Sustainable Remediation of Pharmaceuticals Using Crop-Residue-Derived Carbons: Bridging Multi-Component Adsorption and DFT Perspectives
Abstract
1. Introduction
| Adsorbent | Target Pollutants and Matrix | qmax (mg·g−1) and Removal (%) | Key Operating Conditions (pH, T, Dose) | Regeneration/Stability | Main Advantages vs. AC-ON/AC-CN | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC-ON | paracetamol (PCM) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) | PCM: 23.9 mg/g; SMX: 11.0 mg/g. Removal up to 92% | pH = neutral; T = room temperature °C; dose = 2.5 g·L−1 | Not yet investigated | Sustainable onion waste precursor; demonstrates unique cooperative adsorption in binary systems (increasing capacity by ~70% for SMX). | In this work |
| AC-CN | paracetamol (PCM) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) | PCM: 29.4 mg/g; SMX: 20.3 mg/g. Removal up to 99% | pH = neutral; T = room temperature °C; dose = 2.5 g·L−1 | Not yet investigated | Superior performance for SMX (~84% higher than AC-ON); well-developed microporosity (Vmicro = 0.182 cm3/g) and higher SBET | In this work |
| AC (commercial or biomass-derived) | Mixed heavy metals (Ni2+, Mn2+, Cr6+, Cd2+) | qmax (Ni2+) ≈ 3.98; Cd2+ ≈ 1.04; Mn2+ ≈ 1.05 mg g−1; Cr6+ mainly physisorbed; 66–70% removal at best | pH ≈ 6; 25 °C; dose 2.5–100 g L−1 | No specific regeneration enhancement; Mn2+ removal very poor | Reference for unmodified AC in competitive systems; shows limitations for Cr6+ selectivity and Mn2+ uptake | [67] |
| HNO3-oxidized AC (AGC/APC) | Same mixed metals as above | For Cr6+: qmax ≈ 10.5–12.1 mg·g−1; ≈100% removal; Ni2+, Cd2+, Mn2+ removal decreased by 23–37% vs. AC | pH ≈ 6; 25 °C; dose 2.5–100 g L−1 | Good structural stability; surface becomes more hydrophilic | Demonstrates strong selectivity to Cr6+ in multimetal systems via ion-exchange on acidic groups | [67] |
| ZnO/Fe2O3/AC | Cyanide in wastewater | qmax ≈ 101 mg·g−1; 82.5% removal; improved vs. bare AC (78.1 mg·g−1; 66.3%) | Optimized pH; dose not high; Langmuir isotherm (0.56 < R_L < 0.64) | Modified ACs more reusable and stable than bare AC | High capacity for CN−; shows benefit of AC–oxide nanocomposites in anion removal | [68] |
| ACS film (AC-based) | Cr(VI) in water; textile effluent | qmax ≈ 467 mg·g−1 for Cr(VI); Freundlich isotherm; spontaneous, endothermic | RSM-optimized pH, dose, contact time | Maintains high efficiency over 5 cycles | Very high capacity, dual removal (Cr(VI) + SDS); benchmark for high-end AC-based Cr(VI) adsorbents | [69] |
| g-C3N4-coated AC (AC-CN@US) | Organic pollutant (ciprofloxacin) | High adsorption (~50% in 2 h) plus enhanced degradation; surface area ≈ 329 m2·g−1 (vs. 115 m2 g−1 for ball-milled composite) | pH~7; 25 mg in 100 mL of 30 mg·L−1; solar light | Stable over ≥5 cycles; g-C3N4 firmly fixed; no significant leaching | Ultrasonic route gives best dispersion and capacity; low-cost biomass-derived AC; representative of high-performance AC–g-C3N4 | [70] |
2. Results
2.1. Characterization of the Activated Carbons
2.1.1. Textural Properties of the Activated Carbons
2.1.2. Chemistry Surface-Properties of the Activated Carbons
2.1.3. Morphological Properties of the Activated Carbons
2.2. PCM and SMX Adsorption Tests
2.2.1. Kinetic Adsorption Studies
2.2.2. Competitive Kinetic Adsorption Studies
2.2.3. Isotherm Adsorption Studies
2.3. Adsorption Tests Using an Environmentally Relevant Aqueous Matrix
2.4. DFT Studies: Modeling of Adsorption Mechanism
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Materials
3.2. Preparation of the Activated Carbons
3.3. Characterization Techniques
3.4. Adsorption Experiments
3.5. DFT Studies: Methodology
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| PCM | Paracetamol |
| SMX | Sulfamethoxazole |
| GAB | Guggenheim–Anderson–de Boer model |
| DFT | Density Functional Theory |
| D-R | Dubinin–Radushkevich model |
| CECs | Contaminants of emerging concern |
| ACs | Activated carbons |
| SEM | Scanning Electron Microscopy |
| BET | Brunauer–Emmett–Teller |
References
- Di Marcantonio, C.; Chiavola, A.; Gioia, V.; Leoni, S.; Cecchini, G.; Frugis, A.; Ceci, C.; Spizzirri, M.; Boni, M.R. A step forward on site-specific environmental risk assessment and insight into the main influencing factors of CECs removal from wastewater. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 325, 116541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizzo, L.; Malato, S.; Antakyali, D.; Beretsou, V.G.; Đolić, M.B.; Gernjak, W.; Heath, E.; Ivancev-Tumbas, P.; Karaolia, A.R.L.; Ribeiro, G.; et al. Consolidated vs. new advanced treatment methods for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern from urban wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 655, 986–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gogoi, A.; Mazumder, P.; Tyagi, V.K.; Tushara Chaminda, G.G.; An, A.K.; Kumar, M. Occurrence and fate of emerging contaminants in water environment: A review. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 6, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Chu, K.H.; Al-Hamadani, Y.A.J.; Park, C.M.; Jang, M.; Kim, D.-H.; Yu, M.; Heo, J.; Yoon, Y. Removal of contaminants of emerging concern by membranes in water and wastewater: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 335, 896–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krzeminski, P.; Tomei, M.C.; Karaolia, P.; Langenhoff, A.; Almeida, C.M.R.; Felis, E.; Gritten, F.; Andersen, H.R.; Fernandes, T.; Manaia, C.M.; et al. Performance of secondary wastewater treatment methods for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern implicated in crop uptake and antibiotic resistance spread: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 648, 1052–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiedeken, E.J.; Tahar, A.; McHugh, B.; Rowan, N.J. Monitoring, sources, receptors, and control measures for three European Union watch list substances of emerging concern in receiving waters—A 20 year systematic review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 574, 1140–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaczala, F.; Blum, S.E. The Occurrence of Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in the Environment: A Review. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2016, 12, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Richardson, S.D.; Ternes, T.A. Water Analysis: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 398–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, J.A.; Sayed, M.; Khan, S.; Shah, N.S.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Boczkaj, G. Chapter 9—Advanced oxidation processes for the treatment of contaminants of emerging concern, Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Water and Wastewater. Adv. Treat. Process. 2020, 299–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clarke, B.O.; Smith, S.R. Review of ‘emerging’ organic contaminants in biosolids and assessment of international research priorities for the agricultural use of biosolids. Environ. Int. 2011, 37, 226–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stackelberg, P.; Furlong, E.; Meyer, M.; Zaugg, S.; Henderson, A.; Reissman, D. Persistence of pharmaceutical compounds and other organic wastewater contaminants in a conventional drinking-water-treatment plant. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 329, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chander, V.; Sharma, B.; Negi, V.; Aswal, R.; Singh, P.; Singh, R.; Dobhal, R. Pharmaceutical Compounds in Drinking Water. J. Xenobiotics 2016, 6, 5774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Focazio, M.; Kolpin, D.; Barnes, K.; Furlong, E.; Meyer, M.; Zaugg, S.; Barber, L.; Thurman, M. A national reconnaissance for pharmaceuticals and other organic wastewater contaminants in the United States--II) untreated drinking water sources. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 402, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sackey, L.; Okobeng, A.; Obidieh, P.; Ngala, F.; Otoo, E.; Quartey, J.; Bentil, J.; Azanu, D. Risk Assessment of Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Pharmaceutical Wastewater. Sci. World J. 2024, 2024, 5538398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalmakhanova, M.S.; Kurtebayeva, A.A.; Tleuova, Z.T.; Satybaldiev, B.; Orynbayev, S.A.; Malakar, A.; Gomes, H.T.; Snow, D.D. Environmental Impact of Wastewater on Surface and Groundwater in Central Asia. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munzhelele, E.; Mudzielwana, R.; Ayinde, W.; Gitari, W. Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Wastewater and Receiving Water Bodies of South Africa: A Review of Sources, Pathways, Occurrence, Effects, and Geographical Distribution. Water 2024, 16, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Oliveira, M.; Frihling, B.; Velasques, J.; Filho, F.; Cavalheri, P.; Migliolo, L. Pharmaceuticals residues and xenobiotics contaminants: Occurrence, analytical techniques and sustainable alternatives for wastewater treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 705, 135568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Couto, C.; Lange, L.; Amaral, M. Occurrence, fate and removal of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) in water and wastewater treatment plants—A review. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 32, 100927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolpin, D.W.; Furlong, E.T.; Meyer, M.T.; Thurman, E.M.; Zaugg, S.D.; Barber, L.B.; Buxton, H.T. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000: A national reconnaissance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 1202–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghazal, H.; Koumaki, E.; Hoslett, J.; Malamis, S.; Katsou, E.; Barceló, D.; Jouhara, H. Insights into current physical, chemical and hybrid technologies used for the treatment of wastewater contaminated with pharmaceuticals. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 361, 132079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanakaraju, D.; Glass, B.; Oelgemöller, M. Advanced oxidation process-mediated removal of pharmaceuticals from water: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 219, 189–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, S.; Lim, Y.; Ngadi, N.; Mat, R.; Hassan, O.; Inuwa, I.M.; Mohamed, N.B.; Low, J.H. Removal of acetaminophen by activated carbon synthesized from spent tea leaves: Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics studies. Powder Technol. 2018, 338, 878–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bizi, M. Sulfamethoxazole Removal from Drinking Water by Activated Carbon: Kinetics and Diffusion Process. Molecules 2020, 25, 4656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gutiérrez-Sánchez, P.; Navarro, P.; Alvarez-Torrellas, S.; García, J.; Larriba, M. Extraction of neonicotinoid pesticides from aquatic environmental matrices with sustainable terpenoids and eutectic solvents. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 302, 122148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haciosmanoğlu, G.G.; Mejías, C.; Martín, J.; Santos, J.L.; Aparicio, I.; Alonso, E. Antibiotic adsorption by natural and modified clay minerals as designer adsorbents for wastewater treatment: A comprehensive review. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 317, 115397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, S.; Kalmakhanova, M.S.; Massalimova, B.K.; Sgorlon, J.G.; de Tuesta, J.L.D.; Gomes, H.T. Wet Peroxide Oxidation of Paracetamol Using Acid Activated and Fe/Co-Pillared Clay Catalysts Prepared from Natural Clays. Catalysts 2019, 9, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumari, S.; Chowdhry, J.; Kumar, M.; Garg, M.C. Zeolites in wastewater treatment: A comprehensive review on scientometric analysis, adsorption mechanisms, and future prospects. Environ. Res. 2024, 260, 119782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimabuku, K.K.; Kearns, J.P.; Martinez, J.E.; Mahoney, R.B.; Moreno-Vasquez, L.; Summers, R.S. Biochar sorbents for sulfamethoxazole removal from surface water, stormwater, and wastewater effluent. Water Res. 2016, 96, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Galán, M.D.M.; Fernández-Blanco, C.A.; Cuerda-Correa, E.M.; Garrido-Zoido, J.M.; Alexandre-Franco, M.F. Waste Surgical Masks as Precursors of Activated Carbon: A Circular Economy Approach to Mitigate the Impact of Microplastics and Emerging Dye Contaminants. Materials 2025, 18, 4115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calisto, V.; Jaria, G.; Silva, C.P.; Ferreira, C.I.A.; Otero, M.; Esteves, V.I. Single and multi-component adsorption of psychiatric pharmaceuticals onto alternative and commercial carbons. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 192, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ndagijimana, P.; Liu, X.; Yu, G.; Wang, Y. Synthesis of a novel core-shell-structure activated carbon material and its application in sulfamethoxazole adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 368, 602–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Álvarez-Torrellas, S.; Peres, J.A.; Gil-Álvarez, V.; Ovejero, G.; García, J. Effective adsorption of non-biodegradable pharmaceuticals from hospital wastewater with different carbon materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 320, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çaliskan, E.; Göktürk, S. Adsorption Characteristics of Sulfamethoxazole and Metronidazole on Activated Carbon. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kheddo, A.; Rhyman, L.; Elzagheid, M.I.; Jeetah, P.; Ramasami, P. Adsorption of synthetic dyed wastewater using activated carbon from rice husk. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bibi, F.; Hussain, R.; Iqbal, N.; Saeed, S.; Waseem, M.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Al-Anazy, M.M.; Haq, S. Chemical activation and magnetization of onion waste derived carbon for arsenic removal. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 105118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torrellas, S.Á.; Lovera, R.G.; Escalona, N.; Sepúlveda, C.; Sotelo, J.L.; García, J. Chemical-activated carbons from peach stones for the adsorption of emerging contaminants in aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 279, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tonucci, M.C.; Gurgel, L.V.A.; de Aquino, S.F. Activated carbons from agricultural byproducts (pine tree and coconut shell), coal, and carbon nanotubes as adsorbents for removal of sulfamethoxazole from spiked aqueous solutions: Kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 74, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Portillo, E.; Flores, S.; Carrizosa, R.; Álvarez-Torrellas, S.; Carbajo, J.; Águeda, V.I.; García, J. Sustainable adsorbents from sewage sludge: Efficient removal of cytostatic compounds in single and complex aqueous matrices. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 116927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Yu, Q.; Cui, Y.; Xie, F.; Li, W.; Li, Y.; Chen, M. Adsorption properties of activated carbon from reed with a high adsorption capacity. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 102, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.; Kil, H.; Nakabayashi, K.; Yoon, S.; Miyawaki, J. Structural elucidation of physical and chemical activation mechanisms based on the microdomain structure model. Carbon 2017, 114, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heidarinejad, Z.; Dehghani, M.; Heidari, M.; Javedan, G.; Ali, I.; Sillanpää, M. Methods for preparation and activation of activated carbon: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 393–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazem, M.; Zare, M.; Shirazian, S. Preparation and optimization of activated nano-carbon production using physical activation by water steam from agricultural wastes. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 1463–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tobi, A.R.; Dennis, J.O.; Zaid, H.M.; Adekoya, A.A.; Yar, A.; Fahad, U. Comparative analysis of physiochemical properties of physically activated carbon from palm bio-waste. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 3688–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayashi, J.; Kazehaya, A.; Muroyama, K.; Watkinson, A. Preparation of activated carbon from lignin by chemical activation. Carbon 2000, 38, 1873–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Fernández, M.; Alexandre-Franco, M.; Fernández-González, C.; Gómez-Serrano, V. Development of activated carbon from vine shoots by physical and chemical activation methods. Some insight into activation mechanisms. Adsorption 2011, 17, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macia-Agullo, J.; Moore, B.; Cazorla-Amorós, D.; Linares-Solano, Á. Activation of coal tar pitch carbon fibres: Physical activation vs. chemical activation. Carbon 2004, 42, 1367–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedia, J.; Peñas-Garzón, M.; Gómez-Avilés, A.; Rodriguez, J.; Belver, C. Review on Activated Carbons by Chemical Activation with FeCl3. C 2020, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Yue, Q.; Gao, B.; Li, A. Insight into activated carbon from different kinds of chemical activating agents: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 746, 141094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olivares-Marín, M.; Fernández-González, C.; Macías-García, A.; Gómez-Serrano, V. Preparation of activated carbon from cherry stones by physical activation in air. Influence of the chemical carbonisation with H2SO4. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2012, 94, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neme, I.; Gonfa, G.; Masi, C. Activated carbon from biomass precursors using phosphoric acid: A review. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y. The performance of phosphoric acid in the preparation of activated carbon-containing phosphorus species from rice husk residue. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 54, 5008–5021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higai, D.; Huang, Z.; Qian, E.W. Preparation and surface characteristics of phosphoric acid-activated carbon from coconut shell. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2020, 40, e13509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debbache, H. A comprehensive analysis of the use of chemical activation technology to produce activated carbon from agricultural residues. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2024, 58, 1149–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashem, H. Inclusive study of peanut shells derived activated carbon as an adsorbent for removal of lead and methylene blue from water. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 13515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giraldo, L.; Vargas, D.P.; Moreno-Piraján, J.C. Study of CO2 Adsorption on Chemically Modified Activated Carbon with Nitric Acid. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 543452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ternero-Hidalgo, J.; Rosas, J.M.; Palomo, J.; Valero-Romero, M.J.; Rodríguez-Mirasol, J.; Cordero, T. Functionalization of activated carbons by HNO3 treatment. Carbon 2016, 101, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilkinson, J.; Boxall, A.B.A.; Kolpin, D.W.; Leung, K.M.Y.; Lai, R.W.S.; Galbán-Malagón, C.; Adell, A.D.; Mondon, J.; Metian, M.; Marchant, R.A.; et al. Pharmaceutical pollution of the world’s rivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2113947119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoang, A.; Do, M.C.; Kim, K.-W. Environmental risk assessment of selected pharmaceuticals in hospital wastewater. Chemosphere 2024, 356, 141973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossen, M.; Sattar, G.S.; Mostafa, M.G. Factors affecting the performance of a pharmaceutical wastewater treatment plant. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rosli, F.; Ahmad, H.; Jumbri, K.; Abdullah, A.H.; Kamaruzaman, S.; Abdullah, N.A.F. Efficient removal of pharmaceuticals from water using graphene nanoplatelets as adsorbent. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2021, 8, 201076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madhusudhan, A.; Zelenka, T.; Satrapinskyy, L.; Roch, T.; Gregor, M.; Cheng, P.; Monfort, O. A comparative study of different activation methods for hydrochar. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2025, 32, 18107–18120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Ding, J.; Liu, L.-M.; Wu, R.; Ding, L.; Jiang, J.-Q.; Pang, J.-W.; Li, Y.; Ren, N.-Q.; Yang, S.-S. Selective removal of sulfamethoxazole by a novel double Z-scheme photocatalyst. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnology 2023, 17, 100308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Upadhyay, S.; Rani, N.; Kumar, V.; Mythili, R.; Jain, D. A review on simultaneous heavy metal removal and organo-contaminants degradation. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 273, 127419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Madesh, S.; Sudhakaran, G.; Meenatchi, R.; Guru, A.; Arockiaraj, J. Interconnected environmental challenges: Heavy metal–drug interactions. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2024, 47, 1282–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultana, E.; Mamun, M. Golden eyes on pollutants: Colorimetric detection of emerging contaminants with AuNPs. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 32833–32870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-Daabes, M.; Zeitoun, A.; Mazi, W. Competitive Adsorption of Quaternary Metal Ions, Ni2+, Mn2+, Cr6+, and Cd2+, on Acid-Treated Activated Carbon. Water 2023, 15, 1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eskandari, P.; Farhadian, M.; Nazar, A.; Goshadrou, A. Cyanide adsorption on activated carbon impregnated with ZnO, Fe2O3, TiO2 nanometal oxides: A comparative study. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 18, 297–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathi, T.; Gomase, V.; Thawkar, S.; Ganvir, P.; Saravanan, D.; Jugade, R. Novel ACS Film for Efficient Dual Adsorption of Cr(VI) and SDS: Mechanistic In-sights and Practical Applications. Environ. Res. 2025, 279, 121765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mergbi, M.; Aboagye, D.; Contreras, S.; Amor, H.; Medina, F.; Djellabi, R. Fast g-C3N4 sonocoated activated carbon for enhanced solar photocatalytic oxidation of organic pollutants through Adsorb & Shuttle process. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2023, 99, 106550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, Z.; Lotfy, V.; Zhou, X.; Fu, S.; Basta, A. Assessment of porous carbon from rice straw residues with potassium ferrate-assisted activation as cationic and anionic dye adsorbents. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2024, 212, 118298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blachnio, M.; Derylo-Marczewska, A.; Charmas, B.; Zienkiewicz-Strzalka, M.; Bogatyrov, V.; Galaburda, M. Activated carbon from agricultural wastes for adsorption of organic pollutants. Molecules 2020, 25, 5105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hafizuddin, M.S.; Lee, C.L.; Chin, K.L.; H’ng, P.S.; Khoo, P.S.; Rashid, U. Fabrication of Highly Microporous Structure Activated Carbon via Surface Modification with Sodium Hydroxide. Polymers 2021, 13, 3954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno-Castilla, C. Adsorption of organic molecules from aqueous solutions on carbon materials. Carbon 2004, 42, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, F.; Li, K.; Hang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, P.; Wei, L.; Xie, C. Efficient removal of methylene blue by activated hydrochar prepared by hydrothermal carbonization and NaOH activation of sugarcane bagasse and phosphoric acid. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 1885–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djilani, C.; Zaghdoudi, R.; Modarressi, A.; Rogalski, M.; Djazi, F.; Lallam, A. Elimination of organic micropollutants by adsorption on activated carbon prepared from agricultural waste. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 189–190, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.N.; Sarwar, A. Determination of Points of Zero Charge of Natural and Treated Adsorbents. Surf. Rev. Lett. 2007, 14, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiol, N.; Villaescusa, I. Determination of sorbent point zero charge: Usefulness in sorption studies. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2009, 7, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ţucureanu, V.; Matei, A.; Avram, A.M. FTIR Spectroscopy for Carbon Family Study. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2016, 46, 502–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, W.T.; Chang, C.Y.; Lee, S.L.; Wang, S.Y. Thermogravimetric analysis of corn cob impregnated with zinc chloride for preparation of activated carbon. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2001, 63, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, L.; Biggs, M.J.; Skinner, W.; Bandosz, T.J. The effects of activated carbon surface features on the reactive adsorption of carbamazepine and sulfamethoxazole. Carbon 2014, 80, 419–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svahn, O.; Björklund, E. Thermal stability assessment of antibiotics in moderate temperature and subcritical water using a pressurized dynamic flow-through system. Int. J. Innov. Appl. Sci. 2015, 11, 872–880. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, D.T.; Tran, H.N.; Juang, R.-S.; Dat, N.D.; Tomul, F.; Ivanets, A.; Woo, S.H.; Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A.; Nguyen, V.P.; Chao, H.-P. Adsorption process and mechanism of acetaminophen onto commercial activated carbon. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jendrzejewska, I.; Goryczka, T.; Pietrasik, E.; Klimontko, J.; Jampílek, J. X-ray and Thermal Analysis of Selected Drugs Containing Acetaminophen. Molecules 2020, 25, 5909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tortet, L.; Ligner, E.; Blanluet, W.; Noguez, P.; Marichal, C.; Schäf, O.; Paillaud, J.-L. Adsorptive elimination of paracetamol from physiological solutions: Interaction with MFI-type zeolite. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2017, 252, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jasper, E.E.; Ajibola, V.O.; Onwuka, J.C. Nonlinear regression analysis of the sorption of crystal violet and methylene blue from aqueous solutions onto an agro-waste derived activated carbon. Appl. Water Sci. 2020, 10, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, T.; Li, J.; Ma, X.; Zhou, L.; Wu, H.; Yang, L. The adsorption properties of microporous activated carbon prepared from pistachio nut shell for low-concentration VOCs under low-medium temperatures. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 65216–65228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil, A.; Taoufik, N.; Garcia, A.; Korili, S. Comparative removal of emerging contaminants from aqueous solution by adsorption on an activated carbon. Environ. Technol. 2019, 40, 3017–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sellaoui, L.; Gómez-Avilés, A.; Dhaouadi, F.; Bedia, J.; Bonilla-Petriciolet, A.; Rtimi, S.; Belver, C. Adsorption of emerging pollutants on lignin-based activated carbon: Analysis of adsorption mechanism via characterization, kinetics and equilibrium studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 452, 139399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Kim, N.; Park, D. Insights into the Adsorption Performance of Emerging Contaminants on Granular Activated Carbon. Separations 2023, 10, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diniz, V.; Rath, G.; Rath, S.; Araújo, L.; Cunha, D. Competitive kinetics of adsorption onto activated carbon for emerging contaminants with contrasting physicochemical properties. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 29, 42185–42200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozyatnyk, I.; Oesterle, P.; Wurzer, C.; Mašek, O.; Jansson, S. Removal of contaminants of emerging concern from multi-component systems using carbon dioxide activated biochar from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 340, 125561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motaghi, H.; Arabkhani, P.; Parvinnia, M.; Asfaram, A. Simultaneous adsorption of cobalt ions, azo dye, and imidacloprid pesticide on the magnetic chitosan/activated carbon@UiO-66 bio-nanocomposite: Optimization, mechanisms, regeneration, and application. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 284, 120258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diniz, V.; Cunha, D.; Rath, S. Adsorption of recalcitrant contaminants of emerging concern onto activated carbon: A laboratory and pilot-scale study. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 325, 116489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Álvarez-Torrellas, S.; Rodríguez, A.; Ovejero, G.; García, J. Comparative adsorption performance of ibuprofen and tetracycline from aqueous solution by carbonaceous materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 283, 936–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fotsop, C.G.; Lieb, A.; Scheffler, F. Core-shell material based on ion-exchange-assisted growth of ZIFs on chamfered-edged zeolite crystals for N2/CO2 adsorption: Modeling and mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 119887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Ridder, D.J.; Verliefde, A.R.; Heijman, S.G.; Verberk, J.Q.; Rietveld, L.C.; van der Aa, L.T.; Amy, G.L.; van Dijk, J.C. Influence of natural organic matter on equilibrium adsorption of neutral and charged pharmaceuticals onto activated carbon. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Margot, J.; Kienle, C.; Magnet, A.; Weil, M.; Rossi, L.; de Alencastro, L.F.; Abegglen, C.; Thonney, D.; Chèvre, N.; Schärer, M.; et al. Treatment of micropollutants in municipal wastewater: Ozone or powdered activated carbon? Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 461–462, 480–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Altmann, J.; Ruhl, A.S.; Zietzschmann, F.; Jekel, M. Direct comparison of ozonation and adsorption onto powdered activated carbon for micropollutant removal in advanced wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2014, 55, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mailler, R.; Gasperi, J.; Coquet, Y.; Deshayes, S.; Zedek, S.; Cren-Olivé, C.; Cartiser, N.; Eudes, V.; Bressy, A.; Caupos, E.; et al. Study of a large scale powdered activated carbon pilot: Removals of a wide range of emerging and priority micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluents. Water Res. 2015, 72, 315–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- PubChem. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 6 November 2025).
- Boreen, A.L.; Arnold, W.A.; McNeill, K. Photochemical Fate of Sulfa Drugs in the Aquatic Environment: Sulfa Drugs Containing Five-Membered Heterocyclic Groups. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 3933–3940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steiner, T. The Hydrogen Bond in the Solid State. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 48–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caron, G.; Ermondi, G. Molecular Descriptors for Polarity: The Need for Going Beyond Polar Surface Area. Future Med. Chem. 2016, 8, 2013–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ertl, P.; Rohde, B.; Selzer, P. Fast Calculation of Molecular Polar Surface Area as a Sum of Fragment-Based Contributions and Its Application to the Prediction of Drug Transport Properties. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3714–3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopez-Ramon, M.V.; Stoeckli, F.; Moreno-Castilla, C.; Carrasco-Marin, F. On the characterization of acidic and basic surface sites on carbons by various techniques. Carbon 1999, 37, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision A.03; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Peverati, R.; Truhlar, D.G. Screened-exchange density functionals with broad accuracy for chemistry and solid-state physics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 16187–16191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weigend, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3297–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marenich, A.V.; Cramer, C.J.; Truhlar, D.G. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 6378–6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dennington, R.; Keith, T.A.; Millam, J.M. GaussView, version 6; Semichem Inc.: Shawnee Mission, KS, USA, 2016.
- Lu, T.; Chen, F. Multiwfn: A Multifunctional Wavefunction Analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, T.; Chen, Q. Realization of Conceptual Density Functional Theory and Information-Theoretic Approach in Multiwfn Program. In Conceptual Density Functional Theory; WILEY-VCH GmbH: Weinheim, Germany, 2022; pp. 631–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
















| Material | SBET (m2∙g−1) | VTotal (cm3∙g−1) | Vmicro (cm3∙g−1) | Vmeso (cm3∙g−1) | Vmicro/VTotal | dpore (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC-OP | 289 | 0.146 | 0.113 | 0.033 | 0.77 | 20.2 |
| AC-ON | 397 | 0.198 | 0.158 | 0.040 | 0.79 | 19.9 |
| AC-OS | 1.4 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.20 | 137.1 |
| AC-CP | 335 | 0.163 | 0.129 | 0.034 | 0.79 | 19.5 |
| AC-CN | 462 | 0.224 | 0.182 | 0.042 | 0.81 | 19.4 |
| AC-CS | 251 | 0.125 | 0.094 | 0.031 | 0.75 | 20.0 |
| Kinetic Model | SMX | PCM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC-OP | AC-ON | AC-OS | AC-OP | AC-ON | AC-OS | |
| qtexp (mg∙g−1) | 8.77 ± 0.9 | 11.02 ± 0.3 | 3.81 ± 0.1 | 9.63 ± 0.1 | 18.31 ± 0.04 | 2.69 ± 0.4 |
| Pseudo-first-order | ||||||
| qtcal (mg∙g−1) | 8.19 | 10.63 | 3.86 | 9.24 | 17.39 | 2.37 |
| K1 (min−1) | 0.097 | 0.140 | 0.005 | 0.035 | 0.036 | 0.028 |
| R2 | 0.9923 | 0.9936 | 0.9610 | 0.9797 | 0.9482 | 0.9131 |
| SSE | 0.4565 | 0.6301 | 2.0801 | 1.6738 | 15.0732 | 0.5166 |
| RMSE | 0.2554 | 0.3000 | 0.5451 | 0.4890 | 1.4674 | 0.2717 |
| Pseudo-second-order | ||||||
| qtcal (mg∙g−1) | 8.40 | 10.78 | 4.53 | 9.82 | 18.57 | 2.59 |
| K2 (g/(mg/min)) | 0.028 | 0.047 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| R2 | 0.9891 | 0.9917 | 0.9563 | 0.9935 | 0.9877 | 0.9663 |
| SSE | 0.6402 | 0.8208 | 2.4174 | 0.5345 | 3.5806 | 0.2005 |
| RMSE | 0.3024 | 0.3424 | 0.5877 | 0.2763 | 0.7152 | 0.1692 |
| Elovich | ||||||
| α (mg∙g−1min) | 2.88 × 106 | 1.51 × 1014 | 0.04 | 9.32 | 16.88 | 0.52 |
| β (g∙mg−1) | 2.64 | 3.73 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.46 | 2.66 |
| R2 | 0.9779 | 0.9900 | 0.9344 | 0.9532 | 0.97191 | 0.9773 |
| SSE | 1.3003 | 0.9920 | 3.6378 | 0.8499 | 8.1726 | 0.1352 |
| RMSE | 0.4310 | 0.3764 | 0.7209 | 0.7416 | 1.0805 | 0.1390 |
| Kinetic Model | SMX | PCM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC-CP | AC-CN | AC-CS | AC-CP | AC-CN | AC-CS | |
| qtexp (mg∙g−1) | 19.78 ± 0.1 | 19.49 ± 0.2 | 1.94 ± 0.3 | 18.91 ± 0.2 | 20.26 ± 0.05 | 6.63 ± 0.2 |
| Pseudo-first-order | ||||||
| qtcal (mg∙g−1) | 18.90 | 17.67 | 1.87 | 18.18 | 19.49 | 5.17 |
| K1 (min−1) | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.004 | 0.093 | 0.069 | 0.012 |
| R2 | 0.9470 | 0.9300 | 0.9310 | 0.9818 | 0.9651 | 0.6397 |
| SSE | 18.2931 | 23.0483 | 0.2348 | 5.2810 | 11.941 | 3.6552 |
| RMSE | 1.6166 | 1.8145 | 0.1832 | 0.8686 | 1.3061 | 0.7226 |
| Pseudo-second-order | ||||||
| qtcal (mg∙g−1) | 20.14 | 18.89 | 2.13 | 18.81 | 20.40 | 5.70 |
| K2 (g/(mg min)) | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.011 | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| R2 | 0.9815 | 0.9505 | 0.9531 | 0.9977 | 0.9911 | 0.7499 |
| SSE | 6.3790 | 15.5812 | 0.1598 | 0.6668 | 3.0483 | 6.4670 |
| RMSE | 0.9546 | 1.4919 | 0.1511 | 0.3086 | 0.6600 | 0.9612 |
| Elovich | ||||||
| α (mg/g min) | 14.24 | 37.53 | 0.03 | 2.43 × 105 | 2.0 × 103 | 0.44 |
| β (g∙mg−1) | 0.41 | 0.49 | 2.19 | 0.99 | 0.66 | 1.09 |
| R2 | 0.9634 | 0.9368 | 0.9646 | 0.9915 | 0.9784 | 0.8771 |
| SSE | 12.6154 | 19.9009 | 0.1205 | 2.4575 | 7.3964 | 7.4370 |
| RMSE | 1.3425 | 1.6861 | 0.1312 | 0.5925 | 1.0280 | 1.0307 |
| Material | PCM | SMX | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qe,single | qe,binary | Δqe (%) | qe,single | qe,binary | Δqe (%) | |
| AC-OP | 9.63 | 7.44 | 22.74 | 8.77 | 7.70 | 12.20 |
| AC-ON | 18.31 | 19.14 | −4.53 * | 11.02 | 18.83 | −70.87 * |
| AC-OS | 2.58 | 7.37 | −185.66 * | 3.81 | 6.99 | −83.46 * |
| AC-CP | 19.81 | 7.78 | 60.72 | 19.78 | 8.83 | 55.36 |
| AC-CN | 20.26 | 17.17 | 15.25 | 19.49 | 11.59 | 40.53 |
| AC-CS | 6.63 | 6.06 | 8.60 | 1.94 | 3.80 | −95.88 * |
| Kinetic Model | SMX-PCM | SMX-PCM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC-OP | AC-ON | AC-OS | AC-CP | AC-CN | AC-CS | |
| qtexp (mg∙g−1) | 13.34 ± 0.2 | 37.97 ± 0.3 | 14.36 ± 0.07 | 16.61 ± 0.1 | 28.77 ± 0.2 | 9.85 ± 0.2 |
| Pseudo-first-order | ||||||
| qtcal (mg∙g−1) | 12.91 | 33.31 | 13.52 | 13.53 | 23.14 | 8.35 |
| K1 (min−1) | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| R2 | 0.9857 | 0.9593 | 0.9861 | 0.8500 | 0.8463 | 0.9271 |
| SSE | 2.1271 | 95.0388 | 2.2383 | 27.6945 | 84.6663 | 4.8918 |
| RMSE | 0.5954 | 3.6847 | 0.5655 | 1.9891 | 3.4778 | 0.8360 |
| Pseudo-second-order | ||||||
| qtcal (mg∙g−1) | 13.27 | 36.19 | 13.82 | 14.55 | 25.08 | 8.83 |
| K2 (g/(mg min)) | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.006 | 0.003 | 0.01 |
| R2 | 0.9292 | 0.9620 | 0.9925 | 0.9197 | 0.9223 | 0.9523 |
| SSE | 10.5404 | 46.8451 | 1.2151 | 14.8238 | 42.8015 | 3.2029 |
| RMSE | 1.3254 | 2.5869 | 0.4166 | 1.4552 | 2.4727 | 0.6764 |
| Elovich | ||||||
| α (mg/g min) | 52.99 | 8.91 | 2.25 × 109 | 26.01 | 17.75 | 31.92 |
| β (g∙mg−1) | 0.70 | 0.20 | 2.05 | 0.62 | 0.32 | 1.12 |
| R2 | 0.9561 | 0.9228 | 0.9974 | 0.9866 | 0.9905 | 0.9684 |
| SSE | 6.5303 | 50.1278 | 0.4248 | 2.4716 | 5.2620 | 2.1240 |
| RMSE | 1.0432 | 2.6760 | 0.2463 | 0.5942 | 0.8670 | 0.5508 |
| Isotherm Model | SMX | PCM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC-ON | AC-CN | AC-ON | AC-CN | |
| qexp (mg∙g−1) | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 20.2 ± 0.3 | 23.9 ± 0.04 | 29.4 ± 0.01 |
| Langmuir | ||||
| qmax (mg∙g−1) | – | 246.54 | – | 14.39 |
| KL (L∙mg−1) | 0.03 | 0.007 | 1.6 × 10−6 | 0.63 |
| R2 | 0.9911 | 0.8562 | 0.9128 | 0.5854 |
| Freundlich | ||||
| KF (L∙g−1) | 0.04 | 4.20 | 0.82 | 5.65 |
| nF | 0.81 | 1.49 | 0.94 | 3.29 |
| R2 | 0.6433 | 0.8867 | 0.9154 | 0.7604 |
| D-R | ||||
| qm (mg∙g−1) | 5.81 | 64.99 | 24.71 | 12.37 |
| β (mol2/kJ2) | 626.33 | 286.02 | 89.90 | 1.47 |
| R2 | 0.5127 | 0.7409 | 0.9371 | 0.4242 |
| ED-R (kJ/mol) | 8.01 | 8.90 | 14.01 | 15.81 |
| GAB | ||||
| qm (mg∙g−1) | 3.65 | 7.00 | - | - |
| K1 (mg∙L−1) | 0.02 | 8.32 | 1.65 × 10−4 | 3.71 × 10−4 |
| K2 (mg∙L−1) | 0.4 × 10−3 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| R2 | 0.8205 | 0.9715 | 0.9310 | 0.9394 |
| Adsorbent | Pollutant | KL (L·mg−1) | ΔG0 (kJ·mol−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AC-CN | PCM | 0.63 | −28.41 |
| AC-CN | SMX | 0.007 | −18.55 |
| AC-ON | PCM | 1.6 × 10−6 | +3.52 |
| AC-ON | SMX | 0.03 | −22.14 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Kurtebayeva, A.A.; Álvarez-Torrellas, S.; García, J.; Gomes, H.T.; Garrido-Zoido, J.M.; Gil, M.V.; Orynbayev, S.A.; Kalmakhanova, M.S. Sustainable Remediation of Pharmaceuticals Using Crop-Residue-Derived Carbons: Bridging Multi-Component Adsorption and DFT Perspectives. Molecules 2026, 31, 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071162
Kurtebayeva AA, Álvarez-Torrellas S, García J, Gomes HT, Garrido-Zoido JM, Gil MV, Orynbayev SA, Kalmakhanova MS. Sustainable Remediation of Pharmaceuticals Using Crop-Residue-Derived Carbons: Bridging Multi-Component Adsorption and DFT Perspectives. Molecules. 2026; 31(7):1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071162
Chicago/Turabian StyleKurtebayeva, Assel A., Silvia Álvarez-Torrellas, Juan García, Helder T. Gomes, Juan M. Garrido-Zoido, Maria Victoria Gil, Seitzhan A. Orynbayev, and Marzhan S. Kalmakhanova. 2026. "Sustainable Remediation of Pharmaceuticals Using Crop-Residue-Derived Carbons: Bridging Multi-Component Adsorption and DFT Perspectives" Molecules 31, no. 7: 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071162
APA StyleKurtebayeva, A. A., Álvarez-Torrellas, S., García, J., Gomes, H. T., Garrido-Zoido, J. M., Gil, M. V., Orynbayev, S. A., & Kalmakhanova, M. S. (2026). Sustainable Remediation of Pharmaceuticals Using Crop-Residue-Derived Carbons: Bridging Multi-Component Adsorption and DFT Perspectives. Molecules, 31(7), 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071162

