Next Article in Journal
Integrated Analysis of the Altered lncRNAs and mRNAs Expression in 293T Cells after Ionizing Radiation Exposure
Next Article in Special Issue
Small RNA Mobility: Spread of RNA Silencing Effectors and its Effect on Developmental Processes and Stress Adaptation in Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Stenotic Microchannels to Study Thrombus Formation in Shear Gradients: Influence of Shear Forces and Human Platelet-Related Factors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Small RNA Functions as a Trafficking Effector in Plant Immunity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms20122966
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Determination of the MiRNAs Related to Bean Pyralid Larvae Resistance in Soybean Using Small RNA and Transcriptome Sequencing

by
Weiying Zeng
1,
Zudong Sun
1,*,
Zhenguang Lai
1,
Shouzhen Yang
1,
Huaizhu Chen
1,
Xinghai Yang
2,
Jiangrong Tao
1 and
Xiangmin Tang
1
1
Cash Crops Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China
2
Rice Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(12), 2966; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20122966
Submission received: 28 April 2019 / Revised: 15 June 2019 / Accepted: 17 June 2019 / Published: 18 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regulations by Small RNA in Plant Development and Beyond)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Soybean is one of the most important oil crops in the world. Bean pyralid is a major leaf-feeding insect of soybean. In order to screen out the functional genes and regulatory pathways related to the resistance for bean pyralid larvae, the small RNA and transcriptome sequencing were performed based on the highly resistant material (Gantai-2-2) and highly susceptible material (Wan 82-178) of soybean. The results showed that, when comparing 48 h feeding with 0 h feeding, 55 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified in Gantai-2-2 and 58 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified in Wan82-178. When comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178, 77 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified at 0 h feeding, and 70 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified at 48 h feeding. The pathway analysis of the predicted target genes revealed that the plant hormone signal transduction, RNA transport, protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum, zeatin biosynthesis, ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis, and isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis may play important roles in soybean’s defense against the stress caused by bean pyralid larvae. According to conjoint analysis of the miRNA/mRNA, a total of 20 differentially expressed miRNAs were negatively correlated with 26 differentially expressed target genes. The qRT-PCR analysis verified that the small RNA sequencing results were credible. According to the analyses of the differentially expressed miRNAs, we speculated that miRNAs are more likely to play key roles in the resistance to insects. Gma-miR156q, Gma-miR166u, Gma-miR166b, Gma-miR166j-3p, Gma-miR319d, Gma-miR394a-3p, Gma-miR396e, and so on—as well as their negatively regulated differentially expressed target genes—may be involved in the regulation of soybean resistance to bean pyralid larvae. These results laid a foundation for further in-depth research regarding the action mechanisms of insect resistance.

1. Introduction

MicroRNA (miRNA) is a type of non-coding RNA (small RNA) approximately 20–24 nt in length, which widely exists in both higher and lower organisms. It is an important regulatory factor for gene expression at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels [1]. The functions of miRNA in plant development, environmental adaptation, stress resistance, and so on, have been confirmed, it is even considered that miRNA is a new level of gene regulation [2,3,4,5]. Soybean is subjected to biotic and abiotic stresses during its growth stages. It is known that soybean miRNA also plays an important role in regulatory gene expressions during various stresses. For example, 10 miRNAs were associated with the infection and resistance of Phytophthora sojae, and over-expressions of these differential miRNAs could impact the pathogenicity of Phytophthora sojae, Gma-miR393 and Gma-miR166 may be involved in the basic defense against Phytophthora sojae [6,7]. Gma-miR160, Gma-miR393, and Gma-miR1510 responded to SMV infections [8]. There were 101 miRNAs in 40 miRNA families involved in the infection defense against SCN; Gma-miR393, Gma-miR1507, Gma-miR1510, Gma-miR1515, Gma-miR171, and Gma-miR2118 were able to produce phase RNA in order to respond to SCN infections [9,10]. There were 126 miRNAs related to phosphorus stress, of which 112 were simultaneously expressed in the roots and leaves [11]. A total of 27 known miRNAs, 16 conserved miRNAs and 12 new miRNAs responded to phosphate deficiency in roots, 34 known miRNAs, 14 conserved miRNAs, and 7 new miRNAs responded to phosphate deficiency in seedlings [12]. It was found that 26 miRNAs responded to cadmium stress, of which 12 were expressed only in cadmium susceptible varieties, 5 in cadmium resistant varieties, and 9 in both varieties [13]. In addition, 30 miRNAs were found to have responded to aluminum stress [14]. Therefore, as demonstrated from the results of the aforementioned research regarding the regulation functions of soybean miRNA, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of crop resistance has been achieved.
Bean pyralid (Lamprosema indicata Fabricius) is an important leaf-feeding pest of soybean, it is widely distributed throughout the world and is found in Korea, Japan, China, India, the Americas, and Africa [15]. It can only feed and reproduce on soybean, so soybean is its only food source. Bean pyralid larvae begin to roll the leaves after the third instar and then lie in them. It feeds on the leaf tissues, consequently soybean cannot perform normal photosynthesis and lose nutrients, preventing the normal growth, so that the flowers and pods fall off and the yield is reduced. These serious harmful effects can cause sharp decreases in yield or even total crop failure of soybean [16]. In southern China, four to five generations can occur in one year. In years with serious damage, only veins and petioles have been left on the blades after leaves have been consumed, generally, the yield is reduced between 15% and 20%, and when the infestation is severe, the yield can be reduced more than 30% [17]. We have been studying on soybean resistance to bean pyralid for a long time, including resistance resource mining, resistance identification, resistance inheritance, physiology, biochemistry, etc. For example, after some years of resistance identification, the results showed that Gantai-2-2 from Jiangsu was highly resistant, Wan82-178 from Anhui was highly susceptible, and resistance to bean pyralid is stable. The soybean resistance to bean pyralid was evaluated by the density of package and insect mouth [17]. Long et al. found that the pupation rate, generation survival rate, and egg hatching rate of adult bean pyralid were different in the different genotypes of soybean varieties. The pupation rate and generational survival rate of bean pyralid were the lowest among Gantai-2-2, the results showed that Gantai-2-2 could significantly inhibit the growth and oviposition of bean pyralid [18].
Therefore, further study regarding the regulations of miRNAs under bean pyralid larvae stress will deepen our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of soybean insect resistance and allow better use of miRNAs to enhance soybean resistance. The leaves of Gantai-2-2 and Wan82-178 were used to identify the differentially expressed miRNAs and their target genes related to the regulation of the resistance to bean pyralid larvae through high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analyses. Then study could be conducted on the metabolic pathways and molecular networks of the differentially expressed miRNAs and their involved target genes. The purpose of this study was to explore the functions of the specific miRNA/target genes resistance to bean pyralid stress in soybean, and to develop a preliminary understanding of the pathways of soybean resistance to bean pyralid mediated by miRNA/target genes. Functional verification will be carried out by screening targeted miRNA/target genes related to insect resistance, so as to further analyze the insect resistance regulation mechanism involved by miRNA/target genes and create new insect-resistant transgenic materials. It will open up new ideas for further clarifying the molecular mechanism of soybean resistance to bean pyralid, and also provide a breakthrough for the development of specific insect-resistant elements to find the level of target gene regulation. These results will lay a solid theoretical foundation for soybean insect-resistant molecular breeding.

2. Results

2.1. Analysis of the Small RNA Sequencing Data

For the purpose of understanding the roles of miRNAs in the regulation of soybean resistance to bean pyralid larvae, eight small RNA libraries were constructed for Gantai-2-2 (HRK) and Wan82-178 (HSK) before and after bean pyralid larvae feeding. Then, high-throughput sequencing was performed using an Illumina sequencing technique. More than 15 million raw reads were obtained in the eight small RNA libraries, respectively (Table 1). Then, following the filtering of the low-quality sequences; 3′ and 5′ adapter sequences; sequences without insert fragments; sequences with overly long insert fragments; polyA sequences; and fragment sequences <18 nt, more than 14 million clean reads were obtained, ranging from 14335242 to 20230796. Among these, 12999357 to 18078009 small RNA sequences were matched into soybean genome, respectively (Table 1).
The lengths of these small RNAs sequences in leaves were analyzed statistically in accordance with the sequencing results (Figure 1). The results showed that the lengths of the small RNAs ranged 18–32 nt, and majority of the small RNAs in the eight libraries were 20–24 nt. Also, the distribution peaks were concentrated in 20 nt, 21 nt, and 24 nt.
The classified annotations of the small RNAs showed that the number of unannotated small RNAs in the eight samples was much larger than the number of annotations in both quantity and species (Table 1). In terms of quantity, the proportion of the miRNAs was found to be larger than that of the other types of non-coding RNAs. However, the number of types was smaller than that of the other types of non-coding RNAs. In addition, the ratios of the rRNAs were determined to be 1.26%, 2.37%, 2.76%, 1.46%, 1.59%, 1.74%, 1.68%, and 1.87%, all of which were much lower than 60% [19]. These results indicated that the samples were of good quality, and the obtained data were reliable.

2.2. Identification and Conservation Analyses of the MiRNAs

All mappable small RNA sequences were compared with the known soybean miRNAs in the miRbase database (miRbase 21.0, http://www.mirbase.org/), 428 mature miRNAs belonging to 192 miRNA families was completed. Among these known families of miRNAs, MIR166 contained 18 members; followed by MIR156 with 16 members, MIR319 with 16 members, MIR171 with 15 members, MIR396 with 14 members, and MIR172 with 11 members. However, the majority of the miRNA families were found to have fewer than 10 members. Most of the miRNAs (51.84%) were conserved in the different plant species and played important and conserved roles in plant development, including leaf tissue development. In contrast, the non-conserved miRNAs were observed to only have species-specific characteristics in plant development. Zhang et al. demonstrated that the miRNA families classified as highly-, moderately-, lowly-, and non-conserved miRNAs found in more than 10, 5–9, 2–4, and only 1 plant species [20]. There were 23 highly conserved; 3 moderately conserved; 20 lowly conserved; and 146 non-conserved miRNAs families have been identified in the eight samples (Table 2).
Also, according to the prediction results, 61 putative novel miRNAs (Table S1) in 61 new families were identified. The sequence lengths of these mature miRNAs were found to range from 19 to 30 nt. The precursors of these miRNAs were identified by MIREAP. The length distributions were found to range from 69 to 910 nt. The first base in the sequence of the majority of the mature novel miRNA was U, which was consistent with the results of the previously reported soybean miRNA.

2.3. Analyses of the Differentially Expressed MiRNAs

The expression quantities of some miRNAs were found to change significantly during the process of bean pyralid larvae stress. Therefore, in order to determine the miRNAs which were associated with soybean resistance to bean pyralid larvae, analyses were made of the different expressions of soybean miRNAs in two control groups (HRK48/HRK0 and HSK48/HSK0). The results showed that 55 differentially expressed miRNAs (52 known miRNAs and 3 novel miRNAs) were identified in Gantai-2-2 when comparing 48 h feeding with 0 h feeding, of which 28 miRNAs were upregulated and 27 were downregulated. A total of 58 differentially expressed miRNAs (45 known miRNAs and 13 novel miRNAs) were identified in Wan82-178, of which 25 miRNAs were upregulated and 33 were downregulated (Table S2). In accordance with the expressions of the miRNAs, the number of the upregulated miRNAs was not found to be significantly different from that of the downregulated miRNAs when soybean was stressed by bean pyralid larvae. These findings suggested that some of the miRNAs in soybean had become activated, and some of the miRNAs were inhibited after stimulation. It was speculated that the significant or very significant differentially expressed miRNAs may have been responding to the stress caused by bean pyralid larvae through the upregulated or downregulated differential expressions.
In order to screen the constitutive defense genes, miRNAs were identified by analyzing the expression of the miRNAs in the resistant and susceptible materials without bean pyralid larvae feeding (HRK0/HSK0). It was found that, a total of 77 differentially expressed miRNAs (69 known miRNAs and 8 novel miRNAs) were identified when comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178, of which 47 miRNAs were upregulated and 30 were downregulated. Among these, Gma-miR4352b and Gma-miR5040 were expressed only in Gantai-2-2 and had almost no expression in Wan82-178. These results indicated that these two miRNAs were specifically expressed in the insect-resistant material. Also, in accordance with the genotype-specific expressions of the miRNAs without insect stress, it was speculated that some miRNAs would also be preferentially expressed in certain material after being invaded by bean pyralid larvae. Therefore, the expression of the miRNAs in the resistant and susceptible materials were also analyzed at 48 h (HRK48/HSK48). A total of 70 differentially expressed miRNAs (60 known miRNAs and 10 novel miRNAs) were identified when comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178, of which 42 miRNAs were upregulated and 28 were downregulated (Table S2). It was speculated that these differentially expressed miRNAs regulated soybean resistance to the infringement of bean pyralid larvae by upregulating or downregulating their expressions.
There were three types of differentially expressed miRNAs in the two materials. The first type included “differentially expressed miRNAs with non-bean pyralid-induced genotype”. There were 77 miRNAs identified in total. This type of miRNAs were the “differentially expressed miRNAs identified in Gantai-2-2 compared to Wan82-178 before bean pyralid feeding”, in which, 17 miRNAs were always upregulated and 12 were always downregulated at 0 h and 48 h, respectively. In addition, 3 miRNAs were found to be upregulated at 0 h but downregulated at 48 h. Furthermore, 5 miRNAs were downregulated at 0 h but upregulated at 48 h. The other 40 miRNAs displayed no regulation differences. The second type included the “bean pyralid-induced differentially expressed miRNAs which appeared in both the insect-resistant and insect-susceptible materials”. A total of 24 miRNAs were determined to belong to this type, of which 10 miRNAs were upregulated and 6 were downregulated in both materials; 3 miRNAs were downregulated in Gantai-2-2 but upregulated in Wan82-178; and 5 miRNAs were upregulated in Gantai-2-2 but downregulated in Wan82-178. The third type of miRNAs were the “bean pyralid-induced genotype differentially expressed miRNAs”. There were 65 miRNAs in this type, such miRNAs which were only expressed in the resistant or susceptible material. Among these, 31 miRNAs were expressed only in Gantai-2-2 and 34 miRNAs in Wan82-178.

2.4. Cluster Analyses of the Differentially Expressed MiRNAs

The cluster analyses results of the differentially expressed miRNAs in the four control groups showed that these groups were divided into two modules (Figure 2). In the first module, HRK48/HRK0 and HRK48/HSK48 were found to have similar overall expression patterns. In the second module, HSK48/HSK0 and HRK0/HSK0 also had similar overall expression patterns. These similarities were mainly manifested in simultaneous upregulations or downregulations. Moreover, these results indicated that the insect-induced miRNAs of the two genotype materials following the feeding stress caused by bean pyralid larvae were able to respond to the insect stress.

2.5. Analysis of the qRT-PCR of the Differential MiRNAs

The differentially expressed miRNAs were verified using a stem-loop qRT-PCR method. During the verification, 10 differentially expressed miRNAs were randomly selected. It was found that 8 miRNAs had identical sequencing results in the four control groups (Figure 3). It was observed that Gma-miR159e-5p was downregulated by small RNA sequencing but upregulated by the stem-loop qRT-PCR in HRK48/HSK48; however, it was consistent with the sequencing results in the other three control groups. Gma-miR156a-5p was downregulated by small RNA sequencing but upregulated by the stem-loop qRT-PCR in HRK0/HSK0, yet it was consistent with the sequencing results in the other three control groups. Therefore, the miRNAs with inconsistent expression trends required further verification.

2.6. Target Gene Prediction and the Functional Analyses of the Differentially Expressed MiRNAs

The roles of miRNAs mainly include the regulation of plant-related physiological processes through the splicing or translation inhibition of target genes. Therefore, target gene predictions are important links in understanding the biological functions of miRNAs [21]. The target gene predictions of differentially expressed miRNAs can directly capture some of the genes which are affected by the differentially expressed miRNAs (Table S3). Furthermore, target gene predictions can help to further understand the regulatory roles of miRNAs in soybean resistance against bean pyralid larvae, so the target gene predictions were made on the differentially expressed miRNAs in the four control groups using prediction software. The results showed that, when comparing 48 h feeding with 0 h feeding, the number of predicted target genes and predicted target gene loci in Gantai-2-2 were 608 and 748; and in Wan82-178 were 704 and 928, respectively. When comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178 at 0 h feeding, the number of predicted target genes and predicted target gene loci were 1010 and 1133, respectively. When comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178 at 48 h feeding, the number of predicted target genes and predicted target gene loci were 637 and 761, respectively. It was observed that the regulation relationships between the miRNAs and their target genes were not always one-to-one, at times, one miRNA would regulate multiple target genes. Meanwhile, at other times, one target gene was regulated by multiple miRNAs. Generally speaking, the target genes of the same miRNA belonged to the same gene family [22].
GO (gene ontology) function analysis was conducted on the predicted target genes, in order to preliminarily understand the possible biological functions of the differentially expressed miRNAs and facilitate the screening of the candidate miRNAs. The results showed that, when comparing 48 h feeding with 0 h feeding, 442 (72.70%) of 608 target genes predicted in Gantai-2-2 were annotated into 42 functional groups (Figure 4A), including 16 biological processes, 14 cellular components, and 12 molecular functions, and 527 (74.86%) of 704 target genes predicted in Wan82-178 were annotated in 41 functional groups (Figure 4B), including 17 biological processes, 13 cellular components, and 11 molecular functions. When comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178 at 0 h feeding, 794 (78.4%) of the 1010 target genes predicted were annotated in 41 functional groups (Figure 4C), including 17 biological processes, 12 cellular components, and 12 molecular functions. When comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178 at 48 h feeding, 492 (77.24%) of 637 target genes predicted were annotated in 41 functional groups (Figure 4D), including 17 biological processes, 13 cellular components, and 11 molecular functions. From the enrichment results of the four control groups, it can be seen that the predicted target gene functions were similar among the different control groups. For example, during the biological process, the target genes were mainly involved in the cell, metabolic, single-organism, and biological regulation processes. In the cell component, the target genes were mainly concentrated in the cells, cell parts, organelle, membranes, and membrane parts. In the molecular function, the target genes were mainly involved in the functions of binding and catalytic activities. The role of the differentially expressed miRNAs could be preliminarily understood through the analysis of the aforementioned functions in order to facilitate the screening of the miRNAs with specific functions.
In organisms, different genes coordinate with each other to perform specific biological functions. Pathway-based analysis assists in furthering our understanding of the biological functions of genes. It has been found that significant pathway enrichment analysis can determine the main biochemical metabolic pathways and signal transduction pathways in which the predicted target genes participate. The results revealed that, when comparing 48 h feeding with 0 h feeding, 478 (78.61%) of 608 target genes predicted in Gantai-2-2 were enriched into 75 pathways, including 11 significantly enriched pathways, the main pathways were RNA transport (25, 5.23%), protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum (23, 4.81%), zeatin biosynthesis (8, 1.67%), ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis (8, 1.67%). In addition, 551 (78.27%) of 704 target genes predicted in Wan82-178 were enriched in 79 pathways, including 6 significantly enriched pathways, these pathways mainly included plant hormone signal transduction (111, 20.15%), arginine and proline metabolism (13, 2.63%), zeatin biosynthesis (8, 1.45%), ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis (8, 1.45%). When comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178 at 0 h feeding, 864 (85.54%) of 1010 predicted target genes were enriched into 91 pathways, including 12 significantly enriched pathways, these pathways mainly included plant hormone signal transduction (105, 12.15%), RNA transport (32, 3.70%), arginine and proline metabolism (17, 1.97%). When comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178 at 48 h feeding, 552 (86.66%) of 637 predicted target genes were enriched in 78 pathways, including 15 significantly enriched pathways, these pathways mainly included plant hormone signal transduction (30, 5.75%), RNA transport (24, 4.60%), isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis (18, 3.45%), and tyrosine metabolism (18, 3.45%). It was speculated that the plant hormone signal transduction, RNA transport, protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum, zeatin biosynthesis, ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis, and isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis played important roles in the defense process of soybean against the stress caused by bean pyralid larvae. Therefore, it was speculated that the miRNAs displayed the ability to improve the plants resistance to insects by regulating the expressions of related genes in the aforementioned metabolic pathways when the plants were under biotic stress. These results also confirmed that the mechanism of soybean insect resistance is a very complex process, which involves the interactions of multiple metabolic pathways.

2.7. Conjoint Analysis of the Negative Regulations of the MiRNA/mRNA under Bean Pyralid Larvae Stress

The miRNAs in plants are usually completely complementary to the coding sequences of target genes in order to splice and degrade the mRNA, thereby regulating the physiological processes of the plants. Therefore, the accuracy of target gene screening can be improved by using the conjoint analysis of the small RNA sequencing and transcriptome sequencing. Due to the fact that the miRNAs complete post-transcriptional regulations of target genes mainly by suppressing or even silencing the expressions of the target genes, they are generally considered to be negative regulations. A conjoint analysis was made on the differentially expressed genes [23] and the differentially expressed miRNAs. The downregulated target genes were obtained through the upregulated miRNAs. Meanwhile, the upregulated target genes were obtained through the downregulated miRNAs. The results showed that a total of 20 differentially expressed miRNAs were negatively correlated with 26 differentially expressed target genes in the four control group (Table 3). There were 6 differentially expressed miRNAs were negatively correlated with 7 differentially expressed target genes in HRK48/HRK0, 9 differentially expressed miRNAs were negatively correlated with 9 differentially expressed target genes in HSK48/HSK0, 7 differentially expressed miRNAs were negatively correlated with 7 differentially expressed target genes in HRK0/HSK0, 8 differentially expressed miRNAs were correlated with 8 differentially expressed target genes in HRK48/HSK48. It was found that Gma-miR4996 regulated three target genes; Gma-miR166u, Gma-miR1535a, Gma-miR394a-3p, Gma-miR395g, Gma-miR5761a and novel-miR36 regulated two target genes, respectively; and the other 13 miRNAs regulated one target gene, respectively. Meanwhile, Gma-miR166b, Gma-miR166j-3p, and Gma-miR166u were observed to regulate the same one target gene. These results revealed that complex regulatory networks of functional redundancy had occurred in the target genes of the miRNAs related to soybean resistance to bean pyralid larvae. The GO function analysis of the negative regulatory target genes associated with the differentially expressed miRNAs confirmed that these target genes were mainly associated with the responses to stimulus, regulations of transcriptions, and DNA-templates, as well as responses to hormones, cell cycles, activations of MAPKK activities, calcium-transporting ATPase activities, and calciumion transmembrane transport. It was speculated that these miRNAs may play important regulatory roles in soybean resistance to bean pyralid larvae. They may also be involved in the process of resistance to bean pyralid larvae, which can be used for further research examinations.

3. Discussion

Under normal physiological conditions, the gene expressions in plants are in a dynamic equilibrium state. However, when stimulated by the outside world, the dynamic balance will be broken, and the expressions of some genes will change accordingly. In recent years, many research results have suggested that miRNAs are indispensable regulators in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. MiRNAs are known to play important roles in the defense and immune responses of plants [4,24]. High-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analyses were used to initially screen out the miRNAs associated with bean pyralid larvae in soybean. Then, target gene predictions were made on the obtained differentially expressed miRNAs, and the conjoint analysis was conducted in combination with the mRNA. The results showed that some miRNAs had participated in the corresponding regulation process of soybean resistance to bean pyralid larvae. It was possible that when soybean was stimulated by bean pyralid larvae, the organisms resisted the insect pests by inhibiting or inducing miRNAs to activate or inhibit its target gene expressions.
MiR156 is known to be a major factor regulating the transition of plants from juvenile stages to adult stages, and plays an important role in regulating plant growth and development [25]. Its expression tends to decrease with the increased age of a plant, while the plant resistance increases with age [25]. It has been reported that the over-expression of miR156 in maize [26] and Arabidopsis thaliana [27] resulted in a longer juvenile period for these plants. Rice resistance to brown plant hopper was enhanced when miR156 was silenced [28]. In addition, previous related studies have indicated that miR156 mainly regulates the SPL (squamosa promoter-binding protein-like) transcription factor [29]. When comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178 at 0 h feeding, Gma-miR156q was downregulated, and the conjoint analysis showed that Glyma.06G238100.1 (squamosa promoter-binding protein 1-like, SPL) was negatively targeted by Gma-miR156q, we concluded that Gma-miR156q may regulate plant growth and development during insect stress by regulating the SPL transcription factor. In this manner, the plants are able to cope with the insect stress.
It has been determined that miR166 plays an important role in the growth and development of monocotyledons and dicotyledons by regulating the HD-Zip (homodomain-leucine zipper) transcription factors [30,31]. HD-Zip is one of the conserved transcription factors in plants. It is composed of a DNA-homologous domain (HD), and additional Leu zipper (Zip) elements. The HD binds to DNA sequences, and the Zip mediates the formation of protein dimer [32]. Recent studies have shown that miR166 plays a role in plant responses to various environmental stresses, such as miR166 was downregulated in potato and maize under salt stress [33,34], and downregulated in rice during chilling injury [35]. Previous studies have shown that the expressions of subfamily I and II genes of the HD-Zip family transcription factor were induced by drought, high salinity, and chilling injury. These two genes are known to participate in hormone signaling pathways, and regulate plant cell expansion, division, and differentiation by interacting with hormone pathway genes and downstream genes, thereby improving the tolerance levels of plants to stresses [36]. For example, GmHZ1 is a subclass I protein in soybean and plays the role of a transcription activator during the process of mosaic virus infection. Its expression is related to the virus resistance of plants, and it is downregulated in SMV resistant plants [37]. Cabello et al. found that, when arabidopsis was treated with 50.0 mmol/L NaCl for 3 d, the HaHB1 and AtHB13 were increased. Arabidopsis with over-expressions of HaHB1 and AtHB13 displayed good cell membrane stability. Furthermore, the leaf senescence induced by the stress was also delayed, and the transgenic plants showed a higher stress tolerance [38]. HaHB4 has also been confirmed as a drought/ABA inducible gene. In previous studies, arabidopsis with over-expressed HaHB4 genes in Arabidopsis thaliana displayed strong drought tolerance, salt tolerance, and herbivore resistance [39,40]. When comparing 0 h feeding with 48 h feeding, Gma-miR166u and Gma-miR166j-3p were downregulated in Wan82-178 and Gantai-2-2, and Gma-miR166b was upregulated when comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178 at 48 h feeding. The conjoint analysis showed that Gma-miR166u, Gma-miR166b, and Gma-miR166j-3p were negatively correlated with target gene Glyma.07G016700.2 (homeobox-leucine zipper protein ATHB-15-like isoform X4, ATHB-15). These findings led us to the conclusion that Gma-miR166u, Gma-miR166b, and Gma-miR166j-3p may have been involved in regulating soybean resistance to bean pyralid larvae through the target negative regulations of the ATHB-15 transcription factor.
MiR319 regulates the growth and development of leaf by regulating the target TCP transcription factors of family [41]. TCPs directly regulate the LOX2 coding gene which is synthesized in the first-step synthesis of jasmonic acid (JA) [42]. Also, miR319 has the ability to regulate the JA-dependent signaling pathway by regulating the expressions of its target gene TCP, thereby improving the host immunity levels [43]. It has confirmed that miR319 plays an important role in plant reactions to biotic and abiotic stresses. For example, miR319 was involved in plant responses to Botrytis cinerea and freezing injury stress [44,45]. When Osa-miRNA319a was transferred to Agrostis stolonifera, it was found that the drought resistance and salt tolerance levels were improved in the transgenic Agrostis stolonifera [46]. JA signaling plays an important role in anti-insect response, regulating the expression of plant downstream defense response genes, and significantly induced responses of defense systems in plant, thereby effectively reducing pests [47,48,49]. Six Gma-miR319 were upregulated and one Gma-miR319 was downregulated when comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178 at 0 h feeding, and the target gene predictions indicated that TCP family transcription factors were targeted by Gma-miR319. It is speculated that Wan82-178 uses JA signaling to resist pests, this result is consistent with the results of previous transcriptome studies [23]. In addition, five Gma-miR319 in Gantai-2-2 and two Gma-miR319 in Wan82-178 were downregulated after bean pyralid larvae feeding for 48 h, this would mean that the JA signaling was upregulated. It is speculated that when soybean is under the feeding stress of pests, the activation of JA signaling will be induced, and JA signaling plays an important role in the insect defense of soybean with different genotypes. Therefore, Gma-miR319 may have been involved in the defense responses of soybean against pests stress. However, its specific situation requires further functional verification.
It has been determined that miR394 mainly regulates the richness of the F-box domain proteins [50]. Previous studies have shown that when plants had suffered adversity stresses—such as B. cinerea, blue light, drought, and so on—the miR394 were downregulated in tomato [51], longan [52], wild Ipomoea campanulata L [53], and Saccharum spp. [54]. When Gma-miR394a was transferred into Arabidopsis thaliana, it was found that Gma-miR394a had the ability to improve the adaptability to drought stress by reducing the leaf water evaporation rates [55]. When comparing 0 h feeding with 48 h feeding, the Gma-miR394a-3p was downregulated in Gantai-2-2. When comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178 at 0 h feeding, the Gma-miR394a-3p was upregulated. Then, the conjoint analysis showed that Glyma.14G004300.1 (nudix hydrolase 2-like) and Glyma.05G073500.2 (F-box protein SKIP14-like) were negatively targeted by Gma-miR394a-3p. On the basis of our findings, it was speculated that Gma-miR394a-3p possibly participated in soybean resistance to the stress caused by bean pyralid larvae through the negative target regulations of the F-box protein SKIP14-like and nudix hydrolase 2-like.
It has been found that miR396 mainly regulates the plant growth regulator GRF (growth regulating factor) [56]. The GRF regulation mediated by miRNA396 plays an important role in plant growth and development, and is also involved in varieties of stress responses [57]. For example, miR396a in arabidopsis was observed to be significantly upregulated when it was treated with high salinity, low temperatures, and drought [58]. It was found that the expressions of miR396 had been increased by nearly four times on the seventh day after the cyst nematode was introduced, and the expressions of the corresponding target genes GRF1, GRF3, and GRF8 had decreased during the interactions between arabidopsis and cyst nematode [59]. When Ath-miR396a and Ath-miR396b were over-expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana, the development of parasitic nematodes had been restricted in transgenic plants [60]. Furthermore, the drought resistance had been enhanced [61]. When Sp-miR396a was over-expressed in tobacco, the drought, salt and low-temperature resistance of transgenic plants had been enhanced [62]. When comparing Gantai-2-2 with Wan82-178 at 0 h feeding, the Gma-miR396e was upregulated. The results of the target gene predictions indicated that the Gma-miR396e had mainly targeted the GRF3 and GRF5. Then, the conjoint analysis showed that Glyma.13G159700.1 (hypothetical protein GLYMA_13G159700) was negatively targeted by Gma-miR396e. It was speculated that Gma-miR396e could potentially enhance the resistance levels of the highly-resistant material against bean pyralid larvae infestation through the negative target regulation of the GRF genes.

4. Methods

4.1. Materials, Sample Collection, and Total RNA Extraction

Materials which were used for this experimental were Gantai-2-2 (highly resistant material) [17] and Wan82-178 (highly susceptible material) [17]. The materials were planted in an insect controlled net room of the experimental field of the Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences in July 2017. During the entire growth period of soybean, the pesticides and fertilizers were not sprayed. When soybean had grown to a stage where 10 compound leaves were present, bean pyralid larvae in their fourth instar were insect-inoculated according to a density of five insects per seedling. Sampling was conducted at 0 h and 48 h of the insect inoculation, respectively, and two biological replicates were processed for each. The samples were referred to as HRK0-1, HRK0-2, HRK48-1, HRK48-2, HSK0-1, HSK0-1, HSK48-1, and HSK48-2, respectively. Among these samples, HRK represented Gantai-2-2, and HSK represented Wan82-178. The numbers 0 and 48 represented the processing times, and -1 and -2 represented the first and second replicates, respectively. Five plants were taken from each sample for the mixture. These samples were quickly frozen using liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C refrigerated conditions for further use. Total RNA from the leaves of eight samples was extracted using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

4.2. Library Construction

The qualified libraries were amplified on cBot in order to generate the clusters on the flow-cell (TruSeq SE Cluster Kit V3-cBot-HS, Illumina, SanDiego, CA, USA). Also, the amplified flow-cell was a sequenced single end on the HiSeq 2000 System (TruSeq SBS KIT-HS V3, Illumina; BGI, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China), in which read lengths of 50 are the most common sequencing strategy. Filtering the small RNA: 5–10 μg samples of RNA were used, in which separate RNA segments of different sizes were selected using PAGE gel, and 18–30 nt (14–30 ssRNA Ladder Marker, TAKARA) stripes were selected and recycled. 5′ adaptor ligation: A 5′ adaptor connection system was prepared. Reaction conditions: 20 °C for 6 h, then RNA segments of different sizes were separated by PAGE gel, and 40–60 nt stripes were selected and recycled. 3′ adaptor ligation: A 3′ adaptor connection system was prepared. Reaction conditions: 20 °C for 6 h, then RNA segments of different sizes were separated by PAGE gel, and 60–80 nt stripes were selected and recycled. RT-PCR: A First Strand Master Mix and Super Script II (Invitrogen) reverse transcription were prepared. Reaction conditions: 65 °C for 10 m, 48 °C for 3 m, 42 °C for 1 h, and 70 °C for 15 m. PCR amplification: Several rounds of PCR Primer Cocktail and PCR Mix were performed in order to enrich the cDNA fragments. Reaction conditions: 98 °C for 30 s, 12–15 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s and 72 °C for 15 s, 72 °C for 10 m, and a 4 °C hold. Purification of the PCR products: The PCR products were purified with PAGE gel, approximately 110 bp of the recycled product stripes were selected and recycled, and the recycled products were dissolved in an EB solution. The final library was analyzed in two ways: (1) the average molecule length was determined using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer instrument (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and (2) the library was quantified using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) (ABI StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System, Foster city, CA, USA).

4.3. Data Analysis of the Small RNA

After the sequencing was completed, the raw data was processed, and the main processing steps were as follows: (1) the reads with low sequencing quality were removed, (2) the reads with N proportions higher than 10% were removed (where N denotes that the base information could not be determined), (3) the reads with 5′ junction contamination were removed, (4) the reads without 3′ junction sequences were removed, (5) the reads without insertion fragments were removed, (6) the reads containing polyA were removed, and (7) the reads which were less than 18 nt were removed.
After the above treatments were completed, the data which were obtained were clean reads. Then, the types of small RNA (sRNA) sequences (expressed by ‘unique’), and the number of sequences (expressed by ‘total’) were counted. Also, the length distribution of the small RNA sequences was counted. The expressions and distributions of the sRNA on the genome were analyzed by comparing the sRNA with soybean genome (ftp://ftp.jgi-psf.org/pub/compgen/phytozome/v9.0/Gmax) using AASRA comparison software [63]. Then, by comparing the sRNA with repetitive sequences, repeat-associated sRNA were obtained. Repeat-associated sRNA were obtained by comparing the sRNA with the repeat sequences. The rRNA, scRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, and tRNA in the Genbank (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) were selected to annotate the small RNA which had been obtained from the sequencing. The rRNA, scRNA, snoRNA, snoRNA, and tRNA were found and removed as much as possible. At this point, the Rfam database (11.0, http://rfam.janelia.org/) was selected to annotate the small RNA sequences which had been obtained from the sequencing, and the rRNA, scRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, and tRNA were found and removed as much as possible. In order to make each of the unique sRNA have a unique annotation, the sRNAs were traversed and annotated in the following priority order: miRNA > piRNA > snoRNA > Rfam > other sRNAs. The sum of the rRNAs in the classified annotation results could then be used as a quality control standard for a sample.

4.4. Small RNA Predictions and Small RNA Expression Quantifications

After removing the non-target sRNA sequences—such as the rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA and repetitive sequences—as well as the known miRNAs, the remaining unannotated unique reads were used to predict the new miRNAs. The precursors which were based on the miRNAs formed hairpin secondary structures, dicer restriction enzyme cutting sites, and minimum free energy. RIPmiR [64] was used to predict the new miRNAs (the minimum folding free energy (MFE) of the novel miRNA precursor <0.2 kcal/mol/nt; and the minimum folding free energy index (MFEI) >0.85).
TPM [65] was used to standardize the expression levels of the small RNA, which effectively avoided the impacts of the different sequencing quantities on the quantitative accuracy. Therefore, the standardized data could be directly used for follow-up comparative analysis.
The TPM calculation formula was:
TPM = C ∗ 10 6 N

4.5. Target Gene Predictions

The process of determining the potential target genes for the miRNAs was necessary for the subsequent analysis. In order to ensure more accurate results, this study utilized psRobot [66] and TargetFinder [67] software to predict the target genes of miRNA in this study. The default parameters of the target gene prediction software were as follows: psRobot: -gl 17, -p 8, -gn 1; TargetFinder: -c 4, and the union set was taken. The filtering was implemented in combination with the corresponding filtering conditions, such as free energy, score value, and so on.

4.6. Screening of the Differentially Expressed MiRNA

RNA sequencing is a known to be a random process, and each sequence is uniformly random from its sample [68]. Therefore, based on this assumption, this study assumed that the expression of each gene (transcript) followed a binomial distribution (or Poisson distribution). Then, using the above model, the DEGseq [69] calculated the differential expression based on the MA-plot [70]. It was assumed that C_1 and C_2 were the total number of reads in the comparison of the two samples, respectively, and obeyed binomial distribution. We define M = (log2C1 − log2C2) and A = (log2C1 + log2C2/2). It can be proven that under the conditions of random sampling, the distribution of M obeys A = a and accords with the approximate normal distribution. Multiple hypothesis testing and corrections were made for the p-value of each gene using Q-value. If the selection threshold of |Log2FC (Fold Change)| ≥ 1 and the Q-value ≤ 0.001, it was considered to be a significantly differentially expressed miRNA.

4.7. Hierarchical Cluster Analyses

In accordance with the test results of the differentially expressed miRNAs, the ‘pheatmap’ function of R software was used to carry out a hierarchical clustering analysis. It was determined that multiple groups of differentially expressed miRNAs were clustered at the same time. Therefore, the clustering analysis was performed separately for the intersections and unions of the differentially expressed miRNAs.

4.8. Bioinformatics Analyses

GO (GO, http://www.geneontology.org/) and functional enrichment analyses were conducted for all the target genes using TermFinder software (http://www.yeastgenome.org/help/analyze/go-term-finder). Then, all of the target genes were mapped to a pathway in the KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html) using Blast_v2.2.26 software. Also, the p-value ≤ 0.05 was used as the threshold for the purpose of judging the significance of the GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses.

4.9. Quantitative Real Time-PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis

A RT specific primer (Table S4) was used for the reverse transcription of the miRNA of each sample (2.5 mM dNTP: 2.0 μL, 10×RT Buffer: 2.0 μL, 1.0 μM RT specific primer: 2.0 μL, Total RNA: 2.0 μg, 10.0 u/μL reverse transcriptase: 1.0 μL, 10.0 u/μL RNA enzyme inhibitor: 1.0 μL, RNA-free enzyme: water up to 20.0 μL), and RT reactions was completed on a PCR amplifier (16 °C for 30 m, 42 °C for 40 m, 85 °C for 5 m). After completing the reactions, the samples were placed on ice for standby use or stored at −20 °C. Fluorescent quantitative PCR amplification was implemented (H2O: 6.6 μL, 2×PCR MIX: 8.0 μL, 50 pM/μL up primer: 0.2 μL, 50 pM/μL down primer: 0.2 μL, template (reverse transcription product: for example, cDNA): 1.0 μL. Three parallel experiments were carried out for each sample in the 384 hole plate using an ABI ViiA 7 PCR instrument. The data regarding the CT values in the reactions were collected by the corrected threshold setting. The miRNAs in the real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR method used mir1520d as the reference gene [71], and a 2−ΔΔCt method was used for the relative quantification. The means of 2−ΔΔCt were considered significantly different at p < 0.5.

5. Conclusions

The identification processes and expression analyses of miRNAs before and after soybean suffered stress caused by bean pyralid larvae were implemented, in accordance with the changes of miRNAs in the highly resistant and highly susceptible materials, a total of 132 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified which were confirmed to be related to soybean resistance to bean pyralid larvae. The results of the pathway analysis speculated that predicted target genes of these miRNAs may have formed the soybean insect-resistant regulation network through many ways, such as plant hormone signal transduction, RNA transport, protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum, and zeatin biosynthesis. As a result, soybean was able to effectively defend itself against the insect invasion. A combination of the conjoint analysis of miRNA/mRNA was found that 20 differentially expressed miRNAs were negatively correlated with 26 differentially expressed target genes. According to relevant literature reports, it is speculated that Gma-mirR156q, Gma-miR166u, Gma-miR166b, Gma-miR166j-3p, Gma-miR396e, and their corresponding target genes SPL transcription factors, ATHB-1 and GRF may improve the insect resistance of soybean by regulating plant growth and development, Gma-miR319 and its target gene TCP family transcription factors may induce plant defense system response through the regulation of JA signaling. It was speculated that soybean regulated the production and expressions of some of the miRNAs when undergoing stress caused by bean pyralid larvae. In addition, the expressions of coding genes at the transcriptional and translational levels were observed to be regulated through mRNA molecules targeted by miRNAs, and through the interaction between genes, which eventually led to improved resistance against insect pests. This study presented the first report regarding miRNAs associated with soybean resistance to bean pyralid larvae, which will potentially provide a basis for further understanding of plant resistance mechanisms and genetic improvements in resistant plant varieties.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/12/2966/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Z.S. and W.Z. Performed the experiments: W.Z., Z.L., S.Y., H.C., X.Y., J.T., and X.T. Analyzed the data: W.Z. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: Z.S. and W.Z. Conceived the experiments and wrote the manuscript: W.Z. and Z.S. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (2017GXNSFDA198037, 2016GXNSFAA380238), and the Development Foundation of Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2015YT58).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Abbreviations

GOGene Ontology
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
qRT-PCRQuantitative real time-PCR
miRNAMicroRNA
sRNASmall RNA
SPLSquamosa promoter-binding protein-like
HD-ZipHomodomain-leucine zipper
JAJasmonic acid
GRFGrowth regulating factor
MFEMinimum folding free energy
MFEIMinimum folding free energy index

References

  1. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004, 116, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sunkar, R. MicroRNAs with macro-effects on plant stress responses. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010, 21, 805–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meng, Y.J.; Shao, C.G.; Chen, M. Toward microRNA-mediated gene regulatory networks in plants. Brief. Bioinform. 2011, 12, 645–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sunkar, R.; Li, Y.F.; Jagadeeswaran, G. Functions of microRNAs in plant stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, B.H.; Wang, Q.L. MicroRNA-based biotechnology for plant improvement. J. Cell. Physiol. 2015, 230, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guo, N.; Ye, W.W.; Wu, X.L.; Shen, D.Y.; Wang, Y.C.; Xing, H.; Dou, D.L. Microarray profiling reveals microRNAs involving soybean resistance to Phytophthora sojae. Genome 2011, 54, 954–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wong, J.; Gao, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhai, J.X.; Arikit, S.; Yu, Y.; Duan, S.Y.; Chan, V.; Xiong, Q.; Yan, J.; et al. Roles of small RNAs in soybean defense against Phytophthora sojae infection. Plant J. 2014, 79, 928–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yin, X.C.; Wang, J.; Cheng, H.; Wang, X.L.; Yu, D.Y. Detection and evolutionary analysis of soybean miRNAs responsive to soybean mosaic virus. Planta 2013, 237, 1213–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, X.Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.P.; Liu, D.W.; Duan, Y.X.; Dong, W. Identification of soybean microRNAs involved in soybean cyst nematode infection by deep sequencing. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, M.Y.; Li, Y.H.; Zhang, Q.X.; Xu, T.; Qiu, L.J.; Fan, Y.L.; Wang, L. Novel miRNA and phasiRNA biogenesis networks in soybean roots from two sister lines that are resistant and susceptible to SCN race 4. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, F.; Liu, Q.; Chen, L.Y.; Kuang, J.B.; Walk, T.; Wang, J.X.; Liao, H. Genome-wide identification of soybean microRNAs and their targets reveals their organ-specificity and responses to phosphate starvation. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sha, A.H.; Chen, Y.H.; Ba, H.P.; Shan, Z.H.; Wu, X.J.; Qiu, D.Z.; Chen, S.L.; Zhou, X.N. Identification of Glycine max microRNAs in response to phosphorus deficiency. J. Plant Biol. 2012, 55, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fang, X.L.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Ma, Q.B.; Huang, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhang, J.; Nian, H.; Yang, C.Y. Identification and comparative analysis of cadmium tolerance-associated miRNAs and their targets in two soybean genotypes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zeng, Q.Y.; Yang, C.Y.; Ma, Q.B.; Li, X.P.; Dong, W.W.; Nian, H. Identification of wild soybean miRNAs and their target genes responsive to aluminum stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Choi, K.H.; Hong, Y.K.; Chang, Y.J.; Moon, J.S.; Kim, C.S.; Choi, D.C.; Kim, T.H. Development under constants temperatures and seasonal prevalence in soybean field of the bean pyralid, Omiodes indicates (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 2008, 47, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Editorial Committee of Plate of Chinese Diseases and Insects on Crop. Plate of Chinese Diseases and Insects on Crop, Fifth Fascicule, Diseases and Insectson Oil Crop (First); Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 1982; pp. 136–137. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sun, Z.D.; Yang, S.Z.; Chen, H.Z.; Li, C.Y.; Long, L.P. Identification of soybean resistance to bean pyralid (Lamprosema indicata Fabricicus) and oviposition preference of bean pyralid on soybean varieties. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci. 2005, 27, 69–71. [Google Scholar]
  18. Long, L.P.; Yang, S.Z.; Chen, H.Z.; Qin, J.L.; Li, C.Y.; Sun, Z.D. Effects of different genotypes of soybean varieties on the experimental population of bean pyralid (Lamprosema indicata Fabricicus). Oil Crop Sci. 2004, 26, 67–70. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ding, X.L. Identification and Functional Study of Differential miRNA in Cytoplasmic-Nuclear Male Sterile Line NJCMS1A and Its Maintainer, Restorer of Soybean. Ph.D. Thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, B.H.; Pan, X.P.; Cannon, C.H.; Cobb, G.P.; Anderson, T.A. Conservation and divergence of plant microRNA genes. Plant J. 2006, 46, 243–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 2009, 136, 215–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, X.Y.; Wang, L.C.; Yuan, D.J.; Lindsey, K.; Zhang, X.L. Small RNA and degradome sequencing reveal complex miRNA regulation during cotton somatic embryogenesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1521–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zeng, W.Y.; Sun, Z.D.; Cai, Z.Y.; Chen, H.Z.; Lai, Z.G.; Yang, S.Z.; Tang, X.M. Comparative transcriptome analysis of soybean response to bean pyralid larvae. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ruiz-Ferrer, V.; Voinnet, O. Roles of plant small RNAs in biotic stress responses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60, 485–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schwarz, S.; Grande, A.V.; Bujdoso, N.; Saedler, H.; Huijser, P. The microRNA regulated SBP-box genes SPL9 and SPL15 control shoot maturation in arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 67, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chuck, G.; Cigan, A.M.; Saeteurn, K.; Hake, S. The heterochronic maize mutant Corngrass1 results from overexpression of a tandem microRNA. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 544–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, G.; Park, M.Y.; Conway, S.R.; Wang, J.W.; Weiqel, D.; Poethig, R.S. The sequential action of miR156 and miR172 regulates developmental timing in arabidopsis. Cell 2009, 138, 750–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ge, Y.F.; Han, J.Y.; Zhou, G.X.; Xu, Y.M.; Ding, Y.; Shi, M.; Guo, C.K.; Wu, G. Silencing of miR156 confers enhanced resistance to brown planthopper in rice. Planta 2018, 248, 813–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stief, A.; Altmann, S.; Hoffmann, K.; Pant, B.D.; Scheible, W.R.; Bäurle, I. Arabidopsis miR156 regulates tolerance to recurring environmental stress through SPL transcription factors. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1792–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chuck, G.; Candela, H.; Hake, S. Big impacts by small RNAs in plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Q.L.; Yao, X.Z.; Pi, L.M.; Wang, H.; Cui, X.F.; Huang, H. The ARGONAUTE10 gene modulates shoot apical meristem maintenance and establishment of leaf polarity by repressing miR165/166 in arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 58, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, H.; Li, G.B.; Zhang, D.Y.; Lin, J.; Sheng, B.L.; Han, J.L.; Chang, Y.H. Biological functions of HD-Zip transcription factors. Hereditas 2013, 35, 1179–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ding, D.; Zhang, L.F.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z.J.; Zhang, Z.X.; Zheng, Y.L. Differential expression of miRNAs in response to salt stress in maize roots. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kitazumi, A.; Kawahara, Y.; Onda, T.S.; De Koeyer, D.; de los Reyes, B.G. Implications of miR166 and miR159 induction to the basal response mechanisms of an andigena potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena) to salinity stress, predicted from network models in arabidopsis. Genome 2015, 58, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lv, D.K.; Bai, X.; Li, Y.; Ding, X.D.; Ge, Y.; Cai, H.; Ji, W.; Wu, N.; Zhu, Y.M. Profiling of cold-stress-responsive miRNAs in rice by microarrays. Gene 2010, 459, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Agalou, A.; Purwantomo, S.; Övernäs, E.; Johannesson, H.; Zhu, X.Y.; Estiati, A.; de Kam, R.J.; Engstrom, P.; Slamet-Loedin, I.H.; Zhu, Z.; et al. A genome-wide survey of HD-Zip genes in rice and analysis of drought-responsive family members. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 66, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, Y.J.; Li, Y.D.; Luo, G.Z.; Tian, A.G.; Wang, H.W.; Zhang, J.S.; Chen, S.Y. Cloning and characterization of an HDZip I gene GmHZ1 from soybean. Planta 2005, 221, 831–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cabello, J.V.; Arce, A.L.; Chan, R.L. The homologous HDZip I transcription factors HaHB1 and AtHB13 confer cold tolerance via the induction of pathogenesis-related and glucanase proteins. Plant J. 2011, 69, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Manavella, P.A.; Dezar, C.A.; Ariel, F.D.; Drincovich, M.F.; Chan, R.L. The sunflower HD-Zip transcription factor HAHB4 is up-regulated in darkness, reducing the transcription of photosynthesis-related genes. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 3143–3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Manavella, P.A.; Arce, A.L.; Dezar, C.A.; Bitton, F.; Renou, J.P.; Crespi, M.; Chan, R.L. Cross-talk between ethylene and drought signalling pathways is mediated by the sunflower HaHB-4 transcription factor. Plant J. 2006, 48, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Palatnik, J.F.; Allen, E.; Wu, X.; Schommer, C.; Schwab, R.; Carrington, J.C.; Weigel, D. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature 2003, 425, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhang, W.; Gao, S.; Zhou, X.; Chellappan, P.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, X.; Fromuth, N.; Coutino, G.; Coffey, M.; et al. Bacteria-responsive microRNAs regulate plant innate immunity by modulating plant hormone networks. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 75, 205–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schommer, C.; Palatnik, J.F.; Aggarwal, P.; Chétela, A.; Cubas, P.; Farmer, E.E.; Nath, U.; Weigel, D. Contron of jasmonate biosynthesis and senescence by miR319 targets. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6, e230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jin, W.B.; Wu, F.L. Characterization of miRNAs associated with Botrytis cinerea infection of tomato leaves. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, H.Y.; Chen, X.L.; Chen, D.; Li, J.F.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, A.X. A comparison of the low temperature transcriptomes of two tomato genotypes that differ in freezing tolerance: Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum habrochaites. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhou, M.; Li, D.; Li, Z.; Yang, C.; Zhu, L.; Luo, H. Constitutive expression of a miR319 gene alters plant development and enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic creeping bentgrass. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 1375–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Reymond, P.; Farmer, E.E. Jasmonate and salicylate as global signals for defense gene expression. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1998, 1, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Reymond, P.; Weber, H.; Damond, M.; Fanner, E.E. Differential gene expression in response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 707–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Birkett, M.A.; Campbeel, C.A.; Chamberlain, K.; Guerrieri, E.; Hick, A.J.; Martn, J.L.; Mathes, M.; Napier, J.A.; Pickett, J.A.; Poppy, G.M.; et al. New roles for cis-jasmone as an insect semiochemical and in plant defense. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 9329–9334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jones-Rhoades, M.W.; Bartel, D.P. Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress-induced miRNA. Mol. Cell 2004, 14, 787–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tian, X.; Song, L.P.; Wang, Y.; Jin, W.B.; Tong, F.D.; Wu, F.L. MiR394 acts as a negative regulator of arabidopsis resistance to B. cinerea infection by targeting LCR. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, H.S.; Lin, Y.L.; Chen, X.H.; Bai, Y.; Wang, C.Q.; Xu, X.P.; Wang, Y.; Lai, Z.X. Effects of blue light on flavonoid accumulation linked to the expression of miR393, miR394 and miR395 in longan embryogenic calli. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ghorecha, V.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, L.; Sunkar, R.; Krishnayya, N.S.R. MicroRNA dynamics in a wild and cultivated specie s of convolvulaceae exposed to drought stress. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2017, 23, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ferreira, T.H.; Gentile, A.; Vilela, R.D.; Costa, G.G.L.; Dias, L.I.; Endres, L.; Menossi, M. MicroRNAs associated with drought response in the bioenergy crop sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ni, Z.Y.; Hu, Z.; Jiang, Q.Y.; Zhang, H. Overexpression of Gma-miR394a confers tolerance to drought in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 427, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sunkar, R.; Zhu, J.K. Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2001–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Omidbakhshfard, M.A.; Proost, S.; Fujikura, U.; Mueller-Roeber, B. Growth-regulating factors (GRFs): A small transcription factor family with important functions in plant biology. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 998–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, H.H.; Tian, X.; Li, Y.J.; Wu, C.A.; Zheng, C.C. Microarray-based analysis of stress-regulated microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. RNA 2008, 14, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hewezi, T.; Howe, P.; Maier, T.R.; Baum, T.J. Arabidopsis small RNAs and their targets during cyst nematode parasitism. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 1622–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hewezi, T.; Maier, T.R.; Nettleton, D.; Baum, T.J. The arabidopsis microRNA396-GRF1/GRF3 regulatory module acts as a developmental regulator in the reprogramming of root cells during cyst nematode infection. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, D.M.; Song, Y.; Chen, Z.X.; Yu, D.Q. Ectopic expression of miR396 suppresses GRF target gene expression and alters leaf growth in arabidopsis. Physiol. Plant. 2009, 136, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, L.; Luan, Y.S.; Zhai, J.M. Sp-miR396a-5p acts as a stress-responsive genes regulator by conferring tolerance to abiotic stresses and susceptibility to Phytophthora nicotianae infection in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 2013–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tang, C.; Xie, Y.M.; Yan, W. AASRA: An anchor alignment-based small RNA annotation pipeline. BioRxiv 2017, 132918. [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang, K.; Liang, C.; Liu, J.D.; Xiao, H.M.; Huang, S.P.; Xu, J.H.; Li, F. Prediction of piRNAs using transposon interaction and a support vector machine. BMC Bioinform. 2014, 15, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Krüger, J.; Rehmsmeier, M. RNAhybrid: microRNA target prediction easy, fast and flexible. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 451–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wu, H.J.; Ma, Y.K.; Chen, T.; Wang, M.; Wang, X.J. PsRobot: A web-based plant small RNA metaanalysis toolbox. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fahlgren, N.; Carrington, J.C. MiRNA target prediction in plants. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 592, 51–57. [Google Scholar]
  68. Wong, W.H. Statistical inferences for isoform expression in RNASeq. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1026–1032. [Google Scholar]
  69. Wang, L.K.; Feng, Z.X.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.W.; Zhang, X.G. DEGseq: An R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 2011, 26, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, Y.H.; Dudoit, S.; Luu, P.; Peng, V.; Ngai, J.; Speed, T.P. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: A robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kulcheski, F.R.; Marcelino-Guimaraes, F.C.; Nepomuceno, A.L.; Abdelnoor, R.V.; Margis, R. The use of microRNAs as reference gene for quantitative polymerase chain reaction in soybean. Anal. Biochem. 2010, 406, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 02966 g001 550
Figure 1. Length distribution of the small RNA.
Figure 1. Length distribution of the small RNA.
Ijms 20 02966 g001
Ijms 20 02966 g002 550
Figure 2. Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed miRNAs. Note: x-axis represents comparing, y-axis represents differentially expressed miRNAs. Coloring indicates fold change (upregulated: red, downregulated: blue).
Figure 2. Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed miRNAs. Note: x-axis represents comparing, y-axis represents differentially expressed miRNAs. Coloring indicates fold change (upregulated: red, downregulated: blue).
Ijms 20 02966 g002
Ijms 20 02966 g003 550
Figure 3. Verification results of differentially expressed miRNAs. Note: “*” representing p ≤ 0.01, respectively, which indicated significant difference level.
Figure 3. Verification results of differentially expressed miRNAs. Note: “*” representing p ≤ 0.01, respectively, which indicated significant difference level.
Ijms 20 02966 g003
Ijms 20 02966 g004a 550Ijms 20 02966 g004b 550
Figure 4. GO function analysis of the DEGs. (A) HRK48/HRK0; (B) HSK48/HSK0; (C) HRK0/HSK0; (D) HRK48/HSK48.
Figure 4. GO function analysis of the DEGs. (A) HRK48/HRK0; (B) HSK48/HSK0; (C) HRK0/HSK0; (D) HRK48/HSK48.
Ijms 20 02966 g004aIjms 20 02966 g004b
Table
Table 1. Data statistics of the small RNA library.
Table 1. Data statistics of the small RNA library.
TypeHRK0-1HRK0-2HRK48-1HRK48-2HSK0-1HSK0-2HSK48-1HSK48-2
Total reads1818756415645006158114732221382915877691164180901915474919705533
Clean reads16725511
(91.96%)		14594887
(93.29%)		14335242
(90.66%)		20230796
(91.07%)		14697929
(92.57%)		15060199
(91.73%)		17541500
(91.58%)		18523834
(94.00%)
Mapped reads15092682
(90.24%)		13055191
(89.45%)		12999357
(90.68%)		18078009
(89.36%)		13090959
(89.07%)		13620528
(90.44%)		15751832
(89.80%)		16892630
(91.19%)
Intergenic9443266
(56.46%)		7076994
(48.49%)		7502556
(52.34%)		10774382
(53.26%)		8035260
(54.67%)		7314000
(48.57%)		9032395
(51.49%)		9351270
(50.48%)
Exon2296806
(13.73%)		2735655
(18.74%)		2230122
(15.56%)		3074662
(15.20%)		2018611
(13.73%)		2881758
(19.13%)		2785970
(15.88%)		3185485
(17.20%)
Intron2197086
(13.14%)		2293967
(15.72%)		2330038
(16.25%)		2958235
(14.62%)		2056682
(13.99%)		2628373
(17.45%)		2986540
(17.03%)		3410640
(18.41%)
miRNA929540
(5.56%)		607305
(4.16%)		536353
(3.74%)		959353
(4.74%)		748416
(5.09%)		528713
(3.51%)		641115
(3.65%)		584366
(3.15%)
rRNA211127
(1.26%)		345408
(2.37%)		395420
(2.76%)		295084
(1.46%)		233612
(1.59%)		262057
(1.74%)		294055
(1.68%)		346254
(1.87%)
snoRNA5719
(0.03%)		6779
(0.05%)		5929
(0.04%)		9232
(0.05%)		4486
(0.03%)		6169
(0.04%)		7500
(0.04%)		8553
(0.05%)
tRNA1767
(0.01%)		2581
(0.02%)		5226
(0.04%)		6462
(0.03%)		1742
(0.01%)		1970
(0.01%)		1915
(0.07%)		3580
(0.02%)
sncRNA4662
(0.03%)		5472
(0.04%)		7182
(0.05%)		7141
(0.04%)		5164
(0.04%)		5714
(0.04%)		5719
(0.03%)		5406
(0.03%)
Precursor30472
(0.18%)		7206
(0.05%)		6290
(0.04%)		34022
(0.17%)		5193
(0.04%)		7113
(0.05%)		2449
(0.01%)		51321
(0.28%)
Unmap1604212
(9.59%)		1518313
(10.40%)		1312486
(9.17%)		2110698
(10.43%)		1588107
(10.80%)		1423625
(9.45%)		1771428
(10.10%)		1574369
(8.50%)
Note: HRK represented the highly resistant material Gantai-2-2; HSK represented the highly susceptible material Wan82-178; numbers 0 and 48 represented the processing time; and -1 and -2 represented repetitions 1 and 2, respectively.
Table
Table 2. MiRNA conservatism grade analysis and statistics.
Table 2. MiRNA conservatism grade analysis and statistics.
TypeHighly-ConservedModerately-ConservedLowly-ConservedNon-ConservedTotal
No. of known miRNAs1882332185428
No. of known miRNAs families23320146192
Table
Table 3. Correlation analysis of differentially expressed miRNA and negative regulation of differentially expressed mRNA.
Table 3. Correlation analysis of differentially expressed miRNA and negative regulation of differentially expressed mRNA.
Control GroupsmiRNAmiRNA_log2Ratio (Fold Change)mRNAmRNA_log2Ratio (Fold Change)NR Description
HRK48/HRK0Gma-miR1535a1.57Glyma.08G264900.2−2.25phototropin-2-like
Gma-miR166u−1.70Glyma.18G204800.13.42ammonium transporter AMT2.2
Gma-miR394a-3p−2.26Glyma.14G004300.13.71nudix hydrolase 2-like
Gma-miR394a-3p−2.26Glyma.05 G073500.27.12F-box protein SKIP14-like
Gma-miR49961.77Glyma.U019800.1−7.57auxin response factor 4-like
Gma-miR5374-3p−2.20Glyma.17G128200.27.21cyclin-dependent kinase G-2-like
Novel_miR21.19Glyma.05G167800.2−3.78guanosine nucleotide diphosphate dissociation inhibitor 2
HSK48/HSK0Gma-miR1512b3.10Glyma.09G019300.1−6.94protein FAR1-RELATED SEQUENCE 6
Gma-miR1535a2.22Glyma.19G036600.2−7.41probable leucine-rich repeat receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase At5g15730
Gma-miR166j-3p−1.25Glyma.07G016700.28.54homeobox-leucine zipper protein ATHB-15-like isoform X4
Gma-miR166u−1.42Glyma.07G016700.28.54homeobox-leucine zipper protein ATHB-15-like isoform X4
Gma-miR395g−1.21Glyma.14G005800.38.16nuclear pore complex protein NUP96
Gma-miR395g−1.21Glyma.14G005800.48.10nuclear pore complex protein NUP96
Gma-miR399b−2.31Glyma.03G021900.27.06uncharacterized protein LOC100306494 isoform X1
Gma-miR5761a2.34Glyma.11G210400.3−2.68glycinol 4-dimethylallyltransferase-like
Gma-miR9749−1.30Glyma.09G236600.37.32lipoate-protein ligase LplJ
Novel_miR23.13Glyma.05G167800.2−9.51guanosine nucleotide diphosphate dissociation inhibitor 2
HRK0/HSK0Gma-miR156q−1.10Glyma.06G238100.12.37squamosa promoter-binding protein 1-like
Gma-miR319d1.65Glyma.08G087400.1−5.22uncharacterized protein LOC100778760
Gma-miR394a-3p1.66Glyma.05G073500.2−7.96F-box protein SKIP14-like
Gma-miR396e3.89Glyma.13G159700.1−6.85hypothetical protein GLYMA_13G159700
Gma-miR4996−3.14Glyma.06G040600.19.05THO complex subunit 5A-like isoform X1
Gma-miR5769−1.27Glyma.02G186100.28.96calcium-transporting ATPase 4, plasma membrane-type-like
Novel_miR361.99Glyma.07G178800.2−6.80pentatricopeptide repeat-containing protein At2g15820, chloroplastic-like
HRK48/HSK48Gma-miR166b4.63Glyma.07G016700.2−8.54homeobox-leucine zipper protein ATHB-15-like isoform X4
Gma-miR166j-3p1.63Glyma.07G016700.2−8.54homeobox-leucine zipper protein ATHB-15-like isoform X4
Gma-miR395g1.38Glyma.14G005800.3−8.16nuclear pore complex protein NUP96
Gma-miR398b−1.47Glyma.01G055700.23.19hypothetical protein GLYMA_01G055700
Gma-miR4416a−1.15Glyma.19G136400.27.88putative calcium-transporting ATPase 11, plasma membrane-type
Gma-miR4996−1.73Glyma.06G040600.18.90THO complex subunit 5A-like
Gma-miR4996−1.73Glyma.07G002800.27.50ubiquitin receptor RAD23b-like
Gma-miR5761a−1.30Glyma.13G004400.12.45zinc transporter 8-like
Novel_miR362.66Glyma.06G088200.3−7.97amino acid permease 6-like
Note: HRK represented the highly resistant material Gantai-2-2; HSK represented the highly susceptible material Wan82-178; and the numbers 0 and 48 represented the processing times.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, W.; Sun, Z.; Lai, Z.; Yang, S.; Chen, H.; Yang, X.; Tao, J.; Tang, X. Determination of the MiRNAs Related to Bean Pyralid Larvae Resistance in Soybean Using Small RNA and Transcriptome Sequencing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2966. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20122966

AMA Style

Zeng W, Sun Z, Lai Z, Yang S, Chen H, Yang X, Tao J, Tang X. Determination of the MiRNAs Related to Bean Pyralid Larvae Resistance in Soybean Using Small RNA and Transcriptome Sequencing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(12):2966. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20122966

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Weiying, Zudong Sun, Zhenguang Lai, Shouzhen Yang, Huaizhu Chen, Xinghai Yang, Jiangrong Tao, and Xiangmin Tang. 2019. "Determination of the MiRNAs Related to Bean Pyralid Larvae Resistance in Soybean Using Small RNA and Transcriptome Sequencing" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 12: 2966. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20122966

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop