Next Article in Journal
Sinomenine Hydrochloride Inhibits the Metastasis of Human Glioblastoma Cells by Suppressing the Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2/-9 and Reversing the Endogenous and Exogenous Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Cloning and Characterization of Carbonic Anhydrase XII from Pufferfish (Takifugu rubripes)
Previous Article in Special Issue
3,3′-Diindolylmethane Suppressed Cyprodinil-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Metastatic-Related Behaviors of Human Endometrial Ishikawa Cells via an Estrogen Receptor-Dependent Pathway
Open AccessEditorial

Chemical and Molecular Approach to Tumor Metastases

Callerio Foundation Onlus, 34127 Trieste, Italy
Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(3), 843;
Received: 1 March 2018 / Revised: 8 March 2018 / Accepted: 12 March 2018 / Published: 14 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical and Molecular Approach to Tumor Metastases)
Tumours are not merely masses of abnormally proliferating cancer cells. Today, we have a clearer view of cancer complexity in which the participation of cancer and host cells leads to a tremendous heterogeneity of neoplastic diseases concerning the genetics, epigenetics, proteomics and biochemistry of the tumour [1]. Such intra-tumour heterogeneity provides the basis for inter-metastatic heterogeneity among different metastatic lesions of the same patient, each originating from a founder cell, or small group of cells, with a very different mutation kit, and likely originating from different and distinct primary tumour areas [1]. This situation has important implications regarding chemotherapeutic sensitivity and responses. In addition, the offspring of the founder cell(s) can generate heterogeneity among the cells of an individual metastasis, affecting the response to systemic therapies and providing the seeds for drug resistance.
Correspondingly, drug treatment is progressively shifting from the use of chemicals producing toxics effects in general processes of cell division, with the goal of killing the tumour cell, to compounds targeting specific cell behaviours with the goal of disarming the malignancy of the tumour cell (Figure 1) [2,3]. This new strategy implies the use of novel systems of drug design, particularly those concerning biological drugs leading to compounds capable of targeting specific molecules expressed only by selected tumour cells [4,5,6]. The main aim of this novel era of drug development is the response to the need of overcoming the heavy toxicity of the “conventional” chemotherapy that poorly distinguishes between cancer and healthy cells, therefore, causing severe side effects that often hamper the compliance of the patient.
Metastasis is the primary target for cancer chemotherapy, independently of the kind of drug being used. The main reason is that the primary tumour can often, if not always, be aggressed by surgery and/or radiotherapy whereas metastases, spread in several tissues and organs, are believed to be better reached with drugs that follow the pharmacological rules of distribution in the body.
The generation of these novel drugs, whether selective and specific monoclonal antibodies or small organic molecules, requires a deep knowledge of the nature of the tumour cell and particularly of tumour metastasis. Similarly, to the primary lesions, tumour metastases are characterised by the interactions with healthy cells and extracellular matrix leading to a complex microenvironment in dynamic evolution but extremely important for the metastatic growth [7,8].
The twin research that joins the biochemistry and molecular biology of cancer metastasis with the study of novel targets and novel approaches to combat their growth is even more mandatory in a scientific era in which the improvements of human health are transforming cancers into chronic diseases and therefore significantly prolonging the life-time expectancy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Yachida, S.; Jones, S.; Bozic, I.; Antal, T.; Leary, R.; Fu, B.; Kamiyama, M.; Hruban, R.H.; Eshleman, J.R.; Nowak, M.A.; et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature 2010, 467, 1114–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000, 100, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Palumbo, M.O.; Kavan, P.; Miller, W.H., Jr.; Panasci, L.; Assouline, S.; Johnson, N.; Cohen, V.; Patenaude, F.; Pollak, M.; Jagoe, R.T.; et al. Systemic cancer therapy: Achievements and challenges that lie ahead. Front. Pharmacol. 2013, 4, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. He, Q.; Guo, S.; Qian, Z.; Chen, X. Development of Individualized Anti-Metastasis Strategies by Engineering Nanomedicines. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 6258–6286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Park, G.-T.; Choi, K.-C. Advanced new strategies for metastatic cancer treatment by therapeutic stem cells and oncolytic virotherapy. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 58684–58695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sun, Y.; Ma, L. The emerging molecular machinery and therapeutic targets of metastasis. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 36, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kitamura, T.; Qian, B.-Z.; Pollard, J.W. Immune cell promotion of metastasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Graphical representation of the tumour/metastasis heterogeneity and of the main targets and therapeutic approaches (CAR-T = Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell; TME = Tumour Micro Environment).
Figure 1. Graphical representation of the tumour/metastasis heterogeneity and of the main targets and therapeutic approaches (CAR-T = Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell; TME = Tumour Micro Environment).
Ijms 19 00843 g001
Back to TopTop