Review Reports
- Bijay Singh1,2,†,
- Sushila Maharjan2,3,† and
- Princy Sindurakar4
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Beata Kaczmarek-Szczepańska Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The review is very interesting. Mayby it would be better to write [26,27] instead of [26][27]. Please also check the resolution quality of Figures if it is appropriate.
Author Response
Point 1: The review is very interesting. Maybe it would be better to write [26,27] instead of [26][27]. Please also check the resolution quality of Figures if it is appropriate.
Response 1: Thank you for your nice comments. We have corrected the reference style according to your suggestion and we have provided the high resolution figures.
Reviewer 2 Report
The review presented by Singh et al. is very well organized and written.
The topics are logically conducted as well as the references are acceptable.
Also language is very fluid and never confusing.
I certainly suggest this work for publication.
Author Response
Point 2: The review presented by Singh et al. is very well organized and written.
The topics are logically conducted as well as the references are acceptable.
Also language is very fluid and never confusing.
I certainly suggest this work for publication.
Response 2: Thank you for your nice comments.