Next Article in Journal
Endocytosis of Connexin 36 is Mediated by Interaction with Caveolin-1
Next Article in Special Issue
Redox-Dependent Structural Modification of Nucleoredoxin Triggers Defense Responses against Alternaria brassicicola in Arabidopsis
Previous Article in Journal
Few Layered Oxidized h-BN as Nanofiller of Cellulose-Based Paper with Superior Antibacterial Response and Enhanced Mechanical/Thermal Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fe2+ Ions Alleviate the Symptom of Citrus Greening Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Overexpressed BSR1-Mediated Enhancement of Disease Resistance Depends on the MAMP-Recognition System

1
Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, NARO (NIAS), Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan
2
Department of Applied Biological Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Noda 278-8510, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(15), 5397; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155397
Submission received: 22 June 2020 / Revised: 22 July 2020 / Accepted: 26 July 2020 / Published: 29 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrients and Disease Resistance in Plants)

Abstract

:
Plant plasma membrane-localized receptors recognize microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) and activate immune responses via various signaling pathways. Receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases (RLCKs) are considered key signaling factors in plant immunity. BROAD-SPECTRUM RESISTANCE 1 (BSR1), a rice RLCK, plays a significant role in disease resistance. Overexpression of BSR1 confers strong resistance against fungal and bacterial pathogens. Our recent study revealed that MAMP-triggered immune responses are mediated by BSR1 in wild-type rice and are hyperactivated in BSR1-overexpressing rice. It was suggested that hyperactivated immune responses were responsible for the enhancement of broad-spectrum disease resistance; however, this remained to be experimentally validated. In this study, we verified the above hypothesis by disrupting the MAMP-recognition system in BSR1-overexpressing rice. To this end, we knocked out OsCERK1, which encodes a well-characterized MAMP-receptor-like protein kinase. In the background of BSR1 overaccumulation, the knockout of OsCERK1 nearly abolished the enhancement of blast resistance. This finding indicates that overexpressed BSR1-mediated enhancement of disease resistance depends on the MAMP-triggered immune system, corroborating our previously suggested model.

1. Introduction

Plants can detect approaching microbes by recognizing microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), and in response activate various immune responses, which are referred to as pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) [1]. PTI acts as a barrier to a broad spectrum of indigenous microbial species. Numerous factors are involved in PTI. Receptor-like kinases (RLKs) and receptor-like proteins on the plasma membrane form pattern-recognition receptor complexes to perceive MAMPs and activate intracellular signaling pathways [2]. Activated signaling factors regulate downstream responses, such as the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the transcriptional activation of defense-related genes, followed by signal transduction via plant hormones and phytoalexin biosynthesis [1,3,4]. Virulent microbes (i.e., pathogens) have evolved various means to avoid triggering PTI in host plants, including the secretion of effectors and structural variations of MAMPs [5].
Despite the vast improvements in our knowledge of plant immunity and plant–pathogen interactions, our understanding of genes that confer broad-spectrum resistance against pathogens is currently limited. BROAD-SPECTRUM RESISTANCE 1 (BSR1; OsRLCK278), which encodes a rice receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase (RLCK), is a broad-spectrum disease resistance gene. Overexpression of BSR1 confers strong resistance against at least four pathogens in rice, i.e., Pyricularia oryzae, which causes rice blast, Cochliobolus miyabeanus, which causes brown spot disease, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, which causes bacterial leaf blight, and Burkholderia glumae, which causes bacterial seedling rot [6,7]. RLCKs are characterized as RLK-homologous cytosolic protein kinases [8,9]. Accumulating evidence indicates that RLCKs act as phosphorylation signaling factors that are crucial for the activation of PTI [10]. Knockout of BSR1 in rice strongly suppresses immune responses triggered by MAMPs, such as chitin, peptidoglycan, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [11,12]. The BSR1 protein possesses protein kinase activity [13]; this indicates that, in wild-type (WT) rice, it may mediate the intracellular phosphorylation signaling downstream of pattern recognition receptors. In BSR1-overexpressing rice, MAMP-triggered immune responses are hyperactivated, resulting in enhanced disease resistance [12]. The broad-spectrum disease resistance induced by BSR1 overexpression has been attributed to the hyperactivation of PTI; however, this remained to be experimentally validated.
Here, we knocked out OsCERK1, which encodes a plasma membrane-localized RLK, in BSR1-overexpressing rice to determine whether or not the enhancement of resistance depends on the MAMP-recognition system. OsCERK1 contributes to the recognition of various MAMPs, such as peptidoglycan, LPS, and chitin [14,15,16,17]. It coassembles with several receptor-like proteins into receptor complexes that recognize MAMPs [14,15]. Such complexes are considered to activate immune responses via a signaling pathway involving BSR1 [11].

2. Results

First, we attempted to knock out OsCERK1 in a BSR1-overexpressing line using the CRISPR/Cas9 system [18]. Two independent CRISPR/Cas9 system-mediated cleavage sequences (target sites #4 and #10; Table 1) were designed in OsCERK1 exon 1 (Table 1). Biallelic frameshift mutations in the sequences abolish almost all domains of OsCERK1, such as protein kinase domain whose activity is necessary for signaling function [16,17]. However, transgenic plants could not be regenerated for any of the two target sites. OsCERK1 is not a lethal gene [16], indicating that BSR1 overexpression is responsible for the failure to transform. It was suggested that BSR1-overexpressing rice might be resistant to Agrobacterium infection, as it is resistant to the bacterial pathogens X. oryzae pv. oryzae and Burkholderia glumae [7]. To avoid BSR1 overexpression interfering with Agrobacterium infection, we next constructed a modified binary vector. It had a T-DNA region containing a Cas9-, gRNA-, and BSR1-constitutive expression cassette (Figure 1a) to concomitantly introduce BSR1 and CRISPR/Cas9 components into WT rice. Modified binary vectors targeted to sites #4 and #10 were used for Agrobacterium-mediated rapid transformation. For both target sites, the cleavage site in each regenerated plant was sequenced, and insertion-deletion mutations were successfully detected (Table 1). Transgenic plants containing biallelic mutations which were expected to disrupt OsCERK1 were selected for subsequent confirmation. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated insertion mutation in transgenic plant #4-4 generated a stop codon, and the plant was expected to express only N-terminal 41 amino acid residues of OsCERK1. Transgenic plant #10-2 was estimated to express N-terminal 33 amino acid residues followed by nonfunctional peptide generated by frameshift (Figure S1). The mutations were detected in OsCERK1 transcripts from #4-4 and #10-2 lines by cDNA sequencing (Figure S2). Meanwhile, a BSR1 overexpression vector pRiceFOX:BSR1 was also introduced into WT rice. Three T1 plants for each transgenic line were subjected to western blot analysis using an anti-BSR1 antibody, which indicated that BSR1 was overaccumulated in the transgenic lines (Figure 1b). Transgenic lines #4-4 and #10-2 (designated as OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#4-4 and #10-2, respectively) were used for further analyses, as they accumulated more BSR1 protein than BSR1ox6, a simple BSR1-overexpressing line.
In rice, the recognition of chitin and subsequent activation of immune responses completely depends on OsCERK1 [14,16]. To ascertain whether the CRISPR/Cas9 system-mediated mutations disrupted OsCERK1, the chitin-responsivity of OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox lines was compared with that of the BSR1ox6 line. Leaf strips from leaf blades of all lines were treated with chitin as an elicitor. H2O2, a kind of ROS molecule produced during the immune response, was quantified after chitin treatment. Leaf strips from BSR1-overexpressing plants produced detectable amounts of ROS in response to chitin treatment, whereas those from OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#4-4 and #10-2 plants displayed no significant chitin responsivity (Figure 2a). Transcriptional activation of defense-related genes was assessed by quantitative reverse-transcription (RT-q)PCR. PROBENAZOLE-INDUCIBLE PROTEIN 1 (PBZ1) and KAURENE SYNTHASE-LIKE 4 (KSL4), the expression of which is upregulated in response to chitin [12], were analyzed. Chitin treatment remarkably increased PBZ1 and KSL4 transcript levels in BSR1ox6 leaf strips, but not in OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#4-4 and #10-2 leaf strips (Figure 2b). Similarly, the knockout of OsCERK1 suppressed H2O2 production induced by peptidoglycan, a bacterial MAMP, in leaf strips under BSR1-overexpressing background (Figure S3). These results showed that the OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#4-4 and #10-2 lines lacked responsivity to chitin, indicating that, as expected, the function of OsCERK1 was completely abolished by the insertion mutations.
Resistance to rice blast was assessed in WT, BSR1ox6, and the two OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox lines. Plants were spray-inoculated with conidia of Pyricularia oryzae. When comparing the BSR1ox6 line with the WT line, BSR1 overexpression was found to strongly suppress lesion formation (Figure 3), which is in line with findings in a previous report [5]. This indicates that BSR1 overaccumulation at the level observed in BSR1ox6 plants (Figure 1b) is sufficient to confer disease resistance. On the other hand, plants of the two independent OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox lines were significantly more susceptible than those of the BSR1ox6 line, despite the higher levels of accumulated BSR1 protein (Figure 1b and Figure 3). Together with previous reports that loss-of-function of OsCERK1 had no effect on the number of blast lesions formed in WT plants [16,19], this result indicated that knockout of OsCERK1 impaired the enhancement of disease resistance by overaccumulation of BSR1.

3. Discussion

Until now, it was unclear whether OsCERK1 contributes to resistance against rice pathogens. Our data demonstrated the importance of OsCERK1 in PTI. In a previous study, knockout of OsCERK1 completely abolished chitin responsivity in cultivated cells, but had no significant effect on lesion formation by a compatible rice blast fungal strain in leaf blades [16]. In a study using other compatible strain, the number of lesions formed was unaffected by knockdown of OsCERK1, although lesion size was increased [19]. In the current study, knockout of OsCERK1 clearly suppressed the rice blast resistance of BSR1-overexpressing plants. Although in the background of BSR1-overexperssion, these data suggest, for the first time, that OsCERK1 contributes to the suppression of lesion formation by blast fungus in natural conditions (i.e., on leaf blades), and support the hypothesis that it recognizes MAMPs during blast infection, which is in line with previous observations in cultivated cells.
Overexpression of BSR1 enhances disease resistance [6,7]. In a previously suggested model, the underlying mechanism was as follows: intracellular signaling following MAMP-recognition would be amplified via overaccumulation of BSR1, resulting in enhanced broad-spectrum immunity [12]. The simultaneous overexpression and knockout experiment in our study revealed that the enhancement of resistance depends on OsCERK1 (Figure S4). As OsCERK1 is involved in the recognition of fungi and bacteria [16], receptor complexes containing OsCERK1 could be fully responsible for the activation of BSR1-mediated resistance. Meanwhile, many other RLKs homologous to OsCERK1 are involved in PTI [1,2]. These RLKs may also be involved in resistance enhancement, which requires further investigation.
In conclusion, our data demonstrated that the MAMP-recognition system (at least, OsCERK1) is mechanistically involved in broad-spectrum disease resistance. Given the limited knowledge of broad-spectrum resistance mechanisms, our study provides a new insight into this type of resistance.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant and Microbial Materials and Inoculation

Oryza sativa L. ‘Nipponbare’ was used as the WT line. Pyricularia oryzae isolate Kyu89-246 (MAFF101506, race 003.0) was used as a compatible rice blast fungus strain. Fungal culture and spore inoculation were performed as previously described [7,12]. Briefly, one milliliter of a P. oryzae conidial suspension (1.0 × 105 mL−1) was sprayed onto each plant at the 3.5–4.0 leaf stage. The number of compatible lesions on the 4th leaf blade was counted on day 6 after inoculation.

4.2. Plasmid Construction and Transformation

The CRISPR-P online tool (http://cbi.hzau.edu.cn/crispr/) [20] was used to design CRISPR/Cas9 system-mediated cleavage sequences. Two independent sequences on OsCERK1 exon 1 were selected: 5′-CCTTCTACGTGACGCCGAACCAG-3′ (target site #4) and 5′-CCGGGTGCGACCTCGCGCTGGCT-3′ (target site #10) were located at 120–142 bp and 95–117 bp from the first nucleotide of the start codon, respectively. To construct the modified binary vectors, a DNA fragment containing the maize Ubiquitin promotor–BSR1 cDNA–NOS terminator was PCR-amplified from the pRiceFOX:BSR1 vector [6]. The fragment was inserted into the AscI site of the CRISPR/Cas9 vector (pZH_MMCas9), [18] resulting in a T-DNA containing a Cas9-, gRNA-, and BSR1-constitutive expression cassette. The targeting region in gRNA was replaced with the sequence of sites #4 or #10. These vectors and pRiceFOX:BSR1 were used for Agrobacterium (Rhizobium radiobacter)-mediated rapid transformation, as previously reported [21]. OsCERK1 in genome DNA of T0 plant was sequenced using a primer 5′-AGCTTCCACCTCCCTCCTAGTC-3′ (OsCERK1-F primer) as previously described [11]. Western blot analysis using anti-BSR1 antibody were performed as previously described [12,13]. For sequencing the OsCERK1 transcript, total RNA was extracted from WT, BSR1ox6 and the two OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox plants, and reverse-transcribed using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA Remover (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). DNA fragments containing the CRISPR/Cas9 system target site and neighboring region were amplified by PCR using OsCERK1-F primer and a primer 5′-GGTGTCCGGGATGTTGTT-3′, and sequenced using a primer 5′-GCGGTGGTGAGGTTGTTGTAG-3′.

4.3. Assay of MAMP-Responsivity

Leaf strips were prepared from the second leaves of two-month old plants. Two fragments of each leaf blade (8-mm length and 6-mm width) were slit using bundled razor blades [22] and placed in sterile water in a 12-well plate. Treatment with 100 nM chitin hexamer (N-acetylchitohexaose, GN6) and 10 µg mL−1 peptidoglycan from Bacillus subtilis (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and determination of the H2O2 concentration using luminol-dependent chemiluminescence assay, were conducted as previously described [12]. Transcript levels of defense-related genes at 5 h after treatment were assessed by RT-qPCR, using the comparative CT (2−ΔΔCt) method [23]. PBZ1 and KSL4 were used as chitin-induced marker genes [11]. Rice Ubiquitin1 (RUBQ1; Os06g0681400) was used as an internal control [24].

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/15/5397/s1. Figure S1: Schematic structure of the translation products of wild-type OsCERK1 and mutated OsCERK1; Figure S2: Sequences of OsCERK1 transcript in WT, OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox lines, and BSR1ox6; Figure S3: Knockout of OsCERK1 suppressed peptidoglycan-triggered H2O2 production in the BSR1-overexpressing background; Figure S4: The enhancement of disease resistance by BSR1 overexpression depends on OsCERK1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.K., Y.N., T.K. and M.M.; formal analysis, Y.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.K.; writing—review and editing, Y.N. and M.M.; supervision, Y.N., T.K. and M.M.; project administration, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20H02953.

Acknowledgments

We thank Masaki Endo and Masafumi Mikami (NIAS, Japan) for providing the rice CRISPR/Cas9 system. We thank Eiichi Minami (NIAS, Japan) for providing a luminometer, and Naoto Shibuya and Yoshitake Desaki (Meiji University) for providing the bundled razor blades used in chitin responsivity experiments. We also thank Lois Ishizaki and Yuka Yamazaki (NIAS, Japan) for their help during the rice transformation experiments and for their overall technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Boller, T.; Felix, G. A renaissance of elicitors: Perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60, 379–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Monaghan, J.; Zipfel, C. Plant pattern recognition receptor complexes at the plasma membrane. Curr. Opin Plant Biol. 2012, 15, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Macho, A.P.; Zipfel, C. Plant PRRs and the activation of innate immune signaling. Mol. Cell 2014, 54, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kawasaki, T.; Yamada, K.; Yoshimura, S.; Yamaguchi, K. Chitin receptor-mediated activation of MAP kinases and ROS production in rice and Arabidopsis. Plant. Signal. Behav. 2017, 12, e1361076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jones, J.D.; Dangl, J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Dubouzet, J.G.; Maeda, S.; Sugano, S.; Ohtake, M.; Hayashi, N.; Ichikawa, T.; Kondou, Y.; Kuroda, H.; Horii, Y.; Matsui, M.; et al. Screening for resistance against Pseudomonas syringae in rice-FOX Arabidopsis lines identified a putative receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase gene that confers resistance to major bacterial and fungal pathogens in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2011, 9, 466–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Maeda, S.; Hayashi, N.; Sasaya, T.; Mori, M. Overexpression of BSR1 confers broad-spectrum resistance against two bacterial diseases and two major fungal diseases in rice. Breed. Sci. 2016, 66, 396–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Shiu, S.H.; Karlowski, W.M.; Pan, R.; Tzeng, Y.H.; Mayer, K.F.; Li, W.H. Comparative analysis of the receptor-like kinase family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1220–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Vij, S.; Giri, J.; Dansana, P.K.; Kapoor, S.; Tyagi, A.K. The receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase (OsRLCK) gene family in rice: Organization, phylogenetic relationship, and expression during development and stress. Mol. Plant 2008, 1, 732–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liang, X.; Zhou, J.M. Receptor-Like Cytoplasmic Kinases: Central Players in Plant Receptor Kinase-Mediated Signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018, 69, 267–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kanda, Y.; Yokotani, N.; Maeda, S.; Nishizawa, Y.; Kamakura, T.; Mori, M. The receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase BSR1 mediates chitin-induced defense signaling in rice cells. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 1497–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kanda, Y.; Nakagawa, H.; Nishizawa, Y.; Kamakura, T.; Mori, M. Broad-Spectrum Disease Resistance Conferred by the Overexpression of Rice RLCK BSR1 Results from an Enhanced Immune Response to Multiple MAMPs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Sugano, S.; Maeda, S.; Hayashi, N.; Kajiwara, H.; Inoue, H.; Jiang, C.J.; Takatsuji, H.; Mori, M. Tyrosine phosphorylation of a receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase, BSR1, plays a crucial role in resistance to multiple pathogens in rice. Plant J. 2018, 96, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shimizu, T.; Nakano, T.; Takamizawa, D.; Desaki, Y.; Ishii-Minami, N.; Nishizawa, Y.; Minami, E.; Okada, K.; Yamane, H.; Kaku, H.; et al. Two LysM receptor molecules, CEBiP and OsCERK1, cooperatively regulate chitin elicitor signaling in rice. Plant J. 2010, 64, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ao, Y.; Li, Z.; Feng, D.; Xiong, F.; Liu, J.; Li, J.F.; Wang, M.; Wang, J.; Liu, B.; Wang, H.B. OsCERK1 and OsRLCK176 play important roles in peptidoglycan and chitin signaling in rice innate immunity. Plant J. 2014, 80, 1072–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kouzai, Y.; Mochizuki, S.; Nakajima, K.; Desaki, Y.; Hayafune, M.; Miyazaki, H.; Yokotani, N.; Ozawa, K.; Minami, E.; Kaku, H.; et al. Targeted gene disruption of OsCERK1 reveals its indispensable role in chitin perception and involvement in the peptidoglycan response and immunity in rice. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 975–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Desaki, Y.; Kouzai, Y.; Ninomiya, Y.; Iwase, R.; Shimizu, Y.; Seko, K.; Molinaro, A.; Minami, E.; Shibuya, N.; Kaku, H.; et al. OsCERK1 plays a crucial role in the lipopolysaccharide-induced immune response of rice. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 1042–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mikami, M.; Toki, S.; Endo, M. Comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 expression constructs for efficient targeted mutagenesis in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 88, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, X.; Dong, W.; Sun, J.; Feng, F.; Deng, Y.; He, Z.; Oldroyd, G.E.; Wang, E. The receptor kinase CERK1 has dual functions in symbiosis and immunity signalling. Plant J. 2015, 81, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lei, Y.; Lu, L.; Liu, H.Y.; Li, S.; Xing, F.; Chen, L.L. CRISPR-P: A web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in plants. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1494–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Toki, S.; Hara, N.; Ono, K.; Onodera, H.; Tagiri, A.; Oka, S.; Tanaka, H. Early infection of scutellum tissue with Agrobacterium allows high-speed transformation of rice. Plant J. 2006, 47, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Desaki, Y.; Shimada, H.; Takahashi, S.; Sakurayama, C.; Kawai, M.; Kaku, H.; Shibuya, N. Handmade leaf cutter for efficient and reliable ROS assay. Plant Biotechnol. (Tokyo) 2019, 36, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jiang, C.J.; Shimono, M.; Sugano, S.; Kojima, M.; Yazawa, K.; Yoshida, R.; Inoue, H.; Hayashi, N.; Sakakibara, H.; Takatsuji, H. Abscisic acid interacts antagonistically with salicylic acid signaling pathway in rice-Magnaporthe grisea interaction. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Generation of transgenic rice lines overexpressing BSR1 and lacking OsCERK1. (a) Schematic representation of the construct for simultaneous BSR1 overexpression and OsCERK1 knockout. BSR1 under the control of the maize Ubiquitin promoter was inserted into the T-DNA region of the pZH_MMCas9 CRISPR/Cas9 vector. A separate vector was prepared for each of target sites #4 and #10. Agrobacterium-mediated introduction of the vectors into rice resulted in transformant #4 and #10 lines, respectively. PmUbi, maize Ubiquitin promoter; TNOS, NOS terminator; gRNA, guide RNA. (b) Western blot analysis using anti-BSR1 antibody showing the levels of accumulated BSR1 protein in WT (Nipponbare), BSR1-overexpressing (BSR1ox6), and BSR1-overexpressing and OsCERK1-knockout (OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#4-4 and #10-2) plants. Three T1 plants were used for each transgenic line. WB (anti-BSR1), western blot analysis using anti-BSR1 antibody; Ponceau-S, Ponceau-S staining before antibody staining; black arrowhead, BSR1 (44.7 kDa).
Figure 1. Generation of transgenic rice lines overexpressing BSR1 and lacking OsCERK1. (a) Schematic representation of the construct for simultaneous BSR1 overexpression and OsCERK1 knockout. BSR1 under the control of the maize Ubiquitin promoter was inserted into the T-DNA region of the pZH_MMCas9 CRISPR/Cas9 vector. A separate vector was prepared for each of target sites #4 and #10. Agrobacterium-mediated introduction of the vectors into rice resulted in transformant #4 and #10 lines, respectively. PmUbi, maize Ubiquitin promoter; TNOS, NOS terminator; gRNA, guide RNA. (b) Western blot analysis using anti-BSR1 antibody showing the levels of accumulated BSR1 protein in WT (Nipponbare), BSR1-overexpressing (BSR1ox6), and BSR1-overexpressing and OsCERK1-knockout (OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#4-4 and #10-2) plants. Three T1 plants were used for each transgenic line. WB (anti-BSR1), western blot analysis using anti-BSR1 antibody; Ponceau-S, Ponceau-S staining before antibody staining; black arrowhead, BSR1 (44.7 kDa).
Ijms 21 05397 g001
Figure 2. Knockout of OsCERK1 completely abolishes chitin-triggered defense responses in BSR1-overexpressing leaf strips. (a) Chitin-triggered H2O2 production. H2O2 concentrations were measured by luminol-dependent chemiluminescence assay before treatment and at 120 min and 300 min after treatment. Left panel, time course of H2O2 concentration; right panel, data, with different letters indicating significant differences. (b) Transcript levels of defense-related genes in chitin-treated leaf strips. PBZ1 and KSL4 transcript levels at 5 h posttreatment were assessed by RT-qPCR. Values are presented as the means ± standard deviations of three biological replicates. Experiments were conducted twice, with similar results. Different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s test; p < 0.05). Mock, treatment with water; GN6, treatment with 100 nM chitin hexamer (N-acetylchitohexaose).
Figure 2. Knockout of OsCERK1 completely abolishes chitin-triggered defense responses in BSR1-overexpressing leaf strips. (a) Chitin-triggered H2O2 production. H2O2 concentrations were measured by luminol-dependent chemiluminescence assay before treatment and at 120 min and 300 min after treatment. Left panel, time course of H2O2 concentration; right panel, data, with different letters indicating significant differences. (b) Transcript levels of defense-related genes in chitin-treated leaf strips. PBZ1 and KSL4 transcript levels at 5 h posttreatment were assessed by RT-qPCR. Values are presented as the means ± standard deviations of three biological replicates. Experiments were conducted twice, with similar results. Different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s test; p < 0.05). Mock, treatment with water; GN6, treatment with 100 nM chitin hexamer (N-acetylchitohexaose).
Ijms 21 05397 g002
Figure 3. Knockout of OsCERK1 impairs BSR1 overexpression-mediated enhancement of rice blast resistance. (a) A photograph of the 4th leaf blades. (b) The number of compatible lesions on the 4th leaf blade counted on day 6 after inoculation. Pyricularia oryzae was spray-inoculated onto plants at the 3.5–4.0 leaf stage. Values are presented as the means ± standard deviations (n = 8, 8, 8, and 10 for WT, BSR1ox6, OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#4-4, and OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#10-2, respectively). Experiments were conducted twice, with similar results. * p < 0.05, Dunnett’s test for OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#4-4 and OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#10-2 vs. BSR1ox6; *** p < 0.001, t-test, WT vs. BSR1ox6. WT, wild-type; ox, overexpression; ko, knockout.
Figure 3. Knockout of OsCERK1 impairs BSR1 overexpression-mediated enhancement of rice blast resistance. (a) A photograph of the 4th leaf blades. (b) The number of compatible lesions on the 4th leaf blade counted on day 6 after inoculation. Pyricularia oryzae was spray-inoculated onto plants at the 3.5–4.0 leaf stage. Values are presented as the means ± standard deviations (n = 8, 8, 8, and 10 for WT, BSR1ox6, OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#4-4, and OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#10-2, respectively). Experiments were conducted twice, with similar results. * p < 0.05, Dunnett’s test for OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#4-4 and OsCERK1ko:BSR1ox#10-2 vs. BSR1ox6; *** p < 0.001, t-test, WT vs. BSR1ox6. WT, wild-type; ox, overexpression; ko, knockout.
Ijms 21 05397 g003
Table 1. Representative oscerk1 mutations induced by transformation with an OsCERK1-knockout/BSR1-overexpression vector.
Table 1. Representative oscerk1 mutations induced by transformation with an OsCERK1-knockout/BSR1-overexpression vector.
TargetLineCleavage Site SequenceFrameshift
(Site #4)WT-GCTGGCTTCCTTCTACGTGACGCCGAACCAGAACGTCAC-
Transformant#4-2-GCTGGCTTCCTTCTaACGTGACGCCGAACCAGAACGTCAC-+1
-GCTGGCTTCCTTCT-CGTGACGCCGAACCAGAACGTCAC-−1
Transformant#4-4-GCTGGCTTCCTTCTaACGTGACGCCGAACCAGAACGTCAC-+1
-GCTGGCTTCCTTCTaACGTGACGCCGAACCAGAACGTCAC-+1
(Site #10)WT-GTGCAGCGCCGGGTGCGACCTCGCGCTGGCTTCCTTCTA-
Transformant#10-2-GTGCAGCGCCGGGTtGCGACCTCGCGCTGGCTTCCTTCTA-+1
-GTGCAGCGCCGGGTtGCGACCTCGCGCTGGCTTCCTTCTA-+1
Transformant#10-6-GTGCAGCGCCGGGT--GACCTCGCGCTGGCTTCCTTCTA-−2
-GTGCAGCGCCGGGTaGCGACCTCGCGCTGGCTTCCTTCTA-+1
Underlined strings, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated cleavage sequences; lower-case letters and hyphens, insertion–deletion mutations found in the T0 plants.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kanda, Y.; Nishizawa, Y.; Kamakura, T.; Mori, M. Overexpressed BSR1-Mediated Enhancement of Disease Resistance Depends on the MAMP-Recognition System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155397

AMA Style

Kanda Y, Nishizawa Y, Kamakura T, Mori M. Overexpressed BSR1-Mediated Enhancement of Disease Resistance Depends on the MAMP-Recognition System. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(15):5397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155397

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kanda, Yasukazu, Yoko Nishizawa, Takashi Kamakura, and Masaki Mori. 2020. "Overexpressed BSR1-Mediated Enhancement of Disease Resistance Depends on the MAMP-Recognition System" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 15: 5397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155397

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop