Next Article in Journal
Heparanase Increases Podocyte Survival and Autophagic Flux after Adriamycin-Induced Injury
Previous Article in Journal
Internalized Amyloid-β (1-42) Peptide Inhibits the Store-Operated Calcium Entry in HT-22 Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Zn-Catalyzed Regioselective and Chemoselective Reduction of Aldehydes, Ketones and Imines

Laboratory of New Energy & New Functional Materials, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Engineering, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(20), 12679; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012679
Submission received: 19 September 2022 / Revised: 10 October 2022 / Accepted: 16 October 2022 / Published: 21 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics)

Abstract

:
An operationally convenient Zn-catalyzed synthesis of alcohols by the reduction of aldehydes, ketones, and α,β-unsaturated aldehydes/ketones is reported. It is a rare example of using mild and sustainable HBpin as a reductant for catalytic reduction of carbonyl compounds in the absence of acid or base as hydrolysis reagent. The reaction is upscalable and proceeds in high selectivity without the formation of boronate ester by-products, and tolerates sensitive functionalities, such as iodo, bromo, chloro, fluoro, nitro, trifluoromethyl, aminomethyl, alkynyl, and amide. The Zn(OAc)2/HBpin combination has been also proved to be chemoselective for the C=N reduction of imine analogs.

1. Introduction

Selective reduction is one of the most efficient reactions in modern synthetic chemistry because of it is importance in the manufacture of chemicals and basic raw materials [1,2,3,4]. The reduction of carbonyl compounds is a straightforward method to prepare alcohols, which are widely used as chemical intermediates for the synthesis of natural products, pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and functional materials [5,6].Traditionally, the reduction of carbonyl compounds was usually accomplished by using stoichiometric amounts of metal hydrides (NaBH4) and Lewis acid [7,8]. Alternatively, transition-metal-catalyzed hydrogenation of C=O bond in the presence of hydrogen (as the reductant) could also provide corresponding alcohol [9,10,11,12]. In the past two decades, pinacolborane (HBpin=4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane), as a mild and sustainable carbonyl reductant, has attracted considerable interest [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Metal-catalyzed hydroboration of polarized C=O bonds for the preparation of alcohols has been developed [24,25,26]; however, certain special reagents are required for the hydrolysis reaction, such as HCl [27,28], NaOH [29,30], H2O2 [31], SiO2 [32,33,34,35,36] (Scheme 1a). In 2019, the commercially available MgBu2-catalyzed reduction of α,β-unsaturated ketones for the synthesis of alcohols was reported; however, the sensitive functional groups could not survive under the reported conditions [37].
To develop cost-effective hydrogenation protocols, the replacement of precious transition metals with earth-abundant, low-cost, first-row metals is contemporary and highly desirable in terms of sustainability [38,39,40,41,42,43]. Zinc, as a typical first-row transition metal, is abundant, inexpensive, and nontoxic, having been applied in a wide range of chemical reactions [44,45,46,47]. In 2006, an efficient ZnCl2-catalyzed selective alkylation of ketones for the synthesis of tertiary alcohol in the presence of RMgCl (1.3 equiv.) was reported [48]. Zn-catalyzed hydrogenation of carbonyl in the presence of NH4Cl was also reported with a wide range of substrates bearing various sensitive groups, but excessive amounts of metallic zinc were necessary [49]. Recently, Panda’s group reported that zinc(II) complexes catalyzed chemoselective hydroboration of aldehydes and ketones to achieve corresponding primary and secondary alcohols, requiring the necessary SiO2/MeOH as hydrolysis reagent [50]. Therefore, it is important to develop a simple and efficient zinc catalytic system for the reduction of carbonyl groups with good tolerance of functional groups.
In this work, we present Zn(OAc)2-catalyzed chemoselective reduction of aldehydes, ketones, and α,β-unsaturated ketones for the synthesis of corresponding alcohols dispensed with special hydrolysis steps. In addition, Zn(OAc)2/HBpin was not only active for C=O reduction, but also chemoselective for the C=N reduction of imine under optimized conditions (Scheme 1b).

2. Results

We began our catalytic studies by using HBpin as a reducing agent in THF and 2-naphthaldehyde 1a as a model substrate (Table 1). Different zinc salts were tested at 45 °C for 24 h (Table 1, entries 1–3). Treatment of 2-naphthaldehyde 1a in the presence of HBpin (1.5 equiv.) and Zn(OTf)2 (10 mol%) in THF at 45 °C for 24 h gave the hydrogenated product naphthalen-2-ylmethanol 2a in 44% yield. We found that directly hydrogenated products were obtained in the absence of acid or base as hydrolysis reagent, and the undesired hydroboration products of carbonyl groups were not observed. The hydrogenated product 2a was isolated in 80% and 94% with ZnCl2 and Zn(OAc)2, respectively (entries 2–3). Under the same conditions, the reduction products were not detected when silane was used as a reducing agent (entries 4). It is surprising to find out that that there was no influence on the catalytic activity with significantly lowered temperature (rt) and shortened time (1 h), which is a huge advantage of the Zn-HBpin system (entries 5). Further optimization revealed that the loading of Zn(OAc)2 could be cut to 1 mol % while maintaining the yield of product 2a at 93% (entries 6). Various solvents, including EtOH, toluene, DCM, and CH3CN, were found to be unsatisfactory (entries 7–10). The hydrogenation of 1a was also successful with other transition metal catalysts, such as FeCl2, CoBr2, NiBr2, and MnBr(CO)5; however, the yield of 2a was much lower (41–80%) under standard conditions (entries 11–14). Moreover, CrCl2 and CuCl2 failed to give any hydrogenation product (entries 15 and 16). It is worth noting that the Zn-catalyzed hydrogenation of 1a proceeded smoothly in the presence of a huge excess of Hg (0) (100 equiv., entry 6, footnote d), indicating that it is highly likely to be a homogeneous catalytic system.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, the scope of the zinc-catalyzed reduction of aldehydes was examined. As shown in Scheme 2, all substrates were well tolerated under optimal conditions, and the desired hydrogenation products were isolated in good to excellent yields. Since the hydrogenation of o-nitro (2b), o-methoxy (2c), and m-nitro (2d) aldehydes gave the corresponding primary alcohols in good yields and selectivity, it can be concluded that the position (ortho, meta, para) and substituent effect (electron donating vs. electron withdrawing) have no obvious influence on the efficiency of hydrogenation. A series of parasubstituted aromatic aldehydes were investigated. The results showed that various electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups (e.g., halogen, nitro, trifluoromethyl, and aminomethyl) were all well tolerated (2e2m). Remarkably, the substrates bearing an alkynyl and amido group were well tolerated as well. The corresponding reduction products were obtained in 65% and 93%, respectively (2n2o). Interestingly, the subjection of 4-acetyl benzaldehyde under the optimal condition gave a reduction of a formyl group. However, increasing the loading of the hydrogen source could easily boost the efficiency to 87% with the reduction of both carbonyl groups (2p). The treatment of p-dibenzaldehyde with 1.5 equiv. of HBpin for 12 h gave product 2q with the selective reduction of one carbonyl group. In addition, various heavily functionalized aromatic, ferrocene complex and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons bearing an aldehyde group were explored as well. All the reduced primary alcohol products were obtained in high yields (77–89%, 2r2v). Inspired by the promising results, the feasibility of Zn(OAc)2/HBpin for catalytic reduction of heteroaromatic aldehydes was further examined. As expected, various thiophene, furan, pyridine, quinoline aldehyde analogues can be regioselectively reduced and gave the corresponding primary alcohols in good yields (65–92%, 2w2ab).
Next, a series of aromatic and aliphatic ketones were examined (Scheme 3). It is important to mention that Zn(OAc)2-catalyzed reduction of ketones would only proceed at an elevated temperature (60 °C). As expected, the boronate ester was not observed during the reaction (analyzed by 1H NMR).
Both the diaryl ketone 4c and aryl alkyl ketones 4a, 4b, and 4d4l were efficiently converted to the corresponding secondary alcohols under optimal conditions. Various electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups, such as bromide, chloride, fluoride, trifluoromethyl, cyano, nitro, and amino, were well tolerated. Furthermore, the efficiency of the demonstrated catalytic system was not compromised in the presence of heteroatom (4l). Last but not least, dialkyl ketones were also examined, and the corresponding secondary alcohols were obtained in moderate yields (79–90%, 4m4o).
Inspired by these results, the feasibility of Zn(OAc)2/HBpin-catalyzed reduction of α,β-unsaturated aldehyde/ketones was examined (Scheme 4). The carbonyl group of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes/ketones can be regioselectively reduced at an elevated temperature (45 °C) by the formation of allylic alcohols in good yields. We found that the C=C bond reduction was not observed according to the 1H NMR analysis. The efficiency and selectivity were not significantly affected by the type and location of substituents in the aromatic ring, and all the corresponding allylic alcohols were obtained in fair to good yields (81–95%, 6a6m). Moreover, fluoride, chloride, bromide, iodine, trifluoromethyl, and heteroatom, which are usually sensitive to catalytic hydrogenation, were intact (6g6m). Lastly, the subjection of alkynone to the optimal conditions gave the corresponding product 6n in 74% with the preservation of the alkyne group.
In order to check the generality of the demonstrated Zn(OAc)2/HBpin system, the subjection of the gram scale of 1a (1.56 g, 10 mmol) to the optimal conditions with an extended reaction time (8 h) gave 2a in 94% (Scheme 5).
Since it has been demonstrated that more than two carbonyl groups could be reduced with increased loading of a Zn catalyst (Scheme 2, 2p), it is important to find out the reactivity of different carbonyls in aldehydes, ketones, esters, and amides. Hence, the chemoselectivity of the Zn-catalyzed hydrogenation reaction was further explored (Scheme 6). The treatment of an equal molar of aldehyde (1 mmol) and ketone (1 mmol) with Zn(OAc)2 (1 mol%) and HBpin (1.5 equiv.) in THF at ambient temperature for 2 h gave naphthalen-2-ylmethanol as a major reduction product (92%) with the recovery of naphthalen-2-yl methyl ketone (Scheme 6a). A similar chemoselectivity was also observed for the pair of 4-methylbenzaldehyde and 4-methylacetophenone. Most of the 4-methylbenzaldehyde was reduced, while the 4-methylacetophenone was successfully recovered (Scheme 6b). The treatment of acetophenone along with ethyl benzoate and N,N′-dimethyl benzamide respectively with Zn(OAc)2/HBpin gave the reduction product of acetophenone as the major one (90% and 91%) with the recovery of ethyl benzoate (97%) and N,N′-dimethyl benzamide (96%, Scheme 6c,d). In summary, the reactivity of Zn-catalyzed hydrogenation could be concluded in the following order: aldehyde > ketone > ester ≈ amide.
Out of curiosity, the reactivity of imines was explored at the optimal conditions. It is surprising to find out that the hydrogenation products 8 were obtained in excellent yields (Scheme 7). Additionally, the electron-withdrawing groups did not affect reduction efficiency at all. Thus, it is an excellent alternative method for the preparation of secondary amine.
To have an insight of the reaction mechanism, the kinetic behavior associated with Zn-catalyzed hydrogenation of 2-naphthaldehyde was explored. The hydrogenation proceeded rapidly at the first 0.5 h to give 2a in 88% yield (Figure 1a). The yield was increased to 94% in the next half an hour. There was a significant improvement in the next hour, as the reaction was almost finished in the first hour. The dependence of the initial reaction rate on the substrate, catalyst, and HBpin was investigated. The initial reaction rate (Δ[2a]/Δt) for the initial concentration of 1a, Zn(OAc)2 and HBpin catalysts showed a clear positive correlation, suggesting that the catalytic concentration of 2-naphthaldehyde, Zn(OAc)2, and HBpin determined the initial rate (Figure 1b–d).
The reduction of 2-naphthaldehyde (1a) with 1.5 equiv. of DBpin showed that deuterium was introduced mainly at the C2 positions of naphthalen-2-ylmethanol (92%, Figure 2a). On the basis of the experimental results and literature report [30,37,51], the proposed Zn-catalyzed reduction of carbonyl compounds is shown in Figure 2b. First of all, commercially available Zn(OAc)2 reacts with HBpin to in situ generate active ZnH(OAc) species [52,53,54], and the (OAc)Bpin intermediate was observed by 11B NMR, followed by the addition of C=O bonds of substrate 1 or 3 or 5 to provide the corresponding Zn alkoxide species. Finally, HBpin reproduces active ZnH(OAc) species by the formation of the corresponding boronic esters and provides corresponding alcohols.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Unless otherwise noted, materials and solvents were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry, Aldrich Inc., Alfa Aesar, Adamas-beta, and other commercial suppliers and used as received. Zn(OAc)2 (99.5%) and ZnCl2 (98%) were purchased from Innochem and used as received. CuCl2 (98%) and Zn(OTf)2 (99%) were purchased from Adamas-beta and used as received. CoBr2 (97%), Mn(CO)5Bri (98%), CrCl3 (99%), and NiBr2 (99%) were purchased from Aldrich Inc. and used as received. FeCl2 (99.5%) was purchased from Aladdin and used as received. Aldehyde and ketone derivatives were purchased or were prepared according the known procedures.
All reactions dealing with air- or moisture-sensitive compounds were carried out in a flame-dried, sealed Schlenk reaction tube under an atmosphere of nitrogen. Analytical thin-layer chromatography was performed on glass plates coated with 0.25 mm 230–400 mesh silica gel containing a fluorescent indicator (Merck). Flash silica gel column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 N (spherical and neutral, 140–325 mesh), as described by Still. NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker AV-400 spectrometer and reported in parts per million. 1H NMR spectra were recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3, or DMSO-d6 was referenced internally to tetramethylsilane as a standard, and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 100 MHz and referenced to the solvent resonance. Supplementary Materials: Characterization spectra (1HNMR and 13CNMR) of compounds 2, 4, 6 and 8.

3.2. General Procedure for Zn-Catalyzed Reduction of Aldehydes

A mixture of corresponding aldehyde derivatives (0.2 mmol) and Zn(OAc)2 (0.002 mmol) was added to a Schlenk tube. Then HBpin (1.5 equiv.) and THF (2 mL) were added by syringe under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 1 h. After quenching with saturated NH4Cl/H2O (10 mL), the crude product was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phases were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum, and the crude product was purified by column chromatography to afford the desired hydrogenation compound.

3.3. General Procedure for Zn-Catalyzed Reduction of Ketones

A mixture of corresponding ketone derivatives (0.2 mmol) and Zn(OAc)2 (0.002 mmol) was added to a Schlenk tube. Then HBpin (1.5 equiv.) and THF (2 mL) were added by syringe under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 24 h. After quenching with saturated NH4Cl/H2O (10 mL), the crude product was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phases were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum, and the crude product was purified by column chromatography to afford the desired hydrogenation compound.

3.4. General Procedure for Zn-Catalyzed Reduction of Imines

A mixture of corresponding imines (0.2 mmol) and Zn(OAc)2 (0.002 mmol) was added to a Schlenk tube. Then HBpin (1.5 equiv.) and THF (2 mL) were added by syringe under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 5 h. After quenching with saturated NH4Cl/H2O (10 mL), the crude product was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phases were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum, and the crude product was purified by column chromatography to afford the desired hydrogenation compound.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we successfully demonstrated a method for the synthesis of various alcohols and related derivatives by using low-cost HBpin with commercially available Zn(OAc)2 in THF. Good yields and chemoselectivity were obtained for a wide range of substrates, including aldehydes, ketones, α,β-unsaturated aldehydes/ketones, and imines, showing the great versatility and group tolerance. The current protocol operates under mild conditions and enables the reduction of C=O in good yields and selectivity without the requirement of a hydrolysis reagent (acid or base). Mechanistic studies indicated the formation of active ZnH(OAc) species. Further studies on the mechanism and enantioselective reducing ketones and α,β-unsaturated ketones using Zn(OAc)2/HBpin are undergoing. We believe that the catalytic system is expected to be used for asymmetric hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232012679/s1, Characterization spectra (1HNMR and 13CNMR) of compounds 2, 4, 6 and 8.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z. and H.J.; methodology, M.Z.; software, H.J.; validation, H.M., J.W.; formal analysis, B.H.; investigation, R.L.; resources, Y.Z; data curation, M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, B.H.; writing—review and editing, B.H.; visualization, Y.Z.; supervision, Y.Z.; project administration, Y.Z.; funding acquisition, B.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Science Foundation of China (22061041), Open Sharing Platform for Scientific and Technological Resources of Shaanxi Province (2021PT-004), Doctoral Research Foundation of Yan’an University (YDBK2019-60) and Shaanxi Province Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates (S202210719055), and Research Program of Yan’an University (YDY2020-61).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xie, J.-H.; Zhu, S.-F.; Zhou, Q.-L. Transition Metal-Catalyzed Enantioselective Hydrogenation of Enamines and Imines. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1713–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, D.S.; Chen, Q.A.; Lu, S.M.; Zhou, Y.G. Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Heteroarenes and Arenes. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2557–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. He, Y.M.; Feng, Y.; Fan, Q.H. Asymmetric Hydrogenation in the Core of Dendrimers. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2894–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Han, B.; Ma, P.; Cong, X.; Chen, H.; Zeng, X. Chromium- and Cobalt-Catalyzed, Regiocontrolled Hydrogenation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 9018–9026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ikariya, T.; Murata, K.; Noyori, R. Bifunctional transition metal-based molecular catalysts for asymmetric syntheses. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 393–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gladiali, S.; Alberico, E. Asymmetric transfer hydrogenation: Chiral ligands and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Das, D.; Roy, S.; Das, P.K. Efficient and Simple NaBH4 Reduction of Esters at Cationic Micellar Surface. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4133–4136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Forkel, N.V.; Henderson, D.A.; Fuchter, M.J. Lanthanide replacement in organic synthesis: Luche-type reduction of α,β-unsaturated ketones in the presence of calcium triflate. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 2129–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, M.M.; He, L.; Liu, Y.M.; Cao, Y.; He, H.Y.; Fan, K.N. Gold supported on mesostructured ceria as an efficient catalyst for the chemoselective hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds in neat water. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 602–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Merel, D.S.; Elie, M.; Lohier, J.-F.; Gaillard, S.; Renaud, J.-L. Bifunctional Iron Complexes: Efficient Catalysts for C=O and C=N Reduction in Water. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 2939–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Spasyuk, D.; Vicent, C.; Gusev, D.G. Chemoselective Hydrogenation of Carbonyl Compounds and Acceptorless Dehydrogenative Coupling of Alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3743–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dub, P.A.; Scott, B.L.; Gordon, J.C. Why Does Alkylation of the N–H Functionality within M/NH Bifunctional Noyori-Type Catalysts Lead to Turnover? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1245–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chong, C.C.; Kinjo, R. Catalytic Hydroboration of Carbonyl Derivatives, Imines, and Carbon Dioxide. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 3238–3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shegavi, M.L.; Bose, S.K. Recent advances in the catalytic hydroboration of carbonyl compounds. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 3307–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Erik, A.R.; Jesse, L.P.; Rodolphe, J.; Bertrand, G. Catalyst Free Dehydrocoupling of Amines, Alcohols, and Thiols with Pinacol Borane and 9-Borabicyclononane (9-BBN). Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 10563–10565. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kucinski, K.; Hreczycho, G. Chemoselective and Catalyst-Free O-Borylation of Silanols: A Facile Access to Borasiloxanes. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 4695–4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kazmierczak, J.; Kucinski, K.; Stachowiak, H.; Hreczycho, G. Introduction of Boron Functionalities into Silsesquioxanes: Novel Independent Methodologies. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 2509–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, D.H.; Jaladi, A.K.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, T.S.; Shin, W.K.; Hwang, H.; An, D.K. Catalytic Hydroboration of Aldehydes, Ketones, and Alkenes Using Potassium Carbonate: A Small Key to Big Transformation. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 15893–15903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wang, W.; Luo, M.; Zhu, D.; Yao, W.; Xu, L.; Ma, M. Green hydroboration of carboxylic acids and mechanism investigation. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 3604–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Harinath, A.; Bhattacharjee, J.; Panda, T.K. Facile reduction of carboxylic acids to primary alcohols under catalyst-free and solvent-free conditions. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 1386–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Xu, X.; Yan, D.; Zhu, Z.; Kang, Z.; Yao, Y.; Shen, Q.; Xue, M. Catalyst-Free Approach for Hydroboration of Carboxylic Acids under Mild Conditions. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 6775–6783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, G.J.; Davis Cheng, K.; Bonifacio, M.G.; Zajaczkowski, C. Practical and selective hydroboration of aldehydes and ketones in air catalysed by an iron(II) coordination polymer. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 1114–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kucin Ski, K.; Hreczycho, G. Lithium triethylborohydride as catalyst for solvent-free hydroboration of aldehydes and ketones. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 1912–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Weidner, V.L.; Barger, C.J.; Delferro, M.; Lohr, T.L.; Marks, T.J. Rapid, mild, and selective ketone and aldehyde hydroboration/reduction mediated by a simple lanthanide catalyst. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 1244–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tamang, S.R.; Findlater, M. Iron catalyzed hydroboration of aldehydes and ketones. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 12857–12862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, G.; Zeng, H.; Wu, J.; Yin, Z.; Zheng, S.; Fettinger, J.C. Highly selective hydroboration of alkenes, ketones and aldehydes catalyzed by a well-defined manganese complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14369–14372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bai, T.; Janes, T.; Song, D. Homoleptic iron(ii) and cobalt(ii) bis(phosphoranimide) complexes for the selective hydrofunctionalization of unsaturated molecules. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 12408–12412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kaithal, A.; Chatterjee, B.; Gunanathan, C. Ruthenium Catalyzed Selective Hydroboration of Carbonyl Compounds. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 4790–4793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kuciński, K.; Hreczycho, G. Potassium Fluoride-Catalyzed Hydroboration of Aldehydes and Ketones: Facile Reduction to Primary and Secondary Alcohols. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 5, 552–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sahoo, R.K.; Mahato, M.; Jana, A.; Nembenna, S. Zinc Hydride-Catalyzed Hydrofuntionalization of Ketones. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 11200–11210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Tamang, S.R.; Bedi, D.; Shafifiei-Haghighi, S.; Smith, C.R.; Crawford, C.; Findlater, M. Cobalt-Catalyzed Hydroboration of Alkenes, Aldehydes, and Ketones. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 6695–6700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wu, J.H.; Zeng, J.; Cheng, S.; Zheng, J.A.; Golen, D.; Manke, R.; Zhang, G. Cobalt(II) Coordination Polymer as a Precatalyst for Selective Hydroboration of Aldehydes, Ketones, and Imines. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9442–9448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zeng, H.; Wu, J.; Li, S.; Hui, C.; Ta, A.; Cheng, S.-Y.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, G. Copper(II)-Catalyzed Selective Hydroboration of Ketones and Aldehydes. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Qi, X.; Zheng, T.; Zhou, J.; Dong, Y.; Zuo, X.; Li, X.; Sun, H.; Fuhr, O.; Fenske, D. Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Iron Hydride Ligated with Bidentate N-Heterocyclic Silylenes for Hydroboration of Carbonyl Compounds. Organometallics 2019, 38, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vijjamarri, S.; O’Denius, T.M.; Yao, B.; Kubátová, A.; Du, G. Highly Selective Hydroboration of Carbonyls by a Manganese Catalyst: Insight into the Reaction Mechanism. Organometallics 2020, 39, 3375–3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Blasius, C.K.; Vasilenkom, V.; Gade, L.H. Ultrafast Iron-Catalyzed Reduction of Functionalized Ketones: Highly Enantioselective Synthesis of Halohydrines, Oxaheterocycles, and Aminoalcohols. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 10231–10235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jang, Y.K.; Magre, M.; Rueping, M. Chemoselective Luche-Type Reduction of α,β-Unsaturated Ketones by Magnesium Catalysis. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 8349–8352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chirik, P.J. Iron- and Cobalt-Catalyzed Alkene Hydrogenation: Catalysis with Both Redox-Active and Strong Field Ligands. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1687–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ryken, S.A.; Schafer, L.L. N,O-Chelating Four-Membered Metallacyclic Titanium(IV) Complexes for Atom-Economic Catalytic Reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 2576–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peng, J.B.; Wu, F.P.; Wu, X.F. First-Row Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Carbonylative Transformations of Carbon Electrophiles. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 2090–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Adam, R.; Cabrero-Antonino, J.R.; Spannenberg, A.; Junge, K.; Jackstell, R.; Beller, M. A General and Highly Selective Cobalt-Catalyzed Hydrogenation of N-Heteroarenes under Mild Reaction Conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3216–3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhao, L.; Hu, C.; Cong, X.; Geng, G.; Liu, L.L.; Luo, M.; Zeng, X. Cyclic (Alkyl)(amino)carbene Ligand-Promoted Nitro Deoxygenative Hydroboration with Chromium Catalysis: Scope, Mechanism, and Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1618–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Han, B.; Zhang, M.; Jiao, H.; Ma, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y. Ligand-enabled and magnesium-activated hydrogenation with earth-abundant cobalt catalysts. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 39934–39939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Parkin, G. Synthetic Analogues Relevant to the Structure and Function of Zinc Enzymes. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 699–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Psomas, G.; Kessissoglou, D.P. Quinolones and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs interacting with copper(ii), nickel(ii), cobalt(ii) and zinc(ii): Structural features, biological evaluation and perspectives. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 6252–6276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khoo, T.J.; Bin Break, M.K.; Crouse, K.A.; Tahir, M.I.M.; Ali, A.M.; Cowley, A.R.; Watkin, D.J.; Tarafder, M.T.H. Synthesis, characterization and biological activity of two Schiff base ligands and their nickel(II), copper(II), zinc(II) and cadmium(II) complexes derived from S-4-picolyldithiocarbazate and X-ray crystal structure of cadmium(II) complex derived from pyridine-2-carboxaldehyde. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2014, 413, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wu, X.-F.; Neumann, H. Zinc-Catalyzed Organic Synthesis: C-C, C-N, C-O Bond Formation Reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 3141–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hatano, M.H.; Suzuki, S.; Lshihara, K. Highly Efficient Alkylation to Ketones and Aldimines with Grignard Reagents Catalyzed by Zinc(II) Chloride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9998–9999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Mandal, T.; Jana, S.; Dash, J. Zinc-Mediated Efficient and Selective Reduction of Carbonyl Compounds. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 33, 4972–4983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kumar, R.; Rawal, P.; Banerjee, I.; Nayek, H.P.; Gupta, P.; Panda, T.K. Zinc-Mediated Efficient and Selective Reduction of Carbonyl Compounds. Chem. Asian. J. 2022, 17, 4972–4983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kumar, G.S.; Harinath, A.; Narvariya, R.; Panda, T.K. Homoleptic Zinc-Catalyzed Hydroboration of Aldehydes and Ketones in the Presence of HBpin. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 5, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bezłada, A.; Szewczyk, M.; Mlynarski, J. Enantioselective Hydrosilylation of Imines Catalyzed by Chiral Zinc Acetate Complexes. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Stolla, E.L.; Tonguea, T.; Andrewsa, K.G.; Valetteb, D.; Hirstb, D.J.; Denton, R.M. A practical catalytic reductive amination of carboxylic acids. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 9494–9500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Procter, R.J.; Uzelac, M.; Cid, J.; Rushworth, P.J.; Ingleson, M.J. Low-Coordinate NHC–Zinc Hydride Complexes Catalyze Alkyne C–H Borylation and Hydroboration Using Pinacolborane. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 5760–5771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Zn(OAc)2-catalyzed chemoselective reduction of aldehydes, ketones, and imines.
Scheme 1. Zn(OAc)2-catalyzed chemoselective reduction of aldehydes, ketones, and imines.
Ijms 23 12679 sch001
Scheme 2. Scope for the Zn-catalyzed reduction of aldehydes a. a All reactions were performed with substrate 1 (0.2 mmol), Zn(OAc)2 (0.002 mmol), HBpin (1.5 equiv.) in THF (2 mL) at 25 °C for 1 h under N2. Isolated yield. b HBpin (3 equiv.), 45 °C for 24 h.
Scheme 2. Scope for the Zn-catalyzed reduction of aldehydes a. a All reactions were performed with substrate 1 (0.2 mmol), Zn(OAc)2 (0.002 mmol), HBpin (1.5 equiv.) in THF (2 mL) at 25 °C for 1 h under N2. Isolated yield. b HBpin (3 equiv.), 45 °C for 24 h.
Ijms 23 12679 sch002
Scheme 3. Scope for the Zn-catalyzed reduction of ketones a. a All reactions were performed with substrate 3 (0.2 mmol), Zn(OAc)2 (1 mol %), HBpin (1.5 equiv.) in THF (2 mL) at 60 °C for 24 h under N2, isolated yield.
Scheme 3. Scope for the Zn-catalyzed reduction of ketones a. a All reactions were performed with substrate 3 (0.2 mmol), Zn(OAc)2 (1 mol %), HBpin (1.5 equiv.) in THF (2 mL) at 60 °C for 24 h under N2, isolated yield.
Ijms 23 12679 sch003
Scheme 4. Scope for the Zn-catalyzed reduction of α,β-unsaturated aldehyde/ketones a. a All reactions were performed with substrate 5 (0.2 mmol), Zn(OAc)2 (2 mol %), HBpin (1.5 equiv.) in THF (2 mL) at 45 °C for 24 h under N2, isolated yield.
Scheme 4. Scope for the Zn-catalyzed reduction of α,β-unsaturated aldehyde/ketones a. a All reactions were performed with substrate 5 (0.2 mmol), Zn(OAc)2 (2 mol %), HBpin (1.5 equiv.) in THF (2 mL) at 45 °C for 24 h under N2, isolated yield.
Ijms 23 12679 sch004
Scheme 5. Gram-scale reduction of 1a.
Scheme 5. Gram-scale reduction of 1a.
Ijms 23 12679 sch005
Scheme 6. Intermolecular chemoselective reduction of carbonyl substrate: (a) Intermolecular chemoselective of 2-naphthaldehyde and 2-acetonaphthone; (b) Intermolecular chemoselective of 4-methylbenzaldehyde and 4-methylacetophenone; (c) Intermolecular chemoselective of acetophenone and ethyl benzoate; (d) Intermolecular chemoselective of acetophenone and N,N-dimethylbenzamide.
Scheme 6. Intermolecular chemoselective reduction of carbonyl substrate: (a) Intermolecular chemoselective of 2-naphthaldehyde and 2-acetonaphthone; (b) Intermolecular chemoselective of 4-methylbenzaldehyde and 4-methylacetophenone; (c) Intermolecular chemoselective of acetophenone and ethyl benzoate; (d) Intermolecular chemoselective of acetophenone and N,N-dimethylbenzamide.
Ijms 23 12679 sch006
Scheme 7. The substrate scope of Zn(OAc)2–catalyzed reduction of imines with HBpin a. a All reactions were performed with substrate 7 (0.2 mmol), Zn(OAc)2 (1 mol %), HBpin (1.5 equiv.) in THF (2 mL) at 25 °C for 5 h under N2. Isolated yield.
Scheme 7. The substrate scope of Zn(OAc)2–catalyzed reduction of imines with HBpin a. a All reactions were performed with substrate 7 (0.2 mmol), Zn(OAc)2 (1 mol %), HBpin (1.5 equiv.) in THF (2 mL) at 25 °C for 5 h under N2. Isolated yield.
Ijms 23 12679 sch007
Figure 1. Kinetic profiles for Zn-catalyzed reduction of 1a: (a) reaction profile of Zn-catalyzed reduction of 2-naphthaldehyde, (b) initial reaction rate against the concentration of 1a, (c) initial reaction rate against the concentration of catalyst of Zn(OAc)2, (d) initial reaction rate against the concentration of HBpin.
Figure 1. Kinetic profiles for Zn-catalyzed reduction of 1a: (a) reaction profile of Zn-catalyzed reduction of 2-naphthaldehyde, (b) initial reaction rate against the concentration of 1a, (c) initial reaction rate against the concentration of catalyst of Zn(OAc)2, (d) initial reaction rate against the concentration of HBpin.
Ijms 23 12679 g001
Figure 2. Plausible mechanism for the hydroboration of carbonyl compounds: (a) control experiment; (b) proposed mechanism for the Zn-catalyzed regioselective and chemoselective reduction of aldehydes, ketones and α,β-unsaturated aldehydes/ketones.
Figure 2. Plausible mechanism for the hydroboration of carbonyl compounds: (a) control experiment; (b) proposed mechanism for the Zn-catalyzed regioselective and chemoselective reduction of aldehydes, ketones and α,β-unsaturated aldehydes/ketones.
Ijms 23 12679 g002
Table 1. Reaction optimization for the Zn-catalyzed reduction of 2-naphthaldehyde a.
Table 1. Reaction optimization for the Zn-catalyzed reduction of 2-naphthaldehyde a.
Ijms 23 12679 i001
EntryMetal SaltReductantSolventTime/hYield of 2a/%
1 bZn(OTf)2HBpinTHF2444
2 bZnCl2HBpinTHF2480
3 bZn(OAc)2HBpinTHF2494
4 bZn(OAc)2PhSiH3THF24nd c
5Zn(OAc)2HBpinTHF194
6Zn(OAc)2HBpinTHF193(88) d
7Zn(OAc)2HBpinEtOH116
8Zn(OAc)2HBpinToluene141
9Zn(OAc)2HBpinDCM148
10Zn(OAc)2HBpinCH3CN1trace
11FeCl2HBpinTHF158
12CoBr2HBpinTHF171
13NiBr2HBpinTHF141
14MnBr(CO)5HBpinTHF180
15CrCl2HBpinTHF1nd c
16CuCl2HBpinTHF1nd c
a Conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), metal salt (0.002 mmol, 1 mol %), HBpin (1.5 equiv.), THF (2.0 mL), rt, 1 h. isolated yield. b Metal salt (0.02 mmol, 10 mol %), 45 °C. c Not detected. d Hg(0) (100 equiv.) was added.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M.; Jiao, H.; Ma, H.; Li, R.; Han, B.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Zn-Catalyzed Regioselective and Chemoselective Reduction of Aldehydes, Ketones and Imines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012679

AMA Style

Zhang M, Jiao H, Ma H, Li R, Han B, Zhang Y, Wang J. Zn-Catalyzed Regioselective and Chemoselective Reduction of Aldehydes, Ketones and Imines. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(20):12679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012679

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Miaomiao, Hongmei Jiao, Haojie Ma, Ran Li, Bo Han, Yuqi Zhang, and Jijiang Wang. 2022. "Zn-Catalyzed Regioselective and Chemoselective Reduction of Aldehydes, Ketones and Imines" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 20: 12679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012679

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop