Next Article in Journal
Empagliflozin Inhibits Basal and IL-1β-Mediated MCP-1/CCL2 and Endothelin-1 Expression in Human Proximal Tubular Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Aspects of Mycotoxins—A Serious Problem for Human Health
Previous Article in Special Issue
FLASH Radiotherapy: Current Knowledge and Future Insights Using Proton-Beam Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Radiation Damage in Biomolecules and Cells

by
Mario P. Carante
1 and
Francesca Ballarini
1,2,*
1
INFN (Italian National Institute for Nuclear Physics), Sezione di Pavia, via Bassi 6, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
2
Physics Department, University of Pavia, via Bassi 6, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(21), 8188; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218188
Submission received: 12 October 2020 / Accepted: 28 October 2020 / Published: 1 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiation Damage in Biomolecules and Cells)
Ionizing radiation is widely used in medicine, both as a diagnostic tool and as a therapeutic agent. Furthermore, several exposure scenarios, like occupational and environmental exposure (e.g., radon), raise radiation protection issues, since the initial damage to DNA and chromosomes may lead either to cell death [1,2], which in turn can cause early tissue damage, or to cell conversion to malignancy and, eventually, cancer [3]. It is therefore mandatory for the scientific community to continuously update and improve the knowledge about the mechanisms governing the induction of radiation effects in biological targets, as well as to apply the acquired information to optimize the use of ionizing radiation and the corresponding radiation protection strategies.
Although the DNA double helix is widely recognized as the main radiation target, the features of the critical DNA damage type(s) leading to cell death or cell conversion to malignancy are still unclear. Moreover, the role played by other potential targets, which may be involved in bystander effects and other phenomena that may occur at low doses, deserves further investigation. Among the many possible medical applications, several aspects of cancer hadron therapy should be further addressed, including a more and more accurate RBE (Relative Biological Effectiveness) evaluation [4,5]. Such investigations can be carried out both experimentally, by means of in vitro and/or in vivo studies, and theoretically, by biophysical models and simulation codes.
In this framework, this Special Issue reports studies on the effects of ionizing radiation at molecular and cellular level, as well as possible applications in medicine and radiation protection. More specifically, some works [6,7,8] analyzed the early stages of the interaction between ionizing radiation and DNA, with particular attention to the role played by radiation track-structure in modulating the induction of DNA cluster damage, which is thought to lead to important endpoints including chromosome aberrations and cell death [9,10,11]. Another work [12] studied the impact of such damage on nuclear architecture, which is known to play a relevant role in DNA damage induction and repair [13]; other studies [14,15] investigated the consequences of hypoxia on the evolution of the initial damage, and one work analyzed genome-wide DNA alterations in X-irradiated human fibroblasts [16].
Among the studies aimed at better understanding the mechanisms involved in cancer radiation therapy, as well as improving its effectiveness, the metabolic response of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells to photons and C-ions was characterized [17], the therapeutic potential of a new targeted c-SRC inhibitor molecule on X- or proton-irradiated GBM cells was investigated [18,19], the sensitization of breast cancer cells by checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition was studied [20], and the in vivo molecular response to proton therapy and its efficacy in a xenograft model was analyzed [21]. Furthermore, potential differences in the effects induced by passive or active clinical proton beams were explored [22], and FLASH radiotherapy was reviewed [23]. Within the field of cancer therapy side effects, the consequences of high radiation doses on gene expression in healthy tissues were analyzed [24] and the RBE for late effects in the central nervous system following proton or C-ion therapy was predicted by a novel biophysical model called BIANCA [25]. Since ionizing radiation can also be used to treat diseases other than cancer, radiation-stimulated translocation of CD166 and CRYAB proteins to the endothelial surface was found to provide potential vascular targets on irradiated brain Arteriovenous Malformations (bAVMs) [26].
Finally, in the framework of radiation protection studies, the protective role of melatonin and Vitamin D [27], as well as hypothermia [28], was reviewed, and valine radiolysis by fast ions was investigated [29]. Furthermore, the changes in radio-sensitivity and responses to ionizing radiation of embryos during the early developmental stages of the preimplantation were analyzed [30], and epigenetic modifications induced by ionizing radiation were critically reviewed [31].

Funding

This research was funded by the Italian National Institute for Nuclear Physics, project MC-INFN/FLUKA.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ballarini, F.; Altieri, S.; Bortolussi, S.; Carante, M.P.; Giroletti, E.; Protti, N. The BIANCA model/code of radiation induced cell death: Application to human cells exposed to different radiation types. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2014, 53, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Carante, M.P.; Altieri, S.; Bortolussi, S.; Postuma, I.; Protti, N.; Ballarini, F. Modeling radiation-induced cell death: Role of different levels of DNA damage clustering. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2015, 54, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ballarini, F.; Ottolenghi, A. A model of chromosome aberration induction and CML incidence at low doses. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2004, 43, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Karger, C.P.; Peschke, P. RBE and related modeling in carbon-ion therapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 2017, 63, 01TR02. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Carante, M.P.; Aricò, G.; Ferrari, A.; Kozlowska, K.; Mairani, A.; Ballarini, F. First benchmarking of the BIANCA model for cell survival predictions in a clinical hadron therapy scenario. Phys. Med. Biol. 2019, 64, 215008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Matsuya, Y.; Nakano, T.; Kai, T.; Shikazono, N.; Akamatsu, K.; Yoshii, Y.; Sato, T. A Simplified Cluster Analysis of Electron Track Structure for Estimating Complex DNA Damage Yields. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Boscolo, D.; Krämer, M.; Fuss, M.C.; Durante, M.; Scifoni, E. Impact of Target Oxygenation on the Chemical Track Evolution of Ion and Electron Radiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Tang, N.; Bueno, M.; Meylan, S.; Perrot, Y.; Tran, H.N.; Freneau, A.; Dos Santos, M.; Vaurijoux, A.; Gruel, G.; Bernal, M.A.; et al. Assessment of Radio-Induced Damage in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with 40 kVp, 220 kVp, and 4 MV X-rays by Means of Micro and Nanodosimetric Calculations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Georgakilas, A.G.; O’Neill, P.; Stewart, R.D. Induction and repair of clustered DNA lesions: What do we know so far? Radiat. Res. 2013, 180, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Testa, A.; Ballarini, F.; Giesen, U.; Gil, O.M.; Carante, M.P.; Tello, J.J.; Langner, F.; Rabus, H.; Palma, V.; Pinto, M.; et al. Analysis of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations on cell-by-cell basis after 4He-ion microbeam irradiation: Experimental data and simulations. Radiat. Res. 2018, 189, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ballarini, F.; Altieri, S.; Bortolussi, S.; Carante, M.; Giroletti, E.; Protti, N. The role of DNA cluster damage and chromosome aberrations in radiation-induced cell killing: A theoretical approach. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2015, 166, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tonnemacher, S.; Eltsov, M.; Jakob, B. Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy (CLEM) Analysis of Nuclear Reorganization Induced by Clustered DNA Damage Upon Charged Particle Irradiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ottolenghi, A.; Ballarini, F.; Biaggi, M. Modelling chromosomal aberration induction by ionising radiation: The influence of interphase chromosome architecture. Adv. Space Res. 2001, 27, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liew, H.; Klein, C.; Zenke, F.T.; Abdollahi, A.; Debus, J.; Dokic, I.; Mairani, A. Modeling the Effect of Hypoxia and DNA Repair Inhibition on Cell Survival after Photon Irradiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Liew, H.; Mein, S.; Debus, J.; Dokic, I.; Mairani, A. Modeling Direct and Indirect Action on Cell Survival After Photon Irradiation under Normoxia and Hypoxia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nath, N.; Hagenau, L.; Weiss, S.; Tzvetkova, A.; Jensen, L.R.; Kaderali, L.; Port, M.; Scherthan, H.; Kuss, A.W. Genome-Wide DNA Alterations in X-Irradiated Human Gingiva Fibroblasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Palma, A.; Grande, S.; Ricci-Vitiani, L.; Luciani, A.M.; Buccarelli, M.; Biffoni, M.; Dini, V.; Cirrone, G.A.P.; Ciocca, M.; Guidoni, L.; et al. Different mechanisms underlie the metabolic response of GBM stem like cells to ionizing radiation: Biological and MRS studies on effects of photons and carbon ions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Torrisi, F.; Minafra, L.; Cammarata, F.P.; Savoca, G.; Calvaruso, M.; Vicario, N.; Maccari, L.; Pérès, E.A.; Özçelik, H.; Bernaudin, M.; et al. SRC Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and X-rays Combined Effect on Glioblastoma Cell Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cammarata, F.P.; Torrisi, F.; Forte, G.I.; Minafra, L.; Bravatà, V.; Pisciotta, P.; Savoca, G.; Calvaruso, M.; Petringa, G.; Cirrone, G.A.P.; et al. Proton Therapy and Src Family Kinase Inhibitor Combined Treatments on U87 Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Cell Line. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Choi, C.; Cho, W.K.; Park, S.; Shin, S.-W.; Park, W.; Kim, H.; Choi, D.H. Checkpoint Kinase 1 (CHK1) Inhibition Enhances the Sensitivity of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells to Proton Irradiation via Rad51 Downregulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Cammarata, F.P.; Forte, G.I.; Broggi, G.; Bravatà, V.; Minafra, L.; Pisciotta, P.; Calvaruso, M.; Tringali, R.; Tomasello, B.; Torrisi, F.; et al. Molecular Investigation on a Triple Negative Breast Cancer Xenograft Model Exposed to Proton Beams. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Michaelidesová, A.; Vachelová, J.; Klementová, J.; Urban, T.; Brabcová, K.P.; Kaczor, S.; Falk, M.; Falková, I.; Depeš, D.; Vondráček, V.; et al. In Vitro comparison of passive and active clinical proton beams. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hughes, J.R.; Parsons, J.L. FLASH Radiotherapy: Current Knowledge and Future Insights Using Proton-Beam Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kanakoglou, D.S.; Michalettou, T.-D.; Vasileiou, C.; Gioukakis, E.; Maneta, D.; Kyriakidis, K.V.; Georgakilas, A.G.; Michalopoulos, I. Effects of High-Dose Ionizing Radiation in Human Gene Expression: A Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Carante, M.P.; Aricò, G.; Ferrari, A.; Karger, C.P.; Kozłowska, W.S.; Mairani, A.; Sala, P.R.; Ballarini, F. In Vivo validation of the BIANCA biophysical model: Benchmarking against rat spinal cord RBE data. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. McRobb, L.S.; McKay, M.J.; Gauden, A.J.; Lee, V.S.; Subramanian, S.; Thomas, S.G.; Wiedmann, M.; Moutrie, V.; Grace, M.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Radiation-Stimulated Translocation of CD166 and CRYAB to the Endothelial Surface Provides Potential Vascular Targets on Irradiated Brain Arteriovenous Malformations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Nuszkiewicz, J.; Woźniak, A.; Szewczyk-Golec, K. Ionizing radiation as a source of oxidative stress-the protective role of melatonin and vitamin D. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fukunaga, H. The Effect of Low Temperatures on Environmental Radiation Damage in Living Systems: Does Hypothermia Show Promise for Space Travel? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Da Costa, C.; Muniz, G.S.V.; Boduch, P.; Rothard, H.; Da Silveira, E.F. Valine Radiolysis by H+, He+, N+, and S15+ MeV Ions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Honjo, Y.; Ichinohe, T. Stage-Specific Effects of Ionizing Radiation during Early Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Belli, M.; Tabocchini, M.A. Ionizing Radiation-Induced Epigenetic Modifications and Their Relevance to Radiation Protection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carante, M.P.; Ballarini, F. Radiation Damage in Biomolecules and Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218188

AMA Style

Carante MP, Ballarini F. Radiation Damage in Biomolecules and Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(21):8188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218188

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carante, Mario P., and Francesca Ballarini. 2020. "Radiation Damage in Biomolecules and Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 21: 8188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218188

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop