Next Article in Journal
Lipopolysaccharide from Porphyromonas gingivalis, but Not from Porphyromonas endodontalis, Induces Macrophage M1 Profile
Next Article in Special Issue
Liver Graft Proteomics Reveals Potential Incipient Mechanisms behind Early Renal Dysfunction after Liver Transplantation
Previous Article in Journal
Curcumin Remedies Testicular Function and Spermatogenesis in Male Mice with Low-Carbohydrate-Diet-Induced Metabolic Dysfunction
Previous Article in Special Issue
TMAO Suppresses Megalin Expression and Albumin Uptake in Human Proximal Tubular Cells Via PI3K and ERK Signaling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 17
10.3390/ijms231710010
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Differences of Uric Acid Transporters Carrying Extracellular Vesicles in the Urine from Uric Acid and Calcium Stone Formers and Non-Stone Formers

by
Zhijian Lin
1,2,
Muthuvel Jayachandran
2,3,4,
Zejfa Haskic
2,
Sanjay Kumar
2,5 and
John C. Lieske
2,6,*
1
School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
2
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
3
Division of Hematology Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
4
Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
5
Department of Life Science, School of Basic Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India
6
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 10010; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231710010
Submission received: 14 July 2022 / Revised: 15 August 2022 / Accepted: 19 August 2022 / Published: 2 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Renal Diseases)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Low urine pH and volume are established risk factors for uric acid (UA) stone disease (UASD). Renal tubular epithelial cells exposed to an acidic pH and/or UA crystals can shed extracellular vesicles (EVs) into the tubular fluid, and these EVs may be a pathogenic biomarker of UASD. Methods: Urinary EVs bearing UA transporters (SLC2A9, SLC17A3, SLC22A12, SLC5A8, ABCG2, and ZNF365) were quantified in urine from UA stone formers (UASFs), calcium stone formers (CSFs), and age-/sex-matched non-stone formers (NSFs) using a standardized and published method of digital flow cytometry. Results: Urinary pH was lower (p < 0.05) and serum and urinary UA were greater (p < 0.05) in UASFs compared with NSFs. Urinary EVs carrying SLC17A3 and SLC5A8 were lower (p < 0.05) in UASFs compared with NSFs. Urinary EVs bearing SLC2A9, SLC22A12, SLC5A8, ABCG2, and ZNF365 were lower (p < 0.05) in CSFs than UASFs, while excretion of SLC17A3-bearing EVs did not differ between groups. Conclusion: EVs bearing specific UA transporters might contribute to the pathogenesis of UASD and represent non-invasive pathogenic biomarkers for calcium and UA stone risk.

1. Introduction

The incidence and prevalence of urinary stone disease (USD) appears to be increasing worldwide [1]. In the United States, uric acid (UA) stone disease (UASD) constitutes approximately 8–10% of total stone formers [2,3]. The most important metabolic risks for UASD include a low urine pH (<5.5) and low urine volume, or a combination of both [4,5]. Low urinary pH increases the risk of UASD because the acid form of UA (pKa 5.4) is poorly soluble [6]. In the kidney, filtered UA undergoes a complex series of reabsorption and secretion along the proximal nephron, the result ultimately determining urinary UA excretion [7,8]. A body of evidence, including human genome-wide association studies, suggests that the urate transporters SLC2A9 (solute carrier family 2, glucose transporter member 9), ABCG2 (ATP-binding cassette transporter G2), SLC17A3 (solute carrier family 17 member 3; a voltage-driven transporter excreting intracellular urate and organic anions from the blood into renal tubule cells), SLC22A12 (solute carrier family 22 member 12; organic anion/cation transporter), urate transporter 1 (URAT1), and SLC5A8 (solute carrier family member 8; an electrogenic sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl−)-dependent sodium-coupled solute transporter) together regulate blood and urine UA concentrations [9,10,11,12,13]. ZNF365 (zinc finger protein 365) has also been associated with UA stones in both children and adults [14,15], and is thought to play a role in the expression of renal UA transporters. The relative expression of UA transporters and their proposed functions within the proximal and distal tubule are presented in Figure 1.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) act as important mediators in normal physiology as well as many pathological states [16,17]. After release from parent cells, EVs affect the function of recipient cells via delivery of biologically active molecules that include proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids (DNA, mRNAs, and miRNAs) [18]. Recent studies have indicated that EVs can be used for the diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and management of individuals with suspected renal diseases [19]. Specific populations of urinary EVs appear to reflect underlying renal cell processes that might be associated with USD [20,21]. However, the pathophysiological association between EVs bearing UA transporters and UA stone formation has not been investigated.
The present study was designed to test the hypotheses that urinary EVs might carry renal UA transporters as signaling molecules, and urinary EV populations carrying specific UA transporters may differ in UA stone formers (UASFs) as a group. Thus, specific populations of urinary EVs bearing UA transporters could represent a biomarker of UA stone risk and provide clues regarding pathogenic steps. To test these hypotheses, we quantitated urinary EVs that contained six renal transporters associated with UA stone risk in cell-free urine samples from UASFs, calcium stone forms (CSFs), and age-/sex-matched non-stone formers (NSFs).

2. Methods

2.1. Study Participants

USD patients and non-stone forming controls were recruited at the Mayo Clinic O’Brien Urology Research Center from participants in IRB: 08-006541 (Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis and chronic kidney disease: Prospective Cohort) and IRB: 09-002083 (CT and Urinary Correlates of Renal Stone Precursor Lesions). Blood and 24 h urine samples (collected using toluene as a preservative) were obtained at the time of a Mayo Stone Clinic visit (UASFs and CSFs) or study visit (NSFs). Aliquots of the 24 h urine samples were centrifuged at 2100× g/3000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C to remove the cells and larger molecular weight protein aggregates before freezing to −80 °C for future analysis [20,21].
All UASFs and CSFs had a complete evaluation in the Mayo Stone Clinic and those with secondary causes (enteric hyperoxaluria, primary hyperoxaluria, primary hyperparathyroidism, or renal tubular acidosis) were excluded. CSFs had stones composed of a majority calcium oxalate or hydroxyapatite. UASFs had a stone composed of a majority UA [20]. Age-/sex- matched NSFs were recruited form the general population. Stored urine samples from 18 UASFs (11 men and 7 women), 26 CSFs (16 men and 10 women), and 65 NSFs (39 men and 26 women) were used in the current study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA and all participants gave written informed consent for future analysis.

2.2. Laboratory Measurements

Clinical laboratory analyses were performed in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified Mayo Clinic Renal Testing Laboratory, Rochester, MN, USA. Serum (uric acid, calcium, phosphorus, creatinine) and urine (sodium, potassium, chloride, uric acid, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, citrate (via citrate lyase), oxalate (via oxalate oxidase)) biochemistries were analyzed using a Roche/Cobas C501 Autoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA); pH using a pH meter; and osmolality using a freezing point osmometer. The EQUIL2 computer program was utilized to calculate urinary supersaturations [22]. Serum and urine creatinine were measured using an isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)-traceable enzymatic creatinine assay (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and the serum creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) 2009 equation was used to determine estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [20,21].

2.3. Quantification of Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) by Digital Flow Cytometer

Frozen (−80 °C) cell-free urine samples were thawed in a 37 °C waterbath for 5 min prior to EV analysis by digital flow cytometry (BD FACSCanto™) using a size between 200 nm to 1000 nm in diameter and annexin-V positivity using the cross-validated protocol previously described by our group [20,21,23,24]. Previous analysis suggests EVs are stable under these conditions [20]. This analysis protocol detects both types of EVs, exosomes and microvesicles, carrying one of the six candidate UA transporter biomarkers. It is not possible to accurately differentiate between these two types of vesicles based on currently available surface markers, and evidence suggests both types of EVs have similar and overlapping bioactivities [25]. The absolute EV count either in the absence or presence of single or dual fluorophore-conjugated antibody staining was calculated using a previously validated method [20,21,23,24]. The number of EVs/µL urine was used to calculate EV excretion per 24 h and also normalized to EVs/mg urine creatinine [20,21,24,26,27,28]. All antibodies were fully validated with reagent controls and appropriate isotype control antibodies conjugated with the same fluorophores together with negative controls, as per our previous publications [20,21,23,24]. To prevent antibody–antibody interactions or binding, each fluorophore-conjugated antibody was used with and without dilutions with reagents only (without samples) and quantified by flow cytometer for optimization of antibodies, in order to prevent non-specific binding during quantification. We have also validated non-specific binding of each antibody using dose-response relationships in cell-free urine sample from the same patient or control.
Candidate EV-associated proteins for the current study were chosen from those that have been demonstrated to be, or might plausibly represent, a monogenic cause of UASD via literature review and the online database Genetics Home Reference (https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/ accessed on 1 November 2018), and then narrowed down to those associated with urinary UA excretion or pH regulation: SLC2A9, SLC17A3, SLC22A12, SLC5A8, ABCG2, and ZNF365 (Figure 1) [9,10,11,12,13,14,15].

2.4. Chemicals, Reagents, and Antibodies

Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated recombinant annexin-V protein (catalog#: 55419-FITC; 563544-PE), mouse anti-human CD63 antibody conjugated with PE (catalog#: 556421), and TruCOUNT™ (4.2 μm) beads were obtained from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA); FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-human SLC2A9 (catalog#: abx316565), ZNF365 (catalog#: abx313505), and SLC17A3 (catalog#: abx305326) antibodies from Abbexa Ltd. (Cambridge, UK); FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-human SLC22A12 (catalog#: bs-10357R-FITC) from Bioss (Boston, MA, USA); Alex Fluor488-conjugated mouse anti-human SLC5A8 (catalog#: FAB8398G) antibody from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA); and PE-conjugated mouse anti-human ABCG2 (catalog#: 332008) antibody from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA). HEPES and Hanks’ balanced salts were purchased from Sigma Chemicals Co., St. Louis, MO, USA. All other reagents and solvents used in this study were of analytical/reagent grade.

2.5. Data Analysis

Baseline clinical characteristics and serum and urine biochemical data were presented as the median with interquartile range for continuous variables, and number [percentage] for categorical variables of NSFs, UASFs, and CSFs. The numbers of EVs bearing UA transporters were presented on a log10 scale due to the range and non-normal distribution of the data. The statistical significance of differences between groups were examined using a non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Chi-square (Fisher’s exact) test for categorical variables using JMP software (SAS, Cary, NC, USA). p <0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference between groups.

3. Results

Baseline Clinical Parameters

Age, sex, and systolic blood pressure; percentage of persons with malabsorption syndrome (but without enteric hyperoxaluria) or hypertension; serum calcium; and urine volume were all similar between groups (Table 1). Body mass index (BMI), serum UA, and creatinine; urinary excretions of protein, UA, phosphorous, and creatinine; and urinary supersaturation of UA were significantly greater in UASFs vs. NSFs (p < 0.05), whereas diastolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urine pH were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in UASFs vs. NSFs (Table 1). Serum UA, phosphorous, and creatinine; urinary excretions of UA, phosphorous, calcium, and creatinine; and urinary supersaturation of calcium oxalate and UA were all significantly greater, while eGFR, and urine pH and osmolality were significantly lower in CSFs compared with NSFs (Table 1). Only the urinary excretion of calcium was significantly higher in CSFs compared with UASFs (Table 1).
Representative scatter and fluorescence dot plots of a single subject from the FACSCanto™ flow cytometer are shown in Figure 2. This particular subject had a significant number of urinary EVs carrying SLC2A9, SLC17A3, and ZNF365, but not SLC22A12 or SLC5A8. In the entire cohort, compared with NSFs, urinary excretion of EVs carrying SLC17A3 and SLC5A8 were significantly lower (p < 0.05), while urinary excretion of EVs carrying SLC2A9, SLC17A3, SLC22A12, ABCG2, and ZNF365 trended lower in UASFs (Figure 3). Urinary excretion of EVs bearing SLC2A9, SLC17A3, SLC22A12, SLC5A8, ABCG2, and ZNF365 were significantly lower in CSFs compared with NSFs (p < 0.05, Figure 3). Urinary excretion of EVs carrying SLC2A9-, SLC22A12-, SLC5A8-, ABCG2-, and ZNF365 were lower in CSFs compared with UASFs, while SLC17A3-bearing EVs did not differ between these two groups (Figure 3). Trends were similar when data for these six biomarker-expressing EVs were expressed as EVs excreted per 24 h, with numbers being lowest in CSFs, while UASFs were intermediate and closer to NSFs (Table 2).

4. Discussion

Low urine pH and urine volume are the major factors affecting urinary UA supersaturation (SS) and risk of UA stone formation [4,5,6,29,30,31]. In this study, urine pH and eGFR were lower, whereas BMI, serum UA, and creatinine; and urinary excretion of protein, UA, phosphorous, and creatinine, and urinary UA supersaturation were all greater in UASFs compared with NSFs. These findings are as expected from previous studies [31].
Tubular fluid pH and/or uric acid concentration, both risks for UA crystallization, could potentially be altered by EVs carrying transporters. In this study, urinary EVs carrying SLC17A3 and SLC5A8 were significantly lower in UASFs compared with NSFs. Urinary EVs carrying SLC2A9, SLC22A12, SLC5A8, ABCG2, and ZNF365 were lower in CSFs than UASFs, while EVs carrying SLC17A3 were not different between these two groups. SLC17A3 is a voltage-driven transporter of intracellular urate and organic anions from blood into renal tubular epithelial cells, and it thus plays an important role in metabolic disorders including serum uric acid concentration. Our current results suggest that renal tubular cells might respond to a specific type(s) of urinary crystals and tubular fluid compositions and release EVs containing specific UA transporters, and those changes may in turn reflect underlying UASD risk. These EVs could also potentially serve as a signaling mechanism that mediates UA stone risk (positively or negatively). For example, increasing tubular fluid uric acid concentration might downregulate proximal tubular cell secretion of EVs carrying SLC17A3 and SLC5A8 as a negative regulatory or unknown mechanism.
EVs can serve as potential mediators of intercellular signal communication via their bioactive molecules (proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids) [16,17,18,25]. Published studies suggest that the interaction between kidney epithelial cells and UA crystals could play a critical role in UA nephrolithiasis [32,33,34]. In vivo tubular fluid UA crystals could conceivably induce renal tubular epithelial cell injury, triggering EV secretion and initiating cellular processes related to UA stone formation. It is of note that in the current study, specific urinary EVs bearing UA-relevant transporters were reduced in CSFs compared with both NSFs and UASFs. The relative decrease of urinary EVs carrying UA transporters among CSFs compared with UASFs may reflect different degrees of ongoing UA crystal exposure that occur in vivo in these two groups of patients. The decrease in urinary excretion of EVs bearing UA transporters might reflect inhibition of EV excretion from tubular cells by urinary uric acid crystals and low urinary pH, since the urine pH of CSFs and UASFs were both reduced compared with controls, with the low urinary pH more pronounced among the UASF group. Furthermore, our study used the CSFs as a comparison group to analyze whether changes in urinary EV populations were a marker of stone former status in general, or more specific to the UASF group.
EV surface expression of SLC2A9, SLC5A8, SLC17A3, SLC22A12, ABCG2, and ZNF365 might reflect altered UA transport capacity of tubular epithelial cells in a given individual, and could also signal other distally located tubular epithelial cells. The populations of urinary EVs carrying SLC2A9, SLC17A3, and ZNF365 were greater than SLC22A12, SLC5A8, and ABCG2, and differed between UASFs and CSFs. These results suggest that urinary EVs could potentially represent pathogenic biomarkers of CSF vs. UASF risk. Thus, the use of EVs as noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers would enhance their clinical applicability.
This study has certain limitations. Only six pre-selected UA-transporters were measured in urine. This study also analyzed CSFs as a group, which is clinically relevant and commonly done but also represents a phenotypically diverse group. More evidence and mechanistic studies are needed to further define the precise relationship between urinary EVs carrying different transporters and stone pathogenesis. Furthermore, given the limited number of UASFs, we were not powered to do multivariable analysis and take into account the possible independent effect of urinary composition (as opposed to stone former type) on EV numbers. The candidate EV proteins were detected using flow cytometry with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies. In the future, it would be optimal to rigorously validate the expression of protein markers on purified urinary EVs using quantitative Western blot and/or mass spectrometry. Furthermore, the number of UASFs was relatively modest in comparison to the number of CSFs. The EV candidate biomarker pool could also potentially be increased, perhaps using an unbiased approach, such as by systematic bioinformatic analysis, and not only assessing EV-associated proteins but also bioactive nucleic acids (miRNA, mRNA, and DNA). Nevertheless, this is the first study to assess UA transporter-carrying EV populations in human urine from UASFs, CSFs, and NSF controls.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that reduced urinary excretion of EVs carrying UA transporters by UASFs and CSFs might reflect the lower urine pH, volume, and resulting increased number of intratubular UA crystals that are associated with these two disease groups. The varied populations of EVs between disease groups might also reflect ongoing cell–cell communication. For example, renal UA transporter-carrying EVs could merge into a target cell membrane of recipient cells, which could in turn alter UA absorption and secretion, or otherwise alter the expression of this family of UA-transporters through mechanisms yet to be determined (e.g., EV-associated mRNA or miRNA, lithogenic proteins or UA nanocrystals). This process could protect against further renal injury when cells in one part of the nephron are exposed to low pH and/or UA crystals. If the physiological processes resulting in a lower urinary pH and/or hyperuricosuria and low urine flows are pronounced, the mechanisms that physiologically alter EV excretion from renal tubular cells might be overcome. Cellular responses to the UA and COM crystals could also play a role in the progression of chronic kidney disease that has been associated with hyperuricemia [35], and nephrolithiasis [36]. More mechanistic validation studies are needed to define the pathogenic role(s) of UA transporter-carrying urinary EVs in UA and calcium stone formation and their interrelationships, crystal nephropathy, and associated chronic kidney disease risk.

Author Contributions

Z.L.: performed experiments, collected data and drafted manuscript during his research training with J.C.L. and M.J.; M.J.: design or conceptualization of the study, validated urinary EVs analysis methods by digital flow cytometry, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafted and revised the manuscript; Z.H.: performed partial experiments and data entry; S.K.: performed partial experiments; J.C.L.: design or conceptualization of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the Mayo Clinic O’Brien Urology Research Center (DK100227), the Rare Kidney Stone Consortium (U54DK083908), a part of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN), an initiative of the Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), and the Mayo Foundation. The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81403152) was also supported this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Research involving human participants, human material, or human data, has been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and all participants gave written informed consent (Mayo Clinic IRB# 08-006541 and IRB# 09-002083).

Informed Consent Statement

Research involving human participants, human material, or human data, has been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Mayo Clinic IRB# 08-006541 and IRB# 09-002083). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study were presented as individual data points from each study group in Figure 2 of this manuscript and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank all study participants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ABCG2ATP-binding cassette transporter G2
CSFscalcium stone formers
eGFRestimated glomerular filtration rate
EVsextracellular vesicles
FITCFluorescein isothiocyanate
NSFsnon-stone formers
PEphycoerythrin
SLC2A9solute carrier family 2, glucose transporter, member 9
SLC5A8solute carrier family 5, member 8
SLC17A3solute carrier family 17, organic anion transporter, member 3
SLC22A12solute carrier family 22, organic anion/cation trans-porter, member 12
UAuric acid
UASDstone disease
UASFsUA stone formers
URAT1urate transporter 1
USDurinary stone disease
ZNF365zinc finger protein 365
COMcalcium oxalate monohydrate
CKDchronic kidney disease

References

  1. Kittanamongkolchai, W.; Vaughan, L.E.; Enders, F.T.; Dhondup, T.; Mehta, R.A.; Krambeck, A.E.; McCollough, C.H.; Vrtiska, T.J.; Lieske, J.C.; Rule, A.D. The Changing Incidence and Presentation of Urinary Stones Over 3 Decades. Mayo. Clin. Proc. 2018, 93, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mandel, N.S.; Mandel, G.S. Urinary tract stone disease in the United States veteran population. II. Geographical analysis of variations in composition. J. Urol. 1989, 142, 1516–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lieske, J.C.; Rule, A.D.; Krambeck, A.E.; Williams, J.C.; Bergstralh, E.J.; Mehta, R.A.; Moyer, T.P. Stone composition as a function of age and sex. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014, 9, 2141–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moe, O.W. Uric acid nephrolithiasis: Proton titration of an essential molecule? Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2006, 15, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wiederkehr, M.R.; Moe, O.W. Uric Acid Nephrolithiasis: A Systemic Metabolic Disorder. Clin. Rev. Bone Miner. Metab. 2011, 9, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grases, F.; Costa-Bauza, A.; Gomila, I.; Ramis, M.; Garcia-Raja, A.; Prieto, R.M. Urinary pH and renal lithiasis. Urol. Res. 2012, 40, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bobulescu, I.A.; Moe, O.W. Renal transport of uric acid: Evolving concepts and uncertainties. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012, 19, 358–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, L.; Shi, Y.; Zhuang, S.; Liu, N. Recent advances on uric acid transporters. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 100852–100862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Karns, R.; Zhang, G.; Sun, G.; Rao Indugula, S.; Cheng, H.; Havas-Augustin, D.; Novokmet, N.; Rudan, D.; Durakovic, Z.; Missoni, S.; et al. Genome-wide association of serum uric acid concentration: Replication of sequence variants in an island population of the Adriatic coast of Croatia. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2012, 76, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. So, A.; Thorens, B. Uric acid transport and disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 1791–1799. [Google Scholar]
  11. Merriman, T.R. An update on the genetic architecture of hyperuricemia and gout. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015, 17, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Jutabha, P.; Anzai, N.; Kitamura, K.; Taniguchi, A.; Kaneko, S.; Yan, K.; Yamada, H.; Shimada, H.; Kimura, T.; Katada, T.; et al. Human sodium phosphate transporter 4 (hNPT4/SLC17A3) as a common renal secretory pathway for drugs and urate. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 35123–35132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Srivastava, S.; Nakagawa, K.; He, X.; Kimura, T.; Fukutomi, T.; Miyauchi, S.; Sakurai, H.; Anzai, N. Identification of the multivalent PDZ protein PDZK1 as a binding partner of sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter SMCT1 (SLC5A8) and SMCT2 (SLC5A12). J. Physiol. Sci. 2019, 69, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gianfrancesco, F.; Esposito, T.; Casu, G.; Maninchedda, G.; Roberto, R.; Pirastu, M. Emergence of Talanin protein associated with human uric acid nephrolithiasis in the Hominidae lineage. Gene 2004, 339, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Medina-Escobedo, M.; Gonzalez-Herrera, L.; Villanueva-Jorge, S.; Martin-Soberanis, G. Metabolic abnormalities and polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and ZNF365 genes in children with urolithiasis. Urolithiasis 2014, 42, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Meldolesi, J. Exosomes and Ectosomes in Intercellular Communication. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, R434–R444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lv, L.L.; Feng, Y.; Tang, T.T.; Liu, B.C. New insight into the role of extracellular vesicles in kidney disease. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pomatto, M.A.C.; Gai, C.; Bussolati, B.; Camussi, G. Extracellular Vesicles in Renal Pathophysiology. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2017, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Murakami, T.; Oakes, M.; Ogura, M.; Tovar, V.; Yamamoto, C.; Mitsuhashi, M. Development of glomerulus-, tubule-, and collecting duct-specific mRNA assay in human urinary exosomes and microvesicles. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109074. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jayachandran, M.; Lugo, G.; Heiling, H.; Miller, V.M.; Rule, A.D.; Lieske, J.C. Extracellular vesicles in urine of women with but not without kidney stones manifest patterns similar to men: A case control study. Biol. Sex. Differ. 2015, 6, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chirackal, R.S.; Jayachandran, M.; Wang, X.; Edeh, S.; Haskic, Z.; Perinpam, M.; Halling, T.M.; Mehta, R.; Rivera, M.E.; Lieske, J.C. Urinary extracellular vesicles associated MCP-1 and NGAL derived from specific nephron segments differ between calcium oxalate stone formers and controls. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 2019, 317, F1475–F1482. [Google Scholar]
  22. Werness, P.G.; Brown, C.M.; Smith, L.H.; Finlayson, B. EQUIL2: A BASIC computer program for the calculation of urinary saturation. J. Urol. 1985, 134, 1242–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jayachandran, M.; Miller, V.M.; Heit, J.A.; Owen, W.G. Methodology for isolation, identification and characterization of microvesicles in peripheral blood. J. Immunol. Methods 2012, 375, 207–214. [Google Scholar]
  24. Turco, A.E.; Lam, W.; Rule, A.D.; Denic, A.; Lieske, J.C.; Miller, V.M.; Larson, J.J.; Kremers, W.K.; Jayachandran, M. Specific renal parenchymal-derived urinary extracellular vesicles identify age-associated structural changes in living donor kidneys. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2016, 5, 29642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thery, C.; Witwer, K.W.; Aikawa, E.; Alcaraz, M.J.; Anderson, J.D.; Andriantsitohaina, R.; Antoniou, A.; Arab, T.; Archer, F.; Atkin-Smith, G.K.; et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2018, 7, 1535750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jayachandran, M.; Yuzhakov, S.V.; Kumar, S.; Larson, N.B.; Enders, F.T.; Milliner, D.S.; Rule, A.D.; Lieske, J.C. Correction to: Specific populations of urinary extracellular vesicles and proteins differentiate type 1 primary hyperoxaluria patients without and with nephrocalcinosis or kidney stones. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 2021, 16, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, J.; Kumar, S.; Jayachandran, M.; Herrera Hernandez, L.P.; Wang, S.; Wilson, E.M.; Lieske, J.C. Excretion of urine extracellular vesicles bearing markers of activated immune cells and calcium/phosphorus physiology differ between calcium kidney stone formers and non-stone formers. BMC Nephrol. 2021, 22, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Blijdorp, C.J.; Tutakhel, O.A.Z.; Hartjes, T.A.; van den Bosch, T.P.P.; van Heugten, M.H.; Rigalli, J.P.; Willemsen, R.; Musterd-Bhaggoe, U.M.; Barros, E.R.; Carles-Fontana, R.; et al. Comparing Approaches to Normalize, Quantify, and Characterize Urinary Extracellular Vesicles. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2021, 32, 1210–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kanbara, A.; Miura, Y.; Hyogo, H.; Chayama, K.; Seyama, I. Effect of urine pH changed by dietary intervention on uric acid clearance mechanism of pH-dependent excretion of urinary uric acid. Nutr. J. 2012, 11, 39. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bobulescu, I.A.; Park, S.K.; Xu, L.H.R.; Blanco, F.; Poindexter, J.; Adams-Huet, B.; Davidson, T.L.; Sakhaee, K.; Maalouf, N.M.; Moe, O.W. Net Acid Excretion and Urinary Organic Anions in Idiopathic Uric Acid Nephrolithiasis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2019, 14, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Viers, B.R.; Lieske, J.C.; Vrtiska, T.J.; Herrera Hernandez, L.P.; Vaughan, L.E.; Mehta, R.A.; Bergstralh, E.J.; Rule, A.D.; Holmes, D.R., 3rd; Krambeck, A.E. Endoscopic and histologic findings in a cohort of uric acid and calcium oxalate stone formers. Urology 2015, 85, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Emmerson, B.T.; Cross, M.; Osborne, J.M.; Axelsen, R.A. Reaction of MDCK cells to crystals of monosodium urate monohydrate and uric acid. Kidney Int. 1990, 37, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Koka, R.M.; Huang, E.; Lieske, J.C. Adhesion of uric acid crystals to the surface of renal epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 2000, 278, F989–F998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Umekawa, T.; Chegini, N.; Khan, S.R. Increased expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) by renal epithelial cells in culture on exposure to calcium oxalate, phosphate and uric acid crystals. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2003, 18, 664–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jalal, D.I.; Chonchol, M.; Chen, W.; Targher, G. Uric acid as a target of therapy in CKD. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2013, 61, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Tang, X.; Lieske, J.C. Acute and chronic kidney injury in nephrolithiasis. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2014, 23, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 10010 g001 550
Figure 1. Diagrammatic presentation of the renal expression of six renal tubular uric acid (UA) transporters and their functions in the proximal and distal nephron. SLC2A9 (solute carrier family 2, glucose transporter member 9) is expressed in both the apical and basolateral membrane of proximal and distal tubular cells, and functions as a urate uniporter/urate reabsorption. SLC17A3 (solute carrier family 17 (organic anion transporter), member 3) is expressed on the apical membrane of the proximal tubular epithelium and transports urate and anionic compounds into the tubular fluid. SLC22A12 (solute carrier family 22 (organic anion/cation transporter member 12) or urate transporter 1 (URAT1) is expressed on the apical membrane of the proximal tubular epithelium and functions as a urate monocarboxylate exchanger to reabsorb urate from tubular lumen into the cytosol. SLC5A8 (solute carrier family 5, member 8) is expressed on the apical membrane of proximal tubular epithelium and functions as an electrogenic Na+ and Cl− dependent sodium-coupled solute transporter/urate reabsorption. ABCG2 (ATP-binding cassette transporter G2) is expressed in both the apical and basolateral membranes of the proximal tubular epithelium and functions as a urate extrusion pump to aid in UA excretion. ZNF365 (zinc finger protein 365) is expressed on proximal tubular epithelial cells, has been associated with UA stones, and is proposed to contribute to UA excretion. The pre-selected renal UA-transporters play an important role in the pathophysiology of UA secretion and reabsorption, and urinary pH regulation in the kidney.
Figure 1. Diagrammatic presentation of the renal expression of six renal tubular uric acid (UA) transporters and their functions in the proximal and distal nephron. SLC2A9 (solute carrier family 2, glucose transporter member 9) is expressed in both the apical and basolateral membrane of proximal and distal tubular cells, and functions as a urate uniporter/urate reabsorption. SLC17A3 (solute carrier family 17 (organic anion transporter), member 3) is expressed on the apical membrane of the proximal tubular epithelium and transports urate and anionic compounds into the tubular fluid. SLC22A12 (solute carrier family 22 (organic anion/cation transporter member 12) or urate transporter 1 (URAT1) is expressed on the apical membrane of the proximal tubular epithelium and functions as a urate monocarboxylate exchanger to reabsorb urate from tubular lumen into the cytosol. SLC5A8 (solute carrier family 5, member 8) is expressed on the apical membrane of proximal tubular epithelium and functions as an electrogenic Na+ and Cl− dependent sodium-coupled solute transporter/urate reabsorption. ABCG2 (ATP-binding cassette transporter G2) is expressed in both the apical and basolateral membranes of the proximal tubular epithelium and functions as a urate extrusion pump to aid in UA excretion. ZNF365 (zinc finger protein 365) is expressed on proximal tubular epithelial cells, has been associated with UA stones, and is proposed to contribute to UA excretion. The pre-selected renal UA-transporters play an important role in the pathophysiology of UA secretion and reabsorption, and urinary pH regulation in the kidney.
Ijms 23 10010 g001
Ijms 23 10010 g002 550
Figure 2. Representative scatter plots and fluorescence dot plots from the FACSCanto™ flow cytometer. (A) Example scatter plot of buffer with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies and calibration beads (no samples). (B) Example scatter plot of diluted urine plus appropriate fluorophore-conjugated antibodies and calibration beads. (C–H) Fluorescent dot plot (quadrants derived from microvesicle gate (contain major portions of extracellular vesicles) of (B)) showing fluorophore spectra for Annexin-V and SLC2A9 antibodies (C), SLC17A3 antibodies (D), URAT1 antibodies (E), ZNF365 antibodies (F), ABCG2 antibodies (G), and SLC5A8 antibodies (H).
Figure 2. Representative scatter plots and fluorescence dot plots from the FACSCanto™ flow cytometer. (A) Example scatter plot of buffer with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies and calibration beads (no samples). (B) Example scatter plot of diluted urine plus appropriate fluorophore-conjugated antibodies and calibration beads. (C–H) Fluorescent dot plot (quadrants derived from microvesicle gate (contain major portions of extracellular vesicles) of (B)) showing fluorophore spectra for Annexin-V and SLC2A9 antibodies (C), SLC17A3 antibodies (D), URAT1 antibodies (E), ZNF365 antibodies (F), ABCG2 antibodies (G), and SLC5A8 antibodies (H).
Ijms 23 10010 g002
Ijms 23 10010 g003 550
Figure 3. Urinary extracellular vesicles (EVs; microvesicles and exosomes) bearing six uric acid (UA)-transporters from UA stone formers (UASFs) and calcium stone formers (CSFs) and age-/sex-matched non-stone formers (NSFs). Urinary EVs were presented as the log10 of EVs/mg creatinine. * p < 0.05 UASFs or CSFs vs. NSFs; † p < 0.05 UASFs vs. CSFs (Wilcoxon rank sum test). The concentrations of SLC2A9, SLC17A3, and ZNF365-bearing EVs were greater than SLC22A12, SLC5A8, and ABCG2-expressing EVs in human urine.
Figure 3. Urinary extracellular vesicles (EVs; microvesicles and exosomes) bearing six uric acid (UA)-transporters from UA stone formers (UASFs) and calcium stone formers (CSFs) and age-/sex-matched non-stone formers (NSFs). Urinary EVs were presented as the log10 of EVs/mg creatinine. * p < 0.05 UASFs or CSFs vs. NSFs; † p < 0.05 UASFs vs. CSFs (Wilcoxon rank sum test). The concentrations of SLC2A9, SLC17A3, and ZNF365-bearing EVs were greater than SLC22A12, SLC5A8, and ABCG2-expressing EVs in human urine.
Ijms 23 10010 g003
Table
Table 1. Baseline clinical characteristics of study participants.
Table 1. Baseline clinical characteristics of study participants.
Clinical ParametersNSFs
(n = 65)		UASFs
(n = 18)		CSFs
(n = 26)
Age (years)63 (56, 73)64 (55, 74)65 (59, 74)
Female, n [%]26 [40]7 [39]10 [38]
Body mass index (kg/m2)27 (24, 30)32 (27, 42) *29 (26, 34)
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)126 (111, 138)130 (112, 143)127 (113, 136)
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)73 (66, 82)69 (58, 72) *70 (61, 78)
Malabsorption syndrome, n [%]3 [5]2 [11]2 [8]
Hypertension, n [%]18 [28]9 [50]12 [46]
Diabetic mellitus, n [%]11 [17]9 [50]8 [31]
Estimated GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)78 (62, 91)67 (46, 76) *62 (51, 76) *
Blood biochemistry
Serum uric acid (mg/dL)5.0 (4.0, 6.2)6.7 (5.6, 7.0) *5.8 (4.8, 6.5) *
Serum phosphorous (mg/dL)3.3 (3.0, 3.7)3.3 (2.9, 3.6)3.6 (3.2, 3.8) *
Serum calcium (mg/dL)9.3 (8.9, 9.6)9.3 (9.2, 9.8)9.5 (9.3, 9.7)
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)0.9 (0.69, 1.1)1.1 (0.9, 1.4) *1.0 (0.9, 1.2) *
Urine biochemistry
Urine pH6.0 (6.0, 7.0)5.7 (5.4, 6.1) *6.0 (5.5, 6.2) *
Osmolality (mOsm)528 (388, 763)495 (346, 726)409 (241, 580) *
Urine volume (mL/24 h)1955
(1402, 2634)		2167
(1518, 2544)		2064
(1443, 2680)
Protein (mg/24 h)26 (10, 42)71.5 (22, 303) *33 (16, 61)
Uric acid (mg/24 h)376 (295, 581)580 (431, 710) *584 (456, 775) *
Phosphorus (mg/24 h)516 (353, 826)872 (714,1406) *942 (713,1304) *
Calcium (mg/24 h)139 (99, 200)140 (105, 236) 255 (168, 327) *,†
Creatinine (mg/24 h)939 (644, 1325)1384 (1117, 1715) *1573 (1235, 1977) *
CaOx (supersaturation, dG)1.2 (0.8, 1.9)1.5 (0.9, 1.9)1.8 (1.2, 2.3) *
Uric acid (supersaturation, dG)−0.7 (−6, 0.2)0.8 (0, 3.9) *0.8 (−1, 1.9) *
Continuous variables data were presented as median (interquartile range) and categorical variables data were reported as the number [percentage] (n, [%]) of non-stone formers (NSFs), uric acid stone formers (UASFs), and calcium stone formers (CSFs). Significant differences between groups were determined by Wilcoxon rank sum test. * p < 0.05 compared with NSFs; † p < 0.05 compared with UASFs. Abbreviations: dG, ∆Gibbs; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; CSFs, calcium stone formers; CaOx, calcium oxalate; NSFs, non-stone formers, UASFs, uric acid stone formers.
Table
Table 2. Twenty-four-hour excretion of urinary extracellular vesicles (EVs; microvesicles and exosomes) bearing six uric acid (UA)-transporters from UA stone formers (UASFs) and calcium stone formers (CSFs) and age-/sex-matched non-stone formers (NSFs).
Table 2. Twenty-four-hour excretion of urinary extracellular vesicles (EVs; microvesicles and exosomes) bearing six uric acid (UA)-transporters from UA stone formers (UASFs) and calcium stone formers (CSFs) and age-/sex-matched non-stone formers (NSFs).
Uric Acid Transporter-Positive EVs Excreted (106 per 24 h) NSFs
(n = 65)		UASFs
(n = 18)		CSFs
(n = 26)
SLC2A9 positive1477 (477, 2872)963 (342, 3089)399 (167, 1450) *
SLC17A3 positive2786 (1047, 4549)2148 (507, 4977)1305 (587, 2343) *
SLC22A12 positive52 (24, 102)41 (14, 119)13 (6, 22) *,†
SLC5A8 positive98 (48, 188)129 (14, 257)13 (7, 28) *,†
ABCG2 positive183 (66, 763)228 (31, 612)47 (25, 187) *
ZNF365 positive1404 (519, 2968)1448 (336, 3401)316 (71, 1146) *,†
Data were presented as median (25th, and 75th percentiles), EVs × 106/24 h. * p < 0.05 UASFs or CSFs vs. NSFs; † p < 0.05 UASFs vs. CSFs (Wilcoxon rank sum test). The excretions of SLC2A9, SLC17A3, and ZNF365-bearing EVs were greater than SLC22A12, SLC5A8, and ABCG2-expressing EVs in human urine.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, Z.; Jayachandran, M.; Haskic, Z.; Kumar, S.; Lieske, J.C. Differences of Uric Acid Transporters Carrying Extracellular Vesicles in the Urine from Uric Acid and Calcium Stone Formers and Non-Stone Formers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231710010

AMA Style

Lin Z, Jayachandran M, Haskic Z, Kumar S, Lieske JC. Differences of Uric Acid Transporters Carrying Extracellular Vesicles in the Urine from Uric Acid and Calcium Stone Formers and Non-Stone Formers. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(17):10010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231710010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Zhijian, Muthuvel Jayachandran, Zejfa Haskic, Sanjay Kumar, and John C. Lieske. 2022. "Differences of Uric Acid Transporters Carrying Extracellular Vesicles in the Urine from Uric Acid and Calcium Stone Formers and Non-Stone Formers" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 17: 10010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231710010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop