Next Article in Journal
Recombinant Reg3α Prevents Islet β-Cell Apoptosis and Promotes β-Cell Regeneration
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrospun Azithromycin-Laden Gelatin Methacryloyl Fibers for Endodontic Infection Control
Previous Article in Journal
Mutation of GmIPK1 Gene Using CRISPR/Cas9 Reduced Phytic Acid Content in Soybean Seeds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tissue Characteristics in Endodontic Regeneration: A Systematic Review
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Modulators of Wnt Signaling Pathway Implied in Dentin Pulp Complex Engineering: A Literature Review

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10582; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810582
by Marion Florimond 1,2,†, Sandra Minic 1,†, Paul Sharpe 3, Catherine Chaussain 1,4, Emmanuelle Renard 5,6 and Tchilalo Boukpessi 1,7,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10582; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810582
Submission received: 31 July 2022 / Revised: 5 September 2022 / Accepted: 8 September 2022 / Published: 13 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Advances in Dental Pulp Tissue Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript submitted by Florimond et al. is of potential interest but needs to be modified, in my opinion, as reported below

1. Chapter 2 deals with the Wnt signal in general, but then the topic is resumed in the following paragraphs regarding what has been detected as for the stimulation of dentin regeneration. My suggestion is to include all the considerations in chapter 2, accordingly modifying the related figure.

2. The importance of treating the Wnt signal with regard to osteogenesis in dental pulp cells is unclear. I believe that chapter 3 should be better placed in the context, otherwise it is disconnected from the purpose of the review itself.

3. The authors should clarify how the Wnt signal is important for some substances that have a hypoglycemic effect.

4. Overall, it is difficult to follow the discussion regarding the importance of Wnt signal in the repair of dental pulp. There is no incisiveness in the observations produced which are mostly generic and speculative.

 

Minor point

on page 9, the authors forgot to delete the phrase about "Patents driving"

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper is not acceptable because of its high level of plagiarism.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I think the review has improved a lot overall. However, I have noted the following points that need further revision:

1. In Fig. 1, letter A covers a part of the figure and I don't know if that was the intention (then that part should be eliminated) or not. In the legend of the same figure, the verb "control" in line 9 should be "controls";

2. on page 6, lines 175-178, the phrase "the use of hydrogel ..." is repeated twice;

3. on page 6, lines 183-186, the two isoforms alpha and beta of GSK3 are introduced which previously had not been defined. Therefore it is necessary to briefly explain their existence;

4. in the chapter on lithium chlroride the phrase "they succeed to stimulate ..." needs to be revised, in which verbs should be used in the past tense. It is also unclear whether the effect of TEGDMA is related to new dentinogenesis or not.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop