Next Article in Journal
A Comprehensive miRNome Analysis of Macrophages Isolated from db/db Mice and Selected miRNAs Involved in Metabolic Syndrome-Associated Cardiac Remodeling
Next Article in Special Issue
Cervid Prion Protein Polymorphisms: Role in Chronic Wasting Disease Pathogenesis
Previous Article in Journal
The Potential of Hydrogen Sulfide Donors in Treating Cardiovascular Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neurometals in the Pathogenesis of Prion Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms22042196
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Neuroinflammation in Prion Disease

by
Bei Li
†,
Meiling Chen
† and
Caihong Zhu
*
School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Dong’An Rd 130, Shanghai 200032, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(4), 2196; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042196
Submission received: 10 February 2021 / Revised: 20 February 2021 / Accepted: 20 February 2021 / Published: 23 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Genetics of Prion Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Neuroinflammation, typically manifest as microglial activation and astrogliosis accompanied by transcriptomic alterations, represents a common hallmark of various neurodegenerative conditions including prion diseases. Microglia play an overall neuroprotective role in prion disease, whereas reactive astrocytes with aberrant phenotypes propagate prions and contribute to prion-induced neurodegeneration. The existence of heterogeneous subpopulations and dual functions of microglia and astrocytes in prion disease make them potential targets for therapeutic intervention. A variety of neuroinflammation-related molecules are involved in prion pathogenesis. Therapeutics targeting neuroinflammation represents a novel approach to combat prion disease. Deciphering neuroinflammation in prion disease will deepen our understanding of pathogenesis of other neurodegenerative disorders.

1. Introduction

Prion diseases, also called transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE), are rare and fatal neurodegenerative disorders affecting both human and animals [1]. Prion diseases include Creutzfeldt–Jacob disease (CJD), Gerstmann–Sträussler–Scheinker syndrome (GSS), fatal familial insomnia (FFI), and kuru in humans, scrapie in sheep and goats, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE, also known as mad cow disease) in cattle, chronic wasting disease (CWD) in cervids, transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) in minks, feline spongiform encephalopathy (FSE) in felines, and the recently identified camel prion disease (CPD) in dromedary camels [2]. Additionally, prion diseases can be experimentally recapitulated in laboratory animals such as mice, hamster, and bank voles.
The term “prion” was coined by Stanley Prusiner in 1982 to describe proteinaceous infectious particles that account for the transmission of scrapie between sheep or goats [3]. According to the “protein-only” hypothesis first proposed by John Griffith in 1967 [4], prions are devoid of nucleic acid and mainly composed of scrapie prion protein (PrPSc), a misfolded isoform of the host-derived cellular prion protein (PrPC). The gene-encoding prion protein (Prnp) was thereafter identified in hamster, mouse, and other mammals [5,6,7]. PrPSc and PrPC share the same amino acid sequence. Posttranslational chemical modifications have not been found; however, there are significant differences in conformation. PrPC contains abundant α-helix and minimal β-sheet, whereas PrPSc is predominantly composed of β-sheet. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis of recombinant PrPC revealed an unstructured N-terminal flexible tail and a globular C-terminal domain comprising two-stranded antiparallel β-sheets and three α-helixes [8,9]. The high-resolution structure of PrPSc is still lacking largely due to its insolubility and heterogeneity of the purified infectious materials [10]. Nevertheless, it is now well accepted that the conformational transition from PrPC to PrPSc represents a fundamental event during prion infection and propagation. As the principal component of prion, PrPSc acts as a template to recruit and convert PrPC into nascent PrPSc with the same conformation, followed by fragmentation of the PrPSc aggregates to accrete further PrPC, thereby replicating and propagating the prion. The conformational differences of PrPSc determine diverse prion strains, which exhibit distinct disease phenotypes, such as clinical manifestation, incubation time, and lesion patterns, when transmitted to identical hosts. Different hosts also show varied susceptibility to various strains, which is known as the species barrier. The underlying factors discriminating prion strains may include glycosylation and sialylation of PrPSc.
The etiology of prion diseases can be sporadic, inherited, or acquired by iatrogenic or dietary exposure to prions [11]. Although diverse etiologies differ in the initiator of disease cascade, they share a common fundamental molecular event and similar neuropathological features, which encompass spongiform changes, neuronal loss, and neuroinflammatory responses such as astrogliosis and microglial activation as well as the accumulation and deposition of PrPSc aggregates [11]. Here, we review the recent advances on neuroinflammation in prion disease.

2. Neuroinflammation in Prion Disease

The CNS has long been considered immune privileged, as the brain fails to mount an immune response to allogeneic grafts. But now it is well appreciated that the CNS is immune competent and does display features of inflammation [12]. The term “neuroinflammation”, meaning inflammation of the nervous system, was originally designated to describe immune responses (lymphocytic infiltrates, antibody production, and cytokine secretion, etc.) to infections, brain injury, toxic metabolites, or autoimmune diseases. More recently, however, the concept of neuroinflammation has been expanded to comprise chronic and sustained glial activation that is typically associated with aging and a variety of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), as well as prion disease [13]. The involvement of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration is a subject of intensive study. Accumulating evidence supports that neuroinflammation mediated by microglia and astrocytes may play an important role in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases [14]. Recently, a tsunami of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has identified more than 100 gene variants associated with increased risk for developing AD, PD, FLD, or ALS. Many of the gene variants are related to immune response and highly expressed by microglia, highlighting the critical role of neuroinflammatory processes in neurodegenerative disorders [15].
Typically, prion infection does not elicit a prominent adaptive immune response in the periphery, probably due to self-tolerance associated with the similar immunogenicity of PrPSc with PrPC, which is constitutively expressed by the host [16]. Lymphocytic infiltration and the related inflammatory response are usually undetectable in prion-infected brains [17]. However, activation and proliferation of microglia are especially rampant in prion-infected brains. By immunohistochemical analysis, microglia have been observed to be closely associated with plaques in CJD, GSS, and kuru [18,19,20,21]. Compared to non-prion controls, the number of microglia is markedly increased in CJD and animal models of prion infection [22,23]. The morphology of the microglia also changes to an activated phenotype, suggesting a microglial response in prion diseases. Time course studies on experimental animals have found that microglial activation occurs at an early phase of the disease, preceding neuronal death, spongiform changes, and the onset of clinical symptoms [24,25,26]. Microarray analysis of prion-infected mouse brains has identified a unique expression profile of microglia [27]. Transcriptome profiling of mouse brains revealed that the genes upregulated by prion infection, irrespective of the prion strain or mouse genetic background, are expressed mainly by activated microglia [28], underscoring the central role of microglia in prion disease. These observations collectively imply that microglial activation actively drive prion-induced neurodegeneration rather than occurring merely as a secondary effect. However, the molecular mechanisms by which prion infections activate microglia and the functions of microglia in prion pathogenesis under distinct conditions remain largely unknown.
Astrogliosis has also been well recognized and documented in prion disease. Astrocytes, together with neurons, are considered important sites of prion replication. Early studies have shown that PrPSc deposit in astrocytes of both prion-diseased humans and rodents [29,30,31,32,33]. Astrocyte-specific expression of PrPC could restore the susceptibility of Prnp knockout mice to prion infection, associated with PrPSc accumulation in astrocytes [34]. Primary astrocytes isolated from ovine PrP-overexpressing transgenic mice are capable of sustaining efficient replication and propagation of natural sheep scrapie [35]. Recently, human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes have been successfully established to efficiently replicate human prions in a cell culture model [36]. An immortalized mouse astrocyte cell line could selectively and differentially propagate different murine prions [37]. Taken together, these results suggest that astrocytes play a critical role in prion propagation and pathogenesis. Nevertheless, how prion infection trigger astrogliosis and the role of reactive astrocytes in prion disease are still undeciphered.
More recently, RNA-sequencing of prion-infected mouse brains collected at different time points found that conspicuous molecular changes can be detected at 8 weeks post inoculation, much earlier than previously anticipated and months before mice display clinical symptoms or brain damage. Interestingly, glial-related gene expression changes correlate precisely with the appearance of clinical signs, suggesting that glial perturbation, rather than the neuronal demise, could be the driver of disease [38]. Another longitudinal study comparing the transcriptome of prion-infected and uninfected mice by RNA-sequencing revealed unique molecular signatures of both microglia and astrocytes, which differ from the expression profiles of other neurodegenerative diseases [39]. Cell type-specific and genome-wide ribosome profiling of prion-infected mouse brains revealed that terminally sick mice with severe neurological symptoms displayed extensive molecular alterations in microglia and astrocytes, whereas only minor changes were detected in translational profiles of neurons. These results again imply that aberrant phenotype of glia suffice to cause disease and may even be the primary driver of prion-induced neurodegeneration [40].
Taken together, neuroinflammation, typically manifest as microglial activation and astrogliosis, along with transcriptomic changes, represents a rapidly emerging field of prion research. With the advances in the study on the neuroinflammation of prion disease, we believe it will deepen our understanding and facilitate innovative therapeutic approaches to combat this disease.

3. Microglial Activation in Prion Disease

Microglia, the main resident macrophages in the CNS, are highly dynamic and motile [41]. Microglia play pivotal roles in the early development of the brain and maintenance of brain homeostasis throughout life. Microglia actively and continuously survey the brain parenchyma to find, uptake, and remove apoptotic cells or cell debris. Notably, microglia are also considered the most elaborate sensors of danger signals in the brain. In response to neural injury, infection, or neurodegeneration, microglia become activated and change their cell morphology, accompanied by marked proliferation and alterations in their expression profile. The central role of microglia in various neurodegenerative diseases is highlighted by genetic studies showing that variants of several microglia-expressed genes are important risk factors [42]. Microglia can be both beneficial and detrimental. The exact role of microglia in neurodegeneration may depend on their activated status and microenvironment, which can turn microglia into either friends or foes under distinct conditions [13].
In prion-infected mice, microglia are observed encompassing PrPSc deposits, and intracellular PrPSc can be detected within microglia [18,19,20,43,44]. The presence of prion in motile microglia indicates that microglia might facilitate the dissemination and spread of prion within the brain [44]. Furthermore, activated microglia in prion-infected brains produce pro-inflammatory cytokines that may contribute to neuronal damage [45,46]. However, microglia can engulf and degrade prions, thereby decreasing the prion load in the CNS and delaying disease progression [47,48]. The expression of anti-proinflammatory cytokine by activated microglia could also dampen neuroinflammation and ameliorate the pathogenesis [49]. The potential dual role of microglia in prion pathogenesis has prompted scientists to dissect the association between microglia and prion disease.
An early study using the synthetic peptide PrP106–126 (corresponding to the amino acid 106–126 of human prion protein) to treat primary cell cultures demonstrated that microglia are necessary for PrP106–126-induced cytotoxicity in primary neurons, suggesting that microglia are a mediator of neurotoxicity [50]. However, PrP106–126 is fundamentally different from bona fide prion, since the peptide has never been detected in vivo and is not infectious per se, which raises serious concerns about the relevance and validity of the findings. Another study reported that the CSF1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibitor, GW2580, restrained microglial activation and proliferation in prion-infected mice and thereby attenuated neuronal damage and slowed down disease progression, indicating a deleterious effect of microglial activation in prion diseases [51]. However, a contradictory effect was observed in another study using a different CSF1R inhibitor, PLX5622 (Plexxicon) [52]. These discrepant results suggest that pharmacological manipulation of microglia by targeting CSF1R may not be specific and therefore caution is indicated when employed in therapy. Indeed, CSF1R inhibition by PLX5622 affects myeloid and lymphoid compartment in the periphery and causes long-term changes in circulating and tissue-resident macrophages [53]. Accordingly, the role of microglia in prion diseases remains contentious, largely because of the dearth of appropriate model systems.
In an ex vivo model, ganciclovir-mediated radical and specific ablation of microglia in cerebellar organotypic-cultured slices (COCS) prepared from tga20/CD11b-HSVTK (overexpressed PrP in neurons and specifically expressed thymidine kinase of herpes simplex virus CD11b-positive myeloid cells including microglia) transgenic mice resulted in augmented PrPSc accumulation and elevated prion infectivity titer, suggesting that microglia play a crucial role in prion clearance [47]. Notably, neuronal loss was also significantly enhanced and neuropathological changes were remarkably aggravated upon microglial depletion [48]. When the tga20/CD11b-HSVTK mice were inoculated with prions and implanted with osmotic mini pumps to deliver the ganciclovir directly into the brain, disease progression was significantly accelerated [48]. Additionally, in prion-infected Il34−/− mice that contain fewer microglia due to impaired microglial development and maintenance [54], PrPSc deposition was enhanced and incubation time was shortened compared with wild-type littermates [48]. Therefore, these results collectively suggest that microglia, rather than mediating prion pathogenesis, are potent defenders of the brain against prion disease. The beneficial role of microglia in prion disease was later confirmed by another independent study using an orthogonal approach [52]. Interestingly, microglia depletion does not affect anti-PrP antibody-induced neurotoxicity [55], indicating that microglia exert neuroprotection by decreasing the prion deposition instead of by affecting downstream events shared by prion infection and anti-PrP antibody treatment [56].
A transcriptomic analysis of different brain regions with or without neurodegeneration revealed at least two types of microglial responses in prion-infected brains: A homeostatic response across all brain regions and an inflammatory response restricted to sites of neurodegeneration [57]. In concert with recent single-cell RNA-seq studies showing existence of heterogeneity and diversity of microglia subtypes in various mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases [58,59,60,61,62,63,64], we speculate that although microglia are generally neuroprotective, microglial activation during prion disease is a complex and multistep process. Activated microglia consist of a heterogeneous population with distinct functions. At early stages, most microglia respond to prion infection and consequently enhance their phagocytic capacity to clear PrPSc. However, the phagocytosis and clearance function are insufficient, and sustained PrPSc accumulation causes neuronal damage, which could stimulate microglia to switch to a pro-inflammatory phenotype and elicit a detrimental effect in the brain (Figure 1).

4. Astrogliosis in Prion Disease

Astrocytes are the most abundant glial cells in the CNS that function in the maintenance of brain homeostasis and the blood–brain barrier, modulation of neurotransmission, energy supply, and many others [65]. Upon stimulation, astrocytes become activated and acquire reactive phenotypes manifest as morphological changes and upregulation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression, a process called astrogliosis. Similar to activated microglia, reactive astrocytes can adopt both protective and harmful properties [66,67]. Astrogliosis represents another neuropathological hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases [68].
In prion disease, astrogliosis is pronounced and widespread as indicated by a significant increase in astrocyte cell numbers and associated GFAP signals. Interestingly, the response of astrocytes to prion infection is region dependent and heterogeneous. In a mouse model of prion infection, astrocytes in the hippocampus responded to PrPSc accumulation, whereas in the thalamus, the increase in GFAP and morphological changes were less pronounced despite stronger PrPSc deposition [69]. Therefore, prion infection-induced astrogliosis is context dependent and determined by the microenvironment of brain regions. With the disease progression, however, the region-specific homeostatic signature of astrocytes was partially lost and replaced by a uniform neuroinflammatory signature [70]. Recently, markers of reactive astrocytes have been applied to discriminate and stratify different prion strain or subtypes [71,72].
Recent studies suggest that reactive astrocytes are heterogeneous with different subtypes in distinct states and phenotypes [73,74,75,76]. Microglial activation and astrogliosis might be more closely related than previously assumed, as cytokine combination (TNFα, IL-1α, and C1qa) released by activated microglia could directly activate a subset of astrocytes into a neurotoxic phenotype (A1-astrocytes) [77]. In a transgenic mouse model of Parkinson’s disease, ablation of cytokines that stimulate A1 astrocytes results in neuroprotection [78]. To investigate the impact of A1-astrocytes on prion pathogenesis, TNFα, IL-1α, and C1qa triple-knockout mice were infected with prions. Although C3-positive A1-like astrocytes were significantly reduced, the amount of PrPSc deposition and titers of prion infectivity were not affected. Unexpectedly, triple-knockout even led to a significant acceleration of prion disease progression [79]. Given that lack of TNFα or C1qa has no effect on prion pathogenesis in the CNS [80,81], but single knockout of TNFα, IL-1α, or C1qa leads to decreased A1 astrocytes [77], the role of A1 reactive astrocytes in prion disease may be dose and context dependent. Interestingly, systemic inflammation induced by oral infection of a gastrointestinal helminth pathogen in prion-infected mice leads to earlier appearance of interferon γ receptor 1 (IFNGR1)-expressing reactive astrocytes and accelerated onset of prion disease [82]. Overall, these results suggest that reactive astrocytes in prion-infected mouse brains are more complex than the oversimplified A1 and A2 polarization, and their molecular features and functions in prion disease might differ from other neurodegenerative conditions.
Activation of unfolded protein response (UPR)-induced phosphorylated protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (p-PERK) signaling has been observed in neurons in a wide spectrum of neurodegenerative disorders including prion disease [83]. Interestingly, p-PERK has also been detected in astrocytes of human tauopathy; however, the pathological contribution of astrocytic p-PERK signaling in neurodegenerative diseases remains unclear. A recent study found that dysregulated astrocytic p-PERK signaling turns astrocytes into distinct reactivity states, leading to a loss of synaptic trophism and neuroprotective functions. The specific block of astrocytic p-PERK signaling in prion-infected mice suffices to reverse this activation state and restores synaptic trophism and neuroprotective function, with improvement of behavioral deficits and increased survival [84]. Thus, targeting this astrocytic signaling represents a novel therapeutic approach for battling prion disease. These results also highlight the importance of astrocytes in prion pathogenesis. Indeed, astrocytes isolated from prion-infected mouse brain showed synaptotoxicity to primary cultured neurons, supporting the hypothesis that reactive astrocytes contribute to neurodegeneration in prion disease [85].
Taken together, reactive astrocytes not only replicate and accumulate prions in the brain, but their aberrant phenotype with dysregulated signaling also play an overall neurotoxic role in prion pathogenesis. Due to the existence of heterogeneous subtypes of astrocyte in prion-infected brains, further studies, such as single cell RNA-sequencing of astrocytes and cell-specific manipulation of certain astrocytic pathways, are required to dissect the precise role of each subpopulation in prion disease (Figure 2).

5. Neuroinflammation-Related Molecules in Prion Diseases

5.1. Toll-Like Receptors

The innate immune receptor mediating microglial response to prion infection is not clearly defined. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a class of pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) mainly expressed by innate immune cells, including microglia. TLRs sense and recognize a diverse range of invading pathogens to initiate the innate immune response. Therefore, it is conceivable that TLRs may mediate prion-induced microglial activation to defend against prion infection.
Indeed, activation of innate immunity with a TLR ligand reduced prion accumulation, whereas suppression with a TLR inhibitor enhanced prion propagation in a mixed glial culture model [86]. Moreover, mice lacking TLR2 (C57BL/6, infected with 22L) or TLR4 (C3H/HeJ, infected with 139A or Me7) showed significant acceleration of prion progression, suggesting a protective function of TLR signaling in prion disease [87,88]. The contribution of TLR2 and TLR4 to prion pathogenesis seems to be Myd88-independent [89]. In agreement with these results, depletion of interferon regulatory factor 3 (Irf3−/−, C57BL/6J, infected with 22L, Fukuoka-1, or mBSE), a key transcription factor of the MyD88-independent type I IFN production pathway, resulted in a significantly earlier onset of prion pathology [90]. Interestingly, mice deficient in CD14 (C57BL/6), a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein that acts as a co-receptor of TLR4 to recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns, survived longer than wild-type mice upon Chandler or Obihiro prion infection. This protective effect might be due to enhanced microglial activation and prion clearance, as well as elevated expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines [91,92].
Collectively, these results suggest an overall protective role of certain TLR in prion pathogenesis. But the full picture of various TLRs in prion disease is complex and context dependent. Further studies, such as cell type-specific manipulation of TLRs, are required to delineate the role of specific TLR signaling and downstream events within different cells in prion pathogenesis.

5.2. Complement System

In the CNS, components of the complement system are synthesized by microglia, astrocytes, and neurons [93]. In the CNS of prion disease patients and animal models of prion infections, early and terminal complement cascade components have been associated with PrPSc deposits [94,95,96,97]. Both classical and alternative pathways of the complement system were activated in prion-infected animals in a time-dependent pattern. Active complement compounds such as C1q, C3b, and membrane attack complex (MAC) were upregulated in various neural cells including microglia [96,97]. However, the contribution of complement activation to prion pathogenesis seems negligible, since mice lacking various complement components or their receptors succumbed to disease at a similar rate to the wild-type control upon intracerebral infection of prions [80,88,98,99]. Intriguingly, however, after peripheral challenge of prions, complement can trap and retain prions in secondary lymphoid organs, thereby facilitating peripheral prion replication and promoting prion pathogenesis [80,98,99,100,101,102].

5.3. Cytokines

Expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNFα, IL-1α, and IL 1β, is significantly upregulated in the brains of both prion-infected animals and CJD patients [27,45,46,103,104]. Importantly, the temporal pattern of cytokine upregulation paralleled the onset and progression of molecular and clinical prion neuropathology [103]. Cytokines were predominantly induced in brain areas showing characteristic spongiform change and neuronal loss [104]. The spatiotemporal pattern suggests that cytokines may play a critical role in prion-induced neurodegeneration. Anti-inflammatory cytokine TGFβ was also upregulated in various animal models of prion diseases [105,106]. However, the temporal patterns and magnitude of upregulation varied substantially among models, differing with the prion strain and the species infected [105]. Similarly, expression levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-10 were also heightened in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of CJD patients [107].
The contribution of cytokines to prion pathogenesis was examined. While most cytokines (TNFα, IL-6, TGFβ1, etc.) do not play a major role in prion-induced neurodegeneration, deficiency of IL-1 receptor 1 (IL-1R1, C57BL/6J, infected with 139A; B6;129S1/Sv, infected with RML), the receptor for IL-1α and IL-1β, caused a mild but statistically significant delay of disease progression [108,109], suggesting a detrimental role of IL-1R signaling in prion disease. Pathomechanically, depletion of IL-1R1 led to attenuated astrogliosis and enhanced microglial activation, resulting in augmented prion phagocytosis and clearance. These observations were supported by an association study that uncovered a correlation between SNPs in the Il1r1 locus and incubation time of prion diseases [110]. In a mouse model of CJD, pharmacological inhibition of astrocytic IL-1R signaling could restore normal synaptic responses and reduce seizure susceptibility, suggesting that targeting IL-1 signaling may offer a novel symptomatic treatment for CJD [111].
Similarly, ablation of IL-4 or IL-13 had no overt effects on prion disease. However, knockout of IL-10 in 129Sv mice (infected with RML or ME7) markedly accelerated prion progression [112], suggesting that IL-10 exerts neuroprotective functions in prion pathogenesis. Interestingly, this effect seems to be dependent on genetic background, since another study observed only a modest acceleration of prion progression in Il10−/− mice on a C57BL/6 background, but not on a 129S1/SvImj background (infected with RML) [109]. Therefore, both host genetic background and prion strain affect prion pathogenesis significantly. Additionally, constitutive knockout of certain gene may affect their functions in the periphery, such as in the gut, which could in turn influence the CNS via the gut–brain axis. Further studies, such as tissue- and cell type-specific conditional knockout, are required to dissect the precise role of specific cytokines in prion pathogenesis.

5.4. Chemokines

Expression of the CC chemokine ligand CCL2 is progressively upregulated in the CNS of C57BL/6 mice infected with ME7 prions, with upregulation temporally correlating with microglial activation. Upon inoculation of ME7 prions, CCL2 deficiency (C57BL/6) slightly prolonged the incubation time but had no impact on microglial activation or neuronal death [113]. Another study failed to find any alterations in disease progression after inoculation of RML prions into Ccl2−/− mice (C57BL/6) [114], suggesting that the effect might be prion-strain dependent. Likewise, mice lacking the CCL2 receptor CCR2 (C57BL/6) experienced similar disease progression as wild-type mice following the RML prion challenge [17,109]. Expression levels of CCL5 and its receptors CCR1, CCR3, and CCR5 are also elevated in prion-infected mice [105,115]. Ablation of CCR1 (C57BL/6, infected with RML) led to a compensatory induction of CCL3 and CCR5, resulting in earlier activation of Erk1/2 in astrocytes and faster prion progression [116]. However, depletion of CCR5 had no effect on prion pathogenesis [109].
The levels of CXC chemokines ligands CXCL9 and CXCL10, which signal via receptor CXCR3, are upregulated by prion infection [108,117]. Interestingly, Cxcr3−/− mice (C57BL/6) intracerebrally inoculated with 139A prion succumbed to disease with a delayed progression rate but accumulated more PrPSc in their brains [118]. Pathomechanically, knockout of CXCR3 decreased release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which could account for the prolonged incubation time. On the other hand, ablation of CXCR3 blocked microglial activation and therefore impaired prion clearance, resulting in enhanced PrPSc deposition. The chemokine CXCL13 is also upregulated in prion disease [44,117]; however, deficiency of its receptor CXCR5 failed to alter prion pathogenesis after intracerebral challenge of RML prions [119].
CX3CR1, the receptor of a neuron-derived CX3C chemokine ligand CX3CL1 (also known as fractalkine), is primarily expressed by microglia in the CNS [120,121]. CX3CL1-CX3CR1 signaling represents an important neuron–microglia interaction that maintains microglia in a homeostatic phenotype [122]. The CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis has been extensively studied in various models of neurodegeneration, yet conflicting results have been reported [123,124,125,126]. Altered CX3CL1-CX3CR1 signaling has been observed in animal models of prion infection [127,128]. Cx3cr1−/− mice with Balb/c background infected with RML, Me7, and MRC2 prions experienced a slightly shortened incubation time compared to wild-type mice, suggesting a neuroprotective role of CX3CR1 signaling in prion disease [129]. Whereas Cx3cr1−/− mice with a C57BL/6 background infected with RML and 22L failed to show any difference in disease onset, the duration and pathology was comparable to wild-type controls [130]. The dissimilar results may be due to the different mouse strains and genetic background and/or distinct experimental protocols used in each study. Notably, both studies observed no evidence of an impact of CX3CR1 deficiency on prion-induced microglial activation. Together, these studies suggest an overall weak effect of CX3CR1 signaling on prion pathogenesis.

5.5. Inflammation Regulators

Galectin-3, a regulator of inflammation, is mainly expressed by microglia in the brain. Upon prion infection, the galectin-3 level was significantly elevated [131]. Knockout of galectin-3 (C57BL/6, infected with 139A) slowed down prion progression without affecting PrPSc deposition or gliosis. However, lysosomal activation was profoundly suppressed by galectin-3 deficiency, suggesting that galectin-3 plays a detrimental role in prion disease by regulating lysosomal function [132].
Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome has been observed in various neurodegenerative disorders and its contribution to pathology of these diseases has been studied [133,134,135,136,137,138,139]. In cell culture models, the NLRP3 inflammasome was found to be crucial for IL-1β secretion after treatment with PrP106–126 peptide [140] or PrP fibrils [141]. The role of the NLRP3 inflammasome in bona fide prion disease was assessed by intracerebral inoculation of Nlrp3−/− and Pycard−/− mice (C57BL/6) with RML prions. However, depletion of NLRP3 or ASC neither changed levels of IL 1β in the brain nor altered attack rates and survival times. Thus, NLRP3/ASC inflammasome does not play a major role in prion pathogenesis [142].
Immune checkpoints are regulators that protect immune system from attacking cells indiscriminately. The effect of blocking programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway on mouse models of AD has been assessed, but conflicting results have been reported [143,144]. In prion disease, PD-1 expression was found to be restricted to microglia and highly increased following prion infection. Nevertheless, PD-1 deficiency (C57BL/6, infected with ME7) had no major impact on prion pathogenesis [145]. Similarly, lymphocyte activation gene 3 (Lag3, C57BL/6, infected with RML), an immune checkpoint receptor, was increased in prion infections, but did not overtly modify disease progression [146]. These results together suggest that blockade of immune checkpoint may not be an effective therapeutic strategy to halt prion diseases.
Sterile α and HEAT/armadillo motif-containing protein (SARM1), a member of the Myd88 family, negatively regulates innate immune response. Inactivation of SARM1 protects various forms of axonal degeneration [147,148,149,150,151,152]. Unexpectedly, upon prion infection, Sarm1−/− mice (C57BL/6, infected with RML) displayed unaltered neuroinflammation but accelerated prion progression, ruling out an involvement of SAMR1-mediated immunity in prion pathogenesis. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that SARM1 deficiency upregulated expression of pro-apoptotic gene X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP)-associated factor 1 (XAF1), thereby enhancing neuronal death and exacerbating disease [153]. Further study is required to delineate the crosstalk between SARM1 and XAF1, and their role in maintaining brain homeostasis.

5.6. Phagocytosis Mediators

The receptors and molecules that mediate the phagocytosis of prion remain to be elucidated. Milk fat globule epidermal growth factor 8 (MFGE8) is an opsonin that bridges apoptotic cells and phagocytes to facilitate phagocytosis by binding to phosphatidylserine on apoptotic cell membrane and integrins on phagocytes [154]. Because prion infectivity is often associated with lipids [155,156], it is conceivable that MFGE8 contribute to prion clearance by microglia. Indeed, mice deficient of MFGE8 (Mfge8−/−, infected with RML) displayed enhanced prion accumulation and experienced accelerated disease progression upon prion infection in a strain-dependent manner, since the effect of MFGE8 deficiency was observed in mice with C57BL/6 × 129Sv, but not with a C57BL/6 background [157]. The developmental endothelial locus-1 (Del-1, infected with RML), a homolog of MFGE8, does not complement MFGE8 for prion clearance in mice with a C57BL/6 background [158]. This finding suggests the existence of other unidentified polymorphic determinants of prion clearance.
The triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2) is an innate immune cell receptor predominantly expressed by microglia in the brain. TREM2 facilitates engulfment and phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and bacteria, thereby quenching inflammation [159,160]. Dysfunctional variants of TREM2 have been identified as important genetic risk factors for developing AD and other neurodegenerative disorders [161,162,163,164,165]. Knockout of Trem2 in a mouse model of AD (5xFAD) resulted in elevated hippocampal Aβ burden and augmented loss of cortical neurons, which are associated with markedly attenuated microglial activation [166]. Nonetheless, when Trem2−/− mice (C57BL/6) were intracerebrally inoculated with RML prions, neither PrPSc deposition nor disease progression was altered, suggesting that TREM2 does not facilitate prion clearance. Interestingly, similar to what was observed in 5xFAD model, microglial activation was also diminished in prion-infected Trem2−/− mice, indicating that TREM2 is involved in prion-induced microglial activation [167]. These results indicate that microglia-mediated phagocytosis and clearance of prion and Aβ may adopt distinct receptors and molecular pathways.

6. Therapeutics of Prion Diseases by Targeting Neuroinflammation

Prion diseases are so far incurable. Neuroinflammation offers as a new therapeutic target for prion diseases. Microglia play an overall neuroprotective role in prion pathogenesis, whereas aberrant phonotypes of reactive astrocytes may lead to neurodegeneration. Nevertheless, single-cell RNA-seq demonstrates that activated microglia and reactive astrocytes comprise heterogeneous subtypes and can adopt distinct phenotypes. While some subtypes are neuroprotective and beneficial, others could be more neurotoxic in the brain. Hence, it is conceivable to guide microglial activation and astrogliosis towards a beneficial phenotype that could efficiently clear prions, release anti-inflammatory and neurotrophic factors, and consequently slow down disease progression.
Early attempts to halt prion progression by blocking TLRs via administration of unmethylated CpG oligodinucleotides led to a delay in prion progression in mice peripherally inoculated with prions [168]. However, this effect may be neuroinflammation-unrelated and mainly due to alterations in the morphology and function of peripheral lymphoid elements [169]. CD14 deficiency confers neuroprotection from prion disease in mice by modifying cytokine release. Accordingly, the therapeutic strategy of using glimepiride to eliminate this GPI-anchored protein from the cell surface appears promising to modify prion progression [170]. Blockage of CSF1R signaling by GW2580 decreased microglial proliferation and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in ME7-infected mice and improved behavioral performance and prolonged survival [51]. However, inhibition of CSF1R using PLX5622 (Plexxicon) impaired prion clearance and exacerbated prion pathology [52], suggesting that therapeutic strategies against prion disease should avoid simply eliminating or depleting microglia.
Microglia exert neuroprotection in the brain partly through engulfing and degrading prions. However, this process is inefficient, and animals eventually die [171]. Strategies aiming to strengthen phagocytic capacity of microglia have been explored. Retrovirus infection of prion-inoculated mice could transiently enhance microglial activation and prion clearance, although survival was not prolonged [172]. Intracerebral or systemic administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to ME7-infected mice profoundly triggered microglial activation; however, this treatment exacerbated local inflammation and increased neuronal death [173].
Attempts to express anti-PrP scFv in brain-engraftable murine microglial cells followed by intracerebral transplantation into mice before or after prion infection have been reported. Intriguingly, injection of anti-PrP scFv-expressing microglia before or at an early stage of prion infection modestly delayed disease progression. This result supports a novel microglia-mediated immunotherapeutic approach to combat prion diseases [174].

7. Conclusion Remarks and Perspective

Neuroinflammation mediated by microglia activation and astrogliosis is now widely recognized as a hallmark of most types of neurodegeneration including prion diseases. While several models of microglial deficiency point to a neuroprotective role of microglia in prion pathogenesis, the exact molecular mechanisms underlying the microglial response to prion infection remains unclear. Emerging evidence suggests a crucial role of reactive astrocytes with aberrant phenotypes in prion-induced neurodegeneration. However, the underlying mechanisms of prion-induced astrogliosis are elusive and the precise involvement of reactive astrocytes in prion pathogenesis remains to be fully elucidated. Developing effective therapeutic strategies to modulate microglia and astrocytes in prion pathogenesis is challenging due to their heterogeneity and complex interactions with various cell types. Deciphering the orchestration of different subpopulations during prion progression represents a crucial step towards a better understanding of neuroinflammation in prion disease.
Recently, a study using single-nucleus RNA sequencing revealed that microglia and astrocytes in human and mouse respond differently to amyloidosis [175]. This cross-species difference may reflect the incomplete recapitulation of AD pathology in animal models. Since most studies of neuroinflammation in prion disease are based on animal models, whether microglial activation and astrogliosis in prion disease also differ between human and animal models remains to be determined.
A deeper understanding of neuroinflammation in prion disease may facilitate the development of techniques and approaches to modulate microglial activation and astrogliosis and thereby dampen disease progression. Since neuroinflammation is a common neuropathological hallmark of most neurodegenerative disorders, and prion disease shares many molecular and clinical similarities with other more prevalent neurodegenerative diseases such as AD and PD, we speculate the study of neuroinflammation in prion diseases could help uncover important insights into the role of neuroinflammation in other neurodegenerative conditions.

Funding

C.Z. was sponsored by the Research Startup Funds of Fudan University, Shanghai Pujiang Program (No. 20PJ1401100) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82071436).

Acknowledgments

We thank Elisabeth J. Rushing for critically reading and editing the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  1. Aguzzi, A.; Zhu, C. Five questions on prion diseases. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Babelhadj, B.; Di Bari, M.A.; Pirisinu, L.; Chiappini, B.; Gaouar, S.B.S.; Riccardi, G.; Marcon, S.; Agrimi, U.; Nonno, R.; Vaccari, G. Prion Disease in Dromedary Camels, Algeria. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 1029–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Prusiner, S.B. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 1982, 216, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Griffith, J.S. Self-replication and scrapie. Nature 1967, 215, 1043–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Oesch, B.; Westaway, D.; Walchli, M.; McKinley, M.P.; Kent, S.B.; Aebersold, R.; Barry, R.A.; Tempst, P.; Teplow, D.B.; Hood, L.E.; et al. A cellular gene encodes scrapie PrP 27-30 protein. Cell 1985, 40, 735–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chesebro, B.; Race, R.; Wehrly, K.; Nishio, J.; Bloom, M.; Lechner, D.; Bergstrom, S.; Robbins, K.; Mayer, L.; Keith, J.M.; et al. Identification of scrapie prion protein-specific mRNA in scrapie-infected and uninfected brain. Nature 1985, 315, 331–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Basler, K.; Oesch, B.; Scott, M.; Westaway, D.; Walchli, M.; Groth, D.F.; McKinley, M.P.; Prusiner, S.B.; Weissmann, C. Scrapie and cellular PrP isoforms are encoded by the same chromosomal gene. Cell 1986, 46, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Riek, R.; Hornemann, S.; Wider, G.; Billeter, M.; Glockshuber, R.; Wuthrich, K. NMR structure of the mouse prion protein domain PrP(121–231). Nature 1996, 382, 180–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Riek, R.; Hornemann, S.; Wider, G.; Glockshuber, R.; Wuthrich, K. NMR characterization of the full-length recombinant murine prion protein, mPrP(23–231). FEBS Lett. 1997, 413, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Aguzzi, A.; De Cecco, E. Shifts and drifts in prion science. Science 2020, 370, 32–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aguzzi, A.; Nuvolone, M.; Zhu, C. The immunobiology of prion diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 888–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Stephenson, J.; Nutma, E.; van der Valk, P.; Amor, S. Inflammation in CNS neurodegenerative diseases. Immunology 2018, 154, 204–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Aguzzi, A.; Barres, B.A.; Bennett, M.L. Microglia: Scapegoat, saboteur, or something else? Science 2013, 339, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kwon, H.S.; Koh, S.H. Neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disorders: The roles of microglia and astrocytes. Transl. Neurodegener 2020, 9, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Diaz-Ortiz, M.E.; Chen-Plotkin, A.S. Omics in Neurodegenerative Disease: Hope or Hype? Trends Genet. 2020, 36, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Porter, D.D.; Porter, H.G.; Cox, N.A. Failure to demonstrate a humoral immune response to scrapie infection in mice. J. Immunol. 1973, 111, 1407–1410. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gomez-Nicola, D.; Schetters, S.T.; Perry, V.H. Differential role of CCR2 in the dynamics of microglia and perivascular macrophages during prion disease. Glia 2014, 62, 1041–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Miyazono, M.; Iwaki, T.; Kitamoto, T.; Kaneko, Y.; Doh-ura, K.; Tateishi, J. A comparative immunohistochemical study of Kuru and senile plaques with a special reference to glial reactions at various stages of amyloid plaque formation. Am. J. Pathol. 1991, 139, 589–598. [Google Scholar]
  19. Barcikowska, M.; Liberski, P.P.; Boellaard, J.W.; Brown, P.; Gajdusek, D.C.; Budka, H. Microglia is a component of the prion protein amyloid plaque in the Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker syndrome. Acta Neuropathol. 1993, 85, 623–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guiroy, D.C.; Wakayama, I.; Liberski, P.P.; Gajdusek, D.C. Relationship of microglia and scrapie amyloid-immunoreactive plaques in kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and Gerstmann-Straussler syndrome. Acta Neuropathol. 1994, 87, 526–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Muhleisen, H.; Gehrmann, J.; Meyermann, R. Reactive microglia in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1995, 21, 505–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sasaki, A.; Hirato, J.; Nakazato, Y. Immunohistochemical study of microglia in the Creutzfeldt-Jakob diseased brain. Acta Neuropathol. 1993, 86, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Williams, A.E.; Lawson, L.J.; Perry, V.H.; Fraser, H. Characterization of the microglial response in murine scrapie. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1994, 20, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Betmouni, S.; Perry, V.H.; Gordon, J.L. Evidence for an early inflammatory response in the central nervous system of mice with scrapie. Neuroscience 1996, 74, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Williams, A.; Lucassen, P.J.; Ritchie, D.; Bruce, M. PrP deposition, microglial activation, and neuronal apoptosis in murine scrapie. Exp. Neurol. 1997, 144, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Giese, A.; Brown, D.R.; Groschup, M.H.; Feldmann, C.; Haist, I.; Kretzschmar, H.A. Role of microglia in neuronal cell death in prion disease. Brain Pathol. 1998, 8, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Baker, C.A.; Manuelidis, L. Unique inflammatory RNA profiles of microglia in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Vincenti, J.E.; Murphy, L.; Grabert, K.; McColl, B.W.; Cancellotti, E.; Freeman, T.C.; Manson, J.C. Defining the Microglia Response during the Time Course of Chronic Neurodegeneration. J. Virol. 2015, 90, 3003–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. DeArmond, S.J.; Mobley, W.C.; DeMott, D.L.; Barry, R.A.; Beckstead, J.H.; Prusiner, S.B. Changes in the localization of brain prion proteins during scrapie infection. Neurology 1987, 37, 1271–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liberski, P.P. Astrocytic reaction in experimental scrapie in hamsters. J. Comp. Pathol. 1987, 97, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Diedrich, J.F.; Bendheim, P.E.; Kim, Y.S.; Carp, R.I.; Haase, A.T. Scrapie-associated prion protein accumulates in astrocytes during scrapie infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 375–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lasmezas, C.I.; Deslys, J.P.; Demaimay, R.; Adjou, K.T.; Hauw, J.J.; Dormont, D. Strain specific and common pathogenic events in murine models of scrapie and bovine spongiform encephalopathy. J. Gen. Virol. 1996, 77 Pt 7, 1601–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Na, Y.J.; Jin, J.K.; Kim, J.I.; Choi, E.K.; Carp, R.I.; Kim, Y.S. JAK-STAT signaling pathway mediates astrogliosis in brains of scrapie-infected mice. J. Neurochem. 2007, 103, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Raeber, A.J.; Race, R.E.; Brandner, S.; Priola, S.A.; Sailer, A.; Bessen, R.A.; Mucke, L.; Manson, J.; Aguzzi, A.; Oldstone, M.B.; et al. Astrocyte-specific expression of hamster prion protein (PrP) renders PrP knockout mice susceptible to hamster scrapie. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 6057–6065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Cronier, S.; Laude, H.; Peyrin, J.M. Prions can infect primary cultured neurons and astrocytes and promote neuronal cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 12271–12276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Krejciova, Z.; Alibhai, J.; Zhao, C.; Krencik, R.; Rzechorzek, N.M.; Ullian, E.M.; Manson, J.; Ironside, J.W.; Head, M.W.; Chandran, S. Human stem cell-derived astrocytes replicate human prions in a PRNP genotype-dependent manner. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 3481–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Tahir, W.; Abdulrahman, B.; Abdelaziz, D.H.; Thapa, S.; Walia, R.; Schatzl, H.M. An astrocyte cell line that differentially propagates murine prions. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 11572–11583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sorce, S.; Nuvolone, M.; Russo, G.; Chincisan, A.; Heinzer, D.; Avar, M.; Pfammatter, M.; Schwarz, P.; Delic, M.; Muller, M.; et al. Genome-wide transcriptomics identifies an early preclinical signature of prion infection. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carroll, J.A.; Race, B.; Williams, K.; Striebel, J.; Chesebro, B. RNA-seq and network analysis reveal unique glial gene expression signatures during prion infection. Mol. Brain 2020, 13, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Scheckel, C.; Imeri, M.; Schwarz, P.; Aguzzi, A. Ribosomal profiling during prion disease uncovers progressive translational derangement in glia but not in neurons. Elife 2020, 9, e62911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nimmerjahn, A.; Kirchhoff, F.; Helmchen, F. Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science 2005, 308, 1314–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Hickman, S.; Izzy, S.; Sen, P.; Morsett, L.; El Khoury, J. Microglia in neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 1359–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jeffrey, M.; Goodsir, C.M.; Bruce, M.E.; McBride, P.A.; Farquhar, C. Morphogenesis of amyloid plaques in 87V murine scrapie. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1994, 20, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Baker, C.A.; Martin, D.; Manuelidis, L. Microglia from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease-infected brains are infectious and show specific mRNA activation profiles. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 10905–10913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kordek, R.; Nerurkar, V.R.; Liberski, P.P.; Isaacson, S.; Yanagihara, R.; Gajdusek, D.C. Heightened expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 1 alpha, and glial fibrillary acidic protein in experimental Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 9754–9758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Sharief, M.K.; Green, A.; Dick, J.P.; Gawler, J.; Thompson, E.J. Heightened intrathecal release of proinflammatory cytokines in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology 1999, 52, 1289–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Falsig, J.; Julius, C.; Margalith, I.; Schwarz, P.; Heppner, F.L.; Aguzzi, A. A versatile prion replication assay in organotypic brain slices. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Zhu, C.; Herrmann, U.S.; Falsig, J.; Abakumova, I.; Nuvolone, M.; Schwarz, P.; Frauenknecht, K.; Rushing, E.J.; Aguzzi, A. A neuroprotective role for microglia in prion diseases. J. Exp. Med. 2016, 213, 1047–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Stoeck, K.; Bodemer, M.; Zerr, I. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the CSF of patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J. Neuroimmunol. 2006, 172, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Brown, D.R.; Schmidt, B.; Kretzschmar, H.A. Role of microglia and host prion protein in neurotoxicity of a prion protein fragment. Nature 1996, 380, 345–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gomez-Nicola, D.; Fransen, N.L.; Suzzi, S.; Perry, V.H. Regulation of microglial proliferation during chronic neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 2481–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Carroll, J.A.; Race, B.; Williams, K.; Striebel, J.; Chesebro, B. Microglia Are Critical in Host Defense against Prion Disease. J. Virol. 2018, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Lei, F.; Cui, N.; Zhou, C.; Chodosh, J.; Vavvas, D.G.; Paschalis, E.I. CSF1R inhibition by a small-molecule inhibitor is not microglia specific; affecting hematopoiesis and the function of macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 23336–23338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, Y.; Szretter, K.J.; Vermi, W.; Gilfillan, S.; Rossini, C.; Cella, M.; Barrow, A.D.; Diamond, M.S.; Colonna, M. IL-34 is a tissue-restricted ligand of CSF1R required for the development of Langerhans cells and microglia. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Sonati, T.; Reimann, R.R.; Falsig, J.; Baral, P.K.; O’Connor, T.; Hornemann, S.; Yaganoglu, S.; Li, B.; Herrmann, U.S.; Wieland, B.; et al. The toxicity of antiprion antibodies is mediated by the flexible tail of the prion protein. Nature 2013, 501, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Herrmann, U.S.; Sonati, T.; Falsig, J.; Reimann, R.R.; Dametto, P.; O’Connor, T.; Li, B.; Lau, A.; Hornemann, S.; Sorce, S.; et al. Prion infections and anti-PrP antibodies trigger converging neurotoxic pathways. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004662. [Google Scholar]
  57. Alibhai, J.; Blanco, R.A.; Barria, M.A.; Piccardo, P.; Caughey, B.; Perry, V.H.; Freeman, T.C.; Manson, J.C. Distribution of Misfolded Prion Protein Seeding Activity Alone Does Not Predict Regions of Neurodegeneration. PLoS Biol. 2016, 14, e1002579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Keren-Shaul, H.; Spinrad, A.; Weiner, A.; Matcovitch-Natan, O.; Dvir-Szternfeld, R.; Ulland, T.K.; David, E.; Baruch, K.; Lara-Astaiso, D.; Toth, B.; et al. A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell 2017, 169, 1276–1290.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mathys, H.; Adaikkan, C.; Gao, F.; Young, J.Z.; Manet, E.; Hemberg, M.; De Jager, P.L.; Ransohoff, R.M.; Regev, A.; Tsai, L.H. Temporal Tracking of Microglia Activation in Neurodegeneration at Single-Cell Resolution. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 366–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Hammond, T.R.; Dufort, C.; Dissing-Olesen, L.; Giera, S.; Young, A.; Wysoker, A.; Walker, A.J.; Gergits, F.; Segel, M.; Nemesh, J.; et al. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Microglia throughout the Mouse Lifespan and in the Injured Brain Reveals Complex Cell-State Changes. Immunity 2019, 50, 253–271.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Li, Q.; Cheng, Z.; Zhou, L.; Darmanis, S.; Neff, N.F.; Okamoto, J.; Gulati, G.; Bennett, M.L.; Sun, L.O.; Clarke, L.E.; et al. Developmental Heterogeneity of Microglia and Brain Myeloid Cells Revealed by Deep Single-Cell RNA Sequencing. Neuron 2019, 101, 207–223.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Jordao, M.J.C.; Sankowski, R.; Brendecke, S.M.; Sagar; Locatelli, G.; Tai, Y.H.; Tay, T.L.; Schramm, E.; Armbruster, S.; Hagemeyer, N.; et al. Single-cell profiling identifies myeloid cell subsets with distinct fates during neuroinflammation. Science 2019, 363, eaat7554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Masuda, T.; Sankowski, R.; Staszewski, O.; Bottcher, C.; Amann, L.; Sagar; Scheiwe, C.; Nessler, S.; Kunz, P.; van Loo, G.; et al. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of mouse and human microglia at single-cell resolution. Nature 2019, 566, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Marschallinger, J.; Iram, T.; Zardeneta, M.; Lee, S.E.; Lehallier, B.; Haney, M.S.; Pluvinage, J.V.; Mathur, V.; Hahn, O.; Morgens, D.W.; et al. Lipid-droplet-accumulating microglia represent a dysfunctional and proinflammatory state in the aging brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2020, 23, 194–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Santello, M.; Toni, N.; Volterra, A. Astrocyte function from information processing to cognition and cognitive impairment. Nat. Neurosci. 2019, 22, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Li, K.; Li, J.; Zheng, J.; Qin, S. Reactive Astrocytes in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Aging Dis. 2019, 10, 664–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Escartin, C.; Galea, E.; Lakatos, A.; O’Callaghan, J.P.; Petzold, G.C.; Serrano-Pozo, A.; Steinhauser, C.; Volterra, A.; Carmignoto, G.; Agarwal, A.; et al. Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions. Nat. Neurosci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Colombo, E.; Farina, C. Astrocytes: Key Regulators of Neuroinflammation. Trends Immunol. 2016, 37, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Makarava, N.; Chang, J.C.; Kushwaha, R.; Baskakov, I.V. Region-Specific Response of Astrocytes to Prion Infection. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Makarava, N.; Chang, J.C.; Molesworth, K.; Baskakov, I.V. Region-specific glial homeostatic signature in prion diseases is replaced by a uniform neuroinflammation signature, common for brain regions and prion strains with different cell tropism. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020, 137, 104783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Bradford, B.M.; Wijaya, C.A.W.; Mabbott, N.A. Discrimination of Prion Strain Targeting in the Central Nervous System via Reactive Astrocyte Heterogeneity in CD44 Expression. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2019, 13, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ugalde, C.L.; Lewis, V.; Stehmann, C.; McLean, C.A.; Lawson, V.A.; Collins, S.J.; Hill, A.F. Markers of A1 astrocytes stratify to molecular sub-types in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease brain. Brain Commun. 2020, 2, fcaa029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. John Lin, C.C.; Yu, K.; Hatcher, A.; Huang, T.W.; Lee, H.K.; Carlson, J.; Weston, M.C.; Chen, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, W.; et al. Identification of diverse astrocyte populations and their malignant analogs. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Wu, Y.E.; Pan, L.; Zuo, Y.; Li, X.; Hong, W. Detecting Activated Cell Populations Using Single-Cell RNA-Seq. Neuron 2017, 96, 313–329.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Habib, N.; McCabe, C.; Medina, S.; Varshavsky, M.; Kitsberg, D.; Dvir-Szternfeld, R.; Green, G.; Dionne, D.; Nguyen, L.; Marshall, J.L.; et al. Disease-associated astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease and aging. Nat. Neurosci. 2020, 23, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Al-Dalahmah, O.; Sosunov, A.A.; Shaik, A.; Ofori, K.; Liu, Y.; Vonsattel, J.P.; Adorjan, I.; Menon, V.; Goldman, J.E. Single-nucleus RNA-seq identifies Huntington disease astrocyte states. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2020, 8, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Liddelow, S.A.; Guttenplan, K.A.; Clarke, L.E.; Bennett, F.C.; Bohlen, C.J.; Schirmer, L.; Bennett, M.L.; Munch, A.E.; Chung, W.S.; Peterson, T.C.; et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 2017, 541, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yun, S.P.; Kam, T.I.; Panicker, N.; Kim, S.; Oh, Y.; Park, J.S.; Kwon, S.H.; Park, Y.J.; Karuppagounder, S.S.; Park, H.; et al. Block of A1 astrocyte conversion by microglia is neuroprotective in models of Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 931–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hartmann, K.; Sepulveda-Falla, D.; Rose, I.V.L.; Madore, C.; Muth, C.; Matschke, J.; Butovsky, O.; Liddelow, S.; Glatzel, M.; Krasemann, S. Complement 3(+)-astrocytes are highly abundant in prion diseases, but their abolishment led to an accelerated disease course and early dysregulation of microglia. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2019, 7, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Klein, M.A.; Kaeser, P.S.; Schwarz, P.; Weyd, H.; Xenarios, I.; Zinkernagel, R.M.; Carroll, M.C.; Verbeek, J.S.; Botto, M.; Walport, M.J.; et al. Complement facilitates early prion pathogenesis. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Prinz, M.; Montrasio, F.; Klein, M.A.; Schwarz, P.; Priller, J.; Odermatt, B.; Pfeffer, K.; Aguzzi, A. Lymph nodal prion replication and neuroinvasion in mice devoid of follicular dendritic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 919–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Donaldson, D.S.; Bradford, B.M.; Else, K.J.; Mabbott, N.A. Accelerated onset of CNS prion disease in mice co-infected with a gastrointestinal helminth pathogen during the preclinical phase. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Moreno, J.A.; Radford, H.; Peretti, D.; Steinert, J.R.; Verity, N.; Martin, M.G.; Halliday, M.; Morgan, J.; Dinsdale, D.; Ortori, C.A.; et al. Sustained translational repression by eIF2alpha-P mediates prion neurodegeneration. Nature 2012, 485, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Smith, H.L.; Freeman, O.J.; Butcher, A.J.; Holmqvist, S.; Humoud, I.; Schatzl, T.; Hughes, D.T.; Verity, N.C.; Swinden, D.P.; Hayes, J.; et al. Astrocyte Unfolded Protein Response Induces a Specific Reactivity State that Causes Non-Cell-Autonomous Neuronal Degeneration. Neuron 2020, 105, 855–866.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Kushwaha, R.; Sinha, A.; Makarava, N.; Molesworth, K.; Baskakov, I.V. Non-cell autonomous astrocyte-mediated neuronal toxicity in prion diseases. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2021, 9, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Kang, S.G.; Kim, C.; Cortez, L.M.; Carmen Garza, M.; Yang, J.; Wille, H.; Sim, V.L.; Westaway, D.; McKenzie, D.; Aiken, J. Toll-like receptor-mediated immune response inhibits prion propagation. Glia 2016, 64, 937–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Spinner, D.S.; Cho, I.S.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, J.I.; Meeker, H.C.; Ye, X.; Lafauci, G.; Kerr, D.J.; Flory, M.J.; Kim, B.S.; et al. Accelerated prion disease pathogenesis in Toll-like receptor 4 signaling-mutant mice. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 10701–10708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Carroll, J.A.; Race, B.; Williams, K.; Chesebro, B. Toll-like receptor 2 confers partial neuroprotection during prion disease. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Prinz, M.; Heikenwalder, M.; Schwarz, P.; Takeda, K.; Akira, S.; Aguzzi, A. Prion pathogenesis in the absence of Toll-like receptor signalling. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Ishibashi, D.; Atarashi, R.; Fuse, T.; Nakagaki, T.; Yamaguchi, N.; Satoh, K.; Honda, K.; Nishida, N. Protective role of interferon regulatory factor 3-mediated signaling against prion infection. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 4947–4955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Sakai, K.; Hasebe, R.; Takahashi, Y.; Song, C.H.; Suzuki, A.; Yamasaki, T.; Horiuchi, M. Absence of CD14 delays progression of prion diseases accompanied by increased microglial activation. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 13433–13445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Hasebe, R.; Suzuki, A.; Yamasaki, T.; Horiuchi, M. Temporary upregulation of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-13 expression in the brains of CD14 deficient mice in the early stage of prion infection. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 454, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Bonifati, D.M.; Kishore, U. Role of complement in neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. Mol. Immunol. 2007, 44, 999–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ishii, T.; Haga, S.; Yagishita, S.; Tateishi, J. The presence of complements in amyloid plaques of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease. Appl. Pathol. 1984, 2, 370–379. [Google Scholar]
  95. Kovacs, G.G.; Gasque, P.; Strobel, T.; Lindeck-Pozza, E.; Strohschneider, M.; Ironside, J.W.; Budka, H.; Guentchev, M. Complement activation in human prion disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2004, 15, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lv, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhang, B.Y.; Xiao, K.; Wang, J.; Chen, L.N.; Sun, J.; Gao, C.; Shi, Q.; Dong, X.P. Remarkable Activation of the Complement System and Aberrant Neuronal Localization of the Membrane Attack Complex in the Brain Tissues of Scrapie-Infected Rodents. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 52, 1165–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chen, C.; Lv, Y.; Hu, C.; Xu, X.F.; Zhang, R.Q.; Xiao, K.; Ma, Y.; Gao, L.P.; Li, J.L.; Shi, Q.; et al. Alternative complement pathway is activated in the brains of scrapie-infected rodents. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 209, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mabbott, N.A.; Bruce, M.E.; Botto, M.; Walport, M.J.; Pepys, M.B. Temporary depletion of complement component C3 or genetic deficiency of C1q significantly delays onset of scrapie. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 485–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mabbott, N.A.; Bruce, M.E. Complement component C5 is not involved in scrapie pathogenesis. Immunobiology 2004, 209, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Michel, B.; Ferguson, A.; Johnson, T.; Bender, H.; Meyerett-Reid, C.; Pulford, B.; von Teichman, A.; Seelig, D.; Weis, J.H.; Telling, G.C.; et al. Genetic depletion of complement receptors CD21/35 prevents terminal prion disease in a mouse model of chronic wasting disease. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 4520–4527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Michel, B.; Ferguson, A.; Johnson, T.; Bender, H.; Meyerett-Reid, C.; Wyckoff, A.C.; Pulford, B.; Telling, G.C.; Zabel, M.D. Complement protein C3 exacerbates prion disease in a mouse model of chronic wasting disease. Int. Immunol. 2013, 25, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Kane, S.J.; Swanson, E.; Gordon, E.O.; Rocha, S.; Bender, H.R.; Donius, L.R.; Aguzzi, A.; Hannan, J.P.; Zabel, M.D. Relative Impact of Complement Receptors CD21/35 (Cr2/1) on Scrapie Pathogenesis in Mice. mSphere 2017, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Campbell, I.L.; Eddleston, M.; Kemper, P.; Oldstone, M.B.; Hobbs, M.V. Activation of cerebral cytokine gene expression and its correlation with onset of reactive astrocyte and acute-phase response gene expression in scrapie. J. Virol. 1994, 68, 2383–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Williams, A.E.; van Dam, A.M.; Man, A.H.W.K.; Berkenbosch, F.; Eikelenboom, P.; Fraser, H. Cytokines, prostaglandins and lipocortin-1 are present in the brains of scrapie-infected mice. Brain Res. 1994, 654, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Baker, C.A.; Lu, Z.Y.; Zaitsev, I.; Manuelidis, L. Microglial activation varies in different models of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 5089–5097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Cunningham, C.; Boche, D.; Perry, V.H. Transforming growth factor beta1, the dominant cytokine in murine prion disease: Influence on inflammatory cytokine synthesis and alteration of vascular extracellular matrix. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2002, 28, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Stoeck, K.; Bodemer, M.; Ciesielczyk, B.; Meissner, B.; Bartl, M.; Heinemann, U.; Zerr, I. Interleukin 4 and interleukin 10 levels are elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Arch. Neurol. 2005, 62, 1591–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Schultz, J.; Schwarz, A.; Neidhold, S.; Burwinkel, M.; Riemer, C.; Simon, D.; Kopf, M.; Otto, M.; Baier, M. Role of interleukin-1 in prion disease-associated astrocyte activation. Am. J. Pathol. 2004, 165, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Tamguney, G.; Giles, K.; Glidden, D.V.; Lessard, P.; Wille, H.; Tremblay, P.; Groth, D.F.; Yehiely, F.; Korth, C.; Moore, R.C.; et al. Genes contributing to prion pathogenesis. J. Gen. Virol 2008, 89 Pt 7, 1777–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Akhtar, S.; Grizenkova, J.; Wenborn, A.; Hummerich, H.; Fernandez de Marco, M.; Brandner, S.; Collinge, J.; Lloyd, S.E. Sod1 deficiency reduces incubation time in mouse models of prion disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Bertani, I.; Iori, V.; Trusel, M.; Maroso, M.; Foray, C.; Mantovani, S.; Tonini, R.; Vezzani, A.; Chiesa, R. Inhibition of IL-1beta Signaling Normalizes NMDA-Dependent Neurotransmission and Reduces Seizure Susceptibility in a Mouse Model of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 10278–10289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Thackray, A.M.; McKenzie, A.N.; Klein, M.A.; Lauder, A.; Bujdoso, R. Accelerated prion disease in the absence of interleukin-10. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 13697–13707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Felton, L.M.; Cunningham, C.; Rankine, E.L.; Waters, S.; Boche, D.; Perry, V.H. MCP-1 and murine prion disease: Separation of early behavioural dysfunction from overt clinical disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2005, 20, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. O’Shea, M.; Maytham, E.G.; Linehan, J.M.; Brandner, S.; Collinge, J.; Lloyd, S.E. Investigation of mcp1 as a quantitative trait gene for prion disease incubation time in mouse. Genetics 2008, 180, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Lee, H.P.; Jun, Y.C.; Choi, J.K.; Kim, J.I.; Carp, R.I.; Kim, Y.S. The expression of RANTES and chemokine receptors in the brains of scrapie-infected mice. J. Neuroimmunol. 2005, 158, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. LaCasse, R.A.; Striebel, J.F.; Favara, C.; Kercher, L.; Chesebro, B. Role of Erk1/2 activation in prion disease pathogenesis: Absence of CCR1 leads to increased Erk1/2 activation and accelerated disease progression. J. Neuroimmunol. 2008, 196, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Riemer, C.; Queck, I.; Simon, D.; Kurth, R.; Baier, M. Identification of upregulated genes in scrapie-infected brain tissue. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 10245–10248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Riemer, C.; Schultz, J.; Burwinkel, M.; Schwarz, A.; Mok, S.W.; Gultner, S.; Bamme, T.; Norley, S.; van Landeghem, F.; Lu, B.; et al. Accelerated prion replication in, but prolonged survival times of, prion-infected CXCR3-/- mice. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 12464–12471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Prinz, M.; Heikenwalder, M.; Junt, T.; Schwarz, P.; Glatzel, M.; Heppner, F.L.; Fu, Y.X.; Lipp, M.; Aguzzi, A. Positioning of follicular dendritic cells within the spleen controls prion neuroinvasion. Nature 2003, 425, 957–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Harrison, J.K.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, S.; Xia, Y.; Maciejewski, D.; McNamara, R.K.; Streit, W.J.; Salafranca, M.N.; Adhikari, S.; Thompson, D.A.; et al. Role for neuronally derived fractalkine in mediating interactions between neurons and CX3CR1-expressing microglia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 10896–10901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Jung, S.; Aliberti, J.; Graemmel, P.; Sunshine, M.J.; Kreutzberg, G.W.; Sher, A.; Littman, D.R. Analysis of fractalkine receptor CX(3)CR1 function by targeted deletion and green fluorescent protein reporter gene insertion. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000, 20, 4106–4114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Paolicelli, R.C.; Bisht, K.; Tremblay, M.E. Fractalkine regulation of microglial physiology and consequences on the brain and behavior. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2014, 8, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Cardona, A.E.; Pioro, E.P.; Sasse, M.E.; Kostenko, V.; Cardona, S.M.; Dijkstra, I.M.; Huang, D.; Kidd, G.; Dombrowski, S.; Dutta, R.; et al. Control of microglial neurotoxicity by the fractalkine receptor. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9, 917–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Fuhrmann, M.; Bittner, T.; Jung, C.K.; Burgold, S.; Page, R.M.; Mitteregger, G.; Haass, C.; LaFerla, F.M.; Kretzschmar, H.; Herms, J. Microglial Cx3cr1 knockout prevents neuron loss in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13, 411–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Lee, S.; Varvel, N.H.; Konerth, M.E.; Xu, G.; Cardona, A.E.; Ransohoff, R.M.; Lamb, B.T. CX3CR1 deficiency alters microglial activation and reduces beta-amyloid deposition in two Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 177, 2549–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Bhaskar, K.; Konerth, M.; Kokiko-Cochran, O.N.; Cardona, A.; Ransohoff, R.M.; Lamb, B.T. Regulation of tau pathology by the microglial fractalkine receptor. Neuron 2010, 68, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Hughes, P.M.; Botham, M.S.; Frentzel, S.; Mir, A.; Perry, V.H. Expression of fractalkine (CX3CL1) and its receptor, CX3CR1, during acute and chronic inflammation in the rodent CNS. Glia 2002, 37, 314–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Xie, W.L.; Shi, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, B.Y.; Gong, H.S.; Guo, Y.; Wang, S.B.; Xu, Y.; Wang, K.; Chen, C.; et al. Abnormal activation of microglia accompanied with disrupted CX3CR1/CX3CL1 pathway in the brains of the hamsters infected with scrapie agent 263K. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2013, 51, 919–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Grizenkova, J.; Akhtar, S.; Brandner, S.; Collinge, J.; Lloyd, S.E. Microglial Cx3cr1 knockout reduces prion disease incubation time in mice. BMC Neurosci. 2014, 15, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Striebel, J.F.; Race, B.; Carroll, J.A.; Phillips, K.; Chesebro, B. Knockout of fractalkine receptor Cx3cr1 does not alter disease or microglial activation in prion-infected mice. J. Gen. Virol. 2016, 97, 1481–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Riemer, C.; Neidhold, S.; Burwinkel, M.; Schwarz, A.; Schultz, J.; Kratzschmar, J.; Monning, U.; Baier, M. Gene expression profiling of scrapie-infected brain tissue. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 323, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Mok, S.W.; Riemer, C.; Madela, K.; Hsu, D.K.; Liu, F.T.; Gultner, S.; Heise, I.; Baier, M. Role of galectin-3 in prion infections of the CNS. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 359, 672–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Halle, A.; Hornung, V.; Petzold, G.C.; Stewart, C.R.; Monks, B.G.; Reinheckel, T.; Fitzgerald, K.A.; Latz, E.; Moore, K.J.; Golenbock, D.T. The NALP3 inflammasome is involved in the innate immune response to amyloid-beta. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 857–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Heneka, M.T.; Kummer, M.P.; Stutz, A.; Delekate, A.; Schwartz, S.; Vieira-Saecker, A.; Griep, A.; Axt, D.; Remus, A.; Tzeng, T.C.; et al. NLRP3 is activated in Alzheimer’s disease and contributes to pathology in APP/PS1 mice. Nature 2013, 493, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Gordon, R.; Albornoz, E.A.; Christie, D.C.; Langley, M.R.; Kumar, V.; Mantovani, S.; Robertson, A.A.B.; Butler, M.S.; Rowe, D.B.; O’Neill, L.A.; et al. Inflammasome inhibition prevents alpha-synuclein pathology and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaah4066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Pike, A.F.; Varanita, T.; Herrebout, M.A.C.; Plug, B.C.; Kole, J.; Musters, R.J.P.; Teunissen, C.E.; Hoozemans, J.J.M.; Bubacco, L.; Veerhuis, R. alpha-Synuclein evokes NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1beta secretion from primary human microglia. Glia 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Johann, S.; Heitzer, M.; Kanagaratnam, M.; Goswami, A.; Rizo, T.; Weis, J.; Troost, D.; Beyer, C. NLRP3 inflammasome is expressed by astrocytes in the SOD1 mouse model of ALS and in human sporadic ALS patients. Glia 2015, 63, 2260–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Deora, V.; Lee, J.D.; Albornoz, E.A.; McAlary, L.; Jagaraj, C.J.; Robertson, A.A.B.; Atkin, J.D.; Cooper, M.A.; Schroder, K.; Yerbury, J.J.; et al. The microglial NLRP3 inflammasome is activated by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis proteins. Glia 2020, 68, 407–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ising, C.; Venegas, C.; Zhang, S.; Scheiblich, H.; Schmidt, S.V.; Vieira-Saecker, A.; Schwartz, S.; Albasset, S.; McManus, R.M.; Tejera, D.; et al. NLRP3 inflammasome activation drives tau pathology. Nature 2019, 575, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Shi, F.; Yang, L.; Kouadir, M.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhou, X.; Yin, X.; Zhao, D. The NALP3 inflammasome is involved in neurotoxic prion peptide-induced microglial activation. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012, 9, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  141. Hafner-Bratkovic, I.; Bencina, M.; Fitzgerald, K.A.; Golenbock, D.; Jerala, R. NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophage cell lines by prion protein fibrils as the source of IL-1beta and neuronal toxicity. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 4215–4228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Nuvolone, M.; Sorce, S.; Schwarz, P.; Aguzzi, A. Prion pathogenesis in the absence of NLRP3/ASC inflammasomes. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Baruch, K.; Deczkowska, A.; Rosenzweig, N.; Tsitsou-Kampeli, A.; Sharif, A.M.; Matcovitch-Natan, O.; Kertser, A.; David, E.; Amit, I.; Schwartz, M. PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade reduces pathology and improves memory in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 135–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Latta-Mahieu, M.; Elmer, B.; Bretteville, A.; Wang, Y.; Lopez-Grancha, M.; Goniot, P.; Moindrot, N.; Ferrari, P.; Blanc, V.; Schussler, N.; et al. Systemic immune-checkpoint blockade with anti-PD1 antibodies does not alter cerebral amyloid-beta burden in several amyloid transgenic mouse models. Glia 2018, 66, 492–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Obst, J.; Mancuso, R.; Simon, E.; Gomez-Nicola, D. PD-1 deficiency is not sufficient to induce myeloid mobilization to the brain or alter the inflammatory profile during chronic neurodegeneration. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018, 73, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Liu, Y.; Sorce, S.; Nuvolone, M.; Domange, J.; Aguzzi, A. Lymphocyte activation gene 3 (Lag3) expression is increased in prion infections but does not modify disease progression. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kim, Y.; Zhou, P.; Qian, L.; Chuang, J.Z.; Lee, J.; Li, C.; Iadecola, C.; Nathan, C.; Ding, A. MyD88-5 links mitochondria, microtubules, and JNK3 in neurons and regulates neuronal survival. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 2063–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Osterloh, J.M.; Yang, J.; Rooney, T.M.; Fox, A.N.; Adalbert, R.; Powell, E.H.; Sheehan, A.E.; Avery, M.A.; Hackett, R.; Logan, M.A.; et al. dSarm/Sarm1 is required for activation of an injury-induced axon death pathway. Science 2012, 337, 481–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Gerdts, J.; Summers, D.W.; Sasaki, Y.; DiAntonio, A.; Milbrandt, J. Sarm1-mediated axon degeneration requires both SAM and TIR interactions. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 13569–13580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Geisler, S.; Doan, R.A.; Strickland, A.; Huang, X.; Milbrandt, J.; DiAntonio, A. Prevention of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy by genetic deletion of SARM1 in mice. Brain 2016, 139 Pt 12, 3092–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Henninger, N.; Bouley, J.; Sikoglu, E.M.; An, J.; Moore, C.M.; King, J.A.; Bowser, R.; Freeman, M.R.; Brown, R.H., Jr. Attenuated traumatic axonal injury and improved functional outcome after traumatic brain injury in mice lacking Sarm1. Brain 2016, 139 Pt 4, 1094–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Jiang, Y.; Liu, T.; Lee, C.H.; Chang, Q.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Z. The NAD(+)-mediated self-inhibition mechanism of pro-neurodegenerative SARM1. Nature 2020, 588, 658–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Zhu, C.; Li, B.; Frontzek, K.; Liu, Y.; Aguzzi, A. SARM1 deficiency up-regulates XAF1, promotes neuronal apoptosis, and accelerates prion disease. J. Exp. Med. 2019, 216, 743–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Hanayama, R.; Tanaka, M.; Miwa, K.; Shinohara, A.; Iwamatsu, A.; Nagata, S. Identification of a factor that links apoptotic cells to phagocytes. Nature 2002, 417, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Klein, T.R.; Kirsch, D.; Kaufmann, R.; Riesner, D. Prion rods contain small amounts of two host sphingolipids as revealed by thin-layer chromatography and mass spectrometry. Biol. Chem. 1998, 379, 655–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Rouvinski, A.; Karniely, S.; Kounin, M.; Moussa, S.; Goldberg, M.D.; Warburg, G.; Lyakhovetsky, R.; Papy-Garcia, D.; Kutzsche, J.; Korth, C.; et al. Live imaging of prions reveals nascent PrPSc in cell-surface, raft-associated amyloid strings and webs. J. Cell Biol. 2014, 204, 423–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Kranich, J.; Krautler, N.J.; Falsig, J.; Ballmer, B.; Li, S.; Hutter, G.; Schwarz, P.; Moos, R.; Julius, C.; Miele, G.; et al. Engulfment of cerebral apoptotic bodies controls the course of prion disease in a mouse strain-dependent manner. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 2271–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Zhu, C.; Li, Z.; Li, B.; Pfammatter, M.; Hornemann, S.; Aguzzi, A. Unaltered prion disease in mice lacking developmental endothelial locus-1. Neurobiol. Aging 2019, 76, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. N’Diaye, E.N.; Branda, C.S.; Branda, S.S.; Nevarez, L.; Colonna, M.; Lowell, C.; Hamerman, J.A.; Seaman, W.E. TREM-2 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2) is a phagocytic receptor for bacteria. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Takahashi, K.; Rochford, C.D.; Neumann, H. Clearance of apoptotic neurons without inflammation by microglial triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 201, 647–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Guerreiro, R.; Wojtas, A.; Bras, J.; Carrasquillo, M.; Rogaeva, E.; Majounie, E.; Cruchaga, C.; Sassi, C.; Kauwe, J.S.; Younkin, S.; et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  162. Jonsson, T.; Stefansson, H.; Steinberg, S.; Jonsdottir, I.; Jonsson, P.V.; Snaedal, J.; Bjornsson, S.; Huttenlocher, J.; Levey, A.I.; Lah, J.J.; et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Rayaprolu, S.; Mullen, B.; Baker, M.; Lynch, T.; Finger, E.; Seeley, W.W.; Hatanpaa, K.J.; Lomen-Hoerth, C.; Kertesz, A.; Bigio, E.H.; et al. TREM2 in neurodegeneration: Evidence for association of the p.R47H variant with frontotemporal dementia and Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener 2013, 8, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Guerreiro, R.J.; Lohmann, E.; Bras, J.M.; Gibbs, J.R.; Rohrer, J.D.; Gurunlian, N.; Dursun, B.; Bilgic, B.; Hanagasi, H.; Gurvit, H.; et al. Using exome sequencing to reveal mutations in TREM2 presenting as a frontotemporal dementia-like syndrome without bone involvement. JAMA Neurol. 2013, 70, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Cady, J.; Koval, E.D.; Benitez, B.A.; Zaidman, C.; Jockel-Balsarotti, J.; Allred, P.; Baloh, R.H.; Ravits, J.; Simpson, E.; Appel, S.H.; et al. TREM2 variant p.R47H as a risk factor for sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2014, 71, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Wang, Y.; Cella, M.; Mallinson, K.; Ulrich, J.D.; Young, K.L.; Robinette, M.L.; Gilfillan, S.; Krishnan, G.M.; Sudhakar, S.; Zinselmeyer, B.H.; et al. TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Cell 2015, 160, 1061–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Zhu, C.; Herrmann, U.S.; Li, B.; Abakumova, I.; Moos, R.; Schwarz, P.; Rushing, E.J.; Colonna, M.; Aguzzi, A. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 is involved in prion-induced microglial activation but does not contribute to prion pathogenesis in mouse brains. Neurobiol. Aging 2015, 36, 1994–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Sethi, S.; Lipford, G.; Wagner, H.; Kretzschmar, H. Postexposure prophylaxis against prion disease with a stimulator of innate immunity. Lancet 2002, 360, 229–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Heikenwalder, M.; Polymenidou, M.; Junt, T.; Sigurdson, C.; Wagner, H.; Akira, S.; Zinkernagel, R.; Aguzzi, A. Lymphoid follicle destruction and immunosuppression after repeated CpG oligodeoxynucleotide administration. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Ingham, V.; Williams, A.; Bate, C. Glimepiride reduces CD14 expression and cytokine secretion from macrophages. J. Neuroinflamm. 2014, 11, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  171. Hughes, M.M.; Field, R.H.; Perry, V.H.; Murray, C.L.; Cunningham, C. Microglia in the degenerating brain are capable of phagocytosis of beads and of apoptotic cells, but do not efficiently remove PrPSc, even upon LPS stimulation. Glia 2010, 58, 2017–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Muth, C.; Schrock, K.; Madore, C.; Hartmann, K.; Fanek, Z.; Butovsky, O.; Glatzel, M.; Krasemann, S. Activation of microglia by retroviral infection correlates with transient clearance of prions from the brain but does not change incubation time. Brain Pathol. 2017, 27, 590–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Cunningham, C.; Wilcockson, D.C.; Campion, S.; Lunnon, K.; Perry, V.H. Central and systemic endotoxin challenges exacerbate the local inflammatory response and increase neuronal death during chronic neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 9275–9284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Fujita, K.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Mori, T.; Muramatsu, N.; Miyamoto, T.; Yano, M.; Miyata, H.; Ootsuyama, A.; Sawada, M.; Matsuda, H.; et al. Effects of a brain-engraftable microglial cell line expressing anti-prion scFv antibodies on survival times of mice infected with scrapie prions. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2011, 31, 999–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Zhou, Y.; Song, W.M.; Andhey, P.S.; Swain, A.; Levy, T.; Miller, K.R.; Poliani, P.L.; Cominelli, M.; Grover, S.; Gilfillan, S.; et al. Human and mouse single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal TREM2-dependent and TREM2-independent cellular responses in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 02196 g001 550
Figure 1. Microglial activation in prion disease. During prion disease progression, microglial activation is a complex and multistep process. Activated microglia consist of a heterogeneous population with distinct functions. At early stages, most microglia respond to prion infection and consequently enhance their phagocytic capacity to clear PrPSc. Therefore, activated microglia at this stage are neuroprotective. However, the phagocytosis and clearance function are insufficient and sustained PrPSc accumulation causes neuronal damage, which could stimulate microglia to switch to a dysfunctional pro-inflammatory phenotype and elicit a detrimental effect in the brain.
Figure 1. Microglial activation in prion disease. During prion disease progression, microglial activation is a complex and multistep process. Activated microglia consist of a heterogeneous population with distinct functions. At early stages, most microglia respond to prion infection and consequently enhance their phagocytic capacity to clear PrPSc. Therefore, activated microglia at this stage are neuroprotective. However, the phagocytosis and clearance function are insufficient and sustained PrPSc accumulation causes neuronal damage, which could stimulate microglia to switch to a dysfunctional pro-inflammatory phenotype and elicit a detrimental effect in the brain.
Ijms 22 02196 g001
Ijms 22 02196 g002 550
Figure 2. Astrogliosis in prion disease. Upon prion infection, astrocytes become activated into either the neuroprotective A2 phenotype or neurotoxic A1 phenotype. Heterogenous reactive astrocytes may coexist in prion-infected brains. Activated microglia release TNFα, IL-1α, and C1q factors which in turn could trigger the transition from A2 to A1 phenotype. Reactive astrocytes can replicate and accumulate prions, and their aberrant phenotype with dysregulated signaling plays an overall neurotoxic role in prion pathogenesis.
Figure 2. Astrogliosis in prion disease. Upon prion infection, astrocytes become activated into either the neuroprotective A2 phenotype or neurotoxic A1 phenotype. Heterogenous reactive astrocytes may coexist in prion-infected brains. Activated microglia release TNFα, IL-1α, and C1q factors which in turn could trigger the transition from A2 to A1 phenotype. Reactive astrocytes can replicate and accumulate prions, and their aberrant phenotype with dysregulated signaling plays an overall neurotoxic role in prion pathogenesis.
Ijms 22 02196 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, B.; Chen, M.; Zhu, C. Neuroinflammation in Prion Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042196

AMA Style

Li B, Chen M, Zhu C. Neuroinflammation in Prion Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(4):2196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042196

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Bei, Meiling Chen, and Caihong Zhu. 2021. "Neuroinflammation in Prion Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 4: 2196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042196

APA Style

Li, B., Chen, M., & Zhu, C. (2021). Neuroinflammation in Prion Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(4), 2196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042196

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop