Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Scalp Microbiome Research: Molecular Insights into the Metabolism-Inflammation-Barrier Axis and Dandruff Pathogenesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in Nano-Drug Delivery Systems for Chronic Autoimmune Diseases: A Focus on Diabetes Mellitus, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Rheumatoid Arthritis

1
Hunan Engineering and Technology Research Center for Health Products and Life Science, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China
2
Homologous Innovation Laboratory of Medicine and Food, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China
3
School of Pharmacy, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China
4
Xiangxing College, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Xiangyin Campus, Yueyang 414615, China
5
Guizhou Institute of Crop Germplasm Resources, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2026, 31(12), 2094; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31122094 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 24 April 2026 / Revised: 26 May 2026 / Accepted: 12 June 2026 / Published: 14 June 2026

Abstract

The global prevalence of autoimmune diseases ranges from 3% to 8%, with women at a significantly higher risk than men. The core mechanisms underlying these diseases include impaired T-cell and B-cell immune tolerance, abnormal cytokine production, and aberrant activation of related signaling pathways. Conventional treatments primarily focus on suppressing immune responses, but their efficacy remains limited and they are often associated with substantial side effects. Nanomedicine leverages nanoscale materials to enable precise diagnosis and targeted therapy. Nanocarriers can penetrate biological barriers, enhance cellular uptake, and prolong circulation time in vivo, demonstrating considerable potential for drug delivery. Common nanoscale drug delivery platforms include nanoparticles, polymeric micelles, liposomes, dendrimers, mesoporous materials, hydrogels, and exosomes. Each carrier type possesses distinct characteristics in terms of drug-loading capacity, stability, responsiveness, and biocompatibility, thereby enabling targeted delivery and controlled release. This review summarizes recent advances in nano-delivery technologies for three representative chronic autoimmune diseases: diabetes mellitus (DM), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Nano-delivery systems can improve therapeutic outcomes by optimizing drug delivery, targeting complications, and modulating the pathological microenvironment. They enhance drug bioavailability, reduce off-target and systemic adverse effects, and provide novel strategies for the precise and efficient treatment of chronic autoimmune diseases.

1. Introduction

Autoimmune diseases are a group of conditions in which the body’s immune system mistakenly attacks its own cells and tissues. This abnormal response triggers chronic inflammation and causes damage to multiple organs and tissues, leading to various clinical symptoms and complications. Globally, the overall prevalence of autoimmune diseases ranges from 3% to 8%, with women accounting for 78% to 85% of patients [1]. In the United States, over 15 million people have been diagnosed with at least one autoimmune disease, with 34% having multiple conditions; women are approximately twice as likely to develop these diseases as men [2]. Currently, more than 80 types of autoimmune diseases have been identified, and these diseases exhibit significant differences in target organs, immunopathological mechanisms, and clinical progression [3]. Autoimmune diseases can be classified into organ-specific autoimmune diseases and systemic autoimmune diseases. DM, IBD, multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis all fall under the category of organ-specific autoimmune diseases, in which the patient’s immune system targets specific organs or tissues. In contrast, systemic autoimmune diseases are characterized by the immune system targeting autoantigens that are present in virtually all types of cells, such as in RA and systemic lupus erythematosus [4].
The pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases is characterized by complexity. These diseases share common pathogenic mechanisms, primarily manifested by the disruption of immune tolerance in T cells and B cells, accompanied by abnormal cytokine production and the abnormal activation of related signaling pathways [5]. Due to the highly complex structure and function of the immune system itself, the progression of autoimmune diseases is often unpredictable. Current treatment strategies primarily focus on suppressing immune responses and controlling clinical symptoms; however, these approaches remain limited in achieving long-term, stable disease management and are often associated with significant side effects [6]. Therefore, it is particularly crucial to thoroughly investigate the specific mechanisms driving autoimmune responses. Through the use of nanomaterials, effective drug delivery devices can be developed. In addition, innovative drug targets may help restore immune tolerance or selectively control pathogenic immune signaling. Together, these advances are expected to enable more focused, efficient, and safe treatment strategies for autoimmune diseases and may create new opportunities for treating chronic autoimmune diseases in a targeted manner.
Nanomedicine is a new discipline that uses nanoscale materials to provide assistance in disease diagnosis and therapy. As an example, the methods and materials created based on nanotechnology have already been used in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer [7].The interdisciplinary integration of nanotechnology and pharmacy holds great potential for development and has made rapid progress in recent years. Dendrimers, micelles, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), carbon nanotubes, liposomes, and exosomes are common nanocarriers. They are composed of organic or inorganic compounds, polymers, or metals and are frequently used in targeted drug delivery and controlled-release systems [8,9]. However, the size, charge, morphological structure, and compositional makeup of nanoparticles can all influence their in vivo distribution, cellular penetration efficiency, and the release rate of the loaded drug [10]. Compared to micron-sized particles, nanocarriers possess significant advantages, as their minute size enables them to overcome biological barriers, enhance cellular uptake, and prolong circulation time. Unlike micrometer-sized particles, nanoparticles can achieve passive tumor targeting through enhanced permeation and retention effects and penetrate tissues more deeply [11]. Therefore, under ideal conditions, nanoparticles and materials with good biodegradability [12] and biocompatibility [13] are excellent choices for drug delivery in the biomedical field.
Given the immense potential of nanotechnology in the field of human disease intervention, this review aims to systematically summarize various drug delivery strategies mediated by nanomaterials. It focuses on recent advances in their application for the treatment of chronic autoimmune diseases, with particular emphasis on DM, IBD, and RA, and provides an in-depth analysis of the key issues and core challenges currently facing this field.

2. Applications of Various Nanocarriers in Three Representative Chronic Autoimmune Diseases: DM, IBD, and RA

In the field of disease diagnosis, nanomaterials can leverage high-resolution imaging and highly sensitive sensing technologies to accurately identify various biomarkers, thereby improving the accuracy of early-stage disease screening [14]. In disease treatment, the application of nanoparticles enables targeted drug delivery, which reduces adverse reactions while further enhancing overall therapeutic efficacy [15]. Continuous advancements in controlled-release platforms and nanocarrier technologies are accelerating the development of treatments for chronic autoimmune diseases toward greater precision and efficiency. Nanocarriers serve as highly efficient drug delivery systems capable of loading both natural and synthetic biomolecules, as well as nucleic acid-based drugs, to achieve controlled drug release and exert synergistic effects within tissues, thereby enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. Additionally, various biopolymers can be used to modify their surface and interfacial properties, optimizing delivery performance [16]. Nanomaterials with different structures and morphologies are combined with drug molecules to construct nanoscale drug delivery systems. Based on recent technological advancements, the most widely used drug delivery carriers currently include nanoparticles [17], liposomes [18], polymeric micelles [19], and exosomes [20]. The variety of materials used for drug delivery is rapidly expanding, and these materials demonstrate significant potential for application in both disease diagnosis and treatment [21]. Details of various nano-drug delivery systems are shown in Figure 1.
The following discussion will focus on three chronic autoimmune diseases—DM, IBD, and RA—addressing core pathological mechanisms such as damage to pancreatic β-cells, chronic intestinal inflammation, and synovial infiltration. Therapeutic strategies for three chronic autoimmune diseases are shown in Figure 2. The targeted modification, smart response, and non-invasive delivery capabilities of nanotechnology offer new strategies for overcoming therapeutic bottlenecks in the treatment of these diseases.

2.1. Applications of Nano-Drug Delivery Systems in DM

DM is a chronic metabolic disorder caused by insufficient insulin secretion or impaired insulin action, characterized primarily by persistent hyperglycemia. In 2024, approximately 3.4 million people worldwide died from diabetes, and it is projected that by 2045, the global adult population with DM will reach 783 million, with the disease burden continuing to increase [23]. Based on pathological and physiological mechanisms, DM is primarily classified into type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Type 1 diabetes results from an absolute deficiency of insulin due to autoimmune-mediated destruction of β-cells, while type 2 diabetes is characterized by insulin resistance and progressive β-cell dysfunction. Additionally, the spectrum includes gestational diabetes and other specific types [23,24]. If diabetes is poorly controlled over the long term, it can lead to various secondary complications, such as diabetic nephropathy, diabetic retinopathy(DR), diabetic peripheral neuropathy, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral artery disease [25]. Current standard treatment for diabetes is based on lifestyle interventions combined with oral hypoglycemic agents such as metformin, sulfonylureas, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and DPP-4 inhibitors, as well as insulin injections. Although these approaches can effectively control blood glucose levels, they still have limitations, including low drug bioavailability, the need for frequent dosing, poor patient compliance, and adverse reactions associated with long-term use [25,26]. In contrast, nanodelivery systems, by encapsulating drugs within carriers such as liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, or nanovesicles, protect the drugs from degradation by the acidic environment and enzymes of the gastrointestinal tract, enhance intestinal mucosal permeability, and enable targeted delivery and controlled release. This significantly improves oral bioavailability, offering a new strategy for diabetes management that is both more precise and highly effective [27,28,29]. Applications of specific nano-drug delivery systems in DM are summarized in Table 1.

2.1.1. Optimizing Delivery and Glucose Response

Targeted drug delivery is a rapidly evolving method of drug administration that utilizes carrier systems to transport active substances to target organs or cells. This enables therapeutic drugs to accumulate precisely at the site of the lesion, increasing local drug concentrations and effectively reducing side effects [30]. Targeted delivery systems consist of three core elements: the drug component, the delivery carrier, and the target cells, tissues, or organs to be treated. The carrier itself is non-toxic, biodegradable, low in immunogenicity, and easily detectable. It is used to encapsulate drug molecules and deliver them to the target organ, while simultaneously enhancing drug permeability and bioavailability [31]. Nanoparticles can precisely deliver drugs to target cells; their delivery efficiency is far higher than that of micron-sized particles, and they are less likely to be rapidly cleared by the immune system. Polymer nanoparticles are colloidal systems composed of natural or synthetic polymers, primarily prepared through two methods: direct polymerization of monomers or the dispersion of preformed polymers [32]. Polymer nanoparticles allow for precise control over physicochemical properties such as particle size, shape, structure, and charge, enabling targeted delivery. They can also encapsulate various types of therapeutic agents and achieve efficient drug release in response to external or internal stimuli. Therefore, the design of efficient polymer nanoparticles for drug delivery is of critical importance [33]. Studies have shown that ANG nanoparticles can upregulate LRP-1 expression on the apical surface of Caco-2 cells and promote its redistribution to the basolateral side, thereby establishing a transcellular transport pathway from the apical to the basolateral side. Thanks to this enhanced transcytosis, insulin-loaded ANG nanoparticles demonstrated higher absorption efficiency in diabetic rats, resulting in a maximum reduction in blood glucose levels of 61.46% [34]. In addition to enhancing nanoparticle trans-epithelial transport through ligand modification, the development of smart drug delivery systems using materials responsive to the pathological microenvironment is also a key strategy for optimizing diabetes treatment. Volpatti et al. [35] designed a glucose-responsive nanoparticle based on the reversible binding of glucose to a phenylboronic acid derivative, enabling rapid insulin release upon elevated blood glucose levels and cessation of release once blood glucose returns to normal. A single injection of this formulation can maintain blood glucose within the normal range for up to 12 hours while preventing hypoglycemic events. Compared to injectable smart drug delivery systems, oral insulin formulations offer higher patient compliance but must overcome enzymatic, chemical, and epithelial barriers in the gastrointestinal tract. Hydrogels are a class of three-dimensional cross-linked supramolecular networks with high water-absorption capacity and are among the biomaterials with the greatest potential for development [36]. Hydrogels can be prepared through various methods. For example, the overall gel structure can be formed through several cross-linking mechanisms. These include covalent bonds, ionic bonds, physical entanglement, hydrogen bonds, and other interactions between polar molecules [37]. A pH-responsive microalgal hydrogel-based oral insulin delivery system derived from Chlorella (CV@INS@ALG), cross-linked with calcium alginate, effectively protects insulin from degradation by gastric acid and enzymes and triggers drug release under intestinal pH conditions. CV@INS@ALG demonstrated a more sustained and effective hypoglycemic effect than subcutaneous insulin injection, with no intestinal toxicity [38].

2.1.2. Targeting Microvascular Complications

Diabetic pan-vascular disease is a clinical syndrome characterized by vascular lesions in multiple sites throughout the body, primarily manifested by the coexistence of atherosclerosis in large vessels and structural and functional abnormalities in microvessels. Large-vessel lesions and microvascular damage often coexist in the heart, brain, and peripheral tissues, whereas the kidneys and retina are primarily affected by microvascular lesions [39]. Microvascular complications are the primary cause of disability and mortality in diabetes, and targeted delivery systems can concentrate therapeutic drugs at the sites of lesions. Early oxidative stress plays a critical role in the progression of DR. Li et al. [40] designed a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive nanodelivery system loaded with essential oil of Azalea, which significantly inhibits abnormal cell proliferation and reduces oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. This system not only alleviates early pathological changes in the retina but also mitigates multi-organ damage. Diabetic nephropathy is also one of the primary manifestations of microvascular complications, and renal interstitial fibrosis is a key pathological process in its progression to end-stage renal disease. Liposomes are spherical vesicles composed of one or more concentric phospholipid bilayers enclosing an internal aqueous core [41]. Their internal aqueous phase can be used to encapsulate hydrophilic drugs, while the phospholipid bilayers are suitable for loading lipophilic drugs. Liposomes possess nanoscale particle sizes, structural characteristics similar to biological membranes, and excellent biocompatibility. Consequently, they are increasingly recognized as carrier systems in the field of drug delivery [42]. Liposomes can achieve passive accumulation in pathological tissues through the enhanced permeability and retention effect. Compared to unencapsulated free drugs, this passive targeting strategy can significantly improve pharmacokinetic behavior, reduce non-specific toxicity, and widen the therapeutic window [43]. Carthamin yellow (CY)-loaded glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) liposomes can improve renal function, reduce collagen deposition and the area of fibrosis, and downregulate TGF-β1 expression, with therapeutic efficacy superior to that of vitamin E or free CY. By inhibiting the activation of the TGFBR1/Smad2/Smad3 signaling pathway, these liposomes effectively suppress TGF-β1-stimulated proliferation of human renal interstitial fibroblasts and reduce the expression of fibrosis markers such as fibronectin(FN) and type I collagen [44]. In addition to liposomal delivery, Mesoporous materials have become ideal carriers for drug delivery and release due to their excellent biocompatibility and high thermodynamic stability [45]. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) possess characteristics such as a large specific surface area, tunable mesoporous structures, substantial pore volume and pore size, and ease of surface functionalization. They can efficiently load therapeutic drugs such as genes, peptides, and proteins through chemical bonding or electrostatic adsorption, enabling precise targeted drug delivery [46,47]. One such example is a FN-coated, thiol-linked methoxypolyethylene glycol thiol-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticle (FN@ EGCG-MSN-TK NPs). Under the trigger of high levels of ROS in an inflammatory environment, FN@EGCG-MSN-TK NPs enable the controlled release of EGCG and exhibit excellent biocompatibility and ROS scavenging capacity. By alleviating oxidative stress, inhibiting apoptosis, enhancing autophagy, and regulating macrophage polarization, these nanoparticles significantly improved pathological damage in diabetic nephropathy [48].

2.1.3. Modulating the Wound Microenvironment

Diabetic wounds represent one of the most challenging public health issues today. Their development is associated with infection, insufficient blood supply, and oxidative stress imbalance, and there is a lack of effective treatment options. Due to their small particle size, high safety profile, and good biocompatibility, nanoparticles possess anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties. They can carry various bioactive substances and be combined with biomaterials, demonstrating promising applications in the repair of diabetic wounds [49]. Multifunctional hydrogels, by integrating multiple active ingredients with controlled-release systems, provide a more comprehensive platform for the treatment of diabetic wounds. Dihydromyricetin (DMY) was encapsulated in aldehyde-modified Pluronic F127 micelles, which were then cross-linked with amine-rich polyethyleneimine (PEI) via a Schiff base reaction to construct a multifunctional hydrogel (DPFI). The DPFI hydrogel exerts synergistic effects through the antimicrobial action of PEI and the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of DMY. Concurrently, DMY effectively scavenges ROS, induces the expression of antioxidant enzymes, and promotes the conversion of M1 macrophages to M2 macrophages, thereby alleviating inflammation. Notably, the DPFI hydrogel also exhibits intrinsic blood glucose-regulating functions, which help reduce hyperglycemia-related wound complications [50]. A hyperglycemic environment also poses a serious threat to the survival of multi-vessel flaps during surgery, with distal necrosis closely associated with insufficient perfusion in the “choke zone.” By encapsulating metformin-loaded MSNs within exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, engineered exosomes (M-MS@EXO NPs) were constructed to achieve targeted delivery of metformin. By inhibiting the TNF/apoptosis signaling pathway and enhancing the VEGF signaling pathway, M-MS@EXO NPs exert dual anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic effects, effectively alleviating inflammation in the “choke zone” and promoting neovascularization, thereby reducing distal flap necrosis and significantly improving flap survival rates. Compared with oral metformin, this engineered exosome delivery system enables precise drug delivery within the diabetic microenvironment, offering a new strategy for improving the prognosis of skin flap transplantation in diabetic patients [51].
Table 1. Applications of nano-drug delivery systems in DM management.
Table 1. Applications of nano-drug delivery systems in DM management.
Therapeutic StrategiesTypes of NanocarriersSurface FinishingDrug-LoadedAnimal ModelsFunctionReferences
Optimizing Delivery and Glucose ResponseNanoparticleANGINSSTZ, DM ratsLRP1-mediated transport ↑, BG ↓[34]
Nanoparticlen/aINS + GOx + CATSTZ, DM miceGlucose-responsive release, BG ↓[35]
Nanoparticlen/aMETSTZ, DM ratsSustained release, BG ↓, islet repair ↑[52]
Liposomen/aMETSTZ, DM miceLiver mitochondrial targeting, glucose catabolism ↑, BG ↓[53]
DendrimerGlucose-binding motifMitoPBNSTZ, DM mice, DM pigsGlucose-responsive release, BG ↓[54]
Mesoporous materialAminoModified INSHFD, IR miceCo-delivery, hepatic IR and BG ↓[55]
Mesoporous materialFcBPpFGF21 + LiraSTZ, DM micePro-inflammatory cytokines ↓, macrophage polarization balance ↑, hyperglycemia ↓[56]
Exosomen/aExeSTZ, DM miceFibroblast proliferation/collagen deposition/fibrosis ↓[57]
Targeting microvascular complicationsLiposomeGACYDN ratsROS-responsive release, autophagy ↑,M1 polarization ↓[44]
Mesoporous materialFNEGCGSTZ, DM miceRenal targeting, NF-κB/NLRP3 ↓, renal function ↑[48]
LiposomeCSTAXSTZ, DM miceROS ↓,Akt signaling and cell migration ↑[58]
Regulating the wound microenvironmentHydrogelPF127/PEIDMYSTZ, DM miceInflammation ↓,angiogenesis/flap survival ↑[50]
ExosomeBMSC-EXOMET@MSNsSTZ, DM ratsInflammation/bacteria ↓, angiogenesis ↑[51]
NanoparticleHAORI micelles + Cu(II)-PDA NPsSTZ, DM micePro-inflammatory cytokines ↓, macrophage polarization balance ↑, hyperglycemia ↓[59]
HydrogelGelMA/DAMSC-EXOs + MC-EXOsSTZ, DM miceInflammation/oxidative stress ↓, angiogenesis ↑, macrophage polarization balance ↑[60]
HydrogelFc/CDBBR-micellesSTZ, DM miceM2 polarization ↑, inflammation ↓[61]
HydrogelGelMA/DASLemon-EXOsSTZ, DM ratsMacrophage reprogramming/fibroblast proliferation ↑, sustained release[62]
HydrogelF127/Gel-BACUR-FCHO + Mg micromotorsSTZ, DM micepH-responsive release, inflammation ↓, angiogenesis/collagen deposition ↑[63]
HydrogelQCS-BA/KGMSanqi EVsSTZ, DM micepH-responsive release, angiogenesis/collagen deposition ↑[64]
Table notes: n/a (not applicable or not available), ↑ (up-regulated, increase, activate), ↓ (down-regulated, decrease, inhibit), ANG (angiopep-2), BBR (berberine), BG (blood glucose), BMSC (bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell), CAT (catalase), CP (choline phosphat), CS (chitosan), CUR (curcumin), CY (carthamin yellow), DAS (dialdehyde starch), DN (diabetic nephropathy), EGCG (epigallocatechin gallate), EVs (extracellular vesicles), EXOs (exosomes), Exe (exenatide), FCHO (aldehyde-functionalized Pluronic F127), Fc/CD (ferrocene/cyclodextrin), FcBP (FcRn-binding peptide), FN (fibronectin), GA (glycyrrhetinic acid), Gel-BA (gelatin-benzaldehyde), GelMA (gelatin methacryloyl), GOx (glucose oxidase), HA (hyaluronic acid), HFD (high-fat diet), INS (insulin), IR (insulin resistance), KGM (konjac glucomannan), Lira (liraglutide), MC (Momordica charantia (bitter melon)), MET (metformin hydrochloride), MSC (mesenchymal stem cell), MSNs (mesoporous silica nanoparticles), PEI (polyethylenimine), PF127 (Pluronic F127), pFGF21 (fibroblast growth factor 21 plasmid), QCS-BA (quaternized chitosan-boronic acid), ROS (reactive oxygen species), STZ (streptozotocin), T1DM (type 1 diabetes mellitus), TAX (taxifolin).

2.2. Controlling IBD Using Nanocarriers

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). It is a chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract. Its development is characterized by complex interactions among genetic susceptibility, immune dysregulation, alterations in the gut microbiota, and environmental exposures [65,66]. The epidemiological evolution of IBD is divided into four phases: the emergence phase, the accelerated incidence phase, the compound growth phase of prevalence, and the equilibrium phase of prevalence. In 2020, developing countries were in the emergence phase, newly industrialized countries were in the accelerated phase, and Western countries were in the compound growth phase. In the future, due to the aging of the patient population and the impact of mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic, Western countries will enter the equilibrium phase, where the growth in prevalence stabilizes [67]. Current IBD medications, such as 5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and other biologics, all carry risks of inducing immunosuppression and long-term systemic exposure [68]. Compared to traditional methods, nanocarriers offer numerous advantages in IBD treatment, such as the ability to achieve specific localization and targeted delivery of drugs. They can preferentially accumulate in inflamed areas and release the required drug dose at the target site, thereby reducing potential adverse reactions while enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of the treatment. Furthermore, because nanocarriers remain in the inflamed area for a longer duration, their sustained-release properties can further extend the duration of drug action [69]. By enabling colon-targeted delivery, modulating immune and inflammatory responses, and repairing the intestinal barrier and microenvironment, nanodelivery systems offer new strategies for the treatment of IBD. Applications of specific nano-drug delivery systems in IBD are summarized in Table 2.

2.2.1. Targeted Delivery to the Colon

Oral administration targeting the colon is a highly attractive strategy for treating IBD. However, achieving effective drug delivery to the colon remains challenging, necessitating the design of more advanced delivery systems. Nanocarriers have garnered widespread attention as colon-targeted delivery platforms because their small size and structural composition facilitate drug accumulation at the site of action, thereby aiding in localized therapy [70]. Wang et al. [71] prepared curcumin-loaded anionic liposomes (CUR-LPs) with a particle size of approximately 167 nm and a zeta potential of −34 mV, which exhibited good stability in simulated gastric fluid. CUR-LPs significantly alleviated clinical symptoms such as weight loss, diarrhea, and bloody stools, prevented colonic tissue damage and colonic shortening, and reduced levels of inflammatory markers including malondialdehyde, myeloperoxidase, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α. Therefore, liposomes show great potential as colon-specific delivery carriers for enhancing the stability and anti-inflammatory effects of curcumin. Silica nanoparticles (5-ASA-SiO2 NPs) loaded with 5-ASA were prepared using the microemulsion method and were able to selectively deliver the drug to the inflamed colon in a DSS-induced UC mouse model. Compared with free 5-ASA, these nanoparticles significantly improved the disease activity index and histopathological scores, reduced levels of myeloperoxidase, serum IL-6, and TNF-α, as well as their mRNA expression in the colonic mucosa, thereby effectively enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of UC treatment [72]. Rectal administration allows the drug to act directly on the affected colonic mucosa by avoiding absorption in the upper gastrointestinal tract and first-pass metabolism. However, the efficacy of rectal formulations is often limited by insufficient drug retention time. Mucus-adhering hydrogel-based rectal delivery systems offer a more effective and safer administration strategy for UC treatment. Xu et al. [73] prepared a mucus-adhesive hydrogel (SSZ/Cat-CS) loaded with sulfasalazine (SSZ) using quinidine-crosslinked catechol-modified chitosan (Cat-CS) for rectal administration in the treatment of UC. Compared with oral SSZ, rectal administration of the SSZ/Cat-CS hydrogel demonstrated better therapeutic effects while significantly reducing the plasma concentration of the toxic byproduct sulfonamidopyridine.

2.2.2. Regulation of Immune Inflammation

IBD is an incurable disease characterized by inflammatory immune cell infiltration and inflammatory damage to the intestinal epithelium [74]. To address the issues of instability and poor targeting of oral drugs in the gastrointestinal tract, Zhang et al. [75] employed a one-step surface functionalization technique to prepare PLGA/PLA-PEG-folic acid nanoparticles (NPs-PEG-FA/6-shogaol) loaded with the ginger-derived compound 6-shogaol. NPs-PEG-FA/6-shogaol exhibited good biocompatibility both in vitro and in vivo and were efficiently taken up by C26 cells and activated RAW 264.7 macrophages via receptor-mediated endocytosis. At the same time, these nanoparticles can regulate the expression levels of pro-inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, iNOS) and anti-inflammatory factors (Nrf-2, HO-1), accelerating colonic wound repair. The shift from synthetic nanoparticles to natural, edible plant-derived liposomes offers a new strategy for the treatment of UC. Ginger-derived lipid vesicles (GDLVs) loaded with CD98-targeting siRNA (siRNA-CD98/GDLVs) demonstrated efficient targeting of colonic tissue following oral administration, significantly reducing CD98 expression levels. GDLVs exhibit good biocompatibility and transfection efficiency, effectively avoiding the potential side effects and non-specific issues associated with traditional synthetic nanoparticles [76]. Exosomes are a class of nanoscale extracellular vesicles, typically 30–200 nm in size [77]. They are enclosed by a lipid bilayer membrane, and their formation begins with budding from the endosomal membrane [78]. This process forms multivesicular bodies, which fuse with the plasma membrane to release exosomes into the extracellular environment. Through interactions with neighboring or distant cells, exosomes play a crucial role in regulating various cellular functions [79]. Exosomes possess inherent low immunogenicity, good biocompatibility, and the ability to carry endogenous bioactive molecules (such as proteins and nucleic acids), demonstrating unique advantages in regulating complex immune-inflammatory networks. Treatment of IBD mice with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (hucMSC-Ex) administered via the tail vein demonstrated that hucMSC-Ex effectively suppresses inflammatory responses in vivo and in vitro. The mechanism involves upregulating the expression of SIRT1 and FXR in macrophages, reducing FXR acetylation levels, and thereby inhibiting the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, thus blocking the inflammatory process. By targeting macrophages or inhibiting pro-inflammatory pathways, these nanosystems remodel the intestinal immune microenvironment [80].

2.2.3. Repairing the Intestinal Barrier and Microenvironment

The pathogenesis of IBD is associated with an imbalance in the gut microbiome, impaired intestinal barrier function, and dysregulation of the mucosal immune response to gut commensal bacteria. Traditional medical interventions for IBD primarily aim to control symptoms by suppressing the immune response. However, these approaches typically fail to address the underlying causes of IBD. To address this unmet clinical need, nanomedicines capable of targeting inflamed colonic epithelium, modulating the gut microbiome, and promoting local anti-inflammatory immune responses have demonstrated superior efficacy compared to conventional IBD therapies [81]. Tang et al. [82] developed a supramolecular hydrogel platform based on furanaldehyde-functionalized chitosan-mannan polymers and 3 -maleimide-functionalized HP-β-CD, encapsulating kaempferol (Kae) within the hydrophobic cavity while simultaneously incorporating rhubarb-derived nanovesicles (RNs) into the cross-linked network of the hydrogel, thereby forming the Kae/CMCHD@RNs system. RNs and Kae exhibit synergistic effects in treating UC, including reducing inflammation, alleviating oxidative stress, and restoring intestinal barrier function. The Kae/CMCHD@RNs system utilizes pH/enzyme sensitivity to achieve sustained release at the colonic site and enables targeted delivery to macrophages. Exosome-like nanoparticles isolated from edible Portulaca oleracea L(PELNs) effectively inhibit the expression of pro-inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12, IL-1β) and myeloperoxidase, while elevating levels of the anti-inflammatory factor IL-10. Furthermore, PELNs maintain the diversity and balance of the gut microbiota and promote the growth of Lactobacillus reuteri. By modulating the microbiota-immune axis to treat UC, PELNs offer a new direction for the development of oral, colon-targeted natural nanomedicines [83]. Similar to PELNs, nanovesicles derived from honeysuckle (HNVs) also demonstrate potential for modulating the gut microbiome. Wang et al. [84] isolated and prepared HNVs from honeysuckle. Studies indicate that the therapeutic effects of HNVs are closely associated with beneficial changes in the gut microbiota, including increased abundance of beneficial bacteria, reduced numbers of pathogenic bacteria, elevated levels of short-chain fatty acids, and regulation of bile acid metabolism, thereby maintaining intestinal immune homeostasis.
Table 2. Applications of nano-drug delivery systems in the treatment of IBD.
Table 2. Applications of nano-drug delivery systems in the treatment of IBD.
Therapeutic StrategiesTypes of NanocarriersSurface FinishingDrug-LoadedAnimal ModelsFunctionReferences
Targeted delivery to the colonLiposomen/aCURDSS, UC miceColon targeting, oxidative stress ↓, inflammation ↓[71]
Nanoparticlen/a5-ASADSS, UC miceInflamed-colon targeting, inflammation ↓, histopathology ↑[72]
HydrogelCat-CSSSZUC miceRectal delivery, colon retention ↑, systemic toxicity ↓[73]
Mesoporous materialn/aMDCDSS, UC miceColon targeting, inflammation ↓, oxidative stress ↓, microbiota homeostasis ↑[85]
NanoparticleES1005-ASADSS, UC miceColon targeting, inflammation ↓, mucosal barrier ↑[86]
NanoparticleHA/PEIRHDSS, UC miceColon targeting, macrophage uptake ↑, inflammation ↓[87]
Nanoparticlen/a6-Shogaol + M2/M13DSS, UC miceColon targeting, sustained release, inflammation ↓[88]
LiposomeCH/PTPsoralenDSS, UC miceColon targeting, inflammation ↓, oxidative stress ↓, mucosal barrier ↑[89]
LiposomePT/TMCCelastrolDSS, UC miceColon retention ↑, inflammation ↓[90]
Mesoporous materialAzo-ureaSafranin O + HCTNBS, UC miceColon targeting, inflammation ↓, retention ↑[91]
Hydrogeln/a5-ASAUC miceColon targeting, retention ↑, colitis symptoms ↓[92]
Regulate immune inflammationNanoparticleFA6-ShogaolDSS, UC miceInflamed-colon targeting, uptake ↑, ulcer healing ↑[75]
Liposomen/asiCD98UC miceCD98 ↓, inflammation ↓[76]
Nanoparticlen/aTplUC miceColon targeting, ROS ↓, inflammation ↓[93]
Nanoparticlen/aLMWHUC miceTissue targeting, macrophage cytokines ↓, drug protection ↑[94]
NanoparticleATP-CMIBUDColitis miceLesion accumulation ↑, redox-triggered release[95]
MicelleGC-boronateQueColitis miceLesion accumulation ↑, pH/ROS-responsive release, inflammation ↓[96]
Liposomen/aSODDSS, UC miceOxidative stress ↓, inflammation ↓, barrier protection ↑[97]
Nanoparticlen/aDex + butyrateDSS, UC miceCell adhesion ↓, pro-inflammatory factors ↓, anti-inflammatory effect ↑[98]
NanoparticleMann/aColitis miceMacrophage targeting ↑, imaging/therapy integration ↑[99]
Exosomen/aNAIDSS, acute colitis micePro-inflammatory factors ↓, anti-inflammatory factors ↑[100]
ExosomeEphB2NAIDSS, UC miceImmune balance ↑, inflammation ↓[101]
Restoring the Barrier and the MicrobiomeHydrogelCMCHD/HP-β-CDRNs + KaeUC miceInflammation ↓, oxidative stress ↓, intestinal barrier ↑[82]
Exosomen/aNAIDSS, colitis miceMicrobiota homeostasis ↑, T-cell response ↑[83]
Exosomen/aNAIDSS, UC miceMicrobiota homeostasis ↑, SCFAs ↑, bile acid metabolism ↑[84]
Nanoparticlen/aNatural cargoDSS, IBD miceIEC survival/proliferation ↑, intestinal repair ↑, inflammation balance ↑[102]
HydrogelPAACeO2 NPsIBD miceFree radicals ↓, oxidative inflammation ↓[103]
HydrogelPCLGA-PEG-PCLGA5-ASA + CURUC miceSustained release, inflammation ↓, mucosal barrier ↑[104]
Exosomen/aNAIUC miceMicrobiota homeostasis ↑, tryptophan metabolism ↑, barrier protection ↑[105]
Exosomen/aNAIDSS, colitis miceNETs ↓, zinc homeostasis ↑[106]
Exosomen/aNAIDSS, UC miceMicrobiota/tryptophan metabolism ↑, oxidative stress ↓, inflammation ↓[107]
Exosomen/aNAIDSS, colitis miceNLRP3 signaling ↓, microbiota homeostasis ↑[108]
Exosomen/aCX5461DSS, colitis micePro-inflammatory factors ↓, M2 polarization ↑[109]
Exosomen/aNAIDSS, colitis miceIEC protection ↑, colitis ↓[110]
Exosomen/aNAIDSS, colitis miceMicrobiota homeostasis ↑, M2 polarization ↑[111]
Table notes: n/a (not applicable or not available), ↑ (up-regulated, increase, activate), ↓ (down-regulated, decrease, inhibit), 5-ASA (5-aminosalicylic acid), BUD (budesonide), CeO2 NPs (cerium dioxide nanoparticles), CH (chitosan), CMCHD (carboxymethyl chitosan derivative), CUR (curcumin), Dex (dexamethasone), DSS (dextran sulfate sodium), HA (hyaluronic acid), HC (hydrocortisone), HP-β-CD (hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin), IBD (inflammatory bowel disease), IEC (intestinal epithelial cell), Kae (kaempferol), LMWH (low-molecular-weight heparin), Man (mannosylated), NAI (naturally occurring active ingredients), NETs (neutrophil extracellular traps), PAA (polyacrylic acid), PEG (polyethylene glycol), PEI (polyethyleneimine), PT (pectin), Que (quercetin), RNs (rhubarb-derived nanobubbles), ROS (reactive oxygen species), SCFAs (short-chain fatty acids), siCD98 (small interfering RNA targeting CD98), SOD (superoxide dismutase), SSZ (sulfasalazine), TMC (trimethyl chitosan), TNBS (2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid), Tpl (tempol), UC (ulcerative colitis).

2.3. Applications of Nano-Drug Delivery Systems in RA

RA is a chronic autoimmune disease that primarily affects the joints and surrounding soft tissues. It is closely associated with progressive functional decline, premature mortality, and a significant socioeconomic burden [112]. Globally, the prevalence of RA varies widely, ranging from 0.25% to 1% [113], with women being approximately two to three times more likely to be affected than men [114]. RA is currently considered a multifactorial disease involving complex interactions between host-specific and environmental factors, which collectively influence susceptibility, disease persistence, and severity. Regarding host-related factors, the risk of developing RA can be attributed to genetic, epigenetic, reproductive, neuroendocrine mechanisms, and hormonal levels. Environmental risk factors include dietary patterns, smoking, the microbiome and infectious agents, other air pollutants, and socioeconomic conditions [115]. Current treatment approaches are primarily based on surgical and pharmacological interventions, including biologics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), glucocorticoids, and gene therapy [116]. Taking glucocorticoids as an example, although they possess significant immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects and are widely used to treat RA, adverse reactions such as weight gain, peptic ulcers, and even psychiatric abnormalities have been observed in patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy [117]. Given the broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory effects of nanoparticles, they have been applied in the management of RA. Nanoparticles can neutralize pro-inflammatory cytokines, suppress synovial inflammation, penetrate deep into the cartilage matrix, and provide robust cartilage protection to prevent joint damage [118]. Nanoparticle delivery systems offer a precise and efficient strategy for RA treatment by targeting inflamed joints, modulating the immune response, and promoting cartilage repair. Applications of specific nano-drug delivery systems in RA are summarized in Table 3.

2.3.1. Targeted Delivery to Joints

Increased macrophage infiltration and vascular permeability are major pathological features of RA, providing favorable conditions and target cells for nanomedicine delivery systems [119]. Wang et al. [120] developed a targeted exosome therapeutic system using exosomes derived from anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages as a platform, simultaneously modifying their membrane surface with poly-L-lysine and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-cleavable polyethylene glycol (PEG). Following intravenous injection, PEG prolongs circulation time, and in conjunction with chemokine ligand-mediated active targeting, achieves accumulation in inflamed joints, while the exosomes themselves induce macrophage polarization toward the M2 phenotype. Oral nanoparticle formulations offer unique advantages in terms of patient compliance and long-term safety. Folic acid (FA)-modified chitosan (CS)-coated SLNs were prepared using a layer-by-layer coating technique to load leflunomide. Following oral administration, these nanoparticles significantly improved joint healing, reduced hepatotoxicity, and enhanced anti-inflammatory effects through folate receptor-mediated targeting [121]. In addition to serving as drug delivery carriers, inorganic nanoparticles often possess intrinsic therapeutic functions (such as scavenging ROS). However, traditional inorganic nanomaterials are prone to being coated with a protein shell in vivo, thereby reducing their therapeutic efficacy. To address this issue, Jia et al. [122] loaded methotrexate (MTX) into hollow manganese dioxide nanoparticles (H-MnO2 NPs) and formed a “pseudo-protein corona” coating using HSA at physiological concentrations, yielding HSA-MnO2@MTX NPs. Compared with uncoated nanoparticles, the HSA coating more effectively reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and inhibited the accumulation of ROS. HSA-MnO2@MTX NPs exhibited improved biodistribution, specifically targeted the ankle joint, modulated pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and limited cartilage degradation and signs of inflammation.

2.3.2. Regulation of the Immune Response

The onset and progression of RA are closely associated with the abnormal activation of immune cells, such as macrophages and T cells, as well as inflammatory cytokines. Macrophages are key effector cells in the pathological process of RA. These cells can interact with T cells, B cells, and fibroblast-like synoviocytes, producing large amounts of cytokines, chemokines, digestive enzymes, and ROS, thereby accelerating bone destruction. Therefore, the use of nanomaterials to target macrophages for the treatment of RA is of critical importance [118]. Polymer micelles are core-shell structures formed by the self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymer molecules. The inner core of polymer micelles consists of hydrophobic segments within the copolymer, enabling them to encapsulate poorly water-soluble drugs, antifungal agents [123], and polynucleotides [124]. Meanwhile, the hydrophilic segments form the outer layer of the micelle, enabling it to remain stable in biological systems [125]. The core-shell structure of polymer micelles allows for efficient drug loading and protection against interference from the aqueous environment, making them highly promising for applications in drug delivery. Yu et al. [126] prepared folic acid (FA)-modified micelles based on Panax notoginseng polysaccharide-deoxycholic acid (DC) conjugates for the targeted delivery of polyphyllin I (PPI) to macrophages, naming them FA-PPI-Ms. FA-PPI-Ms undergo FA receptor-mediated endocytosis, scavenge ROS, and inhibit the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway, promoting the polarization of macrophages from the M1 to the M2 phenotype, thereby significantly alleviating joint swelling and synovial inflammation. Dendritic macromolecules are a class of polymeric materials with precisely defined three-dimensional branched conformations. They have demonstrated significant application value in the fields of integrated neurodiagnosis and -therapy as well as biomedicine, and have attracted particular attention as nanoscale drug carriers [127]. The particle size, molecular weight, and solubility properties (including water solubility) of dendrimers can all be flexibly controlled, making them functional materials with an extremely broad range of applications. These macromolecules inherently possess cavity structures capable of accommodating guest molecules, and their surfaces can be engineered to incorporate various functional groups, such as targeting ligands and charged groups, thereby enhancing the material’s biocompatibility while reducing its own toxicity [128,129]. Another study utilized fluorinated polyamidine dendrimer (FP) to deliver miR-23b (FP/miR-23b). Following intravenous injection, FP/miR-23b nanoparticles preferentially accumulated in inflamed joints and were nonspecifically taken up by synovial cells, thereby restoring miR-23b expression in synovial tissue. miR-23b inhibits the NF-κB pathway, reduces pro-inflammatory factors, and induces apoptosis in activated macrophages. Importantly, FP/miR-23b did not cause significant systemic toxicity [130]. As endogenous nanocarriers, exosomes offer advantages such as low immunogenicity, high biocompatibility, and the ability to carry various bioactive molecules. Li et al. [131] utilized exosomes derived from M2 macrophages (M2-Exos) for the treatment of RA. In this study, plasmid DNA (pDNA) encoding the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was co-loaded into M2-Exos with the glucocorticoid betamethasone sodium phosphate, creating a biomimetic co-delivery system (M2 Exo/pDNA/BSP). M2 Exo/pDNA/BSP significantly suppressed the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors (IL-1β, TNF-α) and upregulated the expression of the anti-inflammatory factor IL-10, thereby effectively inducing the polarization of macrophages from the M1 phenotype to the M2 phenotype. Furthermore, exosome-targeted delivery allows for a reduction in the dosage of glucocorticoids, thereby lowering the risk of side effects associated with conventional administration methods. Consequently, M2 exosomes, as a biomimetic nanoplatform, offer a new strategy for the immunotherapy of RA by reprogramming the polarization state of macrophages.

2.3.3. Promoting Cartilage Repair

Advanced RA is often accompanied by irreversible cartilage and bone erosion. The low-cell-density characteristics and acellular nature of cartilage tissue make cartilage repair extremely difficult. Promoting cartilage repair is key to improving prognosis, and nanocarriers offer new opportunities for effective cartilage repair [132]. Nanocarriers can achieve local drug delivery via transdermal routes, thereby enhancing bioavailability. Simultaneously, by utilizing biomimetic microneedle structures to penetrate the skin’s stratum corneum barrier, they precisely deliver therapeutic drugs to the joint cavity, thereby inhibiting the inflammatory death of synovial cells and creating a favorable microenvironment for cartilage repair. Zheng et al. [133] designed and fabricated a biomimetic, double-crosslinked hydrogel-based soluble microneedle (MN). This MN, based on GelMA and methacrylated fibrinogen, is used for transdermal delivery of quercetin liposome nanoparticles modified with the transmembrane peptide TAT (QUE-Lipo-TAT). QUE-Lipo-TAT can block the pyroptosis pathway in RA-FLS by specifically inhibiting caspase-8, thereby preventing pyroptosis in RA-FLS while effectively suppressing inflammatory cell death, abnormal cell proliferation, and migration, thus providing the prerequisites for cartilage self-repair. Regulating the polarization state of macrophages can also alleviate joint inflammation, thereby protecting cartilage from erosion. Exosomes (ADSCs-EXO) were extracted from adipose-derived stem cells and loaded with icariin (ICA) to construct the ADSCs-EXO-ICA delivery system. ADSCs-EXO-ICA can reduce glycolysis levels by inhibiting the ERK/HIF-1α/GLUT1 signaling pathway. Furthermore, ADSCs-EXO-ICA effectively accumulates at joint sites, reducing levels of inflammatory cytokines, alleviating synovitis, and protecting cartilage integrity [134]. Regulating the gut microbiota-immune axis also offers a new approach to cartilage protection in RA. Han et al. [135] isolated and extracted ELNs from Pueraria root(Pu-ELNs)to target Ruminococcus gnavus, a pathogenic bacterium enriched in the intestines of RA patients. Mechanistic studies have shown that R. gnavus induces excessive neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation by secreting phenylethylamine (PEA), thereby exacerbating arthritis. Pu-ELNs can inhibit the expression of phenylalanine decarboxylase, reduce PEA production, and thereby alleviate arthritis symptoms. By regulating gut microbiota metabolism, Pu-ELNs indirectly alleviate joint inflammation and cartilage destruction.
Table 3. Applications of nano-drug delivery systems in the treatment of RA.
Table 3. Applications of nano-drug delivery systems in the treatment of RA.
Therapeutic StrategiesTypes of NanocarriersSurface FinishingDrug-LoadedAnimal ModelsFunctionReferences
Targeted delivery to jointsExosomeOligolysine + MMP-cleavable PEGExosomes + cfDNA scavengingCIA miceJoint targeting, cfDNA ↓, M2 polarization ↑[120]
NanoparticleCS/FALefAIA ratsFR targeting, sustained release, joint repair ↑[121]
NanoparticleHSAMTXCIA ratsAnkle targeting, ROS/inflammation ↓, synoviocyte proliferation ↓[122]
NanoparticleMSC membrane (LFA-1/ICAM-1)DexCIA mice Joint targeting, inflammation ↓, cartilage protection ↑[136]
LiposomeCKDexCIA miceJoint targeting, anti-inflammation ↑[137]
LiposomeHADSP nanogelCIA ratsJoint targeting, inflammation ↓, cartilage repair ↑[138]
LiposomePDAMTX + O2 generatorAIA ratsJoint targeting, hypoxia/ROS ↓, synergistic therapy ↑[139]
NanoparticleHA + mixed membranesINDAIA ratsJoint targeting, pH-responsive release, inflammation ↓[140]
ExosomeCD90 AbPBCIA miceInflammation ↓, joint swelling ↓[141]
Regulate the immune responseMicelleFAPPICIA ratsJAK2/STAT3 ↓, M2 polarization ↑[126]
DendrimerFPmiR-23bAIA ratsMacrophage apoptosis ↑, NF-kB signaling ↓[130]
Exosomen/aIL-10 pDNA + BSPCIA miceM1-to M2 reprogramming ↑, inflammation ↓[131]
Hydrogeln/aSIN + GAAIA miceNeutrophil overactivation ↓, apoptosis normalization ↑[142]
Mesoporous materialn/aZn-CurAIA miceAntioxidant activity ↑, M2 polarization ↑, mineralization ↑[143]
NanoparticlePCL-ACGA + BudCIA ratsInflammation ↓, bone/cartilage damage ↓, joint histology ↑[144]
NanoparticleCD44/FR ligandRBAAIA ratsTargeted delivery, ERK/HIF-1alpha/GLUT1 ↓[145]
Nanoparticlen/amiR-124 + KetAIA ratsAcid-responsive release, inflammation ↓, arthritis progression ↓[146]
NanoparticleRGD + MMP-9-cleavable PEGCELAIA ratsMacrophage/osteoclast targeting, apoptosis ↑[147]
Nanoparticlen/aIL-10 pDNA + DSPCIA ratsSynovial macrophage targeting, M1 to M2 polarization ↑[148]
Micellen/aTP + VPCIA miceInflammation/oxidative stress ↓, swelling/bone erosion ↓[149]
DendrimerFPmiR-30aCIA miceNF-kB/MAPK ↓, arthritis ↓[150]
Dendrimern/an/aCIA ratscfDNA ↓, joint inflammation ↓[151]
Hydrogeln/aDNase ICIA miceInflammatory factors ↓, arthritis symptoms ↓[152]
ExosomeM2 exosome membraneCuS + CitP + RapACIA miceT-cell apoptosis ↑, immune tolerance ↑[153]
Exosomen/aIkBalpha inhibitorSKG and CIA miceNF-kB ↓, inflammation ↓, cartilage damage ↓[154]
ExosomeFAGDEV cargoCIA miceM1 macrophage targeting, PI3K-AKT modulation[155]
Exosomen/aPD-L1 cargoCIA miceJoint targeting, T-cell activity ↓[156]
Nanoparticlen/aNAICIA miceanti-inflammatory, MAPK ↓[157]
Exosomen/aNAICAIA miceattenuated synovitis, arthritis severity ↓[158]
Exosomen/aCTLA-4Ig cargoCIA miceImmune modulation ↑, cartilage protection ↑[159]
Promotes cartilage repairHydrogelTAT (DSPE-PEG2K-TAT)QueCIA ratsPyroptosis/necroptosis ↓, inflammation/synovial hyperplasia ↓ [133]
Exosomen/aICACIA ratsM1 to M2 polarization ↑, synovitis ↓, cartilage protection ↑ [134]
Exosomen/agma-miR4412CIA miceNETs ↓, arthritis ↓, cartilage protection ↑ [135]
Hydrogeln/aMTX NP + PEITC NEAIA ratsAnti-inflammation/chondroprotection ↑, cartilage degradation ↓[160]
Hydrogeln/aMTXAIA ratsCartilage repair ↑, hyperalgesia ↓[161]
Exosomen/aSiO2-MTXAIA and CIA miceM2 polarization ↑, cartilage protection ↑[162]
ExosomeLMWH (ROS-responsive linker)DexCIA miceNeutrophil apoptosis ↑, oxidative damage ↓[163]
Table notes: n/a (not applicable or not available), ↑ (up-regulated, increase, activate), ↓ (down-regulated, decrease, inhibit), AIA (adjuvant-induced arthritis), BSP (betamethasone sodium phosphate), cfDNA (cell-free DNA), CEL (celastrol), CIA (collagen-induced arthritis), CAIA (collagen antibody-induced arthritis), CitP (citrullinated peptide), CS (chitosan), CTLA-4Ig (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immunoglobulin), CuS (copper sulfide), Dex (dexamethasone), DNase (deoxyribonuclease), DSP (sodium dexamethasone phosphate), FA (folic acid), FP (fluorinated polyamidine dendrimer), FR (folate receptor), GA (glycyrrhizic acid), GDEV (ginger-derived extracellular vesicle), HA (hyaluronic acid), HSA (human serum albumin), ICA (icariin), ICAM-1 (intercellular adhesion molecule-1), IkBalpha (inhibitor of kappa B alpha), IL-10 pDNA (plasmid DNA encoding interleukin-10), IND (indomethacin), LFA-1 (lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1), LMWH (low-molecular-weight heparin), MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase), MSC (mesenchymal stem cell), MTX (methotrexate), NAI (naturally occurring active ingredients), NETs (neutrophil extracellular traps), NP (nanoparticle), PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1), PEG (polyethylene glycol), PEITC (phenethyl isothiocyanate), PPI (polyphyllin I), PB (Prussian blue), Que (quercetin), RBA (roburic acid), RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid), ROS (reactive oxygen species), SiO2 (silica), SIN (sinapine), SKG (SKG arthritis model), TAT (trans-activator of transcription peptide), TP (trichosanthin), VP (L-ascorbyl palmitate), Zn-Cur (zinc-curcumin).

3. Conclusions and Future Prospects

Nano-drug delivery systems have opened up new avenues for the treatment of chronic autoimmune diseases, including DM, IBD, and RA. By enabling targeted delivery, controlled release, and improved pharmacokinetic behavior, nanotechnology has significantly overcome the limitations of traditional immunosuppressive therapies, such as low bioavailability, severe off-target effects, and poor patient compliance. Various nanocarriers, such as polymeric nanoparticles, liposomes, micelles, dendrimers, mesoporous silica, hydrogels, and exosomes, have demonstrated promising results in preclinical studies, capable of modulating immune responses, reducing inflammation, and promoting tissue repair.
Despite these advances, the clinical translation of nanomedicines in the field of autoimmune diseases still faces significant challenges. Currently, most studies remain in the preclinical stage, and there is an urgent need to establish standardized protocols for large-scale production and a comprehensive toxicological evaluation system. Thus, future studies must involve the development of personalized nanocarriers specific to individual patient immune profiles. They must also include engineering intelligent, responsive delivery systems, like carriers responsive to ROS, pH, or enzymes, to facilitate on-demand drug delivery depending upon disease activity. Diagnostics-therapeutics integration, that is, combining diagnostic and therapeutic activities to observe the response to the treatment in real time, is another key direction. Furthermore, investigating noninvasive administration routes, including oral, transdermal MN, and inhalation, is necessary to enhance the compliance with long-term treatment. Before regulatory acceptance, the risk-benefit analysis of the long-term organ toxicity of nanomedicines, such as effects on the liver, kidneys, spleen, and lungs, as well as their possible immunosuppressive properties, is required to be performed carefully. With the deepening of multidisciplinary collaboration, nanotechnology is expected to drive a fundamental shift in the management of chronic autoimmune diseases, moving from symptom control toward immune modulation and ultimately the restoration of immune tolerance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.H. and Z.X.; data collection and analysis: M.H., Y.Z.,T.M. and L.Z.; software and visualization: M.H., L.Y. and Y.Z.; drafting of the article: M.H., Y.Z. and X.L.; funding acquisition: Z.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the project “Hunan Natural Science Foundation, grant number 2024JJ8163”; the project “State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of traditional Chinese medicine monitoring statistics research subject, grant number 2025JCTJA60”; and the project “Modern Agricultural Technology System of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Guizhou Province, grant number GZZYCCYJSTX-02”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and would like to confirm that all individuals included in this acknowledgement have consented to be acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BSPBetamethasone sodium phosphate
Cat-CSCatechol-modified chitosan
CDCrohn’s disease
CUR-LPsCurcumin-loaded anionic liposomes
DCDeoxycholic acid
DMARDsDisease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
DR Diabetic retinopathy
FN Fibronectin
FPFluorinated polyamidine dendrimer
GAGlycyrrhetinic acid
GelMAGelatin Methacryloyl
GDLVsGinger-derived lipid vesicles
HNVsHoneysuckle-derived nanovesicles
HSAHuman serum albumin
IBDInflammatory bowel disease
ICAIcariin
KaeKaempferol
MMPMatrix metalloproteinase
MSNsMesoporous silica nanoparticles
M2-ExosExosomes derived from M2 macrophages
MNMicroneedle
MTXMethotrexate
pDNAplasmid DNA
PEAPhenylethylamine
PEGPolyethylene glycol
PELNsExosome-like nanoparticles isolated from edible Portulaca oleracea L
PPIPolyphyllin I
Pu-ELNsPueraria lobata-derived exosome-like nanovesicles
RARheumatoid arthritis
RNsRhubarb-derived nanovesicles
ROSReactive oxygen species
SLNsSolid lipid nanoparticles
SSZ Sulfasalazine
UCUlcerative colitis

References

  1. Wang, L.; Wang, F.-S.; Gershwin, M.E. Human Autoimmune Diseases: A Comprehensive Update. J. Intern. Med. 2015, 278, 369–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Abend, A.H.; He, I.; Bahroos, N.; Christianakis, S.; Crew, A.B.; Wise, L.M.; Lipori, G.P.; He, X.; Murphy, S.N.; Herrick, C.D.; et al. Estimation of Prevalence of Autoimmune Diseases in the United States Using Electronic Health Record Data. J. Clin. Invest. 2025, 135, e178722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pisetsky, D.S. Pathogenesis of Autoimmune Disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2023, 19, 509–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bieber, K.; Hundt, J.E.; Yu, X.; Ehlers, M.; Petersen, F.; Karsten, C.M.; Köhl, J.; Kridin, K.; Kalies, K.; Kasprick, A.; et al. Autoimmune Pre-Disease. Autoimmun. Rev. 2023, 22, 103236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rosenblum, M.D.; Remedios, K.A.; Abbas, A.K. Mechanisms of Human Autoimmunity. J. Clin. Invest. 2015, 125, 2228–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fugger, L.; Jensen, L.T.; Rossjohn, J. Challenges, Progress, and Prospects of Developing Therapies to Treat Autoimmune Diseases. Cell 2020, 181, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, B.; Hu, S.; Teng, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, H.; Xu, Y.; Wang, K.; Xu, J.; Cheng, Y.; Gao, X. Current Advance of Nanotechnology in Diagnosis and Treatment for Malignant Tumors. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 201–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wakaskar, R.R. General Overview of Lipid–Polymer Hybrid Nanoparticles, Dendrimers, Micelles, Liposomes, Spongosomes and Cubosomes. J. Drug Target. 2018, 26, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tenchov, R.; Hughes, K.J.; Ganesan, M.; Iyer, K.A.; Ralhan, K.; Lotti Diaz, L.M.; Bird, R.E.; Ivanov, J.M.; Zhou, Q.A. Transforming Medicine: Cutting-Edge Applications of Nanoscale Materials in Drug Delivery. ACS Nano 2025, 19, 4011–4038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sykes, E.A.; Dai, Q.; Sarsons, C.D.; Chen, J.; Rocheleau, J.V.; Hwang, D.M.; Zheng, G.; Cramb, D.T.; Rinker, K.D.; Chan, W.C.W. Tailoring Nanoparticle Designs to Target Cancer Based on Tumor Pathophysiology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E1142–E1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Batty, C.J.; Bachelder, E.M.; Ainslie, K.M. Historical Perspective of Clinical Nano and Microparticle Formulations for Delivery of Therapeutics. Trends Mol. Med. 2021, 27, 516–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gagliardi, A.; Giuliano, E.; Venkateswararao, E.; Fresta, M.; Bulotta, S.; Awasthi, V.; Cosco, D. Biodegradable Polymeric Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery to Solid Tumors. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 601626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Wan, W.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Lin, K.; Yang, J.; Hao, J.; Tian, F. Rational Design of pH-Responsive Nano-Delivery System with Improved Biocompatibility and Targeting Ability from Cellulose Nanocrystals via Surface Polymerization for Intracellular Drug Delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 281, 136435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jalalvand, A.R.; Karami, M.M. Roles of Nanotechnology in Electrochemical Sensors for Medical Diagnostic Purposes: A Review. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2025, 47, 100733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Al-Thani, A.N.; Jan, A.G.; Abbas, M.; Geetha, M.; Sadasivuni, K.K. Nanoparticles in Cancer Theragnostic and Drug Delivery: A Comprehensive Review. Life Sci. 2024, 352, 122899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Petrikaite, V.; D’Avanzo, N.; Celia, C.; Fresta, M. Nanocarriers Overcoming Biological Barriers Induced by Multidrug Resistance of Chemotherapeutics in 2D and 3D Cancer Models. Drug Resist. Updat. 2023, 68, 100956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gao, X.; Liu, X.; Wang, N.; Cui, C.; Liu, W.; Yang, M.; Li, Q.; Ou, Y.; Ning, A.; Wei, X.; et al. Nanoparticles Hijack Calvarial Immune Cells for CNS Drug Delivery and Stroke Therapy. Cell 2026, 189, 1341–1355.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Moghimipour, E.; Handali, S. Functionalized Liposomes as a Potential Drug Delivery Systems for Colon Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 269, 132023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Eczacioglu, N.; Postina, A.; Ebert, M.; Laffleur, F.; Kali, G.; Seybold, A.; Bernkop-Schnürch, A. Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems: A Comparison of Dry and Wet Reverse Micelles. Acta Biomater. 2025, 202, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hao, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, J. Exosomes as Drug Delivery Systems in Glioma Immunotherapy. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 22, 341–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Larrañeta, E.; Domínguez-Robles, J. Long-Acting Drug Delivery Systems: Current Landscape and Future Prospects. Drug Discov. Today 2025, 30, 104447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jiang, S.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Mu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, T.; Wu, J.; Tang, H.; Zheng, S.; Liu, Y.; et al. Generic Diagramming Platform (GDP): A Comprehensive Database of High-Quality Biomedical Graphics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D1671–D1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mohd, S.; Kumar, L.L.; Harish, V.; Kumar, R.; Chaudhary, A.; Sharma, V. Diabetes Mellitus: Complications, Emerging Therapeutic Targets, and Evolving Treatment Approaches. Obes. Med. 2025, 58, 100652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wen, S.; Yuan, Y.; Li, Y.; Xu, C.; Chen, L.; Ren, Y.; Wang, C.; He, Y.; Li, X.; Gong, M.; et al. The Effects of Non-Insulin Anti-Diabetic Medications on the Diabetic Microvascular Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2025, 25, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pinto, S.F.T.; Santos, H.A.; Sarmento, B.F.C.C. New Insights into Nanomedicines for Oral Delivery of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Analogs. WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 16, e1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Umar, M.; Sherazi, T.A.; Talha, M.; Ramadan, M.F.; Ahmed, A.E.; Taha, R.; Naqvi, S.A.R. Nanoliposome-Based Drug Delivery Systems for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: A Review. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 49119–49143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liang, J.; Bai, M.; Bi, Y.; Jian, X.; Wang, S.; Jiang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, W.; Yin, S.; Zhang, W. Heyndrickxia Coagulans Spore-Based Nanoparticle Generator for Improved Oral Insulin Delivery and Hypoglycemic Therapy. J. Control. Release 2025, 378, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chu, C.; Wei, M.; Bian, C.; Bi, X.; Deng, Y.; Xiao, P.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Y.; He, H.; Gou, J.; et al. Oral Dosed Organo-Silica Nanoparticles Restore Glucose Homeostasis and β-Cell Function in Diabetes Rats. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 36, e19628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xia, B.; Xu, F.; Chen, J.; Shan, S.; Shen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Z.; Sun, W.; Jia, Y.; et al. Site-Specific Adaptive Nanovesicles for Oral Insulin Delivery. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eady6386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liang, Y.; Duan, L.; Lu, J.; Xia, J. Engineering Exosomes for Targeted Drug Delivery. Theranostics 2021, 11, 3183–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ashique, S.; Sandhu, N.K.; Chawla, V.; Chawla, P.A. Targeted Drug Delivery: Trends and Perspectives. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2021, 18, 1435–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pulingam, T.; Foroozandeh, P.; Chuah, J.-A.; Sudesh, K. Exploring Various Techniques for the Chemical and Biological Synthesis of Polymeric Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Beach, M.A.; Nayanathara, U.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Such, G.K. Polymeric Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. Chem. Rev. 2024, 124, 5505–5616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, X.; Wu, R.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, R.; Li, L.; Xiang, Y.; Wu, J.; Xing, L.; Huang, Y. Angiopep-2-Functionalized Nanoparticles Enhance Transport of Protein Drugs across Intestinal Epithelia by Self-Regulation of Targeted Receptors. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 2903–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Volpatti, L.R.; Matranga, M.A.; Cortinas, A.B.; Delcassian, D.; Daniel, K.B.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D.G. Glucose-Responsive Nanoparticles for Rapid and Extended Self-Regulated Insulin Delivery. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 488–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ahmad, Z.; Salman, S.; Khan, S.A.; Amin, A.; Rahman, Z.U.; Al-Ghamdi, Y.O.; Akhtar, K.; Bakhsh, E.M.; Khan, S.B. Versatility of Hydrogels: From Synthetic Strategies, Classification, and Properties to Biomedical Applications. Gels 2022, 8, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Koetting, M.C.; Peters, J.T.; Steichen, S.D.; Peppas, N.A. Stimulus-Responsive Hydrogels: Theory, Modern Advances, and Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2015, 93, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ren, C.; Zhong, D.; Qi, Y.; Liu, C.; Liu, X.; Chen, S.; Yan, S.; Zhou, M. Bioinspired pH-Responsive Microalgal Hydrogels for Oral Insulin Delivery with Both Hypoglycemic and Insulin Sensitizing Effects. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 14161–14175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, S.; Gao, M.; Wang, W.; Chen, K.; Huang, L.; Liu, Y. Diabetic Vascular Diseases: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 152–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Geng, K.; Lu, X.; Shen, X.; Guo, Q. ROS-Responsive Nanoparticles with Antioxidative Effect for the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2025, 36, 441–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guimarães, D.; Cavaco-Paulo, A.; Nogueira, E. Design of Liposomes as Drug Delivery System for Therapeutic Applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 601, 120571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, M.; Du, C.; Guo, N.; Teng, Y.; Meng, X.; Sun, H.; Li, S.; Yu, P.; Galons, H. Composition Design and Medical Application of Liposomes. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 164, 640–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sobol, Ż.; Chiczewski, R.; Wątróbska-Świetlikowska, D. Advances in Liposomal Drug Delivery: Multidirectional Perspectives on Overcoming Biological Barriers. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, Y.; He, W.; Ren, P.; Zhao, L.; Zheng, D.; Jin, J. Carthamin Yellow-Loaded Glycyrrhetinic Acid Liposomes Alleviate Interstitial Fibrosis in Diabetic Nephropathy. Ren. Fail. 2025, 47, 2459356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhao, H.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Q.; Cui, J.; Shi, A.; Wu, J. Environmental Stimulus-Responsive Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as Anticancer Drug Delivery Platforms. Colloids Surf. B 2024, 234, 113758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Escriche-Navarro, B.; Escudero, A.; Lucena-Sánchez, E.; Sancenón, F.; García-Fernández, A.; Martínez-Máñez, R. Mesoporous Silica Materials as an Emerging Tool for Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2200756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nguyen, T.L.; Choi, Y.; Kim, J. Mesoporous Silica as a Versatile Platform for Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1803953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, C.; Zhang, P.; Cheng, Q.; Fu, S.; Qiu, R.; Wang, R.; Xiong, X. Fibronectin-Assisted Reactive Oxygen Species-Responsive Mesoporous Silica-Loaded Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate for Treating Diabetic Nephropathy by Enhancing Autophagy and Regulating M1-Type Macrophage Polarization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 321, 146353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Qin, W.; Wu, Y.; Liu, J.; Yuan, X.; Gao, J. A Comprehensive Review of the Application of Nanoparticles in Diabetic Wound Healing: Therapeutic Potential and Future Perspectives. Int. J. Nanomed. 2022, 17, 6007–6029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, H.; Wen, H.; Zhang, H.; Cao, X.; Li, L.; Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, X.; Shubhra, Q.T.H.; Yang, H.; et al. A Multifunctional Dihydromyricetin-Loaded Hydrogel for the Sequential Modulation of Diabetic Wound Healing and Glycemic Control. Burn. Trauma 2025, 13, tkaf024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sun, C.; Su, J.; Wang, Z.; Liu, C.; Yi, X.; Chen, W.; Zhang, D.; Yu, A. Engineering Stem Cell Exosomes Promotes the Survival of Multi-Territory Perforator Flap in Diabetes via Regulating Anti-Inflammatory and Angiogenesis. Regen. Biomater. 2025, 12, rbaf075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lari, A.S.; Zahedi, P.; Ghourchian, H.; Khatibi, A. Microfluidic-Based Synthesized Carboxymethyl Chitosan Nanoparticles Containing Metformin for Diabetes Therapy: In Vitro and in Vivo Assessments. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 261, 117889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wu, M.; Liao, L.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, C.; Gao, H.; Qiao, L.; Liu, S.; Shi, D. Liver-Targeted Nano-MitoPBN Normalizes Glucose Metabolism by Improving Mitochondrial Redox Balance. Biomaterials 2019, 222, 119457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Xian, S.; Xiang, Y.; Liu, D.; Fan, B.; Mitrová, K.; Ollier, R.C.; Su, B.; Alloosh, M.A.; Jiráček, J.; Sturek, M.; et al. Insulin–Dendrimer Nanocomplex for Multi-Day Glucose-Responsive Therapy in Mice and Swine. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2308965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Geng, S.; Qin, L.; He, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, M.; Li, L.; Liu, D.; Li, Y.; Niu, D.; Yang, G. Effective and Safe Delivery of GLP-1AR and FGF-21 Plasmids Using Amino-Functionalized Dual-Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles in Vitro and in Vivo. Biomaterials 2021, 271, 120763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zou, Z.; Zhuo, Y.; Liu, C.; Nie, D.; Gan, Y.; Yu, M. Enhanced Gut-to-Liver Oral Drug Delivery via Ligand-Modified Nanoparticles by Attenuating Protein Corona Adsorption. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 35311–35324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, X.; An, H.; Du, Y.; Zhong, H.; Zhang, F.; Zeng, X.; Lv, F.; Tian, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Peng, Q.; et al. hucMSC-Derived Exosomes Targeting Macrophage Polarization Attenuate Systemic Inflammation in T1DM via INS/SOD1 Delivery. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2025, 16, 384–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhao, Y.; Ding, Q.; He, Q.; Zu, T.; Rong, Z.; Wu, Y.; Shmanai, V.V.; Jiao, J.; Zheng, R. Reno Protective Potential of Taxifolin Liposomes Modified by Chitosan in Diabetic Mice. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 306, 141464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nan, W.; Wang, H.; Li, L.; Du, J.; Wei, X.; Wang, D.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ding, D.; Chen, H. Microneedles Incorporating Oridonin Micelles and Cu(II)-Polydopamine Provide Effective Inflammatory Regulation and Antibacterial Effects for the Healing of Infected Diabetic Wounds. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2025, 254, 114814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Weng, J.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Jin, W.; Ji, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Li, H.; Yi, M.; Niu, X.; et al. A Novel Hydrogel Loaded with Plant Exosomes and Stem Cell Exosomes as a New Strategy for Treating Diabetic Wounds. Mater. Today Bio 2025, 32, 101810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Liang, X.; Chen, H.; Zhang, R.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, G.; Xu, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xu, F.-J. Herbal Micelles-Loaded ROS-Responsive Hydrogel with Immunomodulation and Microenvironment Reconstruction for Diabetic Wound Healing. Biomaterials 2025, 317, 123076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jin, E.; Yang, Y.; Cong, S.; Chen, D.; Chen, R.; Zhang, J.; Hu, Y.; Chen, W. Lemon-Derived Nanoparticle-Functionalized Hydrogels Regulate Macrophage Reprogramming to Promote Diabetic Wound Healing. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025, 23, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, T.; Cheng, X.; Xiu, J.; Liu, M.; Liu, S.; Zhang, B.; Miao, Q.; Cun, D.; Yang, C.; Li, K.; et al. pH-Responsive Injectable Multifunctional Pluronic F127/Gelatin-Based Hydrogels with Hydrogen Production for Treating Diabetic Wounds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 55392–55408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xia, F.; Li, X.; Wen, X.; Chen, B.; Wu, G.; Ye, X.; Sun, Y.; Liu, X.; Fan, L.; Wang, Y.; et al. Targeting Single-Cell Multiomics-Identified Vascular Impairment: Panax Notoginseng Extracellular Vesicles-Loaded Adhesive QBK-2/EVs Promotes Angiogenesis in Diabetic Wound Healing. Mater. Today Bio 2026, 36, 102714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, Y.-Z. Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pathogenesis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Calvez, V.; Puca, P.; Di Vincenzo, F.; Del Gaudio, A.; Bartocci, B.; Murgiano, M.; Iaccarino, J.; Parand, E.; Napolitano, D.; Pugliese, D.; et al. Novel Insights into the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kaplan, G.G.; Windsor, J.W. The Four Epidemiological Stages in the Global Evolution of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, F.; Liu, Q.; Xiong, Y.; Xu, L. Current Strategies and Potential Prospects of Nanomedicine-Mediated Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 4225–4237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Nedelcu, A.; Mosteanu, O.; Pop, T.; Mocan, T.; Mocan, L. Recent Advances in Nanoparticle-Mediated Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dos Santos, A.M.; Carvalho, S.G.; Meneguin, A.B.; Sábio, R.M.; Gremião, M.P.D.; Chorilli, M. Oral Delivery of Micro/Nanoparticulate Systems Based on Natural Polysaccharides for Intestinal Diseases Therapy: Challenges, Advances and Future Perspectives. J. Control. Release 2021, 334, 353–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, C.; Han, Z.; Wu, Y.; Lu, X.; Tang, X.; Xiao, J.; Li, N. Enhancing Stability and Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Curcumin in Ulcerative Colitis Therapy Using Liposomes Mediated Colon-Specific Drug Delivery System. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 151, 112123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tang, H.; Xiang, D.; Wang, F.; Mao, J.; Tan, X.; Wang, Y. 5-ASA-Loaded SiO2 Nanoparticles-a Novel Drug Delivery System Targeting Therapy on Ulcerative Colitis in Mice. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 15, 1117–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Xu, J.; Tam, M.; Samaei, S.; Lerouge, S.; Barralet, J.; Stevenson, M.M.; Cerruti, M. Mucoadhesive Chitosan Hydrogels as Rectal Drug Delivery Vessels to Treat Ulcerative Colitis. Acta Biomater. 2017, 48, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhao, Y.; Yin, W.; Yang, Z.; Sun, J.; Chang, J.; Huang, L.; Xue, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhi, H.; Chen, S.; et al. Nanotechnology-Enabled M2 Macrophage Polarization and Ferroptosis Inhibition for Targeted Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment. J. Control. Release 2024, 367, 339–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, M.; Xu, C.; Liu, D.; Han, M.K.; Wang, L.; Merlin, D. Oral Delivery of Nanoparticles Loaded with Ginger Active Compound, 6-Shogaol, Attenuates Ulcerative Colitis and Promotes Wound Healing in a Murine Model of Ulcerative Colitis. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2018, 12, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Han, M.K.; Collins, J.F.; Merlin, D. Oral Administration of Ginger-Derived Nanolipids Loaded with siRNA as a Novel Approach for Efficient siRNA Drug Delivery to Treat Ulcerative Colitis. Nanomedicine 2017, 12, 1927–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gurung, S.; Perocheau, D.; Touramanidou, L.; Baruteau, J. The Exosome Journey: From Biogenesis to Uptake and Intracellular Signalling. Cell Commun. Signal. 2021, 19, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, X.; Tian, L.; Lu, J.; Ng, I.O.-L. Exosomes and Cancer - Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Vehicle. Oncogenesis 2022, 11, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kalluri, R.; LeBleu, V.S. The Biology , Function , and Biomedical Applications of Exosomes. Science 2020, 367, eaau6977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhou, M.; Pei, B.; Cai, P.; Yi, C.; Akanyibah, F.A.; Lyu, C.; Mao, F. Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Repair IBD by Activating the SIRT1-FXR Pathway in Macrophages. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2025, 16, 233–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lee, Y.; Sugihara, K.; Gillilland, M.G.; Jon, S.; Kamada, N.; Moon, J.J. Hyaluronic Acid–Bilirubin Nanomedicine for Targeted Modulation of Dysregulated Intestinal Barrier, Microbiome and Immune Responses in Colitis. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tang, X.; Wang, K.; Liu, Z.; Luo, X.; Wu, M.; Ding, H.; Liu, G.; Du, Q. Functional Chitosan/HP-β-CD Hydrogel for Targeted Co-Delivery of Rhubarb-Derived Nanovesicles and Kaempferol for Alleviating Ulcerative Colitis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 352, 123206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhu, M.; Xu, H.; Liang, Y.; Xu, J.; Yue, N.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, C.; Yao, J.; Wang, L.; Nie, Y.; et al. Edible Exosome-like Nanoparticles from Portulaca Oleracea L Mitigate DSS-Induced Colitis via Facilitating Double-Positive CD4+CD8+T Cells Expansion. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 21, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, Q.; Li, Y.; Huang, Y.; Yu, K.; Li, P.; Lv, Z.; Liu, H.; Zou, H.; et al. Honeysuckle-Derived Nanovesicles Regulate Gut Microbiota for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e05208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zhang, L.; Gui, S.; Xu, Y.; Zeng, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, Q.; Su, L.; Wang, Z.; Deng, R.; Chu, F.; et al. Colon Tissue-Accumulating Mesoporous Carbon Nanoparticles Loaded with Musca Domestica Cecropin for Ulcerative Colitis Therapy. Theranostics 2021, 11, 3417–3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ahmad, A.; Ansari, M.M.; Mishra, R.K.; Kumar, A.; Vyawahare, A.; Verma, R.K.; Raza, S.S.; Khan, R. Enteric-Coated Gelatin Nanoparticles Mediated Oral Delivery of 5-Aminosalicylic Acid Alleviates Severity of DSS-Induced Ulcerative Colitis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 119, 111582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Chen, Q.; Luo, R.; Han, X.; Zhang, J.; He, Y.; Qi, S.; Pu, X.; Nie, W.; Dong, L.; Xu, H.; et al. Entrapment of Macrophage-Target Nanoparticles by Yeast Microparticles for Rhein Delivery in Ulcerative Colitis Treatment. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22, 2754–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yang, C.; Zhang, M.; Lama, S.; Wang, L.; Merlin, D. Natural-Lipid Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutic Approach to Deliver 6-Shogaol and Its Metabolites M2 and M13 to the Colon to Treat Ulcerative Colitis. J. Control. Release 2020, 323, 293–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Su, L.; Song, G.; Zhou, T.; Tian, H.; Xin, H.; Zou, X.; Xu, Y.; Jin, X.; Gui, S.; Lu, X. Colon-Targeted Oral Nanoliposomes Loaded with Psoralen Alleviate DSS-Induced Ulcerative Colitis. Biomater. Sci. 2024, 12, 3212–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xian, J.; Zhong, X.; Gu, H.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J. Colonic Delivery of Celastrol-Loaded Layer-by-Layer Liposomes with Pectin/Trimethylated Chitosan Coating to Enhance Its Anti-Ulcerative Colitis Effects. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Teruel, A.H.; Pérez-Esteve, É.; González-Álvarez, I.; González-Álvarez, M.; Costero, A.M.; Ferri, D.; Parra, M.; Gaviña, P.; Merino, V.; Martínez-Mañez, R.; et al. Smart Gated Magnetic Silica Mesoporous Particles for Targeted Colon Drug Delivery: New Approaches for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Treatment. J. Control. Release 2018, 281, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xu, W.; Su, W.; Xue, Z.; Pu, F.; Xie, Z.; Jin, K.; Polyakov, N.E.; Dushkin, A.V.; Su, W. Research on Preparation of 5-ASA Colon-Specific Hydrogel Delivery System without Crosslinking Agent by Mechanochemical Method. Pharm. Res. 2021, 38, 693–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, Q.; Tao, H.; Lin, Y.; Hu, Y.; An, H.; Zhang, D.; Feng, S.; Hu, H.; Wang, R.; Li, X.; et al. A Superoxide Dismutase/Catalase Mimetic Nanomedicine for Targeted Therapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Biomaterials 2016, 105, 206–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yazeji, T.; Moulari, B.; Beduneau, A.; Stein, V.; Dietrich, D.; Pellequer, Y.; Lamprecht, A. Nanoparticle-Based Delivery Enhances Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Experimental Ulcerative Colitis. Drug Deliv. 2017, 24, 811–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sun, Q.; Luan, L.; Arif, M.; Li, J.; Dong, Q.-J.; Gao, Y.; Chi, Z.; Liu, C.-G. Redox-Sensitive Nanoparticles Based on 4-Aminothiophenol-Carboxymethyl Inulin Conjugate for Budesonide Delivery in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 189, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Shen, C.; Zhao, L.; Du, X.; Tian, J.; Yuan, Y.; Jia, M.; He, Y.; Zeng, R.; Qiao, R.; Li, C. Smart Responsive Quercetin-Conjugated Glycol Chitosan Prodrug Micelles for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Mol. Pharm. 2021, 18, 1419–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Zhang, C.; Hu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Guo, J.; Li, H.; Li, Q.; Liu, S. Liposome-Embedded SOD Attenuated DSS-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice by Ameliorating Oxidative Stress and Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 4392–4405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Dianzani, C.; Foglietta, F.; Ferrara, B.; Rosa, A.C.; Muntoni, E.; Gasco, P.; Della Pepa, C.; Canaparo, R.; Serpe, L. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Delivering Anti-Inflammatory Drugs to Treat Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Effects in an in Vivo Model. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 4201–4210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sun, Q.; Arif, M.; Chi, Z.; Li, G.; Liu, C.-G. Macrophages-Targeting Mannosylated Nanoparticles Based on Inulin for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 169, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Heidari, N.; Abbasi-Kenarsari, H.; Namaki, S.; Baghaei, K.; Zali, M.R.; Ghaffari Khaligh, S.; Hashemi, S.M. Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Secreted Exosome Alleviates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Acute Colitis by Treg Cell Induction and Inflammatory Cytokine Reduction. J. Cell. Physiol. 2021, 236, 5906–5920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yu, T.; Chu, S.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Chen, Q.; Xu, M.; Wu, H.; Li, M.; Dong, Y.; Zhu, F.; et al. Extracellular Vesicles Derived from EphB2-Overexpressing Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Ameliorate DSS-Induced Colitis by Modulating Immune Balance. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021, 12, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhang, M.; Viennois, E.; Prasad, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Han, M.K.; Xiao, B.; Xu, C.; Srinivasan, S.; et al. Edible Ginger-Derived Nanoparticles: A Novel Therapeutic Approach for the Prevention and Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Colitis-Associated Cancer. Biomaterials 2016, 101, 321–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Xiong, Z.; Feng, C.; Tang, J.; Sun, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, H.; Wang, T.; Wang, X.; Liu, S.; Lei, P.; et al. Rationally Constructing the Theranostics Hydrogels for Targeted CT Imaging and Healing of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 513, 162986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chen, S.; Gao, W.; Ge, P.; Chang, S.; Wang, T.; Zhao, Q.; He, B. Negatively Charged Thermosensitive Hydrogel Loaded with Pectin Microspheres to Recover the Mucosal Barrier for Ulcerative Colitis Therapy. Biomacromolecules 2024, 25, 6801–6813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Tan, X.; Gao, B.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Jiang, J.; Sun, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, S.; Fan, J.-B.; Zhang, M.; et al. Atractylodes Macrocephala-Derived Extracellular Vesicles-like Particles Enhance the Recovery of Ulcerative Colitis by Remodeling Intestinal Microecological Balance. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025, 23, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Yang, Y.; Yang, L.; Deng, H.; Liu, Y.; Wu, J.; Yang, Y.; Su, J.; Su, S.; Xu, J.; Wei, J.; et al. Coptis Chinensis-Derived Extracellular Vesicle-like Nanoparticles Delivered miRNA-5106 Suppresses NETs by Restoring Zinc Homeostasis to Alleviate Colitis. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025, 23, 444–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wu, H.; Pang, M.; Li, Y.; Huang, J.; Geng, S.; Hong, J.; Liu, P.; Yang, J. Flos Sophorae Immaturus Exosome-like Nanovesicles Alleviate Ulcerative Colitis by Attenuating Intestinal Oxidative Stress and Inflammation through Activating Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor via Gut Microbiota and Tryptophan Metabolism Regulation. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2026, 24, 132–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Li, J.-H.; Xu, J.; Huang, C.; Hu, J.-X.; Xu, H.-M.; Guo, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.-K.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Houttuynia Cordata-Derived Exosome-like Nanoparticles Mitigate Colitis in Mice via Inhibition of the NLRP3 Signaling Pathway and Modulation of the Gut Microbiota. Int. J. Nanomed. 2024, 19, 13991–14018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhang, M.; Xu, X.; Su, L.; Zeng, Y.; Lin, J.; Li, W.; Zou, Y.; Li, S.; Lin, B.; Li, Z.; et al. Oral Administration of Sophora Flavescens-Derived Exosomes-like Nanovesicles Carrying CX5461 Ameliorates DSS-Induced Colitis in Mice. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 22, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Kim, K.-U.; Kim, J.; Jang, H.; Dan, K.B.; Kim, B.K.; Ji, Y.W.; Yi, D.Y.; Min, H. Protective Effects of Human Breast Milk-Derived Exosomes on Inflammatory Bowel Disease through Modulation of Immune Cells. npj Sci. Food 2025, 9, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Gao, C.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, H.; Xiao, Y.; Hao, W.; Zhu, Y.; Vong, C.T.; Farag, M.A.; Wang, Y.; et al. Turmeric-Derived Nanovesicles as Novel Nanobiologics for Targeted Therapy of Ulcerative Colitis. Theranostics 2022, 12, 5596–5614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Di Matteo, A.; Bathon, J.M.; Emery, P. Rheumatoid Arthritis. Lancet 2023, 402, 2019–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Finckh, A.; Gilbert, B.; Hodkinson, B.; Bae, S.-C.; Thomas, R.; Deane, K.D.; Alpizar-Rodriguez, D.; Lauper, K. Global Epidemiology of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2022, 18, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Scott, I.C.; Whittle, R.; Bailey, J.; Twohig, H.; Hider, S.L.; Mallen, C.D.; Muller, S.; Jordan, K.P. Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Axial Spondyloarthritis Epidemiology in England from 2004 to 2020: An Observational Study Using Primary Care Electronic Health Record Data. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. 2022, 23, 100519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Romão, V.C.; Fonseca, J.E. Etiology and Risk Factors for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A State-of-the-Art Review. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 689698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ben Mrid, R.; Bouchmaa, N.; Ainani, H.; El Fatimy, R.; Malka, G.; Mazini, L. Anti-Rheumatoid Drugs Advancements: New Insights into the Molecular Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 151, 113126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Conn, D.L. The Story behind the Use of Glucocorticoids in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2021, 51, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhang, Q.; Dehaini, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, L.; Fang, R.H.; Gao, W.; Zhang, L. Neutrophil Membrane-Coated Nanoparticles Inhibit Synovial Inflammation and Alleviate Joint Damage in Inflammatory Arthritis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 1182–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Li, S.; Su, J.; Cai, W.; Liu, J. Nanomaterials Manipulate Macrophages for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 699245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Meng, J.; Jiao, Z.; Bao, W.; Tian, H.; Wu, C.; Chai, W.; Li, R.; Liu, Z.; et al. A Targeted Exosome Therapeutic Confers Both CfDNA Scavenging and Macrophage Polarization for Ameliorating Rheumatoid Arthritis. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2302503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zewail, M. Folic Acid Decorated Chitosan-Coated Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for the Oral Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ther. Deliv. 2021, 12, 297–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Jia, M.; Ren, W.; Wang, M.; Liu, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, M.; Ding, N.; Li, C.; Yang, H. Surface Saturation of Drug-Loaded Hollow Manganese Dioxide Nanoparticles with Human Serum Albumin for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis. Drug Deliv. 2024, 31, 2380538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Facchinatto, W.M.; Galante, J.; Mesquita, L.; Silva, D.S.; Martins Dos Santos, D.; Moraes, T.B.; Campana-Filho, S.P.; Colnago, L.A.; Sarmento, B.; Das Neves, J. Clotrimazole-Loaded N-(2-Hydroxy)-Propyl-3-Trimethylammonium, O-Palmitoyl Chitosan Nanoparticles for Topical Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis. Acta Biomater. 2021, 125, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Roy, S.; Zhang, K.; Roth, T.; Vinogradov, S.; Kao, R.S.; Kabanov, A. Reduction of Fibronectin Expression by Intravitreal Administration of Antisense Oligonucleotides. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 476–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Thotakura, N.; Parashar, P.; Raza, K. Assessing the Pharmacokinetics and Toxicology of Polymeric Micelle Conjugated Therapeutics. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2021, 17, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Yu, Y.; Kong, L.; Guo, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Zhang, F.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.-Y.; Li, X. Engineered Panax Notoginseng Polysaccharide Micelles Inhibit Macrophage Polarization and Delay the Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis via JAK2-STAT3 Signaling Pathway. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025, 23, 509–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Li, H.; Zha, S.; Li, H.; Liu, H.; Wong, K.-L.; All, A.H. Polymeric Dendrimers as Nanocarrier Vectors for Neurotheranostics. Small 2022, 18, 2203629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Samad, A.; Alam, M.; Saxena, K. Dendrimers: A Class of Polymers in the Nanotechnology for the Delivery of Active Pharmaceuticals. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009, 15, 2958–2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Pérez-Ferreiro, M.; M. Abelairas, A.; Criado, A.; Gómez, I.J.; Mosquera, J. Dendrimers: Exploring Their Wide Structural Variety and Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 4369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Han, H.; Xing, J.; Chen, W.; Jia, J.; Li, Q. Fluorinated Polyamidoamine Dendrimer-Mediated miR-23b Delivery for the Treatment of Experimental Rheumatoid Arthritis in Rats. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Li, H.; Feng, Y.; Zheng, X.; Jia, M.; Mei, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, M.; Li, C. M2-Type Exosomes Nanoparticles for Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy via Macrophage Re-Polarization. J. Control. Release 2022, 341, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Cheng, D.; Wang, Q.; Long, J.; Ou, X.; Shi, S. Nanomaterials in Osteoarthritis Therapy: Advances in Drug Delivery, Tissue Regeneration, and Implant Engineering. Front. Med. 2026, 13, 1775067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Zheng, Q.; Lin, R.; Chen, R.; Xu, W. Biomimetic Dual-Crosslinked GelMA-SilMA Hydrogel Microneedle for Delivering DSPE-PEG2K-TAT-Modified Quercetin Liposomes to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis via the Caspase-8/Caspase-3/GSDME Pathway. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025, 23, 787–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Yan, Q.; Liu, H.; Sun, S.; Yang, Y.; Fan, D.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Song, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, R.; et al. Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Exosomes Loaded with Icariin Alleviates Rheumatoid Arthritis by Modulating Macrophage Polarization in Rats. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 22, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Han, B.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, F.; Xu, Y.; Li, Z.; Zheng, S.; Ma, F.; Shi, H.; Jia, X.; et al. Pueraria Lobata-Derived Exosome-like Nanovesicles Alleviate Rheumatoid Arthritis via Targeting Ruminococcus Gnavus Phenylethylamine Production. Gut 2025, 75, 1123–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ma, L.; Wu, H.; Cao, J.; Zhang, N.; Li, Y.; Zheng, J.; Jiang, X.; Gao, J. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Biomimetic Liposome for Targeted Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 47206–47215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Zhang, M.; Zhang, R.; Feng, C.; Jiang, X.; Xu, X.; Wang, J. Ginsenoside Compound K-Based Multifunctional Liposomes for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Drug Deliv. 2025, 32, 2464190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhang, Z.; Wang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, X.; Wang, G.; Xu, M.; Yang, X.; Zhong, X.; Li, C.; Zhou, M. Locally Administered Liposomal Drug Depot Enhances Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment by Inhibiting Inflammation and Promoting Cartilage Repair. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025, 23, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Fu, X.; Song, Y.; Feng, X.; Liu, Z.; Gao, W.; Song, H.; Zhang, Q. Synergistic Chemotherapy/PTT/Oxygen Enrichment by Multifunctional Liposomal Polydopamine Nanoparticles for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2024, 19, 100885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Hu, S.; Lin, Y.; Tong, C.; Huang, H.; Yi, O.; Dai, Z.; Su, Z.; Liu, B.; Cai, X. A pH-Driven Indomethacin-Loaded Nanomedicine for Effective Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy by Combining with Photothermal Therapy. J. Drug Target. 2022, 30, 737–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Yang, H.; Hu, X.; Zhu, F.; Zhao, B.; Wang, Y.; Deng, Y.; Jin, F.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, S.; Mei, X. Targeted Delivery of Prussian Blue Modified Exosomes to CD90-Expressing Synovial Fibroblasts for Rheumatoid Arthritis Immunotherapy. Mater. Today Bio 2025, 35, 102580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Jiang, H.; Lu, Q.; Huang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zeng, J.; Wang, M.; Xu, J.; Yuan, Z.; Wei, Q.; Xiao, E.; et al. Sinomenine-Glycyrrhizic Acid Self-Assembly Enhanced the Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Sinomenine in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Control. Release 2025, 382, 113718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Yang, J.; Yang, B.; Shi, J. A Nanomedicine-Enabled Ion-Exchange Strategy for Enhancing Curcumin-Based Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202310061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Ansari, M.M.; Ahmad, A.; Kumar, A.; Alam, P.; Khan, T.H.; Jayamurugan, G.; Raza, S.S.; Khan, R. Aminocellulose-Grafted-Polycaprolactone Coated Gelatin Nanoparticles Alleviate Inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Combinational Therapeutic Approach. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 258, 117600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Jia, N.; Gao, Y.; Li, M.; Liang, Y.; Li, Y.; Lin, Y.; Huang, S.; Lin, Q.; Sun, X.; He, Q.; et al. Metabolic Reprogramming of Proinflammatory Macrophages by Target Delivered Roburic Acid Effectively Ameliorates Rheumatoid Arthritis Symptoms. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhao, M.; Yao, J.; Meng, X.; Cui, Y.; Zhu, T.; Sun, F.; Li, Y.; Teng, L. Polyketal Nanoparticles Co-Loaded with miR-124 and Ketoprofen for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 110, 2233–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Deng, C.; Zhang, Q.; He, P.; Zhou, B.; He, K.; Sun, X.; Lei, G.; Gong, T.; Zhang, Z. Targeted Apoptosis of Macrophages and Osteoclasts in Arthritic Joints Is Effective against Advanced Inflammatory Arthritis. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zheng, X.; Yu, X.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Jia, M.; Lei, F.; Tian, J.; Li, C. Targeted Co-Delivery Biomimetic Nanoparticles Reverse Macrophage Polarization for Enhanced Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 1025–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Li, M.; Wang, G.; Yan, Y.; Jiang, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, X.; Zeng, H. Triptolide and l-Ascorbate Palmitate Co-Loaded Micelles for Combination Therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Side Effect Attenuation. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 2751–2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Xing, J.; Jia, J.; Zhang, H.; Han, H.; Li, Q. Fluorinated Dendrimer-Mediated miR-30a Delivery Regulates the Inflammation of Macrophages and Mitigates the Symptoms of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Control. Release 2024, 376, 1143–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Peng, B.; Liang, H.; Li, Y.; Dong, C.; Shen, J.; Mao, H.-Q.; Leong, K.W.; Chen, Y.; Liu, L. Tuned Cationic Dendronized Polymer: Molecular Scavenger for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 4254–4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Wang, N.; Ma, J.; Song, W.; Zhao, C. An Injectable Hydrogel to Disrupt Neutrophil Extracellular Traps for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis. Drug Deliv. 2023, 30, 2173332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Wu, G.; Su, T.; Zhou, P.; Tang, R.; Zhu, X.; Wang, J.; Chao, M.; Fan, L.; Yan, H.; Ye, P.; et al. Engineering M2 Macrophage-Derived Exosomes Modulate Activated T Cell Cuproptosis to Promote Immune Tolerance in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Biomaterials 2025, 315, 122943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Lee, H.-I.; Ahn, M.-J.; Yoo, J.-K.; Ahn, S.-H.; Park, S.Y.; Seo, H.; Kim, M.-J.; Lee, Y.J.; Jang, H.H.; Shim, S.C.; et al. Exosome-Mediated Delivery of Super-Repressor IκBα Alleviates Inflammation and Joint Damages in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2024, 26, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Han, R.; Zhou, D.; Ji, N.; Yin, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Liu, H.; et al. Folic Acid-Modified Ginger-Derived Extracellular Vesicles for Targeted Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis by Remodeling Immune Microenvironment via the PI3K-AKT Pathway. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025, 23, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wang, S.; Zhang, K.; Wang, L.; Guo, Y. Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes with High Expression of PD-L1 as Nanotherapeutics in Rheumatoid Arthritis Model Mice. Int. J. Nanomed. 2025, 20, 8935–8949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Wang, X.; Liu, H.; Fan, H.; Han, B.; Ye, H.; Ye, X.; Zhang, D.; Ma, F.; Huang, Q.; Cheng, L.; et al. Ginseng Exosomal miRNA Ameliorates Rheumatoid Arthritis by Mediating KRAS-MAPK Signaling. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2025, 161, 115046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Kaneta, H.; Nakasa, T.; Yimiti, D.; Moriwaki, D.; Kawasaki, R.; Ogura, T.; Miyaki, S.; Adachi, N. Oral Ginger-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Ameliorate Arthritis via Anti-Inflammatory Actions of microRNA-149 and 6-Gingerol. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2026, 37, 102840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Choi, E.W.; Lim, I.-R.; Park, J.H.; Song, J.; Choi, B.; Kim, S. Therapeutic Effects of CTLA4Ig-Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in a Mouse Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2025, 16, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Haloi, P.; Lokesh, B.S.; Chawla, S.; Konkimalla, V.B. Formulation of a Dual Drug-Loaded Nanoparticulate Co-Delivery Hydrogel System and Its Validation in Rheumatoid Arthritis Animal Model. Drug Deliv. 2023, 30, 2184307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Agostini, S.B.N.; Malta, I.H.S.; Rodrigues, R.F.; Freitas, J.T.J.; de Sousa Lino, M.E.; Dos Santos, R.S.; Elisei, L.S.; Moraes, T.R.; Giusto, L.A.D.R.; de Oliveira, M.K.; et al. Preclinical Evaluation of Methotrexate-Loaded Polyelectrolyte Complexes and Thermosensitive Hydrogels as Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 163, 105856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Zhu, Q.; Chen, R.; Wu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, H.; Sun, L.; Shuai, Z. Bioinspired Exosome-SiO2 Nanohybrid Therapeutic for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment. Theranostics 2025, 15, 6553–6571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Kang, Y.; Han, X.; Zhou, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Song, P.; Su, X.; Qin, M.; Qian, D.; Meng, H.; et al. Engineered Apoptotic Extracellular Vesicles for Programmable Regulation of Neutrophil-Macrophage-ROS Pathogenic Axis to Reconstruct Rheumatoid Arthritis Microenvironment. Adv. Mater. 2026, 38, e08072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Summary of nano-drug delivery systems for three representative chronic autoimmune diseases: DM, IBD, and RA. Created with BioGDP.com [22].
Figure 1. Summary of nano-drug delivery systems for three representative chronic autoimmune diseases: DM, IBD, and RA. Created with BioGDP.com [22].
Molecules 31 02094 g001
Figure 2. Three representative types of chronic autoimmune diseases and treatment strategies for each. Created with BioGDP.com [22].
Figure 2. Three representative types of chronic autoimmune diseases and treatment strategies for each. Created with BioGDP.com [22].
Molecules 31 02094 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, M.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhou, L.; Liu, X.; Ma, T.; Xiao, Z. Advances in Nano-Drug Delivery Systems for Chronic Autoimmune Diseases: A Focus on Diabetes Mellitus, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Molecules 2026, 31, 2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31122094

AMA Style

Hu M, Zhou Y, Yang L, Zhou L, Liu X, Ma T, Xiao Z. Advances in Nano-Drug Delivery Systems for Chronic Autoimmune Diseases: A Focus on Diabetes Mellitus, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Molecules. 2026; 31(12):2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31122094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Mengqing, Yimiao Zhou, Lin Yang, Liquan Zhou, Xiao Liu, Tianjin Ma, and Zuowei Xiao. 2026. "Advances in Nano-Drug Delivery Systems for Chronic Autoimmune Diseases: A Focus on Diabetes Mellitus, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Rheumatoid Arthritis" Molecules 31, no. 12: 2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31122094

APA Style

Hu, M., Zhou, Y., Yang, L., Zhou, L., Liu, X., Ma, T., & Xiao, Z. (2026). Advances in Nano-Drug Delivery Systems for Chronic Autoimmune Diseases: A Focus on Diabetes Mellitus, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Molecules, 31(12), 2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31122094

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop