Next Article in Journal
Cathepsin B-associated Activation of Amyloidogenic Pathway in Murine Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Brain Cortex
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Non-Structural Carbohydrates and Xylem Anatomy of Leaf Petioles Offers New Insights in the Drought Response of Two Grapevine Cultivars
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

EbARC1, an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene in Erigeron breviscapus, Confers Self-Incompatibility in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana

1
State Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, The Key Laboratory of Medicinal Plant Biology of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
2
National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center on Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Chinese Medicinal Materials in Southwest China, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
3
CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Plant Resources and Sustainable Use, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China
4
College of Life Science and Technology, Honghe University, Mengzi 661100, China
5
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kunming University, Kunming 650214, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(4), 1458; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041458
Submission received: 30 December 2019 / Revised: 14 February 2020 / Accepted: 15 February 2020 / Published: 20 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
Erigeron breviscapus (Vant.) Hand.-Mazz. is a famous traditional Chinese medicine that has positive effects on the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. With the increase of market demand (RMB 500 million per year) and the sharp decrease of wild resources, it is an urgent task to cultivate high-quality and high-yield varieties of E. breviscapus. However, it is difficult to obtain homozygous lines in breeding due to the self-incompatibility (SI) of E. breviscapus. Here, we first proved that E. breviscapus has sporophyte SI (SSI) characteristics. Characterization of the ARC1 gene in E. breviscapus showed that EbARC1 is a constitutive expression gene located in the nucleus. Overexpression of EbARC1 in Arabidopsis thaliana L. (Col-0) could cause transformation of transgenic lines from self-compatibility (SC) into SI. Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays indicated that EbARC1 and EbExo70A1 interact with each other in the nucleus, and the EbARC1-ubox domain and EbExo70A1-N are the key interaction regions, suggesting that EbARC1 may ubiquitinate EbExo70A to regulate SI response. This study of the SSI mechanism in E. breviscapus has laid the foundation for further understanding SSI in Asteraceae and breeding E. breviscapus varieties.

1. Introduction

Sexual reproduction of flowering plants is a complex biological process that involves recognition between pollen and stigma. In order to ensure biodiversity, several effective mechanisms in plants have evolved to avoid inbreeding and promote heterosexuality, such as herkogamy, dichogamy, and self-incompatibility (SI) [1,2,3,4,5]. Herkogamy is the separation of the pistil and stamen in space, while dichogamy is the staggering of the maturation time of the pistil and stamen in time, thus effectively reducing the probability of self-pollination [6]. Unlike herkogamy and dichogamy, SI is a process in which the specific recognition of stigma and pollen rejects self-pollen fertilization [6]. According to the genetic control pattern, SI has been widely accepted as either sporophyte SI (SSI) or gametophyte SI (GSI) [7]. Presently, the GSI mechanism has been well illustrated in Solanaceae, Rosaceae, and Papaveraceae. However, the SSI mechanism in other plants is still poorly understood, except in Brassica.
In Brassica, SSI is controlled by multiple alleles in the S-locus, including S-locus cysteine-rich protein/S-locus protein 11 (SCR/SP11) and S-locus receptor kinase (SRK), which act as ligands and receptors, respectively [8,9,10]. Firstly, SCR/SP11 recognizes SRK and phosphorylates SRK. Phosphorylated SRK further interacts with ARC1 (E3 ubiquitin ligase) and phosphorylates ARC1 [11,12,13,14,15]. Finally, ARC1 degrades compatibility factors, including Exo70A1, Glyoxalase I (GLO1), and Phospholipase D α1 (PLDα1), by ubiquitination, thus regulating the SI response [16,17,18]. Inhibition of ARC1 expression in Brassica napus L. and Arabidopsis lyrata L. could partially break SSI, indicating that ARC1 is relatively conserved in the positive regulation of SSI response [19,20]. However, whether such assumed conservation of ARC1 can also be applied to other families of plants remains to be studied.
Besides Brassica, SSI also exists in 73% of Asteraceae plants [21,22]. However, the molecular mechanism of SSI in Asteraceae is not clear. In order to identify the female and male determinants in the S-locus of Asteraceae, a large number of previous studies focused on Senecio squalidus L. and found that genes encoding stigma S-associated protein (SSP), Senecio S-receptor-like kinases (SSRLKs), and stigma-specific peroxidase (SSP), which are expressed in the stigma of mature flowers, might be the key candidate genes in the S-locus that mediates the SSI response [23,24,25,26]. However, the specific function of these genes has not been revealed. Erigeron breviscapus (Vant.) Hand.-Mazz. is a perennial herbaceous plant of Erigeron in Compositae, which is mainly distributed in the mountainous areas of Southwest China. The rosette leaves grow at the basal part of the stem and survive at the flowering stage. The capitulum, which consists of peripheral female ligulate flowers and central hermaphroditic tubular flowers, grows alone or branches at the top of the stem. In the wild, E. breviscapus is mainly pollinated by insect vectors, and the life history is R-strategy, which prevails with quantity [27]. Up to now, E. breviscapus has been used as a Chinese traditional medicinal plant for more than 1000 years. Breviscapine, one of the most valuable compounds in E. breviscapus, has a significant effect on the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, with a commercial value of RMB 500 million annually [28]. Our previous studies showed that SSI is a characteristic of E. breviscapus. Further transcriptomic analysis showed that the SRK, ARC1, CaM, and Exo70A1 genes were differentially expressed in self-pollination and cross-pollination, indicating that they may be involved in the SI response of E. breviscapus [29]. However, their functions have not yet been characterized.
In this study, we further confirmed that E. breviscapus has SSI characteristics. The cloning and functional characterization showed that EbARC1 could interact with the downstream EbExo70A1, and overexpression of EbARC1 in Arabidopsis thaliana L. would lead to the SI response of transgenic plants, providing circumstantial evidence that EbARC1 might mediate the SSI response of E. breviscapus.

2. Results

2.1. E. breviscapus has SSI Characteristics

Previous studies have shown that both self-compatibility (SC) and SI are present in Asteraceae [22]. To confirm whether E. breviscapus possesses theSI response, the aniline blue staining method was used to observe pollen tube growth between self-pollination and cross-pollination. The result showed that the pollen tube could grow normally in the style of cross-pollination (Figure 1A), while it was inhibited in the style of self-pollination after germination (Figure 1B). This feature suggests that E. breviscapus has SSI characteristics.

2.2. Molecular Characteristics and Expression Analysis of EbARC1

In order to study the potential role of ARC1 in the SSI of E. breviscapus, the ARC1 homolog from E. breviscapus was cloned and designated as EbARC1. The full length of EbARC1 is 2199 bp, which encodes a protein with 732 amino acid residues. EbARC1 contains the U-box N-terminal domain (UND), U-box domain and ARM repeat domain, which are highly conservative to those in other species (Figure 2A). The phylogenetic analysis showed that EbARC1 is most closely related to AaARC1 of Artemisia annua L. (Figure 2B).
The subcellular localization of EbARC1 was determined in a transient expression system in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. The EbARC1::GFP fusion protein was found to be exclusively localized to the nucleus (Figure 3A). The expression profiles of EbARC1 detected by real-time PCR further indicated that EbARC1 was expressed in whole plant tissues, with relatively higher expression in cauline leaves and lower expression in buds (Figure 3B), suggesting that EbARC1 is a constitutive expression gene.

2.3. Overexpression of EbARC1 Causes Self-Sterility in A. thaliana

Previous studies have reported that ARC1 positively regulated the SSI response in Brassica and A. lyrata [16,18,19,20]. To investigate whether the SSI response in E. breviscapus was also regulated by EbARC1, we overexpressed EbARC1 in A. thaliana by transforming the recombination plasmid of pocA30-CaMV-35S::EbARC1 (Figure 4A). Two independent transgenic lines EbARC1-OE-L6 and EbARC1-OE-L36 were selected to study self-sterility characteristics. We found that the silique length was shorter and the seed number per silique was much less compared with the wild-type plants (Figure 4B–D). In addition, we also observed that stamen height in transgenic lines was lower than stigma compared with wild-type plants (Figure 4E). These results show that EbARC1 mediates the SI response in A. thaliana.

2.4. Transforming SC into SI through Overexpressing EbARC1 in A. thaliana

To further analyze what causes sterility, we carried out a hybrid test. By analyzing the silique growth and pollen tube staining of two different sets of hybridization (i.e., EbARC1-OE-L36 (♀) × Col-0, and Col-0 (♀) × EbARC1-OE-L36), we found that the pollen and stigma of EbARC1-OE-L36 were normal (Figure 5A–D). Because the stamen of EbARC1-OE-L36 is lower than the stigma, we examined whether the sterility is caused by the pollen not falling on the stigma. The staining analysis of selfing wild type and EbARC1-OE-L36 showed that the stigma of EbARC1-OE-L36 inhibited the growth of pollen tubes, but it was normal in wild type (Figure 5E,F). These results indicate that the sterility was not caused by the activity of the pollen and stigma and the heterotopia of the stigma but was achieved by the SI mediated by the overexpression of EbARC1.

2.5. EbARC1 Protein Interacts with EbExo70A1

To investigate the potential protein interacting with EbARC1, we fused full-length EbARC1 to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain of the bait vector (BD-EbARC1) and found a positive clone encoding 638 amino acid residues through a yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening system. Sequence analysis showed that the positive clone was Exo70A1, which is highly conserved among homologs in A. annua, Cynara cardunculus, Lactuca sativa, and Helianthus annuus L. (Figure S1A,B). EbExo70A1 was expressed in all tissues of E. breviscapus, and the highest expression was in buds (Figure S1C). Subcellular localization showed that EbExo70A1was also located in the nucleus (Figure S1D).
To verify the interaction between EbARC1 and EbExo70A1, we fused the full-length EbExo70A1 to the GAL4 activation domain of the prey vector (AD-EbExo70A1). Y2H indicated that coexpressing four combinations (BD-EbARC1 and AD-EbExo70A1, BD and AD, BD-EbARC1 and AD, BD and AD-EbExo70A1) displayed normal yeast growth in SD-T/L defective medium, whereas yeast only coexpressing BD-EbARC1 and AD-EbExo70A1 could grow in SD-T/L/H/A defective medium, suggesting the interaction between EbARC1 and EbExo70A1 (Figure 6A,B). Moreover, the bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays showed that the coexpressing EbARC1–n-YFP and EbExo70A1–c-YFP in N. benthamiana could produce green fluorescence, which further illustrated that the interaction between EbARC1 and EbExo70A1 occurred in the nucleus (Figure 6C).
To analyze the key domains responsible for the interaction between EbARC1 and EbExo70A1, EbARC1 was divided into three parts according to its domain distribution, including BD-EbARC1 (1-588 aa), BD-EbARC1 (1-368 aa), and BD-EbARC1 (1-301 aa), while EbExo70A1 was divided into EbExo70A1-N (1-284 aa) and EbExo70A1-C (285-639 aa). Y2H results showed that EbARC1 (1-368 aa) and EbExo70A1-N (1-284 aa) are the key domains of the two proteins’ interaction (Figure 6A,B).

3. Discussion

In Brassicaceae, SSI controlled by multiple alleles in the S-locus (SCR and SRK) can promote cross-pollination among related species by inhibiting the growth of pollen tubes on the style, ultimately ensuring the biodiversity of plants. However, the mechanism of SSI response in other families is still poorly understood. So far, the S-locus controlling SSI in Asteraceae has not been determined, which seriously hinders the understanding of the SSI mechanism and breeding in Asteraceae. Previous studies have shown that many plant species in Asteraceae are SSI (e.g., Tolpis coronopifolia (Desf.) Biv., S. squalidus) [30,31], while a few are SC (L. sativa and cultivated sunflower). E. breviscapus is a medicinal plant of Asteraceae, which has a significant effect on the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases [32]. Our previous study found that self-pollination of E. breviscapus could not produce seeds [29]. Here, we further found that all the pollen tubes of self-pollinated plants could not grow normally, while most of the pollen tubes of cross-pollinated plants grew normally (Figure 1), confirming that there is SSI in E. breviscapus. However, the molecular mechanism controlling SSI in E. breviscapus is still unclear.
Previous studies have found that the structural mutation of S-locus genes (SCR and SRK) is considered to be an important reason for the transformation from SI into SC in Arabidopsis [33,34]. Coexpressing A. lyrate AlSCR-SRK in Sha, Kas-2, and C24 ecotypes could transform SC into SI but not for the Col-0 ecotype [35,36]. Further investigation found that this phenomenon is caused by the mutation of ARC1 rather than S-locus genes [20], which was supported by the fact that expression of SCR-SRK-AlARC1/BnARC1/AhARC1 in Col-0 and Sha could produce significant SI [5,37]. Although A. lyrate, Arabidopsis helleri L., and B. napus belong to Brassicaceae, Arabidopsis and Brassica differentiated about 20–40 million years ago [38]. Interestingly, AlARC1/BnARC1/AhARC1 showed the same function in the regulation of SI response [5,14,37], suggesting that the role of ARC1 derived from different species may be conservative. However, up to now, there is no report on whether high expression of ARC1 alone in A. thaliana (Col-0) can transform SC into SI. In this study, overexpression of EbARC1 in A. thaliana resulted in self-sterility (Figure 4). Further analysis showed that the sterility of the EbARC1-OE-L6/L36 line was caused by the SI response, not by the activity of the pollen and stigma or the heterotopia of the stigma (Figure 5), indicating that EbARC1 was positively involved in SI regulation.
Further analysis showed that EbARC1 interacted with Exo70A1 (Figure 6). The same study in Brassica also indicated that ARC1 interacts with Exo70A1, and the ARC1-Ubox domain and the N-terminal of Exo70A1 are the key regions for the interaction [16,39,40], which is consistent with our results (Figure 6). Exo70A1 is a compatibility factor that is required for normal germination and growth of pollen [41]. In Brassica, the degradation of Exo70A1 mediated by ARC1 could result in SI [16]. At the same time, the mutation of Exo70A1 in A. thaliana caused dwarf and sterile plants [42]. The prediction showed that the EbExo70A1 protein has multiple potential sites of ubiquitination (Figure S2), suggesting that EbARC1 may ubiquitinate EbExo70A1 through these sites. Meanwhile, the interaction between EbARC1 and EbExo70A1 also implied that there are several crosstalks and coevolutions between Asteraceae and Brassicaceae in SSI response. In addition, several studies have also shown that ARC1 can interact with upstream SRK and M-locus protein kinase (MLPK) [11,14,15]. Recent research on B. napus reported that the SI response was partially broken down in the bnmlpk mutant due to downregulated expression of BnSRK and BnARC1 [43]. Overexpression of the GATA transcription factor BnA5.ZML1 could partially breakdown the SI response in B. napus by indirectly regulating SRK and ARC1 expression [44]. In the future, using EbARC1 as bait to screen a library will help to identify new SI-related proteins and describe the regulatory network of SI in E. breviscapus.
In traditional cross-breeding, inhibiting self-pollination by artificial emasculation or an emasculation agent not only takes time but also increases the breeding cost. In this study, the heterologous expression of EbARC1 in A. thaliana showed that EbARC1 functions in regulating the SI response by transforming A. thaliana SC into SI. Considering that we have preliminarily established the Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation system of E. breviscapus, the site-directed mutation of ARC1 in E. breviscapus through gene editing will help to verify the function of ARC1 and create homozygous parent materials in the future.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana L. (Col-0) were preserved in our laboratory, and EbARC1-overexpressing A. thaliana lines were obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. A. thaliana was planted in an artificial greenhouse at 22 °C under a 10 h light/14 h dark condition. The seedlings of E. breviscapus were obtained from Longjin Biotech Co., Ltd., Xuanwei, China and then were transplanted into flowerpots (20 cm in length and width, 15 cm in height) for growth in a natural greenhouse. The substrate of all materials was vermiculite: perlite (3:1), and 1/5 Hoagland nutrient solution was poured every 3 days. For A. thaliana, phenotype tests and crosses were carried out in three biological repeats (n = 20 for each biological repeat). For E. breviscapus, three separate biological repeats collected in the same environment during different planting seasons (spring, summer, and autumn) were used to perform the crosses (n = 30 for each biological repeat) and subsequent qRT-PCR (n = 10 for each biological repeat).

4.2. Bioinformation Analysis

The sequences of EbARC1 and EbExo70A1 were acquired from an E. breviscapus genome database (available online: https://www.herbal-genome.cn). Other species’ protein sequences of ARC1 and Exo70A1 were obtained from the NCBI data bank. Amino acid sequences were analyzed using the Clustal Omega software (available online: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the MEGA 6.0 software (available online: https://www.megasoftware.net/mega4/mega.html). The ubiquitin site prediction was conducted on the network UbiSite (available online: http://csb.cse.yzu.edu.tw/UbiSite/predict.php).

4.3. Vector Construction and Plasmid Transformation

The coding sequence (CDS) of EbARC1 was amplified via specific primers that contained SacI/Xbal restriction endonuclease sites for the subcellular localization assay for EbARC1. The amplified CDS of EbARC1 was inserted into the pocA30-CaMV-35S-GFP vector to generate recombinant plasmid. To obtain the overexpressing transgenic plants, the EbARC1 CDS was inserted into the pocA30-CaMV-35S vector via BamHI/Sall restriction endonuclease sites. The reconstructed plasmids were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain EHA105) and then transformed into Col-0 plants by the floral dipping method. Transgenic lines that displayed a 3:1 ratio for hygromycin resistance in the T2 generation were selected for further analysis.

4.4. Subcellular Localization Analysis

The recombinant plasmids pocA30-CaMV-35S::EbARC1-GFP and control plasmids pocA30-CaMV-35S::GFP were transformed into A. tumefaciens (strain EHA105). After overnight cell culture at 28 °C, A. tumefaciens was harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in infiltration liquid media (0.15 mM acetosyringone, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES-KOH; pH 5.6). Leaf epidermis cells of N.benthamiana L. were imaged using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). GFP fluorescence was observed at 450 nm excitation and 490 nm emission. The nuclei were also stained with DAPI (4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride) as a control to indicate nucleus localization.

4.5. Pollination Assays

For E. breviscapus, the stamens of immature flowers were removed at the full flowering stage and crossed with the mature pollen of different plants (n = 30 for each biological repeat). For A. thaliana, the Col-0 and transgenic lines were emasculated firstly in the stage 12 buds, and the crosses were carried out when the flower was completely open and the stigma was active (n = 20 for each biological repeat). After that, the cross buds were covered with plastic film and placed in darkness overnight. Photos of the top 10 siliques per plant were taken with a Nikon digital camera.

4.6. Aniline Blue Staining Assay

The aniline blue staining was performed in the stigmas of E. breviscapus after self-pollination and cross-pollination for 2 days and in the stigmas of A. thaliana after self-pollination and cross-pollination for 2 h, respectively. The collected stigmas were fixed by ethanol and glacial acetic acid (3:1). After that, the stigmas were treated overnight with 1 M NaOH solution and washed several times with potassium metaphosphate solution. Subsequent staining was performed as previously described by Samuel [16]. The stained stigmas were observed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus-bx63, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

4.7. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from different tissues of E. breviscapus (n = 10 for each biological repeat) using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, New York, USA). The first-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1.5 μg of DNase-treated RNA in a 20 μL volume system using M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (Thermo, New York, USA) with oligo (dT) 18 primer. qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR Green master mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) on a Roche Light-Cycler 480 real-time PCR machine (Roche, Basel, CHE), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The conditions for PCR amplification were as follows: 94 °C for 5 min; 45 cycles of 94 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. The PCR reactions were carried out in three biological and technical repeats, and expression data were normalized with respect to the EbACTIN2 expression level. The expression data were analyzed based on the comparative 2−ΔΔCT method. The primers used in this assay are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

4.8. Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay

The full-length as well as truncated EbARC1 were cloned into the bait vector pGBKT7, while the full-length EbExo70A1 and truncated fragments were cloned into the prey vector pGADT7. Yeast two-hybrid assays were performed according to the protocol described in Clontech’s MatchmakerTM Gold Yeast Two-Hybrid user manual. Primers used for amplifying these CDSs and fragments are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

4.9. BiFC Assay

The full-length EbExo70A1 CDS was inserted into c-YFP to generate c-YFP–EbExo70A1, while EbARC1 CDSs were inserted into n-YFP to form n-YFP–EbARC1. The recombinant plasmids were introduced into A. tumefaciens (strain EHA105) and infiltrated N. benthamiana young leaves. Infected tissues were observed 48–72 h after infiltration. YFP and DAPI fluorescence were observed at 450 nm excitation and 490 nm emission via a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus-FV1000, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Primers used for amplifying these full-length and fragmented genes are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

5. Conclusions

In this study, SSI characteristics in E. breviscapus has been uncovered. The functional charaterization of an E3 ubiquitin ligase gene EbARC1 in A. thaliana demonstrated that it cofers SI response of transgenic plants probaly by ubiquiting compatibility factor EbExo70A1, suggesting that the involvement of EbARC1 in SSI response of E. breviscapus.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/4/1458/s1.

Author Contributions

M.C., Y.H., and S.Y. conceived and designed research; M.C. and M.Y. conducted the experiments; W.Z., G.L., Y.Z., Y.L. (Yanli Liang), Z.Z., and Y.L. (Yingchun Lu) analyzed data and created the figures; G.Z., B.H., and W.F. performed the statistical analysis; M.C. wrote the manuscript. Y.H. and S.Y. revised and approved the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (81760692, 31701854), the Major Science and Technique Programs in Yunnan Province (2017ZF002), the Yunnan Ten Thousand Talents Plan Young & Elite Talents Project (YNWRQNBJ-2018-047), and the Project of Young and Middle-Aged Talent of Yunnan Province (No. 2019HB019).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Barrett, S.C. Mating strategies in flowering plants: The outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2003, 358, 991–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Charlesworth, D. Evolution of plant breeding systems. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Webb, C.J.; Lloyd, D.G. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms ii. herkogamy. New Zeal J. Bot. 1986, 24, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Iwano, M.; Takayama, S. Self/non-self discrimination in angiosperm self-incompatibility. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Indriolo, E.; Safavian, D.; Goring, D.R. The ARC1 E3 ligase promotes two different self-pollen avoidance traits in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1525–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Luo, Y.; Widmer, A. Herkogamy and its effects on mating patterns in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Hiscock, S.J. Self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae). Ann. Botany. 2000, 85, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Takasaki, T.; Hatakeyama, K.; Suzuki, G.; Watanabe, M.; Isogai, A.; Hinata, K. The S receptor kinase determines self-incompatibility in Brassica stigma. Nature 2000, 403, 913–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Takayama, S.; Shimosato, H.; Shiba, H.; Funato, M.; Che, F.S.; Watanabe, M.; Iwano, M.; Isogai, A. Direct ligand–receptor complex interaction controls Brassica self-incompatibility. Nature 2001, 413, 534–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iwano, M.; Shiba, H.; Funato, M.; Shimosato, H.; Takayama, S.; Isogai, A. Immunohistochemical studies on translocation of pollen S-haplotype determinant in self-incompatibility of Brassica rapa. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 428–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gu, T.; Mazzurco, M.; Sulaman, W.; Matias, D.D.; Goring, D.R. Binding of an ARM repeat containing protein to the kinase domain of the S-locus receptor kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Mazzurco, M.; Sulaman, W.; Elina, H.; Cock, J.M.; Goring, D.R. Further analysis of the interactions between the Brassica S receptor kinase and three interacting proteins (ARC1, THL1 and THL2) in the yeast two-hybrid system. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 45, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Stone, S.L.; Anderson, E.M.; Mullen, R.T.; Goring, D.R. ARC1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase and promotes the ubiquitination of proteins during the rejection of self-incompatible Brassica pollen. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 885–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Indriolo, E.; Goring, D.R. A conserved role for the ARC1 E3 ligase in Brassicaceae self-incompatibility. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Indriolo, E.; Goring, D.R. Yeast two-hybrid interactions between Arabidopsis lyrata S receptor kinase and the ARC1 E3 ligase. Plant Signal. Behav. 2016, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Samuel, M.A.; Chong, Y.T.; Haasen, K.E.; Aldea-Brydges, M.G.; Stone, S.L.; Goring, D.R. Cellular pathways regulating responses to compatible and self-incompatible pollen in Brassica and Arabidopsis stigmas intersect at Exo70A1, a putative component of the exocyst complex. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2655–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sankaranarayanan, S.; Jamshed, M.; Samuel, M.A. Degradation of glyoxalase I in Brassica napus stigma leads to self-incompatibility response. Nat. Plants 2015, 1, 15185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Scandola, S.; Samuel, M.A. A flower-specific phospholipase D Is a stigmatic compatibility factor targeted by the self-incompatibility response in Brassica napus. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Stone, S.L.; Arnoldo, M.; Goring, D.R. A breakdown of Brassica self-incompatibility in ARC1 antisense transgenic plants. Science 1999, 286, 1729–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Indriolo, E.; Tharmapalan, P.; Wright, S.I.; Goring, D.R. The ARC1 E3 ligase gene is frequently deleted in self-compatible Brassicaceae species and has a conserved role in Arabidopsis lyrata self-pollen rejection. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 4607–4620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wikström, N.; Savolainen, V.; Chase, M.W. Evolution of the angiosperms: Calibrating the family tree. P Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2001, 268, 2211–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ferrer, M.M.; Good-Avila, S.V. Macrophylogenetic analyses of the gain and loss of self-incompatibility in the asteraceae. New Phytol. 2007, 173, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hiscock, S.J.; Tabah, D.A. The different mechanisms of sporophytic self-incompatibility in flowering plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 2003, 358, 1037–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mcinnis, S.M.; Costa, L.M.; Gutiérrez-Marcos, J.F.; Henderson, C.A.; Hiscock, S.J. Isolation and characterization of a polymorphic stigma-specific class III peroxidase gene from senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae). Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 57, 659–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. McInnis, S.; Emery, D.; Porter, R.; Desikan, R.; Hancock, J.T.; Hiscock, S.J. The role of stigma peroxidases in flowering plants: Insights from further characterization of a stigma-specific peroxidase (SSP) from Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae). J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1835–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Tabah, D.A.; Mcinnis, S.M.; Hiscock, S.J. Members of the S-receptor kinase multigene family in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae), a species with sporophytic self-incompatibility. Sex. Plant Repord. 2004, 17, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, R.; Chen, Y.L.; Shi, Z. Asteraceae. In Flora of China; China Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 1985; Volume 74, pp. 297–308. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, X.N.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, G.H.; Ding, W.T.; Duan, L.J.; Yang, J.; Kui, L.; Cheng, X.Z.; Ruan, J.X.; Fan, W.; et al. Engineering yeast for the production of breviscapine by genomic analysis and synthetic biology approaches. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, W.; Wei, X.; Meng, H.L.; Ma, C.H.; Jiang, N.H.; Zhang, G.H.; Yang, S.C. Transcriptomic comparison of the self-pollinated and cross-pollinated flowers of Erigeron breviscapus to analyze candidate self-incompatibility-associated genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Allen, A.M.; Thorogood, C.J.; Hegarty, M.J.; Lexer, C.; Hiscock, S.J. Pollen-pistil interactions and self-incompatibility in the Asteraceae: New insights from studies of senecio squalidus (oxford ragwort). Ann. Botany. 2011, 108, 687–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Koseva, B.; Crawford, D.J.; Brown, K.E.; Mort, M.E.; Kelly, J.K. The genetic breakdown of sporophytic self-incompatibility in tolpis coronopifolia (Asteraceae). New Phytologist. 2017, 216, 1256–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Gao, J.L.; Chen, G.; He, H.Q.; Liu, C.; Xiong, X.J.; Li, J.; Wang, J. Therapeutic Effects of Breviscapine in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Review. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sherman-Broyles, S.; Nathan, B.; Agnes, F.; Pei, L.; Julia, V.; Nasrallah, M.E.; Nasrallah, J.B. S Locus Genes and the Evolution of Self-Fertility in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Tsuchimatsu, T.; Suwabe, K.; Shimizu-Inatsugi, R.; Isokawa, S.; Pavlidis, P.; Stadler, T.; Suzuki, G.; Takayama, S.; Watanabe, M.; Kentaro, K.; et al. Evolution of self-compatibility in Arabidopsis by a mutation in the male specificity gene. Nature 2010, 464, 1342–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Nasrallah, M.E.; Liu, P.; Sherman-Broyles, S.; Boggs, N.A.; Nasrallah, J.B. Natural variation in expression of self-incompatibility in Arabidopsis thaliana: Implications for the evolution of selfing. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 2004, 101, 16070–16074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Boggs, N.A.; Dwyer, K.G.; Shah, P.; McCulloch, A.A.; Bechsgaard, J.; Schierup, M.H.; Nasrallah, M.E.; Nasrallah, J.B. Expression of distinct self-incompatibility specificities in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2009, 182, 1313–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Zhang, T.; Zhou, G.; Goring, D.R.; Liang, X.; Macgregor, S.; Dai, C.; Wen, J.; Yi, B.; Shen, J.; Tu, J.; et al. Generation of transgenic self-incompatible Arabidopsis thaliana shows a genus-specific preference for self-incompatibility genes. Plants 2019, 8, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Franzke, A.; Lysak, M.A.; Al-Shehbaz, I.A.; Koch, M.A.; Mummenhoff, K. Cabbage family affairs: The evolutionary history of Brassicaceae. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shi, S.M.; Gao, Q.G.; Zeng, J.; Liu, X.H.; Pu, Q.M.; Liu, G.X.; Zhang, H.C.; Yang, X.H.; Zhu, L.Q. N-terminal domains of ARC1 are essential for interaction with the N-terminal region of Exo70A1 in transducing self-incompatibility of Brassica oleracea. Acta Bioch. Bioph. Sin. 2016, 48, 777–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liu, J.; Zhang, H.C.; Lian, X.P.; Converse, R.; Zhu, L.Q. Identification of Interacting Motifs Between ARM repeatadillo Repeat Containing 1 (ARC1) and Exocyst 70 A1 (Exo70A1) Proteins in Brassica oleracea. Protein J. 2016, 35, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zárský, V.; Kulich, I.; Fendrych, M.; Peèenková, T. Exocyst complexes multiple functions in plant cells secretory pathways. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 2013, 16, 726–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, S.P.; Chen, M.; Yu, D.L.; Ren, S.C.; Sun, S.F.; Liu, L.D.; Ketelaar, T.; Emons, A.M.; Liu, C.M. EXO70A1-Mediated Vesicle Trafficking Is Critical for Tracheary Element Development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 1774–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Duan, Z.Q.; Zhang, Y.T.; Tu, J.X.; Shen, J.X.; Yi, B.; Fu, T.D.; Dai, C.; Ma, C.Z. The Brassica napus GATA transcription factor BnA5.ZML1 is a stigma compatibility factor. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chen, F.; Yang, Y.; Li, B.; Liu, Z.Q.; Fawad, K.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, G.L.; Tu, J.X.; Shen, J.X.; Yi, B.; et al. Functional analysis of M-locus protein kinase revealed a novel regulatory mechanism of Self-Incompatibility in Brassica napus L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The growth of pollen tubes in the stigma and style of Erigeron breviscapus was observed by aniline blue staining 2 days after pollination. (A) Cross-pollinated pollen tubes could pass through the stigma. Normally growing pollen tubes can be seen in the style. (B) Self-pollination pollen tube growth was suppressed in the stigma, and no pollen tube growth was observed in the style. Three biological repeats were separately carried out in spring, summer, and autumn (n = 30).
Figure 1. The growth of pollen tubes in the stigma and style of Erigeron breviscapus was observed by aniline blue staining 2 days after pollination. (A) Cross-pollinated pollen tubes could pass through the stigma. Normally growing pollen tubes can be seen in the style. (B) Self-pollination pollen tube growth was suppressed in the stigma, and no pollen tube growth was observed in the style. Three biological repeats were separately carried out in spring, summer, and autumn (n = 30).
Ijms 21 01458 g001
Figure 2. Sequence analysis of EbARC1. (A) Alignment of the amino acid sequences of EbARC1 and orthologous proteins from other plant species, including Lactuca sativa L. var. ramosa Hort. (XP_023732862.1), Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus L. (XP_024992831.), Artemisia annua L. (PWA78229.1), Trifolium pretense L. (PNX95847.19), Rosa chinensis Jacq. (XP_024199500.1), and Malus domestica L. (XP_008371510.2). Identical residues are shown on a black background. Blue and black lines point to the conserved domains of the U-box and ARM repeat domains, respectively. (B) Phylogenetic tree of EbARC1 and ARC1s from other plant species, including Arabidopsis thaliana L. (AtARC1, NP_195803.1), L. sativa (LsARC1, XP_023732862.1), A. annua (AaARC1, PWA78229.1), C. cardunculus (Ccv.sARC1, XP_024992831.), Nicotiana tabacum L. (NtARC1, NP_001313174.1), Solanum lycopersicum L. (SlARC1, XP_004233034.1), Hevea brasiliensis L. (HbARC1, XP_021659773.1). Durio zibethinus Murr. (DzARC1, XP_022720359.1), Medicago truncatula Gaertn. (MtARC1, XP_003593822.2), Theobroma cacao L. (TcARC1, EOY27921.1), Prosopis alba Grisebach. (PaARC1, XP_028770127.1), Coffea eugenioides S. Moore. (CeARC1, XP_027163052.1), Glycine soja Sieb. (GsARC1, XP_028188525.1), Capsicum baccatum L. (CbARC1, PHT55858.1), Manihot esculenta Crantz. (MeARC1, XP_021597342.1), Vigna unguiculate L. Walp. (VuARC1, XP_027932349.1), Ricinus communis L. (RcARC1, XP_002522266.1), Trifolium pretense L. (TpARC1, PNX95847.1), Quercus suber L. (QsARC1, XP_023874938.1), Ziziphus jujube Mill. (ZjARC1, XP_015875655.1), Citrus clementina Hort. (CcARC1, XP_006449554.1), Rosa chinensis Jacq. (RcARC1, XP_024199500.1), Vitis vinifera L. (VvARC1, RVW19787.1), Prunus avium L. (PaARC1, XP_021813189.1), Camellia sinensis L. (CsARC1, XP_028072792.1), Malus domestica L. (AdARC1, XP_008371510.2), Brassica napus L. (BnARC1, XP_022558023.1), Papaver somniferum L. (PsARC1, XP_026455241.1), and Brassica oleracea var. oleracea L. (Bov.oARC 1, XP_013593471.1).
Figure 2. Sequence analysis of EbARC1. (A) Alignment of the amino acid sequences of EbARC1 and orthologous proteins from other plant species, including Lactuca sativa L. var. ramosa Hort. (XP_023732862.1), Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus L. (XP_024992831.), Artemisia annua L. (PWA78229.1), Trifolium pretense L. (PNX95847.19), Rosa chinensis Jacq. (XP_024199500.1), and Malus domestica L. (XP_008371510.2). Identical residues are shown on a black background. Blue and black lines point to the conserved domains of the U-box and ARM repeat domains, respectively. (B) Phylogenetic tree of EbARC1 and ARC1s from other plant species, including Arabidopsis thaliana L. (AtARC1, NP_195803.1), L. sativa (LsARC1, XP_023732862.1), A. annua (AaARC1, PWA78229.1), C. cardunculus (Ccv.sARC1, XP_024992831.), Nicotiana tabacum L. (NtARC1, NP_001313174.1), Solanum lycopersicum L. (SlARC1, XP_004233034.1), Hevea brasiliensis L. (HbARC1, XP_021659773.1). Durio zibethinus Murr. (DzARC1, XP_022720359.1), Medicago truncatula Gaertn. (MtARC1, XP_003593822.2), Theobroma cacao L. (TcARC1, EOY27921.1), Prosopis alba Grisebach. (PaARC1, XP_028770127.1), Coffea eugenioides S. Moore. (CeARC1, XP_027163052.1), Glycine soja Sieb. (GsARC1, XP_028188525.1), Capsicum baccatum L. (CbARC1, PHT55858.1), Manihot esculenta Crantz. (MeARC1, XP_021597342.1), Vigna unguiculate L. Walp. (VuARC1, XP_027932349.1), Ricinus communis L. (RcARC1, XP_002522266.1), Trifolium pretense L. (TpARC1, PNX95847.1), Quercus suber L. (QsARC1, XP_023874938.1), Ziziphus jujube Mill. (ZjARC1, XP_015875655.1), Citrus clementina Hort. (CcARC1, XP_006449554.1), Rosa chinensis Jacq. (RcARC1, XP_024199500.1), Vitis vinifera L. (VvARC1, RVW19787.1), Prunus avium L. (PaARC1, XP_021813189.1), Camellia sinensis L. (CsARC1, XP_028072792.1), Malus domestica L. (AdARC1, XP_008371510.2), Brassica napus L. (BnARC1, XP_022558023.1), Papaver somniferum L. (PsARC1, XP_026455241.1), and Brassica oleracea var. oleracea L. (Bov.oARC 1, XP_013593471.1).
Ijms 21 01458 g002
Figure 3. Expression analysis of EbARC1. (A) N. benthamian leaves were infected with 35S::EbARC1-GFP. Bright field, GFP, DAPI, and Merge images. (B) The tissue-specific expression patterns of EbARC1 in flowers, buds, cauline leaves, stems, basal leaves, and roots of E. breviscapus determined by qRT-PCR analysis.
Figure 3. Expression analysis of EbARC1. (A) N. benthamian leaves were infected with 35S::EbARC1-GFP. Bright field, GFP, DAPI, and Merge images. (B) The tissue-specific expression patterns of EbARC1 in flowers, buds, cauline leaves, stems, basal leaves, and roots of E. breviscapus determined by qRT-PCR analysis.
Ijms 21 01458 g003
Figure 4. Expression of EbARC1 resulted in infertility in A. thaliana. (A) qRT-PCR characterization of EbARC1 expression in four independent transgenic lines. (B) Phenotypes of EbARC1 overexpressed lines and wild type. (C) Silique lengths and (D) seed numbers of EbARC1 overexpressed lines and wild type. (E) Phenotypes of stamen and stigma in both overexpressed lines and wild type. Arrows indicate position of siliques. Error bars denote SDs (** p < 0.01).
Figure 4. Expression of EbARC1 resulted in infertility in A. thaliana. (A) qRT-PCR characterization of EbARC1 expression in four independent transgenic lines. (B) Phenotypes of EbARC1 overexpressed lines and wild type. (C) Silique lengths and (D) seed numbers of EbARC1 overexpressed lines and wild type. (E) Phenotypes of stamen and stigma in both overexpressed lines and wild type. Arrows indicate position of siliques. Error bars denote SDs (** p < 0.01).
Ijms 21 01458 g004
Figure 5. Overexpression of EbARC1 conferred self-incompatibility (SI) in transgenic A. thaliana. (A) OEARC1-OE-L36 was (♀), while wild type and OEARC1-OE-L36 were (♂). (B) Wild type was (♀), while OEARC1-OE-L36 was (♂). (C) Pollen tube staining of OEARC1-OE-L36 (♀) and wild type (♂). (D) Pollen tube staining of wild type (♀) and OEARC1-OE-L36 (♂). (E) Pollen tube staining of selfing wild type. (F) Pollen tube staining of OEARC1-OE-L36. Crosses were carried out in three biological repeats (n = 20). Arrows indicate position of pollen tube.
Figure 5. Overexpression of EbARC1 conferred self-incompatibility (SI) in transgenic A. thaliana. (A) OEARC1-OE-L36 was (♀), while wild type and OEARC1-OE-L36 were (♂). (B) Wild type was (♀), while OEARC1-OE-L36 was (♂). (C) Pollen tube staining of OEARC1-OE-L36 (♀) and wild type (♂). (D) Pollen tube staining of wild type (♀) and OEARC1-OE-L36 (♂). (E) Pollen tube staining of selfing wild type. (F) Pollen tube staining of OEARC1-OE-L36. Crosses were carried out in three biological repeats (n = 20). Arrows indicate position of pollen tube.
Ijms 21 01458 g005
Figure 6. Protein interaction between EbARC1 and EbExo70A1. (A) Interaction between EbARC1 with EbExo70A1 was detected in the yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) system. pGBKT7 (BD) and pGADT7 (AD) were used as negative controls. The full-length EbARC1 and three truncated EbARC1 sequences were fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain (BD) in pGBKT7, while EbExo70A1 was inserted into the GAL4 activation domain (AD) in pGADT7. (B) The interaction between EbExo70A1 with EbARC1 were detected in Y2H system. The full-length EbExo70A1 and two truncated EbExo70A1 sequences were fused to the AD in pGADT7, while EbARC1 was inserted into BD in pGBKT7. (C) Interaction between EbARC1 with EbExo70A1 was detected in the bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) system. The N-terminal of YFP was fused to EbARC1 (n-YFP–EbARC1), while the C-terminal of YFP was fused to EbExo70A1 (c-YFP–EbExo70A1). DAPI (4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) was used as a nucleus indicator.
Figure 6. Protein interaction between EbARC1 and EbExo70A1. (A) Interaction between EbARC1 with EbExo70A1 was detected in the yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) system. pGBKT7 (BD) and pGADT7 (AD) were used as negative controls. The full-length EbARC1 and three truncated EbARC1 sequences were fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain (BD) in pGBKT7, while EbExo70A1 was inserted into the GAL4 activation domain (AD) in pGADT7. (B) The interaction between EbExo70A1 with EbARC1 were detected in Y2H system. The full-length EbExo70A1 and two truncated EbExo70A1 sequences were fused to the AD in pGADT7, while EbARC1 was inserted into BD in pGBKT7. (C) Interaction between EbARC1 with EbExo70A1 was detected in the bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) system. The N-terminal of YFP was fused to EbARC1 (n-YFP–EbARC1), while the C-terminal of YFP was fused to EbExo70A1 (c-YFP–EbExo70A1). DAPI (4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) was used as a nucleus indicator.
Ijms 21 01458 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, M.; Fan, W.; Hao, B.; Zhang, W.; Yan, M.; Zhao, Y.; Liang, Y.; Liu, G.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, G.; et al. EbARC1, an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene in Erigeron breviscapus, Confers Self-Incompatibility in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041458

AMA Style

Chen M, Fan W, Hao B, Zhang W, Yan M, Zhao Y, Liang Y, Liu G, Lu Y, Zhang G, et al. EbARC1, an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene in Erigeron breviscapus, Confers Self-Incompatibility in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(4):1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041458

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Mo, Wei Fan, Bing Hao, Wei Zhang, Mi Yan, Yan Zhao, Yanli Liang, Guanze Liu, Yingchun Lu, Guanghui Zhang, and et al. 2020. "EbARC1, an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene in Erigeron breviscapus, Confers Self-Incompatibility in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 4: 1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041458

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop