Next Article in Journal
APOA2: New Target for Molecular Hydrogen Therapy in Sepsis-Related Lung Injury Based on Proteomic and Genomic Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
ROS and Abiotic Stress in Plants 2.0
Previous Article in Journal
Protective Effect of Water-Soluble Acacetin Prodrug on APAP-Induced Acute Liver Injury Is Associated with Upregulation of PPARγ and Alleviation of ER Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
miR2119, a Novel Transcriptional Regulator, Plays a Positive Role in Woody Plant Drought Tolerance by Mediating the Degradation of the CkBI-1 Gene Associated with Apoptosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Transcriptomics of Multi-Stress Responses in Pachycladon cheesemanii and Arabidopsis thaliana

1
School of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand
2
Department Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24–25, Haus 20, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
3
School of Agriculture & Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
4
School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
5
Biochemistry Department, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
6
Center of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology (CPSBB), 139 Ruski Blvd., 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
7
Department of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, University of Plovdiv, 24 Tsar Assen Str., 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
8
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Present address: Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, 410 Koorliny Way, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(14), 11323; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411323
Submission received: 18 May 2023 / Revised: 26 June 2023 / Accepted: 6 July 2023 / Published: 11 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ROS and Abiotic Stress in Plants 2.0)

Abstract

:
The environment is seldom optimal for plant growth and changes in abiotic and biotic signals, including temperature, water availability, radiation and pests, induce plant responses to optimise survival. The New Zealand native plant species and close relative to Arabidopsis thaliana, Pachycladon cheesemanii, grows under environmental conditions that are unsustainable for many plant species. Here, we compare the responses of both species to different stressors (low temperature, salt and UV-B radiation) to help understand how P. cheesemanii can grow in such harsh environments. The stress transcriptomes were determined and comparative transcriptome and network analyses discovered similar and unique responses within species, and between the two plant species. A number of widely studied plant stress processes were highly conserved in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii. However, in response to cold stress, Gene Ontology terms related to glycosinolate metabolism were only enriched in P. cheesemanii. Salt stress was associated with alteration of the cuticle and proline biosynthesis in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii, respectively. Anthocyanin production may be a more important strategy to contribute to the UV-B radiation tolerance in P. cheesemanii. These results allowed us to define broad stress response pathways in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii and suggested that regulation of glycosinolate, proline and anthocyanin metabolism are strategies that help mitigate environmental stress.

1. Introduction

Plants survive various environmental stresses by responding at physiological, biochemical, cellular and molecular levels [1,2,3,4]. Plants adapt to their environment throughout their lifetime. In addition, over evolutionary time, plants evolved to mount effective responses to environmental cues such as drought, salinity, low or high temperature, and UV-B radiation [5,6,7].
The ability to determine the expression of thousands of genes from a single sample has allowed the identification of complex stress-induced expression networks and considerable overlap between distinct stresses, and interactions within stress networks were found. A cDNA microarray analysis of cold, drought and high salinity-treated rice plants showed a wide range of cross talk involving 15 common stress-induced genes [8]. Likewise, in potato plants, 232 clones were shared between responses to cold, heat and salt stresses, as analysis of cDNA microarray data uncovered [9]. More recently, a meta-analysis of publicly accessible rice RNA-seq data revealed that photosynthesis is downregulated in response to both abiotic and biotic stress, and significant expression changes were found in genes involved in abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) signalling pathways [10]. In addition, this study found that several genes were uniquely induced by abiotic or biotic stress, but this was not further analysed. In Arabidopsis thaliana, 390 microarray samples (from 29 microarray studies) were analysed to compare drought and cold stress responses. This identified 2890 differentially expressed genes in both stress responses with similar expression patterns. Moreover, 21 drought and 16 highly inter-correlated cold gene modules were identified with four consensus gene modules, but few stress-specific genes were mentioned [11]. Osmotic stress is a primary effect caused by both drought and salt stress, while salt stress has ionic effects on cells as well [12]. Also, these stresses induce oxidative stress and damage to the membrane system [13]. Thus, drought and salt stresses have unique and overlapping responses [14]. The comparative transcriptome analysis of Iris lactea var. chinensis under drought and salt stress showed that, against the untreated control, 3897 differentially expressed genes had the same expression pattern. Nevertheless, Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis revealed that while the responses were largely the same, a number of unique GO terms were enriched only in the drought or salt stress response, suggesting that this plant species can distinguish between the two related stresses [15]. Therefore, comprehensive crosstalk among multiple stress responses could be identified by high-throughput expression profiling. Yet, few studies have compared transcriptome differences between multiple stress responses of related plant species. As part of a gene co-expression analysis of four cotton species in response to cold and salt stress, 29 co-expression modules displayed significant correlations. However, four major modules were most strongly correlated with each of the four genomes, suggesting these highly co-expressed genes were species specific. This study evidenced the presence of evolutionary divergence and the potential shared network of cold and salt response among four related species [16].
In contrast with research on drought, temperature and biotic stress, research on plants’ responses to UV-B stress has been performed relatively independently to other stresses [17,18,19,20]. Nevertheless, high-throughput analyses have resulted in greater knowledge of plant UV-B radiation response pathways. Maize (Zea mays) plants were exposed to 9 kJ m−2 d−1 UV-B radiation, and several transcripts were found to be substantially upregulated or downregulated in one or more organs [21]. Grape (Vitis vinifera) leaves were subjected to UV-B radiation (4.75 kJ m−2 d−1) and microarray analysis of their gene expression responses led to classification of plant stress responses as either general protective (synthesis of UV-B absorbing compounds), antioxidant defence, pathogen defence, or abiotic [22]. RNA-seq analysis of Lycium ruthenicum plants subjected to UV-B radiation found 1913 upregulated and 536 downregulated genes compared to non-treated control plants, which included antioxidant-related, secondary metabolite synthesis-related, and defence response-related genes [23]. However, limited research has been conducted on the relation between UV-B radiation and other stress responses. The AtGenExpress project used Affymetrix ATH1 microarray analyses to compare heat, cold, drought, salt, high osmolarity, UV-B radiation and wounding stress regulatory networks. It was proposed that a core group of genes present in Arabidopsis is primarily responsible for the response to environmental stresses [24].
Here, we studied Pachycladon cheesemanii, a tetraploid species of Brassicaceae native to New Zealand, and compared it to its relative, Arabidopsis thaliana. P. cheesemanii can be found over an extensive latitudinal and altitudinal range, from near sea level to 1600 m altitude, and it is exposed to relatively intense UV-B radiation and winter temperatures of 2–5 °C [7,25]. Additionally, varied rock substrate (greywacke, haast schist, and basaltic and andesitic volcanic rocks) on which P. cheesemanii lives could impact growth via soil nutrient availability [25,26]. Thus, these diverse environmental conditions have likely caused the development of adaptive characteristics in this species, exemplified by its high UV-B tolerance [7]. In comparison, Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes distribute through Western Eurasia with wide temperature ranges of −20 to +17.5 °C and precipitation (11.5–190 mm) over the year [27]. Nevertheless, the widely used laboratory accession, Col-0, was collected from Columbia, United States of America, with a daily temperature 15–16 (night)/21–22 °C (day) and a monthly precipitation of 30–70 mm (ABRC, Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center). Although the two plant species are close relatives, P. cheesemanii experienced a genome duplication event, a relatively short 1.61 million years ago, where one of the P. cheesemanii sub-genomes was proposed to have the same origin as A. thaliana’s genome [28]. The different living niches most likely have caused the development of species-specific characteristics over evolutionary time, while the genome duplication event may have provided the means for genes to evolve new functions in P. cheesemanii. Thus, we hypothesised that P. cheesemanii has evolved different responses to abiotic stresses from A. thaliana, and comparing how P. cheesemanii and A. thaliana respond to different stresses could help deepen our understanding of how the environment shapes plant evolution and adaptation.
Here, we present an interaction model describing the correlating gene networks that respond to cold, salt and UV-B radiation stress in two related plant species: A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii. The study confirmed that conserved pathways exist, but also considerable species-specific response pathways were identified, possibly driven by evolutionary selective processes.

2. Results

2.1. Abiotic Stress Transcriptomes of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii

Changes in gene expression caused by different abiotic stresses were investigated by analysing the transcriptomes of stressed and unstressed A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii plants using an RNA-seq approach. Six-week-old A. thaliana and nine-week-old P. cheesemanii plants were treated at 4 °C, 250 mM NaCl or 5.2 μmol m−2 s−1 UV-B radiation. This UV-B radiation level was shown to cause different responses of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii [7]. Treated and control plants were collected after 5 h of treatment to detect early transcriptional changes. Total RNA was extracted from treated and untreated leaves to result in 12 samples for each of the species; 3 biological replicates for each of the stresses and the control. The 24 RNA samples were used for RNA-seq as described in Materials and methods.
The A. thaliana transcriptome is available online (GenBank CP002684–CP002688) and represents 27,655 genes. We generated a P. cheesemanii transcriptome via RNA-seq as follows: The 12 P. cheesemanii Illumina libraries of 2 × 150-bp paired-end (PE) reads were sequenced for a total of 122.11 GB of sequence from 437,025,992 clean reads (Table S1). A de novo transcriptome assembly of 67,905 transcripts (including alternative splicing variants) and 45,911 genes were generated as described in the Materials and Methods section (Supplementary File S1). Transcript length distribution analysis revealed that 73.98% of transcripts were between 200 and 2000 bp, with 1% being longer than 5000 bp (Figure S1a). The Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Ortholog (BUSCO) assessment results showed that 94.7% of BUSCOs could be found in the set as single (48.7%) or duplicate (46.0%) copy. Fragmented and missing BUSCOs were rare, i.e., 2.7% and 2.6%, respectively (Figure S1b). These results demonstrated high-quality integrity of the P. cheesemanii transcript set and validated it for use in downstream analysis.

2.2. Differentially Expressed Gene Number Bias in the Three Stress Responses of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii

Using the transcriptomes of the two plant species, RNA-seq data were used to discover genes significantly differentially expressed (DE) in response to cold, salt or UV-B treatment. We used edgeR with Trimmed Mean of M-values (TMM) normalisation in all treatments [29]. Table 1 shows that between ~800 and 4000 genes were significantly DE in response to cold, salt or UV-B treatment, out of 27,655 A. thaliana and 45,911 P. cheesemanii genes. Salt stress induced the lowest number of DE genes in both plant species. A volcano plot analysis showed considerable DE gene number bias in both plant species (Figure 1), with salt stress showing ~4-fold more upregulated than downregulated genes. In P. cheesemanii, UV-B radiation (~4-fold) and cold (~2-fold) stress also caused a similar bias which was not found in A. thaliana.
Thus, while the number of DE genes in response to each stress was broadly similar in the two species, there was considerable DE gene expression bias.

2.3. Comparative Analysis of Stress-Responsive Gene Sets

Next, the relationship between stress responses was examined, which identified responsive genes shared among stresses, and also responsive genes that are unique to each stress within species. A comparison was made of responsive genes that were upregulated and downregulated between stresses using a Venn diagram analysis, as shown in Figure 2. As expected, upregulated transcripts due to one stress were more likely to be upregulated by another stress than downregulated, apart from one notable exception, where in P. cheesemanii more salt-downregulated genes were upregulated than downregulated by cold stress. Furthermore, in both plant species, salt- and UV-B-radiation-upregulated genes showed considerable overlap with cold-upregulated genes, while UV-B-radiation-upregulated genes showed little overlap with salt-upregulated ones. In general, while different stress responses shared a number of responsive genes, the majority of responsive genes were specific to each stress response within species.
Nevertheless, DE genes were selected using strict cut-off parameters and genes that were strongly upregulated under one stress may still be upregulated by another stress, but not identified as a result of the parameters used. Therefore, we also compared the stress responses by means of overlapping GO terms associated with the DE genes. GO enrichment analysis was completed and overrepresented terms for GO biological processes compared among stresses using a Venn diagram (Figure 3 and Supplementary File S2). The overlap in GO terms was considerable between all stresses. Nevertheless, the UV-B radiation response in A. thaliana appeared more distinct from the others and that in P. cheesemanii, while the salt response included genes with comparatively less unique GO terms than those in the cold and UV-B radiation responses.

2.4. Network Analysis Identifies Multiple Stress-Responsive Crosstalks in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii

To further unravel crosstalk comprising multiple stress responses, the stress transcriptomes of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii were used to generate GO enrichment networks. GO terms were arranged in a network where connections were shaped, based on overlap between the gene sets using weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), as described in the Materials and Methods section. The network layout then grouped related GO terms into network clusters to identify major overrepresented functional themes. Figure 4 shows the A. thaliana network analysis of upregulated pathways. Salt and cold responses shared ‘Response to stress and hormone stimulus’, ‘Response to hormone and ABA’; cold and UV-B stress responses shared ’Flavone and flavone biosynthesis’ and ‘Biological regulation’; salt and UV-B responses only shared ‘Monosaccharide signalling: glucose and hexose’. Only a few network nodes within ‘Response to UV’ were shared by all three stress responses.
For both cold and salt treatments, the downregulation network included over-represented GO terms in ‘DNA geometric change’, while cold and UV-B stress downregulated GO terms included genes involved in ‘Immune response’ and ‘Response to wounding’ (Figure S2).
Unlike the multi-stress network in A. thaliana, the P. cheesemanii’s network showed few clusters (Figure 5). ‘Response to stress’ was identified as the main cluster that included all three stress responses, which comprised some typical stress-related biological processes like anthocyanin biosynthesis and response to stress hormones.
Overall, a wide overlap was present between stress responses in A. thaliana in both upregulation and downregulation, while P. cheesemanii differed by having only one main cluster, ‘Response to stress’, identified.

2.5. Identification of Biological Processes Shared between A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii Stress Responses

To pinpoint biological processes shared between the two species in response to stress, overrepresented terms for GO biological processes in each stress were compared. Figure 6 shows the results of this analysis using a Venn diagram revealing that salt and UV-B stress causes overrepresentation of about the same number of unique and shared GO terms in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii. In contrast, cold stress causes overrepresentation of many more GO terms in P. cheesemanii than in A. thaliana, and those of P. cheesemanii included most of those of A. thaliana.
Next, we aimed to obtain an overall structure of responses common to both plants. For both species and each stress response, overrepresented terms for GO biological processes (FDR < 0.05) were selected for further comparison. In response to cold, 74 overrepresented GO terms, with a similar percentage of induced genes, were shared by A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii, and the overrepresented GO terms were clustered into 13 groups (Figure 7a and Figure S2). Then, we used REVIGO to summarise and visualise the GO terms [30] as described in the Materials and Methods section. Figure 7a shows the resulting scatterplot of the common cold response, where the GO terms are placed in a semantic space, and clusters indicate semantic similarity among the terms within that cluster. Representative GO terms are then shown based on their dispensability values (<0.15) and visual inspection. The results suggest that in both A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii, a wound-like response is initiated and that circadian rhythm (in plants only circadian rhythm is relevant within rhythmic process) as well as secondary metabolism, including that of flavonoids, trehalose, phenylpropanoid and oxylipin, is important during the early cold response. Most of the representative GO terms had similar percentages of upregulated and downregulated genes in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii except flavonoid metabolism and regulation of response to stimulus (Figure S3).
The common salt response included 26 GO terms, and the REVIGO analysis indicated relatively generic GO terms, including the cluster ‘Response to stimulus’, ‘Regulation of abscisic acid-activated signalling pathway’ and ‘Regulation of response to stimulus’ (Figure 7b). The results suggest that the salt response may either be a generic response, or both species may respond to this stress in unique ways (Figure S4).
The common UV-B radiation response included 65 overrepresented GO terms and REVIGO indicated clusters summarised by ‘Vitamin, L-phenylalanine, chorismite, L-ascorbic acid, and aromatic amino acid metabolic process’ and ‘Response to stimulus’. Other representative terms include those associated with secondary metabolism and pigments in particular and photosynthesis and light harvesting. The representative GO terms of these clusters also had similar rates of upregulated and downregulated genes in both species except ‘Cellular amine metabolic process’, ‘Response to stimulus’, and ‘Secondary metabolic process’ (Figure S5).
Overall, the analysis suggests that both species commonly use generic processes, including changes in secondary metabolism, as an early response to stress.

2.6. Identification of Unique Biological Processes in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii Responses to Three Stresses

To achieve an overall picture of specific responses of each species, unique overrepresented terms for A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii biological processes in each stress response were selected for REVIGO analysis as described in the Materials and Methods section. Figure 8 shows the resulting six scatter plots representing the unique cold, salt and UV-B radiation response sets for A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii. The A. thaliana cold-response set is largely encompassed by that of P. cheesemanii (Figure 6), and in Figure 8a this is reflected by a few unique representative terms for A. thaliana: notably, ‘Jasmonic acid metabolic process’, ‘Negative regulation of ethylene-activated signalling pathway’, ‘Hyperosmotic salinity response’ and ‘Disaccharide and oligosaccharide metabolic process’. The unique P. cheesemanii response set is much larger and includes ‘Cell wall organisation or biogenesis’, ‘Positive regulation of cell communication’ and ‘L-phenylalanine, proline, cinnamic acid, oxylipin, and glycosinolate metabolic process’. In response to salt, both species activate a similar number of unique GO terms. Major unique A. thaliana clusters are ‘Regulation of response to biotic stimulus’, ‘Wax biosynthetic process’ and ‘Oxylipin, jasmonic acid metabolic process’, while the terms for P. cheesemanii include ‘Catabolic processes’, ‘Stomatal movement’, ‘Tetrapyrrole and proline catabolic process’ and ‘Ageing and leaf senescence’ (Figure 8b). Upon exposure to UV-B radiation, A. thaliana responds with ‘Photosynthesis’, ‘Response to red light’, ‘Indole glucosinolate metabolic process’, ‘Defence response by callose deposition in cell wall’, ‘Embryo development’ and several stress-related hormone metabolic processes, while unique P. cheesemanii responses are ‘Wound healing’, ‘Regeneration’, ‘Positive regulation of flavonoid biosynthetic process’, ‘Maltose metabolic process’ and ‘Anthocyanin-containing compound cinnamic acid, galactose, chlorophyll, and L-phenylalanine biosynthetic process’ (Figure 8c).

3. Discussion

Plants must respond to a wide range of abiotic and biotic environmental stresses and different plant species have developed unique strategies for dealing with these challenges [31,32,33,34]. P. cheesemanii is a close relative of A. thaliana, and its tetraploid genome may have contributed to its ability to survive in a wide range of habitats. The work presented here aimed to detect unique stress response pathways in P. cheesemanii. Both species showed similarity in the number of responsive genes upregulated and downregulated under different stresses, with the exception that UV-B radiation downregulated much fewer genes in P. cheesemanii (Table 1 and Figure 1), and in terms of overrepresented GO terms, A. thaliana induced more responses to this stress. In addition, P. cheesemanii displayed a broader response to cold stress compared to the other two stresses (Figure 3). These findings suggest that A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii induce some similar responses to each stress, but that there should also be unique stress-responsive processes in each species.

3.1. Classical Stress Responsive Processes Are Conserved in Both A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii

General plant stress-responses have been identified through analyses of plant stress transcriptomes and include the response to stimulus, regulation of response to stimulus, multi-organism process, biological regulation and signalling [10,35,36,37]. Unsurprisingly, these processes were found in both A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii responding to multiple stresses (Figure 7). For instance, three out of four overrepresented biological processes (multi-organism process, response to stimulus and response to endogenous stimulus) induced by salt stress in both A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii were induced by cold and UV-B stress as well. Only the regulation of the abscisic acid-activated signalling pathway was specific to salt stress in both plant species (Figure 7b).
Cold stress induced 13 common biological processes in both A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii. These included metabolic processes of trehalose, phenylpropanoid and oxylipin and rhythmic process, with the latter being highly specific to cold stress (Figure 4 and Figure 7a). The circadian rhythm is coordinated with environmental signals to maintain plant fitness and survival via various hormone pathways and contributes to regulation of seed germination, leaf growth, photosynthesis and flowering [38,39,40]. The circadian rhythm regulates abiotic stress responses in a wide range of plants, including Arabidopsis, soybean, barley and rice [41,42,43,44,45]. Key circadian clock regulators, CCA1, LHY, CHE, TIC and TOC1, regulate stress responses via crosstalk with salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and ethylene signalling pathways [46,47]. TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (TOC1) can be induced by ABA treatment and then contribute to ABA signalling induction [48]. Overexpressed TOC1 resulted in drought hypersensitivity due to reduced stomatal closure [48]. The circadian clock furthermore regulates the extent of induction of genes encoding C-repeat Binding Factor 1/Dehydration Responsive Element Binding 1 (CBF1/DREB1) family of transcription factors, which contribute to cold tolerance [49]. The putative MYB transcription factor, cold-induced MYB (CMYB1) was found to respond to circadian rhythm in rice leaves at different developmental stages [50]. Induction of secondary metabolism is another common cold response in plants, and genes involved in trehalose, oxylipin and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis were upregulated in P. cheesemanii and A. thaliana in this study. Notably, these metabolites interact with circadian rhythm and hormone pathways [51,52,53]. Moreover, flavonoids influence the expression of circadian clock genes as found by RNA-seq analysis of an Arabidopsis flavonoid biosynthesis mutant [54]. Elevated trehalose biosynthesis increased drought, salt, cold, and heat tolerance in tobacco, potato, Arabidopsis and rice [55,56,57]. In A. thaliana, trehalose also interacts with JA and SA signalling after heat stress via multiprotein bridging factor 1c (MBF1c), a protein involved in controlling thermotolerance [58]. In maize, JA-deficient mutants revealed that wound-induced oxylipin responses are positively regulated by JA signalling [52]. In addition, other secondary metabolites, phenylpropanoids, were induced by salinity, drought, temperature and UV radiation stress. The downstream phenolic compounds of phenylpropanoid metabolism in turn scavenged stress-causing free radicals like 1O2, O22−, OH, thereby protecting plant membranes from stress-induced peroxidation damage [59,60].
In both A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii, UV-B radiation impacted pathways involved in metabolism of L-ascorbic acid, L-phenylalanine, and chorismate from aromatic amino acid metabolic process (Figure 7c). Besides their structural role in proteins, phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan are precursors of a number of phytohormones such as auxin and SA as well as aromatic secondary metabolites in plants and micro-organisms [61]. Phenylalanine can be deaminated by phenylalanine ammonia-lyase to produce phenylpropanoid compounds like flavonoids, anthocyanins, flavonols, and flavones [62]. Flavonoids are important pigments that protect against UV-B-induced damage because of their antioxidant capacity and UV radiation absorption capacity [63]. In addition, genes involved in L-ascorbic acid (vitamin C) biosynthesis were impacted by UV-B radiation in both A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii (Figure 7c), and also in other plant species [64,65]. In cucumber seedlings, low-fluence UV-B radiation (20 μW cm−2) elevated L-ascorbic acid abundance and its biosynthesis genes (CsGLDH, CsMIOX1, CsAO2, CsAO4, CsAPX5, CsGR1, and CsDHAR1) and light-responsive elements were identified in their promoter regions [64]. Thus, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites appears a conserved strategy to cope with UV-B radiation.
In conclusion, a number of widely studied plant stress processes are highly conserved in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii as well (Figure 9). This suggests that these responses likely function in adapting generic processes such as growth and development in many plant species in order to minimise the impact of the stresses and provide time for plants to adapt to the stress and finish their lifecycle.

3.2. Unique Cold, Salt, and UV-B-Radiation Responses in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii

Plants cope with challenging temperatures by adopting different strategies, one of which is the accumulation of low molecular weight carbohydrates (LMWC) [66]. We found that cold stress induces genes involved in biosynthesis of LMWC metabolites (oligosaccharides) in A. thaliana uniquely (Figure 8a). Galactinol synthase (GolS) catalyses the first step of the biosynthesis of the raffinose family of oligosaccharides (RFO) and overexpression of GolS, increases endogenous galactinol and raffinose and improves drought tolerance in rice [67]. Its overexpression also increases the tolerance of transgenic plants to osmotic and salinity stresses, and increased levels of galactose and raffinose were found in a chilling-tolerant genotype of Oryza sativa after cold stress [68,69]. RFOs likely play a role in reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging under stress [70]. Oligosaccharides themselves can also trigger various stress-related signalling pathways [71,72,73]. Treatment with chitosan oligosaccharides elevates JA content in multiple plant species and the expression of JA-related genes in Brassica napus [74,75,76,77]. A study of jar1 (JA-deficient), NahG, and sid2 (SA-deficient) mutants in Arabidopsis suggested the involvement of both SA and JA signalling in chitosan oligosaccharide-induced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 [78]. This could be the reason for ‘Jasmonic acid metabolic process’ and ‘Negative regulation of ethylene activated signalling pathway’ in A. thaliana unique responses to cold stress in this study (Figure 8a). In contrast, the responses of P. cheesemanii to cold stress included many more overrepresented terms for GO biological processes relative to those in responses to salt and UV-B radiation (Figure 3), implying the complexity of P. cheesemanii cold responses. Under cold stress, the responses to multiple plant hormones, including salicylic acid, ethylene and gibberellin, as well as a couple of stress-related metabolites have indeed been found in P. cheesemanii cold response (Figure 5 and Figure 8a). Another noticeable process was glucosinolate metabolism and relevant processes (glycoside catabolic process and sulfate reduction). Glucosinolates are a class of glycosinolates whose sugar component is glucose and which are primarily found in Brassicaceae [79]. The accumulation of glucosinolates is induced by a variety of abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, temperature and nutritional deficiencies [80,81,82,83]. Arabidopsis TU8 mutants exhibited a deficiency in glucosinolate metabolism and displayed less tolerance to high temperatures, while exogenous application of glucosinolate derivatives strengthened the heat tolerance of A. thaliana plants [84,85]. However, there was little evidence to support a role for glycosinolate metabolism under low temperatures. In contrast, here, we identified glycosinolate metabolism as a unique cold response in P. cheesemanii (Figure 8a). It might be a stress-acclimating strategy similar to that of glucosinolate-induced heat tolerance, and this hypothesis would be interesting to follow up in further studies.
It has been reported that wax biosynthesis responds to salinity in a variety of plant species, which also has been found in this study [86,87,88]. Stress-induced wax biosynthesis has been linked to enhanced plant tolerance to abiotic stresses like low temperature and drought [89,90]. In this study, it could be associated with cuticle development in A. thaliana’s unique salt response, as waxes are main components of the plant cuticle [91]. The cuticle plays a role in protection against water loss and its biosynthesis is responsive to environmental stress [92]. Salt stress causes accumulation of alcohols, which are wax components, and this may stimulate sugar beet growth [93]. The A. thaliana shine gain-of-function mutant displayed increased and altered wax composition accompanied by increased cuticle permeability, reduced stomatal density and drought tolerance [94]. Similarly, the AP2 domain-containing putative transcription factor gene WXP1 of Medicago truncatula can increase wax production and confer drought tolerance in Medicago sativa [95]. Alteration of the cuticle is widely reported in response to salt and drought stress, but, interestingly, GO terms related to this process were not overrepresented in P. cheesemanii.
Overrepresented pigment and chlorophyll, as well as tetrapyrrole and proline catabolic processes GO terms, were unique in the P. cheesemanii salt response (Figure 8b). It was reported that foliar application of the tetrapyrrole precursor 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) onto salt-stressed Brassica napus seedlings increased chlorophyll and proline abundance and improved tolerance to salt [96]. The concentration of the tetrapyrrole chlorophyll was reduced under salt stress, resulting from a declined leaf water potential that limited the photosynthetic rate and disrupted the biosynthesis of chlorophyll [96]. Elevated proline abundance is a salt-induced phenomenon in many plant species, including pepper, maize, melon, and sorghum, and it alleviates the effect of salinity stress in a number of ways, including inhibition of the stomatal opening [97,98,99,100,101]. Notably, the GO term ‘Stomatal movement’ was overrepresented in P. cheesemanii in response to salt stress (Figure 8b). Two major responses to salt and the related drought stress are alteration of the cuticle and biosynthesis of proline. Curiously, the former appears to be working only in A. thaliana and the latter only in P. cheesemanii. This suggests an important evolutionary deviation between these related species and it will be interesting to discover the functional and evolutionary basis of this difference.
A unique UV-B radiation response in A. thaliana was the enrichment of GO terms related to protecting actions like callose-related cell wall defence (´Polysaccharide localisation´) (Figure 8c). This may also contribute to plants’ acquired resistance to biotic stresses following UV-B radiation [102]. In A. thaliana, exposure to sub-lethal UV-C radiation increased the production of callose [103], and UV-B radiation induced callose ring formation and cell wall thickening of the upper part of the trichome [104]. Interestingly, GO terms related to glucosinolate metabolism were also uniquely impacted by UV-B radiation in A. thaliana (Figure 8c). Glucosinolate-dependent callose deposition is part of the Arabidopsis innate immune response against microbial pathogens [105]. Derivates derived from glucosinolate hydrolysis were suggested to function as insect feeding and oviposition deterrents in insect resistance; they also contribute to microbe-associated molecular pattern-mediated defence as signalling molecules [106,107]. While callose-related cell wall defence is correlated with pathogen tolerance, callose deposition was also observed in response to abiotic stress, with unknown physiological and molecular mechanisms [108]. Therefore, our observations support the existence of cross-tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in plants [109]. After UV-B radiation treatment of P. cheesemanii, the enrichment network analysis identified a unique cluster related to anthocyanin biosynthesis and included the regulation of L-phenylalanine (biosynthetic precursor of anthocyanin) and anthocyanin metabolism (Figure 8c). This observation further implied an important role for anthocyanins in P. cheesemanii stress responses (Figure 5). Anthocyanins are a widely distributed group of water-soluble flavonoid pigments, and their biosynthesis involves more steps than those of flavone and flavonol biosynthesis [110]. Coupled with steroid metabolism, anthocyanin accumulation was associated with reduced membrane damage in other plant species and this could help stabilise membrane systems and minimise the ROS damage caused by UV-B radiation [111] in P. cheesemanii (Figure 7c and Figure 8c). In conclusion, the unique UV-B radiation response in A. thaliana suggests that changes at the cell, organ and whole plant level help adapt the plant to UV-B radiation, while in P. cheesemanii anthocyanin production may be a main strategy for coping with this stress.
While A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii share common stress responses, they also display considerable differences, even though they are evolutionarily relatively closely related (Figure 9). The natural habitat of the two species is quite different [7] and our results suggest that plants evolve unique stress response pathways quickly. A better understanding of the shared and unique stress-responsive pathways of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii could help to model common stress responses in all plant species but also provides insight into the range of potential responses that help mitigate environmental stress.

3.3. Prominent Brassicaceae Pathways May Contribute to a Variety of Stress Responses

In a comprehensive transcriptomic comparison of responses to cold, salt, heat and drought stress between the distantly related plants Arabidopsis and rice, there was an overlap in the abiotic stress transcriptome of the two species [112]. However, both had significant differences in responding to stresses. Only ~14% of differentially expressed genes in rice had Arabidopsis orthologues with a similar response under drought and salt stresses; the two species shared less than 25% of the orthologues that have common responses in the heat and cold-responsive sets, although more than 60% of the responsive genes in two sets had orthologues in Arabidopsis and rice. In addition, a number of orthologous genes were responding to stresses in an opposite manner. Besides, there was a large proportion of stress-responsive non-orthologous genes in rice and Arabidopsis. The downregulated orthologous under drought stress represented ~10% of downregulated genes in rice and 44% in Arabidopsis. In terms of functional representation, Arabidopsis and rice have similar over/under-representation patterns in three functional categories, while there were significant differences between the two species in drought, salt, cold and heat stress responses [112]. In contrast, the transcriptomes of the closely related Brassicaceae A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii overlapped largely in three stress response sets. For example, 127 out of 166 overrepresented GO terms in A. thaliana overlapped with 354 P. cheesemanii overrepresented GO terms in responding to cold stress (Figure 6). Additionally, the two species shared characteristics with other species from the Brassicaceae family. Plant species in this family contain high phenolic and glucosinolate levels, which may play a role in detoxifying excess ROS resulting from biotic and abiotic stresses [113,114,115]. In Brassicas, biotic or abiotic stresses increased the production of amino acids, sugars, indoles, phenolics and glucosinolates [81,115,116,117,118] and activated JA, SA, and ABA signalling pathways, resulting in the initiation of the plant defence responses [119,120,121]. In this study, amino acid and phenolics-related metabolism processes were overrepresented in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii cold responses, and sugar, indole and glucosinolate-related metabolism processes were overrepresented in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii, responding to different stresses (Figure 8a,c). Moreover, hormone and defence-related processes were found to be overrepresented in both species and in response to three abiotic stresses. (Figure 4 and Figure 5). These results are consistent with the idea that over evolutionary time, some stress-related metabolites and stress-response mechanisms that are prominent in Brassicaceae have been repurposed in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii to respond to different stresses. In addition, the two species have evolved their unique responses to the same stress as described above. A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii are relatively closely related but the ecological niches they occupy are quite distinct [7] and this may be the reason for the divergence in their response to stresses. In response to cold, P. cheesemanii may employ more primary and secondary metabolites (L-phenylalanine, pro-line, cinnamic acid, oxylipin and glycosinolate) to limit cold-induced damage or activate stress signalling pathways. Such multiple strategies could help this species survive in an Alpine area with rapidly changing temperatures. Similarly, P. cheesemanii may have evolved a more well-developed strategy to cope with the relatively high levels of UV-B radiation in its living niches (Figure 9).
The two subgenomes of P. cheesemanii are likely another driving force behind the observed divergence in stress responses. The historic genome duplication could have provided the genetic basis for the development of new gene functions [122,123] and may have contributed to the redirection and diversification of the stress response pathways already present. In this study, few analyses were performed on the relationship between the polyploidy of P. cheesemanii and its stress responses, due to the difficulty of correctly assembling homologous transcripts. Further study on this aspect would help us to delve into the interaction of plant polyploidization and adaptation.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Growth and Stress Treatments

Seeds of P. cheesemanii Kingston (geographical coordinates in decimal degrees −45.3273, 168.7078) was provided by Dr. Claudia Voelckel (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany) and Dr. Peter Heenan (Wildland Consultants Ltd., Rotorua, New Zealand). Seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana Heynh. accession Col-0 was obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC; https://abrc.osu.edu). Seeds of both species were sown and germinated in wet Seed Raising Mix® soil from Daltons (Matamata, New Zealand) and seedlings were grown under a 16 h light (200 μmol m−2s−1 cool white fluorescent tube)/8 h dark (long-day) regime at 22 °C. For multiple stress transcriptome profiling, seedlings were grown under a 10 h light (200 μmol m−2s−1 cool white fluorescent lamp)/14 h dark (short-day) regime at 22 °C for six weeks (A. thaliana) or nine weeks (P. cheesemanii) (Figure S6). A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii plants with different ages were used due to the distinct growth characteristics of the two species. Six-week-old A. thaliana and nine-week-old P. cheesemanii plants appeared similar [7] and were used for the experiments. For cold stress, plants were transferred to a 4 °C growth chamber with otherwise the same light settings. For salt stress, pots containing the plants were saturated with a 250 mM NaCl solution and excess solution was allowed to drain. The plants were transferred to the UV-B radiation chamber where they were subjected to normal white light (200 μmol m−2s−1 cool white fluorescent tube) supplemented with 5.2 μmol m−2s−1 UV-B (290–320 nm) for UV-B treatments, while the control plants were kept under white light conditions [7]. The UV-B fluorescent tubes used in the chamber were Q-Panel 313 (Q-Lab Corp, Cleveland, OH, USA), which were wrapped in 0.13 mm-thick cellulose diacetate foil (Clarifoil; Courtaulds Ltd., Derby, UK) to remove wavelengths < 290 nm. The chamber was split into a UV-B+ zone and a UV-B− zone separated by a central curtain of UV-B opaque film (Lumivar; BPI Visqueen, Ardeer, UK). For the UV-B− zone, the UV-B tubes were wrapped in the same UV-B opaque film [124]. UV-B treatments were quantified at plant canopy height with an Optronics OL-756 UV-VIS Spectroradiometer (Optronic Laboratories, Gooch and Housego, FL, USA) equipped with an integrating sphere. Spectroradiometric scans of the controlled environment chamber confirmed that the biologically effective UV dose was < 0.01 kJ m−2d−1 in the UV-B− zone (Figure S6). Plants were treated one hour after the lights turned on (simulating dawn); then, five hours later (6 h after dawn), the two largest, fully expanded mature leaves of treated and nontreated plants were collected.

4.2. Library Preparation and Illumina Transcriptome Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from mature leaves using a Quick-RNA MiniPrep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and treated with DNase I to remove genomic DNA contamination (Supplementary File S3). Purified untreated and treated plant RNA was used to generate 150 bp paired-end sequencing libraries, including 12 A. thaliana and 12 P. cheesemanii samples (three biological replicates for untreated plants and each stress treatment in each plant species). Following library quality control, the libraries were sequenced on Illumina HiSeq X Ten (San Diego, CA, USA), with 2 × 150-PE reads generating a total of ~278.2 Gb raw sequencing data. PE library construction and Illumina sequencing were performed by Novogene Limited (Beijing, China).

4.3. Pachycladon Transcriptome Assembly

Sequencing adaptors were removed from sequenced reads using trim_galore v0.4.1 [125] and ribosomal RNA was filtered out by using SortMeRNA v2.1b [126]. The quality filtered reads were normalised in silico using Trinity v2.5.1 [127]. Since a genome draft was assembled in our previous study, the reference genome-guided transcriptome assembly was applied [7]. However, the results from Bowtie2 and BUSCO showed that the quality of the assembled transcriptome was not optimal, as shown by a low-percentage Bowtie and BUSCO alignment. Therefore, de novo transcriptome assembly was performed using three programs with the results compared to generate a high-quality transcriptome. Trinity, Velvet/Oases and Trans-ABySS have been suggested as providing better performance for de novo transcriptome assemblies [128]. The normalised read sets were then independently assembled using Trinity v2.5.1 [127], Velvet v1.1/Oases v0.2 [129,130], and Trans-ABySS v2.0.1 [131] assemblers using a range of k-mer sizes (Table S2). For each assembler, a popular range of k-mer sizes was selected (Trinity: 19–31-mer; Trans-ABySS: 51–63-mer; Velvet/Oases: 55–95-mer). BUSCO analysis was used to confirm whether the best assembly was achieved in the selected range. BUSCO (v3.0.2; dataset: ‘embryophypta_odb9’, containing 1440 orthogroups, downloaded from http://busco.ezlab.org, access on 1 March 2019) [132] and the percentage of reads aligned using Bowtie2 were used as assembly quality metrics to select the Trans-ABySS assembly based on its superior completeness and accuracy. The resulting 19 assemblies were evaluated using the Bowtie alignment rate and near-universal orthologue searching (Table S2). Seven assemblies produced by Trans-ABySS generated higher read alignment rates (~91.08%) than those from the other two assemblers (~87.23% from Velvet/Oases and ~88.91% from Trinity). The BUSCO results generally showed high percentages of complete BUSCO across all assemblies (Table S2), with the exception of the 19-mer assembly from Trinity, which had higher percentages of fragmented and missing BUSCOs.
As the assemblies from the Trans-ABySS assembler outperformed those of Velvet/Oases and Trinity, based on a Bowtie evaluation, they were selected for further processing. Next, Trans-ABySS assemblies across different k-mer sizes were combined to generate the final transcript set (318,111 transcripts), which was further clustered and assembled using the CAP3 [133] assembly program. This program removed technical redundancy with 99% overlap in percentage identity and 200 bp overlap in length, resulting in 223,341 transcripts (Table S3). Finally, EvidentialGene: tr2aacds [134] was applied to remove redundancies and fragments and to identify transcript splice isoforms.

4.4. Functional Annotation of The Pachycladon Transcriptome

Homology-based annotation was performed using BLASTP v2.6.0 [135] against the Uniprot A. thaliana dataset (Swissprot + TrEMBL) using the parameters best hit, E-value cut-off of 1 × 10−20, query coverage of ≥50% and percentage identity ≥50%. GO annotations were obtained from the Uniprot database. To annotate the final transcript set, the sequences were searched against the A. thaliana UniProt database using BLASTX with an E-value cut-off of 1 × 10−5. Of the 45,911 genes, 39,949 had homologies in the UniProt database with >50% identity. These genes were mapped to 29,060 Arabidopsis proteins with 5294 GO annotations. The overrepresented GO terms for biological processes were ‘Carbohydrate metabolic process’ (735 members), ‘Cell redox homeostasis’ (352 members), ‘Cell wall organisation’ (365 members), ‘Defence response’ (430 members), ‘DNA integration’ (493 members), ‘Intracellular protein transport’ (487 members), ‘Protein transport’ (472 members), ‘Regulation of transcription, DNA-templated’ (1418 members), ‘Signal transduction’ (415 members) and ‘Translation’ (960 members) (Supplementary File S2). There were 78% transcripts which could be annotated against the A. thaliana protein database, as expected, suggesting that the assembled transcriptome was suitable for downstream analysis.

4.5. Analysis of Differential Gene Expression

To analyse differential gene expression induced by stress, the 147.1 Gb raw data with 490,400,436 raw reads from the A. thaliana stress response sequencing libraries was processed using trim_galore [125] to remove adaptor contamination. SortMeRNA [126] was then used to remove ribosomal RNA sequences from the adaptor-trimmed reads. Then, A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii reads from untreated and treated samples were mapped to the A. thaliana transcriptome reference (GenBank CP002684–CP002688) and the de novo assembled P. cheesemanii transcriptome using kallisto v0.43.1 [136], respectively. The A. thaliana reference used to quantify transcripts was downloaded from www.araport.org (v10). The parameters of kallisto/edgeR analysis were: counts per million (cpm) > 1 (removing low count), false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and log of fold change (FC) ≥ 1. Differential gene expression was then performed using edgeR v3.26.1 [137] with default parameters.

4.6. Identification of Shared and Unique Biological Processes of Species’ Stress Responses

A number of biological processes were identified as being shared or not shared between A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii responding to each stress. To obtain an overall structure of responses common to the species for each stress, the overrepresented terms in common between the A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii biological process in each stress response, with a 0.05 adjusted p-value (adjusted by Benjamini and Hochberg correction), were selected as significantly overrepresented terms. This resulted in three sets: a common cold response set; a common salt response set; and a common UV-B radiation response set. Because of the well-annotated A. thaliana transcriptome, A. thaliana genes from these three sets were used to generate three gene subsets for further GO ontology and clustering analysis. Each subset was scrutinised to identify clusters of overrepresented terms for GO biological processes and then the identified clusters were annotated functionally.
To achieve an overall picture of each species’ unique response to each stress, unique overrepresented terms for A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii biological processes in each stress response (with a 0.05 adjusted p-value) were selected as significantly overrepresented terms. This resulted in six sets: one unique cold, salt and UV-B radiation response set for both A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii. All genes were extracted from these six sets to generate six gene subsets. Each subset was scrutinised to identify clusters of overrepresented terms for GO biological processes and then the identified clusters were annotated functionally.

4.7. Combining Weighted Correlation Network Analysis and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis

Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA)-based gene modules were used as gene sets for gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Twelve datasets from the three stress responses (three biological replicates) in A. thaliana were utilised for WGCNA. The stress-responsive genes could be moulded into 11 groups; up- and downregulated genes were identified in each. GSEA v4.0.3 [138] was performed on 11 WGCNA modules in each stress and the network was then generated and visualised using EnrichmentMap and the compound spring embedder (CoSE) layout in Cytoscape v3.8.0 [139]. For the interaction network analysis of stress responses in P. cheesemanii, GSEA was applied to the datasets. The resulting network was also generated and visualised using EnrichmentMap and the CoSE layout in Cytoscape.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241411323/s1.

Author Contributions

P.P.D., J.P. and R.C.M. conceived the idea. P.P.D., J.P., R.C.M., T.S.G., Y.D. and B.M.-R. designed the study. Y.D. performed the experiments with Pachycladon and A. thaliana accessions. Y.D. and S.G. performed the computational analysis of the RNA-seq data. J.J.W. designed the UV-B radiation experiments. P.P.D., R.C.M., B.M.-R. and T.S.G. supervised the research. Y.D., S.G., B.M.-R. and P.P.D. wrote the manuscript, which was corrected and approved by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 642901 (CropStrengthen), project PlantaSYST (SGA-CSA No. 739582 under FPA No. 664620), and the European Regional Development Fund through the Bulgarian “Science and Education for Smart Growth” Operational Programme (project BG05M2OP001-1.003-001-C01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: the NCBI Sequencing Read Archive (SRA), BioProject ID PRJNA956584.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Claudia Voelckel (MPI for Chemical Eology, Jena, Germany) and Peter Heenan (Wildland Consultants Ltd., Rotorua, New Zealand) for providing P. cheesemanii seeds. The authors would also like to acknowledge the help from the Massey Genome Service.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Alam, M.M.; Roychowdhury, R.; Fujita, M. Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Mechanisms of Heat Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 9643–9684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hasegawa, P.M.; Bressan, R.A.; Zhu, J.-K.; Bohnert, H.J. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 51, 463–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Misra, A.N.; Biswal, A.K.; Misra, M. Physiological, biochemical and molecular aspects of water stress responses in plants, and the bio-technological applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B 2002, 72, 115–134. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shanker, A.; Venkateswarlu, B. Abiotic Stress in Plants: Mechanisms and Adaptations; BoD–Books on Demand; IntechOpen: Norderstedt, Germany, 2011; p. 22. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Fujit, M. Extreme Temperature Responses, Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense in Plants. In Abiotic Stress—Plant Responses and Applications in Agriculture; InTechOpen: London, UK, 2013; pp. 169–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, X.; Li, W.; Li, M.; Welti, R. Profiling lipid changes in plant response to low temperatures. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 126, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dong, Y.; Gupta, S.; Sievers, R.; Wargent, J.J.; Wheeler, D.; Putterill, J.; Macknight, R.; Gechev, T.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Dijkwel, P.P. Genome draft of the Arabidopsis relative Pachycladon cheesemanii reveals novel strategies to tolerate New Zealand’s high ultraviolet B radiation environment. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rabbani, M.A.; Maruyama, K.; Abe, H.; Khan, M.A.; Katsura, K.; Ito, Y.; Yoshiwara, K.; Seki, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Monitoring Expression Profiles of Rice Genes under Cold, Drought, and High-Salinity Stresses and Abscisic Acid Application Using cDNA Microarray and RNA Gel-Blot Analyses. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 1755–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Rensink, W.A.; Iobst, S.; Hart, A.; Stegalkina, S.; Liu, J.; Buell, C.R. Gene expression profiling of potato responses to cold, heat, and salt stress. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2005, 5, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cohen, S.P.; Leach, J.E. Abiotic and biotic stresses induce a core transcriptome response in rice. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sharma, R.; Singh, G.; Bhattacharya, S.; Singh, A. Comparative transcriptome meta-analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana under drought and cold stress. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, J.K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 247–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Pan, Y.; Wu, L.J.; Yu, Z.L. Effect of salt and drought stress on antioxidant enzymes activities and SOD isoenzymes of liquorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch). Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 49, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, C.X.; Li, M.Q.; Gao, X.X.; Liu, L.N.; Wu, X.F.; Zhou, J.H. Metabolic response of maize plants to multi-factorial abiotic stresses. Plant Biol. 2016, 18 (Suppl. S1), 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ni, L.; Wang, Z.; Guo, J.; Pei, X.; Liu, L.; Li, H.; Yuan, H.; Gu, C. Full-Length Transcriptome Sequencing and Comparative Transcriptome Analysis to Evaluate Drought and Salt Stress in Iris lactea var. chinensis. Genes 2021, 12, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xu, Y.; Magwanga, R.O.; Jin, D.; Cai, X.; Hou, Y.; Juyun, Z.; Zhou, Z. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals evolutionary divergence and shared network of cold and salt stress response in diploid D-genome cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dai, Q.; Yan, B.; Huang, S.; Liu, X.; Peng, S.; Miranda, M.L.L.; Chavez, A.Q.; Vergara, B.S.; Olszyk, D.M. Response of oxidative stress defense systems in rice (Oryza sativa) leaves with supplemental UV-B radiation. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 101, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, B.C.; Tennessen, D.J.; Last, R.L. UV-B-induced photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 15, 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raghuvanshi, R.; Sharma, R.K. Response of two cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (French beans) plants exposed to enhanced UV-B radiation under mountain ecosystem. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vyšniauskienė, R.; Rančelienė, V. Effect of UV-B radiation on growth and antioxidative enzymes activity in Lithuanian potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars. Zemdirb.-Agric. 2014, 101, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Casati, P.; Walbot, V. Rapid transcriptome responses of maize (Zea mays) to UV-B in irradiated and shielded tissues. Genome Biol. 2004, 5, R16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Gil, M.; Pontin, M.; Berli, F.; Bottini, R.; Piccoli, P. Metabolism of terpenes in the response of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) leaf tissues to UV-B radiation. Phytochemistry 2012, 77, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, H.; Li, J.; Tao, W.; Zhang, X.; Gao, X.; Yong, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Duan, J. Lycium ruthenicum studies: Molecular biology, Phytochemistry and pharmacology. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kilian, J.; Whitehead, D.; Horak, J.; Wanke, D.; Weinl, S.; Batistic, O.; D’Angelo, C.; Bornberg-Bauer, E.; Kudla, J.; Harter, K. The AtGenExpress global stress expression data set: Protocols, evaluation and model data analysis of UV-B light, drought and cold stress responses. Plant J. 2007, 50, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Heenan, P.; Mitchell, A. Phylogeny, biogeography and adaptive radiation of Pachycladon (Brassicaceae) in the mountains of South Island, New Zealand. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30, 1737–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Burghelea, C.; Zaharescu, D.; Dontsova, K.; Maier, R.; Huxman, T.; Chorover, J. Mineral nutrient mobilization by plants from rock: Influence of rock type and arbuscular mycorrhiza. Biogeochemistry 2015, 124, 187–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hoffmann, M.H. Biogeography of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) heynh. (Brassicaceae). J. Biogeogr. 2002, 29, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Joly, S.; Heenan, P.B.; Lockhart, P.J. A Pleistocene inter-tribal allopolyploidization event precedes the species radiation of Pachycladon (Brassicaceae) in New Zealand. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 51, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, J.; Witten, D.M.; Johnstone, I.M.; Tibshirani, R. Normalization, testing, and false discovery rate estimation for RNA-sequencing data. Biostatistics 2012, 13, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Supek, F.; Bošnjak, M.; Škunca, N.; Šmuc, T. REVIGO Summarizes and Visualizes Long Lists of Gene Ontology Terms. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Abla, M.; Sun, H.; Li, Z.; Wei, C.; Gao, F.; Zhou, Y.; Feng, J. Identification of miRNAs and Their Response to Cold Stress in Astragalus Membranaceus. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Agurla, S.; Gahir, S.; Munemasa, S.; Murata, Y.; Raghavendra, A.S. Mechanism of stomatal closure in plants exposed to drought and cold stress. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1081, 215–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fei, J.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, H.; Su, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Zheng, L. Cloning and characterization of KoOsmotin from mangrove plant Kandelia obovata under cold stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zeng, Z.; Zhang, W.; Marand, A.P.; Zhu, B.; Buell, C.R.; Jiang, J. Cold stress induces enhanced chromatin accessibility and bivalent histone modifications H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 of active genes in potato. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Jiang, C.; Li, X.; Zou, J.; Ren, J.; Jin, C.; Zhang, H.; Yu, H.; Jin, H. Comparative transcriptome analysis of genes involved in the drought stress response of two peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kashyap, S.P.; Prasanna, H.C.; Kumari, N.; Mishra, P.; Singh, B. Understanding salt tolerance mechanism using transcriptome profiling and de novo assembly of wild tomato Solanum chilense. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, X.; Li, M.; Zhou, B.; Yang, Y.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, J. Transcriptome analysis provides insights into the stress response crosstalk in apple (Malus × domestica) subjected to drought, cold and high salinity. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Inoue, K.; Araki, T.; Endo, M. Circadian clock during plant development. J. Plant Res. 2018, 131, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Singh, M.; Mas, P. A Functional Connection between the Circadian Clock and Hormonal Timing in Arabidopsis. Genes 2018, 9, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Xu, X.; Yuan, L.; Yang, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Xie, Q. Circadian clock in plants: Linking timing to fitness. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 792–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Andreeva, A.A.; Kudryakova, N.V.; Kuznetsov, V.V.; Kusnetsov, V.V. Ontogenetic, Light, and Circadian Regulation of PAP Protein Genes during Seed Germination of Arabidopsis thaliana. Dokl. Biochem. Biophys. 2021, 500, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Blair, E.J.; Bonnot, T.; Hummel, M.; Hay, E.; Marzolino, J.M.; Quijada, I.A.; Nagel, D.H. Contribution of time of day and the circadian clock to the heat stress responsive transcriptome in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Cao, L. The Molecular Interactions of Soybean Circadian Clock with Abiotic Stresses and Soybean Cyst Nematode (Heterodera glycines). Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chang, T.; Zhao, Y.; He, H.; Xi, Q.; Fu, J.; Zhao, Y. Exogenous melatonin improves growth in hulless barley seedlings under cold stress by influencing the expression rhythms of circadian clock genes. PeerJ 2021, 9, e10740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Fan, F.; Peng, J.; Zhang, J. Coordination of light, circadian clock with temperature: The potential mechanisms regulating chilling tolerance in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 737–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cortleven, A.; Roeber, V.M.; Frank, M.; Bertels, J.; Lortzing, V.; Beemster, G.T.S.; Schmülling, T. Photoperiod Stress in Arabidopsis thaliana Induces a Transcriptional Response Resembling That of Pathogen Infection. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 838284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Srivastava, D.; Shamim, M.; Kumar, M.; Mishra, A.; Maurya, R.; Sharma, D.; Pandey, P.; Singh, K.N. Role of circadian rhythm in plant system: An update from development to stress response. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 162, 256–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Legnaioli, T.; Cuevas, J.; Mas, P. TOC1 functions as a molecular switch connecting the circadian clock with plant responses to drought. EMBO Rep. 2009, 28, 3745–3757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Fowler, S.; Thomashow, M.F. Arabidopsis Transcriptome Profiling Indicates That Multiple Regulatory Pathways Are Activated during Cold Acclimation in Addition to the CBF Cold Response Pathway. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 1675–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Duan, M.; Huang, P.; Yuan, X.; Chen, H.; Huang, J.; Zhang, H. CMYB1 Encoding a MYB Transcriptional Activator Is Involved in Abiotic Stress and Circadian Rhythm in Rice. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 178038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gao, Y.; Yang, X.; Yang, X.; Zhao, T.; An, X.; Chen, Z. Characterization and expression pattern of the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase and trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase gene families in Populus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 187, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. He, Y.; Borrego, E.J.; Gorman, Z.; Huang, P.-C.; Kolomiets, M.V. Relative contribution of LOX10, green leaf volatiles and JA to wound-induced local and systemic oxylipin and hormone signature in Zea mays (maize). Phytochemistry 2020, 174, 112334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tyagi, K.; Maoz, I.; Kochanek, B.; Sela, N.; Lerno, L.; Ebeler, S.E.; Lichter, A. Cytokinin but not gibberellin application had major impact on the phenylpropanoid pathway in grape. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hildreth, S.B.; Littleton, E.S.; Clark, L.C.; Puller, G.C.; Kojima, S.; Winkel, B.S. Crosstalk between flavonoids and the plant circadian clock. BioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Romero, C.; Bellés, J.M.; Vayá, J.L.; Serrano, R.; Culiáñez-Macià, F.A. Expression of the yeast trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene in transgenic tobacco plants: Pleiotropic phenotypes include drought tolerance. Planta 1997, 201, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lin, Q.; Yang, J.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, H.; Chen, Z.; Dao, Y.; Wang, K. Overexpression of the trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase family gene AtTPPF improves the drought tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Jang, I.-C.; Oh, S.-J.; Seo, J.-S.; Choi, W.-B.; Song, S.I.; Kim, C.H.; Kim, Y.S.; Seo, H.-S.; Choi, Y.D.; Nahm, B.H.; et al. Expression of a Bifunctional Fusion of the Escherichia coli Genes for Trehalose-6-Phosphate Synthase and Trehalose-6-Phosphate Phosphatase in Transgenic Rice Plants Increases Trehalose Accumulation and Abiotic Stress Tolerance without Stunting Growth. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 516–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Wang, X.; Du, Y.; Yu, D. Trehalose phosphate synthase 5-dependent trehalose metabolism modulates basal defense responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2019, 61, 509–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ahanger, M.A.; Tomar, N.S.; Tittal, M.; Argal, S.; Agarwal, R.M. Plant growth under water/salt stress: ROS production; antioxidants and significance of added potassium under such conditions. Physiol. Mol. Biol 2017, 23, 731–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Harinasut, P.; Poonsopa, D.; Roengmongkol, K.; Charoensataporn, R. Salinity effects on antioxidant enzymes in mulberry cultivar. ScienceAsia 2003, 29, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Parthasarathy, A.; Cross, P.J.; Dobson, R.C.J.; Adams, L.E.; Savka, M.A.; Hudson, A.O. A Three-Ring Circus: Metabolism of the Three Proteogenic Aromatic Amino Acids and Their Role in the Health of Plants and Animals. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2018, 5, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kong, J.-Q. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, a key component used for phenylpropanoids production by metabolic engineering. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 62587–62603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Singh, M.; Bashri, G.; Prasad, S.M.; Singh, V.P. Kinetin Alleviates UV-B-Induced Damage in Solanum lycopersicum: Implications of Phenolics and Antioxidants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 831–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, P.; Li, Q.; Gao, Y.; Wang, H.; Chai, L.; Yu, H.; Jiang, W. A New Perspective on the Effect of UV-B on l -Ascorbic Acid Metabolism in Cucumber Seedlings. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 4444–4452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Xu, Y.; Fu, X.; Lu, M.; Wei, B. A transcriptomic perspective on the effect of UV irradiation on vitamin C content in pea sprouts. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 42, e09022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Megías-Pérez, R.; Hahn, C.; Ruiz-Matute, A.I.; Behrends, B.; Albach, D.C.; Kuhnert, N. Changes in low molecular weight carbohydrates in kale during development and acclimation to cold temperatures determined by chromatographic techniques coupled to mass spectrometry. Food Res. Int. 2020, 127, 108727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Selvaraj, M.G.; Ishizaki, T.; Valencia, M.; Ogawa, S.; Dedicova, B.; Ogata, T.; Yoshiwara, K.; Maruyama, K.; Kusano, M.; Saito, K.; et al. Overexpression of an Arabidopsis thaliana galactinol synthase gene improves drought tolerance in transgenic rice and increased grain yield in the field. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1465–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Morsy, M.R.; Jouve, L.; Hausman, J.-F.; Hoffmann, L.; Stewart, J. McD. Alteration of oxidative and carbohydrate metabolism under abiotic stress in two rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes contrasting in chilling tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 164, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sun, Z.; Qi, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, P.; Wu, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y. Overexpression of TsGOLS2, a galactinol synthase, in Arabidopsis thaliana enhances tolerance to high salinity and osmotic stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 69, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Van den Ende, W.; Peshev, D. Sugars as antioxidants in plants. In Crop Improvement under Adverse Conditions; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 285–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bolouri-Moghaddam, M.R.; Le Roy, K.; Xiang, L.; Rolland, F.; Van den Ende, W. Sugar signalling and antioxidant network connections in plant cells: Sugar signalling and antioxidant networks in plants. FEBS J. 2010, 277, 2022–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shen, X.; Wang, Z.; Song, X.; Xu, J.; Jiang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, C.; Zhang, H. Transcriptomic profiling revealed an important role of cell wall remodelling and ethylene signalling pathway during salt acclimation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 86, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Van den Ende, W.; El-Esawe, S.K. Sucrose signaling pathways leading to fructan and anthocyanin accumulation: A dual function in abiotic and biotic stress responses? Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 108, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Doares, S.H.; Syrovets, T.; Weiler, E.W.; Ryan, C.A. Oligogalacturonides and chitosan activate plant defensive genes through the octadecanoid pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 4095–4098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jia, X.; Zeng, H.; Bose, S.K.; Wang, W.; Yin, H. Chitosan oligosaccharide induces resistance to Pst DC3000 in Arabidopsis via a non-canonical N-glycosylation regulation pattern. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 250, 116939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Linden, J.C.; Phisalaphong, M. Oligosaccharides potentiate methyl jasmonate-induced production of paclitaxel in Taxus canadensis. Plant Sci. 2000, 158, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Yin, H.; Li, S.; Zhao, X.; Du, Y.; Ma, X. CDNA microarray analysis of gene expression in Brassica napus treated with oligochitosan elicitor. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2006, 44, 910–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Jia, X.; Zeng, H.; Wang, W.; Zhang, F.; Yin, H. Chitosan Oligosaccharide Induces Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato DC3000 in Arabidopsis thaliana by Activating Both Salicylic Acid– and Jasmonic Acid–Mediated Pathways. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2018, 31, 1271–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Wennberg, M.; Ekvall, J.; Olsson, K.; Nyman, M. Changes in carbohydrate and glucosinolate composition in white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. Capitata) during blanching and treatment with acetic acid. Food Chem. 2006, 95, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cocetta, G.; Mishra, S.; Raffaelli, A.; Ferrante, A. Effect of heat root stress and high salinity on glucosinolates metabolism in wild rocket. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 231, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ljubej, V.; Radojcic Redovnikovic, I.; Salopek-Sondi, B.; Smolko, A.; Roje, S.; Samec, D. Chilling and Freezing Temperature Stress Differently Influence Glucosinolates Content in Brassica oleracea var. acephala. Plants 2021, 10, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Salehin, M.; Li, B.; Tang, M.; Katz, E.; Song, L.; Ecker, J.R.; Kliebenstein, D.J.; Estelle, M. Auxin-sensitive Aux/IAA proteins mediate drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by regulating glucosinolate levels. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Troufflard, S.; Mullen, W.; Larson, T.R.; Graham, I.A.; Crozier, A.; Amtmann, A.; Armengaud, P. Potassium deficiency induces the biosynthesis of oxylipins and glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Hara, M.; Harazaki, A.; Tabata, K. Administration of isothiocyanates enhances heat tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 69, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Ludwig-Müller, J.; Krishna, P.; Forreiter, C. A Glucosinolate Mutant of Arabidopsis Is Thermosensitive and Defective in Cytosolic Hsp90 Expression after Heat Stress. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 949–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. More, P.; Agarwal, P.; Joshi, P.S.; Agarwal, P.K. The JcWRKY tobacco transgenics showed improved photosynthetic efficiency and wax accumulation during salinity. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Shepherd, T.; Wynne Griffiths, D. The effects of stress on plant cuticular waxes. New Phytol. 2006, 171, 469–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zhou, M.; Li, D.; Li, Z.; Hu, Q.; Yang, C.; Zhu, L.; Luo, H. Constitutive Expression of a miR319 Gene Alters Plant Development and Enhances Salt and Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Creeping Bentgrass. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 1375–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Djemal, R.; Khoudi, H. TdSHN1, a WIN1/SHN1-type transcription factor, imparts multiple abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 131, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhu, X.; Xiong, L. Putative megaenzyme DWA1 plays essential roles in drought resistance by regulating stress-induced wax deposition in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 17790–17795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kunst, L.; Samuels, L. Plant cuticles shine: Advances in wax biosynthesis and export. Curr. Opin. Plant 2009, 12, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bi, H.; Kovalchuk, N.; Langridge, P.; Tricker, P.J.; Lopato, S.; Borisjuk, N. The impact of drought on wheat leaf cuticle properties. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Geng, G.; Li, R.; Stevanato, P.; Lv, C.; Lu, Z.; Yu, L.; Wang, Y. Physiological and Transcriptome Analysis of Sugar Beet Reveals Different Mechanisms of Response to Neutral Salt and Alkaline Salt Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 571864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Aharoni, A.; Dixit, S.; Jetter, R.; Thoenes, E.; van Arkel, G.; Pereira, A. The SHINE Clade of AP2 Domain Transcription Factors Activates Wax Biosynthesis, Alters Cuticle Properties, and Confers Drought Tolerance when Overexpressed in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2463–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Zhang, J.Y.; Broeckling, C.D.; Blancaflor, E.B.; Sledge, M.K.; Sumner, L.W.; Wang, Z.Y. Overexpression of WXP1, a putative Medicago truncatula AP2 domain-containing transcription factor gene, increases cuticular wax accumulation and enhances drought tolerance in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Plant J. 2005, 42, 689–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Xiong, J.L.; Wang, H.C.; Tan, X.Y.; Zhang, C.L.; Naeem, M.S. 5-aminolevulinic acid improves salt tolerance mediated by regulation of tetrapyrrole and proline metabolism in Brassica napus L. seedlings under NaCl stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 124, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Korkmaz, A.; Şirikçi, R.; Kocaçınar, F.; Değer, Ö.; Demirkırıan, A.R. Alleviation of salt-induced adverse effects in pepper seedlings by seed application of glycinebetaine. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 148, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Pingle, S.N.; Suryawanshi, S.T.; Pawar, K.R.; Harke, S.N. The Effect of Salt Stress on Proline Content in Maize (Zea mays). Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 16, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sivritepe, N.; Sivritepe, H.O.; Eris, A. The effects of NaCl priming on salt tolerance in melon seedlings grown under saline conditions. Sci. Hortic. 2003, 97, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sobahan, M.A.; Akter, N.; Ohno, M.; Okuma, E.; Hirai, Y.; Mori, I.C.; Nakamura, Y.; Murata, Y. Effects of Exogenous Proline and Glycinebetaine on the Salt Tolerance of Rice Cultivars. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2012, 76, 1568–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Weimberg, R.; Lerner, H.R.; Poljakoff-Mayber, A. A relationship between potassium and proline accumulation in salt-stressed Sorghum bicolor. Physiol. Plant. 1982, 55, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kravets, E.A.; Zelena, L.B.; Zabara, E.P.; Blume, Y.B. Adaptation strategy of barley plants to UV-B radiation. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2012, 24, 632–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mintoff, S.J.L.; Rookes, J.E.; Cahill, D.M. Sub-lethal UV-C radiation induces callose, hydrogen peroxide and defence-related gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Biol. 2015, 17, 703–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kulich, I.; Vojtíková, Z.; Glanc, M.; Ortmannová, J.; Rasmann, S.; Žárský, V. Cell wall maturation of Arabidopsis trichomes is dependent on exocyst subunit EXO70H4 and involves callose deposition. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Clay, N.K.; Adio, A.M.; Denoux, C.; Jander, G.; Ausubel, F.M. Glucosinolate Metabolites Required for an Arabidopsis Innate Immune Response. Science 2009, 323, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Ahuja, I.; Rohloff, J.; Bones, A.M. Defence mechanisms of Brassicaceae: Implications for plant-insect interactions and potential for integrated pest management. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 30, 311–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. De Coninck, B.; Timmermans, P.; Vos, C.; Cammue, B.P.A.; Kazan, K. What lies beneath: Belowground defense strategies in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Stass, A.; Horst, W.J. Callose in Abiotic Stress. In Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Biology of 1-3 Beta Glucans and Related Polysaccharides, 1st ed.; Bacic, A., Fincher, G.B., Stone, B.A., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 499–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Foyer, C.H.; Rasool, B.; Davey, J.W.; Hancock, R.D. Cross-tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in plants: A focus on resistance to aphid infestation. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 2025–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Martin, C.; Gerats, T. Control of Pigment Biosynthesis Genes during Petal Development. Plant Cell 1993, 5, 1253–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Berli, F.J.; Moreno, D.; Piccoli, P.; Hespanhol-Viana, L.; Silva, M.F.; Bressan-Smith, R.; Cavagnaro, J.B.; Bottini, R. Abscisic acid is involved in the response of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Malbec leaf tissues to ultraviolet-B radiation by enhancing ultraviolet-absorbing compounds, antioxidant enzymes and membrane sterols. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Narsai, R.; Castleden, I.; Whelan, J. Common and distinct organ and stress responsive transcriptomic patterns in Oryza sativa and Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Jahangir, M.; Kim, H.K.; Choi, Y.H.; Verpoorte, R. Metabolomic response of Brassica rapa submitted to pre-harvest bacterial contamination. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Jahangir, M.; Abdel-Farid, I.B.; Kim, H.K.; Choi, Y.H.; Verpoorte, R. Healthy and unhealthy plants: The effect of stress on the metabolism of Brassicaceae. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 67, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rezayian, M.; Niknam, V.; Ebrahimzadeh, H. Differential responses of phenolic compounds of Brassica napus under drought stress. Iran. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 8, 2417–2425. [Google Scholar]
  116. Tan, P.; Zeng, C.; Wan, C.; Liu, Z.; Dong, X.; Peng, J.; Lin, H.; Li, M.; Liu, Z.; Yan, M. Metabolic profiles of Brassica juncea roots in response to cadmium stress. Metabolites 2021, 11, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Zhao, X.; Nechols, J.R.; Williams, K.A.; Wang, W.; Carey, E.E. Comparison of phenolic acids in organically and conventionally grown pac choi (Brassica rapa L.chinensis). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 940–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Shawon, R.A.; Kang, B.S.; Lee, S.G.; Kim, S.K.; Lee, H.J.; Katrich, E.; Gorinstein, S.; Ku, Y.G. Influence of drought stress on bioactive compounds, antioxidant enzymes and glucosinolate contents of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa). Food Chem. 2020, 308, 125657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Akula, R.; Ravishankar, G.A. Influence of abiotic stress signals on secondary metabolites in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1720–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Jacobo-Velázquez, D.A.; González-Agüero, M.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L. Cross-talk between signaling pathways: The link between plant secondary metabolite production and wounding stress response. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Bari, R.; Jones, J.D. Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69, 473–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Glasauer, S.M.; Neuhauss, S.C. Whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes and its evolutionary consequences. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2014, 289, 1045–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Kaessmann, H. Origins, evolution, and phenotypic impact of new genes. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1313–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Wargent, J.J.; Nelson, B.C.W.; McGhie, T.K.; Barnes, P.W. Acclimation to UV-B radiation and visible light in Lactuca sativa involves up-regulation of photosynthetic performance and orchestration of metabolome-wide responses. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 929–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Krueger, F. Trim Galore: A Wrapper Tool around Cutadapt and FastQC to Consistently Apply Quality and Adapter Trimming to FastQ Files. 2015. Available online: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/ (accessed on 1 February 2018).
  126. Kopylova, E.; Noé, L.; Touzet, H. SortMeRNA: Fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 3211–3217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q.; et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Zhao, Q.Y.; Wang, Y.; Kong, Y.M.; Luo, D.; Li, X.; Hao, P. Optimizing de novo transcriptome assembly from short-read RNA-Seq data: A comparative study. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, S2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Schulz, M.H.; Zerbino, D.R.; Vingron, M.; Birney, E. Oases: Robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1086–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Zerbino, D.R.; Birney, E. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008, 18, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  131. Robertson, G.; Schein, J.; Chiu, R.; Corbett, R.; Field, M.; Jackman, S.D.; Mungall, K.; Lee, S.; Okada, H.M.; Qian, J.Q.; et al. De novo assembly and analysis of RNA-seq data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 909–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Huang, X.; Madan, A. CAP3: A DNA Sequence Assembly Program. Genome Res. 1999, 9, 868–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Gilbert, D. EvidentialGene Genome Informatics Software May 2013. Available online: http://arthropods.eugenes.org/EvidentialGene/ (accessed on 23 June 2019).
  135. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Yi, L.; Liu, L.; Melsted, P.; Pachter, L. A direct comparison of genome alignment and transcriptome pseudoalignment. BioRxiv 2018, 444620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Subramanian, A.; Tamayo, P.; Mootha, V.K.; Mukherjee, S.; Ebert, B.L.; Gillette, M.A.; Paulovich, A.; Pomeroy, S.L.; Golub, T.R.; Lander, E.S.; et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 15545–15550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Differential gene expression of P. cheesemanii and A. thaliana caused by different stresses. Volcano plots, showing fold change in abundance (logFC) against significance, indicate DE genes in response to cold, salt and UV-B radiation stress. FC: fold change; FDR: false discovery rate. Upper row: A. thaliana; lower row: P. cheesemanii. The differentially expressed genes were grouped into 4 levels with different colours: Level I (orange), with 2 ≤ |FC| < 4; Level II (blue), with 4 ≤ |FC| < 32; Level III (green), with 32 ≤ |FC| < 1024 and Level IV (purple), with 1024 ≤ |FC|. FC, fold change.
Figure 1. Differential gene expression of P. cheesemanii and A. thaliana caused by different stresses. Volcano plots, showing fold change in abundance (logFC) against significance, indicate DE genes in response to cold, salt and UV-B radiation stress. FC: fold change; FDR: false discovery rate. Upper row: A. thaliana; lower row: P. cheesemanii. The differentially expressed genes were grouped into 4 levels with different colours: Level I (orange), with 2 ≤ |FC| < 4; Level II (blue), with 4 ≤ |FC| < 32; Level III (green), with 32 ≤ |FC| < 1024 and Level IV (purple), with 1024 ≤ |FC|. FC, fold change.
Ijms 24 11323 g001
Figure 2. Venn diagrams of up- and downregulated genes in response to stress in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii. The diagrams show the number of up- and downregulated genes and overlap in response to cold, salt, and UV-B radiation. Upper row: A. thaliana; lower row: P. cheesemanii.
Figure 2. Venn diagrams of up- and downregulated genes in response to stress in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii. The diagrams show the number of up- and downregulated genes and overlap in response to cold, salt, and UV-B radiation. Upper row: A. thaliana; lower row: P. cheesemanii.
Ijms 24 11323 g002
Figure 3. Venn diagram of the numbers of GO terms of biological processes between stresses in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii. AT: A. thaliana; PC: P. cheesemanii. UV circles: the number of overrepresented GO terms in UV-B radiation response; Cold circles: the number of overrepresented GO terms in cold response; Salt circles: the number of overrepresented GO terms in salt response.
Figure 3. Venn diagram of the numbers of GO terms of biological processes between stresses in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii. AT: A. thaliana; PC: P. cheesemanii. UV circles: the number of overrepresented GO terms in UV-B radiation response; Cold circles: the number of overrepresented GO terms in cold response; Salt circles: the number of overrepresented GO terms in salt response.
Ijms 24 11323 g003
Figure 4. Network analysis of upregulated biological processes of A. thaliana multiple stress-responsive transcriptomes. Purple, red and blue circles: overrepresented GO terms in response to UV-B radiation, salt and cold stress, respectively. Boxes with dashed lines: clusters of overrepresented GO terms involved in similar biological processes.
Figure 4. Network analysis of upregulated biological processes of A. thaliana multiple stress-responsive transcriptomes. Purple, red and blue circles: overrepresented GO terms in response to UV-B radiation, salt and cold stress, respectively. Boxes with dashed lines: clusters of overrepresented GO terms involved in similar biological processes.
Ijms 24 11323 g004
Figure 5. Network analysis of biological processes of P. cheesemanii multiple stress-responsive transcriptomes. Purple, red and blue circles: overrepresented GO terms in response to UV-B radiation, salt and cold stress, respectively. Boxes with dashed lines: clusters of overrepresented GO terms involved in similar biological processes.
Figure 5. Network analysis of biological processes of P. cheesemanii multiple stress-responsive transcriptomes. Purple, red and blue circles: overrepresented GO terms in response to UV-B radiation, salt and cold stress, respectively. Boxes with dashed lines: clusters of overrepresented GO terms involved in similar biological processes.
Ijms 24 11323 g005
Figure 6. Venn diagrams of the numbers of overrepresented GO terms of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii in response to different stresses. Species-specific and overlapping numbers of overrepresented GO terms in response to cold, salt and UV-B radiation stress. AT: A. thaliana; PC: P. cheesemanii; UV circles: the number of overrepresented GO terms in UV-B radiation (UV) response; Cold circles: the number of overrepresented GO terms in cold stress response; salt circles: the number of overrepresented GO terms in salt stress response.
Figure 6. Venn diagrams of the numbers of overrepresented GO terms of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii in response to different stresses. Species-specific and overlapping numbers of overrepresented GO terms in response to cold, salt and UV-B radiation stress. AT: A. thaliana; PC: P. cheesemanii; UV circles: the number of overrepresented GO terms in UV-B radiation (UV) response; Cold circles: the number of overrepresented GO terms in cold stress response; salt circles: the number of overrepresented GO terms in salt stress response.
Ijms 24 11323 g006
Figure 7. Common GO biological processes of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii in response to cold, salt and UV-B radiation stress. Clustering of the common overrepresented terms of GO biological processes of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii responding to cold, salt, and UV-B radiation stress. (a) Eighty-four common overrepresented GO terms in responding to cold stress were clustered with fourteen representatives of GO biological processes. (b) Twenty-six common overrepresented GO terms in responding to salt stress were clustered with four representatives of GO biological processes. (c) Sixty-five common overrepresented GO terms in responding to UV-B radiation were clustered with fourteen representatives of GO biological processes. Semantic space X and Y: no intrinsic meaning; uniqueness: measure whether the term is an outlier compared to the list, namely, the negative of average similarity of a term to all other terms. In REVIGO, multi-dimensional scaling was used to reduce the dimensionality of a matrix of the GO terms’ pairwise semantic similarities. First, the terms were placed by using an eigenvalue decomposition of the terms’ pairwise distance matrix. Then, a stress minimization step improved the agreement between the semantic similarities of the terms and their closeness in the two-dimensional space. Thus, the semantically similar GO terms should remain close together in the plot. Figure was generated from REVIGO web (http://revigo.irb.hr/, accessed on 20 October 2021) [30].
Figure 7. Common GO biological processes of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii in response to cold, salt and UV-B radiation stress. Clustering of the common overrepresented terms of GO biological processes of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii responding to cold, salt, and UV-B radiation stress. (a) Eighty-four common overrepresented GO terms in responding to cold stress were clustered with fourteen representatives of GO biological processes. (b) Twenty-six common overrepresented GO terms in responding to salt stress were clustered with four representatives of GO biological processes. (c) Sixty-five common overrepresented GO terms in responding to UV-B radiation were clustered with fourteen representatives of GO biological processes. Semantic space X and Y: no intrinsic meaning; uniqueness: measure whether the term is an outlier compared to the list, namely, the negative of average similarity of a term to all other terms. In REVIGO, multi-dimensional scaling was used to reduce the dimensionality of a matrix of the GO terms’ pairwise semantic similarities. First, the terms were placed by using an eigenvalue decomposition of the terms’ pairwise distance matrix. Then, a stress minimization step improved the agreement between the semantic similarities of the terms and their closeness in the two-dimensional space. Thus, the semantically similar GO terms should remain close together in the plot. Figure was generated from REVIGO web (http://revigo.irb.hr/, accessed on 20 October 2021) [30].
Ijms 24 11323 g007
Figure 8. Unique overrepresented terms of GO biological process of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii in response to cold, salt and UV-B radiation stress. Clustering of the unique overrepresented terms of GO biological process of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii responding to cold, salt and UV-B radiation stress. (a) A. thaliana Cold vs. P. cheesemanii Cold: 32 and 150 unique overrepresented GO terms of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii in responding to cold stress were clustered with 7 and 12 representatives of GO biological processes. (b) A. thaliana Salt vs. P. cheesemanii Salt: 90 and 52 unique overrepresented GO terms of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii in responding to salt stress were clustered with 11 and 9 representatives of GO biological processes. (c) A. thaliana UV-B vs. P. cheesemanii UV-B: 114 and 57 unique overrepresented GO terms of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii in responding to UV-B radiation were clustered with 13 and 5 representatives of GO biological processes. Semantic space X and Y: no intrinsic meaning; uniqueness: measure whether the term is an outlier compared to the list. Namely, the negative of average similarity of a term to all other terms. In REVIGO, multi-dimensional scaling was used to reduce the dimensionality of a matrix of the GO terms’ pairwise semantic similarities. First, the terms were placed by using an eigenvalue decomposition of the terms’ pairwise distance matrix. Then, a stress minimization step improved the agreement between the semantic similarities of the terms and their closeness in the two-dimensional space. Thus, the semantically similar GO terms should remain close together in the plot. Figure was generated from REVIGO web (http://revigo.irb.hr/) [30].
Figure 8. Unique overrepresented terms of GO biological process of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii in response to cold, salt and UV-B radiation stress. Clustering of the unique overrepresented terms of GO biological process of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii responding to cold, salt and UV-B radiation stress. (a) A. thaliana Cold vs. P. cheesemanii Cold: 32 and 150 unique overrepresented GO terms of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii in responding to cold stress were clustered with 7 and 12 representatives of GO biological processes. (b) A. thaliana Salt vs. P. cheesemanii Salt: 90 and 52 unique overrepresented GO terms of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii in responding to salt stress were clustered with 11 and 9 representatives of GO biological processes. (c) A. thaliana UV-B vs. P. cheesemanii UV-B: 114 and 57 unique overrepresented GO terms of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii in responding to UV-B radiation were clustered with 13 and 5 representatives of GO biological processes. Semantic space X and Y: no intrinsic meaning; uniqueness: measure whether the term is an outlier compared to the list. Namely, the negative of average similarity of a term to all other terms. In REVIGO, multi-dimensional scaling was used to reduce the dimensionality of a matrix of the GO terms’ pairwise semantic similarities. First, the terms were placed by using an eigenvalue decomposition of the terms’ pairwise distance matrix. Then, a stress minimization step improved the agreement between the semantic similarities of the terms and their closeness in the two-dimensional space. Thus, the semantically similar GO terms should remain close together in the plot. Figure was generated from REVIGO web (http://revigo.irb.hr/) [30].
Ijms 24 11323 g008aIjms 24 11323 g008b
Figure 9. Summary of responses of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii plants to cold, salt, and UV-B radiation stresses. Main boxes indicate the three different types of stresses. In each box, main common enrichments in GO terms are indicated in the center, while unique GO enrichments are indicated towards the left for A. thaliana and the right for P. cheesemanii. See text for details.
Figure 9. Summary of responses of A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii plants to cold, salt, and UV-B radiation stresses. Main boxes indicate the three different types of stresses. In each box, main common enrichments in GO terms are indicated in the center, while unique GO enrichments are indicated towards the left for A. thaliana and the right for P. cheesemanii. See text for details.
Ijms 24 11323 g009
Table 1. Summary of differentially expressed genes in multiple stresses in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii.
Table 1. Summary of differentially expressed genes in multiple stresses in A. thaliana and P. cheesemanii.
SpeciesStressUpregulated GenesDownregulated GenesLevel I%Level II%Level III%Level IV%Total
A. thalianaCold20601911264166.5124231.3832.150.13971
Salt86918559656.542340.1323.030.31054
UV-B11811033176379.640418.2431.940.22214
P. cheesemaniiCold25091181273074.091824.9421.1003690
Salt62018663578.816019.9111.400806
UV-B100523793775.528422.9201.6001242
To group genes based on their expression levels, the following expression categories were defined: Level I, with 2 ≤ |FC| < 4; Level II, with 4 ≤ |FC| < 32; Level III, with 32 ≤ |FC| < 1024 and Level IV, with 1024 ≤ |FC|. FC, fold change.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, Y.; Gupta, S.; Wargent, J.J.; Putterill, J.; Macknight, R.C.; Gechev, T.S.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Dijkwel, P.P. Comparative Transcriptomics of Multi-Stress Responses in Pachycladon cheesemanii and Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411323

AMA Style

Dong Y, Gupta S, Wargent JJ, Putterill J, Macknight RC, Gechev TS, Mueller-Roeber B, Dijkwel PP. Comparative Transcriptomics of Multi-Stress Responses in Pachycladon cheesemanii and Arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(14):11323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411323

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Yanni, Saurabh Gupta, Jason J. Wargent, Joanna Putterill, Richard C. Macknight, Tsanko S. Gechev, Bernd Mueller-Roeber, and Paul P. Dijkwel. 2023. "Comparative Transcriptomics of Multi-Stress Responses in Pachycladon cheesemanii and Arabidopsis thaliana" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 14: 11323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411323

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop