Next Article in Journal
Elevated Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins and Albumin Determine a Poor Prognosis for Spinal Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptomics and RNA-Based Therapeutics as Potential Approaches to Manage SARS-CoV-2 Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 19
10.3390/ijms231911062
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular and Functional Characterization of a Short-Type Peptidoglycan Recognition Protein, Ct-PGRP-S1 in the Giant Triton Snail Charonia tritonis

by
Wenguang Liu
1,2,
Bing Liu
1,3,
Gege Zhang
1,3,
Huixia Jia
1,3,
Yang Zhang
1,2,
Xitong Cen
1,3,
Gaoyou Yao
1,3 and
Maoxian He
1,2,*
1
CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Marine Biology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China
2
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China
3
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11062; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911062
Submission received: 17 August 2022 / Revised: 15 September 2022 / Accepted: 17 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Macromolecules)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs) are a family of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) involved in host antibacterial responses, and their functions have been characterized in most invertebrate and vertebrate animals. However, little information is available regarding the potential function of PGRPs in the giant triton snail Charonia tritonis. In this study, a short-type PGRP gene (termed Ct-PGRP-S1) was identified in C. tritonis. Ct-PGRP-S1 was predicted to contain several structural features known in PGRPs, including a typical PGRP domain (Amidase_2) and Src homology-3 (SH3) domain. The Ct-PGRP-S1 gene was constitutively expressed in all tissues examined except in proboscis, with the highest expression level observed in the liver. As a typical PRR, Ct-PGRP-S1 has an ability to degrade peptidoglycan (PGN) and was proven to have non-Zn2+-dependent amidase activity and antibacterial activity against Vibrio alginolyticus and Staphylococcus aureus. It is the first report to reveal the peptidoglycan recognition protein in C. tritonis, and these results suggest that peptidoglycan recognition protein Ct-PGRP-S1 is an important effector of C. tritonis that modulates bacterial infection resistance of V. alginolyticus and S. aureus, and this study may provide crucial basic data for the understanding of an innate immunity system of C. tritonis.

1. Introduction

As we know, invertebrates rely solely on innate immunity to protect themselves against various microorganisms because they lack an acquired immune system as vertebrates have. Innate immunity employs several kinds of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) to discriminate self from non-self, and initiate subsequent immune cascades to eliminate harmful invaders [1]. Peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs), one of the PRRs, specifically recognize bacterial peptidoglycan (PGN) [2], which is a unique component from the cytoderm of prokaryotic organisms, which helps to maintain the integrity of the microbial cells [3].
Since PGRP was purified and shown to bind specifically to bacterial PGN, activating an antibacterial response [4], subsequently, a large amount of PGRP homologues have been identified from both invertebrates and vertebrates. Usually, each species contains more than one homologue of PGRP, such as 13 genes from Drosophila [5,6,7], 4 genes from mammals [8] and 7 genes from Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas [9]. To date, there have been over 100 PGRPs found in all species and expressed in various tissues, especially in immune tissues [10,11]. According to their structure and molecular weight, PGRPs are divided into three classes: short and extracellular (20–25 kDa, PGRP-S), intermediate (PGRP-I) with two transmembrane domains, and long and intercellular (>90 kDa, PGRP-L) types [1,12,13]. The diversity of PGRPs in structure and classification indicates that PGRPs perform multiple functions. Generally, their functions are divided into three categories: PRRs, signal regulation molecules, and effectors, all of which are involved in the antimicrobial innate immunity process [14], indicating their prominent roles in host innate immune defense.
In recent years, studies focusing on marine PGRPs have made great progress. These marine PGRPs were proven to act as PRRs, opsonins, and bactericidal amidases similarly to their counterparts in terrestrial vertebrates [1]. For example, some marine PGRPs serve as PRRs by specifically binding PGN and/or bacteria [11,15,16,17], while others enhance agglutination or phagocytosis [1,18,19,20]. Moreover, many marine PGRPs exhibit amidase activity and degrade PGN, thereby suppressing bacterial growth [18,19]. These important functions strongly indicate crucial roles in the immune system of marine organisms in the defense against potential pathogens. Thus far, PGRPs have been identified from only a few species, including amphioxus [19], scallop [18], razor clam [21], abalone [22], oyster [9], sea star [23], red drum [24], vent mussel [25], squid [26], sea cucumber [27] and tongue sole [20,28].
C. tritonis is an endangered gastropod species of its ecological and economic importance [29]. Protection of C. tritonis populations requires solid knowledge of biology and ecology, which can be further improved by studies on maintenance and breeding in captivity [30]. However, artificial cultures will inevitably be affected by bacteria-induced diseases. Given the important roles that PGRPs play in the recognition and inhibition of bacterial pathogens and the subsequent initiation of immune pathways in response to pathogen invasion, exploring novel family members and investigating the functional characteristics in C. tritonis are essential for understanding the evolution, diversity, and immune mechanisms of PGRPs as well as exploring effective strategies and efficacious immunomodulatory methods to control bacterial diseases in this important species. However, compared with the remarkable progress in insects and mammals or other marine animals, there is a research gap on the studies of C. tritonis PGRPs.
Here, we identified a PGRP gene from the transcriptome of the giant triton snail (Charonia tritonis). Given that C. tritonis is an endangered gastropod species, we did not perform pathogens challenge assay to investigate which play the most vital roles in antibacterial immune response in C. tritonis. To further explore its characterization and potential functions, we obtained one full-length open reading frame of the cDNA sequence of peptidoglycan recognition protein Ct-PGRP-S1 and determined its mRNA expression patterns of Ct-PGRP-S1 in different tissues of C. tritonis. The recombinant Ct-PGRP-S1 protein was expressed, and its functions were characterized including amidase activity and antibacterial activity. It is the first report to reveal the peptidoglycan recognition protein in C. tritonis. These results suggest that peptidoglycan recognition protein Ct-PGRP-S1 is an important effector of C. tritonis that modulates bacterial infection resistance of V. alginolyticus and S. aureus, and this study may provide crucial basic data for the understanding of an innate immunity system of C. tritonis.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of Ct-PGRP-S1 cDNA Sequence from Transcriptome of C. tritonis

Based on the gene annotation of the transcriptome of C. tritonis (NCBI sample ID: PRJNA695322) [29], we obtained the cDNA sequence of Ct-PGRP-S1 (ID: Unigene31272_All), which was annotated as peptidoglycan recognition protein. The cDNA sequence of the open reading frame of Ct-PGRP-S1 was then determined by TA-cloning and deposited in Genbank under the accession number OP351736. As shown in Figure 1, the open reading frame (ORF) of Ct-PGRP-S1 is 867 bp in size, which encodes for a 288 a.a. protein precursor with a calculated molecular weight (MW) of 31.42 KDa.

2.2. Molecular Characterization and Bioinformatic Analyses of Ct-PGRP-S1

Based on the SignalP program, Ct-PGRP-S1 was predicted to contain a 22 a.a. signal peptide (Figure 1). SMART program analysis revealed that the putative mature protein of Ct-PGRP-S1 contained an Amidase_2 domain and a SH3_3 domain (Figure 1A,B). In addition, a 3-D model of the Ct-PGRP-S1 protein precursor was predicted by the SWISS-MODEL server (Figure 1C), which shared 47.06% similarity with the crystal structure of peptidoglycan recognition protein 3 of Branchiostoma belcheri tsingtauense.
Blast analysis showed that the deduced amino acid sequences of Ct-PGRP-S1 share 63.53% and 62.26% identity with the previously identified sequence from Littorina littorea (UFA46008.1) and Pomacea canaliculate (XP_025096405.1). Furthermore, a range of PGRP proteins from various gastropod mollusks was collected to study the evolutionary relationships by phylogenetic analysis. The results of the phylogenetic analysis revealed that our newly identified Ct-PGRP-S1 has the shortest evolutionary distance from the evolutionary distance from Littorina littorea and Batillaria attramentaria (Figure 2A). Multiple alignments of amino acid sequences of PGRP-S (Figure 2B) showed that PGRPs were relatively conserved among these species, especially C-terminal, which belongs to the typical PGRP domain. Furthermore, four Zn2+-binding amino acids (two histidines, one tyrosine, and one cysteine) [31,32,33], which are essential for amidase activity of PGRPs, were conserved among these species.

2.3. Expression Profiles of Ct-PGRP-S1 mRNA in Different Tissues

The mRNA expression pattern of Ct-PGRP-S1 was analyzed in various tissues of C. tritonis by qPCR. As shown in Figure 3A, the expression of Ct-PGRP-S1 was ubiquitously detected in almost all selected tissues except in proboscis, with the strongest expression level in the liver, followed by the mantle, tentacle and salivary glands.
In addition, the transcriptome data before and after feeding showed that the highest expression level of Ct-PGRP-S1 was seen in the liver among three tissues (digestive glands, liver, salivary glands), followed by the digestive glands and salivary glands. However, the RPKM (reads per kilobase per million mapped reads) of Ct-PGRP-S1 after feeding was upregulated significantly by more than 150-fold in the liver of C. tritonis but remained unchanged in digestive glands and salivary glands. It implied that feeding increases the expression of Ct-PGRP-S1 in the liver but has on impact on the transcript abundance of Ct-PGRP-S1 in digestive glands and salivary glands (Figure 3B).

2.4. Prokaryotic Expression Vector Construction and Purification of rCt-PGRP-S1

The ORF sequence of Ct-PGRP-S1 was obtained from C. tritonis cDNA and was cloned into the pET-28b vector to produce rCt-PGRP-S1 in E. coli BL21(DE3). rCt-PGRP-S1 was overexpressed after IPTG induction and subsequently purified by using Ni-NTA beads. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the purified rCt-PGRP-S1 band was approximately 30 kDa (Figure 4A), which was in accordance with the Western blot band detected by the anti-6×His Tag antibody in Figure 4B.

2.5. Amidase Activity and Antibacterial Activity of rCt-PGRP-S1 Protein

Based on the domain prediction (Figure 1A,B) and high sequence similarity of Ct-PGRP-S1 to PGRP-S in other animals (Figure 2B), we speculated that Ct-PGRP-S1 could have amidase activity. Considering the important role of amidase activity against pathogens [14], we further measured the release of muramic acid from the interpeptide chains of S. aureus PGN. When PGN was degraded by rCt-PGRP-S1 in Tris-ZnCl2 buffer, the OD540nm value decreased dramatically from 0.425 to 0.266 within 120 min (Figure 5). However, a much similar level of activity was also detected in the group rCt-PGRP-S1 without Zn2+ as evidenced by the dramatically decreased OD540nm value (from 0.392 to 0.261), indicating that the amidase activity of rCt-PGRP-S1 was not Zn2+ dependent. This feature is inconsistent with previous results [16,21], which demonstrated that the amidase activity toward PGN of PGRP-S must be Zn2+ dependent. The result here suggests that rCt-PGRP-S1 has amidase activity toward PGN, but the amidase activity was not Zn2+ dependent.
The inhibition effects of rCt-PGRP-S1 were investigated on the growth of V. alginolyticus (Figure 6A), V. cholerae (Figure 6B), V. parahaemolyticus (Figure 6C), E. coli (Figure 6D), and S. aureus (Figure 6E). In the presence of Zn2+, no significantly different growth curves of E. coli, V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus were exhibited, implying that rCt-PGRP-S1 showed no apparent inhibition effects on E. coli, V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus. By contrast, rCt-PGRP-S1 weakly inhibited the growth of V. alginolyticus, as they showed similar lag phase but had lower maximum cell density. In addition, S. aureus exhibited a prolonged lag phase (>2 h) compared with the group without rCt-PGRP-S1, indicating that rCt-PGRP-S1 suppresses the growth of S. aureus bacteria.

3. Discussion

PGRPs are a family of PRRs that play crucial roles in host innate immune responses [14,34,35], and their functions have been characterized in most invertebrates and vertebrates. However, little information is available to date regarding the functions of C. tritonis PGRPs. In the present study, we identified a PGRP gene named as Ct-PGRP-S1 in the endangered species C. tritonis. The predicted protein of Ct-PGRP-S1 possesses a typical PGRP domain (Amidase_2 domain) [14,35,36] and Src homology-3 (SH3) domain. Ct-PGRP-S1 and other short-type PGRPs in gastropods all contained a conserved C-terminal typical PGRP domain, indicating that Ct-PGRP-S1 is a kind of short-type PGRP in gastropods.
As we know, most PGRPs contain one C-terminal PGRP domain (approximate 165 amino acids), which is homologous to bacteriophage and bacterial type 2 amidases [5,8,12]. However, not all PGRPs contain a SH3 domain. We performed domain prediction on all the proteins described in the phylogenetic tree, and we found that only a few PGRP-S proteins contained the SH3_3 domain, including P. canaliculate (XP_025096405.1), D. polymorpha (KAH3862486.1), and M. mercenaria (XP_045194511.1). Src homology-3 (SH3) domains, consisting of approximately 60 amino acids, mediate intramolecular associations and form supramodules with their own supertertiary structures [37], which further regulate a wide spectrum of cellular processes such as cell–environment and cell–cell communication, cytoskeletal rearrangement, cell migration and growth, protein trafficking and degradation, and immune responses [38,39,40]. Bacterial homologs of the SH3 domain were primarily extracellular domains in periplasmic or cell-wall-associated proteins [41,42,43]. Tamai et al. showed that Src homology 3 domains are indispensable for the lytic activity of endolysin as the cell wall-binding domain and suggested that the SH3 domain presumably recognizes peptide side-chains to fix the catalytic domain in proper orientation for binding to the glycan backbone [44]. Therefore, the SH3 domain of Ct-PGRP-S1 possibly facilitates PGRP to interact with peptidoglycans on the cell wall and exerts immune inhibition.
One common feature between invertebrate and vertebrate PGRPs is amidase activity, which hydrolyses the amide bond between MurNAc and L-alanine in bacterial PGN [35]. Previous studies suggest that amidase-active PGRPs must contain four conserved Zn2+-binding residues, including two histidines, one tyrosine, and one cysteine [31,32,33]. Here, Ct-PGRP-S1 has these four residues (histidine: +146 a.a. and +255 a.a.; tyrosine: +208 a.a.; cysteine: +263 a.a.), indicating that Ct-PGRP-S1 is a kind of amidase-active PGRP. However, the amidase activity of recombinant Ct-PGRP-S1 has been proven to be non-Zn2+-dependent. This result was unexpected because the three Zn2+-binding residues in the PGRP domain were completely conserved in Ct-PGRP-S1. However, this is not an exception. Jaeeun et al. demonstrated that the absence or presence of metal ions, such as EDTA, Mg2+, Ca2+, Zn2+, or Mn2+, did not affect the lytic activity of endolysin, although it has three completely conserved Zn2+-binding residues in the PGRP domain [45], which is the same as the case of Ct-PGRP-S1.
C. tritonis are specialist predators of Acanthaster planci (crown-of-thorns starfish), which is important for the biodiversity of coral reefs and their biological communities [29]. However, C. tritonis are considered vulnerable, and a decline in their populations will contribute to recurring population outbreaks of A. planci. Aquaculture has been considered as one effective approach that could help restore natural populations of C. tritonis and mitigate coral loss [46]. We could speculate that in the process of aquaculture, they may be at risk of bacterial infection, especially the Vibrio, since there are many reports of bacterial infection causing a massive economic loss in the aquaculture industry [47,48,49,50]. Meanwhile, various aquatic animals have suffered from S. aureus infections [51,52,53,54,55]. In the present study, co-incubation assay revealed that recombinant Ct-PGRP-S1 was proven to have antibacterial activity against V. alginolyticus and S. aureus by direct contact, reflecting the importance of Ct-PGRP-S1 in the antibacterial defense of C. tritonis and providing important evidence to suggest that amidase-active PGRPs may function as the key effectors to promote antibacterial response in hosts.
In summary, a gene coding a short-type PGRP, named Ct-PGRP-S1, was identified in C. tritonis. Except in proboscis, the Ct-PGRP-S1 gene was constitutively expressed in all tissues examined, with the highest expression level was observed in liver. In addition, the recombinant Ct-PGRP-S1 has been proven to have PGN-degrading activity, non-Zn2+-dependent amidase activity and antibacterial activity against V. alginolyticus and S. aureus. To the best of our knowledge, the present study represents the first discovery on the function of PGRPs in C. tritonis, thus contributing to a better understanding of the functional evolution of PGRPs in gastropoda.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals and Tissue Collection

The adult C. tritonis were obtained from Nansha archipelagic waters of the South China Sea. Tissue samples (salivary glands, tentacle, proboscis, mantle and liver) were collected and quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen for 24 h, and then stored at 80 °C until total RNA extraction as previous described by Zhang et al. [29]. The animal experiments were conducted following the guidelines and approval of the Ethics Committees of the South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (approval code: 2022-001; approval date: 25 July 2022).

4.2. Molecular Cloning and Bioinformatics Analysis of Ct-PGRP-S1

A full-length cDNA sequence of the C. tritonis Ct-PGRP-S1 gene was found in a transcriptomic database constructed by our laboratory (NCBI sample ID: PRJNA695322, accessed on 27 January 2021), and the open reading frame (ORF) sequence of Ct-PGRP-S1 was obtained using the primers annotated Ct-PGRP-S1-F/R (Table 1). The sequence was deposited in GenBank (GenBank ID: OP351736, accessed on 1 September 2022). The cDNA extraction of total RNA and reverse transcription of first-strand cDNA were performed following the procedure described by Liu et al. [56]. Prediction of the structural domains of the Ct-PGRP-S1 protein was conducted with the SMART program, and the three-dimensional (3-D) model was generated by using the SWISS-MODEL server. The amino acid sequence alignment was performed with clustalx1.8, and the phylogenetic tree was built by neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates using MEGA 6.0. The species used in this analysis and their accession ID are shown as follows: Littorina littorea UFA46008.1, Pomacea canaliculate XP_025096405.1, Dreissena polymorpha KAH3862486.1, Mercenaria mercenaria XP_045194511.1, Reishia clavigera AET43945.1, Ostrea edulis XP_048750675.1, Crassostrea virginica XP_022311450.1, Mytilus edulis CAG2232607.1, Mytilus galloprovincialis AJQ21531.1, Tegillarca granosa QZM06958.1, Crassostrea gigas XP_011420323.2, Batillaria attramentaria KAG5698050.1, Mizuhopecten yessoensis XP_021376412.1, Gigantopelta aegis XP_041366403.1, Pecten maximus XP_033761487.1, Lottia gigantea XP_009064695.1, Bulinus truncatus KAH9512611.1, Physella acuta AEH26026.1.

4.3. RNA Isolation and Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis

Total RNA of multiple tissues, including salivary glands, tentacle, proboscis, mantle and liver from adult C. tritonis, was isolated using the TransZol Up Plus RNA Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). Prime-Script RT Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu City, Japan) was used for reverse transcription. TB Green® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu City, Japan) was used for quantitative real-time PCR detection. Tissue expression pattern of Ct-PGRP-S1 was detected by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using the gene-specific primers (Table 1), and 18s rDNA was used as an internal reference. A Thermal Cycler Dice Real Time System III (Takara Bio Inc.) instrument was used for qPCR with the following parameters: for the holding stage, 95 °C for 30 s; for the two step PCR stage, 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s (repeated 40 times) with the fluorescence recorded at 60 °C; and for the melting curve stage, 90 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and then 95 °C for 15 s with the fluorescence recorded every 0.05 s. The relative expression levels were calculated using the threshold cycle (ΔΔCT) method [57]. Measurements were performed in triplicate biologically and technically. Statistical significance was determined by the Student’s t test (ns p > 0.05, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).

4.4. Construction of Prokaryotic Expression Vector

The cDNA segment (67–864 bp) including the full-length coding sequence of the Ct-PGRP-S1 gene except for the sequence of predicted signal peptide was amplified by PCR with the primer sets Ct-PGRP-S1-orf-F/R (Table 1). The plasmid pET28b was amplified with linearized primer pairs pET28b-F/R, and the fragments were then inserted into plasmid pET28b with a ClonExpress® II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) to obtain a recombinant plasmid, which was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3)-competent cells. Subsequently, PCR and sequencing were used to check for the presence of the target genes with the primer pair pET28b-check-F/R.

4.5. Over-Expression and Purification of Recombinant Ct-PGRP-S1 Protein

Bacterial Strain rCt-PGRP-S1-pET28b/BL21 (DE3) was grown overnight in LB medium plus 50 μg kanamycin at 30 °C with shaking at 200 rpm. Then, 500 μL of overnight E. coli BL21 (DE3) culture was diluted into 500 mL fresh Luria broth (LB) with 50 mg/mL kanamycin (1:1000). The culture was incubated at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm until the cell density reached 0.6 at 600 nm optical density. Overexpression of recombinant proteins was induced by isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG). Briefly, the culture was shifted to 28 °C and induced by IPTG at 0.5 mM final concentration. After 4 h of induction, the induced cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6000× g for 3 min at 4 °C. The cells were resuspended in 10 mL lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole, and 100 mM protease inhibitor PMSF). Pressure cell disruptor (Constant Systems, Daventry, UK) was used for cell disruption, and cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 15,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was incubated with 2 mL of nickel agarose beads for 3 h with rotation. The slurry was eluted by using a 50–500 mM imidazole gradient. The reaction mixture was then passed through a nickel agarose column, and purified protein was concentrated using Amicon Ultra centrifuge tube (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and stored in Tris buffer at −80 °C. The purified rCt-PGRP-S1 protein was characterized using 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Western Blot was carried out according to the methods described by Liu et al. [58]. Briefly, the proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to 0.2 μm polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The purified protein was detected using anti-6×His tag monoclonal antibody (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), and SuperSignal™ West Pico PLUS (Thermo Fisher scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for visualization.

4.6. Amidase Activity Assay

The enzyme activity of rCt-PGRP-S1 toward PGN from S. aureus (Macklin, Shanghai, China) was determined according to a previous method with minor modification [1]. In brief, a total of 40 μg PGN (1 mg/mL) was incubated with 50 μg rCt-PGRP-S1 protein in Tris buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.2) or Tris-ZnCl2 buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM ZnCl2, pH 7.2) at 37 °C. Simultaneously, the Tris buffer without PGN was used as control group. The absorbance (OD) values were recorded at 540 nm per 10 min lasting for 120 min.

4.7. Antimicrobial Activity Assay

The antimicrobial activity of purified recombinant Ct-PGRP-S1 protein was investigated according to the method described by He et al. [59] with slight modification. In brief, the microbial strains used in the assays included Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli and Vibrio alginolyticus, Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus, grown overnight in LB medium at 37 °C. All cells were grown to mid-logarithmic phase (OD600nm ≈ 0.5). The bacterial growth rate method was used to investigate the antimicrobial activity of the purified recombinant Ct-PGRP-S1 protein. The purified recombinant protein was diluted with sterile Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) to final concentrations of 50 μg/mL, and 50 μL of rCt-PGRP-S1 was added to 900 μL OD600nm of 0.1 E. coli, V. alginolyticus, V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and S. aureus. Cultures (3 replicates in each case) were then incubated at 37 °C with continuous shaking at 200 rpm in 96-well plates. The wells in which the recombinant protein was replaced with Tris were used as the loading control. The wells in which the recombinant protein and the bacterial culture were left out were used as the blank control. OD600nm was measured at regular time intervals using the Multiskan Ascent plate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The antimicrobial activity of Ct-PGRP-S1 was measured by the growth kinetics or maximum cell densities of differenced bacteria.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.L., Y.Z. and M.H.; methodology, B.L.; software, B.L. and X.C.; validation, B.L., G.Z. and X.C.; formal analysis, B.L. and G.Y.; investigation, H.J.; resources, G.Z. and H.J.; data curation, B.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.L. and G.Z.; writing—review and editing, W.L.; visualization, Y.Z.; supervision, M.H.; project administration, M.H.; funding acquisition, W.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42176129), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2022A1515010779), the Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (GML2019ZD0402), Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Marine Biology (2020B1212060058).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines and approval of the Ethics Committees of the South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (approval code: 2022-001; approval date: 25 July 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable for studies not involving humans.

Data Availability Statement

The open reading frame (ORF) sequence of Ct-PGRP-S1 is deposited in GenBank (GenBank ID: OP351736). The other data presented in this study are available in the article.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Wuhan Genecreate Biological engineering Co., Ltd. for assisting in protein purification. We are thankful for the data archive support from the South China Sea Ocean Data Center (http://data.scsio.ac.cn, accessed on 17 August 2022), National science & Technology infrastructure of China (http://www.geodata.cn, accessed on 17 August 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wei, X.; Yang, D.; Li, H.; Zhao, T.; Jiang, H.; Liu, X.; Yang, J. Peptidoglycan recognition protein of Solen grandis (SgPGRP-S1) mediates immune recognition and bacteria clearance. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 73, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kurata, S. Peptidoglycan recognition proteins in Drosophila immunity. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2014, 42, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shin, J.H.; Sulpizio, A.G.; Kelley, A.; Alvarez, L.; Murphy, S.G.; Fan, L.X.; Cava, F.; Mao, Y.X.; Saper, M.A.; Dorr, T. Structural basis of peptidoglycan endopeptidase regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 11692–11702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yoshida, H.; Kinoshita, K.; Ashida, M. Purification of a peptidoglycan recognition protein from hemolymph of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 13854–13860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Werner, T.; Liu, G.; Kang, D.; Ekengren, S.; Steiner, H.; Hultmark, D. A family of peptidoglycan recognition proteins in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 13772–13777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Christophides, G.K.; Zdobnov, E.; Barillas-Mury, C.; Birney, E.; Blandin, S.; Blass, C.; Brey, P.T.; Collins, F.H.; Danielli, A.; Dimopoulos, G.; et al. Immunity-related genes and gene families in Anopheles gambiae. Science 2002, 298, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Werner, T.; Borge-Renberg, K.; Mellroth, P.; Steiner, H.; Hultmark, D. Functional diversity of the Drosophila PGRP-LC gene cluster in the response to lipopolysaccharide and peptidoglycan. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 26319–26322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, C.; Xu, Z.J.; Gupta, D.; Dziarski, R. Peptidoglycan recognition proteins—A novel family of four human innate immunity pattern recognition molecules. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 34686–34694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.; Yu, Z.N. The first evidence of positive selection in peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP) genes of Crassostrea gigas. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 34, 1352–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wolf, A.J.; Underhill, D.M. Peptidoglycan recognition by the innate immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luo, S.; Wang, L.-C.; Shuai, Z.-H.; Yang, G.-J.; Lu, J.-F.; Chen, J. A short peptidoglycan recognition protein protects Boleophthalmus pectinirostris against bacterial infection via inhibiting bacterial activity. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022, 127, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dziarski, R. Peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs). Mol. Immunol. 2004, 40, 877–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ni, D.J.; Song, L.S.; Wu, L.T.; Chang, Y.Q.; Yu, Y.D.; Qiu, L.M.; Wang, L.L. Molecular cloning and mRNA ex-pression of peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP) gene in bay scallop (Argopecten irradians, Lamarck 1819). Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2007, 31, 548–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dziarski, R.; Gupta, D. The peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs). Genome Biol. 2006, 7, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hou, J.; Gan, Z.; Chen, S.N.; Nie, P. Molecular and functional characterization of a short-type peptidoglycan recognition protein, PGRP-S in the amphibian Xenopus laevis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2019, 98, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hou, J.; Gan, Z.; Chen, S.; Cheng, J.; Lu, Y.; Huang, B.; Nie, P.; Xia, L. Identification and functional characterization of a short-type peptidoglycan recognition protein, PGRP-S in the orange-spotted grouper, Epinephelus coioides. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 20, 100739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, L.; Chen, S.N.; Gan, Z.; Nie, P. Molecular and functional identification of a short-type peptidoglycan recognition protein, PGRP-S, in the Chinese soft-shelled turtle Pelodiscus sinensis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2021, 117, 103965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, J.L.; Wang, W.; Wei, X.M.; Qiu, L.M.; Wang, L.L.; Zhang, H.A.; Song, L.S. Peptidoglycan recognition protein of Chlamys farreri (CfPGRP-S1) mediates immune defenses against bacterial infection. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2010, 34, 1300–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yao, F.; Li, Z.H.; Zhang, Y.J.; Zhang, S.C. A novel short peptidoglycan recognition protein in amphioxus: Identification, expression and bioactivity. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2012, 38, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, Q.L.; Sun, L. A short-type peptidoglycan recognition protein from tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis) promotes phagocytosis and defense against bacterial infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015, 47, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meng, Y.; Dai, W.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, W.; Dong, Y. Expression and functional characterization of peptidoglycan recognition protein-S6 involved in antibacterial responses in the razor clam Sinonovacula constricta. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2022, 129, 104331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Premachandra, H.K.A.; Elvitigala, D.A.S.; Whang, I.; Lee, J. Identification of a novel molluscan short-type peptidoglycan recognition protein in disk abalone (Haliotis discus discus) involved in host antibacterial defense. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014, 39, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Coteur, G.; Mellroth, P.; De Lefortery, C.; Gillan, D.; Dubois, P.; Communi, D.; Steiner, H. Peptidoglycan recognition proteins with amidase activity in early deuterostornes (Echinodermata). Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2007, 31, 790–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, M.F.; Zhang, M.; Wang, C.L.; Sun, L. A peptidoglycan recognition protein from Sciaenops ocellatus is a zinc amidase and a bactericide with a substrate range limited to Gram-positive bacteria. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012, 32, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ikuta, T.; Tame, A.; Saito, M.; Aoki, Y.; Nagai, Y.; Sugimura, M.; Inoue, K.; Fujikura, K.; Ohishi, K.; Maruyama, T.; et al. Identification of cells expressing two peptidoglycan recognition proteins in the gill of the vent mussel, Bathymodiolus septemdierurn. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 93, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Troll, J.V.; Bent, E.H.; Pacquette, N.; Wier, A.M.; Goldman, W.E.; Silverman, N.; McFall-Ngai, M.J. Taming the symbiont for coexistence: A host PGRP neutralizes a bacterial symbiont toxin. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 2190–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, J.; Gao, S.; Wang, X.; Guan, X.; Wang, B.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Sun, H.; Dong, Y.; Zhou, Z. The role of a novel secretory peptidoglycan recognition protein from the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus in innate immunity. Aquaculture 2022, 546, 737339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Meng, F.; Li, S.; Xu, Q.; Qi, Z. Characterization of the ligand binding of PGRP-L in half-smooth tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis) by molecular dynamics and free energy calculation. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 31, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, G.G.; Xu, M.; Zhang, C.L.; Jia, H.X.; Zhang, H.; He, M.X.; Liu, W.G. Comparative Transcriptomic and Expression Profiles Between the Foot Muscle and Mantle Tissues in the Giant Triton Snail Charonia tritonis. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 632518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Doxa, C.K.; Divanach, P.; Kentouri, M. Consumption rates and digestibility of four food items by the marine gastropod Charonia seguenzae (Aradas & Benoit, 1870). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2013, 446, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chang, C.I.; Pili-Floury, S.; Herve, M.; Parquet, C.; Chelliah, Y.; Lemaitre, B.; Mengin-Lecreulx, D.; Deisenhofer, J. A Drosophila pattern recognition receptor contains a peptidoglycan docking groove and unusual L,D-carboxypeptidase activity. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2, 1293–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reiser, J.B.; Teyton, L.; Wilson, I.A. Crystal structure of the drosophila peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP)-SA at 1.56 angstrom resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 340, 909–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Guan, R.J.; Wang, Q.; Sundberg, E.J.; Mariuzza, R.A. Crystal structure of human peptidoglycan recognition protein S (PGRP-S) at 1.70 angstrom resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 347, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dziarski, R.; Gupta, D. Mammalian PGRPs: Novel antibacterial proteins. Cell. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 1059–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Royet, J.; Dziarski, R. Peptidoglycan recognition proteins: Pleiotropic sensors and effectors of antimicrobial defences. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 264–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, Z.M.; Li, X.N.; Cocklin, R.R.; Wang, M.H.; Wang, M.; Fukase, K.; Inamura, S.; Kusumoto, S.; Gupta, D.; Dziarski, R. Human peptidoglycan recognition protein-L is an N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 49044–49052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dionne, U.; Percival, L.J.; Chartier, F.J.M.; Landry, C.R.; Bisson, N. SRC homology 3 domains: Multifaceted binding modules. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2022, 47, 772–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kaneko, T.; Li, L.; Li, S.S.C. The SH3 domain—A family of versatile peptide- and protein-recognition module. Front. Biosci. -Landmark 2008, 13, 4938–4952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tatarova, Z.; Brabek, J.; Rosel, D.; Novotny, M. SH3 Domain Tyrosine Phosphorylation—Sites, Role and Evolution. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mayer, B.J. The discovery of modular binding domains: Building blocks of cell signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 16, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ponting, C.P.; Aravind, L.; Schultz, J.; Bork, P.; Koonin, E.V. Eukaryotic signalling domain homologues in archaea and bacteria. Ancient ancestry and horizontal gene transfer. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 289, 729–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Anantharaman, V.; Aravind, L. Evolutionary history, structural features and biochemical diversity of the NlpC/P60 superfamily of enzymes. Genome Biol. 2003, 4, R11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xu, Q.P.; Mengin-Lecreulx, D.; Liu, X.Q.W.; Patin, D.; Farr, C.L.; Grant, J.C.; Chiu, H.J.; Jaroszewski, L.; Knuth, M.W.; Godzik, A.; et al. Insights into Substrate Specificity of NlpC/P60 Cell Wall Hydrolases Containing Bacterial SH3 Domains. mBio 2015, 6, e02327-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tamai, E.; Yoshida, H.; Sekiya, H.; Nariya, H.; Miyata, S.; Okabe, A.; Kuwahara, T.; Maki, J.; Kamitori, S. X-ray structure of a novel endolysin encoded by episomal phage phiSM101 of Clostridium perfringens. Mol. Microbiol. 2014, 92, 326–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Park, J.; Yun, J.; Lim, J.-A.; Kang, D.-H.; Ryu, S. Characterization of an endolysin, LysBPS13, from a Bacillus cereus bacteriophage. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2012, 332, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Klein, A.H.; Motti, C.A.; Hillberg, A.K.; Ventura, T.; Thomas-Hall, P.; Armstrong, T.; Barker, T.; Whatmore, P.; Cummins, S.F. Development and Interrogation of a Transcriptomic Resource for the Giant Triton Snail (Charonia tritonis). Mar. Biotechnol. 2021, 23, 501–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ucko, M.; Colorni, A.; Dubytska, L.; Thune, R.L. Edwardsiella piscicida-like pathogen in cultured grouper. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2016, 121, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shen, G.M.; Shi, C.Y.; Fan, C.; Jia, D.; Wang, S.Q.; Xie, G.S.; Li, G.Y.; Mo, Z.L.; Huang, J. Isolation, identification and pathogenicity of Vibrio harveyi, the causal agent of skin ulcer disease in juvenile hybrid groupers Epinephelus fuscoguttatus x Epinephelus lanceolatus. J. Fish Dis. 2017, 40, 1351–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Travers, M.-A.; Miller, K.B.; Roque, A.; Friedman, C.S. Bacterial diseases in marine bivalves. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2015, 131, 11–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yoshida, T. Streptococcosis in aquaculture. Fish Pathol. 2016, 51, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Shah, K.L.; Tyagi, B.C. An eye disease in silver carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, held in tropical ponds, associated with the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus. Aquaculture 1986, 55, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rajan, V.; Sivaraman, G.K.; Vijayan, A.; Elangovan, R.; Prendiville, A.; Bachmann, T.T. Genotypes and phenotypes of methicillin-resistant staphylococci isolated from shrimp aquaculture farms. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2022, 14, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fu, L.L.; Gao, T.H.; Jiang, H.H.; Qiang, F.Q.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, J. Staphylococcus aureus causes hepatopancreas browned disease and hepatopancreatic necrosis complications in Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis. Aquac. Int. 2019, 27, 1301–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, H.; Huang, H.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Li, J. Construction of predictive model for the growth of Staphylococcus aureus in bread shrimp. Guangdong Agric. Sci. 2014, 41, 104–108. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wu, X.; Su, Y.-C. Growth of Staphylococcus aureus and enterotoxin production in pre-cooked tuna meat. Food Control 2014, 42, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, B.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, X.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Yang, S.; Chen, C. CsrA Regulates Swarming Motility and Carbohydrate and Amino Acid Metabolism in Vibrio alginolyticus. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, B.; Fang, J.; Chen, H.; Sun, Y.; Yang, S.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, C. GcvB Regulon Revealed by Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analysis in Vibrio alginolyticus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. He, X.C.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Z.N. An Mpeg (macrophage expressed gene) from the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas: Molecular characterization and gene expression. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011, 30, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 11062 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) The full-length cDNA sequence of Ct-PGRP-S1 and its deduced amino acid sequence. The signal peptide is shadowed. The Amidase_2 (N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase, PF01510.28) domain is yellow. The SH3_3 (Bacterial SH3 domain, PF08239.14) domain is blue. (B) Simplified structural domain model of Ct-PGRP-S1 predicted by SMART program. (C) Three-dimensional (3-D) protein model for Ct-PGRP-S1 predicted by SWISS-MODEL server.
Figure 1. (A) The full-length cDNA sequence of Ct-PGRP-S1 and its deduced amino acid sequence. The signal peptide is shadowed. The Amidase_2 (N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase, PF01510.28) domain is yellow. The SH3_3 (Bacterial SH3 domain, PF08239.14) domain is blue. (B) Simplified structural domain model of Ct-PGRP-S1 predicted by SMART program. (C) Three-dimensional (3-D) protein model for Ct-PGRP-S1 predicted by SWISS-MODEL server.
Ijms 23 11062 g001
Ijms 23 11062 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Phylogenetic analysis of PGRP-S among various species of gastropod mollusk using the neighbor-joining method with a bootstrap value of 1000. (B) Multiple alignments of amino acid sequences of PGRP-S in different species. Conserved Zn2+-binding amino acids that are essential for amidase activity of PGRPs are indicated in the red triangle.
Figure 2. (A) Phylogenetic analysis of PGRP-S among various species of gastropod mollusk using the neighbor-joining method with a bootstrap value of 1000. (B) Multiple alignments of amino acid sequences of PGRP-S in different species. Conserved Zn2+-binding amino acids that are essential for amidase activity of PGRPs are indicated in the red triangle.
Ijms 23 11062 g002
Ijms 23 11062 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Tissue distribution of Ct-PGRP-S1 mRNA. The selected tissues included the liver, proboscis, mantle, tentacle and salivary glands. The data are presented as the means ± SD (n ≥ 3); significant differences between different groups are indicated with * at p < 0.05, and with ** at p < 0.01; “nd” indicates not detected. (B) RPKM of Ct-PGRP-S1 mRNA in different tissues before and after feeding. Different letters denote significant differences.
Figure 3. (A) Tissue distribution of Ct-PGRP-S1 mRNA. The selected tissues included the liver, proboscis, mantle, tentacle and salivary glands. The data are presented as the means ± SD (n ≥ 3); significant differences between different groups are indicated with * at p < 0.05, and with ** at p < 0.01; “nd” indicates not detected. (B) RPKM of Ct-PGRP-S1 mRNA in different tissues before and after feeding. Different letters denote significant differences.
Ijms 23 11062 g003
Ijms 23 11062 g004 550
Figure 4. Prokaryotic expression and Western blot analysis of rCt-PGRP-S1. (A) The SDS-PAGE analysis of prokaryotic expressed rCt-PGRP-S1. Lane M: protein marker; 1 and 2: protein from BL21 (DE3) transformed with pET28b-rCt-PGRP-S1 plasmid before and after 0.5 mM IPTG induction; 3: purified rCt-PGRP-S1. (B) Western blot analysis of rCt-PGRP-S1 with anti-6×His tag monoclonal antibody.
Figure 4. Prokaryotic expression and Western blot analysis of rCt-PGRP-S1. (A) The SDS-PAGE analysis of prokaryotic expressed rCt-PGRP-S1. Lane M: protein marker; 1 and 2: protein from BL21 (DE3) transformed with pET28b-rCt-PGRP-S1 plasmid before and after 0.5 mM IPTG induction; 3: purified rCt-PGRP-S1. (B) Western blot analysis of rCt-PGRP-S1 with anti-6×His tag monoclonal antibody.
Ijms 23 11062 g004
Ijms 23 11062 g005 550
Figure 5. Activity of rCt-PGRP-S1 in the degradation of PGN. rCt-PGRP-S1 was incubated with PGN with or without Zn2+, and Tris buffer without rCt-PGRP-S1 and PGN was used as a control. The OD value was recorded at 540 nm per 10 min, lasting for 120 min. For growth curves, biological replicates (n = 7) are shown as points with their average values connected by lines. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM).
Figure 5. Activity of rCt-PGRP-S1 in the degradation of PGN. rCt-PGRP-S1 was incubated with PGN with or without Zn2+, and Tris buffer without rCt-PGRP-S1 and PGN was used as a control. The OD value was recorded at 540 nm per 10 min, lasting for 120 min. For growth curves, biological replicates (n = 7) are shown as points with their average values connected by lines. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM).
Ijms 23 11062 g005
Ijms 23 11062 g006 550
Figure 6. Growth suppressive test of rCt-PGRP-S1 against bacteria. V. alginolyticus (A), V. cholerae (B) V. parahaemolyticus (C), E. coli (D), and S. aureus (E) were mixed with rCt-PGRP-S1 (final concentration 50 μg/mL), and the OD600nm was recorded per half hour lasting for 10 h. The wells in which the recombinant protein was replaced with Tris were used as the loading control. The wells in which the recombinant protein and the bacterial culture were left out were used as the blank control (termed con). For growth curves, three biological replicates are shown as points with their average values connected by lines. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM).
Figure 6. Growth suppressive test of rCt-PGRP-S1 against bacteria. V. alginolyticus (A), V. cholerae (B) V. parahaemolyticus (C), E. coli (D), and S. aureus (E) were mixed with rCt-PGRP-S1 (final concentration 50 μg/mL), and the OD600nm was recorded per half hour lasting for 10 h. The wells in which the recombinant protein was replaced with Tris were used as the loading control. The wells in which the recombinant protein and the bacterial culture were left out were used as the blank control (termed con). For growth curves, three biological replicates are shown as points with their average values connected by lines. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM).
Ijms 23 11062 g006
Table
Table 1. Nucleotide sequences of primers used in this study.
Table 1. Nucleotide sequences of primers used in this study.
PrimersSequence (5′-3′)
For ORF cloning
Ct-PGRP-S1-FATGCATCTGGCCATCATTCTG
Ct-PGRP-S1-RGGTACCATAACGATGCAACG
For qPCR
QCt-PGRP-S1-FCAGTGGCAAGTTCTCTGCAG
QCt-PGRP-S1-RCTCTCACCAATAACTGCGCC
Q18S-FATGGTCAGAACTACGACGGTAT
Q18S-RGTATTGCGGTGTTAGAGGTGAA
For recombinant Ct-PGRP-S1 protein construction
pET28b-FCACCACCACCACCACCAC
pET28b-RGGTATATCTCCTTCTTAAAGTTAAACAAAATTATTTC
Ct-PGRP-S1-orf_FctttaagaaggagatataccATGCATCTGGCCATCATTC
Ct-PGRP-S1-orf_FcagtggtggtggtggtggtgCGCACCATTATACAGCGC
pET28b-check-FAAGTGGCGAGCCCGATCTTC
pET28b-check-RCTAGGGCGCTGGCAAGTGTA
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, W.; Liu, B.; Zhang, G.; Jia, H.; Zhang, Y.; Cen, X.; Yao, G.; He, M. Molecular and Functional Characterization of a Short-Type Peptidoglycan Recognition Protein, Ct-PGRP-S1 in the Giant Triton Snail Charonia tritonis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11062. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911062

AMA Style

Liu W, Liu B, Zhang G, Jia H, Zhang Y, Cen X, Yao G, He M. Molecular and Functional Characterization of a Short-Type Peptidoglycan Recognition Protein, Ct-PGRP-S1 in the Giant Triton Snail Charonia tritonis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(19):11062. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Wenguang, Bing Liu, Gege Zhang, Huixia Jia, Yang Zhang, Xitong Cen, Gaoyou Yao, and Maoxian He. 2022. "Molecular and Functional Characterization of a Short-Type Peptidoglycan Recognition Protein, Ct-PGRP-S1 in the Giant Triton Snail Charonia tritonis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 19: 11062. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911062

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop