Next Article in Journal
Role of High-Mobility Group Box-1 in Liver Pathogenesis
Next Article in Special Issue
Animal Models for Parkinson’s Disease Research: Trends in the 2000s
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Genome-wide Analysis and Expression Profiling of Histone Acetyltransferase (HAT) Gene Family in Response to Hormonal Applications, Metal and Abiotic Stresses in Cotton
Previous Article in Special Issue
Probiotics for Parkinson’s Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Overcrowded Crossroads: Mitochondria, Alpha-Synuclein, and the Endo-Lysosomal System Interaction in Parkinson’s Disease

1
Mitochondrial Research Unit, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
2
Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
3
Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
4
Center of Parkinson’s Disease, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(21), 5312; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215312
Submission received: 30 September 2019 / Revised: 21 October 2019 / Accepted: 24 October 2019 / Published: 25 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurobiology Research in Parkinson's Disease)

Abstract

:
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder worldwide, mainly affecting the elderly. The disease progresses gradually, with core motor presentations and a multitude of non-motor manifestations. There are two neuropathological hallmarks of PD, the dopaminergic neuronal loss and the alpha-synuclein-containing Lewy body inclusions in the substantia nigra. While the exact pathomechanisms of PD remain unclear, genetic investigations have revealed evidence of the involvement of mitochondrial function, alpha-synuclein (α-syn) aggregation, and the endo-lysosomal system, in disease pathogenesis. Due to the high energy demand of dopaminergic neurons, mitochondria are of special importance acting as the cellular powerhouse. Mitochondrial dynamic fusion and fission, and autophagy quality control keep the mitochondrial network in a healthy state. Should defects of the organelle occur, a variety of reactions would ensue at the cellular level, including disrupted mitochondrial respiratory network and perturbed calcium homeostasis, possibly resulting in cellular death. Meanwhile, α-syn is a presynaptic protein that helps regulate synaptic vesicle transportation and endocytosis. Its misfolding into oligomeric sheets and fibrillation is toxic to the mitochondria and neurons. Increased cellular oxidative stress leads to α-syn accumulation, causing mitochondrial dysfunction. The proteasome and endo-lysosomal systems function to regulate damage and unwanted waste management within the cell while facilitating the quality control of mitochondria and α-syn. This review will analyze the biological functions and interactions between mitochondria, α-syn, and the endo-lysosomal system in the pathogenesis of PD.

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease in the world, affecting up to two percent of the population over 65 years of age [1]. Age has been recognized as the greatest risk factor affecting disease progression, with evidence of a doubling of the risks of mortality and dementia post PD diagnosis [2]. With an aging global population, the significance of this disease is accentuated. James Parkinson first described clinical manifestations of bradykinesia, rigidity, rest tremor, and gait disturbance over two centuries ago [3]. A century later, the pathological hallmark of α-synuclein (α-syn) protein aggregates, termed Lewy bodies, was discovered in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) by Tre´tiakoff [4]. By the 1960s, high-dose L-DOPA was introduced as the standard clinical treatment which greatly improved the quality of life and the life expectancy of PD patients [5]. Recent clinical-pathological studies have provided insight into another important PD hallmark, progressive neuronal loss. Based on the PD progression staging system proposed by Braak et al., neurodegeneration begins and is initially restricted to the ventrolateral region of the SNpc, becoming more widespread by the end-stage [6]. Studies have also demonstrated reciprocal Lewy body accumulation traveling from both the peripheral and enteric nervous systems to the central nervous system [7,8]. This corresponds with heterogeneous non-motor PD features which have been shown to occur up to decades in advance of motor symptoms. The non-motor manifestations include altered endocrine signaling, autonomic control, neuropsychiatric functions, olfactory functions, gastrointestinal motility, sleep disturbance, and pain perception [9,10]. While the pathogenesis of PD has been investigated extensively, the primary causes remain elusive; although many risk factors have been identified, including age, environmental toxin exposure, and genomic defects [11,12]. More recent investigations into discrete genetic and molecular causes have implicated mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, calcium (Ca2+) homeostasis, autophagy and endo-lysosomal system dysfunction, the accumulation of aberrant or misfolded proteins, and ubiquitin-proteasome system dysfunction in principle molecular pathways as underlying the pathogenesis of sporadic and familial PD [13,14,15]. Furthermore, reports indicate a trilateral relationship of mitochondrial dysfunction, α-syn aggregation, and degradation of the endo-lysosomal and proteasome systems in the neurodegenerative process of PD [16,17,18].
In a normal-functioning neuron, mitochondria supply cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) via the respiratory chain, maintain cellular Ca2+ homeostasis, and regulate cellular growth and death [19]. The integrity of this organelle is maintained by its dynamic functions, including morphological changes of fusion and fission, and quality control mechanisms [20]. The constant production of ATP through the I–IV respiratory chain enzymatic complexes located in the mitochondrial inner membrane is coupled with leaked electrons leading to the generation of toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS). Protective antioxidative manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2) enzymes reside in the mitochondria and work to dismutate the radical superoxide anions. Oxidative stress occurs when imbalances between free radical production and the antioxidative system develop, leading to macromolecular damage and further cellular functional impairment [21]. Meanwhile, the PD-related denaturing of the pathological protein α-syn also occurs. This 140-amino-acid protein is normally soluble and functions as a presynaptic terminal protein assisting with synaptic vesicle trafficking and endocytosis. Of particular importance to dopaminergic (DA) neurons, α-syn regulates the synthesis, storage, and release of dopamine [22]. Furthermore, α-syn interacts with membrane lipids of mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), affecting Ca2+ homeostasis. Through interactions with tubulin, α-syn contributes to microtubule dynamics [17,23]. A normal turnover of mitochondria and α-syn contribute to neuronal health, while mechanisms of their homeostasis involve the proteasome pathways and autophagy and endo-lysosomal pathways. Misfolded proteins are targeted for protease degradation, and larger sized waste is segregated and degraded by lysosomal hydrolases. When imbalances occur, for instance by mitochondrial defects, mitochondrial ROS production increases which promote intracellular α-syn misfolding and aggregation [24,25]. Studies have shown α-syn aggregation to cause a multitude of mitochondrial defects, including decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and energy production, disruption of mitochondrial-ER Ca2+ homeostasis, inhibited mitochondrial dynamics, and induced mitochondrial pro-apoptotic protein cytochrome c release [26,27]. Increased cellular ROS triggers mitochondrial importation of α-syn, subsequently inducing intra-mitochondrial α-syn aggregation and respiratory Complex I dysfunction. Overexpression or mutation of α-syn will impair mitochondrial functions, while subsequent increased ROS will drive toxic α-syn conformation, thereby creating a vicious cycle [18,28]. The build-up of damaged mitochondria and α-syn increases the proteasome and autophagy-lysosomal loads, possibly causing dysfunctions in these clearance pathways [29,30]. On the contrary, when degradation pathways are disrupted, possibly due to genetic mutations, the normal quality control process is hindered resulting in a build-up of unwanted proteins and fragmented mitochondria. This perturbed degradation impairs the biogenesis of mitochondria and mitochondrial proteins and induces mitochondrial stress responses such as the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt) and apoptotic mechanisms [31,32]. The decreased degradation of α-syn may lead to α-syn misfolding, oligomerization, and fibrillization. These toxic structures cause further mitochondrial dysfunction which again may lead to cellular death. There has also been evidence of prion-like propagation of α-syn between neuronal synapses corresponding with the progressive symptoms of PD [33,34]. The associations between PD and endo-lysosomal dysfunction have been observed in mitochondrial quality control, intracellular protein regulation, intra- and inter-cellular α-syn transfer, genetic crosstalk between PD and lysosomal dysfunctions, and clinical lysosomal disease presentations [35]. Of note, clinical associations have been observed in Gaucher’s disease (GD) patients with a presentation of parkinsonism and pathological Lewy body accumulations [36]. Following studies of this lysosomal storage disorder revealed that the GD causative gene GBA1 also increased the risk for developing PD [37]. DA neurons produce and consume a great amount of ATP within the human body due to the millions of synapse connections they form, further emphasizing the importance of mitochondria in neuronal health [38,39,40]. The genetic defects of this organelle combined with the α-syn encoding gene and lysosomal genetic mutations are major causes of PD-related neurodegeneration [41]. We herein summarize the complex and interrelated roles of mitochondrial dysfunction, α-syn, and the endo-lysosomal system in PD neurodegeneration (Figure 1).

2. Mitochondria and Parkinson’s Disease

The earliest report of indicating an association between mitochondria and PD was in 1976, when scientists discovered a link between recreational drug use and contaminated mitochondrial Complex I inhibitor 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), resulting in PD-like motor symptoms. The additional observation of a 30% to 40% decrease in the mitochondrial Complex I activity observed in the SNpc of patients with PD further supports the critical role of this organelle in the development of PD [42]. The discovery that exposure to environmental mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) inhibitors including pesticides were parkinsonism-related further associated mitochondria with this disease. Subsequent genomic studies have also revealed many PD-related genetic mutations cause organelle dysfunction through disrupting the mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes, decreasing the mitochondrial membrane potential, causing mitochondrial fission, fusion, and quality control disequilibrium, affecting the autophagic degradation of the organelles’ damaged components, and activating the mitochondrial-related cell death signals through apoptosis. Since mitochondria are the major source of ROS under normal physiological conditions, the relevance of mitochondrial health for maintenance of organelle function is critical for DA neurons which are sensitive to oxidative damage, under additional ROS load from dopamine metabolism, and possess a relative paucity of antioxidative enzymes [43]. In the following sections, we will further discuss mitochondrial biology, homeostasis of intracellular Ca2+, apoptosis, the maintenance of mitochondrial quality, and recent hereditary PD genetic findings related to mitochondria.

2.1. Mitochondrial Biology

Mitochondria are double-membraned, highly dynamic organelles that are responsible for efficient cellular energy generation, and mitochondrial functionality determines cellular survival or death [44]. The mitochondrial outer membrane (OM) and the mitochondrial inner membrane (IM) partition the mitochondria into two fluid-filled compartments. The outer compartment is the intermembrane space (IMS). The central compartment is the mitochondrial matrix, which is surrounded by convoluted IM folds known as cristae. This compartmentalized structure of the organelle enables bioenergetic catabolic processes and biosynthesis of nucleotides, glucose, amino acids, fatty acids, cholesterol, and heme. An estimated 90% of mammalian oxygen consumption is utilized by this organelle to produce adenosine triphosphate (ATP) via the chemiosmotic-coupling oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) process [45]. Reduced equivalents (NADH and FADH2) generated from the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle pass electrons on to the electron transport chain (ETC) located in the IM. The ETC enzyme Complexes I–IV use energy generated from the redox reactions to pump protons across the IM into the IMS. Impermeable to protons, the IM acts as a functional barrier and establishes an electrochemical gradient across the IM, termed mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) [46]. This proton gradient generated from electron transportation (oxidation) then drives the proton across the IM through the F1F0-ATP synthase (Complex V) and ultimately phosphorylate adenosine diphosphate (ADP) into ATP (phosphorylation) [47]. The mitochondrial proteome encompasses more than 1000 proteins and more than 95% are encoded by nuclear genes, synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes, while less than 5% are encoded by mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) which are critical parts of the OXPHOS complexes. Each human cell harbors from a few hundred to one thousand mitochondria, and each mitochondrion contains two to eight copies of mtDNA in the matrix [48]. The 16569 bp double-stranded circular mtDNA contains 37 genes and encodes for 22 transfer RNAs (tRNA), the 12S and 16S ribosomal RNAs (rRNA), and 13 polypeptides that form core parts of the OXPHOS complexes [49].
There is a constant “leak” of electrons from the ETC, especially from Complexes I and III, to oxygen which forms superoxide anions radical (O2•-). The dismutation of O2•- produces hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and diffuses into the cytosol and nucleus to be detoxified by glutathione peroxidase and catalase into water [50]. In the presence of transition metals, H2O2 can then be turned into highly reactive hydroxyl radical (•OH) [51]. To cope with the ROS generated during metabolic processes, cells have developed the antioxidative system, including antioxidants and antioxidative enzymes. Physiological ROS levels are essential for cellular survival and act as important signals in a wide array of cellular responses by changing the redox state of signaling proteins regulating processes including altering mitochondrial morphology, quality control mitophagy, and mitochondrial bioenergetics [24,52,53]. However, when the optimum balance between ROS production and antioxidative capability is not achieved, the cellular redox states can be disturbed, leading to oxidative stress [54]. An excess of these chemically-active ROS can readily oxidize proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, DNA and RNA, and causes oxidative damage [51]. Since mitochondria have a less efficient DNA repair system, chronic exposure to ROS contributes to a more rapid accumulation of mtDNA mutations compared to nuclear DNA (nDNA), which has been linked to PD [13]. As mitochondria age, damage to proteins including α-syn and mtDNA perturb their normal function and energy states which may further lead to cell death and has been implicated in several age-related disorders [55,56].

2.2. Mitochondria, Intracellular Calcium Homeostasis, Apoptosis and Mitochondrial Dynamics

Another important function of mitochondria is in the homeostasis of intracellular Ca2+ and programmed cell death, both of which are highly relevant to PD [57,58,59]. Mitochondrial Ca2+ coordinates the upregulation of the OXPHOS machinery, while the dysregulated increase of Ca2+ could disrupt ATP synthesis and increase ROS production [60,61]. The close proximity of mitochondria with Ca2+ channels in the ER at the mitochondria-associated membranes allows transient influx from the intracellular Ca2+ stores to the mitochondrial matrix and assist in prompt mitochondrial Ca2+ buffering and Ca2+ gradient control in other cellular compartments [62,63,64,65]. Local Ca2+ sensors in the mitochondria IMS control Ca2+ uptake and signal mitochondrial trafficking along intracellular microtubules. Upon sensor signaling, Ca2+ influx from the cytosol passes through the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) in the OM, the Δψm-driven mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter (MCU) complex in the IM and finally enters the mitochondrial matrix [66]. Efflux of Ca2+ from the matrix is managed by the IM Na+/Ca2+ antiporter and normal brief flickering of IM mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) between open and closed states [67]. mPTP is also associated with ROS release to cytosol from the mitochondrial matrix, possessing timely and adaptive housekeeping functions by relieving mitochondria of potentially toxic accumulations of Ca2+ and ROS [68]. Upon extreme overloading of matrix Ca2+ and ROS in combination with high phosphate concentrations, there is an activation of cyclophilin D which induces sustained mPTP opening and leads to Δψm collapse, mitochondrial swelling, pro-apoptotic mediators release from the mitochondria matrix into the cytosol, and subsequent cell death via the intrinsic mitochondrial apoptotic pathway [51]. The implications of mitochondrial involvement in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway are associated with PD, while neuronal loss is a pathological hallmark of PD [69]. The intrinsic apoptosis pathway is initiated when the intracellular environment becomes too hazardous for cell survival and begins with the activation of the mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) [70]. MOMP entails the opening of mPTP, with the release of mitochondrial pro-apoptotic proteins into the cytosol including cytochrome c. Activation of downstream apoptotic peptidase-activating factor 1 (APAF1), pro-caspase-9 (CASP9), and apoptosome-dependent activation of CASP 3 execute the cleavage and destruction of subcellular structures [71,72]. Mitochondria involvement is integrated within the apoptotic signal transduction cascades and ensure the process of a controlled type of cell death, with minimal effect on surrounding tissue [73]. Of note, the overactivation of caspases can lead to excessive cell death, which is observed in PD [74]. Thus, maintenance of a healthy pool of mitochondria is critical; moreover, this versatile organelle has developed protective measures of dysfunctional mitochondria elimination and repair, involving mitochondrial dynamics [75]. These dynamic processes include mitochondrial fusion, fission, trafficking, and clearance through selective autophagy of this organelle, termed mitophagy [18]. Mitochondrial fusion provides macromolecular and Ca2+ exchange between neighboring mitochondria and complements mtDNA. The process restores functional proteins and non-damaged mtDNA to dysfunctional mitochondria, therefore, decreasing the occurrence of mitophagy. Chief fusion machinery includes three GTPases: the mitofusins 1 and 2 (Mfn1, Mfn2) mediate OM fusion; and the third GTPase, the optic dominant atrophy (OPA1), mediates IM fusion [76]. Mitochondrial fission segregates dysfunctional parts of the mitochondria; these fragments can subsequently be degraded through lysosomal-related pathways via mitophagy. This fragmented structure allows for more efficient engulfment by autolysosome machinery, while interconnected tubular mitochondria are protected [18]. The master fission proteins include the dynamin-related GTPase protein 1 (Drp1), the mammalian Drp1 homolog dynamin like protein 1 (DLP1), and mitochondrial fission 1 protein (Fis1) [21].

2.3. The Defenses of Mitochondria Dysfunction: Mitochondrial Protein Homeostasis and Mitochondrial-Derived Vesicles

The major players of mitochondrial protein homeostasis (proteostasis) include mitochondrial chaperones, such as mitochondrial 70 kilodalton heat shock proteins (mtHsp70), mitochondrial heat shock protein (Hsp60), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated protein 1/Hsp90 (Trap1), and mortalin (HSPA9). These chaperones assist in protein folding/re-folding and prevention of aggregate formation [77]. Damaged or terminally misfolded proteins within the matrix are degraded by mitochondria-localized proteases such as LON, ClpXP and m-AAA proteases. The proteins in the OM are ubiquitinated by E3 ligase MARCH5 and targeted to the 26S proteasome [20]. When unfolded or misfolded proteins in the mitochondria go beyond the capacity of chaperone proteins, the importation of mitochondrial proteins is hindered, initiating the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt) by eliciting the increased transcription of nuclear genes for mitochondrial chaperones and proteases to promote the recovery of organellar proteostasis [78]. A regulator of UPRmt, the stress-activated transcription factor ATFS-1 is normally imported rapidly into healthy mitochondria and degraded. However, during mitochondrial misfolded protein accumulation and impaired import of mitochondrial-targeted proteins due to decreased Δψm, a percentage of the ATFS-1 translocate to the nucleus where they upregulate mitochondrial chaperones and proteases, downregulate the TCA-cycle and OXPHOS transcripts, and increase glycolysis and amino acid catabolism. When combined, the load on damaged mitochondria is decreased via substitute intracellular energy generation through other pathways and the clearing up of unwanted mitochondrial and cellular proteins. If the proteostasis quality control is insufficient for stress homeostasis, mitochondrial-derived vesicles (MDVs) and mitophagy target partial or whole mitochondria for degradation through the lysosomal system [79]. The cargo selective MDVs bud from the organelle independent from the fission machinery and eliminate larger amounts of misfolded proteins and ROS at the lysosome in a mitophagy-independent manner [80]. The PD-linked PINK1/parkin pathway has been found to be implicated in both of these mechanisms, to the point when stress adaptation attempts may not achieve homeostasis, quality control at the cellular level is carried out through MOMP activation of intrinsic apoptosis [81].

2.4. The Clearance of Damaged Mitochondria: Mitophagy and Underlying Autophagic Mechanisms

Mitophagy, the selective degradation of mitochondria via autophagy (self-eating), is a key process for maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis. Mitochondrial turnover via this mechanism is essential for maintaining neuronal health since autophagy sequesters, degrades, and recycles cellular material [74]. Abnormal mitochondrial autophagy accompanies neurodegeneration. Several PD-related proteins are known to participate in the regulation of mitophagy, and the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1) and parkin pathway regulates ubiquitin (Ub)-dependent mitophagy. PINK1 localizes to the mitochondria under normal conditions and is rapidly translocated to the IM to be cleaved and inactivated by IM protease presenilins-associated rhomboid-like protein (PARL). PINK1 fragments are then released into the cytosol to be degraded via the N-end rule pathway. When the damaged mitochondrion become depolarized, PINK1 is unable to enter the mitochondrion, resulting in PINK1 accumulation on the OM. Parkin is normally inactivated cytosolic proteins. PINK1 localization to mitochondrial OM activates parkin by phosphorylation and recruits parkin to the OM where the protein assembles a ubiquitin chain on OM proteins. Parkin subsequently recruits ubiquitin-binding mitophagy receptors (including p62) to the mitochondrion, which promotes capture by light chain 3 (LC3-II)-positive phagophores. The enclosed mitochondrion is then trafficked to the lysosome for further degradation.
Autophagy is a cytoplasmic catabolic process that prevents the build-up of misfolded proteins, removes damaged organelles, and provides the cell and organism with bioenergetic substrates necessary for survival [82,83]. Three types of autophagy have been reported. The first type is microautophagy, responsible for the direct invagination and degradation of soluble or particulate cytoplasmic contents into the lysosomes [84,85]. The second type, chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), involves the chaperone heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein (Hsc70), which discriminates KFERQ-like-motif-bearing proteins and its delivery to the lysosome. The lysosome-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP2A) assists with protein-lysosomal docking, internalization, and final degradation, and is involved in the clearance of damaged proteins including α-syn [86]. The third type is macroautophagy, sometimes referred to as autophagy. In this process, waste products are enclosed within double membrane structures and brought to the lysosome for degradation. The mechanism involves initiation, nucleation, elongation, lysosomal fusion, and degradation. Macroautophagy (hereafter “autophagy”) originates from conditions of stress including starvation, oxidative stress, protein aggregation, and ER stress [87]. The common target of different stress signaling pathways is the Unc-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) complex, the initiation of which phosphorylates the class III PI3K (PI3KC3) Complex I [88]. The PI3KC3-C1 then assists phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI(3)P) production at the isolation membrane of the ER, from which transient double-membraned phagophores are formed [89]. Downstream proteins and complexes work to enhance autophagy-related proteins ATG8-family-protein (ATG8s) binding to the phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) on the membrane. ATG8s (including the microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3) proteins) assist in nucleation, recruiting LC3-interacting-region(LIR)-motif-bearing autophagy factors, and selectively sequestering specifically tagged cargo via LIR cargo receptors [90]. While ATG8s also facilitate elongation and closure of the phagophore membrane to form the autophagosome, the insertion of lipidated-ATG8s to autophagosome membrane drives autophagosome maturation [91]. The lipidated family member LC3-II bound on the autophagic membrane is a characteristic signature of autophagic activation [92]. Elongation of autophagosomal membranes is supplied by ATG9-containing vesicles bringing lipid bilayers from the plasma membrane, the mitochondria, recycling endosomes, and the Golgi complex. Autophagosomes are trafficked to and fuse with a lysosome, forming an autolysosome and trapped cargo is subsequently degraded [93]. During starvation, the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylates tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) and inactivates a negative regulator of autophagy, the mammalian target of rapamycin complex (mTORC), triggering autophagy and promoting survival [94]. Another regulator of autophagic proteins is the pro-autophagic protein Beclin 1, a part of the PI3KC3 complex. Beclin 1 is activated once phosphorylated by kinases including AMPK to stimulate autophagy. Autophagy may be a survival mechanism for cells under acute stress. In the event of autophagic vesicle accumulation, impaired autophagic flux autophagy may become detrimental, leading to apoptosis. Mitophagy is of especial importance in high energy demand neurons for its selective autophagic elimination of potentially harmful damaged mitochondria and the maintenance of mitochondrial homeostasis [13].

2.5. Mitochondrial ETC Dysfunction and PD

In the initial report of an association between mitochondria and PD, scientists discovered a link with the usage of a recreational opioid analog with contaminate MPTP, resulting in PD-like motor symptoms associated with SN degeneration. Experiments showed that its metabolite MPP+, a mitochondrial respiratory chain Complex I inhibitor, is selectively imported to DA neurons after passing the blood-brain barrier [95]. Lewy body pathology and DA neuronal loss were noted upon autopsy [96]. Studies have suggested inhibitor binding to mitochondrial Complex I as a molecular initiating event (MIE) for the adverse outcome (AO), namely Parkinsonian motor deficits. Key events within this process include mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired proteostasis, and eventual degeneration of DA neurons within the SN [97]. With the bridge between mitochondrial ETC complex dysfunction and PD established, links between other environmental mitochondrial toxin exposures and parkinsonism were subsequently investigated. Pesticides, herbicides, insecticides such as paraquat, rotenone, and maneb have been shown to cause PD through ETC interference and are now frequently used for PD toxin models [43,98]. Paraquat and rotenone are notorious Complex I inhibitors, and the manganese ethylene-bis-dithiocarbamate (Mn-EBDC) containing maneb inhibits Complex III. A multitude of studies has explored the pathogenic mechanisms behind mitochondrial involvement in PD through rotenone PD models which reveal these toxins increase ROS production, decrease mitochondrial membrane potential, induce apoptosis, and hinder autophagic flux [99,100]. During the past two decades, genetic investigations have revealed numerous mechanistic findings, notably the involvement of mitochondria-related pathways in PD [101].

2.6. Genetic Links of Mitochondria to PD

The role of genetics in the etiology of PD has been debated, as less than 15% of PD patients have a family history, and no more than 10% have Mendelian inheritance [102]. However, these hereditary forms of PD have provided crucial clues to the underlying neuropathology of PD, with large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have confirmed that these genes may have effects in sporadic PD. Many of the genes responsible for familial PD have strong links to mitochondrial function. These include the autosomal recessive familial genes PRKN (PARK2), PINK1 (PARK6), Daisuke-Junko-1 (DJ-1/PARK7), ATPase type13A2 (ATP13A2, PARK9), and F-box only protein 7 (FBXO7/PARK15). The autosomal dominant PD genes involved include the SNCA (PARK1), Leucine rich repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2/PARK8), and vacuolar protein sorting 35 (VPS35/PARK17) (Table 1).
Loss of function mutations in PINK1 and parkin genes have been associated with juvenile PD, with mutated parkin protein recording the greatest frequency. The PINK1 protein is a kinase localized on mitochondria and parkin, a ubiquitin(Ub)-E3 ligase, and the PINK1-dependent activation of parkin plays a critical role in the process of Ub-dependent mitophagy, as previously stated [103]. PINK1 and parkin are also shown to modify a wide range of substrate proteins and mediate their clearance. This includes targeting fusion proteins Mfn-1 and Mfn-2 to prevent the re-fusion of damaged mitochondria back into the healthy network. These Mfns are eliminated through mitochondria-assisted degradation via the 26S proteasome. Due to inhibited fusion, further fragmentation of damaged mitochondria is induced, possibly leading to the formation of MDVs for localized quality control. Damaged mitochondrial transport along axons is also hindered by the degradation of Miro, a mitochondrial transportation protein, through PINK1 and parkin-dependent proteasome pathways. This inhibition of the mitochondrial movement may prevent the spreading of dysfunctional organelles along neurons and could be a quarantine step prior to mitophagy [104,105]. Other roles of PINK1 and parkin for mitochondrial health include targeting the transcriptional repressor parkin interacting substrate (PARIS) for proteasomal degradation, promoting the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1α for mitochondrial biogenesis. Loss of parkin function could impair mitochondrial biogenesis and may lead to cell death [106]. The anti-apoptosis role of parkin has been reported, as the ligase oppose pro-apoptotic Bax translocation to the mitochondria and therefore inhibit subsequent cytochrome c release [107]. The recessive PD gene FBXO7 encodes a component of the E3 Ub ligase, the reduced expression of which leads to deficient parkin translocation to damaged mitochondria, decreased Mfn ubiqutination, and impaired mitophagy [108]. The loss of function mutations of the DJ-1 gene is associated with recessive early-onset familial PD and late-onset sporadic PD [109]. The gene encodes the 189-amino-acid DJ-1 protein, with studies having demonstrated greater DJ-1 oxidative damage and elevated DJ-1 protein levels in postmortem brains of sporadic PD patients [110]. This ubiquitous pleiotropic protein has been proposed to play a protective role in multiple functions, including redox-sensitive esterase, chaperone for α-syn, protease, transcriptional regulator, the regulator of pro-apoptotic Bax, the regulator of tyrosine hydroxylase in dopamine synthesis, and regulator of the 20S proteasome [111]. DJ-1 has a highly oxidative-stress sensitive cysteine residue at position 106 (Cys-106), which induces DJ-1 localization to the depolarized mitochondria to regulate antioxidant defense and maintain Complex I activity [112,113,114]. Knockdown of DJ-1 has resulted in impaired Complex I function, reduced Δψm, fragmented mitochondria, impaired Ca2+ dynamics, with increased oxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction [115,116]. Sharma et al. demonstrated that reduced DJ-1 activity due to oxidative stress may lead to α-syn aggregation [117]. Meanwhile, deficiency of another PD recessive gene, ATP13A2, causes fragmentation of the mitochondria network, increased ROS production, and decreased autophagic events [118]. The SNCA gene is the first familial autosomal dominant PD-associated gene encoding the α-syn protein, which is proposed to function in dopamine release regulation, fibrillization of the protein tau, inhibition of tumor suppressor protein p53, and inhibition of other pro-apoptotic genes [119]. A fraction of cellular α-syn selectively localizes to the mitochondria upon specific stimuli, and the protein directly influences cytochrome c release, Ca2+ homeostasis, Δψm mediation, and OXPHOS efficiency [120,121,122]. The mutation of the SNCA gene causes Complex I inhibition and mitochondria fragmentation, which could be rescued by co-expression of PINK1, parkin, and DJ-1 [123]. Studies have also shown α-syn binding to the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM) protein, thereby impairing mitochondrial protein importation and further affecting the PINK1 and parkin pathways [124]. The deficiency of LRRK2 has also been shown to cause α-syn accumulation and autophagic stress [125,126]. The major autosomal dominant PD-related gene LRRK2 is the most frequent genetic cause of familial and sporadic PD. The gene product is a 286-kDa ROCO family protein with a kinase and a GTPase domain [127]. LRRK2 functions in cytoskeletal maintenance, vesicle trafficking, autophagy protein degradation, and the immune system [126]. LRRK2 deficiency leads to reduced Δψm, dysregulation of mitochondria fusion and fission, higher levels of mtDNA damage, and reduced cell survival. The third autosomal dominant PD gene is the VPS35. The protein is part of a retromer complex that plays an important part in endosome-Golgi-plasma membrane protein transport, and also plays a role in MDVs, shuttling cargo from mitochondria to peroxisomes or lysosomes [128]. Through MDVs, VPS35 mediates mitochondrial fission complex DLP1 recycling. As such, Wang et al. have demonstrated that PD-associated VPS35 mutation causes increased DLP1 turnover and excessive fission which further leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal loss [129].

2.7. Mitochondrion as a Therapeutic Target for PD

Since mitochondrial dysfunction takes center stage for PD pathogenesis, approaches aimed at modulating mitochondrial function as a therapeutic target for PD treatment include mitochondrial biogenesis induction, enhancing mitochondrial quality control, preventing mitochondrial involved cell death, and altering mitochondrial signaling and metabolic pathways [130]. Promising candidate drugs and supplements include nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) replenishment with nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN), mitochondrially targeted antioxidants MitoQ and SS-31, free radical scavenger Coenzyme Q10, and mPTP inhibitors for blocking apoptosis creatine and cyclosporin A [131]. NAD+ is a cofactor and electron carrier in the ETC, whose depletion leads to disrupted mitochondrial ETC ATP production, the elevation of protein lysine acylation resulting in damaged and misfolded proteins accumulation, and mPTP formation leading to cell death [132,133,134]. Other compounds with antioxidative qualities include resveratrol which has also been demonstrated to affect mitochondrial morphology, autophagic flux, and mitochondrial biogenesis enhancing effects in PD cellular models [101,135]. Additional pharmacological interventions aimed at transcription factors and their co-activators involving in mitochondrial biogenesis have been demonstrated, such as nuclear respiratory factor 1 and 2 (NRF1, NRF2), mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) co-activator 1 α (PGC1α) which affect mtDNA replication, expression, and coordinate organelle biogenesis in response to metabolic challenges [136,137]. An interesting study by Lin et al. showed healthy mitochondria transfer from Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells (WJMSCs) to cells harboring a mtDNA defect in rotenone-stressed mitochondrial myopathy, encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) patient cells, demonstrating that healthy mitochondria transfer may be a potential treatment avenue in rescuing dysfunctional mitochondria [138]. Though the mitochondrial strategies have not yet proven rewarding on humans, there are still promises of its potential usage in delaying PD disease progression in the future.

3. Alpha-Synuclein Accumulation and PD

3.1. Alpha-Synuclein: The Main Component Protein of Lewy Body

As people age, unfolded proteins and aggregates progressively accumulate in specific regions of the brain, leading to proteotoxic neurodegenerative diseases, with α-syn accumulation in the case of PD [139]. Aggregated α-syn are the main components of cytosolic eosinophilic Lewy body inclusions, which are found in afflicted central and peripheral nervous systems of PD patients, most abundant in the SNpc where selective DA neuron loss is greatest [140]. Of note, α-syn protein is encoded by the SNCA gene, the first gene associated with familial PD. The protein is mainly localized at the presynaptic terminal where α-syn promotes membrane curvature and assembly of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex, a mediator for vesicle fusion with target membranes [141]. Composed of 140 amino acids, α-syn contributes to synaptic trafficking, vesicle budding, and vesicle recycling; while in the case of DA neurons, it mediates dopamine synthesis, storage, and release [142,143]. In addition, α-syn interacts with membrane lipids on mitochondria and ER, and play a part in Ca2+ homeostasis. The α-syn protein is divided into three major domains: the amphipathic N-terminus (1-60), the hydrophobic central non-amyloid component (NAC) (61-95), and the acidic C-terminus (96-140). The N-terminal is characterized by lipid-binding α-helixes formed by seven repeats of 11 amino acids containing the conserved KTKEGV hexameric motif. Various point mutations at coordinates of the N-terminal (A53E/T, A30P, E46K H50Q, and G51D) are likely involved in membrane lipid interactions and are linked to dominant familial parkinsonism and PD [144]. The NAC is the core of α-syn and deletions in this region are essential for misfolding and aggregation of α-syn into fibrils. The C-terminus is a charged unstructured tail important for the prevention of α-syn aggregation and also helps regulate synaptic vesicles [145]. Multimeric conformations of physiological α-syn co-exist within the cell, including non-toxic soluble unfolded monomers and, in large part, the aggregation-resistant tetramers [146]. In high concentrations, α-syn has the propensity to convert into pathological oligomers and self-aggregates into higher-order fibrils with amyloid cross-beta conformation, which are then deposited into Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites in affected neurons [147]. Oligomers are aggregated α-syn that have not acquired a fibrillary conformation and encompass a wide spectrum of molecular weights and beta-sheet content. Larger oligomers are more stable, process high seeding properties, and are highly toxic [148,149]. These oligomers and amyloid fibrils notably affect mitochondrial function, ER–Golgi trafficking, protein degradation, and synaptic transmission, which induce neurodegeneration. Zhang et al. have suggested nigral neuronal damage releases aggregated α-syn into the substantia nigra, activating microglia and producing subsequent pro-inflammatory mediators and ROS [150]. Oxidative stress, toxins, and interaction with oxidized dopamine further increase the propensity of α-syn to aggregate and accumulate. Research has also demonstrated excess α-syn to inhibit dopamine biosynthesis through interaction with tyrosine hydroxylase and impair dopamine uptake via dopamine transporter [142]. Therefore, DA neurons are focal aggregation sites due in part to the numerous synapses these neurons possess as well as the increased oxidative stress caused by dopamine production. The pathological course of α-syn involves the spread of disease; as such, reports have shown that α-syn oligomers and fibrils, as well as monomers, can transfer between cells and propagate the disease to other brain regions - the prion-like theory [151,152]. Once inside host cells, α-syn aggregates undergo nucleation, aggregation, and propagation [153]. The spreading mechanisms involved are multiple and can occur via endocytosis, direct penetration, trans-synaptic transmission, or membrane receptors. Furthermore, the pathogenic roles of α-syn are supported by genetic data, as multiplications of SNCA, and N-terminal point mutations result in dominant familial PD [144]. SNCA gene overexpression results in the formation of intracellular insoluble α-syn, with other underlying causes of unfavorable α-syn accumulation including post-translational modulation, and impaired α-syn degradation which consequently leads to neuron degeneration. There are two major proteolytic pathways implicated in α-syn processing, the ubiquitin-dependent and -independent proteasome systems, and the macroautophagy and CMA autophagy-endo-lysosomal systems [16,154,155]. The monomeric form of α-syn are predominantly degraded by CMA, and ser-129 phosphorylation on α-syn leads to degradation via the proteasome system [155]. Numerous PD-linked mutations or failed proteases are linked to a deficient ubiquitin-proteasome system and dysfunctional CMA, such as the A53T and A30P SNCA point mutations, and some autophagy-lysosomal related genes [156].

3.2. The Translocation of Alpha-Synuclein to the Mitochondria and Nucleus

The relationship between mitochondria and α-syn is one of interconnection; more specifically, α-syn overexpression or genetic mutation causes dysfunction of mitochondria, mitochondrial fragmentation, mitochondrial membrane shaping inhibition, mitochondrial axonal transport decrease, and impaired mitochondrial-ER Ca2+ exchange at the mitochondria-associated membrane [17,157]. In post mortem PD brains and animal models, overexpressed or mutant α-syn accumulate in the ER, thus impairing protein folding and evoking ER stress. A53T α-syn plays a role in impairing both mitochondrial and ER, thereby generating an environment of oxidative and ER dysfunction, and consequent neuronal death. Stressed ER transfer excess Ca2+ to the mitochondria, which then generate even more ROS [158]. ER and mitochondrial stress both activate antioxidative systems, which in turn activate the UPRmt, helping to reestablish the redox states of both organelles [16]. Different immunogold electron microscopy studies have reported α-syn localization to the mitochondrial OM, IMS, and IM [17]. Research has indicated that A53T mutated α-syn targeting to mitochondrial OM induces OM curvature changes and surrounding mitochondrial fragmentation, suggesting α-syn directly binds to the mitochondrial OM, with such interaction interrupting mitochondrial morphology [124]. α-syn accumulation has also been identified in mitochondria in model cells, different regions of mouse brains, and also post-mortem brains of PD patients [18]. The N-terminus domain of α-syn has been observed to mimic mitochondrial targeting sequence properties and may promote anchoring of the protein to mitochondrial membranes [159]. Distinct pathogenic variants that contain a single amino acid substitution in the first 32 amino acids of the N-terminus display different affinities for membranes and are fundamental for mitochondrial localization, suggesting that aside from the role in protein aggregation, the N-terminus could impact α-syn association to intracellular membranes, and thus α-syn subcellular localization. This notion is supported by the observation that A53T α-syn variant is highly enriched in mitochondria as compared to A30T variants under general and oxidative-stressed conditions; the E46K mutant protein show higher affinity for vesicles containing more negatively charged lipids [159]. Although the specific mechanisms of α-syn importation into mitochondria are not fully understood, it has been shown to involve Δψm dependency, the TOM complex, and the voltage-dependent anion channels (VDAC/ mitochondrial porins). The import of α-syn into mitochondria impairs a broad range of mitochondrial functions, and when α-syn further accumulate within the mitochondria, translocase of the inner and outer membrane (TIM/TOM) complex assembly process is disrupted, subsequently hindering mitochondrial protein import from the cytosol [17,160]. The mitochondrial translocation of α-syn is enhanced by cellular stress and low intracellular pH [161]. Interestingly, Ludtmann et al. demonstrated α-syn function in the mitochondrial matrix, suggesting that a pool of physiological α-syn increases ATP synthase activity through directly binding to its α subunit, thereby ensuring mitochondrial health and proper ATP fueling for synaptic function [124,162]. Furthermore, α-syn nuclear localization has been observed, and α-syn binding to DNA upon increased oxidative stress presents the genetic modulatory functions of the protein. The precise influence of α-syn on the nucleus remains controversial, with some studies reporting that nuclear α-syn downregulated major DNA repair and cell cycle-related genes, and others reporting the protective effects on mitochondrial biogenesis and histone hyperacetylation [163]. Pinho et al. have noted phosphorylation at specific α-syn sites and nuclear presence of different α-syn species affecting the role of α-syn on gene expression and neurotoxicity [164].

3.3. Future Prospect: Alpha-Synuclein as a Treatment Target for PD

Due to the numerous toxic effects of α-syn aggregates, strategies to reduce α-syn accumulation have been developed, including decreasing α-syn synthesis through use of small interfering RNA (siRNA) or microRNA (miRNA), and activating clearance mechanisms such as autophagy, the proteasome, neurosin, matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), and heat shock proteins [165]. In in vitro and ex vivo models, Loria et al. demonstrated efficiency differences of α-syn aggregation transfer between neurons and astrocytes. They also exhibited that α-syn puncta were mainly localized within the lysosomal compartment of the recipient cell and that differently from neurons, astrocytes are able to degrade α-syn fibrils efficiently. This data indicates that astrocytes are able to trap and clear pathological α-syn deposits in PD [166]. In addition, anti-aggregating, antioxidant or post-translational modification approaches, and immunotherapy may be used to block transmission and oligomer formation and thus α-syn aggregation. Of note, since mitochondria are the major source of intracellular ROS under normal physiological conditions, antioxidants against mitochondria-related oxidative stress can be a potential target for the prevention of ROS-induced α-syn protein denaturing and aggregation [158]. As recently reported, overexpression of the lysosomal transcription factor TFEB in rats, expressing α-synuclein decreases α-synuclein oligomer levels and prevents lysosomal dysfunction decline and neurodegeneration; therefore, augmentation of endo-lysosomal function to enhance damaged protein and organelle turnover can potentially protect neurons from α-syn pathology with excessive damaged protein accumulation [165].

4. Lysosomal Disorders and Parkinson’s Disease: Interrelationship with Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Alpha-synuclein Aggregation

4.1. The Biological Function of Lysosome beyond Protein Catabolism

Lysosomes are membrane-enclosed cytoplasmic organelles in the endomembrane system of animal cells and harbor a diverse array of hydrolases. As the degradative endpoint for intracellular and exogenous biomacromolecules, these cellular quality controllers are highly dynamic in intracellular trafficking and distribution, and they continuously fuse and fission with each other as well as other organelles, including late endosomes, phagosomes, and autophagosomes for autophagy [167]. According to hydrolases requirements, vacuolar ATPase (V-ATPase) pumps protons into the lysosome to maintain a pH of 4.5–5.0. Lysosomes are also recognized as sophisticated signaling centers that are able to interface physically and functionally with other organelles to govern cell growth, division, and differentiation [168]. The physical membrane contact with organelles such as mitochondria and the ER aid in mitochondrial fission and may participate in metabolic regulatory roles through nutrient and metabolite sharing [169]. Involved in critical cellular anabolic-catabolic function, the lysosomal function is under strict signaling regulations, including recruitment and activation of the master growth regulator, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) protein kinase [170]. mTORC1 is activated at the lysosomal surface under the dual presence of nutrients and growth factors, and its activation triggers downstream anabolic pathways, directing cells toward growth. During starvation conditions, mTORC1 enhances autophagy by disinhibition of the autophagosome initiators Atg1 kinase and the Atg13 protein, and via the MiT/TFE basic leucine zipper transcription factors, which coordinate many lysosomal target gene expressions, increasing autophagosome numbers, lysosome biogenesis, and lipid catabolism [171,172,173]. Lysosome lumens also serve as storage sites where amino acids, phosphate, ions, and intermediate metabolites can be selectively transported and retained [174]. Moreover, faulty mutations of lysosomal genes lead to a spectrum of metabolic diseases known as lysosomal storage disorders, and defective execution of lysosome growth and catabolic programs have notably been implicated in neurodegeneration, cancer, and age-related diseases [175].

4.2. Link between Parkinson’s Disease and Glucocerebrosidase Gene Mutations

The clinical correlation between PD and lysosomal dysfunction was initially observed when a small group of patients with GD, a lysosomal storage disease, presented with parkinsonian symptoms [176,177]. GD is caused by the loss of function in the GBA1 gene which encodes the lysosomal hydroxylase, β-glucocerebrosidase (GCase) [178]. In 2003, Sidransky et al. reported on a cohort of 17 GD patients who developed PD symptoms at a mean age of 48, including patients of different ethnic origins [179]. Autopsies were performed in four of the patients and α-syn-positive Lewy body pathology was observed in the GD-vulnerable hippocampal layers CA2-4 [180,181,182]. Meanwhile, Wong et al. studied 7 GD patients with GBA-associated parkinsonism and found α-syn-immunoreactive cortical-type and brain-stem-type Lewy bodies, and Lewy neurites [183]. Subsequent studies have revealed that some of the probands have a positive family history of parkinsonism; specifically, while concurrent GD and PD is rare, the more frequent phenomenon of non-GD diseased family members with early developing PD symptoms has been noted, demonstrating higher PD risk in carriers [184]. In other studies, a higher incidence of the GBA1 mutation was noted in pathologically-confirmed, idiopathic PD brains [179]. GBA1 mutation frequency has shown heterozygous GBA mutations in 10.7%–31.3% of Ashkenazi Jewish patients with PD, and 1.3%–9.4% in other ethnic origins worldwide [185,186,187]. As for the role of GBA1 mutations in PD, there has been a hypothesis for the gain of function, loss of function, and prion-like mechanism [188,189]. Toxic gain of function by GBA1 mutation suggests aberrant misfolded-mutant GCase interaction with cellular protein homeostasis, including the quality control machinery in the ER [190]. The chronic stress of ER combined with ROS accumulation may further lead to widespread cellular dysfunction [191]. Functional loss of GCase activity due to GBA1 mutations have been shown to decrease lysosomal proteolysis, disrupt the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, and interfere with autophagic processes, thereby further inducing α-syn accumulation and neuron toxicity in human midbrain neuron cultures [192]. Prion hypothesis and the possible combination of the second hit hypothesis suggests that a cell-to-cell α-syn transmission through a lipid-rich environment may occur during pathological development [193]. Jakob et al. suggested lysosomal importance in the processing and spreading of aggregated α-syn between neurons in their study of cultured human SH-SY5Y cells, and notably observed that most α-syn co-localized with the lysosomal/endosomal system, both pre- and post-synaptically [24]. Alternatively, α-syn accumulation disrupts GCase trafficking to lysosomes and decreases GCase activity, which may further exacerbate the vicious cycle of protein misfolding underlying GBA-associated PD Lewy body formation [194,195]. Supporting this, enhancing GCase activity has been shown to decrease α-syn accumulation and salvage lysosomal, mitochondrial, and neuronal dysfunction [196]. Further investigation into the mechanisms that contribute to GBA-associated parkinsonism and to identify other risk factors that may function concurrently are required.

4.3. PD Susceptible Gene Mutation and Lysosomal Dysfunction

Several partially-penetrant mutations of PD converge on cellular clearance pathways, this has been observed in several mechanistic studies that have linked lysosomal dysfunction to defective mitochondrial clearance and α-syn toxicity [37]. As such, deletion of mitochondrial proteins PINK1, OPA1, and apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) in a mouse cortical neuron model has resulted in defective lysosomal acidification, decreased lysosomal activity, and large cytoplasmic late-endosome-marker-positive vacuole formation; while further addition of antioxidants to these mitochondria dysfunctional neurons exhibited improvement of decreased lysosomal activity [197,198]. In addition to the critical roles in the well-known mitophagy and proteasome degradation pathways [167,199,200], PINK1/parkin has recently been found to be involved in rapid lysosomal targeting of oxidized mitochondrial proteins via MDVs [201]. McLelland et al. noted that in response to oxidative stress, parkin induces PINK1-dependent mitochondrial vesicles formation which incorporates oxidized cargo and shuttles them to late endosomes for protein degradation [202]. Parkin has also been shown to modulate the endosomal structure and function and has displayed interaction with VPS35 to affect MDVs formation [203]. This vesicular trafficking pathway is PINK1/parkin-dependent, autophagy-independent, and lysosome targeted, hence preserving the integrity of mitochondria. Using PD in vivo and in vitro models, Xu et al. demonstrated that α-syn overexpression activated CMA by elevation of LAMP2A, and that DJ-1 knockout/down suppressed LAMP2A upregulation as well as accelerated LAMP2A degradation in the lysosomes, further inhibiting α-syn degradation [204]. In 2015, Oren et al. also demonstrated rigorous regulation of DJ-1 on the major proteolytic machinery, the 20S proteasome, under the oxidizing environment [205]. The 20S proteasome eliminates oxidative-damaged protein, keeps high maintenance of native intrinsic unstructured proteins for regulatory and signaling events, and plays a part in ubiquitin-independent autophagosome-lysosome fusion [206,207,208]. Lysosomal association of the most frequent PD-associated gene LRRK2, accounting for 40% of genetic cases of PD, has also been connected, depicting interaction with many proteins in the endo-lysosome compartment and the role played in autophagosome formation, lysosome maturation, and lysosome trafficking [209]. Meanwhile, LRRK2 mutations have been shown to interfere with mitochondria fission factor DLP1, causing mitochondrial dynamic imbalance, disturbing mitochondrial quality control. These effects combined lead to the eventual accumulation of damaged mitochondria [210,211].

4.4. Conversely Lysosomal Genes Mutations Link to Parkinson’s Disease

A causal relationship has been identified between heterozygous mutations in the lysosomal P5-type transport ATPase, ATP13A2 gene, which cause an autosomal recessive form of juvenile-onset parkinsonism [212]. The function of ATP13A2 is elusive and its transported substrate still to be identified; however, evidence has shown the role of ATP13A2 in Zn2+, Fe3+ and Mn2+ homeostasis [213,214]. Reports by Grünewald et al. and Gusdon et al. have shown that depletion of the ATP13A2 gene is associated with decreased mitochondrial turnover, impaired lysosomal acidification, proteolytic processing of lysosomal enzymes, and diminished lysosomal-mediated clearance of autophagosomes [215,216]. Another well-known PD-associated lysosomal protein, VPS35, mediates MDVs transport between mitochondria and other cellular compartments and is associated with various neurodegenerative disorders including both PD and Alzheimer’s disease [217,218]. Pathogenic D620N mutation in VPS35 disrupts both endosomal protein trafficking and the other main target, the mitochondria [129]. In addition, investigations of mouse cultured neurons have shown depletion of VPS35 reduces Mfn2 stabilization and impedes mitochondrial fusion, resulting in mitochondrial fragmentation [219]. Drosophila experiments revealed VPS35 part in the PINK1-parkin pathway, in which overexpression of VPS35 salvaged parkin but not PINK1 phenotypes [220]. Tang et al. show in their research specific deletion of the VPS35 gene in mice DA neurons to cause neuronal loss and α-syn accumulation [219]. Identification of PD related genes through GWAS include a signal at chromosome 4p16.3, and one variant was discovered in the human transmembrane protein 175 (TMEM175) [221]. TMEM175 is a lysosomal K+ channel transmembrane protein, whose deficiency has been found to impair lysosomal acidification, causing mitochondrial dysfunction, influencing α-syn phosphorylation, and impairing autophagy [222]. Also noted through the GWAS study, sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 1 (SREBF1) links lipogenesis to PD [223,224]. SREBF1 is a transcriptional activator imperative for the regulation of lysosomal lipid and cholesterol accumulation [225]. Of note, knockdown of the SREBF1 has been shown to block the translocation of parkin to the mitochondria, consequently decreasing mitophagy [226]. The endo-lysosomal pathways, mitochondrial dysfunction, and α-syn aggregation have been extensively documented to be involved in the pathogenesis of PD. Genetic and mechanistic investigations have revealed the intricate interplay of how dysregulation of one system impacts the other two. Whether one of the three factors is dominant or whether they develop concomitantly in the process of PD neurodegeneration remains unclear, however strong associations between the three factors and the disease have been established, akin to traffic jams at overcrowded crossroads (Table 1).

5. Conclusions

The pathogenesis of PD is a multifactorial process, with the primary contributors known to be age, environment, and genetic factors. Although familial parkinsonism makes up less than 10% of adult parkinsonism, the findings generated from these genetic function studies have greatly enhanced the understanding of the processes involved in neuron degeneration. These include mitochondrial dysfunction, disruption of network integrity, and α-syn accumulation. Meanwhile, the functions of the proteasome and endo-lysosomal pathways in cellular degradation are also involved. Mitochondrial dysfunctions, endo-lysosomal disruptions, and α-syn aggregation mutually interact within neurons, while α-syn prion-like propagation may also be associated with PD in an inter-neuronal manner. Both mitochondria and endo-lysosomal dysfunction contribute to the development of α-syn pathology, however, the specific organelle playing the most important role might be decided by individual genetic and environmental factors, based on the highly variable clinical presentations among PD patients. Most likely, a vicious cycle may develop once one system becomes dysfunctional. Although successful therapies to control PD progression have yet to be identified, further elucidation of the precise molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of PD may provide guidance for the development of future therapeutic targets to treat this complex disease.

Funding

This research was funded by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, grant number CMRPG8H0192 and the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan, grant number NMRPG8G6073 (106-2314-B-182A-057-MY3).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Mitochondrial Research Unit for their support. The authors would also like to thank James Waddell for his proofreading and assistance with revision.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

PDParkinson’s disease
APAF1apoptotic peptidase-activating factor 1
α-synalpha-synuclein
Ca2+calcium
CASPcaspase
DAdopaminergic
ERendoplasmic reticulum
ETCelectron transport chain
GDGaucher’s disease
H2O2hydrogen peroxide
IMmitochondrial inner membrane
IMSmitochondrial intermembrane space
MCUmitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter complex
Δψmmitochondrial membrane potential
mPTPmitochondrial permeability transition pore
MOMPmitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization
•OHhydroxyl radical
OMmitochondrial outer membrane
OXPHOSoxidative phosphorylation process
UPRmtmitochondrial unfolded protein response
ROSreactive oxygen species
O2•-superoxide anions radical
VDACvoltage-dependent anion channel

References

  1. GBD 2016 Parkinson’s Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson’s disease, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. Neurol. 2018, 17, 939–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Levy, G.; Tang, M.X.; Louis, E.D.; Cote, L.J.; Alfaro, B.; Mejia, H.; Stern, Y.; Marder, K. The association of incident dementia with mortality in PD. Neurology 2002, 59, 1708–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lees, A.; Eyre, P.; Brown, P. The true face of James Parkinson. Lancet. Neurol. 2018, 17, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Goetz, C.G. The history of Parkinson’s disease: Early clinical descriptions and neurological therapies. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2011, 1, a008862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Curtis, L.; Lees, A.J.; Stern, G.M.; Marmot, M.G. Effect of L-dopa on course of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 1984, 2, 211–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Braak, H.; Del Tredici, K.; Rub, U.; de Vos, R.A.; Jansen Steur, E.N.; Braak, E. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2003, 24, 197–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chandra, R.; Hiniker, A.; Kuo, Y.M.; Nussbaum, R.L.; Liddle, R.A. alpha-Synuclein in gut endocrine cells and its implications for Parkinson’s disease. JCI Insight 2017, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liddle, R.A. Parkinson’s disease from the gut. Brain Res. 2018, 1693, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Todorova, A.; Jenner, P.; Ray Chaudhuri, K. Non-motor Parkinson’s: Integral to motor Parkinson’s, yet often neglected. Pract. Neurol. 2014, 14, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fitzgerald, E.; Murphy, S.; Martinson, H.A. Alpha-Synuclein Pathology and the Role of the Microbiota in Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Emamzadeh, F.N.; Surguchov, A. Parkinson’s Disease: Biomarkers, Treatment, and Risk Factors. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ascherio, A.; Schwarzschild, M.A. The epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease: Risk factors and prevention. Lancet. Neurol. 2016, 15, 1257–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Helley, M.P.; Pinnell, J.; Sportelli, C.; Tieu, K. Mitochondria: A Common Target for Genetic Mutations and Environmental Toxicants in Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zaichick, S.V.; McGrath, K.M.; Caraveo, G. The role of Ca2+ signaling in Parkinson’s disease. Dis. Models Mech. 2017, 10, 519–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Franco-Iborra, S.; Cuadros, T.; Parent, A.; Romero-Gimenez, J.; Vila, M.; Perier, C. Defective mitochondrial protein import contributes to complex I-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Grassi, D.; Howard, S.; Zhou, M.; Diaz-Perez, N.; Urban, N.T.; Guerrero-Given, D.; Kamasawa, N.; Volpicelli-Daley, L.A.; LoGrasso, P.; Lasmezas, C.I. Identification of a highly neurotoxic alpha-synuclein species inducing mitochondrial damage and mitophagy in Parkinson’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E2634–E2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vicario, M.; Cieri, D.; Brini, M.; Cali, T. The Close Encounter Between Alpha-Synuclein and Mitochondria. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Pozo Devoto, V.M.; Falzone, T.L. Mitochondrial dynamics in Parkinson’s disease: A role for alpha-synuclein? Dis. Models Mech. 2017, 10, 1075–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Spinelli, J.B.; Haigis, M.C. The multifaceted contributions of mitochondria to cellular metabolism. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018, 20, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yoo, S.M.; Jung, Y.K. A Molecular Approach to Mitophagy and Mitochondrial Dynamics. Mol. Cells 2018, 41, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eisner, V.; Picard, M.; Hajnóczky, G. Mitochondrial dynamics in adaptive and maladaptive cellular stress responses. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018, 20, 755–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yavich, L.; Tanila, H.; Vepsalainen, S.; Jakala, P. Role of alpha-synuclein in presynaptic dopamine recruitment. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 11165–11170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Haas, R.H. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Aging and Diseases of Aging. Biology 2019, 8, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ganguly, G.; Chakrabarti, S.; Chatterjee, U.; Saso, L. Proteinopathy, oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction: Cross talk in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2017, 11, 797–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Perfeito, R.; Lazaro, D.F.; Outeiro, T.F.; Rego, A.C. Linking alpha-synuclein phosphorylation to reactive oxygen species formation and mitochondrial dysfunction in SH-SY5Y cells. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2014, 62, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Luth, E.S.; Stavrovskaya, I.G.; Bartels, T.; Kristal, B.S.; Selkoe, D.J. Soluble, prefibrillar alpha-synuclein oligomers promote complex I-dependent, Ca2+-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 21490–21507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xie, W.; Chung, K.K. Alpha-synuclein impairs normal dynamics of mitochondria in cell and animal models of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2012, 122, 404–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brundin, P.; Melki, R.; Kopito, R. Prion-like transmission of protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lee, H.J.; Suk, J.E.; Patrick, C.; Bae, E.J.; Cho, J.H.; Rho, S.; Hwang, D.; Masliah, E.; Lee, S.J. Direct transfer of alpha-synuclein from neuron to astroglia causes inflammatory responses in synucleinopathies. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 9262–9272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mercado, G.; Lopez, N.; Martinez, A.; Sardi, S.P.; Hetz, C. A new model to study cell-to-cell transfer of alphaSynuclein in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 503, 1385–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pfanner, N.; Warscheid, B.; Wiedemann, N. Mitochondrial proteins: From biogenesis to functional networks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lin, Y.F.; Haynes, C.M. Metabolism and the UPR(mt). Mol. Cell 2016, 61, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Choi, Y.R.; Cha, S.H.; Kang, S.J.; Kim, J.B.; Jou, I.; Park, S.M. Prion-like Propagation of alpha-Synuclein Is Regulated by the FcgammaRIIB-SHP-1/2 Signaling Pathway in Neurons. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 136–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Alam, P.; Bousset, L.; Melki, R.; Otzen, D.E. alpha-synuclein oligomers and fibrils: A spectrum of species, a spectrum of toxicities. J. Neurochem. 2019, 150, 522–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Riboldi, G.M.; Di Fonzo, A.B. GBA, Gaucher Disease, and Parkinson’s Disease: From Genetic to Clinic to New Therapeutic Approaches. Cells 2019, 8, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mazzulli, J.R.; Xu, Y.H.; Sun, Y.; Knight, A.L.; McLean, P.J.; Caldwell, G.A.; Sidransky, E.; Grabowski, G.A.; Krainc, D. Gaucher disease glucocerebrosidase and alpha-synuclein form a bidirectional pathogenic loop in synucleinopathies. Cell 2011, 146, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Klein, A.D.; Mazzulli, J.R. Is Parkinson’s disease a lysosomal disorder? Brain J. Neurol. 2018, 141, 2255–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Haddad, D.; Nakamura, K. Understanding the susceptibility of dopamine neurons to mitochondrial stressors in Parkinson’s disease. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 3702–3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bolam, J.P.; Pissadaki, E.K. Living on the edge with too many mouths to feed: Why dopamine neurons die. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 2012, 27, 1478–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hunn, B.H.; Cragg, S.J.; Bolam, J.P.; Spillantini, M.G.; Wade-Martins, R. Impaired intracellular trafficking defines early Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 2015, 38, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zeng, X.S.; Geng, W.S.; Jia, J.J.; Chen, L.; Zhang, P.P. Cellular and Molecular Basis of Neurodegeneration in Parkinson Disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Telford, J.E.; Kilbride, S.M.; Davey, G.P. Complex I is rate-limiting for oxygen consumption in the nerve terminal. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 9109–9114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Martinez, T.N.; Greenamyre, J.T. Toxin models of mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 16, 920–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cooper, G.M. The Cell A Molecular Approach; Sinauer Associates Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  45. Leveille, C.F.; Mikhaeil, J.S.; Turner, K.D.; Silvera, S.; Wilkinson, J.; Fajardo, V.A. Mitochondrial cristae density: A dynamic entity that is critical for energy production and metabolic power in skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 2017, 595, 2779–2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mitchell, P. Chemiosmotic coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation. 1966. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta 2011, 1807, 1507–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lu, B. Mitochondrial Dynamics and Neurodegeneration; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  48. Jang, Y.H.; Lim, K.I. Recent Advances in Mitochondria-Targeted Gene Delivery. Molecules 2018, 23, 2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wiedemann, N.; Pfanner, N. Mitochondrial Machineries for Protein Import and Assembly. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017, 86, 685–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Munro, D.; Treberg, J.R. A radical shift in perspective: Mitochondria as regulators of reactive oxygen species. J. Exp. Biol. 2017, 220, 1170–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Liu, X.L.; Wang, Y.D.; Yu, X.M.; Li, D.W.; Li, G.R. Mitochondria-mediated damage to dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson’s disease (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 41, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Vikash, V.; Ye, Q.; Wu, D.; Liu, Y.; Dong, W. ROS and ROS-Mediated Cellular Signaling. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 4350965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hekimi, S.; Wang, Y.; Noe, A. Mitochondrial ROS and the Effectors of the Intrinsic Apoptotic Pathway in Aging Cells: The Discerning Killers! Front. Genet. 2016, 7, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Salim, S. Oxidative Stress and the Central Nervous System. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2017, 360, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. James, A.M.; Murphy, M.P. How mitochondrial damage affects cell function. J. Biomed. Sci. 2002, 9, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Liou, C.W.; Chuang, J.H.; Chen, J.B.; Tiao, M.M.; Wang, P.W.; Huang, S.T.; Huang, T.L.; Lee, W.C.; Weng, S.W.; Huang, P.H.; et al. Mitochondrial DNA variants as genetic risk factors for Parkinson disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2016, 23, 1289–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Raffaello, A.; Mammucari, C.; Gherardi, G.; Rizzuto, R. Calcium at the Center of Cell Signaling: Interplay between Endoplasmic Reticulum, Mitochondria, and Lysosomes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016, 41, 1035–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Boulware, M.J.; Marchant, J.S. Timing in cellular Ca2+ signaling. Curr. Biol. CB 2008, 18, R769–R776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Clapham, D.E. Calcium signaling. Cell 2007, 131, 1047–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Feng, Z.; Zhang, J.T. Central nervous system calcium homeostasis imbalance and brain aging. Sheng Li Ke Xue Jin Zhan Prog. Physiol. 2000, 31, 102–108. [Google Scholar]
  61. Giorgi, C.; Marchi, S.; Pinton, P. The machineries, regulation and cellular functions of mitochondrial calcium. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 713–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Feno, S.; Butera, G.; Vecellio Reane, D.; Rizzuto, R.; Raffaello, A. Crosstalk between Calcium and ROS in Pathophysiological Conditions. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 9324018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Romero-Garcia, S.; Prado-Garcia, H. Mitochondrial calcium: Transport and modulation of cellular processes in homeostasis and cancer (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 54, 1155–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Martinvalet, D. The role of the mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum contact sites in the development of the immune responses. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rieusset, J. The role of endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria contact sites in the control of glucose homeostasis: An update. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Brookes, P.S.; Yoon, Y.; Robotham, J.L.; Anders, M.W.; Sheu, S.S. Calcium, ATP, and ROS: A mitochondrial love-hate triangle. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2004, 287, C817–C833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mnatsakanyan, N.; Beutner, G.; Porter, G.A.; Alavian, K.N.; Jonas, E.A. Physiological roles of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2017, 49, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zorov, D.B.; Juhaszova, M.; Sollott, S.J. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-induced ROS release. Physiol. Rev. 2014, 94, 909–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhao, X.Y.; Lu, M.H.; Yuan, D.J.; Xu, D.E.; Yao, P.P.; Ji, W.L.; Chen, H.; Liu, W.L.; Yan, C.X.; Xia, Y.Y.; et al. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Neural Injury. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Ashkenazi, A.; Salvesen, G. Regulated Cell Death: Signaling and Mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014, 30, 337–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tang, D.; Kang, R.; Berghe, T.V.; Vandenabeele, P.; Kroemer, G. The molecular machinery of regulated cell death. Cell Res. 2019, 29, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Riedl, S.J.; Salvesen, G.S. The apoptosome: Signalling platform of cell death. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chipuk, J.E.; Green, D.R. How do BCL-2 proteins induce mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization? Trends Cell Biol. 2008, 18, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Doherty, J.; Baehrecke, E.H. Life, death and autophagy. Nat. Cell Biol 2018, 20, 1110–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Haelterman, N.A.; Yoon, W.H.; Sandoval, H.; Jaiswal, M.; Shulman, J.M.; Bellen, H.J. A mitocentric view of Parkinson’s disease. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 37, 137–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chan, D.C. Mitochondrial fusion and fission in mammals. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 22, 79–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Naresh, N.U.; Haynes, C.M. Signaling and Regulation of the Mitochondrial Unfolded Protein Response. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jovaisaite, V.; Mouchiroud, L.; Auwerx, J. The mitochondrial unfolded protein response, a conserved stress response pathway with implications in health and disease. J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Liu, J.; Liu, W.; Li, R.; Yang, H. Mitophagy in Parkinson’s Disease: From Pathogenesis to Treatment. Cells 2019, 8, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Misgeld, T.; Schwarz, T.L. Mitostasis in Neurons: Maintaining Mitochondria in an Extended Cellular Architecture. Neuron 2017, 96, 651–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Larsen, S.B.; Hanss, Z.; Kruger, R. The genetic architecture of mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Cell Tissue Res. 2018, 373, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Green, D.R.; Levine, B. To be or not to be? How selective autophagy and cell death govern cell fate. Cell 2014, 157, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Galluzzi, L.; Baehrecke, E.H.; Ballabio, A.; Boya, P.; Bravo-San Pedro, J.M.; Cecconi, F.; Choi, A.M.; Chu, C.T.; Codogno, P.; Colombo, M.I.; et al. Molecular definitions of autophagy and related processes. EMBO J. 2017, 36, 1811–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Tekirdag, K.; Cuervo, A.M. Chaperone-mediated autophagy and endosomal microautophagy: Joint by a chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 5414–5424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Oku, M.; Sakai, Y. Three Distinct Types of Microautophagy Based on Membrane Dynamics and Molecular Machineries. Bioessays News Rev. Mol. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2018, 40, e1800008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Kaushik, S.; Cuervo, A.M. The coming of age of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 365–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Dikic, I.; Elazar, Z. Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 349–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Feng, Y.; Kang, H.H.; Wong, P.M.; Gao, M.; Wang, P.; Jiang, X. Unc-51-like kinase (ULK) complex-independent autophagy induced by hypoxia. Protein Cell 2019, 10, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hurley, J.H.; Young, L.N. Mechanisms of Autophagy Initiation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017, 86, 225–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wirth, M.; Zhang, W.; Razi, M.; Nyoni, L.; Joshi, D.; O’Reilly, N.; Johansen, T.; Tooze, S.A.; Mouilleron, S. Molecular determinants regulating selective binding of autophagy adapters and receptors to ATG8 proteins. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Johansen, T.; Lamark, T. Selective Autophagy: ATG8 Family Proteins, LIR Motifs and Cargo Receptors. J. Mol. Biol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wild, P.; McEwan, D.G.; Dikic, I. The LC3 interactome at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Klionsky, D.J.; Eskelinen, E.L.; Deretic, V. Autophagosomes, phagosomes, autolysosomes, phagolysosomes, autophagolysosomes... wait, I’m confused. Autophagy 2014, 10, 549–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhu, Z.; Yang, C.; Iyaswamy, A.; Krishnamoorthi, S.; Sreenivasmurthy, S.G.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Tong, B.C.; Song, J.; Lu, J.; et al. Balancing mTOR Signaling and Autophagy in the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Nicklas, W.J.; Youngster, S.K.; Kindt, M.V.; Heikkila, R.E. MPTP, MPP+ and mitochondrial function. Life Sci. 1987, 40, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Davis, G.C.; Williams, A.C.; Markey, S.P.; Ebert, M.H.; Caine, E.D.; Reichert, C.M.; Kopin, I.J. Chronic Parkinsonism secondary to intravenous injection of meperidine analogues. Psychiatry Res. 1979, 1, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Terron, A.; Bal-Price, A.; Paini, A.; Monnet-Tschudi, F.; Bennekou, S.H.; Members, E.W.E.; Leist, M.; Schildknecht, S. An adverse outcome pathway for parkinsonian motor deficits associated with mitochondrial complex I inhibition. Arch. Toxicol. 2018, 92, 41–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Tanner, C.M.; Kamel, F.; Ross, G.W.; Hoppin, J.A.; Goldman, S.M.; Korell, M.; Marras, C.; Bhudhikanok, G.S.; Kasten, M.; Chade, A.R.; et al. Rotenone, paraquat, and Parkinson’s disease. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 866–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lin, T.K.; Chen, S.D.; Chuang, Y.C.; Lin, H.Y.; Huang, C.R.; Chuang, J.H.; Wang, P.W.; Huang, S.T.; Tiao, M.M.; Chen, J.B.; et al. Resveratrol partially prevents rotenone-induced neurotoxicity in dopaminergic SH-SY5Y cells through induction of heme oxygenase-1 dependent autophagy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 1625–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Greenamyre, J.T.; Cannon, J.R.; Drolet, R.; Mastroberardino, P.G. Lessons from the rotenone model of Parkinson’s disease. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2010, 31, 141–142; author reply 142–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lin, K.L.; Lin, K.J.; Wang, P.W.; Chuang, J.H.; Lin, H.Y.; Chen, S.D.; Chuang, Y.C.; Huang, S.T.; Tiao, M.M.; Chen, J.B.; et al. Resveratrol provides neuroprotective effects through modulation of mitochondrial dynamics and ERK1/2 regulated autophagy. Free Radic. Res. 2018, 52, 1371–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Nagoshi, E. Drosophila Models of Sporadic Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Truban, D.; Hou, X.; Caulfield, T.R.; Fiesel, F.C.; Springer, W. PINK1, Parkin, and Mitochondrial Quality Control: What can we Learn about Parkinson’s Disease Pathobiology? J. Parkinson’s Dis. 2017, 7, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tang, B.L. MIRO GTPases in Mitochondrial Transport, Homeostasis and Pathology. Cells 2016, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Wang, X.; Winter, D.; Ashrafi, G.; Schlehe, J.; Wong, Y.L.; Selkoe, D.; Rice, S.; Steen, J.; LaVoie, M.J.; Schwarz, T.L. PINK1 and Parkin target Miro for phosphorylation and degradation to arrest mitochondrial motility. Cell 2011, 147, 893–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Lee, Y.; Stevens, D.A.; Kang, S.U.; Jiang, H.; Lee, Y.I.; Ko, H.S.; Scarffe, L.A.; Umanah, G.E.; Kang, H.; Ham, S.; et al. PINK1 Primes Parkin-Mediated Ubiquitination of PARIS in Dopaminergic Neuronal Survival. Cell Rep. 2017, 18, 918–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Bernardini, J.P.; Brouwer, J.M.; Tan, I.K.; Sandow, J.J.; Huang, S.; Stafford, C.A.; Bankovacki, A.; Riffkin, C.D.; Wardak, A.Z.; Czabotar, P.E.; et al. Parkin inhibits BAK and BAX apoptotic function by distinct mechanisms during mitophagy. EMBO J. 2019, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Burchell, V.S.; Nelson, D.E.; Sanchez-Martinez, A.; Delgado-Camprubi, M.; Ivatt, R.M.; Pogson, J.H.; Randle, S.J.; Wray, S.; Lewis, P.A.; Houlden, H.; et al. The Parkinson’s disease-linked proteins Fbxo7 and Parkin interact to mediate mitophagy. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mita, Y.; Kataoka, Y.; Saito, Y.; Kashi, T.; Hayashi, K.; Iwasaki, A.; Imanishi, T.; Miyasaka, T.; Noguchi, N. Distribution of oxidized DJ-1 in Parkinson’s disease-related sites in the brain and in the peripheral tissues: Effects of aging and a neurotoxin. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chen, S.; Annesley, S.J.; Jasim, R.A.F.; Musco, V.J.; Sanislav, O.; Fisher, P.R. The Parkinson’s disease-associated protein DJ-1 plays a positive nonmitochondrial role in endocytosis in Dictyostelium cells. Dis. Models Mech. 2017, 10, 1261–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Matsuda, N.; Kimura, M.; Queliconi, B.B.; Kojima, W.; Mishima, M.; Takagi, K.; Koyano, F.; Yamano, K.; Mizushima, T.; Ito, Y.; et al. Parkinson’s disease-related DJ-1 functions in thiol quality control against aldehyde attack in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Biosa, A.; Sandrelli, F.; Beltramini, M.; Greggio, E.; Bubacco, L.; Bisaglia, M. Recent findings on the physiological function of DJ-1: Beyond Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2017, 108, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Takahashi-Niki, K.; Niki, T.; Iguchi-Ariga, S.; Ariga, H. Function of DJ-1 in mitochondria. Yakugaku Zasshi J. Pharm. Soc. Jpn. 2012, 132, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Ariga, H.; Takahashi-Niki, K.; Kato, I.; Maita, H.; Niki, T.; Iguchi-Ariga, S.M. Neuroprotective function of DJ-1 in Parkinson’s disease. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013, 683920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Larsen, N.J.; Ambrosi, G.; Mullett, S.J.; Berman, S.B.; Hinkle, D.A. DJ-1 knock-down impairs astrocyte mitochondrial function. Neuroscience 2011, 196, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Strobbe, D.; Robinson, A.A.; Harvey, K.; Rossi, L.; Ferraina, C.; de Biase, V.; Rodolfo, C.; Harvey, R.J.; Campanella, M. Distinct Mechanisms of Pathogenic DJ-1 Mutations in Mitochondrial Quality Control. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 11, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Sharma, N.; Rao, S.P.; Kalivendi, S.V. The deglycase activity of DJ-1 mitigates alpha-synuclein glycation and aggregation in dopaminergic cells: Role of oxidative stress mediated downregulation of DJ-1 in Parkinson’s disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 135, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bento, C.F.; Ashkenazi, A.; Jimenez-Sanchez, M.; Rubinsztein, D.C. The Parkinson’s disease-associated genes ATP13A2 and SYT11 regulate autophagy via a common pathway. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Sang, Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Qi, L.; Sun, W.; Wang, W.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, H. CircSNCA downregulation by pramipexole treatment mediates cell apoptosis and autophagy in Parkinson’s disease by targeting miR-7. Aging 2018, 10, 1281–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Pozo Devoto, V.M.; Dimopoulos, N.; Alloatti, M.; Pardi, M.B.; Saez, T.M.; Otero, M.G.; Cromberg, L.E.; Marin-Burgin, A.; Scassa, M.E.; Stokin, G.B.; et al. alphaSynuclein control of mitochondrial homeostasis in human-derived neurons is disrupted by mutations associated with Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Paillusson, S.; Gomez-Suaga, P.; Stoica, R.; Little, D.; Gissen, P.; Devine, M.J.; Noble, W.; Hanger, D.P.; Miller, C.C.J. alpha-Synuclein binds to the ER-mitochondria tethering protein VAPB to disrupt Ca(2+) homeostasis and mitochondrial ATP production. Acta Neuropathol. 2017, 134, 129–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Faustini, G.; Bono, F.; Valerio, A.; Pizzi, M.; Spano, P.; Bellucci, A. Mitochondria and alpha-Synuclein: Friends or Foes in the Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s Disease? Genes 2017, 8, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Siddiqui, I.J.; Pervaiz, N.; Abbasi, A.A. The Parkinson Disease gene SNCA: Evolutionary and structural insights with pathological implication. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Di Maio, R.; Barrett, P.J.; Hoffman, E.K.; Barrett, C.W.; Zharikov, A.; Borah, A.; Hu, X.; McCoy, J.; Chu, C.T.; Burton, E.A.; et al. alpha-Synuclein binds to TOM20 and inhibits mitochondrial protein import in Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 342ra378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Alegre-Abarrategui, J.; Christian, H.; Lufino, M.M.; Mutihac, R.; Venda, L.L.; Ansorge, O.; Wade-Martins, R. LRRK2 regulates autophagic activity and localizes to specific membrane microdomains in a novel human genomic reporter cellular model. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 4022–4034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Xiong, Y.; Dawson, T.M.; Dawson, V.L. Models of LRRK2-Associated Parkinson’s Disease. Adv. Neurobiol. 2017, 14, 163–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Li, J.-Q.; Tan, L.; Yu, J.-T. The role of the LRRK2 gene in Parkinsonism. Mol. Neurodegener. 2014, 9, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Sugiura, A.; McLelland, G.L.; Fon, E.A.; McBride, H.M. A new pathway for mitochondrial quality control: Mitochondrial-derived vesicles. EMBO J. 2014, 33, 2142–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Fujioka, H.; Hoppel, C.; Whone, A.L.; Caldwell, M.A.; Cullen, P.J.; Liu, J.; Zhu, X. Parkinson’s disease-associated mutant VPS35 causes mitochondrial dysfunction by recycling DLP1 complexes. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Thomas, B.; Beal, M.F. Mitochondrial therapies for Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 2010, 25 (Suppl. 1), S155–S160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Murphy, M.P.; Hartley, R.C. Mitochondria as a therapeutic target for common pathologies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018, 17, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ying, W.; Alano, C.C.; Garnier, P.; Swanson, R.A. NAD+ as a metabolic link between DNA damage and cell death. J. Neurosci. Res. 2005, 79, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Rajman, L.; Chwalek, K.; Sinclair, D.A. Therapeutic Potential of NAD-Boosting Molecules: The In Vivo Evidence. Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 529–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Connell, N.J.; Houtkooper, R.H.; Schrauwen, P. NAD(+) metabolism as a target for metabolic health: Have we found the silver bullet? Diabetologia 2019, 62, 888–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Whitaker, R.M.; Corum, D.; Beeson, C.C.; Schnellmann, R.G. Mitochondrial Biogenesis as a Pharmacological Target: A New Approach to Acute and Chronic Diseases. Annu. Rev. Pharm. Toxicol. 2016, 56, 229–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Gureev, A.P.; Shaforostova, E.A.; Popov, V.N. Regulation of Mitochondrial Biogenesis as a Way for Active Longevity: Interaction Between the Nrf2 and PGC-1alpha Signaling Pathways. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Piantadosi, C.A.; Suliman, H.B. Redox regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 2043–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Lin, T.K.; Chen, S.D.; Chuang, Y.C.; Lan, M.Y.; Chuang, J.H.; Wang, P.W.; Hsu, T.Y.; Wang, F.S.; Tsai, M.H.; Huang, S.T.; et al. Mitochondrial Transfer of Wharton’s Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells Eliminates Mutation Burden and Rescues Mitochondrial Bioenergetics in Rotenone-Stressed MELAS Fibroblasts. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 9537504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sorrentino, V.; Romani, M.; Mouchiroud, L.; Beck, J.S.; Zhang, H.; D’Amico, D.; Moullan, N.; Potenza, F.; Schmid, A.W.; Rietsch, S.; et al. Enhancing mitochondrial proteostasis reduces amyloid-beta proteotoxicity. Nature 2017, 552, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zhang, W.; Wang, T.; Pei, Z.; Miller, D.S.; Wu, X.; Block, M.L.; Wilson, B.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, Y.; Hong, J.S.; et al. Aggregated alpha-synuclein activates microglia: A process leading to disease progression in Parkinson’s disease. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Westphal, C.H.; Chandra, S.S. Monomeric synucleins generate membrane curvature. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 1829–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mor, D.E.; Tsika, E.; Mazzulli, J.R.; Gould, N.S.; Kim, H.; Daniels, M.J.; Doshi, S.; Gupta, P.; Grossman, J.L.; Tan, V.X.; et al. Dopamine induces soluble α-synuclein oligomers and nigrostriatal degeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Li, J.D. The Roles of Post-translational Modifications on alpha-Synuclein in the Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s Diseases. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Flagmeier, P.; Meisl, G.; Vendruscolo, M.; Knowles, T.P.; Dobson, C.M.; Buell, A.K.; Galvagnion, C. Mutations associated with familial Parkinson’s disease alter the initiation and amplification steps of alpha-synuclein aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 10328–10333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Goedert, M.; Jakes, R.; Spillantini, M.G. The Synucleinopathies: Twenty Years On. J. Parkinsons Dis 2017, 7, S53–S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Dettmer, U.; Newman, A.J.; Soldner, F.; Luth, E.S.; Kim, N.C.; von Saucken, V.E.; Sanderson, J.B.; Jaenisch, R.; Bartels, T.; Selkoe, D. Parkinson-causing α-synuclein missense mutations shift native tetramers to monomers as a mechanism for disease initiation. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Roeters, S.J.; Iyer, A.; Pletikapić, G.; Kogan, V.; Subramaniam, V.; Woutersen, S. Evidence for Intramolecular Antiparallel Beta-Sheet Structure in Alpha-Synuclein Fibrils from a Combination of Two-Dimensional Infrared Spectroscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Pieri, L.; Madiona, K.; Melki, R. Structural and functional properties of prefibrillar alpha-synuclein oligomers. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Parnetti, L.; Chiasserini, D.; Persichetti, E.; Eusebi, P.; Varghese, S.; Qureshi, M.M.; Dardis, A.; Deganuto, M.; De Carlo, C.; Castrioto, A.; et al. Cerebrospinal fluid lysosomal enzymes and alpha-synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 2014, 29, 1019–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. More, S.V.; Kumar, H.; Kim, I.S.; Song, S.Y.; Choi, D.K. Cellular and molecular mediators of neuroinflammation in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Mediat. Inflamm. 2013, 2013, 952375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Dieriks, B.V.; Park, T.I.H.; Fourie, C.; Faull, R.L.M.; Dragunow, M.; Curtis, M.A. α-synuclein transfer through tunneling nanotubes occurs in SH-SY5Y cells and primary brain pericytes from Parkinson’s disease patients. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Domert, J.; Sackmann, C.; Severinsson, E.; Agholme, L.; Bergström, J.; Ingelsson, M.; Hallbeck, M. Aggregated Alpha-Synuclein Transfer Efficiently between Cultured Human Neuron-Like Cells and Localize to Lysosomes. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Lashuel, H.A.; Overk, C.R.; Oueslati, A.; Masliah, E. The many faces of alpha-synuclein: From structure and toxicity to therapeutic target. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 2013, 14, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Limanaqi, F.; Biagioni, F.; Busceti, C.L.; Ryskalin, L.; Polzella, M.; Frati, A.; Fornai, F. Phytochemicals Bridging Autophagy Induction and Alpha-Synuclein Degradation in Parkinsonism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Rott, R.; Szargel, R.; Shani, V.; Hamza, H.; Savyon, M.; Abd Elghani, F.; Bandopadhyay, R.; Engelender, S. SUMOylation and ubiquitination reciprocally regulate alpha-synuclein degradation and pathological aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 13176–13181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Arotcarena, M.L.; Teil, M.; Dehay, B. Autophagy in Synucleinopathy: The Overwhelmed and Defective Machinery. Cells 2019, 8, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Guardia-Laguarta, C.; Area-Gomez, E.; Rub, C.; Liu, Y.; Magrane, J.; Becker, D.; Voos, W.; Schon, E.A.; Przedborski, S. alpha-Synuclein is localized to mitochondria-associated ER membranes. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Melo, T.Q.; Copray, S.; Ferrari, M.F.R. Alpha-Synuclein Toxicity on Protein Quality Control, Mitochondria and Endoplasmic Reticulum. Neurochem. Res. 2018, 43, 2212–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Miraglia, F.; Ricci, A.; Rota, L.; Colla, E. Subcellular localization of alpha-synuclein aggregates and their interaction with membranes. Neural Regen. Res. 2018, 13, 1136–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ludtmann, M.H.R.; Angelova, P.R.; Horrocks, M.H.; Choi, M.L.; Rodrigues, M.; Baev, A.Y.; Berezhnov, A.V.; Yao, Z.; Little, D.; Banushi, B.; et al. α-synuclein oligomers interact with ATP synthase and open the permeability transition pore in Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Cole, N.B.; Dieuliis, D.; Leo, P.; Mitchell, D.C.; Nussbaum, R.L. Mitochondrial translocation of alpha-synuclein is promoted by intracellular acidification. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314, 2076–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ludtmann, M.H.; Angelova, P.R.; Ninkina, N.N.; Gandhi, S.; Buchman, V.L.; Abramov, A.Y. Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 10510–10521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Schaser, A.J.; Osterberg, V.R.; Dent, S.E.; Stackhouse, T.L.; Wakeham, C.M.; Boutros, S.W.; Weston, L.J.; Owen, N.; Weissman, T.A.; Luna, E.; et al. Alpha-synuclein is a DNA binding protein that modulates DNA repair with implications for Lewy body disorders. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Pinho, R.; Paiva, I.; Jercic, K.G.; Fonseca-Ornelas, L.; Gerhardt, E.; Fahlbusch, C.; Garcia-Esparcia, P.; Kerimoglu, C.; Pavlou, M.A.S.; Villar-Pique, A.; et al. Nuclear localization and phosphorylation modulate pathological effects of alpha-synuclein. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019, 28, 31–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Wong, Y.C.; Krainc, D. alpha-synuclein toxicity in neurodegeneration: Mechanism and therapeutic strategies. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Loria, F.; Vargas, J.Y.; Bousset, L.; Syan, S.; Salles, A.; Melki, R.; Zurzolo, C. α-Synuclein transfer between neurons and astrocytes indicates that astrocytes play a role in degradation rather than in spreading. Acta Neuropathol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Wong, E.; Cuervo, A.M. Integration of clearance mechanisms: The proteasome and autophagy. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a006734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Lawrence, R.E.; Zoncu, R. The lysosome as a cellular centre for signalling, metabolism and quality control. Nat. Cell Biol 2019, 21, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Rowland, A.A.; Chitwood, P.J.; Phillips, M.J.; Voeltz, G.K. ER contact sites define the position and timing of endosome fission. Cell 2014, 159, 1027–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Hosios, A.M.; Manning, B.D. Lysosomal catch-and-release controls mTORC1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018, 20, 996–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Nezich, C.L.; Wang, C.; Fogel, A.I.; Youle, R.J. MiT/TFE transcription factors are activated during mitophagy downstream of Parkin and Atg5. J. Cell Biol. 2015, 210, 435–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Puertollano, R.; Ferguson, S.M.; Brugarolas, J.; Ballabio, A. The complex relationship between TFEB transcription factor phosphorylation and subcellular localization. EMBO J. 2018, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Napolitano, G.; Ballabio, A. TFEB at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 2475–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Lim, C.Y.; Zoncu, R. The lysosome as a command-and-control center for cellular metabolism. J. Cell Biol. 2016, 214, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Audano, M.; Schneider, A.; Mitro, N. Mitochondria, lysosomes, and dysfunction: Their meaning in neurodegeneration. J. Neurochem. 2018, 147, 291–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Tayebi, N.; Callahan, M.; Madike, V.; Stubblefield, B.K.; Orvisky, E.; Krasnewich, D.; Fillano, J.J.; Sidransky, E. Gaucher disease and parkinsonism: A phenotypic and genotypic characterization. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2001, 73, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Machaczka, M.; Rucinska, M.; Skotnicki, A.B.; Jurczak, W. Parkinson’s syndrome preceding clinical manifestation of Gaucher’s disease. Am. J. Hematol. 1999, 61, 216–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Schöndorf, D.C.; Aureli, M.; McAllister, F.E.; Hindley, C.J.; Mayer, F.; Schmid, B.; Sardi, S.P.; Valsecchi, M.; Hoffmann, S.; Schwarz, L.K.; et al. iPSC-derived neurons from GBA1-associated Parkinson’s disease patients show autophagic defects and impaired calcium homeostasis. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Sidransky, E.; Lopez, G. The link between the GBA gene and parkinsonism. Lancet. Neurol. 2012, 11, 986–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Bembi, B.; Zambito Marsala, S.; Sidransky, E.; Ciana, G.; Carrozzi, M.; Zorzon, M.; Martini, C.; Gioulis, M.; Pittis, M.G.; Capus, L. Gaucher’s disease with Parkinson’s disease: Clinical and pathological aspects. Neurology 2003, 61, 99–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Sidransky, E. Gaucher disease and parkinsonism. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2005, 84, 302–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Hruska, K.S.; Goker-Alpan, O.; Sidransky, E. Gaucher disease and the synucleinopathies. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2006, 2006, 78549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Wong, K.; Sidransky, E.; Verma, A.; Mixon, T.; Sandberg, G.D.; Wakefield, L.K.; Morrison, A.; Lwin, A.; Colegial, C.; Allman, J.M.; et al. Neuropathology provides clues to the pathophysiology of Gaucher disease. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2004, 82, 192–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Tayebi, N.; Walker, J.; Stubblefield, B.; Orvisky, E.; LaMarca, M.E.; Wong, K.; Rosenbaum, H.; Schiffmann, R.; Bembi, B.; Sidransky, E. Gaucher disease with parkinsonian manifestations: Does glucocerebrosidase deficiency contribute to a vulnerability to parkinsonism? Mol. Genet. Metab. 2003, 79, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Aharon-Peretz, J.; Rosenbaum, H.; Gershoni-Baruch, R. Mutations in the glucocerebrosidase gene and Parkinson’s disease in Ashkenazi Jews. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 1972–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Toft, M.; Pielsticker, L.; Ross, O.A.; Aasly, J.O.; Farrer, M.J. Glucocerebrosidase gene mutations and Parkinson disease in the Norwegian population. Neurology 2006, 66, 415–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Wu, Y.R.; Chen, C.M.; Chao, C.Y.; Ro, L.S.; Lyu, R.K.; Chang, K.H.; Lee-Chen, G.J. Glucocerebrosidase gene mutation is a risk factor for early onset of Parkinson disease among Taiwanese. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007, 78, 977–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Migdalska-Richards, A.; Schapira, A.H. The relationship between glucocerebrosidase mutations and Parkinson disease. J. Neurochem. 2016, 139 (Suppl. 1), 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Bengoa-Vergniory, N.; Roberts, R.F.; Wade-Martins, R.; Alegre-Abarrategui, J. Alpha-synuclein oligomers: A new hope. Acta Neuropathol. 2017, 134, 819–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Fernandes, H.J.; Hartfield, E.M.; Christian, H.C.; Emmanoulidou, E.; Zheng, Y.; Booth, H.; Bogetofte, H.; Lang, C.; Ryan, B.J.; Sardi, S.P.; et al. ER Stress and Autophagic Perturbations Lead to Elevated Extracellular alpha-Synuclein in GBA-N370S Parkinson’s iPSC-Derived Dopamine Neurons. Stem Cell Rep. 2016, 6, 342–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Goker-Alpan, O.; Stubblefield, B.K.; Giasson, B.I.; Sidransky, E. Glucocerebrosidase is present in alpha-synuclein inclusions in Lewy body disorders. Acta Neuropathol. 2010, 120, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Sidransky, E.; Nalls, M.A.; Aasly, J.O.; Aharon-Peretz, J.; Annesi, G.; Barbosa, E.R.; Bar-Shira, A.; Berg, D.; Bras, J.; Brice, A.; et al. Multicenter analysis of glucocerebrosidase mutations in Parkinson’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 1651–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Goldin, E. Gaucher disease and parkinsonism, a molecular link theory. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2010, 101, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  194. Bras, J.; Singleton, A.; Cookson, M.R.; Hardy, J. Emerging pathways in genetic Parkinson’s disease: Potential role of ceramide metabolism in Lewy body disease. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 5767–5773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Wong, Y.C.; Krainc, D. Lysosomal trafficking defects link Parkinson’s disease with Gaucher’s disease. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 2016, 31, 1610–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Mazzulli, J.R.; Zunke, F.; Tsunemi, T.; Toker, N.J.; Jeon, S.; Burbulla, L.F.; Patnaik, S.; Sidransky, E.; Marugan, J.J.; Sue, C.M.; et al. Activation of beta-Glucocerebrosidase Reduces Pathological alpha-Synuclein and Restores Lysosomal Function in Parkinson’s Patient Midbrain Neurons. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 7693–7706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Gomez-Sanchez, R.; Yakhine-Diop, S.M.; Bravo-San Pedro, J.M.; Pizarro-Estrella, E.; Rodriguez-Arribas, M.; Climent, V.; Martin-Cano, F.E.; Gonzalez-Soltero, M.E.; Tandon, A.; Fuentes, J.M.; et al. PINK1 deficiency enhances autophagy and mitophagy induction. Mol. Cell. Oncol. 2016, 3, e1046579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Demers-Lamarche, J.; Guillebaud, G.; Tlili, M.; Todkar, K.; Belanger, N.; Grondin, M.; Nguyen, A.P.; Michel, J.; Germain, M. Loss of Mitochondrial Function Impairs Lysosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 10263–10276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Akabane, S.; Matsuzaki, K.; Yamashita, S.; Arai, K.; Okatsu, K.; Kanki, T.; Matsuda, N.; Oka, T. Constitutive Activation of PINK1 Protein Leads to Proteasome-mediated and Non-apoptotic Cell Death Independently of Mitochondrial Autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 16162–16174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Bragoszewski, P.; Turek, M.; Chacinska, A. Control of mitochondrial biogenesis and function by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Open Biol. 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Roberts, R.F.; Tang, M.Y.; Fon, E.A.; Durcan, T.M. Defending the mitochondria: The pathways of mitophagy and mitochondrial-derived vesicles. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2016, 79, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. McLelland, G.L.; Soubannier, V.; Chen, C.X.; McBride, H.M.; Fon, E.A. Parkin and PINK1 function in a vesicular trafficking pathway regulating mitochondrial quality control. EMBO J. 2014, 33, 282–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Song, P.; Trajkovic, K.; Tsunemi, T.; Krainc, D. Parkin Modulates Endosomal Organization and Function of the Endo-Lysosomal Pathway. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 2425–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Xu, C.Y.; Kang, W.Y.; Chen, Y.M.; Jiang, T.F.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.N.; Ding, J.Q.; Liu, J.; Chen, S.D. DJ-1 Inhibits alpha-Synuclein Aggregation by Regulating Chaperone-Mediated Autophagy. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Kumar Deshmukh, F.; Yaffe, D.; Olshina, M.A.; Ben-Nissan, G.; Sharon, M. The Contribution of the 20S Proteasome to Proteostasis. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Moscovitz, O.; Ben-Nissan, G.; Fainer, I.; Pollack, D.; Mizrachi, L.; Sharon, M. The Parkinson’s-associated protein DJ-1 regulates the 20S proteasome. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Tanaka, K. The proteasome: Overview of structure and functions. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2009, 85, 12–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Njomen, E.; Tepe, J.J. Regulation of Autophagic Flux by the 20S Proteasome. Cell Chem. Biol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Hockey, L.N.; Kilpatrick, B.S.; Eden, E.R.; Lin-Moshier, Y.; Brailoiu, G.C.; Brailoiu, E.; Futter, C.E.; Schapira, A.H.; Marchant, J.S.; Patel, S. Dysregulation of lysosomal morphology by pathogenic LRRK2 is corrected by TPC2 inhibition. J. Cell Sci. 2015, 128, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Singh, A.; Zhi, L.; Zhang, H. LRRK2 and mitochondria: Recent advances and current views. Brain Res. 2019, 1702, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Salašová, A.; Yokota, C.; Potěšil, D.; Zdráhal, Z.; Bryja, V.; Arenas, E. A proteomic analysis of LRRK2 binding partners reveals interactions with multiple signaling components of the WNT/PCP pathway. Mol. Neurodegener. 2017, 12, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  212. Estrada-Cuzcano, A.; Martin, S.; Chamova, T.; Synofzik, M.; Timmann, D.; Holemans, T.; Andreeva, A.; Reichbauer, J.; De Rycke, R.; Chang, D.I.; et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the ATP13A2/PARK9 gene cause complicated hereditary spastic paraplegia (SPG78). Brain J. Neurol. 2017, 140, 287–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Park, J.S.; Blair, N.F.; Sue, C.M. The role of ATP13A2 in Parkinson’s disease: Clinical phenotypes and molecular mechanisms. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 2015, 30, 770–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Dehay, B.; Martinez-Vicente, M.; Ramirez, A.; Perier, C.; Klein, C.; Vila, M.; Bezard, E. Lysosomal dysfunction in Parkinson disease. Autophagy 2012, 8, 1389–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Grunewald, A.; Arns, B.; Seibler, P.; Rakovic, A.; Munchau, A.; Ramirez, A.; Sue, C.M.; Klein, C. ATP13A2 mutations impair mitochondrial function in fibroblasts from patients with Kufor-Rakeb syndrome. Neurobiol. Aging 2012, 33, 1843 e1841–e1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Gusdon, A.M.; Zhu, J.; Van Houten, B.; Chu, C.T. ATP13A2 regulates mitochondrial bioenergetics through macroautophagy. Neurobiol. Dis. 2012, 45, 962–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Yun, S.P.; Kim, H.; Ham, S.; Kwon, S.-H.; Lee, G.H.; Shin, J.-H.; Lee, S.H.; Ko, H.S.; Lee, Y. VPS35 regulates parkin substrate AIMP2 toxicity by facilitating lysosomal clearance of AIMP2. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Olszewska, D.A.; McCarthy, A.; Lynch, T. Commentary: Parkinson’s Disease Genes VPS35 and EIF4G1 Interact Genetically and Converge on alpha-Synuclein. Front. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Tang, F.L.; Liu, W.; Hu, J.X.; Erion, J.R.; Ye, J.; Mei, L.; Xiong, W.C. VPS35 Deficiency or Mutation Causes Dopaminergic Neuronal Loss by Impairing Mitochondrial Fusion and Function. Cell Rep. 2015, 12, 1631–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Malik, B.R.; Godena, V.K.; Whitworth, A.J. VPS35 pathogenic mutations confer no dominant toxicity but partial loss of function in Drosophila and genetically interact with parkin. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 6106–6117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Jinn, S.; Blauwendraat, C.; Toolan, D.; Gretzula, C.A.; Drolet, R.E.; Smith, S.; Nalls, M.A.; Marcus, J.; Singleton, A.B.; Stone, D.J. Functionalization of the TMEM175 p.M393T Variant as a risk factor for Parkinson Disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Jinn, S.; Drolet, R.E.; Cramer, P.E.; Wong, A.H.; Toolan, D.M.; Gretzula, C.A.; Voleti, B.; Vassileva, G.; Disa, J.; Tadin-Strapps, M.; et al. TMEM175 deficiency impairs lysosomal and mitochondrial function and increases alpha-synuclein aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 2389–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Ivatt, R.M.; Whitworth, A.J. SREBF1 links lipogenesis to mitophagy and sporadic Parkinson disease. Autophagy 2014, 10, 1476–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Do, C.B.; Tung, J.Y.; Dorfman, E.; Kiefer, A.K.; Drabant, E.M.; Francke, U.; Mountain, J.L.; Goldman, S.M.; Tanner, C.M.; Langston, J.W.; et al. Web-based genome-wide association study identifies two novel loci and a substantial genetic component for Parkinson’s disease. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Gan-Or, Z.; Dion, P.A.; Rouleau, G.A. Genetic perspective on the role of the autophagy-lysosome pathway in Parkinson disease. Autophagy 2015, 11, 1443–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Redensek, S.; Trost, M.; Dolzan, V. Genetic Determinants of Parkinson’s Disease: Can They Help to Stratify the Patients Based on the Underlying Molecular Defect? Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Mazzulli, J.R.; Zunke, F.; Isacson, O.; Studer, L.; Krainc, D. alpha-Synuclein-induced lysosomal dysfunction occurs through disruptions in protein trafficking in human midbrain synucleinopathy models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 1931–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Harper, J.W.; Ordureau, A.; Heo, J.M. Building and decoding ubiquitin chains for mitophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 93–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Farrer, M.; Chan, P.; Chen, R.; Tan, L.; Lincoln, S.; Hernandez, D.; Forno, L.; Gwinn-Hardy, K.; Petrucelli, L.; Hussey, J.; et al. Lewy bodies and parkinsonism in families with parkin mutations. Ann. Neurol. 2001, 50, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Doherty, K.M.; Hardy, J. Parkin disease and the Lewy body conundrum. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 2013, 28, 702–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  231. Gandhi, S.; Muqit, M.M.; Stanyer, L.; Healy, D.G.; Abou-Sleiman, P.M.; Hargreaves, I.; Heales, S.; Ganguly, M.; Parsons, L.; Lees, A.J.; et al. PINK1 protein in normal human brain and Parkinson’s disease. Brain J. Neurol. 2006, 129, 1720–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Beyer, K.; Domingo-Sabat, M.; Ariza, A. Molecular pathology of Lewy body diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 724–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Samaranch, L.; Lorenzo-Betancor, O.; Arbelo, J.M.; Ferrer, I.; Lorenzo, E.; Irigoyen, J.; Pastor, M.A.; Marrero, C.; Isla, C.; Herrera-Henriquez, J.; et al. PINK1-linked parkinsonism is associated with Lewy body pathology. Brain J. Neurol. 2010, 133, 1128–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  234. Taipa, R.; Pereira, C.; Reis, I.; Alonso, I.; Bastos-Lima, A.; Melo-Pires, M.; Magalhaes, M. DJ-1 linked parkinsonism (PARK7) is associated with Lewy body pathology. Brain J. Neurol. 2016, 139, 1680–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Roosen, D.A.; Cookson, M.R. LRRK2 at the interface of autophagosomes, endosomes and lysosomes. Mol. Neurodegener. 2016, 11, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Tong, Y.; Yamaguchi, H.; Giaime, E.; Boyle, S.; Kopan, R.; Kelleher, R.J., 3rd; Shen, J. Loss of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 causes impairment of protein degradation pathways, accumulation of alpha-synuclein, and apoptotic cell death in aged mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9879–9884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Kalia, L.V.; Lang, A.E.; Hazrati, L.N.; Fujioka, S.; Wszolek, Z.K.; Dickson, D.W.; Ross, O.A.; Van Deerlin, V.M.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Hurtig, H.I.; et al. Clinical correlations with Lewy body pathology in LRRK2-related Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol. 2015, 72, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Kett, L.R.; Dauer, W.T. Endolysosomal dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: Recent developments and future challenges. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 2016, 31, 1433–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Murphy, K.E.; Cottle, L.; Gysbers, A.M.; Cooper, A.A.; Halliday, G.M. ATP13A2 (PARK9) protein levels are reduced in brain tissue of cases with Lewy bodies. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2013, 1, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Mensikova, K.; Tuckova, L.; Kolarikova, K.; Bartonikova, T.; Vodicka, R.; Ehrmann, J.; Vrtel, R.; Prochazka, M.; Kanovsky, P.; Kovacs, G.G. Atypical parkinsonism of progressive supranuclear palsy-parkinsonism (PSP-P) phenotype with rare variants in FBXO7 and VPS35 genes associated with Lewy body pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2019, 137, 171–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Miura, E.; Hasegawa, T.; Konno, M.; Suzuki, M.; Sugeno, N.; Fujikake, N.; Geisler, S.; Tabuchi, M.; Oshima, R.; Kikuchi, A.; et al. VPS35 dysfunction impairs lysosomal degradation of alpha-synuclein and exacerbates neurotoxicity in a Drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2014, 71, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Dhungel, N.; Eleuteri, S.; Li, L.B.; Kramer, N.J.; Chartron, J.W.; Spencer, B.; Kosberg, K.; Fields, J.A.; Stafa, K.; Adame, A.; et al. Parkinson’s disease genes VPS35 and EIF4G1 interact genetically and converge on alpha-synuclein. Neuron 2015, 85, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Li, H.; Ham, A.; Ma, T.C.; Kuo, S.H.; Kanter, E.; Kim, D.; Ko, H.S.; Quan, Y.; Sardi, S.P.; Li, A.; et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction and mitophagy defect triggered by heterozygous GBA mutations. Autophagy 2019, 15, 113–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Sardi, S.P.; Clarke, J.; Kinnecom, C.; Tamsett, T.J.; Li, L.; Stanek, L.M.; Passini, M.A.; Grabowski, G.A.; Schlossmacher, M.G.; Sidman, R.L.; et al. CNS expression of glucocerebrosidase corrects alpha-synuclein pathology and memory in a mouse model of Gaucher-related synucleinopathy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 12101–12106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Blandini, F.; Cilia, R.; Cerri, S.; Pezzoli, G.; Schapira, A.H.V.; Mullin, S.; Lanciego, J.L. Glucocerebrosidase mutations and synucleinopathies: Toward a model of precision medicine. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 2019, 34, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Moors, T.E.; Paciotti, S.; Ingrassia, A.; Quadri, M.; Breedveld, G.; Tasegian, A.; Chiasserini, D.; Eusebi, P.; Duran-Pacheco, G.; Kremer, T.; et al. Characterization of Brain Lysosomal Activities in GBA-Related and Sporadic Parkinson’s Disease and Dementia with Lewy Bodies. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 56, 1344–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Ivatt, R.M.; Sanchez-Martinez, A.; Godena, V.K.; Brown, S.; Ziviani, E.; Whitworth, A.J. Genome-wide RNAi screen identifies the Parkinson disease GWAS risk locus SREBF1 as a regulator of mitophagy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 8494–8499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The importance of mitochondrial dysfunction, α-syn aggregation, and the autophagy-endo-lysosomal system dysregulation in PD (Parkinson’s disease) pathogenesis. The clearance of damaged mitochondria and denatured α-synuclein (α-syn) are through autophagy-lysosome pathways. Minor mitochondrial damage is fixed via dynamic fission and fusion, complementing the damaged organelles and mitochondrial proteins. Medium amounts of damaged mitochondrial proteins and mitochondria parts are delivered to the lysosome via mitochondrial-derived vesicles (MDVs). The whole mitochondrion is trafficked to the lysosome for degradation via the mitophagy process (this figure depicts the most well-known PINK1/parkin dependent mitophagy pathway). Mitochondrial membrane potential dissipation leads to PINK1 kinase stabilization on the mitochondrial outer membrane (OM) and recruits cytosolic E3 ubiquitin ligase, parkin, to the mitochondria. Parkin subsequently ubiquitinates mitochondrial OM proteins, tagging them for autophagy receptors (such as p62) recognition. These autophagy receptors bind with LC3-II-positive phagophores and the double-membraned structure closes up around the mitochondrion to form autophagosomes. Autophagosomes eventually fuse with lysosomes to form autolysosomes where damaged mitochondrion is degraded. Upon initiation of the PINK1/parkin dependent pathway, the dynamic fusion and motility of the damaged mitochondrion is disabled by targeting Mitofusin (Mfn) and Miro for ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation. Native α-syn monomers are able to transition into toxic beta-sheet containing oligomers, which further converts into insoluble amyloid fibrils and are eventually deposited into Lewy bodies. α-syn monomers are degraded via the chaperone mediated autophagy (CMA) under physiological conditions. In this process, the heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein (Hsc70) chaperone recognizes the KFERQ domain of α-syn and targets the protein for the lysosome. At the lysosome membrane, the lysosome-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP2A) receptor assists in α-syn docking and internalization into the lysosome, where α-syn is degraded by hydrolases. Toxic α-syn oligomers and non-toxic monomers can both be degraded via the macroautophagy process.
Figure 1. The importance of mitochondrial dysfunction, α-syn aggregation, and the autophagy-endo-lysosomal system dysregulation in PD (Parkinson’s disease) pathogenesis. The clearance of damaged mitochondria and denatured α-synuclein (α-syn) are through autophagy-lysosome pathways. Minor mitochondrial damage is fixed via dynamic fission and fusion, complementing the damaged organelles and mitochondrial proteins. Medium amounts of damaged mitochondrial proteins and mitochondria parts are delivered to the lysosome via mitochondrial-derived vesicles (MDVs). The whole mitochondrion is trafficked to the lysosome for degradation via the mitophagy process (this figure depicts the most well-known PINK1/parkin dependent mitophagy pathway). Mitochondrial membrane potential dissipation leads to PINK1 kinase stabilization on the mitochondrial outer membrane (OM) and recruits cytosolic E3 ubiquitin ligase, parkin, to the mitochondria. Parkin subsequently ubiquitinates mitochondrial OM proteins, tagging them for autophagy receptors (such as p62) recognition. These autophagy receptors bind with LC3-II-positive phagophores and the double-membraned structure closes up around the mitochondrion to form autophagosomes. Autophagosomes eventually fuse with lysosomes to form autolysosomes where damaged mitochondrion is degraded. Upon initiation of the PINK1/parkin dependent pathway, the dynamic fusion and motility of the damaged mitochondrion is disabled by targeting Mitofusin (Mfn) and Miro for ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation. Native α-syn monomers are able to transition into toxic beta-sheet containing oligomers, which further converts into insoluble amyloid fibrils and are eventually deposited into Lewy bodies. α-syn monomers are degraded via the chaperone mediated autophagy (CMA) under physiological conditions. In this process, the heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein (Hsc70) chaperone recognizes the KFERQ domain of α-syn and targets the protein for the lysosome. At the lysosome membrane, the lysosome-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP2A) receptor assists in α-syn docking and internalization into the lysosome, where α-syn is degraded by hydrolases. Toxic α-syn oligomers and non-toxic monomers can both be degraded via the macroautophagy process.
Ijms 20 05312 g001
Table 1. Selected PD associated genes and their mitochondria, endo-lysosomal system, and α-synuclein pathology phenotype.
Table 1. Selected PD associated genes and their mitochondria, endo-lysosomal system, and α-synuclein pathology phenotype.
Gene
/Mode of Inheritance
Locus SymbolMain FunctionMitochondrial DysfunctionEndo-Lysosomal
Dysfunction
α-Synuclein PathologyReference
SNCA (α-synuclein) ADPARK1Synaptic vesicle recycling+++
PD patients
[165,227]
PRKN (Parkin) ARPARK2E3 ubiquitin ligase (Mitophagy)+++
PD patients
[47,228,229,230]
PINK1
AR
PARK6Kinase (Mitophagy)+++
PD patients
[79,231,232,233]
DJ-1
AR
PARK7Antioxidant, α-syn chaperone, protease, transcription factor (Mitophagy)+++
PD patients
[234]
LRRK2
AD
PARK8Kinase (Endo-lysosomal trafficking)+++
PD patients
[235,236,237]
ATP13A2
AR
PARK9Lysosomal ATPase+++
PD patients
[238,239]
FBXO7
AR
PARK15Adaptor protein in
E3 ubiquitin ligase subunit (Mitophagy)
+-+
PD patients
[225,240]
VPS35
AD
PARK17Retromer complex subunit (Vesicular trafficking)+++
PD patients
[219,240,241,242]
GBA1Lysosomal hydrolase glucocerebrosidase+++
PD patients
[243,244,245,246]
TMEM175Lysosomal K+ channel transmembrane protein+++
Rat primary neurons
[222]
SREBF1Transcriptional factor (Lysosomal lipid regulation)++NA[223,247]
Listed are PD associated genes, whose mutations cause defects in mitochondria, the endo-lysosomal system and may also cause α-synuclein (α-syn) pathology. The mutations in SNCA causes the α-syn aggregation and also leads to mitochondrial damage and inhibits autophagy processes. The parkin, PINK1, DJ-1, and FBXO7 are renowned players of mitophagy which has an effect on α-syn clearance and also impacts autophagy-endo-lysosomal pathway dysfunction. The GBA1, VPS35, ATP13A2, SREBF1, and TMEM175 are PD risk genes with functions in the endo-lysosomal system and the dysfunction of which are shown to influence mitochondrial function and Lewy body pathology. Abbreviations: NA: not available.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, K.-J.; Lin, K.-L.; Chen, S.-D.; Liou, C.-W.; Chuang, Y.-C.; Lin, H.-Y.; Lin, T.-K. The Overcrowded Crossroads: Mitochondria, Alpha-Synuclein, and the Endo-Lysosomal System Interaction in Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5312. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215312

AMA Style

Lin K-J, Lin K-L, Chen S-D, Liou C-W, Chuang Y-C, Lin H-Y, Lin T-K. The Overcrowded Crossroads: Mitochondria, Alpha-Synuclein, and the Endo-Lysosomal System Interaction in Parkinson’s Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(21):5312. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215312

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Kai-Jung, Kai-Lieh Lin, Shang-Der Chen, Chia-Wei Liou, Yao-Chung Chuang, Hung-Yu Lin, and Tsu-Kung Lin. 2019. "The Overcrowded Crossroads: Mitochondria, Alpha-Synuclein, and the Endo-Lysosomal System Interaction in Parkinson’s Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 21: 5312. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215312

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop