannins (20 mg/kg/day) were administered orally to rats for ten days, and ethanol was administered one hour before sacrifice. The mucosa of the stomach was separated and utilized to measure IL-8 release, NF-κB nuclear translocation, TEAC, and superoxide dismutase and catalase activities. This investigation demonstrates that the treatment with these compounds can decrease NF-κB nuclear translocation and suppress IL-8 production. The present work demonstrated that ellagitannins derived from Rubus berries definitively protect against the formation of gastric ulcers in rat animal models. In particular, ellagitannins can block the NF-κB cascade either directly on the cell response to pro-inflammatory cytokines or act as antioxidant agents by inhibiting reactive species generated in several inflammatory conditions [143].

4.5. Neuroprotection

The human brain is responsible for a wide range of cognitive, motor and behavioral functions that require significant amounts of energy. Neurons are responsible for transmitting information to and from the brain. Neurodegenerative illnesses are distinguished by progressive brain cell death and neuronal loss, which impair motor or cognitive function. Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and spinocerebellar ataxia are examples of common neurodegenerative disorders. These disorders are a major public health concern, particularly among the elderly [120]. These disorders develop because the brain is more sensitive to oxidative stress than other organs due to the poor activity of antioxidant defense mechanisms [144].
Many epidemiological studies are being conducted to study the potential of phenolics to be used to promote neuronal health and prevent neural cells from being damaged through their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, and thus delay Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases, ischemic diseases, and aging effects [137,145].
The inclusion of blackberries in the diet has been shown to reduce brain degeneration [9,93,146,147,148]. The neuroprotective capacity of this fruit mainly comes from its antioxidant capacity, promoted by the presence of phenolic compounds, such as anthocyanins, caffeic acid, and quercetin [45,50,137,148,149,150]. Indeed, these compounds can penetrate the hematoencephalic membrane and have neuroprotective effects on various cerebral structures in the brain, including the hippocampus and cortex [122]. Flavonoids may also have important impacts on mammalian cognitive function, perhaps halting the aging-related declines in memory and learning. These benefits are mostly sought for preventing brain damage, such as neurodegenerative diseases, and improving memory, learning, and cognitive functions [148]. Blackberries from the north of Portugal can lower intracellular reactive species levels, alter glutathione levels, and inhibit the emergence of caspases during treatment, hence reducing oxidative stress and preventing neurodegeneration [147]. Mulberry fruit extracts and cyanidin 3-O-glucoside have shown the ability to inhibit reactive species production and, consequently, neuronal injury [151,152].
Neuroblastoma cells exposed to H2O2 and treated with raw, digested, and dialyzed blackberry extracts at physiological concentrations revealed lower age-related neurodegeneration [9]. In addition, animal research found that an intermediate dosage of blackberry juice (5.83 mg/kg anthocyanins, 27.10 mg/kg polyphenols) enhanced mechanisms of behavioral coping with diazepam l. The forced swim test supported these findings by demonstrating that blackberry juice, at moderate and high doses, improves the acute stress response [153]. These findings suggest that blackberry juice may have a therapeutic value in alleviating anxiety caused by stressful experiences.
M. nigra revealed a notable protective effect against Alzheimer’s disease, specifically by inhibiting amyloid-β-induced paralysis symptoms and suppressing over-sensitivity to exogenous serotonin by about 55.65% in transgenic Alzheimer’s disease Caenorhabditis elegans models, which were treated with up to 1.00 mg/mL. These effects are due to the capacity of this fruit to activate the DAF-16/SOD-3/GST-4 pathway, improve antioxidant capacity, delay aging, and alleviate the symptoms caused by the amyloid-β protein [154]. These findings suggest that functional foods, such as mulberry, can be used to lower the risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

4.6. Anticancer Activity

Cancers are characterized by abnormal cell growth capable of invading other regions of the body, resulting in metastasis. A tumor is a complex multistage process that begins with the genesis of a cancer cell caused by DNA damage, followed by accumulation of mutations, progression to cell proliferation and tumor expansion, and, finally, progression to malignancy and metastasis. While new cancer incidence is expected to rise by 70% by 2034, approximately 35% of cancer deaths are attributed to behavioral and dietary risks, such as high body mass index, low fruit and vegetable intake, and lack of physical activity [155].
According to epidemiological and clinical research, a diet consisting of 400–800 g of various vegetables and fruits per day can prevent 20% or more of all cancer cases [2,48,137].
Phenolic berry content has shown the capacity to reduce inflammation, inhibit angiogenesis, protect against DNA damage, and influence apoptosis or proliferation rates in malignant cells. Indeed, they demonstrate the ability to interfere in all phases of cancer development, including initiation, promotion, progression, invasion, and metastasis [45,134,150,156]. Berry extracts also inhibited cancer-induced AP-1 and NF-κB, as well as decreasing the expression of the two proteins involved in tumor promotion and progression, i.e., vascular endothelial growth factor and COX2 [136,157]. These effects are intimately linked to the capacity of phenolics to alter the genomic stability at many phases in the cancer genesis process [137]. For example, anthocyanins have been shown to activate phase II enzymes, which may inactivate carcinogens triggered by phase I enzymes, and hence prevent DNA damage caused by the carcinogens [82,112,124,158].
Dietary bioactive compounds can also decrease telomerase activity by modifying histones or by inhibiting DNA methyltransferases. Telomerase activity has been detected in more than 80% of human malignancies, making the enzyme a promising target for anticancer treatment. According to research, the antiproliferative impact of blackberry fruits is mediated by their anti-telomerase activity [159]. Additionally, there have been no negative effects associated with the administration of blackberries, indicating that this fruit has the potential to be effective for a dietary plan to reduce cancer risk and assist cancer patients with illness prognosis [157].
Blackberries previously demonstrated significant chemo-preventative and antioxidant activities by inhibiting the growth, proliferation, and migration of the human A549 lung carcinoma cell line, and strong inhibitory effects on the cell growth of highly metastatic breast cancer HS578T cells, by inducing significant alterations in cell cycle regulators, causing G2/M arrests [160]. Blackberries and mulberries contain anthocyanin cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, which has promising qualities for usage in nutraceuticals, and has shown potential to limit cell proliferation, arresting the cell cycle in the G2/M phase, and inducing apoptosis in vitro [112,138,161]. In fact, in a recent investigation, rats were administered orally with purified cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (800 µmol/kg of body weight). After 30 min–2.0 h of delivery, this was detected in plasma, with a Cmax value of 0.8 µM. This evidence represents added value regarding the incorporation of this anthocyanin in dietary supplements, aiding in the anticancer therapy of breast cancer [161].
Morus nigra extracts have also been the subject of much research. A three-month enriched diet applied in MUC2−/− mice, with a model of spontaneous chronic intestinal inflammation and induced-intestinal tumors at three months, at 5% or 10%, resulted in a reduction in tumorigenesis and intestinal inflammation. Basically, mice aged 6 to 8 weeks that were supplemented with 5% or 10% M. nigra extracts for 10 days and there were observed improvements in their signs and symptoms caused by dextran sulfate sodium-induced acute colitis, preventing weight loss and bloody stools, and promoting positive changes in the histology of the colorectal lining [162].

4.7. Cardiovascular Protection

Cardiovascular disorders affect the heart and blood vessels and are the major cause of death worldwide. People who have high blood pressure and cholesterol, as well as smokers, those who are sedentary or obese, and people who have a diet rich in salt, sugar, and fatty acids, are more susceptible to cardiovascular problems [163].
The current nutritional guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases include a Mediterranean-style diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, as well as non-tropical vegetable oils, in order to reduce total cholesterol, oxidative stress, and inflammation [2,48,50,59,137,164].
Blackberry phenolic compounds have demonstrated the capacity to diminish LDL oxidation, quench free radicals by hydrogen molecule donation, and interfere with liposome oxidation systems [165,166]. In particular, anthocyanins from M. nigra showed the capacity to protect human primary endothelial cells by decreasing the production of the cytokine-induced chemokine monocyte chemotactic protein 1, a protein directly linked to atherogenesis, and which is mainly responsible for attracting macrophages to sites of infection or inflammation [167]. Moreover, although not directly shown in blackberry flavonoids, several flavonoids also revealed the capacity to protect platelet function, which is crucial in the pathogenesis of these diseases. In fact, flavonoids can minimize platelet aggregation, reduce platelet generation of superoxide anions, and increase platelet NO production [168].
In epidemiological studies, diets high in plant-derived phenolic compounds have been shown to reduce the incidence of coronary heart disease. The chronic antioxidant and hypolipidemic characteristics of these compounds play critical roles in the prevention of lipoprotein oxidation and the formation of atherosclerotic lesions [2,122,166,169].

5. Conclusions

The health benefits of fruits vary based on their composition, growth, and environmental circumstances. Mulberries and blackberries are little red/purple fruits that have high levels of natural health-promoting chemicals. These fruits are rich in phytochemicals, such as anthocyanins, ellagitannins, flavanol glycosides, and phenolic acids, as well as dietary fiber. All of these are beneficial to human health and fitness. Several studies have demonstrated that the phytochemical contents of R. fruticosus, R. ulmifolius, and M. nigra can act as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotector, and antitumoral agents, and offer cardiovascular protection. However, further studies are needed to completely understand the mechanism of action of the blackberry and mulberry metabolites that trigger the biological activities outlined in this review. Furthermore, more in vitro and in vivo studies are also required to assess the impact of daily consumption of these small fruits and to determine their optimal doses to maximize human health benefits. New understanding must be created in order to build novel medications for future pharmaceutical and nutraceutical uses.

Author Contributions

M.S.M. and A.C.G. performed the research and wrote the paper. A.C.G., G.A. and L.R.S. designed the research and review the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by CICS-UBI (UIDP/00709/2020) and financed by National Funds from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Community Funds (UIDB/00709/2020) and CENTRO-04-3559-FSE-000162, project PRR-C05-i03-I-000143, Fundação La Caixa and Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) under the Programa Promove Project PD21-00023. The authors are also grateful to Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education (MCTES), European Social Fund (EFS), and European Union (EU) for the PhD fellowship of Ana C. Gonçalves (2020.04947.BD).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), the Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education (MCTES), the European Social Fund (EFS), and the European Union (EU) for the PhD fellowship of Ana C. Gonçalves (2020.04947.BD).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jin, J. Dietary Guidelines for Americans. JAMA 2016, 315, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bertoia, M.L.; Mukamal, K.J.; Cahill, L.E.; Hou, T.; Ludwig, D.S.; Mozaffarian, D.; Willett, W.C.; Hu, F.B.; Rimm, E.B. Changes in intake of fruits and vegetables and weight change in United States men and women followed for up to 24 years: Analysis from three prospective cohort studies. PLoS Med. 2015, 12, e1001878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Valtueña, J.; Huybrechts, I.; Breidenassel, C.; Henauw, S.; De Stehle, P.; Kafatos, A.; Kersting, M. Fruit and vegetables consumption is associated with higher vitamin intake and blood vitamin status among European adolescents. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 71, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cosme, F.; Pinto, T.; Aires, A.; Morais, M.C.; Bacelar, E.; Anjos, R.; Ferreira-Cardoso, J.; Oliveira, I.; Vilela, A.; Gonçalves, B. Red fruits composition and their health benefits—A review. Foods 2022, 11, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Halvorsen, B.L.; Holte, K.; Myhrstad, M.C.W.; Barikmo, I.; Hvattum, E.; Remberg, S.F.; Wold, A.; Haffner, K.; Baugerød, H.; Andersen, L.F.; et al. A systematic screening of total antioxidants in dietary plants. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Paredes-López, O.; Cervantes-Ceja, M.L.; Vigna-Pérez, M.; Hernández-Pérez, T. Berries: Improving human health and healthy aging, and promoting quality life- A review. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2010, 65, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, C.; Zhang, B.; Fu, X.; You, L.J.; Abbasi, A.M.; Liu, R.H. The digestibility of mulberry fruit polysaccharides and its impact on lipolysis under simulated saliva, gastric and intestinal conditions. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 58, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Morin, P. Anti-Inflammatory properties of blackberry phenolic and volatile compounds. Master’s Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tavares, L.; Figueira, I.; MacEdo, D.; McDougall, G.J.; Leitão, M.C.; Vieira, H.L.A.; Stewart, D.; Alves, P.M.; Ferreira, R.B.; Santos, C.N. Neuroprotective effect of blackberry (Rubus sp.) polyphenols is potentiated after simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Food Chem. 2012, 131, 1443–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baby, B.; Antony, P.; Vijayan, R. Antioxidant and anticancer properties of berries. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 2491–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cooper, D.; Doucet, L.; Pratt, M. Influence of cultivar, conventional and organic agricultural practices on phenolic and sensory profile of blackberries (Rubus fruticosus). J. Organ. Behav. 2007, 28, 303–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Plants for a Future. Available online: https://pfaf.org/user/plant.aspx?latinname=Rubus+fruticosus (accessed on 16 March 2023).
  13. Silva, L.P.; Pereira, E.; Pires, T.C.S.P.; Alves, M.J.; Pereira, O.R.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Rubus ulmifolius Schott fruits: A detailed study of its nutritional, chemical and bioactive properties. Food Res. Int. 2019, 119, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Jardim Botânico UTAD. Available online: https://jb.utad.pt/especie/Rubus_ulmifolius_var_ulmifolius (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  15. BioDiversity4All. Available online: https://www.biodiversity4all.org/taxa/126741-Morus-nigra (accessed on 15 April 2023).
  16. Foster, T.M.; Bassil, N.V.; Dossett, M.; Leigh Worthington, M.; Graham, J. Genetic and genomic resources for Rubus breeding: A roadmap for the future. Hortic. Res. 2019, 6, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Marulanda, M.L.; López, A.M.; Aguilar, S.B. Genetic diversity of wild and cultivated Rubus species in Colombia using AFLP and SSR markers. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 2007, 7, 242–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Verma, R.; Gangrade, T.; Punasiya, R.; Ghulaxe, C. Rubus fruticosus (blackberry) use as an herbal medicine. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2014, 8, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Hummer, K.E.; Janick, J. Rubus iconography: Antiquity to the renaissance. Acta Hortic. 2007, 759, 89–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Strik, B.C.; Finn, C.E.; Clark, J.R.; Bañados, M.P. Worldwide production of blackberries. Acta Hortic. 2008, 777, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Associação dos Jovens Agricultores de Portugal. Manual Competitividade e Mercados Para Culturas Emergentes—A Cultura da Amora; Associação dos Jovens Agricultores de Portugal: Lisboa, Portugal, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  22. Selina Wamucii Insights. Available online: https://www.selinawamucii.com/insights/prices/yemen/raspberries-blackberries-mulberries-and-log/ (accessed on 5 May 2023).
  23. Huang, W.Y.; Zhang, H.C.; Liu, W.X.; Li, C.Y. Survey of antioxidant capacity and phenolic composition of blueberry, blackberry, and strawberry in Nanjing. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2012, 13, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Skrovankova, S.; Sumczynski, D.; Mlcek, J.; Jurikova, T.; Sochor, J. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity in different types of berries. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 24673–24706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zia-Ul-Haq, M.; Riaz, M.; De Feo, V.; Jaafar, H.Z.E.; Moga, M. Rubus fruticosus L.: Constituents, biological activities and health related uses. Molecules 2014, 19, 10998–11029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Tomas, M.; Toydemir, G.; Boyacioglu, D.; Hall, R.D.; Beekwilder, J.; Capanoglu, E. Processing black mulberry into jam: Effects on antioxidant potential and in vitro bioaccessibility. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 97, 3106–3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Choe, U.; Li, Y.; Yu, L.; Gao, B.; Wang, T.T.Y.; Sun, J.; Chen, P.; Yu, L. Chemical composition of cold-pressed blackberry seed flour extract and its potential health-beneficial properties. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 1215–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ali, L. Pre-harvest factors affecting quality and shelf-life in raspberries and blackberries (Rubus spp. L.). Doctoral Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mikulic-Petkovsek, M.; Veberic, R.; Hudina, M.; Zorenc, Z.; Koron, D.; Senica, M. Fruit quality characteristics and biochemical composition of fully ripe blackberries harvested at different times. Foods 2021, 10, 1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ercisli, S.; Orhan, E. Chemical composition of white (Morus alba), red (Morus rubra) and black (Morus nigra) mulberry fruits. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 1380–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Weli, A.M.; Al-Saadi, H.S.; Al-Fudhaili, R.S.; Hossain, A.; Putit, Z.B.; Jasim, M.K. Cytotoxic and antimicrobial potential of different leaves extracts of R. fruticosus used traditionally to treat diabetes. Toxicol. Rep. 2020, 7, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kaume, L.; Howard, L.R.; Devareddy, L. The blackberry fruit: A review on its composition and chemistry, metabolism and bioavailability, and health benefits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 5716–5727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Iqbal, M.; Khan, K.M.; Jilani, M.S.; Khan, M.M. Physico-chemical characteristics of different mulberry cultivars grown under agro-climatic conditions of Miran Shah, North Waziristan (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa), Pakistan. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 48, 209–217. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jiang, Y.; Nie, W.J. Chemical properties in fruits of mulberry species from the Xinjiang province of China. Food Chem. 2015, 174, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ercisli, S.; Orhan, E. Some physico-chemical characteristics of black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) genotypes from northeast Anatolia region of Turkey. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gundogdu, M.; Canan, I.; Gecer, M.K.; Kan, T.; Ercisli, S. Phenolic compounds, bioactive content and antioxidant capacity of the fruits of mulberry (Morus spp.) germplasm in Turkey. Folia Hortic. 2017, 29, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wang, R.S.; Dong, P.H.; Shuai, X.X.; Chen, M.S. Evaluation of different black mulberry fruits (Morus nigra L.) based on phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity. Foods 2022, 11, 1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yilmaz, K.U.; Zengin, Y.; Ercisli, S.; Serce, S.; Gunduz, K.; Sengul, M.; Asma, B.M. Some selected physico-chemical characteristics of wild and cultivated blackberry fruits (Rubus fruticosus L.) from Turkey. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 14, 4152–4163. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ryu, J.; Kwon, S.-J.; Jo, Y.D.; Jin, C.H.; Nam, B.M.; Lee, S.Y.; Jeong, S.W.; Im, S.B.; Oh, S.C.; Cho, L.; et al. Comparison of phytochemicals and antioxidant activity in blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L.) fruits of mutant lines at the different harvest time. Plant Breed. Biotechnol. 2016, 4, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gonçalves, A.C.; Campos, G.; Alves, G.; Garcia-Viguera, C.; Moreno, D.A.; Silva, L.R. Physical and phytochemical composition of 23 Portuguese sweet cherries as conditioned by variety (or genotype). Food Chem. 2021, 335, 127637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Skrovankova, S.; Ercisli, S.; Ozkan, G.; Ilhan, G.; Sagbas, H.I.; Karatas, N.; Jurikova, T.; Mlcek, J. Diversity of phytochemical and antioxidant characteristics of black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) fruits from Turkey. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Imran, M.; Khan, H.; Shah, M.; Khan, R.; Khan, F. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of certain Morus species. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2010, 11, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ercisli, S.; Tosun, M.; Duralija, B.; Voća, S.; Sengul, M.; Turan, M. Phytochemical content of some black (Morus nigra L.) and purple (Morus rubra L.) mulberry genotypes. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2010, 48, 102–106. [Google Scholar]
  44. Okatan, V. Phenolic compounds and phytochemicals in fruits of black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) genotypes from the Aegean region in Turkey. Folia Hortic. 2018, 30, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Gonçalves, A.C.; Bento, C.; Silva, B.; Simões, M.; Silva, L.R. Nutrients, bioactive compounds and bioactivity: The health benefits of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.). Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 15, 208–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mehta, M.; Kumar, A. Nutrient composition, phytochemical profile and antioxidant properties of Morus nigra: A review. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 2021, 6, 424–432. [Google Scholar]
  47. Department of Agriculture. USDA. Available online: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/ (accessed on 22 March 2023).
  48. European Food Safety Authority. Dietary Reference Values for Nutrients—Summary Report. ESFA J. 2017, 14, e15121E. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Vega, E.N.; Molina, A.K.; Pereira, C.; Dias, M.I.; Heleno, S.A.; Rodrigues, P.; Fernandes, I.P.; Barreiro, M.F.; Stojković, D.; Soković, M.; et al. Anthocyanins from Rubus fruticosus L. and Morus nigra L. applied as food colorants: A natural alternative. Plants 2021, 10, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Mattioli, R.; Francioso, A.; Mosca, L.; Silva, P. Anthocyanins: A comprehensive review of their chemical properties and health effects on cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules 2020, 25, 3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mikulic-Petkovsek, M.; Schmitzer, V.; Slatnar, A.; Stampar, F.; Veberic, R. Composition of sugars, organic acids, and total phenolics in 25 wild or cultivated berry species. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zafra-Rojas, Q.; Cruz-Cansino, N.; Delgadillo-Ramírez, A.; Alanís-García, E.; Añorve-Morga, J.; Quintero-Lira, A.; Castañeda-Ovando, A.; Ramírez-Moreno, E. Organic acids, antioxidants, and dietary fiber of Mexican blackberry (Rubus fruticosus) residues cv. Tupy. J. Food Qual. 2018, 2018, 5950761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hans, K.B.; Jana, T. Micronutrients in the life cycle: Requirements and sufficient supply. NFS J. 2018, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Savarino, G.; Corsello, A.; Corsello, G. Macronutrient balance and micronutrient amounts through growth and development. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2021, 47, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, Y.; Yang, C.; Ahmad, H.; Maher, M.; Fang, C.; Luo, J. Benefiting others and self: Production of vitamins in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 210–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Croge, C.P.; Cuquel, F.L.; Pintro, P.T.M.; Biasi, L.A.; Bona, C.M. Antioxidant capacity and polyphenolic compounds of blackberries produced in different climates. HortScience 2019, 54, 2209–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xu, T.; Yin, Y.; Samtani, J.B. Blackberry Fruit: Nutrition Facts and Health Benefits; Virginia Tech, Virginia State University: Petersburg, VA, USA, 2015; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  58. Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Carvalho, A.M.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Sánchez-Mata, M.S.O.S.C.C.; Cámara, M.; Morales, R.; Tardío, J. Wild edible fruits as a potential source of phytochemicals with capacity to inhibit lipid peroxidation. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2013, 115, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saini, R.K.; Nile, S.H.; Park, S.W. Carotenoids from fruits and vegetables: Chemistry, analysis, occurrence, bioavailability and biological activities. Food Res. Int. 2015, 73, 735–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ferreira, D.S.; de Rosso, V.V.; Mercadante, A.Z. Bioactive compounds of blackberry fruits (Rubus spp.) grown in Brazil|Compostos bioativos presentes em amora-preta (Rubus spp.). Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2010, 32, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gonçalves, A.C.; Campos, G.; Pinto, E.; Oliveira, A.S.; Almeida, A.; de Pinho, P.G.; Alves, G.; Silva, L.R. Essential and non-essential elements, and volatile organic compounds for the discrimination of twenty-three sweet cherry cultivars from Fundão, Portugal. Food Chem. 2022, 367, 130503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Castro, R.I.; Vásquez-Rojas, C.; Cortiella, M.G.I.; Parra-Palma, C.; Ramos, P.; Morales-Quintana, L. Evolution of the volatile organic compounds, phenols and antioxidant capacity during fruit ripening and development of Rubus ulmifolius Schott fruits. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Padilla-Jimenez, S.M.; Angoa-Pérez, M.V.; Mena-Violante, H.G.; Oyoque-Salcedo, G.; Renteria-Ortega, M.; Oregel-Zamudio, E. Changes in the aroma of organic blackberries (Rubus fruticosus) during Ripeness. Anal. Chem. Lett. 2019, 9, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tchabo, W.; Ma, Y.; Engmann, F.N.; Ye, H. Effect of enzymatic treatment on phytochemical compounds and volatile content of mulberry (Morus nigra) must by multivariate analysis. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2015, 54, 128–141. [Google Scholar]
  65. Jacques, A.C.; Chaves, F.C.; Zambiazi, R.C.; Brasil, M.C.; Caramão, E.B. Bioactive and volatile organic compounds in Southern Brazilian blackberry (Rubus fruticosus) fruit cv. Tupy. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 34, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. D’Agostino, M.F.; Sanz, J.; Martínez-Castro, I.; Giuffrè, A.M.; Sicari, V.; Soria, A.C. Statistical analysis for improving data precision in the SPME GC-MS analysis of blackberry (Rubus ulmifolius Schott) volatiles. Talanta 2014, 125, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Hu, W.; Sarengaowa; Guan, Y.; Feng, K. Biosynthesis of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 906069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. El Cadi, H.; El Bouzidi, H.; Selama, G.; Ramdan, B.; Majdoub, Y.O.; El Alibrando, F.; Brigui, J.; Altemimi, A.B.; Dugo, P.; Mondello, L.; et al. Characterization of Rubus fruticosus L. berries growing wild in Morocco: Phytochemical screening, antioxidant activity and chromatography analysis. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2021, 247, 1689–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Schulz, M.; Seraglio, S.K.T.; Della Betta, F.; Nehring, P.; Valese, A.C.; Daguer, H.; Gonzaga, L.V.; Costa, A.C.O.; Fett, R. Blackberry (Rubus ulmifolius Schott): Chemical composition, phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity in two edible stages. Food Res. Int. 2019, 122, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sellappan, S.; Akoh, C.C.; Krewer, G. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of Georgia-grown blueberries and blackberries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2432–2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ruiz-Rodríguez, B.M.; Sánchez-Moreno, C.; De Ancos, B.; De Cortes Sánchez-Mata, M.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Cámara, M.; Tardío, J. Wild Arbutus unedo L. and Rubus ulmifolius Schott fruits are underutilized sources of valuable bioactive compounds with antioxidant capacity. Fruits 2014, 69, 435–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pap, N.; Fidelis, M.; Azevedo, L.; do Carmo, M.A.V.; Wang, D.; Mocan, A.; Pereira, E.P.R.; Xavier-Santos, D.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Yang, B.; et al. Berry polyphenols and human health: Evidence of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, microbiota modulation, and cell-protecting effects. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 42, 167–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gonçalves, A.C.; Bento, C.; Jesus, F.; Alves, G.; Silva, L.R. Sweet cherry phenolic compounds: Identification, characterization, and health benefits. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Atta-ur-Rahman, F., Ed.; Science Publishers: Amesterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 31–78. [Google Scholar]
  74. Kumar, N.; Goel, N. Phenolic acids: Natural versatile molecules with promising therapeutic applications. Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 24, e00370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Häkkinen, S.H.; Törrönen, A.R. Content of flavonols and selected phenolic acids in strawberries and Vaccinium species: Influence of cultivar, cultivation site and technique. Food Res. Int. 2000, 33, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pinheiro, C.; Wienkoop, S.; de Almeida, J.F.; Brunetti, C.; Zarrouk, O.; Planchon, S.; Gori, A.; Tattini, M.; Ricardo, C.P.; Renaut, J.; et al. Phellem cell-wall components are discriminants of cork quality in Quercus suber. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Hayaloglu, A.A.; Demir, N. Phenolic compounds, volatiles, and sensory characteristics of twelve sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars grown in Turkey. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, C7–C18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zadernowski, R.; Naczk, M.; Nesterowicz, J. Phenolic acid profiles in some small berries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 2118–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Aly Maher Arafa, N. Utilization of Egyptian mulberry in manufacture of some high nutritional value products. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. Heal. Fam. Stud. 2021, 2, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sariburun, E.; Şahin, S.; Demir, C.; Türkben, C.; Uylaşer, V. Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of raspberry and blackberry cultivars. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chanoca, A.; Kovinich, N.; Burkel, B.; Stecha, S.; Bohorquez-Restrepo, A.; Ueda, T.; Eliceiri, K.W.; Grotewold, E.; Otegui, M.S. Anthocyanin vacuolar inclusions form by a microautophagy mechanism. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 2545–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Ayvaz, H.; Cabaroglu, T.; Akyildiz, A.; Pala, C.U.; Temizkan, R.; Ağçam, E.; Ayvaz, Z.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Direito, R.; et al. Anthocyanins: Metabolic digestion, bioavailability, therapeutic effects, current pharmaceutical/industrial use, and innovation potential. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Benvenuti, S.; Pellati, F.; Melegari, M.; Bertelli, D. Polyphenols, anthocyanins, ascorbic acid, and radical scavenging activity of Rubus, Ribes, and Aronia. J. Food Sci. 2004, 69, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Scalzo, J.; Currie, A.; Stephens, J.; McGhie, T.; Alspach, P. The anthocyanin composition of different Vaccinium, Ribes and Rubus genotypes. BioFactors 2008, 34, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Silva, L.P.; Pereira, E.; Prieto, M.A.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Pires, T.C.S.P.; Alves, M.J.; Calhelha, R.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Rubus ulmifolius Schott as a novel source of food colorant: Extraction optimization of coloring pigments and incorporation in a bakery product. Molecules 2019, 24, 2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Ponder, A.; Hallmann, E.; Kwolek, M.; Średnicka-Tober, D.; Kazimierczak, R. Genetic differentiation in anthocyanin content among berry fruits. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2021, 43, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gundogdu, M.; Muradoglu, F.; Sensoy, R.I.G.; Yilmaz, H. Determination of fruit chemical properties of Morus nigra L., Morus alba L. and Morus rubra L. by HPLC. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 132, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Veličković, I.; Žižak, Ž.; Simin, N.; Bekvalac, K.; Ivanov, M.; Soković, M.; Marin, P.D.; Grujić, S. Phenolic profile and biological potential of wild blackberry (Rubus discolor) fruits. Bot. Serbica 2021, 45, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Krzepiłko, A.; Prażak, R.; Święciło, A. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of raspberry, blackberry and raspberry-blackberry hybrid leaf buds. Molecules 2021, 26, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jan, B.; Parveen, R.; Zahiruddin, S.; Khan, M.U.; Mohapatra, S.; Ahmad, S. Nutritional constituents of mulberry and their potential applications in food and pharmaceuticals: A review. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 3909–3921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ezzati, M.; Riboli, E. Behavioral and dietary risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 954–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Gil-Martínez, L.; Mut-Salud, N.; Ruiz-García, J.A.; Falcón-Piñeiro, A.; Maijó-Ferré, M.; Baños, A.; De la Torre-Ramírez, J.M.; Guillamón, E.; Verardo, V.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M. Phytochemicals determination, and antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities of blackberry fruits. Foods 2023, 12, 1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Manzoor, M.F.; Hussain, A.; Tazeddinova, D.; Abylgazinova, A.; Xu, B. Assessing the nutritional-value-based therapeutic potentials and non-destructive approaches for mulberry fruit assessment: An overview. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Solverson, P.M.; Rumpler, W.V.; Leger, J.L.; Redan, B.W.; Ferruzzi, M.G.; Baer, D.J.; Castonguay, T.W.; Novotny, J.A. Blackberry feeding increases fat oxidation and improves insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese males. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Salau, V.F.; Erukainure, O.L.; Islam, M.S. Phenolics: Therapeutic applications against oxidative injury in obesity and type 2 diabetes pathology. In Pathology-Oxidative Stress and Dietary Antioxidants; Victor, R.P., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 297–307. [Google Scholar]
  96. Saeedi, P.; Petersohn, I.; Salpea, P.; Malanda, B.; Karuranga, S.; Unwin, N.; Colagiuri, S.; Guariguata, L.; Motala, A.A.; Ogurtsova, K.; et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pr. 2019, 157, 107843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Taylor, S.I.; Yazdi, Z.S.; Beitelshees, A.L. Pharmacological treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. J. Clin. Invest. 2021, 131, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kambale, E.K.; Quetin-Leclercq, J.; Memvanga, P.B.; Beloqui, A. An overview of herbal-based antidiabetic drug delivery systems: Focus on lipid- and inorganic-based nanoformulations. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Volpato, G.T.; Calderon, I.M.P.; Sinzato, S.; Campos, K.E.; Rudge, M.V.C.; Damasceno, D.C. Effect of Morus nigra aqueous extract treatment on the maternal-fetal outcome, oxidative stress status and lipid profile of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 138, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Samappito, S.; Butkhup, L. Effect of skin contact treatments on the aroma profile and chemical components of mulberry (Morus alba Linn.) wines. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2010, 4, 52–61. [Google Scholar]
  101. Abouzed, T.K.; Sadek, K.M.; Ghazy, E.W.; Abdo, W.; Kassab, M.A.; Hago, S.; Abdel-Wahab, S.; Mahrous, E.A.; Abdel-Sattar, E.; Assar, D.H. Black mulberry fruit extract alleviates streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy in rats: Targeting TNF-α inflammatory pathway. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2020, 72, 1615–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ştefănuţ, M.N.; Căta, A.; Pop, R.; Tănasie, C.; Boc, D.; Ienaşcu, I.; Ordodi, V. Anti-hyperglycemic effect of bilberry, blackberry and mulberry ultrasonic extracts on diabetic rats. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2013, 68, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Lim, S.H.; Choi, C.I. Pharmacological properties of Morus nigra L. (Black mulberry) as a promising nutraceutical resource. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Fabroni, S.; Ballistreri, G.; Amenta, M.; Romeo, F.V.; Rapisarda, P. Screening of the anthocyanin profile and in vitro pancreatic lipase inhibition by anthocyanin-containing extracts of fruits, vegetables, legumes and cereals. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 4713–4723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Xu, M.; Hu, J.; Zhao, W.; Gao, X.; Jiang, C.; Liu, K.; Liu, B.; Huang, F. Quercetin differently regulates insulin-mediated glucose transporter 4 translocation under basal and inflammatory conditions in adipocytes. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2014, 58, 931–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yi, H.; Peng, H.; Wu, X.; Xu, X.; Kuang, T.; Zhang, J.; Du, L.; Fan, G. The therapeutic effects and mechanisms of quercetin on metabolic diseases: Pharmacological data and clinical evidence. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kim, J.H.; Kang, M.J.; Choi, H.N.; Jeong, S.M.; Lee, Y.M.; Kim, J.I. Quercetin attenuates fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia in animal models of diabetes mellitus. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2011, 5, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Bumrungpert, A.; Lilitchan, S.; Tuntipopipat, S.; Tirawanchai, N.; Komindr, S. Ferulic acid supplementation improves lipid profiles, oxidative stress, and inflammatory status in hyperlipidemic subjects: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Nutrients 2018, 10, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Adeyi, O.E.; Somade, O.T.; Ajayi, B.O.; James, A.S.; Adeboye, T.R.; Olufemi, D.A.; Oyinlola, E.V.; Sanyaolu, E.T.; Mufutau, I.O. The anti-inflammatory effect of ferulic acid is via the modulation of NFκB-TNF-α-IL-6 and STAT1-PIAS1 signaling pathways in 2-methoxyethanol-induced testicular inflammation in rats. Phytomedicine Plus 2023, 3, 100464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Rai, V.; Jamuna, B.; Joceline, C.; Moreira, S.; Joceline, C.; Moreira, S. Science against microbial pathogens: Communicating current research and technological advances. Microbiol. Ser. 2011, 1, 197. [Google Scholar]
  111. Vaou, N.; Stavropoulou, E.; Voidarou, C.; Tsigalou, C.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Towards advances in medicinal plant antimicrobial activity: A review study on challenges and future perspectives. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Liu, J.; Zhou, H.; Song, L.; Yang, Z.; Qiu, M.; Wang, J.; Shi, S. Anthocyanins: Promising natural products with diverse pharmacological activities. Molecules 2021, 26, 3807. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  113. Mihok, E.; György, É.; Máthé, E. The Carpathian lingonberry, raspberry and blackberry fruit extracts feature variable antimicrobial efficiency. Acta Agrar. Debreceniensis 2019, 23, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Hajaji, S.; Jabri, M.A.; Sifaoui, I.; López-Arencibia, A.; Reyes-Batlle, M.; B’chir, F.; Valladares, B.; Pinero, J.E.; Lorenzo-Morales, J.; Akkari, H. Amoebicidal, antimicrobial and in vitro ROS scavenging activities of Tunisian Rubus ulmifolius Schott, methanolic extract. Exp. Parasitol. 2017, 183, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Chen, H.; Yu, W.; Chen, G.; Meng, S.; Xiang, Z.; He, N. Antinociceptive and antibacterial properties of anthocyanins and flavonols from fruits of black and non-black mulberries. Molecules 2018, 23, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Budiman, A.; Aulifa, D.L.; Kusuma, A.S.W.; Sulastri, A. Antibacterial and antioxidant activity of black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) extract for acne treatment. Pharmacogn. J. 2017, 9, 611–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Khalid, N.; Fawad, S.A.; Ahmed, I. Antimicrobial activity, phytochemical profile and trace minerals of black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) fresh juice. Pak. J. Bot. 2011, 43, 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  118. Wang, S.; Melnyk, J.P.; Tsao, R.; Marcone, M.F. How natural dietary antioxidants in fruits, vegetables and legumes promote vascular health. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Shahat, A.A.; Cos, P.; De Bruyne, T.; Apers, S.; Hammouda, F.M.; Ismail, S.I.; Azzam, S.; Claeys, M.; Goovaerts, E.; Pieters, L.; et al. Antiviral and antioxidant activity of flavonoids and proanthocyanidins from Crataegus sinaica. Planta Med. 2002, 68, 539–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Youdim, K.A.; Joseph, J.A. A possible emerging role of phytochemicals in improving age-related neurological dysfunctions: A multiplicity of effects. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 30, 583–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Olas, B. Berry phenolic antioxidants—Implications for human health? Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 26, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Nowak, R.; Olech, M.; Nowacka, N. Plant polyphenols as chemopreventive agents. Polyphen. Hum. Health Dis. 2013, 2, 1289–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wang, S.Y.; Jiao, H. Scavenging capacity of berry crops on superoxide radicals, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals, and singlet oxygen. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 5677–5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Shih, P.H.; Yeh, C.T.; Yen, G.C. Anthocyanins induce the activation of phase II enzymes through the antioxidant response element pathway against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 9427–9435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Yiğit, D.; Mavi, A.; Aktaş, M. Antıoxıdant actıvıtıes of black mulberry (Morus nigra). Fen Bilim. Enstitüsü Derg. 2008, 1, 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  126. Koczka, N.; Stefanovits-Bányai, É.; Prokaj, E. Element composition, total phenolics and antioxidant activity of wild and cultivated blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L.) fruits and leaves during the harvest time. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2018, 46, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Arfan, M.; Khan, R.; Rybarczyk, A.; Amarowicz, R. Antioxidant activity of mulberry fruit extracts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 2472–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Bae, S.H.; Suh, H.J. Antioxidant activities of five different mulberry cultivars in Korea. LWT 2007, 40, 955–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Li, J.; Shi, C.; Shen, D.; Han, T.; Wu, W.; Lyu, L.; Li, W. Composition and antioxidant activity of anthocyanins and non-anthocyanin flavonoids in blackberry from different growth stages. Foods 2022, 11, 2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Feng, R.; Wang, Q.; Tong, W.; Xiong, J.; Wei, Q.; Zhou, W.; Yin, Z.; Jia, R.; Song, X.; Zou, Y.; et al. Extraction and antioxidant activity of flavonoids of Morus nigra. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 22328–22336. [Google Scholar]
  131. Miller, D.D.; Li, T.; Liu, R.H. Antioxidants and phytochemicals. Ref. Modul. Biomed. Sci. 2014, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Chaves, V.C.; Boff, L.; Vizzotto, M.; Calvete, E.; Reginatto, F.H.; Simões, C.M. Berries grown in Brazil: Anthocyanin profiles and biological properties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 4331–4338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Bowen-Forbes, C.S.; Zhang, Y.; Nair, M.G. Anthocyanin content, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties of blackberry and raspberry fruits. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2010, 23, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Rapjut, S.; Wilber, A. Roles of inflammation in cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis. Front. Biosci. (Schol. Ed.) 2010, 2, 810–818. [Google Scholar]
  135. Lail, H.L.; Feresin, R.G.; Hicks, D.; Stone, B.; Price, E.; Wanders, D. Berries as a treatment for obesity-induced inflammation: Evidence from preclinical models. Nutrients 2021, 13, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Kaume, L.; Gilbert, W.C.; Brownmiller, C.; Howard, L.R.; Devareddy, L. Cyanidin 3-O-β-d-glucoside-rich blackberries modulate hepatic gene expression, and anti-obesity effects in ovariectomized rats. J. Funct. Foods 2012, 4, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Slavin, J.L.; Lloyd, B. Health beneficts of fruits and vegetables. Adv. Nutr. 2012, 3, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Khoo, H.E.; Azlan, A.; Tang, S.T.; Lim, S.M. Anthocyanidins and anthocyanins: Colored pigments as food, pharmaceutical ingredients, and the potential health benefits. Food Nutr. Res. 2017, 61, 1361779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Serra, D.; Paixão, J.; Nunes, C.; Dinis, T.C.P.; Almeida, L.M. Cyanidin-3-glucoside suppresses cytokine-induced inflammatory response in human intestinal cells: Comparison with 5-aminosalicylic acid. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e0073001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Johnson, M.H.; De Mejia, E.G.; Fan, J.; Lila, M.A.; Yousef, G.G. Anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins from blueberry-blackberry fermented beverages inhibit markers of inflammation in macrophages and carbohydrate-utilizing enzymes in vitro. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 1182–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lee, S.G.; Kim, B.; Yang, Y.; Pham, T.X.; Park, Y.K.; Manatou, J.; Koo, S.I.; Chun, O.K.; Lee, J.Y. Berry anthocyanins suppress the expression and secretion of proinflammatory mediators in macrophages by inhibiting nuclear translocation of NF-κB independent of NRF2-mediated mechanism. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2014, 25, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sangiovanni, E.; Vrhovsek, U.; Rossoni, G.; Colombo, E.; Brunelli, C.; Brembati, L.; Trivulzio, S.; Gasperotti, M.; Mattivi, F.; Bosisio, E.; et al. Ellagitannins from Rubus berries for the control of gastric inflammation: In vitro and in vivo studies. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e0071762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. González-Sarrías, A.; Larrosa, M.; Toms-Barberán, F.A.; Dolara, P.; Espín, J.C. NF-κB-dependent anti-inflammatory activity of urolithins, gut microbiota ellagic acid-derived metabolites, in human colonic fibroblasts. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 104, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Leyane, T.S.; Jere, S.W.; Houreld, N.N. Oxidative stress in ageing and chronic degenerative pathologies: Molecular mechanisms involved in counteracting oxidative stress and chronic inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, Q. Oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases: From molecular mechanisms to clinical applications. Biomed. Res. 2017, 28, 3568–3573. [Google Scholar]
  146. Kang, T.H.; Hur, J.Y.; Kim, H.B.; Ryu, J.H.; Kim, S.Y. Neuroprotective effects of the cyanidin-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside isolated from mulberry fruit against cerebral ischemia. Neurosci. Lett. 2006, 391, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Tavares, L.; Figueira, I.; McDougall, G.J.; Vieira, H.L.A.; Stewart, D.; Alves, P.M.; Ferreira, R.B.; Santos, C.N. Neuroprotective effects of digested polyphenols from wild blackberry species. Eur. J. Nutr. 2013, 52, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Subash, S.; Essa, M.M.; Al-Adawi, S.; Memon, M.A.; Manivasagam, T.; Akbar, M. Neuroprotective effects of berry fruits on neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regen. Res. 2014, 9, 1557–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Taofiq, O.; González-Paramás, A.M.; Barreiro, M.F.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; McPhee, D.J. Hydroxycinnamic acids and their derivatives: Cosmeceutical significance, challenges and future perspectives, a review. Molecules 2017, 22, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Ullah, A.; Munir, S.; Badshah, S.L.; Khan, N.; Ghani, L.; Poulson, B.G.; Emwas, A.H.; Jaremko, M. Important flavonoids and their role as a therapeutic agent. Molecules 2020, 25, 5243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Chen, G.; Bower, K.A.; Xu, M.; Ding, M.; Shi, X.; Ke, Z.J.; Luo, J. Cyanidin-3-glucoside reverses ethanol-induced inhibition of neurite outgrowth: Role of glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta. Neurotox. Res. 2009, 15, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Sukprasansap, M.; Chanvorachote, P.; Tencomnao, T. Cyanidin-3-glucoside activates Nrf2-antioxidant response element and protects against glutamate-induced oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress in HT22 hippocampal neuronal cells. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Fernández-Demeneghi, R.; Rodríguez-Landa, J.F.; Guzmán-Gerónimo, R.I.; Acosta-Mesa, H.G.; Meza-Alvarado, E.; Vargas-Moreno, I.; Herrera-Meza, S. Effect of blackberry juice (Rubus fruticosus L.) on anxiety-like behaviour in Wistar rats. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 70, 856–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Wang, E.; Wang, N.; Zou, Y.; Fahim, M.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, H. Black mulberry (Morus nigra) fruit extract alleviated AD-like symptoms induced by toxic Aβ protein in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans via insulin DAF-16 signaling pathway. Food Res. Int. 2022, 160, 111696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. McGuire, S. World cancer report 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO Press, 2015. Adv. Nutr. 2016, 7, 418–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Donaldson, M.S. Nutrition and cancer: A review of the evidence for an anti-cancer diet. Nutr. J. 2004, 3, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Kristo, A.S.; Klimis-Zacas, D.; Sikalidis, A.K. Protective role of dietary berries in cancer. Antioxidants 2016, 5, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Dharmawansa, K.V.S.; Hoskin, D.W.; Vasantha, H.P.R. Chemopreventive effect of dietary anthocyanins against gastrointestinal cancers: A review of recent advances and perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Tatar, M.; Bagheri, Z.; Varedi, M.; Naghibalhossaini, F. Blackberry extract inhibits telomerase activity in human colorectal cancer cells. Nutr. Cancer 2019, 71, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Feng, R.; Bowman, L.L.; Lu, Y.; Leonard, S.S.; Shi, X.; Jiang, B.H.; Castranova, V.; Vallyathan, V.; Ding, M. Blackberry extracts inhibit activating protein 1 activation and cell transformation by perturbing the mitogenic signaling pathway. Nutr. Cancer 2004, 50, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Chen, P.-N.; Chu, S.-C.; Chiou, H.-L.; Yang, S.-F.; Hsieh, Y.-S. Cyanidin 3-glucoside and peonidin 3-glucoside inhibit tumor cell growth and induce apoptosis in vitro and suppress tumor growth in vivo. Nutr. Cancer 2005, 53, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Qian, Z.; Wu, Z.; Huang, L.; Qiu, H.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Yao, L.; Kang, K.; Qu, J.; Wu, Y.; et al. Mulberry fruit prevents LPS-induced NF-ΚB/pERK/MAPK signals in macrophages and suppresses acute colitis and colorectal tumorigenesis in mice. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Namara, K.M.; Alzubaidi, H.; Jackson, J.K. Cardiovascular disease as a leading cause of death: How are pharmacists getting involved? Integr. Pharm. Res. Pract. 2019, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Han, X.; Shen, T.; Lou, H. Dietary polyphenols and their biological significance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2007, 2, 950–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Rambaran, T.F.; Nembhard, N.; Bowen-Forbes, C.S.; Alexander-Lindo, R.L. Hypoglycemic effect of the fruit extracts of two varieties of Rubus rosifolius. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ghorbani, A.; Hooshmand, S. Protective effects of Morus nigra and its phytochemicals against hepatotoxicity: A review of preclinical studies. Pharmacology 2021, 106, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Jiang, Y.; Dai, M.; Nie, W.J.; Yang, X.R.; Zeng, X.C. Effects of the ethanol extract of black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) fruit on experimental atherosclerosis in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 200, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Freedman, J.E.; Parker, C.; Li, L.; Perlman, J.A.; Frei, B.; Ivanov, V.; Deak, L.R.; Iafrati, M.D.; Folts, J.D. Select flavonoids and whole juice from purple grapes inhibit platelet function and enhance nitric oxide release. Circulation 2001, 103, 2792–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Jimenez-Garcia, S.N.; Guevara-Gonzalez, R.G.; Miranda-Lopez, R.; Feregrino-Perez, A.A.; Torres-Pacheco, I.; Vazquez-Cruz, M.A. Functional properties and quality characteristics of bioactive compounds in berries: Biochemistry, biotechnology, and genomics. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 1195–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The main benefits linked to blackberries and mulberries consumption.
Figure 1. The main benefits linked to blackberries and mulberries consumption.
Ijms 24 12024 g001
Figure 2. (A) Rubus fruticosus, (B) Rubus ulmifolius [14], (C) Morus nigra [15].
Figure 2. (A) Rubus fruticosus, (B) Rubus ulmifolius [14], (C) Morus nigra [15].
Ijms 24 12024 g002
Figure 3. General composition of fruits.
Figure 3. General composition of fruits.
Ijms 24 12024 g003
Figure 4. Phenolic compounds’ classification.
Figure 4. Phenolic compounds’ classification.
Ijms 24 12024 g004
Figure 5. Principal phenolic acids found in Rubus fruticosus, Rubus ulmifolius, and Morus nigra.
Figure 5. Principal phenolic acids found in Rubus fruticosus, Rubus ulmifolius, and Morus nigra.
Ijms 24 12024 g005
Figure 6. Principal flavan-3-ols and flavonols present in Rubus fruticosus, Rubus ulmifolius, and Morus nigra.
Figure 6. Principal flavan-3-ols and flavonols present in Rubus fruticosus, Rubus ulmifolius, and Morus nigra.
Ijms 24 12024 g006
Figure 7. Principal anthocyanins present in Rubus fruticosus, Rubus ulmifolius, and Morus nigra.
Figure 7. Principal anthocyanins present in Rubus fruticosus, Rubus ulmifolius, and Morus nigra.
Ijms 24 12024 g007
Table 1. Basic chemical composition, macronutrients, and mineral content of blackberry and mulberry (per 100 g of fresh weight) [41,47,48].
Table 1. Basic chemical composition, macronutrients, and mineral content of blackberry and mulberry (per 100 g of fresh weight) [41,47,48].
Nutrient (Unit)Basic Chemical Composition
Raw BlackberryRaw Black Mulberry
Water (g/100 g)88.287.7
Energy (kcal/100 g)43–125.2543
Macronutrients
Protein (g/100 g)1.39–2.41.44
Total lipid (fat)0.49–1.220.39
Fatty acids, total monounsaturated (g/100 g)0.0470.041
Fatty acids, total polyunsaturated (g/100 g)0.280.207
Ash (g/100 g)0.37–0.580.69
Carbohydrate, by difference (g/100 g)9.61–26.29.8
Dietary fiber (g/100 g)5.31.7
Total sugars (g/100 g)4.78–16.310.14–21.32
Sucrose (g/100 g)0.07–0.341.08–2.14
Glucose (g/100 g)2.31–8.17.18–10.33
Fructose (g/100 g)2.4–7.81.88–8.85
Maltose (g/100 g)0.07-
Galactose (g/100 g)0.03-
Micronutrients
Minerals
Calcium, Ca (mg/100 g)12.5–2939–502
Iron, Fe (mg/100 g)0.62–3.41.85–77.6
Magnesium, Mg (mg/100 g)2018–386
Phosphorus, P (mg/100 g)2238–2520
Potassium, K (mg/100 g)11.9–162194–2234
Sodium, Na (mg/100 g)15.9–302
Zinc, Zn (mg/100 g)0.530.10–62
Cooper, Cu (mg/100 g)0.1650.06–0.10
Manganese, Mn (mg/100 g)0.6460.40–19
Selenium, Se (µg/100 g)0.40.008–0.6
Table 2. Organic acids identified in Rubus ulmifolius and Rubus fruticosus blackberries, and Morus nigra mulberry [13,36,51,52].
Table 2. Organic acids identified in Rubus ulmifolius and Rubus fruticosus blackberries, and Morus nigra mulberry [13,36,51,52].
Organic AcidR. ulmifoliusR. fruticosusM. nigra
Citric acid-125.54 mg per 100 g dw1084–7020 mg per 100 g fw
Oxalic acid71 mg per 100 g fw59.51 mg per 100 g dw450–1250 mg per 100 g fw
Quinic acid119 mg per 100 g fw--
Malic acid29 mg per 100 g fw5706.37 mg per 100 g dw1323–13,650 mg per 100 g fw
Succinic acid--342 mg per 100 g fw
Shikimic acid11.33 mg per 100 g fw-1.36 mg per 100 g fw
Tartaric acid--220–860 mg per 100 g fw
Ascorbic acid6.66 mg per 100 g fw6.00 mg per 100 g dw12.81–15.37 mg per 100 g fw
Fumaric acidtr230.25 mg per 100 g dw-
Total238 mg per 100 g fw6127.67 mg per 100 g dw2951 mg per 100 g fw
tr: traces; -: no data; fw: fresh weight; dw: dry weight.
Table 3. Vitamin content of raw blackberry and mulberry fruits [30,33,41,43,47,48,56,57].
Table 3. Vitamin content of raw blackberry and mulberry fruits [30,33,41,43,47,48,56,57].
VitaminsRaw BlackberryRaw Black Mulberry
Vitamin C (mg/100 g)21.019.3–36.4
Thiamin (mg/100 g)0.020.029
Riboflavin (mg/100 g)0.0260.04–0.10
Niacin (mg/100 g)0.6460.62–1.60
Vitamin B-6 (mg/100 g) 0.03 0.05
Folate total (µg /100 g) 25.0 6.0
Folate, DFE (µg /100 g) 25.0 6.0
Folate, food (µg /100 g) 25.0 6.0
Choline, total (mg/100 g) 8.5 12.3
Vitamin K (phylloquinone) (µg /100 g) 19.8 7.8
Table 4. Tocopherols present in in Rubus ulmifolius and Rubus fruticosus blackberries, and Morus nigra mulberry [13,49,58].
Table 4. Tocopherols present in in Rubus ulmifolius and Rubus fruticosus blackberries, and Morus nigra mulberry [13,49,58].
TocopherolsR. ulmifolius
(mg per 100 g fw)
R. fruticosus
(mg per g Extract)
M. nigra
(mg per g Extract)
α-tocopherol1.15–3.386.143
β-tocopherol0.02–0.24nd1.27
γ-tocopherol1.34–3.73nd12.5
δ-tocopherol0.9–3.69nd5.5
Total5.1–13.486.162
nd: not detected; fw: fresh weight.
Table 5. Carotenoids present in Rubus fruticosus blackberry and Morus nigra mulberry [47].
Table 5. Carotenoids present in Rubus fruticosus blackberry and Morus nigra mulberry [47].
CarotenoidsR. fruticosusM. nigra
Carotene, beta (µg per 100 g)128.09.0
Carotene, alfa (µg per 100 g)0.012.0
Vitamin A, RAE (µg per 100 g)11.01.0
Vitamin A, IU (µg per 100 g)214.025.0
Lutein + zeaxanthin (µg per 100 g)118.0136.0
Table 6. Volatile compounds identified in R. fruticosus, R. ulmifolius, and M. nigra fruits [62,64,65,66].
Table 6. Volatile compounds identified in R. fruticosus, R. ulmifolius, and M. nigra fruits [62,64,65,66].
Volatile CompoundsFruit SpeciesVolatile CompoundsFruit Species
Esters
Methoxyphenyl oximeR. ulmifoliusMethyl salicylateR. ulmifolius
Ethyl octanoateR. ulmifoliusMethyl acetateM. nigra
Etyl acetateM. nigraEtyl propanoateM. nigra
Etyl 2-metylbutanoateM. nigraPropyl acetateM. nigra
Ethyl 3-metylbutanoateM. nigraEtyl butanoateM. nigra
Isopentyl acetateM. nigraEtyl pentanoateM. nigra
Ethyl 2-hydroxyhexanoateM. nigraEthyl lactateM. nigra
Isoamyl lactateM. nigraEthyl octanoateM. nigra
Ethyl decanoateM. nigraEthyl 9-decenoateM. nigra
Diethyl succinateM. nigraBenzyl acetateM. nigra
2-Phenylethyl acetateM. nigraMethyl salicytateM. nigra
Ethyl dodecanoateM. nigraDiethyl pentanedioateM. nigra
Ethyl-3phenylpropanoateM. nigraEthyl phenoylethanoateM. nigra
Ethyl tetradecanoateM. nigraEthyl hexadecanoateM. nigra
Metyl-hexanoateR. futicosusEthyl-hexanoateR. fruticosus
M nigra
Ethyl benzoateR. futicosusMethyl salicylateR. futicosus
Terpenes
D-limoneneR. ulmifoliusb-LinaloolR. ulmifolius
L-α-terpineolR. ulmifoliusb-MyriceneR. ulmifolius
Terpenoids
α-ThujeneR. futicosusβ-MyrceneR. futicosus
α-PineneR. futicosusα-PhellandreneR. futicosus
1-OctanolR. futicosus
M. nigra
TerpinoleneR. futicosus
CampheneR. futicosusLimoneneR. futicosus
o-CimeneR. futicosusα-TerpineneR. futicosus
LinaloolR. futicosusLinalool oxideR. futicosus
trans Limonene oxideR. futicosusIsoborneolR. futicosus
IsopinocarveolR. futicosusTerpinen-4-olR. futicosus
(-)-CarvoneR. futicosusp-Cymen-8-olR. futicosus
GeraniolR. futicosusα-CopaeneR. futicosus
VitispiraneR. futicosusα-TerpineolR. futicosus
TheaspiraneR. futicosus
Aldehydes
PentanalR. ulmifoliusHexanalR. futicosus
R. ulmifolius
E-2-PentenalR. ulmifoliuNonanalR. futicosus
R. ulmifolius
E-2-HexenalR. ulmifoliusZ-2-HeptenalR. ulmifolius
2-HexenalR. futicosusOctanalR. futicosu
HeptanalR. futicosusDecanalR. futicosus
NonenalR. futicosusp-MentenalR. futicosus
AcetaldehydeM. nigraBenzaldehydeR. futicosus
M. nigra
Alcohols
2-Ethyl-1-pentanolR. ulmifoliusPhenylthyl alcoholM. nigra
1-Penten-3-olR. ulmifolius1-Octen-3-olR. ulmifolius
Isoamyl alcoholR. ulmifoliusSulcatolR. ulmifolius
2-HeptanolR. ulmifolius
R. futicosus
M. nigra
(s)-3-Ethyl-4- methylpentanolR. ulmifolius
Z-2-Penten-olR. ulmifoliusZ-5-Octen-1-olR. ulmifolius
1-HexanolR. ulmifolius
M. nigra
Benzyl alcoholM. nigra
R. ulmifolius
1-HeptanolR. futicosus
R. ulmifolius
E-2-Hexen-1-olR. ulmifolius
Z-3-Hexen-1-olR. ulmifolius2-TetradecanolM. nigra
2-ButanolM. nigra2-PentadecanolM. nigra
1-PropanolM. nigra2-NonanolM. nigra
3-Methyl-2-butanolM. nigra1-OctanolM. nigra
R. fruticosus
2-Metyl-1-butanolM. nigra4-Methyl-1-pentanolM. nigra
3-Methyl-1-butanolM. nigra3-Methyl-1-pentanolM. nigra
3-Methyl-3-buten-1-olM. nigraTerpene-4-olM. nigra
1,3-ButanediolM. nigra2-DecanolM. nigra
2-UndecanolM. nigraEthanolM. nigra
2-Methyl-1-propanolM. nigra2,3-ButanediolM. nigra
2-Butyl-1-octanolM. nigra3-Ethyl-4-methyl-pentanolM. nigra
Ketones
Methyl ethyl ketoneR. futicosusDamascenoneR. futicosus
2-HeptanoneR. futicosusVerbenoneR. futicosus
3-Hydroxy-2-butanoneM. nigra
Hydrocarbons
PentadecaneM. nigraDodecaneM. nigra
NonadecaneM. nigraTridecaneM. nigra
HeptaneR. futicosusTetradecaneM. nigra
TolueneR. futicosus
Acids
Hexanoic acidM. nigraAcetic acidM. nigra
Octanoic acidM. nigraButanoic acidM. nigra
Isovaleric acidM. nigra
Carbonyls
1-Penten-3-oneR. ulmifolius2-HeptanoneR. ulmifolius
SulcatoneR. ulmifolius2-Methyl butanoic acidR. ulmifolius
Phenols
2,4-Di-tert-butylphenolM. nigra2-MethoxyphenolM. nigra
4-Methyl-2-methoxyphenolM. nigra
Acids
Hexanoic acidM. nigraAcetic acidM. nigra
Octanoic acidM. nigraButanoic acidM. nigra
Isovaleric acidM. nigra
Table 7. Phenolic compounds reported in Rubus fruticosus, Rubus ulmifolius, and Morus nigra.
Table 7. Phenolic compounds reported in Rubus fruticosus, Rubus ulmifolius, and Morus nigra.
Phenolic CompoundsR. fruticosusR. ulmifoliusM. nigraReferences
Phenolic Acids
Hydroxybenzoic acids
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid1.44 mg per 100 g fw-0.053–0.47 mg per 100 g dw[36,65]
Gallic Acid145.85 mg per 100 g fw268.72 mg per 100 g fw21.83–40.90 mg per 100 g fw[44,65,68]
Syringic acid-40.84 µg per 100 g dw-[69]
Vanillic acid14.72 mg per 100 g-0.014–0.10 mg per 100 g dw[37,68]
Salicylic acid-296.62 µg per 100 g dw0.007–0.12 mg per 100 g dw[37,69]
Ellagic acid30.01–33.81 mg per 100 g fw-1.36–6.32 mg per 100 g fw[44,70]
Hydroxycinnamic acids
Caffeic acid-75.52 µg per100 g dw6.14–21.93 mg per 100 g fw[44,69]
Ferulic acid2.99–22.09 mg per 100 g fw388.59 µg per 100 g dw0.009–00.056 mg per 100 g dw[37,69,70]
Chlorogenic acid--43.76–97.59 mg per 100 g fw[44]
p-Coumaric acid0.40–2.08 mg per 100 g fw39.65 µg per 100 g dw-[69,70]
Sinapic acid-228.69 µg per 100 g dw0.013–0.11 mg per 100 g dw[37,69]
Flavonoids
Flavonols
Quercetin20.62 mg per 100 g fw5509.61 µg per 100 g dw2.33–11.25 mg per 100 g fw[44,65,69]
Rutin4.16–6.45 mg per 100 g-32.06–133.60 mg per 100 g fw[44,68]
Quercetin 3-O-galactoside5.44 mg per 100 g fw--[71]
Quercetin 3-O-glucoside18.18 mg per 100 g fw36.46 mg per 100 g-[68,71]
Kaempferol0.63 mg per 100 g399.48 µg per 100 g dw0.009–0.17 mg per 100 g dw[37,68,69]
Flavan-3-ols
(+)-Catechin265.75–312.86 mg per 100 g fw156.61 µg per 100 g dw2.28–10.54 mg per 100 g fw[44,69,70]
(+)-Epicatechin-250.82 µg per 100 g dw0.004–0.054 mg per 100 g dw[37,69]
(-)-Epicatechin94.29 mg per 100 g fw--[65]
Flavone
Myricetin9.99 mg per 100 g fw--[70]
Luteolin-5.97 µg per 100 g dw0.098–2.26 mg per 100 g dw[37,69]
Flavanone
Naringenin-28.34 µg per 100 g dw-[69]
Anthocyanins
Cyanidin 3-O-glucoside19.49–86.73 mg per 100 g fw92.3-335.6 mg per 100 g6.01 mg per g extract[39,49,71]
Cyanidin O-hexoside-3.76 mg per g extract-[49]
Cyanidin 3,5-diglucoside55,447.28 µg per 100 g-0.51–7.28 mg per 100 g dw[37,72]
Cyanidin 3-O-rutinoside330,616.73 µg per 100 g-1.00–9.21 mg per 100 g dw[37,72]
Cyanidin O-rhamnoside-O-hexoside--2.43 mg per g extract[49]
Cyanidin O-pentoside-1.27 mg per g extract-[49]
Cyanidin 3-O-xyloside2.62 mg per g extract12.1–47.1 mg per 100 g-[13,39]
Cyanidin 3-O-malonylglucoside-5.7–20.9 mg per 100 g-[39]
Cyanidin 3-O-dioxalylglucoside1.20–2.04 mg per g extract16.90–107.50 mg per 100 g-[39,71]
Delphinidin 3-O-glucoside--0.24–7.42 mg per 100 g dw[37]
Pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside102,936.30 µg per 100 g-0.012–0.068 mg per 100 g dw[37,72]
Pelargonidin 3-O-rutinoside4.23 mg per 100 g fw--[71]
-: no data; fw: fresh weight; dw: dry weight.
Table 8. Antimicrobial effect of Morus nigra juice, Rubus fruticosus (crude and ethanolic extracts), and Rubus ulmifolius (methanolic and hydroethanolic extracts) [13,113,114,115,116,117].
Table 8. Antimicrobial effect of Morus nigra juice, Rubus fruticosus (crude and ethanolic extracts), and Rubus ulmifolius (methanolic and hydroethanolic extracts) [13,113,114,115,116,117].
Antimicrobial Activity
MicroorganismsM. nigra juice (100 µL)R. fruticosusR. ulmifolius
Crude ExtractEthanolic ExtractMethanolic Extract (15 µL)Hydroethanolic Extract
Mean Zone of Inhibition (mm)MICMBCMICMBC
Gram-negative bacteria
Escherichia coli9.989.3716.70284.038.925>20
Klebsiella pneumoniae------>20>20
Morganella morganii------5>20
Porteus mirabilis------10>20
Proteus vulgaris-12.7520.53-----
Pseudomonas aeruginosa19.87----->20>20
Pseudomonas baetica-9.7614.30-----
Salmonella typhimurium11.73--22.54.138.24--
Salmonella Hartford-14.499.54-----
Gram-positive bacteria
Enterococcus faecium---164.768.70--
Enterococcus faecalis16.03-----5>20
Listeria monocytogenes------5>20
Bacillus spizizenii19.68-------
Bacillus cereus-11.2014.00-----
Bacillus subtilus18.468.1014.04-----
Bacillus mojavensis-9.7915.43-----
Corynebacterium diphtheriae15.57-------
Micrococcus luteus-10.6415.00-----
Saccharomyces cerevisiae--11.52-----
Staphylococus aureus17.377.2815.64393.227.17--
Streptococcus agalactiae---502.294.38--
MRSA------10>20
MSSA------->20
Fungi
Candida albicans---39----
-: no data; MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration; MBC: minimum bactericidal concentration.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martins, M.S.; Gonçalves, A.C.; Alves, G.; Silva, L.R. Blackberries and Mulberries: Berries with Significant Health-Promoting Properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512024

AMA Style

Martins MS, Gonçalves AC, Alves G, Silva LR. Blackberries and Mulberries: Berries with Significant Health-Promoting Properties. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(15):12024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martins, Mariana S., Ana C. Gonçalves, Gilberto Alves, and Luís R. Silva. 2023. "Blackberries and Mulberries: Berries with Significant Health-Promoting Properties" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 15: 12024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512024

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop