Next Article in Journal
Glycyrrhizin Acid and Glycyrrhetinic Acid Modified Polyethyleneimine for Targeted DNA Delivery to Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical Ventilation Impairs IL-17 Cytokine Family Expression in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 20
10.3390/ijms20205073
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Generation of a Nebulizable CDR-Modified MERS-CoV Neutralizing Human Antibody

by
Sang Il Kim
1,2,†,
Sujeong Kim
1,3,†,
Jinhee Kim
4,
So Young Chang
4,
Jung Min Shim
5,
Jongwha Jin
6,
Chungsu Lim
6,
Songyi Baek
6,
Ji-Young Min
4,
Wan Beom Park
7,
Myoung-don Oh
7,
Seungtaek Kim
5,* and
Junho Chung
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
2
Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
3
Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
4
Respiratory Virus Laboratory, Institut Pasteur Korea, Gyeonggi-do 13488, Korea
5
Zoonotic Virus Laboratory, Institut Pasteur Korea, Gyeonggi-do 13488, Korea
6
New Drug Development Center, 123 Osongsaengmyeng-ro, Cheongju-si, Chungbuk 28160, Korea
7
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(20), 5073; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20205073
Submission received: 16 September 2019 / Revised: 10 October 2019 / Accepted: 10 October 2019 / Published: 12 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) induces severe aggravating respiratory failure in infected patients, frequently resulting in mechanical ventilation. As limited therapeutic antibody is accumulated in lung tissue following systemic administration, inhalation is newly recognized as an alternative, possibly better, route of therapeutic antibody for pulmonary diseases. The nebulization process, however, generates diverse physiological stresses, and thus, the therapeutic antibody must be resistant to these stresses, remain stable, and form minimal aggregates. We first isolated a MERS-CoV neutralizing antibody that is reactive to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of spike (S) glycoprotein. To increase stability, we introduced mutations into the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of the antibody. In the HCDRs (excluding HCDR3) in this clone, two hydrophobic residues were replaced with Glu, two residues were replaced with Asp, and four residues were replaced with positively charged amino acids. In LCDRs, only two Leu residues were replaced with Val. These modifications successfully generated a clone with significantly greater stability and equivalent reactivity and neutralizing activity following nebulization compared to the original clone. In summary, we generated a MERS-CoV neutralizing human antibody that is reactive to recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein for delivery via a pulmonary route by introducing stabilizing mutations into five CDRs.

1. Introduction

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was first identified in Saudi Arabia in 2012 from a patient who suffered acute pneumonia and subsequent renal failure [1]. Since then, the World Health Organization has reported 2254 laboratory-confirmed cases of MERS-CoV infections in 27 different countries around the world, and South Korea has recorded the highest number of cases outside of the Middle East. Despite resilient efforts throughout the scientific and medical communities, no vaccine or antiviral agent for MERS-CoV is currently available.
MERS-CoV is a large (30 kb), enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus. The viral genome encodes four major structural proteins: spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N) proteins [2]. The S glycoprotein is a major envelope protein and interacts with the cellular receptor dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) for entry into the host cell [3]. This protein consists of the S1 and S2 subunits. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) within the S1 subunit mediates receptor binding, whereas the S2 subunit facilitates membrane fusion. DPP4 is expressed on a variety of human cells, including fibroblasts, intestinal epithelial cells, and hepatocytes [4], as well as in the lung parenchyma and interstitium [5,6]. MERS-CoV is detected in respiratory secretions and the lower respiratory tract of the infected patients [7,8]. In the most severe cases of MERS-CoV infection, aggravating respiratory failure ultimately results in mechanical ventilation [9]. These observations suggest that the MERS-CoV virus primarily infects the human respiratory tract and replicates within the human airway epithelium [10,11].
Antibodies play a crucial role in the prevention and treatment of viral infection. Polysera taken from recovered patients and vaccinated donors have been used as prophylactic agents for hepatitis B, rabies, and other viral diseases [12,13,14]. Palivizumab (Synagis, Medimmune, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) was approved for the prophylaxis of RSV in 1998, and ibalizumab-uiyk (Trogarzo, TailMed Biologics, Taiwan) became clinically available in 2018 for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in treatment-experienced adults with multi-drug-resistant HIV-1 and failure to respond to the current antiretroviral regimen.
In response to the ongoing epidemic, several groups have developed anti-MERS-CoV neutralizing monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies that target RBD [15,16]. These antibodies were generated from B cells derived from convalescent patients, nonimmune human antibody phage-display libraries, fully humanized mice, transchromosomic bovines, or hybridomas from mice that were immunized with MERS-CoV S. These antibodies potently inhibit RBD binding to the DPP4 receptor [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Furthermore, therapeutic effects of RBD-specific neutralizing antibodies were evaluated in several animal models, including Ad5/hDPP4-trasduced mice, humanized DPP4 mice, and hDPP4-transgenic mice as well as hDPP4-knock-in mice, rabbits, and rhesus monkeys [17,21,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
All MERS-CoV neutralizing antibodies were developed for intravenous (i.v.) delivery; however, recent reports indicate that the amount of antibody delivered to lung tissue is often quite limited following systemic delivery [31,32]. In cynomolgus monkeys, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid contained dose-proportional concentrations of systemically administrated antibody, and these concentrations were approximately 500-fold less than those in plasma [31]. Therefore, delivery of therapeutic antibody to lung tissues via inhalation has garnered considerable interest. Following delivery via the airway, cetuximab, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody, accumulated in normal and cancerous tissues in the lung at a concentration that was twice that achieved after i.v. delivery [33]. In addition, recent studies showed that Fc fusion proteins and nanobodies are also efficiently delivered via the pulmonary route [34,35,36,37]. Therefore, MERS-CoV neutralizing antibody may also accumulate at higher concentrations following delivery via a pulmonary route, suggesting higher efficacy. In order for this pulmonary delivery to be successful, the antibody must be sufficiently stable to resist denaturation during the process of nebulization.
In this study, we generated a MERS-CoV neutralizing antibody for delivery via nebulization. We constructed a phage-display library from two convalescent MERS-CoV-infected patients and successfully isolated nine MERS-CoV RBD-specific neutralizing mAbs. After nebulization, these antibodies showed significant aggregation and reduced reactivity to recombinant S glycoprotein. We therefore reduced the number of hydrophobic residues and introduced solubilizing mutations within the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs), generating an antibody that is resistant to aggregation during nebulization and retains its MERS-CoV neutralizing activity.

2. Results

2.1. Generation of Antibodies Reactive to Recombinant MERS-CoV RBD Protein From Patients

We generated human single-chain variable fragment (scFv) phage-display libraries using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from two MERS-CoV-infected convalescent patients. One patient (P014) was considered to be the super spreader, and the other patient (P002) was the wife of the index patient in the previous report [38]. The complexity of the libraries exceeded 3.6 × 109 and 1.9 × 109 colony-forming units for patients P002 and P014, respectively. After the third and fourth rounds of biopanning against recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein, the scFv clones were retrieved in a high-throughput manner as described previously [39]. Briefly, 1800 microcolonies formed on the TR chip, and of these, 542 clones with unique VH and VΚ/Vλ were identified. In these clones, 44 unique HCDR3 sequences were identified. We selected 44 clones encoding unique HCDR3 sequences and rescued phages for phage enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. A total of 36 unique scFv clones were highly reactive to recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein (data not shown). These clones were prepared as scFv fused with human Fc (scFv-hFc) using a eukaryotic expression vector and HEK293F cells. A human anti-MERS-CoV neutralizing mAb reported previously, m336, was also prepared in this same form for use as a positive control [40].

2.2. Selection of MERS-CoV Neutralizing Antibodies

We performed a microneutralization assay to test the neutralizing activity of the 36 identified scFv clones against MERS-CoV (MERS-CoV/KOR/KNIH/002_05_2015). Among these, scFV clones 10, 15, 20, C-8, 34, 42, 46, 47, and 48 potently inhibited MERS-CoV replication, with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values ranging from 2.40 to 9.61 μg/mL (Table S1).
Next, we tested the stability of these clones during nebulization. We nebulized the fusion proteins at a concentration of 100 μg/mL in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using a vibrating mesh nebulizer and then collected the aerosol. All the collected samples showed clearly visible aggregation (data not shown). After centrifugation to remove the aggregated material, we repeated the ELISA analysis and compared the reactivity of pre- and post-nebulized scFv-hFc. All nine clones showed significantly reduced reactivity against recombinant S glycoprotein after nebulization (Figure S1).
We selected the clones C-8 and 48, as these antibodies exhibited the lowest IC50 values among the antibodies derived from patients P002 and P014, respectively. Before performing further studies, we studied the mechanism underlying inhibition of viral infection on cells. The antibodies were mixed with recombinant S glycoprotein and added to hDPP4-expressing Huh-7 cells. Both C-8 and 48 scFv-hFc nearly completely blocked binding of recombinant S glycoprotein to cells at equimolar concentration of 100 nM (Figure S2), indicating that the antibodies block the initial interaction of the virus with cells.

2.3. Modification of CDR Residues to Enhance Antibody Stability

To enhance the stability of the C-8 and 48 clones, we sought to introduce mutations in CDRs, except for heavy chain CDR3 (HCDR3), for replacement of hydrophobic residues with hydrophilic residues. We defined CDRs according to the International Immunogenetics Information System (IMGT) and targeted Phe, Ile, Leu, Val, Met, Trp, and Tyr which were defined as hydrophobic amino acids in previous reports [41,42]. For the C-8 clone, the F29, Y32, I51, I52, F53, and F54 hydrophobic residues in HCDR1 and HCDR2 were selected for randomization (Figure 1A). These six residues were designed to encode the wild-type amino acid, Asp, Glu, or redundant amino acids depending on the degenerate codon in the first scFv phage-display library (Table S2). We preferred negatively charged amino acids to positively charged amino acids as lowering the isoelectric point of an antibody may reduce the non-specific in vivo clearance [43]. The randomized scFv phage-display library had a complexity of 2.6 × 109 colony-forming units, which exceeded the theoretical complexity of 1.3 × 105 on the nucleotide level. After two rounds of biopanning on recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein, we randomly rescued phage clones and performed phage ELISA. Eleven scFv clones showed reactivity to recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein similar to or higher than that of the original C-8 clone. The C-8-2 clone harbored F29E and Y32E replacements, while the other ten clones had only one residue replaced with either Asp, Glu, or redundant amino acids, depending on the degenerate codon. To test the stability of the C-8-2 clone during nebulization, a scFv-hFc fusion protein was prepared and subjected to ELISA following nebulization. The reactivity of C-8-2 scFv-hFc to recombinant S glycoprotein was much less affected by nebulization than that of C-8 scFv-hFc; however, the reactivity of the C-8-2 clone was somewhat reduced compared with that of the C-8 clone (Figure S3A).
In a parallel experiment using clone 48, we prepared a randomized scFv phage-display library and selected seven clones. None of the clones were successfully expressed in the scFv-hFc format (less than 300 μg/L), preventing us from conducting further studies on clone 48 (data not shown).
To achieve further stabilization and affinity maturation, we generated a second scFv phage-display library using the same strategy to randomize nine residues in HCDR1 and HCDR2 of the C-8-2 clone to introduce more negatively charged residues (Figure 1A, Table S2). The proline at H52A was excluded from the randomization, as proline frequently forms a unique structure essential for antibody reactivity [44]. The second randomized scFv phage-display library had a complexity of 1.0 × 109 colony-forming units, which exceeded the theoretical complexity of 4.2 × 106 on the nucleotide level. After the second round of biopanning on recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein, we selected 12 clones that displayed greater reactivity to recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein than the C-8-2 clone in phage ELISA analysis. Clone C-8-2-4B contained replacement at six residues (G26D, T28K, S30K, S31R, G55D, and T56K; Figure 1A) and showed the highest intrinsic solubility score [45] among the 12 tested clones. Interestingly, only two residues were replaced with Asp, and four residues were replaced with positively charged amino acids, as allowed by the degenerate codons (Figure 1A). We then prepared a C-8-2-4B scFv-hFc fusion protein using a eukaryotic expression system. After nebulization, the reactivity of C-8-2-4B scFv-hFc to recombinant S glycoprotein was less affected than either C-8 or C-8-2 scFv-hFc (Figure S3A,B). In addition, the reactivity of C-8-2-4B scFv-hFc was enhanced compared to that of C-8-2 scFv-hFc and comparable to that of C-8 scFv-hFc.
Next, we prepared C-8 and C-8-2-4B IgG1 using a eukaryotic expression system and compared the reactivity of these immunoglobulins to recombinant S glycoprotein before and after nebulization. As expected, the reactivity of C-8-2-4B IgG1 was better retained following nebulization than that of C-8 IgG1 (Figure S3C). We also tested whether C-8-2-4B IgG1 effectively blocked the interaction between recombinant S glycoprotein and hDPP4-expressing Huh-7 cells after nebulization. In flow cytometry analysis, we found that C-8-2-4B IgG1 almost completely blocked the binding of recombinant S glycoprotein to hDPP4-expressing cells following nebulization, while C-8 IgG1 failed to block this interaction after nebulization (Figure S3D).
As C-8-2-4B IgG1 showed a somewhat reduced reactivity after nebulization, we sought to confer additional stability by randomizing eight hydrophobic residues in LCDRs using the same randomization scheme. We achieved 2.0 × 109 colony-forming units in the third randomized scFv phage-display library, exceeding the theoretical complexity of 2.1 × 106 (Figure 1B). After two rounds of biopanning on recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein, we selected clones in a phage ELISA with reactivity similar to or greater than that of C-8-2-4B. Sanger sequencing revealed that a single clone was repetitively selected. The selected clone, C-8-2-4B-10D, harbored replacements at L27C and L92V with valine (Figure 1B). We prepared C-8-2-4B-10D IgG1 using a eukaryotic expression system and analyzed the characteristics using ELISA, size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT50). ELISA revealed a noticeable decline in reactivity to recombinant S glycoprotein by C-8 IgG1 and m336 IgG1 after nebulization; yet, the change in reactivity of C-8-2-4B-10D IgG1 after nebulization was negligible (Figure 2).
In SE-HPLC analysis, high-molecular weight aggregates were detected in post-nebulization samples of C-8 and m336 IgG1; however, no aggregate was found in post-nebulized samples of C-8-2-4B-10D IgG1 (Table 1, Figure S4). In accordance with these SE-HPLC data, DLS analysis showed that the nebulization process converted 21.6% and 22.5% of C-8 and m336 IgG1, respectively, into high-molecular-weight aggregates, while nebulization resulted in <1% aggregates for C-8-2-4B-10D IgG1. (Table 1, Figure 3).

2.4. Neutralizing Potency After Nebulization

The neutralizing activities of pre- and post-nebulized C-8 and C-8-2-4B-10D IgG1 were evaluated in PRNT50 using the live MERS-CoV (MERS-CoV/KOR/KNIH/002_05_2015). Antibodies were mixed with live MERS-CoV, and then the antibody-virus mixture was allowed to infect Vero cells. C-8 and C-8-2-4B-10D IgG1 exhibited effective inhibitory activity against MERS-CoV, with IC50 values of 0.29 and 0.28 μg/mL, respectively. After nebulization, C-8-2-4B-10D showed an IC50 value similar to that of pre-nebulized IgG1, but the IC50 value of C-8 was dramatically increased following nebulization (Figure 4).

3. Discussion

Pulmonary delivery can be an efficient drug delivery route to the lung parenchyma, and such delivery can sometimes exceed the efficiency of systemic injection [33]. To deliver drug via the airways, an aerosol that contains the drugs is generated by a nebulizer [46]; however, the physical stress of nebulization often causes protein instability by affecting the integrity of the molecular structure, frequently resulting in fragmentation and aggregation [47]. Aggregation of therapeutic proteins is a major concern, as it contributes to immunogenicity, which frequently causes adverse events, such as decreased drug efficacy, infusion reactions, cytokine release syndrome, or anaphylaxis [48]. A vibrating mesh nebulizer, which was designed for protein delivery, generates limited variation on the temperature, concentration, and surface tension, and its effect on the stability of the protein is the least among nebulizers [49]. This type of nebulizer also produces uniform sized particles and flow rates, which are also beneficial in maintaining the stability of biological products [37].
To reduce the immunogenicity of therapeutic protein, maintaining the stability of the native protein conformation as well as minimal (or no) formation of high-molecular weight species are crucial [50]. Therefore, engineering of a protein to render it more stable for pulmonary delivery is important. In a recent study, a trivalent nanobody against RSV F protein (ALX-O171) was successfully delivered directly into the lungs by nebulization and neutralized RSV in newborn lambs [46]. In this case, the framework 2 region of the nanobody contained more hydrophilic residues that are not observed in human VH domains and thereby increasing the stability of the nanobody [37]. In this study, we focused on CDRs, as the sequences of the CDR loops are closely related to the folding stability of antibodies [51,52]. CDR loops frequently possess hydrophobic residues to facilitate high binding affinity; however, solvent-exposed hydrophobic residues also impact antibody stability and aggregation [53,54,55]. To increase solubility and counterbalance the impact of the hydrophobic residues required for antibody binding, solubilizing residues can be introduced either at the edges of the CDR loops or within the CDR [56,57]. Furthermore, negatively charged substitution mutations within CDRs can be used to prevent aggregation [58]. In our study, we employed both strategies and reduced the number of hydrophobic residues and increased the number of charged residues in the CDRs, resulting in successful enhancement of the stability of a MERS-CoV neutralizing antibody. The final optimized antibody, C-8-2-4B-10D, showed very limited protein aggregation after nebulization and its biological potency was well maintained after such delivery. Further, we expect that formulation with surfactants such as polysorbate may prevent aggregation of this antibody during nebulization.
To test whether the C-8-2-4B-10D antibody provides better efficacy when delivered via a pulmonary route than via systemic injection, an animal model with progressive pulmonary failure is essential. In the case of hDPP4-transgenic mouse models, the infected mice exhibited central nervous system and multi-organ failure but no severe pulmonary symptoms [59,60,61]. Recently, hDPP4-knock-in mice were developed and showed progressive pulmonary manifestations when infected with a mouse-adapted strain [62]. Thus, in future studies, we will test the efficacy of C-8-2-4B-10D delivered via pulmonary route in these hDPP4-knock-in mice.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Ethics Statement

The study that provided the human samples was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital (IRB approval number: 1602-100-742), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

4.2. Construction of A Human scFv Phage-Display Library and Three Randomization Libraries

PBMCs were isolated from two MERS-CoV-infected convalescent patients using a Ficoll-Paque density gradient medium (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) as described previously [63]. The PBMCs were subjected to total RNA isolation using the TRI Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis system (Invitrogen) with oligo(dT) primers according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Using the cDNA as a template, the genes encoding the variable regions of heavy and light chains (VH and VΚ/Vλ) were amplified and used for the construction of a human scFv phage-display libraries as described previously [64,65].
For the construction of the first randomization library, a set of degenerate Ultramer DNA oligonucleotides (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA) encoding residues from H1 to H65 of clone C-8 (VHN1) was chemically synthesized to contain either a codon encoding the wild-type amino acid or a GAK degenerate codon at the H29, H32, H51, H52, H53, and H54 residues (Table S2). Then, the gene fragment (VHC) encoding residues from H58 to H113 of clone C-8 was amplified by PCR using primer set 1 (Table S3) in a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The PCR conditions were as follows: preliminary denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of 15 s at 94 °C, 15 s at 56 °C and 90 s at 72 °C. A final extension was then conducted for 10 min at 72 °C. After electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel, the PCR products were purified using QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified VHN1 and VHC gene fragments were mixed at a concentration of 100 ng and subjected to linker PCR using primer set 2 (Table S3) in a T100 Thermal Cycler to yield the VH1 fragment. The PCR conditions were as follows: preliminary denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of 15 s at 94 °C, 15 s at 56 °C and 120 s at 72 °C. The reaction was ended with an extension step for 10 min at 72 °C. The gene fragment encoding VL (VL1) of clone C-8 was amplified by PCR using primer set 3 (Table S3) with the same PCR conditions described above for amplification of VHC. Then, the VH1 and VL1 fragments were subjected to electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel, and excised bands were purified using the QIAquick gel extraction kit. The purified VH1 and VL1 fragments were used for the synthesis of the scFv gene (scFv1) using PCR as described previously [64]. The amplified scFv1 fragment was purified and cloned into the phagemid vector as described [64,65].
For the construction of the second randomization library, a set of degenerate Ultramer DNA oligonucleotides encoding residues from H1 to H65 of clone C-8-2 (VHN2) was chemically synthesized to contain either a codon encoding the wild-type amino acid or a GAK degenerate codon at the H26 to H33 (HCDR1) and H51 to H57 (HCDR2) residues (Table S2), excluding the previously randomized residues. The VHN2 and VHC gene fragments were mixed at equal ratios at 100 ng and subjected to linker PCR using primer set 2 (Table S3) in a T100 Thermal Cycler to yield the VH2 gene fragment as described above. The VH2 gene fragment was purified as described above and subjected to linker PCR with VL1 fragments to yield the scFv2 gene fragment, which was cloned into the phagemid vector as described above.
For the construction of the third randomization library, two sets of degenerate Ultramer DNA oligonucleotides with a length of 200 nucleotides were chemically synthesized. One set encoded from L1 to L61 residues of clone C-8 (VLN), while the other one encoded from L56 to L107 of clone C-8 (VLC). These degenerate oligonucleotides contained either a codon encoding the wild-type amino acid or a GAK degenerate codon at L27B, L27C, L30, L32, L50, L89, L92, and L96 residues (Table S2). The VLN and VLC gene fragments (100 ng each) were subjected to a linker PCR using primer set 3 (Table S3) in a T100 Thermal Cycler to produce the VL2 gene fragment using the same PCR conditions as described above for the amplification of the VH1 gene fragment. The gene fragment encoding VH of C-8-2-4B (VH3) was amplified by PCR using primer set 2 (Table S3) using the same PCR conditions used for the amplification of the VHC gene fragment as described above. After purification, VL2 and VH3 gene fragments were used to produce the scFv3 gene fragment, which was cloned into the phagemid vector as described above.

4.3. Biopanning

The human scFv phage-display libraries were subjected to four rounds of biopanning against recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein (Sino Biological Inc., Beijing, China) as described previously [66]. Briefly, the scFv phage-display libraries (~1011 phage) were added to 3 μg of the recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein conjugated to 5.0 × 106 magnetic beads (Dynabeads M-270 epoxy, Invitrogen) and incubated with rotation for 2 h at 37 °C. The beads were washed once with 500 μL of 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in PBS (PBST) during the first round of biopanning. The number of washes was increased to three for the other rounds. Phages bound to beads were eluted, neutralized, allowed to infect E. coli ER2738 (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), and rescued as described previously [66].
The first randomized scFv library was subjected to two rounds of biopanning against recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein. The scFv phage-display library (~1011 phage) was added to 1.5 μg of the recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein conjugated to 2.5 × 106 magnetic beads and incubated with rotation for 2 h at 37 °C. The beads were washed once with 500 μL of 0.5% PBST and three times with 500 μL of 0.5% PBST during the first and second rounds of biopanning, respectively. After each round of washing, bound phages were eluted and rescued as described above.
For first round of biopanning for the second and third randomized scFv libraries, the scFv phage-display libraries (~1011 phage) were added to 1.5 μg of the recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein conjugated to 2.5 × 106 magnetic beads and incubated with rotation for 2 h at 37 °C. After washing three times with 500 μL of 0.5% PBST, bound phages were eluted and rescued as described above.
Before the second round of biopanning of the second and third randomized scFv libraries, 10 μg of recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein was conjugated to 200 μg of non-magnetic beads (Nacalai, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, the scFv phage-display libraries (~1011 phage) were added to 1.5 μg of recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein conjugated to 2.5 × 106 magnetic beads and incubated on a rotator for 2 h at 37 °C. After washing three times with 500 μL of 0.5% PBST, magnetic beads were resuspended in 100 μL of PBS and transferred to a microtube (microTUBE AFA Fiber Pre-Slit Snap-Cap, 520045, Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA) along with the recombinant MERS-COV S RBD protein-conjugated non-magnetic beads resuspended in 30 μL of PBS at a concentration of 0.33 μg/mL. Then, these bead mixtures were subjected to an ultrasound washing step using an ultrasonicator (M220, Covaris) with the following conditions: duty factor (DF) 20%, peak incident power (PIP) 12.5 W, cycles/burst 50, 20 min, and 24 °C. After ultrasonication, magnetic beads were transferred to 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube and washed three times with 0.5% PBST. Then, the bound phages were eluted and rescued as described above.

4.4. High-Throughput Retrieval of scFv Clones and Phage ELISA

After the fourth round of biopanning of human scFv phage-display libraries, the plasmid DNA was obtained from overnight cultures of E. coli cells and subjected to high-throughput retrieval of scFv clones by TrueRepertoire analysis as described previously (Celemics, Seoul, Korea) [39].
To select reactive clones to recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein, the scFv genes obtained from TrueRepertoire were cloned into the pComb3XSS vector [64] and used to transform E. coli ER2738 cells. After overnight culture, the phages were rescued from individual colonies using the M13K07 helper phage and subjected to phage ELISA as described previously [64]. Microtiter plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA, USA) were coated with 100 ng of recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein in coating buffer (0.1 M sodium bicarbonate, pH 8.6) at 4 °C overnight. The wells were blocked with 3% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) dissolved in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C, and culture supernatant containing scFv-displayed phages that were rescued from individual colonies were added into each well. After incubation for 2 h at 37 °C, the microtiter plates were washed three times with 0.05% PBST. Then, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-M13 monoclonal antibody (GE Healthcare) in 3% BSA/PBS was added into wells, and the plate was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing three times with PBST, 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid solution (Thermo Scientific) was used as the substrate for HRP. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm with a Multiskan Ascent microplate reader (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland).
To select reactive clones from the randomized libraries, phage ELISA was performed as described previously [64] using recombinant MERS-CoV S RBD protein-coated microtiter plates. The nucleotide sequences of positive scFv clones were determined by Sanger sequencing (Cosmogenetech, Seoul, Korea).

4.5. Expression of scFv-hFc and IgG1

The genes encoding the selected scFv clones were cloned into a modified mammalian expression vector containing the hIgG1 Fc regions (hFc) at the C-terminus as described previously [67]. The expression vectors were transfected into HEK293F cells (Invitrogen), and the fusion proteins were purified by Protein A affinity chromatography as described previously [67].
For the expression of IgG1, genes encoding VH and VL were amplified from the phage clones, cloned into a mammalian expression vector, and transfected into HEK293F cells. Then, IgG1 was purified by Protein A affinity chromatography as described previously [68]. Then the eluate containing IgG1 was subjected to gel filtration chromatography. A total of 4 mg of IgG1 was injected at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and purified by gel filtration using a XK16/100 column packed with Superdex 200 pg at pH 7.4 (ÄKTA pure, GE Healthcare). The chromatogram was recorded at a UV absorbance of 280 nm. The fractions containing IgG1 were pooled by collection criteria and concentrated.

4.6. ELISA

Microtiter plates (Costar) were coated with 100 ng of recombinant S glycoprotein in coating buffer at 4 °C overnight. The wells were blocked with 3% BSA/PBS for 1 h at 37 °C. Both nebulized and non-nebulized scFv-hFc or IgG1 were serially diluted (5-fold, 12 dilutions starting from 500 nM for scFv-hFc fusion protein or 1000 nM for IgG1) in blocking buffer and added into individual wells. After incubation for 1 h at 37 °C, the microtiter plates were washed three times with 0.05% PBST. Then, HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-human IgG antibody (Invitrogen) in blocking buffer (1:5000) was added into wells, and the plate was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing three times with PBST, 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid solution (Thermo Scientific) was used as the substrate. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer (Multiskan GO; Thermo Scientific)

4.7. Nebulization

A nebulizer (Aerogen Pro, Aerogen, Galway, Ireland) was used for all experiments following the manufacturer’s instructions. The nebulizer containing 1 mL of scFv-hFc fusion proteins or IgG1 antibodies was placed on top of a 50-mL conical tube (SPL Life Sciences, Pocheon, Korea) and nebulized at a concentration of either 0.1, 0.3, or 1 mg/mL in PBS.

4.8. Microneutralization Assay

The virus (MERS-CoV/KOR/KNIH/002_05_2015, accession number KT029139.1) was obtained from the Korea National Institute of Health (kindly provided by Dr. Sung Soon Kim) and propagated in Vero cells (ATCC CCL-81) in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Welgene, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea) in the presence of 2% fetal bovine serum (Gibco). The cells were grown in T-75 flasks, inoculated with MERS-CoV, and incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment. Then 3 days after inoculation, the viruses were harvested and stored at −80 °C. The virus titer was determined via a TCID50 assay [69].
A neutralization assay was performed as previously described [19]. Briefly, Vero cells were seeded in 96-well plates (1 × 104 cells/well) in Opti-PRO SFM (Thermo Scientific) supplemented with 4 mM L-glutamine and 1× Antibiotics-Antimycotic (Thermo Scientific) and grown for 24 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment. Two-fold serially diluted scFv-hFc fusion proteins were mixed with 100 TCID50 of MERS-CoV, and the mixture was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Then, the mixture was added to the Vero cells in tetrad and incubated for 4 days at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment. The cytopathic effect (CPE) in each well was visualized following crystal violet staining 4 days post-infection. The IC50 values were calculated using the dose-response inhibition equation of GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

4.9. Flow Cytometry

The scFv-hFc fusion proteins (2000, 1000, 250, or 200 nM) were incubated either with 200 nM of the recombinant S glycoprotein fused with a polyhistidine tag at the C-terminus (Sino Biological Inc.) or without S protein in 50 μL of 1% (w/v) BSA in PBS containing 0.02% (w/v) sodium azide (FACS buffer) at 37 °C for 1 h. The m336 scFv-hFc and irrelevant scFv-hFc fusion proteins were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Huh-7 cells (hDPP4+) were added into v-bottom 96-well plates (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) at a density of 3 × 105 cells per well, and then, the mixture was added to the wells. After incubation at 37 °C for 1 h, cells were washed three times with FACS buffer and incubated with FITC-labeled rabbit anti-HIS Ab (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 37 °C for 1 h. Then, the cells were washed three times with FACS buffer, resuspended in 200 μL of PBS, and subjected to analysis by flow cytometry using a FACS Canto II instrument (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). For each sample, 10,000 cells were assessed, and the data were analyzed using the FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, USA).

4.10. SE-HPLC

Non-nebulized and nebulized samples were analyzed using Waters e2695 HPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a BioSuite high-resolution size-exclusion chromatography column (250 Å 7.5 mm × 300 mm). Each sample (10 μg) was injected at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The mobile phase was PBS (pH 7.4), and UV detection was performed at 280 nm/220 nm. The sample tray and column holder were maintained at 4 and 30 °C, respectively, throughout data acquisition. The molecular weights corresponding to the antibody peaks were calculated using the Empower software (Waters Corporation).

4.11. DLS Assay

DLS experiments were performed using a Zetasizer Nano S (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) and a 633-nm/4-mW laser at a 173 ° detection angle as described previously [37]. Non-nebulized and nebulized samples were analyzed by performing three acquisitions per sample. PBS (pH 7.4) was used as the reference solvent. The results were evaluated with the Zetasizer software 7.02 (Malvern Panalytical Ltd.).

4.12. PRNT Assay

Vero cells were seeded in 12-well plates (3.5 × 105 cells/well) in Opti-PRO SFM supplemented with 4 mM L-glutamine and 1× Antibiotics-Antimycotic (Thermo Scientific) and grown for 24 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment. IgG1 antibodies were serially diluted three-fold in Dulbecco’s PBS (Welgene) and mixed with an equal volume of culture media containing MERS-CoV/KOR/KNIH/002_05_2015 (100 pfu). After incubation for 1 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment, the virus-antibody mixture was added to the cells and maintained for 1 h at room temperature. The mixture was then removed, and the cells were overlaid with 1% agarose in DMEM. After incubation for 2 days at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment, the cells were washed with PBS and fixed for 24 h with 4% paraformaldehyde. The agarose overlay was removed, and the cell monolayer was gently washed with water to remove residual agarose. The cells were stained with 0.5% crystal violet solution, and the plaques were counted manually. The number of plaques was plotted as a function of IgG1 antibodies, and the concentration of IgG1 at which the number of plaques was reduced by 50% compared to that in the absence of IgG1 (PRNT50) was calculated using GraphPad Prism 6.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/20/5073/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K. (Seungtaek Kim) and J.C.; Methodology, S.I.K., S.K. (Sujeong Kim), S.Y.C. and J.K.; Validation, S.I.K., S.K. (Sujeong Kim), S.Y.C., and J.K.; Formal analysis, S.I.K., S.K. (Sujeong Kim) and J.K.; Investigation, S.I.K., S.K. (Sujeong Kim), J.K., S.Y.C., J.M.S., C.L. and S.B.; Resources, S.I.K., S.K. (Sujeong Kim), J.K., W.B.P. and M.-d.O.; Data curation, S.I.K., S.K. (Sujeong Kim); Writing—original draft preparation, S.I.K., S.K. (Sujeong Kim) and J.C.; Writing—review and editing, S.I.K. and J.C.; Visualization, S.I.K., S.K. (Sujeong Kim) and J.K.; Supervision, S.K. (Seungtaek Kim) and J.C.; Project administration, J.J., J.-Y.M., S.K. (Seungtaek Kim), and J.C.; Funding acquisition, J.J., J.-Y.M., S.K. (Seungtaek Kim) and J.C.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea, grant number NRF-2016M3A9B6918973, 2016M3A9B6918984 and 2017M3A9G6068245.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

MERS-CoVMiddle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus
DPP4dipeptidyl peptidase 4
RBDreceptor-binding domain
i.v.intravenous
mAbmonoclonal antibody
CDRcomplementarity-determining region
scFvsingle-chain variable fragment
PBMCperipheral blood mononuclear cell
SE-HPLCsize-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography
DLSdynamic light scattering
PRNTplaque reduction neutralization test

References

  1. Zaki, A.M.; van Boheemen, S.; Bestebroer, T.M.; Osterhaus, A.D.; Fouchier, R.A. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1814–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Van Boheemen, S.; de Graaf, M.; Lauber, C.; Bestebroer, T.M.; Raj, V.S.; Zaki, A.M.; Osterhaus, A.D.; Haagmans, B.L.; Gorbalenya, A.E.; Snijder, E.J.; et al. Genomic characterization of a newly discovered coronavirus associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in humans. mBio 2012, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Raj, V.S.; Mou, H.; Smits, S.L.; Dekkers, D.H.; Muller, M.A.; Dijkman, R.; Muth, D.; Demmers, J.A.; Zaki, A.; Fouchier, R.A.; et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature 2013, 495, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. The FANTOM Consortium and the RIKEN PMI and CLST (DGT). A promoter-level mammalian expression atlas. Nature 2014, 507, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  5. Chan, J.F.; Choi, G.K.; Tsang, A.K.; Tee, K.M.; Lam, H.Y.; Yip, C.C.; To, K.K.; Cheng, V.C.; Yeung, M.L.; Lau, S.K.; et al. Development and Evaluation of Novel Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Assays with Locked Nucleic Acid Probes Targeting Leader Sequences of Human-Pathogenic Coronaviruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 2722–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Chan, J.F.; Lau, S.K.; Woo, P.C. The emerging novel Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: The “knowns” and “unknowns”. J. Med. Assoc. 2013, 112, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oh, M.D.; Park, W.B.; Choe, P.G.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, J.I.; Chae, J.; Park, S.S.; Kim, E.C.; Oh, H.S.; Kim, E.J.; et al. Viral Load Kinetics of MERS Coronavirus Infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1303–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guery, B.; Poissy, J.; el Mansouf, L.; Sejourne, C.; Ettahar, N.; Lemaire, X.; Vuotto, F.; Goffard, A.; Behillil, S.; Enouf, V.; et al. Clinical features and viral diagnosis of two cases of infection with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus: A report of nosocomial transmission. Lancet 2013, 381, 2265–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oh, M.D.; Park, W.B.; Park, S.W.; Choe, P.G.; Bang, J.H.; Song, K.H.; Kim, E.S.; Bin Kim, H.; Kim, N.J. Middle East respiratory syndrome: What we learned from the 2015 outbreak in the Republic of Korea. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2018, 33, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kindler, E.; Jonsdottir, H.R.; Muth, D.; Hamming, O.J.; Hartmann, R.; Rodriguez, R.; Geffers, R.; Fouchier, R.A.; Drosten, C.; Muller, M.A.; et al. Efficient replication of the novel human betacoronavirus EMC on primary human epithelium highlights its zoonotic potential. MBio 2013, 4, 11–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zielecki, F.; Weber, M.; Eickmann, M.; Spiegelberg, L.; Zaki, A.M.; Matrosovich, M.; Becker, S.; Weber, F. Human cell tropism and innate immune system interactions of human respiratory coronavirus EMC compared to those of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 5300–5304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Corti, D.; Misasi, J.; Mulangu, S.; Stanley, D.A.; Kanekiyo, M.; Wollen, S.; Ploquin, A.; Doria-Rose, N.A.; Staupe, R.P.; Bailey, M.; et al. Protective monotherapy against lethal Ebola virus infection by a potently neutralizing antibody. Science 2016, 351, 1339–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Gunn, B.M.; Yu, W.H.; Karim, M.M.; Brannan, J.M.; Herbert, A.S.; Wec, A.Z.; Halfmann, P.J.; Fusco, M.L.; Schendel, S.L.; Gangavarapu, K.; et al. A Role for Fc Function in Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody-Mediated Protection against Ebola Virus. Cell Host Microbe. 2018, 24, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Walker, L.M.; Burton, D.R. Passive immunotherapy of viral infections: ‘super-antibodies’ enter the fray. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Du, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, L.; Li, F.; Jiang, S. MERS-CoV spike protein: A key target for antivirals. Expert. Opin. Targets 2017, 21, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, N.; Shi, X.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, S.; Wang, D.; Tong, P.; Guo, D.; Fu, L.; Cui, Y.; Liu, X.; et al. Structure of MERS-CoV spike receptor-binding domain complexed with human receptor DPP4. Cell Res. 2013, 23, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Corti, D.; Zhao, J.; Pedotti, M.; Simonelli, L.; Agnihothram, S.; Fett, C.; Fernandez-Rodriguez, B.; Foglierini, M.; Agatic, G.; Vanzetta, F.; et al. Prophylactic and postexposure efficacy of a potent human monoclonal antibody against MERS coronavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 10473–10478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Du, L.; Zhao, G.; Yang, Y.; Qiu, H.; Wang, L.; Kou, Z.; Tao, X.; Yu, H.; Sun, S.; Tseng, C.T.; et al. A conformation-dependent neutralizing monoclonal antibody specifically targeting receptor-binding domain in Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 7045–7053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiang, L.; Wang, N.; Zuo, T.; Shi, X.; Poon, K.M.; Wu, Y.; Gao, F.; Li, D.; Wang, R.; Guo, J.; et al. Potent neutralization of MERS-CoV by human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to the viral spike glycoprotein. Sci Transl Med. 2014, 6, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Luke, T.; Wu, H.; Zhao, J.; Channappanavar, R.; Coleman, C.M.; Jiao, J.A.; Matsushita, H.; Liu, Y.; Postnikova, E.N.; Ork, B.L.; et al. Human polyclonal immunoglobulin G from transchromosomic bovines inhibits MERS-CoV in vivo. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pascal, K.E.; Coleman, C.M.; Mujica, A.O.; Kamat, V.; Badithe, A.; Fairhurst, J.; Hunt, C.; Strein, J.; Berrebi, A.; Sisk, J.M.; et al. Pre- and postexposure efficacy of fully human antibodies against Spike protein in a novel humanized mouse model of MERS-CoV infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 8738–8743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Tang, X.C.; Agnihothram, S.S.; Jiao, Y.; Stanhope, J.; Graham, R.L.; Peterson, E.C.; Avnir, Y.; Tallarico, A.S.; Sheehan, J.; Zhu, Q.; et al. Identification of human neutralizing antibodies against MERS-CoV and their role in virus adaptive evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 2018–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ying, T.; Du, L.; Ju, T.W.; Prabakaran, P.; Lau, C.C.; Lu, L.; Liu, Q.; Wang, L.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Exceptionally potent neutralization of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus by human monoclonal antibodies. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 7796–7805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Agrawal, A.S.; Ying, T.; Tao, X.; Garron, T.; Algaissi, A.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Peng, B.H.; Jiang, S.; Dimitrov, D.S.; et al. Passive Transfer of A Germline-like Neutralizing Human Monoclonal Antibody Protects Transgenic Mice Against Lethal Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cockrell, A.S.; Yount, B.L.; Scobey, T.; Jensen, K.; Douglas, M.; Beall, A.; Tang, X.C.; Marasco, W.A.; Heise, M.T.; Baric, R.S. A mouse model for MERS coronavirus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 2, 16226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fan, C.; Wu, X.; Liu, Q.; Li, Q.; Liu, S.; Lu, J.; Yang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Huang, W.; Liang, C.; et al. A Human DPP4-Knockin Mouse’s Susceptibility to Infection by Authentic and Pseudotyped MERS-CoV. Viruses 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Houser, K.V.; Gretebeck, L.; Ying, T.; Wang, Y.; Vogel, L.; Lamirande, E.W.; Bock, K.W.; Moore, I.N.; Dimitrov, D.S.; Subbarao, K. Prophylaxis With a Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV)-Specific Human Monoclonal Antibody Protects Rabbits From MERS-CoV Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 213, 1557–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Johnson, R.F.; Bagci, U.; Keith, L.; Tang, X.; Mollura, D.J.; Zeitlin, L.; Qin, J.; Huzella, L.; Bartos, C.J.; Bohorova, N.; et al. 3B11-N, a monoclonal antibody against MERS-CoV, reduces lung pathology in rhesus monkeys following intratracheal inoculation of MERS-CoV Jordan-n3/2012. Virology 2016, 490, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Y.; Wan, Y.; Liu, P.; Zhao, J.; Lu, G.; Qi, J.; Wang, Q.; Lu, X.; Wu, Y.; Liu, W.; et al. A humanized neutralizing antibody against MERS-CoV targeting the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 1237–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Qiu, H.; Sun, S.; Xiao, H.; Feng, J.; Guo, Y.; Tai, W.; Wang, Y.; Du, L.; Zhao, G.; Zhou, Y. Single-dose treatment with a humanized neutralizing antibody affords full protection of a human transgenic mouse model from lethal Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-coronavirus infection. Antivir. Res. 2016, 132, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hart, T.K.; Cook, R.M.; Zia-Amirhosseini, P.; Minthorn, E.; Sellers, T.S.; Maleeff, B.E.; Eustis, S.; Schwartz, L.W.; Tsui, P.; Appelbaum, E.R.; et al. Preclinical efficacy and safety of mepolizumab (SB-240563), a humanized monoclonal antibody to IL-5, in cynomolgus monkeys. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2001, 108, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Koleba, T.; Ensom, M.H. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous immunoglobulin: A systematic review. Pharmacotherapy 2006, 26, 813–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Guilleminault, L.; Azzopardi, N.; Arnoult, C.; Sobilo, J.; Herve, V.; Montharu, J.; Guillon, A.; Andres, C.; Herault, O.; Le Pape, A.; et al. Fate of inhaled monoclonal antibodies after the deposition of aerosolized particles in the respiratory system. J. Control. Release 2014, 196, 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bitonti, A.J.; Dumont, J.A. Pulmonary administration of therapeutic proteins using an immunoglobulin transport pathway. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2006, 58, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bitonti, A.J.; Dumont, J.A.; Low, S.C.; Peters, R.T.; Kropp, K.E.; Palombella, V.J.; Stattel, J.M.; Lu, Y.; Tan, C.A.; Song, J.J.; et al. Pulmonary delivery of an erythropoietin Fc fusion protein in non-human primates through an immunoglobulin transport pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 9763–9768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Low, S.C.; Nunes, S.L.; Bitonti, A.J.; Dumont, J.A. Oral and pulmonary delivery of FSH-Fc fusion proteins via neonatal Fc receptor-mediated transcytosis. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 20, 1805–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Van Heeke, G.; Allosery, K.; De Brabandere, V.; De Smedt, T.; Detalle, L.; de Fougerolles, A. Nanobodies(R) as inhaled biotherapeutics for lung diseases. Pharm. Ther. 2017, 169, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, Y.S.; Aigerim, A.; Park, U.; Kim, Y.; Rhee, J.Y.; Choi, J.P.; Park, W.B.; Park, S.W.; Kim, Y.; Lim, D.G.; et al. Sequential Emergence and Wide Spread of Neutralization Escape Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Mutants, South Korea, 2015. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 1161–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Noh, J.; Kim, O.; Jung, Y.; Han, H.; Kim, J.E.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Park, J.; Jung, R.H.; Kim, S.I.; et al. High-throughput retrieval of physical DNA for NGS-identifiable clones in phage display library. MAbs 2019, 11, 532–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ying, T.; Prabakaran, P.; Du, L.; Shi, W.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, W.; Jiang, S.; Dimitrov, D.S.; et al. Junctional and allele-specific residues are critical for MERS-CoV neutralization by an exceptionally potent germline-like antibody. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Pommie, C.; Levadoux, S.; Sabatier, R.; Lefranc, G.; Lefranc, M.P. IMGT standardized criteria for statistical analysis of immunoglobulin V-REGION amino acid properties. J. Mol. Recognit. 2004, 17, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tartaglia, G.G.; Cavalli, A.; Pellarin, R.; Caflisch, A. Prediction of aggregation rate and aggregation-prone segments in polypeptide sequences. Protein Sci. 2005, 14, 2723–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Igawa, T.; Tsunoda, H.; Tachibana, T.; Maeda, A.; Mimoto, F.; Moriyama, C.; Nanami, M.; Sekimori, Y.; Nabuchi, Y.; Aso, Y.; et al. Reduced elimination of IgG antibodies by engineering the variable region. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2010, 23, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Feige, M.J.; Hendershot, L.M.; Buchner, J. How antibodies fold. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Sormanni, P.; Amery, L.; Ekizoglou, S.; Vendruscolo, M.; Popovic, B. Rapid and accurate in silico solubility screening of a monoclonal antibody library. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Larios Mora, A.; Detalle, L.; Gallup, J.M.; Van Geelen, A.; Stohr, T.; Duprez, L.; Ackermann, M.R. Delivery of ALX-0171 by inhalation greatly reduces respiratory syncytial virus disease in newborn lambs. MAbs 2018, 10, 778–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Respaud, R.; Marchand, D.; Parent, C.; Pelat, T.; Thullier, P.; Tournamille, J.F.; Viaud-Massuard, M.C.; Diot, P.; Si-Tahar, M.; Vecellio, L.; et al. Effect of formulation on the stability and aerosol performance of a nebulized antibody. MAbs 2014, 6, 1347–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Moussa, E.M.; Panchal, J.P.; Moorthy, B.S.; Blum, J.S.; Joubert, M.K.; Narhi, L.O.; Topp, E.M. Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Protein Aggregates. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 105, 417–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Beck-Broichsitter, M.; Kleimann, P.; Schmehl, T.; Betz, T.; Bakowsky, U.; Kissel, T.; Seeger, W. Impact of lyoprotectants for the stabilization of biodegradable nanoparticles on the performance of air-jet, ultrasonic, and vibrating-mesh nebulizers. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2012, 82, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rosenberg, A.S. Effects of protein aggregates: An immunologic perspective. AAPS J. 2006, 8, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ewert, S.; Huber, T.; Honegger, A.; Pluckthun, A. Biophysical properties of human antibody variable domains. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 325, 531–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Honegger, A.; Malebranche, A.D.; Rothlisberger, D.; Pluckthun, A. The influence of the framework core residues on the biophysical properties of immunoglobulin heavy chain variable domains. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2009, 22, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Chennamsetty, N.; Voynov, V.; Kayser, V.; Helk, B.; Trout, B.L. Design of therapeutic proteins with enhanced stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 11937–11942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Wang, X.; Das, T.K.; Singh, S.K.; Kumar, S. Potential aggregation prone regions in biotherapeutics: A survey of commercial monoclonal antibodies. MAbs 2009, 1, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, S.J.; Luo, J.; O’Neil, K.T.; Kang, J.; Lacy, E.R.; Canziani, G.; Baker, A.; Huang, M.; Tang, Q.M.; Raju, T.S.; et al. Structure-based engineering of a monoclonal antibody for improved solubility. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2010, 23, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Jespers, L.; Schon, O.; Famm, K.; Winter, G. Aggregation-resistant domain antibodies selected on phage by heat denaturation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 1161–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Perchiacca, J.M.; Bhattacharya, M.; Tessier, P.M. Mutational analysis of domain antibodies reveals aggregation hotspots within and near the complementarity determining regions. Proteins 2011, 79, 2637–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dudgeon, K.; Rouet, R.; Kokmeijer, I.; Schofield, P.; Stolp, J.; Langley, D.; Stock, D.; Christ, D. General strategy for the generation of human antibody variable domains with increased aggregation resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 10879–10884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Agrawal, A.S.; Garron, T.; Tao, X.; Peng, B.H.; Wakamiya, M.; Chan, T.S.; Couch, R.B.; Tseng, C.T. Generation of a transgenic mouse model of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection and disease. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 3659–3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, K.; Wohlford-Lenane, C.; Perlman, S.; Zhao, J.; Jewell, A.K.; Reznikov, L.R.; Gibson-Corley, K.N.; Meyerholz, D.K.; McCray, P.B., Jr. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Causes Multiple Organ Damage and Lethal Disease in Mice Transgenic for Human Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 213, 712–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhao, G.; Jiang, Y.; Qiu, H.; Gao, T.; Zeng, Y.; Guo, Y.; Yu, H.; Li, J.; Kou, Z.; Du, L.; et al. Multi-Organ Damage in Human Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Transgenic Mice Infected with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 145561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Li, K.; Wohlford-Lenane, C.L.; Channappanavar, R.; Park, J.E.; Earnest, J.T.; Bair, T.B.; Bates, A.M.; Brogden, K.A.; Flaherty, H.A.; Gallagher, T.; et al. Mouse-adapted MERS coronavirus causes lethal lung disease in human DPP4 knockin mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E3119–E3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Kanof, M.E.; Smith, P.D.; Zola, H. Isolation of whole mononuclear cells from peripheral blood and cord blood. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Barbas, C.F.; Burton, D.R.; Scott, J.K.; Silverman, G.J. Phage Display: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Andris-Widhopf, J.; Steinberger, P.; Fuller, R.; Rader, C.; Barbas, C.F., 3rd. Generation of human scFv antibody libraries: PCR amplification and assembly of light- and heavy-chain coding sequences. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lee, Y.; Kim, H.; Chung, J. An antibody reactive to the Gly63-Lys68 epitope of NT-proBNP exhibits O-glycosylation-independent binding. Exp. Mol. Med. 2014, 46, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lee, S.; Yoon, I.H.; Yoon, A.; Cook-Mills, J.M.; Park, C.G.; Chung, J. An antibody to the sixth Ig-like domain of VCAM-1 inhibits leukocyte transendothelial migration without affecting adhesion. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 4592–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jin, J.; Park, G.; Park, J.B.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.; Chung, J. An anti-EGFR x cotinine bispecific antibody complexed with cotinine-conjugated duocarmycin inhibits growth of EGFR-positive cancer cells with KRAS mutations. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Reed, L.J.; Muench, H. A Simple Method for Estimating Fifty Per Cent. Endpoints. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1938, 27, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 05073 g001 550
Figure 1. Sequential randomization of CDR residues of the C-8 clone. (A) In the first randomized library, six hydrophobic amino acid residues (asterisks) in HCDR1 and HCDR2 were targeted. The second library was prepared in the C-8-2 clone by randomizing nine amino acid residues (asterisks) that were not randomized in the first randomized library. (B) Eight amino acid residues (asterisks) in LCDRs of the C-8-2-4B clone selected from the second library were randomized in the third randomized library.
Figure 1. Sequential randomization of CDR residues of the C-8 clone. (A) In the first randomized library, six hydrophobic amino acid residues (asterisks) in HCDR1 and HCDR2 were targeted. The second library was prepared in the C-8-2 clone by randomizing nine amino acid residues (asterisks) that were not randomized in the first randomized library. (B) Eight amino acid residues (asterisks) in LCDRs of the C-8-2-4B clone selected from the second library were randomized in the third randomized library.
Ijms 20 05073 g001
Ijms 20 05073 g002 550
Figure 2. Reactivity of anti-MERS-CoV IgG1 antibodies before and after nebulization. Following nebulization at a concentration of 1 mg/mL, aerosol was collected and subjected to ELISA. Recombinant S glycoprotein-coated microtiter plates were incubated with pre-nebulized and post-nebulized C-8 IgG1 (A), C-8-2-4B-10D IgG1 (B), and m336 (C). HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG antibody was used as the probe, and ABTS was used as the substrate. All experiments were performed in duplicate, and the data indicate mean ± SD.
Figure 2. Reactivity of anti-MERS-CoV IgG1 antibodies before and after nebulization. Following nebulization at a concentration of 1 mg/mL, aerosol was collected and subjected to ELISA. Recombinant S glycoprotein-coated microtiter plates were incubated with pre-nebulized and post-nebulized C-8 IgG1 (A), C-8-2-4B-10D IgG1 (B), and m336 (C). HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG antibody was used as the probe, and ABTS was used as the substrate. All experiments were performed in duplicate, and the data indicate mean ± SD.
Ijms 20 05073 g002
Ijms 20 05073 g003 550
Figure 3. DLS analysis. To evaluate the size distribution profile of pre-nebulized C-8 (A), pre-nebulized C-8-2-4B-10D (B), pre-nebulized m336 (C), post-nebulized C-8 (D), post-nebulized C-8-2-4B-10D (E), and post-nebulized m336 IgG1 (F) antibodies, DLS was performed using 633-nm/4-mW laser at a 173° detection angle. PBS was used as the reference solvent, and the results were evaluated with Zetasizer software 7.02. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and representative results are shown for each antibody.
Figure 3. DLS analysis. To evaluate the size distribution profile of pre-nebulized C-8 (A), pre-nebulized C-8-2-4B-10D (B), pre-nebulized m336 (C), post-nebulized C-8 (D), post-nebulized C-8-2-4B-10D (E), and post-nebulized m336 IgG1 (F) antibodies, DLS was performed using 633-nm/4-mW laser at a 173° detection angle. PBS was used as the reference solvent, and the results were evaluated with Zetasizer software 7.02. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and representative results are shown for each antibody.
Ijms 20 05073 g003
Ijms 20 05073 g004 550
Figure 4. Neutralization of MERS-CoV by pre- and post-nebulized IgG1. Culture media containing 100 PFU MERS-CoV was mixed with equal volume of serially diluted C-8 IgG1 (A), C-8-2-4B-10D IgG1 (B), m336 IgG1 (C), and palivizumab (D). After incubation for 1 h, the mixture was added to Vero cells. After 2 days, the plaques were counted. The inhibition of virus infection was plotted as a function of IgG1 antibody concentration, and PRNT50 values were calculated by GraphPad Prism 6. All experiments were performed in quadruplicate, and the data indicate mean ± SD.
Figure 4. Neutralization of MERS-CoV by pre- and post-nebulized IgG1. Culture media containing 100 PFU MERS-CoV was mixed with equal volume of serially diluted C-8 IgG1 (A), C-8-2-4B-10D IgG1 (B), m336 IgG1 (C), and palivizumab (D). After incubation for 1 h, the mixture was added to Vero cells. After 2 days, the plaques were counted. The inhibition of virus infection was plotted as a function of IgG1 antibody concentration, and PRNT50 values were calculated by GraphPad Prism 6. All experiments were performed in quadruplicate, and the data indicate mean ± SD.
Ijms 20 05073 g004
Table
Table 1. Size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis
Table 1. Size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis
AntibodySE-HPLC
(% Monomer/% Aggregates)		DLS
(% Monomer ± SD/% Aggregates ± SD)
Pre-NebulizationPost-NebulizationPre-NebulizationPost-Nebulization
C-8100.0/097.9/2.1100.0 ± 0/078.4 ± 3.5/21.6 ± 3.5
C-8-2-4B-10D100.0/0100.0/099.2 ± 0.7/0.8 ± 0.798.6 ± 0.4/1.4 ± 0.4
m336100.0/099.4/0.696.6 ± 0.6/3.4 ± 0.677.5 ± 2.3/22.5 ± 2.3

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, S.I.; Kim, S.; Kim, J.; Chang, S.Y.; Shim, J.M.; Jin, J.; Lim, C.; Baek, S.; Min, J.-Y.; Park, W.B.; et al. Generation of a Nebulizable CDR-Modified MERS-CoV Neutralizing Human Antibody. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5073. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20205073

AMA Style

Kim SI, Kim S, Kim J, Chang SY, Shim JM, Jin J, Lim C, Baek S, Min J-Y, Park WB, et al. Generation of a Nebulizable CDR-Modified MERS-CoV Neutralizing Human Antibody. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(20):5073. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20205073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Sang Il, Sujeong Kim, Jinhee Kim, So Young Chang, Jung Min Shim, Jongwha Jin, Chungsu Lim, Songyi Baek, Ji-Young Min, Wan Beom Park, and et al. 2019. "Generation of a Nebulizable CDR-Modified MERS-CoV Neutralizing Human Antibody" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 20: 5073. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20205073

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop