Next Article in Journal
Neuroinflammation and Precision Medicine in Pediatric Neurocritical Care: Multi-Modal Monitoring of Immunometabolic Dysfunction
Previous Article in Journal
Photoimmunotherapy Using Cationic and Anionic Photosensitizer-Antibody Conjugates against HIV Env-Expressing Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 23
10.3390/ijms21239152
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Staphylococcus aureus and Hyper-IgE Syndrome

by
Bonggoo Park
1 and
George Y. Liu
2,*
1
Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and the Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
2
Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(23), 9152; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239152
Submission received: 6 November 2020 / Revised: 19 November 2020 / Accepted: 22 November 2020 / Published: 1 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Immunology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hyper-immunoglobulin E syndrome (HIES) is a primary immunodeficiency disease characterized by recurrent Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infections, eczema, skeletal abnormalities and high titers of serum immunoglobulin E. Although the genetic basis of HIES was not known for almost a half century, HIES most frequently exhibits autosomal dominant trait that is transmitted with variable expressivity. Careful genetic studies in recent years identified dominant-negative mutations in human signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) gene as the cause of sporadic and dominant forms of HIES. The STAT3 mutations were localized to DNA-binding, SRC homology 2 (SH2) and transactivating domains and disrupted T helper 17 (TH17) cell differentiation and downstream expression of TH17 cytokines IL-17 and IL-22. Deficiency of IL-17 and IL-22 in turn is responsible for suboptimal expression of anti-staphylococcal host factors, such as neutrophil-recruiting chemokines and antimicrobial peptides, by human keratinocytes and bronchial epithelial cells. TH17 cytokines deficiency thereby explains the recurrent staphylococcal lung and skin infections of HIES patients.

1. Introduction

S. aureus causes a wide range of pathological conditions ranging from minor skin and soft tissue infections to life-threatening invasive diseases [1]. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains are particularly problematic since they cause persistent colonization of mucosal tissues in at least 20% of individuals, and thereby predispose the colonized subjects to infections and spread of their isolates to close contacts [2]. Staphylococci use many strategies to evade host innate and adaptive immune defenses and survive hostile environments [1,3,4,5,6]. These strategies include resistance to specific antimicrobial peptides, neutralization of reactive oxygen species (ROS), inactivation of complement, inhibition of neutrophil migration, and evasion of phagocytosis [1,7]. MRSA is recognized as a more formidable pathogen than most other bacteria, and their proliferation within healthcare and community settings has contributed to the current public health crisis [8,9,10]. Combating MRSA has necessitated routine use of vancomycin and other last line agents for treatment of S. aureus infections [11,12]. The dire circumstance of increased disease burden along with spread of antibiotic resistance has prompted public health officials and scientists alike to look for novel therapeutic approaches. Among these, vaccination has long been the Holy Grail since it has the potential to effectively address both disease burden and overuse of antibiotics. Although more than ten passive and active staphylococcal vaccines have been tested in clinical trials in the past decades, all vaccines have been found to be ineffective in humans without a clear explanation [13]. Useful insight on alternative staphylococcal vaccine strategies and host adaptive immune responses to S. aureus have come from studies of a particular immunodeficiency condition, hyper-IgE syndrome (HIES), which confers susceptibility to recurrent S. aureus infections. Below we will review our current understanding of HIES in relation to S. aureus infections and will refer readers to other excellent reviews for overview of S. aureus pathogenesis [1,3,4,5,6].

2. Hyper-IgE Syndrome (HIES)

Hyper-IgE syndrome (HIES), also called Job’s syndrome or Buckley’s syndrome, was first described as a rare primary immunodeficiency disease characterized by recurrent staphylococcal “cold” skin and pulmonary abscesses, eczematoid dermatitis, markedly elevated levels of serum IgE and eosinophilia, reduced neutrophil chemotaxis, and variably impaired T cell function [14,15].

2.1. Genetics

Job’s syndrome was first described in 1966 and recognized as hyper-IgE syndrome (HIES) in 1972 on the basis of extreme elevation of IgE in patients with the syndrome. The involvement of multiple organs including various skeletal malformations was delineated over several decades [14,15,16]. However, only recently was significant progress made in the molecular understanding of both clinical phenotype and pathogenesis of the autosomal dominant form of HIES (AD-HIES). Although mutations in dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) gene is responsible for the autosomal recessive form of HIES, this review will focus on the more common and better characterized form of HIES caused by STAT3 mutations.
Early research on the genetics of HIES benefited from the discovery of a supernumerary marker chromosome in a patient with sporadic HIES. Microdissection and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of lymphocytes and skin fibroblasts from the patient identified a small interstitial deletion of one homologue of chromosome 4q21 [17] and pointed to the genes disrupted or lost from the marker chromosome as possible causes of HIES phenotypes [17]. In a subsequent study, 19 kindreds with multiple cases of HIES were recruited, scored based on clinical and laboratory findings, and genotyped with polymorphic markers in the candidate region on human chromosome 4. The linkage and multipoint analyses and simulation testing corroborated the earlier finding that the proximal 4q region harbors the disease locus for HIES [18]. STAT3 mutations were eventually identified as the cause of autosomal dominant HIES in 2007, wherein the mutated STAT3 inhibited the activity of the wild-type allele while homozygous STAT3 mutations led to lethality [19,20,21,22]. The identified STAT3 mutations were shown to be largely missense or in-frame deletions located primarily in the DNA binding and SH2 domains (Figure 1) [19,20,23,24,25]. Although non-immunologic features such as high palate, increased inter-alar distance, and increased scoliosis appeared to be linked to mutations in the SH2 domain, patients with mutations in the DNA binding and SH2 domains generally had similar phenotypic features [26].
STAT3 is a signaling molecule that functions downstream of several cytokine receptors including IL-6R, IL-IL-11R and IL-21R [27,28]. Patients with IL-11RA deficiency have craniosynostosis, maxillary hypoplasia, dental abnormalities, but show no immunodeficiency [29]. Subjects with IL-6R deficiency present with recurrent skin and lung infections, eczema, high IgE levels, and eosinophilia [30], whereas patients with IL-21R deficiency suffer from recurrent respiratory tract infections and exhibit impaired B cell proliferation, immunoglobulin class-switch and reduced T cell effector function [31]. Consistent with the expected pleiotropic effect of STAT3 mutations on clinical phenotypes, STAT3-HIES patients exhibit both immune and non-immune phenotypes that could be attributable to defective signaling through at least IL-6R, IL-11R, and IL-21R.

2.2. Immunoglobulins

The discovery of STAT3 mutations as the immunologic basis of autosomal dominant HIES paved the way towards unraveling the mechanism for reduced neutrophil chemotaxis and variable T cell defects in HIES, but also towards the etiology behind hyper-IgE and abnormal humoral responses in HIES (ref) [16,32,33]. To define candidate genes involved in the pathophysiology of HIES, investigators interrogated S. aureus-stimulated CD4+ T cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from HIES and control subjects, and showed significantly greater numbers of lysosome- and immunoglobulin-related genes that were up-regulated in HIES patients compared to controls [34]. However, when HIES patients were tested for antibody responses to bacteriophage φX174 (φX174) and several protein and polysaccharide vaccines, responses were heterologous, with many of the subjects showing low level or accelerated decline of antibody levels, with failure to class switch from IgM to IgG in others, consistent with suboptimal humoral responses that could confer susceptibility to infections in these patients [35]. Another study of HIES patients noted markedly elevated levels of serum IgE to S. aureus and Candida albicans (C. albicans), compared to IgE from normal subjects with parasitic infections [36]. Because IgE antibodies from HIES patients did not bind other common pathogens, the specific IgE antibodies were proposed to actually confer susceptibility to S. aureus and C. albicans infections [36]. Investigation of other antibody isotypes also showed elevated serum anti-S. aureus IgM, lower than expected level of anti-S. aureus IgG given the IgM level, and a deficit in the level of anti-S. aureus IgA in HIES patients [37]. When analyzed against the incidence of infections at mucosal surfaces and adjacent lymph nodes, an inverse correlation was shown to the level of serum anti-S. aureus IgA and IgE, and total serum IgE and IgD, thus pointing to regulatory defects in humoral responses in HIES patients that likely contributed to staphylococcal susceptibility [37].
As discussed, STAT3 acts as a signaling molecule downstream of IL-21R [27]. IL-21 produced by follicular T helper cells confers B cell help by activating STAT3 in germinal centers and inducing immunoglobulin class switching and maintaining high titer and high affinity antigen-specific antibody response [38,39]. Uniquely, IL-21 suppress antigen-induced IgE production by inducing apoptosis of B cells committed to produce IgE and by inhibiting germline C(epsilon) transcription in IL-4 stimulated B cells [40,41]. Consistent with these mechanisms, STAT3-HIES patients have reduced plasmablast and memory B cell compartment but have significant numbers of IgE plasma cells in bone marrow and lymph nodes [42]. HIES B cells exhibit suboptimal proliferative response to IL-21 and reduced immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene somatic hypermutation [42].
In agreement with humoral immunodeficiency, administration of replacement immunoglobulin to STAT3-HIES patients with low level of anti-S. aureus IgG increased serum S. aureus-specific IgG and improved the course of staphylococcal infection [43].

2.3. TLRs

Abnormalities in specific immune responses of HIES patients led investigators initially to hypothesize that defects in Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathways underlie the primary immunodeficiency. In studies stimulating blood samples from HIES patients with Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway agonists, although HIES individuals showed an interferon-γ (IFN-γ) secretion defect in T cells following phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) challenge, they produced normal levels of several TLR-regulated proinflammatory cytokines and showed no unique mutations or polymorphisms in several TLR pathway genes [44,45]. These studies confirmed an imbalance in T cell responses in HIES patients but gave no indication of defects in toll-like receptor signaling.

2.4. STAT3

Following analysis of cytogenetic and linkage data that narrowed HIES gene linkage to a locus on chromosome 4q [18], subsequent investigations of HIES patients and their families identified STAT3 gene as a candidate gene from measurements of cytokine secretions from stimulated leukocytes and gene expression profiles in resting and stimulated cells [19]. Although homozygous recessive tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK) deficiency also can present with primary immunodeficiency with mild IgE elevation, STAT3 mutations are the predominant cause of sporadic and familial hyper-IgE syndrome [20,46]. Missense mutations and single codon in-frame deletions were identified in STAT3 genes in familial and sporadic cases of the hyper-IgE syndrome, where discrete mutations included hot spots in the DNA binding and SH2 domains [19]. Investigation of peripheral blood cells from HIES patients unveiled defective response to selective cytokines IL-6 and IL-10, decreased STAT3 binding to DNA in those cells, along with dominant-negative effects of the non-functional STAT3 in presence of wild-type STAT3. Altogether, the findings underline the complex and critical role played by STAT3 in the signaling of multiple cytokine pathways and which are defective in HIES [20].
For control of S. aureus infection in the lungs and skin, studies have identified several critical roles played by STAT3. In pneumonia, clearance of S. aureus requires the activation and robust phosphorylation of STAT3 in lung epithelium [47], which in turn regulate expression of Reg3y (regenerating islet-derived 3y) through direct binding to the Reg3γ promoter [47]. Reg3γ is an antimicrobial peptide that binds and induce dose-dependent killing of S. aureus [47]. During skin infection, IL-17A and IL-22 produced by activated T cells induce keratinocytes to express antimicrobial factors CXCL8 and β-defensin 2 and 3 (BD-2 and -3), which critically control S. aureus infection. Thus, mutations in STAT3 leading to defective T cell development affect the production of antimicrobials required to control S. aureus [48]. TH17 cells play a central role in host immunity on mucosal surfaces against extracellular bacterial infections, by producing the TH17-related cytokines IL-22 and IL-17A that regulate chemokines and granulocyte colony–stimulating factor production in the lung. IL-22 further increases lung epithelial cell proliferation and transepithelial resistance to injury [49,50]. IL-17 and also IL-1β promote neutrophil recruitment to the site of S. aureus infection in the skin to induce bacterial clearance [50]. A study showed that the presence of eosinophils reduces the half-life of STAT3-deficient neutrophils ex vivo, although no specific aberrations in these neutrophil functions were detected [51]. Infection of the STAT3-deficient neutrophils in presence of eosinophils, thus accelerated neutrophil cell death and had the potential to negatively impact pathogen burden and tissue pathology in the HIES subjects [51]. Another investigation sought to determine the cutaneous response of HIES and normal subjects after induction of suction blisters and challenge of the wound with lethally irradiated S. aureus. Interestingly, no difference in cutaneous production in IL-17A or IL-17F was observed in the two groups albeit the time course of bacterial challenge was short. HIES patients however produced more TNF-α that was associated with reduced IL-10 family signaling in the blister infiltrating cells and defective epithelial cell function, findings that were recapitulated in a mouse model of HIES and shown to involve defective epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) [52].

3. TH17 Cells in Staphylococcus Infections of Hyper-IgE Syndrome (HIES)

3.1. TH17 Cells

TH17 cells are a helper T cell subset distinct from TH1, TH2 or regulatory T cells that requires unique cytokines and transcription factors for their differentiation. TH17 cells produce so-called TH17 cytokines including IL-17A, IL-17F and IL-22 that protect the host from infections by various microorganisms [53,54,55] but are important immunologic players or drivers of various immunological disorders. One particularly crucial role of TH17 cells is their defense against extracellular pathogens which are not effectively cleared by TH1- and Th2-type immune responses. Mice that produce neither IL-17A nor IL-17F are susceptible to skin infection by S. aureus [56], since TH17-type cytokines IL-17A and IL-17F critically recruit neutrophils to clear S. aureus [57]. IL-22 which activates keratinocyte production of antimicrobial peptides, BD-2 and -3 via STAT3, is essential for defense against Gram-negative bacteria, as evidenced by susceptibility of IL-22 deficient mice to lung infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae [49,58,59]. Deficiency of IL-17A receptor or administration of anti–IL-17A neutralizing antibodies impairs granulopoiesis and mobilization of neutrophils against systemic infection induced by C. albicans [60]. These findings indicate that TH17 cells play a key role in immune responses to extracellular bacteria and fungi in mice.
Differentiation of TH2 from naïve CD4+ T cells and TH2 cell secretion of IL-5 and IL-13 appear normal in STAT3 patients [61]. However, IL-5 and IL-13 levels in PBMC are elevated in STAT3 patients compared with control subjects, suggesting that cells other than CD4+ T cells in PBMC are responsible for the increased TH2 cytokine production [61]. When treated with IL-10, DC isolated from STAT3 patients show impaired up-regulation of surface inhibitory molecules PD-L1 and ILT-4, and reduced ability to induce naive CD4+ T cell differentiation to FOXP3+ induced Treg cells (iTreg cells), both of which could contribute to the inflammatory changes in HIES [61].

3.2. STAT3 Mutations

Studies have shown that autosomal dominant-negative mutations in the human STAT3 gene are largely responsible classical multisystem HIES [19,20,23]. Most mutations of the STAT3 gene in HIES patients are localized to the DNA binding and SH2 domains, with few mutations shown in the transactivation domain [20,23]. The mutants were non-functional on their own and exhibited dominant-negative effects in the presence of wild-type STAT3 [20]. STAT3 mutations lead to impaired TH17 cell development, with SH2 domain mutations showing reduced STAT3 phosphorylation, and mutations in the DNA binding domain exhibiting STAT3 phosphorylation comparable to normal controls [23]. Broadly, there are two types of HIES. Type 1 HIES displays abnormalities in multiple organ systems, including the skeletal, dental and immune systems that are related to the mutations in STAT3, whereas a null mutation in tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) causes type 2 autosomal recessive form of HIES with abnormalities confined to the immune system [62,63,64,65].
Analyses of cytokine responses in both types of HIES showed severe defects in signal transduction that lead to depressed IL-6 and IL-23 expression and impaired TH17 differentiation [62,63,65]. Thus, T cells from HIES individuals produce IL-2 and IFN-γ but not IL-17 on stimulation with staphylococcal enterotoxin B or C. albicans [66]. CD4 + T cells derived from HIES subjects were unable to generate TH17 cells in vitro and in vivo because of low retinoid-related orphan receptor (ROR)-γt expression [24,25,66]. As TH17 cells are important for the clearance of fungal and extracellular bacterial infections, the inability to produce TH17 cells appears to be the primary mechanism responsible for the susceptibility of HIES patients to the recurrent infections [24,25,60,67].

3.3. Molecular Mechanisms Conferring Site-Specific Susceptibility to S. aureus Infections in HIES Patients

HIES patients suffer from recurrent fungal and S. aureus infections most likely from defective TH17 cell differentiation [23,24,25,66]. Staphylococcal infections in HIES patients are often confined to the skin and lungs, in comparison to patients with neutrophil deficiency who suffer from infections occurring in a wide variety of organs including the lungs, lymph nodes, liver, bone, gastrointestinal tract, kidney, and brain [68]. To explain the predilection of HIES infections for the lungs and skin, investigators compared expression of chemokines and antimicrobial peptides in a variety of immune and non-immune cells. The study showed that keratinocytes (skin) and bronchial epithelial cells (lungs) require both TH17 cytokines and classical proinflammatory cytokines, acting in synergy, to produce the anti-staphylococcal factors. In comparison, other cell types, including fibroblasts, endothelial cells and macrophages, require only the common proinflammatory cytokines to produce the anti-staphylococcal factors [48,62]. Compared to T cells derived from normal subjects, HIES T cells have defects in TH17 cytokines, IL-17A and IL-22 production, but show normal levels of common cytokines IL-1β, TNF-α and IFN-γ (Figure 2) [48]. Altogether, these findings explain the predisposition of HIES subject to infections of the lungs and skin, but not of other organ systems [48]. Accordingly, the local application of neutrophil-recruiting chemokines and β-defensins or other antimicrobial peptides could be as a strategy to treat recurrent skin- and lung-restricted staphylococcal infections in HIES patients.

3.4. Antimicrobial Peptides in Dermatitis of HIES Patients

IL-17 and IL-22, the effector cytokines produced by TH17 cells, regulate the production of antimicrobial peptides that directly kill microbes in the gut and lungs. Antimicrobial proteins can be constitutively expressed, but some antimicrobials in skin epithelial cells and on mucosal surfaces can be induced by cytokines secreted by TH17 cells, and thus underline the importance of this helper T-cell lineage in skin and mucosal immunity [69,70,71]. Microarray gene expression analysis have shown that IL-17 is the most potent cytokine to induce human β-defensin 2 (hBD-2) expression in primary human airway epithelial cells. The IL-17R-mediated signaling pathway that stimulates hBD-2 gene transcription in response to microbial infection in airway epithelium involves Janus kinase (JAK) and nuclear factor-κB (NF- κB) [72,73,74]. Interestingly, neither resting nor activated immune cells express IL-22 receptor and therefore do not respond to IL-22 stimulation in vitro and in vivo. In keratinocytes, upregulation of IL-22 receptor occurs upon IFN-γ stimulation, which allows IL-22 to activates STAT3 and increases β-defensin 2 and β-defensin 3 expression [75].
Skin diseases such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis have been linked to abnormal production of antimicrobial peptides in dermal pathology [76,77]. Dermal concentration of antimicrobial peptides increases during inflammatory conditions and is usually negligible in normal skins [78]. Immunohistochemical study of human skin-biopsy samples shows significantly lower concentration of cathelicidins (LL-37) and β-defensins in patients with acute and chronic atopic dermatitis, but high amount of the peptides in psoriasis patients. Associated with low antimicrobial peptide expression, atopic dermatitis patients have more frequent S. aureus colonization and infection of the skin lesions. LL-37 activity appears to synergize with hBD-2 anti-staphylococcal activity; therefore, a deficiency of these antimicrobial peptides may account for the susceptibility of atopic dermatitis patients to S. aureus skin infections [76,77,79].

4. Conclusions

Genetic and immunologic characterization of HIES has been one of the more remarkable scientific stories in the study of human primary immunodeficiencies. HIES started as a constellation of discrete clinical and laboratory findings, which were linked by specific genetic defects. The genetic discoveries in turn led to the identification of disrupted immune pathways that explained enhanced infectious susceptibility of HIES patients. Because HIES has variable clinical manifestations, single laboratory index or clinical feature remain insufficient to secure diagnosis of the disease. Likewise, supportive and prophylactic skin care and antibiotics remain the most effective treatment to date; but the genetic and immunologic advances in the pathogenesis of HIES promise to usher in novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis and staphylococcal infections.
Although investigations have focused primarily on the TH17 axis and downstream effector functions, many aspects of HIES immune and non-immune defects, including IL11R and other related mechanisms underlying common manifestations such as scoliosis, eczema, aneurysms, atherosclerosis, and osteoporosis remain to be more fully elucidated. Reports of abnormal anti-S. aureus antibodies in sera and saliva of HIES patients along with suboptimal memory responses to antigens point to defects in IL21R signaling that explain aspects of the humoral immune response of HIES patients.
STAT3 mutations have been identified as important causes of multisystem HIES, adding to previous finding of TYK2 mutations as causes of HIES, and suggest complex cytokine signaling defects to be at the heart of HIES pathogenesis. Discovery of STAT3 mutations as the genetic basis of major HIES will facilitate early and definitive diagnosis in spite of paucity of specific clinical features in many patients and will permit timely administration of prophylactic antibiotic. STAT3 mutations disrupt TH17 generation in vitro and in vivo and highlight the importance of STAT3 in TH17 differentiation and TH17 effector role in infection of HIES patients and other immune-mediated diseases. Conversely, the importance of TH17 and related cytokines in combating S. aureus cutaneous infections is well documented for HIES patients but also for normal subjects [50]. Thus, increasing production of IL-17 or TH17 related cytokines constitutes an approach to treat infections in HIES and normal subjects.
For HIES patients, although T cells exhibit defects in production of TH17 cytokines such as IL-17 or IL-22, production of other proinflammatory cytokines including IL-1β and TNF-α is normal upon challenge with staphylococcal antigens. The defective cytokine production selectively impacts anti-staphylococcal defense in keratinocytes and bronchial epithelial cells but not other cell types, and thus provides a possible molecular explanation for the selective susceptibility of HIES patients to skin- and lung-infections, but not systemic staphylococcal infections. Accordingly, IL-17 or IL-22 represent potential local therapeutic approaches for treatment of infections in HIES patients. Beyond HIES patients, S. aureus infections remain one of the most frequent causes of infectious morbidity and mortality worldwide. With the universal failure of antibody-based strategies against S. aureus in human vaccine trials, an immunization approach that promotes anti-staphylococcal TH17 development, as supported by HIES findings and several recent studies, could represent an effective strategy to addressing the failed vaccines [80,81].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.P. and G.Y.L.; validation, B.P. and G.Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.P. and G.Y.L.; writing—review and editing, G.Y.L.; supervision, G.Y.L.; funding acquisition, G.Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by NIH (National Institute of Health), grant number R01 AI127406.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Foster, T. Immune evasion by staphylococci. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 948–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wertheim, H.; Melles, D.C.; Vos, M.C.; Van Leeuwen, W.; Van Belkum, A.; Verbrugh, H.A.; Nouwen, J.L. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2005, 5, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, G.Y. Molecular Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Pediatr. Res. 2009, 65, 71R–77R. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gordon, R.J.; Lowy, F.D. Pathogenesis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, S350–S359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Rooijakkers, S.H.M.; Ruyken, M.; Roos, A.; Daha, M.R.; Presanis, J.S.; Sim, R.B.; Van Wamel, W.J.B.; Van Kessel, K.P.M.; Strijp, J.A.G.V. Immune evasion by a staphylococcal complement inhibitor that acts on C3 convertases. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6, 920–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Graves, S.F.; Kobayashi, S.D.; DeLeo, F.R. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus immune evasion and virulence. J. Mol. Med. 2010, 88, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Rooijakkers, S.H.; Van Kessel, K.P.; Van Strijp, J.A. Staphylococcal innate immune evasion. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13, 596–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Klevens, R.M.; Morrison, M.A.; Nadle, J.; Petit, S.; Gershman, K.; Ray, S.; Harrison, L.H.; Lynfield, R.; Dumyati, G.; Townes, J.M.; et al. Invasive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in the United States. JAMA 2007, 298, 1763–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Miller, L.G.; Perdreau-Remington, F.; Rieg, G.; Mehdi, S.; Perlroth, J.; Bayer, A.S.; Tang, A.W.; Phung, T.O.; Spellberg, B. Necrotizing Fasciitis Caused by Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusin Los Angeles. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 1445–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Moran, G.J.; Krishnadasan, A.; Gorwitz, R.J.; Fosheim, G.E.; McDougal, L.K.; Carey, R.B.; Talan, D.A. Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Infections among Patients in the Emergency Department. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 666–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gould, I.M. Clinical relevance of increasing glycopeptide MICs against Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2008, 31, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Steinkraus, G.; White, R.; Friedrich, L. Vancomycin MIC creep in non-vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin-susceptible clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001 05. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 60, 788–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Miller, L.S.; Fowler, V.G.; Shukla, S.K.; Rose, W.E.; Proctor, R.A. Development of a vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus invasive infections: Evidence based on human immunity, genetics and bacterial evasion mechanisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 44, 123–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Buckley, R.H.; Wray, B.B.; Belmaker, E.Z. Extreme hyperimmunoglobulinemia E and undue susceptibility to infection. Pediatrics 1972, 49, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Davis, S.; Schaller, J.; Wedgwood, R.; Harvard, M. JOB’S SYNDROME. Lancet 1966, 287, 1013–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Grimbacher, B.; Holland, S.M.; Gallin, J.I.; Greenberg, F.; Hill, S.C.; Malech, H.L.; Miller, J.A.; O’Connell, A.C.; Puck, J.M. Hyper-IgE Syndrome with Recurrent Infections—An Autosomal Dominant Multisystem Disorder. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 340, 692–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Grimbacher, B.; Dutra, A.S.; Holland, S.M.; Fischer, R.E.; Pao, M.; Gallin, J.I.; Puck, J.M. Analphoid marker chromosome in a patient with hyper-IgE syndrome, autism, and mild mental retardation. Genet. Med. 1999, 1, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Grimbacher, B.; Schäffer, A.A.; Holland, S.M.; Davis, J.; Gallin, J.I.; Malech, H.L.; Atkinson, T.P.; Belohradsky, B.H.; Buckley, R.H.; Cossu, F.; et al. Genetic Linkage of Hyper-IgE Syndrome to Chromosome 4. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1999, 65, 735–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Holland, S.; DeLeo, F.R.; Elloumi, H.Z.; Hsu, A.P.; Uzel, G.; Brodsky, N.; Freeman, A.F.; Demidowich, A.; Davis, J.; Turner, M.L.C.; et al. STAT3 Mutations in the Hyper-IgE Syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 1608–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Minegishi, Y.; Saito, M.; Metin, A.; Karasuyama, H.; Tsuchiya, S.; Tsuge, I.; Takada, H.; Hara, T.; Kawamura, N.; Ariga, T.; et al. Dominant-negative mutations in the DNA-binding domain of STAT3 cause hyper-IgE syndrome. Nature 2007, 448, 1058–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Takeda, K.; Noguchi, K.; Shi, W.; Tanaka, T.; Matsumoto, M.; Yoshida, N.; Kishimoto, T.; Akira, S. Targeted disruption of the mouse Stat3 gene leads to early embryonic lethality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 3801–3804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sowerwine, K.J.; Holland, S.M.; Freeman, A.F. Hyper-IgE syndrome update. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012, 1250, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Renner, E.D.; Rylaarsdam, S.; Aňover-Sombke, S.; Rack, A.L.; Reichenbach, J.; Carey, J.C.; Zhu, Q.; Jansson, A.F.; Barboza, J.; Schimke, L.F.; et al. Novel signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) mutations, reduced TH17 cell numbers, and variably defective STAT3 phosphorylation in hyper-IgE syndrome. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 122, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De Beaucoudrey, L.; Puel, A.; Filipe-Santos, O.; Cobat, A.; Ghandil, P.; Chrabieh, M.; Feinberg, J.; Von Bernuth, H.; Samarina, A.; Jannière, L.; et al. Mutations in STAT3 and IL12RB1 impair the development of human IL-17–producing T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 1543–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ma, C.S.; Chew, G.Y.; Simpson, N.; Priyadarshi, A.; Wong, M.; Grimbacher, B.; Fulcher, D.A.; Tangye, S.G.; Cook, M.C. Deficiency of Th17 cells in hyper IgE syndrome due to mutations in STAT3. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 1551–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Heimall, J.; Davis, J.; Shaw, P.A.; Hsu, A.P.; Gu, W.; Welch, P.; Holland, S.M.; Freeman, A.F. Paucity of genotype–phenotype correlations in STAT3 mutation positive Hyper IgE Syndrome (HIES). Clin. Immunol. 2011, 139, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kane, A.; Deenick, E.K.; Ma, C.S.; Cook, M.C.; Uzel, G.; Tangye, S.G. STAT3 is a central regulator of lymphocyte differentiation and function. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2014, 28, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Béziat, V.; Tavernier, S.J.; Chen, Y.-H.; Ma, C.S.; Materna, M.; Laurence, A.; Staal, J.; Aschenbrenner, D.; Roels, L.; Worley, L.; et al. Dominant-negative mutations in human IL6ST underlie hyper-IgE syndrome. J. Exp. Med. 2020, 217, e20191804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Nieminen, P.; Morgan, N.V.; Fenwick, A.L.; Parmanen, S.; Veistinen, L.; Mikkola, M.L.; Van Der Spek, P.J.; Giraud, A.; Judd, L.M.; Arte, S.; et al. Inactivation of IL11 Signaling Causes Craniosynostosis, Delayed Tooth Eruption, and Supernumerary Teeth. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 89, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Spencer, S.; Bal, S.K.; Egner, W.; Allen, H.L.; Raza, S.I.; Ma, C.A.; Gürel, M.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, G.; Sabroe, R.A.; et al. Loss of the interleukin-6 receptor causes immunodeficiency, atopy, and abnormal inflammatory responses. J. Exp. Med. 2019, 216, 1986–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kotlarz, D.; Ziętara, N.; Uzel, G.; Weidemann, T.; Braun, C.J.; Diestelhorst, J.; Krawitz, P.M.; Robinson, P.N.; Hecht, J.; Puchałka, J.; et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the IL-21 receptor gene cause a primary immunodeficiency syndrome. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Leung, D.Y.M.; Geha, S. Clinical and Immunologic Aspects of the Hyperimmunoglobulin E Syndrome. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 1988, 2, 81–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Erlewyn-Lajeunesse, M.D.S. Hyperimmunoglobulin-E syndrome with recurrent infection: A review of current opinion and treatment. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2000, 11, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tanaka, T.; Takada, H.; Nomura, A.; Ohga, S.; Shibata, R.; Hara, T. Distinct gene expression patterns of peripheral blood cells in hyper-IgE syndrome. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2005, 140, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sheerin, K.A.; Buckley, R.H. Antibody responses to protein, polysaccharide, and ΦX174 antigens in the hyperimmunoglobulinemia E (hyper-IgE) syndrome. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1991, 87, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Berger, M.; Kirkpatrick, C.H.; Goldsmith, P.K.; Gallin, J.I. IgE antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans in patients with the syndrome of hyperimmunoglobulin E and recurrent infections. J. Immunol. 1980, 125, 2437–2443. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Dreskin, S.C.; Goldsmith, P.K.; Gallin, J.I. Immunoglobulins in the hyperimmunoglobulin E and recurrent infection (Job’s) syndrome. Deficiency of anti-Staphylococcus aureus immunoglobulin A. J. Clin. Investig. 1985, 75, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pène, J.; Gauchat, J.-F.; Lécart, S.; Drouet, E.; Guglielmi, P.; Boulay, V.; Delwail, A.; Foster, D.; Lecron, J.-C.; Yssel, H. Cutting edge: IL-21 is a switch factor for the production of IgG1 and IgG3 by human B cells. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 5154–5157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Avery, D.T.; Deenick, E.K.; Ma, C.S.; Suryani, S.; Simpson, N.; Chew, G.Y.; Chan, T.D.; Palendira, U.; Bustamante, J.; Boisson-Dupuis, S.; et al. B cell–intrinsic signaling through IL-21 receptor and STAT3 is required for establishing long-lived antibody responses in humans. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 155–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Suto, A.; Nakajima, H.; Hirose, K.; Suzuki, K.; Kagami, S.-I.; Seto, Y.; Hoshimoto, A.; Saito, Y.; Foster, D.C.; Iwamoto, I. Interleukin 21 prevents antigen-induced IgE production by inhibiting germ line Cε transcription of IL-4–stimulated B cells. Blood 2002, 100, 4565–4573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wood, N.; Bourque, K.; Donaldson, D.D.; Collins, M.; Vercelli, D.; Goldman, S.J.; Kasaian, M.T. IL-21 effects on human IgE production in response to IL-4 or IL-13. Cell. Immunol. 2004, 231, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Van De Veen, W.; Krätz, C.E.; McKenzie, C.I.; Aui, P.M.; Neumann, J.; Van Noesel, C.J.M.; Wirz, O.F.; Hagl, B.; Kröner, C.; Spielberger, B.D.; et al. Impaired memory B-cell development and antibody maturation with a skewing toward IgE in patients with STAT3 hyper-IgE syndrome. Allergy 2019, 74, 2394–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stentzel, S.; Hagl, B.; Abel, F.; Kahl, B.C.; Rack-Hoch, A.; Bröker, B.M.; Renner, E.D. Reduced Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Response to Staphylococcus aureus in STAT3 Hyper-IgE Syndrome. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 64, 1279–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hawn, T.R.; Ozinsky, A.; Williams, L.M.; Rodrigues, S.; Clark, A.; Pham, U.; Hill, H.R.; Ochs, H.; Aderem, A.; Liles, W.C. Hyper-IgE Syndrome Is Not Associated with Defects in Several Candidate Toll-Like Receptor Pathway Genes. Hum. Immunol. 2005, 66, 842–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Renner, E.D.; Pawlita, I.; Hoffmann, F.; Hornung, V.; Hartl, D.; Albert, M.; Jansson, A.; Endres, S.; Hartmann, G.; Belohradsky, B.H.; et al. No Indication for a Defect in Toll-Like Receptor Signaling in Patients with Hyper-IgE Syndrome. J. Clin. Immunol. 2005, 25, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Minegishi, Y.; Saito, M.; Morio, T.; Watanabe, K.; Agematsu, K.; Tsuchiya, S.; Takada, H.; Hara, T.; Kawamura, N.; Ariga, T.; et al. Human Tyrosine Kinase 2 Deficiency Reveals Its Requisite Roles in Multiple Cytokine Signals Involved in Innate and Acquired Immunity. Immunity 2006, 25, 745–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Choi, S.-M.; McAleer, J.P.; Zheng, M.; Pociask, D.A.; Kaplan, M.H.; Qin, S.; Reinhart, T.A.; Kolls, J.K. Innate Stat3-mediated induction of the antimicrobial protein Reg3γ is required for host defense against MRSA pneumonia. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Minegishi, Y.; Saito, M.; Nagasawa, M.; Takada, H.; Hara, T.; Tsuchiya, S.; Agematsu, K.; Yamada, M.; Kawamura, N.; Ariga, T.; et al. Molecular explanation for the contradiction between systemic Th17 defect and localized bacterial infection in hyper-IgE syndrome. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 1291–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Aujla, S.J.; Chan, Y.R.; Husain, S.; Kreindler, J.L.; Dubin, P.J.; Pilewski, J.M.; Myerburg, M.M.; Mason, C.A.; Iwakura, Y.; Kolls, J.K.; et al. IL-22 mediates mucosal host defense against Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Miller, L.S.; Cho, J.S. Immunity against Staphylococcus aureus cutaneous infections. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 505–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Farmand, S.; Kremer, B.; Häffner, M.; Pütsep, K.; Bergman, P.; Sundin, M.; Ritterbusch, H.; Seidl, M.; Follo, M.; Henneke, P.; et al. Eosinophilia and reduced STAT3 signaling affect neutrophil cell death in autosomal-dominant Hyper-IgE syndrome. Eur. J. Immunol. 2018, 48, 1975–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Myles, I.A.; Anderson, E.D.; Earland, N.J.; Zarember, K.A.; Sastalla, I.; Williams, K.W.; Gough, P.; Moore, I.N.; Ganesan, S.; Fowler, C.J.; et al. TNF overproduction impairs epithelial staphylococcal response in hyper IgE syndrome. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 3595–3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Dong, C. TH17 cells in development: An updated view of their molecular identity and genetic programming. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ivanov, I.I.; Zhou, L.; Littman, D.R. Transcriptional regulation of Th17 cell differentiation. Semin. Immunol. 2007, 19, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Chen, Z.; Laurence, A.; O’Shea, J.J. Signal transduction pathways and transcriptional regulation in the control of Th17 differentiation. Semin. Immunol. 2007, 19, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Ishigame, H.; Kakuta, S.; Sudo, K.; Nakae, S.; Sasakawa, C.; Iwakura, Y.; Nagai, T.; Kadoki, M.; Nambu, A.; Komiyama, Y.; et al. Differential Roles of Interleukin-17A and -17F in Host Defense against Mucoepithelial Bacterial Infection and Allergic Responses. Immunity 2009, 30, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kolls, J.K.; Lindén, A. Interleukin-17 Family Members and Inflammation. Immunity 2004, 21, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Toy, D.; Kugler, D.; Wolfson, M.; Bos, T.V.; Gurgel, J.; Derry, J.; Tocker, J.; Peschon, J. Cutting Edge: Interleukin 17 Signals through a Heteromeric Receptor Complex. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zheng, Y.; Valdez, P.A.; Danilenko, D.M.; Hu, Y.; Sa, S.M.; Gong, Q.; Abbas, A.R.; Modrusan, Z.; Ghilardi, N.; De Sauvage, F.J.; et al. Interleukin-22 mediates early host defense against attaching and effacing bacterial pathogens. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Huang, W.; Na, L.; Fidel, P.L.; Schwarzenberger, P. Requirement of Interleukin-17A for Systemic Anti–Candida albicansHost Defense in Mice. J. Infect. Dis. 2004, 190, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Saito, M.; Nagasawa, M.; Takada, H.; Hara, T.; Tsuchiya, S.; Agematsu, K.; Yamada, M.; Kawamura, N.; Ariga, T.; Tsuge, I.; et al. Defective IL-10 signaling in hyper-IgE syndrome results in impaired generation of tolerogenic dendritic cells and induced regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Minegishi, Y.; Karasuyama, H. Defects in Jak-STAT-mediated cytokine signals cause hyper-IgE syndrome: Lessons from a primary immunodeficiency. Int. Immunol. 2008, 21, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Minegishi, Y.; Karasuyama, H. Genetic origins of hyper-IgE syndrome. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2008, 8, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Grimbacher, B.; Holland, S.M.; Puck, J.M. Hyper-IgE syndromes. Immunol. Rev. 2005, 203, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Minegishi, Y.; Karasuyama, H. Hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome and tyrosine kinase 2 deficiency. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007, 7, 506–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Milner, J.D.; Brenchley, J.M.; Davis, J.; Hsu, A.; Asher, A.I.; O’Shea, J.; Holland, S.M.; Paul, W.E.; Douek, D.C.; Laurence, A.; et al. Impaired TH17 cell differentiation in subjects with autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome. Nature 2008, 452, 773–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Happel, K.I.; Dubin, P.J.; Zheng, M.; Ghilardi, N.; Lockhart, C.; Quinton, L.J.; Odden, A.R.; Shellito, J.E.; Bagby, G.J.; Nelson, S.; et al. Divergent roles of IL-23 and IL-12 in host defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 761–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Winkelstein, J.A.; Marino, M.C.; Buckley, R.H.; Foster, C.B.; Chanock, S.J.; Dickler, H.; Johnston, R.B.; Boyle, J.; Curnutte, J.; Gallin, J.I.; et al. Chronic Granulomatous Disease: Report on a National Registry of 368 Patients. Medicine 2000, 79, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kolls, J.K.; McCray, P.B.; Chan, Y.R. Cytokine-mediated regulation of antimicrobial proteins. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 829–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Happel, K.I.; Zheng, M.; Young, E.; Quinton, L.J.; Lockhart, E.; Ramsay, A.J.; Shellito, J.E.; Schurr, J.R.; Bagby, G.J.; Nelson, S.; et al. Cutting Edge: Roles of Toll-Like Receptor 4 and IL-23 in IL-17 Expression in Response to Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 4432–4436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Chen, Z.; Tato, C.M.; Muul, L.M.; Laurence, A.; O’Shea, J.J. Distinct regulation of interleukin-17 in human T helper lymphocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 56, 2936–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Kao, C.-Y.; Chen, Y.; Thai, P.; Wachi, S.; Huang, F.; Kim, C.; Harper, R.W.; Wu, R. IL-17 Markedly Up-Regulates β-Defensin-2 Expression in Human Airway Epithelium via JAK and NF-κB Signaling Pathways. J. Immunol. 2004, 173, 3482–3491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Chen, Y.; Thai, P.; Zhao, Y.-H.; Ho, Y.-S.; DeSouza, M.M.; Wu, R. Stimulation of Airway Mucin Gene Expression by Interleukin (IL)-17 through IL-6 Paracrine/Autocrine Loop. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 17036–17043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Kolls, J.K.; Kanaly, S.T.; Ramsay, A.J. Interleukin-17. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2003, 28, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wolk, K.; Kunz, S.; Witte, E.; Friedrich, M.; Asadullah, K.; Sabat, R. IL-22 Increases the Innate Immunity of Tissues. Immunity 2004, 21, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Gallo, R.L.; Hooper, L.V. Epithelial antimicrobial defence of the skin and intestine. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 12, 503–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Yamazaki, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Núñez, G. Role of the microbiota in skin immunity and atopic dermatitis. Allergol. Int. 2017, 66, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Brown, K.L.; Hancock, R.E. Cationic host defense (antimicrobial) peptides. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2006, 18, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ong, P.Y.; Ohtake, T.; Brandt, C.; Strickland, I.; Boguniewicz, M.; Ganz, T.; Gallo, R.L.; Leung, D.Y. Endogenous antimicrobial peptides and skin infections in atopic dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 1151–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Paterson, M.J.; Caldera, J.R.; Liu, G.Y.; Underhill, D.M.; Nguyen, C.; Sharma, P.; Castro, A.M.; Kolar, S.L.; Tsai, C.-M.; Limon, J.J.; et al. Harnessing antifungal immunity in pursuit of a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine strategy. PLOS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sanchez, M.; Kolar, S.L.; Martins, G.A.; Liu, G.Y.; Müller, S.; Reyes, C.N.; Wolf, A.J.; Ogawa, C.; Singhania, R.; De Carvalho, D.D.; et al. O-Acetylation of Peptidoglycan Limits Helper T Cell Priming and Permits Staphylococcus aureus Reinfection. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 22, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 21 09152 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic structure of mutations in STAT3. Previously described mutations, which are likely involved in recurrent S. aureus infections in HIES patients, are shown in the upper part of the figure. The lower part of the figure described the relevant abnormalities involved in staphylococcal infections of HIES patients.
Figure 1. Schematic structure of mutations in STAT3. Previously described mutations, which are likely involved in recurrent S. aureus infections in HIES patients, are shown in the upper part of the figure. The lower part of the figure described the relevant abnormalities involved in staphylococcal infections of HIES patients.
Ijms 21 09152 g001
Ijms 21 09152 g002 550
Figure 2. In HIES patients, STAT3 mutations cause defects in TH17 cell differentiation and in host defense against S. aureus infection. In normal subjects, IL-1β and IL-6, secreted by dendritic cells (DCs), result in the differentiation of TH17 cells from CD4+ T cells through activating its transcription factor retinoic acid-related RORγt in STAT3-dependent way. Then, in presence of IL-23, TH17 cells secrete IL-17A and IL17F stimulating epithelial cells in lungs for production of chemokines such as CXCL8 to recruit polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) for phagocytic killing of S. aureus. IL-22 out of TH17 cells also activates STAT3 in keratinocytes to produce β-defensins and calcium binding proteins along with IL-17A to defend against extracellular S. aureus. In HIES patients, mutations in STAT3 result in failure of TH17 differentiation, which in turn leads to the inability of epithelial cells to produce CXCL8 for recruitment of neutrophils and of keratinocytes to trigger production of β-defensins and calcium binding proteins to kill S. aureus.
Figure 2. In HIES patients, STAT3 mutations cause defects in TH17 cell differentiation and in host defense against S. aureus infection. In normal subjects, IL-1β and IL-6, secreted by dendritic cells (DCs), result in the differentiation of TH17 cells from CD4+ T cells through activating its transcription factor retinoic acid-related RORγt in STAT3-dependent way. Then, in presence of IL-23, TH17 cells secrete IL-17A and IL17F stimulating epithelial cells in lungs for production of chemokines such as CXCL8 to recruit polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) for phagocytic killing of S. aureus. IL-22 out of TH17 cells also activates STAT3 in keratinocytes to produce β-defensins and calcium binding proteins along with IL-17A to defend against extracellular S. aureus. In HIES patients, mutations in STAT3 result in failure of TH17 differentiation, which in turn leads to the inability of epithelial cells to produce CXCL8 for recruitment of neutrophils and of keratinocytes to trigger production of β-defensins and calcium binding proteins to kill S. aureus.
Ijms 21 09152 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, B.; Liu, G.Y. Staphylococcus aureus and Hyper-IgE Syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239152

AMA Style

Park B, Liu GY. Staphylococcus aureus and Hyper-IgE Syndrome. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(23):9152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239152

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Bonggoo, and George Y. Liu. 2020. "Staphylococcus aureus and Hyper-IgE Syndrome" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 23: 9152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239152

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop