Next Article in Journal
Computational Study of Linker Polarity Effects on Optical Electron Transfer in Imine- and Acylhydrazone-Linked Covalent Organic Frameworks Using Fragment Models
Previous Article in Journal
Review of Structural Modification and Development of Novel Tramadol Derivatives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pyridyl-Thiourea Ruthenium and Osmium Complexes: Coordination of Ligand and Application as FLP Hydrogenation Catalysts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nickel-Catalyzed Intermolecular Cyclization of 2-Bromobenzamide: A General Strategy for Synthesizing 6(5H)-Phenanthridinone Derivatives

1
College of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou 425199, China
2
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2026, 31(7), 1176; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071176
Submission received: 4 February 2026 / Revised: 30 March 2026 / Accepted: 31 March 2026 / Published: 2 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Transition Metal Catalysis, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

6(5H)-phenanthridinone derivatives, as an important class of alkaloids, have broad application value in drug development and functional material synthesis. In this study, a nickel-catalyzed synthetic strategy was developed, using 2-bromobenzamide compounds as starting materials. Through an intermolecular cyclization reaction, a series of 6(5H)-phenanthridinone derivatives bearing amide substituents was efficiently constructed. The optimal reaction system was identified: Ni(acac)2/Zn as the catalyst, PCy3 as the ligand, toluene as the solvent, Cs2CO3 as the base, under an argon atmosphere at 150 °C for 12 h. The target products were obtained in yields up to 88%. Further substrate scope exploration demonstrated the excellent generality of this method, successfully synthesizing 21 derivatives with various substitution patterns, achieving yields ranging from 51% to 92%, and showing good compatibility with multiple functional groups such as alkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic moieties. Importantly, the reaction remained stable during gram-scale experiments, successfully yielding the desired compound at 85%. This work not only provides an approach for the precise construction of the 6(5H)-phenanthridinone framework but also opens an efficient pathway for the controlled synthesis of amide-substituted derivatives.

1. Introduction

6(5H)-Phenanthridinones are fused heterocyclic structures widely present in natural alkaloids and pharmaceutical molecules [1,2,3], exhibiting significant biological activities including antitumor, antiviral, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory effects [4,5]. Some derivatives have been applied in treating myasthenia gravis, myopathies, and neurological disorders [6,7]. This scaffold is commonly found in Amaryllidaceae alkaloids from plants such as Daffodils and Clivia. For instance, hippadine from Lycoris radiata reversibly inhibits male rat fertility [5]. Kalbretorine from Tacca exhibits anticancer activity [8], and hydrogenated derivatives like lycorine show potent antitumor effects via acetylcholinesterase inhibition, disruption of DNA/protein synthesis, and impairment of mitochondrial function [9]. The broad application prospects of 6(5H)-phenanthridinones have driven interest in developing efficient, versatile, and economical synthetic methods [10,11,12].
Current phenanthridinone synthesis relies on four classic strategies: ring-closing reactions, Beckmann rearrangement, Schmidt reaction, and transition metal-catalyzed C–H activation (Scheme 1). The ring-closing approach proceeds in two steps: Suzuki cross-coupling of dialkyl (2-fluorophenyl)boronate with 2-halobenzonitrile yields a 2-fluorobiphenyl-2-nitrile intermediate, followed by KOH-induced anionic cyclization [13]. Beckmann rearrangement converts ketoximes to amides under acidic conditions; for example, 9-fluorenone oxime rearranges to phenanthridinone at 175–180 °C with trans configuration retention [14]. The intramolecular Schmidt reaction employs azides: 9-fluorenones undergo ring formation in NaN3/H2SO4 to afford phenanthridinone [15]. Palladium-catalyzed C–H activation offers high atom economy, typically using Pd(OAc)2/norbornene cooperative catalysis in CH3CN/DMF with K2CO3 for one-step cyclization [16].
Moreover, transition metals are crucial in phenanthridinone synthesis. Intramolecular cyclization typically requires halogens (Br, Cl, I) on the phenyl rings for activation, giving satisfactory yields. Alternatively, direct C–H bond oxidative activation can provide moderate yields without halogens. In 1996, Harayama et al. first reported Pd(OAc)2/PPh3-catalyzed cyclization of N-methyl-N-phenyl-o-(X-substituted)benzamide (X = Br/I), achieving up to 98% yield [17]. The following year, they improved yield stability by replacing PPh3 with dppp/P(OPh)3 and using diisopropylethylamine as base [18]. In 2005, they confirmed that when X is on the amide phenyl ring, palladium catalysis remains highly efficient; oxygen at the carbonyl phenyl meta-position induced configurational changes, affording up to 99% yield [19]. Campeau et al. employed an imidazolium salt/Pd(IV) system with K2CO3 in DMA at 130 °C for 18 h, achieving 97% yield—more environmentally friendly but costly [20]. In 2010, Yeung et al. developed a green approach using Pd(OAc)2/Na2S2O8 in TFA/DCE at 70 °C via double C–H activation, obtaining moderate yields [21]. Boonya-Udtayan et al. utilized Cu(I) thiophene-2-carboxylate under microwave conditions for rapid synthesis, achieving up to 96% yield [22].
Transition metal-catalyzed intermolecular reactions provide diverse strategies for quinolinone synthesis. For instance, two identical 2-bromobenzamide molecules undergo palladium-catalyzed coupling under Pd(OAc)2/L with Cs2CO3 in 1,4-dioxane for 24 h, tolerating both electron-donating and -withdrawing substituents [23]. For non-halogenated substrates such as iodobenzene and benzamide derivatives, coupling proceeds at 120 °C via C–H/C–I/N–H activation using Pd(OAc)2/Ag2O/AcOH [24]. Non-iodinated benzene substrates react at room temperature with an N-methoxybenzamide/benzene/TFA/Pd(OAc)2/K2S2O8 system [25]. Other approaches include one-pot Suzuki coupling/amidation between methyl 2-chlorobenzoate and 2-aminophenylboronic acid catalyzed by Pd/phosphine ligands [26], as well as borylation of 2-aminobiphenyl followed by Pd/CO carbonylation. These methods enhance the flexibility and practicality of quinolinone synthesis.
Despite various reported strategies for phenanthridinone synthesis, most suffer from limitations, including expensive materials, precious metal catalysts, or narrow substrate scope. This study develops an efficient nickel-catalyzed approach using readily available 2-bromobenzamides via intramolecular cyclization to construct amide-substituted 6(5H)-phenanthridinones. Key parameters were systematically optimized for high yields. Substrate scope was extensively explored, followed by gram-scale validation. This work provides a general and economical strategy for the precise construction of the phenanthridinone framework.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Optimization Results of Reaction Conditions

As shown in Scheme 2, using 2-bromobenzoyl butylamine as the model substrate, an intermolecular cyclization reaction was carried out under a nickel catalyst in an argon atmosphere. The effects of various reaction conditions, including the catalyst, ligand, solvent, base, and temperature, on the reaction were investigated.

2.1.1. Results of Catalyst Screening

To optimize the catalytic system, a systematic screening was conducted under standardized conditions. Triphenylphosphine (PPh3, 10 mol%) served as the ligand to stabilize the nickel center via its electron-donating and steric properties, which can prevent the metal from decomposing or becoming inactive. Toluene was chosen as the solvent for its thermal stability and low polarity, while Na2CO3 (2.0 eq.) provided mild basicity to facilitate deprotonation without decomposition. Reactions were performed at 0.1 M substrate concentration under argon at 150 °C for 12 h. This study evaluated commercially available metal catalysts at 5 mol% loading with Zn powder (1.5 eq.) as reducing agent. Products were purified by column chromatography and characterized by 1H, 13C, 19F NMR and HRMS. Isolated yields were determined using the internal standard method.
Table 1 summarizes the catalyst screening results. CuI failed to obtain the products (entry 1), likely due to disproportionation or formation of inactive complexes under the conditions. Palladium catalysts (PdCl2, Pd(OAc)2) afforded the product in low yields of 24% and 35%, respectively (entries 2–3), underscoring the trade-off between cost and efficiency. In contrast, nickel-based systems with Zn additive proved more effective. NiCl2·6H2O, Ni(COD)2, NiBr2, and Ni(acac)2 all facilitated the cyclization, delivering isolated yields ranging from 31% to 64% (entries 4–7). Among these, Ni(acac)2/Zn performed best (64% yield), representing a 22–33% improvement over other nickel catalysts (entry 7). This superior result is attributed to the high solubility and thermal stability of Ni(acac)2, along with its synergistic effect with the PPh3 ligand, which promotes efficient nickel reduction and substrate insertion [27,28]. Moreover, nickel offers significant cost advantages over palladium, and the use of Zn effectively suppresses catalyst oxidation and deposition, enhancing system reliability.
Furthermore, no target product was detected in the absence of a catalyst (entry 8), underscoring the essential role of nickel in lowering the activation energy and stabilizing key intermediates. Nickel species facilitate bond cleavage (e.g., C–Br) through coordination or oxidative addition, enabling otherwise inaccessible reaction pathways. Without catalytic mediation, the kinetic barrier remains insurmountable under identical conditions, resulting in negligible conversion. This control experiment confirms the thermodynamic and kinetic necessity of nickel participation for successful cyclization.
This screening established Ni(acac)2/Zn as an efficient catalytic system, revealing that the ligand environment of nickel critically governs reaction kinetics, while Zn serves an indispensable reducing role [29,30]. This finding underpins the development of low-loading, high-turnover nickel catalysis and supports its economic viability for industrial scale-up [31]. Table 1 provides quantitative performance data, offering mechanistic insights and guiding process design.

2.1.2. Results of Ligand Screening

We further investigated the effect of the ligand on the reaction operating in toluene with 0.1 M substrate, 5 mol% of Ni(acac)2 with 1.5 equivalents of zinc powder, 2 equivalents of Na2CO3 at 150 °C for 12 h under inter conditions. As shown in Table 2, all selected ligands facilitated the target transformation with varying yields. The monodentate phosphine PPh3 afforded a 64% yield (entry 1), while the bidentate ligand dppp slightly improved it to 68% (entry 2). Chiral BINOL and bulky BINAP delivered 62% and 65% yields, respectively (entries 3–4). Notably, the electron-rich and sterically bulky ligand PCy3 exhibited outstanding performance, achieving a record 78% yield—approximately 14 percentage points higher than PPh3 (entry 5). This is attributed to PCy3’s strong electron-donating ability, which enhances Ni(0) nucleophilicity, and its steric bulk, which effectively suppresses side reactions [32,33]. Moreover, a control experiment confirmed the indispensable role of the ligand, as its omission led to a sharply diminished yield of only 27% (entry 6).
In-depth analysis reveals that ligand properties critically govern catalytic kinetics and stability: strong σ-donors like PCy3 accelerate low-valent nickel formation, shortening the induction period [34]. Moderate steric hindrance balances substrate binding and product release, and heteroatom coordination modes (O^N vs. P^P) modulate the metal’s microenvironment polarity [28]. Although ligands such as BINAP and PCy3 are relatively costly, their yield enhancements provide essential parameters for process economic evaluation. These experiments establish PCy3 as the optimal ligand and offer empirical insights into ligand-metal cooperative mechanisms, guiding the development of efficient ligand libraries in nickel catalysis.

2.1.3. Results of Solvent Screening

To enhance economic and environmental efficiency, this study systematically investigated solvent effects on reaction performance using the optimal Ni(acac)2/Zn-PCy3 system. Representative aprotic solvents—toluene, 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE), acetonitrile (CH3CN), DMSO, and DMF—were selected. By comparing dielectric constants (ε), hydrogen-donating abilities (α), and Lewis basicity, solvent–substrate interaction mechanisms were elucidated.
The experimental data are summarized in Table 3. Solvent type plays a decisive role in reaction outcome. Strongly polar aprotic solvents DMSO and DMF completely inhibited the reaction (entries 4–5), likely due to over-stabilization of Ni(II) precursors hindering low-valent nickel formation, and their electron-withdrawing nature suppressing oxidative addition. Moderately polar solvents showed varied performance: 1,2-DCE afforded a 47% yield (entry 2), while acetonitrile delivered only 25% (entry 3), possibly due to cyano coordination interfering with the catalytic cycle. Remarkably, the nonpolar aromatic solvent toluene achieved the highest yield of 78% (entry 1)—31% higher than 1,2-DCE. This outstanding performance is attributed to toluene’s dual advantages: its low polarity promotes hydrophobic substrate enrichment, increasing collision frequency; and its high boiling point (110.6 °C) ensures thermal stability and minimizes volatilization losses.
Further analysis reveals that solvent effects regulate reaction kinetics through multiple dimensions: dielectric shielding reduces electrostatic repulsion between charged intermediates, accelerating cyclization [35,36]; secondary interactions between aromatic π systems and nickel d orbitals stabilize transition states [37,38]; and solvent viscosity influences mass transfer, with toluene’s moderate fluidity balancing diffusion control and surface reactions. Although 1,2-DCE offers industrial cost advantages, its toxicity limits practical use. These experiments establish toluene as the optimal solvent and guide the development of green alternatives [39]. Future research will explore supercritical fluids or ionic liquid media for sustainable chemical transformations.

2.1.4. Results of Bases Screening

To elucidate the critical role of base additives in the nickel-catalyzed system, this study systematically investigated six typical inorganic/organic bases—potassium acetate (KOAc), potassium tert-butoxide (KOtBu), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), triethylamine (NEt3), potassium carbonate (K2CO3), and cesium carbonate (Cs2CO3)—based on the previously optimized Ni(acac)2/Zn-PCy3-toluene system.
The experimental data are summarized in Table 4. Base nature significantly influences reaction progress. Weak organic base NEt3 completely inhibited activity (entry 4), likely due to poor nucleophilicity and steric hindrance impeding deprotonation. Strong base KOtBu afforded a moderate 80% yield (entry 2), suggesting excessive activation may promote side reactions. Oxygen-containing salts showed differentiated performance: KOAc achieved 82% yield (entry 1) via carboxylate chelation; carbonates exhibited a progressive trend, with K2CO3 and Cs2CO3 delivering 85% and 88% yields, respectively (entries 5–6). Cs2CO3’s superior performance (3% improvement) is attributed to cesium’s large ionic radius weakening lattice energy, its low charge density releasing more free OH, and its soft acid character matching the nickel center’s d orbitals to form stable ion-pair intermediates. Notably, NaOH, despite the strongest theoretical basicity, gave only 69% yield (entry 3) due to hygroscopicity and corrosiveness, demonstrating that simply pursuing high pH is not optimal.
In-depth mechanistic analysis reveals that the base plays a dual role: acting as a proton shuttle to facilitate α-C–H bond cleavage and stabilizing the negatively charged transition state via electrostatic interactions [40]. Cs2CO3 offers key advantages: (1) moderate basicity balances deprotonation rate with intermediate stability; (2) unique solvation behavior of Cs+ enhances solid–liquid mass transfer; and (3) maintains ionic mobility even at lower temperatures [41]. NEt3 fails due to structural limitations—its tertiary amine group cannot effectively abstract the weakly acidic α-C–H proton and tends to compete for nickel coordination [42]. These experiments establish Cs2CO3 as the optimal base and provide empirical insights into base-metal cooperative mechanisms, guiding development of novel composite base systems.

2.1.5. Results of Temperature Screening

To investigate the influence of temperature, six different temperatures, varying from 90 to 190 °C, were applied to the synthesis. The experimental data are summarized in Table 5. The results demonstrate that temperature exerts a significant influence on the reaction progress. When the temperature was elevated from 90 to 150 °C (entries 1–4), the yields exhibited a substantial increase, rising from 47% to 78%. According to the Arrhenius equation, an increase in temperature significantly enhances the reaction rate constant, thereby accelerating the overall reaction rate. For most organic synthesis reactions, within the temperature range where the catalyst maintains its activity, elevating the temperature generally facilitates the activation of reactant molecules. This process involves reducing the activation energy of the reaction and increasing the effective collision frequency, both of which contribute to an enhancement in the conversion rate. Moreover, nickel-based catalysts require activation within a specific temperature window, typically ranging from 80 to 120 °C. If the temperature falls below this range, the formation rate of C-C bonds becomes sluggish, resulting in a low conversion rate. However, when the temperature was further increased from 150 to 190 °C (entries 4–6), a notable decline in yields was observed, decreasing from 78% to 61%. This phenomenon can be attributed to the fact that high temperatures may trigger a greater number of side reactions, such as cracking and isomerization. These competing side reactions consume reactants and reduce the selectivity towards the target product, ultimately leading to a decrease in overall yield. Furthermore, the catalyst deactivation is another reason.

2.2. Expansion of Reaction Substrates

After establishing the optimal reaction conditions, we evaluated the substrate scope of this nickel-catalyzed system (Scheme 3). Under standard conditions (Ni(acac)2/Zn, PCy3, Cs2CO3, toluene, Ar, 150 °C, 12 h), various 2-bromobenzamide derivatives underwent cyclization to afford phenanthridinones in moderate to excellent yields (51–92%, Table 6). The reaction showed broad compatibility with nitrogen substituents. For linear alkyl groups (2a2d), yields gradually decreased with increasing chain length, likely due to steric effects [43]. Branched alkyl substrates (2e, 2g) gave significantly lower yields than their linear counterparts, highlighting steric hindrance as a critical factor. Cycloalkyl (2f) and hydroxyalkyl (2h) substrates reacted smoothly in moderate yields, demonstrating tolerance toward polar functional groups [44,45].
Notably, N-aryl-substituted substrates exhibited excellent reactivity [46]. Phenyl (2i) and various alkylphenyl derivatives (2j2m) were efficiently converted in good yields. Within the alkylphenyl series, longer alkyl chains (2l, 2m) generally afforded higher yields, likely due to enhanced electron-donating effects or improved solubility. However, branched alkyl chains (2k) led to a slight yield decrease, further confirming steric hindrance as a sensitive factor in this reaction. It should be noted that for product 2l, due to the presence of a chiral carbon in the starting material, the resulting product contains two chiral centers and exists as diastereomers. Because the properties of diastereomers are very similar, they could not be separated by column chromatography, and the product was obtained as a mixture. The similar properties of the mixture led to closely overlapping NMR signals, resulting in peak broadening. In summary, this nickel-catalyzed system efficiently accommodates diverse 2-bromobenzamides for phenanthridinone synthesis. Steric and electronic effects significantly influence yields, providing mechanistic insights and guiding substrate design.
Having established the optimal conditions and evaluated N-substituent effects, we further investigated the influence of substituents on the benzene ring. As shown in Scheme 3, using 2-bromo-N-butylbenzamide as the model substrate, we systematically explored how various substituents (halogens, nitro, alkyl, alkoxy) at different positions (4-, 5-, and 6-positions) affect reaction activity to assess the method’s generality and functional group tolerance. The results, including positional effects on yields, are summarized in Table 7.
The experimental results demonstrate good adaptability of this catalytic system toward phenyl-ring-substituted substrates. Halogenated substrates (fluorinated 2n, 2r; chlorinated 2t) afforded good to excellent yields, with chlorine generally outperforming fluorine—suggesting that electronic effects (inductive vs. conjugative) significantly influence efficiency. Substituent position also played a critical role: 4-fluoro substitution (2n) gave higher yields than 6-fluoro (2r), indicating pronounced steric hindrance at the 6-position, which is closer to the catalytic site.
Nitro-substituted (2o), alkyl-substituted (2p, 2q, 2u), and alkoxy-substituted (2s) substrates all reacted smoothly in good yields. Among methyl-substituted analogs, 4- and 5-methyl (2p, 2u) performed similarly, while 6-methyl (2q) showed reduced yield—further confirming steric sensitivity at the 6-position. Notably, electron-donating methoxy (2s) afforded significantly higher yield than electron-withdrawing nitro (2o), suggesting an electron-rich phenyl ring favors cyclization, possibly via electrophilic activation or electron transfer pathways. Furthermore, the structure of a representative product (2p) was unequivocally confirmed by full 2D NMR (HSQC and HMBC) analysis; the detailed assignments are provided in the Supplementary Materials.
In summary, this nickel-catalyzed system tolerates diverse functional groups (halogens, nitro, alkyl, alkoxy) on the phenyl ring. Yields are governed jointly by electronic and positional effects: electron-donating groups promote the reaction, while substitution at the sterically hindered 6-position consistently reduces yield. These insights guide the design of complex phenanthridinone derivatives.

2.3. Gram-Scale Amplification Experimental Results

To evaluate the application potential of this reaction system, gram-scale amplification experiments were systematically conducted (Scheme 4). Using substrate 1a (10 mmol, 2.55 g) under standard conditions, the target product 2a was obtained in 85% isolated yield (1.49 g), consistent with milligram-scale results and validating reaction stability during scale-up.
When catalyst and ligand loadings were halved to 50% of the original conditions, reaction efficiency remained stable with comparable yield, indicating high tolerance and untapped catalytic potential. However, further reduction to 1 mol% catalyst caused a significant yield drop to 53%, revealing a nonlinear relationship between catalyst concentration and efficiency and emphasizing the need for precise dosage control.
From an engineering perspective, this system offers three advantages: scalability validated by gram-scale yield, robustness to moderate catalyst loading adjustments, and optimization potential despite the 53% yield floor. These features support industrial applications, particularly in pharmaceutical intermediates and functional materials. Future work may focus on catalyst modification, mechanistic studies, and process optimization to advance green chemistry goals.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

As shown in the Supplementary Table S1, the commercial reagents used in the experiment were purchased from suppliers such as Bide Medicine and Adamas, with purity grades all at analytical reagent (AR) level or higher.

3.2. Methods

3.2.1. Preparation of Raw Materials

As shown in Scheme 5, 2-bromobenzamide derivatives were synthesized from 2-bromobenzoic acid. 2-Bromobenzoic acid (5.0 mmol) was dissolved in DCM (20 mL), then SOCl2 (4 mL) and DMF (0.25 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at 40 °C for 4 h, and the solvent was removed to yield 2-bromobenzoyl chloride. The residue was redissolved in DCM (20 mL) and cooled to 0 °C. Triethylamine (1.5 mL) and the corresponding amine (10.0 mmol, 2.0 eq.) were added dropwise. The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature, then quenched with saturated NaHCO3 (10 mL) and extracted with DCM (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, concentrated, and purified by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 5:1, v/v, 1 h) to afford the pure 2-bromobenzamide derivatives.

3.2.2. Optimization of Reaction Conditions

As shown in Scheme 2, 2-bromobenzoyl butylamine was used as the model substrate, under an argon atmosphere, an intermolecular cyclization reaction catalyzed by nickel was carried out. By changing one variable at a time, the effects of catalyst, ligand, solvent, base, and temperature on the reaction were systematically investigated. (1) Catalyst screening: Used PPh3 as the ligand, toluene as the solvent, Na2CO3 as the base, and at 150 °C, the effects of different catalysts were examined. (2) Ligand screening: Used Ni(acac)2 as the catalyst, toluene as the solvent, Na2CO3 as the base, and at 150 °C, the effects of different ligands were studied. (3) Solvent screening: Used Ni(acac)2 as the catalyst, PCy3 as the ligand, Na2CO3 as the base, and at 150 °C, the effects of different solvents were evaluated. (4) Base screening: Used Ni(acac)2 as the catalyst, PCy3 as the ligand, toluene as the solvent, and at 150 °C, the effects of different bases were investigated. (5) Temperature screening: Used Ni(acac)2 as the catalyst, PCy3 as the ligand, toluene as the solvent, and Na2CO3 as the base, the effects of different temperatures were investigated.
A dry reaction tube was charged with a magnetic stir bar, metal catalyst (10 mol%), zinc powder (2.0 eq.), ligand (20 mol%), base (2.0 eq.), solvent (1.0 mL), and 2-bromobenzoyl butylamine (0.20 mmol). The tube was evacuated and backfilled with argon, then placed in a 150 °C oil bath for 12 h. After cooling to room temperature, saturated brine was added, and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL × 3). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, concentrated under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 5:1, v/v, 1.5 h) to afford the product, whose yield was calculated.

3.2.3. Experiment on Expanding the Scope of Reaction Substrates

As shown in Scheme 6, the optimal conditions were established as: Ni(acac)2 (10 mol%), PCy3 (20 mol%), Cs2CO3 (2.0 eq.), toluene (1.0 mL), under argon at 150 °C for 12 h. The substrate scope was then explored using various 2-bromobenzamides (0.20 mmol). In a typical procedure, a dry reaction tube was charged with a magnetic stir bar, Ni(acac)2 (10 mol%), Zn powder (2.0 eq.), PCy3 (20 mol%), Cs2CO3 (2.0 eq.), toluene (1.0 mL), and the corresponding 2-bromobenzamide (0.20 mmol). The tube was evacuated and backfilled with argon, then heated in a 150 °C oil bath for 12 h. After cooling to room temperature, saturated brine was added, and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL × 3). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, concentrated under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography to afford the target compound, whose yield was calculated.

3.2.4. Separation and Characterization of Samples

1H NMR, 13C NMR, and 19F NMR data were collected on a Bruker Avance III HD 400 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Berlin, Germany). For 1H NMR, TMS (δ 0.00) or CDCl3 (δ 7.26) was used as the internal standard, while CDCl3 (δ 77.00) served as the internal standard for 13C NMR. Infrared spectra were recorded using a Bio-Rad FTS-185 spectrometer. HRMS were recorded using a GC-MSQ P2010 gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer. Melting points were measured with a WRS-2 digital melting point apparatus. Column chromatography was performed using 300–400 mesh silica gel. The Supplementary Materials comprehensively present the 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR spectra, along with 16 distinct sets of HRMS and IR data.

4. Conclusions

This study developed an efficient nickel-catalyzed intermolecular cyclization strategy for constructing 6(5H)-phenanthridinones from 2-bromobenzamide derivatives. The optimal conditions employed Ni(acac)2 (10 mol%), PCy3 (20 mol%), Cs2CO3 (2.0 eq.) in toluene at 150 °C under argon for 12 h, affording the model product in 88% yield. Substrate scope studies demonstrated excellent generality. Nitrogen substituents (13 examples), including alkyl, hydroxyalkyl, benzyl, and aryl groups, were well tolerated (51–92% yields). Phenyl ring substituents (8 examples) such as halogens, nitro, alkyl, and alkoxy groups also performed well (64–86% yields). Electronic effects (electron-donating groups favored) and steric hindrance (6-substitution reduced yields) significantly influenced efficiency. Gram-scale synthesis (10 mmol) afforded 85% yield (1.49 g). Reducing catalyst loading to 5 mol% maintained 85% yield, while 1 mol% dropped the yield to 53%. The key innovation is the first use of inexpensive nickel catalysts to replace precious metals (Pd, Rh) for phenanthridinone synthesis. This method features mild conditions, broad substrate scope, excellent functional group tolerance, operational simplicity, and scalability—offering a green, economical route to bioactive natural products and pharmaceuticals containing the phenanthridinone core.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules31071176/s1, Table S1: Main raw materials and reagent specifications. 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR Spectra & Data, HRMS and IR Data.

Author Contributions

X.X.: Data curation, Writing—original draft. X.Z.: Visualization. Y.S.: Writing—original draft, Visualization. B.Z.: Writing—Review and editing, Resources. C.Z.: Validation. A.N.: Writing—Review and editing, Validation. Z.L.: Methodology, Investigation, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2023JJ50068; Grant No. 2026JJ80559); the Scientific Research Project of Hunan University of Science and Engineering (Grant No. 23XKYZZ01); the Guiding Science and Technology Planning Project of Yongzhou City (Grant No. 2024YZ015); and the Construct Program of Applied Characteristic Discipline in Hunan Province.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bhakuni, B.S.; Kumar, A.; Balkrishna, S.J.; Sheikh, J.A.; Konar, S.; Kumar, S. Kotbu Mediated Synthesis of Phenanthridinones and Dibenzoazepinones. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2838–2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peng, R.; Xu, M.; Xie, B.; Min, Q.; Hui, S.; Du, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yu, W.; Wang, S.; Chen, X.; et al. Insights on Antitumor Activity and Mechanism of Natural Benzophenanthridine Alkaloids. Molecules 2023, 28, 6588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Laines-Hidalgo, J.I.; Muñoz-Sánchez, J.A.; Loza-Müller, L.; Vázquez-Flota, F. An Update of the Sanguinarine and Benzophenanthridine Alkaloids’ Biosynthesis and Their Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fang, S.D.; Wang, L.K.; Hecht, S.M. Inhibitors of DNA Topoisomerase I Isolated from the Roots of Zanthoxylum Nitidum. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5025–5027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Y.; Cha, T.L.; Jiang, J.; Li, Y.; Xie, X.Y.; Li, D.; Yan, C.X.; Shao, L.D. Divergent Total Syntheses of Lycorine Alkaloids Via a Sequential C-H Functionalization Strategy. J. Org. Chem. 2024, 89, 4851–4860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Moyano, P.; Vicente-Zurdo, D.; Blázquez-Barbadillo, C.; Menéndez, J.C.; González, J.F.; Rosales-Conrado, N.; Del Pino, J. Neuroprotective Action of Multitarget 7-Aminophenanthridin-6(5h)-One Derivatives against Metal-Induced Cell Death and Oxidative Stress in Sn56 Cells. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2021, 12, 3358–3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Moyano, P.; Vicente-Zurdo, D.; Blázquez-Barbadillo, C.; Menéndez, J.C.; González, J.F.; Rosales-Conrado, N.; Pino, J.D. Neuroprotective Mechanisms of Multitarget 7-Aminophenanthridin-6(5h)-One Derivatives against Metal-Induced Amyloid Proteins Generation and Aggregation. Food Chem. Toxicol. Int. J. Publ. Br. Ind. Biol. Res. Assoc. 2022, 167, 113264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miki, Y.; Umemoto, H.; Dohshita, M.; Hamamoto, H. Synthesis of Pyrrolophenanthridone Alkaloid Kalbretorine from Indolecarboxylic Acids Via Hypervalent Iodine(III) Mediated Halodecarboxylation and Reduction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 1924–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.-M.; Li, T.; Xu, C.-C.; Qian, J.-Y.; Guo, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhan, Z.-J.; Lu, J.-J. Uncover the Anticancer Potential of Lycorine. Chin. Med. 2024, 19, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, J.; Ma, H.; Hu, S.; Cheng, L.; Wang, F.; Zhang, G. Benzophenanthridine Alkaloids from the Roots of Thalictrum microgynum Lecoy.ex Oliv. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 2964–2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tang, Y.; Xu, X.; Li, J.; Deng, L.; Mu, S. Synthesis and Antileukemia Activity Evaluation of Benzophenanthridine Alkaloid Derivatives. Molecules 2022, 27, 3934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hu, Q.F.; Gao, T.T.; Shi, Y.J.; Lei, Q.; Liu, Z.H.; Feng, Q.; Chen, Z.J.; Yu, L.T. Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel 1-Phenyl Phenanthridin-6(5h)-One Derivatives as Anti-Tumor Agents Targeting Topk. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 162, 407–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cailly, T.; Fabis, F.; Rault, S. A New, Direct, and Efficient Synthesis of Benzonaphthyridin-5-Ones. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 5862–5867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nagesh, H.N.; Suresh, N.; Prakash, G.V.S.B.; Gupta, S.; Rao, J.V.; Sekhar, K.V.G.C. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel Phenanthridinyl Piperazine Triazoles Via Click Chemistry as Anti-Proliferative Agents. Med. Chem. Res. 2015, 24, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fang, Y.; Tranmer, G.K. Continuous Flow Photochemistry as an Enabling Synthetic Technology: Synthesis of Substituted-6(5h)-Phenanthridinones for Use as Poly(Adp-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors. MedChemComm 2016, 7, 720–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ferraccioli, R.; Carenzi, D.; Rombolà, O.; Catellani, M. Synthesis of 6-Phenanthridinones and Their Heterocyclic Analogues through Palladium-Catalyzed Sequential Aryl−Aryl and N-Aryl Coupling. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4759–4762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Harayama, T.; Akiyama, T.; Kawano, K. A Convenient Synthesis of Benzo[C]Phenanthridine Alkaloid, Chelerythrine, by the Palladium-Assisted Internal Biaryl Coupling Reaction. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1996, 44, 1634–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Harayama, T.; Akiyama, T.; Nakano, Y. Internal Aryl-Aryl Coupling Reaction Using a Novel and Highly Active Palladium Reagent Prepared from Pd(Oac)2, Dppp, and Bu3P. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1997, 45, 1723–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abe, H.; Nishioka, K.; Takeda, S.; Arai, M.; Takeuchi, Y.; Harayama, T. Synthesis of Graphislactones a–D through a Palladium-Mediated Biaryl Coupling Reaction of Phenyl Benzoate Derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 3197–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  20. Campeau, L.-C.; Thansandote, P.; Fagnou, K. High-Yielding Intramolecular Direct Arylation Reactions with Aryl Chlorides. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1857–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yeung, C.S.; Zhao, X.; Borduas, N.; Dong, V.M. Pd-Catalyzed Ortho-Arylation of Phenylacetamides, Benzamides, and Anilides with Simple Arenes Using Sodium Persulfate. Chem. Sci. 2010, 1, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Boonya-udtayan, S.; Yotapan, N.; Woo, C.; Bruns, C.J.; Ruchirawat, S.; Thasana, N. Synthesis and Biological Activities of Azalamellarins. Chem.-Asian J. 2010, 5, 2113–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Furuta, T.; Kitamura, Y.; Hashimoto, A.; Fujii, S.; Tanaka, K.; Kan, T. Efficient Synthesis of Phenanthridinone Derivatives Via a Palladium-Catalyzed Coupling Process. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, G.W.; Yuan, T.T.; Li, D.D. One-Pot Formation of C-C and C-N Bonds through Palladium-Catalyzed Dual C-H Activation: Synthesis of Phenanthridinones. Angew. Chem. (Int. Ed. Engl.) 2011, 50, 1380–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Karthikeyan, J.; Cheng, C.H. Synthesis of Phenanthridinones from N-Methoxybenzamides and Arenes by Multiple Palladium-Catalyzed C-H Activation Steps at Room Temperature. Angew. Chem. (Int. Ed. Engl.) 2011, 50, 9880–9883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tanimoto, K.; Nakagawa, N.; Takeda, K.; Kirihata, M.; Tanimori, S. A Convenient One-Pot Access to Phenanthridinones Via Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 3712–3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meng, Q.-Y.; Wang, S.; Huff, G.S.; König, B. Ligand-Controlled Regioselective Hydrocarboxylation of Styrenes with Co2 by Combining Visible Light and Nickel Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3198–3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, X.; Jin, P.; Li, S.; Wen, Y.; Wang, F.; Wei, H.; Wei, D. Effects of Phosphine Ligands in Nickel-Catalyzed Decarbonylation Reactions of Lactone. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2023, 21, 7410–7418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Netherton, M.R.; Fu, G.C. Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Couplings of Unactivated Alkyl Halides and Pseudohalides with Organometallic Compounds. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1525–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Diccianni, J.B.; Diao, T. Mechanisms of Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 830–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, S.; Goldfogel, M.J.; Ahern, B.N.; Salgueiro, D.C.; Guzei, I.A.; Weix, D.J. Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Electrophile Coupling of Aryl Triflates with Alkyl Halides: Mechanism-Informed Design of More General Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 2616–2625. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Guo, P.; Jin, H.; Han, J.; Xu, L.; Li, P.; Zhan, M. Nickel-Catalyzed Negishi Cross-Coupling of Alkyl Halides, Including Unactivated Tertiary Halides, with a Boron-Stabilized Organozinc Reagent. Org. Lett. 2023, 25, 1268–1273. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Düker, J.; Philipp, M.; Lentner, T.; Cadge, J.A.; Lavarda, J.E.A.; Gschwind, R.M.; Sigman, M.S.; Ghosh, I.; König, B. Cross-Coupling Reactions with Nickel, Visible Light, and Tert-Butylamine as a Bifunctional Additive. ACS Catal. 2025, 15, 817–827. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Clarke, M.L.; Frew, J.J.R. Ligand Electronic Effects in Homogeneous Catalysis Using Transition Metal Complexes of Phosphine Ligands. In Organometallic Chemistry; Fairlamb, I.J.S., Lynam, J.M., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2009; Volume 35, pp. 19–46. [Google Scholar]
  35. Varghese, J.J.; Mushrif, S.H. Origins of Complex Solvent Effects on Chemical Reactivity and Computational Tools to Investigate Them: A Review. React. Chem. Eng. 2019, 4, 165–206. [Google Scholar]
  36. Becker, M. Dynamic Solvation Fields: A Paradigm Shift in Solvent Effects on Chemical Reactivity. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2025, 27, 24146–24158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, J.; Yao, L.; Su, J.-Y.; Liu, Y.-Z.; Wang, Q.; Deng, W.P. Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Aromatic C–H Functionalization Assisted by the Phosphorus-Containing Directing Groups. Green Synth. Catal. 2023, 4, 206–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kasera, A.; Biswas, J.P.; Ali Alshehri, A.; Ahmed Al-Thabaiti, S.; Mokhtar, M.; Maiti, D. Transition Metal Pincer Complexes: A Series of Potential Catalysts in Ch Activation Reactions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 475, 214915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sheldon, R.A. Green Solvents for Sustainable Organic Synthesis: State of the Art. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Docherty, J.H.; Lister, T.M.; McArthur, G.; Findlay, M.T.; Domingo-Legarda, P.; Kenyon, J.; Choudhary, S.; Larrosa, I. Transition-Metal-Catalyzed C–H Bond Activation for the Formation of C–C Bonds in Complex Molecules. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 7692–7760. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rabie, R.; Hammouda, M.M.; Elattar, K.M. Cesium Carbonate as a Mediated Inorganic Base in Some Organic Transformations. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2017, 43, 1979–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wei, J.; Bin, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, D.; Duan, L. Suppressing Competitive Coordination Reaction for Ohmic Cathode Contact Using Amino-Substituted Organic Ligands and Air-Stable Metals. CCS Chem. 2021, 3, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Thakur, R.; Jaiswal, Y.; Kumar, A. Primary Amides: Sustainable Weakly Coordinating Groups in Transition Metal-Catalyzed C–H Bond Functionalization Reactions. Tetrahedron 2021, 93, 132313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khake, S.M.; Chatani, N. Nickel-Catalyzed C−H Functionalization Using a Non-Directed Strategy. Chem 2020, 6, 1056–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chatani, N. Nickel-Catalyzed Functionalization Reactions Involving C–H Bond Activation Via an Amidate-Promoted Strategy and Its Extension to the Activation of C–F, C–O, C–S, and C–Cn Bonds. Acc. Chem. Res. 2023, 56, 3053–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Green, K.-A.; Honeycutt, A.P.; Ciccone, S.R.; Grice, K.A.; Baur, A.; Petersen, J.L.; Hoover, J.M. A Redox Transmetalation Step in Nickel-Catalyzed C–C Coupling Reactions. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 6375–6381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Phenanthridinone compounds synthesis strategies.
Scheme 1. Phenanthridinone compounds synthesis strategies.
Molecules 31 01176 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 6(5H)-phenanthridinone derivatives (N,5-dibutyl-6-oxo-5,6-dihydrophenanthridine-4-carboxamide) by using 2-bromobenzoyl butylamine.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 6(5H)-phenanthridinone derivatives (N,5-dibutyl-6-oxo-5,6-dihydrophenanthridine-4-carboxamide) by using 2-bromobenzoyl butylamine.
Molecules 31 01176 sch002
Scheme 3. Expansion of substrates.
Scheme 3. Expansion of substrates.
Molecules 31 01176 sch003
Scheme 4. Gram-scale amplification experiment.
Scheme 4. Gram-scale amplification experiment.
Molecules 31 01176 sch004
Scheme 5. Preparation of 2-bromobenzamide derivatives.
Scheme 5. Preparation of 2-bromobenzamide derivatives.
Molecules 31 01176 sch005
Scheme 6. Expansion of Reaction Substrates.
Scheme 6. Expansion of Reaction Substrates.
Molecules 31 01176 sch006
Table 1. Catalyst Screening.
Table 1. Catalyst Screening.
Entry12345678
Catalyst (5 mol%)CuIPdCl2Pd(OAc)2NiCl2·6H2O/ZnNi(COD)2/ZnNiBr2/ZnNi(acac)2/Zn/
Yield (%)NR243531423246NR
Note: The reaction was carried out in toluene with a 0.1 M substrate concentration, 5 mol% catalyst, 1.5 equivalents of zinc powder, 10 mol% PPh3, and 2 equivalents of Na2CO3 at 150 °C for 12 h under inert conditions.
Table 2. Ligand Screening.
Table 2. Ligand Screening.
Entry123456
Ligand (10 mol%)PPh3dpppBINOLBINAPPCy3/
Yield (%)646862657827
Note: The reaction was carried out in toluene with a 0.1 M substrate concentration, 5 mol% Ni(acac)2, 1.5 equivalents of zinc powder, 10 mol% ligand, and 2 equivalents of Na2CO3 at 150 °C for 12 h under inert conditions.
Table 3. Solvent Screening.
Table 3. Solvent Screening.
Entry12345
SolventToluene1,2-DCECH3CNDMSODMF
Yield (%)784725NRNR
Note: The reaction was carried out in a solvent with 0.1 M substrate, 5 mol% Ni(acac)2, 1.5 equivalents of zinc powder, 10 mol% PCy3, and 2 equivalents of Na2CO3 at 150 °C for 12 h under inert conditions.
Table 4. Bases Screening.
Table 4. Bases Screening.
Entry123456
Bases (2 eq.)KOAcKOtBuNaOHNEt3K2CO3Cs2CO3
Yield (%)828069NR8588
Note: The reaction was carried out in toluene with a 0.1 M substrate concentration, 5 mol% Ni(acac)2, 1.5 equivalents of zinc powder, 10 mol% PCy3, and 2 equivalents of base at 150 °C for 12 h under inert conditions.
Table 5. Temperature Screening.
Table 5. Temperature Screening.
Entry123456
Temperature (°C)90110130150170190
Yield (%)476372787061
Note: The reaction was carried out in toluene with a 0.1 M substrate concentration, 5 mol% Ni(acac)2, 1.5 equivalents of zinc powder, 10 mol% PCy3, and 2 equivalents of Na2CO3 at various temperatures for 12 h under inert conditions.
Table 6. Summary of Phenanthridinone Derivatives Synthesized via Substrate Scope Expansion.
Table 6. Summary of Phenanthridinone Derivatives Synthesized via Substrate Scope Expansion.
EntrySubstrateProductYield (%)
1Molecules 31 01176 i001Molecules 31 01176 i00288
2Molecules 31 01176 i003Molecules 31 01176 i00489
3Molecules 31 01176 i005Molecules 31 01176 i00692
4Molecules 31 01176 i007Molecules 31 01176 i00875
5Molecules 31 01176 i009Molecules 31 01176 i01079
6Molecules 31 01176 i011Molecules 31 01176 i01258
7Molecules 31 01176 i013Molecules 31 01176 i01469
8Molecules 31 01176 i015Molecules 31 01176 i01668
9Molecules 31 01176 i017Molecules 31 01176 i01873
10Molecules 31 01176 i019Molecules 31 01176 i02084
11Molecules 31 01176 i021Molecules 31 01176 i02289
12Molecules 31 01176 i023Molecules 31 01176 i02480
13Molecules 31 01176 i025Molecules 31 01176 i02651
Table 7. Effect of Substituent Position on the Yields of Phenanthridinone Derivatives.
Table 7. Effect of Substituent Position on the Yields of Phenanthridinone Derivatives.
EntrySubstrateProductYield(%)
14Molecules 31 01176 i027Molecules 31 01176 i02878
15Molecules 31 01176 i029Molecules 31 01176 i03065
16Molecules 31 01176 i031Molecules 31 01176 i03284
17Molecules 31 01176 i033Molecules 31 01176 i03477
18Molecules 31 01176 i035Molecules 31 01176 i03664
19Molecules 31 01176 i037Molecules 31 01176 i03885
20Molecules 31 01176 i039Molecules 31 01176 i04083
21Molecules 31 01176 i041Molecules 31 01176 i04286
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiao, X.; Zhu, X.; Shu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, C.; Nawaz, A.; Li, Z. Nickel-Catalyzed Intermolecular Cyclization of 2-Bromobenzamide: A General Strategy for Synthesizing 6(5H)-Phenanthridinone Derivatives. Molecules 2026, 31, 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071176

AMA Style

Xiao X, Zhu X, Shu Y, Zhang B, Zhao C, Nawaz A, Li Z. Nickel-Catalyzed Intermolecular Cyclization of 2-Bromobenzamide: A General Strategy for Synthesizing 6(5H)-Phenanthridinone Derivatives. Molecules. 2026; 31(7):1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiao, Xinsheng, Xueli Zhu, Yan Shu, Bowen Zhang, Changhui Zhao, Asad Nawaz, and Zunhua Li. 2026. "Nickel-Catalyzed Intermolecular Cyclization of 2-Bromobenzamide: A General Strategy for Synthesizing 6(5H)-Phenanthridinone Derivatives" Molecules 31, no. 7: 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071176

APA Style

Xiao, X., Zhu, X., Shu, Y., Zhang, B., Zhao, C., Nawaz, A., & Li, Z. (2026). Nickel-Catalyzed Intermolecular Cyclization of 2-Bromobenzamide: A General Strategy for Synthesizing 6(5H)-Phenanthridinone Derivatives. Molecules, 31(7), 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071176

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop