Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Behaviour and Remote Degeneration Following Thalamic Stroke in the Rat
Previous Article in Journal
Dimethyl Fumarate Protects Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells and Neurons from Oxidative Damage through Nrf2-ERK1/2 MAPK Pathway
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 16
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms160613908
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Proliferation and Anti-Apoptosis of the Papain-Generated Casein and Soy Protein Hydrolysates towards Osteoblastic Cells (hFOB1.19)

by
Xiao-Wen Pan
1 and
Xin-Huai Zhao
1,2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Dairy Science, Ministry of Education, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
2
Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(6), 13908-13920; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160613908
Submission received: 28 April 2015 / Revised: 8 June 2015 / Accepted: 9 June 2015 / Published: 17 June 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Casein and soy protein were digested by papain to three degrees of hydrolysis (DH) 7.3%–13.3%, to obtain respective six casein and soy protein hydrolysates, aiming to clarify their in vitro proliferation and anti-apoptosis towards a human osteoblastic cell line (hFOB1.19 cells). Six casein and soy protein hydrolysates at five levels (0.01–0.2 mg/mL) mostly showed proliferation as positive 17β-estradiol did, because they conferred the osteoblasts with cell viability of 100%–114% and 104%–123%, respectively. The hydrolysates of higher DH values had stronger proliferation. Casein and soy protein hydrolysates of the highest DH values altered cell cycle progression, and enhanced cell proportion of S-phase from 50.5% to 56.5% and 60.5%. The two also antagonized etoposide- and NaF-induced osteoblast apoptosis. In apoptotic prevention, apoptotic cells were decreased from 31.6% to 22.6% and 15.6% (etoposide treatment), or from 19.5% to 17.7% and 12.4% (NaF treatment), respectively. In apoptotic reversal, soy protein hydrolysate decreased apoptotic cells from 13.3% to 11.7% (etoposide treatment), or from 14.5% to 11.0% (NaF treatment), but casein hydrolysate showed no reversal effect. It is concluded that the hydrolysates of two kinds had estradiol-like action on the osteoblasts, and soy protein hydrolysates had stronger proliferation and anti-apoptosis on the osteoblasts than casein hydrolysates.

1. Introduction

Osteoporosis as a systemic skeletal disease is characterized by low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture [1]. Osteoporosis is one of these serious health problems and reported to affect millions of people all over the world. Bone growth is maintained by two coordinated actions of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. In the body, osteoblasts are responsible for bone formation while the duty of osteoclasts is bone resorption. Imbalance between the osteoblasts and osteoclasts leads to osteopetrosis or osteoporosis, by changing bone mass [2]. Traditional medication for osteoporotic treatment is divided into three parts: antiresorptive, bone-forming and mineralization drugs. However, some side effects, such as the risk of breast and endometrial cancers caused by the estrogen and the gastrointestinal discomfort caused by the bisphosphonates, are still plaguesome at the present time [3]. It is beneficial to develop functional food ingredients with bone health function but without any side effect.
Both food proteins and amino acids are essential materials for the organic synthesis in the bone. Lacking protein long-term can cause a decrease in bone matrix synthesis, leading to osteoporosis. For example, the animals with lower protein feeding (13% of total feed) for five months have shown an increased bone resorption [4]. On the contrary, high protein intake is also detrimental to bone health, as it causes greater calcium losing and bone absorption, together with an inhibition on matrix mineralization [5]. The role of food protein in bone health therefore needs a long-term systematic investigation and experimental evaluation.
Decomposed products of food protein with lower molecular weights possess biological activities, and are known as bioactive peptides. Bioactive peptides, mostly obtained by enzymatic hydrolysis or microbial fermentation of protein substrates, play important roles in metabolism and physiological regulation, and their bioactivities, such as antihypertension, antioxidation, immuno-modulation and others, have become the most popular topic in the field of food science. Bioactive peptides have the potential to become health ingredients and nutraceutical preparations [6]. Enzymatic hydrolysis of food proteins offers a rapid and reproducible approach to generate bioactive peptides. Some bioactive peptides from plant and animal protein origins have been found to have an effect on bone health. Casein phosphorpeptides are able to promote calcium absorption and utilization [7], while soy protein hydrolysates are capable of reducing bone turnover for the postmenopausal women [8]. In short, the effects of protein hydrolysates on bone health have been proven. However, a comparison of potential in vitro effects of protein hydrolysates on the osteoblast in view of cell proliferation, cycle progression and apoptotic antagonism (i.e., apoptotic prevention and apoptotic reversal) are not well-clarified yet. A detailed investigation is therefore absolutely needed.
In the present study, casein and soy protein were digested in vitro by papain into three degrees of hydrolysis (DH). Six hydrolysates obtained were divided into two groups based on their origins, and evaluated for their cell proliferation on a human fetal osteoblastic cell line (hFOB1.19 cells) in vitro, aiming to select the hydrolysate of the strongest cell proliferation from each group. Moreover, two hydrolysates selected were evaluated for their in vitro effects on cell cycle distribution and apoptosis of the cells induced by two chemicals (etoposide and NaF, respectively). The aim of the present study was to reveal protein hydrolysates’ proliferation and anti-apoptosis on the osteoblasts as well as the potential effect on the bone health.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. In Vitro Proliferation of the Six Hydrolysates towards hFOB1.19 Cells

Six protein hydrolysates were prepared in the present study from casein and soy protein. The data given in Table 1 show their measured DH values (i.e., hydrolysis extent). The six hydrolysates were added to the cell culture at 0.0–0.2 mg/mL to assay their in vitro proliferation towards the hFOB1.19 cells. After culture time of 24–72 h, cell viability of the osteoblasts in each group was assayed (shown in Figure 1). Almost all hydrolysates promote in vitro osteoblastic proliferation as the used positive chemical 17β-estradiol dose. The measured cell viability is 100%–114% and 104%–123% when casein and soy protein hydrolysates are added into the cultures. These data show that both casein and soy protein hydrolysates have estradiol-like action. However, soy hydrolysates (SH) totally show greater proliferation than casein hydrolysates (CH). More importantly, the hydrolysates with higher DH values seem to possess stronger osteoblast proliferation, that is, CH3 and SH3 show much more powerful proliferation than their counterparts with lower DH values (p < 0.05). At the same time, it can be seen that the six hydrolysates mostly exhibit greater osteoblast proliferation (p < 0.05) when hydrolysate addition and culture time are 0.05 mg/mL and 48 h, respectively. It is thus briefly concluded that the hydrolysates prepared in the present study could enhance osteoblast growth and protein origin; hydrolysis extent (i.e., DH) and addition level are important to the measured proliferation. Two hydrolysates, CH3 and SH3, have the strongest proliferation compared to their counterpart hydrolysates of lower DH values; thus, they are selected as target hydrolysates in the forthcoming study.
Table
Table 1. Hydrolysis conditions and degrees of hydrolysis (DH) of the prepared six hydrolysates.
Table 1. Hydrolysis conditions and degrees of hydrolysis (DH) of the prepared six hydrolysates.
HydrolysatesHydrolysis Times (h)Other ConditionsDH (%)
CH11.5pH 6.0, 60 °C, papain of 2 kU/g protein7.3
CH23.510.8
CH37.013.3
SH13.07.5
SH25.010.9
SH37.013.2
CH and SH denote casein and soy protein hydrolysates, respectively.
Ijms 16 13908 g001 1024
Figure 1. Proliferation of casein and soy protein hydrolysates (CH1–3 and SH1–3) on hFOB1.19 cells cultured for 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively. E denotes 17β-estradiol. CH1–3 denote casein hydrolysates with DH values of 7.3%, 10.8% and 13.3%, while SH1–3 denote soy protein hydrolysates with DH values of 7.5%, 10.9% and 13.2%, respectively. Different lowercase letters above the columns indicate that the mean values of different groups are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Proliferation of casein and soy protein hydrolysates (CH1–3 and SH1–3) on hFOB1.19 cells cultured for 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively. E denotes 17β-estradiol. CH1–3 denote casein hydrolysates with DH values of 7.3%, 10.8% and 13.3%, while SH1–3 denote soy protein hydrolysates with DH values of 7.5%, 10.9% and 13.2%, respectively. Different lowercase letters above the columns indicate that the mean values of different groups are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Ijms 16 13908 g001
Bone remodeling occurs continuously to maintain normal bone mass in the whole life period [9]. Osteoblasts are bone-forming cells, and osteoblast proliferation is absolutely an important stage in bone formation. In fact, casein and soy protein hydrolysates have been studied to show their beneficial effects on the bone. For example, the two kinds of protein hydrolysates can accelerate bone turnover with formation exceeding resorption and lead to overall gains in density [10,11], providing a support to the present result. Furthermore, in comparison with casein hydrolysates, soy protein hydrolysates tend to increase sIGF-1, a key regulator of bone metabolism [12,13]. This could partly explain the present CCK-8 assaying results that soy protein hydrolysates have greater ability to promote osteoblast proliferation. The protein hydrolysates investigated in the present study exert different effects on osteoblast proliferation, if they have similar DH values. This might be caused by the different amino acid composition of the hydrolysates, which should be investigated in later study. Why hydrolysis extent (i.e., DH) of protein hydrolysates affects osteoblast proliferation remains to be an unexplored topic, and also should be clarified in future.

2.2. Effects of the Two Hydrolysates on Cell Cycle Distribution of hFOB1.19 Cells

The effects of CH3 and SH3 on cell cycle progression of the osteoblasts were monitored. Flow cytometry analysis results are given in Figure 2, which reveals the distribution of the cells in G0/G1-, S-, and G2/M-phases. Compared to the cell cycle distribution of the cells in control group, CH3 and SH3 have no effect on the ratio of G2/M-phase cells, but elevate the ratio of S-phase cells and decrease the ratio of G0/G1-phase cells. SH3 exhibits the more potent capacity to arrest more cells in S-phase (60.5%); however, CH3 shows the weaker one (56.5%). This result is consistent with the proliferation of the two hydrolysates measured before. It is thus concluded that CH3 and SH3 confer the hFOB1.19 cells with cell proliferation via an alteration of cell cycle in the S-phase.
Ijms 16 13908 g002 1024
Figure 2. Effects of casein and soy protein and hydrolysates (CH3 and SH3) on cell cycle phase distribution of hFOB1.19 cells. (A) Representative histograms of DNA content in control group cells; (B,C) Representative histograms of DNA content in the cell incubated with CH3 and SH3 at 0.05 mg/mL for 48 h. Horizontal and vertical axes indicate the relative nuclear DNA content and number of cells, respectively; and (D) Percentage of cell populations in G0/G1-, S- and G2/M-phases.
Figure 2. Effects of casein and soy protein and hydrolysates (CH3 and SH3) on cell cycle phase distribution of hFOB1.19 cells. (A) Representative histograms of DNA content in control group cells; (B,C) Representative histograms of DNA content in the cell incubated with CH3 and SH3 at 0.05 mg/mL for 48 h. Horizontal and vertical axes indicate the relative nuclear DNA content and number of cells, respectively; and (D) Percentage of cell populations in G0/G1-, S- and G2/M-phases.
Ijms 16 13908 g002
Cell cycle is a well-ordered sequence of biochemical events, occurring in eukaryotic cells between one cell division and the next [14]. More cells are in S-phase (DNA synthesis), which suggests that more cells are ready for proliferation. Some studies have reported the effects of collagen and gelatin hydrolysates on cell cycle progression, stating that they can promote osteoblast proliferation by increasing the ratio of S-phase cells [15,16]. Similarly, a combination of 17β-estradiol and testosterone (two chemicals with osteoblast proliferation) also have been observed to enhance the ratio of S-phase cells effectively [17]. The present result is consistent with the past ones, clarifying an intrinsic effect of casein and soy protein hydrolysates on the hFOB1.19 cells by arresting cell cycle in S-phase.

2.3. Anti-Apoptosis of the Two Hydrolysates towards hFOB1.19 Cells

In vitro antagonism of CH3 and SH3 towards EP- and NaF-induced apoptosis of the osteoblasts was investigated by assaying the ratio of apoptotic cells, using Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining and flow cytometric analysis. Previous evaluation showed that EP and NaF at 10 and 40 mg/mL, respectively, were capable of inducing osteoblast apoptosis. The two addition levels were thereof applied to treat the cells in the present study. After being treated with 0.05 mg/mL CH3 or SH3 for 48 h, and then with EP or NaF for 24 h respectively, the cells were double stained and assayed to reveal apoptotic prevention of CH3 and SH3. Otherwise, after being first treated with EP or NaF for 24 h, and then with 0.05 mg/mL CH3 or SH3 for 48 h, respectively, the cells were also double stained and assayed to reveal apoptotic reversal of CH3 and SH3.
The results given in Figure 3 show that both CH3 and SH3 have ability to decrease apoptotic cells, that is, to provide apoptotic prevention for the osteoblasts towards EP- and NaF-induced apoptosis. Based on these assaying results, a statistical analysis is carried out (as shown in Table 2). It is seen that application of CH3 and SH3 results in the ratios of apoptotic cells (Q2 + Q4) decreased from 31.6% (EP model group) and 19.5% (NaF model group) into 22.6% and 15.1% (EP treatment), or into 17.7% and 12.4% (NaF treatment), respectively. SH3 is more potent than CH3, as much less apoptotic cells are detected during assaying. The results given in Figure 4 show that SH3 other than CH3 has the ability to decrease apoptotic cells; that is, only SH3 has a reversal effect on apoptotic osteoblasts. It is seen from the data that application of SH3 results in the ratios of apoptotic cells decreased from 13.3% (EP model group) and 14.5% (NaF model group) into 11.7% (EP treatment) and 11.0% (NaF treatment), while application of CH3 results in the ratios of apoptotic cells about 13.3% (EP treatment) and 15.3% (NaF treatment) (Table 2). Overall, it is seen that SH3 exhibits more powerful protection and reversal effects on the two induced apoptosis than CH3, conferring the treated osteoblasts with less apoptotic cells in any case.
Ijms 16 13908 g003a 1024Ijms 16 13908 g003b 1024
Figure 3. Apoptotic prevention of casein and soy protein hydrolysates (CH3 and SH3) at 0.05 mg/mL on etoposide- and NaF-induced apoptosis of hFOB1.19 cells. Cell apoptosis was measured by Annexin FITC-V/PI double-stained flow cytometry. Q1, dead cells; Q2, later apoptotic cells; Q3, viable cells; Q4, early apoptotic cells. (A) The cells in the control group; (B,C) The cells treated by etoposide and NaF, respectively; (D,F) The cells first treated by CH3 and SH3, respectively, and then by etoposide; and (E,G) The cells first treated by CH3 and SH3, respectively, and then by NaF. The labeled data were obtained from one assaying only.
Figure 3. Apoptotic prevention of casein and soy protein hydrolysates (CH3 and SH3) at 0.05 mg/mL on etoposide- and NaF-induced apoptosis of hFOB1.19 cells. Cell apoptosis was measured by Annexin FITC-V/PI double-stained flow cytometry. Q1, dead cells; Q2, later apoptotic cells; Q3, viable cells; Q4, early apoptotic cells. (A) The cells in the control group; (B,C) The cells treated by etoposide and NaF, respectively; (D,F) The cells first treated by CH3 and SH3, respectively, and then by etoposide; and (E,G) The cells first treated by CH3 and SH3, respectively, and then by NaF. The labeled data were obtained from one assaying only.
Ijms 16 13908 g003aIjms 16 13908 g003b
Table
Table 2. Anti-apoptosis of casein and soy protein hydrolysates (CH3 and SH3) towards etoposide (EP)- or NaF-induced apoptosis of hFOB1.19 cells.
Table 2. Anti-apoptosis of casein and soy protein hydrolysates (CH3 and SH3) towards etoposide (EP)- or NaF-induced apoptosis of hFOB1.19 cells.
ModesApoptosis InducersPercentage of Apoptotic Cells (%)
Model GroupCH3 GroupSH3 Group
Apoptotic preventionEP31.622.615.1
NaF19.517.712.4
Apoptotic reversalEP13.313.311.7
NaF14.515.311.0
CH3 and SH3 are casein and soy protein hydrolysates with DH of 13.3% and 13.2%, respectively. Apoptotic cells are the total of later (Q2) and early (Q4) apoptotic cells shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
Apoptosis is a morphologically identifiable form of programmed cell death in the mammals [18]. It is recognized now that many factors regulate the apoptosis of bone cells [19]. The prevention and reversal for osteoblast apoptosis are expected importantly to prevent osteoporosis. NaF can induce osteoblast apoptosis [20]. EP is an anti-neoplastic agent and epipodophyllotoxin used in cancer treatment, also has dose-related inhibition on osteoblasts [21]. EP and NaF thus are capable of inducing osteoblast apoptosis, evidenced again by the present study. Fortunately, some proteins such as lactoferrin and thrombin were found able to inhibit osteoblast apoptosis [22,23], which gave the same conclusion as the present study. Antioxidation, antihypertension and immuno-modulation of protein hydrolysates had been widely studied in the past [24,25,26]. However, less attention has been paid to anti-apoptosis of protein hydrolysates towards osteoblasts and other cells. The finding of anti-apoptosis of casein and soy protein hydrolysates towards osteoblasts might initiate a novel perspective of food research. Much work should be carried out for other hydrolysates and cells, especially, why soy protein hydrolysates had a stronger effect than casein hydrolysates is still a scientific mystery.
Ijms 16 13908 g004 1024
Figure 4. Apoptotic reversal of casein and soy protein hydrolysates (CH3 and SH3) at 0.05 mg/mL on etoposide- and NaF-induced apoptosis of hFOB1.19 cells. Cell apoptosis was measured by Annexin FITC-V/PI double-stained flow cytometry. Q1, dead cells; Q2, later apoptotic cells; Q3, viable cells; Q4, early apoptotic cells. (A) The cells in control group; (B,C) The cells treated by etoposide and NaF, respectively; (D,F) The cells first treated by etoposide, and then by CH3 and SH3, respectively; and (E,G) The cells first treated by NaF, and then by CH3 and SH3, respectively. The labeled data were obtained from one assaying only.
Figure 4. Apoptotic reversal of casein and soy protein hydrolysates (CH3 and SH3) at 0.05 mg/mL on etoposide- and NaF-induced apoptosis of hFOB1.19 cells. Cell apoptosis was measured by Annexin FITC-V/PI double-stained flow cytometry. Q1, dead cells; Q2, later apoptotic cells; Q3, viable cells; Q4, early apoptotic cells. (A) The cells in control group; (B,C) The cells treated by etoposide and NaF, respectively; (D,F) The cells first treated by etoposide, and then by CH3 and SH3, respectively; and (E,G) The cells first treated by NaF, and then by CH3 and SH3, respectively. The labeled data were obtained from one assaying only.
Ijms 16 13908 g004

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Reagents

Casein was obtained from Beijing Aoboxing Biotechnologies Inc. (Beijing, China). Soy protein was prepared from defatted soy flour with a procedure described by Jiang and Zhao [27]. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Cleveland, OH, USA). Papain was obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Dextran T-70, activated charcoal, G418, etoposide (EP) and DMEM:Ham’s F12 (1:1) medium were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and Annexin V-FITC/PI Kit were purchased from Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc. (Kyushu, Japan) and 4 A Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), respectively. The following reagents were purchased from Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China): trypsin-EDTA, propidium iodide (PI), RNase A reagent. The water used was redistilled or ultrapure water, while other chemicals used were analytical grade.
Charcoal/dextran treated FBS (CD-FBS) was performed using a modified method of Eckert and Katzenellenbogen [28]. In brief, charcoal (250 mg) and dextran (25 mg) were mixed with the FBS (100 mL) and incubated at 55 °C for 45 min; after that, centrifugal separation of the FBS and insolubles were carried out at 9000× g for 15 min. The above steps were repeated three times to get sterilized serum by filtration through a 0.22 μm filter.
Human fetal osteoblast cell line (hFOB1.19 cells) was obtained from Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The cells were derived from primary cultures of the tissue of fetal limbs and conditionally immortalized with a gene coding for a temperature-sensitive mutant (tsA58) of the SV40 large T-antigen along with a gene coding for neomycin (G418) resistance.

3.2. Preparation of the Hydrolysates

Casein and soy protein of 5 g (on dry basis) were dissolved in 100 mL water, respectively. The solutions were adjusted to pH 6.0 by adding 1 mol/L NaOH or HCl, kept at water bath with a set temperature of 60 °C, and then added by papain of 2 kU/g protein. The used papain is specified with preferential cleavage on the peptide bonds formed by Arg, Lys, and Phe-X [29]. After hydrolysis times of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 h, hydrolyzed protein solutions of 15 mL were separated and heated at boiling water bath for 15 min to terminate the hydrolysis. After cooling to room temperature, hydrolyzed protein solutions were centrifuged at 11,000× g for 20 min. The supernatants (protein hydrolysates) collected were evaluated for protein content and free amino groups to calculate DH values. Based on the assaying results, each protein was hydrolyzed at the same conditions but with different times, to generate three hydrolysates of different DH values. Six hydrolysates thus prepared were lyophilized, dried and stored at −20 °C before use.

3.3. Chemical Analyses

Nitrogen content was assessed using the Kjeldahl method in the Kjeltec 2300 Protein Analyzer (Foss Tecator AB, Hoganas, Sweden), and multiplied by conversion factors of 6.38 and 5.71 to obtain respective content of casein and soy protein, respectively [30].
Free amino groups were assayed by the o-pthaldialdehyde (OPA) method [31] with slight modifications. The assaying was carried out by adding hydrolysate (or standard) solution of 3 mL to the OPA reagent of 3 mL. Absorbance of the mixed solution was measured at 340 nm by a UV spectrophotometer (UV-2401PC, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) after a reaction time of 5 min. l-Leucine solutions of 6–30 μg/mL were used as standards. DH value was calculated as DH (%) = (h/htot) × 100. The suggested htot values were 8.2 and 7.8 meq/g protein for casein and soy protein [32], respectively.

3.4. Cell Culture Conditions and Cell Viability Assaying

The cells were cultured in DMEM: Ham’s F-12 (1:1) medium without phenol red supplemented with 10% (v/v) CD-FBS and 0.3 mg/mL G418, and maintained at 34 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
Cell viability was assayed by a CCK-8 method. CCK-8 contains WST-8 reagent that can be reduced into a kind of yellow water-soluble compounds (formazan) by dehydrogenase in the mitochondria [33]. Amount of the generated formazan is proportional to the number of living cells. The cells were seeded at 5 × 103 cells per well in 96-well plates and incubated at 34 °C in normal culture medium. After 24 h, the cells were starved with DMEM:Ham’s F-12 medium (1:1) containing 0.5% CD-FBS overnight. After then, the cells were treated with each hydrolysate of six levels (0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 mg/mL) and 17β-estradiol (E) (10−8 mol/L) for 24–72 h. As a positive control, E was dissolved in DMSO and made up with the medium so that final concentration of the vehicle was less than 0.1%. After the incubation, 20 μL CCK-8 was added to each well and incubated for another 4 h; afterwards, the absorbance was measured by a microplate reader (Bio Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) at a wavelength of 450 nm. The cells without hydrolysates or E treatment were as 100% viable.

3.5. Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Assaying

Cell cycle distribution was detected by the classical propidium iodide (PI) staining method and flow cytometric analysis. The cells were seeded in 6-well flat-bottomed plates at 3 × 105 cells per well for 24 h in normal culture medium, and then another 24 h in serum-deprived medium to synchronize cells at G0-phase. After that, the cells were exposed to the selected hydrolysates at 0.05 mg/mL for 48 h. The cells without hydrolysate treatment were served as the control. All cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) twice, suspended in chilled 70% ethanol at 4 °C overnight, and then re-suspended in the solution containing 50 μg/mL PI, Triton X-100 (0.1%) and RNase A (20 μg/mL) for 30 min at 37 °C in a dark room. For each experiment, 3000 events per sample were recorded by the flow cytometry (FACS Calibur, Becton Dickson, San Jose, CA, USA). Proportion of the cells in G0/G1-, S-, and G2/M-phases were analyzed by the ModFit software (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME, USA).
Two fluorescent dyes, Annexin V-FITC and PI, were used to detect the apoptotic and necrotic cells. Annexin V-FITC identifies early and late apoptotic cells, while late apoptosis and necrotic cells are stained by PI. The protocol used in the present analysis was recommended by the kit manufacturer. Briefly, the experiment was divided into two groups: apoptotic prevention group and apoptotic reversal group. In apoptotic prevention group, the cells were grown to about 80% confluence in the 6-well plates and treated with the hydrolysates for 48 h, followed by 24 h treatment with the proapoptotic agent EP (10 mg/L) and NaF (40 mg/L), respectively. While in apoptotic reversal group, two proapoptotic agents were added before hydrolysates. Those cells without any treatment served as the control group. After treatment, the cells in each group were harvested by trypsinisation, washed twice with PBS and re-suspended in 200 μL binding buffer containing 10 μL Annexin V-FITC and 5 μL PI. The samples were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 15 min, and then analyzed on the flow cytometry. The number of intact cells, early and late apoptotic cells and necrotic cells were discriminated by counting the cells directly.

3.6. Statistical Analyses

All data are expressed as means or means ± standard derivations (SD) from three independent experiments and analyses, and statistical significance between different groups was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan’s multiple range tests. Statistical significance was defined as a p < 0.05, with Duncan procedure of the SPSS version 13.0 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

4. Conclusions

The papain-generated casein and soy protein hydrolysates have estradiol-like action in vitro, and could promote the growth of human fetal osteoblasts (hFOB1.19 cells). The assessed proliferation depends on protein origins, hydrolysis extent and addition levels of the hydrolysates. Two hydrolysates of the highest DH values can arrest cell cycle progression in S-phase to favor cell proliferation, and antagonize NaF- and etoposide-induced apoptosis shown as apoptotic prevention or reversal for the osteoblasts. Soy protein hydrolysates totally show powerful proliferation and anti-apoptosis compared to casein hydrolysates. In total, the present results provide scientific evidence to show new bio-function of protein hydrolysates; that is, they are beneficial to the bone via proliferation and anti-apoptosis towards the osteoblasts.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 31371738) and the Program of International Science and Technology Cooperation of Heilongjiang Province (Project No. WB13C102).

Author Contributions

Xiao-Wen Pan carried out the experiments; Xin-Huai Zhao designed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adamson, N.J.; Reynolds, E.C. Characterization of casein phosphopeptides prepared using alcalase: Determination of enzyme specificity. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1996, 19, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Henderson, J.E.; Kremer, R.; Goltzman, D. Systemic factors in skeletal manifestations of malignancy. In Principles of Bone Biology; Bilezikian, J.P., Raisz, L.G., Rodan, G.A., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2002; pp. 1079–1092. [Google Scholar]
  3. Reid, I.R. Osteoporosis treatment: Focus on safety. Eur. J. Int. Med. 2013, 24, 691–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mardon, J.; Habauzit, V.; Trzeciakiewicz, A.; Davicco, M.J.; Lebecque, P.; Mercier, S.; Tressol, J.C.; Horcajada, M.N.; Demigné, C.; Coxam, V. Influence of high and low protein intakes on age-related bone loss in rats submitted to adequate or restricted energy conditions. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2008, 82, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Krieger, N.S.; Frick, K.K.; Bushinsky, D.A. Mechanism of acid-induced bone resorption. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2014, 13, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hartmann, R.; Meisel, H. Food-derived peptides with biological activity: From research to food applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2007, 18, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Donida, B.M.; Mrak, E.; Gravaghi, C.; Villa, I.; Cosentino, S.; Zacchi, E.; Perego, S.; Rubinacci, A.; Fiorilli, A.; Tettamanti, G.; et al. Casein phosphopeptides promote calcium uptake and modulate the differentiation pathway in human primary osteoblast-like cells. Peptides 2009, 30, 2233–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Evans, E.M.; Racette, S.B.; van Pelt, R.E.; Peterson, L.R.; Villareal, D.T. Effects of soy protein isolate and moderate exercise on bone turnover and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Menopause 2007, 14, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhang, J.C.; Liu, C.L.; Li, Y.P.; Sun, J.; Wang, P.; Di, K.Q.; Chen, H.; Zhao, Y.Y. Effect of cerium ion on the proliferation, differentiation and mineralization function of primary mouse osteoblasts in vitro. J. Rare Earths 2010, 28, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arjmanoi, B.H.; Alekel, L.; Hollis, B.W.; Amin, D.; Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis, M.; Guo, P.; Kukreja, S.C. Dietary soybean protein prevents bone loss in an ovariectomised rat model of osteoporosis. J. Nutr. 1996, 126, 161–167. [Google Scholar]
  11. Budek, A.Z.; Bjornvad, C.R.; Molgaard, C.; Bügel, S.; Vestergaard, M.; Pulkkinend, P.; Michaelsen, K.F.; Sangild, P.T. Effects of casein, whey and soy proteins on volumetric bone density and bone strength in immunocompromised piglets. e-SPEN Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. Metab. 2007, 2, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Canalis, E.; Pash, J.; Varghese, J.S. Skeletal growth factors. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 1993, 3, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Rizzoli, R.; Bonjour, J.P. Dietary protein and bone health. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2004, 19, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kelly, G.M.; Kilpatrick, J.I.; van Es, M.H.; Weafer, P.P.; Prendergast, P.J.; Jarvis, S.P. Bone cell elasticity and morphology changes during the cell cycle. J. Biomech. 2011, 44, 1484–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tsuruoka, N.; Yamato, R.; Sakai, Y.; Yoshitake, Y.; Yonekura, H. Promotion by collagen tripeptide of type I collagen gene expression in human osteoblastic cells and fracture healing of rat femur. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2007, 71, 2680–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fu, Y.; Zhao, X.H. In vitro responses of hFOB1.19 cells towards chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) skin gelatin hydrolysates in cell proliferation, cycle progression and apoptosis. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, X.X.; Deng, Y.F.; Zhou, Z.L.; Tao, Q.S.; Zhu, J.; Li, X.L.; Chen, J.L.; Hou, J.F. 17β-estradiol combined with testosterone promotes chicken osteoblast proliferation and differentiation by accelerating the cell cycle and inhibiting apoptosis in vitro. Vet. Res. Commun. 2010, 34, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Heath, M.C. Apoptosis, programmed cell death and the hypersensitive response. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 1998, 104, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bellido, T.; Plotkin, L.I. Novel actions of bisphosphonates in bone: Preservation of osteoblast and osteocyte viability. Bone 2011, 49, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ren, G.; Ferreri, M.; Wang, Z.; Su, Y.; Han, B.; Su, J. Sodium fluoride affects proliferation and apoptosis through insulin-like growth factor I receptor in primary cultured mouse osteoblasts. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 144, 914–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ahuja, S.S.; Zhao, S.; Bellido, T.; Plotkin, L.I.; Jimenez, F.; Bonewald, L.F. CD40 ligand blocks apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor α, glucocorticoids, and etoposide in osteoblasts and the osteocyte-like cell line murine long bone osteocyte-Y4. Endocrinology 2003, 144, 1761–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pagel, C.N.; Niese, M.R.; Abraham, L.A.; Chinni, C.; Song, S.J.; Pike, R.N.; Mackie, E.J. Inhibition of osteoblast apoptosis by thrombin. Bone 2003, 33, 733–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Grey, A.; Zhu, Q.; Watson, M.; Callon, K.; Cornish, J. Lactoferrin potently inhibits osteoblast apoptosis, via an LRP1-independent pathway. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2006, 251, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, R.Y.; Zhang, Z.F.; Pei, X.R.; Han, X.L.; Wang, J.B.; Wang, L.L.; Long, Z.; Shen, X.Y.; Li, Y. Immunomodulatory effects of marine oligopeptide preparation from chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in mice. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 464–470. [Google Scholar]
  25. Martínez-Maqueda, D.; Miralles, B.; Recio, I.; Hernández-Ledesma, B. Antihypertensive peptides from food proteins: A review. Food Funct. 2012, 3, 350–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fu, Y.; Zhao, X.H. Utilization of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) skin gelatin hydrolysates to attenuate hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative injury in rat hepatocyte BRL cell model. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, S.J.; Zhao, X.H. Transglutaminase-induced cross-linking and glucosamine conjugation in soybean protein isolates and its impacts on some functional properties of the products. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2010, 231, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eckert, R.L.; Katzenellenbogen, B.S. Effect of estrogens and antiestrogen receptor dynamics and the induction of progesterone receptor in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1982, 42, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Kunst, T. Handbook of Food Enzymology; Whitaker, J.R., Voragen, A.G.J., Wong, D.W.S., Eds.; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2003; Chapter 17; pp. 221–236. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhou, P.; Regenstein, J.M. Determination of total protein content in gelatin solutions with the lowry or biuret assay. J. Food Sci. 2006, 71, 474–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Church, F.C.; Swaisgood, H.E.; Porter, D.H.; Catignani, G.L. Spectrophotometric assay using o-phthaldialdehyde for determination of proteolysis in milk and isolated milk protein. J. Dairy Sci. 1983, 66, 1219–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nielsen, P.M.; Petersen, D.; Dambmann, C. Improved method for determining food protein degree of hydrolysis. J. Food Sci. 2001, 66, 642–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Mu, X.M.; Jiang, Z.Z.; Zhang, L.Y. Effect of triptolide on estradiol release from cultured rat granulose cells. Endocr. J. 2012, 59, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pan, X.-W.; Zhao, X.-H. In Vitro Proliferation and Anti-Apoptosis of the Papain-Generated Casein and Soy Protein Hydrolysates towards Osteoblastic Cells (hFOB1.19). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 13908-13920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160613908

AMA Style

Pan X-W, Zhao X-H. In Vitro Proliferation and Anti-Apoptosis of the Papain-Generated Casein and Soy Protein Hydrolysates towards Osteoblastic Cells (hFOB1.19). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(6):13908-13920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160613908

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pan, Xiao-Wen, and Xin-Huai Zhao. 2015. "In Vitro Proliferation and Anti-Apoptosis of the Papain-Generated Casein and Soy Protein Hydrolysates towards Osteoblastic Cells (hFOB1.19)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 6: 13908-13920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160613908

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop