1. Introduction
Phosphorus (P) is an essential macronutrient for sustaining optimal plant growth, and plays a significant role in a diverse array of cellular processes, including energy production, redox reactions, photosynthesis, and phosphorylation/dephosphorylation-based reactions [
1,
2]. Soil-P exists in various organic and inorganic forms due to the decomposition of soil organic matter and weathering of parent rock materials [
3]. However, the various P forms differ in their behavior in soils depending on the soil’s pH and the size of mineral particles [
3,
4]. Among several soil-P forms, inorganic phosphate (PO
43−, H
2PO
4−, and HPO
42−, referred to as Pi hereafter) is the most readily accessible for plants; however, bioavailable Pi concentrations rarely exceed 1–10 µm in soil solutions [
5,
6,
7]. In acidic soils, Pi is mostly adsorbed onto the surface of iron (Fe)/aluminum (Al) oxides, such as hematite, gibbsite, and goethite, due to ionic strength, thus trapping Pi in soil nanopores, thereby becoming unavailable to plants [
3,
4]. In calcareous-to-neutral soils, Pi can be precipitated with calcium (Ca
2+), generating a dicalcium phosphate form that is available to plants; however, dicalcium phosphate can also be transformed into more stable forms, such as hydroxyapatite and octocalcium phosphate, which are less available to plants under alkaline soil-pH conditions [
3]. To maintain crop productivity, farmers use enormous amounts of Pi-fertilizers derived from non-renewable rock phosphate [
5,
6,
7]. However, the increasing demand for high crop yields due to the ever-increasing world population combined with the gradual decrease of global P reserves requires us to address how plants uptake, transport, and store Pi under conditions of limited Pi availability [
5,
6,
7]. Plants have evolved several morphological, physiological, and molecular changes, including changes in root architecture, secretion of organic acids and acid phosphatases, accumulation of anthocyanin pigments, and improved Pi uptake efficiency to sustain their growth under Pi-deficient conditions [
4]. Plants have developed specialized uptake/transport system at the root/soil interface for efficient Pi uptake from the soil and for transporting Pi across intracellular compartments [
6]. In the event of Pi deficiency, one of the early responses includes lowering cytosolic Pi levels, resulting in transcriptional reprogramming, as well as Pi redistribution [
8]. Plants are equipped with both low- and high-affinity Pi transporters that mediate Pi uptake and root-to-shoot transport [
9,
10] (
Figure 1). Furthermore, dedicated sets of transporters are known to facilitate Pi redistribution at tissue, cellular, and subcellular levels [
3,
6,
10].
Since the Pi concentration in soil solution is very low (<10 µM, as written above), while Pi concentration inside the plant cell is much higher (1–10 mM), root cells need to absorb Pi against the steep concentration gradient occurring between the cytosol and the soil solution [
11,
12]. Additionally, H
2PO
4− and HPO
42− anions need to overcome the negative membrane potential to enter the plant cell, which requires an energized transport system via H
+/Pi co-transport [
11,
12]. Therefore, Pi does not enter the cell as H
2PO
4− or HPO
42− only; instead, it is accompanied by other cations like H
+ to avoid membrane hyperpolarization [
11,
12]. Indeed, investigations during Pi uptake demonstrated decreased cytoplasmic pH in a
Catharanthus roseus cell suspension, but increased pH in the extracellular medium [
13], as well as the acidification of cytoplasmic pH in the root hairs of
Limmobium stoloniferum [
14]. After Pi uptake into the root symplasm, Pi can go via different routes: (i) Pi enters the cell cytoplasm (metabolic pool), where the primary access form of Pi into organic molecules occurs via anhydride bond formation as the γ-phosphate group of ATP; (ii) Pi (H
2PO
4− or HPO
42−) is secreted into the xylem for long-distance translocation to aerial parts of the plant; and (iii) Pi is stored in vacuoles for the maintenance of Pi homeostasis [
11,
12]. Additionally, Pi transport from the phloem to the xylem primarily occurs in the form of H
2PO
4− or HPO
42−; however, organic Pi compounds such as hexose-phosphates and ATP are also detectable in phloem sap [
11,
12].
Significant progress was made in understanding Pi transport and utilization mechanisms, which are more or less conserved across the plant kingdom [
5,
6,
15]. A few plant species have a unique ability to tackle adverse effects of Pi deficiency. For instance,
Hakea prostrate from the Proteaceae family evolved in severely Pi-deficient soils of southwestern Australia; thus,
H. prostrate is highly efficient in managing Pi deficiency as it possesses some unique features [
16]. These include cluster roots for efficient Pi uptake, delayed greening, altered Pi allocation to ribosomes, changes in membrane lipid composition, highly efficient photosynthetic Pi use, efficient remobilization of Pi from older senescing leaves, and high-Pi-containing seeds for the initiation of life in Pi-deficient environments [
16]. This observation suggests that subcellular Pi transport and its reallocation into various plant parts are important factors for maintaining plant growth under both Pi-repleted and Pi-depleted conditions. Recently, with progress in functional genomics, the roles of novel genes associated with subcellular Pi transport and regulation were investigated. The pH of the cytoplasm and subcellular compartments, as well as the intracellular membrane potential, influences Pi transport at the subcellular level. While pH affects the chemical species of Pi, membrane potentials determine the feasibility of Pi import/export [
15] (
Table 1).
In view of this background information, the presented paper reviews our current understanding, gained mainly in Arabidopsis thaliana and rice (Oryza sativa), to provide an integrated view of Pi uptake from the soil and its transport mechanisms in/among various organs and subcellular organelles. Future research directions are discussed to develop suitable strategies for the development of crops better suited for growing under Pi-deficient conditions.
2. Phosphate Transporters and Their Role in Pi Acquisition, Translocation, and Remobilization in Various Organs
The transport of Pi across cell membranes is a critical stage in the regulation of Pi use. During the past few years, several transporter genes that mediate Pi transport processes were identified (
Figure 1). However, the functions of many Pi transporters still remain elusive.
Arabidopsis and rice plants contain five high-affinity Pi transporter (PHT1, PHT2, PHT3, PHT4, and PHT5) families that are distinguished based on their protein sequences, locations, and functions [
23].
Table 2 summarizes known transporters for uptake at the root surface, root-to-shoot translocation, and the unloading of Pi in shoots.
The PHT1 proteins are plasma membrane (PM) proton-coupled Pi-symporters that mediate Pi acquisition from the soil [
23,
27]. The
PHT1 gene family has more members than other
PHT families. For example, the
Arabidopsis (At)
AtPHT1 gene family contains nine Pi transporters (
AtPHT1;1 to
AtPHT1;9), among which
AtPHT1;1 to
AtPHT1;4 are mainly involved in Pi uptake from the soil to roots [
9]. Gene expression analysis in
Arabidopsis showed that
AtPHT1;1,
AtPHT1;2,
AtPHT1;3, and
AtPHT1;4 are mainly expressed in various types of root cells, suggesting that these transporters have similar and partially overlapping functions [
36,
39]. For example, AtPHT1;1 plays a major role when Pi supply is high, whereas AtPHT1;4 becomes predominant under Pi-deficient conditions in
Arabidopsis [
39]. Ayadi et al. [
39] demonstrated that the
Arabidopsis atpht1;1/
atpht1;2/
atpht1;3/
atpht1;4 quadruple and the
phosphate transporter traffic facilitator1(
phf1)/
atpht1;4 double mutants are impaired in Pi uptake from soil to roots. In addition, Wang et al. [
27] reported that
WRKY45 is a positive regulator of
AtPHT1;1, and the
Arabidopsis transgenic
WRKY45-over-expressing lines showed induced
AtPHT1;1 expression and increased Pi uptake. By contrast, the
atpht1;1 mutants showed decreased Pi uptake in comparison with wild-type (WT) plants. In addition to the four major transporters (AtPHT1;1 to AtPHT1;4), the roles of other AtPHT1 proteins in Pi acquisition and transport cannot be neglected. For example, Nagarajan et al. [
24] demonstrated that the
Arabidopsis AtPHT1;5 plays a significant role in Pi translocation from source to sink organs. The authors reported that under low-Pi conditions,
Arabidopsis atpht1;5-1 mutants exhibited a significant decline in Pi translocation into the shoots, and induced expression of several Pi starvation-response genes [e.g.,
At4,
digalactosyldiacylglycerol synthase 1 (
DGD1), and
UDP-sulfoquinovose synthase 1 (
SQD1)] [
24]. However, under Pi-sufficient conditions, the
Arabidopsis atpht1;5-1 mutants had higher shoot-Pi content than WT, suggesting that AtPHT1;5 plays a significant role in Pi homeostasis between the source and sink organs, in accordance with the Pi states and developmental cues [
24]. In
Arabidopsis, AtPHT1;6 and AtPHT1;7 regulate Pi translocation from leaves to pollens under Pi-sufficient conditions, while AtPHT1;8 and AtPHT1;9 control Pi translocation from roots to shoots, but not from the soil to roots, especially under Pi-deficient conditions [
9,
24,
36].
The
Arabidopsis phosphate transporter 1 (
PHO1) gene family is another important Pi-transporter family, playing an essential role in long-distance Pi transport from roots to shoots, and is responsible for the regulation of Pi export from root epidermal and cortical cells into xylem vessels [
40,
41] (
Figure 1). In
Arabidopsis,
AtPHO1 is mainly expressed in the lower part of the hypocotyl and the stellar cells of the roots, which is in agreement with its role in Pi transport to the xylem. It was reported that the
atpho1 mutants were deficient in loading Pi from root epidermal cells into the xylem vessels, resulting in Pi deficiency in the shoots [
40,
42]. Among several
AtPHO1 homologs in
Arabidopsis, only
AtPHO1 and
AtPHO1;H1 could recover the defects of the
atpho1 mutation, demonstrating that only
AtPHO1 and
AtPHO1;H1 are implicated in long-distance Pi transport from roots to shoots [
32]. Recently,
AtPHO1;H3 was shown to be involved in the suppression of root-to-shoot Pi transport under zinc-deficient conditions in
Arabidopsis [
33], while the roles of remaining transporter genes,
AtPHO1;H2, and from
AtPHO1;H4 to
AtPHO1;H10, still need to be identified. In rice (Os), all three
PHO1 (
OsPHO1;1,
OsPHO1;2, and
OsPHO1;3) genes possess a
cis-natural antisense transcript positioned at the 5′ end of the genes, and only
OsPHO1;2 is highly induced in the roots under Pi-deficient conditions [
43]. Characterization of the
ospho1;1 and
ospho1;2 single mutants indicated that only
ospho1;2 mutants had a significant decrease in Pi transport from roots to shoots, which was accompanied by high root-Pi and low shoot-Pi contents [
43].
The rice OsPHT1 family comprises 13 Pi transporters [
28], and with the exception of
OsPHT1;3,
5,
7, and
12, all other
OsPHT1 genes were studied in detail. Sun et al. [
44] demonstrated that
OsPHT1;1 was expressed in various shoot and root cells under Pi-sufficient conditions, and transgenic rice plants overexpressing
OsPHT1;1 exhibited higher shoot-Pi content than WT, suggesting that OsPHT1;1 has a crucial role in Pi uptake and translocation under Pi-sufficient conditions. On the other hand, the low-affinity
OsPHT1;2 and high-affinity
OsPHT1;6 are strongly upregulated under Pi-deficient conditions in rice roots and shoots [
35]. The authors suggested that OsPHT1;6 plays a broad role in Pi uptake from soil to roots, and probably in Pi translocation throughout the plant, whereas OsPHT1;2 mediates only Pi transport from roots to shoots [
34].
OsPHT1;4 is expressed in roots, leaves, ligules, stamens, and caryopses, and is induced under long-term Pi-deficient conditions [
28]. Transgenic
OsPHT1;4-overexpressing rice plants displayed a significant increase in Pi contents in roots and shoots, whereas
ospht1;4 mutants exhibited a decrease in Pi contents in the respective organs [
28,
29]. In addition, a gradual increase in the relative expression of
OsPHT1;4 was observed in the embryos from 10 to 20 days after pollination when compared with that in the panicle axis and endosperm, suggesting a potential role of OsPHT1;4 in Pi acquisition during embryogenesis [
29]. In rice, OsPHT1;4 is also implicated in Pi remobilization from flag leaves to panicles, while OsPHT1;6 and OsPHT1;8 are involved in Pi remobilization from senescing leaves to young ones and grains [
28,
45,
46]. Additionally, using
33Pi as a radiotracer, plausible involvement of OsPHT1;4, OsPHT1;6 and OsPHT1;8 in root-to-shoot Pi transport was also demonstrated [
29,
45,
47]. A recent study by Jia et al. [
47] reported that the transgenic rice
OsPHT1;8-overexpressing lines exhibited a significant increase in both root- and shoot-Pi contents; however, the transgenic plants showed toxicity symptoms with a decrease in root and shoot biomass under highly Pi-supplied conditions. However, under limited-Pi conditions,
OsPHT1;8-overexpressing lines exhibited normal root and shoot biomass similar to that of WT plants [
47]. Thus, appropriate regulation of cytoplasmic Pi and/or organelle Pi levels is important for maintaining plant fitness under Pi-deficient conditions.