Next Article in Journal
Liquid–Liquid and Vapor–Liquid–Liquid Equilibria of the Alkyl Palmitate + Alkyl–OH + Glycerol Systems at 101.3 kPa—Measurements, Quality Test/Consistency, Thermodynamic Modeling and Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Previous Article in Journal
β-Glucuronidase at the Microbiota—Host Interface: Dual Regulatory Roles and Precision Modulation by Natural Products
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nature-Inspired Enzymatic Cascades: Emerging Strategies for Sustainable Chemistry

by
Eliana Capecchi
1,*,
Elisabetta Tomaino
1,
Giulia Onnelli
1,
Valentina Ubertini
1 and
Raffaele Saladino
2,*
1
Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
2
Department of Chemistry and Technology of Drugs, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2026, 31(4), 603; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040603
Submission received: 9 January 2026 / Revised: 2 February 2026 / Accepted: 3 February 2026 / Published: 9 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Biocatalysis)

Abstract

Enzymatic cascades, defined here as multi-enzymatic sequences operating on a shared reaction pathway and inspired by the spatial and temporal organization of metabolism, have emerged as powerful and versatile tools for sustainable organic synthesis. They minimize intermediate isolation, enhance atom economy and ensure outstanding chemo-, regio- and stereoselectivity, providing efficient alternatives to conventional multistep routes. Here, we highlight the conceptual role of substrate channeling, minimal cells, artificial metabolism and enzyme promiscuity in the translation of enzymatic cascades into synthetic strategies. Special attention is focused on advanced immobilization on functional and renewable supports, which enhance stability and recyclability and introduce new ways for thermodynamic and kinetic control. Hybrid systems integrating enzymes with photocatalysis, electrochemistry and chemical modules expand the catalytic repertoire far beyond biology. Complementary tools in bioinformatics, structural modeling and artificial intelligence may also enable pathway balancing, predictive design and dynamic optimization. Applications span from the valorization of renewable feedstocks to the synthesis of privileged scaffolds and fine chemicals.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In living organisms, enzymatic cascades are a pervasive solution for complex chemical transformations. It is estimated that hundreds of enzymatic cascades operate in central and secondary metabolism, spanning glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle (Krebs cycle), nucleotide biosynthesis and secondary metabolism. Their unique efficiency arises from the spatial and temporal coordination of enzymes, which prevents the accumulation of intermediates, minimizes energy dissipation and ensures chemo-, regio- and stereoselectivity. These properties make enzymatic cascades a powerful source of inspiration for synthetic organic chemistry, where the challenge is to reproduce complex multi-step transformations in a selective and sustainable way. Comprehensive reviews have previously highlighted different aspects of this topic. They include enzymatic cascade applied to industrial challenges, spatial and structural features associated with metabolons [1], one-pot cascades for natural product synthesis [2,3] and artificial cascades [4,5,6]. Despite these studies, a more integrated perspective unifying biological inspiration with practical synthetic applications is still needed. In this context, the heterogenization of enzymes emerges as a crucial enabling tool for the translation of natural efficiency into sustainable catalysis. The immobilization of an enzymatic cascade on functional polymers, nanoparticles and porous matrices enhances enzyme stability, facilitates the recovery of reaction products and allows the system to operate under one-pot conditions with high atom economy [7,8]. This approach has enabled the green synthesis of drugs and bioactive privileged scaffolds, fundamental to modern drug discovery programs [9]. The present review aims to provide a concept-driven perspective on enzymatic cascade design by bridging the evolutionary logic of metabolism with synthetic organic chemistry. Rather than offering a purely descriptive survey of cascade reactions, we focus on how biological organization principles can be translated into rational and transferable catalytic strategies. Within this framework, the present review differs from prior literature by shifting the focus from the cataloging of cascade reactions to the identification of transferable design principles derived from metabolism. By adopting this perspective, enzymatic cascades are discussed as programmable catalytic systems rather than as isolated synthetic tools. We emphasize how minimal cells, artificial metabolism, enzyme promiscuity and hybrid chemoenzymatic systems may converge to efficient enzymatic cascades as scalable synthetic platforms. Special focus will be devoted to thermodynamics and kinetics, advanced immobilization procedures and the use of computational and AI-assisted design. By tracing the continuum from natural to artificial cascades, we outline how evolutionary principles can be reinterpreted to enable sustainable, selective and industrially relevant transformations.

2. Origins of Enzymatic Cascades

Designing cascade reactions with controllable synthetic outcomes, high molecular efficiency and selectivity is one of the great challenges in modern chemistry. Evolution has developed highly efficient solutions to this problem. From prebiotic assemblies to the present day, complex cellular enzymatic cascades have become key tools to manage unstable intermediates, controlling molecular flux and ensuring high selectivity. Minimal cells, first conceived in a prebiotic context, demonstrated that simple vesicles and primitive cofactors could sustain multistep catalysis [10,11]. These insights provide a bridge between abiotic chemistry and metabolism, encompassing the relationships among cofactors, compartmentalization, cell life and replication [12,13]. Similar strategies have been reinterpreted in the laboratory as programmable chemical networks, providing a conceptual and practical way for sustainable transformations [14].

2.1. Cell Metabolism as a Source of Inspiration for Organic Synthesis

The living cell shows how evolution has turned multistep catalysis into efficient enzymatic cascades. Enzymes rarely freely diffuse in solutions: they are confined within complex assemblies that stabilize intermediates, accelerate molecular flux and prevent undesired side reactions [12]. The key mechanism is substrate channeling, involving the direct transfer of intermediates between the enzymes without the necessity of thermodynamic equilibration in the bulk of the solution [15]. Different evolutionary solutions are recurring in the cell. Quantum mechanical intramolecular tunnelling has been proposed to connect the active sites of enzymes, as in the case of tryptophan synthase, where a 2.5 nm hydrophobic channel transfers indole between adjacent catalytic pockets at a rate of >1000 s−1. Electrostatic guidance may steer favorable trajectories for electrically charged intermediates, exemplified by thymidylate synthase-dihydrofolate reductase and malate dehydrogenase-citrate synthase [12]. Covalent swing arms shuttle intermediates in the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, the lipoamide arm transfers acetyl groups and polyketide synthase employs acyl carrier proteins in a modular assembly-line fashion. Finally, spatial and ordered clusters concentrate enzymes in specific microcompartments (Figure 1). Carboxysomes encapsulate RuBisCO and carbonic anhydrase, mitochondrial super complexes align enzymes in the tricarboxylic acid cycle and flavonoid metabolons assemble at the endoplasmic reticulum [13]. Metabolism also reveals constraints: up to 83% of enzymes are inhibited by metabolites structurally related to natural substrates, and organelle compartmentalization evolved as a solution to mitigate self-inhibition [13]. In addition, enzymatic cascades are not static systems, but they are finely regulated through the action of molecular motors, feedback loops and on/off switching mechanisms. Physical and chemical modulators, including allosteric regulators, post-translational modifications and metabolite-driven signaling, continuously tune the enzyme assemblies, ensuring that molecular fluxes are dynamically adapted to the cellular state [16].

2.2. The Minimal Cell

The minimal cell shows that catalytic life-like networks can emerge from simplicity [17]. Pioneered in prebiotic chemistry, minimal cells are described as vesicle-based assemblies where amphiphile molecules, peptides and oligonucleotides act in a combinatorial way to start primitive compartmentalization and informational flow [10]. Recent work has translated these ideas into practical applications. Synthetic minimal cells have been prepared where glucose oxidase and horseradish peroxidase catalyze the polymerization of aniline to polyaniline emeraldine salt (PANI-ES), which spontaneously aggregates into vesicle membranes [18]. Here, the membrane can be viewed as a genotype-like element, encoding the polymer sequence, while PANI-ES feeds back as a phenotype, promoting membrane growth as a synthetic reinterpretation inspired by the central dogma of biology (from nucleic acids to proteins). Primitive cofactors further support this conceptual framework: aromatic heme and Fe–S clusters, plausibly formed under prebiotic conditions as ingredients of the primordial multifunctional organic entity (PriME) [19], confer redox activity when embedded in the membrane, bridging early chemistry with electron-transfer cascades [20]. To overcome protocell fragility, new minimal cells integrate stability and supra molecular communication. Copolymer-stabilized coacervates [21] and multicompartment hydrogels [22] provide selective permeability and robustness, while vesicles equipped with DNA circuits or enzymatic cascades create chemical communication between different receptors, achieving synchronization and the formation of specific reaction patterns [23]. From a practical standpoint, principles derived from minimal cells and metabolon organization have already guided synthetic cascade design through enzyme co-localization, compartmentalization in semi-permeable matrices and diffusion-controlled substrate channeling, enabling efficient and robust one-pot catalytic systems [21]. Thus, the minimal cell is not only a reduced life model but also an envisaged conceptual and technological bridge linking prebiotic chemistry and modern biocatalysis, marking the transition from artificial metabolic networks to feasible natural enzymatic cascades.

2.3. Artificial Metabolism

The translation of minimal cell principles into biotechnology enables programmable synthetic frameworks. Artificial metabolism and semi-artificial networks extend these basic principles, encompassing the efficiency of enzyme catalysis, cascade logic and compartmentalization into cell-free and reprogrammed chemical systems. A striking example is provided by an engineered plasmid encapsulated inside E. coli, which improves enzymatic clustering and the production of bioactive sesquiterpene amorpha-4,11-diene, a precursor of the drug artemisinin [24]. In this system, sequential enzymes mimic the mevalonate pathway, acting as an intrinsic on/off–like switch to regulate metabolic flux. Early milestones include a seven-enzyme cascade based on fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase for asymmetric C–C bond formation [25] and system-level biocatalytic cycles able to interconvert amino acids and keto acids in modular and functional assemblies [26]. Recent studies show how thermostable [4Fe–4S] enzymes, such as glycerate dehydratase, enable non-natural entry points into cascade chemistry [27]. Improved performance often relies on spatial organization. These strategies encompass enzymes co-immobilized on double-layered hydroxides for sugar phosphorylation [28], protein shells and scaffolds boosting flux in vivo [29] and covalent tagging for enhanced terpenoid production in E. coli [30]. In addition, liquid–liquid phase compartmentalization mimics metabolons and improves terpene biosynthesis [31]. Beyond the structural architecture, dynamic control of building block production provides unexpected degrees of freedom in the system: light-responsive protein domains reversibly assemble synthetic organelles in yeast [32], while programmable compartments in bacteria direct phosphoglycosyl transferases with tunable properties [33]. At the microscale, multicompartmental particles produced by gas-shearing may co-localize otherwise incompatible glucose oxidase–catalase cascades reproducing β cell-like behavior in the release of insulin [34]. Artificial metabolism also demonstrates switchable on/off regulation and communication. DNA-based transduction circuits in vesicles enable sender–receiver networks, and vesicle cascades may mimic endocrine-like signaling pathways [35,36]. Biomolecular condensates emerge as programmable platforms where crowding and material properties strongly influence catalysis [37]. Likewise, “mimicomes” combining nanozymes replicate natural complexes with improved stability [38]. The rational assembly of enzymes favored the synthesis of chiral amines, terpenes and alkaloids with high selectivity. In microbial systems, the assembly of enzymes in terpenoid and flavonoid biosynthesis increased the yield of natural substances up to 6.6-fold [39]. Scaffold-free approaches based on short peptide tags such as RIAD/RIDD further enabled modular and tunable assemblies affording carotenoid [40]. The modular assembly of an artificially concise biocatalytic cascade for the manufacture of phenethyl-isoquinoline alkaloids is also reported [41]. These examples clearly illustrate how structural biology, synthetic biology and metabolic engineering may converge to create efficient and flexible synthetic factories. Taken together, artificial metabolism and semi-artificial networks represent an evolutionary continuum: from simple enzyme assemblies to dynamically regulated and communicating scalable systems. By recasting the logic of natural metabolism into modular synthetic frameworks, they provide both a veritable model of life and a versatile platform for sustainable catalysis. Nonetheless, several challenges in scaffold preparation, enzyme stability and long-term functionality remain to be solved in large-scale implementation where catalyst leakage and the costs associated with enzyme purification become critical factors. Future work must therefore focus on optimizing assemblies, balancing confinement and dynamics and integrating hybrid chemoenzymatic strategies to achieve robust and cost-effective platforms for biomanufacturing [42,43].

2.4. Benefits and Challenges of Enzymatic Cascades

Enzymatic cascades are attractive because they reproduce key features of metabolism in simplified settings. Their main benefits lie in the direct transfer of intermediates between enzymes, with reduced diffusion in the bulk solution and the stabilization of unstable molecules, avoiding the need for intermediate isolation and tedious purification steps. This principle, often indicated as “channeling”, underpins the efficiency of complexes such as tryptophan synthase and pyruvate dehydrogenase, where tunnels and covalent swing arms ensure controlled molecular flux [44,45]. However, diffusion phenomena dominate in vitro, and the occurrence of spatial proximity alone rarely improves catalysis, highlighting the very fact that efficiency arises mainly from structural integration rather than from a simple enzyme colocalization (Table 1). A second key message from metabolism is compartmentalization. Organelles and metabolons confine reactions, stabilize intermediates and regulate molecular flux through selective permeability. In vitro, enzymes are diluted, and intermediates are prone to degradation, but confinement strategies such as coacervates, vesicles, protocells and phospholipid membranes create selective barriers that improve cascade robustness [18,46]. Cofactor management represents both a benefit and a challenge. Natural pathways rely on the continuous recycling of cofactors (e.g., NAD(P)H, ATP, and SAM), whereas depletion rapidly halts in vitro cascades. Advances in orthogonal regeneration mimic metabolic cycles with notable successes in terpene biosynthesis [47] and the one-pot production of rare sugar nucleotides at an industrial scale [48]. Yet, the stoichiometric balance and long-term stability remain persistent obstacles [45]. A further dimension is switching on/off regulation, which is a central tool for metabolic control. Feedback inhibition, signaling pathways and temporal programs act as molecular switches that finely tune the molecular flux in the cell. In vitro cascades usually lack such adaptive mechanisms, even if recent work demonstrated that enzymatic logic gates can fuel transient pH cycles [49] and that colloidal oxidase assemblies can catalyze their own disassembly [50]. Additional features reveal both potential and challenges in enzymatic cascade. Protein dynamics, spanning from femtoseconds to seconds, govern substrate binding and transition-state stabilization and product release. Their destabilization outside the cell poses a challenge while remaining a design paradigm for next-generation catalysts [51]. Similarly, long-range electron transfer is efficiently managed by natural membrane complexes (STEAP enzymes), which integrate heme and flavin cofactors in very ordered architectures [52]. Reconstituting such molecular order in artificial systems is difficult and critical for sustaining complex redox cascades. Altogether, the benefits and challenges of enzymatic cascades are summarized in Table 1.

3. Cascade Design

3.1. Assembly and Nanotechnology-Based Supports

The design of an enzymatic cascade on functional materials represents a critical tool in the translation of catalytical biological efficiency into artificial devices. In metabolism, spatial proximity between the enzymes has evolutionary relevance: enzymes are arranged within metabolons, organelles or multienzyme complexes able to channel intermediates with high local control. Artificial systems aim to reproduce this architectural precision, allowing the exploitation of one-pot sequences and high yields, selectivity and atom economy. Two general strategies have emerged for cascade organization. The scaffold-free strategy exploits the intrinsic ability of enzymes to self-assemble [53]. Cross-linked enzyme crystals (CLECs) and enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) are associated with high stability and activity. Gene fusion, in-frame ligation and engineered interaction domains, such as leucine zippers or SpyTag/SpyCatcher modules, further provide modular ways to co-localize activities without the use of exogenous carriers [54,55]. These assemblies enhance catalytic efficiency by promoting substrate channeling, minimize intermediate escape and constrain the enzymes in specific configurations, with applications spanning from terpenoid and flavonoid biosynthesis to the enantioselective synthesis of amino alcohols via redox-neutral cascades, including systems supported on agarose beads [56]. In these systems, the spatial co-localization of enzymes was shown to enhance the cofactor recycling efficiency and shift reaction equilibria, resulting in up to 80% conversion of alcohol into amines. In parallel, the scaffold-based strategy provides external architectures to organize enzymes with nanoscale precision [57]. DNA and RNA nanostructures [58], including three-dimensional DNA origami [59,60,61,62], allow the programmable spacing of oxidases and peroxidases [63], demonstrating how catalytic efficiency depends not only on proximity but also on scaffold continuity and the topology. For instance, a DNA-based hybrid architecture enables the translocation of molecules as small as 0.8 nm in radius with minimal leakage [64]. Protein-based scaffolds, such as cohesin–dockerin complexes and synthetic cellulosomes, replicate natural clustering for cellulose degradation [65]. Synthetic protein scaffolds based on SpyCatcher–SpyTag chemistry further highlight the role of geometry in the control of kinetic parameters, tuning both substrate affinity and reaction turnover [66,67]. In this latter case, the conversion rates are reported to be 2.4-fold higher than those obtained with the corresponding free bi-enzyme systems, alongside improved pH tolerance and temperature stability [67]. The palette of supports and materials has expanded dramatically. Polysaccharides such as alginates [68], chitosan [69], and agarose [70] have been re-engineered in electrospun fibers and gels characterized by dual-stimuli responsive activity in biomedical applications [71]. Agricultural wastes, biochar and renewable materials like lignin nanoparticles (LNPs) provided green and low-cost platforms with remarkable ability to preserve orientation [72,73,74]. For example, LNPs have been applied for the immobilization of peroxidase and glucose oxidase to design novel biosensors for the determination of glucose [75] (Figure 2). In this system, LNPs enabled stable enzyme immobilization and controlled co-localization, resulting in enhanced operational stability, improved signal reproducibility and sustained catalytic activity over repeated measurement cycles compared to the corresponding free-enzyme system. In addition, magnetic nanoparticles [76,77], nanoporous electrodes [78,79,80] and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [81,82,83] have been reported to enable efficient enzyme loading and facile recovery of the catalyst. Particularly striking are polymersome-based catalytic nano-compartments, clustered by DNA linkers into “satellite organelles”, that recreate metabolic communication and improve oxidative cascades [84,85,86,87]. These diverse strategies converge on a central principle: substrate channeling and structural and spatio-temporal regulation [88].

3.2. Thermodynamics, Kinetics and Pathway Balancing

Enzymes anchored on solid supports experience altered enthalpic and entropic contributions and restricted diffusion pathways that affect both ΔG and turnover [89]. These phenomena parallel the logic of heterogeneous catalysis, where adsorption energies and microenvironments dictate activity and selectivity [90] and are equally decisive for the engineering of cascade systems [91,92,93]. In a bulk solution, unfavorable equilibria limit molecular flux, whereas solid supports create microdomains in which intermediates accumulate at high local activities [94]. The co-immobilization of alcohol dehydrogenase, ω-transaminase and alanine dehydrogenase on agarose beads exemplifies this principle via the in situ regeneration of NAD+ and the amine donor. The cascade sustains productive molecular flux that would otherwise collapse, highlighting the role of support as an active thermodynamic modulator [95] (Figure 3). Similar effects have been observed with CLEAs, Combi-CLEAs and magnetic derivatives, where confinement of the system reduced the apparent ΔG, enhanced turnover and provided operational stability across multiple classes of enzymes [53,96,97]. Enzymatic cascades also exhibit kinetic behaviors that deviate from the classical Michaelis–Menten law [98,99], especially in the case of immobilized form [100], where substrate affinity is enhanced. A high enzyme packing density, crowding and electrostatic microdomains lead to nonlinear dependencies in which effective molarity becomes the primary driver of the molecular flux [101]. Modeling redox cascades in vivo has revealed unexpected kinetic bottlenecks, showing that enzyme proximity alone does not guarantee optimal throughput [102]. In phosphorylase-based cascades, substrate inhibition emerged as a major limiting factor, but quantitative kinetic analysis allowed the rational extension of substrate loading and improved yields in the case of polysaccharide transformations [103]. These studies underline that the kinetic framework of cascades must be reinterpreted under conditions of confinement and immobilization. The balance of the pathway adds a further level of complexity, since enzymatic cascades require the precise tuning of stoichiometry, enzyme ratios and cofactor economy [104]. In the convergent cascade of cyclohexanone monooxygenase alcohol dehydrogenase, ε-caprolactone is balanced in both the concentration and cofactor turnover [105]. Integrated kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of a multistep cascade for statin side-chain synthesis revealed that pathway imbalance was the primary reason for yield limitations, and fed-batch strategies were proposed to redistribute the molecular flux [106]. Similarly, a combined modelling and experiment-based approach to farnesyl pyrophosphate production identified ATP as the thermodynamic bottleneck, allowing targeted interventions in cofactor supply [107]. Thus, debottlenecking cascades can be viewed as akin to retrosynthetic planning, where equilibrium constraints and kinetic mismatches must be identified and corrected step by step [108]. Beyond case studies, recent innovations propose generalizable design rules. DNA nanostructures demonstrated that catalytic enhancement follows Sabatier-like “volcano” relationships between the scaffold and the substrate [109,110,111]. This data suggests that the interactions between the enzyme and support can be used to tune and to optimize both kcat/KM and apparent ΔG.

3.3. Enzyme Promiscuity and Noncanonical Reactivities. The Other Side of the Enzymatic Cascade

Enzyme promiscuity refers to the ability of enzymes to catalyze noncanonical reactions and expands the scope of sustainable enzymatic cascades [112,113]. Beyond natural enzyme specificity, promiscuity reveals alternative catalytic landscapes that can be exploited for novel bond-forming strategies [114,115], stereoselective transformations [116,117,118] and hybrid chemoenzymatic routes [119,120]. Unlike a conventional cascade, which emphasizes the optimization of native activities, the exploitation of promiscuity introduces a synthetic flexibility reminiscent of organic chemistry, where reagents are repurposed and reaction manifolds are expanded. In addition, promiscuity can help address challenges related to enzyme availability and cost. A paradigmatic case is that of a lipase-mediated double-faced enzymatic cascade in the synthesis of bioactive chiral flavanones. Two commercially available lipases with distinct promiscuous functions, namely lipase from Porcine pancreas (PPL) catalyzing cross-aldol condensation and lipase from Mucor javanicus (MJL) promoting stereoselective intramolecular oxa-Michael addition, were combined to afford (S)-flavanones in one-pot conditions and good enantiomeric excess (up to 92%). In this way, the use of poorly available and high-cost aldolases and chalcone isomerase was avoided. Immobilization of this enzymatic cascade on lignin nanoparticles via Concanavalin A further improved the overall performance of the enzymes furnishing a reusable and sustainable heterogeneous biocatalyst [121]. Computational docking and molecular dynamics confirmed the structural basis of the stereochemical outcome, highlighting how promiscuity can be rationalized and guided at the molecular level (Figure 4A). A further example of promiscuity in an enzymatic cascade is represented by glycosyltransferase coupled with sucrose synthase, where galactosyltransferase from Neisseria meningitidis (LgtB) revealed unexpected glucose polymerase activity in the formation of β-1,4 glycosidic bonds [122] (Figure 4B). Transformations traditionally confined to organic chemistry have been unlocked through promiscuous activities in enzymatic cascades. The repertoire of promiscuous enzymatic cascades extends into the alkaloid’s synthesis. The Fe (II)/2-oxoglutarate dioxygenase (AsqJ), previously applied for the epoxidation of quinolones [123], enabling cascades that combine enzymatic epoxidation with Lewis-acid promoted rearrangements [124]. This strategy produced gram-scale libraries of viridicatin derivatives (57–91% overall yield) by overcoming the scale-up limitations associated with crude lysates using purified AsqJ, highlighting the practical potential of hybrid enzymatic–chemical cascades for drug discovery (Figure 4C). Finally, styrene oxide isomerase (SOI), which catalyzes the stereospecific Meinwald rearrangement of internal epoxides via 1,2-methyl shifts, coupled with phenylacetaldehyde reductase (PAR) afford (R)-arylpropanols acids and amines with enantiopurity exceeding 97% (Figure 4D).

3.4. Chimera Enzymatic Cascades

Chimera enzymatic cascades combine enzymes with inorganic catalysts, metal complexes or artificial cofactors. These systems integrate the stereoselectivity of enzymes with the broad reactivity of transition metals [126,127]. Early studies used free enzymes together with homogeneous metal catalysts in sequential multi-step protocols. They demonstrated compatibility between these components but often showed low robustness and limited synthetic value [128]. Attempts to create more integrated systems included biphasic conditions [129,130] and the application of surfactants or nanomicelles, which reduced catalyst deactivation and enabled one-pot reactions under milder conditions [131,132,133]. A significant advance came with the development of enzyme–metal hybrid catalysts (EMHCs). In these systems, enzymes are immobilized with polymers [134], combined with metal nanoparticles [135], or incorporated into metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [136]. Immobilization protects enzymes from deactivation by reactive metal species and brings both catalysts into spatial proximity, creating confined environments where cooperative reactivity can occur. One representative example involves lipases co-localized with gold catalysts encapsulated in tetrahedral gallium clusters. This arrangement allowed the synthesis of enantioenriched tetrahydrofurans in high yields, while encapsulation prevented deactivation of the gold catalyst by the enzyme [137]. Simpler and more cost-effective solutions have been realized through Pd/CALB nanohybrids, where lipase B from Candida antarctica (CALB) was immobilized on the amphiphilic polymer Pluronic F-127. The polymer creates a nanoreactor that stabilizes ultrasmall Pd clusters [138]. These hybrids perform the dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) of racemic amines with high efficiency: the Pd clusters catalyze racemization of the undesired enantiomer, while CALB selectively acylates the preferred one. The result is the formation of enantiopure amides in quantitative yield and with enantiomeric excess above 99% under mild conditions (Figure 5). The concept was further developed in Pd/CALB cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs). In these materials, the enzyme and Pd species are confined within cross-linked aggregates, which improves stability and allows repeated use. The design significantly enhanced productivity, reaching space–time yields reported to be up to five orders of magnitude higher than conventional preparation methods [139].

3.5. Analytical, Bioinformatic and AI Tools for Enzymatic Cascades

The emergence of advanced analytical, computational and AI-assisted tools is reshaping enzymatic cascade design. These approaches are not auxiliary but represent a core methodology, integrating thermodynamics, kinetics and reaction pathway balancing with predictive accuracy [140,141]. Nanopore sensing, for example, has been applied to resolve, in real time, the concentration–time profiles of substrates, intermediates and products in three-enzyme cascades, distinguishing molecular flux driven by bulk diffusion from confined transfer processes [142,143]. Complementary advances include broadband mid-infrared spectroscopy based on quantum cascade lasers [144] and fluorescence-based probes [145], which extend the classical kinetic toolbox into real-time, high-resolution readouts of enzyme dynamics. At the computational level, bioinformatic pipelines are increasingly used to design balanced and convergent cascade architectures. The recently introduced SubNetX software identifies subnetworks that integrate cofactors, byproducts and thermodynamic constraints within genome-scale metabolic models, generating synthetic routes that mirror the logic of convergent organic synthesis [146]. Sequence-based predictors such as EP-pred accelerate the discovery of broad-scope esterases for chemo- and stereoselective trans-formations [147]. Molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulations have been employed to rationalize the stereoselectivity in enzymatic cascades. A notable case is the double-face promiscuous lipase cascade leading to (S)-flavanones, where docking studies of chalcone intermediates into the active site of lipase revealed the contribution of conserved residues in stabilizing the S-ring-closure pathway. This computational workflow, from database analysis to docking prediction, together with representative enzyme–substrate interactions, is illustrated in Figure 6 [121]. These approaches explain stereoselectivity but also inform about the quality of the immobilization strategy, directly linking silico predictions to experimental implementation. Artificial intelligence further expands these capabilities. Bayesian Optimization (BO) has emerged as a powerful framework for bioprocess design, enabling the simultaneous optimization of solvents, cofactors, enzyme ratios and immobilization parameters in complex cascades [148]. Compared to classical design-of-experiment strategies, BO accelerates discovery, reduces the experimental burden and accommodates multi-objective trade-offs, such as the yield versus E-factor or stereoselectivity versus productivity. From a process-engineering perspective, enzymatic cascades are inherently difficult to optimize because their performance depends on the simultaneous adjustment of multiple interdependent variables, including the enzyme ratios, cofactor regeneration rates, substrate concentrations, pH, temperature and reaction time. In practical cascade operation, mismatched kinetics between individual steps often result in intermediate accumulation, product inhibition and suboptimal space–time yields, ultimately limiting overall throughput [149]. Data-driven optimization strategies provide a practical route to address these constraints by directly operating on experimentally accessible process variables. Bayesian optimization frameworks have been applied to ATP-dependent enzyme cascades to iteratively tune enzyme loadings and cofactor concentrations, achieving higher specific activities and complete product conversion with a limited number of experiments, in some cases outperforming reference systems based on stoichiometric cofactor addition [150]. Such approaches enable the efficient identification of operating windows that balance reaction rates and cofactor economy without requiring detailed mechanistic models.

4. Application of Enzymatic Cascades

4.1. Redox Cascades

Redox cascades combine oxidative enzymes for the activation of primary oxidants such as hydrogen peroxide, organic peroxides and dioxygen, in some cases associated with the presence of redox cofactors. Recent advances emphasized how redox cascades can transform alcohols, alkenes and ketones into complex chiral scaffolds useful for applications in pharmaceuticals, fragrances and sustainable polymers [151,152]. Advances in this topic encompass the cofactor balance, stabilization of reactive intermediates, stereo-divergence, implementation of modular minimal systems, control of the oxidant supply and generalizable toolboxes and protein engineering in unconventional solvents [153]. A first representative example is the cascade composed of alcohol dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus kefir (LK-ADH), enoate reductase from Pseudomonas putida (XenB) and cyclohexanone monooxygenase from Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (CHMO), which transforms racemic 2-cyclohexenol into ε-caprolactone [154]. This redox cascade shows that the NADPH/NADP+ balance emerges as the kinetic bottleneck. Alcohol oxidase from Colletotrichum graminicola (CgrAlcOx) coupled to Old Yellow Enzymes transforms geraniol into menthol with high stereoselective control [155,156]. The control in the delivery of primary oxidants is exemplified by alcohol oxidase (AOx) from Pichia pastoris coupled with peroxygenase from Agrocybe aegerita (rAaeUPO) [157]. In this latter case, AOx oxidizes methanol releasing H2O2 in situ, which sustains the successive rAaeUPO-catalyzed hydroxylation of ethylbenzene to (R)-1-phenylethanol with enantiomeric excess above 99% and reported turnover numbers above 46,000. A complementary strategy was reported employing formate oxidase from Aspergillus oryzae (AoFOx) for the oxidation of methanol, formaldehyde or formate with reported total turnover numbers of 49,000 [158]. The combination between enoate reductases (EREDs) and Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenases (BVMOs) illustrates the topic of stereodivergence and regiodivergence. In this cascade, EREDs reduce (R)- and (S)-carvone to cis- and trans-dihydrocarvone, respectively, which are subsequently oxidized by BVMOs to yield canonical or non-canonical carvolactones [159]. This sequence achieves yields up to 76% with diastereomeric and enantiomeric excess values above 99%. The robustness of the redox cascade can be improved by combining enzyme engineering with specific solvents. Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and cyclohexanone monooxygenase (CHMO) linked by an oligonucleotide linker catalyze the oxidation of cyclohexanol to ε-caprolactone with internal NADPH recycling [160]. In a deep eutectic solvent (DES) composed of betaine and glycerol, the redox cascade displayed higher thermostability, preventing product hydrolysis and maintaining ~97% yields even at high substrate loading. Redox cascades have been also extended to the synthesis of heterocycles. The combination of oxidase (AcCO6) with bifunctional imine reductases (IREDs/RedAms) enables sequential oxidation and the reductive amination step of amine derivatives, affording piperidines, azepanes and 2,5-disubstituted pyrrolidines [161]. The stereochemical outcome was dependent on the IRED variant, opening a one-pot way to a large panel of derivatives with high biological activity. Examples of applications of supported redox cascades in biomedicine are also reported, mainly focused on the localized generation of reactive oxygen species for therapeutic purposes [75,162,163,164]. The immobilization of redox cascades on functional supports can further improve the efficacy of the transformation, especially in the case in which the support furnishes a contribution to the reaction. For example, the one-pot synthesis of bioactive hydroxytyrosol esters from tyrosol and long chain carboxylic acids has been reported using a cascade based on the combination of lipase from Mucor javanicus and tyrosinase from Agaricus bisporous. To avoid the formation of undesired quinones as side products, ascorbic acid was used as a redox additive [165]. Notably, the use of ascorbic acid was subsequently avoided through the design of redox active support based on lignin nanoparticles containing melanin. Under this experimental condition, the formation of quinones was inhibited by the reductive effect of the melanin component [166]. A schematic comparison between these redox cascades is reported in Figure 7.

4.2. Photo Biocatalytic Cascades

Photocatalysis coupled with biocatalysis recently emerged as an advanced frontier in organic synthesis, enabling the design of an enzymatic cascade in which photon-driven processes are connected to multi-enzymatic transformations [167,168,169]. Photocatalysis alone has long been recognized as a versatile tool for C–C and C-N bond formation [170,171,172,173], C–H activation [174,175], oxy-functionalization [176,177] and carbon dioxide reduction [178,179]. The integration of photocatalysis with an enzymatic cascade provided access to novel stereoselective and highly regio specific transformations that would be difficult to achieve otherwise [180,181,182]. Within this framework, photo biocatalytic cascades represent a powerful strategy. A recurring motif in this system is the photocatalytic regeneration of cofactors, such as nicotinamide derivatives (NADH or NADPH), which in turn sustain the oxidoreductase cascade [183,184,185]. One of the first examples of photo biocatalytic cascade is the stereoconvergent reduction of E/Z mixtures of alkenes [186]. Ene-reductase (ERED) is regenerated in the presence of glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) and is able to recycle NADPH. The photo-driven E/Z photoisomerization ensures that both geometrical isomers of the starting materials are transformed into a common intermediate. This combined strategy converts a mixture of stereoisomers of olefins into a single enantiomerically enriched product, thus overcoming the major limitation of the simple biocatalytic step (Figure 8A). A similar approach was applied in the dynamic kinetic resolution of β-substituted ketones [187], in which case, the initial photochemical transformation generates planar radical intermediates, enabling the racemization of otherwise stable stereocenters. In combination with ketoreductases (KREDs) and GDH, this transformation resulted in a fully integrated photoenzymatic dynamic kinetic resolution, where the enzymes reduced one enantiomer and the photocatalytic cycle replenished the racemic pool (Figure 8B). In addition, the photooxidation of alcohols and alkanes to corresponding ketones was realized using sodium anthraquinone sulfonate (SAS), followed by the action of hydroxynitrile lyases (HNLs), benzaldehyde lyases (BALs), aminotransferases (ATAs), ketoreductases (KREDs), ene-reductases (EREDs) and Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenases (CHMOs), in combination with GDH for the regeneration of the cofactor [188]. Rather than defining a single fixed sequence, this approach illustrates a flexible toolkit, where the same photochemical initiation step feeds into multiple biocatalytic cascades depending on the target transformation. In all cases, the resulting one-pot processes deliver enantioenriched products with excellent stereoselectivity and scalability.
The biocatalytic and photocatalytic transformations may also be inverted [189]. For example, oleate hydratase (FAH) and fatty acid photodecarboxylase from Chlorella variabilis (CvFAP) were combined to achieve stereoselective hydration of the fatty acid double bond, followed by blue-light-driven CvFAP-catalyzed photodecarboxylation of the terminal carboxyl group, yielding enantioenriched secondary alcohols (Figure 9A). As an alternative, 5,8-diol synthase (AnDS) from Aspergillus nidulans was applied to hydroxylate the double bond, followed by CvFAP-mediated photodecarboxylation, yielding optically pure diols (Figure 9B). In both sequences, CvFAP provides the crucial light-driven step. The same photo biocatalytic cascade was applied in a process demonstrated at preparative scale for biodiesel production where process intensification through internal illumination enabled dramatic rate enhancement and efficient photon utilization. While this strategy allowed seamless scale-up to industrially relevant reactor volumes, it also revealed enzyme operational stability as a key bottleneck, with CvFAP turnover numbers remaining below 9000 under process conditions, highlighting the need for improved catalyst robustness in long-term operation [190].
Recent work has further expanded the scope of photo biocatalytic cascades through the integration of a chemical step (Figure 10). For example, cyclic amine has been photochemically oxidized by decatungstate-mediated hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) (Step I) followed by in situ chemical Boc protection (Step II) and successive treatment with ketoreductase (KRED) or aminotransferase (ATA) using glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) to supply NAD(P)H for cofactor regeneration (Step III) [191]. Although this system does not constitute a multi-enzyme cascade in the strict sense, since only one enzyme is operative beyond the auxiliary GDH, it exemplifies the maturity of photo biocatalytic one-pot strategies.

4.3. Electro Biocatalytic Cascades

Electro biocatalytic cascades are systems in which enzymes are combined with electrochemical devices integrating the enzymatic cascade with fine control performed by the electrochemical devices [192,193,194]. Pioneering examples of biocatalysis coupled with electrochemical devices are usually referred to single-enzyme devices [195,196]. Next, electro biocatalytic cascades relied on the combination of two or more enzymes, as for example the case of diaphorase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (DH), (S)-specific alcohol dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus kefir (AdhS) and a mutant halohydrin dehalogenase from Agrobacterium radiobacter (HHDH) coupled with the electrochemical regeneration of NADH (Figure 11) [197]. This electro biocatalytic cascade was applied in the asymmetric synthesis of β-hydroxy nitriles that are valuable intermediates in the synthesis of bioactive statins. In this framework, DH was immobilized on the electrode surface (bioelectrode), while the two resting enzymes were in the bulk of the solution. In the first step, electrochemical regeneration of NADH at the bioelectrode sustained the AdhS-catalyzed reduction of ethyl 4-chloroacetoacetate (COBE) to (S)-4-chloro-3-hydroxybutanoate (S)-CHBE. Successively, (S)-CHBE was transformed into (R)-ethyl-4-cyano-3-hydroxybutyrate (R)-CHCN by HHDH. A further level of complexity was introduced through the design of a four-enzyme cascade composed by nitrogenase, diaphorase (DI), L-alanine dehydrogenase (AlaDH) and ω-transaminase (HN-ωTA). This cascade was applied in the synthesis of optically pure chiral amines, including bioactive (R)-1-methyl-3-phenylpropylamine [198]. In this latter case, NADH was regenerated electrochemically via the reduction of methyl viologen, which was performed as electron shuttle from the electrode to the enzymatic machinery.
The immobilization strategy has been applied to enhance enzyme stability and reusability in an electro biocatalytic cascade while increasing the local concentration of the cofactor, ultimately leading to higher faradaic efficiency [199]. A representative case of this system is the co-immobilization of ferredoxin–NADP+ reductase (FNR) and crotonyl-CoA carboxylase/reductase (Ccr) on a redox-active hydrogel of viologen-modified poly (vinyl alcohol) [200]. In this system, NADPH regeneration is mediated by the redox-active support and facilitates the regio- and stereoselective formation of (2S)-ethylmalonyl-CoA with a faradaic efficiency of 92%. A more advanced strategy included examples of nanoconfinement [201], as in the case of the ordered co-immobilization of ferredoxin–NADP+ reductase (FNR) and NADPH-dependent partner enzymes inside mesoporous indium tin oxide (ITO) electrodes. The confined architecture, named electrochemical leaf (e-Leaf), not only sustains continuous NADPH regeneration but also creates a microenvironment that enhances enzyme activity and cascade efficiency (Figure 12). The e-leaf tool was further applied in the interconversion between aspartate and pyruvate and in the reduction of carboxylic acid to the corresponding aldehyde. Electro biocatalytic cascades dedicated to CO2 reduction merit special attention due to the implications in environmental challenges [202]. One example is the application of the electro-driven reductive glycine pathway, in which formate dehydrogenase and tetrahydrofolate-dependent enzymes were combined with the electrochemical recycling of NADH, enabling the conversion of CO2 and ammonia into glycine [203]. Another environmental-relevant strategy included the application of inorganic catalysts for the initial electroreduction of CO2 to formate and CO, followed by enzymatic cascades to transform these intermediates into high-value building blocks for fine organic synthesis [204]. Semi-artificial photosynthesis is produced when electro biocatalysis is coupled with natural photosystems. A prominent example is represented by the Z-scheme architecture in which the photosystem II (PSII) is linked to a tungsten-dependent formate dehydrogenase (FDH) via a dye-sensitized TiO2 electrode. In this configuration, the oxidation of water driven by PSII supplies electrons for the reductive conversion of CO2 to formate [205].

4.4. Synthesis of Privileged Bioactive Scaffolds

Remarkable progress in the industrial application of multienzymatic cascades has been reported in the last years. Landmark cases include the route to sitagliptin, atorvastatin and pregabalin [206,207]. In addition, nucleoside analogues such as islatravir, molnupiravir and vidarabine have been prepared via biocatalytic cascades, avoiding extensive protecting-group manipulations and hazardous reagents. These results demonstrate that biocatalysis is not confined to proof-of-concept studies, but it is delivering scalable and sustainable solutions for pharmaceutical manufacturing [208]. Despite these technological advances, access to privileged bioactive scaffolds remains limited. Drug development from natural products is often constrained by the low abundance of these compounds in medicinal plants and by the limited structural complexity and diversity. Attention has therefore been devoted to alkaloid frameworks and benzoxazinoid scaffolds, which are recognized molecular frameworks in library design and drug discovery [209,210,211]. In the framework of alkaloid synthesis, cascade strategies have recently been developed to access structurally complex tetrahydroisoquinoline and quinoline derivatives. A three-enzyme cascade composed of ene-reductase, nitroreductase and imine reductase enabled the stereoselective synthesis of chiral 2-substituted tetrahydroquinolines (Figure 13, pathway A) [212]. A modular seven-enzyme cascade including three distinct methyltransferases afforded a panel of methylated norcoclaurine derivatives in high enantiomeric excess, effectively mimicking the Pictet–Spengler pathway of norcoclaurine synthase (Figure 13, pathway B) [213]. More recently, a six-enzyme cascade integrating carboxylic acid reductase, norcoclaurine synthase, methyltransferases, berberine bridge enzyme and scoulerine 9-O-methyltransferase was engineered to produce protoberberine alkaloids. This system was developed at the gram-scale, following targeted pathway and enzyme engineering to mitigate typical scale-up limitations, and further extended to unnatural halogenated derivatives, underscoring its industrial potential (Figure 13, pathway C) [214]. Additionally, a modular chemoenzymatic cascade was established for the diastereo- and enantioselective synthesis of 1,3-disubstituted tetrahydroisoquinolines, in which the first stereocenter was introduced by a transaminase/acylation step and the second stereocenter by imine reductase, thus enabling divergent access to cis- and trans-isomers (Figure 13, pathway D) [215].
In the synthesis of the benzoxazinoid scaffold, a cascade composed of imine reductases (IREDs) and glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) enabled the stereoselective formation of benzo-fused seven-membered N-heterocycles. 2,4-Disubstituted 1,5-benzodiazepines were obtained in one-pot conditions from 1,2-phenylenediamines and 1,3-diketones, via imine formation followed by IRED-catalyzed reduction. The method afforded excellent yields and stereocontrol (>99% ee and de), demonstrating that free-enzyme cascades provide access to complex benzoxazinoid scaffolds. Comparable frameworks have also been achieved using heterogeneous and recyclable multienzymatic cascades [216]. A coherent retrosynthetic strategy suggests the construction of benzoxazinoid scaffolds from simple phenolic and amino acid precursors. The key disconnection involves an electrophilic catechol-derived quinone, followed by intramolecular annulation to close the lactone and/or lactam rings. This concept has been implemented through a heterogeneous, lipase/tyrosinase system co-immobilized on lignin nanoparticles (NOL/LTs) that operate under one-pot conditions. The cascade sequence involves tyrosinase-catalyzed ortho-hydroxylation, the 1,6-Michael addition of α-amino acid methyl esters and lipase-mediated lactonization, affording 1,4-benzoxazines with high atom economy (Figure 14A). The immobilized biocatalyst is stable and recyclable over multiple runs, ensuring robustness and sustainability. Variation in amino acid esters and carboxylic acids further expands the chemical space of benzoxazines [217]. Extension of the same strategy to phenolic acid esters led to tricyclic benzoxazines, where the presence of two methoxy groups promotes sequential lactonization and the formation of a lactam ring in a telescoped process (Figure 14B). Systematic tuning of the phenolic side-chain length modulates the size and geometry of the additional ring, offering a clear demonstration of scaffold morphing through substituent editing. Switching from α- to β-amino acid esters directs the cascade towards the formation of seven-membered lactones, yielding benzoxazepines. This transformation broadens the structural diversity accessible within the same immobilized platform, thus establishing a unified and sustainable route to both benzoxazines and benzoxazepines, with direct implications for scaffold-based library design and medicinal chemistry [218].

5. Conclusions

Enzymatic cascades inspired by metabolism evolved from conceptual models into operational technologies that fully permeate synthetic chemistry. From prebiotic protocells to engineered artificial metabolism, these systems embody the translation of life’s organizational principles—compartmentalization, substrate channeling and dynamic feedback—into controllable and sustainable synthetic tools. Advances in immobilization and the design of functional nanostructured supports, ranging from renewable biopolymers to conductive and photoactive organic–inorganic hybrids, enhance long-term enzyme stability, improve kinetic and thermodynamic profiles and integrate with redox, photo- and electrochemical modules. Together, these achievements define a coherent framework in which enzymatic cascades are no longer considered as isolated bio-transformations, but they become nodes of programmable catalytic networks. The emerging convergence among biocatalysis and material science, artificial intelligence and systems chemistry offers a new paradigm: cascades as adaptive and evolvable systems. Machine-learning algorithms and molecular-level simulations assist in predicting enzyme combinations, balancing cofactor turnover and optimizing spatial arrangements, while micro- and nanoscale confinement brings thermodynamic control comparable to that occurring in living cells. At the same time, hybrid chimera cascades merging enzymes with metal catalysts, photoactive semiconductors and electroactive polymers expand the chemical space far beyond biology, paving the way toward multifunctional platforms capable of performing C–C and C–N bond formations under mild and green conditions. Importantly, the examples discussed throughout this review also highlight the practical constraints that emerge upon scale-up. While several cascades have reached gram-scale production through targeted pathway and enzyme engineering, improved expression and stability or the judicious separation of enzymatic and chemical steps, large-scale implementation remains challenged by catalyst leakage, enzyme deactivation, cofactor economy and the costs associated with protein purification. In this context, data-driven optimization and AI-assisted process control emerge as enabling tools to rationally address kinetic bottlenecks, stoichiometric imbalances and dynamic instability during cascade operation, supporting the transition from laboratory-scale demonstrations to robust and scalable biocatalytic processes. Within this framework, a comparative perspective on external energy inputs becomes increasingly relevant. Photo-driven enzymatic cascades are particularly advantageous when light-induced reactivity and spatiotemporal control enable selective transformations that are difficult to access under purely enzymatic or electrochemical conditions. Electro-driven cascades, in contrast, provide precise control over redox potential and cofactor recycling, often translating into higher energy efficiency, operational robustness and scalability. Rather than representing alternative solutions, photo- and electro-biocatalytic strategies should be regarded as complementary tools whose selection depends on the energetic, selectivity and process requirements of the target cascade. In the coming years, the field will likely move from proof-of-concept demonstrations to effective modular bio-manufacturing, where artificial metabolism is embedded into flow reactors, polymeric matrices and bio-electronic devices for the continuous production of fine chemicals, pharmaceuticals and renewable intermediates. Key challenges remain in enzyme stabilization and viability, cofactor economy and the dynamic control of molecular reaction flux. Addressing these challenges will require the tighter integration of bioinformatics, structural modelling and process engineering, enabling cascades that can self-regulate, adapt and communicate in response to specific environmental inputs. Ultimately, enzymatic cascades represent more than a synthetic methodology; they embody the chemical continuity between life’s origin and modern catalysis. By embracing this continuity, future research can transform cascade catalysis into a unifying platform for green chemistry, capable of connecting biocatalysis, photocatalysis and electrocatalysis within a single, nature-inspired technological vision.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.C. and R.S.; methodology, E.C.; software, E.T.; validation, E.T., V.U. and G.O.; formal analysis, G.O.; investigation, G.O.; writing—original draft preparation, R.S. and E.C.; writing—review and editing, E.C. and R.S.; supervision, R.S.; project administration, E.C. and R.S.; funding acquisition, R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

E.C. acknowledges Progetto ECS Rome Technopole-PNRR Missione 4 Componente 2 Investimento 1.5, finanziato dall’Unione Europea-Next Generation EU. R.S. acknowledges the project “Polyphenols Inspired photo-biocatalytic nanoplatform for the ValOrization of wasTes” (PIVOT’); JOINT RESEARCH UNIT (JRU) IBISBA-IT 2024 CUP B83C19014550005.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Quin, M.B.; Wallin, K.K.; Zhang, G.; Schmidt-Dannert, C. Spatial organization of multi-enzyme biocatalytic cascades. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 4260–4271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yi, J.; Li, Z. Artificial multi-enzyme cascades for natural product synthesis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022, 78, 102831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kröll, S.; Niemeye, C.M. Nucleic Acid-based Enzyme Cascades—Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202314452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Qiao, Y.; Ma, W.; Zhang, S.; Guo, F.; Liu, K.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xin, F.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, M. Artificial multi-enzyme cascades and whole-cell transformation for bioconversion of C1 compounds: Advances, challenge and perspectives. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2023, 8, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nazor, J.; Liu, J.; Huisman, G. Enzyme evolution for industrial biocatalytic cascades. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 69, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jiang, C.; Cheng, G.; Xu, F.; Wu, Q. One Pot Enzyme-Catalyzed Cascade Benefit Systems. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem. 2021, 18, 282–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hwang, E.T.; Lee, S. Multienzymatic Cascade Reactions via Enzyme Complex by Immobilization. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 4402–4425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ijaz, U.; Nadeem, H.U.; Shafique, A.; Rasheed, A.; Batool, R.; Azeem, F. Rice bran composition and its emerging potential applications. In Green Sustainable Process for Chemical and Environmental Engineering and Science, 1st ed.; Inamuddin, Boddula, R., Asiri, A.M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  9. Benítez-Mateos, A.I.; Roura Padrosa, D.; Paradisi, F. Multistep enzyme cascades as a route towards green and sustainable pharmaceutical syntheses. Nat. Chem. 2022, 14, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kurisu, M.; Imai, M. Concepts of a synthetic minimal cell: Information molecules, metabolic pathways, and vesicle reproduction. Biophys. Physicobiol. 2023, 21, e210002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Luisi, P.L.; Ferri, F.; Stano, P. Approaches to semi-synthetic minimal cells: A review. Sci. Nat. 2006, 93, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wheeldon, I.; Minteer, S.D.; Banta, S.; Barton, S.C.; Atanassov, P.; Sigman, M. Substrate channelling as an approach to cascade reactions. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alam, M.T.; Olin-Sandoval, V.; Stincone, A.; Keller, M.A.; Zelezniak, A.; Luisi, B.F.; Ralser, M. The self-inhibitory nature of metabolic networks and its alleviation through compartmentalization. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 16018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stano, P. Synthetic biology of minimal living cells: Primitive cell models and semi-synthetic cells. Syst. Synth. Biol. 2010, 4, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kondrat, S.; Von Lieres, E. Mechanisms and Effects of Substrate Channelling in Enzymatic Cascades. Methods Mol. Biol. 2022, 2487, 27–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ojeda-May, P.; UI Mushtaq, A.; Rogne, P.; Verma, A.; Ovchinnikov, V.; Grundström, C.; Dulko-Smith, B.; Sauer, U.H.; Wolf-Watz, M.; Nam, K. Dynamic Connection between Enzymatic Catalysis and Collective Protein Motions. Biochemistry 2021, 60, 2246–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xavier, J.C.; Patil, K.R.; Rocha, I. Systems biology perspectives on minimal and simpler cells. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014, 78, 487–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kurisu, M.; Katayama, R.; Sakuma, Y.; Kawakatsu, T.; Walde, P.; Imai, M. Synthesising a minimal cell with artificial metabolic pathways. Commun. Chem. 2023, 6, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. d’Ischia, M.; Manini, P.; Martins, Z.; Remusat, L.; O’D Alexander, C.M.; Puzzarini, C.; Barone, V.; Saladino, R. Insoluble organic matter in chondrites: Archetypal melanin-like PAH-based multifunctionality at the origin of life? Phys. Life Rev. 2021, 37, 65–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rossetto, D.; Cvjetan, N.; Walde, P.; Mansy, S.S. Protocellular Heme and Iron−Sulfur Clusters. Acc. Chem. Res. 2024, 57, 2293–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mason, A.F.; Buddingh’, B.C.; Williams, D.S.; van Hest, J.C.M. Hierarchical Self-Assembly of a Copolymer-Stabilized Coacervate Protocell. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 17309–17312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tan, H.; Guo, S.; Dinh, N.-D.; Luo, R.; Jin, L.; Chen, C.-H. Heterogeneous multi-compartmental hydrogel particles as synthetic cells for incompatible tandem reactions. ChemCatChem 2023, 15, e202300346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fujiwara, K.; Morita, M.; Kawamata, I.; Kawagishi, Y.; Sakai, A.; Murayama, Y.; Nomura, S.M.; Murata, S.; Takinoue, M.; Yanagisawa, M. DNA cytoskeleton for stabilizing artificial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 7228–7233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Newman, J.D.; Marshall, J.; Chang, M.; Nowroozi, F.; Paradise, E.; Pitera, D.; Newman, K.L.; Keasling, J.D. High-level production of amorpha-4,11-diene in a two-phase partitioning bioreactor of metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 95, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fessner, W.-D.; Walter, C. “Artificial Metabolisms” for the Asymmetric One-Pot Synthesis of Branched-Chain Saccharides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1992, 31, 614–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tessaro, D.; Pollegioni, L.; Piubelli, L.; D’Arrigo, P.; Servi, S. Systems Biocatalysis: An Artificial Metabolism for Interconversion of Functional Groups. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1604–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sutiono, S.; Knoll, M.; Aslan, S.; Richter, M.; Sieber, V. Enabling the Direct Enzymatic Dehydration of D-Glycerate to Pyruvate as the Key Step in Synthetic Enzyme Cascades Used in the Cell-Free Production of Fine Chemicals. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 13248–13260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mahdi, R.; Guérard-Hélaine, C.; Prévot, V.; de Berardinis, V.; Forano, C.; Lemaire, M. Design of Artificial Metabolisms in Layered Nanomaterials for the Enzymatic Synthesis of Phosphorylated Sugars. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 3110–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, H.; DeLoache, W.C.; Dueber, J.E. Spatial organization of enzymes for metabolic engineering. Metab. Eng. 2012, 14, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qu, J.; Cao, S.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wang, R.; Kang, W.; Ma, T.; Zhang, L.; Liu, T.; Au, S.W.-N.; et al. Synthetic Multienzyme Complexes, Catalytic Nanomachineries for Cascade Biosynthesis In Vivo. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 9895–9906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Wei, Q.; Wu, W.; He, Y.; Gao, J.; Zhou, R.; Jiang, L.; Qu, J.; Xia, J. Phase-Separated Multienzyme Compartmentalization for Terpene Biosynthesis in a Prokaryote. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202203909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhao, E.M.; Suek, N.; Wilson, M.Z.; Dine, E.; Pannucci, N.L.; Gitai, Z.; Avalos, J.L.; Toettcher, J.E. Light-based control of metabolic flux through assembly of synthetic organelles. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2019, 15, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lukose, V.; Walvoort, M.T.C.; Imperiali, B. Bacterial phosphoglycosyl transferases: Initiators of glycan biosynthesis at the membrane interface. Glycobiology 2017, 27, 820–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Qu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Ravanbakhsh, H.; Tang, G.; Zhang, J.; Deng, Y.; Braeckmans, K.; De Smedt, S.C.; Xiong, R.; Huang, C. Gas-shearing synthesis of core–shell multicompartmental microparticles as cell-like system for enzymatic cascade reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 428, 132607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aufinger, L.; Simmel, F.C. Establishing Communication between Artificial Cells. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 7183–7190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Buddingh’, B.C.; Elzinga, J.; van Hest, J.C.M. Intercellular communication between artificial cells by allosteric amplification of a molecular signal. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. André, A.A.M.; Spruijt, E. Toward Design Principles for Biomolecular Condensates for Metabolic Pathways. Adv. Biol. 2025, 9, 2200294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cao, H.; Jiang, J.; Chen, L.; Gao, L. Mimicomes: Mimicking Multienzyme System by Artificial Design. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024, 14, 2402372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, M.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Han, Y.; Xia, J. Synthetic Multienzyme Assemblies for Natural Product Biosynthesis. ChemBioChem 2023, 24, e202200518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kang, W.; Ma, T.; Liu, M.; Qu, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Shi, B.; Fu, S.; Ma, J.; Lai, L.T.F.; et al. Modular enzyme assembly for enhanced cascade biocatalysis and metabolic flux. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gao, Y.; Li, F.; Luo, Z.; Deng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Liu, C.; Rao, Y. Modular assembly of an artificially concise biocatalytic cascade for the manufacture of phenethylisoquinoline alkaloids. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wei, X.; Han, P.; You, C. Facilitation of cascade biocatalysis by artificial multi-enzyme complexes—A review. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 28, 2799–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kracher, D.; Kourist, R. Recent developments in compartmentalization of chemoenzymatic cascade reactions. Curr. Opin. Green Sust. Chem. 2021, 32, 100538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Schmidt, S.; Castiglione, K.; Kourist, R. Overcoming the Incompatibility Challenge in Chemoenzymatic and Multi-Catalytic Cascade Reactions. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 1755–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mordhorst, S.; Andexer, J.N. Round, round we go—Strategies for enzymatic cofactor regeneration. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2020, 37, 1081–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fracassi, A.; Seoane, A.; Brea, R.J.; Lee, H.-G.; Harjung, A.; Devaraj, N.K. Abiotic lipid metabolism enables membrane plasticity in artificial cells. Nat. Chem. 2025, 17, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bat-Erdene, U.; Billingsley, J.M.; Turner, W.C.; Lichman, B.R.; Ippoliti, F.M.; O’Connor, S.E.; Tang, Y. Cell-Free Total Biosynthesis of Plant Terpene Natural Products Using an Orthogonal Cofactor Regeneration System. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 9898−9903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Meisner, J.; Li, W.; Luo, Y.; Wei, F.; Wen, L. Cofactor-Driven Cascade Reactions Enable the Efficient Preparation of Sugar Nucleotides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202115696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fan, X.; Walther, A. pH Feedback Lifecycles Programmed by Enzymatic Logic Gates Using Common Foods as Fuels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 11398–11405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sharma, C.; Walther, A. Self-Regulating Colloidal Co-Assemblies That Accelerate Their Own Destruction via Chemo-Structural Feedback. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202201573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kohen, A. Role of Dynamics in Enzyme Catalysis: Substantial versus Semantic Controversies. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 48, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Oosterheert, W.; Reis, J.; Gros, P.; Mattevi, A. An Elegant Four-Helical Fold in NOX and STEAP Enzymes Facilitates Electron Transport across Biomembranes—Similar Vehicle, Different Destination. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 1969–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sheldon, R.A. CLEAs, Combi-CLEAs and ‘Smart’ Magnetic CLEAs: Biocatalysis in a Bio-Based Economy. Catalysts 2019, 9, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gao, X.; Yang, S.; Zhao, C.; Ren, Y.; Wei, D. Artificial multienzyme supramolecular device: Highly ordered self-assembly of oligomeric enzymes in vitro and in vivo. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 14027–14030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, G.; Quin, M.B.; Schmidt-Dannert, C. Self-Assembling Protein Scaffold System for Easy in Vitro Coimmobilization of Biocatalytic Cascade Enzymes. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 5611–5620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Velasco-Lozano, S.; Santiago-Arcos, J.; Mayoral, J.A.; López-Gallego, F. Co-immobilization and Colocalization of Multi-Enzyme Systems for the Cell-Free Biosynthesis of Aminoalcohols. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 3030–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fu, J.; Yang, Y.; Johnson-Buck, A.; Liu, M.; Liu, Y.; Walter, N.G.; Woodbury, N.W.; Yan, H. Multi-enzyme complexes on DNA scaffolds capable of substrate channelling with an artificial swinging arm. Nat. Nanotech. 2014, 9, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Du, C.; Hu, P.; Ren, L. Nucleic acid-based scaffold systems and application in enzyme cascade catalysis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 107, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jiao, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Xie, Y.; Shang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Guo, X.; Yu, S.; Li, N.; Ding, B. A DNA origami–based enzymatic cascade nanoreactor for chemodynamic cancer therapy and activation of antitumor immunity. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadr9196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Klein, W.P.; Thomsen, R.P.; Turner, K.B.; Walper, S.A.; Vranish, J.; Kjems, J.; Ancona, M.G.; Medintz, I.L. Enhanced catalysis from multienzyme cascades assembled on a DNA origami triangle. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 13677–13689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kahn, J.S.; Xiong, Y.; Huang, J.; Gang, O. Cascaded Enzyme Reactions over a Three-Dimensional, Wireframe DNA Origami Scaffold. JACS Au 2022, 2, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fu, J.; Li, T. Spatial Organization of Enzyme Cascade on a DNA Origami Nanostructure. In 3D DNA Nanostructure: Methods and Protocols; Ke, Y., Wang, P., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 1500, pp. 153–164. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhao, Z.; Fu, J.; Dhakal, S.; Johnson-Buck, A.; Liu, M.; Zhang, T.; Woodbury, N.W.; Liu, Y.; Walter, N.G.; Yan, H. Nanocaged enzymes with enhanced catalytic activity and increased stability against protease digestion. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhan, P.; Peil, A.; Jiang, Q.; Wang, D.; Mousavi, S.; Xiong, Q.; Shen, Q.; Shang, Y.; Ding, B.; Lin, C.; et al. Recent Advances in DNA Origami-Engineered Nanomaterials and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 3976–4050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, H.; Huang, D.; Wang, T. In vitro assembly of the trehalose bi-enzyme complex with artificial scaffold protein. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1251298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, H.; Yuan, H.; Huang, D.; Wang, T. Research progress of multi-enzyme complexes based on the design of scaffold protein. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2023, 10, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, J.; Lu, Y.; Cheng, P.; Zhang, C.; Tang, L.; Du, L.; Li, J.; Ou, Z. Construction of Bi-Enzyme Self-Assembly Clusters Based on SpyCatcher/SpyTag for the Efficient Biosynthesis of (R)-Ethyl 2-hydroxy-4-phenylbutyrate. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Xi, Y.; Frank, B.D.; Tatas, A.; Pavlovic, M.; Zeininger, L. Multicompartment calcium alginate microreactors to reduce substrate inhibition in enzyme cascade reactions. Soft Matter 2023, 19, 7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Cai, Y.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, W.; Xu, W.; Yuan, K.; Xiong, R.; Huang, C. Compartmentalized Encapsulated Multienzyme Chitosan-Based Three-Compartment Microspheres Enable Orderly Multienzyme Cascade Reactions and Blood Sugar Control. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 6824–6836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Maghraby, Y.R.; El-Shabasy, R.M.; Ibrahim, A.H.; Azzazy, H.M.E. Enzyme immobilization technologies and industrial applications. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 5184–5196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rathee, P.; Edelstein-Pardo, N.; Koren, G.; Beck, R.; Amir, R.J. Cascade mesophase transitions of multi-enzyme responsive polymeric formulations. Biomacromolecules 2024, 25, 3607–3619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Capecchi, E.; Piccinino, D.; Bizzarri, B.M.; Botta, L.; Crucianelli, M.; Saladino, R. Oxidative Bio-Desulfurization by Nanostructured Peroxidase Mediator System. Catalysts 2020, 10, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Capecchi, E.; Piccinino, D.; Bizzarri, B.M.; Avitabile, D.; Pelosi, C.; Colantonio, C.; Calabrò, G.; Saladino, R. Enzyme-Lignin Nanocapsules Are Sustainable Catalysts and Vehicles for the Preparation of Unique Polyvalent Bioinks. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 1975–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Capecchi, E.; Piccinino, D.; Delfino, I.; Bollella, P.; Antiochia, R.; Saladino, R. Functionalized Tyrosinase-Lignin Nanoparticles as Sustainable Catalysts for the Oxidation of Phenols. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Capecchi, E.; Piccinino, D.; Tomaino, E.; Bizzarri, B.M.; Polli, F.; Antiochia, R.; Mazzei, F.; Saladino, R. Lignin nanoparticles are renewable and functional platforms for the concanavalin A oriented immobilization of glucose oxidase–peroxidase in cascade bio-sensing. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 29031–29042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, C.; Li, X.; Bai, Y.; Li, X.; Jin, Z.; Long, J. Multienzyme cascade coimmobilization on zif-8-coated magnetic nanoparticles for efficient d-allulose synthesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025, 73, 24302–24313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, D.; Zhang, C.; Xiong, Q.; Liu, W.; Tang, Y.; Liang, L.; Duan, H. Elongated magnetic nanorobots with multi-enzymatic cascades for active in vivo tumor targeting and enhanced chemodynamic therapy. ACS Nano 2025, 19, 15040–15054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, L.; Gao, Y.; Yang, J.; Wan, L.; Li, W.; Luo, H. An intelligent electrochemical multi-enzyme molecular machine for chiral chemical. Chem. Eur. J. 2025, 31, e202404426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, Z.; Gao, L.; Boes, A.; Bajer, B.; Stotz, J.; Apitius, L.; Jakob, F.; Schneider, E.S.; Sperling, E.; Held, M.; et al. An enzymatic continuous-flow reactor based on a pore-size matching nano- and isoporous block copolymer membrane. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Morello, G.; Megarity, C.F.; Armstrong, F.A. The power of electrified nanoconfinement for energising, controlling and observing long enzyme cascades. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liang, J.; Liang, K. Multi-enzyme cascade reactions in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rec. 2020, 20, 1100–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fan, W.; Yu, Z.; Appadoo, D.; Liang, K.; Liang, J. Enhancing multi-enzyme cascade activity in metal-organic frameworks via controlled enzyme encapsulation. Small 2025, 21, 2503059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Z.; Lv, Y. Boosted enzyme activity via encapsulation within metal–organic frameworks with pores matching enzyme size and shape. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2309243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Meyer, C.E.; Liu, J.; Craciun, I.; Wu, D.; Wang, H.; Xie, M.; Fussenegger, M.; Palivan, C.G. Segregated nanocompartments containing therapeutic enzymes and imaging compounds within dna-zipped polymersome clusters for advanced nanotheranostic platform. Small 2020, 16, 1906492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Maffeis, V.; Heuberger, L.; Nikoletić, A.; Schoenenberger, C.; Palivan, C.G. Synthetic cells revisited: Artificial cell construction using polymeric building blocks. Adv. Sci. 2023, 11, 2305837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Maffeis, V.; Belluati, A.; Craciun, I.; Wu, D.; Novak, S.; Schoenenberger, C.-A.; Palivan, C.G. Clustering of catalytic nanocompartments for enhancing an extracellular non-native cascade reaction. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 12274–12285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Korpidou, M.; Becker, J.; Tarvirdipour, S.; Dinu, I.A.; Becer, C.R.; Palivan, C.G. Glycooligomer-functionalized catalytic nanocompartments co-loaded with enzymes support parallel reactions and promote cell internalization. Biomacromolecules 2024, 25, 4492–4509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Houle, F.A.; Agbo, P.; Yano, J. Insights from designing an artificial cascade catalysis system using principles from substrate channeling in enzymes. Chem. Sci. 2025, 16, 13667–13677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhong, C.; Vyas, A.; Liu, J.; Oostenbrink, C.; Nidetzky, B. Keeping the distance: Activity control in solid-supported sucrose phosphorylase by a rigid α-helical linker of tunable spacer length. ACS Catal. 2024, 14, 17090–17102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xie, W.; Xu, J.; Chen, J.; Wang, H.; Hu, P. Achieving theory–experiment parity for activity and selectivity in heterogeneous catalysis using microkinetic modelling. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 1237–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jiao, L.; Wang, J.; Jiang, H. Microenvironment modulation in metal–organic framework-based catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 2, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, M.; Wang, M.; Mi, Y.; Li, T.; Hou, D.; Li, H.; Tong, X.; Zhang, T.; Yi, H.; Yang, H. Enhanced enzyme stability at the interphase of water-oil for continuous-flow olefin epoxidation. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 8087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hooe, S.L.; Breger, J.C.; Medintz, I.L. Enhancing enzymatic activity with nanoparticle display—An updated compendium and engineering outlook. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2024, 9, 679–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Aprahamian, I.; Goldup, S.M. Non-equilibrium Steady States in Catalysis, Molecular Motors, and Supramolecular Materials: Why Networks and Language Matter. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 14169–14183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Santiago-Arcos, J.; Velasco-Lozano, S.; Diamanti, E.; Benítez-Mateos, A.I.; Grajales-Hernández, D.; Paradisi, F.; López-Gallego, F. Optimized spatial configuration of heterogeneous biocatalysts maximizes cell-free biosynthesis of ω-hydroxy and ω-amino acids. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 9474–9489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Su, E.; Meng, Y.; Ning, C.; Ma, X.; Deng, S. Magnetic combined cross-linked enzyme aggregates (Combi-CLEAs) for cofactor regeneration in the synthesis of chiral alcohol. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 271, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sheldon, R.A. Characteristic features and biotechnological applications of cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 92, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Dobovišek, A.; Blaževič, T.; Kralj, S.; Fajmut, A. Enzyme cascade to enzyme complex phase-transition-like transformation studied by the maximum entropy production principle. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2025, 6, 102400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Cooney, M.J. Kinetic measurements for enzyme immobilization. Enzym. Stab. Immobil. 2011, 679, 207–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Fu, Z.; Wang, H.; Yang, L.; Ding, Z.; Xie, J. Cascade assembly of metal-organic framework–immobilized enzyme complexes for enhanced catalytic activity and sensing applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 516, 164279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pavlović, M.; Plucinski, A.; Zhang, J.; Antonietti, M.; Zeininger, L.; Schmidt, B.V.K.J. Cascade kinetics in an enzyme-loaded aqueous two-phase system. Langmuir 2020, 36, 1401–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Milker, S.; Fink, M.J.; Oberleitner, N.; Ressmann, A.K.; Bornscheuer, U.T.; Mihovilovic, M.D.; Rudroff, F. Kinetic modeling of an enzymatic redox cascade in vivo reveals bottlenecks caused by cofactors. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 3420–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sigg, A.; Klimacek, M.; Nidetzky, B. Pushing the boundaries of phosphorylase cascade reaction for cellobiose production I: Kinetic model development. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2024, 121, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Engel, J.; Bornscheuer, U.T.; Kara, S. Kinetics modeling of a convergent cascade catalyzed by monooxygenase–alcohol dehydrogenase coupled enzymes. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2020, 25, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bornadel, A.; Hatti-Kaul, R.; Hollmann, F.; Kara, S. Enhancing the productivity of the bi-enzymatic convergent cascade for ɛ-caprolactone synthesis through design of experiments and a biphasic system. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 7222–7228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sudar, M.; Milčić, N.; Katulić, M.Č.; Szekrenyi, A.; Hernández, K.; Fekete, M.; Wardenga, R.; Elenkov, M.M.; Qi, Y.; Charnock, S.; et al. Cascade enzymatic synthesis of a statin side chain precursor—The role of reaction engineering in process optimization. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 21158–21173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Siedentop, R.; Dziennus, M.; Lütz, S.; Rosenthal, K. Debottlenecking of an in vitro enzyme cascade using a combined model- and experiment-based approach. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2023, 95, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Siedentop, R.; Claaßen, C.; Rother, D.; Lütz, S.; Rosenthal, K. Getting the most out of enzyme cascades: Strategies to optimize in vitro multi-enzymatic reactions. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kari, J.; Olsen, J.P.; Jensen, K.; Badino, S.F.; Krogh, K.B.R.M.; Borch, K.; Westh, P. Sabatier principle for interfacial (heterogeneous) enzyme catalysis. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 11966–11972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lin, J.-L.; Wheeldon, I. Kinetic enhancements in dna–enzyme nanostructures mimic the sabatier principle. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhang, Y.; Hess, H. Toward rational design of high-efficiency enzyme cascades. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 6018–6027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Malfoy, T.; Alkım, C.; François, J. Enzyme promiscuity in the field of synthetic biology applied to white biotechnology: Opportunities and weaknesses. BioDesign Res. 2025, 7, 100026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Gupta, R.D. Recent advances in enzyme promiscuity. Sustain. Chem. Process. 2016, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wang, L.; Wu, Y.; Hu, J.; Yin, D.; Wei, W.; Wen, J.; Chen, X.; Gao, C.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, J.; et al. Unlocking the function promiscuity of old yellow enzyme to catalyze asymmetric morita-baylis-hillman reaction. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 5737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Miao, Y.; Rahimi, M.; Geertsema, E.M.; Poelarends, G.J. Recent developments in enzyme promiscuity for carbon–carbon bond-forming reactions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2015, 25, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Guan, Z.; Li, L.; He, Y. Hydrolase-catalyzed asymmetric carbon–carbon bond formation in organic synthesis. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 16801–16814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Arora, B.; Mukherjee, J.; Gupta, M.N. Enzyme promiscuity: Using the dark side of enzyme specificity in white biotechnology. Sustain. Chem. Process. 2014, 2, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Liu, W.; Wen, Z.; Li, Q.; Liu, H.; Li, Q.; Deng, S.; Zeng, Z.; Luo, M.; Tang, A.; Liu, Y. New insights into exploring new functional enzymes through the enzyme promiscuity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 304, 140576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Carter, N.S.; Nour, M.W.; Fang, C.; Hans, R. Charting the evolution of chemoenzymatic strategies in the syntheses of complex natural products. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 18161–18181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Qiao, S.; Cheng, Z.; Li, F. Chemoenzymatic synthesis of macrocyclic peptides and polyketides via thioesterase-catalyzed macrocyclization. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2024, 20, 721–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ubertini, V.; Capecchi, E.; Tomaino, E.; Piccinino, D.; De Marchi, E.; Bizzarri, B.M.; Carotenuto, G.; Castrignanò, T.; Saladino, R. One-pot synthesis of (S)-flavanones by a double-face promiscuous chemo-enzymatic cascade of lipases. ChemCatChem 2024, 16, e202400974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bulmer, G.S.; Mattey, A.P.; Parmeggiani, F.; Williams, R.; Ledru, H.; Marchesi, A.; Seibt, L.S.; Both, P.; Huang, K.; Galan, M.C.; et al. A promiscuous glycosyltransferase generates poly-β-1,4-glucan derivatives that facilitate mass spectrometry-based detection of cellulolytic enzymes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 5529–5533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Einsiedler, M.; Jamieson, C.S.; Maskeri, M.A.; Houk, K.N.; Gulder, T.A.M. Fungal dioxygenase AsqJ is promiscuous and bimodal: Substrate-directed formation of quinolones versus quinazolinones. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 8297–8302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Tang, H.; Tang, Y.; Kurnikov, I.V.; Liao, H.J.; Chan, N.; Kurnikova, M.G.; Guo, Y.; Chang, W. Harnessing the substrate promiscuity of dioxygenase AsqJ and developing efficient chemoenzymatic synthesis for quinolones. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 7186–7192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Xin, R.; See, W.W.L.; Yun, H.; Li, X.; Li, Z. Enzyme-catalyzed meinwald rearrangement with an unusual regioselective and stereospecific 1,2-methyl shift. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202204889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Li, X.; Cao, X.; Xiong, J.; Ge, J. Enzyme–metal hybrid catalysts for chemoenzymatic reactions. Small 2020, 16, 1902751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wang, W.; Tachibana, R.; Zhang, K.; Lau, K.; Pojer, F.; Ward, T.R.; Hu, X. Artificial metalloenzymes with two catalytic cofactors for tandem abiotic transformations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202422783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. González-Granda, S.; Escot, L.; Lavandera, I.; Gotor-Fernández, V. Chemoenzymatic cascades combining biocatalysis and transition metal catalysis for asymmetric synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202217713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Heckmann, C.M.; Paradisi, F. GPhos ligand enables production of chiral n-arylamines in a telescoped transaminase-buchwald-hartwig amination cascade in the presence of excess amine donor. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 16616–16620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Naapuri, J.M.; Wagner, P.K.; Hollmann, F.; Deska, J. Enzymatic bromocyclization of α- and γ-allenols by chloroperoxidase from curvularia inaequalis. ChemistryOpen 2022, 11, e202100236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Cortes-Clerget, M.; Akporji, N.; Zhou, J.; Gao, F.; Guo, P.; Parmentier, M.; Gallou, F.; Berthon, J.-Y.; Lipshutz, B.H. Bridging the gap between transition metal- and bio-catalysis via aqueous micellar catalysis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Andersson, M.; Gallou, F.; Klumphu, P.; Takale, B.S.; Lipshutz, B.H. Structure of nanoparticles derived from designer surfactant tpgs-750-m in water, as used in organic synthesis. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 6778–6786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Singhania, V.; Cortes-Clerget, M.; Dussart-Gautheret, J.; Akkachairin, B.; Yu, J.; Akporji, N.; Gallou, F.; Lipshutz, B.H. Lipase-catalyzed esterification in water enabled by nanomicelles. applications to 1-pot multi-step sequences. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 1440–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Li, X.; Fan, Y.; Liao, Q.; Lu, T.; Ge, J. Efficient enzyme-metal hybrid catalysts constructed with polymer. ChemCatChem 2022, 15, e202201319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Browne, L.B.F.; Sudmeier, T.; Landis, M.A.; Allen, C.S.; Vincent, K.A. Controlled Biocatalytic Synthesis of a Metal Nanoparticle-Enzyme Hybrid: Demonstration for Catalytic H2-driven NADH Recycling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202404024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Xu, X.; Wan, J.; Sun, J.; Wu, L.; Lei, J. Tailored metal-organic framework-based enzyme hybrids: Immobilization strategies, improved performance, and biological applications. Small Sci. 2025, 5, 2500222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Wang, Z.J.; Clary, K.; Bergman, R.G.; Raymond, K.N.; Toste, F.D. A supramolecular approach to combining enzymatic and transition metal catalysis. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Li, X.; Cao, Y.; Luo, K.; Sun, Y.; Xiong, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, Z.; Li, J.; Ma, J.; Ge, J.; et al. Highly active enzyme–metal nanohybrids synthesized in protein–polymer conjugates. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Qiao, Y.; Xin, R.; Li, X.; Ge, J. Ultrafast and scalable synthesis of enzyme-metal hybrid catalysts in evaporating microdroplets. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eaea0301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Heid, E.; Probst, D.; Green, W.H.; Madsen, G.K.H. Enzymemap: Curation, validation and data-driven prediction of enzymatic reactions. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14, 14229–14242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Campbell, M.J. Viper: A general model for prediction of enzyme substrates. bioRxiv 2024, 599972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Yang, H.; Lin, Y.; Mo, Q.; Li, Z.; Yang, F.; Li, X. Monitoring enzymatic reaction kinetics and activity assays in confined nanospace. Anal. Chem. 2024, 96, 12404–12413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Sheng, Y.; Zhou, K.; Liu, L.; Wu, H.-C. A nanopore sensing assay resolves cascade reactions in a multienzyme system. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202200866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Schwaighofer, A.; Akhgar, C.K.; Lendl, B. Broadband laser-based mid-ir spectroscopy for analysis of proteins and monitoring of enzyme activity. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 253, 119563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Sidhu, J.; Kaur, N.; Singh, N. Trends in small organic fluorescent scaffolds for detection of oxidoreductase. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 191, 113441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Sveshnikova, A.; Oftadeh, O.; Hatzimanikatis, V. Designing pathways for bioproducing complex chemicals by combining tools for pathway extraction and ranking. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 4839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Xiang, R.; Fernández-López, L.; Robles-Martín, A.; Ferrer, M.; Guallar, V. Ep-pred: A machine learning tool for bioprospecting promiscuous ester hydrolases. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Gisperg, F.; Klausser, R.; Elshazly, M.; Kopp, J.; Brichtová, E.; Spadiut, O. Bayesian optimization in bioprocess engineering—Where do we stand today? Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2025, 122, 1313–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Khan, M.F.; Khan, M.T. AI-Driven Enzyme Engineering: Emerging Models and Next-Generation Biotechnological Applications. Molecules 2025, 31, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Siedentop, R.; Siska, M.; Möller, N.; Lanzrath, H.; Lieres, E.v.; Lütz, S.; Rosenthal, K. Bayesian Optimization for an ATP-Regenerating In Vitro Enzyme Cascade. Catalysts 2023, 13, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Gonzalo, G.; Paul, C.E. Recent trends in synthetic enzymatic cascades promoted by alcohol dehydrogenases. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 32, 100548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Fan, X.; Yuan, Y.; Yao, Y.; Li, W.; Tao, F.; Wang, N. Applications of ene-reductases in the synthesis of flavors and fragrances. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 18305–18320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Heath, R.S.; Turner, N.J. Recent advances in oxidase biocatalysts: Enzyme discovery, cascade reactions and scale up. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 38, 100693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ménil, S.; Petit, J.-L.; Courvoisier-Dezord, E.; Debard, A.; Pellouin, V.; Reignier, T.; Sergent, M.; Deyris, V.; Duquesne, K.; de Berardinis, V.; et al. Tuning of the enzyme ratio in a neutral redox convergent cascade: A key approach for an efficient one-pot/two-step biocatalytic whole-cell system. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2019, 116, 2852–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Ma, G.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, D.; Li, H.; Lin, J.; Wei, D. Design of a self-sufficient whole-cell cascade for the production of (R)-citronellal from geraniol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 26305–26315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Ribeaucourt, D.; Höfler, G.T.; Yemloul, M.; Bissaro, B.; Lambert, F.; Berrin, J.-G.; Lafond, M.; Paul, C.E. Tunable production of (R)- or (S)-citronellal from geraniol via a bienzymatic cascade using a copper radical alcohol oxidase and old yellow enzyme. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 1111–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Ni, Y.; Fernández-Fueyo, E.; Gomez Baraibar, A.; Ullrich, R.; Hofrichter, M.; Yanase, H.; Alcalde, M.; van Berkel, W.J.H.; Hollmann, F. Peroxygenase-catalyzed oxyfunctionalization reactions promoted by the complete oxidation of methanol. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 55, 798–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Willot, S.J.-P.; Dat Hoang, M.; Paul, C.E.; Alcalde, M.; Arends, I.W.C.E.; Bommarius, A.S.; Bommarius, B.; Hollmann, F. Fox news: Towards methanol-driven biocatalytic oxyfunctionalisation reactions. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 2713–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Iqbal, N.; Stewart, J.D.; Macheroux, P.; Rudroff, F.; Mihovilovič, M.D. Novel concurrent redox cascades of (R)- and (S)-carvones enables access to carvo-lactones with distinct regio- and enantioselectivity. Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 7389–7394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ma, Y.; Vernet, G.; Zhang, N.; Kara, S. Exploring DES-Water Mixtures for Improved ADH-CHMO Fusion Enzyme Performance in Linear Cascades. ChemCatChem 2025, 17, e202401792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Ramsden, J.I.; Zucoloto da Costa, B.; Heath, R.S.; Marshall, J.R.; Derrington, S.R.; Mangas-Sanchez, J.; Montgomery, S.L.; Mulholland, K.R.; Cosgrove, S.C.; Turner, N.J. Bifunctional imine reductase cascades for the synthesis of saturated n-heterocycles. ACS Catal. 2024, 14, 14703–14710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Liu, J.; Wang, A.; Liu, S.; Yang, R.; Wang, L.; Gao, F.; Zhou, H.; Yu, X.; Liu, J.; Chen, C. A titanium nitride nanozyme for pH-responsive and irradiation-enhanced cascade-catalytic tumor therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 25328–25338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Wang, R.; Yu, Y.; Gai, M.; Mateos-Maroto, A.; Morsbach, S.; Xia, X.; He, M.; Fan, J.; Peng, X.; Landfester, K.; et al. Liposomal enzyme nanoreactors based on nanoconfinement for efficient antitumor therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202308761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Sang, X. An efficient enzyme cascade bio-platform based on metal-organic frameworks nanozyme for the detection of glucose. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2023, 71, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Tomaino, E.; Capecchi, E.; Piccinino, D.; Saladino, R. Lignin nanoparticles support lipase-tyrosinase enzymatic cascade in the synthesis of lipophilic hydroxytyrosol ester derivatives. ChemCatChem 2022, 14, e202200380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Piccinino, D.; Ubertini, V.; Capecchi, E.; Tomaino, E.; Gigli, V.; Saladino, R. Synthesis of bioactive hydroxytyrosol esters via multienzyme cascade on electroactive melanin lignin nanoparticles: A one-pot approach without extra reducing agents. ChemCatChem 2023, 15, e202300533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Schmermund, L.; Jurkaš, V.; Özgen, F.F.; Barone, G.D.; Büchsenschütz, H.C.; Winkler, C.K.; Schmidt, S.; Kourist, R.; Kroutil, W. Photo-biocatalysis: Biotransformations in the presence of light. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 4115–4144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Emmanuel, M.A.; Bender, S.G.; Bilodeau, C.; Carceller, J.M.; DeHovitz, J.S.; Fu, H.; Liu, Y.; Nicholls, B.T.; Ouyang, Y.; Page, C.G.; et al. Photobiocatalytic strategies for organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 5459–5520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Harrison, W.; Huang, X.; Zhao, H. Photobiocatalysis for abiological transformations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 1087–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Fagnoni, M.; Dondi, D.; Ravelli, D.; Albini, A. Photocatalysis for the formation of the C−C bond. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2725–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Lima, F.; Sharma, U.K.; Grunenberg, L.; Saha, D.; Johannsen, S.; Sedelmeier, J.; Van der Eycken, E.V.; Ley, S.V. A lewis base catalysis approach for the photoredox activation of boronic acids and esters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 15136–15140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Shu, C.; Noble, A.; Aggarwal, V.K. Photoredox-catalyzed cyclobutane synthesis by a deboronative radical addition–polar cyclization cascade. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 3870–3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Ceccotti Vlas, N.; Fosso, F.; De Marchi, E.; Gabellone, S.; Capecchi, E.; Piccinino, D.; Botta, L.; Saladino, R. Blue-led oxidative coupling of amines to n-alkyl imines by metal-free meso-tetraphenyl porphyrin/lignin-nanoparticles. ChemCatChem 2025, 17, e202402097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Dai, Z.; Zhang, S.; Hong, X.; Wang, P.; Gong, L. A practical FeCl3/HCl photocatalyst for versatile aliphatic C–H functionalization. Chem. Catal. 2022, 2, 1211–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Niu, B.; Sachidanandan, K.; Cooke, M.V.; Casey, T.E.; Laulhé, S. Photoinduced C(sp3)–H Chalcogenation of Amide Derivatives and Ethers via Ligand-to-Metal Charge-Transfer. Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 4524–4529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Kim, J.; Nguyen, T.V.T.; Kim, Y.H.; Hollmann, F.; Park, C.B. Lignin as a multifunctional photocatalyst for solar-powered biocatalytic oxyfunctionalization of C–H bonds. Nat. Synth. 2022, 1, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. De Marchi, E.; Marino, A.; Fosso, F.; Ceccotti Vlas, N.; Piccinino, D.; Capecchi, E.; Botta, L.; Crucianelli, M.; Saladino, R. Photochemistry of resveratrol: Beyond the reactivity of metal-free porphyrins immobilized on lignin. ChemPhotoChem 2025, 9, e202500073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Chen, F.; Ma, Z.; Ye, L.; Ma, T.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H. Macroscopic Spontaneous Polarization and Surface Oxygen Vacancies Collaboratively Boosting CO2 Photoreduction on BiOIO3 Single Crystals. Adv. Mat. 2020, 32, 1908350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Wang, K.; Hu, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Liu, B. Visible-light-driven CO2 photoreduction over atomically strained indium sites in ambient air. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Ma, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, B.; Zhou, J.; Yang, S.; Zhang, F.; Luo, K.; Wang, Y.; Hollmann, F. Photobiocatalysis: More than just an interesting lab curiosity? Chem. Catal. 2024, 4, 101077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. De Marchi, E.; Hilberath, T.; Zippilli, C.; Wever, R.; Saladino, R.; Hollmann, F.; Botta, L. Synthesis of enantiopure vicinal halohydrins using a sequence of haloperoxidase and lipase. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2024, 366, 3290–3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Özgen, F.F.; Runda, M.E.; Schmidt, S. Photo-biocatalytic cascades: Combining chemical and enzymatic transformations fueled by light. ChemBioChem 2020, 22, 790–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Liu, S.; Shi, J.; Jia, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yang, D.; Chen, Y.; Li, S.; Jiang, Z. Metal-Free Light-Driven 1,4-NADH Regeneration System from Nitrogen and Sulfur Codoped Carbon Dots. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 14233–14240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Wei, W.; Mazzotta, F.; Lieberwirth, I.; Landfester, K.; Ferguson, C.T.J.; Zhang, K.A.I. Aerobic photobiocatalysis enabled by combining core–shell nanophotoreactors and native enzymes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 7320–7326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Wang, S.; Wu, X.; Fang, J.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; He, Y.; Luo, M.; Li, R. Direct Z-Scheme Polymer/Polymer Double-Shell Hollow Nanostructures for Efficient NADH Regeneration and Biocatalytic Artificial Photosynthesis under Visible Light. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 4433–4443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Litman, Z.C.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Hartwig, J.F. Cooperative asymmetric reactions combining photocatalysis and enzymatic catalysis. Nature 2018, 560, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. DeHovitz, J.S.; Yao Loh, Y.; Kautzky, J.A.; Nagao, K.; Meichan, A.J.; Yamauchi, M.; MacMillan, D.W.C.; Hyster, T.K. Static to inducibly dynamic stereocontrol: The convergent use of racemic β-substituted ketones. Science 2020, 369, 1113–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Zhang, W.; Fernandez Fueyo, E.; Hollmann, F.; Leemans Martin, L.; Pesic, M.; Wardenga, R.; Höhne, M.; Schmidt, S. Combining photo-organo redox- and enzyme catalysis facilitates asymmetric C-H bond functionalization. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 2019, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Zhang, W.; Lee, J.-H.; Younes, S.H.H.; Tonin, F.; Hagedoorn, P.-L.; Pichler, H.; Baeg, Y.; Park, J.-B.; Kourist, R.; Hollmann, F. Photobiocatalytic synthesis of chiral secondary fatty alcohols from renewable unsaturated fatty acids. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Duong, H.T.; Wu, Y.; Sutor, A.; Burek, B.O.; Hollmann, F.; Bloh, J.Z. Intensification of photobiocatalytic decarboxylation of fatty acids for the production of biodiesel. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 1053–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Logotheti, M.; Gehres, S.; França, A.S.; Bornscheuer, U.T.; Souza, R.O.M.A.; Höhne, M. Combining photochemical oxyfunctionalization and enzymatic catalysis for the synthesis of chiral pyrrolidines and azepanes. J. Org. Chem. 2025, 90, 1036–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Hou, M.; Yuan, J.; Dong, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, S.; Gao, J. Engineering Oxygen-Independent NADH Oxidase Integrated with Electrocatalytic FAD Cofactor Regeneration. JACS Au 2024, 4, 3581–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Lee, Y.S.; Gerulskis, R.; Minteer, S.D. Advances in electrochemical cofactor regeneration: Enzymatic and non-enzymatic approaches. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022, 73, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Rabaey, K.; Rozendal, R.A. Microbial electrosynthesis—Revisiting the electrical route for microbial production. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 706–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Lim, D.; Paradisi, F. Hybrid catalytic systems: Integrating biocatalysis in the chemical space. ACS Catal. 2025, 15, 16278–16291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Mtemeri, L.; Hickey, D.P. Electrifying enzymatic cascades for organic synthesis. Chem. Catal. 2022, 2, 661–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Dong, F.; Chen, H.; Malapit, C.A.; Prater, M.B.; Li, M.; Yuan, M.; Lim, K.; Minteer, S.D. Biphasic bioelectrocatalytic synthesis of chiral β-hydroxy nitriles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 8374–8382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Chen, H.; Cai, R.; Patel, J.; Dong, F.; Chen, H.; Minteer, S.D. Upgraded Bioelectrocatalytic N2 Fixation: From N2 to Chiral Amine Intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 4963–4971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Lee, H.; Simai Reginald, S.; Sravan, J.S.; Lee, M.; Chang, I.S. Advanced strategies for enzyme–electrode interfacing in bioelectrocatalytic systems. Trends Biotechnol. 2025, 43, 1328–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Castañeda-Losada, L.; Adam, D.; Paczia, N.; Buesen, D.; Steffler, F.; Sieber, V.; Erb, T.J.; Richter, M.; Plumeré, N. Bioelectrocatalytic Cofactor Regeneration Coupled to CO2 Fixation in a Redox-Active Hydrogel for Stereoselective C-C Bond Formation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 12503–12509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Siritanaratkul, B.; Megarity, C.F.; Herold, R.A.; Armstrong, F.A. Interactive biocatalysis achieved by driving enzyme cascades inside a porous conducting material. Commun. Chem. 2024, 7, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Luan, L.; Ji, X.; Guo, B.; Cai, J.; Dong, W.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, S. Bioelectrocatalysis for CO2 reduction: Recent advances and challenges to develop a sustainable system for CO2 utilization. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 63, 108098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Wu, R.; Li, F.; Cui, X.; Li, Z.; Ma, C.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, L.; Job Zhang, Y.-H.P.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, Y. Enzymatic Electrosynthesis of Glycine from CO2 and NH3. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202218387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Guo, S.; Asset, T.; Atanassov, P. Catalytic Hybrid Electrocatalytic/Biocatalytic Cascades for Carbon Dioxide Reduction and Valorization. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 5172–5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Sokol, K.P.; Robinson, W.E.; Oliveira, A.R.; Warnan, J.; Nowaczyk, M.M.; Ruff, A.; Pereira, I.A.C.; Reisner, E. Photoreduction of CO2 with a Formate Dehydrogenase Driven by Photosystem II Using a Semi-artificial Z-Scheme Architecture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 16418–16422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Savile, C.K.; Janey, J.M.; Mundorff, E.C.; Moore, J.C.; Tam, S.; Jarvis, W.R.; Colbeck, J.C.; Krebber, A.; Fleitz, F.J.; Brands, J. Biocatalytic asymmetric synthesis of chiral amines from ketones applied to sitagliptin manufacture. Science 2010, 329, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Naik, K.; Dheeraj, S.; Jeevani, K.; Saravanan, T. Evaluating Multienzyme Cascade Routes for Pharmaceutically Relevant Molecules. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2024, 27, e202301236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Siedentop, R.; Rosenthal, K. Industrially Relevant Enzyme Cascades for Drug Synthesis and Their Ecological Assessment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Welsch, M.E.; Snyder, S.A.; Stockwell, B.R. Privileged scaffolds for library design and drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010, 14, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Sun, S.; Wesolowski, S.S. Biologically active metabolites in drug discovery. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2021, 48, 128255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Kim, J.; Kim, H.; Park, S.B. Privileged Structures: Efficient Chemical “Navigators” toward Unexplored Biologically Relevant Chemical Spaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14629–14638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. De, A.; Shukla, A.; Husain, S.M. One-Pot Multienzyme Cascades for Stereodivergent Synthesis of Tetrahydroquinolines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202411561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Subrizi, F.; Wang, Y.; Thair, B.; Méndez-Sánchez, D.; Roddan, R.; Cárdenas-Fernández, M.; Siegrist, J.; Richter, M.; Andexer, J.N.J.; Ward, M.; et al. Multienzyme One-Pot Cascades Incorporating Methyltransferases for the Strategic Diversification of Tetrahydroisoquinoline Alkaloids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 18673–18679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Li, F.; Yuan, Z.; Gao, Y.; Deng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Z.; Rao, Y. A concise enzyme cascade enables the manufacture of natural and halogenated protoberberine alkaloids. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Zhang, H.H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, C.; Deng, Z.; Ji, L.; Yin, D.; Liu, C.; Luo, Z.; Yuan, Z.; Rao, Y. Modular Chemoenzymatic Cascade for Highly Diastereo- and Enantioselective Synthesis of 1,3-Disubstituted Tetrahydroisoquinolines. ACS Catal. 2025, 15, 5426–5434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Rajput, A.; Manna, T.; Mondal, A.; De, A.; Mondal, J.; Husain, S.M. Biocatalytic Access to Chiral Benzazepines Using Imine Reductases. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 6185–6194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Tomaino, E.; Capecchi, E.; Ubertini, V.; Piccinino, D.; Bizzarri, B.M.; Saladino, R. Synthesis of Benzoxazines by Heterogeneous Multicomponent Biochemo Multienzymes Cascade Reaction. J. Org. Chem. 2024, 89, 2343–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Capecchi, E.; Tomaino, E.; Bizzarri, B.M.; Saladino, R. One-Pot Synthesis of Tricyclic Benzoxazines and Benzoxazepine by Heterogeneous Biochemo Multienzyme Cascade Reaction. J. Org. Chem. 2025, 90, 5805–5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the main strategies of enzymatic cascades in living cells. The hydrophobic channel (Path a) favors the transfer of intermediates between enzymes. Covalent swing arms (Path b) shuttle intermediates between enzymes in proximity. Electrostatic guidance (Path c) controls the trajectory of electric charged intermediates. Spatial and ordered clusters (Path d) concentrate enzymes in specific microcompartments.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the main strategies of enzymatic cascades in living cells. The hydrophobic channel (Path a) favors the transfer of intermediates between enzymes. Covalent swing arms (Path b) shuttle intermediates between enzymes in proximity. Electrostatic guidance (Path c) controls the trajectory of electric charged intermediates. Spatial and ordered clusters (Path d) concentrate enzymes in specific microcompartments.
Molecules 31 00603 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of glucose oxidase–horseradish peroxidase (GOx–HRP) cascade immobilized on lignin nanoparticles (LNPs) [75]. The proximity and correct orientation of the active sites have been ensured by concanavalin A. This configuration assures efficient substrate channeling, atom economy and selectivity. In the first step, GOx catalyzes the oxidation of β-D-glucose to D-glucono-1,5-lactone with the concomitant production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). In the second step, HRP reduces H2O2 to water, simultaneously oxidizing ABTS into the corresponding radical cation, which provides a detectable colorimetric signal. LNPs preserve enzymatic activity by maintaining optimal distance and orientation, highlighting the role of renewable nanomaterials in the design of efficient enzymatic cascade.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of glucose oxidase–horseradish peroxidase (GOx–HRP) cascade immobilized on lignin nanoparticles (LNPs) [75]. The proximity and correct orientation of the active sites have been ensured by concanavalin A. This configuration assures efficient substrate channeling, atom economy and selectivity. In the first step, GOx catalyzes the oxidation of β-D-glucose to D-glucono-1,5-lactone with the concomitant production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). In the second step, HRP reduces H2O2 to water, simultaneously oxidizing ABTS into the corresponding radical cation, which provides a detectable colorimetric signal. LNPs preserve enzymatic activity by maintaining optimal distance and orientation, highlighting the role of renewable nanomaterials in the design of efficient enzymatic cascade.
Molecules 31 00603 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of kinetic and thermodynamic differences between free and immobilized enzyme cascades. Panel (A): Free enzymes in bulk solution. Intermediates and cofactors can diffuse and dilute, leading to unfavorable equilibria (ΔG > 0) and potential bottlenecks. Panel (B): Immobilized cascade on agarose nanoparticles. Enzymes are confined within a microenvironment that concentrates intermediates and cofactors avoiding their dispersion in bulk, resulting in enhanced kinetics and thermodynamics (ΔG < 0) and faster overall reaction rates [95].
Figure 3. Schematic representation of kinetic and thermodynamic differences between free and immobilized enzyme cascades. Panel (A): Free enzymes in bulk solution. Intermediates and cofactors can diffuse and dilute, leading to unfavorable equilibria (ΔG > 0) and potential bottlenecks. Panel (B): Immobilized cascade on agarose nanoparticles. Enzymes are confined within a microenvironment that concentrates intermediates and cofactors avoiding their dispersion in bulk, resulting in enhanced kinetics and thermodynamics (ΔG < 0) and faster overall reaction rates [95].
Molecules 31 00603 g003
Figure 4. Promiscuous enzymatic cascades and noncanonical reactivities. Panel (A): Double-faced lipase cascade affording chiral flavanones: lipase from Porcine pancreas (PPL) catalyzes cross-aldol condensation, and lipase from Mucor javanicus (MJL) mediates stereoselective intramolecular oxa-Michael addition. Immobilization on lignin nanoparticles via Concanavalin A enhances activity and reusability [121]. Panel (B): Promiscuous galactosyltransferase from Neisseria meningitidis (LgtB), in combination with sucrose synthase (SuSy). This system unexpectedly catalyzes glucose polymerization, generating β-1,4 glycosidic linkages [122]. Panel (C): Chemoenzymatic platform of Fe (II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase (AsqJ) and Lewis acid (BF3 or AlCl3) for the synthesis of viridicatin derivatives [124]. Panel (D): Styrene oxide isomerase (SOI) catalyzes the stereospecific Meinwald rearrangement of internal epoxides via 1,2-methyl shifts in cascade with phenylacetaldehyde reductase (PAR) to yield (R)-arylpropanols and amines with high enantiopurity [125].
Figure 4. Promiscuous enzymatic cascades and noncanonical reactivities. Panel (A): Double-faced lipase cascade affording chiral flavanones: lipase from Porcine pancreas (PPL) catalyzes cross-aldol condensation, and lipase from Mucor javanicus (MJL) mediates stereoselective intramolecular oxa-Michael addition. Immobilization on lignin nanoparticles via Concanavalin A enhances activity and reusability [121]. Panel (B): Promiscuous galactosyltransferase from Neisseria meningitidis (LgtB), in combination with sucrose synthase (SuSy). This system unexpectedly catalyzes glucose polymerization, generating β-1,4 glycosidic linkages [122]. Panel (C): Chemoenzymatic platform of Fe (II)/2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase (AsqJ) and Lewis acid (BF3 or AlCl3) for the synthesis of viridicatin derivatives [124]. Panel (D): Styrene oxide isomerase (SOI) catalyzes the stereospecific Meinwald rearrangement of internal epoxides via 1,2-methyl shifts in cascade with phenylacetaldehyde reductase (PAR) to yield (R)-arylpropanols and amines with high enantiopurity [125].
Molecules 31 00603 g004
Figure 5. Pd/CALB–Pluronic nanohybrid in the dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) of racemic 1-phenylethylamine. Pluronic F-127 stabilizes ultrasmall Pd clusters within CALB, enabling concurrent racemization and stereoselective acylation to give enantiopure amides in quantitative yield and high ee [138]. This design also laid the foundation for scalable production through Pd/CALB CLEAs [139].
Figure 5. Pd/CALB–Pluronic nanohybrid in the dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) of racemic 1-phenylethylamine. Pluronic F-127 stabilizes ultrasmall Pd clusters within CALB, enabling concurrent racemization and stereoselective acylation to give enantiopure amides in quantitative yield and high ee [138]. This design also laid the foundation for scalable production through Pd/CALB CLEAs [139].
Molecules 31 00603 g005
Figure 6. Workflow of computational analysis for enzyme–substrate interactions in the design of optimal enzymatic cascade. The system includes database mining, interaction and active site prediction and docking simulations. Panels (A,B) show representative docking models highlighting the physical interactions between catalytic residues and the ligand within the lipase active site in the synthesis of stereoselective flavanone [121].
Figure 6. Workflow of computational analysis for enzyme–substrate interactions in the design of optimal enzymatic cascade. The system includes database mining, interaction and active site prediction and docking simulations. Panels (A,B) show representative docking models highlighting the physical interactions between catalytic residues and the ligand within the lipase active site in the synthesis of stereoselective flavanone [121].
Molecules 31 00603 g006
Figure 7. One-pot redox cascades for the synthesis of bioactive hydroxytyrosol esters from simple tyrosol and carboxylic acids. Panel (A): Lipase from Mucor javanicus (MJL) and tyrosinase from Agaricus bisporus (Tyr) supported on lignin nanoparticles (LNPs) afford hydroxytyrosol esters in the presence of ascorbic acid as a reducing agent to prevent quinone side-chain formation [165]. Panel (B): The same redox cascade immobilized on electroactive hybrid lignin nanoparticles containing melanin (EHLNPs/PM) in the absence of ascorbic acid [166]. Reaction conditions: 2-MeTHF/PBS, 48 h, 50 °C, O2. The system affords hydroxytyrosol esters with up to an 80% yield.
Figure 7. One-pot redox cascades for the synthesis of bioactive hydroxytyrosol esters from simple tyrosol and carboxylic acids. Panel (A): Lipase from Mucor javanicus (MJL) and tyrosinase from Agaricus bisporus (Tyr) supported on lignin nanoparticles (LNPs) afford hydroxytyrosol esters in the presence of ascorbic acid as a reducing agent to prevent quinone side-chain formation [165]. Panel (B): The same redox cascade immobilized on electroactive hybrid lignin nanoparticles containing melanin (EHLNPs/PM) in the absence of ascorbic acid [166]. Reaction conditions: 2-MeTHF/PBS, 48 h, 50 °C, O2. The system affords hydroxytyrosol esters with up to an 80% yield.
Molecules 31 00603 g007
Figure 8. Examples of photo biocatalytic cascades. Panel (A): Photocatalytic step: blue-light isomerization of E/Z alkenes (FMN or Ir(III) photocatalyst). Enzymatic cascade: reduction by ene-reductases (EREDs) with NADPH regenerated by glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) [186]. Panel (B): Photocatalytic step: blue-light induced racemization of β-substituted ketones. Enzymatic cascade: stereoselective reduction by ketoreductases (KREDs) with GDH-mediated recycling of NADPH, yielding enantioenriched alcohols [187].
Figure 8. Examples of photo biocatalytic cascades. Panel (A): Photocatalytic step: blue-light isomerization of E/Z alkenes (FMN or Ir(III) photocatalyst). Enzymatic cascade: reduction by ene-reductases (EREDs) with NADPH regenerated by glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) [186]. Panel (B): Photocatalytic step: blue-light induced racemization of β-substituted ketones. Enzymatic cascade: stereoselective reduction by ketoreductases (KREDs) with GDH-mediated recycling of NADPH, yielding enantioenriched alcohols [187].
Molecules 31 00603 g008
Figure 9. Example of photo biocatalytic cascades based on the first enzymatic step followed by the photocatalytic step [189]. Panel (A): Biocatalytic step: oleate hydratase (FAH) catalyzes the stereoselective hydration of oleic acid to 10-hydroxystearic acid. Photocatalytic step: fatty acid photo decarboxylase from Chlorella variabilis (CvFAP) performs blue-light driven photodecarboxylation, affording enantioenriched 9-heptadecanol. Panel (B): Biocatalytic step: 5,8-diol synthase from Aspergillus nidulans (AnDS) hydroxylates oleic acid to 5,8-dihydroxy-9(Z)-octadecenoic acid. Photocatalytic step: CvFAP-mediated blue-light photodecarboxylation yields optically pure (4S,7R, Z)-heptadec-8-ene-4,7-diol.
Figure 9. Example of photo biocatalytic cascades based on the first enzymatic step followed by the photocatalytic step [189]. Panel (A): Biocatalytic step: oleate hydratase (FAH) catalyzes the stereoselective hydration of oleic acid to 10-hydroxystearic acid. Photocatalytic step: fatty acid photo decarboxylase from Chlorella variabilis (CvFAP) performs blue-light driven photodecarboxylation, affording enantioenriched 9-heptadecanol. Panel (B): Biocatalytic step: 5,8-diol synthase from Aspergillus nidulans (AnDS) hydroxylates oleic acid to 5,8-dihydroxy-9(Z)-octadecenoic acid. Photocatalytic step: CvFAP-mediated blue-light photodecarboxylation yields optically pure (4S,7R, Z)-heptadec-8-ene-4,7-diol.
Molecules 31 00603 g009
Figure 10. Integration of photocatalysis, chemo catalysis and biocatalysis in a one-pot cascade. Step I (photocatalytic step): violet-light mediated oxidation of cyclic amines (pyrrolidine, azepane) via decatungstate (NaDT) hydrogen atom transfer (HAT). Step II (chemical step): in situ Boc-protection of the corresponding lactams. Step III (biocatalytic step): stereoselective reduction by ketoreductases (KREDs) or aminotransferases (ATAs) with glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) for NAD(P)H recycling, yielding N-Boc-protected hydroxylated amines [191].
Figure 10. Integration of photocatalysis, chemo catalysis and biocatalysis in a one-pot cascade. Step I (photocatalytic step): violet-light mediated oxidation of cyclic amines (pyrrolidine, azepane) via decatungstate (NaDT) hydrogen atom transfer (HAT). Step II (chemical step): in situ Boc-protection of the corresponding lactams. Step III (biocatalytic step): stereoselective reduction by ketoreductases (KREDs) or aminotransferases (ATAs) with glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) for NAD(P)H recycling, yielding N-Boc-protected hydroxylated amines [191].
Molecules 31 00603 g010
Figure 11. Electro biocatalytic cascade for the asymmetric synthesis of β-hydroxy nitriles. Step I (electrochemical activation): diaphorase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (DH) is immobilized on a carbon–cobalt–polyacrylic acid electrode (DH/Cc-PAA bioelectrode) to regenerate the reduced cofactor NADH from NAD+. Step II (enzymatic reduction): (S)-specific alcohol dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus kefir (AdhS) catalyzes the stereoselective reduction of ethyl 4-chloroacetoacetate (COBE) to (S)-4-chloro-3-hydroxybutanoate (S)-CHBE. Step III (enzymatic substitution): mutant halohydrin dehalogenase from Agrobacterium radiobacter (HHDH) converts (S)-CHBE into (R)-ethyl-4-cyano-3-hydroxybutyrate (R)-CHCN [197].
Figure 11. Electro biocatalytic cascade for the asymmetric synthesis of β-hydroxy nitriles. Step I (electrochemical activation): diaphorase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (DH) is immobilized on a carbon–cobalt–polyacrylic acid electrode (DH/Cc-PAA bioelectrode) to regenerate the reduced cofactor NADH from NAD+. Step II (enzymatic reduction): (S)-specific alcohol dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus kefir (AdhS) catalyzes the stereoselective reduction of ethyl 4-chloroacetoacetate (COBE) to (S)-4-chloro-3-hydroxybutanoate (S)-CHBE. Step III (enzymatic substitution): mutant halohydrin dehalogenase from Agrobacterium radiobacter (HHDH) converts (S)-CHBE into (R)-ethyl-4-cyano-3-hydroxybutyrate (R)-CHCN [197].
Molecules 31 00603 g011
Figure 12. E-Leaf and spatial organization of the enzymatic cascade inside metal oxide nanoparticles [199].
Figure 12. E-Leaf and spatial organization of the enzymatic cascade inside metal oxide nanoparticles [199].
Molecules 31 00603 g012
Figure 13. Application of enzymatic cascade in alkaloid synthesis. Pathway A: A three-enzyme cascade enabled the stereoselective synthesis of chiral 2-substituted tetrahydroquinolines [212]. Pathway B: A modular seven-enzyme cascade afforded a panel of methylated norcoclaurine derivatives in high enantiomeric excess [213]. Pathway C: A six-enzyme cascade was engineered to produce protoberberine alkaloids [214]. Pathway D: A modular chemoenzymatic cascade was established for the diastereo- and enantioselective synthesis of 1,3-disubstituted tetrahydroisoquinolines [215].
Figure 13. Application of enzymatic cascade in alkaloid synthesis. Pathway A: A three-enzyme cascade enabled the stereoselective synthesis of chiral 2-substituted tetrahydroquinolines [212]. Pathway B: A modular seven-enzyme cascade afforded a panel of methylated norcoclaurine derivatives in high enantiomeric excess [213]. Pathway C: A six-enzyme cascade was engineered to produce protoberberine alkaloids [214]. Pathway D: A modular chemoenzymatic cascade was established for the diastereo- and enantioselective synthesis of 1,3-disubstituted tetrahydroisoquinolines [215].
Molecules 31 00603 g013
Figure 14. Tyrosinase-lipase cascade for benzoxazines and benzoxazepines one-pot synthesis. Panel (A): Lipase/tyrosinase system co-immobilized on lignin nanoparticles (NOL/LTs) performs in a single process the conversion of phenols and α-amino acid methyl esters to 1,4-benzoxazines via sequential ortho-hydroxylation, 1,6-Michael addition, and lipase-catalyzed lactonization [217]. Panel (B): Extension of the same cascade to phenolic acid esters to yield tricyclic benzoxazines via lactonization and subsequent lactam formation. Systematic variation in the phenolic side-chain length or substitution of α- by β-amino acid esters direct the cascade toward larger seven-membered lactones, producing benzoxazepine structures [218].
Figure 14. Tyrosinase-lipase cascade for benzoxazines and benzoxazepines one-pot synthesis. Panel (A): Lipase/tyrosinase system co-immobilized on lignin nanoparticles (NOL/LTs) performs in a single process the conversion of phenols and α-amino acid methyl esters to 1,4-benzoxazines via sequential ortho-hydroxylation, 1,6-Michael addition, and lipase-catalyzed lactonization [217]. Panel (B): Extension of the same cascade to phenolic acid esters to yield tricyclic benzoxazines via lactonization and subsequent lactam formation. Systematic variation in the phenolic side-chain length or substitution of α- by β-amino acid esters direct the cascade toward larger seven-membered lactones, producing benzoxazepine structures [218].
Molecules 31 00603 g014
Table 1. Natural vs. in vitro enzymatic cascades: features, limitations and message from metabolism.
Table 1. Natural vs. in vitro enzymatic cascades: features, limitations and message from metabolism.
FeaturesNaturalIn VitroMessage from MetabolismRepresentative Examples
Substrate channelingMulti-enzyme complexes and tunnels ensure direct transfer of intermediates, preventing build-up of unstable speciesDiffusion dominates; spatial proximity alone rarely improves molecular fluxEfficiency comes from structural integration, not mere proximityPyruvate dehydrogenase complex; tryptophan synthase tunnel [44,45]
CompartmentalizationOrganelles and metabolons confine reactions, stabilize intermediates, and regulate flux via selective permeabilityEnzymes diluted, intermediates unstable, prone to degradationMetabolic flux control requires selective barriers and confined volumesProtocells, coacervates, vesicles and phospholipid membrane as confinement analogues [18,46]
Cofactor managementContinuous recycling of NAD(P)H, ATP, SAM sustains catalytic turnoverCofactor depletion rapidly halts cascadesOrthogonal regeneration mimics metabolic cyclesCentral carbon metabolism; artificial NAD(P)H regeneration [45]
Switch on/offFeedback inhibition and signaling pathways act as natural on/off switchesIsolated enzymes lack adaptive feedback; stoichiometry fragileMetabolic regulation relies on feedback loops and temporal programsGlycolytic feedback loops; enzymatic logic gates, transient pH oscillations [49,50]
Protein dynamicsConformational motions tune binding, transition-state stabilization and releaseIn vitro conditions destabilize dynamicsDesign inspired by conformational landscapesDynamics of dihydrofolate reductase as paradigm [51]
Electron transferMembrane complexes integrate cofactors (heme, FAD) for efficient long-range ET.Reconstitution outside membranes is difficult and unstablePrecision architecture is essential for sustained redox cascadesNADPH oxidases; STEAP enzymes [52]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Capecchi, E.; Tomaino, E.; Onnelli, G.; Ubertini, V.; Saladino, R. Nature-Inspired Enzymatic Cascades: Emerging Strategies for Sustainable Chemistry. Molecules 2026, 31, 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040603

AMA Style

Capecchi E, Tomaino E, Onnelli G, Ubertini V, Saladino R. Nature-Inspired Enzymatic Cascades: Emerging Strategies for Sustainable Chemistry. Molecules. 2026; 31(4):603. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040603

Chicago/Turabian Style

Capecchi, Eliana, Elisabetta Tomaino, Giulia Onnelli, Valentina Ubertini, and Raffaele Saladino. 2026. "Nature-Inspired Enzymatic Cascades: Emerging Strategies for Sustainable Chemistry" Molecules 31, no. 4: 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040603

APA Style

Capecchi, E., Tomaino, E., Onnelli, G., Ubertini, V., & Saladino, R. (2026). Nature-Inspired Enzymatic Cascades: Emerging Strategies for Sustainable Chemistry. Molecules, 31(4), 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040603

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop