Skip to Content
  • Review
  • Open Access

21 June 2023

60 Pages

Systematic Review of Molecular Targeted Therapies for Adult-Type Diffuse Glioma: An Analysis of Clinical and Laboratory Studies

,
,
and
Department of Neurosurgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1501 Red River Street, Austin, TX 78712, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Gliomas are the most common brain tumor in adults, and molecularly targeted therapies to treat gliomas are becoming a frequent topic of investigation. The current state of molecular targeted therapy research for adult-type diffuse gliomas has yet to be characterized, particularly following the 2021 WHO guideline changes for classifying gliomas using molecular subtypes. This systematic review sought to characterize the current state of molecular target therapy research for adult-type diffuse glioma to better inform scientific progress and guide next steps in this field of study. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were queried for study design, subject (patients, human cell lines, mice, etc.), type of tumor studied, molecular target, respective molecular pathway, and details pertaining to the molecular targeted therapy—namely the modality, dose, and duration of treatment. A total of 350 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 52 of these were clinical studies, 190 were laboratory studies investigating existing molecular therapies, and 108 were laboratory studies investigating new molecular targets. Further, a total of 119 ongoing clinical trials are also underway, per a detailed query on clinicaltrials.gov. GBM was the predominant tumor studied in both ongoing and published clinical studies as well as in laboratory analyses. A few studies mentioned IDH-mutant astrocytomas or oligodendrogliomas. The most common molecular targets in published clinical studies and clinical trials were protein kinase pathways, followed by microenvironmental targets, immunotherapy, and cell cycle/apoptosis pathways. The most common molecular targets in laboratory studies were also protein kinase pathways; however, cell cycle/apoptosis pathways were the next most frequent target, followed by microenvironmental targets, then immunotherapy pathways, with the wnt/β-catenin pathway arising in the cohort of novel targets. In this systematic review, we examined the current evidence on molecular targeted therapy for adult-type diffuse glioma and discussed its implications for clinical practice and future research. Ultimately, published research falls broadly into three categories—clinical studies, laboratory testing of existing therapies, and laboratory identification of novel targets—and heavily centers on GBM rather than IDH-mutant astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma. Ongoing clinical trials are numerous in this area of research as well and follow a similar pattern in tumor type and targeted pathways as published clinical studies. The most common molecular targets in all study types were protein kinase pathways. Microenvironmental targets were more numerous in clinical studies, whereas cell cycle/apoptosis were more numerous in laboratory studies. Immunotherapy pathways are on the rise in all study types, and the wnt/β-catenin pathway is increasingly identified as a novel target.

1. Introduction

As the most common brain tumor in adults, gliomas have sustained the focus of scientific research for the past several decades. Recently, more attention has been drawn to the diagnostic criteria of gliomas with the restructured 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, specifically focusing more on molecular biomarkers as a means of categorization [1]. Within this classification adult-type diffuse gliomas are the most prevalent tumor types, defined on the basis of molecular expression of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and the 1p/19q codeletion. These glioma subtypes include astrocytoma (IDH-mutant astrocytoma), oligodendroglioma (IDH-mutant and 1p19q-codeleted), and glioblastoma (GBM) (IDH-wildtype) [1]. The typical management of adult-type diffuse glioma begins with a resection or biopsy, followed by possible radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy with the alkylating agent, temozolomide, or the combination procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) [2]. Even with this regimen, recurrence is prevalent, and the prognosis is dismal, particularly in GBM, which has an average survival of 14–16 months [3].
As gliomas are becoming more molecularly defined, so too is their treatment progressing more towards the targeting of molecular pathways [4]. Compared with traditional chemotherapeutic drugs, molecularly targeted antitumor therapy has the advantage of strong specificity with minimal damage to normal tissues. Molecular-targeted glioma therapies have gained traction in the scientific literature, with many analyses centered on identifying mechanisms pertinent to glioma growth [5]. The Raf/MEK/Erk pathway has been of particular interest as a targetable pathway due to its preponderance among gliomas [5]. Additionally, a systematic review by Da Silva et al. highlighted the molecular targeted therapies in clinical trials for GBM, identifying four categories of targets: targeting the potential for unlimited replication, growth autonomy and migration, cell cycle and apoptosis, and angiogenesis [6].
To date, there has yet to be a systematic review of the literature characterizing molecular targeted therapy in adult-type diffuse gliomas. A comprehensive understanding of the progress in this field—both in terms of existing therapies and novel targets—is integral to guiding advancement in treatment development, integration into clinical trials, and more adequate treatment options for diffuse glioma patients.

2. Methods

A systematic review was performed, characterizing the current state of molecular targeted therapies for gliomas, to inform scientific progress and guide advancement in this area of study. The protocol was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines.

2.1. Search Strategy

A literature search of English-text articles was conducted through January 2023 using PubMed and Web of Science. Categories of concepts related to both molecular targeted therapy and glioma, both adhering to the 2021 WHO classification as well as prior classifications (including language such as low- or high-grade glioma), were searched; results were combined via Boolean operators (Appendix A).
Additionally, a search with the same search terms was conducted on clinicaltrials.gov to assess clinical trials relating to molecular targeted therapy for adult-type diffuse glioma.

2.2. Selection Criteria

Article titles and abstracts were screened for relevance by two authors (L.M. and N.K.G.), and duplicates were removed. The remaining articles were then screened in full text by three authors (L.M., N.K.G., and N.C.). Inclusion criteria used were: any clinical or laboratory studies testing molecular targeted therapies for glioma or laboratory studies identifying novel molecular targets for glioma with a target of adult-type diffuse glioma or its subtypes. Exclusion criteria used were: brain tumors other than adult-type diffuse glioma—such as medulloblastoma; any study of pediatric tumor focus, etc.; papers centering on the delivery technology rather than the molecular target; systemic therapies or adjuvants to molecular targeted therapies; studies with no molecular target identified; or papers that were correspondences, reviews, or commentaries. Conflict resolution at all stages of article selection was via discussion between authors.

2.3. Data Extraction

The data extraction for the systematic review included the following: first author, year of publication, design (multi-institutional retrospective analysis, in vivo, in vitro, and in vivo, etc.), study subject (patients, human cell lines, mice, etc.), ages of subjects, type of tumor studied, molecular target, respective molecular pathway, and the modality and results of the molecular targeted therapy investigated.
The data extraction for clinicaltrials.gov was limited to ongoing trials—defined as those with a status of completed, recruiting, or active, non-recruiting. The extracted variables included the following: title of the study, year started and year of most recent update, tumor type, NCT number, sponsoring or collaborating organization, molecular target of interest, intervention utilized, as well as the phase of the study (Phase 1, 2, or 3), status (active or recruiting), funding sources (NIH, industry, or other), and results, if available.

2.4. Data Categorization

Published studies were then divided into three main categories: clinical studies testing existing molecular targeted therapies; laboratory studies testing existing molecular targeted therapies; and laboratory studies identifying a novel molecular target.
Unless specifically stated otherwise in the study, tumor types were classified by molecular associations with respective cell lines in the literature. For instance, those classified under GBM included cell lines known to harbor wild-type IDH (U87, U251, T98G, and A172) and human tumors classified specifically as GBM [7,8,9,10,11]. In instances where molecular mutation information was not readily available or numeric glioma grading was utilized (grades I–IV), these were classified as simply “Glioma”.
To assess for 3-dimensional (3D) or spheroid technologies in laboratory studies of existing therapies, a full text search of terms related to these technologies—“sphere”, “spheroid”, “3D”, “3-D”, “3-Dimensional”—was also conducted.
Ongoing clinical trials were also queried in this manner and organized by tumor type.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

A meta-analysis was not conducted; therefore, descriptive data is reported for most variables in this study. To compare means by group, ANOVA testing was utilized. The chosen type 1 error rate was set to p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed via IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh (version 28.0.1.1) (Armonk, NY, USA).

2.6. Quality Assessment

The quality of evidence was determined by study design and graded using a level of evidence scheme adapted from Ackley et al. (Table 1) [12].
Table 1. Level of Evidence and Quality Assessment.

3. Results

3.1. Search Results

This study identified 350 articles for inclusion. (Figure 1) Data extraction for each respective category is detailed. Only 15% (52/350) of the total articles were clinical studies (Table 2). The majority of articles (54%, 190/350) were laboratory studies investigating existing molecularly targeted therapies (Table 3), and 31% (108/350) were laboratory studies identifying new molecular targets without testing an existing therapy (Table 4). Across these groups, clinical studies had a more recent median publication year (2017) compared to both laboratory studies testing existing therapies (2015) and laboratory studies identifying novel targets (2016; p < 0.05).
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram, demonstrating search pathway results and included articles.
Table 2. Summary of clinical studies implementing molecular targeted therapies in glioma.
Table 3. Summary of Laboratory Studies Implementing Molecular Targeted Therapies. All studies were level III evidence.
Table 4. Summary of Laboratory Studies Identifying Novel Molecular Targets.

3.2. Clinical Studies Implementing Molecular Targeted Therapies

Fifty-two clinical studies implementing molecular targeted therapies for glioma were identified, with a median publication year of 2017 (Table 2) [343]. In terms of tumor type, 40/52 (77%) studied GBM (GBM), 10/52 (19%) studied IDH-mutant astrocytoma, and there was one study on an IDH-wt, 1p19q co-deleted glioma (2%). In terms of molecular targets, 26/52 (51%) targeted some form of protein kinase, 15/52 (29%) targeted angiogenesis or environmental pathways, 3/52 (6%) targeted immunotherapy pathways, and 3/52 (6%) targeted cell cycle or apoptosis pathways.
The level of evidence for the clinical studies varied. Eight studies had Level II evidence (15%), as they were multi-institutional clinical trials. Most published clinical studies had Level IV evidence (34/52; 65%), consisting of single institutional phase II or prospective trials. The rest of the clinical studies (10/52, 19%) were case reports or series, classifying them as Level VI studies (Table 1 and Table S1).

3.3. Laboratory Studies Implementing Molecular Targeted Therapies

There were 190 laboratory studies implementing existing molecularly targeted therapies for glioma (Table 3). An overwhelming majority of studies (167/190, 88%) focused on GBM, followed by studies of unspecified gliomas (17/190, 9%), then IDH-mutant astrocytomas (11/190, 6%), then oligodendrogliomas (3/190, 2%), with some studies covering multiple glioma types. The most prevalent molecular targets were those involving protein kinase pathways (79/190, 42%), particularly tyrosine kinase receptors. Out of the protein kinase pathways, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, Ras/BRAF/Mek/Erk, and upstream targets were found in the largest proportion (29/79, 37%). Additionally, nearly a quarter of all clinical studies targeted cycle/apoptosis/transcription-targeted pathways (41/190, 22%). The next most prevalent pathway targets were microenvironmental targets (30/190, 16%)—including angiogenesis, cell-cell adhesion molecules, and iron/cation regulation—followed by immunotherapy pathways (8/190, 4%) (Table 3). All studies were Level III evidence (Table 1).
Most studies (100/190, 53%) were conducted using combined in vitro and in vivo designs; the next most common were 61/190 (32%) in vitro studies, then 6/190 (3%) were combined in vivo and ex vivo studies (Table S2). The most frequent cell lines were U87 (105/190, 55%), U251 (51/190, 27%), T98 (22/190, 12%), A172 (19/190, 10%), or GBM patient samples (28/190, 15%) (Table S2).
Of the laboratory studies testing existing molecular targeted therapies, all were queried for whether or not they utilized spheroid or 3-dimensional (3D) technologies for cell culture as part of their methodology. Fifty-nine (31%) of studies adopted tumor sphere or 3D technology (Table S2).

3.4. Laboratory Studies Identifying Novel Molecular Targets

There were 108 laboratory studies identifying novel molecular targets for treating glioma (Table 4).
The majority of studies (82/108, 76%) focused on GBM, followed by 29/108 (27%) studying unspecified gliomas, 6/108 (6%) studying IDH-mutant astrocytoma, and lastly 3/108 (3%) studying oligodendroglioma, with some studies covering multiple glioma types. Twenty-seven (25%) studies targeted protein kinase pathways, 21/108 (19%) targeted cell cycle/apoptosis pathways, 16/108 (15%) studies targeted microenvironmental targets, 10/108 (9%) studies targeted immunotherapy pathways, and 7/108 (6%) targeted the wnt/beta catenin pathway (Figure 2). All studies were Level III evidence (Table 1).
Figure 2. Summary of molecularly targeted pathways in adult-type diffuse glioma.

3.5. Ongoing Clinical Trials

A search of clincialtrials.gov yielded 341 clinical trials, of which 119 met our inclusion criteria for ongoing clinical trials investigating molecular targeted therapies for adult-type diffuse glioma and its subtypes (Table 5). The most prevalent targets involved protein kinase pathways (65/119, 55%), followed by angiogenesis or microenvironmental targets (33/119, 28%), then cell cycle/apoptosis (10/119, 8%), and immunotherapy pathways (10/119, 8%). For tumor types, 74/119 (62%) tested GBM, 5/119 (4%) tested IDH-mutant astrocytoma, and 2/119 (2%) tested oligodendroglioma, with many studies testing specific subcategories. The average start year was earlier in trials testing protein kinase targets (2009 ± 6), compared with trials testing cell cycle/apoptosis inhibitors (2016 ± 4) and immunotherapies (2018 ± 2), which occurred more recently on average (p < 0.001).
Table 5. Summary of Ongoing Clinical trials Testing Molecular Targeted Therapies in Glioma.
The most common funding source was industry-related funding (54/119, 45%), followed by the National Institute of Health (NIH) (45/119, 38%) (Table S3). All ongoing clinical trials were in phase I or II.

4. Discussion

This systematic review examined the current evidence on molecular targeted therapy for adult-type diffuse glioma. The majority of clinical and laboratory studies focused on GBM, with few studies examining IDH-mutant astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, or unspecified gliomas. In both clinical and laboratory settings, protein kinase pathways—particularly PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/BRAF/Mek/Erk—were the most commonly targeted molecular pathways. The next most common molecular targets in published clinical studies and clinical trials were microenvironmental targets—including angiogenesis, cell-cell adhesion, or ion/cation regulation—followed by cell cycle/apoptosis pathways and immunotherapy. The second most common molecular targets in laboratory studies were cell cycle/apoptosis pathways, followed by microenvironmental targets, and then immunotherapy pathways. The wnt/β-catenin pathway was also prevalent in the studies identifying novel targets. The level of evidence for published clinical studies varied, with the majority being Level IV—consistent with early-phase, single-institution clinical trials; all laboratory studies were quasi-experimental designs. Published clinical studies testing molecular targeted therapies, in general, were published more recently than laboratory studies. Lastly, clinical trials on protein kinase pathways began earlier than other clinical trial types, particularly trials testing cell cycle/apoptosis targets or immunotherapy.

4.1. Adult-Type Diffuse Glioma Subtypes

Though the overwhelming majority of studies centered on GBM, the literature shows that adult gliomas found more frequently in practice tend to harbor IDH mutations [7,344]. The reason for the overrepresentation of GBM-focused studies and the underrepresentation of IDH-mutant astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma is multifactorial. First off, the updated WHO classification is a recent development as of 2021; because the majority of the works in this study occurred prior to the molecular subtype differentiation, there were likely studies that self-identified as GBM studies that may have included tumors with an IDH mutation or 1p19q co-deletion. To the best of our ability, we retroactively identified studies that specifically identified these molecular statuses, but those were few in number. Additionally, it is likely that GBM has received more research funding and scientific attention than other brain tumors, perhaps due to its more aggressive nature and mortality rates. Therefore, the funding for studies investigating IDH-mutant astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma may be less robust. Of note, the ongoing clinical trials for glioma vastly favor GBM as well, receiving the majority of funding from industry sources. Further studies to quantify the distribution of research funding between glioma subsets would be necessary to confirm this association. Lastly, the standard cell lines for all glioma research tend to be glioblastoma models, particularly U87, U373, and U251, as also reflected in our study [345] (Table S2).

4.2. Protein Kinase Pathways

In terms of molecular targets, protein kinase pathways—especially PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/BRAF/Mek/Erk—were the most prevalent in the clinical and laboratory studies analyzing existing therapies and novel targets to treat adult-type diffuse glioma. (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4) These results are consistent with previous studies that have demonstrated a predominance in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/BRAF/Mek/Erk protein kinase pathways in molecularly targeted glioma treatment [5,6]. The importance of these pathways in glioma has been well-described in the literature; ultimately, these tumors harbor mutations that continuously activate these protein kinase signaling pathways, leading to increased tumorigenesis and progression [346,347,348].
Both the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/BRAF/Mek/Erk protein kinase pathways are also downstream of receptors such as EGFR, one of the most significant signaling pathways clinically implicated in glioma [349]. A systematic review of molecular targeted therapy clinical trials for GBM identified EGFR as the most prevalent molecular target [6]. Nonetheless, studies have demonstrated limited clinical benefit of anti-EGFR therapies, theorized to be secondary to PTEN-mediated resistance of GBM to this therapy type [350].
Similar to the published clinical studies on this topic, protein kinase pathways were by far the most predominant molecular targets tested in ongoing clinical trials. Interestingly, these therapeutics were also investigated much earlier on average. This finding is likely due to the fact that protein kinase inhibitors are some of the earliest molecular target therapies in the field of targeted oncologic interventions, thus being able to start clinical trials for the treatment of glioma as early as 2001 [351]. Perhaps, in the coming years, as the analysis of existing molecularly targeted therapies progresses from earlier stage clinical testing or laboratory testing, there will be a shift favoring more of the scientifically novel approaches—such as immunotherapeutics, cell cycle inhibitors, or more specifically localized targeting—in clinical trials.
Additional protein kinase pathways targeted in laboratory studies included HER2 receptors, epithelial membrane protein-2 (EMP2), and STAT3, to name a few [108,117,140]. HER2 expression tends to be low in GBM, and though one clinical trial examining a HER2 inhibitor has yet to show therapeutic gain, laboratory studies have promising evidence for efficacy [140,352]. EMP2 has been implicated in bevacizumab resistance and thus shows promise as a molecular target for preventing resistance in conjunction with this common therapeutic [117,353]. STAT3 plays a role in astrocyte development and has tumor suppressive roles in glial malignancies; this target shows promise in laboratory research using tetrandrine as an inhibitor [108]. Despite varying clinical evidence of efficacy, protein kinase-targeted therapies remain a prevalent area of study for both individual inhibitors and combined therapies.

4.3. Cell Cycle/Apoptosis Pathways

Interestingly, a prevalent molecular target in laboratory studies—both testing existing therapies and identifying novel targets—were cell cycle/apoptosis pathways. This difference may be attributed to the fact that clinical studies tend to focus on targets with existing FDA-approved therapies or targets that are more well-established in the literature, while studies with the goal of establishing new targets or testing newly developed therapies can explore a wider range of targets with less established evidence.
The use of cell cycle or apoptosis pathways as targets stems from the use of these pathways in the treatment of other tumors, in particular. In the present study, only four clinical studies included cell cycle/apoptosis pathway inhibitors, namely the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, the mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) inhibitor idasanutlin, the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Motexafin Gadolinium, and the 26S proteasome inhibitor bortezomib [36,57,58,59]. CDK and MDM2 inhibitors were also prevalent in laboratory studies testing existing therapies [150,156,160,161,165,176]. Two CDKs were identified as novel molecular targets—namely CDK 5 and 10—and other novel targets include other apoptosis regulators such as E2F1, trichothiodystrophy group A protein (TTDA), and protease activated receptor 2 (PAR2) [267,269,274,279,280].

4.4. Microenvironmental Pathways (Angiogenesis, Cell-Cell Adhesion, Ιron/Cation Regulation)

Anti-angiogenic therapies aim to compensate for the robust vascularity of gliomas, particularly GBM [354]. Specifically, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is overexpressed in GBM, providing rationale for the thirteen published clinical trials investigating VEGF inhibitors. Specific inhibitors studied include cediranib, cabozantinib, apatinib, and bevacizumab, which appear to be well-tolerated by patients and, in many cases, portend progression-free survival [32,39,40,41,42,43,45,46,48,49,50,55]. Many laboratory studies also tested VEGF inhibitors—namely bevacizumab, axitinib, and apatinib—and all found promising results in vivo [187,191,203]. Other microenvironmental targets included mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM), transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4 (TRPV4), and HIF2α. These targets were acted on by melatonin, cannabidiol, and PT2385, respectively, all of which demonstrated antitumor effects [183,186,198]. Promising novel microenvironmental targets include miR-497, TWIST transcription factor, and tenascin-W, among others [291,293,296].

4.5. Immunotherapy Pathways

The immune checkpoint blockade adopted in the glioma therapeutics model follows treatment paradigms for melanoma, lung cancer, colon cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma; the therapies used to treat these tumors tend to block programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), a protein known for attenuating the host immune response to tumor cells, or cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), a molecule that inhibits T-cell activation [355,356,357,358]. The clinical studies identified in the present study investigating immunotherapeutic pathways targeted PD1 using the inhibitor nivolumab [54,359]. Other immunotherapy targets that were found to be effective in vivo included the inhibition of CD73 with antibodies, extracellular matrix metalloproteinase (EMMPRIN) with icaritin, and NFκB with BAY117082 [207,210,211]. Novel immunotherapeutics for GBM and oligodendroglioma include cluster of differentiation 204 (CD204), S100A, and the CE7 epitope of the L1-CAM adhesion molecule [92,306,308].

4.6. Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway

The wnt/β-catenin pathway was much more prevalent in earlier stages of laboratory research identifying new targets, likely because the role of wnt/β-catenin in glioma progression is a more recent scientific advancement [310,311,312,313,314,315,316,349]. It is likely that in the upcoming years, the distribution of molecular targets may shift from protein kinase pathway-targeted therapies towards the wnt/β-catenin pathway or a combinatory approach of the two. Ongoing clinical trials have yet to target these pathways, but it is likely that this will soon change.

4.7. Study Design

The majority of laboratory studies utilized GBM cell lines or GBM patient samples. The frequent use of the U87 cell line in laboratory studies may be attributed to its widely accepted use as a model for GBM [360]. The use of technology such as spheroid or 3D cell culture is highly relevant in the context of therapies for gliomas. These technologies more accurately represent the tumor microenvironment and allow for better design of patient-specific treatments. Nearly one-third of laboratory studies testing existing therapies utilized this technology, implying that these studies are likely closer to translation to human studies.
The use of patient-derived GBM and glioma samples also highlights the importance of personalized medicine approaches in glioma treatment; nonetheless, this use also limits the generalizability of the conclusions, as most of these studies did not investigate molecular subtypes.

4.8. Implications

Molecular targeted therapy is predicted to revolutionize glioma therapy [361,362,363]. Particularly looking at the NCT Neuro Master Match (N2M2) trial, which uses molecular signatures of GBM to inform treatment, future studies will likely use the molecular identities of tumors to designate treatment [36]. These findings portend a shift in molecular targeted therapy research as well, wherein laboratory studies testing existing treatments will enter Phase I/II clinical trials and studies identifying novel targets will advance into the development and testing of therapies in a laboratory setting. Specifically, we will likely see a broadening of the current clinical studies and ongoing clinical trials—including more immunotherapeutics and microenvironmental pathway testing—in addition to testing of wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitors in vitro and in vivo in the coming years.

4.9. Limitations

There are several limitations to our analysis that should be considered. First, there was significant heterogeneity in the patient populations, interventions, and outcomes reported across clinical studies. The quality of the studies included in our analysis also varied, with the majority having low levels of evidence due to being case reports or series. Notably, only 52 clinical studies were identified, which may be an underrepresentation of the true number of current clinical research studies investigating molecular targeted therapies for glioma. For instance, for GBM alone, a study analyzing the clinical trials related to molecular targeted therapy totaled 257 [6]. In contrast, the sum of published literature and ongoing clinical trials identified in this study totaled 171. This discrepancy is likely due to the fact that clinical trial titles may utilize specific drug names rather than the term “molecular targeted therapy” or broad names of categories within molecular targeted therapies.
Additional limitations include the fact that the studies had varying methodological quality and targeted different molecular pathways, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. The categorization of molecular targets is an imperfect model as well, for pathways such as STAT3 can simultaneously qualify as involving protein kinase inhibitors and angiogenesis, for instance [108]. The categorization of tumor types has also changed drastically since the WHO 2021 guideline change. This study retroactively reflects the updated tumor classification for these studies, using the literature to classify the mutation status of known cell lines. This may create a discrepancy between GBM literature released prior to 2021 and current models, but it more accurately reflects what these studies can add to future glioma literature. Our study, while comprehensive and broad in scope, is restricted by the vast variation, particularly in histological methodology and molecular marker identification capabilities.
Other limitations inherent to a systematic review are that of the search terms—for there may be studies about molecular targeted therapies that do not self-identify as such; publication bias from only including published studies; limiting the studies to only those available in English for full-text screen; and the lack of meta-analysis to quantify the data.

4.10. Future Directions

Future studies should aim to address these limitations by conducting larger multi-institutional clinical trials with standardized protocols and consistent reporting of outcomes. Studies should also consider investigating the effectiveness of combination therapies that target multiple molecular pathways simultaneously.

5. Conclusions

Here, we identify the current state of molecular target therapy research for adult-type diffuse gliomas, broadly found to be among one of three stages: validating molecular targeted therapies through published human clinical studies, testing existing therapies in a laboratory setting, and identifying novel molecular targets in a laboratory setting. We also queried clinicaltrials.gov for ongoing clinical trials on this topic. All studies predominantly investigated GBM, with few mentioning IDH-mutant astrocytomas or oligodendrogliomas. The most common molecular targets in all study types were protein kinase pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Ras/BRAF/Mek/Erk. Microenvironmental targets were more numerous in clinical studies, whereas cell cycle/apoptosis were more numerous in laboratory studies. Immunotherapy pathways are few in number but on the rise in all study types, and the wnt/β-catenin pathway has been increasingly identified as a novel target.
Ultimately, these findings provide insight into the current state of molecular targeted therapy for glioma, highlighting the need for further investigation and the potential for this approach to improve patient outcomes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241310456/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.M. and M.T.K.; methodology: L.M., N.K.G. and M.T.K.; software, L.M.; validation, L.M., N.K.G. and M.T.K.; formal analysis, L.M.; investigation, L.M., N.K.G. and N.C.; resources, L.M., N.K.G. and N.C.; data curation, L.M., N.K.G. and N.C.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M.; writing—reviewing and editing, L.M., N.K.G., N.C. and M.T.K.; visualization, N.K.G. and L.M.; supervision: M.T.K.; project administration, M.T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This requirement was not applicable due to the study not involving human subjects or animals aside from already-published sources.

Data Availability Statement

Due to the nature of the research, there was no primary data collected. Materials were obtained from searches of the PubMed and Web of Science databases.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. Search Terms

Glioma [Mesh] OR “Glioma/drug therapy” OR “Glioblastoma/drug therapy” OR Ganglioglioma/drug therapy [MeSH] OR “adult-type diffuse glioma” OR “oligodendroglioma” OR “astrocytoma”
AND
Molecular targeted therapy [MeSH] OR Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration and dosage [MeSH] OR “Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration and dosage” OR “Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/analysis” OR “Multikinase inhibitor” OR MAP Kinases/antagonists and inhibitors [MeSH] OR “Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases/antagonists and inhibitors” OR “Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use” **
** Format adapted for PubMed, Web of Science-Medline, and clinicaltrials.gov advanced searches, respectively, from 1 January 1900 through 1 January 2023.

References

  1. Louis, D.N.; Perry, A.; Wesseling, P.; Brat, D.J.; Cree, I.A.; Figarella-Branger, D.; Hawkins, C.; Ng, H.K.; Pfister, S.M.; Reifenberger, G.; et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Summary. Neuro-Oncology 2021, 23, 1231–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Jakola, A.S.; Skjulsvik, A.J.; Myrmel, K.S.; Sjåvik, K.; Unsgård, G.; Torp, S.H.; Aaberg, K.; Berg, T.; Dai, H.Y.; Johnsen, K.; et al. Surgical Resection versus Watchful Waiting in Low-Grade Gliomas. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, 1942–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Chai, R.; Fang, S.; Pang, B.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, T. Molecular Pathology and Clinical Implications of Diffuse Glioma. Chin. Med. J. 2022, 135, 2914–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Whitfield, B.T.; Huse, J.T. Classification of Adult-type Diffuse Gliomas: Impact of the World Health Organization 2021 Update. Brain Pathol. 2022, 32, e13062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Yang, K.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, N.; Wu, W.; Wang, Z.; Dai, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Peng, Y.; et al. Glioma Targeted Therapy: Insight into Future of Molecular Approaches. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Cruz Da Silva, E.; Mercier, M.-C.; Etienne-Selloum, N.; Dontenwill, M.; Choulier, L. A Systematic Review of Glioblastoma-Targeted Therapies in Phases II, III, IV Clinical Trials. Cancers 2021, 13, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Ichimura, K.; Pearson, D.M.; Kocialkowski, S.; Bäcklund, L.M.; Chan, R.; Jones, D.T.W.; Collins, V.P. IDH1 Mutations Are Present in the Majority of Common Adult Gliomas but Rare in Primary Glioblastomas. Neuro-Oncology 2009, 11, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Heinzen, D.; Divé, I.; Lorenz, N.I.; Luger, A.-L.; Steinbach, J.P.; Ronellenfitsch, M.W. Second Generation MTOR Inhibitors as a Double-Edged Sword in Malignant Glioma Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Garrett, M.; Fujii, Y.; Osaka, N.; Ito, D.; Hirota, Y.; Sasaki, A. Emerging Roles of Wild-Type and Mutant IDH1 in Growth, Metabolism and Therapeutics of Glioma. In Gliomas; Exon Publications: Brisbane, Australia, 2021; pp. 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Miyata, S.; Tominaga, K.; Sakashita, E.; Urabe, M.; Onuki, Y.; Gomi, A.; Yamaguchi, T.; Mieno, M.; Mizukami, H.; Kume, A.; et al. Comprehensive Metabolomic Analysis of IDH1R132H Clinical Glioma Samples Reveals Suppression of β-Oxidation Due to Carnitine Deficiency. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Barbarisi, M.; Iaffaioli, R.V.; Armenia, E.; Schiavo, L.; De Sena, G.; Tafuto, S.; Barbarisi, A.; Quagliariello, V. Novel Nanohydrogel of Hyaluronic Acid Loaded with Quercetin Alone and in Combination with Temozolomide as New Therapeutic Tool, CD44 Targeted Based, of Glioblastoma Multiforme. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 6550–6564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Ackley, B.J.; Ladwig, G.B.; Swan, B.A.; Tucker, S.J. Evidence-Based Nursing Care Guidelines—E-Book: Medical-Surgical Interventions; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; ISBN 978-0-323-05933-6. [Google Scholar]
  13. Berzero, G.; Bellu, L.; Baldini, C.; Ducray, F.; Guyon, D.; Eoli, M.; Silvani, A.; Dehais, C.; Idbaih, A.; Younan, N.; et al. Sustained Tumor Control With MAPK Inhibition in BRAF V600-Mutant Adult Glial and Glioneuronal Tumors. Neurology 2021, 97, e673–e683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Butowski, N.; Chang, S.M.; Lamborn, K.R.; Polley, M.Y.; Parvataneni, R.; Hristova-Kazmierski, M.; Musib, L.; Nicol, S.J.; Thornton, D.E.; Prados, M.D. Enzastaurin plus Temozolomide with Radiation Therapy in Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Phase I Study. Neuro-Oncology 2010, 12, 608–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Chinnaiyan, P.; Won, M.; Wen, P.Y.; Rojiani, A.M.; Wendland, M.; Dipetrillo, T.A.; Corn, B.W.; Mehta, M.P. RTOG 0913: A Phase I Study of Daily Everolimus (RAD001) In Combination with Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2013, 86, 880–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Drobysheva, A.; Klesse, L.J.; Bowers, D.C.; Rajaram, V.; Rakheja, D.; Timmons, C.F.; Wang, J.; Koral, K.; Gargan, L.; Ramos, E.; et al. Targeted MAPK Pathway Inhibitors in Patients With Disseminated Pilocytic Astrocytomas. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. JNCCN 2017, 15, 978–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Franceschi, E.; Stupp, R.; Van Den Bent, M.J.; Van Herpen, C.; Laigle Donadey, F.; Gorlia, T.; Hegi, M.; Lhermitte, B.; Strauss, L.C.; Allgeier, A.; et al. EORTC 26083 Phase I/II Trial of Dasatinib in Combination with CCNU in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology 2012, 14, 1503–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Fusco, M.J.; Piña, Y.; Macaulay, R.J.; Sahebjam, S.; Forsyth, P.A.; Peguero, E.; Walko, C.M. Durable Progression-Free Survival With the Use of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Four Cases With BRAF V600E-Mutated Gliomas. Cancer Control J. Moffitt Cancer Cent. 2021, 28, 10732748211040012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Hottinger, A.F.; Bensaid, D.; De Micheli, R.; Moura, B.; Mokhtari, K.; Cardoso, E.; Idbaih, A.; Stupp, R. Leptomeningeal Tumor Response to Combined MAPK/ERK Inhibition in V600E-Mutated Gliomas despite Undetectable CSF Drug Levels. Ann. Oncol. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. 2019, 30, 155–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  20. Johanns, T.M.; Ferguson, C.J.; Grierson, P.M.; Dahiya, S.; Ansstas, G. Rapid Clinical and Radiographic Response With Combined Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Adults With BRAF-Mutated High-Grade Glioma. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. JNCCN 2018, 16, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  21. Kaley, T.; Touat, M.; Subbiah, V.; Hollebecque, A.; Rodon, J.; Lockhart, A.C.; Keedy, V.; Bielle, F.; Hofheinz, R.D.; Joly, F.; et al. BRAF Inhibition in BRAF(V600)-Mutant Gliomas: Results From the VE-BASKET Study. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 3477–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  22. Kanemaru, Y.; Natsumeda, M.; Okada, M.; Saito, R.; Kobayashi, D.; Eda, T.; Watanabe, J.; Saito, S.; Tsukamoto, Y.; Oishi, M.; et al. Dramatic Response of BRAF V600E-Mutant Epithelioid Glioblastoma to Combination Therapy with BRAF and MEK Inhibitor: Establishment and Xenograft of a Cell Line to Predict Clinical Efficacy. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2019, 7, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Kebir, S.; Rauschenbach, L.; Radbruch, A.; Lazaridis, L.; Schmidt, T.; Stoppek, A.-K.; Pierscianek, D.; Stuschke, M.; Forsting, M.; Sure, U.; et al. Regorafenib in Patients with Recurrent High-Grade Astrocytoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 145, 1037–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B.K.; Aisner, D.L.; Foreman, N.K. BRAF VE1 Immunoreactivity Patterns in Epithelioid Glioblastomas Positive for BRAF V600E Mutation. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015, 39, 528–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Lapointe, S.; Mason, W.; MacNeil, M.; Harlos, C.; Tsang, R.; Sederias, J.; Luchman, H.A.; Weiss, S.; Rossiter, J.P.; Tu, D.; et al. A Phase I Study of Vistusertib (Dual MTORC1/2 Inhibitor) in Patients with Previously Treated Glioblastoma Multiforme: A CCTG Study. Investig. New Drugs 2020, 38, 1137–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Lee, C.; Fotovati, A.; Triscott, J.; Chen, J.; Venugopal, C.; Singhal, A.; Dunham, C.; Kerr, J.M.; Verreault, M.; Yip, S.; et al. Polo-like Kinase 1 Inhibition Kills Glioblastoma Multiforme Brain Tumor Cells in Part through Loss of SOX2 and Delays Tumor Progression in Mice. Stem Cells 2012, 30, 1064–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Lombardi, G.; De Salvo, G.L.; Brandes, A.A.; Eoli, M.; Rudà, R.; Faedi, M.; Lolli, I.; Pace, A.; Daniele, B.; Pasqualetti, F.; et al. Regorafenib Compared with Lomustine in Patients with Relapsed Glioblastoma (REGOMA): A Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised, Controlled, Phase 2 Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Mason, W.P.; Macneil, M.; Kavan, P.; Easaw, J.; Macdonald, D.; Thiessen, B.; Urva, S.; Lwin, Z.; McIntosh, L.; Eisenhauer, E. A Phase I Study of Temozolomide and Everolimus (RAD001) in Patients with Newly Diagnosed and Progressive Glioblastoma Either Receiving or Not Receiving Enzyme-Inducing Anticonvulsants: An NCIC CTG Study. Investig. New Drugs 2012, 30, 2344–2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Migliorini, D.; Aguiar, D.; Vargas, M.-I.; Lobrinus, A.; Dietrich, P.-Y. BRAF/MEK Double Blockade in Refractory Anaplastic Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma. Neurology 2017, 88, 1291–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Rosenberg, T.; Yeo, K.K.; Mauguen, A.; Alexandrescu, S.; Prabhu, S.P.; Tsai, J.W.; Malinowski, S.; Joshirao, M.; Parikh, K.; Farouk Sait, S.; et al. Upfront Molecular Targeted Therapy for the Treatment of BRAF-Mutant Pediatric High-Grade Glioma. Neuro-Oncology 2022, 24, 1964–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Sanai, N.; Li, J.; Boerner, J.; Stark, K.; Wu, J.; Kim, S.; Derogatis, A.; Mehta, S.; Dhruv, H.D.; Heilbrun, L.K.; et al. Phase 0 Trial of AZD1775 in First-Recurrence Glioblastoma Patients. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 3820–3828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Schiff, D.; Desjardins, A.; Cloughesy, T.; Mikkelsen, T.; Glantz, M.; Chamberlain, M.C.; Reardon, D.A.; Wen, P.Y. Phase 1 Dose Escalation Trial of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Cabozantinib Concurrent with Temozolomide and Radiotherapy or Temozolomide after Radiotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Patients with High-Grade Gliomas. Cancer 2016, 122, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Shah, G.D.; Silver, J.S.; Rosenfeld, S.S.; Gavrilovic, I.T.; Abrey, L.E.; Lassman, A.B. Myelosuppression in Patients Benefiting from Imatinib with Hydroxyurea for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas. J. Neurooncol. 2007, 85, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Shi, L.; Zou, Z.; Ding, Q.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, H.; Hong, X.; Peng, G. Successful Treatment of a BRAF V600E-Mutant Extracranial Metastatic Anaplastic Oligoastrocytoma with Vemurafenib and Everolimus. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2019, 20, 431–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Werner, J.-M.; Wolf, L.; Tscherpel, C.; Bauer, E.K.; Wollring, M.; Ceccon, G.; Deckert, M.; Brunn, A.; Pappesch, R.; Goldbrunner, R.; et al. Efficacy and Tolerability of Regorafenib in Pretreated Patients with Progressive CNS Grade 3 or 4 Gliomas. J. Neurooncol. 2022, 159, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  36. Wick, W.; Dettmer, S.; Berberich, A.; Kessler, T.; Karapanagiotou-Schenkel, I.; Wick, A.; Winkler, F.; Pfaff, E.; Brors, B.; Debus, J.; et al. N2M2 (NOA-20) Phase I/II Trial of Molecularly Matched Targeted Therapies plus Radiotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Non-MGMT Hypermethylated Glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology 2019, 21, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  37. Yau, W.H.; Ameratunga, M. Combination of BRAF and MEK Inhibition in BRAF V600E Mutant Low-Grade Ganglioglioma. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2020, 45, 1172–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  38. Zustovich, F.; Landi, L.; Lombardi, G.; Porta, C.; Galli, L.; Fontana, A.; Amoroso, D.; Galli, C.; Andreuccetti, M.; Falcone, A.; et al. Sorafenib plus Daily Low-Dose Temozolomide for Relapsed Glioblastoma: A Phase II Study. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33, 3487–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Badruddoja, M.A.; Pazzi, M.; Sanan, A.; Schroeder, K.; Kuzma, K.; Norton, T.; Scully, T.; Mahadevan, D.; Ahmadi, M.M. Phase II Study of Bi-Weekly Temozolomide plus Bevacizumab for Adult Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2017, 80, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Brown, N.; McBain, C.; Nash, S.; Hopkins, K.; Sanghera, P.; Saran, F.; Phillips, M.; Dungey, F.; Clifton-Hadley, L.; Wanek, K.; et al. Multi-Center Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Cediranib plus Gefitinib with Cediranib plus Placebo in Subjects with Recurrent/Progressive Glioblastoma. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Clarke, J.L.; Molinaro, A.M.; Phillips, J.J.; Butowski, N.A.; Chang, S.M.; Perry, A.; Costello, J.F.; DeSilva, A.A.; Rabbitt, J.E.; Prados, M.D. A Single-Institution Phase II Trial of Radiation, Temozolomide, Erlotinib, and Bevacizumab for Initial Treatment of Glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology 2014, 16, 984–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. D’Alessandris, Q.G.; Montano, N.; Cenci, T.; Martini, M.; Lauretti, L.; Bianchi, F.; Larocca, L.M.; Maira, G.; Fernandez, E.; Pallini, R. Targeted Therapy with Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Tailored to the Molecular Profile of Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma. Preliminary Experience. Acta Neurochir. 2013, 155, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Desjardins, A.; Reardon, D.A.; Coan, A.; Marcello, J.; Herndon II, J.E.; Bailey, L.; Peters, K.B.; Friedman, H.S.; Vredenburgh, J.J. Bevacizumab and Daily Temozolomide for Recurrent Glioblastoma. Cancer 2012, 118, 1302–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Hasselbalch, B.; Eriksen, J.G.; Broholm, H.; Christensen, I.J.; Grunnet, K.; Horsman, M.R.; Poulsen, H.S.; Stockhausen, M.-T.; Lassen, U. Prospective Evaluation of Angiogenic, Hypoxic and EGFR-Related Biomarkers in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme Treated with Cetuximab, Bevacizumab and Irinotecan. APMIS 2010, 118, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Lassen, U.; Chinot, O.L.; McBain, C.; Mau-Sørensen, M.; Larsen, V.A.; Barrie, M.; Roth, P.; Krieter, O.; Wang, K.; Habben, K.; et al. Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of the Antiplacental Growth Factor Monoclonal Antibody RO5323441 Combined with Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology 2015, 17, 1007–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  46. Lu, Y.; Qi, S.; Ouyang, H.; Li, Z.; Yin, Y.; Shi, J.; Qiu, X.; Mo, Y. Preliminary clinical evaluations of bevacizumab for recurrent malignant glioma in Chinese patients. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2014, 94, 1165–1168. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Prados, M.D.; Byron, S.A.; Tran, N.L.; Phillips, J.J.; Molinaro, A.M.; Ligon, K.L.; Wen, P.Y.; Kuhn, J.G.; Mellinghoff, I.K.; de Groot, J.F.; et al. Toward Precision Medicine in Glioblastoma: The Promise and the Challenges. Neuro-Oncology 2015, 17, 1051–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  48. Vaccaro, V.; Fabi, A.; Vidiri, A.; Giannarelli, D.; Metro, G.; Telera, S.; Vari, S.; Piludu, F.; Carosi, M.A.; Villani, V.; et al. Activity and Safety of Bevacizumab plus Fotemustine for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 351252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  49. Vredenburgh, J.J.; Desjardins, A.; Kirkpatrick, J.P.; Reardon, D.A.; Peters, K.B.; Herndon, J.E.; Marcello, J.; Bailey, L.; Threatt, S.; Sampson, J.; et al. Addition of Bevacizumab to Standard Radiation Therapy and Daily Temozolomide Is Associated with Minimal Toxicity in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012, 82, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Wang, F.; Huang, Q.; Zhou, L.-Y. Analysis of the Treatment of Gliomas with SEC Therapy Combined with Radiochemotherapy. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 19, 2400–2405. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang, L.; Liang, L.; Yang, T.; Qiao, Y.; Xia, Y.; Liu, L.; Li, C.; Lu, P.; Jiang, X. A Pilot Clinical Study of Apatinib plus Irinotecan in Patients with Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: Clinical Trial/Experimental Study. Medicine 2017, 96, e9053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Weller, M.; van den Bent, M.; Preusser, M.; Le Rhun, E.; Tonn, J.C.; Minniti, G.; Bendszus, M.; Balana, C.; Chinot, O.; Dirven, L.; et al. EANO Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diffuse Gliomas of Adulthood. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 18, 170–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Wick, A.; Desjardins, A.; Suarez, C.; Forsyth, P.; Gueorguieva, I.; Burkholder, T.; Cleverly, A.L.; Estrem, S.T.; Wang, S.; Lahn, M.M.; et al. Phase 1b/2a Study of Galunisertib, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of Transforming Growth Factor-Beta Receptor I, in Combination with Standard Temozolomide-Based Radiochemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Malignant Glioma. Investig. New Drugs 2020, 38, 1570–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Anghileri, E.; Di Ianni, N.; Paterra, R.; Langella, T.; Zhao, J.; Eoli, M.; Patanè, M.; Pollo, B.; Cuccarini, V.; Iavarone, A.; et al. High Tumor Mutational Burden and T-Cell Activation Are Associated with Long-Term Response to Anti-PD1 Therapy in Lynch Syndrome Recurrent Glioblastoma Patient. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. CII 2021, 70, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  55. Nayak, L.; Molinaro, A.M.; Peters, K.; Clarke, J.L.; Jordan, J.T.; de Groot, J.; Nghiemphu, L.; Kaley, T.; Colman, H.; McCluskey, C.; et al. Randomized Phase II and Biomarker Study of Pembrolizumab plus Bevacizumab versus Pembrolizumab Alone for Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2021, 27, 1048–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  56. Reardon, D.A.; Brandes, A.A.; Omuro, A.; Mulholland, P.; Lim, M.; Wick, A.; Baehring, J.; Ahluwalia, M.S.; Roth, P.; Bähr, O.; et al. Effect of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: The CheckMate 143 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020, 6, 1003–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  57. Brachman, D.G.; Pugh, S.L.; Ashby, L.S.; Thomas, T.A.; Dunbar, E.M.; Narayan, S.; Robins, H.I.; Bovi, J.A.; Rockhill, J.K.; Won, M.; et al. Phase 1/2 Trials of Temozolomide, Motexafin Gadolinium, and 60-Gy Fractionated Radiation for Newly Diagnosed Supratentorial Glioblastoma Multiforme: Final Results of RTOG 0513. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2015, 91, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Kubicek, G.J.; Werner-Wasik, M.; Machtay, M.; Mallon, G.; Myers, T.; Ramirez, M.; Andrews, D.; Curran, W.J.; Dicker, A.P. A Phase I Trial Using the Proteasome Inhibitor Bortezomib and Concurrent Temozolomide and Radiotherapy for CNS Malignancies. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2009, 74, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Lin, J.; Yu, L.; Fu, Y.; Chen, H.; Zheng, X.; Wang, S.; Gao, C.; Cao, Y.; Lin, L. A Refractory Case of CDK4-Amplified Spinal Astrocytoma Achieving Complete Response upon Treatment with a Palbociclib-Based Regimen: A Case Report. BMC Cancer 2020, 20, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Geletneky, K.; Hajda, J.; Angelova, A.L.; Leuchs, B.; Capper, D.; Bartsch, A.J.; Neumann, J.O.; Schöning, T.; Hüsing, J.; Beelte, B.; et al. Oncolytic H-1 Parvovirus Shows Safety and Signs of Immunogenic Activity in a First Phase I/IIa Glioblastoma Trial. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther. 2017, 25, 2620–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Hashimoto, N.; Tsuboi, A.; Kagawa, N.; Chiba, Y.; Izumoto, S.; Kinoshita, M.; Kijima, N.; Oka, Y.; Morimoto, S.; Nakajima, H.; et al. Wilms Tumor 1 Peptide Vaccination Combined with Temozolomide against Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Safety and Impact on Immunological Response. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. CII 2015, 64, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Patel, S.; DiBiase, S.; Meisenberg, B.; Flannery, T.; Patel, A.; Dhople, A.; Cheston, S.; Amin, P. Phase I Clinical Trial Assessing Temozolomide and Tamoxifen with Concomitant Radiotherapy for Treatment of High-Grade Glioma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012, 82, 739–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Sautter, L.; Hofheinz, R.; Tuettenberg, J.; Grimm, M.; Vajkoczy, P.; Groden, C.; Schmieder, K.; Hochhaus, A.; Wenz, F.; Giordano, F.A. Open-Label Phase II Evaluation of Imatinib in Primary Inoperable or Incompletely Resected and Recurrent Glioblastoma. Oncology 2020, 98, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Aldea, M.D.; Petrushev, B.; Soritau, O.; Tomuleasa, C.I.; Filip, A.G.; Chereches, G.; Cenariu, M.; Tatomir, C.; Florian, I.-S.; Crivii, C.B.; et al. Metformin plus Sorafenib Highly Impacts Temozolomide Resistant Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells. J. BUON 2014, 19, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Aoki, K.; Nakamura, H.; Suzuki, H.; Matsuo, K.; Kataoka, K.; Shimamura, T.; Motomura, K.; Ohka, F.; Shiina, S.; Yamamoto, T.; et al. Prognostic Relevance of Genetic Alterations in Diffuse Lower-Grade Gliomas. Neuro-Oncology 2018, 20, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  66. Arcella, A.; Biagioni, F.; Oliva, M.A.; Bucci, D.; Frati, A.; Esposito, V.; Cantore, G.; Giangaspero, F.; Fornai, F. Rapamycin Inhibits the Growth of Glioblastoma. Brain Res. 2013, 1495, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  67. Ariey-Bonnet, J.; Carrasco, K.; Le Grand, M.; Hoffer, L.; Betzi, S.; Feracci, M.; Tsvetkov, P.; Devred, F.; Collette, Y.; Morelli, X.; et al. In Silico Molecular Target Prediction Unveils Mebendazole as a Potent MAPK14 Inhibitor. Mol. Oncol. 2020, 14, 3083–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  68. Balkhi, H.M.; Gul, T.; Haq, E. Anti-Neoplastic and Calcium Modulatory Action of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester and Dasatinib in C6 Glial Cells: A Therapeutic Perspective. CNS Neurol. Disord.-Drug Targets 2016, 15, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Benezra, M.; Hambardzumyan, D.; Penate-Medina, O.; Veach, D.R.; Pillarsetty, N.; Smith-Jones, P.; Phillips, E.; Ozawa, T.; Zanzonico, P.B.; Longo, V.; et al. Fluorine-Labeled Dasatinib Nanoformulations as Targeted Molecular Imaging Probes in a PDGFB-Driven Murine Glioblastoma Model. Neoplasia 2012, 14, 1132–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Camorani, S.; Crescenzi, E.; Colecchia, D.; Carpentieri, A.; Amoresano, A.; Fedele, M.; Chiariello, M.; Cerchia, L. Aptamer Targeting EGFRvIII Mutant Hampers Its Constitutive Autophosphorylation and Affects Migration, Invasion and Proliferation of Glioblastoma Cells. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 37570–37587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Chen, T.; Chen, J.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, B.; et al. CD163, a Novel Therapeutic Target, Regulates the Proliferation and Stemness of Glioma Cells via Casein Kinase 2. Oncogene 2019, 38, 1183–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Cheng, X.; Ren, Z.; Liu, Z.; Sun, X.; Qian, R.; Cao, C.; Liu, B.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Guo, Y.; et al. Cysteine Cathepsin C: A Novel Potential Biomarker for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Glioma. Cancer Cell Int. 2022, 22, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Ciesielski, M.J.; Bu, Y.; Munich, S.A.; Teegarden, P.; Smolinski, M.P.; Clements, J.L.; Lau, J.Y.N.; Hangauer, D.G.; Fenstermaker, R.A. KX2-361: A Novel Orally Bioavailable Small Molecule Dual Src/Tubulin Inhibitor That Provides Long Term Survival in a Murine Model of Glioblastoma. J. Neurooncol. 2018, 140, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  74. Cloninger, C.; Bernath, A.; Bashir, T.; Holmes, B.; Artinian, N.; Ruegg, T.; Anderson, L.; Masri, J.; Lichtenstein, A.; Gera, J. Inhibition of SAPK2/P38 Enhances Sensitivity to MTORC1 Inhibition by Blocking IRES-Mediated Translation Initiation in Glioblastoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2011, 10, 2244–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Combs, S.E.; Schulz-Ertner, D.; Roth, W.; Herold-Mende, C.; Debus, J.; Weber, K.-J. In Vitro Responsiveness of Glioma Cell Lines to Multimodality Treatment with Radiotherapy, Temozolomide, and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition with Cetuximab. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2007, 68, 873–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  76. Dasgupta, T.; Olow, A.K.; Yang, X.; Hashizume, R.; Nicolaides, T.P.; Tom, M.; Aoki, Y.; Berger, M.S.; Weiss, W.A.; Stalpers, L.J.A.; et al. Survival Advantage Combining a BRAF Inhibitor and Radiation in BRAF V600E-Mutant Glioma. J. Neurooncol. 2016, 126, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Dantas-Barbosa, C.; Bergthold, G.; Daudigeos-Dubus, E.; Blockus, H.; Boylan, J.F.; Ferreira, C.; Puget, S.; Abely, M.; Vassal, G.; Grill, J.; et al. Inhibition of the NOTCH Pathway Using γ-Secretase Inhibitor RO4929097 Has Limited Antitumor Activity in Established Glial Tumors. Anticancer Drugs 2015, 26, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Davare, M.A.; Henderson, J.J.; Agarwal, A.; Wagner, J.P.; Iyer, S.R.; Shah, N.; Woltjer, R.; Somwar, R.; Gilheeney, S.W.; DeCarvalo, A.; et al. Rare but Recurrent ROS1 Fusions Resulting From Chromosome 6q22 Microdeletions Are Targetable Oncogenes in Glioma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 6471–6482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Di Stefano, A.L.; Fucci, A.; Frattini, V.; Labussiere, M.; Mokhtari, K.; Zoppoli, P.; Marie, Y.; Bruno, A.; Boisselier, B.; Giry, M.; et al. Detection, Characterization, and Inhibition of FGFR-TACC Fusions in IDH Wild-Type Glioma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 3307–3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  80. Dominguez, C.L.; Floyd, D.H.; Xiao, A.; Mullins, G.R.; Kefas, B.A.; Xin, W.; Yacur, M.N.; Abounader, R.; Lee, J.K.; Wilson, G.M.; et al. Diacylglycerol Kinase α Is a Critical Signaling Node and Novel Therapeutic Target in Glioblastoma and Other Cancers. Cancer Discov. 2013, 3, 782–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  81. Du, W.; Zhou, J.; Wang, D.; Gong, K.; Zhang, Q. Vitamin K1 Enhances Sorafenib-Induced Growth Inhibition and Apoptosis of Human Malignant Glioma Cells by Blocking the Raf/MEK/ERK Pathway. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 10, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Emlet, D.R.; Gupta, P.; Holgado-Madruga, M.; Del Vecchio, C.A.; Mitra, S.S.; Han, S.Y.; Li, G.; Jensen, K.C.; Vogel, H.; Xu, L.W.; et al. Targeting a Glioblastoma Cancer Stem-Cell Population Defined by EGF Receptor Variant III. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 1238–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  83. Farrell, P.J.; Matuszkiewicz, J.; Balakrishna, D.; Pandya, S.; Hixon, M.S.; Kamran, R.; Chu, S.; Lawson, J.D.; Okada, K.; Hori, A.; et al. MET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition Enhances the Antitumor Efficacy of an HGF Antibody. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2017, 16, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Feng, Y.; Huang, J.; Ding, Y.; Xie, F.; Shen, X. Tamoxifen-Induced Apoptosis of Rat C6 Glioma Cells via PI3K/Akt, JNK and ERK Activation. Oncol. Rep. 2010, 24, 1561–1567. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Glassmann, A.; Reichmann, K.; Scheffler, B.; Glas, M.; Veit, N.; Probstmeier, R. Pharmacological Targeting of the Constitutively Activated MEK/MAPK-Dependent Signaling Pathway in Glioma Cells Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Migration. Int. J. Oncol. 2011, 39, 1567–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  86. Goker Bagca, B.; Ozates, N.P.; Asik, A.; Caglar, H.O.; Gunduz, C.; Biray Avci, C. Temozolomide Treatment Combined with AZD3463 Shows Synergistic Effect in Glioblastoma Cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 533, 1497–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  87. Golubovskaya, V.M.; Huang, G.; Ho, B.; Yemma, M.; Morrison, C.D.; Lee, J.; Eliceiri, B.P.; Cance, W.G. Pharmacologic Blockade of FAK Autophosphorylation Decreases Human Glioblastoma Tumor Growth and Synergizes with Temozolomide. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013, 12, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  88. Grossen, A.; Gavula, T.; Chrusciel, D.; Evans, A.; McNall-Knapp, R.; Taylor, A.; Fossey, B.; Brakefield, M.; Carter, C.; Schwartz, N.; et al. Multidisciplinary Neurocutaneous Syndrome Clinics: A Systematic Review and Institutional Experience. Neurosurg. Focus 2022, 52, E2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Gürsel, D.B.; Connell-Albert, Y.S.; Tuskan, R.G.; Anastassiadis, T.; Walrath, J.C.; Hawes, J.J.; Amlin-Van Schaick, J.C.; Reilly, K.M. Control of Proliferation in Astrocytoma Cells by the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase/PI3K/AKT Signaling Axis and the Use of PI-103 and TCN as Potential Anti-Astrocytoma Therapies. Neuro-Oncology 2011, 13, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. He, H.; Yao, M.; Zhang, W.; Tao, B.; Liu, F.; Li, S.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, C.; Meng, Y.; Li, Y.; et al. MEK2 Is a Prognostic Marker and Potential Chemo-Sensitizing Target for Glioma Patients Undergoing Temozolomide Treatment. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2016, 13, 658–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  91. Hjelmeland, A.B.; Lattimore, K.P.; Fee, B.E.; Shi, Q.; Wickman, S.; Keir, S.T.; Hjelmeland, M.D.; Batt, D.; Bigner, D.D.; Friedman, H.S.; et al. The Combination of Novel Low Molecular Weight Inhibitors of RAF (LBT613) and Target of Rapamycin (RAD001) Decreases Glioma Proliferation and Invasion. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 2449–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Hong, H.; Stastny, M.; Brown, C.; Chang, W.C.; Ostberg, J.R.; Forman, S.J.; Jensen, M.C. Diverse Solid Tumors Expressing a Restricted Epitope of L1-CAM Can Be Targeted by Chimeric Antigen Receptor Redirected T Lymphocytes. J. Immunother. 2014, 37, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  93. Jiang, H.; Gao, H.; Kong, J.; Song, B.; Wang, P.; Shi, B.; Wang, H.; Li, Z. Selective Targeting of Glioblastoma with EGFRvIII/EGFR Bitargeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2018, 6, 1314–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Jin, R.; Nakada, M.; Teng, L.; Furuta, T.; Sabit, H.; Hayashi, Y.; Demuth, T.; Hirao, A.; Sato, H.; Zhao, G.; et al. Combination Therapy Using Notch and Akt Inhibitors Is Effective for Suppressing Invasion but Not Proliferation in Glioma Cells. Neurosci. Lett. 2013, 534, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  95. Joel, M.; Mughal, A.A.; Grieg, Z.; Murrell, W.; Palmero, S.; Mikkelsen, B.; Fjerdingstad, H.B.; Sandberg, C.J.; Behnan, J.; Glover, J.C.; et al. Targeting PBK/TOPK Decreases Growth and Survival of Glioma Initiating Cells in Vitro and Attenuates Tumor Growth in Vivo. Mol. Cancer 2015, 14, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  96. Joshi, A.D.; Botham, R.C.; Schlein, L.J.; Roth, H.S.; Mangraviti, A.; Borodovsky, A.; Tyler, B.; Joslyn, S.; Looper, J.S.; Podell, M.; et al. Synergistic and Targeted Therapy with a Procaspase-3 Activator and Temozolomide Extends Survival in Glioma Rodent Models and Is Feasible for the Treatment of Canine Malignant Glioma Patients. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 80124–80138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  97. Ju, R.-J.; Zeng, F.; Liu, L.; Mu, L.-M.; Xie, H.-J.; Zhao, Y.; Yan, Y.; Wu, J.-S.; Hu, Y.-J.; Lu, W.-L. Destruction of Vasculogenic Mimicry Channels by Targeting Epirubicin plus Celecoxib Liposomes in Treatment of Brain Glioma. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 1131–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Junca, A.; Villalva, C.; Tachon, G.; Rivet, P.; Cortes, U.; Guilloteau, K.; Balbous, A.; Godet, J.; Wager, M.; Karayan-Tapon, L. Crizotinib Targets in Glioblastoma Stem Cells. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 2625–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Jung, Y.; Park, H.; Zhao, H.Y.; Jeon, R.; Ryu, J.H.; Kim, W.Y. Systemic Approaches Identify a Garlic-Derived Chemical, Z-Ajoene, as a Glioblastoma Multiforme Cancer Stem Cell-Specific Targeting Agent. Mol. Cells 2014, 37, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Kawauchi, D.; Takahashi, M.; Satomi, K.; Yamamuro, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Uchida, E.; Honda-Kitahara, M.; Narita, Y.; Iwadate, Y.; Ichimura, K.; et al. The ALK Inhibitors, Alectinib and Ceritinib, Induce ALK-Independent and STAT3-Dependent Glioblastoma Cell Death. Cancer Sci. 2021, 112, 2442–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  101. Kim, R.-K.; Kim, M.-J.; Yoon, C.-H.; Lim, E.-J.; Yoo, K.-C.; Lee, G.-H.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kim, H.; Jin, Y.B.; Lee, Y.-J.; et al. A New 2-Pyrone Derivative, 5-Bromo-3-(3-Hydroxyprop-1-Ynyl)-2H-Pyran-2-One, Suppresses Stemness in Glioma Stem-Like Cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2012, 82, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Koul, D.; Shen, R.; Bergh, S.; Lu, Y.; de Groot, J.; Liu, T.; Mills, G.; Yung, W. Targeting Integrin-Linked Kinase Inhibits Akt Signaling Pathways and Decreases Tumor Progression of Human Glioblastoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2005, 4, 1681–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  103. Koul, D.; Shen, R.; Kim, Y.-W.; Kondo, Y.; Lu, Y.; Bankson, J.; Ronen, S.M.; Kirkpatrick, D.L.; Powis, G.; Yung, W.K.A. Cellular and in Vivo Activity of a Novel PI3K Inhibitor, PX-866, against Human Glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology 2010, 12, 559–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  104. Liu, J.; Xu, X.; Feng, X.; Zhang, B.; Wang, J. Adenovirus-Mediated Delivery of BFGF Small Interfering RNA Reduces STAT3 Phosphorylation and Induces the Depolarization of Mitochondria and Apoptosis in Glioma Cells U251. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 30, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  105. Liu, H.; Zhou, L.; Shi, S.; Wang, Y.; Ni, X.; Xiao, F.; Wang, S.; Li, P.; Ding, K. Oligosaccharide G19 Inhibits U-87 MG Human Glioma Cells Growth in Vitro and in Vivo by Targeting Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) and Activating P53/P21 Signaling. Glycobiology 2014, 24, 748–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  106. Liu, X.; Chhipa, R.R.; Nakano, I.; Dasgupta, B. The AMPK Inhibitor Compound C Is a Potent AMPK-Independent Anti-Glioma Agent. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 596–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  107. Luchman, H.A.; Stechishin, O.D.; Dang, N.H.; Blough, M.D.; Chesnelong, C.; Kelly, J.J.; Nguyen, S.A.; Chan, J.A.; Weljie, A.M.; Cairncross, J.G.; et al. An in Vivo Patient-Derived Model of Endogenous IDH1-Mutant Glioma. Neuro-Oncology 2012, 14, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Ma, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, R.; Ye, J.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Li, J.; Zhong, X.; Yang, X. Tetrandrine Suppresses Human Glioma Growth by Inhibiting Cell Survival, Proliferation and Tumour Angiogenesis through Attenuating STAT3 Phosphorylation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 764, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  109. Matsuda, K.; Sato, A.; Okada, M.; Shibuya, K.; Seino, S.; Suzuki, K.; Watanabe, E.; Narita, Y.; Shibui, S.; Kayama, T.; et al. Targeting JNK for Therapeutic Depletion of Stem-like Glioblastoma Cells. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  110. Maxwell, M.J.; Arnold, A.; Sweeney, H.; Chen, L.; Lih, T.-S.M.; Schnaubelt, M.; Eberhart, C.G.; Rubens, J.A.; Zhang, H.; Clark, D.J.; et al. Unbiased Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Analysis Identifies Response Signatures and Novel Susceptibilities After Combined MEK and MTOR Inhibition in BRAFV600E Mutant Glioma. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2021, 20, 100123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. Nicolaides, T.P.; Li, H.; Solomon, D.A.; Hariono, S.; Hashizume, R.; Barkovich, K.; Baker, S.J.; Paugh, B.S.; Jones, C.; Forshew, T.; et al. Targeted Therapy for BRAFV600E Malignant Astrocytoma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 7595–7604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  112. Paternot, S.; Roger, P.P. Combined Inhibition of MEK and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Abolishes Phosphorylation of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 in Glioblastoma Cell Lines and Prevents Their Proliferation. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 4577–4581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  113. Peng, R.; Jiang, B.; Ma, J.; Ma, Z.; Wan, X.; Liu, H.; Chen, Z.; Cheng, Q.; Chen, R. Forced Downregulation of RACK1 Inhibits Glioma Development by Suppressing Src/Akt Signaling Activity. Oncol. Rep. 2013, 30, 2195–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  114. Pezuk, J.A.; Brassesco, M.S.; Morales, A.G.; de Oliveira, J.C.; de Paula Queiroz, R.G.; Machado, H.R.; Carlotti, C.G.; Neder, L.; Scrideli, C.A.; Tone, L.G. Polo-like Kinase 1 Inhibition Causes Decreased Proliferation by Cell Cycle Arrest, Leading to Cell Death in Glioblastoma. Cancer Gene Ther. 2013, 20, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  115. Phillips, A.C.; Boghaert, E.R.; Vaidya, K.S.; Mitten, M.J.; Norvell, S.; Falls, H.D.; DeVries, P.J.; Cheng, D.; Meulbroek, J.A.; Buchanan, F.G.; et al. ABT-414, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting a Tumor-Selective EGFR Epitope. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2016, 15, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  116. Premkumar, D.R.; Jane, E.P.; Pollack, I.F. Co-Administration of NVP-AEW541 and Dasatinib Induces Mitochondrial-Mediated Apoptosis through Bax Activation in Malignant Human Glioma Cell Lines. Int. J. Oncol. 2010, 37, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  117. Qin, Y.; Fu, M.; Takahashi, M.; Iwanami, A.; Kuga, D.; Rao, R.G.; Sudhakar, D.; Huang, T.; Kiyohara, M.; Torres, K.; et al. Epithelial Membrane Protein-2 (EMP2) Activates Src Protein and Is a Novel Therapeutic Target for Glioblastoma. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 13974–13985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  118. Raub, T.J.; Wishart, G.N.; Kulanthaivel, P.; Staton, B.A.; Ajamie, R.T.; Sawada, G.A.; Gelbert, L.M.; Shannon, H.E.; Sanchez-Martinez, C.; De Dios, A. Brain Exposure of Two Selective Dual CDK4 and CDK6 Inhibitors and the Antitumor Activity of CDK4 and CDK6 Inhibition in Combination with Temozolomide in an Intracranial Glioblastoma Xenograft. Drug Metab. Dispos. Biol. Fate Chem. 2015, 43, 1360–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  119. Salphati, L.; Heffron, T.P.; Alicke, B.; Nishimura, M.; Barck, K.; Carano, R.A.; Cheong, J.; Edgar, K.A.; Greve, J.; Kharbanda, S.; et al. Targeting the PI3K Pathway in the Brain—Efficacy of a PI3K Inhibitor Optimized to Cross the Blood-Brain Barrier. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 6239–6248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  120. Sathornsumetee, S.; Hjelmeland, A.B.; Keir, S.T.; McLendon, R.E.; Batt, D.; Ramsey, T.; Yusuff, N.; Rasheed, B.K.A.; Kieran, M.W.; Laforme, A.; et al. AAL881, a Novel Small Molecule Inhibitor of RAF and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Activities, Blocks the Growth of Malignant Glioma. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 8722–8730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  121. See, W.L.; Tan, I.-L.; Mukherjee, J.; Nicolaides, T.; Pieper, R.O. Sensitivity of Glioblastomas to Clinically Available MEK Inhibitors Is Defined by Neurofibromin 1 Deficiency. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 3350–3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  122. Selvasaravanan, K.D.; Wiederspohn, N.; Hadzalic, A.; Strobel, H.; Payer, C.; Schuster, A.; Karpel-Massler, G.; Siegelin, M.D.; Halatsch, M.-E.; Debatin, K.-M.; et al. The Limitations of Targeting MEK Signalling in Glioblastoma Therapy. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  123. Shingu, T.; Holmes, L.; Henry, V.; Wang, Q.; Latha, K.; Gururaj, A.E.; Gibson, L.A.; Doucette, T.; Lang, F.F.; Rao, G.; et al. Suppression of RAF/MEK or PI3K Synergizes Cytotoxicity of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Glioma Tumor-Initiating Cells. J. Transl. Med. 2016, 14, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  124. Siegelin, M.D.; Raskett, C.M.; Gilbert, C.A.; Ross, A.H.; Altieri, D.C. Sorafenib Exerts Anti-Glioma Activity in Vitro and in Vivo. Neurosci. Lett. 2010, 478, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  125. Signore, M.; Pelacchi, F.; di Martino, S.; Runci, D.; Biffoni, M.; Giannetti, S.; Morgante, L.; De Majo, M.; Petricoin, E.F.; Stancato, L.; et al. Combined PDK1 and CHK1 Inhibition Is Required to Kill Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells in Vitro and in Vivo. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  126. Spino, M.; Kurz, S.C.; Chiriboga, L.; Serrano, J.; Zeck, B.; Sen, N.; Patel, S.; Shen, G.; Vasudevaraja, V.; Tsirigos, A.; et al. Cell Surface Notch Ligand DLL3 Is a Therapeutic Target in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Mutant Glioma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 1261–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  127. Thanasupawat, T.; Glogowska, A.; Burg, M.; Krcek, J.; Beiko, J.; Pitz, M.; Zhang, G.J.; Hombach-Klonisch, S.; Klonisch, T. C1q/TNF-Related Peptide 8 (CTRP8) Promotes Temozolomide Resistance in Human Glioblastoma. Mol. Oncol. 2018, 12, 1464–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  128. Thompson, E.M.; Landi, D.; Ashley, D.; Keir, S.T.; Bigner, D. Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, Temozolomide, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition, and MEK Inhibition Are Effective against Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma Regardless of V600E Status. J. Neurooncol. 2018, 140, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  129. Tsigelny, I.F.; Mukthavaram, R.; Kouznetsova, V.L.; Chao, Y.; Babic, I.; Nurmemmedov, E.; Pastorino, S.; Jiang, P.; Calligaris, D.; Agar, N.; et al. Multiple Spatially Related Pharmacophores Define Small Molecule Inhibitors of OLIG2 in Glioblastoma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 22370–22384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  130. van den Heuvel, C.N.A.M.; Navis, A.C.; de Bitter, T.; Amiri, H.; Verrijp, K.; Heerschap, A.; Rex, K.; Dussault, I.; Caenepeel, S.; Coxon, A.; et al. Selective MET Kinase Inhibition in MET-Dependent Glioma Models Alters Gene Expression and Induces Tumor Plasticity. Mol. Cancer Res. MCR 2017, 15, 1587–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  131. Wang, J.; Sai, K.; Chen, F.; Chen, Z. MiR-181b Modulates Glioma Cell Sensitivity to Temozolomide by Targeting MEK1. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2013, 72, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  132. Wang, L.; Shi, Z.M.; Jiang, C.F.; Liu, X.; Chen, Q.D.; Qian, X.; Li, D.M.; Ge, X.; Wang, X.F.; Liu, L.Z.; et al. MiR-143 Acts as a Tumor Suppressor by Targeting N-RAS and Enhances Temozolomide-Induced Apoptosis in Glioma. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 5416–5427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  133. Wang, X.; Yang, K.; Wu, Q.; Kim, L.J.Y.; Morton, A.R.; Gimple, R.C.; Prager, B.C.; Shi, Y.; Zhou, W.; Bhargava, S.; et al. Targeting Pyrimidine Synthesis Accentuates Molecular Therapy Response in Glioblastoma Stem Cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaau4972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  134. Wichmann, H.; Güttler, A.; Bache, M.; Taubert, H.; Rot, S.; Kessler, J.; Eckert, A.W.; Kappler, M.; Vordermark, D. Targeting of EGFR and HER2 with Therapeutic Antibodies and SiRNA: A Comparative Study in Glioblastoma Cells. Strahlenther. Onkol. Organ Dtsch. Rontgengesellschaft Al 2015, 191, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  135. Yan, D.; Kowal, J.; Akkari, L.; Schuhmacher, A.J.; Huse, J.T.; West, B.L.; Joyce, J.A. Inhibition of Colony Stimulating Factor-1 Receptor Abrogates Microenvironment-Mediated Therapeutic Resistance in Gliomas. Oncogene 2017, 36, 6049–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  136. Yang, W.; Barth, R.F.; Wu, G.; Kawabata, S.; Sferra, T.J.; Bandyopadhyaya, A.K.; Tjarks, W.; Ferketich, A.K.; Moeschberger, M.L.; Binns, P.J.; et al. Molecular Targeting and Treatment of EGFRvIII-Positive Gliomas Using Boronated Monoclonal Antibody L8A4. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 3792–3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  137. Yao, T.W.; Zhang, J.; Prados, M.; Weiss, W.A.; James, C.D.; Nicolaides, T. EGFR Blockade Prevents Glioma Escape from BRAFV600E Targeted Therapy. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 21993–22005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  138. Zavalhia, L.S.; Romitti, M.; Netto, G.C.; dos Santos, G.T.; Meurer, R.T.; Hilbig, A.; Michalowski, M.B.; Barbosa Coutinho, L.M.; de Castro Ribeiro, M. Evaluation of the Expression of C-Kit (CD117) in Ependymomas and Oligodendrogliomas. Dis. Markers 2012, 33, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Zhang, C.; Yuan, X.R.; Li, H.Y.; Zhao, Z.J.; Liao, Y.W.; Wang, X.Y.; Su, J.; Sang, S.S.; Liu, Q. Anti-Cancer Effect of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 1 Inhibition in Human Glioma U87 Cells: Involvement of PI3K/Akt/MTOR Pathway. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 35, 419–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  140. Zhang, C.; Burger, M.C.; Jennewein, L.; Genßler, S.; Schönfeld, K.; Zeiner, P.; Hattingen, E.; Harter, P.N.; Mittelbronn, M.; Tonn, T.; et al. ErbB2/HER2-Specific NK Cells for Targeted Therapy of Glioblastoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2016, 108, djv375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  141. Bychkov, M.; Shulepko, M.; Osmakov, D.; Andreev, Y.; Sudarikova, A.; Vasileva, V.; Pavlyukov, M.S.; Latyshev, Y.A.; Potapov, A.A.; Kirpichnikov, M.; et al. Mambalgin-2 Induces Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis in Glioma Cells via Interaction with ASIC1a. Cancers 2020, 12, 1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  142. Chen, S.; Zhao, H.; Deng, J.; Liao, P.; Xu, Z.; Cheng, Y. Comparative Proteomics of Glioma Stem Cells and Differentiated Tumor Cells Identifies S100A9 as a Potential Therapeutic Target. J. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 114, 2795–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  143. Chen, C.H.; Chen, P.Y.; Lin, Y.Y.; Feng, L.Y.; Chen, S.H.; Chen, C.Y.; Huang, Y.C.; Huang, C.Y.; Jung, S.M.; Chen, L.Y.; et al. Suppression of Tumor Growth via IGFBP3 Depletion as a Potential Treatment in Glioma. J. Neurosurg. 2019, 132, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  144. Grinshtein, N.; Rioseco, C.C.; Marcellus, R.; Uehling, D.; Aman, A.; Lun, X.; Muto, O.; Podmore, L.; Lever, J.; Shen, Y.; et al. Small Molecule Epigenetic Screen Identifies Novel EZH2 and HDAC Inhibitors That Target Glioblastoma Brain Tumor-Initiating Cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 59360–59376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  145. Festa, M.; Del Valle, L.; Khalili, K.; Franco, R.; Scognamiglio, G.; Graziano, V.; De Laurenzi, V.; Turco, M.C.; Rosati, A. BAG3 Protein Is Overexpressed in Human Glioblastoma and Is a Potential Target for Therapy. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 178, 2504–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  146. Ge, Y.F.; Sun, J.; Jin, C.J.; Cao, B.Q.; Jiang, Z.F.; Shao, J.F. AntagomiR-27a Targets FOXO3a in Glioblastoma and Suppresses U87 Cell Growth in Vitro and in Vivo. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. APJCP 2013, 14, 963–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  147. Genoud, V.; Espinoza, F.I.; Marinari, E.; Rochemont, V.; Dietrich, P.-Y.; McSheehy, P.; Bachmann, F.; Lane, H.A.; Walker, P.R. Treating ICB-Resistant Glioma with Anti-CD40 and Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint Controller BAL101553 (Lisavanbulin). JCI Insight 2021, 6, e142980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  148. Gu, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Ma, G.; Li, Y.; Cui, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, B.; Li, K. Efficient Inhibition of Human Glioma Development by RNA Interference-Mediated Silencing of PAK5. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 11, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  149. Guo, L.; Fan, L.; Pang, Z.; Ren, J.; Ren, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; Wen, Z.; Jiang, X. TRAIL and Doxorubicin Combination Enhances Anti-Glioblastoma Effect Based on Passive Tumor Targeting of Liposomes. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2011, 154, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  150. Hamada, T.; Akahane, T.; Yokoyama, S.; Higa, N.; Kirishima, M.; Matsuo, K.; Shimokawa, M.; Yoshimoto, K.; Tanimoto, A. An Oncogenic Splice Variant of PDGFRα in Adult Glioblastoma as a Therapeutic Target for Selective CDK4/6 Inhibitors. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  151. Kalluri, H.S.G.; Kuo, J.S.; Dempsey, R.J. Chronic D609 Treatment Interferes with Cell Cycle and Targets the Expression of Olig2 in Glioma Stem like Cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 814, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  152. Kaneta, Y.; Ullrich, A. NEK9 Depletion Induces Catastrophic Mitosis by Impairment of Mitotic Checkpoint Control and Spindle Dynamics. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 442, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  153. Kong, Y.; Ai, C.; Dong, F.; Xia, X.; Zhao, X.; Yang, C.; Kang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Sun, X.; et al. Targeting of BMI-1 with PTC-209 Inhibits Glioblastoma Development. Cell Cycle 2018, 17, 1199–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  154. Lamour, V.; Henry, A.; Kroonen, J.; Nokin, M.J.; von Marschall, Z.; Fisher, L.W.; Chau, T.L.; Chariot, A.; Sanson, M.; Delattre, J.Y.; et al. Targeting Osteopontin Suppresses Glioblastoma Stem-like Cell Character and Tumorigenicity in Vivo. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 137, 1047–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  155. Lescarbeau, R.S.; Lei, L.; Bakken, K.K.; Sims, P.A.; Sarkaria, J.N.; Canoll, P.; White, F.M. Quantitative Phosphoproteomics Reveals Wee1 Kinase as a Therapeutic Target in a Model of Proneural Glioblastoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2016, 15, 1332–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Li, C.; Shen, J.; Wei, X.; Xie, C.; Lu, W. Targeted Delivery of a Novel Palmitylated D-Peptide for Antiglioblastoma Molecular Therapy. J. Drug Target. 2012, 20, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  157. Lian, S.; Shi, R.; Bai, T.; Liu, Y.; Miao, W.; Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Fan, Y. Anti-MiRNA-23a Oligonucleotide Suppresses Glioma Cells Growth by Targeting Apoptotic Protease Activating Factor-1. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013, 19, 6382–6389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  158. Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Shi, L.; Shan, Q.; Cao, Q.; Yue, C.; Li, H.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; Gao, S.; et al. The Third-Generation EGFR Inhibitor AZD9291 Overcomes Primary Resistance by Continuously Blocking ERK Signaling in Glioblastoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. CR 2019, 38, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  159. Mao, P.; Hever-Jardine, M.P.; Rahme, G.J.; Yang, E.; Tam, J.; Kodali, A.; Biswal, B.; Fadul, C.E.; Gaur, A.; Israel, M.A.; et al. Serine/Threonine Kinase 17A Is a Novel Candidate for Therapeutic Targeting in Glioblastoma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  160. Merlino, F.; Daniele, S.; La Pietra, V.; Di Maro, S.; Di Leva, F.S.; Brancaccio, D.; Tomassi, S.; Giuntini, S.; Cerofolini, L.; Fragai, M.; et al. Simultaneous Targeting of RGD-Integrins and Dual Murine Double Minute Proteins in Glioblastoma Multiforme. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 4791–4809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  161. Michaud, K.; Solomon, D.A.; Oermann, E.; Kim, J.-S.; Zhong, W.-Z.; Prados, M.D.; Ozawa, T.; James, C.D.; Waldman, T. Pharmacologic Inhibition of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 Arrests the Growth of Glioblastoma Multiforme Intracranial Xenografts. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 3228–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  162. Niu, M.; Cai, W.; Liu, H.; Chong, Y.; Hu, W.; Gao, S.; Shi, Q.; Zhou, X.; Liu, X.; Yu, R. Plumbagin Inhibits Growth of Gliomas in Vivo via Suppression of FOXM1 Expression. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 128, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  163. Nonnenmacher, L.; Westhoff, M.A.; Fulda, S.; Karpel-Massler, G.; Halatsch, M.E.; Engelke, J.; Simmet, T.; Corbacioglu, S.; Debatin, K.M. RIST: A Potent New Combination Therapy for Glioblastoma. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 136, E173–E187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  164. Patyka, M.; Sharifi, Z.; Petrecca, K.; Mansure, J.; Jean-Claude, B.; Sabri, S. Sensitivity to PRIMA-1(MET) Is Associated with Decreased MGMT in Human Glioblastoma Cells and Glioblastoma Stem Cells Irrespective of P53 Status. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 60245–60269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  165. Punganuru, S.R.; Artula, V.; Zhao, W.; Rajaei, M.; Deokar, H.; Zhang, R.; Buolamwini, J.K.; Srivenugopal, K.S.; Wang, W. Targeted Brain Tumor Therapy by Inhibiting the MDM2 Oncogene: In Vitro and In Vivo Antitumor Activity and Mechanism of Action. Cells 2020, 9, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  166. Sasame, J.; Ikegaya, N.; Kawazu, M.; Natsumeda, M.; Hayashi, T.; Isoda, M.; Satomi, K.; Tomiyama, A.; Oshima, A.; Honma, H.; et al. HSP90 Inhibition Overcomes Resistance to Molecular Targeted Therapy in BRAF(V600E)-Mutant High-Grade Glioma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 28, 2425–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  167. Tasaki, T.; Fujita, M.; Okuda, T.; Yoneshige, A.; Nakata, S.; Yamashita, K.; Yoshioka, H.; Izumoto, S.; Kato, A. MET Expressed in Glioma Stem Cells Is a Potent Therapeutic Target for Glioblastoma Multiforme. Anticancer Res. 2016, 36, 3571–3577. [Google Scholar]
  168. Tchoghandjian, A.; Soubéran, A.; Tabouret, E.; Colin, C.; Denicolaï, E.; Jiguet-Jiglaire, C.; El-Battari, A.; Villard, C.; Baeza-Kallee, N.; Figarella-Branger, D. Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Expression in Glioblastomas and Their in Vitro and in Vivo Targeting by SMAC Mimetic GDC-0152. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  169. Vengoji, R.; Macha, M.A.; Nimmakayala, R.K.; Rachagani, S.; Siddiqui, J.A.; Mallya, K.; Gorantla, S.; Jain, M.; Ponnusamy, M.P.; Batra, S.K.; et al. Afatinib and Temozolomide Combination Inhibits Tumorigenesis by Targeting EGFRvIII-CMet Signaling in Glioblastoma Cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  170. Wang, F.; Bai, H.R.; Wang, J.; Bai, Y.Z.; Dou, C.W. Glioma Growth Inhibition in Vitro and in Vivo by Single Chain Variable Fragments of the Transferrin Receptor Conjugated to Survivin Small Interfering RNA. J. Int. Med. Res. 2011, 39, 1701–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  171. Wang, X.; Hua, Y.; Xu, G.; Deng, S.; Yang, D.; Gao, X. Targeting EZH2 for Glioma Therapy with a Novel Nanoparticle-SiRNA Complex. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 2637–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  172. Xu, L.; Chen, Y.; Dutra-Clarke, M.; Mayakonda, A.; Hazawa, M.; Savinoff, S.E.; Doan, N.; Said, J.W.; Yong, W.H.; Watkins, A.; et al. BCL6 Promotes Glioma and Serves as a Therapeutic Target. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 3981–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  173. Xu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Qian, M.; Wang, S.; Qiu, W.; Chen, Z.; Sun, Z.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, C.; Sun, X.; et al. Cullin-7 (CUL7) Is Overexpressed in Glioma Cells and Promotes Tumorigenesis via NF-Kappa B Activation. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  174. Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.Y.; Qin, Z.H.; Yang, J.M. Expression of Elongation Factor-2 Kinase Contributes to Anoikis Resistance and Invasion of Human Glioma Cells. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2011, 32, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  175. Zhao, Z.; He, H.; Wang, C.; Tao, B.; Zhou, H.; Dong, Y.; Xiang, J.; Wang, L.; Luo, C.; Lu, Y.; et al. Downregulation of Id2 Increases Chemosensitivity of Glioma. Tumor Biol. 2015, 36, 4189–4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  176. Zhong, S.; Wu, B.; Dong, X.; Han, Y.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, Y.; Luo, S.X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; et al. Identification of Driver Genes and Key Pathways of Glioblastoma Shows JNJ-7706621 as a Novel Antiglioblastoma Drug. World Neurosurg. 2018, 109, e329–e342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  177. Abdul Rahim, S.A.; Dirkse, A.; Oudin, A.; Schuster, A.; Bohler, J.; Barthelemy, V.; Muller, A.; Vallar, L.; Janji, B.; Golebiewska, A.; et al. Regulation of Hypoxia-Induced Autophagy in Glioblastoma Involves ATG9A. Br. J. Cancer 2017, 117, 813–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  178. Angara, K.; Rashid, M.H.; Shankar, A.; Ara, R.; Iskander, A.; Borin, T.F.; Jain, M.; Achyut, B.R.; Arbab, A.S. Vascular Mimicry in Glioblastoma Following Anti-Angiogenic and Anti-20-HETE Therapies. Histol. Histopathol. 2017, 32, 917–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  179. Blanco, V.M.; Chu, Z.; Vallabhapurapu, S.D.; Sulaiman, M.K.; Kendler, A.; Rixe, O.; Warnick, R.E.; Franco, R.S.; Qi, X. Phosphatidylserine-Selective Targeting and Anticancer Effects of SapC-DOPS Nanovesicles on Brain Tumors. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 7105–7118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  180. Blank, M.; Weinschenk, T.; Priemer, M.; Schluesener, H. Systematic Evolution of a DNA Aptamer Binding to Rat Brain Tumor Microvessels—Selective Targeting of Endothelial Regulatory Protein Pigpen. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 16464–16468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  181. Chen, L.; Miao, W.; Tang, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, S.; Luo, F.; Yan, J. Inhibitory Effect of Neuropilin-1 Monoclonal Antibody (NRP-1 MAb) on Glioma Tumor in Mice. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2013, 9, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  182. Fleurence, J.; Cochonneau, D.; Fougeray, S.; Oliver, L.; Geraldo, F.; Terme, M.; Dorvillius, M.; Loussouarn, D.; Vallette, F.; Paris, F.; et al. Targeting and Killing Glioblastoma with Monoclonal Antibody to O-Acetyl GD2 Ganglioside. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 41172–41185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  183. Franco, D.G.; Moretti, I.F.; Marie, S.K.N. Mitochondria Transcription Factor A: A Putative Target for the Effect of Melatonin on U87MG Malignant Glioma Cell Line. Molecules 2018, 23, 1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  184. Grossman, R.; Tyler, B.; Rudek, M.A.; Kim, E.; Zadnik, P.; Khan, U.; Blakeley, J.O.; Pathak, A.P.; Brem, H. Microdialysis Measurement of Intratumoral Temozolomide Concentration after Cediranib, a Pan-VEGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in a U87 Glioma Model. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2013, 72, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  185. He, B.; Jabouille, A.; Steri, V.; Johansson-Percival, A.; Michael, I.P.; Kotamraju, V.R.; Junckerstorff, R.; Nowak, A.K.; Hamzah, J.; Lee, G.; et al. Vascular Targeting of LIGHT Normalizes Blood Vessels in Primary Brain Cancer and Induces Intratumoural High Endothelial Venules. J. Pathol. 2018, 245, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  186. Huang, T.; Xu, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, D.; Wang, Z.; He, L.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Davidson, D.; et al. Cannabidiol Inhibits Human Glioma by Induction of Lethal Mitophagy through Activating TRPV4. Autophagy 2021, 17, 3592–3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  187. Huveldt, D.; Lewis-Tuffin, L.J.; Carlson, B.L.; Schroeder, M.A.; Rodriguez, F.; Giannini, C.; Galanis, E.; Sarkaria, J.N.; Anastasiadis, P.Z. Targeting Src Family Kinases Inhibits Bevacizumab-Induced Glioma Cell Invasion. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  188. Jaszberenyi, M.; Schally, A.V.; Block, N.L.; Zarandi, M.; Cai, R.Z.; Vidaurre, I.; Szalontay, L.; Jayakumar, A.R.; Rick, F.G. Suppression of the Proliferation of Human U-87 MG Glioblastoma Cells by New Antagonists of Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone in Vivo and in Vitro. Target. Oncol. 2013, 8, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  189. Ji, X.; Wang, H.; Zhu, J.; Tang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, L.; Gao, C.; Li, W.; You, W.; Yu, B.; et al. Correlation of Nrf2 and HIF-1 Alpha in Glioblastoma and Their Relationships to Clinicopathologic Features and Survival. Neurol. Res. 2013, 35, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  190. Kuan, C.T.; Wakiya, K.; Herndon, J.E.; Lipp, E.S.; Pegram, C.N.; Riggins, G.J.; Rasheed, A.; Szafranski, S.E.; McLendon, R.E.; Wikstrand, C.J.; et al. MRP3: A Molecular Target for Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Immunotherapy. BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  191. Lu, L.; Saha, D.; Martuza, R.L.; Rabkin, S.D.; Wakimoto, H. Single Agent Efficacy of the VEGFR Kinase Inhibitor Axitinib in Preclinical Models of Glioblastoma. J. Neurooncol. 2015, 121, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  192. Mojarad-Jabali, S.; Farshbaf, M.; Hemmati, S.; Sarfraz, M.; Motasadizadeh, H.; Mojarrad, J.S.; Atyabi, F.; Zakeri-Milani, P.; Valizadeh, H. Comparison of Three Synthetic Transferrin Mimetic Small Peptides to Promote the Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration of Vincristine Liposomes for Improved Glioma Targeted Therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 613, 121395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  193. Mostafavi, H.; Khaksarian, M.; Joghataei, M.T.; Yoosefee, S.; Soleimannejad, M.; Gholamzadeh, R.; Bahnamiri, S.S.; Hadjighassem, M.R. CAMP-Epac Pathway Stimulation Modulate Connexin-43 and MicroRNA-21 Expression in Glioma Cells. Basic Clin. Neurosci. 2015, 6, 52–57. [Google Scholar]
  194. Nandhu, M.S.; Behera, P.; Bhaskaran, V.; Longo, S.L.; Barrera-Arenas, L.M.; Sengupta, S.; Rodriguez-Gil, D.J.; Chiocca, E.A.; Viapiano, M.S. Development of a Function-Blocking Antibody Against Fibulin-3 as a Targeted Reagent for Glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 821–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  195. Nawashiro, H.; Otani, N.; Shinomiya, N.; Fukui, S.; Ooigawa, H.; Shima, K.; Matsuo, H.; Kanai, Y.; Endou, H. L-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 as a Potential Molecular Target in Human Astrocytic Tumors. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 119, 484–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  196. Pall, A.E.; Juratli, L.; Guntur, D.; Bandyopadhyay, K.; Kondapalli, K.C. A Gain of Function Paradox: Targeted Therapy for Glioblastoma Associated with Abnormal NHE9 Expression. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 7859–7872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  197. Phillips, R.E.; Yang, Y.; Smith, R.C.; Thompson, B.M.; Yamasaki, T.; Soto-Feliciano, Y.M.; Funato, K.; Liang, Y.; Garcia-Bermudez, J.; Wang, X.; et al. Target Identification Reveals Lanosterol Synthase as a Vulnerability in Glioma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 7957–7962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  198. Renfrow, J.J.; Soike, M.H.; West, J.L.; Ramkissoon, S.H.; Metheny-Barlow, L.; Mott, R.T.; Kittel, C.A.; D’Agostino, R.B.J.r.; Tatter, S.B.; Laxton, A.W.; et al. Attenuating Hypoxia Driven Malignant Behavior in Glioblastoma with a Novel Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 2 Alpha Inhibitor. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  199. Saw, P.E.; Xu, X.; Kang, B.R.; Lee, J.; Lee, Y.S.; Kim, C.; Kim, H.; Kang, S.-H.; Na, Y.J.; Moon, H.J.; et al. Extra-Domain B of Fibronectin as an Alternative Target for Drug Delivery and a Cancer Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker for Malignant Glioma. Theranostics 2021, 11, 941–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  200. Takano, S.; Tsuboi, K.; Matsumura, A.; Nose, T. Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Antibody and Nimustine as Combined Therapy: Effects on Tumour Growth and Angiogenesis in Human Glioblastoma Xenografts. Neuro-Oncology 2003, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Tyrinova, T.; Leplina, O.; Mishinov, S.; Tikhonova, M.; Kalinovskiy, A.; Chernov, S.; Dolgova, E.; Stupak, V.; Voronina, E.; Bogachev, S.; et al. Defective Dendritic Cell Cytotoxic Activity of High-Grade Glioma Patients’ Results from the Low Expression of Membrane TNF and Can Be Corrected In Vitro by Treatment with Recombinant IL-2 or Exogenic Double-Stranded DNA. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2018, 38, 298–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  202. Watanabe, S.; Nishijima, N.; Hirai, K.; Shibata, K.; Hase, A.; Yamanaka, T.; Inazu, M. Anticancer Activity of Amb4269951, a Choline Transporter-Like Protein 1 Inhibitor, in Human Glioma Cells. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  203. Xia, L.; Gong, M.; Zou, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, B.; Zhang, S.; Li, L.; Jin, K.; Sun, C. Apatinib Induces Ferroptosis of Glioma Cells through Modulation of the VEGFR2/Nrf2 Pathway. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 9925919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  204. Xiong, D.D.; Xu, W.Q.; He, R.Q.; Dang, Y.W.; Chen, G.; Luo, D.Z. In Silico Analysis Identified MiRNA-based Therapeutic Agents against Glioblastoma Multiforme. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 41, 2194–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  205. Xu, T.J.; Qiu, P.; Zhang, Y.B.; Yu, S.Y.; Xu, G.M.; Yang, W. MiR-148a Inhibits the Proliferation and Migration of Glioblastoma by Targeting ITGA9. Hum. Cell 2019, 32, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  206. Baehr, O.; Gross, S.; Harter, P.N.; Kirches, E.; Mawrin, C.; Steinbach, J.P.; Mittelbronn, M. ASA404, a Vascular Disrupting Agent, as an Experimental Treatment Approach for Brain Tumors. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 5443–5451. [Google Scholar]
  207. Goswami, S.; Walle, T.; Cornish, A.E.; Basu, S.; Anandhan, S.; Fernandez, I.; Vence, L.; Blando, J.; Zhao, H.; Yadav, S.S.; et al. Immune Profiling of Human Tumors Identifies CD73 as a Combinatorial Target in Glioblastoma. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  208. Merrill, M.; Bernhardt, G.; Sampson, J.; Wikstr, C.J.; Bigner, D.; Gromeier, M. Poliovirus Receptor CD155-Targeted Oncolysis of Glioma. Neuro-Oncology 2004, 6, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  209. Schleicher, S.M.; Thotala, D.K.; Linkous, A.G.; Hu, R.; Leahy, K.M.; Yazlovitskaya, E.M.; Hallahan, D.E. Autotaxin and LPA Receptors Represent Potential Molecular Targets for the Radiosensitization of Murine Glioma through Effects on Tumor Vasculature. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  210. Xu, B.; Jiang, C.; Han, H.; Liu, H.; Tang, M.; Liu, L.; Ji, W.; Lu, X.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Icaritin Inhibits the Invasion and Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition of Glioblastoma Cells by Targeting EMMPRIN via PTEN/AKt/HIF-1α Signalling. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2015, 42, 1296–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  211. Zanotto-Filho, A.; Braganhol, E.; Schröder, R.; de Souza, L.H.; Dalmolin, R.J.; Pasquali, M.A.; Gelain, D.P.; Battastini, A.M.; Moreira, J.C. NFκB Inhibitors Induce Cell Death in Glioblastomas. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 81, 412–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  212. Zhang, F.-J.; Yang, J.-Y.; Mou, Y.-H.; Sun, B.-S.; Ping, Y.-F.; Wang, J.-M.; Bian, X.-W.; Wu, C.-F. Inhibition of U-87 Human Glioblastoma Cell Proliferation and Formyl Peptide Receptor Function by Oligomer Procyanidins (F2) Isolated from Grape Seeds. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2009, 179, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  213. Barone, A.; Sengupta, R.; Warrington, N.M.; Smith, E.; Wen, P.Y.; Brekken, R.A.; Romagnoli, B.; Douglas, G.; Chevalier, E.; Bauer, M.P.; et al. Combined VEGF and CXCR4 Antagonism Targets the GBM Stem Cell Population and Synergistically Improves Survival in an Intracranial Mouse Model of Glioblastoma. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 9811–9822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  214. Caruana, B.T.; Skoric, A.; Brown, A.J.; Lutze-Mann, L.H. Site-1 Protease, a Novel Metabolic Target for Glioblastoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 490, 760–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  215. Chen, Z.; Pan, X.; Georgakilas, A.G.; Chen, P.; Hu, H.; Yang, Y.; Tian, S.; Xia, L.; Zhang, J.; Cai, X.; et al. Tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) Protects Cerebral Neurocytes and Inhibits Glioma by down Regulating Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 Expression. Cancer Lett. 2013, 336, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  216. Chen, W.; Wu, M.; Cui, S.-T.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, Z.; Luo, L.-S. CircRNA Circ-ITCH Inhibits the Proliferation and Invasion of Glioma Cells Through Targeting the MiR-106a-5p/SASH1 Axis. Cell Transplant. 2021, 30, 0963689720983785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  217. Colen, C.B.; Shen, Y.; Ghoddoussi, F.; Yu, P.; Francis, T.B.; Koch, B.J.; Monterey, M.D.; Galloway, M.P.; Sloan, A.E.; Mathupala, S.P. Metabolic Targeting of Lactate Efflux by Malignant Glioma Inhibits Invasiveness and Induces Necrosis: An in Vivo Study. Neoplasia 2011, 13, 620–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  218. Harford-Wright, E.; Andre-Gregoire, G.; Jacobs, K.A.; Treps, L.; Le Gonidec, S.; Leclair, H.M.; Gonzalez-Diest, S.; Roux, Q.; Guillonneau, F.; Loussouarn, D.; et al. Pharmacological Targeting of Apelin Impairs Glioblastoma Growth. Brain J. Neurol. 2017, 140, 2939–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  219. Ishiwata, T.; Teduka, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Kawahara, K.; Matsuda, Y.; Naito, Z. Neuroepithelial Stem Cell Marker Nestin Regulates the Migration, Invasion and Growth of Human Gliomas. Oncol. Rep. 2011, 26, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  220. Jiang, Z.; Shi, Y.; Tan, G.; Wang, Z. Computational Screening of Potential Glioma-Related Genes and Drugs Based on Analysis of GEO Dataset and Text Mining. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  221. Kim, S.S.; Harford, J.B.; Moghe, M.; Rait, A.; Pirollo, K.F.; Chang, E.H. Targeted Nanocomplex Carrying SiRNA against MALAT1 Sensitizes Glioblastoma to Temozolomide. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 1424–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  222. Kim, G.-H.; Choi, S.Y.; Oh, T.-I.; Kan, S.-Y.; Kang, H.; Lee, S.; Oh, T.; Ko, H.M.; Lim, J.-H. IDH1(R132H) Causes Resistance to HDAC Inhibitors by Increasing NANOG in Glioblastoma Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  223. Li, L.; Wu, M.; Wang, C.; Yu, Z.; Wang, H.; Qi, H.; Xu, X. Beta-Asarone Inhibits Invasion and EMT in Human Glioma U251 Cells by Suppressing Splicing Factor HnRNP A2/B1. Molecules 2018, 23, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  224. Liu, X.; Chong, Y.; Tu, Y.; Liu, N.; Yue, C.; Qi, Z.; Liu, H.; Yao, Y.; Liu, H.; Gao, S.; et al. CRM1/XPO1 Is Associated with Clinical Outcome in Glioma and Represents a Therapeutic Target by Perturbing Multiple Core Pathways. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2016, 9, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  225. Loskutov, Y.V.; Griffin, C.L.; Marinak, K.M.; Bobko, A.; Margaryan, N.V.; Geldenhuys, W.J.; Sarkaria, J.N.; Pugacheva, E.N. LPA Signaling Is Regulated through the Primary Cilium: A Novel Target in Glioblastoma. Oncogene 2018, 37, 1457–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  226. Luwor, R.; Morokoff, A.P.; Amiridis, S.; D’Abaco, G.; Paradiso, L.; Stylli, S.S.; Nguyen, H.P.T.; Tarleton, M.; Young, K.A.; O’Brien, T.J.; et al. Targeting Glioma Stem Cells by Functional Inhibition of Dynamin 2: A Novel Treatment Strategy for Glioblastoma. Cancer Investig. 2019, 37, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  227. Miyazaki, T.; Pan, Y.; Joshi, K.; Purohit, D.; Hu, B.; Demir, H.; Mazumder, S.; Okabe, S.; Yamori, T.; Viapiano, M.; et al. Telomestatin Impairs Glioma Stem Cell Survival and Growth through the Disruption of Telomeric G-Quadruplex and Inhibition of the Proto-Oncogene, c-Myb. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 1268–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  228. Peng, G.; Yang, C.; Liu, Y.; Shen, C. MiR-25-3p Promotes Glioma Cell Proliferation and Migration by Targeting FBXW7 and DKK3. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 18, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  229. Piunti, A.; Hashizume, R.; Morgan, M.A.; Bartom, E.T.; Horbinski, C.M.; Marshall, S.A.; Rendleman, E.J.; Ma, Q.; Takahashi, Y.H.; Woodfin, A.R.; et al. Therapeutic Targeting of Polycomb and BET Bromodomain Proteins in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  230. Preukschas, M.; Hagel, C.; Schulte, A.; Weber, K.; Lamszus, K.; Sievert, H.; Pällmann, N.; Bokemeyer, C.; Hauber, J.; Braig, M.; et al. Expression of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 5A and Hypusine Forming Enzymes in Glioblastoma Patient Samples: Implications for New Targeted Therapies. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  231. Saito, R.; Bringas, J.R.; Panner, A.; Tamas, M.; Pieper, R.O.; Berger, M.S.; Bankiewicz, K.S. Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand with Systemic Administration of Temozolomide Prolongs Survival in an Intracranial Glioblastoma Xenograft Model. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 6858–6862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  232. Saito, K.; Iizuka, Y.; Ohta, S.; Takahashi, S.; Nakamura, K.; Saya, H.; Yoshida, K.; Kawakami, Y.; Toda, M. Functional Analysis of a Novel Glioma Antigen, EFTUD1. Neuro-Oncology 2014, 16, 1618–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  233. Sanzey, M.; Abdul Rahim, S.A.; Oudin, A.; Dirkse, A.; Kaoma, T.; Vallar, L.; Herold-Mende, C.; Bjerkvig, R.; Golebiewska, A.; Niclou, S.P. Comprehensive Analysis of Glycolytic Enzymes as Therapeutic Targets in the Treatment of Glioblastoma. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  234. Saunders, J.T.; Holmes, B.; Benavides-Serrato, A.; Kumar, S.; Nishimura, R.N.; Gera, J. Targeting the YAP-TEAD Interaction Interface for Therapeutic Intervention in Glioblastoma. J. Neurooncol. 2021, 152, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  235. Shulepko, M.A.; Bychkov, M.L.; Lyukmanova, E.N.; Kirpichnikov, M.P. Recombinant Analogue of the Human Protein SLURP-1 Inhibits the Growth of U251 MG and A172 Glioma Cells. Dokl. Biochem. Biophys. 2020, 493, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  236. Song, Y.; Shao, L.; Xue, Y.; Ruan, X.; Liu, X.; Yang, C.; Zheng, J.; Shen, S.; Chen, J.; Li, Z.; et al. Inhibition of the Aberrant A1CF-FAM224A-MiR-590-3p-ZNF143 Positive Feedback Loop Attenuated Malignant Biological Behaviors of Glioma Cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  237. Tu, Y.; Niu, M.; Xie, P.; Yue, C.; Liu, N.; Qi, Z.; Gao, S.; Liu, H.; Shi, Q.; Yu, R.; et al. Smoothened Is a Poor Prognosis Factor and a Potential Therapeutic Target in Glioma. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  238. Venere, M.; Horbinski, C.; Crish, J.F.; Jin, X.; Vasanji, A.; Major, J.; Burrows, A.C.; Chang, C.; Prokop, J.; Wu, Q.; et al. The Mitotic Kinesin KIF11 Is a Driver of Invasion, Proliferation, and Self-Renewal in Glioblastoma. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 304ra143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  239. von Spreckelsen, N.; Fadzen, C.M.; Hartrampf, N.; Ghotmi, Y.; Wolfe, J.M.; Dubey, S.; Yang, B.Y.; Kijewski, M.F.; Wang, S.; Farquhar, C.; et al. Targeting Glioblastoma Using a Novel Peptide Specific to a Deglycosylated Isoform of Brevican. Adv. Ther. 2021, 4, 2000244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  240. Wu, N.; Wu, G.C.; Hu, R.; Li, M.; Feng, H. Ginsenoside Rh2 Inhibits Glioma Cell Proliferation by Targeting MicroRNA-128. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2011, 32, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  241. Yan, Y.; Xu, Y.; Gao, Y.-Y.; Zong, Z.-H.; Zhang, Q.; Li, C.; Wang, H.-Q. Implication of 14-3-3 Epsilon and 14-3-3 Theta/Tau in Proteasome Inhibition-Induced Apoptosis of Glioma Cells. Cancer Sci. 2013, 104, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  242. Zhang, N.; Zheng, B.; Yao, X.; Huang, X.; Du, J.; Shen, Y.; Huang, Z.; Chen, J.; Lin, Q.; Lan, W.; et al. Identification and Characterization of a Novel Mutant Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 Inhibitor for Glioma Treatment. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 551, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  243. Zhang, S.; Zhao, S.; Qi, Y.; Li, B.; Wang, H.; Pan, Z.; Xue, H.; Jin, C.; Qiu, W.; Chen, Z.; et al. SPI1-Induced Downregulation of FTO Promotes GBM Progression by Regulating Pri-MiR-10a Processing in an M6A-Dependent Manner. Mol. Ther.-Nucleic Acids 2022, 27, 699–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  244. Chen, X.; Xiang, Z.; Li, D.; Zhu, X.; Peng, X. ACTL6A Knockdown Inhibits Cell Migration by Suppressing the AKT Signaling Pathway and Enhances the Sensitivity of Glioma Cells to Temozolomide. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 21, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  245. Edwards, L.A.; Verreault, M.; Thiessen, B.; Dragowska, W.H.; Hu, Y.; Yeung, J.H.F.; Dedhar, S.; Bally, M.B. Combined Inhibition of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt and Ras/Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathways Results in Synergistic Effects in Glioblastoma Cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  246. Gabler, L.; Lötsch, D.; Kirchhofer, D.; van Schoonhoven, S.; Schmidt, H.M.; Mayr, L.; Pirker, C.; Neumayer, K.; Dinhof, C.; Kastler, L.; et al. TERT Expression Is Susceptible to BRAF and ETS-Factor Inhibition in BRAFV600E/TERT Promoter Double-Mutated Glioma. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2019, 7, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  247. Gu, F.; Zhang, H.; Qin, F.; Liu, X.; Li, W.; Fu, L.; Ying, G.; Li, B.; Zhang, M.; Ma, Y. Intersectin1-s, A Multidomain Adapter Protein, Is Essential for Malignant Glioma Proliferation. Glia 2015, 63, 1595–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  248. Hou, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, X.; Liu, M.; Che, H.; Guo, F.; Wang, C.; Zhang, D.; Wu, J.; et al. PERK Silence Inhibits Glioma Cell Growth under Low Glucose Stress by Blockage of P-AKT and Subsequent HK2’s Mitochondria Translocation. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  249. Iqbal, A.; Eckerdt, F.; Bell, J.; Nakano, I.; Giles, F.J.; Cheng, S.Y.; Lulla, R.R.; Goldman, S.; Platanias, L.C. Targeting of Glioblastoma Cell Lines and Glioma Stem Cells by Combined PIM Kinase and PI3K-P110α Inhibition. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 33192–33201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  250. Keating, A.K.; Kim, G.K.; Jones, A.E.; Donson, A.M.; Ware, K.; Mulcahy, J.M.; Salzberg, D.B.; Foreman, N.K.; Liang, X.; Thorburn, A.; et al. Inhibition of Mer and Axl Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Astrocytoma Cells Leads to Increased Apoptosis and Improved Chemosensitivity. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 1298–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  251. Kim, S.-H.; Ezhilarasan, R.; Phillips, E.; Gallego-Perez, D.; Sparks, A.; Taylor, D.; Ladner, K.; Furuta, T.; Sabit, H.; Chhipa, R.; et al. Serine/Threonine Kinase MLK4 Determines Mesenchymal Identity in Glioma Stem Cells in an NF-Kappa B-Dependent Manner. Cancer Cell 2016, 29, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  252. Lerner, T.N.; Shilyansky, C.; Davidson, T.J.; Evans, K.E.; Beier, K.T.; Zalocusky, K.A.; Crow, A.K.; Malenka, R.C.; Luo, L.; Tomer, R.; et al. Intact-Brain Analyses Reveal Distinct Information Carried by SNc Dopamine Subcircuits. Cell 2015, 162, 635–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  253. Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Wu, J.; Zhou, L.; Ren, Y.-J.; Yang, W.-Q.; Ming, Z.-J.; Chen, B.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Inhibition of Elongation Factor-2 Kinase Augments the Antitumor Activity of Temozolomide against Glioma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  254. Liu, K.; Zhang, Q.; Lan, H.; Wang, L.; Mou, P.; Shao, W.; Liu, D.; Yang, W.; Lin, Z.; Lin, Q.; et al. GCN5 Potentiates Glioma Proliferation and Invasion via STAT3 and AKT Signaling Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 21897–21910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  255. Martínez-Sáez, E.; Peg, V.; Ortega-Aznar, A.; Martínez-Ricarte, F.; Camacho, J.; Hernández-Losa, J.; Ferreres Piñas, J.C.; Ramón YCajal, S. PeIF4E as an Independent Prognostic Factor and a Potential Therapeutic Target in Diffuse Infiltrating Astrocytomas. Cancer Med. 2016, 5, 2501–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  256. Shoshan, Y.; Nishiyama, A.; Chang, A.; Mörk, S.; Barnett, G.H.; Cowell, J.K.; Trapp, B.D.; Staugaitis, S.M. Expression of Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cell Antigens by Gliomas: Implications for the Histogenesis of Brain Tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 10361–10366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  257. Sulzmaier, F.J.; Young-Robbins, S.; Jiang, P.; Geerts, D.; Prechtl, A.M.; Matter, M.L.; Kesari, S.; Ramos, J.W. RSK2 Activity Mediates Glioblastoma Invasiveness and Is a Potential Target for New Therapeutics. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 79869–79884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  258. Sun, W.; Zhang, W.; Yu, J.; Lu, Z.; Yu, J. Inhibition of Nrf2 Might Enhance the Anti-Tumor Effect of Temozolomide in Glioma Cells via Inhibition of Ras/Raf/MEK Signaling Pathway. Int. J. Neurosci. 2021, 131, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  259. Tsuruta, T.; Aihara, Y.; Kanno, H.; Funase, M.; Murayama, T.; Osawa, M.; Fujii, H.; Kubo, O.; Okada, Y. Shared Molecular Targets in Pediatric Gliomas and Ependymomas. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2011, 57, 1117–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  260. Yamanaka, R.; Arao, T.; Yajima, N.; Tsuchiya, N.; Homma, J.; Tanaka, R.; Sano, M.; Oide, A.; Sekijima, M.; Nishio, K. Identification of Expressed Genes Characterizing Long-Term Survival in Malignant Glioma Patients. Oncogene 2006, 25, 5994–6002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  261. Zhang, H.; Geng, D.; Gao, J.; Qi, Y.; Shi, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, J.; Dong, Y.; et al. Expression and Significance of Hippo/YAP Signaling in Glioma Progression. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 15665–15676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  262. Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Liu, C. Microrchidia Family CW-Type Zinc Finger 2 Promotes the Proliferation, Invasion, Migration and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Glioma by Regulating PTEN/PI3K/AKT Signaling via Binding to N-Myc Downstream Regulated Gene 1 Promoter. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2022, 49, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  263. Zhao, H.-F.; Wang, J.; Jiang, H.-R.; Chen, Z.-P.; To, S.-S.T. PI3K P110β Isoform Synergizes with JNK in the Regulation of Glioblastoma Cell Proliferation and Migration through Akt and FAK Inhibition. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 35, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  264. Zhou, Y.; Bian, X.; Le, Y.; Gong, W.; Hu, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Iribarren, P.; Salcedo, R.; Howard, O.; et al. Formylpeptide Receptor FPR and the Rapid Growth of Malignant Human Gliomas. JNCI-J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005, 97, 823–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  265. Zhu, M.; Chen, L.; Zhao, P.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, C.; Yu, S.; Lin, Y.; Yang, X. Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry Regulates Glioma Cell Migration and Invasion via Modulation of Pyk2 Phosphorylation. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 33, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  266. Zohrabian, V.M.; Forzani, B.; Chau, Z.; Murali, R.; Jhanwar-Uniyal, M. Rho/ROCK and MAPK Signaling Pathways Are Involved in Glioblastoma Cell Migration and Proliferation. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
  267. Abe, T.; La, T.M.; Miyagaki, Y.; Oya, E.; Wei, F.-Y.; Sumida, K.; Fujise, K.; Takeda, T.; Tomizawa, K.; Takei, K.; et al. Phosphorylation of Cortactin by Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5 Modulates Actin Bundling by the Dynamin 1-Cortactin Ring-like Complex and Formation of Filopodia and Lamellipodia in NG108-15 Glioma-Derived Cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 54, 550–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  268. Bai, Y.; Lathia, J.D.; Zhang, P.; Flavahan, W.; Rich, J.N.; Mattson, M.P. Molecular Targeting of TRF2 Suppresses the Growth and Tumorigenesis of Glioblastoma Stem Cells. Glia 2014, 62, 1687–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  269. Bai, H.-L.; Kang, C.-M.; Sun, Z.-Q.; Li, X.-H.; Dai, X.-Y.; Huang, R.-Y.; Zhao, J.-J.; Bei, Y.-R.; Huang, X.-Z.; Lu, Z.-F.; et al. TTDA Inhibited Apoptosis by Regulating the P53-Bax/Bcl2 Axis in Glioma. Exp. Neurol. 2020, 331, 113380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  270. Cai, Y.; Gu, W.T.; Cheng, K.; Jia, P.F.; Li, F.; Wang, M.; Zhang, W.F.; Qiu, J.T.; Wu, Z.B.; Zhao, W.G. Knockdown of TRIM32 Inhibits Tumor Growth and Increases the Therapeutic Sensitivity to Temozolomide in Glioma in a P53-Dependent and -Independent Manner. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 550, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  271. Cao, W.; Yang, X.; Zhou, J.; Teng, Z.; Cao, L.; Zhang, X.; Fei, Z. Targeting 14-3-3 Protein, Difopein Induces Apoptosis of Human Glioma Cells and Suppresses Tumor Growth in Mice. Apoptosis 2010, 15, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  272. Chiang, M.F.; Yeh, S.T.; Liao, H.F.; Chang, N.S.; Chen, Y.J. Overexpression of WW Domain-Containing Oxidoreductase WOX1 Preferentially Induces Apoptosis in Human Glioblastoma Cells Harboring Mutant P53. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2012, 66, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  273. Feng, S.; Cai, X.; Li, Y.; Jian, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, B. Tripartite Motif-Containing 14 (TRIM14) Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition via ZEB2 in Glioblastoma Cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  274. Godoy, P.R.D.V.; Donaires, F.S.; Montaldi, A.P.L.; Sakamoto-Hojo, E.T. Anti-Proliferative Effects of E2F1 Suppression in Glioblastoma Cells. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2021, 161, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  275. Kang, C.M.; Bai, H.L.; Li, X.H.; Huang, R.Y.; Zhao, J.J.; Dai, X.Y.; Zheng, L.; Qiu, Y.R.; Hu, Y.W.; Wang, Q. The Binding of LncRNA RP11-732M18.3 with 14-3-3 β/α Accelerates P21 Degradation and Promotes Glioma Growth. EBioMedicine 2019, 45, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  276. Kikuchi, R.; Sampetrean, O.; Saya, H.; Yoshida, K.; Toda, M. Functional Analysis of the DEPDC1 Oncoantigen in Malignant Glioma and Brain Tumor Initiating Cells. J. Neurooncol. 2017, 133, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  277. Klose, A.; Waerzeggers, Y.; Monfared, P.; Vukicevic, S.; Kaijzel, E.L.; Winkeler, A.; Wickenhauser, C.; Lowik, C.W.G.M.; Jacobs, A.H. Imaging Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7 Induced Cell Cycle Arrest in Experimental Gliomas. Neoplasia 2011, 13, 276-U123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  278. Lan, Y.; Lou, J.; Hu, J.; Yu, Z.; Lyu, W.; Zhang, B. Downregulation of SNRPG Induces Cell Cycle Arrest and Sensitizes Human Glioblastoma Cells to Temozolomide by Targeting Myc through a P53-Dependent Signaling Pathway. Cancer Biol. Med. 2020, 17, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  279. Li, H.; You, Y.; Liu, J. Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 10 Prevents Glioma Metastasis via Modulation of Snail Expression. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 18, 1165–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  280. Luo, R.; Wang, X.; Dong, Y.; Wang, L.; Tian, C. Activation of Protease-Activated Receptor 2 Reduces Glioblastoma Cell Apoptosis. J. Biomed. Sci. 2014, 21, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  281. Ma, Q.; Huang, J.; Xiong, Y.; Yang, X.; Han, R.; Zhu, W. MicroRNA-96 Regulates Apoptosis by Targeting PDCD4 in Human Glioma Cells. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2017, 16, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  282. Meuth, S.G.; Herrmann, A.; Ip, C.W.; Kanyshkova, T.; Bittner, S.; Weishaupt, A.; Budde, T.; Wiendl, H. The Two-Pore Domain Potassium Channel TASK3 Functionally Impacts Glioma Cell Death. J. Neurooncol. 2008, 87, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  283. Tong, H.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, J.; Xiao, J. YB-1 Modulates the Drug Resistance of Glioma Cells by Activation of MDM2/P53 Pathway. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2019, 13, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  284. Wirsching, H.-G.; Krishnan, S.; Florea, A.-M.; Frei, K.; Krayenbuehl, N.; Hasenbach, K.; Reifenberger, G.; Weller, M.; Tabatabai, G. Thymosin Beta 4 Gene Silencing Decreases Stemness and Invasiveness in Glioblastoma. Brain 2014, 137, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  285. Yan, F.; Alinari, L.; Lustberg, M.E.; Martin, L.K.; Cordero-Nieves, H.M.; Banasavadi-Siddegowda, Y.; Virk, S.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.; Bell, E.H.; Wojton, J.; et al. Genetic Validation of the Protein Arginine Methyltransferase PRMT5 as a Candidate Therapeutic Target in Glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 1752–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  286. Yuan, F.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, S.; Ye, L.; Xu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Liu, B.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Q. HSP27 Protects against Ferroptosis of Glioblastoma Cells. Hum. Cell 2022, 35, 238–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  287. Chung, L.K.; Pelargos, P.E.; Chan, A.M.; Demos, J.V.; Lagman, C.; Sheppard, J.P.; Nguyen, T.; Chang, Y.-L.; Hojat, S.A.; Prins, R.M.; et al. Tissue Microarray Analysis for Epithelial Membrane Protein-2 as a Novel Biomarker for Gliomas. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2018, 35, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  288. Bao, Z.; Qiu, X.; Wang, D.; Ban, N.; Fan, S.; Chen, W.; Sun, J.; Xing, W.; Wang, Y.; Cui, G. High Expression of Adenylate Cyclase-Associated Protein 1 Accelerates the Proliferation, Migration and Invasion of Neural Glioma Cells. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2016, 212, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  289. Haining, Z.; Kawai, N.; Miyake, K.; Okada, M.; Okubo, S.; Zhang, X.; Fei, Z.; Tamiya, T. Relation of LAT1/4F2hc Expression with Pathological Grade, Proliferation and Angiogenesis in Human Gliomas. BMC Clin. Pathol. 2012, 12, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  290. Kaur, H.; Phillips-Mason, P.J.; Burden-Gulley, S.M.; Kerstetter-Fogle, A.E.; Basilion, J.P.; Sloan, A.E.; Brady-Kalnay, S.M. Cadherin-11, a Marker of the Mesenchymal Phenotype, Regulates Glioblastoma Cell Migration and Survival In Vivo. Mol. Cancer Res. 2012, 10, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  291. Lan, J.; Xue, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhao, S.; Wu, Z.; Fang, J.; Han, C.; Lou, M. Hypoxia-Induced MiR-497 Decreases Glioma Cell Sensitivity to TMZ by Inhibiting Apoptosis. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 3333–3339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  292. Li, S.-J.; Liu, H.-L.; Tang, S.-L.; Li, X.-J.; Wang, X.-Y. MicroRNA-150 Regulates Glycolysis by Targeting von Hippel-Lindau in Glioma Cells. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017, 9, 1058–1066. [Google Scholar]
  293. Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, C.; Chen, F.; Xi, S.; Zeng, J.; Ke, C.; Sharma, H.S.; Chen, Z. Expression of Twist Associated to Microcirculation Patterns of Human Glioma Correlated with Progression and Survival of the Patient—Novel Therapeutic Advances In Glioblastoma. In International Review of Neurobiology; Academic Press Ltd.—Elsevier Science Ltd.: London, UK, 2020; Volume 151, ISBN 0074-7742. [Google Scholar]
  294. Liu, Y.; Hou, X.; Liu, M.; Yang, Z.; Bi, Y.; Zou, H.; Wu, J.; Che, H.; Li, C.; Wang, X.; et al. XBP1 Silencing Decreases Glioma Cell Viability and Glycolysis Possibly by Inhibiting HK2 Expression. J. Neurooncol. 2016, 126, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  295. Ljubimova, J.; Fugita, M.; Khazenzon, N.; Das, A.; Pikul, B.; Newman, D.; Sekiguchi, K.; Sorokin, L.; Sasaki, T.; Black, K. Association between Laminin-8 and Glial Tumor Grade, Recurrence, and Patient Survival. Cancer 2004, 101, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  296. Martina, E.; Degen, M.; Rueegg, C.; Merlo, A.; Lino, M.M.; Chiquet-Ehrismann, R.; Brellier, F. Tenascin-W Is a Specific Marker of Glioma-Associated Blood Vessels and Stimulates Angiogenesis in Vitro. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 778–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  297. Okubo, S.; Zhen, H.-N.; Kawai, N.; Nishiyama, Y.; Haba, R.; Tamiya, T. Correlation of L-Methyl-C-11-Methionine (MET) Uptake with l-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 in Human Gliomas. J. Neurooncol. 2010, 99, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  298. Pointer, K.B.; Clark, P.A.; Eliceiri, K.W.; Salamat, M.S.; Robertson, G.A.; Kuo, J.S. Administration of Non-Torsadogenic Human Ether-à-Go-Go-Related Gene Inhibitors Is Associated with Better Survival for High HERG-Expressing Glioblastoma Patients. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  299. Shi, J.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, X. Long Non-Coding RNA LINC00174 Promotes Glycolysis and Tumor Progression by Regulating MiR-152-3p/SLC2A1 Axis in Glioma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  300. Wu, H.; Li, J.; Xu, D.; Jv, D.; Meng, X.; Qiao, P.; Cui, T.; Shi, B. The 37-KDa Laminin Receptor Precursor Regulates the Malignancy of Human Glioma Cells. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2016, 34, 516–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  301. Han, M.-Z.; Wang, S.; Zhao, W.-B.; Ni, S.-L.; Yang, N.; Kong, Y.; Huang, B.; Chen, A.-J.; Li, X.-G.; Wang, J.; et al. Immune Checkpoint Molecule Herpes Virus Entry Mediator Is Overexpressed and Associated with Poor Prognosis in Human Glioblastoma. Ebiomedicine 2019, 43, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  302. Ku, B.M.; Lee, Y.K.; Ryu, J.; Jeong, J.Y.; Choi, J.; Eun, K.M.; Shin, H.Y.; Kim, D.G.; Hwang, E.M.; Yoo, J.C.; et al. CHI3L1 (YKL-40) Is Expressed in Human Gliomas and Regulates the Invasion, Growth and Survival of Glioma Cells. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 128, 1316–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  303. Lou, J.-C.; Lan, Y.-L.; Gao, J.-X.; Ma, B.-B.; Yang, T.; Yuan, Z.-B.; Zhang, H.-Q.; Zhu, T.-Z.; Pan, N.; Leng, S.; et al. Silencing NUDT21 Attenuates the Mesenchymal Identity of Glioblastoma Cells via the NF-Kappa B Pathway. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  304. Saito, K.; Ohta, S.; Kawakami, Y.; Yoshida, K.; Toda, M. Functional Analysis of KIF20A, a Potential Immunotherapeutic Target for Glioma. J. Neurooncol. 2017, 132, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  305. Xu, H.; Chai, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xiao, D.; Li, J.; Xiong, N. Molecular and Clinical Characterization of PARP9 in Gliomas: A Potential Immunotherapeutic Target. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2020, 26, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  306. Yuan, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, H.; Li, Z.; Du, Y.; Tian, X.; Lu, J. Characterization of Transcriptome Profile and Clinical Features of a Novel Immunotherapy Target CD204 in Diffuse Glioma. Cancer Med. 2019, 8, 3811–3821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  307. Yuan, F.; Cong, Z.; Cai, X.; Zhu, J.; Yuan, L.; Wang, Y.; Tang, C.; Ma, C. BACH1 as a Potential Target for Immunotherapy in Glioblastomas. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2022, 103, 108451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  308. Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhu, X.L.; Bai, H.; Wang, Z.Z.; Zhang, J.J.; Hao, C.Y.; Duan, H.B. S100A Gene Family: Immune-Related Prognostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets for Low-Grade Glioma. Aging 2021, 13, 15459–15478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  309. Zhu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Lv, D.; Cheng, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, B.; Han, Z.; Wangs, Y.; Liu, R.; Gao, Y. Identification of PYGL as a Key Prognostic Gene of Glioma by Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis. Future Oncol. 2022, 18, 579–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  310. Chen, T.; Zhang, F.; Liu, J.; Huang, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Deng, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Sun, X. Dual Role of WNT5A in Promoting Endothelial Differentiation of Glioma Stem Cells and Angiogenesis of Glioma Derived Endothelial Cells. Oncogene 2021, 40, 5081–5094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  311. Di, C.; Liang, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, G.; Zhao, Y. SPZ1 Promotes Glioma Aggravation via Targeting CXXC4. J. BUON 2021, 26, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  312. Friedmann-Morvinski, D.; Bhargava, V.; Gupta, S.; Verma, I.M.; Subramaniam, S. Identification of Therapeutic Targets for Glioblastoma by Network Analysis. Oncogene 2016, 35, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  313. Guo, G.; Liu, J.; Ren, Y.; Mao, X.; Hao, Y.; Zhong, C.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Wu, Y.; Lian, S.; et al. FRAT1 Enhances the Proliferation and Tumorigenesis of CD133+ Nestin+ Glioma Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Cancer 2020, 11, 2421–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  314. Lan, J.; Guo, P.; Lin, Y.; Mao, Q.; Guo, L.; Ge, J.; Li, X.; Jiang, J.; Lin, X.; Qiu, Y. Role of Glycosyltransferase PomGnT1 in Glioblastoma Progression. Neuro-Oncology 2015, 17, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  315. Mizobuchi, Y.; Matsuzaki, K.; Kuwayama, K.; Kitazato, K.; Mure, H.; Kageji, T.; Nagahiro, S. REIC/Dkk-3 Induces Cell Death in Human Malignant Glioma. Neuro-Oncology 2008, 10, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  316. Zhou, X.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, K.; Han, L.; Kong, L.; Wei, J.; Chen, L.; Yang, J.; et al. HOTAIR Is a Therapeutic Target in Glioblastoma. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 8353–8365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  317. Borsics, T.; Lundberg, E.; Geerts, D.; Koomoa, D.-L.T.; Koster, J.; Wester, K.; Bachmann, A.S. Subcellular Distribution and Expression of Prenylated Rab Acceptor 1 Domain Family, Member 2 (PRAF2) in Malignant Glioma: Influence on Cell Survival and Migration. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101, 1624–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  318. Cui, P.; Su, J.; Li, Q.; Xu, G.; Zhu, N. LncRNA RHPN1-AS1 Targeting MiR-625/REG3A Promotes Cell Proliferation And Invasion Of Glioma Cells. Oncotargets Ther. 2019, 12, 7911–7921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  319. Dong, Z.; Zhang, J.; Niu, L.; Hou, G.; Gao, Z.; Yang, Q. MiR-381-3p Involves in Glioma Progression by Suppressing Tumor-Promoter Factor ANTXR1. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2021, 2021, 4883509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  320. Fève, M.; Saliou, J.M.; Zeniou, M.; Lennon, S.; Carapito, C.; Dong, J.; Van Dorsselaer, A.; Junier, M.P.; Chneiweiss, H.; Cianférani, S.; et al. Comparative Expression Study of the Endo-G Protein Coupled Receptor (GPCR) Repertoire in Human Glioblastoma Cancer Stem-like Cells, U87-MG Cells and Non Malignant Cells of Neural Origin Unveils New Potential Therapeutic Targets. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  321. Han, M.-Z.; Xu, R.; Xu, Y.-Y.; Zhang, X.; Ni, S.-L.; Huang, B.; Chen, A.-J.; Wei, Y.-Z.; Wang, S.; Li, W.-J.; et al. TAGLN2 Is a Candidate Prognostic Biomarker Promoting Tumorigenesis in Human Gliomas. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 36, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  322. Hou, D.; Wang, Z.; Li, H.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Lou, M. Circular RNA CircASPM Promotes the Progression of Glioblastoma by Acting as a Competing Endogenous RNA to Regulate MiR-130b-3p/E2F1 Axis. J. Cancer 2022, 13, 1664–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  323. Huang, W.; Shi, Y.; Han, B.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, B.; Qi, C.; Liu, F. LncRNA GAS5-AS1 Inhibits Glioma Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion via MiR-106b-5p/TUSC2 Axis. Hum. Cell 2020, 33, 416–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  324. Li, J.-L.; Sainson, R.C.A.; Oon, C.E.; Turley, H.; Leek, R.; Sheldon, H.; Bridges, E.; Shi, W.; Snell, C.; Bowden, E.T.; et al. DLL4-Notch Signaling Mediates Tumor Resistance to Anti-VEGF Therapy in Vivo. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 6073–6083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  325. Li, R.; Li, X.; Ning, S.; Ye, J.; Han, L.; Kang, C.; Li, X. Identification of a Core MiRNA-Pathway Regulatory Network in Glioma by Therapeutically Targeting MiR-181d, MiR-21, MiR-23b, β-Catenin, CBP, and STAT3. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  326. Li, Q.; Wu, Q.; Li, Z.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, F.; Zhai, Z.; Yue, S.; Tian, H. LncRNA LINC00319 Is Associated with Tumorigenesis and Poor Prognosis in Glioma. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 861, 172556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  327. Li, H.; Wang, D.; Yi, B.; Cai, H.; Wang, Y.; Lou, X.; Xi, Z.; Li, Z. SUMOylation of IGF2BP2 Promotes Vasculogenic Mimicry of Glioma via Regulating OIP5-AS1/MiR-495-3p Axis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 17, 2912–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  328. Liu, C.; Liang, S.; Xiao, S.; Lin, Q.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Fu, J. MicroRNA-27b Inhibits Spry2 Expression and Promotes Cell Invasion in Glioma U251 Cells. Oncol. Lett. 2015, 9, 1393–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  329. Liu, L.; Xu, Q.; Xiong, Y.; Deng, H.; Zhou, J. LncRNA LINC01094 Contributes to Glioma Progression by Modulating MiR-224-5p/CHSY1 Axis. Hum. Cell 2022, 35, 214–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  330. Miller, T.E.; Liau, B.B.; Wallace, L.C.; Morton, A.R.; Xie, Q.; Dixit, D.; Factor, D.C.; Kim, L.J.Y.; Morrow, J.J.; Wu, Q.; et al. Transcription Elongation Factors Represent in Vivo Cancer Dependencies in Glioblastoma. Nature 2017, 547, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  331. Noorani, I.; de la Rosa, J.; Choi, Y.H.; Strong, A.; Ponstingl, H.; Vijayabaskar, M.S.; Lee, J.; Lee, E.; Richard-Londt, A.; Friedrich, M.; et al. PiggyBac Mutagenesis and Exome Sequencing Identify Genetic Driver Landscapes and Potential Therapeutic Targets of EGFR-Mutant Gliomas. Genome Biol. 2020, 21, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  332. Qiu, X.; Ji, B.; Yang, L.; Huang, Q.; Shi, W.; Ding, Z.; He, X.; Ban, N.; Fan, S.; Zhang, J.; et al. The Role of FoxJ2 in the Migration of Human Glioma Cells. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2015, 211, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  333. Rose, M.; Cardon, T.; Aboulouard, S.; Hajjaji, N.; Kobeissy, F.; Duhamel, M.; Fournier, I.; Salzet, M. Surfaceome Proteomic of Glioblastoma Revealed Potential Targets for Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 746168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  334. Sharma, V.; Purkait, S.; Takkar, S.; Malgulwar, P.B.; Kumar, A.; Pathak, P.; Suri, V.; Sharma, M.C.; Suri, A.; Kale, S.S.; et al. Analysis of EZH2: Micro-RNA Network in Low and High Grade Astrocytic Tumors. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2016, 33, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  335. Sun, Z.; Zhang, B.; Wang, C.; Fu, T.; Li, L.; Wu, Q.; Cai, Y.; Wang, J. Forkhead Box P3 Regulates ARHGAP15 Expression and Affects Migration of Glioma Cells through the Rac1 Signaling Pathway. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  336. Visvanathan, A.; Patil, V.; Arora, A.; Hegde, A.S.; Arivazhagan, A.; Santosh, V.; Somasundaram, K. Essential Role of METTL3-Mediated m(6)A Modification in Glioma Stem-like Cells Maintenance and Radioresistance. Oncogene 2018, 37, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  337. Wang, H.; Han, M.; Whetsell, W.J.r.; Wang, J.; Rich, J.; Hallahan, D.; Han, Z. Tax-Interacting Protein 1 Coordinates the Spatiotemporal Activation of Rho GTPases and Regulates the Infiltrative Growth of Human Glioblastoma. Oncogene 2014, 33, 1558–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  338. Wei, J.; Li, Z.; Du, C.; Qi, B.; Zhao, X.; Wang, L.; Bi, L.; Wang, G.; Zhang, X.; Su, X.; et al. Abnormal Expression of an ADAR2 Alternative Splicing Variant in Gliomas Downregulates Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA Editing. Acta Neurochir. 2014, 156, 1135–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  339. Weigle, B.; Ebner, R.; Temme, A.; Schwind, S.; Schmitz, M.; Kiessling, A.; Rieger, M.; Schackert, G.; Schackert, H.; Rieber, E. Highly Specific Overexpression of the Transcription Factor SOX11 in Human Malignant Gliomas. Oncol. Rep. 2005, 13, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  340. Xin, J.; Zhao, Y.H.; Zhang, X.Y.; Tian, L.Q. LncRNA NFIA-AS2 Promotes Glioma Progression through Modulating the MiR-655-3p/ZFX Axis. Hum. Cell 2020, 33, 1273–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  341. Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Zhou, H.; Su, L.; Han, X.; Zhang, X.; Han, W.; Wang, Y.; Xue, X. ANXA1: An Important Independent Prognostic Factor and Molecular Target in Glioma. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 851505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  342. Zhou, L.; Li, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhi, Z.; Yan, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhai, Q. MiR-190a-3p Promotes Proliferation and Migration in Glioma Cells via YOD1. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2021, 2021, 3957738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  343. Kumthekar, P. A Phase 0 First-In-Human Study Using NU-0129: A Spherical Nucleic Acid (SNA) Gold Nanoparticle Targeting BCL2L12 in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme or Gliosarcoma Patients. 2022. Available online: clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on 29 May 2023).
  344. Miller, J.J.; Gonzalez Castro, L.N.; McBrayer, S.; Weller, M.; Cloughesy, T.; Portnow, J.; Andronesi, O.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S.; Baumert, B.G.; Berger, M.S.; et al. Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) Mutant Gliomas: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) Consensus Review on Diagnosis, Management, and Future Directions. Neuro-Oncology 2023, 25, 4–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  345. Allen, M.; Bjerke, M.; Edlund, H.; Nelander, S.; Westermark, B. Origin of the U87MG Glioma Cell Line: Good News and Bad News. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 354re3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  346. Kenesei, Á.; Volkó, J.; Szalóki, N.; Mocsár, G.; Jambrovics, K.; Balajthy, Z.; Bodnár, A.; Tóth, K.; Waldmann, T.A.; Vámosi, G. IL-15 Trans-Presentation Is an Autonomous, Antigen-Independent Process. J. Immunol. 2021, 207, 2489–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  347. Cole, D.E.; Lester-McCully, C.M.; Widemann, B.C.; Warren, K.E. Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pharmacokinetics of the Akt Inhibitor, Perifosine, in a Non-Human Primate Model. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2015, 75, 923–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  348. Britten, C.D. PI3K and MEK Inhibitor Combinations: Examining the Evidence in Selected Tumor Types. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2013, 71, 1395–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  349. Paul, I.; Bhattacharya, S.; Chatterjee, A.; Ghosh, M.K. Current Understanding on EGFR and Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in Glioma and Their Possible Crosstalk. Genes Cancer 2013, 4, 427–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  350. Mellinghoff, I.K.; Wang, M.Y.; Vivanco, I.; Haas-Kogan, D.A.; Zhu, S.; Dia, E.Q.; Lu, K.V.; Yoshimoto, K.; Huang, J.H.Y.; Chute, D.J.; et al. Molecular Determinants of the Response of Glioblastomas to EGFR Kinase Inhibitors. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 2012–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  351. National Institute of Health (NIH) 219 Studies Found for: Molecular Targeted Therapy OR Molecular Target OR Protein Kinase Inhibitors/Administration OR Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases/Antagonists and Inhibitors OR Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/Administration and Dosage|Glioma Glioblastoma Multiforme. Clinicaltrials.Gov. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=Glioma+Glioblastoma+Multiforme&term=molecular+targeted+therapy+OR+molecular+target+OR+Protein+Kinase+Inhibitors%2Fadministration+OR+Mitogen-Activated+Protein+Kinase+Kinases%2Fantagonists+and+inhibitors+OR+Antineoplastic+Combined+Chemotherapy+Protocols%2Fadministration+and+dosage&type=&rslt=&age_v=&gndr=&intr=&titles=&outc=&spons=&lead=&id=&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=&locn=&rsub=&strd_s=&strd_e=&prcd_s=&prcd_e=&sfpd_s=&sfpd_e=&rfpd_s=&rfpd_e=&lupd_s=&lupd_e=&sort= (accessed on 29 May 2023).
  352. Thiessen, B.; Stewart, C.; Tsao, M.; Kamel-Reid, S.; Schaiquevich, P.; Mason, W.; Easaw, J.; Belanger, K.; Forsyth, P.; McIntosh, L.; et al. A Phase I/II Trial of GW572016 (Lapatinib) in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: Clinical Outcomes, Pharmacokinetics and Molecular Correlation. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2010, 65, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  353. Patel, K.S.; Kejriwal, S.; Thammachantha, S.; Duong, C.; Murillo, A.; Gordon, L.K.; Cloughesy, T.F.; Liau, L.; Yong, W.; Yang, I.; et al. Increased Epithelial Membrane Protein 2 Expression in Glioblastoma after Treatment with Bevacizumab. Neuro-Oncol. Adv. 2020, 2, vdaa112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  354. Wirsching, H.-G.; Weller, M. The Role of Molecular Diagnostics in the Management of Patients with Gliomas. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2016, 17, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  355. Wang, J.Y.; Bettegowda, C. Genetics and Immunotherapy: Using the Genetic Landscape of Gliomas to Inform Management Strategies. J. Neurooncol. 2015, 123, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  356. Xiong, W.; Zhao, Y.; Du, H.; Guo, X. Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 704336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  357. Han, J.W.; Park, S.-H. Advances in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J. Liver Cancer 2021, 21, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  358. Zhang, H.; Dai, Z.; Wu, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, L.; Zeng, W.-J.; Liu, Z.; Cheng, Q. Regulatory Mechanisms of Immune Checkpoints PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in Cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 40, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  359. Restrepo, P.; Yong, R.; Laface, I.; Tsankova, N.; Nael, K.; Akturk, G.; Sebra, R.; Gnjatic, S.; Hormigo, A.; Losic, B. Tumoral and Immune Heterogeneity in an Anti-PD-1-Responsive Glioblastoma: A Case Study. Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 2020, 6, a004762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  360. Ostrom, Q.T.; Gittleman, H.; Farah, P.; Ondracek, A.; Chen, Y.; Wolinsky, Y.; Stroup, N.E.; Kruchko, C.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2006–2010. Neuro-Oncology 2013, 15, ii1–ii56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  361. Penas-Prado, M.; Gilbert, M.R. Molecularly Targeted Therapies for Malignant Gliomas: Advances and Challenges. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2007, 7, 641–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  362. Roesler, R.; Brunetto, A.T.; Abujamra, A.L.; de Farias, C.B.; Brunetto, A.L.; Schwartsmann, G. Current and Emerging Molecular Targets in Glioma. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2010, 10, 1735–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  363. Huang, T.T.; Sarkaria, S.M.; Cloughesy, T.F.; Mischel, P.S. Targeted Therapy for Malignant Glioma Patients: Lessons Learned and the Road Ahead. Neurotherapeutics 2009, 6, 500–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.