Next Article in Journal
New Whitening Constituents from Taiwan-Native Pyracantha koidzumii: Structures and Tyrosinase Inhibitory Analysis in Human Epidermal Melanocytes
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatial Distribution Patterns of Root-Associated Bacterial Communities Mediated by Root Exudates in Different Aged Ratooning Tea Monoculture Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Parallel Reaction Monitoring: A Targeted Experiment Performed Using High Resolution and High Mass Accuracy Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Pathogenicity-Related Genes in Biofilm-Defective Acidovorax citrulli by Transposon Tn5 Mutagenesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 16
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms161226117
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptomic Response to Nitric Oxide Treatment in Larix olgensis Henry

by
Xiaoqing Hu
†,
Jingli Yang
† and
Chenghao Li
*
State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Northeast Forestry University, 26 Hexing Road, Harbin 150040, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(12), 28582-28597; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms161226117
Submission received: 18 September 2015 / Revised: 17 November 2015 / Accepted: 20 November 2015 / Published: 2 December 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Microbe Interaction)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Larix olgensis Henry is an important coniferous species found in plantation forests in northeastern China, but it is vulnerable to pathogens. Nitric oxide (NO) is an important molecule involved in plant resistance to pathogens. To study the regulatory role of NO at the transcriptional level, we characterized the transcriptomic response of L. olgensis seedlings to sodium nitroprusside (SNP, NO donor) using Illumina sequencing and de novo transcriptome assembly. A significant number of putative metabolic pathways and functions associated with the unique sequences were identified. Genes related to plant pathogen infection (FLS2, WRKY33, MAPKKK, and PR1) were upregulated with SNP treatment. This report describes the potential contribution of NO to disease resistance in L. olgensis as induced by biotic stress. Our results provide a substantial contribution to the genomic and transcriptomic resources for L. olgensis, as well as expanding our understanding of the involvement of NO in defense responses at the transcriptional level.

1. Introduction

Nitric oxide (NO) is a redox-active reactive nitrogen species and an important endogenous signaling molecule in plants. NO appears to be involved in various plant developmental and physiological processes such as stomatal closure, root growth, disease resistance, and abiotic stress resistance [1,2,3]. In plants, NO production is facilitated by nitrate reductase (NR) as well as nitric oxide synthase (NOS) pathways [4]. In addition, NO can also be generated from nonenzymatic sources [5]. In fact, upregulated expression of NO synthase (NOS) in Arabidopsis increases abiotic and biotic stress tolerance [6]. It was reported that ectopic expression of NOS genes in tobacco results in enhanced biotic stress resistance [7]. Thousands of NO-responsive genes have been identified previously, most of which are stress-related, and function in plant defense [8,9,10,11]. However, the NO regulatory mechanisms of woody plants in response to biotic stress are poorly understood.
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are low-cost, high-throughput sequencing methods that can rapidly generate information on a large number of genes. Transcriptome sequencing is a convenient and effective means of gene discovery [12,13], especially with the use of high-throughput NGS technologies. Transcriptome sequencing provides a wide range of genome information that can facilitate novel gene discovery and transcription factor (TF) discovery [14,15,16].
Olga Bay larch (Larix olgensis Henry), which is widely distributed in the Changbai Mountain region of Northeast China, North Korea and eastern Russia, is a common temperate, coniferous tree species in East Asia [17]. This species is one of the most ancient larches and is listed in the Red Book of the Russian Federation [18]. It is also one of the most industrially important coniferous species in the plantation forests in northeastern China because its wood products have anti-corrosive properties. China holds the largest total plantation area of L. olgensis for conifers. Unfortunately, L. olgensis is easily ravaged by a number of pathogenic fungi such as Botryosphaeria laricina (Sawada) Shang and Cladosporium tenuissimum Cook, leading to substantial losses of forests. To date, the transcriptomes of multiple larch species, including L. kaempferi × L. olgensis [19], L. gmelinii [20], and L. leptolepis [21] were sequenced by NGS. Unfortunately, information on the L. olgensis genomic sequence is limited, and only a few regulatory genes for biotic stress resistance have been identified.
To investigate the molecular mechanism of NO in L. olgensis, sequencing and de novo transcriptome assembly of seedlings pretreated with sodium nitroprusside (SNP, NO donor) was performed in the present study. Our results indicate that NO plays important roles in various processes, such as significant changes in the expression of genes involved in biotic stress resistance and cell wall biosynthesis. This study explores the possible mechanisms of disease-resistance at the transcriptional level, as well as provides a substantial contribution to the genomic and transcriptomic resources of L. olgensis.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. NO Production in Response to Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP)

L. olgensis seedlings were irrigated in a various concentrations of SNP. Compared with the control sample, there were no observable changes to seedlings treated with 33.5 and 167.8 μM SNP; however, there was visible wilting on seedlings treated with 839 μM SNP.
NO was visualized using the specific fluorescent probe 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM-DA) to detect NO fluorescence. Fluorescence analysis revealed that the control seedlings (Figure 1A) and seedlings treated with 33.5 μM SNP displayed weak fluorescence, whereas those treated with 167.8 μM SNP for 5 h showed a significant increase in fluorescence intensity (Figure 1B). When incubated with 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO), fluorescence intensity markedly decreased (Figure 1C). Based on these results, the seedlings treated with 167.8 μM SNP for 5 h were selected for use in subsequent RNA expression analyses.

2.2. Functional Annotation of Unigenes

To explore the regulatory role of NO in L. olgensis, sequencing and de novo transcriptome assembly were performed. Unigenes were annotated with the Nr, NT, Swiss-Prot, KEGG, COG, and GO databases. To identify unique sequences, similarity searches were performed against the NCBI Nr database using BLASTx (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Of the mapped unigenes, 53.5% and 32.8% had significant homology (≤80%) and an E-value less than 1 × 10−5 (Figure S1A,B). Searches against the COG database led to 26,012 unigenes being divided into 25 categories (Table S1, Figure S2). The largest number of unigenes were predicted to have general functions (4188 unigenes; 16.1%), followed by transcription (2141 unigenes; 8.2%). A total of 175,387 unigenes were classified into 57 GO annotations, which belong to one of the three GO categories: molecular function (26,402), cellular components (64,721) or biological processes (84,264) (Figure 2, Table S2). The largest number of unigenes (16,067 unigenes, 24.8%) in a GO annotation was observed in the cellular components category (Figure 2).

2.3. Investigation of Differentially Expressed Transcripts under SNP Treatment

Exposure of L. olgensis roots to 167.8 μM SNP resulted in the upregulation of 2671 genes and downregulation of 3674 genes (Figure S3). We analyzed the 50 most differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between control and SNP treatments and identified nine upregulated and one downregulated gene (Table S3) that were involved in various important biological pathways, including cyanoamino acid metabolism, tryptophan metabolism, aminobenzoate degradation, styrene degradation, and nitrogen metabolism (Table 1). It is likely that these highly expressed genes may play important roles in biological functions, and need to be investigated further in future studies.
Ijms 16 26117 g001 1024
Figure 1. Effect of SNP on nitric oxide (NO) generation in L. olgensis seedlings. NO fluorescence was detected using the NO-specific 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM-DA) green fluorescent dye, and viewed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. (A) Root of control seedlings; (B) Root of seedlings treated with 167.8 μM sodium nitroprusside (SNP, NO donor) for 5 h; (C) Root of seedlings treated with 167.8 μM SNP and 100 μM 2-4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO) for 5 h.
Figure 1. Effect of SNP on nitric oxide (NO) generation in L. olgensis seedlings. NO fluorescence was detected using the NO-specific 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM-DA) green fluorescent dye, and viewed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. (A) Root of control seedlings; (B) Root of seedlings treated with 167.8 μM sodium nitroprusside (SNP, NO donor) for 5 h; (C) Root of seedlings treated with 167.8 μM SNP and 100 μM 2-4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO) for 5 h.
Ijms 16 26117 g001
For nitrogen metabolism, several DEGs (Table S4) were determined to be involved in nitrate reductase activity (Figure 3A), nitrate transport (Figure 3B), and response to organic nitrogen (Figure 3C). Two NR genes were transcriptionally induced by NO treatment (Figure 3A), which was similar to previous findings involving birch cells in suspension [22]. There is growing evidence that NR is one of the main potential sources of endogenous NO in plants [4]. Therefore, our results support previous findings that exogenous NO is involved in the regulation of endogenous NO signals in larch seedlings.
Among the genes with KEGG pathway annotations, 2670 DEGs were identified between the control and SNP libraries. Pathway enrichment analysis showed that 120 pathways were significantly enriched (Q value ≤ 0.05) in DEGs detected between the control and SNP libraries (Table S5). Most DEGs were associated with metabolic pathways (945 members), biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (573 members), ribosome (213 members), and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (200 members).
Ijms 16 26117 g002 1024
Figure 2. Gene ontology (GO) classifications. GO function is showed in X-axis. The right Y-axis indicates the number of genes with GO functions, and the left Y-axis indicates the percentage in a logarithmic scale.
Figure 2. Gene ontology (GO) classifications. GO function is showed in X-axis. The right Y-axis indicates the number of genes with GO functions, and the left Y-axis indicates the percentage in a logarithmic scale.
Ijms 16 26117 g002
Ijms 16 26117 g003 1024
Figure 3. Clustering of differentially expressed genes. Red colors indicate up-regulation, and green colors indicate down-regulation. (A) Differentially expressed genes related to nitrate reductase activity; (B) Differentially expressed genes related to the response to organic nitrogen; (C) Differentially expressed genes related to nitrate transport.
Figure 3. Clustering of differentially expressed genes. Red colors indicate up-regulation, and green colors indicate down-regulation. (A) Differentially expressed genes related to nitrate reductase activity; (B) Differentially expressed genes related to the response to organic nitrogen; (C) Differentially expressed genes related to nitrate transport.
Ijms 16 26117 g003
Table
Table 1. Gene pathways enriched in the top 50 highly expressed genes.
Table 1. Gene pathways enriched in the top 50 highly expressed genes.
UnigenePathways (Control vs. SNP)Nr-ID
Unigene32649_AllCyanoamino acid metabolism, Tryptophan metabolism, aminobenzoate degradation, styrene degradation, Nitrogen metabolismgi|348690846|gb|EGZ30660.1|
Unigene32533_AllCarbon metabolism, biosynthesis of amino acids, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms, HIF-1 signaling pathway, Alzheimer‘s diseasegi|226495473|ref|NP_001147336.1|
CL6269.Contig1_AllRNA transport, Legionellosisgi|301111276|ref|XP_002904717.1|
Unigene32730_AllRibosomegi|323451608|gb|EGB07485.1|
CL5964.Contig2_AllMineral absorptiongi|357161316|ref|XP_003579051.1|
Unigene32753_AllSpliceosomegi|145324176|ref|NP_001077677.1|
Unigene26640_AllPlant-pathogen interactiongi|2224913|gb|AAB61709.1|

2.4. Protection against Pathogen Infection

Plants are constantly exposed to a range of pathogenic microbes, and possess elaborate defense mechanisms to prevent infection. Our transcriptome analysis result revealed that many genes (156 members) in the plant-pathogen interaction category were differentially expressed between control and NO-treated plants (Figure 4, Table S6).
Ijms 16 26117 g004 1024
Figure 4. Enrichment of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to environmental adaptation. The number of DEGs annotated in this pathway is indicated.
Figure 4. Enrichment of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to environmental adaptation. The number of DEGs annotated in this pathway is indicated.
Ijms 16 26117 g004
Innate immunity in plants is first triggered by the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) in the presence of surface-localized pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [23,24]. In Arabidopsis, the leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase (LRRRLK) flagellin-sensing2 (FLS2) binds to the bacterial PAMP flagellin, initiating PAMP-triggered immunity. The EF-Tu receptor (EFR) has also been extensively characterized. It recognizes the bacterial elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu). The Arabidopsis PAMP chitin, a component of the fungal cell wall, which is recognized by the LysM-RLK chitin elicitor receptor kinase1 (CERK1), also induces a defense response. In the present study, several genes encoding PRRs were differently expressed with NO treatment, including 37 FLS2 genes (16 upregulated and 21 downregulated), eight EFR genes (all down regulated), and one CERK1 gene (downregulated) (Table S6). This is the first report that shows that NO induces the differential expression of PRR genes. Genome-wide transcriptional response of plants to NO treatment has been reported in Arabidopsis [10,25], birch cells, and other plants; however, studies showing that NO alters the expression of PRR genes are limited [22]. NO treatment significantly increased the expression of some FLS2 genes in this study (which included 4 genes out of the 20 most upregulated). The present study has not determined whether FLS2 acts downstream of NO to reverse the effects of PAMPs. However, direct evidence suggests that NO may have a close relationship with PAMPs and PRR in plant defense.
Another important finding of the present study was that mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKKs) were induced by NO at transcriptional level. This result was consistent with results reported for Arabidopsis and tobacco, indicating that NO upregulates mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) [6,7]. MAPKs are organized into signaling cascades that form the backbone of the signaling network within and between cells [26,27]. Several MAPKs have been demonstrated to be involved in the plant response to biotic stress [28,29,30]. These include the upstream receptors, MAPKKs, and MAPKKKs. MAPK-dependent and MAPK-independent signaling pathways act downstream of FLS2 to activate the WRKY gene [31]. This signaling responds to both fungal and bacterial pathogens and could be engineered to enhance disease resistance [31].
An important transcriptional regulator of defense gene Pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR1), was dramatically upregulated with SNP treatment (Table S6) [32]. Previous reports in Arabidopsis have shown that NO treatments increase PR1 expression [11]. In defensive signaling processes of plants, NO is an important component in the hypersensitive response (HR), which occurred when potential pathogens are trapped near the site of infection [33]. In this process, NO activates guanylate cyclase, thereby initiating cGMP-mediated signal transduction [33], as well as protein modifications by S-nitrosylation [34]. These subsequently regulate the transcription of PR1. NO also regulates an NADPH oxidase and thereby controls HR-associated cell death using the same process [35].
In addition, six disease resistance protein genes were upregulated by SNP treatment (Table S6). These include four genes encoding resistance to Pseudomonas syringae 2 (RPS2), one gene encoding resistance to Pseudomonas syringae 5 (RPS5), and one gene encoding resistance to P. syringae pv maculicola 1 (RPM1). Overexpression of RPS2 [36], RPS5 [37], or RPM1 [38] induces disease resistance, suggesting that the responses of larch seedlings to SNP resemble biotic stress responses.
NO also upregulated some transcription factors that are involved in inducing plant defense responses. Of particular interest are the WRKY transcription factors (Table S6). Previous reports involving Arabidopsis have shown that NO treatments increase expression of WRKY genes [10]. The transcription of WRKY genes is strongly and rapidly upregulated in response to wounding in numerous plant species, pathogen infection, or abiotic stresses [39,40,41]. Several studies suggested the function of WRKYs is to bind to the W box element (TTGACC/T) [42,43], which is located in the promoter regions of various plant defense genes [44,45]. An approximate two-fold induction of WRKY22 and WRKY33 was observed with SNP treatment (Table S6). Previous studies have shown that the overexpression of AtWRKY33 enhances resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria brassicicola [46]. In addition, AtWRKY33 is reported as a positive regulator of pathogen-induced autophagy, an important process for plant resistance to pathogenic necrotrophic fungi [47].

2.5. Cell Wall Biosynthesis

The phenylpropanoid pathway is an important process in the synthesis of defensive compounds [48]. Lignin is one of the products of the phenylpropanoid pathway. It is reported that lignin can be used as a physical barrier against initial pathogen colonization [49]. Also, the lignin deposited in infected cells prevents the spread of pathogenic toxins and enzymes, as well as inhibits water and nutrient transport from the plant cells to the pathogen [50]. In addition, some genes involved in lignin biosynthesis are induced, and lignins are deposited rapidly in secondary cell walls [51]. Transcriptional profiling of various plant-pathogen interactions have also revealed the activation of genes whose products are involved in the modification of cell wall components [52,53].
A total of 97 DEGs involved in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway were identified in the present study (Figure 5B). Several DEGs were related to lignin synthesis, including genes coding for 4-coumarate CoA ligase (4CL), caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT), cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR), cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), cinnamate-4-hydroxylase (C4H), ferulate-5-hydroxylase (F5H), and peroxidase (POD). These proteins are involved in the metabolic activity of higher plants and are key enzymes for the monolignol biosynthesis pathway. This pathway is also involved in Scots pine defense against root rot disease [53]. Similarly, in silk spruce, seven DEGs related to the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway of P. sitchensis phloem are involved in plant defense responses to wounding or insects [54]. Some DEGs are involved in the phenylpropanoid pathway after treatment with NO, which includes C4H, PAL, and CAD [10,11], and this is supported by the results of the present study. In addition, differentiating xylem cells of young zinnia seedlings showed outbreaks of NO production at an early stage of the differentiation process, which were sustained during cell wall synthesis [55]. Agnieszka [56] found out that NO was generated in differentiating vessels of roots in P. trichocarpa, through the beginning of the differentiation process. The locations of NO accumulation co-localized to the sites of cell wall thickening. This finding is significant because it indicates that lignin biosynthesis might be induced by NO which activates the enzymes related to this pathway. Moreover, a previous study clearly showed that NO is produced in lignin biosynthesis when plants are exposed to wounding [57]. When NO was eliminated by cPTIO, cell wall lignification was clearly reduced [57]. Based on the above results, we speculate that the changes in the expression of genes involved in cell wall biosynthesis after NO treatment result in cell wall thickening and increased disease resistance, although further verification is warranted.

2.6. Validation of Transcriptomic Data by QRT-PCR

Two genes annotated to nitrate reductase were highly expressed (unigene11797_All, unigene19806_All) (Figure 6). Six genes related to plant pathogen infection were also validated: unigene30469_All and unigene22378_All annotated as PR1; Unigene10916_All, unigene30477_All and cl5322.Contig2_All identified as the disease resistance proteins RPM1, FLS2 and RPS2, respectively (Figure 6). Both cl2769.Contig1_All and cl2769.Contig3_All were named as WRKY. Genes involve in the phenylpropanoid pathway such as PAL (unigene18710_All), CAD (cl769.Contig3_All), POD (cl1210.Contig2_All) and CCoAOMT (cl3623.Contig1_All, cl1102.Contig4_All) were also up-regulated, while another PAL gene (cl2502.Contig2_All) was down-regulated. Thus, the results of qRT-PCR consistently matched with the initial transcriptome analysis, and therefore support the results.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Plant Materials and Treatments

Open-pollinated mature seeds of L. olgensis were collected during mid-September from Qingshan Forestry Bureau Seed Orchard, Heilongjiang Province, China, and were stored in sealed plastic bags at −20 °C. The seeds were sown on the surface of a mixture of equal parts soil and vermiculite for germination.
Six-week-old of seedlings were rinsed in running tap water to remove surface exudates, and irrigated with 33.5, 167.8, or 839 μM SNP in distilled water for 5 h. Seedlings treated with distilled water were used as control. For scavenger treatment, seedlings were irrigated with 100 μM cPTIO and 167.8 μM SNP for 5 h. After treatment, the seedlings were incubated in Mes/KCl buffer (5 mM KCl, 10 mM Mes, 50 M CaCl2, pH 6.15) for 2 h, and then in 10 μM of the NO indicator fluorescent dye DAF-FM-DA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 10 min, washing with Mes/KCl buffer for 20 min. Fluorescence was visualized at 488 nm using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss LSM700, Jena, Germany).
Ijms 16 26117 g005a 1024Ijms 16 26117 g005b 1024
Figure 5. Plant-pathogen interactions and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathways induced by sodium nitroprusside treatment (SNP, NO donor). Black borders: Pathway; Red represents up-regulated genes; Green represents up-regulated genes. (A) Plant-pathogen interaction; (B) Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis.
Figure 5. Plant-pathogen interactions and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathways induced by sodium nitroprusside treatment (SNP, NO donor). Black borders: Pathway; Red represents up-regulated genes; Green represents up-regulated genes. (A) Plant-pathogen interaction; (B) Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis.
Ijms 16 26117 g005aIjms 16 26117 g005b
Ijms 16 26117 g006 1024
Figure 6. QRT-PCR analysis of selected genes. Fifteen genes were selected to verify the transcriptomic data. The histogram represents qRT-PCR analysis and the line chart represents RPKM (Reads per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped reads) values. The X-axis stands for different samples. The right Y-axis stands for relative expression level and the left Y-axis indicates RPKM values. Standard deviations were derived from three replicates of each experiment.
Figure 6. QRT-PCR analysis of selected genes. Fifteen genes were selected to verify the transcriptomic data. The histogram represents qRT-PCR analysis and the line chart represents RPKM (Reads per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped reads) values. The X-axis stands for different samples. The right Y-axis stands for relative expression level and the left Y-axis indicates RPKM values. Standard deviations were derived from three replicates of each experiment.
Ijms 16 26117 g006

3.2. RNA Extraction, cDNA Library Preparation, and Illumina Sequencing

Six-week-old seedlings were soaked in 167.8 μM sodium nitroprusside (SNP) or sterile distilled water (control) for 5 h. Ten individual seedlings were collected and pooled into one sample for sequencing. Total RNA was extracted using a modified CTAB method [58] and digested with RNase-free DNase I (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at 37 °C for 30 min. Both the concentration and integrity of the RNA samples were evaluated using a NanoPhotometer (GmbH, Munich, Germany). MRNA was isolated from total RNA using Dynabeads oligo (dT) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). First-strand cDNA was generated using random hexamer primers. The second-strand cDNA was generated using buffer, dNTPs, RNaseH, and DNA polymerase I (Invitrogen). Double-stranded cDNA was used for library construction. The short PCR fragments were purified with a QiaQuick PCR extraction kit, and suitable fragments, here meaning fragments that had sequencing adaptors, were selected as templates for PCR amplification based on the results of agarose gel electrophoresis. For quality control an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and ABI StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) were used for quantification and to evaluate library quality. Libraries were then sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq™ 2000. The raw Illumina data have been deposited in SRA at NCBI with accession numbers (control: SAMN02665256; SNP: SAMN02665243).

3.3. De Novo Assembly and Annotation

By removing empty reads, adaptor sequences, and low-quality sequences to obtain the clean reads. Then assembled the clean reads into contigs using Trinity [59], and were then connected using Unigene (Table 2). When multiple samples from the same species are sequenced, Unigenes from each sample’s assembly can be analyzed further to identify splicing and to remove redundancy with sequence clustering software. Next, BlastX alignments [60] (E-value < 10−5) were performed between Unigenes and the following protein databases: NCBI non-redundant protein (Nr) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), Swiss-Prot [61], KEGG [62], and COG [63]. The highest sequence similarity to a gene in the NCBI Nr database was annotated to the Unigene. Gene Ontology (GO) annotations for the unigenes were determined using Blast2GO [64], and the WEGO [65] was used to analyze GO functional classifications.
Table
Table 2. Details of the sequencing and assembly.
Table 2. Details of the sequencing and assembly.
ParametersControlSodium Nitroprusside
Total number of reads51,426,92054,580,304
Total nucleotides (bp)4,628,422,8004,912,227,360
GC percentage46.11%46.54%
Q20 percentage98.15%98.28%
Total number of contigs101,85395,211
Length of all contigs (bp)39,753,57338,513,317
Contigs N50 (bp)872910
Mean length (bp) of contigs390405
Total number of unigenes65,20758,080
Length of all unigenes (bp)38,628,76338,445,887
Mean length (bp) of contigs592662
Unigenes N50 (bp)9581117

3.4. qRT-PCR Validation

Total RNA was extracted from SNP-treated and non-treated seedlings of L. olgensis Henry plants using method mentioned previously. First-strand cDNA was synthesized with 0.5 μg purified RNA and reverse-transcribed with a Reverse Transcriptase kit (TaKaRa Biotech, Dalian, China). qRT-PCR reactions were performed in a volume of 20 μL, containing 10 μL of SYBR premix ExTaq (TaKaRa Biotech, Dalian, China), 0.5 μM of forward and reverse primers, and 2 μL cDNA template (equivalent to 0.05 μg of total RNA). Thermal cycling conditions were performed as follows: 95 °C for 10 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 78 °C for 1 s for plate reading. The primer sequences used for α-tubulin and 15 selected genes related to NR, plant-pathogen interactions, and the phenylpropanoid pathway that were used to validate the RNA-seq data are presented in Table S7.

4. Conclusions

The present study examined the potential contribution of NO to disease resistance in L. olgensis by analyzing the effect of NO treatment on defense-related genes. Here, we report for the first time de novo transcriptome sequencing for L. olgensis Henry in order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the role of NO in plant defense. Several putative metabolic pathways and functions associated with the unique sequences were identified. Moreover, NO has a significant effect on cell wall biosynthesis, and several genes related to plant pathogen infection were upregulated with SNP treatment (FLS2, WRKY33, RPM1, and PR1) when L. olgensis seedling were exposed to NO. These findings provide a greater understanding of the role NO plays in L. olgensis disease response and provide a substantial contribution to the genomic resources.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/16/12/26117/s1.

Acknowledgments

The National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, 2013AA102704) and National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, 2011AA100203) supported this research study.

Author Contributions

Chenghao Li and Jingli Yang designed the experiments. Xiaoqing Hu and Jingli Yang carried out the data analysis, molecular woks and prepared the RNA. Xiaoqing Hu and Chenghao Li drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, J.; Baldwin, I.T. Herbivory-induced signalling in plants: Perception and action. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 1161–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liao, Y.W.; Sun, Z.H.; Zhou, Y.H.; Shi, K.; Li, X.; Zhang, G.Q.; Xia, X.J.; Chen, Z.X.; Yu, J.Q. The role of hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide in the induction of plant-encoded RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 1 in the basal defense against Tobacco mosaic virus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Delledonne, M. NO news is good news for plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shi, F.M.; Li, Y.Z. Verticillium dahliae toxins-induced nitric oxide production in Arabidopsis is major dependent on nitrate reductase. BMB Rep. 2008, 41, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bethke, P.C.; Badger, M.R.; Jones, R.L. Apoplastic synthesis of nitric oxide by plant tissues. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shi, H.T.; Li, R.J.; Cai, W.; Liu, W.; Wang, C.L.; Lu, Y.T. Increasing nitric oxide content in Arabidopsis thaliana by expressing rat neuronal nitric oxide synthase resulted in enhanced stress tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 344–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chun, H.J.; Park, H.C.; Koo, S.C.; Lee, J.H.; Park, C.Y.; Choi, M.S.; Kang, C.H.; Baek, D.; Cheong, Y.H.; Yun, D.J.; et al. Constitutive expression of mammalian nitric oxide synthase in tobacco plants triggers disease resistance to pathogens. Mol. Cells 2012, 34, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Besson-Bard, A.; Wendehenne, D. NO contributes to cadmium toxicity in Arabidopsis thaliana by mediating an iron deprivation response. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4, 252–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Huang, X.; von Rad, U.; Durner, J. Nitric oxide induces transcriptional activation of the nitric oxide-tolerant alternative oxidase in Arabidopsis suspension cells. Planta 2002, 215, 914–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Parani, M.; Rudrabhatla, S.; Myers, R.; Weirich, H.; Smith, B.; Leaman, D.W.; Goldman, S.L. Microarray analysis of nitric oxide responsive transcripts in Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2004, 2, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Polverari, A.; Molesini, B.; Pezzotti, M.; Buonaurio, R.; Marte, M.; Delledonne, M. Nitric oxide-mediated transcriptional changes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2003, 16, 1094–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vidotto, M.; Grapputo, A.; Boscari, E.; Barbisan, F.; Coppe, A.; Grandi, G.; Kumar, A.; Congiu, L. Transcriptome sequencing and de novo annotation of the critically endangered Adriatic sturgeon. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sun, F.Y.; Liu, S.K.; Gao, X.Y.; Jiang, Y.L.; Perera, D.; Wang, X.L.; Li, C.; Sun, L.Y.; Zhang, J.R.; Kaltenboeck, L.; et al. Male-biased genes in catfish as revealed by RNA-Seq analysis of the testis transcriptome. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Heim, M.A.; Jakoby, M.; Werber, M.; Martin, C.; Weisshaar, B.; Bailey, P.C. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family in plants: A genome-wide study of protein structure and functional diversity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20, 735–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jiao, Y.; Yang, H.; Ma, L.; Sun, N.; Yu, H.; Liu, T.; Gao, Y.; Gu, H.; Chen, Z.; Wada, M.; et al. A genome-wide analysis of blue-light regulation of Arabidopsis transcription factor gene expression during seedling development. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 1480–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Knowles, D.G.; McLysaght, A. Recent de novo origin of human protein-coding genes. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1752–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wei, H.X.; Xu, C.Y.; Ren, J.; Ma, L.Y.; Duan, J.; Jiang, L.N. Newly transplanted Larix olgensis henry stock with greater root biomass has higher early nitrogen flux rate. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2013, 59, 740–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Blokhina, N.I.; Bondarenko, O.V.; Snezhkova, S.A. Fossil wood of Quercus primorica sp nov (Fagaceae) from the pliocene of southern primorye. Paleontol. J. 2005, 39, 664–670. [Google Scholar]
  19. Han, H.; Sun, X.; Xie, Y.; Feng, J.; Zhang, S. Transcriptome and proteome profiling of adventitious root development in hybrid larch (Larix kaempferi × Larix olgensis). BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Men, L.; Yan, S.; Liu, G. De novo characterization of Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Rupr. transcriptome and analysis of its gene expression induced by jasmonates. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S.G.; Han, S.Y.; Li, X.M.; Qi, L.W. Transcriptome profiling and in silico analysis of somatic embryos in Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis). Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 1637–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zeng, F.; Sun, F.; Li, L.; Liu, K.; Zhan, Y. Genome-scale transcriptome analysis in response to nitric oxide in birch cells: Implications of the triterpene biosynthetic pathway. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e116157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jones, J.D.G.; Dangl, J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Monaghan, J.; Zipfel, C. Plant pattern recognition receptor complexes at the plasma membrane. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Palmieri, M.C.; Sell, S.; Huang, X.; Scherf, M.; Werner, T.; Durner, J.; Lindermayr, C. Nitric oxide-responsive genes and promoters in Arabidopsis thaliana: A bioinformatics approach. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, S.; Klessig, D.F. MAPK cascades in plant defense signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tena, G.; Asai, T.; Chiu, W.L.; Sheen, J. Plant mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascades. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ligterink, W.; Kroj, T.; zur Nieden, U.; Hirt, H.; Scheel, D. Receptor-mediated activation of a map kinase in pathogen defense of plants. Science 1997, 276, 2054–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, S.; Klessig, D.F. Resistance gene N-mediated de novo synthesis and activation of a tobacco mitogen-activated protein kinase by tobacco mosaic virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 7433–7438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Nuhse, T.S.; Peck, S.C.; Hirt, H.; Boller, T. Microbial elicitors induce activation and dual phosphorylation of the Arabidopsis thaliana MAPK 6. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 7521–7526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Asai, T.; Tena, G.; Plotnikova, J.; Willmann, M.R.; Chiu, W.L.; Gomez-Gomez, L.; Boller, T.; Ausubel, F.M.; Sheen, J. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 2002, 415, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tada, Y.; Spoel, S.H.; Pajerowska-Mukhtar, K.; Mou, Z.; Song, J.; Wang, C.; Zuo, J.; Dong, X. Plant immunity requires conformational changes [corrected] of NPR1 via S-nitrosylation and thioredoxins. Science 2008, 321, 952–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Durner, J.; Wendehenne, D.; Klessig, D.F. Defense gene induction in tobacco by nitric oxide, cyclic GMP, and cyclic ADP-ribose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 10328–10333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Feechan, A.; Kwon, E.; Yun, B.W.; Wang, Y.; Pallas, J.A.; Loake, G.J. A central role for S-nitrosothiols in plant disease resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 8054–8059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yun, B.W.; Feechan, A.; Yin, M.; Saidi, N.B.; Le Bihan, T.; Yu, M.; Moore, J.W.; Kang, J.G.; Kwon, E.; Spoel, S.H.; et al. S-nitrosylation of NADPH oxidase regulates cell death in plant immunity. Nature 2011, 478, 264–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Axtell, M.J.; Staskawicz, B.J. Initiation of RPS2-specified disease resistance in Arabidopsis is coupled to the AvrRpt2-directed elimination of RIN4. Cell 2003, 112, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ade, J.; DeYoung, B.J.; Golstein, C.; Innes, R.W. Indirect activation of a plant nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat protein by a bacterial protease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 2531–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cherkis, K.A.; Temple, B.R.S.; Chung, E.H.; Sondek, J.; Dangl, J.L. AvrRpm1 missense mutations weakly activate RPS2-mediated immune response in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Eulgem, T.; Rushton, P.J.; Robatzek, S.; Somssich, I.E. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Robatzek, S.; Somssich, I.E. A new member of the Arabidopsis WRKY transcription factor family, AtWRKY6, is associated with both senescence- and defence-related processes. Plant J. 2001, 28, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rizhsky, L.; Liang, H.; Mittler, R. The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rushton, P.J.; Reinstadler, A.; Lipka, V.; Lippok, B.; Somssich, I.E. Synthetic plant promoters containing defined regulatory elements provide novel insights into pathogen- and wound-induced signaling. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 749–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yamasaki, K.; Kigawa, T.; Inoue, M.; Tateno, M.; Yamasaki, T.; Yabuki, T.; Aoki, M.; Seki, E.; Matsuda, T.; Tomo, Y.; et al. Solution structure of an Arabidopsis WRKY DNA binding domain. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 944–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Maleck, K.; Levine, A.; Eulgem, T.; Morgan, A.; Schmid, J.; Lawton, K.A.; Dangl, J.L.; Dietrich, R.A. The transcriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana during systemic acquired resistance. Nat. Genet. 2000, 26, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Chen, W.; Provart, N.J.; Glazebrook, J.; Katagiri, F.; Chang, H.S.; Eulgem, T.; Mauch, F.; Luan, S.; Zou, G.; Whitham, S.A.; et al. Expression profile matrix of Arabidopsis transcription factor genes suggests their putative functions in response to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 559–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zheng, Z.Y.; Abu Qamar, S.; Chen, Z.X.; Mengiste, T. Arabidopsis WRKY33 transcription factor is required for resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens. Plant J. 2006, 48, 592–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Reuber, T.L.; Ausubel, F.M. Isolation of Arabidopsis genes that differentiate between resistance responses mediated by the RPS2 and RPM1 disease resistance genes. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dixon, R.A.; Achnine, L.; Kota, P.; Liu, C.J.; Reddy, M.S.; Wang, L. The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence—A genomics perspective. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2002, 3, 371–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Boerjan, W.; Ralph, J.; Baucher, M. Lignin biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003, 54, 519–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Smith, A.H.; Gill, W.M.; Pinkard, E.A.; Mohammed, C.L. Anatomical and histochemical defence responses induced in juvenile leaves of Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens by mycosphaerella infection. For. Pathol. 2007, 37, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tronchet, M.; Balague, C.; Kroj, T.; Jouanin, L.; Roby, D. Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenases-C and D, key enzymes in lignin biosynthesis, play an essential role in disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 11, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Schenk, P.M.; Kazan, K.; Wilson, I.; Anderson, J.P.; Richmond, T.; Somerville, S.C.; Manners, J.M. Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 11655–11660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Adomas, A.; Heller, G.; Li, G.; Olson, A.; Chu, T.M.; Osborne, J.; Craig, D.; van Zyl, L.; Wolfinger, R.; Sederoff, R.; et al. Transcript profiling of a conifer pathosystem: Response of Pinus sylvestris root tissues to pathogen (Heterobasidion annosum) invasion. Tree Physiol. 2007, 27, 1441–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ralph, S.G.; Yueh, H.; Friedmann, M.; Aeschliman, D.; Zeznik, J.A.; Nelson, C.C.; Butterfield, Y.S.N.; Kirkpatrick, R.; Liu, J.; Jones, S.J.M.; et al. Conifer defence against insects: Microarray gene expression profiling of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) induced by mechanical wounding or feeding by spruce budworms (Choristoneura occidentalis) or white pine weevils (Pissodes strobi) reveals large-scale changes of the host transcriptome. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 1545–1570. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Gabaldon, C.; Gomez Ros, L.V.; Pedreno, M.A.; Ros Barcelo, A. Nitric oxide production by the differentiating xylem of Zinnia elegans. New Phytol. 2005, 165, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bagniewska-Zadworna, A.; Arasimowicz-Jelonek, M.; Smolinski, D.J.; Stelmasik, A. New insights into pioneer root xylem development: Evidence obtained from Populus trichocarpa plants grown under field conditions. Ann. Bot. 2014, 113, 1235–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Arasimowicz, M.; Floryszak-Wieczorek, J.; Milczarek, G.; Jelonek, T. Nitric oxide, induced by wounding, mediates redox regulation in pelargonium leaves. Plant Biol. 2009, 11, 650–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jaakola, L.; Pirttila, A.M.; Halonen, M.; Hohtola, A. Isolation of high quality RNA from bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) fruit. Mol. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 201–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q.D.; et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Tatusov, R.L.; Koonin, E.V.; Lipman, D.J. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 1997, 278, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kanehisa, M.; Araki, M.; Goto, S.; Hattori, M.; Hirakawa, M.; Itoh, M.; Katayama, T.; Kawashima, S.; Okuda, S.; Tokimatsu, T.; et al. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, D480–D484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tatusov, R.L.; Fedorova, N.D.; Jackson, J.D.; Jacobs, A.R.; Kiryutin, B.; Koonin, E.V.; Krylov, D.M.; Mazumder, R.; Mekhedov, S.L.; Nikolskaya, A.N.; et al. The COG database: An updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinform. 2003, 4, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Conesa, A.; Gotz, S.; Garcia-Gomez, J.M.; Terol, J.; Talon, M.; Robles, M. Blast2GO: A universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3674–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ye, J.; Fang, L.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, S.; Li, R.; Bolund, L.; et al. WEGO: A web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W293–W297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, X.; Yang, J.; Li, C. Transcriptomic Response to Nitric Oxide Treatment in Larix olgensis Henry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 28582-28597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms161226117

AMA Style

Hu X, Yang J, Li C. Transcriptomic Response to Nitric Oxide Treatment in Larix olgensis Henry. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(12):28582-28597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms161226117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Xiaoqing, Jingli Yang, and Chenghao Li. 2015. "Transcriptomic Response to Nitric Oxide Treatment in Larix olgensis Henry" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 12: 28582-28597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms161226117

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop