Next Article in Journal
Galloylation-Driven Anchoring of the Asp325-Asp336 Ridge: The Molecular Logic Behind the Superior Kinetic Stabilization of HMPV Fusion Protein by Green Tea Dimeric Catechins
Next Article in Special Issue
Environmental Fate, Soil Ecological Responses and Fruit Quality Impacts of Emerging Contaminants (Antibiotics) in Orchard Ecosystems: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
DES/Extraction and Process Optimization of Callistemon citrinus (Curtis) Skeels Essential Oil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Grab Sampling or Passive Samplers? A Comparative Approach to Water Quality Monitoring
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Organic Molecular Tracer Compounds in Dusts Samples from Schools in Puchuncaví and Quintero (Chile)

1
Laboratorio de Química Analítica y Ambiental, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Avenida Brasil 2950, Valparaíso 2340025, Chile
2
Department of Environmental Chemistry, Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), c/Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2026, 31(5), 818; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050818
Submission received: 9 December 2025 / Revised: 6 February 2026 / Accepted: 12 February 2026 / Published: 28 February 2026

Abstract

This investigation was conducted in order to gain a first knowledge of concentrations, distribution patterns, and potential sources of 16 US EPA priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and organic molecular tracer compounds in deposition dust samples collected in the Valparaiso region, Chile. Dust was sampled in schools (indoor and outdoor) that are located in Puchuncaví and Quintero. Source apportionment analysis using the concentrations of PAHs; glucose, mannitol, sucrose, fructose; di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate; hopanes, and levoglucosan as molecular tracer compounds showed three sources of contribution. The first (46.38%) was related to incomplete combustion processes (Acy, Flu, Ant, Flt, Pyr, and BaA), a second source (20%) represented soil+ biomass burning (levoglucosan, α glucose, β glucose, mannitol, sucrose, and fructose), and a third source (10.26%) was dominated only by 27_norhopane, 27_hopane, which are related to traffic. To assess potential health risks for schoolchildren, the study calculated the benzo[a]pyrene equivalent (BaPE) toxicity and the incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR). Toxicity equivalent (TEQ) results showed that the main contributor to overall toxicity in PAHs, especially in schools located in Puchuncaví, was benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), followed by benzo[α]anthracene (BaA), benzo[b]fluoranthene (BbF), benzo[k]fluoranthene (BkF), indeno[1,2,3-cd] pyrene (IcdP), and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene (DahA). According to the calculated ILCR values, the highest cancer risk was associated with dust ingestion (both indoor and outdoor) for ∑16PAHs, ranging from 1.14 × 10−3 to 8.88 × 10−4. This was followed by dermal contact (1.27 × 10−5 to 7.27 × 10−7) and inhalation (1.22 × 10−8 to 9.99 × 10−9).

1. Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are priority contaminants (16 EPA PAHs; USEPA, 2011) due to their adverse effects on human health, which are related to their cytotoxicity, mutagenic properties, and carcinogenicity. Consequently, they are among the most extensively studied organic compounds in environmental research [1,2,3,4,5,6]. As ubiquitous anthropogenic pollutants, PAHs have been identified worldwide in various environmental matrices, including soil [7,8,9], street dust and air [10,11,12], sediments [13,14], water [15], and food [16].
PAHs are semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) that readily bind to particulate matter and dust in indoor environments, while outdoors, they can undergo long-range atmospheric transport [5]. When released into the atmosphere—primarily through human activities—PAHs originate from sources such as fossil fuel-powered vehicles, industrial facilities, and domestic and residential burning processes [17]. Through both dry and wet deposition, a significant fraction of atmospheric PAHs accumulates in soil [18]. Outdoor air pollution and contaminated soil dust can also affect indoor environments [19,20], including schools, through the introduction of road dust via footwear and through infiltration during cross-ventilation [17,21,22]. Dust can act as an important source of indoor pollution for schoolchildren through dermal contact, ingestion, and inhalation following resuspension, allowing contaminants to enter the human body and adversely affect health [23,24,25,26,27]. Moreover, schoolchildren spend several hours per day indoors. Elementary school students are more vulnerable than adults to exposure to particulate matter (fine dust) due to their early developmental stage. Children inhale air at rates approximately 3–5 times higher than adults and are therefore exposed to higher levels of pollution per unit lung area [28,29].
Besides PAHs, numerous other SVOCs are ubiquitous in indoor environments and are frequently detected in indoor air and settled dust [30]. Among these SVOCs, phthalate esters are commonly found in a wide range of building materials and consumer products, including flooring, carpet padding, wall coverings, tiles, furniture, and electronic devices [31,32]. According to European Union risk assessments conducted in 2005, di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), among other phthalate esters, was classified as a hazardous substance [33].
The aim of the present study was to determine the concentrations of various polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and organic molecular tracer compounds in dust samples collected from schools in Puchuncaví and Quintero (Chile), and to assess the risks associated with schoolchildren’s exposure to these pollutants. In this study, tracer compounds, i.e., hopanes, levoglucosan, and phthalate esters, were used for source apportionment of PAHs derived from fossil fuel combustion emissions, traffic and industrial complexes, biomass burning, and plastics, respectively [17]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to measure hazardous organic pollutants in dust from schools in the Puchuncaví–Quintero area of Chile.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Dust Sampling in the Studied Area

The dust samples (n = 33) were collected in eight different schools (indoors and outdoors) in Quintero and Puchuncaví (Chile) during the summer (15 March 2019) and winter (30 August 2019) seasons (Table 1, Figure 1). Samples were collected on aluminum foil with a soft brush. After collection, the samples were stored in polyethylene bags, sealed, and transported back to the laboratory. For the analysis, the samples were dried at room temperature for 72 h and then sieved through a 63 µm nylon sieve to remove largest particles.

2.2. Study Area

This study was conducted in the cities of Puchuncaví and Quintero (Chile) (Figure 1), which are situated 155 km northwest of Santiago, in the coastal area of Central (from V region) (Meteorological data study area Table S2). The climate is Mediterranean, with intense winter storms (up to 100–120 mm/d). The study area has been documented to be exposed to environmental pollution from industrial complexes, where emissions of trace elements might include contaminants that pose human health risks.
The most environmentally relevant factories in this area are the CODELCO Division Ventanas copper refinery complex and the AES Gener coal-fired power plant complex. There is a high amount of vehicular traffic in both cities, and their residents use the main access routes to schools daily [34].
As mentioned in the study conducted by Parra et al., 2024 [34], based on the study objectives, we selected schools located at varying distances from the main industrial areas in Puchuncaví and Quintero (Table S3), where weekday vehicular activity related to school operations was higher than in other locations.

2.3. Sample Collections

The dust samples (n = 33) were collected in eight different schools (indoors and outdoors) in Quintero and Puchuncaví (Chile) during the summer (15 March 2019) and winter (30 August 2019) seasons (Table 1, Figure 1). Samples were collected following the procedure described by Parra et al., 2024 [34]. After collection, the samples were stored in polyethylene bags, sealed, and transported back to the laboratory. For the analysis, the samples were dried at room temperature for 72 h, sieved through a 63 µm mesh, and stored at ambient temperature before preparation and analysis.

2.4. Chemical Analysis

Two grams of dust (≤63 µm) were used for organic analysis following a methodology described elsewhere Van Droogue et al., 2018 [35]. The samples were spiked with deuterated standards (PAH Mix-9 (LGC) and levoglucosan-D7 (CIL)). The dust was then extracted using an ultrasonic bath with a dichloromethane/methanol mixture (1:1, v/v; 3 × 15 mL). After each extraction, the extracts were filtered through a glass syringe (Fortuna Optima) onto glass fiber filters placed in a stainless-steel filter holder (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) to remove any remaining particles. To derivatize hydroxyl groups into trimethylsilyl ethers, a 25 µL aliquot was evaporated under a gentle N2 stream, followed by the addition of 25 µL of bis(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) and 10 µL of pyridine (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA).
Twenty-five μL of 1-phenyldodecane in isooctane (30 ng) were added and analyzed by gas-chromatography coupled to mass-spectrometry (GC–MS) for the determination of polar compounds, such as saccharides and acids, as well as the phthalate ester di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate.
The remaining extract was hydrolyzed overnight with 5 mL of 6% (w/w) KOH in methanol. The neutral fraction was recovered with n-hexane (3 × 10 mL), vacuum-evaporated to near dryness, and fractionated using a column containing 2 g of alumina, which was eluted with n-hexane/dichloromethane (1:2, v/v). The eluate was concentrated under nitrogen to near dryness, and the combined fractions were vacuum-evaporated to a final volume of 500 µL. Prior to instrumental analysis, the 1-phenyldodecane standard was added.
The sample extracts were injected into a GC–MS (5975; Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped either with a 60 m-fused capillary column HP-5MS 0.25 mm × 25 μm film thickness (Agilent) for the analysis of saccharides and acids, and di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate, and a 30 m column for the analysis of the PAH and hopanes. The oven temperature program started at 60 °C in the first case and 90 °C in the second (holding time 1 min). Then, both programs were heated to 120 °C at 12 °C/min and to 320 °C at 4 °C/min with a final holding time of 10 min. The injector, ion source, quadrupole, and transfer line temperatures were 280 °C, 200 °C, 150 °C, and 280 °C, respectively. Helium was used as carrier gas at 0.9 mL/s. The MS operated in electron impact mode (70 eV). For the purpose of analyzing molecular organic tracers, the quadrupole was run in full scan mode (m/z 50–650) and in SIM-mode for hopanes and PAH.
Levoglucosan (LEV; biomass burning) and saccharides, as well as di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP; plastics), were identified with ions m/z 204, 204, and 149, respectively, and retention times. Quantification was performed with external standard calibration curves.
The recoveries of the field blank levels and the surrogate standard levoglucosan-d7 (m/z 206) were used to adjust the concentrations. Benzo[α]anthracene (BAA m/z 228), chrysene+triphenylene (CHR m/z 228), benzo [b+j+k] fluoranthene (BFL m/z 252), benzo[e]pyrene (BEP m/z 252), benzo[a]pyrene (BAP m/z 252), indeno[1,2,3-cd] pyrene (IP m/z 276), and benzo[ghi] perylene (BGP m/z 276) were among the ion fragment grams used to identify PAHs and hopanes. Moreover, 17(H)α-21(H)β-29-norhopane (norhopane) and 17(H)α-21(H)β-hopane (hopane) were identified in the m/z 191 mass fragment gram and the corresponding retention times [35].
Quantification was also performed by the external standard method. With the exception of benzo[e]pyrene and the hopanes, which were adjusted using benzo[a] pyrene-d12, the computed concentrations were adjusted for surrogate recoveries, which were made up of deuterated compounds for each distinct PAH. These surrogate standard recoveries exceeded 70% in each case.
The range of field blank levels relative to sample levels was between 1% and 10%. In the standard calibration curves, the lowest measured values were used to calculate the limits of quantification (LOQs). For organic molecular tracers, the LOQ was 0.1 ng g−1, whereas for PAHs and hopanes, it was 1.0 ng g−1. The corresponding limits of detection (LOD) were 0.011 ng g−1 for molecular tracers and 0.1 ng g−1 for PAHs and hopanes, respectively.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Principal Component Analysis using PAST software (v5.2.2) was applied on the database, and the resolved components were described by their compound profiles (loadings) and their contribution in each sample (scores).

2.6. Health Risk Assessments

For the carcinogenic risk assessment of PAHs in indoor dust from schools in Quintero and Puchuncaví, two indicators were used: BaPE as the total toxicity equivalence (TEQ) and the incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR).

2.6.1. BaPE as TEQ

Considering that BaP is the most carcinogenic PAHs, BaP equivalent was used to evaluate the toxicity of PAHs. The BaPE factor was calculated using the next equation [36,37].
B a P E ( T E Q ) = C n × T E F
where TEF (ng/g) is the toxic equivalence factor of that PHAs [38] and Cn is the average concentration (ng/g) of the PAH in the indoor dust of schools.

2.6.2. Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (ILCR)

To evaluate the cancer risk among students in school from Puchuncaví and Quintero, the ILRC model was applied to determinate human health risk from the dust bound PAHs via three main pathways i.e., ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact [39,40].
I L C R s i n h a l a t i o n = ( C × C S F i n h × B W 70 3 × I R i n h × E F × E D ) B W × A T × P E F
I L C R s D e r m a l = ( C × C S F d e r × B W 70 3 × S A × A F × A B S × E D ) B W × A T × 10 6
I L C R s I n g e s t i o n = ( C × C S F i n g × B W 70 3 × I R i n g × E F × E D ) B W × A T × 10 6
where C (μg/g) is the total PAH concentration, PEF is the particle emission factor (1.36 × 109 m3/kg), ABS is the dermal adsorption fraction (0.13 both adult and children), AF is the dermal adherence factor (0.07 mg/cm2/h for adult and 0.2 mg/cm2/h for children), SA is the dermal surface exposure (5700 cm2 for adult and 2800 cm2 for children), IRing is the dust intake rate (100 mg/day for adult and 200 mg/day), IRinh is the inhalation rate (20 m3/day for adult and 7.6 m3/day for children), ED is the exposure duration (24 years for adult and 6 years children), EF is the exposure frequency (180 days/year), AT is the average life span (25,550), and BW is body weight taken as 70 kg for adult, as well as 15 kg for children. The CSFing, CSFinh, and CSFder values were taken as 7.3, 3.85, and 25, respectively [26,38,41,42].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Organic Tracer Compound Concentrations

Primary saccharides have been used as tracers for organic soil dust as they are tracer compounds for vegetal debris and fungi [43,44]. Sucrose and glucose are mainly derived from plant materials [45,46]. Amongst sugar alcohols, mannitol is a tracer of airborne fungi [47,48,49]. In this study, glucose, mannitol, sucrose, and fructose are the compounds found in higher concentrations (ng/g) (see Table 2) and directly related to soil dust in combination with microorganisms. Higher indoor concentrations were possibly affected by sugar-holding food consumption due to high concentrations of sucrose and glucose inside schools. Spearman rank correlation coefficients calculated between pollutant levels in school dust show correlations between statistically significant glucose, mannitol, and sucrose (p ˂ 0.001).
In this study, the maximum concentration of DEHP in indoor school dust was 373 µg/g at Santa Filomena School, whereas the maximum outdoor concentration was 473 µg/g at Ingles Quintero School (Table 2). These concentrations are lower than those reported by Kim et al. (2022) [32], who found values up to 1310.00 µg/g but are within the range reported by Blanchard et al. (2014) [30] for settled dust samples. Higher DEHP concentrations observed in some schools are likely associated with the presence of plastic toys in classrooms, the use of plastic-based classroom materials, and PVC flooring, which are recognized as major sources of phthalates in indoor dust [28,50].
Hopanes were used as tracers of mineral oils originating from transportation-related sources, including fossil fuel combustion and residues of unburned lubricating oils [51,52]. In school environments, their presence is likely the result of outdoor air infiltrating indoor spaces through ventilation systems [53]. Among the hopanes analyzed, 7α(H),21β(H)-29-norhopane (Norhop) and 17α(H),21β(H)-hopane (Hop) were the most abundant, and their concentrations were highly correlated (R2 = 0.97, p < 0.001). During winter, the highest indoor concentrations were recorded at Básica Chocota School (847 ng/g), in agreement with values reported by Van Drooge et al. (2020) [17]. These elevated levels likely reflect the school’s location in a high-traffic area. In contrast, the lowest hopane concentrations were observed in outdoor dust samples from Santa Filomena School (74.8 ng/g).
Notably, coal combustion can release levoglucosan, hopanes, and PAHs [54]; however, due to their strong correlation, hopanes were selected as the primary tracers of traffic-related emissions in this study.
Levoglucosan is a common indicator of burning biomass [55,56]. Levoglucosan has been found in aerosols [17,57,58] and soils [59], according to earlier research. In the current study, indoor dust samples from Greda School showed the greatest amounts (1.207 ng/g) during the winter (Table 2). Levoglucosan levels were around three times greater in indoor samples than in outdoor school settings.
PAHs are common byproducts of incomplete combustion and are considered ubiquitous indoor pollutants owing to their widespread sources, with the possibility after the penetration of outdoor air to the indoor air through ventilation [17,30,35,40,60]. Three-ring low-molecular weight (Acy, Ace, Flu, Phe, Ant) PAHs occur in the atmosphere mostly in the vapor state and are indicative of incomplete combustion processes [26,61,62], while 4-ring PAHs exist between the particulate and gaseous states.
In the schools studied, fossil fuel combustion from motorized vehicles represents the main source of PAHs in urban areas [17]. Concentrations and compositional profiles of PAHs in indoor and outdoor dust samples are summarized in Table 3 and Table S1, and Figure 1.
The most frequent PAH species identified in indoor dust samples collected from schools in Puchuncaví was phenanthrene (Phe; 3-ring), accounting for 17%, followed by pyrene (Pyr; 4-ring) and chrysene (Chr; 4-ring), which represented 14% and 12%, respectively. In indoor dust samples collected from schools in Quintero, the predominant PAHs were Pyr (19%) and fluoranthene (Flt; 4-ring) (13%), followed by Chr (12%).
Similarly, in outdoor dust samples collected from schools in Puchuncaví and Quintero, pyrene (Pyr) was the predominant PAH, accounting for 17% and 16%, respectively, followed by phenanthrene (Phe) (15% and 12%) and chrysene (Chr) (14%).
Therefore, based on the obtained results, PAHs tend to accumulate in indoor dust, indicating that indoor environments may act as important reservoirs of PAH contamination and serving as a relevant indicator of indoor pollution.
This fact could be due to the existence of different industries operating rampantly in the area, leading to generation pollution atmospheric, which agrees with the literature where 3- and 4-ring PAHs are reported to be the main contributor in settled dust [63].
Highest ΣPAH concentrations (summer) were measured inside schools from Puchuncaví, including Greda (Alerces) (556 ng/g), Greda (464 ng/g), and Santa Filomena (352 ng/g), with the latter being located in Quintero. Equally, in winter, the highest concentrations were reported in Greda (Alerces) School (746 ng/g), Santa Filomena (507 ng/g). In the case of outdoor conditions in schools, the highest ΣPAH concentrations were measured in the Greda School (summer) 537 ng/g and (winter) 497 ng/g. Equally, the lowest ΣPAH concentrations were measured in the summer (outdoor) at Santa Filomena school (43 ng/g) and in the Básica la Chocota school (76 ng/g).
In general, the relative composition of individual PAHs was dominated by phenanthrene, pyrene, and chrysene, followed by benzo[ghi]perylene and other PAHs at lower concentrations. In dust samples collected from indoor school environments in Puchuncaví during the summer, higher abundances of benzo[b+j+k] fluoranthene were observed. In contrast, during winter, pyrene exhibited the highest abundance, followed by chrysene and fluoranthene. Similarly, in dust samples collected from indoor schools in Quintero, both in winter and summer, benzo[a]pyrene was the most abundant, followed by chrysene and pyrene (Table 2). Across the complete dataset, these correlations were statistically significant, suggesting that combustion is the primary source of PAHs.

3.2. Benzo(a)pyrene Toxicity Equivalence (BaPE as TEQ)

The calculated BaPE data expressed as TEQ are presented in Table 4. Median BaPE values indicated that the primary contributors to overall toxicity in schools located in Puchuncaví were BaP, followed by BaA, BbF, BkF, IcdP, and DahA. Similarly, the overall toxicity in schools located in Quintero was associated with the same PAHs, although their contributions to BaPE as TEQ were considerably lower.
These findings suggest that exposure to these PAHs in both Puchuncaví and Quintero poses a potential carcinogenic risk for schoolchildren. Notably, all schools exhibited the highest BaPE as TEQ levels for BaP (5.6–28.8 ng/g), which may be attributed to traffic emissions and combustion sources in the study areas.

3.3. Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (ILCR)

Table 5 presents the ILCR values, which estimate the cancer risk associated with human exposure to PAHs from pollution sources via ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation. The highest cancer risk was observed through dust ingestion (indoor and outdoor) for Σ16PAHs (1.14 × 10−3–8.88 × 10−4), followed by dermal exposure (1.27 × 10−5–7.27 × 10−7) and inhalation (1.22 × 10−8–9.99 × 10−9). When compared with USEPA reference values (ranging from 1 × 10−6 to 1 × 10−4), the ILCR values for ingestion exceeded the acceptable risk level. In Puchuncaví, the highest cancer risk via dust ingestion for children was observed at Greda School, followed by Chocota and Horcón Schools. In Quintero, all schools exhibited similar ILCR values on the order of 10−4.
These results indicate that combustion is likely a major factor influencing the carcinogenic risk of PAHs, a consideration that should be emphasized when assessing exposure via ingestion.

3.4. Source Identification

The concentrations of the analyzed compounds were evaluated with PCA, and the resolved components are shown in Figure 2. In the present study, loadings were considered significant for values of 0.7 or greater [65].
A three-component solution explains 77% of the variance in the dataset (Figure 2). In this model, the component associated with combustion-related PAHs (CP-1) was most prominent in Greda School (Alerces), which is consistent with the distance to the pollution source (Table S3). In contrast, a component associated with traffic sources (norhopane, hopane, and PAHs; CP-3) was predominant in Greda, Chocota, Ingles Quintero, and Santa Filomena schools, all located in areas with heavy vehicular traffic, where residents frequently use the main routes to access these schools.
Additionally, the contribution of a soil and biomass burning source (saccharides; CP-2) was strongest in Santa Filomena School.
The schools located in Puchuncaví were influenced by indoor pollution originating from outdoor combustion, traffic, and indoor soil and biomass burning sources, respectively. In contrast, in schools located in Quintero, traffic was the predominant indoor source, followed by soil and biomass burning (Figure 3a,b).
Factor 1 (Figure 2) accounted for 46.38% of the total variance and exhibited strong positive loadings for Acy, Flu, Ant, Flt, Pyr, and BaA. Three-ring PAHs are indicative of incomplete combustion processes [14,38,60], while 4-ring high molecular weight PAHs (Flt, Pyr, and BaA) typically originate from pyrogenic sources such as coal combustion [36,64].
Factor 2 (Figure 2) explained 20% of the variance and showed positive loadings for levoglucosan, α-glucose, β-glucose, mannitol, and sucrose, suggesting a source related to soil and biomass burning.
Factor 3 (Figure 2) contributed 10.26% of the variance and was dominated by 27-norhopane and 27-hopane, which are associated with traffic emissions.

4. Conclusions

This study provides the first assessment of organic molecular tracers and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in settled dust from schools in the Puchuncaví–Quintero region, Chile, demonstrating that school dust is a significant source of harmful organic pollutants.
Total Σ16 PAH concentrations in dust ranged from 0.04 to 204 ng/g. The most affected schools were Greda in Puchuncaví and Santa Filomena in Quintero, likely due to their locations in high-traffic areas.
PAH profiles were dominated by low- and medium-molecular-weight compounds (3–4 rings), such as phenanthrene, pyrene, and chrysene, indicating that incomplete combustion is the primary source of contamination. Source apportionment using molecular tracers and multivariate analysis confirmed that traffic emissions and fossil fuel combustion are the main contributors, while biomass burning and soil dust also play a role in certain schools.
DEHP concentrations highlight the influence of indoor sources, including plastic toys, classroom materials, and PVC flooring.
Toxicity assessment (BaPE) revealed that benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), followed by BaA, BbF, BkF, IcdP, and DahA, is the major contributor to carcinogenic risk. Dust ingestion was identified as the primary exposure route, followed by dermal contact and inhalation.
The analysis of molecular tracers, source apportionment, multivariate statistics, and health risk indicators provides a robust interpretation of pollution sources and associated hazards in schools. A clear spatial correlation was observed between emission sources and toxicological impact, with higher PAH loads, elevated hopane concentrations, and increased carcinogenic potential in schools near industrial complexes or high-traffic areas.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules31050818/s1, Table S1: PAHs concentrations (ng g−1) in school dust samples; Table S2: Meteorological data of study area; Table S3: Distance of selected schools to the industrial complex located in the study area (The cities of Puchuncaví and Quintero).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P., B.L.V.D. and M.A.B.; Methodology, S.P. and B.L.V.D.; validation, S.P. and B.L.V.D.; formal analysis, S.P. and B.L.V.D.; investigation, S.P. and B.L.V.D.; resources, S.P., B.L.V.D. and M.A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P., B.L.V.D. and M.A.B.; writing—review and editing, S.P., B.L.V.D. and M.A.B.; visualization, S.P., B.L.V.D. and M.A.B.; supervision, S.P., B.L.V.D. and M.A.B.; project administration, S.P. and B.L.V.D.; funding acquisition, S.P., B.L.V.D. and M.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research work of Sonnia Parra was partially supported by to the Dirección de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados (VRIEA-PUCV) project 039.345/2021. Barend Drooge was supported by the European Commission EU Horizon for financial support (IN CHILD HEALTH EU Horizon 101056883).

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge to the Dirección de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados (VRIEA-PUCV) for financial support (VRIEA-PUCV 039.345/2021) and the European Commission EU Horizon for financial support (INCHILDHEALTH EU Horizon 101056883).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Xiao, R.; Bai, J.; Wang, J.; Lu, Q.; Zhao, Q.; Cui, B.; Liu, X. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in wetland soils under different land uses in a coastal estuary: Toxic levels, sources and relationships with soil organic matter and water-stable aggregates. Chemosphere 2014, 110, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, B.; Xie, X.; Ma, L.; Kan, H.; Zhou, Q. Source, distribution, and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban street dust from Tianjin, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 2817–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cave, M.; Wragg, J.; Beriro, J. An overview of research and development themes in the measurement and occurrences of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in dusts and particulates. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 360, 373–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Y.; Song, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, R.; Wang, Y.; Qi, Z.; Chen, Z.; Cai, Z. Contamination profiles and potential health risks of organophosphate flame retardants in PM 2.5 from Guangzhou and Taiyuan, China. Environ. Int. 2019, 134, 105343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, Z.; Lyu, H.; Guo, Y.; Man, Q.; Niu, H.; Li, J.; Jing, X.; Ren, G.; Ma, X. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polybrominated diphenyl ethers inside university campus: Indoor dust-bound pollution characteristics and health risks to university students. Build. Environ. 2022, 221, 109312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zivancev, J.; Antic, I.; Buljovcic, M.A. Case study on the occurrence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor dust of Serbian households: Distribution, source apportionment and health risk assessment. Chemosphere 2022, 295, 133856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Skrbi, B.V.; Marinkovic, V.; Antic, I.; Petrovic, A. Seasonal variation and health risk assessment of organochlorine compounds in urban soils of Novi Sad, Serbia. Chemosphere 2017, 181, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tong, R.; Yang, X.; Su, H.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, J.; Long, M. Levels, sources and probabilistic health risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the agricultural soils from sites neighboring suburban industries in Shanghai. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 616, 1365–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Škrbić, B.; Antic, I.; Zivancev, J.; Vagvolgyi, C. Comprehensive characterization of PAHs profile in Serbian soils for conventional and organic production: Potential sources and risk assessment. Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 43, 4201–4218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Harbi, M.; Alhajri, I.; Whalen, J. Health risks associated with the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor dust collected from houses in Kuwait. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 266, 115054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Škrbić, B.; Mladenović, D.; Živančev, J. Seasonal occurrence and cancer risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in street dust from the Novi Sad city, Serbia. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 647, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jaén, C.; Villasclaras, P.; Fernández, P.; Grimalt, J.O.; Udina, M.; Bedia, C.; Van Drooge, B.L. Source Apportionment and Toxicity of PM in Urban, Sub-Urban, and Rural Air Quality Network Stations in Catalonia. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Han, B.; Liu, A.; Gong, J.; Li, O.; He, X.; Zhao, J.; Zheng, L. Spatial distribution, source analysis, and ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the sediments from rivers emptying into Jiaozhou Bay, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 168, 112394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Iwegbue, C.; Irerhievwie, G.; Tesi, G.; Olisah, C. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in surficial sediments from selected rivers in the western Niger Delta of Nigeria: Spatial distribution, sources, and ecological and human health risks. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 167, 112351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, C.; Huang, Z.; Qadeer, A.; Liu, Y.; Qiao, X.; Zheng, B.; Zhao, G.; Zhao, X. The sediment-water diffusion and risk assessment of PAHs in different types of drinking water sources in the Yangtze River Delta, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 309, 127456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, J.; Jeong, H.; Park, S.; Lee, K. Monitoring and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in processed foods and their raw materials. Food Control 2018, 92, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Van Drooge, B.L.; Rivas, I.; Querol, X.; Sunyer, J. Organic Air Quality Markers of Indoor and Outdoor PM 2.5 Aerosols in Primary Schools from Barcelona. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lee, J.; Gigliotti, C.; Offenberg, H.; Eisenreich, S.; Turpin, B. Sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to the Hudson River Airshed. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 38, 5971–5981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cao, Z.; Shi, Y.; Feng, J.; Wang, S.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, G.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Shen, M.; et al. PAH contamination in road dust from a moderate city in North China: The significant role of traffic emission. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2017, 23, 1072–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hye, K.; Sung, D. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils from a multi-industrial city, South Korea. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 470, 1494–1501. [Google Scholar]
  21. Romagnoli, P.; Balducci, C.; Perilli, M.; Gherardi, M.; Gordiani, A.; Gariazzo, C.; Gatto, M.P.; Cecinato, A. Indoor PAHs at schools, homes and offices in Rome, Italy. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 92, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sanderson, G.; Farant, J. Indoor and Outdoor Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Residences Surrounding a Soderberg Aluminum Smelter in Canada. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 5350–5356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ferreira, B.; De Miguel, E. Geochemistry and risk assessment of street dust in Luanda, Angola: A tropical urban environment. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 4501–4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mortamais, M.; Pujol, J.; Van Drooge, B.; Dida, M.; Martínez-Vilavella, G.; Reynes, C.; Sabatier, R.; Rivas, I.; Grimalt, J.; Forns, J.; et al. Effect of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on basal ganglia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in primary school children. Environ. Int. 2017, 105, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lelieveld, J.; Evans, J.M.; Fnais, M.; Giannadaki, D.; Pozzer, A. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 2015, 525, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, W.; Huang, M.; Kang, Y.; Wang, H.; Leung, A.; Cheung, K.C.; Wong, M.H. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban surface dust of Guangzhou, China: Status, sources and human health risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 21, 4519–4527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Guo, C.; Xu, J.; Tian, Y.; Shi, G.; Feng, Y.-C. Potential source contributions and risk assessment of PAHs in sediments from Taihu Lake, China: Comparison of three receptor models. Water Res. 2012, 46, 3065–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Besis, A.; Avgenikou, A.; Pantelaki, I.; Serafeim, E.; Georgiadou, E.; Voutsa, D.; Samara, C. Hazardous organic pollutants in indoor dust from elementary schools and kindergartens in Greece: Implications for children’s health. Chemosphere 2023, 310, 136750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sujeong, H.; Kim, D.; Kwoun, Y.; Lee, T.; Jo, Y.M. Characterization and source identification of fine dust in Seoul elementary school classrooms. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 414, 125531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Blanchard, O.; Glorennec, P.; Mercier, F.; Bonvallot, N.; Chevrier, C.; Ramalho, O.; Mandin, C.; Le Bot, B. Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Indoor Air and Settled Dust in 30 French Dwellings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 3959–3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bornehag, C.; Lundgren, B.; Weschler, C.; Sigsgaard, T.; Hagerhed-Engman, L.; Sundell, J. Phthalates in indoor dust and their association with building characteristics. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 1399–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, K.; Kim, T.; Choi, J.; Joo, Y.; Park, H.; Lee, H.; Lee, C.; Jang, S.; Vasseghian, Y.; Joo, S.-W.; et al. Analysis of semi-volatile organic compounds in indoor dust and organic thin films by house type in South Korea. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 113782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Raffy, G.; Mercier, F.; Glorennec, P.; Mandin, C.; Le Bot, B. Oral bio accessibility of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in settled dust: A review of measurement methods, data and influencing factors. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 352, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Parra, S.; De la Fuente, H.; González, A.; Bravo, M. Exposure to environmental pollution in school of Puchuncaví, Chile: Characterization of Heavy metals, health risk assessment, and effects on children s academic performance. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Van Drooge, B.; Prats, R.; Reche, C.; Minguillon, M.; Querol, X.; Grimalt, J.O.; Moreno, T. Origin of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and other organic pollutants in the air particles of subway stations in Barcelona. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qi, H.; Li, W.; Zhu, N.; Ma, W.; Liu, L.; Zhang, F.; Li, Y. Concentrations and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor dust in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 491–492, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Courage, C.; Kanay, J. Appraisal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in indoor dust of Eastern Nigeria and its implications in the COVID-19 years. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2004, 14, 100424. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hu, Y.; Bai, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Q.; Zhu, T. Health risk assessment for traffic policemen exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Tianjin, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 382, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nadeem, A.; Iqbal, M.I.; Mamdouh, K.; Magdy, S.; Mansour, A.; Abdulrahman, A.; Max, C. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the settled dust of automobile workshops, health and carcinogenic risk evaluation. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 601–602, 478–484. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yang, Q.; Chen, H.; Li, B. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Indoor Dusts of Guizhou, Southwest of China: Status, Sources and Potential Human Health risk. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. US EPA. Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites; Office of Emergency and Remedial Response: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  42. Wei, Y.; Han, I.K.; Hu, M.; Shao, M.; Zhang, J.J.; Tang, X. Personal exposure to particulate PAHs and anthraquinone and oxidative DNA damage in humans. Chemosphere 2010, 81, 1280–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Medeiros, M.; Fernández, M.; Dick, R.; Simoneit, B. Seasonal variations in sugar contents and microbial community in ryegrass soil. Chemosphere 2006, 65, 832–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wan, E.; Zhen, J. Analysis of Sugars and Sugar Polyols in Atmospheric Aerosols by Chloride Attachment in Liquid Chromatography/Negative Ion Electrospray Mass Spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 2459–2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pacini, E. From anther and pollen ripening to pollen presentation. Plant Syst. Evol. 2000, 222, 19–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Puxbaum, H.; Tenze, M. Size distribution and seasonal variation of atmospheric cellulose. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 3693–3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bauer, H.; Claeys, M.; Vermeylen, R.; Schueller, E.; Weinke, G.; Berger, A.; Puxbaum, H. Arabitol and mannitol as tracers for the quantification of airborne fungal spores. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Samaké, A.; Jaffrezo, J.; Favez, O. Polyols and glucose particulate species as tracers of primary biogenic organic aerosols at 28 French sites. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 3357–3374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kumer, S.; Kawamural, K.; Chen, J.; Fu, P. Thirteen years of observations on primary sugars and sugar alcohols over remote Chichijima Island in the western North Pacific. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 81. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jeon, S.; Kim, T.; Choi, K. Migration of DEHP and DINP into dust from PVC flooring products at different surface temperature. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 547, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Van Drooge, B.L.; Van Ballesta, P.P. Seasonal and daily source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in PM10 in a semirural european area. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 7310–7316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Van Drooge, B.L.; Garatachea, R.; Reche, C.; Titos, G.; Alastuey, A.; Lyamani, H.; Alados-Arboledas, L.; Querol, X.; Grimalt, J.O. Primary and secondary organic winter aerosols in Mediterranean cities under different mixing layer conditions (Barcelona and Granada). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 29, 36255–36272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tian, Y.; Liu, X.; Huo, R.; Shi, Z.; Sun, Y.; Feng, Y.; Harrison, R.M. Organic compound source profiles of PM 2.5 from traffic emissions, coal combustion, industrial processes and dust. Chemosphere 2021, 278, 130429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yan, C.; Zheng, M.; Sullivan, A.P.; Shen, G.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhao, B.; Cai, S.; Desyaterik, Y.; Li, X.; et al. Residential coal combustion as a source of levoglucosan in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 1665–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Deshmukh, D.; Kawamura, K.; Gupta, T.; Haque, M.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Singh, D.K.; Tsai, Y.I. High Loadings of Water-soluble Oxalic Acid and Related Compounds in PM 2.5 Aerosols in Eastern Central India: Influence of Biomass Burning and Photochemical Processing. Aerosol Atmos. Chem. 2019, 19, 2625–2644. [Google Scholar]
  56. Simoneit, B. Biomass burning a review of organic tracers for smoke from incomplete combustion. Appl. Geochem. 2002, 17, 129–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Barbaro, E.; Kirchgeorg, T.; Zangrado, R.; Vecchiato, M.; Piazza, R.; Barbante, C.; Gambaro, A. Sugars in Antarctic aerosol. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 118, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zangrando, R.; Barbaro, E.; Kirchgeorg, T.; Vecchiato, M.; Scalabrin, E.; Radaelli, M.; Đorđević, D.; Barbante, C.; Gambaro, A. Five primary sources of organic aerosols in the urban atmosphere of Belgrade (Serbia). Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 571, 441–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Otto, A.; Gondokusumo, R.; Simpson, J. Characterization and quantification of biomarkers from biomass burning at a recent wildfire site in Northern Alberta, Canada. Appl. Geochem. 2006, 21, 166–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ali, N. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in indoor air and dust samples of different Saudi microenvironments; health and carcinogenic risk assessment for the general population. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 696, 133995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Dong, T.; Lee, B.-K. Characteristics, toxicity, and source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in road dust of Ulsan, Korea. Chemosphere 2009, 74, 1245–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Jiang, Y.F.; Wang, X.T.; Wang, F.; Jia, Y.; Wu, M.H.; Sheng, G.Y. Levels, composition profiles and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soil of Shanghai, China. Chemosphere 2009, 75, 2259–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Maragkidou, A.; Sharif, A.; Afnan, A.; Ma, Y.; Harrad, S.; Jaghbeir, O.; Faouri, D.; Hämeri, K.; Hussein, T. Occupational health risk assessment and exposure to floor dust PAHs inside an educational building. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hsu, H.; Chen, H.; Huang, C.; Tseng, L. Health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in at industrial city in Taiwan. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2014, 14, 181–192. [Google Scholar]
  65. Comrey, A.; Lee, H. A First Course in Factor Analysis. Technometrics 1992, 35, 453. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Map of the study area.
Figure 1. Map of the study area.
Molecules 31 00818 g001
Figure 2. PCA loading% of the analyzed compounds in three components.
Figure 2. PCA loading% of the analyzed compounds in three components.
Molecules 31 00818 g002
Figure 3. (a) PCA score values of the three components in the outdoor and indoor of the schools of Puchuncaví (ad). (b) PCA score values of the three components in the outdoor and indoor of the schools of Quintero (eh).
Figure 3. (a) PCA score values of the three components in the outdoor and indoor of the schools of Puchuncaví (ad). (b) PCA score values of the three components in the outdoor and indoor of the schools of Quintero (eh).
Molecules 31 00818 g003
Table 1. Schools where samples were collected.
Table 1. Schools where samples were collected.
SchoolPlaceLatitude SLongitude W
Greda los AlercesPuchuncaví32.736.90371.460.276
La GredaPuchuncaví32.747.42071.475.076
Básica ChocotaPuchuncaví32.730.09171.487.255
Básica HorcónPuchuncaví32.712.97871.488.007
El FaroQuintero32.776.90971.530.828
Santa FilomenaQuintero32.786.76071.528.709
Inglés QuinteroQuintero32.783.02271.531.031
Politécnico QuinteroQuintero32.789.09371.526.921
ReferenceCurauma33.14645171.569935
Table 2. Average concentrations of analyzed organic compounds (ng/g).
Table 2. Average concentrations of analyzed organic compounds (ng/g).
SchoolLevoglucosanα Glucoseβ GlucoseMannitolSucroseFructoseDEHPNorhopaneHopane
SeasonsReference7938993957338951395,973185481.64113.98
summer (indoor)La Greda (Los Alerces)29512,40512,92022852,64176,7258920143.38156.79
Santa Filomena636484,220512,21021,451831,759147,975372,622303.39298.02
Básica Horcón 215145,801158,78117421,123,39073,658122,626168.55166.93
El Faro40999610,55180472,06412,97142,48486.82123.60
La Greda29843,15746,01551780,35652,10627,445225.28305.55
Politécnico Quintero40795,135107,5954097627,116142,797208,99375.8496.23
Inglés Quintero 337147,298155,5762448826,024165,156129,893106.00132.41
Básica La Chocota346340,428422,897788879,381253,72696,784153.69168.50
Winter (Indoor)La Greda (Los Alerces)22410,79512,7611059360,082202,0378826170.80179.45
Santa Filomena76619,31722,03412,398532,435250,024117,675315.26352.24
Básica Horcón 453132,909133,25311,408453,33099,08897,817188.89211.81
El Faro19813,15914,898701211,087313,518117,184202.43235.49
La Greda1207353,310390,34079631,145,896204,170286,715146.75162.83
Politécnico Quintero37151,96058,9752931574,085152,543127,480136.89181.62
Inglés Quintero 619386,743407,20273581,570,939150,194245,621157.42185.24
Básica La Chocota898470,643429,53612,9021,584,915235,542315,352390.54456.57
Summer (outdoor)La Greda (Los Alerces)17119,80923,77130424,437161,54610,266224.25263.02
Santa Filomena74175,624211,87721610,55717,148595335.5839.17
Básica Horcón 92202222531764853124,763364,474120.30155.45
El Faro213302,945339,534124194,66599,24720,17448.0669.02
La Greda19722,73124,31834935,16927,36217,195346.63470.68
Politécnico Quintero11727,18229,50217375,31644,23864,024195.94252.78
Inglés Quintero 29623,63627,15695544,337478,32283,299103.28113.88
Básica La Chocota7212,45113,527125102,611156,10814,56856.7469.55
winter (outdoor)La Greda (Los Alerces)26425,64731,232488210,752131,19813,829174.30210.29
Santa Filomena1791124459982119,64970621473221.02300.10
Básica Horcón 11716,31717,2231014127,409101,170107,96797.25126.63
El Faro3151650519114025,10845,435194478.28107.30
La Greda1792988318743098,89973,53428,230224.90278.92
Politécnico Quintero75542254888143,11326,55528,071153.03242.78
Inglés Quintero 110947910,34932873,07268,810472,374221.35257.44
Básica La Chocota85547456384930,38923,27361,461130.19166.35
Table 3. Concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (ng g−1) in dust in schools.
Table 3. Concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (ng g−1) in dust in schools.
IndoorOutdoor
PAHsAverageMinMaxAverageMinMax
Acy0.790.042.600.660.091.87
Ace1.930.349.401.550.695.82
Flu1.950.767.611.440.315.15
Phe43.8010.28204.3733.815.05106.52
Ant4.641.2317.933.820.5312.81
Flt36.507.1584.9224.014.3155.12
Pyr49.137.3799.1641.557.5097.31
BaA14.632.5540.2011.061.1629.02
Chr37.158.5472.9534.746.11105.79
BbF33.957.3165.6023.484.6452.47
Bep23.384.9043.3621.223.7542.75
BaP13.572.9431.649.171.4021.94
PE4.491.1419.553.330.6811.71
IcdP11.803.5024.358.201.9920.96
dBahA3.660.528.803.940.4113.97
Bghip22.776.9350.2725.243.6057.08
ƩPAHs304.2 247.21
Table 4. BaPE as TQE profile of analyzed PAHs in indoor dust of schools from Puchuncaví and Quintero.
Table 4. BaPE as TQE profile of analyzed PAHs in indoor dust of schools from Puchuncaví and Quintero.
AnalytesToxic Equivalent Factors (TEF) [64]BaPE as TQE Exposure Profile (ng/g)
PuchuncavíQuintero
ReferenceLa Greda (Alerces)La GredaBásica La ChocotaBásica Horcón El Faro Santa FilomenaInglés Quintero Politécnico Quintero
Phe0.0010.020.20.10.020.020.010.10.020.02
Ant0.010.020.20.10.030.020.020.10.030.03
FLT0.0010.020.10.00.010.030.030.10.020.03
Pyr0.0010.10.10.10.010.030.10.10.020.03
BaA0.10.43.61.70.91.40.52.00.71.5
Chr0.010.20.60.60.30.30.20.60.20.3
BbjkF0.11.35.96.23.34.12.85.72.23.9
BaP17.528.813.56.710.55.614.716.315.6
Icdp0.10.32.31.10.62.00.41.60.91.0
DahA12.13.75.52.44.15.55.21.71.9
Bghip0.010.30.40.40.10.20.10.30.10.2
Table 5. Cancer risk of PAHs in indoor and outdoor dust of the study schools.
Table 5. Cancer risk of PAHs in indoor and outdoor dust of the study schools.
Study SchoolsSampling LocationSeasonChildren
InhalationDermalIngestion
La Greda (Los Alerces)Indoorsummer2.02 × 10−89.48 × 10−61.37 × 10−3
winter2.71 × 10−81.27 × 10−51.84 × 10−3
Outdoorsummer1.95 × 10−89.16 × 10−61.32 × 10−3
winter1.36 × 10−86.37 × 10−69.20 × 10−4
La GredaIndoorsummer1.68 × 10−87.92 × 10−61.14 × 10−3
winter1.06 × 10−85.00 × 10−67.23 × 10−4
Outdoorsummer1.78 × 10−88.38 × 10−61.21 × 10−3
winter1.80 × 10−88.47 × 10−61.22 × 10−3
Básica La ChocotaIndoorsummer4.40 × 10−92.07 × 10−62.99 × 10−4
winter7.44 × 10−93.50 × 10−65.05 × 10−4
Outdoorsummer2.76 × 10−91.30 × 10−61.87 × 10−4
winter4.54 × 10−92.13 × 10−63.08 × 10−4
Básica HorcónIndoorsummer4.29 × 10−92.02 × 10−62.91 × 10−4
winter1.31 × 10−86.15 × 10−68.88 × 10−4
Outdoorsummer3.17 × 10−91.49 × 10−62.15 × 10−4
winter6.04 × 10−92.84 × 10−64.10 × 10−4
El FaroIndoorsummer8.46 × 10−93.98 × 10−65.74 × 10−4
winter6.80 × 10−93.20 × 10−64.62 × 10−4
Outdoorsummer4.63 × 10−92.18 × 10−63.15 × 10−4
winter5.43 × 10−92.55 × 10−63.69 × 10−4
Santa FilomenaIndoorsummer1.28 × 10−85.99 × 10−68.65 × 10−4
winter1.84 × 10−88.65 × 10−61.25 × 10−3
Outdoorsummer1.55 × 10−97.26 × 10−71.05 × 10−4
winter8.70 × 10−94.09 × 10−65.91 × 10−4
Inglés QuinteroIndoorsummer5.93 × 10−92.79 × 10−64.02 × 10−4
winter7.31 × 10−93.43 × 10−64.96 × 10−4
Outdoorsummer9.99 × 10−94.70 × 10−66.78 × 10−4
winter7.03 × 10−93.30 × 10−64.77 × 10−4
Politécnico QuinteroIndoorsummer7.63 × 10−93.59 × 10−65.18 × 10−4
winter9.43 × 10−94.43 × 10−66.40 × 10−4
Outdoorsummer8.54 × 10−94.02 × 10−65.80 × 10−4
winter1.22 × 10−85.75 × 10−68.30 × 10−4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parra, S.; Bravo, M.A.; Van Drooge, B.L. Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Organic Molecular Tracer Compounds in Dusts Samples from Schools in Puchuncaví and Quintero (Chile). Molecules 2026, 31, 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050818

AMA Style

Parra S, Bravo MA, Van Drooge BL. Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Organic Molecular Tracer Compounds in Dusts Samples from Schools in Puchuncaví and Quintero (Chile). Molecules. 2026; 31(5):818. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050818

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parra, Sonnia, Manuel A. Bravo, and Barend L. Van Drooge. 2026. "Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Organic Molecular Tracer Compounds in Dusts Samples from Schools in Puchuncaví and Quintero (Chile)" Molecules 31, no. 5: 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050818

APA Style

Parra, S., Bravo, M. A., & Van Drooge, B. L. (2026). Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Organic Molecular Tracer Compounds in Dusts Samples from Schools in Puchuncaví and Quintero (Chile). Molecules, 31(5), 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050818

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop