Next Article in Journal
Identification of Rice Large Grain Gene GW2 by Whole-Genome Sequencing of a Large Grain-Isogenic Line Integrated with Japonica Native Gene and Its Linkage Relationship with the Co-integrated Semidwarf Gene d60 on Chromosome 2
Previous Article in Journal
Ultra-Rapid Glutathionylation of Ribonuclease: Is This the Real Incipit of Its Oxidative Folding?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 21
10.3390/ijms20215441
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Downregulated Expression of Virulence Factors Induced by Benzyl Isothiocyanate in Staphylococcus Aureus: A Transcriptomic Analysis

by
Xiaoning Wang
1,
Hongyan Wu
2,
Tongxin Niu
1,
Jingran Bi
1,
Hongman Hou
1,
Hongshun Hao
3 and
Gongliang Zhang
1,*
1
School of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China
2
Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
3
Department of Inorganic Nonmetallic Materials Engineering, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China, [email protected]
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(21), 5441; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215441
Submission received: 11 October 2019 / Revised: 27 October 2019 / Accepted: 28 October 2019 / Published: 31 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Bioactives and Nutraceuticals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a common foodborne pathogen that leads to various diseases; therefore, we urgently need to identify different means to control this harmful pathogen in food. In this study, we monitored the transcriptional changes of S. aureus by RNA-seq analysis to better understand the effect of benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) on the virulence inhibition of S. aureus and determined the bacteriostatic effect of BITC at subinhibitory concentrations. Our results revealed that, compared with the control group (SAC), the BITC-treated experimental group (SAQ_BITC) had 708 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), of which 333 genes were downregulated and the capsular polysaccharide (cp) was significantly downregulated. Furthermore, we screened five of the most virulent factors of S. aureus, including the capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis protein (cp5D), capsular polysaccharide synthesis enzyme (cp8F), thermonuclease (nuc), clumping factor (clf), and protein A (spa), and verified the accuracy of these significantly downregulated genes by qRT-PCR. At the same time, we used light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and inverted fluorescence microscopy (IFM) to observe changes in biofilm associated with the cp5D and cp8F. Therefore, these results will help to further study the basis of BITC for the antibacterial action of foodborne pathogenic bacteria.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a gram-positive bacterium of the symbiotic flora of humans and various animal species and is a common foodborne pathogen [1,2]. Today, foodborne illness has become one of the major food safety and public health issues caused by pathogenic microorganisms in food and is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide [3]. The high density of foodborne diseases and even food poisoning caused by S. aureus infection threatens human health and safety. Therefore, controlling microbes in food, especially S. aureus, remains a worldwide problem [4]. S. aureus has a wide range of viability, and this strong viability contributes to disease [5,6]. That is, the inhibition of S. aureus provides an important basis for foodborne microbial control.
So far, people have been increasingly studying bacteriostatic agents, and the research on S. aureus has not stopped. For example, Yunbin Zhang et al. found that cinnamon essential oil exhibited effective antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and S. aureus by scanning electron microscopy to observe cell microstructure, cell membrane permeability and integrity [7]. For another example, Jiamu Kang et al. studied the antibacterial mechanism of peppermint essential oil (PEO) and the activity of S. aureus biofilm and found that PEO can significantly inhibit the formation of biofilm [8]. Among cruciferous vegetables, isothiocyanate (ITC) is a relatively common organic sulfur compound that has been extensively studied and naturally exists as a glucosinolate [9,10]. ITC has high anticancer properties and inhibits cell proliferation [11,12]. The mechanism by which ITC inhibits cancer cell proliferation is usually achieved by inhibiting proteins in the process of tumor initiation and proliferation [12]. In recent years, researchers have begun to study the effects of benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) on bacteria. For example, Dufour studied the antibacterial effect of BITC on Vibrio parahaemolyticus [13], and Jie Song studied the inhibition and bacterial mechanism of BITC on Vibrio parahaemolyticus at the transcriptional level [14]. However, the effect of BITC on S. aureus at the transcriptional level has not yet been analyzed.
There are an increasing number of studies on the transcriptome analysis of S. aureus, such as the analysis of the formation of S. aureus biofilm in the presence of sublethal concentrations of disinfectants and the validation of related genes, including cell factors (clfAB) and capsular polysaccharides (cap8EFGL) [15]. In another example, resveratrol acted as a natural phytoalexin against S. aureus at subinhibitory concentrations and was subjected to transcriptome analysis. The results showed that resveratrol also reduced the expression of α-hemolysin under the premise of inhibiting the normal growth of S. aureus [16]. The virulence component of S. aureus is the main cause of pathogenicity, including extracellular capsular polysaccharides (CPs), related adhesins, exoenzymes, and exotoxins [17,18]. For example, thermonuclease (nuc) is a relatively common virulence gene, and S. aureus nucleases are considered to be important virulence factors and unique markers widely used to detect S. aureus from food samples and clinical specimens [19,20,21]. Capsular polysaccharide (CP) is a major virulence factor that strengthens resistance against phagocytic uptake by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes [21,22].
A biofilm is a structured community of bacterial cells that are enclosed in a self-produced polymer matrix that adheres to glass or other surfaces by a matrix, and protected in a growth mode that can survive in harsh environments [23]. According to Salimena et al., CP production and biofilm formation of S. aureus isolated from milk from three different Brazilian regions were studied, and CP and biofilm formation were obtained in vitro, and the capsular genotype and phenotype were found. There is a significant correlation with the amount of biofilm formation, and cap5 isolates tend to form more biofilms than cap8 isolates [24].
Therefore, to study the inhibition mechanism of BITC against S. aureus at a deeper level, we analyzed the transcriptome level and further verified the expression of different virulence genes by qRT-PCR to understand the virulence mechanism of BITC on S. aureus. In addition, the qualitative analysis of the effect of BITC on S. aureus biofilm further verified the downregulated expression of CP gene and the effectiveness of BITC.

2. Results

2.1. Antibacterial Assay

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of BITC against S. aureus was 0.5 mmol/L.

2.2. Transcriptome Library Construction and Sequencing Data Quality Control

To obtain a comprehensive analysis of the effect of BITC on S. aureus, six cDNA libraries were constructed after treating S. aureus with BITC, and each library was sequenced with Illumina HiSeqTM 2500, which is with a minimum depth of 2× reads in sequencing. We generated a total of 108,923,888 raw reads and 106,407,410 clean reads. The average error rate for all data was less than 0.03%, while Q20 > 97% and Q30 > 92% in each pool indicated that the data quality assessment was acceptable (Table S1).

2.3. Reads and Reference Genome Comparison

We found that 95.78–97.15% of the reads were perfectly matched to the reference genome in each library. For the unique mapped reads and the multi-mapped reads, 89.59–92.62% and 4.52–5.83% (16,510,649–21,860,562) were matched, respectively (Table 1).

2.4. Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs)

The S. aureus cells treated with BITC at 1/4 MIC were cultured for 9 h. The experimental group (SAQ_BITC) was compared with the BITC-free control group (SAC) to evaluate the transcription of S. aureus under BITC treatment. The selection criteria were p < 0.05. We identified a total of 708 significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in SAQ_BITC. Among them, 333 genes were downregulated, and 375 genes were upregulated (Figure 1a).
To obtain expression patterns of the DEGs under the SAQ_BITC and SAC conditions, genes having similar metabolic functions or involved in similar cellular pathways under different conditions were used to speculate the functions of unknown genes with novel characteristics. In order to easily decide on the number of clusters from the dendrogram and more intuitively indicate the results of cluster analysis of DEG, we used the agglomerative hierarchical clustering analysis (Figure 1b). The FPKM values of the DEGs under the two experimental conditions were used as the expression level. The regions of different colors represent different clusters. Class grouping information, which is similar to gene expression patterns in the same group, can have similar or identical biological processes.
We classified DEGs by Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis, which included three categories related to virulence: “Biological processes (BP)”, “cell components (CC)” and “molecular functions (MF)”. To visually reflect the GO category, we compared SAQ_BITC with SAC, selected the most significant 30 GO term enrichment results, and found that 537 DEGs were annotated to 23 biological processes, two cellular components and five molecular functions (Figure 2).
We selected the top 10 GO functions with the most significant enrichment in the three GO categories (Figure 3a). Among the downregulated GO functions, the oxidation-reduction process was the most significantly enriched biological process and had the largest proportion of DEGs. The cell wall was the most prominent in the cell component class, and iron ion-binding was most prominent in molecular function. At the same time, on the basis of upregulation, the ATP metabolic process was highly enriched among the biological processes and had 14 differential gene enrichments. The membrane fraction was significantly enriched in the cell fraction and had 111 differential genes. Serine-type aminopeptidase activity was significantly enriched in molecular function.
To further investigate the metabolic pathways of S. aureus treated with BITC, KEGG enrichment analysis of differential genes was performed. We selected the 20 most significantly enriched path entries as shown in Figure 3b. The selection criteria were p-value and the value of q-value; the closer the values were to zero, the more significant the enrichment. Among them, oxidative phosphorylation, arginine and proline metabolism, valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis, and the 2-oxocarboxylic acid metabolism pathway were the most significantly enriched.

2.5. Validation of Virulence-Related Gene Results by qRT-PCR

qRT-PCR is commonly used as a method for verifying the accuracy of differential gene expression in RNA-seq analysis. Five common and representative virulence genes were screened for qRT-PCR validation in SAQ_BITC. The DEG validation results were identical to those obtained by RNA-Seq analysis (Table 2; Figure 4). Compared with RNA-Seq, the scale of expression of the five genes in the qRT-PCR analysis was similar, indicating that the DEGs were successfully identified by RNA-Seq.

2.6. Effect of BITC on the S. Aureus Biofilm

Firstly, the existence of biofilms was determined by the light microscopy. Then the effect of BITC on the inhibition of S. aureus biofilm was further observed by SEM and IFM. The results showed that, as shown in the Figure 5, a thick biofilm coating could be detected without treatment with BITC compared to the control group. However, the images treated with 1/4 MIC BITC and 1/8 MIC showed a marked decrease in microbial adhesion and a marked decrease in microbial adhesion after high concentration treatment. As shown, the effect of BITC on S. aureus biofilm was further confirmed by IFM.

3. Discussion

Foodborne pathogens are a very dangerous biological threat because billions of gastrointestinal diseases are caused by foodborne pathogens worldwide, leading to more than five million deaths [16,25]. S. aureus, a common foodborne pathogen, is one of the main pathogens of food poisoning, can be found in a variety of foods, and can cause varying degrees of gastroenteritis when food is contaminated [26,27]. Previous studies have shown that S. aureus cells are subject to certain damage under low temperature conditions, but do not die [15,27]. Therefore, S. aureus poses a very serious threat to food safety [28]. BITC, a kind of edible flavor, was discovered to have a certain antibacterial effect. For example, Jie Song et al. found that BITC had strong antibacterial activity against Vibrio parahaemolyticus [14].
Transcriptomic analysis is gradually being widely used because it can comprehensively evaluate differential genes and enrichment pathways in samples. In recent years, many studies have shown that transcriptome analysis and qRT-PCR can comprehensively analyze S. aureus. For example, Slany M. et al. analyzed the formation of S. aureus biofilm at the transcriptome level by adding a sublethal dose of disinfectant [15]. Another example is the virulence analysis of S. aureus strains isolated from animals by Zahid Iqbal et al. [29].
Similar to other bacterial pathogens, S. aureus expresses capsular polysaccharide (cp) with two major types of capsular polysaccharides, namely, CP5 and CP8, which are present in all clinical S. aureus strains. Capsular polysaccharides are a major virulence factor that enable S. aureus to avoid swallowing and killing [22,30,31]. Biofilm formation has varying degrees of association with the cp5D and cp8F. And BITC has a significant inhibitory effect on the biofilm production of S. aureus effectively observed by SEM and IFM. This is consistent with the expression of the cp5D and cp8F genes. In addition, the aggregation factor (clf) in the adhesion gene is also closely related to biofilm formation, and its protein mediates adhesion to fibrinogen [32,33]. As a typical virulence factor, protein A may have a major impact on osteoclast differentiation in the early stages of S. aureus infection and is now considered to be useful as a preventative for bone damage during S. aureus osteomyelitis [34,35]. Thermonuclease (nuc) is a special S. aureus virulence factor and is widely used in sample testing [20,21]. Recent studies have found new nucleases that are complementary to nuc from S. aureus [36]. Therefore, in future we need to pay more attention to these regulatory genes [37]. BITC effectively reduces the expression of these virulence factors.
In this study, the analysis of the effect of BITC on S. aureus revealed potential control mechanisms and the possible application value of BITC. Further research on protein levels and bacterial morphology is needed to validate specific functions and potential interactions at the molecular level.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture

Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 selected in the study was obtained from the Food Microbiology Laboratory of the Dalian Polytechnic University (Dalian, China) and kept at −80 °C. Prior to use, the bacteria were activated twice in lysogenic fermentation broth (LB) medium at 37 °C for 12 h or more.

4.2. Antibacterial Assays

Determination of the MIC was performed with the broth microdilution method [38]. Different dilutions of BITC and bacterial cultures were added to sterile 96-well microtiter plates to culture at 37 °C for 12 h. Mueller-Hinton Broth (MHB) with or without bacterial cultures served as the control.

4.3. Extraction and Detection of RNA Samples

In this study, the BITC-treated bacterial solution was cultured to a stable growth phase, followed by RNA extraction. The total RNA of the sample was then extracted using an RNAprep Pure Cell/Bacterial Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). The degree of RNA degradation and contamination was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. At the same time, the ratio of OD260/280 was used to verify the purity of the six RNA samples. Qubit accurately quantified the RNA concentration, and the RNA integrity was accurately detected with an Agilent 2100 (G2939B, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Finally, the extracted RNA samples were stored at −80 °C until use.

4.4. Library Construction and Sequencing

Six RNA samples were used as the initial input material for the library. A new sequencing library was formed using the specific NEBNext UltraTM Directional RNA Library Preparation Kit (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, and an index code was then added to the attribute sequence of each sample. That is, the rRNA was removed using a special kit. The purified cDNA fragments were then purified by the A-tail and ligated sequencing linker, which were added by the end-end repair, using the AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, MA, USA). Three microliters of USER enzyme (NEB, USA) was then reacted with the cDNA and subjected to PCR. The reaction was then carried out using Index (X) Primer, Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase and universal PCR primers. Finally, the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (G2939B, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used to evaluate the quality of the products and libraries.

4.5. Biological Information Analysis

After obtaining the original sequencing sequence by building a library and high-throughput sequencing (Illumina HiSeqTM 2500 (Illumina, CA, USA), the sequencing data were evaluated for quality. The filtered sequencing sequences were then subjected to genomic localization analysis and reference sequence alignment analysis. In the case of a related species reference sequence or reference genome, bioinformatics analysis was performed by including reads containing adapters, low quality reads and yield-N readings (clean reads), and removing clean data from the raw data. At the same time, the GC content, Q20 (percentage of bases with a Phred value > 20) and Q30 (percentage of bases with a Phred value > 30) were obtained from the data, and all downstream analyses were performed with the high-quality clean data. The clean reads were aligned with reference sequences to obtain an alignment rate using bowtie2 with default parameters. To assess gene expression levels, we chose the common method FPKM (expected number of fragments per kilobase of transcript sequence per million base pairs sequenced). A log2 (fold change) <1 was used to select the downregulated DEGs. Then, GO enrichment analysis was performed with software for the GO enrichment analysis and p < 0.05 indicated the DEGs that were significantly enriched. The KEGG enrichment classification, the enrichment classification of biological functionals and metabolic pathways, identified the major pathways the DEGs were involved in through determining the significantly enriched metabolic pathways.

4.6. qRT-PCR Validation of Differential Genes

To ensure the accuracy of the RNA-seq data results, we extracted RNA from the SAC control and SAQ_BITC experimental samples, each set in triplicate. According to the instructions of the PrimeScriptTM RT Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan), modifications were performed to remove impurities and for reverse transcription into cDNA templates, and the resulting samples were placed at −20 °C for later use. The 16S rRNA gene was used as an endogenous gene, and the specific primers for the differential genes screened by RNA-Seq were designed using Primer 5.0 software and are listed in Table 3. Amplification was performed according to the TransStart Top Green qPCR SuperMix Kit (TransGen Biotech, BeiJing, China) in a 20 μL system. Finally, the differential gene expression level was evaluated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [39]. Significant analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

4.7. Effects of BITC on Formation of S. Aureus Biofilm

For S. aureus biofilm, place coverslips in a 6-well microtiter plate and add overnight cultured S. aureus and certain nutrients, add different concentrations of BITC to final concentrations of 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC to culture for 24 h. Add MHB as a blank control. The coverslips were washed three times with PBS, then dried at room temperature, and the biofilm was stained with 0.1% crystal violet or 0.01% acridine orange for 15 minutes. Thereafter, the biofilm was observed under a light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo Japan) or IFM (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), respectively. For SEM, the cultured biofilm was washed three times with PBS, and then the biofilm on the coverslip was fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and dehydrated with ethanol (50%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 100%). The dried slides were glued to the table and sprayed with gold and then observed under SEM (Quanta 450, Waltham, MA, USA) [40].

5. Conclusions

Analysis of the antibacterial mechanism of foodborne pathogens by adding flavorants is a very important parameter in food safety. For the first time, the study screened virulence-related differential genes by RNA-seq and further analyzed the expression of differential genes. Through the analysis of differential genes at the molecular level, further changes in protein and morphological levels are needed to verify the virulence changes in S. aureus. These results provide a certain data basis for the antibacterial aspect of S. aureus.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/21/5441/s1.

Author Contributions

G.L.Z. conceived and designed the project. G.L.Z. and X.N.W. drafted the manuscript; X.N.W. and T.X.N. performed the experiments; H.Y.W and J.R.B analyzed data. H.S.H. and H.M.H. modified the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by The National Key R and D Program of China (Grant No.2017YFC1600403), The National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 31571888 and the Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2019-MS-021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ITCsisothiocyanates
BITCbenzyl isothiocyanate
BPbiological process
CCcellular component
MFmolecular function
DEGsdifferential expression genes
FPKMsFragments Per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped reads
GOGene Ontology
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
qRT-PCRquantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction

References

  1. Vanderhaeghen, W.; Hermans, K.; Haesebrouck, F.; Butaye, P. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) in food production animals. Epidemiol. Infect. 2010, 138, 606–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Graveland, H.; Duim, B.; Duijkeren, E.V.; Heederik, D.; Wagenaar, J.A. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals and humans. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 301, 630–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Balaban, N.; Rasooly, A. Analytical chromatography for recovery of small amounts of staphylococcal enterotoxins from food. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 64, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Krishnamoorthy, K.; Moon, J.Y.; Hyun, H.B.; Cho, S.K.; Kim, S.J. Mechanistic investigation on the toxicity of mgo nanoparticles toward cancer cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 24610–24617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Loir, Y.L.; Baron, F.; Gautier, M. Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoning. Genet. Mol. Res. 2003, 2, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Shi, C.; Che, M.Y.; Zhang, X.W.; Liu, Z.J.; Meng, R.Z.; Bu, X.J.; Ye, H.Q.; Guo, N. Antibacterial activity and mode of action of totarol against Staphylococcus aureus in carrot juice. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 924–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Y.B.; Liu, X.Y.; Wang, Y.F.; Jiang, P.P.; Siew, Y.Q. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of cinnamon essential oil against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Food Control. 2016, 59, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kang, J.; Jin, W.; Wang, J.; Sun, Y.; Wu, X.; Liu, L. Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of peppermint essential oil against Staphylococcus aureus. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 101, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Molinavargas, L.F. Mechanism of action of isothiocyanates. a review. Agron. Colomb. 2013, 31, 68–75. [Google Scholar]
  10. Khamis, I.; Heikkila, J.J. Effect of isothiocyanates, bitc and peitc, on stress protein accumulation, protein aggregation and aggresome-like structure formation in xenopus a6 kidney epithelial cells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018, 204, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Higdon, J.V.; Delage, B.; Williams, D.E.; Dashwood, R.H. Cruciferous vegetables and human cancer risk: Epidemiologic evidence and mechanistic basis. Pharmacol. Res. 2007, 55, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Soundararajan, P.; Kim, J.S. Anti-Carcinogenic Glucosinolates in Cruciferous Vegetables and Their Antagonistic Effects on Prevention of Cancers. Molecules 2018, 23, 2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dufour, V.; Stahl, M.; Baysse, C. The antibacterial properties of isothiocyanates. Microbiology 2015, 161, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Song, J.; Hou, H.M.; Wu, H.Y.; Li, K.L.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Q.Q.; Gong-Liang Zhang, G.L. Transcriptomic Analysis of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Reveals Different Virulence Gene Expression in Response to Benzyl Isothiocyanate. Molecules 2019, 24, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Slany, M.; Oppelt, J.; Cincarova, L. Formation of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in the presence of sublethal concentrations of disinfectants studied via a transcriptomic analysis using transcriptome sequencing (rna-seq). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, AEM.01643-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Duan, J.; Li, M.; Hao, Z.; Shen, X.; Liu, L.; Jin, Y.; Wang, S.; Guo, Y.; Yang, L.; Wang, L.; et al. Subinhibitory concentrations of resveratrol reduce alpha-hemolysin production in Staphylococcus aureus isolates by downregulating saers. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lowy, F.D. Medical progress: Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Miyafusa, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Kuroda, M.; Ohta, T.; Tsumoto, K. Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary diffraction analysis of capf, a capsular polysaccharide-synthesis enzyme from Staphylococcus aureus. Acta. Crystallogr Sect. F. Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 2008, 64, 512–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sandel, M.K.; Mckillip, J.L. Virulence and recovery of Staphylococcus aureus relevant to the food industry using improvements on traditional approaches. Food Control. 2004, 15, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alarcón, B.; Vicedo, B.; Aznar, R. Pcr-based procedures for detection and quantification of Staphylococcus aureus and their application in food. J. Appl. Microbil. 2006, 100, 352–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, Y.; Meng, J.; Shi, C.; Hervin, K.; Fratamico, P.M.; Shi, X. Characterization and comparative analysis of a second thermonuclease from Staphylococcus aureus. Microbil. Res. 2013, 168, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thakker, M.; Park, J.S.; Carey, V.; Lee, J.C. Staphylococcus aureus serotype 5 capsular polysaccharide is antiphagocytic and enhances bacterial virulence in a murine bacteremia model. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 5183–5189. [Google Scholar]
  23. Costerton, J.W.; Stewart, P.S.; Greenberg, E.P. Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999, 284, 1318–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Salimena, A.P.S.; Lange, C.C.; Camussone, C.; Signorini, M.; Calvinho, L.F.; Brito, M.A.; Borges, C.A.; Guimarães, A.S.; Ribeiro, J.B.; Mendonça, L.C.; et al. Genotypic and phenotypic detection of capsular polysaccharide and biofilm formation instaphylococcus aureusisolated from bovine milk collected from brazilian dairy farms. Vet. Re. Commun. 2016, 40, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hyldgaard, M.; Sutherland, D.S.; Sundh, M.; Mygind, T.; Meyer, R.L. Antimicrobial mechanism of monocaprylate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 2957–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, S.; Xiong, J.; Lou, W.; Ning, Z.; Zhang, D.; Yang, J. Antimicrobial activity and action mechanism of triglycerol monolaurate on common foodborne pathogens. Food Control. 2018, 98, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hennekinne, J.A.; De Buyser, M.L.; Dragacci, S. Staphylococcus aureus and its food poisoning toxins: Characterization and outbreak investigation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 815–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Suo, B.; Wang, X.; Pan, Z.; Wang, N.; Ai, Z.; Yu, S.; Salazar, J.K. Inactivation and sublethal injury kinetics of Staphylococcus aureus in broth at low temperature storage. J. Food Prot. 2014, 77, 1689–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Iqbal, Z.; Seleem, M.N.; Hussain, H.I.; Huang, L.; Hao, H.; Yuan, Z. Comparative virulence studies and transcriptome analysis of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from animals. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Murphy, E.; Lin, S.L.; Nunez, L.; Andrew, L.; Fink, P.S.; Dilts, D.A.; Hoiseth, S.K.; Jansen, K.U.; Anderson, A.S. Challenges for the evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus protein based vaccines: Monitoring antigenic diversity. Hum. Vaccin. 2011, 7, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nanra, J.S.; Buitrago, S.M.; Crawford, S.; Ng, J.; Fink, P.S.; Hawkins, J.; Scully, I.L.; McNeil, L.K.; Aste-Amézaga, J.M.; Cooop, D. Capsular polysaccharides are an important immune evasion mechanism for Staphylococcus aureus. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2013, 9, 480–487. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rodrigues, M.V.; Fortaleza, C.M.; Riboli, D.F.; Rocha, R.S.; Rocha, C.; da Cunha Mde, L. Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a burn unit from Brazil. Burns 2013, 39, 1242–12499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Costa, L.; Faustino, M.A.; Tomé, J.P.; Neves, M.G.; Tomé, A.C.; Cavaleiro, J.A. Involvement of typeI and typeII mechanisms on the photo in activation of non-enveloped DNA and RNA bacteriophages. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 2013, 120, 10–16. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cassat, J.E.; Hammer, N.D.; Campbell, J.P.; Benson, M.A.; Perrien, D.S.; Mrak, L.N.; Smeltzer, M.S.; Torres, V.J.; Skaar, E.P. A secreted bacterial protease tailors the Staphylococcus aureus virulence repertoire to modulate bone remodeling during osteomyelitis. Cell Host Microbe. 2013, 13, 759–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mendoza Bertelli, A.; Delpino, M.V.; Lattar, S.; Giai, C.; Llana, M.N.; Sanjuan, N.; Cassat, J.E.; Sordelli, D.; Gómez, M.I. Staphylococcus aureus protein A enhances osteoclastogenesis via TNFR1 and EGFR signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 10, 1975–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dunman, P.M.; Murphy, E.; Haney, S.; Palacios, D.; Tucker, K.G.; Wu, S.; Brown, E.L.; Zagursky, R.J.; Shlaes, D.; Projan, S.J. Transcription profiling-based identification of Staphylococcus aureus genes regulated by the agr and/or sara loci. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 7341–7353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pfaller, M.A.; Andes, D.; Diekema, D.J.; Espinel, I.A.; Sheehan, D. Wild-type mic distributions, epidemiological cutoff values and species-specific clinical breakpoints for fluconazole and candida: Time for harmonization of clsi and eucast broth microdilution methods. Drug Resist. Updat. 2010, 13, 180–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Miladi, H.; Zmantar, T.; Kouidhi, B.; Chaabouni, Y.; Mahdouani, K.; Bakhrouf, A.; Chaieb, K. Use of carvacrol, thymol, and eugenol for biofilm eradication and resistance modifying susceptibility of salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium strains to nalidixic acid. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 104, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jinwei, Z.; Shiyuan, B.; Hongjuan, C.; Tongtong, C.; Rui, Y.; Minghui, L.; Fu, Y.L.; Jia, A.Q. Anti-biofilm and antivirulence activities of metabolites from plectosphaerella cucumerina against pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 769. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 20 05441 g001 550
Figure 1. Volcano map of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (a) and hierarchical clustering analysis of DEGs for SAQ_BITC vs SAC (b). Red, green, and blue indicate upregulated, downregulated, and no significant changes in DEGs, respectively. Among them, two columns (from left to right) represent SAC and SAQ_BITC, respectively, different rows represent different genes, and different colors represent different gene expression levels of the two groups of samples.
Figure 1. Volcano map of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (a) and hierarchical clustering analysis of DEGs for SAQ_BITC vs SAC (b). Red, green, and blue indicate upregulated, downregulated, and no significant changes in DEGs, respectively. Among them, two columns (from left to right) represent SAC and SAQ_BITC, respectively, different rows represent different genes, and different colors represent different gene expression levels of the two groups of samples.
Ijms 20 05441 g001
Ijms 20 05441 g002 550
Figure 2. Analysis of the most significant gene functions of SAQ_BITC compared to SAC. We analyzed the functional effects of significant DEGs that were upregulated including (a) biological processes (BP), (b) cell components (CC), and (c) molecular functions (MF); and downregulated, including (d) biological processes (BP), (e) cell components (CC), and (f) molecular functions (MF).
Figure 2. Analysis of the most significant gene functions of SAQ_BITC compared to SAC. We analyzed the functional effects of significant DEGs that were upregulated including (a) biological processes (BP), (b) cell components (CC), and (c) molecular functions (MF); and downregulated, including (d) biological processes (BP), (e) cell components (CC), and (f) molecular functions (MF).
Ijms 20 05441 g002
Ijms 20 05441 g003 550
Figure 3. Functional enrichment of DEGs with GO categorization (a) and the KEGG differentially expressed gene enrichment analysis scatter plot (b). The figure shows the most significant 30 GO term enriched genes and 20 significant KEGG pathways were selected for enrichment, and the Rich factor was used to identify the extent of enrichment.
Figure 3. Functional enrichment of DEGs with GO categorization (a) and the KEGG differentially expressed gene enrichment analysis scatter plot (b). The figure shows the most significant 30 GO term enriched genes and 20 significant KEGG pathways were selected for enrichment, and the Rich factor was used to identify the extent of enrichment.
Ijms 20 05441 g003
Ijms 20 05441 g004 550
Figure 4. The expression of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) verified by qRT-PCR. Relative expression of cp8F, cp5D, nuc, spa and clf compared to the 16S rRNA normalized to one control. The resulting data were derived from the average of three independent replicates. * showed significant differences in gene expression (p < 0.01).
Figure 4. The expression of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) verified by qRT-PCR. Relative expression of cp8F, cp5D, nuc, spa and clf compared to the 16S rRNA normalized to one control. The resulting data were derived from the average of three independent replicates. * showed significant differences in gene expression (p < 0.01).
Ijms 20 05441 g004
Ijms 20 05441 g005 550
Figure 5. The effect of BITC on the biofilm formation of S. aureus was observed by light microscopy (40×) (A, control; B, 1/4 MIC-BITC; C, 1/8 MIC-BITC), SEM image of S. aureus biofilm (20,000×) (D, control; E, 1/4 MIC-BITC; F, 1/8 MIC-BITC), IFM image of S. aureus biofilm (excitation wavelength 488 nm, blocking laser chip wavelength 515 nm) (G, control; H, 1/4 MIC-BITC; I, 1/8 MIC-BITC).
Figure 5. The effect of BITC on the biofilm formation of S. aureus was observed by light microscopy (40×) (A, control; B, 1/4 MIC-BITC; C, 1/8 MIC-BITC), SEM image of S. aureus biofilm (20,000×) (D, control; E, 1/4 MIC-BITC; F, 1/8 MIC-BITC), IFM image of S. aureus biofilm (excitation wavelength 488 nm, blocking laser chip wavelength 515 nm) (G, control; H, 1/4 MIC-BITC; I, 1/8 MIC-BITC).
Ijms 20 05441 g005
Table
Table 1. Summary of RNA-seq alignment.
Table 1. Summary of RNA-seq alignment.
Sample NameTotal ReadsTotal MappedMultiple MappedUniquely Mapped
SAC117,425,77216,699,263 (95.83%)912,234 (5.23%)15,787,029 (90.6%)
SAC219,641,30618,949,431 (96.48%)995,830 (5.07%)17,953,601 (91.41%)
SAC319,752,16218,917,775 (95.78%)1,151,497 (5.83%)17,766,278 (89.95%)
SAQ_BITC117,015,10216,523,451 (97.11%)782,977 (4.6%)15,740,474 (92.51%)
SAQ_BITC219,245,46018,643,857 (96.87%)928,383 (4.82%)17,715,474 (92.05%)
SAQ_BITC313,327,60812,947,341 (97.15%)602,910 (4.52%)12,344,431 (92.62%)
Table
Table 2. Data of the differentially expressed genes.
Table 2. Data of the differentially expressed genes.
Gene_IdGene Namelog2FoldChange
(SAQ_BITC vs SAC)		Pval
(SAQ_BITC vs SAC)		Padj
(SAQ_BITC vs SAC)		Significant
(SAQ_BITC vs SAC)
SAOUHSC_00119Cp8F−3.99452.33 × 10−422.02 × 10−39DOWN
SAOUHSC_00117CP5D−5.42821.73 × 10−345.63 × 10−32DOWN
SAOUHSC_00818nuc−2.13582.85 × 10−213.53 × 10−19DOWN
SAOUHSC_00069spa−1.552.54 × 10−131.10 × 10−11DOWN
SAOUHSC_00812clf−1.10572.92 × 10−74.77 × 10−6DOWN
Table
Table 3. Primer sequences for qRT-PCR.
Table 3. Primer sequences for qRT-PCR.
GenePrimerSequence (5’–3’)
16S rRNA16S rRNA-FCGTGCTACAATGGACAATACA
16S rRNA-RACAATCCGAACTGAGAACAAC
Cp8FCp8F-FACAGACTTTAGTTATCCCTTAC
Cp8F-RTGATGCCAGTGATTACCTTTA
CP5DCP5D-FCTTTAGTTGTTGGTGCTGGTC
CP5D-RCGGTTCAAGTTTCATTTCGTC
nucnuc-FGAAAGGGCAATACGCAAAG
nuc-RACGCCATTATCTGTTTG
spaspa-FATAAGAAGCAACCAGCAAAC
spa-RGGCTAATGATAATCCACCAA
clfclf-FACGAATGGCGATGTTGTAGC
clf-RCTCGGTCTGTAAATAAAGGTAATG

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Wu, H.; Niu, T.; Bi, J.; Hou, H.; Hao, H.; Zhang, G. Downregulated Expression of Virulence Factors Induced by Benzyl Isothiocyanate in Staphylococcus Aureus: A Transcriptomic Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215441

AMA Style

Wang X, Wu H, Niu T, Bi J, Hou H, Hao H, Zhang G. Downregulated Expression of Virulence Factors Induced by Benzyl Isothiocyanate in Staphylococcus Aureus: A Transcriptomic Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(21):5441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215441

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xiaoning, Hongyan Wu, Tongxin Niu, Jingran Bi, Hongman Hou, Hongshun Hao, and Gongliang Zhang. 2019. "Downregulated Expression of Virulence Factors Induced by Benzyl Isothiocyanate in Staphylococcus Aureus: A Transcriptomic Analysis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 21: 5441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215441

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop