Next Article in Journal
In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Immune Response of Jellyfish Collagen Scaffolds and its Suitability for Bone Regeneration
Next Article in Special Issue
Clusters of Circulating let-7 Family Tumor Suppressors Are Associated with Clinical Characteristics of Chronic Hepatitis C
Previous Article in Journal
IPSC-Derived Neuronal Cultures Carrying the Alzheimer’s Disease Associated TREM2 R47H Variant Enables the Construction of an Aβ-Induced Gene Regulatory Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
Wisteria floribunda Agglutinin-Positive Mac-2 Binding Protein but not α-fetoprotein as a Long-Term Hepatocellular Carcinoma Predictor
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Post-Treatment M2BPGi Level and the Rate of Autotaxin Reduction are Predictive of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development after Antiviral Therapy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(12), 4517; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124517
by Kazuya Takemura 1, Etsuko Takizawa 1, Akihiro Tamori 2,*, Mika Nakamae 1,3, Hiroshi Kubota 1, Sawako Uchida-Kobayashi 2, Masaru Enomoto 2, Norifumi Kawada 2 and Masayuki Hino 1,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(12), 4517; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124517
Submission received: 20 May 2020 / Revised: 22 June 2020 / Accepted: 23 June 2020 / Published: 25 June 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The study by Takemura et al. proposed a predictive method to assess risk of HCC development after antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C. However, the variation of sensitivity and specificity between gender needs to be validated by more clinical observation. The manuscript is well prepared and data clearly presented to make appropriate conclusion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Takemura et al. submitted a manuscript entitled "Post-treatment M2BPGi Level and the Rate of Autotaxin Reduction are Predictive of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development after Antiviral Therapy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C". The described work calls for questions and comments that are listed below.

The analyses performed alternate between cohorts A and B, separate male and female patients or not, and mixed status and outcomes of HCC (Figure 6).

The abstract should indicate the use of two cohorts (A:670 and B:270 patients) or more accurately two timepoints (6 months and 3 years, with n=670 and n=270).

The authors should clarify their main claim (M2BPGI and/or ATX) and support it clearly with their data and analysis.

How robust are the analyses taking timepoints at 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 3 years ?

Could a more powerful predictor be built by combining ATX and M2BPOI levels to built ?

Could the authors clarify why M2BPGi is a semi-quantitative value ?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The revised manuscript is clearer and the authors have included a useful reference.

Back to TopTop