Next Article in Journal
Heavy Metal-Induced Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: Insights into Molecular Mechanisms and Possible Reversal Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis and Characterization of Cyclic NU172 Analogues: A Biophysical and Biological Insight
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sex Specific Determinants in Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sex Differences in Proatherogenic Cytokine Levels

1
Department of Medical, Surgical, and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Teaching Hospital UCO Medicina Clinica, 34100 Trieste, Italy
2
ASUGI Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste, Cattinara Teaching Hospital, UCO Medicina Clinica, 34100 Trieste, Italy
3
Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, 34100 Trieste, Italy
4
Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, 34100 Trieste, Italy
5
Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35100 Padova, Italy
6
Department of Diagnostics, Azienda USL Toscana Nordovest, 57100 Livorno, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(11), 3861; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113861
Submission received: 29 April 2020 / Revised: 22 May 2020 / Accepted: 27 May 2020 / Published: 29 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gender Medicine: Pharmacogenetics and Personalised Medicine)

Abstract

:
Background: It has been shown that sex affects immunity, including cytokine production. Given that atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease promoted by specific cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, we aimed at evaluating whether sex could affect the levels of these proatherogenic cytokines in a group of healthy adults. In this analysis, we also included other cytokines and peptides that have been implicated in atherosclerosis development and progression. Methods: A total of 104 healthy adults were recruited; we measured circulating levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, angiotensins and angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2), as well as osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL). Results: IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were significantly higher in men as compared to women. They were all associated with testosterone and the testosterone/estradiol ratio. They remained significantly associated with sex (but not with hormones) after being tested for potential confounders. Conclusions: Sex seems to influence the levels of proatherogenic cytokines. This is consistent not only with sex differences in vulnerability to infections but also with the higher cardiovascular risk exhibited by the male gender as compared to the female gender. Nevertheless, this association is only partly explained by hormone levels.

1. Introduction

It has been shown that sex affects immunity [1]. Women have a higher incidence of autoimmune diseases [2] and a lower burden of microbial infections as compared to men [1], as they exhibit higher immunoglobulin levels [3] and stronger innate and adaptive immune responses than men [4]. Recently, for example, it has emerged that there are also sex differences in mortality and vulnerability to Covid-19 infection [5], as the severity of disease and death is greater in men [6]. It has been reported that the sex differences in immune responses might include cytokine production, which are low-molecular-weight-proteins that mediate the immune responses between cells [7]. In particular, if women display greater type 2 cytokine production, then men seem to display greater type 1 cytokine production [8,9], which include interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α.
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease mediated by innate and adaptive immunity [10]. In this setting, cytokines, which enable the crosstalk between immune and nonimmune cells, are involved in endothelial dysfunction, leukocyte migration, plaque formation and development, as well as its eventual rupture [11]. The cytokines contributing to atherosclerosis can be broadly divided into proatherogenic (such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) and antiatherogenic (such as IL-10 and IL-1rA). Recently, two clinical trials demonstrated that targeted cytokine inhibition, rather than broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory therapy, can significantly reduce adverse cardiovascular events [12,13]. In addition, it has been argued that an imbalance between type 1 and type 2 cytokine production may promote coronary artery disease [11,14]. As such, any difference in cytokine production between men and women could favor plaque development, leading to a higher risk of cardiovascular events.
In order to evaluate whether sex could affect circulating proatherogenic cytokines, we measured IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in a group of healthy adults. In addition to these cytokines, we looked at other cytokines and circulating mediators that are associated with proatherogenic cytokines [15] and that are involved in tissue inflammation and atherosclerosis. These cascades include the renin–angiotensin system [16,17] as well as the system of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and its ligand-receptor activator of NF-κB (RANKL) [18,19].

2. Results

2.1. General Characteristics of the Population

We recruited 104 healthy adults (68 women (65%) and 36 men (35%)), whose general characteristics are reported in Table 1. All the subjects were Caucasian. Groups did not differ in terms of age. All the subjects either worked or studied in the same hospital, as the subjects recruited were 76 medical school students and 28 physicians. The students were 52 women (68%) and 24 men (32%), while the physicians were 16 women (57%) and 12 men (43%). It has to be noted that all these subjects undergo periodically routine medical check-ups by the occupational health service, and none of them had evidence of disease. In both groups, general characteristics were within reference ranges (Table 1). Nevertheless, women exhibited lower body mass index (BMI), lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and higher high density lipoprotein (HDL) and total cholesterol values. Levels of estradiol and testosterone differed according to biological sex.

2.2. Cytokine Levels

Circulating levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were not always detectable and their distribution was not normal. Median IL-1β was 0 pg/mL (0–386.4). Median IL-6 was 17.2 pg/mL (0–600). Median TNF-α was 0 pg/mL (0–1000). Circulating levels of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2), angiotensin (Ang) II, Ang 1-7, OPG, and RANKL were always detectable and their distribution was not normal. Median ACE2 was 61.92 ng/mL (33.69–246.66). Median Ang II was 388.2 pg/mL (54.23–2970.8). Median Ang 1-7 was 212.9 pg/mL (56.1–2227.9). Median Ang II/Ang 1-7 ratio was 1.7 (0.3–5.2). Median OPG was 697.4 pg/mL (382.2–1773.8). Median RANKL was 38.9 pg/mL (0–824). Circulating levels of IL-1β, IL-6, OPG, TNF-α, as well as Ang II and Ang 1-7 in women and men are reported in Figure 1. Men exhibited significantly higher levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α (p = 0.010, p = 0.019, and p = 0.024), while women exhibited significantly higher levels of OPG (p = 0.035). ACE2, Ang II, Ang 1-7, as well as the Ang II/Ang 1-7 ratio, and RANKL did not differ between the groups.

2.3. Linear Correlations between Variables

Given that ACE2, Ang II, Ang 1-7, and RANKL did not differ between women and men, we looked at the correlations between the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, OPG, and baseline general and biochemical variables. All proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) were significantly associated with circulating testosterone and testosterone/estradiol (T/E2) ratio (Table 2) but not with estradiol. In addition, IL-1β was also significantly associated with age and glucose. When we analyzed the group of women separately from that of men, the associations between testosterone and proinflammatory cytokines were no longer significant (Table 3). On the other hand, OPG was associated not only with testosterone (inversely) but also with age (directly), as well as systolic and diastolic blood pressure (inversely), as shown in Table 4. When we analyzed the group of women separately from that of men, these associations remained significant in the subgroup of women (Table 4, Figure 2).

2.4. Multivariate Analysis

The multivariate regression model showed that sex was independently associated with IL-6 (p = 0.024) and TNF-α (p = 0.031), but not with IL-1β and OPG (Table 5). We did not test sex and testosterone together because of collinearity. The multivariate regression model was repeated to test the association of testosterone and T/E2 with proatherogenic cytokines, but hormones were not independently associated with any of them. IL-6, TNF-α, and OPG were also independently associated with age (Table 5). In the subgroup of women, OPG remained independently associated with age (p < 0.01) and with estradiol (p < 0.01), but not with blood pressure levels.

3. Discussion

This work demonstrates that healthy men have higher levels of circulating IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α as compared to women. Our finding is in line with studies that demonstrate that there is a sex difference in cytokine production in humans. For instance, in a study that included more than 500 healthy subjects (blood donors), it was found that the production of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) released from monocytes after stimulation was higher in men, while women exhibited a higher production of lymphocyte-derived cytokines (IL-7 and IL-22) [7]. Other investigators also reported that men had a higher production of monocyte-derived IL-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α upon stimulation [9,20] and a decreased percentage of lymphocytes producing IL-2 as compared to women [20]. The stronger monocyte-derived cytokine production in men has been recently confirmed in a pooled analysis of 15 study populations, where the investigators showed that it was present at all ages regardless of specific diseases, such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or cardiac diseases [21].
Estrogens, progesterone, and testosterone significantly influence innate and adaptive immunity, as reviewed by Klein and Flanagan [4]. Nevertheless, studies on the effects of gonadal hormones on cytokine production report conflicting results [21,22], and the magnitude of hormone effects is debatable [23]. In our study, although we found a significant—albeit weak—correlation between testosterone and proinflammatory cytokine levels, multiple logistic models showed that sex was independently associated with cytokine levels, but not with testosterone or testosterone/estradiol ratio, indicating that hormone levels do not fully explain sex differences in immune responses. Our data are consistent with the observations of Ter Horst et al., who assessed the correlation of inflammatory markers with the levels of progesterone and testosterone in men and women, finding that the majority of cytokines showed no correlation with progesterone and testosterone, ruling out a major role of hormones in explaining the sex difference [7]. In addition, our data are consistent with the current theory of sexual differentiation of all mammalian tissues, whereby the gonadal hormones are relevant to sex differences in phenotype as much as other secondary factors that are downstream of the primary sex-specific effects of X and Y genes [24].
It has been argued that the higher monocyte-derived cytokine production in men may contribute to the increased susceptibility of men to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease [25]. IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α are soluble low-molecular-weight-proteins that mediate crosstalk between immune and nonimmune cells and have been implicated in atherosclerosis development and progression [26]. IL-1β belongs to the IL-1 cytokine family, whose members are expressed in atherosclerotic plaques [11]. Animal studies have shown that blockade of IL-1 signaling with IL-1 receptor antagonist diminishes the size of atherosclerotic lesions [27,28]. Most importantly, it has been recently demonstrated that patients with previous myocardial infarction, who received the monoclonal antibody targeting IL-1β selectively, had a 15% reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as well as a 17% reduction of MACE and hospitalization for unstable angina requiring urgent revascularization after 48 months of treatment [12]. Likewise, IL-6 is also expressed in human atherosclerotic plaques. Several epidemiological studies have highlighted the association between IL-6 signaling and cardiovascular disease onset and complications. In apparently healthy men, elevated levels of IL-6 were associated with increased risk of future myocardial infarction [29]. In addition, in patients with unstable coronary artery disease, circulating IL-6 was a strong independent marker of increased mortality [30]. More recently, in a collaborative meta-analysis, the presence of a minor genetic variant that impairs IL-6 signaling was associated with a reduction of coronary artery disease, indicating the presence of a causal association between IL-6 receptor-related pathways and coronary artery disease [31]. As for TNF-α, earlier experimental studies showed a similar involvement in plaque development and progression [11].
In addition to IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, other circulating peptides and cytokines are linked to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. For instance, it has been clearly demonstrated that the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) and the angiotensins, which are its mediators, promote atherosclerosis development and progression through local inflammation [31]. For this reason, we measured Ang II and Ang 1-7, which are considered the final effectors of the RAS, as well as ACE2, which is considered the key regulator of Ang II and Ang 1-7 levels. In this study, we did not find any difference in Ang II, Ang 1-7, the Ang I /Ang 1-7 ratio, as well as in ACE2 between men and women. Nevertheless, circulating levels might not reflect tissue levels of enzymes and peptides [32,33], which could explain our negative result. More recently, a glycoprotein belonging to the TNF superfamily, which is OPG, has been linked to tissue inflammation, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease. Over the last decades, OPG has been associated with the risk of future coronary artery disease in apparently healthy men and women, independent of established cardiovascular risk factors [18,32]. Moreover, in patients with acute coronary syndromes, OPG has been linked to the incidence of death, hospitalizations, myocardial infarction, and stroke [33], which has been successively observed in the general population as well [34]. Nevertheless, it remains unclear if OPG is a risk marker or a risk factor of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease [19,35]. In this study, we measured OPG and its ligand RANKL, and found that women had higher levels of OPG. This finding is consistent with the literature, reporting that premenopausal women had higher OPG levels as compared to men under the age of 50 years [36], which should be ascribed to the stimulatory effect that estrogen has on OPG expression in osteoblast cells [37], where it inhibits bone resorption. Nevertheless, when the association between OPG and sex was tested for other potential confounders, it was no longer found significant. In the subgroup of women alone, OPG turned out to be independently associated with age (directly) and estradiol (indirectly), which is consistent with the findings of other investigators [38,39].
It has been argued that the stronger monocyte-derived cytokine production in men may contribute not only to the higher cardiovascular risk, but also to the higher vulnerability to infections, as compared to women. It has been shown that higher IL-6 and TNF-α levels are associated with a higher risk of developing sepsis [40], and that, among patients with sepsis, men had worse outcomes, higher TNFα, and lower IL-10 levels than women [41]. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) a global pandemic. Early epidemiological observations indicate that the severity of disease and death is two times greater for men than women [6]. Some investigators have ascribed such a different response to IL-6 levels, which is linked to poor survival in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome [42], and which is lower in women after viral infection [43]. Other explanations include a different expression of ACE2 [44], which has been recently identified as the SARS-CoV-2 receptor [45]. In our study, we found a sex difference in circulating IL-6 but not in ACE2, which may be due to the fact that ACE2 should be measured in tissues rather than in the circulation [45].
In conclusion, in a cohort of healthy adults, sex seems to influence the levels of proinflammatory/proatherogenic cytokines, as we found that men had higher levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α as compared to women. This is consistent not only with sex differences in vulnerability to infections but also with the higher cardiovascular risk exhibited by men as compared to premenopausal women, but it is only partly explained by different hormone levels.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Population

Between January 2019 and December 2019, we recruited 104 adults (68 women and 36 men). All the individuals were recruited among medical school students and physicians working at Cattinara Teaching Hospital (ASUITS). It has to be noted that all these subjects undergo periodically routine medical check-ups by the occupational health service (including medical visits, laboratory tests, and EKGs, if appropriate) with no evidence of disease. Inclusion criteria were a history of normal sexual development for adults. Exclusion criteria were the use of medication, the onset of a fever, cold, or coryza within 14 days of blood sampling, the presence of any known disease, the cessation of menses (for adult women), and an unwillingness to participate in this study. All subjects underwent a medical visit in order to record their medical history as well as general characteristics (such as blood pressure, height, and weight). Blood sampling was performed at fasting, and blood samples were collected in two vacutainer tubes (2 × 10 mL for adults); one tube containing a clot activator and a gel separator to get the serum, the other containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to get the plasma. The study was approved by our regional ethics committee on the 27/09/2019 (CEUR-2019-SPER-113). Inclusion of volunteers and experiments were conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects gave their written informed consent before participation in the study.

4.2. Biochemical Characteristics and Cytokine Measurement

Glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol were measured by autoanalyzer. LDL cholesterol was calculated by the Friedwald’s formula. Estradiol (#07027249190, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and testosterone (#07027915190, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay on a Roche cobas e 801 system. Testosterone (nmol/L)/Estradiol (pmol/L) ratio was measured with the following formula: testosterone/(10* Estradiol). Interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, osteoprotegerin (OPG), receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL), angiotensin (Ang)II, Ang 1-7, and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) were measured by ELISA. IL-1β was measured with the R&D #DY201 ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States); IL-6 was measured with the R&D #DY206 ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States); TNF-α was measured with the R&D #DY210 ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States); Ang II was measured with the Elabscience #E-EL-H0326 ELISA kit (Elabscience, Houston, Texas, United States); Ang 1-7 was measured with the Elabscience #E-EL-H5518 ELISA kit (Elabscience, Houston, Texas, United States); ACE2 was measured with the Elabscience #E-EL-H0281 ELISA kit (Elabscience, Houston, Texas, United States); OPG was measured with the R&D #DY805 ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States); RANKL was measured with the R&D #DY626 ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States). The ELISA kits were evaluated for intra-assay reproducibility by running 3 positive control samples (containing high, medium, and low concentration of the specific marker) in duplicate (coefficient of variation (CV %) was <10%). For the inter-assay reproducibility, three control samples of known concentration were tested in duplicate in separate plates and on different days (CV < 15%).

4.3. Statistics

Continuous variables were checked for normal distribution by visual inspection of the normal probability plot and performing the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. Continuous variables were reported as median with range (minimum–maximum). Categorical variables were reported as percentages. Continuous variables were compared by the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test for independent data. Categorical variables were compared by the Chi-Square test or Fischer’s exact test, whenever appropriate. Linear correlations between variables of interest were analyzed with the Spearman coefficient [46]. A multiple linear regression model was used to evaluate if the association between cytokines and sex was independent of other possible confounders. Sex and testosterone were not evaluated together for collinearity. Statistical analyses were conducted with the software R (version 3.5.3) and p-values less than 5% were considered as evidence of a significant association.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B. and B.F.; methodology, F.G.; formal analysis, S.B., B.T., F.T. and F.G.; investigation S.B., B.T., F.T., M.F., E.C., T.F., S.C. and E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B.; writing—review and editing, B.T., F.T., F.G. and B.F.; visualization B.T.; supervision, S.B. and B.F.; funding acquisition, S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health, grant number GR-2013-02357830 (to S.B.), and by the University of Trieste (to S.B.).

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the voluntary participation of third-year students of the Medical School of the University of Trieste. We would like to acknowledge the support provided by Alberto Taioli, working as a Customer Application Specialist of Roche.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

AngAngiotensin
BMIBody mass index
DBPDiastolic blood pressure
EDTAEthylenediaminetetraacetic acid
ELISAEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
ILInterleukin
LPSlipopolysaccharide
MACEMajor adverse cardiovascular events
OPGOsteoprotegerin
PBMCPeripheral blood mononuclear cells
RASRenin angiotensin system
SBPSystolic blood pressure
TNFTumor necrosis factor

References

  1. Pennell, L.M.; Galligan, C.L.; Fish, E.N. Sex affects immunity. J. Autoimmun. 2012, 38, J282–J291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Beeson, P.B. Age and sex associations of 40 autoimmune diseases. Am. J. Med. 1994, 96, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Butterworth, M.; McClellan, B.; Allansmith, M. Influence of sex in immunoglobulin levels. Nature 1967, 214, 1224–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Klein, S.L.; Flanagan, K.L. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 626–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wenham, C.; Smith, J.; Morgan, R.; Gender and COVID-19 Working Group. COVID-19: The gendered impacts of the outbreak. Lancet 2020, 395, 846–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bischof, E.; Wolfe, J.; Klein, S.L. Clinical trials for COVID-19 should include sex as a variable. J. Clin. Investig. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ter Horst, R.; Jaeger, M.; Smeekens, S.P.; Oosting, M.; Swertz, M.A.; Li, Y.; Kumar, V.; Diavatopoulos, D.A.; Jansen, A.F.M.; Lemmers, H.; et al. Host and environmental factors influencing individual human cytokine responses. Cell 2016, 167, 1111–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Giron-Gonzalez, J.A.; Moral, F.J.; Elvira, J.; Garcia-Gil, D.; Guerrero, F.; Gavilan, I.; Escobar, L. Consistent production of a higher TH1:TH2 cytokine ratio by stimulated T cells in men compared with women. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2000, 143, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Asai, K.; Hiki, N.; Mimura, Y.; Ogawa, T.; Unou, K.; Kaminishi, M. Gender differences in cytokine secretion by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells: Role of estrogen in modulating LPS-induced cytokine secretion in an ex vivo septic model. Shock 2001, 16, 340–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ross, R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 340, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ait-Oufella, H.; Taleb, S.; Mallat, Z.; Tedgui, A. Recent advances on the role of cytokines in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 969–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ridker, P.M.; Everett, B.M.; Thuren, T.; MacFadyen, J.G.; Chang, W.H.; Ballantyne, C.; Fonseca, F.; Nicolau, J.; Koenig, W.; Anker, S.D.; et al. Antiinflammatory therapy with Canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1119–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ridker, P.M.; Everett, B.M.; Pradhan, A.; MacFadyen, J.G.; Solomon, D.H.; Zaharris, E.; Mam, V.; Hasan, A.; Rosenberg, Y.; Iturriaga, E.; et al. Low-dose methotrexate for the prevention of atherosclerotic events. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 752–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mallat, Z.; Taleb, S.; Ait-Oufella, H.; Tedgui, A. The role of adaptive T cell immunity in atherosclerosis. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, S364–S369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Raaz-Schrauder, D.; Schrauder, M.G.; Stumpf, C.; Lewczuk, P.; Kilian, T.; Dietel, B.; Garlichs, C.D.; Schlundt, C.; Achenbach, S.; Klinghammer, L. Plasma levels of sRANKL and OPG are associated with atherogenic cytokines in patients with intermediate cardiovascular risk. Heart Vessels 2017, 32, 1304–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thomas, M.C.; Pickering, R.J.; Tsorotes, D.; Koitka, A.; Sheehy, K.; Bernardi, S.; Toffoli, B.; Nguyen-Huu, T.P.; Head, G.A.; Fu, Y.; et al. Genetic Ace2 deficiency accentuates vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis in the ApoE knockout mouse. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 888–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bernardi, S.; Michelli, A.; Zuolo, G.; Candido, R.; Fabris, B. Update on RAAS Modulation for the Treatment of Diabetic Cardiovascular Disease. J. Diabetes Res. 2016, 2016, 8917578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kiechl, S.; Schett, G.; Wenning, G.; Redlich, K.; Oberhollenzer, M.; Mayr, A.; Santer, P.; Smolen, J.; Poewe, W.; Willeit, J. Osteoprotegerin is a risk factor for progressive atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2004, 109, 2175–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bernardi, S.; Bossi, F.; Toffoli, B.; Fabris, B. Roles and clinical applications of OPG and TRAIL as biomarkers in cardiovascular disease. Biomed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 1752854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bouman, A.; Schipper, M.; Heineman, M.J.; Faas, M.M. Gender difference in the non-specific and specific immune response in humans. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2004, 52, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Beenakker, K.G.M.; Westendorp, R.G.J.; de Craen, A.J.M.; Chen, S.; Raz, Y.; Ballieux, B.; Nelissen, R.; Later, A.F.L.; Huizinga, T.W.; Slagboom, P.E.; et al. Men have a stronger monocyte-derived cytokine production response upon stimulation with the gram-negative stimulus lipopolysaccharide than women: A pooled analysis including 15 study populations. J. Innate Immun. 2020, 12, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bouman, A.; Heineman, M.J.; Faas, M.M. Sex hormones and the immune response in humans. Hum. Reprod. Update 2005, 11, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Mohamad, N.V.; Wong, S.K.; Wan Hasan, W.N.; Jolly, J.J.; Nur-Farhana, M.F.; Ima-Nirwana, S.; Chin, K.Y. The relationship between circulating testosterone and inflammatory cytokines in men. Aging Male 2019, 22, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arnold, A.P. The organizational-activational hypothesis as the foundation for a unified theory of sexual differentiation of all mammalian tissues. Horm. Behav. 2009, 55, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Towfighi, A.; Zheng, L.; Ovbiagele, B. Sex-specific trends in midlife coronary heart disease risk and prevalence. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 1762–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ridker, P.M. Anticytokine Agents: Targeting interleukin signaling pathways for the treatment of atherothrombosis. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 437–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Elhage, R.; Maret, A.; Pieraggi, M.T.; Thiers, J.C.; Arnal, J.F.; Bayard, F. Differential effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and tumor necrosis factor binding protein on fatty-streak formation in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation 1998, 97, 242–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Devlin, C.M.; Kuriakose, G.; Hirsch, E.; Tabas, I. Genetic alterations of IL-1 receptor antagonist in mice affect plasma cholesterol level and foam cell lesion size. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 6280–6285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ridker, P.M.; Rifai, N.; Stampfer, M.J.; Hennekens, C.H. Plasma concentration of interleukin-6 and the risk of future myocardial infarction among apparently healthy men. Circulation 2000, 101, 1767–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lindmark, E.; Diderholm, E.; Wallentin, L.; Siegbahn, A. Relationship between interleukin 6 and mortality in patients with unstable coronary artery disease: Effects of an early invasive or noninvasive strategy. JAMA 2001, 286, 2107–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Collaboration, I.R.G.C.E.R.F.; Sarwar, N.; Butterworth, A.S.; Freitag, D.F.; Gregson, J.; Willeit, P.; Gorman, D.N.; Gao, P.; Saleheen, D.; Rendon, A.; et al. Interleukin-6 receptor pathways in coronary heart disease: A collaborative meta-analysis of 82 studies. Lancet 2012, 379, 1205–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Semb, A.G.; Ueland, T.; Aukrust, P.; Wareham, N.J.; Luben, R.; Gullestad, L.; Kastelein, J.J.; Khaw, K.T.; Boekholdt, S.M. Osteoprotegerin and soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand and risk for coronary events: A nested case-control approach in the prospective EPIC-Norfolk population study 1993-2003. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2009, 29, 975–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Omland, T.; Ueland, T.; Jansson, A.M.; Persson, A.; Karlsson, T.; Smith, C.; Herlitz, J.; Aukrust, P.; Hartford, M.; Caidahl, K. Circulating osteoprotegerin levels and long-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 51, 627–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Lieb, W.; Gona, P.; Larson, M.G.; Massaro, J.M.; Lipinska, I.; Keaney, J.F., Jr.; Rong, J.; Corey, D.; Hoffmann, U.; Fox, C.S.; et al. Biomarkers of the osteoprotegerin pathway: Clinical correlates, subclinical disease, incident cardiovascular disease, and mortality. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 1849–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bernardi, S.; Voltan, R.; Rimondi, E.; Melloni, E.; Milani, D.; Cervellati, C.; Gemmati, D.; Celeghini, C.; Secchiero, P.; Zauli, G.; et al. TRAIL, OPG, and TWEAK in kidney disease: Biomarkers or therapeutic targets? Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 2019, 133, 1145–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Khosla, S.; Arrighi, H.M.; Melton, L.J., III; Atkinson, E.J.; O’Fallon, W.M.; Dunstan, C.; Riggs, B.L. Correlates of osteoprotegerin levels in women and men. Osteoporos. Int. 2002, 13, 394–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jia, J.; Zhou, H.; Zeng, X.; Feng, S. Estrogen stimulates osteoprotegerin expression via the suppression of miR-145 expression in MG-63 cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 15, 1539–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mozzanega, B.; Gizzo, S.; Bernardi, D.; Salmaso, L.; Patrelli, T.S.; Mioni, R.; Finos, L.; Nardelli, G.B. Cyclic variations of bone resorption mediators and markers in the different phases of the menstrual cycle. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2013, 31, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sarink, D.; Yang, J.; Johnson, T.; Chang-Claude, J.; Overvad, K.; Olsen, A.; Tjonneland, A.; Fournier, A.; Mancini, F.R.; Kvaskoff, M.; et al. Reproductive and lifestyle factors and circulating sRANKL and OPG concentrations in women: Results from the EPIC cohort. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2019, 28, 1746–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Majetschak, M.; Christensen, B.; Obertacke, U.; Waydhas, C.; Schindler, A.E.; Nast-Kolb, D.; Schade, F.U. Sex differences in posttraumatic cytokine release of endotoxin-stimulated whole blood: Relationship to the development of severe sepsis. J. Trauma 2000, 48, 832–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schroder, J.; Kahlke, V.; Staubach, K.H.; Zabel, P.; Stuber, F. Gender differences in human sepsis. Arch. Surg. 1998, 133, 1200–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Meduri, G.U.; Headley, S.; Kohler, G.; Stentz, F.; Tolley, E.; Umberger, R.; Leeper, K. Persistent elevation of inflammatory cytokines predicts a poor outcome in ARDS. Plasma IL-1 beta and IL-6 levels are consistent and efficient predictors of outcome over time. Chest 1995, 107, 1062–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Conti, P.; Younes, A. Coronavirus COV-19/SARS-CoV-2 affects women less than men: Clinical response to viral infection. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2020, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sama, I.E.; Ravera, A.; Santema, B.T.; van Goor, H.; Ter Maaten, J.M.; Cleland, J.G.F.; Rienstra, M.; Friedrich, A.W.; Samani, N.J.; Ng, L.L.; et al. Circulating plasma concentrations of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in men and women with heart failure and effects of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 1810–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gheblawi, M.; Wang, K.; Viveiros, A.; Nguyen, Q.; Zhong, J.C.; Turner, A.J.; Raizada, M.K.; Grant, M.B.; Oudit, G.Y. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2: SARS-CoV-2 receptor and regulator of the renin-angiotensin system: Celebrating the 20th anniversary of the discovery of ACE2. Circ. Res. 2020, 126, 1456–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schober, P.; Boer, C.; Schwarte, L.A. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018, 126, 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Proatherogenic cytokine levels in women and men. Circulating levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, as well as angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2), Ang II, Ang 1-7, osteoprotegerin (OPG), and receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL). Bars are median values.
Figure 1. Proatherogenic cytokine levels in women and men. Circulating levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, as well as angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2), Ang II, Ang 1-7, osteoprotegerin (OPG), and receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL). Bars are median values.
Ijms 21 03861 g001aIjms 21 03861 g001b
Figure 2. Correlations between age and OPG, and estradiol and OPG, in the subgroup of women.
Figure 2. Correlations between age and OPG, and estradiol and OPG, in the subgroup of women.
Ijms 21 03861 g002
Table 1. General characteristics of women and men.
Table 1. General characteristics of women and men.
Women (n = 68)Men (n = 36)p-Value
Age (years)22 (20–49)22 (21–37)0.997
Smoke (%)21%15%0.49
CVD Family history (%)39%33%0.59
Physical activity (%)72%70%0.84
BMI (weight/height2)21 (17–36)23.2 (19.8–31.4)<0.001
SBP (mmHg)115 (90–140)125 (100–145)<0.001
DBP (mmHg)70 (60–90)80 (60–90)<0.01
Glucose (mg/dL)85 (65–100)86 (74–123)0.06
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)185 (129–254)159 (95–249)<0.05
HDL-C (mg/dL)61 (38–94)46 (33–64)<0.001
Triglycerides (mg/dL)66 (37–136)68 (40–271)0.4
LDL-C (mg/dL)111 (58–169)97 (39–179)0.14
Estradiol (pg/mL)53 (7.8–319)23 (9–45)<0.05
Testosterone (ng/mL)0.3 (0.02–0.6)5.7 (2.8–8.2)<0.001
Values are reported as median (min–max). BMI is for body mass index, SBP is for systolic blood pressure, and DBP is for diastolic blood pressure. HDL-C is for high density lipoprotein cholesterol and LDL-C is for low density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Table 2. Correlation between proinflammatory cytokines and clinical/hormonal variables in the entire cohort.
Table 2. Correlation between proinflammatory cytokines and clinical/hormonal variables in the entire cohort.
VariableIL1-βIL-6TNF-α
ρp-Valueρp-Valueρp-Value
Age0.230.020.140.160.090.35
BMI (weight/height2)0.150.120.130.210.190.07
SBP (mmHg)0.170.090.170.090.120.25
DBP (mmHg)0.140.170.150.130.090.36
Glucose0.260.0080.140.170.180.08
Total cholesterol−0.100.30−0.190.06−0.150.13
HDL cholesterol−0.050.63−0.180.13−0.040.65
LDL cholesterol−0.120.22−0.150.13−0.180.08
Triglycerides−0.010.89−0.030.79−0.090.35
Estradiol−0.090.38−0.090.35−0.140.19
Testosterone0.250.010.200.040.180.08
T/E20.280.0050.240.020.270.007
Table 3. Correlation between proinflammatory cytokines and clinical/hormonal variables in the subgroups of women and men.
Table 3. Correlation between proinflammatory cytokines and clinical/hormonal variables in the subgroups of women and men.
Women
VariableIL1-βIL-6TNF-α
ρp-Valueρp-Valueρp-Value
Age0.110.370.040.740.040.75
BMI (weight/height2)0.090.460.130.290.130.29
SBP (mmHg)0.060.640.020.88−0.020.86
DBP (mmHg)0.040.720.020.87−0.030.82
Glucose0.190.130.010.990.100.44
Total cholesterol−0.020.88−0.050.71−0.110.39
HDL cholesterol0.090.44−0.070.540.070.56
LDL cholesterol−0.090.48−0.040.75−0.180.14
Triglycerides0.080.520.140.26−0.030.82
Estradiol−0.010.91−0.070.57−0.100.45
Testosterone0.010.99−0.050.72−0.100.42
E2/T−0.060.64−0.080.51−0.090.49
T/E20.020.870.050.670.050.68
Men
VariableIL1-βIL-6TNF-α
ρp-Valueρp-Valueρp-Value
Age0.450.0070.340.050.160.36
BMI0.040.82−0.140.460.020.90
SBP0.040.800.170.350.050.79
DBP0.110.530.180.320.110.56
Glucose0.280.110.310.070.190.29
Total cholesterol−0.070.67−0.230.19−0.050.77
HDL cholesterol0.100.570.080.670.180.30
LDL cholesterol−0.080.64−0.200.25−0.070.69
Triglycerides−0.160.36−0.310.07−0.250.15
Estradiol−0.090.580.030.85−0.160.37
Testosterone−0.020.890.190.270.020.89
T/E20.090.600.090.610.210.23
Table 4. Correlation between OPG and clinical/hormonal variables in the entire cohort and the subgroups of women and men.
Table 4. Correlation between OPG and clinical/hormonal variables in the entire cohort and the subgroups of women and men.
VariableEntire CohortWomenMen
ρp-Valueρp-Valueρp-Value
Age0.350.00040.420.00040.240.17
BMI−0.210.03−0.120.31−0.190.30
SBP−0.220.03−0.260.030.010.94
DBP−0.320.001−0.300.01−0.330.06
Glucose0.060.530.030.790.220.21
Total cholesterol0.030.770.080.52−0.230.19
HDL cholesterol0.150.140.080.500.030.85
LDL cholesterol−0.040.72−0.010.97−0.190.26
Triglycerides−0.020.800.130.30−0.280.11
Estradiol−0.210.04−0.360.0040.0080.96
Testosterone−0.310.001−0.370.0020.060.72
T/E2−0.050.58−0.010.910.090.59
Table 5. Association of sex with proatherogenic cytokines in the entire patient cohort.
Table 5. Association of sex with proatherogenic cytokines in the entire patient cohort.
Dependent Variable IL-1β
Predictive Variablesβ-EstimateStandard Errorp-Value
Sex27.1413.520.09
Age2.751.240.03
BMI0.271.910.88
SBP0.150.540.78
Glucose1.270.780.11
Dependent Variable IL-6
Predictive Variablesβ-EstimateStandard Errorp-Value
Sex61.4126.880.02
Age5.612.510.03
BMI0.463.890.90
SBP0.691.110.53
Glucose2.181.671.94
Dependent Variable TNF-α
Predictive Variablesβ-EstimateStandard Errorp-Value
Sex70.3932.110.03
Age8.913.240.007
BMI−0.044.650.99
SBP (mmHg)0.141.350.91
Glucose (mg/dL)0.781.990.69
Dependent Variable OPG
Predictive Variablesβ-EstimateStandard Errorp-Value
Sex−75.0754.960.17
Age14.775.550.009
BMI−7.107.960.37
SBP−2.222.310.34
Glucose2.753.410.42

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bernardi, S.; Toffoli, B.; Tonon, F.; Francica, M.; Campagnolo, E.; Ferretti, T.; Comar, S.; Giudici, F.; Stenner, E.; Fabris, B. Sex Differences in Proatherogenic Cytokine Levels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113861

AMA Style

Bernardi S, Toffoli B, Tonon F, Francica M, Campagnolo E, Ferretti T, Comar S, Giudici F, Stenner E, Fabris B. Sex Differences in Proatherogenic Cytokine Levels. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(11):3861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113861

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bernardi, Stella, Barbara Toffoli, Federica Tonon, Morena Francica, Elena Campagnolo, Tommaso Ferretti, Sarah Comar, Fabiola Giudici, Elisabetta Stenner, and Bruno Fabris. 2020. "Sex Differences in Proatherogenic Cytokine Levels" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 11: 3861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113861

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop