Next Article in Journal
Modified Carboxyl-Terminated PAMAM Dendrimers as Great Cytocompatible Nano-Based Drug Delivery System
Previous Article in Journal
Polyaniline Functionalized Graphene Nanoelectrodes for the Regeneration of PC12 Cells via Electrical Stimulation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms20082015
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Benefits and Drawbacks of Harboring Plasmid pP32BP2, Identified in Arctic Psychrophilic Bacterium Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B

by
Anna Ciok
,
Adrian Cegielski
,
Dariusz Bartosik
and
Lukasz Dziewit
*
Department of Bacterial Genetics, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1, 02-096 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(8), 2015; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20082015
Submission received: 26 February 2019 / Revised: 11 April 2019 / Accepted: 22 April 2019 / Published: 24 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B, originating from Spitsbergen island (Arctic), carries the large plasmid pP32BP2 (54,438 bp). Analysis of the pP32BP2 nucleotide sequence revealed the presence of three predicted phenotypic modules that comprise nearly 30% of the plasmid genome. These modules appear to be involved in fimbriae synthesis via the chaperone-usher pathway (FIM module) and the aerobic and anaerobic metabolism of carnitine (CAR and CAI modules, respectively). The FIM module was found to be functional in diverse hosts since it facilitated the attachment of bacterial cells to abiotic surfaces, enhancing biofilm formation. The CAI module did not show measurable activity in any of the tested strains. Interestingly, the CAR module enabled the enzymatic breakdown of carnitine, but this led to the formation of the toxic by-product trimethylamine, which inhibited bacterial growth. Thus, on the one hand, pP32BP2 can enhance biofilm formation, a highly advantageous feature in cold environments, while on the other, it may prevent bacterial growth under certain environmental conditions. The detrimental effect of harboring pP32BP2 (and its CAR module) seems to be conditional, since this replicon may also confer the ability to use carnitine as an alternative carbon source, although a pathway to utilize trimethylamine is most probably necessary to make this beneficial. Therefore, the phenotype determined by this CAR-containing plasmid depends on the metabolic background of the host strain.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Bacteria of the genus Psychrobacter (class Gammaproteobacteria) are Gram-negative, non-motile, psychrotolerant, and halotolerant coccobacilli [1,2,3]. Currently (January 22, 2019), the genus includes 42 validated species, isolated mainly from permanently cold environments, including the Arctic and Antarctic regions [1,4,5,6,7]—frequently from the feces of various animals, e.g., sea birds and seals [4,8,9]. Psychrobacter spp. have also been detected in human tissues and blood, which suggests that some strains may be opportunistic pathogens [10,11].
Like most psychrophilic bacteria, Psychrobacter spp. preferentially grow at low temperatures (not exceeding 20 °C). The majority of strains are recognized as halotolerant or halophilic, since they are able to grow in the presence of NaCl at concentrations of up to 25% (w/v). These bacteria also tolerate high concentrations of potassium and magnesium [2,12,13,14]. Interestingly, the increased occurrence of Psychrobacter spp. in some environments may be linked to the presence of various harmful xenobiotics (e.g., diverse hydrocarbons), which can be utilized as carbon sources [15,16]. Such metabolic properties with adaptive value are often determined by mobile genetic elements, including plasmids. However, available reports concerning the role of plasmids in the adaptation of psychrophilic and psychrotolerant bacteria to extreme polar conditions are limited and rather fragmentary (e.g., [17,18,19,20]).
Currently (January 22, 2019), the complete nucleotide sequences of 63 Psychrobacter spp. plasmids are available in the GenBank database (NCBI). They range in size from 1.8 to 59.9 kb, but the majority (70%) are small cryptic replicons that do not exceed 15 kb in size. Interestingly, many Psychrobacter strains have a multireplicon genome composition and can contain up to seven plasmids, e.g., Psychrobacter sp. P11G5 [21]. As Psychrobacter spp. serve as model cold-active and biotechnologically-valuable microorganisms, some of their plasmids have been used for the construction of cloning vectors to enable genetic engineering of psychrophilic bacteria [22,23,24].
Only a few plasmids of Psychrobacter spp. have been recognized as the carriers of genes that assist adaptation to specific environmental conditions, e.g., (i) pKLH80 of P. maritimus MR29-12 conferring resistance to streptomycin, β-lactams, and tetracycline [20] and (ii) pP62BP1 of Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL62B enabling catabolic breakdown of organic sulfates [25]. The number of reports describing Psychrobacter spp. plasmids is limited, so there is a dearth of knowledge about the biology and ecological role of these extrachromosomal replicons.
Previously, we described the general genomic content and chromosomally-encoded adaptive features of the psychrophilic plasmid-containing Arctic bacterium Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B [8,22]. This strain was isolated from the feces of little auks (dovekie; Alle alle) collected on Spitsbergen island (a breeding colony situated on a mountain slope in Ariekammen Isbjornhamna Bay—Hornsund Fjord; 77°00′37.0″N, 15°31′49.5″E) [8]. DAB_AL32B is a psychrophile that can grow at temperatures of between 4 and 25 °C. It is able to utilize anthracene and exhibits low level resistance to As(V), Cr(VI), Cu(II), and Zn(II) [8].
The DAB_AL32B strain carries two circular plasmids: a small cryptic replicon pP32BP1 (4,599 bp) and a larger plasmid pP32BP2 (54,438 bp) [8,22]. In this study, we performed a detailed structural and functional analysis of pP32BP2, which revealed the antagonistic influence of this plasmid on the metabolic and physiological properties of its host strain.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. General Features of Plasmid pP32BP2

The available draft genomic data for Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B [22] was insufficient to permit the assembly of the complete nucleotide sequence of plasmid pP32BP2. Therefore, plasmid DNA was isolated and sequenced de novo using Illumina technology. An analysis of the assembled sequence revealed that the size of pP32BP2 is 54,438 bp, with an average GC content of 39.9%, which is lower than that of the DAB_AL32B chromosome (41.9%) [22], but similar to the average value for other Psychrobacter plasmids (39.2%) (GenBank). The manual annotation of the pP32BP2 sequence identified 54 genes, which constitute 77.9% of the plasmid genome. Possible biological functions were assigned to 47 (87%) of them (Figure 1, Table S1).
A detailed analysis of the pP32BP2 sequence revealed that this plasmid contains several genetic modules (Figure 1). Besides the backbone modules responsible for replication (REP module) and stable maintenance (PAR module) functions, three additional conserved gene clusters were distinguished, comprising about 30% of the plasmid genome. These encode predicted proteins possibly involved in (i) fimbriae synthesis via the chaperone-usher pathway (FIM module), (ii) carnitine aerobic metabolism (CAR module), and (iii) carnitine anaerobic metabolism (CAI module). The functional characterization of these modules was performed and their genetic organization is reported in Figure 1.
Interestingly, pP32BP2 carries 18 genes that encode predicted transposases (Table S1). Seven are located within the DNA region between 20,039 and 22,050 bp, which is a putative hot spot for transposition. Comparative analyses (ISfinder database) revealed that only three transposase genes are complete, while the other 15 are pseudogenes, i.e., remnants of various transposase genes, that encode partial proteins. The accumulation of truncated transposons is not uncommon and has been observed in several other plasmid genomes [26,27].
Our analysis revealed that pP32BP2 carries two insertion sequences (ISs), as judged by the presence of (i) complete transposase genes, (ii) imperfect inverted repeat sequences (IR), representing the site of transposase binding and DNA cleavage, and (iii) direct repeat sequences (DR) adjacent to the IRs resulting from the duplication of the target site of transposition (Table 1). None of these elements carry additional passenger genes. The predicted ISs are novel elements, designated ISPssp4 and ISPssp5, and their nucleotide sequences have been deposited in the ISfinder database. ISPssp4 (classified to the IS256 family) carries a single transposase gene (pP32BP2_p04), while ISPssp5 (a member of the IS427 group of the IS5 family) contains two overlapping genes (pP32BP2_p19 and pP32BP2_p20) that probably produce a functional transposase following a programmed translational frame-shift [28].

2.2. REP and PAR Modules—Plasmid Replication and Active Partitioning

The pP32BP2 backbone modules, REP (plasmid replication), and PAR (active partitioning), were described in detail previously [22]. In brief, the REP module structure is typical for iteron plasmids [29] and consists of a repA gene that encodes the replication initiation protein and an origin of replication (oriV) containing five direct repeats (DRs) and a pair of inverted repeats (IRs). The PAR module is comprised of three components: the parA and parB genes and a parS sequence preceding the putative parAB operon [22]. The REP and PAR modules were previously used to construct two Psychrobacter-specific cloning vectors—pPS-BR and pPS-NR [22]. In this study, the REP and PAR modules were cloned within the vector pABW1, which resulted in construct pABW1-REPPAR (Table 2). This recombinant plasmid was used to remove pP32BP2 from its host cells by means of the plasmid incompatibility phenomenon. As a result, the pP32BP2-less Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B_PL was obtained and used for further analyses of the FIM, CAI, and CAR modules.

2.3. FIM Module—Cell Adhesion to Solid Surfaces and Biofilm Formation

The FIM module of pP32BP2 is composed of four tandemly-arranged genes (pP32BP2_p29-32) (Figure 1). These encode structural proteins and components essential for fimbriae assembly via the chaperone-usher pathway (Figure 2A): (i) a major structural fimbrial subunit (COG3539; pP32BP2_p29), (ii) a chaperone (COG3121; pP32BP2_p30), (iii) an usher protein (COG3188; pP32BP2_p31), and (iv) an adhesin mediating attachment (pP32BP2_p32) (Table S1). Related gene clusters, displaying gene synteny and nucleotide sequence conservation were detected in the genomes of six Psychrobacter strains, i.e., PRwf-1, SHUES1, YP14, 1501(2011), UBA5136, and UBA3962 (GenBank account numbers CP000713, LXWA01000081, CP029789, AFHU01000208, DHYG01000067, and DGDC01000033, respectively). All but one of these FIM modules are located within the chromosome. The exception is that of the SHUES1 strain (draft genome), where the FIM-containing contig (Genbank account number LXWA01000081) is probably of plasmid origin, as it also carries a gene that encodes a putative plasmid replication initiation protein of the Rep_3 superfamily.
It is noteworthy that gene clusters homologous to the FIM module of pP32BP2 were also found in the genomes of many environmental and clinical isolates of the genus Acinetobacter (closely phylogenetically related to Psychrobacter spp.), e.g., Acinetobacter junii 65 that was isolated from limnetic water in the Novosibirsk region, Russia (GenBank account number CP019041) and Acinetobacter haemolyticus sz1652 obtained from the urinary tract of a hospital patient in Shenzhen, China (GenBank account number CP032135).
Fimbriae facilitate attachment to biotic and abiotic surfaces, colonization, and biofilm formation [30,31,32]. According to Hinsa-Leasure et al. [33], the majority of Psychrobacter strains are able to attach to solid surfaces, which is considered an advantageous feature in the cold and salty environments they inhabit. It was hypothesized that the attachment of bacterial cells in proximity to liquid water (a highly limited resource in freezing polar regions) increases bacterial survival in permafrost [33]. An enhanced attachment ability also facilitates colonization and biofilm formation. The ability to form biofilms is considered a highly advantageous feature, since the biofilm matrix protects cells against harmful environmental conditions (e.g., osmotic shock, desiccation, UV radiation), antimicrobial agents (e.g., antibiotics), and also enhances DNA acquisition [33,34,35,36].
To investigate whether the pP32BP2 FIM module is functional, we tested its contribution to the attachment of bacterial cells to an artificial solid surface (polystyrene microtiter plate). Attached cells of the strains DAB_AL32BR (wild-type), DAB_AL32B_PL (pP32BP2-less), and DAB_AL32B_PL carrying plasmid pBBR-Ps-FIM (vector pBBR1-MCS2 with cloned FIM module) were stained with crystal violet and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods.
The obtained results indicated that the FIM module does enhance the attachment of bacterial cells (Figure 2B). The attachment ability of the bacteria is significantly (p < 0.005) reduced in the absence of pP32BP2, and the reintroduction of the FIM module (within plasmid pBBR-Ps-FIM) restores the original phenotype. Compared to the wild-type strain DAB_AL32B, we observed stronger (p < 0.005) surface adhesion of the DAB_AL32B_PL strain carrying pBBR-Ps-FIM. This may be an effect of enhanced expression of the plasmid-borne FIM genes, as was previously seen in an analogous system by Schroll et al. [37].
Plasmids (and other mobile genetic elements) may spread via horizontal gene transfer (HGT) among bacteria belonging to diverse phylogenetic groups [38,39]. None of the genes identified within pP32BP2 are involved in conjugal transfer, nor are there sequences with similarity to known origins of conjugal transfer (oriT), which indicates that the plasmid is non-self-transmissible and non-mobilizable. Nonetheless, it is possible that, following host-cell death, this replicon or its fragments may be retrieved by various (non-Psychrobacter) microorganisms using other HGT mechanisms, e.g., transformation or transduction [40]. Therefore, the activity of the pP32BP2 FIM module was tested in four heterologous hosts belonging to different classes of Proteobacteria (Alpha, Beta, and Gamma). As shown in Figure 2B, all strains carrying plasmid pBBR-Ps-FIM displayed a statistically significant (p < 0.005) (Figure S1) enhanced attachment ability in comparison to the wild-type strains. This result suggests that this FIM cluster can be expressed in various Proteobacteria representing the most abundant inhabitants of polar environments [41,42,43].
The crystal violet staining assay is widely used to assess the ability of bacteria to form biofilms; however, it should only be considered a preliminary test of the adherence abilities of bacterial strains. Cell attachment is the first step in biofilm development. Since this initial analysis of bacterial adherence gave promising results, we then attempted to visualize the biofilm structures using scanning confocal laser microscopy (SCLM). Unlike the crystal violet assay, which examines attachment to a polystyrene surface, cells for imaging by SCLM were cultured on glass-bottomed dishes. Unfortunately, this difference in surface composition meant that biofilm structures could no longer be detected for four of the tested strains—Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B, Achromobacter sp. LM16, A. tumefaciens LBA288, and E. coli DH5α. In these cases, we presumed that the weaker attachment to glass led to the loss of cells during the washing steps in sample preparation. However, in the case of P. aeruginosa PAO1161, we found that the FIM-carrying strain formed a significantly thicker biofilm than the wild-type (Figure 2C). This confirmed that the FIM module enhances biofilm formation and showed that cells of P. aeruginosa have the ability to attach to diverse abiotic surfaces. A more general conclusion from our results is that it is important to compare different basal surfaces in assays to analyze biofilm formation.

2.4. CAR Module—Aerobic Metabolism of Carnitine

The CAR module contains a cluster of five genes (pP32BP2_p35-39) preceded by a divergently oriented gene that encodes a transcriptional regulator of the LysR family (COG0583; pP32BP2_p34)—a putative regulator of CAR gene expression (Figure 1). Sequence similarity searches of the KEGG database allowed us to predict the biological function of the CAR-encoded proteins. Individual proteins may function as (i) a malate dehydrogenase (COG0473; pP32BP2_p35), (ii–iii) two-component carnitine monooxygenase (oxygenase [COG4638; pP32BP2_p37] and reductase [COG1018; pP32BP2_p39]), (iv) a malic semialdehyde dehydrogenase (COG1012; pP32BP2_p38), and (v) a BCCT-family transporter (glycine betaine/choline/carnitine transporter; TC: 2.A.15 [44]; pP32BP2_p36) (Table S1). Information obtained from the MetaCyc database [45] concerning these predicted proteins strongly suggested the involvement of the CAR module in L-carnitine transport and utilization under aerobic conditions (Figure 3).
To test whether plasmid pP32BP2 enables the utilization of carnitine, the wild-type (DAB_AL32BR) strain and its pP32BP2-less derivative (DAB_AL32B_PL) were cultivated in a minimal medium supplemented with carnitine as the sole carbon source. We failed to observe changes in the optical density of the bacterial cultures, regardless of the concentration of carnitine in the medium, which demonstrated an absence of growth (Figure 4). However, a noticeable scent of trimethylamine (TMA; an intermediate in carnitine breakdown; Figure 3) was detected in the cultures of the wild-type strain. The concentration of trimethylamine, determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent assay, was 5.46 ± 0.35 mM (after 120 h of culture in a medium with an initial carnitine concentration of 5 mM). In contrast, no TMA was produced in the pP32BP2-less strain cultures. This indicated that carnitine breakdown occurs and trimethylamine is released only in the presence of pP32BP2.
To confirm that the trimethylamine originates from the utilization of carnitine, conferred by the presence of CAR, this module was cloned into vector pBBR-Ps (Table 2), and the resulting plasmid (pBBR-Ps-CAR) was introduced into the strain DAB_AL32B_PL (pP32BP2-less). As shown in Figure 1, three additional genes are located between the predicted CAR and CAI modules, encoding the following putative proteins: (i) large subunit of acetolactate synthase (COG0028; pP32BP2_p40), (ii) NADPH:quinone oxidoreductase (COG0604; pP32BP2_p41), and (iii) betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (COG1012; pP32BP2_p42) (Figure 1, Table S1). Since it is possible that these enzymes might affect carnitine breakdown, their genes (pP32BP2_p40-42) were also included in the plasmid pBBR-Ps-CAR. When the strain DAB_AL32B_PL (pBBR-Ps-CAR) was cultivated in a minimal medium supplemented with carnitine as the sole carbon source, no growth was observed and trimethylamine was detected, as in the case of the wild-type strain. This confirmed that the TMA is produced by the activity of the CAR module.
To check whether the lack of growth on carnitine was a consequence of a production of toxic TMA, we first carefully inspected the genome of the DAB_AL32B strain for the presence of genes that encode enzymes responsible for trimethylamine utilization. This led to the identification of a putative tmm-like gene (GenBank account number OXL21465), sharing 58% aa identity with an experimentally-tested trimethylamine monooxygenase from Paracoccus aminophilus JCM 7686 [46]. Trimethylamine monooxygenases catalyze the transformation of trimethylamine into trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), which may function as an osmoprotectant in bacteria [47]. However, in the DAB_AL32B genome, we did not find other genes that were shown to be obligatory for further transformation of TMAO, including tdm gene encoding trimethylamine-N-oxide demethylase [48]. The tdm genes are absent in all other currently available Psychrobacter genomes (NCBI). Interestingly, genes that encode enzymes crucial for TMA utilization have been found in the genomes of Acinetobacter spp. that are closely phylogenetically related to Psychrobacter spp. Moreover, Acinetobacter spp. frequently harbor similar CAR modules and can exploit these gene clusters for the utilization of carnitine as a sole carbon source under aerobic conditions [49]. As the strain DAB_AL32B is apparently unable to use TMA as a carbon source due to lack of the appropriate genes, we tested whether malate, a second product of carnitine breakdown (Figure 3), is a suitable substrate for bacterial growth. DAB_AL32B was able to utilize this compound, so the lack of growth of this strain in a minimal medium containing carnitine is not a consequence of the absence of an accessible carbon source.
To verify the presumed toxic effect of carnitine utilization on the strain DAB_AL32B, we next checked its ability to grow in a minimal medium containing a mixture of two carbon sources, i.e., sodium succinate (previously shown to be optimal for this bacterium) together with carnitine. Again, we did not observe any change in the optical density of the cultures (Figure 5), indicating a lack of growth. In addition, the scent of trimethylamine was detected, and the presence of TMA was confirmed using the Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent assay. This result indicated that the breakdown of carnitine mediated by CAR releases a toxic compound, i.e., TMA, that prevents bacterial growth.
To our knowledge, there have been no reports concerning Psychrobacter growth on carnitine as a carbon source. When analyzing genomic sequences of Psychrobacter spp. (GenBank database), we did not identify any complete gene cluster that encodes enzymes responsible for aerobic carnitine utilization, i.e., complete CAR modules. Nonetheless, four Psychrobacter strains, i.e., P. alimentarius PAMC 27889, P. fozii CECT 5889, Psychrobacter sp. JCM 18900, and Psychrobacter sp. 4Bb (GenBank account numbers CP014945, QJSU01000003, BAWG01000006, and PJAS01000001, respectively) carry gene clusters that encode proteins (i.e., carnitine transporter, oxygenase component of carnitine monooxygenase, and malic semialdehyde dehydrogenase, respectively) homologous to pP32BP2_p36-38 (Figure S2). Unlike in DAB_AL32B, these loci have the gene that encodes the carnitine transporter divergently oriented in relation to the other two genes. A detailed analysis of the sequence contigs carrying these gene clusters suggest that they might be of chromosomal origin.
The ability to metabolize carnitine has been experimentally confirmed for three representatives of the genus Acinetobacter, i.e., A. baumannii ATCC19606, A. calcoaceticus ATCC39647, and A. calcoaceticus 69-V, but conserved gene clusters potentially involved in carnitine metabolism were also identified in the genomes of several other Acinetobacter spp., representing human gut microbiota [49,50,51]. In fact, gene clusters with strong similarity to the pP32BP2 CAR module are ubiquitous in both environmental and clinical Acinetobacter isolates, e.g., A. oleivorans KCJK7897 is isolated from soil in the USA (GenBank account number QAYN01000016), A. harbinensis HITLi from river water in China (GenBank account number JXBK01000002), and A. baumannii ATCC19606 from a human subject (GenBank account number GG704573) (Figure S2).
An aerobic carnitine degradation pathway (i.e., CAR module) seems not to occur in Psychrobacter spp. and appears to be a unique feature of plasmid pP32BP2. We speculate that this plasmid-borne CAR module may have been acquired via HGT from bacterium (possibly TMA-utilizing) representing other genus, e.g., closely related Acinetobacter (whose representatives were also isolated from the same soil sample like the DAB_AL32B strain [8]).

2.5. CAI Module—Anaerobic Metabolism of Carnitine

The CAI gene cluster, the second metabolic module located within plasmid pP32BP2, is composed of three genes (pP32BP2_p43-45) that encode the following putative proteins: (i) a transcriptional regulator of the IclR family (COG1414; pP32BP2_p43), (ii) crotonbetainyl-CoA reductase (COG1960; pP32BP2_p44), and (iii) γ-butyrobetainyl-CoA:carnitine CoA transferase (COG1804; pP32BP2_p45) (Figure 1, Table S1). The two enzymes exhibit homology to their respective counterparts (CaiA and CaiB) encoded within the caiTABCDEF operon of E. coli K-12 substr. MG1655 (GenBank account number U00096.3).
The CAI modules described to date encode proteins involved in carnitine metabolism under anaerobic conditions. Various members of the Enterobacteriaceae (e.g., E. coli, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Proteus vulgaris) are able to metabolize L-carnitine via crotonobetaine to γ-butyrobetaine (so-called L-carnitine degradation pathway I) [45]. Crotonobetaine serves as an external electron acceptor and enables bacterial growth under anaerobic conditions.
The pathway substrate, L-carnitine, enters the cell via the CaiT transporter (the BCCT transporter family) [50,52]. Since the CAI module of pP32BP2 does not encode any transporter, we presume that L-carnitine:γ-butyrobetaine antiport is mediated by BCCT family transporters encoded by the DAB_AL32B chromosome.
The L-carnitine degradation pathway I requires four enzymes (CaiABCD). Related enzymes are encoded in the DAB_AL32B chromosome, but they are not organized in one cluster, which may suggest that the observed sequence similarity is irrelevant. Plasmid pP32BP2 encodes only two proteins, CaiA and CaiB (homologous to CaiA and CaiB of E. coli), which means that this plasmid-borne CAI module is incomplete (Figure 3). Possibly, the CaiCD-encoding genes have been lost from the plasmid as a result of transposition events. Notably, transposase gene remnants are present downstream of pP32BP2_p45 (Figure 1). However, it is still possible that the chromosomally-encoded CaiC- and CaiD-like proteins may complete the truncated plasmid-encoded degradation pathway.
To verify this hypothesis, wild-type and pP32BP2-less Psychrobacter sp. strains were cultivated under anaerobic conditions in the presence of sodium succinate (as carbon source) and L-carnitine. No growth was observed in any experimental variant (Figure S3), which confirmed that the CAI module is incomplete and that the identified chromosomal genes did not permit the use of carnitine as an external electron acceptor.
It is important to mention that growth of Psychrobacter spp. under anaerobic conditions has been experimentally demonstrated for only two strains, P. aquimaris SW-210T and P. namhaensis SW-242T; thus, this ability may not be common to the entire genus [53].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Bacterial Strains, Plasmids and Culture Conditions

The following bacterial strains were used: Achromobacter sp. LM16R [54], Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA288 [55], Escherichia coli DH5α [56], Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1161 [57], Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B [8], Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32BR (Rifr-derivative of DAB_AL32B) [23], and—constructed in this study—Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B_PL (i.e., derivative of DAB_AL32BR denuded of plasmid pP32BP2). Strains were grown at 20 °C (Psychrobacter spp.), 30 °C (Achromobacter sp. and A. tumefaciens), or 37 °C (E. coli and P. aeruginosa). Depending on the experiment, strains were cultivated on LB (lysogeny broth) or the following minimal media: (i) a M63 medium for P. aeruginosa (2 g/L (NH4)2SO4; 13.6 g/L KH2PO4; 0.5 mg/L FeSO4x7H2O; 0.246 g/L MgSO4x7H2O) supplemented with 0.2% (w/v) glucose, and (ii) a M9 medium for other strains (6 g/L Na2HPO4; 3 g/L KH2PO4; 1 g/L NH4Cl; 0.5 g/L NaCl; 0.12 g/L MgSO4; 0.01 g/L CaCl2) supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) sodium succinate (for Psychrobacter spp.) or 0.2% (w/v) glucose (for Achromobacter sp., A. tumefaciens, and E. coli). The media were solidified by the addition of 1.5% (w/v) agar. Where necessary, media were supplemented with X-gal, IPTG and antibiotics: kanamycin (50 μg/mL for A. tumefaciens, E. coli, and Psychrobacter spp. or 500 μg/mL for Achromobacter sp. and P. aeruginosa) and rifampin (50 μg/mL). Plasmids used and constructed in this study are listed in Table 2.

3.2. DNA Manipulations and Introduction of Plasmid DNA into Bacterial Cells

Plasmid pP32BP2 DNA was isolated using a large-scale alkaline extraction method and purified by CsCl-ethidium bromide gradient centrifugation [62]. Other plasmid DNAs were isolated using a GeneMATRIX Plasmid Miniprep DNA Purification Kit (EURx, Gdansk, Poland) or a classical alkaline lysis procedure [63]. Routine DNA manipulations were carried out using standard methods [62]. DNA was amplified by PCR using a KAPA HiFi PCR Kit and appropriate primer pairs (Table S2). DNA amplification was performed using a Mastercycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Each thermocycle started with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 20 s, annealing at 62 to 65 °C (depending on the primer pair) for 15 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min/kb, and finished with a final extension at 72 °C for 1 min/kb. PCR-amplified DNA fragments were then cloned in the pABW1 or pBBR1MCS-2 vectors.
To clone isolated CAR and FIM modules, two libraries of BamHI and EcoRI restriction fragments of pP32BP2 were prepared in vector pBGS18. Plasmid clones carrying fragments comprising the CAR or FIM modules were used in further steps to construct pBBR-Ps-CAR, pBBR-FIM and pBBR-Ps-FIM.
The obtained derivatives of pABW1 and pBBR1MCS-2 were introduced into Achromobacter sp. LM16R, A. tumefaciens LBA288, Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32BR, and Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B_PL by triparental mating [64], into DAB_AL32BR and DAB_AL32B_PL by electroporation [65] and into E. coli and P. aeruginosa by chemical transformation [66,67].

3.3. Construction of Plasmid-Less Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B

To remove the naturally occurring plasmid pP32BP2 from Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B, a target-oriented replicon curing technique was applied [68]. A DNA fragment carrying the REP and PAR modules of pP32BP2 was amplified by PCR, cloned into vector pABW1 (resulting in plasmid pABW1-REPPAR), and introduced into strain DAB_AL32BR by electroporation. Several colonies were then screened for the presence of pP32BP2 by (i) DNA isolation and comparing plasmid profiles with the wild-type strain, and (ii) PCR to detect selected genes of pP32BP2 (Table S2). A clone denuded of plasmid pP32BP2 was selected, and a plasmid pABW1-REPPAR was removed from this strain in the following manner. A liquid culture was grown, and every 24 h this was diluted (1:1000) in a fresh medium lacking antibiotics. After 3 days, culture dilutions were plated onto a solid medium without antibiotic selection. About 50 colonies were tested for kanamycin resistance conferred by the presence of vector pABW1-REPPAR. Clones able to grow only on plates without antibiotic were checked for the presence of pABW1-REPPAR by applying the methods described above. The obtained plasmid-less strain, lacking both pP32BP2 and pABW1-REPPAR, was named DAB_AL32B_PL.

3.4. DNA Sequencing

The complete nucleotide sequence of plasmid pP32BP2 was determined in the DNA Sequencing and Oligonucleotide Synthesis Laboratory at the Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences (Warsaw, Poland). The plasmid was sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq instrument in paired-end mode with a v3 chemistry kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The obtained sequence reads were filtered for quality and assembled using Newbler v3.0 software (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Final gap closure was performed by capillary sequencing of PCR amplicons using an ABI3730xl DNA Analyser (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA).
All PCR products obtained in this study were cloned into vectors pABW1 or pBBR1MCS-2 and then sequenced using an ABI3730xl DNA Analyser (Applied Biosystems) to check for errors. Where necessary, primer walking was employed to obtain the complete nucleotide sequence of DNA fragments.

3.5. Bioinformatic Analyses

Plasmid DNA sequences were manually annotated using Artemis software [69]. Similarity searches were performed using the BLAST programs [70] with the NCBI Conserved Domains Database [71] (available online: http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and Pfam [72]. EC numbers were assigned using the KEGG database [73]. Metabolic pathways were screened using the MetaCyc database [45]. Insertion sequences were analyzed using the ISfinder database [74].

3.6. Testing Bacterial Adherence to Artificial Surfaces

To test bacterial adherence to artificial surfaces, a modified crystal violet staining method was used [75]. Bacteria were cultivated overnight in a minimal medium at the optimum temperature and then harvested by centrifugation, washed three times with saline (0.8% w/v), and used to inoculate a fresh medium to an OD600 of 0.05 ± 0.005. Samples of 200 μL of the cell suspensions (three biological replicates, each with six technical replicates) were transferred to the wells of sterile 96-well plates, and these were incubated at the required temperature without shaking. After 24 h (for Achromobacter sp., A. tumefaciens, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa) or 48 h (Psychrobacter spp.) the OD600 of the cultures was measured using a SunriseTM plate reader (with Magellan software; Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). The medium containing unbound cells was then removed, and all wells were rinsed twice with saline solution and dried at 37 °C for about 15 min. Attached bacteria were stained by adding 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet (200 μL/well) and incubating the plates at room temperature. After 10 min, the stain was removed, and the wells rinsed twice with saline solution and dried again at 37 °C. The dried stained biofilms were then dissolved by adding 95% ethanol (200 μL/well) and incubated for 10 min. The OD570 of the obtained suspension was measured using a SunriseTM plate reader. Biofilm formation was quantified by calculating the OD570/OD600 ratio. The statistical significance of obtained results was determined by the Mann-Whitney U test (Figure S1).

3.7. Live Cell Confocal Microscopy (Biofilm Analysis)

Scanning Confocal Laser Microscopy (SCLM) was applied to image live cells in biofilms [76]. Bacteria were cultivated on glass-bottomed dishes (35 mm diameter, 20 mm glass diameter, number 1.5 coverslip; MatTek Corpor, Ashland, OR, USA). Initial cultures were grown in an appropriate minimal medium under optimal conditions. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation, washed three times with saline (0.8% w/v), and used to inoculate a fresh medium to an OD600 of 0.06 ± 0.005. A volume of 4 mL of each cell suspension was transferred to a glass-bottomed dish and incubated without shaking at the optimum temperature for 72 h (for Achromobacter sp., A. tumefaciens, and E. coli) or 96 h (P. aeruginosa and Psychrobacter sp.). The medium was removed from the dish, and the biofilm that had developed on the bottom was washed three times with 10 mM MgSO4 and then stained with acridine orange solution (10 μg/mL in 10 mM MgSO4) (Sigma, Basel, Switzerland). After 30 min, the stain was removed, and the biofilm was rinsed twice with 10 mM MgSO4. Confocal microscopy was then performed using a Nikon Eclipse Ti (A1) microscope equipped with a ×60, 1.4 NA oil immersion phase-contrast lens (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). An argon laser with a maximum-emission line at 488 nm was used as the excitation source. Horizontal optical thin sections were collected at 0.21-μm intervals from the outer surface of the biofilm to the bottom of the glass plate. These images were captured using NIS-ELEMENTS interactive software (Nikon Corporation), and three-dimensional reconstructions were created.

3.8. Testing Psychrobacter spp. Growth on Carnitine as the Sole Carbon Source Under Aerobic Conditions

Cultures of various Psychrobacter strains were grown in a M9 minimal medium supplemented with sodium succinate (0.5% w/v) as the carbon source. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation, washed three times with saline (0.8% w/v), and used to inoculate a fresh medium to an OD600 of 0.05 ± 0.005. Depending on the experimental variant, the M9 medium was supplemented with sodium succinate (0.5% w/v; control) or carnitine (2.5 or 5 mM) as the sole carbon source. Triplicate 10 mL cultures were grown in 50-mL tubes for 120 h at 20 °C with shaking. Every 24 h, 200 μL of each culture was taken, the OD600 measured using a SunriseTM plate reader, and growth curves were plotted.

3.9. Determination of Trimethylamine Concentration

The trimethylamine concentration in bacterial cultures was determined using Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent according the procedure described by Ikawa et al. [77].

3.10. Testing Anaerobic Growth of Psychrobacter spp.

Cultures of Psychrobacter strains were grown in a M9 minimal medium supplemented with sodium succinate (0.5% w/v) as the carbon source. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation, washed three times with saline (0.8% w/v), and used to inoculate fresh M9 supplemented with sodium succinate (0.5% w/v) as carbon source and, depending on the experimental variant, 2.5 or 5.0 mM L-carnitine. Cultures of 80 mL were propagated anaerobically in 100-mL serum bottles (Sigma). Prior to inoculation, the desired medium was added to the bottle and this was then flushed with CO2:N2 (ratio 20:80). The bottles were then corked with silicon stoppers secured by aluminum crimp seals. Bacterial cells were introduced into the sealed bottles via the stopper using a syringe plus needle to obtain an initial OD600 of 0.06 ± 0.005. The cultures were grown for 7 days at 20 °C without shaking. To plot growth curves, 0.5 mL of each culture was collected on days 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7, and the OD600 measured using a SunriseTM plate reader. Each experimental variant was run in triplicate.

3.11. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

The nucleotide sequence of plasmid pP32BP2 was deposited in the GenBank (NCBI) database with the accession number MK422609. Sequences of ISPssp4 and ISPssp5 were deposited in the ISfinder database [74].

4. Conclusions

This study has provided an insight into the overall structure, genetic load, and possible ecological role of plasmid pP32BP2 from the psychrophilic Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B. Plasmid pP32BP2 is the second-largest extrachromosomal replicon identified so far in the genus Psychrobacter. A significant part of the plasmid genome is comprised of three genetic modules (FIM, CAR and CAI), but only the first two were shown to be functional.
The FIM module encodes structural proteins and components required for the assembly of fimbriae via the chaperone-usher pathway. Using a crystal-violet staining assay, we demonstrated that this module positively influences the attachment of DAB_AL32B cells to abiotic surfaces. Moreover, we showed that the FIM module is functional in heterologous hosts representing various classes of Proteobacteria.
The CAR module has a unique gene arrangement among Psychrobacter spp. Homologous gene clusters are prevalent in closely related Acinetobacter spp., which suggests the origin of this plasmid-borne module and the direction of its horizontal transmission. The CAR modules (e.g., those found in Acinetobacter spp.) determine the aerobic breakdown of carnitine, whereby this compound is metabolized (with the release of the by-product TMA) and used as a carbon source. In such circumstances, the presence of pP32BP2 (carrying the CAR module) should be beneficial for the strain DAB_AL32B, since it could broaden the spectrum of metabolically available compounds. However, we showed that the TMA produced is toxic for DAB_AL32B cells, and it prevents their growth when carnitine is present in the medium. This phenomenon makes pP32BP2 a unique and interesting example of an extrachromosomal replicon which can bring benefits and drawbacks to its bacterial host depending on the environmental conditions and specific metabolic properties of the strain (i.e., ability to utilize toxic TMA).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/8/2015/s1, Figure S1: Box plots of OD570/OD600 ratios for the results of the crystal violet staining test performed for Psychrobacter spp. wild-type, pP32BP2-less, and plasmid-less carrying pBBR-Ps-FIM strains as well as heterologous wild-type and FIM module-carrying strains; Figure S2: Comparison of the CAR module of pP32BP2 and related modules found in Psychrobacter and Acinetobacter genomes; Figure S3: Growth of Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B wild-type and plasmid-less strains under anaerobic conditions on sodium succinate and carnitine; Table S1: Genes located within plasmid pP32BP2; Table S2: Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Ci. and L.D.; Data curation, A.Ci.; Formal analysis, A.Ci.; Funding acquisition, A.Ci. and L.D.; Investigation, A.Ci., A.Ce., and L.D.; Methodology, A.Ci.; Project administration, A.Ci. and L.D.; Resources, A.Ci., D.B., and L.D.; Software, A.Ci.; Supervision, L.D.; Validation, A.Ci. and L.D.; Visualization, A.Ci.; Writing—original draft, A.Ci. and L.D.; Writing—review & editing, A.Ci., D.B., and L.D.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Poland) grant number DI2013 012543 financed by the budget for science in the years 2014–2016 as a research project under the program Diamond Grant. The APC was funded by the University of Warsaw (Poland).

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge access to the infrastructure of the Stanislaw Siedlecki Polish Polar Station in Hornsund (Arctic), where the biological material (from which DAB_AL32B strain originates) was collected. Library construction and plasmid genome assembly were carried out in the DNA Sequencing and Oligonucleotide Synthesis Laboratory IBB PAN using the CePT infrastructure financed by the European Union—the European Regional Development Fund (Innovative economy 2007–2013, Agreement POIG.02.02.00-14-024/08-00). We thank Julia Pawlowska for her assistance in statistical analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bozal, N.; Montes, M.J.; Tudela, E.; Guinea, J. Characterization of several Psychrobacter strains isolated from Antarctic environments and description of Psychrobacter luti sp. nov. and Psychrobacter fozii sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 1093–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bowman, J.P. The genus Psychrobacter. In The Prokaryotes; Dworkin, M., Falkow, S., Rosenberg, E., Schleifer, K.-H., Stackebrandt, E., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 920–930. [Google Scholar]
  3. Romanenko, L.A.; Schumann, P.; Rohde, M.; Lysenko, A.M.; Mikhailov, V.V.; Stackebrandt, E. Psychrobacter submarinus sp. nov. and Psychrobacter marincola sp. nov., psychrophilic halophiles from marine environments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bowman, J.P.; Cavanagh, J.; Austin, J.J.; Sanderson, K. Novel Psychrobacter species from Antarctic ornithogenic soils. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1996, 46, 841–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rodrigues, D.F.; Da, C.J.E.; Ayala-Del-Rio, H.L.; Pellizari, V.H.; Gilichinsky, D.; Sepulveda-Torres, L.; Tiedje, J.M. Biogeography of two cold-adapted genera: Psychrobacter and Exiguobacterium. ISME J. 2009, 3, 658–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Denner, E.B.; Mark, B.; Busse, H.J.; Turkiewicz, M.; Lubitz, W. Psychrobacter proteolyticus sp. nov., a psychrotrophic, halotolerant bacterium isolated from the Antarctic krill Euphausia superba Dana, excreting a cold-adapted metalloprotease. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 24, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zeng, Y.-X.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.-R. Psychrobacter glaciei sp. nov., isolated from the ice core of an Arctic glacier. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1792–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dziewit, L.; Cegielski, A.; Romaniuk, K.; Uhrynowski, W.; Szych, A.; Niesiobedzki, P.; Zmuda-Baranowska, M.J.; Zdanowski, M.K.; Bartosik, D. Plasmid diversity in arctic strains of Psychrobacter spp. Extremophiles 2013, 17, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yassin, A.F.; Busse, H.-J. Psychrobacter lutiphocae sp. nov., isolated from the faeces of a seal. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 2049–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ortiz-Alcantara, J.M.; Segura-Candelas, J.M.; Garces-Ayala, F.; Gonzalez-Duran, E.; Rodriguez-Castillo, A.; Alcantara-Perez, P.; Wong-Arambula, C.; Gonzalez-Villa, M.; Leon-Avila, G.; Garcia-Chequer, A.J.; et al. Fatal Psychrobacter sp. infection in a pediatric patient with meningitis identified by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in cerebrospinal fluid. Arch. Microbiol. 2016, 198, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bonwitt, J.; Tran, M.; Droz, A.; Gonzalez, A.; Glover, W.A. Psychrobacter sanguinis wound infection associated with marine environment exposure, Washington, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 1942–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Azevedo, J.S.N.; Correia, A.; Henriques, I. Molecular analysis of the diversity of genus Psychrobacter present within a temperate estuary. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 84, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bjørkevoll, I.; Olsen, R.L.; Skjerdal, O.T. Origin and spoilage potential of the microbiota dominating genus Psychrobacter in sterile rehydrated salt-cured and dried salt-cured cod (Gadus morhua). Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 84, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ponder, M.A.; Gilmour, S.J.; Bergholz, P.W.; Mindock, C.A.; Hollingsworth, R.; Thomashow, M.F.; Tiedje, J.M. Characterization of potential stress responses in ancient Siberian permafrost psychroactive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2005, 53, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lo Giudice, A.; Casella, P.; Caruso, C.; Mangano, S.; Bruni, V.; De Domenico, M.; Michaud, L. Occurrence and characterization of psychrotolerant hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria from surface seawater along the Victoria Land coast (Antarctica). Polar Biol. 2010, 33, 929–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Røberg, S.; Østerhus, J.I.; Landfald, B. Dynamics of bacterial community exposed to hydrocarbons and oleophilic fertilizer in high-Arctic intertidal beach. Polar Biol. 2011, 34, 1455–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Dziewit, L.; Bartosik, D. Plasmids of psychrophilic and psychrotolerant bacteria and their role in adaptation to cold environments. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ciok, A.; Budzik, K.; Zdanowski, M.K.; Gawor, J.; Grzesiak, J.; Decewicz, P.; Gromadka, R.; Bartosik, D.; Dziewit, L. Plasmids of psychrotolerant Polaromonas spp. isolated from arctic and antarctic glaciers–diversity and role in adaptation to polar environments. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Romaniuk, K.; Golec, P.; Dziewit, L. Insight into the diversity and possible role of plasmids in the adaptation of psychrotolerant and metalotolerant Arthrobacter spp. to extreme Antarctic environments. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Petrova, M.; Kurakov, A.; Shcherbatova, N.; Mindlin, S. Genetic structure and biological properties of the first ancient multiresistance plasmid pKLH80 isolated from a permafrost bacterium. Microbiology 2014, 160, 2253–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Moghadam, M.S.; Albersmeier, A.; Winkler, A.; Cimmino, L.; Rise, K.; Hohmann-Marriott, M.F.; Kalinowski, J.; Ruckert, C.; Wentzel, A.; Lale, R. Isolation and genome sequencing of four Arctic marine Psychrobacter strains exhibiting multicopper oxidase activity. BMC Genomics 2016, 17, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ciok, A.; Dziewit, L. Exploring the genome of Arctic Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B and construction of novel Psychrobacter-specific cloning vectors of an increased carrying capacity. Arch. Microbiol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lasek, R.; Dziewit, L.; Ciok, A.; Decewicz, P.; Romaniuk, K.; Jedrys, Z.; Wibberg, D.; Schlüter, A.; Pühler, A.; Bartosik, D. Genome content, metabolic pathways and biotechnological potential of the psychrophilic Arctic bacterium Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL43B, a source and a host of novel Psychrobacter-specific vectors. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 263, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tutino, M.L.; Duilio, A.; Moretti, M.A.; Sannia, G.; Marino, G. A rolling-circle plasmid from Psychrobacter sp. TA144: evidence for a novel rep subfamily. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 274, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lasek, R.; Dziewit, L.; Bartosik, D. Plasmid pP62BP1 isolated from an Arctic Psychrobacter sp. strain carries two highly homologous type II restriction-modification systems and a putative organic sulfate metabolism operon. Extremophiles 2012, 16, 363–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dziewit, L.; Czarnecki, J.; Wibberg, D.; Radlinska, M.; Mrozek, P.; Szymczak, M.; Schlüter, A.; Pühler, A.; Bartosik, D. Architecture and functions of a multipartite genome of the methylotrophic bacterium Paracoccus aminophilus JCM 7686, containing primary and secondary chromids. BMC Genomics 2014, 15, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Czarnecki, J.; Dziewit, L.; Kowalski, L.; Ochnio, M.; Bartosik, D. Maintenance and genetic load of plasmid pKON1 of Paracoccus kondratievae, containing a highly efficient toxin-antitoxin module of the hipAB family. Plasmid 2015, 80, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Siguier, P.; Gourbeyre, E.; Chandler, M. Bacterial insertion sequences: Their genomic impact and diversity. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 38, 865–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Konieczny, I.; Bury, K.; Wawrzycka, A.; Wegrzyn, K. Iteron Plasmids. Microbiol Spectr 2014, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tutino, M.L.; Duilio, A.; Parrilli, R.; Remaut, E.; Sannia, G.; Marino, G. A novel replication element from an Antarctic plasmid as a tool for the expression of proteins at low temperature. Extremophiles 2001, 5, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Nuccio, S.P.; Baumler, A.J. Evolution of the chaperone/usher assembly pathway: fimbrial classification goes Greek. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007, 71, 551–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Waksman, G.; Hultgren, S.J. Structural biology of the chaperone-usher pathway of pilus biogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hinsa-Leasure, S.M.; Koid, C.; Tiedje, J.M.; Schultzhaus, J.N. Biofilm formation by Psychrobacter arcticus and the role of a large adhesin in attachment to surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 3967–3973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Watnick, P.; Kolter, R. Biofilm, city of microbes. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 2675–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. de Carvalho, C.C.C.R. Biofilms: Microbial Strategies for Surviving UV Exposure. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 996, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sutherland, I.W. Biofilm exopolysaccharides: a strong and sticky framework. Microbiology 2001, 147, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Schroll, C.; Barken, K.B.; Krogfelt, K.A.; Struve, C. Role of type 1 and type 3 fimbriae in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm formation. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Smillie, C.; Garcillan-Barcia, M.P.; Francia, M.V.; Rocha, E.P.; de la Cruz, F. Mobility of plasmids. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010, 74, 434–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fondi, M.; Fani, R. The horizontal flow of the plasmid resistome: clues from inter-generic similarity networks. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 3228–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Thomas, C.M.; Nielsen, K.M. Mechanisms of and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 711–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Amato, P.; Hennebelle, R.; Magand, O.; Sancelme, M.; Delort, A.-M.; Barbante, C.; Boutron, C.; Ferrari, C. Bacterial characterization of the snow cover at Spitzberg, Svalbard. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 59, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Cuthbertson, L.; Amores-Arrocha, H.; Malard, L.A.; Els, N.; Sattler, B.; Pearce, D.A. Characterisation of Arctic bacterial communities in the air above Svalbard. Biology (Basel) 2017, 6, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Møller, A.K.; Søborg, D.A.; Abu Al-Soud, W.; Sørensen, S.J.; Kroer, N. Bacterial community structure in High-Arctic snow and freshwater as revealed by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes and cultivation. Polar Res. 2013, 32, 17390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saier, M.H.; Reddy, V.S.; Tsu, B.V.; Ahmed, M.S.; Li, C.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G.; Moreno-Hagelsieb, G. The Transporter Classification Database (TCDB): recent advances. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D372–D379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Caspi, R.; Billington, R.; Fulcher, C.A.; Keseler, I.M.; Kothari, A.; Krummenacker, M.; Latendresse, M.; Midford, P.E.; Ong, Q.; Ong, W.K.; et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D633–D639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dziewit, L.; Czarnecki, J.; Prochwicz, E.; Wibberg, D.; Schlüter, A.; Pühler, A.; Bartosik, D. Genome-guided insight into the methylotrophy of Paracoccus aminophilus JCM 7686. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Murdock, L.; Burke, T.; Coumoundouros, C.; Culham, D.E.; Deutch, C.E.; Ellinger, J.; Kerr, C.H.; Plater, S.M.; To, E.; Wright, G.; et al. Analysis of strains lacking known osmolyte accumulation mechanisms reveals contributions of osmolytes and transporters to protection against abiotic stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 5366–5378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Czarnecki, J.; Dziewit, L.; Puzyna, M.; Prochwicz, E.; Tudek, A.; Wibberg, D.; Schlüter, A.; Pühler, A.; Bartosik, D. Lifestyle-determining extrachromosomal replicon pAMV1 and its contribution to the carbon metabolism of the methylotrophic bacterium Paracoccus aminovorans JCM 7685. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 4536–4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhu, Y.; Jameson, E.; Crosatti, M.; Schafer, H.; Rajakumar, K.; Bugg, T.D.H.; Chen, Y. Carnitine metabolism to trimethylamine by an unusual Rieske-type oxygenase from human microbiota. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014, 111, 4268–4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Bernal, V.; Sevilla, Á.; Cánovas, M.; Iborra, J.L. Production of L-carnitine by secondary metabolism of bacteria. Microb. Cell Fact. 2007, 6, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jameson, E.; Quareshy, M.; Chen, Y. Methodological considerations for the identification of choline and carnitine-degrading bacteria in the gut. Methods 2018, 149, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Engemann, C.; Elssner, T.; Pfeifer, S.; Krumbholz, C.; Maier, T.; Kleber, H.-P. Identification and functional characterisation of genes and corresponding enzymes involved in carnitine metabolism of Proteus sp. Arch. Microbiol. 2005, 183, 176–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yoon, J.-H.; Lee, C.-H.; Yeo, S.-H.; Oh, T.-K. Psychrobacter aquimaris sp. nov. and Psychrobacter namhaensis sp. nov., isolated from sea water of the South Sea in Korea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1007–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dziewit, L.; Pyzik, A.; Szuplewska, M.; Matlakowska, R.; Mielnicki, S.; Wibberg, D.; Schlüter, A.; Pühler, A.; Bartosik, D. Diversity and role of plasmids in adaptation of bacteria inhabiting the Lubin copper mine in Poland, an environment rich in heavy metals. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hooykaas, P.J.; den Dulk-Ras, H.; Schilperoort, R.A. Molecular mechanism of Ti plasmid mobilization by R plasmids: isolation of Ti plasmids with transposon-insertions in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plasmid 1980, 4, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hanahan, D. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J. Mol. Biol. 1983, 166, 557–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bartosik, A.A.; Glabski, K.; Jecz, P.; Mikulska, S.; Fogtman, A.; Koblowska, M.; Jagura-Burdzy, G. Transcriptional profiling of ParA and ParB mutants in actively dividing cells of an opportunistic human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bartosik, D.; Bialkowska, A.; Baj, J.; Wlodarczyk, M. Construction of mobilizable cloning vectors derived from pBGS18 and their application for analysis of replicator region of a pTAV202 mini-derivative of Paracoccus versutus pTAV1 plasmid. Acta Microbiol. Pol. 1997, 46, 387–392. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kovach, M.E.; Phillips, R.W.; Elzer, P.H.; Roop, R.M., 2nd; Peterson, K.M. pBBR1MCS: a broad-host-range cloning vector. Biotechniques 1994, 16, 800–802. [Google Scholar]
  60. Spratt, B.G.; Hedge, P.J.; te Heesen, S.; Edelman, A.; Broome-Smith, J.K. Kanamycin-resistant vectors that are analogues of plasmids pUC8, pUC9, pEMBL8 and pEMBL9. Gene 1986, 41, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ditta, G.; Stanfield, S.; Corbin, D.; Helinski, D.R. Broad host range DNA cloning system for gram-negative bacteria: construction of a gene bank of Rhizobium meliloti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1980, 77, 7347–7351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sambrook, J.; Russell, D.W. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  63. Birnboim, H.C.; Doly, J. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979, 7, 1513–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Bartosik, D.; Szymanik, M.; Wysocka, E. Identification of the partitioning site within the repABC-type replicon of the composite Paracoccus versutus plasmid pTAV1. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 6234–6243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bakermans, C.; Sloup, R.E.; Zarka, D.G.; Tiedje, J.M.; Thomashow, M.F. Development and use of genetic system to identify genes required for efficient low-temperature growth of Psychrobacter arcticus 273-4. Extremophiles 2009, 13, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kushner, S.R. An improved method for transformation of E. coli with ColE1 derived plasmids. In Genetic engineering; Boyer, H.B., Nicosia, S., Eds.; Elsevier/North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1978; pp. 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  67. Irani, V.R.; Rowe, J.J. Enhancement of transformation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 by Mg2+ and heat. Biotechniques 1997, 22, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dziewit, L.; Bartosik, D. Comparative analyses of extrachromosomal bacterial replicons, identification of chromids, and experimental evaluation of their indispensability. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1231, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rutherford, K.; Parkhill, J.; Crook, J.; Horsnell, T.; Rice, P.; Rajandream, M.A.; Barrell, B. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 2000, 16, 944–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Bo, Y.; Han, L.; He, J.; Lanczycki, C.J.; Lu, S.; Chitsaz, F.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Geer, R.C.; Gonzales, N.R.; et al. CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D200–D203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Finn, R.D.; Coggill, P.; Eberhardt, R.Y.; Eddy, S.R.; Mistry, J.; Mitchell, A.L.; Potter, S.C.; Punta, M.; Qureshi, M.; Sangrador-Vegas, A.; et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic. Acids Res. 2016, 44, D279–D285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Siguier, P.; Perochon, J.; Lestrade, L.; Mahillon, J.; Chandler, M. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D32–D36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. O’Toole, G.A. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J. Vis. Exp. 2011, 2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kwiatek, A.; Bacal, P.; Wasiluk, A.; Trybunko, A.; Adamczyk-Poplawska, M. The dam replacing gene product enhances Neisseria gonorrhoeae FA1090 viability and biofilm formation. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ikawa, M.; Schaper, T.D.; Dollard, C.A.; Sasner, J.J. Utilization of Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent for the detection of certain nitrogen compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 1811–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 20 02015 g001 550
Figure 1. Linear map of plasmid pP32BP2. Arrows represent genes (numbered consecutively) and their transcriptional orientation. The predicted genetic modules are as follows: CAI—carnitine anaerobic metabolism, CAR—carnitine aerobic metabolism, FIM—fimbriae synthesis, PAR—partitioning, REP—replication. Insertion sequences ISPssp4 and ISPssp5 are indicated.
Figure 1. Linear map of plasmid pP32BP2. Arrows represent genes (numbered consecutively) and their transcriptional orientation. The predicted genetic modules are as follows: CAI—carnitine anaerobic metabolism, CAR—carnitine aerobic metabolism, FIM—fimbriae synthesis, PAR—partitioning, REP—replication. Insertion sequences ISPssp4 and ISPssp5 are indicated.
Ijms 20 02015 g001
Ijms 20 02015 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Diagram of the predicted structure of fimbriae encoded by the FIM module of pP32BP2. E, OM, and PP—external, outer membrane, and periplasm, respectively. (B) Attachment of Psychrobacter spp. wild-type, pP32BP2-less, and plasmid-less carrying pBBR-Ps-FIM strains as well as heterologous wild-type and FIM module-carrying strains to the polystyrene surface of microtiter plates, measured by crystal violet staining. Error bars represent standard deviations. **—mean statistical significance p < 0.005, compared to adherence of the wild-type strain. LM16—Achromobacter sp. LM16, LBA288—A. tumefaciens LBA288, DH5α—E. coli DH5α, PAO1161—P. aeruginosa PAO1161. (C) Biofilm structure of wild-type and FIM module-carrying P. aeruginosa PAO1161 after 96 h of cultivation, visualized by scanning confocal laser microscopy. Horizontal optical sections were recorded at various depths (5, 10, and 20 μm) from the bottom of the dish. The scale bars represent 100 μm.
Figure 2. (A) Diagram of the predicted structure of fimbriae encoded by the FIM module of pP32BP2. E, OM, and PP—external, outer membrane, and periplasm, respectively. (B) Attachment of Psychrobacter spp. wild-type, pP32BP2-less, and plasmid-less carrying pBBR-Ps-FIM strains as well as heterologous wild-type and FIM module-carrying strains to the polystyrene surface of microtiter plates, measured by crystal violet staining. Error bars represent standard deviations. **—mean statistical significance p < 0.005, compared to adherence of the wild-type strain. LM16—Achromobacter sp. LM16, LBA288—A. tumefaciens LBA288, DH5α—E. coli DH5α, PAO1161—P. aeruginosa PAO1161. (C) Biofilm structure of wild-type and FIM module-carrying P. aeruginosa PAO1161 after 96 h of cultivation, visualized by scanning confocal laser microscopy. Horizontal optical sections were recorded at various depths (5, 10, and 20 μm) from the bottom of the dish. The scale bars represent 100 μm.
Ijms 20 02015 g002
Ijms 20 02015 g003 550
Figure 3. Predicted metabolic pathways determined by the CAR and CAI modules of pP32BP2. Asterisks mark enzymes whose genes are missing from the pP32BP2 genome. Solid arrow—reaction carried out by an enzyme encoded within the CAR module; dashed arrow—reaction carried out by enzymes not encoded within the CAR module.
Figure 3. Predicted metabolic pathways determined by the CAR and CAI modules of pP32BP2. Asterisks mark enzymes whose genes are missing from the pP32BP2 genome. Solid arrow—reaction carried out by an enzyme encoded within the CAR module; dashed arrow—reaction carried out by enzymes not encoded within the CAR module.
Ijms 20 02015 g003
Ijms 20 02015 g004 550
Figure 4. Growth of Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B wild-type (■) and pP32BP2-less (Δ) strains on M9 minimal medium supplemented with sodium succinate (control variant; solid line) or carnitine (dashed and dotted lines) as the sole carbon source. Depending on the experimental variant, the M9 medium was supplemented with sodium succinate (0.5% w/v; control variant; solid lines) or carnitine (2.5 mM—dashed lines or 5 mM—dotted lines) as the sole carbon source. Triplicate cultures were grown in 50-mL tubes for 120 h at 20 °C with shaking under aerobic conditions. Every 24 h, the OD600 was measured. The mean values for three replicate cultures are plotted with error bars representing the standard deviations.
Figure 4. Growth of Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B wild-type (■) and pP32BP2-less (Δ) strains on M9 minimal medium supplemented with sodium succinate (control variant; solid line) or carnitine (dashed and dotted lines) as the sole carbon source. Depending on the experimental variant, the M9 medium was supplemented with sodium succinate (0.5% w/v; control variant; solid lines) or carnitine (2.5 mM—dashed lines or 5 mM—dotted lines) as the sole carbon source. Triplicate cultures were grown in 50-mL tubes for 120 h at 20 °C with shaking under aerobic conditions. Every 24 h, the OD600 was measured. The mean values for three replicate cultures are plotted with error bars representing the standard deviations.
Ijms 20 02015 g004
Ijms 20 02015 g005 550
Figure 5. Growth of Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B on sodium succinate (control variant, solid line), carnitine (5 mM) (dashed line), and sodium succinate plus carnitine (5 mM) (dotted line) as carbon sources. The mean values for three replicate cultures are plotted with error bars representing the standard deviations.
Figure 5. Growth of Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B on sodium succinate (control variant, solid line), carnitine (5 mM) (dashed line), and sodium succinate plus carnitine (5 mM) (dotted line) as carbon sources. The mean values for three replicate cultures are plotted with error bars representing the standard deviations.
Ijms 20 02015 g005
Table
Table 1. Complete transposable elements encoded within plasmid pP32BP2.
Table 1. Complete transposable elements encoded within plasmid pP32BP2.
Gene(s)Transposable ElementFamily/GROUPSize (bp)IR Sequence 1,2,3DR Sequence 1
pP32BP2_p04ISPssp4IS256/-1302IRL: GGGGGTTTCCTAAAAAC
TGTGTAACTGC
IRR: GAGACCATCCCGAATTC
TGTGTAACTGC		CTTAAAAA
pP32BP2_p19-20ISPssp5IS5/IS427837IRL: GGGTGTGTCATCAATTA
IRR: GGGCGTGTCATCAATTA		TA
1 Sequences are shown in the 5′ to 3′ orientation. 2 IRL—left IR; IRR—right IR. 3 Residues identical in IRL and IRR are indicated in bold.
Table
Table 2. Plasmids used and constructed in this study.
Table 2. Plasmids used and constructed in this study.
Plasmid NameCharacteristics 1Reference
pABW1Kmr; 4.5 kb; ori pMB1; Mob+; oriT RK2; lacZα; MCS[58]
pABW1-REPPAR pABW1 carrying REP and PAR modules of pP32BP2 (PCR- amplified with primers L232BREP and R232BREP) This work
pBBR1MCS-2Kmr; 5.1 kb; ori pBBR1; Mob+; oriT RK2; lacZα; MCS[59]
pBBR-PspBBR1MCS-2 carrying REP module of pP32BP2 (PCR-amplified with primers L32REP and R32REP) This work
pBBR-Ps-CARpBBR-Ps carrying CAR module of pP32BP2 (coordinates 31,262–44,421) inserted between SacI and SalI sitesThis work
pBBR-FIMpBBR1MCS-2 carrying FIM module of pP32BP2 (coordinates 24,246–31,265) inserted between BamHI and SalI sitesThis work
pBBR-Ps-FIMpBBR-Ps carrying FIM module of pP32BP2 (coordinates 24,246–31,265) inserted between SacI and SalI sitesThis work
pBGS18Kmr; 3.7 kb; ori pMB1; lacZα; MCS[60]
pRK2013Kmr; helper plasmid carrying genes for conjugal transfer of RK2[61]
1 Primer sequences are listed in Table S1.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ciok, A.; Cegielski, A.; Bartosik, D.; Dziewit, L. Benefits and Drawbacks of Harboring Plasmid pP32BP2, Identified in Arctic Psychrophilic Bacterium Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20082015

AMA Style

Ciok A, Cegielski A, Bartosik D, Dziewit L. Benefits and Drawbacks of Harboring Plasmid pP32BP2, Identified in Arctic Psychrophilic Bacterium Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(8):2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20082015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ciok, Anna, Adrian Cegielski, Dariusz Bartosik, and Lukasz Dziewit. 2019. "Benefits and Drawbacks of Harboring Plasmid pP32BP2, Identified in Arctic Psychrophilic Bacterium Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 8: 2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20082015

APA Style

Ciok, A., Cegielski, A., Bartosik, D., & Dziewit, L. (2019). Benefits and Drawbacks of Harboring Plasmid pP32BP2, Identified in Arctic Psychrophilic Bacterium Psychrobacter sp. DAB_AL32B. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(8), 2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20082015

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop