Next Article in Journal
Cellular Models and Assays to Study NLRP3 Inflammasome Biology
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel HGF/SF Receptor (MET) Agonist Transiently Delays the Disease Progression in an Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mouse Model by Promoting Neuronal Survival and Dampening the Immune Dysregulation
Previous Article in Journal
N-Acetylcysteine Reduces Skeletal Muscles Oxidative Stress and Improves Grip Strength in Dysferlin-Deficient Bla/J Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Burden of Rare Variants in ALS and Axonal Hereditary Neuropathy Genes Influence Survival in ALS: Insights from a Next Generation Sequencing Study of an Italian ALS Cohort
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms21124291
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Multiple Roles of Transforming Growth Factor Beta in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

by
Mariarita Galbiati
*,
Valeria Crippa
,
Paola Rusmini
,
Riccardo Cristofani
,
Elio Messi
,
Margherita Piccolella
,
Barbara Tedesco
,
Veronica Ferrari
,
Elena Casarotto
,
Marta Chierichetti
and
Angelo Poletti
*
Dipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari, Centro di Eccellenza sulle Malattie Neurodegenerative, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(12), 4291; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124291
Submission received: 29 May 2020 / Revised: 12 June 2020 / Accepted: 15 June 2020 / Published: 16 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Highlights of Its Complexity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) is a pleiotropic cytokine known to be dysregulated in many neurodegenerative disorders and particularly in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This motor neuronal disease is non-cell autonomous, as it affects not only motor neurons but also the surrounding glial cells, and the target skeletal muscle fibers. Here, we analyze the multiple roles of TGFB in these cell types, and how TGFB signaling is altered in ALS tissues. Data reported support a crucial involvement of TGFB in the etiology and progression of ALS, leading us to hypothesize that an imbalance of TGFB signaling, diminished at the pre-symptomatic stage and then increased with time, could be linked to ALS progression. A reduced stimulation of the TGFB pathway at the beginning of disease blocks its neuroprotective effects and promotes glutamate excitotoxicity. At later disease stages, the persistent activation of the TGFB pathway promotes an excessive microglial activation and strengthens muscular dysfunction. The therapeutic potential of TGFB is discussed, in order to foster new approaches to treat ALS.

1. Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting the motor system. Nevertheless, it implicates different cell types: motor neurons are the main affected cells, but glial and skeletal muscle cells are strongly implicated and able to deeply modulate the disease onset and course. The neuromuscular system is a complex network; one of the most important factors influencing its development and maintenance is the transforming growth factor beta (TGFB), a pleiotropic molecule also known to be dysregulated in ALS patients. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge of the different roles of TGFB in ALS. We will briefly describe why ALS is also considered a non-cell-autonomous disease, and the general features of the TGFB family; then, we will analyze the roles of TGFB on the multiple cell types involved in ALS, and we will discuss the TGFB pathway as a potential pharmacological target. We will only briefly mention the multiple effects of TGFB on the immune system in ALS, as it is a field that deserves a separate discussion, due to the various and multifaceted roles exerted by TGFB on this system.

2. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis as a Non-Cell-Autonomous Disease

ALS is a disease affecting upper and lower motor neurons, with an incidence of 1–2/100,000 per year, and mean survival of 3–5 years after diagnosis [1]. ALS can occur in two different forms, sporadic (sALS, 90–95% of cases) and familial (fALS, 5–10% of cases), and it can also appear as a pure motor phenotype or in association with fronto-temporal dementia (ALS-FTD). ALS is characterized by a progressive loss of motor neurons, but the precise pathological mechanisms involved are not clear as their complex interplay with neighboring and target cells. Mutations in many different genes have been associated with fALS, starting from the superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) gene (coding for an antioxidant enzyme), to the more recently described mutations in TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), ALS-linked fused in sarcoma/translocated in liposarcoma (FUS/TLS), and other genes (see, for review [2]). Recently, 50% of fALS cases have been associated with an alteration of the chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72), resulting in the expansion of the hexanucleotide (G4C2) repeat located in its 5’-untranslated region [3,4,5].
ALS is primarily caused by the death of upper and lower motor neurons. Nevertheless, in the last 15 years, besides the main classical “neuron-centric” view of ALS, a number of research studies evidenced that ALS could also be a non-cell-autonomous disease [6,7]. Data have been mostly obtained using ALS mouse models, but they may also be linked to sALS cases [8]. Glial and skeletal muscle cells demonstrated their ability to trigger, or modulate, ALS. The analysis of chimeric mice indicated that the restricted expression of human mutant SOD1 (mutSOD1) in motor neuron is not sufficient to induce a cell-autonomous degeneration of motor neurons [9]. Moreover, utilizing floxed mutSOD1 gene, it has been demonstrated that the damaging process starts in motor neurons and determines the disease onset, with little influence on its progression [6]. Conversely, mutSOD1 activates glial cells exacerbating the disease progression, while motor neuronal mutSOD1 has little influence on the progression of ALS [6].
Among the non-neuronal neighbors of ALS motor neurons, glial cells are the most investigated, so far. Astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, and Schwann cells are all able to modulate ALS pathology, and gliosis is a hallmark of ALS from an immuno-histological point of view (see, for review [10,11]).
Activated and proliferating astrocytes become neurotoxic, and no longer provide the metabolic support to motor neurons, but secrete cytokines or other toxic factors (among which is the TGFB) that are critical for determining the rate of disease progression [12,13]. Furthermore, activated astrocytes reduce the expression of the excitatory amino acid transporter-2, that is mandatory for glutamate re-uptake from the synaptic cleft into astrocyte, leading to excitotoxicity in motor neurons [14].
Microglia have long been known to be activated in ALS affected tissues, probably through the innate immune system. The extent of its activation correlates with the severity of the upper motor neuron involvement [15]. The non-cell-autonomous mechanisms of toxicity of microglia include the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines [16]. The reduction of mutSOD1 toxicity within microglia slows the progression of the disease, suggesting that microglia might contribute to the neurodegenerative processes of ALS [17]. Other studies indicated that a decreased number of microglial cells is present at the pre-symptomatic stage in mouse models, while two distinct microglia populations can be identified after symptom manifestation [18]. Whether microglial cells are beneficial or detrimental to motor neurons is already an open question. Probably, they exert a surveillance role on motor neurons and restore the correct environment after an injury but, when constitutively activated in the presence of a chronic stress (such as that causing ALS), they may become toxic.
Other glial cell types are important for motor neuron functionality. Oligodendrocytes provide metabolic support to central nervous system (CNS) neurons and support their survival, while Schwann cells are strictly related to motor neuron axons and support axonal development and regeneration in the peripheral nervous system (PNS). Recent studies implicate oligodendrocytes in ALS pathogenesis, through both myelin sheath disruption and the reduction of the monocarboxylate transporter 1 [19]. Furthermore, it has been shown that oligodendrocytes isolated from human ALS patients are able to induce motor neuron death in a co-culture system [20]. Regarding Schwann cells, few studies addressed their role in ALS, suggesting that axonal degeneration may occur earlier than myelin degeneration.
In addition to neighboring cells, motor neurons can also be influenced by their target, the skeletal muscle cells. It has been shown, at least in fALS, a direct muscular toxicity and/or a functional impairment that has denervation and motor neuron death as a consequence [21,22,23]. Muscle dysfunction and neuromuscular junction (NMJ) degeneration occur long before disease onset [24]. A contribution to the initiation and progression of muscle atrophy is given by altered ALS satellite cell properties [25,26]. Furthermore, muscle gene expression is changed since the early stages of the disease [27,28,29]. Regarding the presence of muscle dysfunction in relation to the expression of other mutant genes linked to ALS, it must be recalled that TDP-43 immuno-reactivity is detectable only in muscle fiber nuclei without any sarcoplasmic TDP-43 aggregation [30,31]; very recently, it has been demonstrated that skeletal muscle contributes to the ALS phenotype also in C9orf72 related cases [32]. These authors demonstrated that the presence and the amount of dipeptide repeats in patient’s muscles are significantly related to a more severe muscular atrophy. In addition, our previous works have indicated that the protein quality control system is a dysfunctional cellular process in ALS muscle cells, but these cells seem to be more protected than motor neurons against the presence of accumulating misfolded proteins [33,34,35]. Proteasome activity is impaired by mutSOD1 only in motor neurons and not in muscle cells [35]. Nevertheless, we proved that motor neurons are characterized by a higher autophagic potential with respect to muscle cells. These results could help to clarify why muscle cells seem more protected than motor neurons from misfolded SOD1. Parallel results have indicated that muscle cells mainly depend on the proteasome system to quickly remove misfolded TDP-43 [33]. As a whole, data indicate that autophagy modulation could be a potential therapeutic approach to counteract muscle atrophy in ALS and to promote aggregate removal in motor neurons.

3. Transforming Growth Factor Beta

TGFB is a family of cytokines with widespread and diverse effects. During development and in adulthood, TGFB family member signals can reach practically all the cells modulating their activities [36]. The TGFB superfamily comprises 32 members grouped into different families, including TGFB, activin, growth and differentiation factor (GDF), and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) families (Table 1) [37]. Among all these ligands, TGFB1 and myostatin are considered the most implicated in skeletal muscle development and function, with shared or contraposed features.
The bioactive TGFB ligands are disulfide-linked dimers cleaved from the C-terminal portion of a precursor. Usually, the ligands are homodimeric, but also heterodimers exist. All the ligands of the TGFB family bind to two pairs of receptors that are transmembrane serine/threonine protein kinases. The binding of the cytokine to the type II receptor (TGFBRII) leads to its activation, and to the phosphorylation of the type I receptor (TGFBRI), allowing it to phosphorylate small mother against decapentaplegic (SMAD) transcription factors which shuttle between the cytosol and the nucleus [36]. In the nucleus, SMADs bind to specific responsive elements (SMAD binding elements, SBEs) throughout the genome, activating or repressing a variety of different responsive genes (Figure 1).
There are eight SMAD proteins in mammals: five are receptor regulated (R-SMAD, SMAD1, 2, 3, 5, 8), two are inhibitory (SMAD6 and 7), and one (SMAD4) is a protein common to all the pathways of TGFB family members. In the pathway activated by TGFB ligands, the TGFBRI phosphorylates SMAD2 and SMAD3. Receptor-mediated phosphorylation facilitates oligomerization between R-SMADs and SMAD4. The formation of this complex is mandatory to bring the signal from the cytosol to the nucleus, but, so far, SMAD4 specific function is unknown since certain TGFB functions do not require SMAD4. SMADs nuclear translocation does not depend on nuclear transport factors or importins; they can directly interact with nucleoporins [38]. The SMAD dependent signaling pathway of TGFB works ubiquitously in all cell types; however, in a context dependent manner, TGFB can activate SMAD-independent signaling cascades, such as PI3K, MAPK, or small GTPases [39]. Inhibitory SMADs bind an already activated TGFBRI, leading to the inhibition of the R-SMAD phosphorylation and their subsequent translocation into the nucleus and adding a further level of regulation of the TGFB/SMAD signaling cascade.
Once in the nucleus, SMAD complexes target specific promoters to regulate gene expression and microRNA processing. R-SMADs can directly bind DNA through SBEs giving gene specificity to the complex, while SMAD4 promotes or inhibits transcriptional activity, recruiting different, tissue-specific co-regulators [40]. Phosphorylated SMAD (pSMAD) signaling is terminated through phosphatase (PPM1A/PP2Cα)-mediated dephosphorylation and SMAD export from the nucleus to the cytosol. Alternatively, nuclear pSMADs are targeted for ubiquitination and subsequent cytosolic proteasomal degradation [41].
TGFB signaling can also be “non-canonical”; in this case, its effects are transduced by Smad-independent pathways, which include ERK MAPKs, a TGFB-activated kinase 1 (TAK1 activating JNK, p38K, and NF-κB), and PI3K-AKT [42]. The differential activation of non-SMAD pathways is context dependent; for example, in myotubes, the atrophic effect of TGFB seems to be linked to ERK1/2 and JNK1/2, in addition to SMADs [43].
TGFB regulates a plethora of cellular functions, in different contexts, ranging from embryonic development to tumor progression, from immune regulation to tissue fibrosis, and neurotrophic response modulation. Dysregulation of the TGFB pathway has been reported also as a common feature in neurodegenerative disorders, and among them, in pathologies affecting motor neurons, and particularly in ALS. The following paragraphs will summarize alterations in the TGFB pathway reported in many different ALS models, both in vivo and in vitro, in addition to those detected in patients.

4. TGFB Plasma Levels in ALS Patients

Similarly to Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s patients [44,45], in which an increased concentration of TGFB1 was found in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or serum respectively, TGFB1 plasma concentration in ALS patients is significantly higher than in the healthy controls, and it positively correlates with the disease [46]. Indeed, TGFB1 is increased in the serum of ALS patients at an advanced stage of disease; likewise, TGFB1 is also augmented in the CSF of ALS patients with long disease duration [47]. A recent study has confirmed the existence of a negative correlation between TGFB1 and TGFB3 levels and ALS severity; this study postulated that high levels of TGFB in the serum might represent a compensatory mechanism to counteract the pronounced systemic immune response typical of the late stage of the disease, by inducing T cells to differentiate into non regulatory phenotypes [48]. Even if the increase in plasma TGFB1 levels has been confirmed also in mutSOD1 transgenic mice [49], whether TGFB1 plasma levels are biomarkers of ALS or not is still an open question; in fact, other studies fail to detect the changes of TGFB1 levels in patient CSF compared to healthy controls [50], or between fast and slow progressing ALS patients analyzed both at early and late stage of disease [49].
In the attempt to find specific ALS-susceptibility genes, a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the ZNF512B gene has been identified; the ZNF512B gene codes for a transcription factor with a reduced ability to promote TGFB signaling [51]. A retrospective analysis of this gene in ALS patients indicated a significantly lower probability of survival in patients, carrying the risk allele independently from other factors know to be involved in ALS [52]. For this reason, ZNF512B might be a new prognostic factor in ALS.

5. TGFB and ALS-Nervous System

In the adult rodent nervous system, TGFB1 immunoreactivity is constitutively present only in meninges and the choroid plexus in the brain [53,54]. However, TGFB1 mRNA is more widely expressed, with intense labeling in cortical layers 2, 3, and 5, hippocampus, retinal ganglionic cells, some hypothalamic areas, and the ventral horn of the spinal cord [54,55]. TGFB2 and 3 are widespread and distributed [53,54]. The immunoreactivity of TGFB is also present in astroglial cells. The expression of TGFBRI and TGFBRII has been demonstrated in neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, microglia, and brain endothelial cells [56,57].
TGFBs have multiple functions in the CNS. They enhance synapse formation and synaptic transmission [58,59], regulate synaptic plasticity and memory [57], increase the number and length of neurites [56], control neuronal migration [60], and cerebral cortex angiogenesis [61]. CNS-TGFB1-deficient mice have a reduced brain weight and a loss of neurons in the CA1 hippocampal region. These mice show a reduction of dendritic spine density, impaired long-term potentiation, and facilitated long-term depression in the hippocampus, in addition to the loss of the astrocyte glutamate transporters GLT-1 (EAAT2) and GLAST (EAAT1), and decreased glutamate uptake, resulting in a higher sensibility to glutamate excitotoxicity, that is one of the possible pathogenic mechanism in ALS (Figure 2) [62].
Motor nerve terminals show an intense TGFBRI and II immunoreactivity [63]; thus, they are expected to be responsive to TGFB. Furthermore, the Schwann cell side of the synapse and axons express TGFBRII, suggesting that motor neurons are exposed to TGFB along their full length. Indeed, motor neurons are surrounded by different cell types, all capable of producing and releasing TGFB: blood cells, Schwann cells, muscle fibers. During development, TGFB promotes motor neurons survival and saves them from naturally occurring cell death, due to competition for a limited amount of survival factors provided by all the cells that they interact with [64]. In primary motor neuron cultures, TGFB1 protects cells from damage caused by cytotoxic hypoxia or excitatory amino acids inducing an increase in cell viability, neuronal ATP levels, and protein content [65]. In vivo, its administration attenuates axotomy-induced motor neuron death, even if its rescue effect is not permanent [66]. TGFB2 is a motor neuron survival factor concentrated in the post-synaptic domain of mature rodent and human muscle fibers [67]. Nevertheless, in specific conditions, motor neurons are able to produce TGFB2 in an autocrine manner, probably to counteract peripheral (dendritic, or at the nerve terminal) apoptotic signals [63].
Even if the comparative analysis of fALS and sALS tissues indicates the existence of common and distinct biological mechanisms driving the different forms of the pathology, altered levels of the TGFB1 pathway have been reported in motor neurons of most ALS models and patients. Recently, an analysis of DEGs and DEPs in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC)-derived motor neurons from patients with mutations in C9orf72 indicated TGFB and SMAD2/3 targets among the pathway most involved with a high correlation between significantly altered mRNA and proteins [68]. Similar results have been obtained in postmortem spinal motor neurons from sALS patients. The mutated TDP-43 protein aggregates form intracytosolic inclusion bodies that sequester pSMAD2/3 and SMURF2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase promoting the ubiquitin-dependent degradation of SMAD proteins, suggesting an impaired TGFB signal in motor neurons of sALS patients [69,70]. Interestingly, TDP-43 inclusions of brain extra-motor neurons do not co-localize with pSMAD2/3, and its nuclear staining is preserved, indicating regional differences in the composition of the inclusions and in the impairment of TGFB signaling [70].
An excessive activation of the TGFB pathway has also been reported in ALS4 patients characterized by mutation in senataxin (SETX) gene. These patients present fewer R-loops (three-stranded nucleic acid structures) and their differentially-expressed genes are highly enriched for activation of the TGFB pathway [71]. Principally, it is decreased in the expression of BAMBI, a TGFB pseudo receptor, which lacks the intracellular kinase domain and acts as a negative regulator, leading to an increased TGFB signaling. Indeed, in the same ALS4 patients, levels of pSMAD2/3 are increased in the anterior horn of the spinal cord [71].
TGFB/SMAD targets are abnormally regulated in iPSC-derived motor neurons from patients with mutSOD1, even if, in this case, they belong to downregulated gene sets [68]. Neuronal injuries, such as oxidative stress, rapidly up-regulate TGFB1 mRNA, inducing the expression of multiple genes involved in neuronal protection, and counteracting neuronal damage [72]. Reduced Tgfb1 mRNA levels in the spinal cord of pre-symptomatic mutSOD1 mice could indicate a lack of the TGFB neuroprotective effect in the early stages of the disease [29]. With disease progression, Tgfb1 gene expression increases in the spinal cord, probably for the development of reactive astrogliosis [29,73]. In fact, it must be highlighted that all types of glial cells are able to produce and/or respond to TGFB. The role of glia-derived TGFB1 in the spinal cord of ALS patients and mice has been studied by Endo and colleagues [12]. They observed an upregulation of TGFB1 in the lumbar spinal cord of ALS mice, mainly in astrocytes. Furthermore, TGFB1 mRNA levels negatively correlated with the survival of ALS mice. Taking advantage of the ALS mice overexpressing TGFB1 in astrocytes and of the ALS mice with the astrocyte-specific deletion of TGFB1, they determined that astrocyte-derived TGFB1 accelerates disease progression in ALS mice, preventing neuroprotective responses mediated by the microglia and T cells [12].
In the spinal cord of ALS mice, the TGFB signaling pathway is also altered. Tgfbr2 mRNA levels are increased [29] in agreement with other authors, indicating a higher TGFBR2 immunoreactivity [73], and higher levels of Tgfbr2 in human and mouse spinal cord ALS samples [74,75].
In mutSOD1 mice, levels of pSMAD2 in the nuclei of lumbar motor neurons are significantly decreased already at the pre-symptomatic stage, while they are preserved at the cytosolic level as the expression of TGFBR1 and 2 [12,69,76]. This led to the hypothesis of an aberrant nucleo/cytosolic transport with an accumulation of cytosolic pSMAD2/3 immunoreactivity [69,76]. Moreover, the presence of pSMAD2 in glial nuclei is preserved. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that physiological pSMAD2 levels in the nucleus are not recovered by overexpressing TGFB1 [12], and that the expression of Smad2 and Smad4 is decreased [29]. Otherwise, an up-regulation of SMAD4 in the spinal motor neurons of autopsied sALS cases has also been reported [77].

6. TGFB Pathway in ALS Skeletal Muscle

In skeletal muscle, the expression of TGFB is related to normal processes such as growth, differentiation, regeneration, and stress response. However, continuously elevated levels of TGFB are linked to impaired regeneration and atrophy. TGFB blocks myogenic responses and stimulates fibrosis [78]. It inhibits the activation of MyoD and myogenin (two transcription factors regulating muscle cell differentiation) through the signaling of SMAD3 or by inactivating cyclin-dependent kinases [79,80]. Satellite cell activation is also prevented in the presence of TGFB, and muscle overexpression of TGFB leads to muscle weakness and atrophy [81,82]. Furthermore, TGFB has a dual role in the inflammatory process taking place after muscle injury: it acts first as a stimulating factor, and then as a suppressor for muscle inflammatory response. Injured muscle fibers secrete TGFB, and in different disorders, its muscle levels are elevated [83]. Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA), a polyglutamine disease dependent on the expansion of the CAG repeat within the androgen receptor (AR) affects motor neurons and skeletal muscles and it is also associated with the disruption of TGFB signaling [84,85]. Mdx mice (a model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy) are characterized by myofiber degeneration and augmented TGFB1 signaling [86]. Furthermore, in this murine model, the neutralization of TGFB1 signaling may enhance the differentiation and fusion of the precursor satellite cells, suggesting a direct role for this cytokine in skeletal muscle regeneration [87].
ALS muscle tissue is also characterized by alterations of the TGFB pathway. We reported increased levels of the Tgfb1 mRNA in the muscle of mice expressing mutSOD1 [28]. These changes are also gender-related, since male mice present an increased TGFB expression in muscle already at the pre-symptomatic stage, both at the mRNA and protein level, while in female animals, TGFB increases only at the symptomatic stage [29]. Tgfb mRNA levels are further increased with the administration of an anabolic/androgenic steroid (AAS), indicating that, at least at the muscular level, AAS might exert a detrimental role in ALS, since it might exacerbate some of the alterations induced by mutSOD1 [28,88]. Moreover, data obtained with the C2C12 muscle cell model indicate that an increase of the AR (that was obtained in vivo by stabilizing the receptor through a chronic AAS treatment) may also modify the effect of the wild type human SOD1, leading to an augmented TGFB1 expression [28]. These data might help to explain gender differences in the risk to develop ALS [2]. Evidence in human confirmed the involvement of TGFB1 since we reported an increased TGFB1 expression in muscle of female and male sporadic ALS patients with a significant gender effect [29], and other authors also reported the increase of TGFB1, 2, and 3 in ALS patient muscles [89,90]. It must also be highlighted that TGFB1 and TGFB3 mRNA show a negative correlation with muscle strength in ALS patients [90]. In the same manner, the increase of TGFB1 correlates with disease progression in mutSOD1 mice [28] and Smad1, 5, and 8 expression negatively correlates with mouse rotarod scores [91]. As a result, TGFB1 has been proposed as a possible biomarker of ALS progression [29,90,92].
The analysis of muscle lysates from ALS patients indicated a strong increase of TGFB1 protein [90]. Even if, in these samples, TGFB1 immunoreactivity has been detected in macrophages and lymphocytes surrounding the fibers and suggesting inflammatory infiltrated cells as the TGFB1 source, we reported that the expression of mutSOD1 in C2C12 cells stimulates Tgfb1 expression [28], and C2C12 cells are able to respond to TGFB, increasing SMADs production and phosphorylation [90].
Regarding the intracellular pathways mediating TGFB functions in muscle cells, different works have evidenced changes in the levels of SMAD proteins. We reported an increased expression of SMAD2 and SMAD3 in symptomatic ALS mice, in agreement with Si and collaborators [29,90]. Evidence in ALS patients is more contradictory, reporting increased [89], diminished [29], or unchanged [90] SMADs muscle expression. These discrepancies might be due to the heterogeneity of ALS patients (sporadic vs. familiar), to the site of the biopsies (deltoid, tibialis anterior, vastus lateralis), duration of the pathology, site of onset, etc. R-SMADs enter into the nucleus through SMAD4, and in line with the work of Saris et al., we found a decreased Smad4 expression in muscle, suggesting a further site of dysregulation of TGFB intracellular signaling [93]. The involvement of other SMAD proteins (SMAD 1, 5, and 8, usually more involved in the BMP signaling pathway), has been reported [91]. BMP is one of the strongest hypertrophic signals in muscle; for this reason, the increase of these SMADs could represent a way to counteract denervation-induced atrophy. Whether SMAD changes are related to the progressive loss of motor neuron innervation or to a muscle pathological modification contributing to its atrophy and to disease progression has yet to be established. However, we reported that mutSOD1 toxicity can be exerted independently of its tendency to aggregate. At motor neuron level, mutSOD1 forms proteinaceous inclusions that alter SOD1 protein bioavailability and turnover [94] and reduce the protective effect exerted by wild type SOD1 against free radical reactive oxygen species [95]. On the contrary, in the gastrocnemius muscle of ALS mice, an increase of mutSOD1 levels was detected only at the terminal stage, and no high molecular weight SDS-resistant species of mutSOD1 were identified, either in ALS mice or in C2C12 cells expressing mutSOD1 [28,35].
The hypothesis of an impairment of TGFB signaling in motor neurons at the step of pSMAD 2/3 translocation into the nucleus is also supported by data obtained in the muscle since, usually, TGFB1 inhibits MyoD transcription through SMAD3, while in mutSOD1 mouse muscle, and in mutSOD1 transfected C2C12 cells, we detected high levels of MyoD mRNA [28].
It has also been proposed that excessive oxidative processes may be a mechanism of activation of latent TGFB pool in ALS, as in other neurodegenerative diseases, leading to an increased TGFB1 release from the complex [96].
TGFB1 is a potent inducer of fibrotic tissue formation, promoting the transformation of myoblasts into fibrotic tissue after an injury, inhibiting satellite cell activation, and impairing myocyte differentiation [86]. In the skeletal muscle of mutSOD1 expressing mice fibrosis is enhanced and correlates with TGFB levels, therefore, we can hypothesize that the beneficial effects of reducing TGFB levels could also be associated with a reduction of fibrosis [97].

7. TGFB and NMJ in ALS

Since the first histological studies, recurrent denervation and reinnervation have been observed in the NMJs of ALS patients [98]. Because of that, it has been proposed to consider ALS also as a distal axonopathy, with pathological changes occurring at the NMJs prior to motor neuron degeneration and muscle fiber atrophy (see, for review [99]).
TGFB pathway regulates the formation and stability of the NMJs. All the members of this tripartite synapse are able to produce and/or respond to TGFB. Muscle fibers express TGFB1, motor neuron terminals express TGFB receptors, and the synapse associated Schwann cells, also called terminal Schwann cells (TSCs, which are active components of the NMJ [100]), promote synaptogenesis at the NMJ via TGFB1 [101]. In this site, TGFB1 is capable of doubling the size of acetylcholine receptor clusters increasing the percentage of nerve–muscle contacts. It has also been demonstrated that this synaptogenic effect of TGFB1 might be ascribed to its ability to induce neuronal agrin expression [101]. Agrin is a proteoglycan important for the maintenance of the architecture of the postsynaptic membrane, known to be down-regulated in the muscle of ALS mice expressing mutSOD1 [22].
Recent studies indicate that alterations of the TSCs are present well before motor neuron terminal degeneration and the beginning of denervation in mutSOD1 expressing mice [102]. An anomaly appears as the absence of TSCs at many NMJs of the fast medial gastrocnemius, and with TSC cell body displacement at other NMJs of gastrocnemius or soleus muscle. This evidence could support the different extent of denervation between fast and slow muscles [102].
Among the factors secreted by muscle fibers and concentrated at the NMJ to promote synapse well-being, there is the fibroblast growth factor binding protein 1 (FGFBP1) [103]. FGFBP1 is a secreted factor that might potentiate the bioactivity of different members of the FGF family during reinnervation, by releasing sequestered FGF from the extracellular matrix [103]. The expression of this binding protein is known to be decreased in mutSOD1 mouse skeletal muscles before NMJ degeneration, and the deletion of FGFBP1 from mutSOD1 mice accelerates NMJ degeneration and disease progression [104]. The same authors reported also that TGFB1 is highly concentrated at NMJs of pre-symptomatic mutSOD1 mice, and represses FGFBP1 expression, indicating TGFB1 pathway as a potential target for preventing NMJ dismantling in ALS mice [104].
Moreover, other genetic models of ALS present NMJ modifications. For example, the loss of function of VAPB in Drosophila reduces the number of boutons that are also larger than in wild type flies, and with a highly disorganized microtubule network [105]. Again, a Drosophila ALS model expressing a mutant form of an ortholog of VAPB (resembling the loss of function phenotype), shows reduced pMAD (an ortholog of SMAD) at the NMJ and in CNS [106].

8. TGFB: A Target for ALS Treatment

The therapeutic potential of TGFB has been investigated, in order to develop new therapies for ALS.
In a study performed with mutSOD1 expressing mice, SB-431542, a selective inhibitor of TGFBRI kinase activity, has been proven to extend animal survival, even if administered after disease onset; this led the authors to hypothesize that TGFB1 produced by astrocytes inhibits the neuroprotective response given by microglia and inflammatory cells and could be considered a negative prognostic factor [12].
Moreover, the intraperitoneal injection of TGFB2 is able to acutely improve the motor performance of ALS mice. It reverses initial muscle weakness, permitting a better performance at rotarod test, probably through a marked trophic action on motor neurons, as can be inferred by motor neuron nuclei and axonal enlargement. Unfortunately, this advantage is transient, leading to an even more rapid progression of the disease [107].
Antibodies neutralizing other members of the TGFB family have been tested in ALS models. For example, the prevention of myostatin binding to its receptor delayed the onset and the progression of the disease in ALS mice, even if without extending their survival [108,109].

9. Conclusions

The pleiotropic effects of TGFB in ALS have been analyzed and are summarized in Figure 2.
The imbalance of TGFB signaling has been linked to ALS progression. On one hand, at the level of the CNS, there is a lack of the neuroprotective effects of TGFB at the first stages of the disease; later, the strong increase of TGFB levels due to microglial stimulation shifts the CNS milieu toward a proinflammatory and neurotoxic environment. On the other hand, at the level of the skeletal muscle, the chronically increased TGFB signaling facilitates the development of atrophy and fibrosis in skeletal muscle fiber, and the process of NMJ dismantling. Furthermore, the higher pre-symptomatic levels of TGFB in male vs. female muscle support the evidence that males are more vulnerable than females in ALS. Whether muscle effects are the cause or the result of the progressive motor neuron degeneration remains to be established.
Taken together, the data reviewed here support the hypothesis that the TGFB pathway may be considered critical for ALS etiology and progression. Thus, TGFB and its signaling pathway could represent a promising target for developing new therapies for ALS.

Author Contributions

M.G. designed and wrote the manuscript, and A.P. critically discussed with M.G. all the sections of this review. M.G. prepared the figures. P.R., V.C., R.C., E.M., M.P., V.F., B.T., E.C., and M.C. critically revised the manuscript and figures. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by: Fondazione Telethon, Italy (n. GGP14039 to A.P., GGP19128 to A.P.); Kennedy’s disease association (2018 grant to R.C.); Fondazione Cariplo, Italy (n. 2014-0686 to A.P.; n. 2017_0747 to V.C.); Fondazione AriSLA, Italy (n. ALS_HSPB8 to A.P.; ALS_Granulopathy to A.P.; MLOpathy to A.P.; Target-RAN to A.P.); Association Française contre les Myopathies, France (AFM Telethon n. 16406 to A.P.); Università degli Studi di Milano e piano di sviluppo UNIMI—linea B (to V.C. and P.R.); Bando Straordinario per Progetti Interdipartimentali (Bando SEED 2019: #TDP-43-iPSC to V.C.) Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR), PRIN—Progetti di ricerca di interesse nazionale (n. 2015LFPNMN to A.P.; n. 2017F2A2C5 to A.P.); Fondo per il Finanziamento delle Attività Base di Ricerca (FFABR) (MIUR, to M.G., E.M., and to P.R.); Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) (Co_ALS to A.P.); Fondazione Regionale per la Ricerca Biomedica (FRRB) (Regione Lombardia, TRANS_ALS, project nr. 2015-0023, to A.P.). EU Joint Programme—Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND) project. The project is supported through the following funding organisations under the aegis of JPND—www.jpnd.eu. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N° 643417 [Grant ID: 01ED1601A, CureALS] (to A.P.); Italian Ministry of University and Research [Progetto Dipartimenti di Eccellenza].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ALSamyotrophic lateral sclerosis
SOD1superoxide dismutase type 1
C9orf72chromosome 9 open reading frame 72
TDP-43TAR DNA-binding protein 43
CNScentral nervous system
PNSperipheral nervous system
TGFBtransforming growth factor beta
TGFBRITGFB type I receptor
TGFBRIITGFB type II receptor
SMADsmall mother against decapentaplegic
SBESMAD binding element

References

  1. Marin, B.; Boumediene, F.; Logroscino, G.; Couratier, P.; Babron, M.C.; Leutenegger, A.L.; Copetti, M.; Preux, P.M.; Beghi, E. Variation in worldwide incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Vegeto, E.; Villa, A.; Della Torre, S.; Crippa, V.; Rusmini, P.; Cristofani, R.; Galbiati, M.; Maggi, A.; Poletti, A. The Role of sex and sex hormones in neurodegenerative diseases. Endocr. Rev. 2020, 41, 273–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ash, P.E.; Bieniek, K.F.; Gendron, T.F.; Caulfield, T.; Lin, W.L.; Dejesus-Hernandez, M.; van Blitterswijk, M.M.; Jansen-West, K.; Paul, J.W., III; Rademakers, R.; et al. Unconventional translation of C9ORF72 GGGGCC expansion generates insoluble polypeptides specific to c9FTD/ALS. Neuron 2013, 77, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Lashley, T.; Hardy, J.; Isaacs, A.M. RANTing about C9orf72. Neuron 2013, 77, 597–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Mori, K.; Weng, S.M.; Arzberger, T.; May, S.; Rentzsch, K.; Kremmer, E.; Schmid, B.; Kretzschmar, H.A.; Cruts, M.; Van Broeckhoven, C.; et al. The C9orf72 GGGGCC repeat is translated into aggregating dipeptide-repeat proteins in FTLD/ALS. Science 2013, 339, 1335–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Boillee, S.; Vande Velde, C.; Cleveland, D.W. ALS: A disease of motor neurons and their nonneuronal neighbors. Neuron 2006, 52, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ilieva, H.; Polymenidou, M.; Cleveland, D.W. Non-cell autonomous toxicity in neurodegenerative disorders: ALS and beyond. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187, 761–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Haidet-Phillips, A.M.; Hester, M.E.; Miranda, C.J.; Meyer, K.; Braun, L.; Frakes, A.; Song, S.; Likhite, S.; Murtha, M.J.; Foust, K.D.; et al. Astrocytes from familial and sporadic ALS patients are toxic to motor neurons. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 824–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Clement, A.M.; Nguyen, M.D.; Roberts, E.A.; Garcia, M.L.; Boillee, S.; Rule, M.; McMahon, A.P.; Doucette, W.; Siwek, D.; Ferrante, R.J.; et al. Wild-type nonneuronal cells extend survival of SOD1 mutant motor neurons in ALS mice. Science 2003, 302, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Yamanaka, K.; Komine, O. The multi-dimensional roles of astrocytes in ALS. Neurosci. Res. 2018, 126, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yamanaka, K.; Yamashita, H. [ALS and microglia--a player for non-cell-autonomous neuron death]. Brain Nerve = Shinkei Kenkyu Shinpo 2007, 59, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar]
  12. Endo, F.; Komine, O.; Fujimori-Tonou, N.; Katsuno, M.; Jin, S.; Watanabe, S.; Sobue, G.; Dezawa, M.; Wyss-Coray, T.; Yamanaka, K. Astrocyte-derived TGF-beta1 accelerates disease progression in ALS mice by interfering with the neuroprotective functions of microglia and T cells. Cell Rep. 2015, 11, 592–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ferraiuolo, L.; Higginbottom, A.; Heath, P.R.; Barber, S.; Greenald, D.; Kirby, J.; Shaw, P.J. Dysregulation of astrocyte-motoneuron cross-talk in mutant superoxide dismutase 1-related amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 2011, 134, 2627–2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Rosenblum, L.T.; Trotti, D. EAAT2 and the molecular signature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Adv. Neurobiol. 2017, 16, 117–136. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Alexianu, M.E.; Kozovska, M.; Appel, S.H. Immune reactivity in a mouse model of familial ALS correlates with disease progression. Neurology 2001, 57, 1282–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, Y.; Hao, W.; Dawson, A.; Liu, S.; Fassbender, K. Expression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-linked SOD1 mutant increases the neurotoxic potential of microglia via TLR2. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 3691–3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Boillee, S.; Yamanaka, K.; Lobsiger, C.S.; Copeland, N.G.; Jenkins, N.A.; Kassiotis, G.; Kollias, G.; Cleveland, D.W. Onset and progression in inherited ALS determined by motor neurons and microglia. Science 2006, 312, 1389–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gerber, Y.N.; Sabourin, J.C.; Rabano, M.; Vivanco, M.; Perrin, F.E. Early functional deficit and microglial disturbances in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nonneman, A.; Robberecht, W.; Van Den Bosch, L. The role of oligodendroglial dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurodegener. Dis. Manag. 2014, 4, 223–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ferraiuolo, L.; Meyer, K.; Sherwood, T.W.; Vick, J.; Likhite, S.; Frakes, A.; Miranda, C.J.; Braun, L.; Heath, P.R.; Pineda, R.; et al. Oligodendrocytes contribute to motor neuron death in ALS via SOD1-dependent mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E6496–E6505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Dobrowolny, G.; Aucello, M.; Rizzuto, E.; Beccafico, S.; Mammucari, C.; Boncompagni, S.; Belia, S.; Wannenes, F.; Nicoletti, C.; Del Prete, Z.; et al. Skeletal muscle is a primary target of SOD1G93A-mediated toxicity. Cell Metab. 2008, 8, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dobrowolny, G.; Giacinti, C.; Pelosi, L.; Nicoletti, C.; Winn, N.; Barberi, L.; Molinaro, M.; Rosenthal, N.; Musaro, A. Muscle expression of a local Igf-1 isoform protects motor neurons in an ALS mouse model. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 168, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Wong, M.; Martin, L.J. Skeletal muscle-restricted expression of human SOD1 causes motor neuron degeneration in transgenic mice. Hum. Mol. Genet 2010, 19, 2284–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Fischer, L.R.; Culver, D.G.; Tennant, P.; Davis, A.A.; Wang, M.; Castellano-Sanchez, A.; Khan, J.; Polak, M.A.; Glass, J.D. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a distal axonopathy: Evidence in mice and man. Exp. Neurol. 2004, 185, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Manzano, R.; Toivonen, J.M.; Olivan, S.; Calvo, A.C.; Moreno-Igoa, M.; Munoz, M.J.; Zaragoza, P.; Garcia-Redondo, A.; Osta, R. Altered expression of myogenic regulatory factors in the mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurodegener. Dis. 2011, 8, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pradat, P.F.; Barani, A.; Wanschitz, J.; Dubourg, O.; Lombes, A.; Bigot, A.; Mouly, V.; Bruneteau, G.; Salachas, F.; Lenglet, T.; et al. Abnormalities of satellite cells function in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2011, 12, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Crippa, V.; Boncoraglio, A.; Galbiati, M.; Aggarwal, T.; Rusmini, P.; Giorgetti, E.; Cristofani, R.; Carra, S.; Pennuto, M.; Poletti, A. Differential autophagy power in the spinal cord and muscle of transgenic ALS mice. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Galbiati, M.; Onesto, E.; Zito, A.; Crippa, V.; Rusmini, P.; Mariotti, R.; Bentivoglio, M.; Bendotti, C.; Poletti, A. The anabolic/androgenic steroid nandrolone exacerbates gene expression modifications induced by mutant SOD1 in muscles of mice models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Pharmacol. Res. 2012, 65, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Meroni, M.; Crippa, V.; Cristofani, R.; Rusmini, P.; Cicardi, M.E.; Messi, E.; Piccolella, M.; Tedesco, B.; Ferrari, V.; Soraru, G.; et al. Transforming growth factor beta 1 signaling is altered in the spinal cord and muscle of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mice and patients. Neurobiol. Aging 2019, 82, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hernandez Lain, A.; Millecamps, S.; Dubourg, O.; Salachas, F.; Bruneteau, G.; Lacomblez, L.; LeGuern, E.; Seilhean, D.; Duyckaerts, C.; Meininger, V.; et al. Abnormal TDP-43 and FUS proteins in muscles of sporadic IBM: Similarities in a TARDBP-linked ALS patient. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2011, 82, 1414–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Soraru, G.; Orsetti, V.; Buratti, E.; Baralle, F.; Cima, V.; Volpe, M.; D’Ascenzo, C.; Palmieri, A.; Koutsikos, K.; Pegoraro, E.; et al. TDP-43 in skeletal muscle of patients affected with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2010, 11, 240–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cykowski, M.D.; Dickson, D.W.; Powell, S.Z.; Arumanayagam, A.S.; Rivera, A.L.; Appel, S.H. Dipeptide repeat (DPR) pathology in the skeletal muscle of ALS patients with C9ORF72 repeat expansion. Acta Neuropathol. 2019, 138, 667–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Cicardi, M.E.; Cristofani, R.; Rusmini, P.; Meroni, M.; Ferrari, V.; Vezzoli, G.; Tedesco, B.; Piccolella, M.; Messi, E.; Galbiati, M.; et al. Tdp-25 Routing to autophagy and proteasome ameliorates its aggregation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis target cells. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Crippa, V.; Galbiati, M.; Boncoraglio, A.; Rusmini, P.; Onesto, E.; Giorgetti, E.; Cristofani, R.; Zito, A.; Poletti, A. Motoneuronal and muscle-selective removal of ALS-related misfolded proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2013, 41, 1598–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Onesto, E.; Rusmini, P.; Crippa, V.; Ferri, N.; Zito, A.; Galbiati, M.; Poletti, A. Muscle cells and motoneurons differentially remove mutant SOD1 causing familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurochem. 2011, 118, 266–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Massague, J. How cells read TGF-beta signals. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000, 1, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. David, C.J.; Massague, J. Contextual determinants of TGFbeta action in development, immunity and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 419–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Massague, J.; Seoane, J.; Wotton, D. Smad transcription factors. Genes Dev. 2005, 19, 2783–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Mu, Y.; Gudey, S.K.; Landstrom, M. Non-Smad signaling pathways. Cell Tissue Res. 2012, 347, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Weiss, A.; Attisano, L. The TGFbeta superfamily signaling pathway. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2013, 2, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Izzi, L.; Attisano, L. Regulation of the TGFbeta signalling pathway by ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Oncogene 2004, 23, 2071–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Zhang, Y.E. Non-Smad signaling pathways of the TGF-beta family. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Abrigo, J.; Campos, F.; Simon, F.; Riedel, C.; Cabrera, D.; Vilos, C.; Cabello-Verrugio, C. TGF-beta requires the activation of canonical and non-canonical signalling pathways to induce skeletal muscle atrophy. Biol. Chem. 2018, 399, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chao, C.C.; Ala, T.A.; Hu, S.; Crossley, K.B.; Sherman, R.E.; Peterson, P.K.; Frey, W.H. 2nd, Serum cytokine levels in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 1994, 1, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mogi, M.; Harada, M.; Kondo, T.; Narabayashi, H.; Riederer, P.; Nagatsu, T. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 levels are elevated in the striatum and in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 1995, 193, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Houi, K.; Kobayashi, T.; Kato, S.; Mochio, S.; Inoue, K. Increased plasma TGF-beta1 in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2002, 106, 299–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ilzecka, J.; Stelmasiak, Z.; Dobosz, B. Transforming growth factor-Beta 1 (tgf-Beta 1) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cytokine 2002, 20, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Duque, T.; Gromicho, M.; Pronto-Laborinho, A.C.; de Carvalho, M. Transforming growth factor-beta plasma levels and its role in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Med. Hypotheses 2020, 139, 109632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zubiri, I.; Lombardi, V.; Bremang, M.; Mitra, V.; Nardo, G.; Adiutori, R.; Lu, C.H.; Leoni, E.; Yip, P.; Yildiz, O.; et al. Tissue-enhanced plasma proteomic analysis for disease stratification in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Mol. Neurodegener. 2018, 13, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Masuda, T.; Itoh, J.; Koide, T.; Tomidokoro, Y.; Takei, Y.; Ishii, K.; Tamaoka, A. Transforming growth factor-beta1 in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with distinct neurodegenerative diseases. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 35, 47–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Iida, A.; Takahashi, A.; Kubo, M.; Saito, S.; Hosono, N.; Ohnishi, Y.; Kiyotani, K.; Mushiroda, T.; Nakajima, M.; Ozaki, K.; et al. A functional variant in ZNF512B is associated with susceptibility to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Japanese. Hum. Mol. Genet 2011, 20, 3684–3692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Tetsuka, S.; Morita, M.; Iida, A.; Uehara, R.; Ikegawa, S.; Nakano, I. ZNF512B gene is a prognostic factor in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. Sci. 2013, 324, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Komuta, Y.; Teng, X.; Yanagisawa, H.; Sango, K.; Kawamura, K.; Kawano, H. Expression of transforming growth factor-beta receptors in meningeal fibroblasts of the injured mouse brain. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2010, 30, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Unsicker, K.; Flanders, K.C.; Cissel, D.S.; Lafyatis, R.; Sporn, M.B. Transforming growth factor beta isoforms in the adult rat central and peripheral nervous system. Neuroscience 1991, 44, 613–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vincze, C.; Pal, G.; Wappler, E.A.; Szabo, E.R.; Nagy, Z.G.; Lovas, G.; Dobolyi, A. Distribution of mRNAs encoding transforming growth factors-beta1, -2, and -3 in the intact rat brain and after experimentally induced focal ischemia. J. Comp. Neurol. 2010, 518, 3752–3770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bottner, M.; Krieglstein, K.; Unsicker, K. The transforming growth factor-betas: Structure, signaling, and roles in nervous system development and functions. J. Neurochem. 2000, 75, 2227–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Diniz, L.P.; Matias, I.; Siqueira, M.; Stipursky, J.; Gomes, F.C.A. Astrocytes and the TGF-beta1 Pathway in the Healthy and Diseased Brain: A Double-Edged Sword. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 56, 4653–4679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fukushima, T.; Liu, R.Y.; Byrne, J.H. Transforming growth factor-beta2 modulates synaptic efficacy and plasticity and induces phosphorylation of CREB in hippocampal neurons. Hippocampus 2007, 17, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Poon, V.Y.; Choi, S.; Park, M. Growth factors in synaptic function. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2013, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Miller, M.W. Expression of transforming growth factor-beta in developing rat cerebral cortex: Effects of prenatal exposure to ethanol. J. Comp. Neurol. 2003, 460, 410–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Siqueira, M.; Francis, D.; Gisbert, D.; Gomes, F.C.A.; Stipursky, J. Radial glia cells control angiogenesis in the developing cerebral cortex through TGF-beta1 signaling. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 3660–3675. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Koeglsperger, T.; Li, S.; Brenneis, C.; Saulnier, J.L.; Mayo, L.; Carrier, Y.; Selkoe, D.J.; Weiner, H.L. Impaired glutamate recycling and GluN2B-mediated neuronal calcium overload in mice lacking TGF-beta1 in the CNS. Glia 2013, 61, 985–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Jiang, Y.; McLennan, I.S.; Koishi, K.; Hendry, I.A. Transforming growth factor-beta 2 is anterogradely and retrogradely transported in motoneurons and up-regulated after nerve injury. Neuroscience 2000, 97, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Oppenheim, R.W.; Prevette, D.; Haverkamp, L.J.; Houenou, L.; Yin, Q.W.; McManaman, J. Biological studies of a putative avian muscle-derived neurotrophic factor that prevents naturally occurring motoneuron death In Vivo. J. Neurobiol. 1993, 24, 1065–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Prehn, J.H.; Peruche, B.; Unsicker, K.; Krieglstein, J. Isoform-specific effects of transforming growth factors-beta on degeneration of primary neuronal cultures induced by cytotoxic hypoxia or glutamate. J. Neurochem. 1993, 60, 1665–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Iwasaki, Y.; Shiojima, T.; Tagaya, N.; Kobayashi, T.; Kinoshita, M. Effect of transforming growth factor beta 1 on spinal motor neurons after axotomy. J. Neurol. Sci. 1997, 147, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Murakami, N.; McLennan, I.S.; Nonaka, I.; Koishi, K.; Baker, C.; Hammond-Tooke, G. Transforming growth factor-beta2 is elevated in skeletal muscle disorders. Muscle Nerve 1999, 22, 889–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wong, C.O.; Venkatachalam, K. Motor neurons from ALS patients with mutations in C9ORF72 and SOD1 exhibit distinct transcriptional landscapes. Hum. Mol. Genet 2019, 28, 2799–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Nakamura, M.; Ito, H.; Wate, R.; Nakano, S.; Hirano, A.; Kusaka, H. Phosphorylated Smad2/3 immunoreactivity in sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and its mouse model. Acta Neuropathol. 2008, 115, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nakamura, M.; Kaneko, S.; Wate, R.; Asayama, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Fujita, K.; Ito, H.; Kusaka, H. Regionally different immunoreactivity for Smurf2 and pSmad2/3 in TDP-43-positive inclusions of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2013, 39, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Grunseich, C.; Wang, I.X.; Watts, J.A.; Burdick, J.T.; Guber, R.D.; Zhu, Z.; Bruzel, A.; Lanman, T.; Chen, K.; Schindler, A.B.; et al. Senataxin mutation reveals how R-Loops Promote transcription by blocking DNA methylation at gene promoters. Mol. Cell 2018, 69, 426–437 e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Henrich-Noack, P.; Prehn, J.H.; Krieglstein, J. Neuroprotective effects of TGF-beta 1. J. Neural Transm. Suppl. 1994, 43, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Phatnani, H.P.; Guarnieri, P.; Friedman, B.A.; Carrasco, M.A.; Muratet, M.; O’Keeffe, S.; Nwakeze, C.; Pauli-Behn, F.; Newberry, K.M.; Meadows, S.K.; et al. Intricate interplay between astrocytes and motor neurons in ALS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E756–E765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. D’Arrigo, A.; Colavito, D.; Pena-Altamira, E.; Fabris, M.; Dam, M.; Contestabile, A.; Leon, A. Transcriptional profiling in the lumbar spinal cord of a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A role for wild-type superoxide dismutase 1 in sporadic disease? J. Mol. Neurosci. 2010, 41, 404–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kirby, J.; Ning, K.; Ferraiuolo, L.; Heath, P.R.; Ismail, A.; Kuo, S.W.; Valori, C.F.; Cox, L.; Sharrack, B.; Wharton, S.B.; et al. Phosphatase and tensin homologue/protein kinase B pathway linked to motor neuron survival in human superoxide dismutase 1-related amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 2011, 134, 506–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Zhang, J.; Ito, H.; Wate, R.; Ohnishi, S.; Nakano, S.; Kusaka, H. Altered distributions of nucleocytoplasmic transport-related proteins in the spinal cord of a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 2006, 112, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jiang, Y.M.; Yamamoto, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yoshihara, T.; Liang, Y.; Terao, S.; Takeuchi, H.; Ishigaki, S.; Katsuno, M.; Adachi, H.; et al. Gene expression profile of spinal motor neurons in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2005, 57, 236–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kim, M.S.; Hwang, N.S.; Lee, J.; Kim, T.K.; Leong, K.; Shamblott, M.J.; Gearhart, J.; Elisseeff, J. Musculoskeletal differentiation of cells derived from human embryonic germ cells. Stem Cells 2005, 23, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gumucio, J.P.; Sugg, K.B.; Mendias, C.L. TGF-beta superfamily signaling in muscle and tendon adaptation to resistance exercise. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2015, 43, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Liu, D.; Black, B.L.; Derynck, R. TGF-beta inhibits muscle differentiation through functional repression of myogenic transcription factors by Smad3. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 2950–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Mendias, C.L.; Gumucio, J.P.; Davis, M.E.; Bromley, C.W.; Davis, C.S.; Brooks, S.V. Transforming growth factor-beta induces skeletal muscle atrophy and fibrosis through the induction of atrogin-1 and scleraxis. Muscle Nerve 2012, 45, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Narola, J.; Pandey, S.N.; Glick, A.; Chen, Y.W. Conditional expression of TGF-beta1 in skeletal muscles causes endomysial fibrosis and myofibers atrophy. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Chen, J.L.; Colgan, T.D.; Walton, K.L.; Gregorevic, P.; Harrison, C.A. The TGF-beta signalling network in muscle development, adaptation and disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016, 900, 97–131. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Katsuno, M.; Adachi, H.; Minamiyama, M.; Waza, M.; Doi, H.; Kondo, N.; Mizoguchi, H.; Nitta, A.; Yamada, K.; Banno, H.; et al. Disrupted transforming growth Factor-{beta} signaling in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 5702–5712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Rusmini, P.; Polanco, M.J.; Cristofani, R.; Cicardi, M.E.; Meroni, M.; Galbiati, M.; Piccolella, M.; Messi, E.; Giorgetti, E.; Lieberman, A.P.; et al. Aberrant autophagic response in the muscle of a knock-in mouse model of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Burks, T.N.; Cohn, R.D. Role of TGF-beta signaling in inherited and acquired myopathies. Skelet. Muscle 2011, 1, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Cohn, R.D.; van Erp, C.; Habashi, J.P.; Soleimani, A.A.; Klein, E.C.; Lisi, M.T.; Gamradt, M.; Ap Rhys, C.M.; Holm, T.M.; Loeys, B.L.; et al. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade attenuates TGF-beta-induced failure of muscle regeneration in multiple myopathic states. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Aggarwal, T.; Polanco, M.J.; Scaramuzzino, C.; Rocchi, A.; Milioto, C.; Emionite, L.; Ognio, E.; Sambataro, F.; Galbiati, M.; Poletti, A.; et al. Androgens affect muscle, motor neuron, and survival in a mouse model of SOD1-related amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 1929–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pradat, P.F.; Dubourg, O.; de Tapia, M.; di Scala, F.; Dupuis, L.; Lenglet, T.; Bruneteau, G.; Salachas, F.; Lacomblez, L.; Corvol, J.C.; et al. Muscle gene expression is a marker of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis severity. Neurodegener. Dis. 2012, 9, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Si, Y.; Kim, S.; Cui, X.; Zheng, L.; Oh, S.J.; Anderson, T.; AlSharabati, M.; Kazamel, M.; Volpicelli-Daley, L.; Bamman, M.M.; et al. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) is a muscle biomarker of disease progression in ALS and correlates with smad expression. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Si, Y.; Cui, X.; Kim, S.; Wians, R.; Sorge, R.; Oh, S.J.; Kwan, T.; AlSharabati, M.; Lu, L.; Claussen, G.; et al. Smads as muscle biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2014, 1, 778–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Peters, S.; Zitzelsperger, E.; Kuespert, S.; Iberl, S.; Heydn, R.; Johannesen, S.; Petri, S.; Aigner, L.; Thal, D.R.; Hermann, A.; et al. The TGF-beta System As a Potential Pathogenic Player in Disease Modulation of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Saris, C.G.; Groen, E.J.; van Vught, P.W.; van Es, M.A.; Blauw, H.M.; Veldink, J.H.; van den Berg, L.H. Gene expression profile of SOD1-G93A mouse spinal cord, blood and muscle. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2013, 14, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Cozzolino, M.; Ferri, A.; Carri, M.T. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: From current developments in the laboratory to clinical implications. Antioxid Redox Signal 2008, 10, 405–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sau, D.; De Biasi, S.; Vitellaro-Zuccarello, L.; Riso, P.; Guarnieri, S.; Porrini, M.; Simeoni, S.; Crippa, V.; Onesto, E.; Palazzolo, I.; et al. Mutation of SOD1 in ALS: A gain of a loss of function. Hum. Mol. Genet 2007, 16, 1604–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Barcellos-Hoff, M.H.; Dix, T.A. Redox-mediated activation of latent transforming growth factor-beta 1. Mol. Endocrinol. 1996, 10, 1077–1083. [Google Scholar]
  97. Gonzalez, D.; Contreras, O.; Rebolledo, D.L.; Espinoza, J.P.; van Zundert, B.; Brandan, E. ALS skeletal muscle shows enhanced TGF-beta signaling, fibrosis and induction of fibro/adipogenic progenitor markers. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Tsujihata, M.; Hazama, R.; Yoshimura, T.; Satoh, A.; Mori, M.; Nagataki, S. The motor end-plate fine structure and ultrastructural localization of acetylcholine receptors in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 1984, 7, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Moloney, E.B.; de Winter, F.; Verhaagen, J. ALS as a distal axonopathy: Molecular mechanisms affecting neuromuscular junction stability in the presymptomatic stages of the disease. Front. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Cappello, V.; Francolini, M. Neuromuscular junction dismantling in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Feng, Z.; Ko, C.P. Schwann cells promote synaptogenesis at the neuromuscular junction via transforming growth factor-beta1. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 9599–9609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Carrasco, D.I.; Seburn, K.L.; Pinter, M.J. Altered terminal Schwann cell morphology precedes denervation in SOD1 mice. Exp. Neurol. 2016, 275, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Williams, A.H.; Valdez, G.; Moresi, V.; Qi, X.; McAnally, J.; Elliott, J.L.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Sanes, J.R.; Olson, E.N. MicroRNA-206 delays ALS progression and promotes regeneration of neuromuscular synapses in mice. Science 2009, 326, 1549–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Taetzsch, T.; Tenga, M.J.; Valdez, G. Muscle fibers secrete FGFBP1 to slow degeneration of neuromuscular synapses during aging and progression of ALS. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Pennetta, G.; Hiesinger, P.R.; Fabian-Fine, R.; Meinertzhagen, I.A.; Bellen, H.J. Drosophila VAP-33A directs bouton formation at neuromuscular junctions in a dosage-dependent manner. Neuron 2002, 35, 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Ratnaparkhi, A.; Lawless, G.M.; Schweizer, F.E.; Golshani, P.; Jackson, G.R. A Drosophila model of ALS: Human ALS-associated mutation in VAP33A suggests a dominant negative mechanism. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Day, W.A.; Koishi, K.; Nukuda, H.; McLennan, I.S. Transforming growth factor-beta 2 causes an acute improvement in the motor performance of transgenic ALS mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 2005, 19, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Holzbaur, E.L.; Howland, D.S.; Weber, N.; Wallace, K.; She, Y.; Kwak, S.; Tchistiakova, L.A.; Murphy, E.; Hinson, J.; Karim, R.; et al. Myostatin inhibition slows muscle atrophy in rodent models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol. Dis. 2006, 23, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Morrison, B.M.; Lachey, J.L.; Warsing, L.C.; Ting, B.L.; Pullen, A.E.; Underwood, K.W.; Kumar, R.; Sako, D.; Grinberg, A.; Wong, V.; et al. A soluble activin type IIB receptor improves function in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Exp. Neurol. 2009, 217, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 04291 g001 550
Figure 1. Signal Transduction pathways of TGFBs. TGFB dimerization triggers the assembly of a heterodimeric complex between Type I and Type II receptors (TGFBRI and TGFBRII). This permits TGFBRII to trans-phosphorylate TGFBRI that, in turn, activates the receptor-regulated SMADs (SMAD2/3) by phosphorylation. Activated R-SMAD forms a complex with the common SMAD (SMAD4) and together translocate into the nucleus through nucleoporins; the complex interacts with specific SMAD binding elements (SBEs), regulating gene transcriptional responses.
Figure 1. Signal Transduction pathways of TGFBs. TGFB dimerization triggers the assembly of a heterodimeric complex between Type I and Type II receptors (TGFBRI and TGFBRII). This permits TGFBRII to trans-phosphorylate TGFBRI that, in turn, activates the receptor-regulated SMADs (SMAD2/3) by phosphorylation. Activated R-SMAD forms a complex with the common SMAD (SMAD4) and together translocate into the nucleus through nucleoporins; the complex interacts with specific SMAD binding elements (SBEs), regulating gene transcriptional responses.
Ijms 21 04291 g001
Ijms 21 04291 g002 550
Figure 2. Possible effects of TGFB on different tissues of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. At the pre-symptomatic stage, the decreased activation of the TGFB pathway reduces its neuroprotective activity, and, at the same time, increases excitotoxicity induced by glutamate, with a lesser uptake by astrocytes. At the symptomatic stage, TGFB levels are largely increased, giving rise to microglia activation, and neuromuscular junction (NMJ) dismantling, thus leading to atrophy of skeletal muscle fibers. ALS disease progression could be promoted by a chronically altered TGFB pathway. A, astrocyte; M, microglia; MN, motor neuron; SkMf, skeletal muscle fibers.
Figure 2. Possible effects of TGFB on different tissues of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. At the pre-symptomatic stage, the decreased activation of the TGFB pathway reduces its neuroprotective activity, and, at the same time, increases excitotoxicity induced by glutamate, with a lesser uptake by astrocytes. At the symptomatic stage, TGFB levels are largely increased, giving rise to microglia activation, and neuromuscular junction (NMJ) dismantling, thus leading to atrophy of skeletal muscle fibers. ALS disease progression could be promoted by a chronically altered TGFB pathway. A, astrocyte; M, microglia; MN, motor neuron; SkMf, skeletal muscle fibers.
Ijms 21 04291 g002
Table
Table 1. Transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) family members, their receptors, and SMAD signaling proteins.
Table 1. Transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) family members, their receptors, and SMAD signaling proteins.
TGFB Super FamilyFamilyFamily MembersType I ReceptorType II ReceptorR-SMADI-SMAD
TGFBTGFB 1–5TGFBR1TGFBR2SMAD2/3SMAD7
ACTIVINS/INHIBINACTIVIN A, BACVR1B, ACVR1CACVR2, ACVR2BSMAD2/3SMAD7
INHIBIN A, B/ACVR2//
LEFTTY A, B////
NODAL/ACVR2, ACVR2BSMAD2/3SMAD6/7
BMPBMP 2, 4BMPR1A, BMPR1BACVR2, ACVR2B, BMPR2SMAD1/5SMAD6/7
BMP 3/ACVR2B/SMAD6/7
BMP 5–8ACVR1A, BMPR1A, BMPR1BACVR2, ACVR2B, BMPR2SMAD1/5SMAD6/7
BMP 9, 10ALK1ACVR2, BMPR2SMAD1/5SMAD6/7
BMP 15BMPR1BBMPR2SMAD1/5SMAD6/7
AMHACVR1A, BMPR1AAMHR2SMAD1/5SMAD6/7
GDFGDF 1, 3ACVR1B, ACVR1CACVR2, ACVR2BSMAD2/3SMAD7
GDF 8 (MYOSTATIN)ACVR1B, TGFBR1ACVR2SMAD2/3SMAD7
GDF 9ACVR1BBMPR2SMAD2/3SMAD7
GDF 11ACVR1BACVR2, ACVR2BSMAD2/3SMAD7
GDF 5–7BMPR1A, BMPR1BACVR2, ACVR2B, BMPR2SMAD1/5SMAD7
GDF 15GFRAL///

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Galbiati, M.; Crippa, V.; Rusmini, P.; Cristofani, R.; Messi, E.; Piccolella, M.; Tedesco, B.; Ferrari, V.; Casarotto, E.; Chierichetti, M.; et al. Multiple Roles of Transforming Growth Factor Beta in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4291. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124291

AMA Style

Galbiati M, Crippa V, Rusmini P, Cristofani R, Messi E, Piccolella M, Tedesco B, Ferrari V, Casarotto E, Chierichetti M, et al. Multiple Roles of Transforming Growth Factor Beta in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(12):4291. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124291

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galbiati, Mariarita, Valeria Crippa, Paola Rusmini, Riccardo Cristofani, Elio Messi, Margherita Piccolella, Barbara Tedesco, Veronica Ferrari, Elena Casarotto, Marta Chierichetti, and et al. 2020. "Multiple Roles of Transforming Growth Factor Beta in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 12: 4291. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124291

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop