Identification, Characterization and Expression Profiling of the RS Gene Family during the Withering Process of White Tea in the Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis) Reveal the Transcriptional Regulation of CsRS8
and Weijiang Sun 1,*
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Reviewer comments
First, I would like to congratulate authors for presenting well written and structured manuscript. The manuscript is recommended for publication, following minor English errors for e.g. missing articles such as “a” and “the”, and Line 75-77: reference and revision needed.
Figures are difficult to read.
Author Response
Dear reviewer：
We thank you for your careful reading and thoughtful comments on the previous draft. We have carefully taken your comments into consideration in preparing our revision, which have resulted in paper that is clearer and more compelling. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to your comments are as following:
(1) “The manuscript is recommended for publication, following minor English errors for eg. missing articles such as “a” and “the”.”
Response: Thank you very much for your recognition of our work. We have carefully examined the writing of the manuscript. The paper was edited for proper English writing by one or more of the highly qualified native English speaking editors at AJE. Please find the editing certificate in the attachment.
(2) “Line 75-77: reference and revision needed.”
Response: Thank you for your careful investigation, and we have added the citation about the Line 75-77.
(3) “Figures are difficult to read.”
Response: Sorry, several figures that we made were more ambiguous than intended, and we have adjusted to the annotation of the figures to make the expression be clearer.
We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. We appreciate for your warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The scientific publication is written in accordance with the rules of the journal, the results are significant for the development of the field. I suggest that the work be published.
I only require additional clarification from the author for figure 2A.
Author Response
Dear reviewer：
We thank you for your careful reading and thoughtful comments on the previous draft. We have carefully taken your comments into consideration in preparing our revision, which have resulted in paper that is clearer and more compelling. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to your comments are as following:
(1) “Require additional clarification from the author for figure 2A.”
Response: This is a valid and important suggestion, and we have modified the annotation of the figure 2A to make it clearer.
We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. We appreciate for your warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
