Next Article in Journal
The Prognostic Relevance of PMCA4 Expression in Melanoma: Gender Specificity and Implications for Immune Checkpoint Inhibition
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification and Expression Analysis of R2R3-MYB Family Genes Associated with Salt Tolerance in Cyclocarya paliurus
Previous Article in Journal
RNA Sequencing of Epithelial Cell/Fibroblastic Foci Sandwich in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: New Insights on the Signaling Pathway
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Progress on the Salt Tolerance Mechanisms and Application of Tamarisk

1
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Research, College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
2
Dongying Institute, Shandong Normal University, No. 2 Kangyang Road, Dongying 257000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(6), 3325; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063325
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 10 March 2022 / Accepted: 16 March 2022 / Published: 19 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanisms of Plant Salt Resistance)

Abstract

:
Salinized soil is a major environmental stress affecting plant growth and development. Excessive salt in the soil inhibits the growth of most plants and even threatens their survival. Halophytes are plants that can grow and develop normally on saline-alkali soil due to salt tolerance mechanisms that emerged during evolution. For this reason, halophytes are used as pioneer plants for improving and utilizing saline land. Tamarisk, a family of woody halophytes, is highly salt tolerant and has high economic value. Understanding the mechanisms of salt tolerance in tamarisk and identifying the key genes involved are important for improving saline land and increasing the salt tolerance of crops. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of the salt tolerance mechanisms of tamarisk and the economic and medicinal value of this halophyte.

1. Introduction

Soil salinization is a global issue [1], with about 20% of the world’s available cultivated land estimated to be affected by salinity [2]. According to incomplete statistics from UNESCO (the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, France) and FAO (the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy), the total land area of the world is about 13.39 billion hectares, of which the saline-alkali land area is more than 800 million hectares [3], or more than 5.9% of the world’s total land area. In addition to the existing saline-alkali land, various factors such as climate change and excessive irrigation cause ongoing secondary salinization of arable land, resulting in more salinized land [4,5,6]. Based on previous statistics, approximately 70% of the land in northwest China is saline [7].
The problem of soil salinization has become one of the important issues discussed in the International Salinization Forum [8]. Soil salinization seriously affects global agricultural production [9,10]; the correlation between soil salinization and crop yield was studied and it was found that crop yields decreased linearly with increases in soil salt content [10,11]. It is speculated that by 2050, about 50% of the world’s arable land will become saline, which will greatly reduce agricultural production. Because of this, it is urgent to increase the area of arable land, improve agricultural production capacity, and accelerate the development and utilization of salinized land. Of all the measures available to reach these goals, increasing the salt tolerance of plants is the most economical and effective. Transgenic or genetic approaches based on advances in biotechnology and gene engineering can be used to improve the salt tolerance of crops. However, most of these improved crops can only survive on mildly saline soil (salt content below 100 mM) and might sustain low yields or die on most moderately and severely saline-alkali land [12]. So, the development and utilization of moderately and severely saline-alkali land is a huge challenge facing mankind.
Halophytes are highly salt-tolerant plants, defined by their ability to complete their life cycles at soil NaCl concentrations of no less than 200 mM for successive generations [13]. Studies have shown that halophytes are adapted to saline-alkali soil and that certain concentrations of NaCl can even promote their growth [14,15]. Therefore, saline-alkali soil is suitable for the cultivation of halophytes. However, halophytes account for only about 1% of all plants, and most have no economic or ornamental value, which restricts their development and utilization. Therefore, it is necessary to screen for and utilize valuable halophytes to develop moderately and severely saline-alkali land, which, because of its lack of cover vegetation, has a tendency toward desertification and ecological vulnerability [16,17,18]. Based on years of research, development, and application, most halophytes have been tested for this purpose [19]. Tamarisk (e.g., Tamarix chinensis Lour) is a many-branched shrub or tree that is a recretohalophyte, a halophyte that secretes salt. This typical woody halophyte can grow well on moderately and severely saline-alkali land, improving the environment and providing increased economic benefits [20,21,22]. In addition to being salt-stress-tolerant, tamarisk is also highly drought-tolerant, making it a good choice for the development and utilization of moderately and severely saline-alkali land. In this review, we focus on recent advances in understanding the salt tolerance mechanisms of tamarisk and the potential uses of this halophyte.

2. The Salt Tolerance Mechanisms of Tamarisk

Tamarisk has two main options for adapting to a saline environment: salt avoidance and salt tolerance [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Tamarisk avoids salt damage by secreting salt via salt glands [23,24,28] and tolerates salt via many physiological and metabolic processes [25,26,27], such as osmotic regulation, scavenging of free radicals, cell detoxification, and protection of biological macromolecules (Figure 1). Maintaining metabolic homeostasis plays an important role in salt tolerance. The following sections review recent research on different aspects of the salt tolerance mechanisms of tamarisk.

2.1. Salt Ion Secretion

Recretohalophytes typically secrete salt ions that enter the plant through salt-secreting structures, mainly salt glands and salt bladders [29,30,31,32]. Dassanayake and Larkin (2017) [32] divided salt-secreting structures into four categories: salt bladders, unicellular salt glands, bicellular salt glands, and multicellular salt glands. Multicellular salt glands are the most complicated salt-secreting structures and generally consist of 4–40 cells, comprising collecting and secretory cells. Salt gland cells are enclosed in a cuticle-lined structure [33].
The salt glands of tamarisk are multicellular [23,24]. Early research focused on the structural and physiological characteristics of tamarisk salt glands. Thomson and Liu (1967) [23] showed that tamarisk salt glands have eight cells, of which two are collecting cells and six are secreting cells, and numerous plasmodesmata connecting the secretory cells with the collecting cells and the collecting cells with the adjacent mesophyll cells. Wei et al. (2020) [28] examined the salt glands of 11 species of Tamarix by differential interference microscopy and ultraviolet microscopy and found that they had only two secretory cells visible on the leaf surface. The cell walls in the salt gland cell fusion area were autofluorescent in tamarisk, similar to Limonium bicolor [33]. This autofluorescence, caused by the unique presence of ferulic acid in salt gland cell walls, can be used as a simple and reliable method to examine salt gland distribution and morphology [28,33,34]. Using this method [28], 11 Tamarix species were divided into three different types based on salt gland density, secretion rate per salt gland, and salt secretion capacity per leaf area. For all Tamarix species studied, salt secretion capacity and the size and density of salt glands significantly increased under NaCl treatment.
Salt secretion by salt glands plays a critical role in the salt tolerance of tamarisk. Several processes, including ion transport, movement through plasmodesmata, and vesicle transport, may be involved in salt secretion from salt glands [35,36,37]. Using specific inhibitors of cation pumps, channels, and transporters [38], it was shown that the salt glands in Tamarix species mainly secrete Na+ and K+. Ding et al. (2009) [30] showed that Ca2+ and H+-ATPase are involved in salt secretion from salt glands in L. bicolor under NaCl treatment. A large amount of transcriptome data suggested that ion transporters are involved in the salt secretion process [37,39].
There are many plasmodesmata between salt gland cells and between salt gland cells and adjacent mesophyll cells [23]. Plasmodesmata connect the cytoplasms of neighboring cells, constituting the symplastic transport pathway of plants. Molecular exchanges via the symplastic pathway are highly controlled [40]. Studies have shown that the intercellular channels traversing plasmodesmata provide a low-resistance pathway for many molecules, such as ions, RNAs, and hormones [41,42]. Thus, plasmodesmata can be an efficient symplastic transport pathway, especially for ions. Ma and Peterson (2001) [43] examined the ion transport pathway in roots from the epidermis to the stele. They analyzed the plasmodesmatal frequencies (which can be considered as representing the transport capacity through plasmodesmata) for all cellular interfaces ranging from the epidermis to the stelar parenchyma within the root and found that the radial transport of ions in the roots is really via plasmodesmatas. Zhang et al. (2022) [37] identified two plasmodesmata-localized proteins (BGs and PDCB5) involved in salt secretion from salt glands under salt stress.
During salt secretion by salt glands, many vesicles appear, suggesting that vesicular trafficking is involved in transporting and secreting salt. Lu et al. (2020) [36] downregulated the expression of the SNARE protein LbSYP61 (involved in vesicle transport) in L. bicolor using virus-induced gene silencing and showed that salt secretion by the salt glands decreased significantly. Through transcriptome and proteome analysis, Zhang et al. (2022) [37] identified a large number of vesicle-trafficking proteins involved in salt secretion by salt glands in L. bicolor. In tamarisk, based on salt gland distribution and ultrastructure, it was speculated that salt ions are transferred by vesicular transport from one excretory cell to the next until the ions are secreted from the plant [44]. However, the genes regulating the development and salt secretion ability of salt glands of tamarisk have not been well characterized. With continued progress in the molecular biology and biotechnology of tamarisk, we will be able to uncover the mechanism of salt secretion by salt glands in this plant.

2.2. Na+ Homeostasis and Osmotic Adjustment

In addition to secreting ions, another mechanism of salt tolerance in tamarisk is to maintain cellular ion homeostasis and osmotic balance [27]. Direct injury to plants by salt stress is caused by ion toxicity. Under salt stress, large amounts of Na+ enter plant cells, which can cause damage to macromolecules and membranes. Salt-tolerant plants can reduce the Na+ content of the cytoplasm by sequestering Na+ in the vacuole via Na+/H+ antiporters localized on the tonoplast and by secreting Na+ out of the cytoplasm via Na+/H+ antiporters (e.g., salt overly sensitive 1 [SOS1]) localized on the plasma membrane (PM). Two studies (Ma et al., 2019.; Che et al., 2019) [27,45] showed that TrSOS1 (from Tamarix ramosissima) had stronger Na+ efflux capacity than AtSOS1 (from Arabidopsis thaliana, a nonhalophyte). Overexpression of TrSOS1 in cotton enhanced salt tolerance by maintaining a lower Na+ content and Na+/H+ ratio inside the plants. H+-ATPases localized on the PM (PM H+-ATPases) pump H+ out of the cell, creating a proton gradient across the plasma membrane that provides energy for SOS1 activity [45]. The same function is performed by vacuolar H+-ATPases (V-ATPases) to support Na+/H+ antiporters localized on the tonoplast [13]. The plant V-ATPase is a multisubunit complex and plays a role in salt tolerance in plants. Wang et al. (2020) [6] showed that homologous transformation of the Th2CysPrx gene (from Tamarix hispida Willd) into T. hispida improved salt stress resistance overexpression lines (Table 1).
Under salt stress, salt-tolerant plants generally accumulate organic compounds to osmotically adjust, protecting biomacromolecules and decreasing cytoplasmic water potential. For example, salt stress increases the proline contents in T. chinensis seedlings [55], and proline can be the main compound used for osmotic adjustments in tamarisk plants. Wang et al. (2017) [46] showed that transient overexpression of ThNAC13 (a NAM, ATAF1/2, and CUC2 transcription factor gene from T. hispida) induced increased proline contents and improved salt tolerance. The nuclear protein ThNAC7 is another NAC transcription factor involved in salt tolerance in T. hispida. Transient overexpression of ThNAC7 in T. hispida seedlings decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) contents and increased proline contents, thereby increasing salt tolerance. Additionally, ThNAC7 can upregulate the expression of genes associated with stress tolerance and improve osmotic stress tolerance by increasing the content of osmotic regulatory substances and reducing ROS [47]. Zang et al. (2015) [48] suggested that ThZFP1 (a zinc finger protein from T. hispida) positively regulates proline accumulation in transgenic Arabidopsis and T. hispida plants. Furthermore, ThDof1.4 (a Dof protein from T. hispida) binds to a Dof motif in the ThZFP1 promoter to activate ThZFP1 expression. Further study showed that ThDof1.4 and ThZFP1 form a transcriptional regulatory cascade involved in increasing salt resistance in T. hispida by increasing proline levels and ROS-scavenging capability [49] (Table 1). Proline is not the only important osmotic adjusting substance. ThbZIP1 is a basic leucine zipper protein involved in abiotic stress responses in T. hispida. Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing ThbZIP1 increased their salt resistance by accumulating compatible osmolytes (soluble sugars and soluble proteins) and inducing the biosynthesis of soluble proteins.

2.3. Efficient ROS Scavenging Mechanism

Plants subjected to salt stress tend to have increased levels of ROS [56]. ROS have a dual effect on plants. At certain concentrations, ROS can act as signal molecules to improve the salt tolerance of plants and keep them alive; low concentrations of ROS are required for many important signaling reactions [57]. Baral (2019) [58] showed that ROS activated a downstream signaling pathway to increase the activities of ion transporters and reduce the concentration of Na+ ions in roots to help plants resist salt stress [58]. However, high concentrations of ROS can damage biological macromolecules, membranes, and basic biological processes, disrupting the normal metabolism and function of cells and even preventing the survival of plants [59,60]. ROS-scavenging enzymes in plants include SOD (superoxide dismutase), CAT (catalase), POD (peroxidase), APX (ascorbate peroxidase), GPX (glutathione peroxidase), and GST (glutathione S-transferase [48]. The activity or level of expression of these antioxidant enzymes increases in salt-stressed plants [56]. Furthermore, increased activity of antioxidant enzymes is often considered to increase plant tolerance to certain concentrations of salt [60,61].
In addition to salt secretion, an effective ROS-scavenging system is also key to the salt tolerance of tamarisk. Yang et al. (2014) [59] found that overexpressing ThGSTZ1 (a GST gene from T. hispida) in Arabidopsis increased the survival rates of the transgenic plants under salinity stress. At the same time, these transgenic plants exhibited increased levels of GST, GPX, SOD, and POD activities, along with decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) contents and ROS levels under salt stress conditions. Transiently overexpressing ThGSTZ1 in T. hispida significantly increased GST and GPX activities and improved ROS-scavenging ability under high-NaCl conditions [59]. As discussed earlier, Zang et al. (2015) [48] showed that the T. hispida zinc finger protein ThZFP1 is involved in salt stress resistance. Overexpression of ThZFP1 in T. hispida plants using a transient transformation system induced the expression of POD and SOD genes, leading to enhanced SOD and POD activities and thus increased ROS-scavenging capability under salt stress. A 2-Cys peroxiredoxin gene from T hispida (Th2CysPrx) is also involved in salt stress tolerance [6] (Table 1). Further research showed that Th2CysPrx increased the salt tolerance of plants by increasing the activities of antioxidant enzymes and enhancing ROS removal. Moreover, Th2CysPrx upregulated the expression of ThGSTZ1, ThGPX, ThSOD, and ThPOD. ThTrx5 (a T. hispida thioredoxin) is also involved in increasing SOD, POD, CAT [61], and glutathione levels [62], as is ThSAP30BP (an SAP30-binding protein from T. hispida). [51]
The regulation of ROS content may be important for salt tolerance in tamarisk. Liu et al. (2021) [52] showed that ThSOS3 (T. hispida SOS3) plays an important role in ROS homeostasis in tamarisk. Transient overexpression of ThSOS3 in T. hispida plants significantly increased their ROS-scavenging capability and antioxidant enzyme activities (Table 1). Wang et al. (2021) [53] constructed a salt-stress-regulated gene library for T. hispida and identified 1224 potential salt tolerance genes. Of these 1224 genes, 21 were randomly selected for further analysis, and 19 of these were involved in salt tolerance in T. hispida. Overexpression and knockdown of the 19 genes in T. hispida significantly decreased and increased, respectively, the ROS levels in the transformed plants compared to the control under salt stress. These results suggested that these genes are involved in scavenging ROS in T. hispida under salt stress.
NAC transcription factors are also involved in ROS scavenging in T. hispida. Wang et al. (2021) [53] showed that overexpressing ThNAC12 (a T. hispida NAC transcription factor gene) in Tamarix and Arabidopsis enhanced their salt tolerance by increasing the ROS-scavenging capability and antioxidant enzyme activities under salt stress. Further research found that ThNAC12 increased salt tolerance in plants through direct regulation of ThPIP2;5 (aquaporins 2:5 which is a plasma membrane intrinsic protein from T. hispida) expression in T. hispida. ThWRKY4 (a T. hispida WRKY gene) is highly induced by salt stress and can be regulated by ABF (ABRE binding factor) and Dof (DNA binding with one finger) transcription factors. ThWRKY4 increases the salt tolerance of T. hispida by increasing the activities of antioxidant enzymes and decreasing the levels of ROS [54]. Further study showed that the expression of ThWRKY4 was activated by ThHSFA1 (a heat shock transcription factor from T. hispida) and that ThHSFA1 can bind to the heat shock element (HSE) of the ThWRKY4 promoter. ThHSFA1-overexpressing T. hispida displayed similar salt tolerance phenotypes to those of ThWRKY4-overexpressing plants: enhanced salt tolerance, increased antioxidant enzyme activities, and reduced ROS levels under salt stress [63].

3. Application of Tamarisk

Tamarisk has many applications due to its high salt tolerance and economic and medicinal value (Figure 2).

3.1. Significance of Tamarisk to the Environment

Because tamarisk is drought- and salt-tolerant, it can be used to build windbreaks to resist erosion by wind and sand in arid regions; it also can be planted on salinized land to improve the local ecological environment [64]. Many trees barely survive on severely saline land, so coastal saline-alkali areas are almost barren due to the lack of suitable trees. However, because of its high salt tolerance, tamarisk is the preferred tree species for greening of coastal saline land. Under these conditions, tamarisk can increase land cover, inhibit soil resalinization, decrease soil salinity, and improve soil quality and the local environment [65]. In addition, tamarisk can purify the environment by decreasing the levels of some pathogens and removing organic compounds where it is grown [66]. Tamarisk also can absorb heavy metal ions, thereby repairing soil polluted by heavy metals.
The development and utilization of tamarisk are mainly concentrated in three aspects. Each aspect is divided into several small research directions, which are marked with numbers in lowercase in English in the boxes connected to each aspect.

3.2. Medicinal Value of Tamarisk

Tamarisk has been used as a medicine for hundreds of years by traditional Chinese doctors. An ancient Chinese medical book, Compendium of Materia Medica, records the functions of tamarisk, including its use for treating a variety of diseases and detoxification. In recent years, many studies involving tamarisk extracts support the medical value of tamarisk. Tamarisk is rich in phenols and flavonoids, which are believed to possess medical value because of their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer activities [67]. Tamarisk preparations used to treat disease showed no toxicity in animal tests, so tamarisk can be considered as a safe medicinal plant [68,69]. The following sections review the main uses of tamarisk to treat disease.

3.2.1. Treatment of Diabetes

The inhibition of α-amylase is an important strategy for treating diabetes [70], (Tundis et al., 2010; Cardullo et al., 2019) [71] due to its role in the digestion of carbohydrates and blood sugar levels. Experiments on rats suggest that tamarisk extracts can inhibit the activity of α-amylase and thus be used in diabetes-related research [72]. In addition, an aqueous extract of tamarisk alleviated complications of diabetes in rats [73]. These results suggest the potential of tamarisk as a treatment for diabetes.

3.2.2. Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Several factors affect the onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including heredity and unhealthy habits, and possibly the environment and microorganisms [74]. Tamarisk is used by traditional Chinese doctors for the clinical treatment of RA. Recent studies have shown that tamaractam, a type of lactam found in tamarisk, is an active component that may be used to treat RA, much as the tamarisk herb was used in the past as a traditional Chinese medicine [75]. In addition, ramosissimin, a flavonol extract from Tamarix, can induce apoptosis of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes (RA-FLSs) [76], supporting the value of ramosissimin as a treatment for RA [77,78].

3.2.3. Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease

Despite decades of research on Alzheimer’s disease, which have led to some hypotheses and various possible pathogenic mechanisms, there are no effective treatment options or specific medicines for this disease [79]. Previous work suggested that vitamins E and C lower the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease by counteracting free radicals [80,81]. Similarly, tamarisk extract contains antioxidants that reduce the damage caused to the brain by oxygen free radicals and thereby may help in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [82,83].

3.2.4. Treatment of Cancer

Tamarisk contains some substances that inhibit cell proliferation. These substances are thought to inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells by blocking the cell cycle [84]. For example, syringic acid extracted from tamarisk can trigger a variety of biological effects, including cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, to inhibit the proliferation of rectal cancer cells [85]. Likewise, methylferulate from tamarisk shows activities against rectal cancer cells similar to those of syringic acid. Methylferulate plays a role not only in the regulation of the cell cycle and apoptosis of rectal cancer cells, but also in making these cells more susceptible to related medicines [86]. Although these advances illustrate the potential of using tamarisk in cancer treatment, it is still a long way from clinical application.

3.2.5. Liver Protection

Liver fibrosis is a serious chronic disease that can be induced by many factors, including chronic liver disease. Late-stage liver fibrosis often endangers the patient’s life [87,88], and liver transplantation is currently the best treatment. Research into the molecular mechanisms of liver fibrosis reversibility may pave the way to developing a better treatment that can reverse liver fibrosis [89]. Recent experiments have shown that polyphenols extracted from tamarisk may have anti-fibrosis effects in animals [90]. In addition, a methanolic extract of tamarisk may help inhibit the carcinogenesis of hepatocytes in a variety of ways [91]. In rats with induced liver damage, a water–alcohol extract of tamarisk returned some biochemical indicators of live damage to normal levels, suggesting that the extract had hepatoprotective activity [6,92]. Therefore, tamarisk also has great research value in the development of hepatoprotective medicine.

3.2.6. Prevention of Lithiasis

Lithiasis, such as the development of urinary stone disease, is often associated with the accumulation and deposition of calcium oxalate in the body [93]. In such cases, inhibiting the formation of calcium oxalate might prevent lithiasis. In vitro experiments showed that an acidic component of tamarisk extracts can effectively inhibit the formation of calcium oxalate [94].

3.3. Economic Value of Tamarisk

Tamarisk can be arborized through appropriate culture methods (Figure 3). This cultivation method was granted a patent in China in 2012 (patent number CN201210082425.2). Arborizing tamarisk overcomes its usual defects, such as soft branches, low degree of lignification, and no obvious trunk, producing a trunk that is straight and robust. This method is simple and feasible and can be used for the large-scale cultivation of tamarisk woodlands. Arborized tamarisk will be an important force for greening saline-alkali land.
For the rapid propagation of high-quality tamarisk, the method of clonal micropropagation should be applicated. This cultivation method was granted a patent in China in 2020 (patent number ZL201710566529.3).
Cistanche deserticola (Herba Cistanche, cistanche, Rou Cong-Rong), native to northwest China, is a parasitic plant that absorbs nutrients and water from its host. It has high medicinal value and is a sought-after plant for traditional Chinese medicine [95]. Tamarisk that is inoculated with cistanche can act as its host, making full use of tamarisk’s strong survival ability and supporting the growth of cistanche in all kinds of harsh environments. A patent (number CN201010134456.9) has been filed for this inoculation method, which makes it possible for cistanche to grow on saline-alkali land, providing a way to fully develop the economic value of Tamarix.
A variety of anti-inflammatory agents have been identified in an ethyl acetate extract of tamarisk, with potential for the development of anti-inflammatory drugs [96]. Polyphenols from tamarisk, hispidulin, cirsimaritin, and isorhamnetin, were suggested to have good inhibitory effects on some bacteria [97], which can inhibit their proliferation [98,99]. Tamarisk extracts showed inhibitory effects on bacteria in the mouth [100] and may provide a good way to develop safe oral antibacterial drugs.
Furthermore, tamarisk extracts can be used as a source of antioxidants and as a natural preservative in food production due to their antibacterial properties. Moreover, in industrial production, tamarisk biomass can be used as a resource for cellulase and amylase production [101].

4. Outlook and Prospects for Development

There are many species of tamarisk, with about 90 species worldwide and 18 species and 2 varieties in China [37]. In recent years, the development of new Tamarix varieties has made it difficult to accurately distinguish different Tamarix species only by their appearance and traits. Therefore, to accurately distinguish tamarisk species, a DNA fingerprint atlas of all Tamarix species should be established. Such an archive will provide technical support for intellectual property protection and orderly development of the market.
Tamarisk is a highly salt-tolerant plant, and exploring the key genes for salt tolerance in this plant will be helpful to elucidate its salt tolerance mechanism and improve the salt tolerance of crops. Although some salt tolerance genes have been identified in tamarisk [48,49,62,102,103], their functions have been verified only in heterologous systems, such as Arabidopsis, tobacco, and tomato, or by transient expression, neither of which can reveal the real functions and regulatory network of genes in tamarisk. Salt tolerance is a complex genetic and physiological trait, determined by more than just a few genes [104]. Whole-genome sequencing of tamarisk should be carried out to excavate key genes of salt tolerance, and an efficient genetic transformation system should be established to verify gene function and clarify the salt tolerance regulatory network in tamarisk. These findings can be applied to increase the salt tolerance of crops.
Although tamarisk has a strong ability to survive adversity, it should be noted that this ability can have both advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, tamarisk can be used to improve the environment where conditions are not suitable for the growth of crops or other plants [50]. On the other hand, the strong ability of tamarisk to survive can make it invasive, potentially causing serious damage to local native ecosystems if appropriate care is not taken. Therefore, the use of tamarisk to improve the ecological environment requires a comprehensive consideration of a variety of factors, rather than random planting.

Author Contributions

Q.D. and Z.Z. wrote this manuscript; Q.D. and Z.Z. participated in the writing and modification of this manuscript; B.W. and M.C. conceptualized the idea. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Agricultural Variety Improvement Project of Shandong Province (2019LZGC009), Shandong Provincial “Bohai Granary” Science and Technology Demonstration Project (2019BHLC004), Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation (ZR2019MC065), and the Program for Scientific Research Innovation Team in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. Rozema, J.; Flowers, T. Crops for a Salinized World. Science 2008, 322, 1478–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morton, M.J.L.; Awlia, M.; Al Tamimi, N.; Saade, S.; Pailles, Y.; Negrão, S.; Tester, M. Salt stress under the scalpel–dissecting the genetics of salt tolerance. Plant J. 2019, 97, 148–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Banin, A.; Fish, A. Secondary desertification due to salinization of intensively irrigated lands: The Israeli experience. Environ. Monit. Assess. 1995, 37, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Daliakopoulos, I.; Tsanis, I.; Koutroulis, A.; Kourgialas, N.; Varouchakis, A.; Karatzas, G.P.; Ritsema, C. The threat of soil salinity: A European scale review. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 573, 727–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, P.; Jiang, B.; Lei, X.; Wu, J.; Dong, W.; Gao, C. A 2-Cys peroxiredoxin gene from Tamarix hispida improved salt stress tolerance in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhao, S.; Liu, J.J.; Banerjee, S.; Zhou, N.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Zhang, K.; Tian, C.Y. Soil pH is equally important as salinity in shaping bacterial communities in saline soils under halophytic vegetation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, C.; Zhang, L.-J.; Huang, R.-D. Cytoskeleton and plant salt stress tolerance. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pimentel, D. Ethical Issues of Global Corporatization: Agriculture and Beyond. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ruan, C.J.; da Silva, J.A.T. Metabolomics: Creating new potentials for unraveling the mechanisms in response to salt and drought stress and for the biotechnological improvement of xero-halophytes. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2011, 31, 153–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bartels, D.; Sunkar, R. Drought and Salt Tolerance in Plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2005, 24, 23–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Orlovsky, N.; Japakova, U.; Zhang, H.; Volis, S. Effect of salinity on seed germination, growth and ion content in dimorphic seeds of Salicornia europaea L. (Chenopodiaceae). Plant Divers. 2016, 38, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Flowers, T.J.; Colmer, T.D. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 945–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Flowers, T.J.; Flowers, S.A. Why does salinity pose such a difficult problem for plant breeders? Agric. Water Manag. 2005, 78, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yuan, F.; Guo, J.; Shabala, S.; Wang, B. Reproductive Physiology of Halophytes: Current Standing. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Abd El-Salam, M.M.; Elhakem, A.H. Desertification and its effect on the erosion of vegetation in the south-western region of Saudi Arabia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Campos, J.A.; Aires, U.R.; Da Silva, D.D.; Calijuri, M.L. Environmental fragility and vegetation cover dynamics in the Lapa Grande State Park, MG, Brazil. An. Da Acad. Bras. Ciências 2019, 91, e20170940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feng, Q.; Ma, H.; Jiang, X.; Wang, X.; Cao, S. What Has Caused Desertification in China? Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kalir, A.; Poljakoff-Mayber, A. Effect of Salinity on Respiratory Pathways in Root Tips of Tamarix tetragyna. Plant Physiol. 1976, 57, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Han, Z.; Yin, W.; Zhang, J.; Niu, S.; Ren, L. Active Anti-erosion Protection Strategy in Tamarisk (Tamarix aphylla). Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mamat, Z.; Halik, U.; Aishan, T.; Aini, A. Ecological effect of the riparian ecosystem in the lower reaches of the Tarim River in northwest China. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0208462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zeng, Y.; Zhao, C.; Kundzewicz, Z.; Lv, G. Distribution pattern of Tugai forests species diversity and their relationship to environmental factors in an arid area of China. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232907. [Google Scholar]
  23. Thomson, W.W.; Liu, L.L. Ultrastructural features of the salt gland of Tamarix aphylla L. Planta 1967, 73, 201–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Thomson, W.W.; Berry, W.L.; Liu, L.L. Localization and secretion of salt by the salt glands of Tamarix aphylla. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1969, 63, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gao, C.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, B.; Liu, G.; Yu, L.; Wei, Z.; Yang, C. A novel vacuolar membrane H+-ATPase c subunit gene (ThVHAc1) from Tamarix hispida confers tolerance to several abiotic stresses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 38, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gupta, B.; Huang, B. Mechanism of Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Characterization. Int. J. Genom. 2014, 2014, 701596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Che, B.; Cheng, C.; Fang, J.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, L.; Yu, B. The Recretohalophyte Tamarix TrSOS1 Gene Confers Enhanced Salt Tolerance to Transgenic Hairy Root Composite Cotton Seedlings Exhibiting Virus-Induced Gene Silencing of GhSOS1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Wei, X.; Yan, X.; Yang, Z.; Han, G.; Wang, L.; Yuan, F.; Wang, B. Salt glands of recretohalophyte Tamarix under salinity: Their evolution and adaptation. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 9384–9395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Breckle, S.W. Salinity Tolerance of Different Halophyte Types; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990; pp. 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  30. Deng, Y.; Feng, Z.; Yuan, F.; Guo, J.; Suo, S.; Wang, B. Identification and Functional Analysis of the Autofluorescent Substance in Limonium bicolor Salt Glands. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 97, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ding, F.; Chen, M.; Sui, N.; Wang, B.-S. Ca2+ significantly enhanced development and salt-secretion rate of salt glands of Limonium bicolor under NaCl treatment. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2009, 76, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Flowers, T.J.; Galal, H.K.; Bromham, L. Evolution of halophytes: Multiple origins of salt tolerance in land plants. Funct. Plant Biol. 2010, 37, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dassanayake, M.; Larkin, J.C. Making Plants Break a Sweat: The Structure, Function, and Evolution of Plant Salt Glands. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Yuan, F.; Leng, B.; Wang, B. Progress in Studying Salt Secretion from the Salt Glands in Recretohalophytes: How Do Plants Secrete Salt? Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Li, J.; Yuan, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, B.; Chen, M. Exogenous melatonin enhances salt secretion from salt glands by upregulating the expression of ion transporter and vesicle transport genes in Limonium bicolor. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lu, C.; Feng, Z.; Yuan, F.; Han, G.; Wang, B. The SNARE protein LbSYP61 participates in salt secretion in Limonium bicolor. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 176, 104076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, M.; Chen, Z.; Yuan, F.; Wang, B.; Chen, M. Integrative transcriptome and proteome analyses provide deep insights into the molecular mechanism of salt tolerance in Limonium bicolor. Plant Mol. Biol. 2022, 108, 127–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ma, H.; Tian, C.; Feng, G.; Yuan, J. Ability of multicellular salt glands in Tamarix species to secrete Na+ and K+ selectively. Sci. China Life Sci. 2011, 54, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Xu, H.; Ning, K.; Wang, B.; Chen, M. Melatonin increases growth and salt tolerance of Limonium bicolor by improving photosynthetic and antioxidant capacity. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, S.-W.; Kumar, R.; Iswanto, A.B.B.; Kim, J.-Y. Callose balancing at plasmodesmata. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 5325–5339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lucas, W.J.; Bouché-Pillon, S.; Jackson, D.P.; Nguyen, L.; Baker, L.; Ding, B.; Hake, S. Selective Trafficking of KNOTTED1 Homeodomain Protein and Its mRNA through Plasmodesmata. Science 1995, 270, 1980–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Miyashima, S.; Roszak, P.; Sevilem, I.; Toyokura, K.; Blob, B.; Heo, J.O.; Mellor, N.; Help-Rinta-Rahko, H.; Otero, S.; Smet, W.; et al. Mobile PEAR transcription factors integrate positional cues to prime cambial growth. Nature 2019, 565, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ma, F.; Peterson, C.A. Frequencies of plasmodesmata in Allium cepa L. roots: Implications for solute transport pathways. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 1051–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Wilson, H.; Mycock, D.; Weiersbye, I.M. The salt glands of Tamarix usneoides E. Mey. ex Bunge (South African Salt Cedar). Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2017, 19, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ma, L.; Ye, J.; Yang, Y.; Lin, H.; Yue, L.; Luo, J.; Long, Y.; Fu, H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. The SOS2-SCaBP8 Complex Generates and Fine-Tunes an AtANN4-Dependent Calcium Signature under Salt Stress. Dev. Cell 2019, 48, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Wang, L.; Li, Z.; Lu, M.; Wang, Y. ThNAC13, a NAC Transcription Factor from Tamarix hispida, Confers Salt and Osmotic Stress Tolerance to Transgenic Tamarix and Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. He, Z.; Li, Z.; Lu, H.; Huo, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ji, X. The NAC Protein from Tamarix hispida, ThNAC7, Confers Salt and Osmotic Stress Tolerance by Increasing Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging Capability. Plants 2019, 8, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Zang, D.; Wang, C.; Ji, X.; Wang, Y. Tamarix hispida zinc finger protein ThZFP1 participates in salt and osmotic stress tolerance by increasing proline content and SOD and POD activities. Plant Sci. 2015, 235, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zang, D.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Y. ThDof1.4 and ThZFP1 constitute a transcriptional regulatory cascade involved in salt or osmotic stress in Tamarix hispida. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 94, 495–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Yang, G.Y.; Wang, Y.C.; Xia, D.A.; Gao, C.Q.; Wang, C.; Yang, C.P. Overexpression of a GST gene (ThGSTZ1) from Tamarix hispida, improves drought and salinity tolerance by enhancing the ability to scavenge reactive oxygen species. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, 117, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Z.; Xie, Q.; Tang, F.; Wu, J.; Dong, W.; Wang, C.; Gao, C. The ThSOS3 Gene Improves the Salt Tolerance of Transgenic Tamarix hispida and Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 597480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.C.; Wang, L.Q. ThNAC12 from Tamarix hispida directly regulates ThPIP2;5 to enhance salt tolerance by modulating reactive oxygen species. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 163, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zheng, L.; Liu, G.; Meng, X.; Liu, Y.; Ji, X.; Li, Y.; Nie, X.; Wang, Y. A WRKY gene from Tamarix hispida, ThWRKY4, mediates abiotic stress responses by modulating reactive oxygen species and expression of stress-responsive genes. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 82, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sun, T.-T.; Wang, C.; Liu, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.-C.; Wang, L.-Q. ThHSFA1 Confers Salt Stress Tolerance through Modulation of Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging by Directly Regulating ThWRKY4. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, J.; Xia, J.; Fang, Y.; Li, T.; Liu, J. Effects of Salt-Drought Stress on Growth and Physiobiochemical Characteristics of Tamarix chinensis Seedlings. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 765840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Wang, Y.; Shen, W.; Chan, Z.; Wu, Y. Endogenous Cytokinin Overproduction Modulates ROS Homeostasis and Decreases Salt Stress Resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Mittler, R. ROS Are Good. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Baral, A. Strawberries under salt stress: ALA and ROS to the rescue. Physiol. Plant. 2019, 167, 2–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ahanger, M.A.; Singh Tomar, N.; Tittal, M.; Argal, S.; Agarwal, R.M. Plant growth under water/salt stress: ROS production; antioxidants and significance of added potassium under such conditions. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2017, 23, 731–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Poór, P.; Kovács, J.; Borbély, P.; Takács, Z.; Szepesi, Á.; Tari, I. Salt stress-induced production of reactive oxygen- and nitrogen species and cell death in the ethylene receptor mutant Never ripe and wild type tomato roots. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 97, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Luan, J.; Dong, J.; Song, X.; Jiang, J.; Li, H. Overexpression of Tamarix hispida ThTrx5 Confers Salt Tolerance to Arabidopsis by Activating Stress Response Signals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Liu, Z.; Lei, X.; Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Lv, J.; Li, X.; Gao, C. Overexpression of ThSAP30BP from Tamarix hispida improves salt tolerance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 146, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Torshizi, M.R.; Miri, A.; Shahriari, A.; Dong, Z.; Davidson-Arnott, R. The effectiveness of a multi-row Tamarix windbreak in reducing aeolian erosion and sediment flux, Niatak area, Iran. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 265, 110486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yang, H.; Xia, J.; Cui, Q.; Liu, J.; Wei, S.; Feng, L.; Dong, K. Effects of different Tamarix chinensis-grass patterns on the soil quality of coastal saline soil in the Yellow River Delta, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 772, 145501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Fountoulakis, M.S.; Daskalakis, G.; Papadaki, A.; Kalogerakis, N.; Manios, T. Use of halophytes in pilot-scale horizontal flow constructed wetland treating domestic wastewater. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 16682–16689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Alnuqaydan, A.M.; Rah, B.; Rahb, B. Tamarix articulata (T. articulata)—An Important Halophytic Medicinal Plant with Potential Pharmacological Properties. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2019, 20, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Bahramsoltani, R.; Farzaei, M.H.; Iranpanah, A.; Hajimahmoudi, M.; Pourjabar, Z.; Daglia, M.; Santarcangelo, C.; Rashidi, K.; Nabavi, S.M.; Rahimi, R. Phytochemical and toxicological evaluation of Tamarix stricta Boiss. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 45, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tundis, R.; Loizzo, M.R.; Menichini, F. Natural Products as α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase Inhibitors and their Hypoglycaemic Potential in the Treatment of Diabetes: An Update. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 315–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cardullo, N.; Muccilli, V.; Pulvirenti, L.; Cornu, A.; Pouységu, L.; Deffieux, D.; Quideau, S.; Tringali, C. C-glucosidic ellagitannins and galloylated glucoses as potential functional food ingredients with anti-diabetic properties: A study of α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition. Food Chem. 2019, 313, 126099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Malik, M.; Sharif, A.; Hassan, S.U.; Muhammad, F.; Khan, H.M.; Akhtar, B.; Saeed, M. Amelioration of hyperglycaemia and modulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines by Tamarix gallica fractions in alloxan induced diabetic rats. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2020. Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hebi, M.; Eddouks, M. Hypolipidemic activity of Tamarix articulata Vahl. in diabetic rats. J. Integr. Med. 2017, 15, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Van Heemst, J.; Jansen, D.T.; Polydorides, S.; Moustakas, A.K.; Bax, M.; Feitsma, A.L.; Bontrop-Elferink, D.G.; Baarse, M.; van der Woude, D.; Wolbink, G.J.; et al. Crossreactivity to vinculin and microbes provides a molecular basis for HLA-based protection against rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Yao, Y.; Jiang, C.-S.; Sun, N.; Li, W.-Q.; Niu, Y.; Han, H.-Q.; Miao, Z.-H.; Zhao, X.-X.; Zhao, J.; Li, J. Tamaractam, a New Bioactive Lactam from Tamarix ramosissima, Induces Apoptosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes. Molecules 2017, 22, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Hong, Z.; Li, J.; Biswas, S.; Jiang, C.S.; Huang, Y.; Sun, T.; Yao, Y. Ramosissimin, a new flavonol from Tararix ramosissima, induces apoptosis in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Pharmazie 2018, 73, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Scott, D.L.; Wolfe, F.; Huizinga, T.W. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2010, 376, 1094–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bottini, N.; Firestein, G.S. Duality of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in RA: Passive responders and imprinted aggressors. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2012, 9, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Hodson, R. Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 2018, 559, S1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Engelhart, M.J.; Geerlings, M.I.; Ruitenberg, A.; van Swieten, J.C.; Hofman, A.; Witteman, J.C.; Breteler, M.M. Dietary intake of antioxidants and risk of Alzheimer disease. JAMA 2002, 287, 3223–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Morris, M.C.; Evans, D.A.; Bienias, J.L.; Tangney, C.C.; Bennett, D.A.; Aggarwal, N.; Wilson, R.S.; Scherr, P.A. Dietary intake of antioxidant nutrients and the risk of incident Alzheimer disease in a biracial community study. JAMA 2002, 287, 3230–3237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Head, E. Oxidative damage and cognitive dysfunction: Antioxidant treatments to promote healthy brain aging. Neurochem. Res. 2009, 34, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Salissou, M.T.M.; Mahaman, Y.A.R.; Zhu, F.; Huang, F.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Ke, D.; Wang, Q.; Liu, R.; Wang, J.-Z.; et al. Methanolic extract of Tamarix Gallica attenuates hyperhomocysteinemia induced AD-like pathology and cognitive impairments in rats. Aging 2018, 10, 3229–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Boulaaba, M.; Tsolmon, S.; Ksouri, R.; Han, J.; Kawada, K.; Smaoui, A.; Isoda, H. Anticancer effect of Tamarix gallica extracts on human colon cancer cells involves Erk1/2 and p38 action on G2/M cell cycle arrest. Cytotechnology 2013, 65, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Abaza, M.S.; Al-Attiyah, R.; Bhardwaj, R.; Abbadi, G.; Koyippally, M.; Afzal, M. Syringic acid from Tamarix aucheriana possesses antimitogenic and chemo-sensitizing activities in human colorectal cancer cells. Pharm. Biol. 2013, 51, 1110–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Abaza, M.S.I.; Afzal, M.; Al-Attiyah, R.J.; Guleri, R. Methylferulate from Tamarix aucheriana inhibits growth and enhances chemosensitivity of human colorectal cancer cells: Possible mechanism of action. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Altamirano-Barrera, A.; Barranco-Fragoso, B.; Méndez-Sánchez, N. Management Strategies for Liver Fibrosis. Ann. Hepatol. 2017, 16, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lai, M.; Afdhal, N.H. Liver Fibrosis Determination. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 48, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sun, M.; Kisseleva, T. Reversibility of liver fibrosis. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2015, 39 (Suppl. S1), S60–S63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Sekkien, A.; Swilam, N.; Ebada, S.S.; Esmat, A.; El-Khatib, A.H.; Linscheid, M.W.; Singab, A.N. Polyphenols from Tamarix nilotica: LC(-)ESI-MS(n) Profiling and In Vivo Antifibrotic Activity. Molecules 2018, 23, 1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Sehrawat, A.; Sultana, S. Evaluation of possible mechanisms of protective role of Tamarix gallica against DEN initiated and 2-AAF promoted hepatocarcinogenesis in male Wistar rats. Life Sci. 2006, 79, 1456–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Abouzid, S.; Sleem, A. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant activities of Tamarix nilotica flowers. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 392–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. O’Kell, A.L.; Grant, D.C.; Khan, S.R. Pathogenesis of calcium oxalate urinary stone disease: Species comparison of humans, dogs, and cats. Urolithiasis 2017, 45, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bensatal, A.; Ouahrani, M.R. Inhibition of crystallization of calcium oxalate by the extraction of Tamarix gallica L. Urol. Res. 2008, 36, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Li, Z.; Lin, H.; Gu, L.; Gao, J.; Tzeng, C.-M. Herba Cistanche (Rou Cong-Rong): One of the Best Pharmaceutical Gifts of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Chen, R.; Yang, Y.; Xu, J.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, W.; Xing, Y.; Ni, H.; Sun, Y.; Hou, Y.; Li, N. Tamarix hohenackeri Bunge exerts anti-inflammatory effects on lipopolysaccharide-activated microglia in vitro. Phytomedicine 2018, 40, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ren, X.; Bao, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, S.; Peng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, G. Isorhamnetin, Hispidulin, and Cirsimaritin Identified in Tamarix ramosissima Barks from Southern Xinjiang and Their Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities. Molecules 2019, 24, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Ksouri, R.; Falleh, H.; Megdiche, W.; Trabelsi, N.; Mhamdi, B.; Chaieb, K.; Bakrouf, A.; Magné, C.; Abdelly, C. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the edible medicinal halophyte Tamarix gallica L. and related polyphenolic constituents. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47, 2083–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Benmerache, A.; Benteldjoune, M.; Magid, A.A.; Abedini, A.; Berrehal, D.; Kabouche, A.; Gangloff, S.C.; Voutquenne-Nazabadioko, L.; Kabouche, Z. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Tamarix balansae J. Gay aerial parts. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 2828–2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Khalid, M.; Hassani, D.; Bilal, M.; Butt, Z.A.; Hamayun, M.; Ahmad, A.; Huang, D.; Hussain, A. Identification of oral cavity biofilm forming bacteria and determination of their growth inhibition by Acacia arabica, Tamarix aphylla L. and Melia azedarach L. medicinal plants. Arch. Oral Biol. 2017, 81, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Luziatelli, F.; Crognale, S.; D’Annibale, A.; Moresi, M.; Petruccioli, M.; Ruzzi, M. Screening, isolation, and characterization of glycosyl-hydrolase-producing fungi from desert halophyte plants. Int. Microbiol. 2014, 17, 41–48. [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhang, P.; Yuan, G.; Zhuang, W.; Xue, S. Ecophysiological responses and adaptation of Tamarix ramosissima to changes in groundwater depth in the Heihe river basin. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2011, 31, 36–46. [Google Scholar]
  101. Flowers, T.J. Improving crop salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 307–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Newete, S.W.; Allem, S.M.; Venter, N.; Byrne, M.J. Tamarix efficiency in salt excretion and physiological tolerance to salt-induced stress in South Africa. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2019, 22, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Chew, M.K. The Monstering of Tamarisk: How Scientists made a Plant into a Problem. J. Hist. Biol. 2009, 42, 231–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Hultine, K.R.; Bean, D.W.; Dudley, T.L.; Gehring, C.A. Species Introductions and Their Cascading Impacts on Biotic Interactions in desert riparian ecosystems. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2015, 55, 587–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Strategies of tamarisk coping with salt stress. (A). The general strategies of tamarisk to deal with salt stress at the whole plant level. This involves the absorption of salt from roots and the removal of salt in the leaf by salt glands, as well as the transport of ABA and other signaling molecules from the roots to the aboveground under salt stress, (B). The general strategies of tamarisk in response to salt stress at the cellular level. Intracellular strategies for dealing with salt stress involve a complex regulatory network that helps cells reduce the damage caused by salt stress and remove salt from the cell to maintain normal physiological metabolism. In the figure, the solid line represents a direct effect, and the dotted line represents an indirect effect; CNGC, cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel; NSCC, non-selective cation channel; CLC, chloride channel; HKT1, high-affinity potassium transporter; NHX1, tonoplast-located Na+/H+ antiporter; SOS1, salt overly sensitive 1 (plasma membrane-located Na+/H+ antiporter).
Figure 1. Strategies of tamarisk coping with salt stress. (A). The general strategies of tamarisk to deal with salt stress at the whole plant level. This involves the absorption of salt from roots and the removal of salt in the leaf by salt glands, as well as the transport of ABA and other signaling molecules from the roots to the aboveground under salt stress, (B). The general strategies of tamarisk in response to salt stress at the cellular level. Intracellular strategies for dealing with salt stress involve a complex regulatory network that helps cells reduce the damage caused by salt stress and remove salt from the cell to maintain normal physiological metabolism. In the figure, the solid line represents a direct effect, and the dotted line represents an indirect effect; CNGC, cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel; NSCC, non-selective cation channel; CLC, chloride channel; HKT1, high-affinity potassium transporter; NHX1, tonoplast-located Na+/H+ antiporter; SOS1, salt overly sensitive 1 (plasma membrane-located Na+/H+ antiporter).
Ijms 23 03325 g001
Figure 2. Main application value of tamarisk in three aspects.
Figure 2. Main application value of tamarisk in three aspects.
Ijms 23 03325 g002
Figure 3. Arborization process of tamarisk seedlings in a greenhouse, (A). Three-year-old natural tamarisk seedlings, (B). One-year-old arborized tamarisk seedlings, (C). Three-year-old arborized tamarisk seedlings.
Figure 3. Arborization process of tamarisk seedlings in a greenhouse, (A). Three-year-old natural tamarisk seedlings, (B). One-year-old arborized tamarisk seedlings, (C). Three-year-old arborized tamarisk seedlings.
Ijms 23 03325 g003
Table 1. The genes from tamarisk were expressed in plants and enhanced salt tolerance of transformed plants by regulating Na+ homeostasis, osmotic adjustment, and ROS homeostasis.
Table 1. The genes from tamarisk were expressed in plants and enhanced salt tolerance of transformed plants by regulating Na+ homeostasis, osmotic adjustment, and ROS homeostasis.
Gene ResourcesTransformed PlantsContribution to Salt ToleranceReferences
TrSOS1 from Tamarix ramosissimacottonNa+ homeostasisChe et al., 2019 [27]
Th2CysPrx from Tamarix hispidaT. hispidaNa+ homeostasisWang et al., 2020 [6]
ThNAC13 from T. hispidaT. hispidaosmotic adjustmentWang et al., 2017 [46]
ThNAC7 from T. hispidaT. hispidaROS homeostasis, osmotic adjustmentHe et al., 2019 [47]
ThZFP1 from T. hispidaT. hispida, ArabidopsisROS homeostasis, osmotic adjustmentZang et al., 2015 [48]
ThbZIP1 from T. hispidatobaccoosmotic adjustmentZang et al., 2017 [49]
ThGSTZ1 from T. hispidaT. hispida, ArabidopsisROS homeostasisYang et al., 2014 [50]
ThSOS3 from T. hispidaT. hispidaROS homeostasisLiu et al., 2021 [51]
ThNAC12 from T. hispidaT. hispida, ArabidopsisROS homeostasisWang et al., 2021 [52]
ThWRKY4 from T. hispidaT. hispidaROS homeostasisZheng et al., 2013 [53]
ThHSFA1 from T. hispida T. hispidaROS homeostasisSun et al., 2021 [54]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duan, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, B.; Chen, M. Recent Progress on the Salt Tolerance Mechanisms and Application of Tamarisk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063325

AMA Style

Duan Q, Zhu Z, Wang B, Chen M. Recent Progress on the Salt Tolerance Mechanisms and Application of Tamarisk. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(6):3325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063325

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duan, Qixin, Zhihui Zhu, Baoshan Wang, and Min Chen. 2022. "Recent Progress on the Salt Tolerance Mechanisms and Application of Tamarisk" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 6: 3325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063325

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop