Next Article in Journal
BrWAX3, Encoding a β-ketoacyl-CoA Synthase, Plays an Essential Role in Cuticular Wax Biosynthesis in Chinese Cabbage
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of the Effects of Ninjin’yoeito on Physical Frailty in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Fluorine Atoms on C6H5-Corrole Affect the Interaction with Mpro and PLpro Proteases of SARS-CoV-2: Molecular Docking and 2D-QSAR Approaches
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors and Pathways Modulating Endothelial Cell Senescence in Vascular Aging
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 18
10.3390/ijms231810937
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Ellagic Acid and Its Anti-Aging Effects on Central Nervous System

by
Heyu Zhu
†,
Yuanmei Yan
†,
Yi Jiang
and
Xianfang Meng
*
Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10937; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810937
Submission received: 31 July 2022 / Revised: 9 September 2022 / Accepted: 10 September 2022 / Published: 19 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers in Anti-aging Treatment Development)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aging is an unavoidable biological process that leads to the decline of human function and the reduction in people’s quality of life. Demand for anti-aging medicines has become very urgent. Many studies have shown that ellagic acid (EA), a phenolic compound widely distributed in dicotyledonous plants, has powerful anti-inflammation and antioxidant properties. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that EA can enhance neuronal viability, reduce neuronal defects, and alleviate damage in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and cerebral ischemia. This paper reviews the biochemical functions and neuroprotective effects of EA, showing the clinical value of its application.

1. Introduction

Aging is an unavoidable process characterized by the gradual decrease in various biological activities in the organs and the reduction in repair capacity for external and internal injuries [1,2]. Researchers are devoted to investigating the molecular mechanisms of aging in order to extend the human lifespan. Some dietary compounds in fruits and vegetables have been extracted and evaluated, and it has been proven that some phenolic substances such as ellagic acid (EA) have anti-aging effects by scavenging free radicals and exhibiting antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties [3].
EA (Figure 1) is a chromene-dione derivative (C14H6O8) [4]. There are four hydroxyl groups, two lactones, and two hydrocarbon rings which give EA the ability to accept electrons from different substrates and participate in antioxidant reactions [5]. It exists in the natural environment in free form, and, more often than not, in condensed form, for example, as ellagitannins (ETs), glycosides, and so on. EA is widely present in some fruits, nuts, and seeds, for instance, pomegranates, black raspberries, raspberries, strawberries, walnuts, and almonds [6]. Several studies have revealed that EA possesses potent biochemical and biological activities, including antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective effects.
EA is considered to possess higher antioxidant activity than vitamin E succinate and melatonin. It plays important roles in scavenging free radicals, enhancing the activities of antioxidant enzymes, inhibiting lipid peroxidation, and reducing ROS production [5]. Moreover, EA can also inhibit the pro-oxidant effect of metal ions through chelation reactions [7,8]. Inflammation and oxidative stress are closely related, while EA has powerful antioxidant and anti-inflammatory capabilities. There are three main signaling pathways that induce inflammatory responses, Nf-κB, MAPKs, and JAK/STAT pathways. EA can inhibit all three pathways to prevent the expression of downstream genes and thus inhibit the release of inflammatory factors such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, iNOX, and so on [9].
Due to its powerful antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties, EA has been shown to have protective effects on several kinds of diseases of the nervous system. In some neurodegenerative diseases, for instance, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD), and cerebral ischemia, excessive oxidative stress and inflammatory response are involved in neuronal death, brain tissue damage, and the development of the diseases. Therefore, it is of great significance to inhibit oxidative stress, scavenge free radicals, and reduce or even eliminate inflammatory responses for the treatment and prevention of nervous system diseases. Numerous pieces of research have shown that EA can significantly improve neurological pathologies through its antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties [5,10].
In this review, we aim to comprehensively summarize the antioxidative and anti-inflammatory mechanisms of EA and its protective effects on the central nervous system in order to provide a potential therapy for the treatment of neurological disorders.

2. Antioxidants

Oxidative stress can be defined as a disruption of the balance between oxidants and antioxidants in the organism. Excessive free radicals causing negative effects on the body are one of the most popular theories of aging [11]. Oxidative stress has been found to be involved in chronic cardiovascular disease [12], hepatic functional changes [13], and neurological disorders [14], and is thought to be a major cause of various cancers in animals and humans [15].
Oxidants can be classified as reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS) [16], and oxidized lipids [17]. ROS include superoxide anions (·O2−), hydroxyl radicals (·HO−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), etc.; RNSs include nitric oxide (·NO), nitrogen dioxide (·NO2), peroxynitrite (·ONOO−), etc.; and oxidized lipids include arachidonic acid, linoleic acid, etc. The antioxidant mechanisms in the body consist of the enzymatic antioxidant system, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems, such as vitamin C, vitamin E, melatonin, glutathione, and superoxide anion (SOA) [18].
EA plays a distinct role in antioxidation by scavenging free radicals, chelating metal ions such as iron and copper, and regulating several signaling pathways [19,20] (Figure 2). As a highly efficient antioxidant, EA can scavenge two free radicals (a ROO· and an O2·) per cycle in aqueous solutions of physiological pH until the intermediate products are consumed in other reactions [21]. EA has been found to scavenge hydroxyl, methoxy, and nitrogen dioxide efficiently (OH·> OCH3·> NO2·) [22]. Researchers have demonstrated that EA can also scavenge O2− and OH· to reduce the peroxidation of lipids [23]. Additionally, EA may regulate peroxynitrite reactions to reduce neurotoxicity and cytotoxicity resulting from the excess production of ·ONOO− [24]. When deprotonated, EA can chelate copper in an aqueous solution to reduce the production of free radicals, especially OH·, in a concentration-dependent manner [21].
EA can regulate oxidative stress in several ways to protect the body. Excessive ROS can damage the human body by increasing membrane lipid, damaging DNA, and triggering apoptosis [19]. Hseu et al. showed that EA can protect human keratinocyte cells from ultraviolet A-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis by upregulating the expression of HO-1, Nrf-2, and SOD [25]. In paraquat-induced oxidative stress in human alveolar A94 cells, EA treatment reduced the release of LDH and lowered the level of NF-κB and HO-1 [26]. Moreover, EA can reduce the production of ROS via regulating antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes as well. EA supplementation has also been shown to increase the activity of antioxidant enzymes in d-galactose-induced rats, such as SOD, CAT, and GPX [27].
Although EA can reduce oxidative stress efficiently through various pathways, the available studies focusing on the effects of EA in humans are very limited and most of them are based on specific human cell lines [18]; the clinical evidence on the pharmacological properties of EA is scarce [20]. Another challenge is the low bioavailability of EA due to poor intestinal absorption [19]. Thus, it is necessary to develop more preclinical studies and look for a better method of administration.

3. Anti-Inflammation

Inflammation is the defensive response of living tissue and the vascular system to injury factors [28]. However, in some specific situations, inflammation can damage the host and induce the dysfunction of organs [29]. Many studies have proved that inflammation is an underlying factor in plenty of diseases, especially chronic diseases such as cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, obesity, cancer, and aging [30]. External stimulus and cell damage could activate inflammatory cells and induce the activation of inflammation signal pathways including NF-κB, MAPK, and JAK-STAT pathways [9]. In addition, leukocytes will migrate to the damaged parts and induce an inflammatory response. So, it is a feasible strategy to prevent and treat chronic diseases through the inhibition of inflammation.
The nf-κB pathway plays a vital role in inflammation, immune response, and apoptosis. The activation of Nf-κB is caused by extracellular stimuli, for example, cytokines, radiation, heavy metals, and viruses [9]. Normally, IκB presents in the cytoplasm and binds to Nf-κB through the specific ankyrin repeat-containing domain at IκB’s C terminal to inhibit the transfer of Nf-κB. When the pathway is activated, IκB will be phosphorylated by IκB Kinase (IKK) so Nf-κB will be free to transfer to the nucleus to regulate genes involved in inflammation [31]. It has been found that EA can bond with one of the precursor proteins (p50) of Nf-κB, p105. This bonding obstructs the binding of Nf-κB to a specific DNA domain so the genes regulated by Nf-κB would not be expressed [32]. Another function of EA on Nf-κB is inhibiting the phosphorylation of IkB and the subsequent translocation of NF-kB into the nucleus [31]. Numerous pieces of evidence have shown that EA can inhibit the Nf-κB pathway and downregulate the expression of iNOS, TNF-α, COX-2, and IL-6 [33,34,35] (Figure 3).
The mammalian MAPK family has three constituents: ERKs, JNKs, and p38 MAP Kinases [36]. The activation of ERKs and JNKs could lead to the phosphorylation and activation of p38 which then cause an inflammatory response [37]. ERKs are usually related to the mitogens and differentiation signals while JNKs and p38 MAPKs are activated by inflammatory signals and stress stimuli [38]. It has been proved that EA can inhibit all the MAPKs’ activation in a dose-dependent manner [39]. Similarly, another group revealed that EA may be the inhibitor of these three MAPKs to downregulate some proinflammatory factors [40]. However, the potential mechanism of this inhibition process is unclear.
The JAK/STAT pathway is another significant inflammatory signal pathway and is highly conserved. The activated JAK/STAT pathway can promote the production of inflammatory cytokines which play a vital role in the inflammatory process [41]. In the cytoplasm, STAT is phosphorylated by JAK and then dimerizes across the nuclear membrane into the nucleus to regulate the expression of downstream genes [9]; researchers have found EA can inhibit the phosphorylation of JAK1, JAK2, and STAT1 to block this inflammatory response pathway [42].

4. Effects of EA in Neurological Diseases

Aging is associated with several diseases that threaten the health of older people, such as neurodegenerative diseases, which cause indelible and irreversible damage to both the physical and psychological well-being of older people and impose a heavy burden on their families and society. In recent years, a large number of studies have focused on the therapeutic effects of EA, demonstrating the health benefits of EA for neurodegenerative diseases. Three common neurological diseases are described here: AD, PD, and cerebral ischemia as well as the antioxidative and anti-inflammatory protective effects of EA.

4.1. EA in Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases around the world, especially in the aging population. The patients behave with cognitive disorders, aphasia, and personality changes, which seriously affect patients’ quality of life [43]. The pathological change of AD can be concluded as three main features: extracellular amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition, intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFT, caused by hyperphosphorylation of tau protein), and the loss of synapses and neurons.
Oxidative imbalance plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD. The sources of free radicals in AD can be summarized in three aspects: (1) the accumulation of Fe and Al in neurons containing NFT can lead to the formation of OH·; (2) activated microglia that can form NO and O 2 − ·; and (3), the abnormal metabolism of mitochondria can produce ROS [44]. It has been found that Fe, Zn, and Cu can bind to Aβ and APP and increase the oxidative stress of the AD brain [45]. Another pathologic feature of AD is the hyperphosphorylation of τ proteins, where the phosphorylation process is associated with the activation and oxidation of Nf-κB; this is important because the τ protein may be related to oxidative stress [46]. It has been clarified that EA can reduce the death of cells containing Aβ, lower the production of ROS, and mitigate DNA damage [47]. With its powerful free radical scavenging ability, EA can inhibit lipid peroxidation and reduce the production of NO, glycation end products, and so on [48].
In recent years, much evidence has proven that inflammation plays an important role in AD pathogenesis with the pathological observations of the inflammatory process [49]. As one of the pathogenetic features of AD, Aβ has been proven to activate the complement system and microglia [43]. Microglia are the immune cells in the CNS and the activation of microglia leads to the secretion of inflammatory cytokines, anaphylatoxin, free radicals, and neurotoxic substances which can kill neurons [43,50,51]. A recent study has shown that the activated microglia can synthesize proteolytic enzymes which can destroy cell structures and lead to the dysfunction of neurons [52]. The T-cells can also be activated in such a process and release inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1α, IL-1β, and TNF-α [53]. The excessive release of inflammatory cytokines induces the production of APP, which will positively upregulate the production of Aβ [51]. The continuous activation of pro-inflammatory responses could cause damage to the brain and the worsening of AD [52]. A study revealed that EA can regulate the production of IL-1β and TNF-1α to protect the damaged neurons induced by arsenic and improve the behavior and pathological change of AD [54]. Another key finding indicates that EA can reduce the number of microglia and inhibit the production of inflammatory cytokines [55] (Figure 4).
Plenty of studies focused on the Aβ and τ protein have shown the effects of EA. Researchers found that a group treated with EA exhibited a reduced level of Aβ plaques [56,57] and EA can significantly inhibit the hyperphosphorylation of the τ protein in animals’ hippocampus [57]. As a natural substance, EA is a potential therapeutic prospect for AD treatment.

4.2. EA in Parkinson’s Disease

PD is recognized as the most common neurodegenerative disorder after AD. The motor features of PD include bradykinesia, muscular rigidity, and resting tremors. The non-motor features include olfactory dysfunction, cognitive impairment, psychiatric symptoms, and autonomic dysfunction. The specific degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and the presence of Lewy bodies (LB) have been recognized microscopically [58]. It has been proven that oxidative stress is one of the primary underlying reasons for substantia nigra pars compacta loss, and neuroinflammation has been recognized as a culprit contributing to PD development [59].
More and more evidence indicates that oxidative stress is a key driver of dopaminergic neurodegeneration in all forms of PD [60,61] and ROS accumulation results in damage to the structural integrity and neuronal dysfunction [62]. Moreover, several epidemiological studies indicate that the use of anti-inflammatory medications reduces the risk of PD [63]. Other studies also revealed that inflammation can directly or indirectly contribute to the development and progression of PD [64]. There is a vicious circle between PD, redox imbalance, and chronic inflammation. As people age, excessive oxidative stress or brain injury can lead to microglial activation [65], and the activated microglia secrete pro-inflammatory factors such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-18 [66]. The accumulation of pro-inflammatory factors leads to the continuing loss of dopamine neurons. The damaged dopamine neurons release neurotoxic factors which induce a secondary activation of microglia that further secrete pro-inflammatory factors leading to more loss of dopamine neurons, thus creating a vicious cycle leading to neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration [67].
Several studies have shown that EA plays an active role in PD by enhancing the antioxidant defense and reducing oxidative stress [68,69,70]. EA can reduce oxidative damage by regulating the Nrf2 and Nf-κB pathways and improving the activity of antioxidant enzymes and antioxidants [71]. It has also been indicated that EA can lead to a decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) level and increased activities of total glutathione (GSH), catalase, and SOD in the mouse model of PD [68]. Pretreatment with EA in the PD rats reduced ROS and improved the level of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B), Nrf2, and HO-1. Additionally, after using the antagonist, the improved results disappeared [69]. In another study, after the oral administration of EA, the medial forebrain bundle (MFB)-injured rats appeared to recover their motor deficiencies by a significant increase in glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and SOD activity and decreasing the level of MDA [70]. The above evidence has shown that EA can protect dopamine neurons by inhibiting oxidative stress in the animal model of PD.
EA can also inhibit the release of endogenous inflammatory mediators in the animal model of PD, such as COX-2, iNOS, and cytokines [68], and has been confirmed to reduce MFB lesions and decrease inflammatory biomarkers such as TNF-α and IL-1β [72]. Furthermore, EA can reduce the activation of NLRP3 signaling associated with neuroinflammation [72] and the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors in microglia and has a neuroprotective effect against LPS-induced dopamine neuronal damage as well [73].
PD threatens our society with a substantial health and economic burden. To slow down or halt disease progression, developing novel therapeutic strategies acting on the underlying disease pathogenesis has become an urgent necessity. Based on the effects of EA on oxidative stress and chronic inflammation in the progress of PD, EA may be a potential drug in clinical therapy.

4.3. EA in Cerebral Ischemia

Cerebral ischemia/reperfusion is a kind of serious cerebrovascular disease with a high morbidity and fatality rate. This ischemia can induce hypoxia in brain tissue and lead to a series of oxidative stress and inflammatory responses, ultimate dysfunction, and even death of the neuron [74].
When cerebral ischemia happens, some enzymes such as succinate dehydrogenase and NADPH oxidase in the cellular mitochondria produce more ROS. The accumulation of ROS could directly injure the intracellular structure and induce neuronal apoptosis [75]. On the other hand, cerebral ischemia induces NOS to produce NO, and excess NO can react with the superoxide anion to produce peroxynitrite and interfere with the SOD activity [76].
The accumulation of inflammatory cells and cytokines is another feature of cerebral ischemia. Exogenous mononuclear phagocytes, T lymphocytes, and polymorphonuclear leukocytes can all trigger an inflammatory response in CNS [77]. If the inflammatory response lasts for a long period of time, it can induce neuroglial cell proliferation and brain atrophy [77]. It has been seen that IL-6 and TNF-α increase significantly in cerebral ischemia and inhibiting the IL-6 and TNF-α pathways can alleviate cerebral ischemia injury [78]. The increased expression of NLRP1 and NLRP3 is also related to cerebral ischemia injury [79,80]. Researchers have shown that NLRP1 and NLRP3 contribute to energy depletion, acidosis, tissue protease release, and increased ROS production [80]. However, the mechanisms of the activation of NLRP1 and NLRP3 receptors during cerebral ischemia remain unknown.
EA can scavenge free radicals generated during cerebral ischemia, increase the activity of antioxidant enzymes, and inhibit the expression of inflammatory factors such as IL-1β and TNF-α by activating the MAPK and Nf-κB pathways to reduce cell death [81]. In addition, the other roles of EA in cerebral ischemia include: (i) improving the decreased blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability after cerebral ischemia by inhibiting the release of inflammatory cytokines [81,82] and (ii) increasing the activity of lactate dehydrogenase and reducing the damage of lactic acid accumulation to cells [82].
EA has protective effects on the ischemic brain, and as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory natural substance, the side effects are low. However, the exact mechanism of its action still needs further investigation.

5. Conclusions

EA is a polyphenolic compound widely distributed in fruits and vegetables. From the analysis of its chemical structure, the four hydroxyl groups and two lactone functional groups are responsible for its active antioxidant and anti-inflammation effects. According to the results of numerous studies, EA is also a neuroprotective agent that can enhance neuronal function and memory and reduce damage to brain areas. Experimental evidence from cytology and histopathology has shown that EA has therapeutic potential for some neurological disorders such as AD, PD, and cerebral ischemia. EA can scavenge free radicals in the brain, increase the activity of antioxidative enzymes, and reduce the production of ROS, while its anti-inflammatory mechanism is manifested in the regulation of the Nf-κB, MAPKs, and JAK/STAT pathways to reduce the expressions of inflammatory factors such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6.
The main problem of EA is its poor water solubility and low intestinal absorption. To overcome the low bioavailability of EA, researchers have developed several methods, such as EA-phospholipid complexes, polymer-based nanoparticles, nanomedicines (thermosensitive liposomes), and nano-sized metal cages [5]. We also suggest that random studies are needed to confirm the laboratory data to ensure the rigor and scientificity of the experiment. However, there are few clinical-based studies on EA and the protocols of clinical trials are diverse. More pharmacokinetic trials are needed, especially in humans, and further research focusing on the mechanisms of the neuronal protective effects of EA is needed as well. Furthermore, clinical studies evaluating the safety of EA and comparing its therapeutic efficacy with the approved drugs applied in clinical practice are essential. In summary, we are optimistic about the prospects for the clinical application of EA based on the current experimental data and results.

Author Contributions

Writing, review, and editing: H.Z., Y.Y., Y.J. Conceptualization, visualization, and funding acquisition: X.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81671066 and 81974162). The funder is Prof. Xianfang Meng.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yuting Zhu and Yijin Li for their work in revising the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kiss, H.J.; Mihalik, A.; Nánási, T.; Ory, B.; Spiró, Z.; Soti, C.; Csermely, P. Ageing as a price of cooperation and complexity: Self-organization of complex systems causes the gradual deterioration of constituent networks. Bioessays 2009, 31, 651–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tosato, M.; Zamboni, V.; Ferrini, A.; Cesari, M. The aging process and potential interventions to extend life expectancy. Clin. Interv. Aging 2007, 2, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Piper, M.D.; Bartke, A. Diet and aging. Cell Metab. 2008, 8, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Quideau, S.; Feldman, K.S. Ellagitannin Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 475–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ríos, J.-L.; Giner, R.M.; Marín, M.; Recio, M.C. A Pharmacological Update of Ellagic Acid. Planta Medica 2018, 84, 1068–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Amakura, Y.; Okada, M.; Tsuji, S.; Tonogai, Y. High-performance liquid chromatographic determination with photodiode array detection of ellagic acid in fresh and processed fruits. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 896, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mira, L.; Fernandez, M.T.; Santos, M.; Rocha, R.; Florêncio, M.H.; Jennings, K.R. Interactions of Flavonoids with Iron and Copper Ions: A Mechanism for their Antioxidant Activity. Free Radic. Res. 2002, 36, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Craft, B.D.; Kerrihard, A.L.; Amarowicz, R.; Pegg, R.B. Phenol-Based Antioxidants and the In Vitro Methods Used for Their Assessment. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2012, 11, 148–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, L.; Deng, H.; Cui, H.; Fang, J.; Zuo, Z.; Deng, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, L. Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 7204–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. de Oliveira, M.R. The Effects of Ellagic Acid upon Brain Cells: A Mechanistic View and Future Directions. Neurochem. Res. 2016, 41, 1219–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sies, H. Oxidative stress: From basic research to clinical application. Am. J. Med. 1991, 91, S31–S38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, J.; Xia, S.; Kalionis, B.; Wan, W.; Sun, T. The Role of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Cardiovascular Aging. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 615312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pillon Barcelos, R.; Freire Royes, L.F.; Gonzalez-Gallego, J.; Bresciani, G. Oxidative stress and inflammation: Liver responses and adaptations to acute and regular exercise. Free Radic. Res. 2017, 51, 222–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Salim, S. Oxidative Stress and the Central Nervous System. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2017, 360, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kruk, J.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in carcinogenesis: Implications of oxidative stress on the progression and development of several cancer types. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 904–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pisoschi, A.M.; Pop, A. The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative stress: A review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 97, 55–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zeb, A. Chemistry and liquid chromatography methods for the analyses of primary oxidation products of triacylglycerols. Free Radic. Res. 2015, 49, 549–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zeb, A. Ellagic acid in suppressing in vivo and in vitro oxidative stresses. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2018, 448, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gupta, A.; Singh, A.K.; Kumar, R.; Jamieson, S.; Pandey, A.K.; Bishayee, A. Neuroprotective Potential of Ellagic Acid: A Critical Re-view. Adv. Nutr. 2021, 12, 1211–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zirak, M.R.; Sahebkar, A. Ellagic Acid: A Logical Lead for Drug Development? Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 106–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Galano, A.; Marquez, M.F.; Pérez-González, A. Ellagic Acid: An Unusually Versatile Protector against Oxidative Stress. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2014, 27, 904–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tiwari, M.K.; Mishra, P.C. Modeling the scavenging activity of ellagic acid and its methyl derivatives towards hydroxyl, methoxy, and nitrogen dioxide radicals. J. Mol. Model. 2013, 19, 5445–5456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Iino, T.; Nakahara, K.; Miki, W.; Kiso, Y.; Ogawa, Y.; Kato, S.; Takeuchi, K. Less Damaging Effect of Whisky in Rat Stomachs in Comparison with Pure Ethanol. Digestion 2001, 64, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, Y.-M.; Chang, W.-C.; Wu, C.-H.; Chiang, S.-Y. Reduction of oxidative stress and apoptosis in hyperlipidemic rabbits by ellagic acid. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2005, 16, 675–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hseu, Y.-C.; Chou, C.-W.; Kumar, K.S.; Fu, K.-T.; Wang, H.-M.; Hsu, L.-S.; Kuo, Y.-H.; Wu, C.-R.; Chen, S.-C.; Yang, H.-L. Ellagic acid protects human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells against UVA-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis through the upregulation of the HO-1 and Nrf-2 antioxidant genes. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, Y.-S.; Zerin, T.; Song, H.-Y. Antioxidant Action of Ellagic Acid Ameliorates Paraquat-Induced A549 Cytotoxicity. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2013, 36, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, P.; Chen, F.; Zhou, B. Antioxidative, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects of ellagic acid in liver and brain of rats treated by D-galactose. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nathan, C.; Ding, A. Nonresolving Inflammation. Cell 2010, 140, 871–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tabas, I.; Glass, C.K. Anti-Inflammatory Therapy in Chronic Disease: Challenges and Opportunities. Science 2013, 339, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Scrivo, R.; Vasile, M.; Bartosiewicz, I.; Valesini, G. Inflammation as “common soil” of the multifactorial diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2011, 10, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zamani-Garmsiri, F.; Emamgholipour, S.; Fard, S.R.; Ghasempour, G.; Ahvazi, R.J.; Meshkani, R. Polyphenols: Potential anti-inflammatory agents for treatment of metabolic disorders. Phytother. Res. 2021, 36, 415–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Khan, M.K.; Ansari, I.A.; Khan, M.S. Dietary phytochemicals as potent chemotherapeutic agents against breast cancer: Inhibition of NF-κB pathway via molecular interactions in rel homology domain of its precursor protein p105. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2013, 9, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rosillo, M.A.; Sanchez-Hidalgo, M.; Cárdeno, A.; de la Lastra, C.A. Protective effect of ellagic acid, a natural polyphenolic com-pound, in a murine model of Crohn’s disease. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 82, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mohammadinejad, A.; Mohajeri, T.; Aleyaghoob, G.; Heidarian, F.; Oskuee, R.K. Ellagic acid as a potent anticancer drug: A comprehensive review on in vitro, in vivo, in silico, and drug delivery studies. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hofseth, L.J.; Hussain, S.P.; Wogan, G.N.; Harris, C.C. Nitric oxide in cancer and chemoprevention. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2003, 34, 955–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, E.K.; Choi, E.-J. Pathological roles of MAPK signaling pathways in human diseases. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Mol. Basis Dis. 2010, 1802, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pearson, G.; Robinson, F.; Beers Gibson, T.; Xu, B.E.; Karandikar, M.; Berman, K.; Cobb, M.H. Mitogen-Activated Protein (MAP) Kinase Pathways: Regulation and Physiological Functions. Endocr. Rev. 2001, 22, 153–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sabio, G.; Davis, R.J. TNF and MAP kinase signalling pathways. Semin. Immunol. 2014, 26, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Masamune, A.; Satoh, M.; Kikuta, K.; Suzuki, N.; Satoh, K.; Shimosegawa, T. Ellagic acid blocks activation of pancreatic stellate cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2005, 70, 869–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rosillo, M.A.; Sánchez-Hidalgo, M.; Cárdeno, A.; Aparicio-Soto, M.; Sánchez-Fidalgo, S.; Villegas, I.; de la Lastra, C.A. Dietary supplementation of an ellagic acid-enriched pomegranate extract attenuates chronic colonic inflammation in rats. Pharmacol. Res. 2012, 66, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hanada, T.; Yoshimura, A. Regulation of cytokine signaling and inflammation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002, 13, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, Q.; Liang, X.; Liang, M.; Qin, R.; Qin, F.; Wang, X. Ellagic Acid Ameliorates Renal Ischemic-Reperfusion Injury Through NOX4/JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway. Inflammation 2019, 43, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ozben, T.; Ozben, S. Neuro-inflammation and anti-inflammatory treatment options for Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Biochem. 2019, 72, 87–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Smith, M.A.; Rottkamp, C.A.; Nunomura, A.; Raina, A.K.; Perry, G. Oxidative stress in Alz-heimer’s disease. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2000, 1502, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Valko, M.; Morris, H.; Cronin, M.T. Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress. Curr. Med Chem. 2005, 12, 1161–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Markesbery, W.R. The Role of Oxidative Stress in Alzheimer Disease. Arch. Neurol. 1999, 56, 1449–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Muthaiyah, B.; Essa, M.M.; Chauhan, V.; Chauhan, A. Protective Effects of Walnut Extract Against Amyloid Beta Peptide-Induced Cell Death and Oxidative Stress in PC12 Cells. Neurochem. Res. 2011, 36, 2096–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Javaid, N.; Shah, M.A.; Rasul, A.; Chauhdary, Z.; Saleem, U.; Khan, H.; Ahmed, N.; Uddin, M.S.; Mathew, B.; Behl, T.; et al. Neuroprotective Effects of Ellagic Acid in Alzheimer’s Disease: Focus on Underlying Mo-lecular Mechanisms of Therapeutic Potential. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2021, 27, 3591–3601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Heneka, M.T.; Carson, M.J.; El Khoury, J.; Landreth, G.E.; Brosseron, F.; Feinstein, D.L.; Jacobs, A.H.; Wyss-Coray, T.; Vitorica, J.; Ransohoff, R.M.; et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015, 14, 388–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lin, L.; Zheng, L.J.; Zhang, L.J. Neuroinflammation, Gut Microbiome, and Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 8243–8250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Blasko, I.; Veerhuis, R.; Stampfer-Kountchev, M.; Saurwein-Teissl, M.; Eikelenboom, P.; Grubeck-Loebenstein, B. Costimulatory ef-fects of interferon-gamma and interleukin-1beta or tumor necrosis factor alpha on the synthesis of Abeta1-40 and Abeta1-42 by human astrocytes. Neurobiol. Dis. 2000, 7, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chaney, A.; Williams, S.R.; Boutin, H. In vivo molecular imaging of neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2019, 149, 438–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. McGeer, P.L.; Rogers, J.; McGeer, E.G. Inflammation, Antiinflammatory Agents, and Alzheimer’s Disease: The Last 22 Years. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2016, 54, 853–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Goudarzi, M.; Amiri, S.; Nesari, A.; Hosseinzadeh, A.; Mansouri, E.; Mehrzadi, S. The possible neuroprotective effect of ellagic acid on sodium arsenate-induced neurotoxicity in rats. Life Sci. 2018, 198, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sanadgol, N.; Golab, F.; Mostafaie, A.; Mehdizadeh, M.; Abdollahi, M.; Sharifzadeh, M.; Ravan, H. Ellagic acid ameliorates cuprizone-induced acute CNS inflammation via restriction of microgliosis and down-regulation of CCL2 and CCL3 pro-inflammatory chemokines. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2016, 62, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Jha, A.B.; Panchal, S.S.; Shah, A. Ellagic acid: Insights into its neuroprotective and cognitive enhancement effects in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2018, 175, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kiasalari, Z.; Heydarifard, R.; Khalili, M.; Afshin-Majd, S.; Baluchnejadmojarad, T.; Zahedi, E.; Sanaierad, A.; Roghani, M. Ellagic acid ameliorates learning and memory deficits in a rat model of Alz-heimer’s disease: An exploration of underlying mechanisms. Psychopharmacology 2017, 234, 1841–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. De Virgilio, A.; Greco, A.; Fabbrini, G.; Inghilleri, M.; Rizzo, M.I.; Gallo, A.; Conte, M.; Rosato, C.; Appiani, M.C.; de Vincentiis, M. Parkinson’s disease: Autoimmunity and neuroinflammation. Autoimmun. Rev. 2016, 15, 1005–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Raza, C.; Anjum, R.; Shakeel, N.U.A. Parkinson’s disease: Mechanisms, translational models and management strategies. Life Sci. 2019, 226, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Blesa, J.; Trigo-Damas, I.; Quiroga-Varela, A.; Jackson-Lewis, V.R. Oxidative stress and Parkinson’s disease. Front. Neuroanat. 2015, 9, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Dias, V.; Junn, E.; Mouradian, M.M. The Role of Oxidative Stress in Parkinson’s Disease. J. Parkinsons Dis. 2013, 3, 461–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Trist, B.G.; Hare, D.J.; Double, K.L. Oxidative stress in the aging substantia nigra and the etiology of Parkinson’s disease. Aging Cell 2019, 18, e13031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Noyce, A.; Msc, J.P.B.; Silveira-Moriyama, L.; Hawkes, C.H.; Giovannoni, G.; Lees, A.J.; Schrag, A. Meta-analysis of early nonmotor features and risk factors for Parkinson disease. Ann. Neurol. 2012, 72, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pajares, M.; I Rojo, A.; Manda, G.; Boscá, L.; Cuadrado, A. Inflammation in Parkinson’s Disease: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Cells 2020, 9, 1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Raichur, A.; Vali, S.; Gorin, F. Dynamic modeling of alpha-synuclein aggregation for the sporadic and genetic forms of Parkin-son’s disease. Neuroscience 2006, 142, 859–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhang, F.; Liu, J.; Shi, J. Anti-inflammatory activities of resveratrol in the brain: Role of resveratrol in microglial activation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 636, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Dauer, W.; Przedborski, S. Parkinson’s Disease: Mechanisms and Models. Neuron 2003, 39, 889–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ardah, M.; Bharathan, G.; Kitada, T.; Haque, M. Ellagic Acid Prevents Dopamine Neuron Degeneration from Oxidative Stress and Neuroinflammation in MPTP Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Baluchnejadmojarad, T.; Rabiee, N.; Zabihnejad, S.; Roghani, M. Ellagic acid exerts protective effect in intrastriatal 6-hydroxydopamine rat model of Parkinson’s disease: Possible involvement of ERβ/Nrf2/HO-1 signaling. Brain Res. 2017, 1662, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sarkaki, A.; Farbood, Y.; Dolatshahi, M.; Mansouri, S.M.T.; Khodadadi, A. Neuroprotective Effects of Ellagic Acid in a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Acta Med. Iran. 2016, 54, 494–502. [Google Scholar]
  71. Tancheva, L.P.; Lazarova, M.I.; Alexandrova, A.V.; Dragomanova, S.T.; Nicoletti, F.; Tzvetanova, E.R.; Hodzhev, Y.K.; Kalfin, R.E.; Miteva, S.A.; Mazzon, E.; et al. Neuroprotective Mechanisms of Three Natural Antioxidants on a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease: A Comparative Study. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Heneka, M.T.; Kummer, M.P.; Stutz, A.; Delekate, A.; Schwartz, S.; Vieira-Saecker, A.; Griep, A.; Axt, D.; Remus, A.; Tzeng, T.-C.; et al. NLRP3 is activated in Alzheimer’s disease and contributes to pathology in APP/PS1 mice. Nature 2013, 493, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. He, X.M.; Zhou, Y.Z.; Sheng, S.; Li, J.J.; Wang, G.Q.; Zhang, F. Ellagic Acid Protects Dopamine Neurons via Inhibition of NLRP3 In-flammasome Activation in Microglia. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 2963540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Moskowitz, M.A.; Lo, E.H.; Iadecola, C. The science of stroke: Mechanisms in search of treatments. Neuron 2010, 67, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chouchani, E.T.; Pell, V.R.; Gaude, E.; Aksentijević, D.; Sundier, S.Y.; Robb, E.L.; Logan, A.; Nadtochiy, S.M.; Ord, E.N.J.; Smith, A.C.; et al. Ischaemic accumulation of succinate controls reperfusion injury through mitochon-drial ROS. Nature 2014, 515, 431–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rodrigo, R.; Fernández-Gajardo, R.; Gutiérrez, R.; Manuel Matamala, J.; Carrasco, R.; Miranda-Merchak, A.; Feuerhake, W. Oxidative stress and pathophysiology of ischemic stroke: Novel therapeu-tic opportunities. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets. 2013, 12, 698–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Brea, D.; Sobrino, T.; Ramos-Cabrer, P.; Castillo, J. Inflammatory and neuroimmunomodulatory changes in acute cerebral ische-mia. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2009, 27 (Suppl. 1), 48–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xing, J.; Lu, J. HIF-1α Activation Attenuates IL-6 and TNF-α Pathways in Hippocampus of Rats Following Transient Global Ischemia. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 39, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. de Rivero Vaccari, J.P.; Dietrich, W.D.; Keane, R.W. Activation and regulation of cellular inflammasomes: Gaps in our knowledge for central nervous system injury. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2014, 34, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fann, D.Y.; Lee, S.Y.; Manzanero, S.; Chunduri, P.; Sobey, C.G.; Arumugam, T.V. Pathogenesis of acute stroke and the role of in-flammasomes. Ageing Res. Rev. 2013, 12, 941–966. [Google Scholar]
  81. Hassonizadeh Falahieh, K.; Sarkaki, A.; Edalatmanesh, M.; Gharib Naseri, M.K.; Farbood, Y. Ellagic acid attenuates post-cerebral ischemia and reperfusion behavioral deficits by decreasing brain tissue inflammation in rats. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2020, 23, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Pang, X.; Li, T.; Feng, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J. Ellagic acid-induced thrombotic focal cerebral ischemic model in rats. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 2014, 69, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 10937 g001 550
Figure 1. The chemical structure of EA.
Figure 1. The chemical structure of EA.
Ijms 23 10937 g001
Ijms 23 10937 g002 550
Figure 2. The antioxidant effects of EA.
Figure 2. The antioxidant effects of EA.
Ijms 23 10937 g002
Ijms 23 10937 g003 550
Figure 3. The anti-inflammation effects of EA to Nf-κB pathway.
Figure 3. The anti-inflammation effects of EA to Nf-κB pathway.
Ijms 23 10937 g003
Ijms 23 10937 g004 550
Figure 4. Pathogenesis of AD and the role of EA.
Figure 4. Pathogenesis of AD and the role of EA.
Ijms 23 10937 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, H.; Yan, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Meng, X. Ellagic Acid and Its Anti-Aging Effects on Central Nervous System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810937

AMA Style

Zhu H, Yan Y, Jiang Y, Meng X. Ellagic Acid and Its Anti-Aging Effects on Central Nervous System. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(18):10937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810937

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Heyu, Yuanmei Yan, Yi Jiang, and Xianfang Meng. 2022. "Ellagic Acid and Its Anti-Aging Effects on Central Nervous System" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 18: 10937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810937

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop