Isolation of Three New Diketopiperazine Alkaloids from Penicillium sp. SCH3-Sd2

Abstract

Intensive analysis of the culture broth of the marine-derived Penicillium sp. strain SCH3-Sd2 led to the isolation of one spirocyclic diketopiperazine alkaloid, spirotryprostatin H (1), as well as two indolyl diketopiperazines, fumitremorgins O and P (2 and 3). The planar structures of 1–3 were elucidated by comprehensive spectroscopic analyses, while their absolute configurations were determined by combined NOESY and ECD analyses, and the configuration of the proline moiety was further confirmed using the advanced Marfey’s method. The evaluation of the antibacterial activity of compounds 1–3 against six bacterial strains revealed weak and selective activity only against Kocuria rhizophila KCTC 1915, with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 64, 128, and 64 μg/mL, respectively.

1. Introduction

Fungi exhibit remarkable adaptability, which enables them to colonize diverse habitats, including marine, freshwater, and terrestrial environments [1,2]. Their ability to withstand extreme environmental conditions has driven the evolution of unique metabolic pathways in marine fungal species [3]. Secondary metabolites produced through these specialized metabolic pathways show promising applications in drug discovery [4]. Notably, fungi belonging to the genus Penicillium are commonly found in marine environments, and secondary metabolites produced by these strains have been shown to possess a broad array of biological activities [5]. In particular, indole diketopiperazine alkaloids from Penicillium, recognized as privileged structures, show significant biological activities, including antimicrobial, antiviral, anticancer, immunomodulatory, antioxidant, and insecticidal effects [6,7,8].

In typical laboratory conditions, the inefficient production of bioactive compounds by marine fungi is attributed to the quiescence of numerous biosynthetic gene clusters [2]. Recent developments in cultivation-based strategies aim to activate these silent gene clusters [9]. Variations in cultivation parameters, including in nutrient composition, temperature, salinity, aeration, and even the geometry of culture flask, have been employed to induce the production and facilitate the discovery of novel natural products [10]. This approach, known as the one strain−many compounds (OSMAC) strategy, facilitates the exploration of the diverse variety of complex chemical structures hidden within the specific strains [11].

Upon incorporating the OSMAC strategy into our ongoing bioprospecting effects for novel bioactive natural products from marine fungi, the cultivation of Penicillium sp. SCH3-Sd2 in potato dextrose broth (PDB) under static culture conditions yielded a markedly different metabolite profile compared to those of strain grown under shaking conditions. This finding prompted an in-depth investigation into the chemical constituents using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chemical profiling and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analyses. Subsequent studies resulted in the isolation of spirotryprostatin H (1) from a 7-day shake culture, while fumitremorgin O and P (2 and 3) were obtained from a 21-day static culture. Herein, we report on the isolation, structures, and bioactivities of these compounds.

Figure 1. Structures of compounds 1–3.

Figure 1. Structures of compounds 1–3.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structure Elucidation

Spirotryprostatin H (1) was isolated as a pale-yellow powder, and its molecular formula was determined as C₂₂H₂₅N₃O₅ on the basis of a protonated adduct observed at m/z 410.1726 [M−H]⁻ (calcd for C₂₂H₂₄N₃O₅, 410.1721) in high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (HR-ESI-MS). The ¹H NMR spectroscopic data displayed three aromatic protons H-4 (δ_H 6.99, d, J = 8.3 Hz), H-5 (δ_H 6.50, dd, J = 8.3, 2.4 Hz), H-7 (δ_H 6.40, d, J = 2.4 Hz), one methoxy group 6-OMe (δ_H 3.72, s), and two methyl groups H-21 (δ_H 1.16, s) and H-22 (δ_H 1.49, s). ¹³C and HSQC NMR spectra revealed the presence of three aromatic methine carbons C-4 (δ_C 126.8), C-5 (δ_C 106.7), C-7 (δ_C 96.5); methoxy carbon 6-OMe (δ_C 55.2), and two methyl carbons C-21 (δ_C 17.7) and C-22 (δ_C 25.1). Further analysis of the ¹³C and HSQC NMR data enabled the assignment of four methylene groups C-8 (δ_C 41.2)/H-8 (δ_H 2.35, d, J = 15.0 Hz and 2.89, d, J = 15.0 Hz), C-13 (δ_C 27.8)/H-13 (δ_H 1.89, m and 2.22, m), C-14 (δ_C 22.7)/H-14 (δ_H 1.90, m), and C-15 (δ_C 44.8)/H-15 (δ_H 3.43, m), methine groups C-12 (δ_C 60.1)/H-12 (δ_H 4.44, m), C-18 (δ_C 60.9)/H-18 (δ_H 4.79, d, J = 9.0 Hz), and C-19 (δ_C 121.8)/H-19 (δ_H 4.92, d, J = 9.0 Hz), as well as three carbonyl groups C-2 (δ_C 182.3), C-11 (δ_C 168.2), and C-17(δ_C 164.3). These NMR data indicated that 1 contains a skeleton similar to the oxindole diketopiperazine structure observed in spirotryprostatin A [12], and asperdiketopoid D [13], except for the presence of a hydroxyl group at 9-OH (δ_H 7.42, s)/C-9 (δ_C 89.4) (

Table 1. NMR data for compounds 1–3 in DMSO-d₆.

Pos.	1		2				3
	δC a, Mult.	δH b (J in Hz)	δC a, Mult.	δH b (J in Hz)	COSY	HMBC	δC a, Mult.	δH b (J in Hz)
1-NH								10.44, s
2	182.3, qC		132.3, qC				131.1, qC
3	55.9, qC		103.3, qC				106.5, qC
3a	119.8, qC		121.1, qC				121.5, qC
4	126.8, CH	6.99, d (8.3)	118.4, CH	7.42, d (8.3)	5	3, 6, 7a	117.7, CH	7.56, d (8.7)
5	106.7, CH	6.50, dd (8.3, 2.4)	108.5, CH	6.69, dd (8.3, 2.2)	4, 7	4, 7	105.6, CH	6.76, d (8.7)
6	159.8, qC		155.3, qC				152.2, qC
7	96.5, CH	6.40, d (2.4)	93.4, CH	6.80, d (2.2)		4, 5, 6	111.9, qC
7a	142.8, qC		137.0, qC				136.5, qC
8	41.2, CH2	α 2.35, d (15.0); β 2.89, d (15.0)	29.4, CH2	α 3.08, d (16.0); β 3.40, d (16.0)		2, 3, 3a, 9	67.8, CH	5.51, s
9	89.4, qC		82.9, qC				83.3, qC
11	168.2, qC		164.9, qC				166.2, qC
12	60.1, CH	4.44, m	57.9, CH	4.37, m	13	13 c	58.2, CH	4.41, m
13	27.8, CH2	α 1.89, m; β 2.22, m	28.5, CH2	α 1.85, m; β 2.27, m	12, 14		28.5, CH2	α 1.87, m; β 2.29, m
14	22.7, CH2	1.90, m	22.1, CH2	1.86, m	13, 15		22.0, CH2	1.89, m
15	44.8, CH2	3.43, m	44.7, CH2	3.45, m	14		44.9, CH2	3.45, m
17	164.3, qC		169.9, qC				170.2, qC
18	60.9, CH	4.79, d (9.0)	40.7, CH	5.93, d (9.8)	19	19, 20	48.7, CH	5.83, d (9.5)
19	121.8, CH	4.92, d (9.0)	123.1, CH	4.82, d (9.8)	18	21 c	124.0, CH	4.78, d (9.5)
20	135.2, qC		132.9, qC				133.0, qC
21	17.7, CH3	1.16, s	17.7, CH3	1.91, s		19, 20, 22	18.4, CH3	1.92, s
22	25.1, CH3	1.49, s	25.1, CH3	1.59, s		19, 20, 21	25.4, CH3	1.57, s
23			41.0, CH2	4.54, m; β 4.64, m	24	25 c	23.4, CH2	3.54, m/3.41, m
24			120.4, CH	4.98, m	23	26 c, 27 c	123.1, CH	5.20, m
25			133.7, qC				130.2, qC
26			18.0, CH3	1.85, s		24, 25, 27	17.9, CH3	1.76, s
27			25.2, CH3	1.66, s		24, 25, 26	25.2, CH3	1.62, s
6-OMe	55.2, CH3	3.72, s	55.0, CH3	3.76, s		6	56.4, CH3	3.76, s
8-OH								4.76, s
9-OH		7.42, s		6.53, br s				4.09, s

^a 400 MHz for ¹H NMR. ^b 100 MHz for ¹³C NMR. ^c Weak HMBC signals.

, Figure 1). Compound 1 shares the same indole diketopiperazine core as spiro spirotryprostatin A and asperdiketopoid D; however, a clear structural difference is observed at the C-9 position. In spirotryprostatin A and asperdiketopoid D, C-9 is a methine carbon, whereas in compound 1, C-9 is an oxygenated quaternary carbon (δ_C 89.4) bearing a hydroxy group. This difference is supported by the absence of C-9 proton signal in ¹H NMR spectrum of 1 and the corresponding downfield shift in the ¹³C NMR data (Table 1).

The analysis of COSY, HSQC and HMBC NMR spectroscopic data enabled the construction of distinct fragments with a unique structural skeleton, characterized by a spiro ring system. This system consists of a γ-lactam fused to a benzene ring and a pentacyclic enamine linked to a diketopiperazine moiety. The diketopiperazine moiety, linked to the pentacyclic enamine derived from a proline residue and to an isoprenyl group, was assigned based on the long-range HMBC correlations from 9-OH (δ_H 7.42, s) to C-9 (δ_C 89.4) and C-17 (δ_C 164.3), from H-8 (δ_H 2.35, d, J = 15.0 Hz and 2.89, d, J = 15.0 Hz) to C-2 (δ_C 182.3), C-3 (δ_C 55.9), C-3a (δ_C 119.8), C-9 (δ_C 89.4), and C-18 (δ_C 60.9), and from H-12 (δ_H 4.44, m) to C-11 (δ_C 168.2), and C-13 (δ_C 27.8). The isoprenyl group was characterized by the COSY correlations H-18 (δ_H 4.79, d, J = 9.0 Hz)/H-19 (δ_H 4.92, d, J = 9.0 Hz), combined with the HMBC correlations from H-18 (δ_H 4.79, d, J = 9.0 Hz) to C-2 (δ_C 182.3), C-3 (δ_C 55.9), C-8 (δ_C 41.2), C-19 (δ_C 121.8), C-20 (δ_C 135.2), from H-19 (δ_H 4.92, d, J = 9.0 Hz) to C-21 (δ_C 17.7) and C-22 (δ_C 25.1), from H-21 (δ_H 1.16, s) to C-19 (δ_C 121.8), C-20 (δ_C 135.2), C-22 (δ_C 25.1), and from H-22 (δ_H 1.49, s) to C-19 (δ_C 121.8), C-20 (δ_C 135.2), and C-21 (δ_C 17.7) (Figures S1–S7). These results illustrate the connectivity of the spiro ring system, which comprised a γ-lactam fused to a benzene ring and a pentacyclic enamine associated with the diketopiperazine moiety. Thus, the planar structure of 1 was assigned as shown in Figure 2.

Fumitremorgin O (2), obtained as a pale-yellow amorphous powder, possessed a molecular formula of C₂₇H₃₃N₃O₄, as determined from its HRESIMS ion peaks at m/z 464.2542 [M+H]⁺ (calcd for C₂₇H₃₄N₃O₄, 464.2544). Both the UV and NMR spectra consistently confirmed the presence of an indole diketopiperazine system within compound 2 [14]. The ¹H NMR spectrum of 2 indicated the presence of one methoxyl proton 6-OMe (δ_H 3.76, s), four methyl protons H-21 (δ_H 1.91, s), H-22 (δ_H 1.59, s), H-26 (δ_H 1.85, s),and H-27 (δ_H 1.66, s), five sets of methylene protons H-8 (δ_H 3.08, d, J = 16.0 Hz and 3.40 d, J = 16.0 Hz), H-13 (δ_H 1.85, m and 2.27, m), H-14 (δ_H 1.86, m), H-15 (δ_H 3.45, m), and H-23 (δ_H 4.54, m and 4.64, m), and four methine protons H-12 (δ_H 4.37, m), H-18 (δ_H 5.93 d, J = 9.8 Hz), H-19 (δ_H 4.82, d, J = 9.8 Hz), H-24 (δ_H 4.98, m), and three aromatic protons H-4 (δ_H 7.42, d, J = 8.2 Hz), H-5 (δ_H 6.69, dd, J = 8.3 and 2.2 Hz), and H-7 (δ_H 6.80, d, J = 2.2 Hz). The ¹³C NMR and HSQC spectra displayed 27 carbon signals, including eight indole carbons C-2 (δ_C 132.3), C-3 (δ_C 103.3), C-3a (δ_C 121.1), C-4 (δ_C 118.4), C-5 (δ_C 108.5), C-6 (δ_C 155.3), C-7 (δ_C 93.5), and C-7a (δ_C 137.0), one methoxy carbon 6-OMe (δ_C 55.0), four methyl carbons C-21 (δ_C 17.7), C-22 (δ_C 25.1), C-26 (δ_C 18.0), and C-27 (δ_C 25.2), five methylene carbons C-8 (δ_C 29.4), C-13 (δ_C 28.5), C-14 (δ_C 22.1), C-15 (δ_C 44.9), and C-23 (δ_C 41.0), four methine carbons C-12 (δ_C 57.9), C-18 (δ_C 40.7), C-19 (δ_C 123.1), and C-24 (δ_C 120.4), two carbonyl carbons C-11 (δ_C 164.9) and C-17 (δ_C 169.9), and four quaternary carbons C-9 (δ_C 82.9), C-11 (δ_C 164.9), C-20 (δ_C 132.9), and C-25 (δ_C 133.7). Thorough analysis of the ¹H and ¹³C NMR data (Table 1 and Table 2), combined with the COSY and HMBC correlations (Figure 3), revealed that 2 shared the same planar structure as the prenylated indole diketopiperazine alkaloid fumitremorgin B [15], except for the presence of a methylene group at H-8 (δ_H 3.08, d, J = 16.0 Hz and 3.40, d, J = 16.0 Hz)/C-8 (δ_C 29.4). This substitution was confirmed by the HMBC correlations from H-8 (δ_H 3.08, d, J = 16.0 Hz and 3.40, d, J = 16.0 Hz) to C-2 (δ_C 132.3), C-3 (δ_C 103.3), C-3a (δ_C 121.1), and C-9 (δ_C 82.9) (Figures S9–S15). In addition, the methylene carbon C-23 exhibited a characteristic downfield chemical shift at δ_C 41.0, which is consistent with a nitrogen-adjacent methylene (N–CH₂–) environment. This observation strongly supports the assignment of the isoprenyl unit being directly attached to the indole nitrogen (N-1), despite the weak or ambiguous long-range HMBC correlations involving H₂-23. Taken together, the spectroscopic data led to the definitive planar structural assignment of 2 (Figure 3a).

Fumitremorgin P (3) was isolated as a pale-yellow amorphous powder. Its molecular formula was determined to be C₂₇H₃₃N₃O₅ based on the HRESIMS ion peaks at m/z 480.2495 [M+H]⁺ (calcd for C₂₇H₃₄N₃O₅, 480.2493). Detailed analysis of the NMR data (Figures S17–S23 and Table 1) indicated that compound 3 contained an indole diketopiperazine system similar to fumitremorgin B (7) except for the presence of an isoprenyl unit [C-23 (δ_C 23.4) to C-27 (δ_C 25.2)] attached to the indole C-7 (δ_C 111.9). Additionally, the ¹H NMR spectrum displayed an additional hydroxyl group C-8 (δ_C 67.8). The key HMBC correlations from H-23 (δ_H 3.41, m and 3.54, m) to C-6 (δ_C 152.2), C-7 (δ_C 111.9), C-7a (δ_C 136.5), and C-24 (δ_C 123.1) confirmed the location of the isoprenyl unit [C-23 (δ_C 23.4) to C-27 (δ_C 25.2)] and allowed to assign the complete planar structure of 3 (Figure 3b). Comparison of compounds 2 and 3 revealed that, while both share a fumitremorgin-type indole diketopiperazine framework, they differ in their prenylation and hydroxylation patterns. Compound 2 possesses a methylene group at C-8 and an N-1-linked isoprenyl unit, whereas compound 3 features an additional hydroxy group at C-8 and a differently positioned isoprenyl unit attached to the indole C-7, as supported by key HMBC correlations. These structural features clearly distinguish compounds 2 and 3 from each other and from previously reported fumitremorgin analogues.

Spirotryprostatin H (1) and fumitremorgins O (2) and P (3) expand the chemical space of prenylated indole diketopiperazines, a well-recognized class of secondary metabolite produced by Aspergillaceae [16]. Compared to previously reported congeners, the presence of the 9-hydroxy-substituted oxindole system in 1 is uncommon within this scaffold, suggesting that late-stage, enzyme-mediated oxidation reactions substantially contribute to structural diversification in this biosynthetic pathway [17,18]. Similarly, the distinct prenylation patterns observed for 2 and 3 further highlight the flexibility of DKP cyclization and subsequent post-NRPS modifications.

Taken together, these findings show that marine-derived fungal strains continue to generate unique structural variations within the spirotryprostatin and fumitremorgin lineages. Such structural diversity, arising from oxidative and prenylation-driven modifications, provides a broader platform for the exploration of structure–activity relationship in prenylated indole DKPs.

2.2. Absolute Configurations of Compounds 1–3

The relative stereochemistry of compounds 1–3 was determined through NOESY experiments. For compound 1, NOESY correlations were observed between H-4 (δ_H 6.99) and H-5 (δ_H 6.50), H-8 (δ_H 2.35 and 2.89), H-19 (δ_H 4.92), and H-22 (δ_H 1.49), between H-18 (δ_H 4.79) and H-8 (δ_H 2.35 and 2.89), H-21 (δ_H 1.16) and H-22 (δ_H 1.49), between H-19 (δ_H 4.92) and H-8 (δ_H 2.89), H-21 (δ_H 1.16), and H-22 (δ_H 1.49), as well as between 9-OH (δ_H 7.42) and H-12 (δ_H 4.44)/H-18 (δ_H 4.79). This indicated that these protons resided on the same face, which allowed the relative configuration as 9R*, 18R* (Figure 4a). For compound 2, the NOESY correlations observed between H-12 (δ_H 4.37) and H-13 (δ_H 2.27), between H-19 (δ_H 4.82) and H-8 (δ_H 3.08), as well as between H-18 (δ_H 5.93) and H-19 (δ_H 4.82) indicated that these protons were located on the same face, enabling the relative configuration to be assigned as 9R*, 18S* (Figure 4b). In the case of compound 3, NOESY correlations were established between H-18 (δ_H 5.83) and H-19 (δ_H 4.78), between H-8 (δ_H 5.51) and H-19 (δ_H 4.78), and H-24 (δ_H 5.20), between 9-OH (δ_H 4.09) and H-24 (δ_H 5.18), as well as between 8-OH (δ_H 4.76) and H-18 (δ_H 5.83), supporting the assignment of 8R*, 9S*, 18R* as the relative configuration of 3 (Figure 4c).

The absolute configurations of proline (Pro) moiety in compounds 1–3 were determined through acid hydrolysis, followed by the advanced Marfey’s method [19]. The retention times of the 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrophenyl-5-_L-leucineamide (_L-FDLA) derivatives of the constituent proline residues in 1–3 were evaluated using LC-ESI-MS. The Pro amino acid in compound 1 was identified as possessing a _D-configuration, meaning the R configuration at C-12 (Figure S26), whereas those in compounds 2 and 3 were determined to a possess an _L-configuration, meaning the S configuration at C-12 (Figure S27).

The ECD spectrum of compound 1 displayed a negative Cotton effect with a minimum at 282 nm and a positive Cotton effect with a maximum at 242 nm (Table S1). Compounds 2 and 3 exhibited negative Cotton effects with minima at 229 nm, while positive Cotton effects were observed with maxima at 270 nm for compound 2 and 292 nm for compound 3 (Table S1). Compared with previously reported ECD data for structurally related spirotryprostatin [20,21,22] and fumitremorgin [8,20] analogues, these Cotton effect patterns were consistent with a 3R configuration for compound 1 and supported the stereochemical assignments for compounds 2 and 3 (Figure 5).

Based on the NOESY spectra, the comparison with the ECD data of reported analogues, and the advanced Marfey’s method, the absolute configuration of spirotryprostatin H (1) was assigned as 3R, 9R, 18R, 12R, whereas that of fumitremorgins O (2) and P (3) was assigned as 9R, 18S, 12S and 8S, 9R, 18S, 12S, respectively.

2.3. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activities of compounds 1–3 were evaluated against three Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis KCTC 1021, Kocuria rhizophila KCTC 1915, and Staphylococcus aureus KCTC 1621) and three Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli KCTC 2441, Salmonella typhimurium KCTC 2515, and Klebsiella pneumoniae KCTC 2690). Among the tested strains, compounds 1–3 displayed weak antibacterial effects only against Kocuria rhizophila KCTC 1915, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 64, 128, 64 μg/mL, respectively (Table 2). In contrast, no significant inhibitory effects were observed against the other bacterial strains, indicating that the present compounds possessed selective and weak antibacterial activity

The weak antibacterial activity of compounds 1–3, which was only observed against the Gram-positive strain K. rhizophila, may be attributed to structural factors such as low membrane permeability or limited interaction with bacterial targets. This lack of efficacy against Gram-negative bacteria is consistent with previous findings that the outer membrane of Gram-negative species serves as a permeability barrier, limiting the entry of indole-based metabolites and related compounds [23,24,25]. This selectivity suggests that the present compounds are not broad-spectrum antibiotics, but could serve as scaffolds for structural modifications to enhance the antibacterial of a drug.

Table 2. Antibacterial activity (MIC, μg/mL) of compounds 1–3 ^a.

Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (μg/mL)
Compounds	Gram (+) Bacteria			Gram (−) Bacteria
	B. subtillis KCTC 1021	K. rhizophila KCTC 1915	S. aureus KCTC 1621	E. coli KCTC 2441	S. tyhimurium KCTC 2515	K. pneumonia KCTC 2690
1	>128	64	>128	>128	>128	>128
2	>128	128	>128	>128	>128	>128
3	>128	64	>128	>128	>128	>128
Ampicillin	0.5	0.25	2	64	16	>128
Vancomycin	0.25	0.25	0.25	>128	>128	>128

^a Each sample was tested in triplicate.

Table 2. Antibacterial activity (MIC, μg/mL) of compounds 1–3 ^a.

Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (μg/mL)
Compounds	Gram (+) Bacteria			Gram (−) Bacteria
	B. subtillis KCTC 1021	K. rhizophila KCTC 1915	S. aureus KCTC 1621	E. coli KCTC 2441	S. tyhimurium KCTC 2515	K. pneumonia KCTC 2690
1	>128	64	>128	>128	>128	>128
2	>128	128	>128	>128	>128	>128
3	>128	64	>128	>128	>128	>128
Ampicillin	0.5	0.25	2	64	16	>128
Vancomycin	0.25	0.25	0.25	>128	>128	>128

^a Each sample was tested in triplicate.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were determined using a Krüss Optronic P-8000 polarimeter with a 5-cm cell (Krüss, Hambrug, Germany) in methanol (MeOH). UV spectra were acquired with a Varian Cary 50 UV–vis spectrophotometer (Varian Inc., Mulgrave, Australia), whereas ECD spectra were obtained using a JASCO J-810 spectrometer (JASCO Inc., Tokyo, Japan). IR spectra were recorded on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Nicolet iS 10 FT-IR spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA). The weak absorption observed around 2200–2400 cm⁻¹ was also present in the CHCl₃ blank spectrum and was therefore attributed to background signals rather than the sample (Figure S25). NMR spectra were obtained utilizing a Varian Inova spectrometer (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Charlottesville, VA, USA) operating at 500 MHz for ¹H and 125 MHz for ¹³C experiments, and a Bruker NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Middlesex, MA, USA) working at 300 MHz for ¹H measurements. The residual solvent signals served as internal references, with δ_H 3.31 ppm and δ_C 49.0 ppm for deuterated methanol (CD₃OD), and δ_H 7.26 and 1.56 ppm for chloroform-d (CDCl₃). Low-resolution LC-MS data were measured using the Agilent Technologies 1260 quadrupole (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Waters Micromass ZQ LC/MS system with a reversed-phase column (Phenomenex Luna C18 (2), 100 Å, 100 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm), operating at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, at the National Research Facilities and Equipment Center (NanoBioEnergy Materials Center) at Ewha Womans University. Column chromatography (CC) experiment was performed using a reversed-phase C18 gel (70-230 mesh, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with a step-gradient solvent of water (H₂O) and methanol (MeOH). Subsequently, the fractions were purified using a reversed-phase HPLC (Phenomenex Luna C-18 (2), 100 Å, 250 × 10 mm, 2.0 mL/min, 5 μm) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antibacterial test was determined by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) for various sample dilutions using a SpectraMax^® ABS Plus microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA).

3.2. Collection and Identification of the Strain SCH3-Sd2

Marine sediment was collected on June 15, 2020, from Suncheon, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea (34°50′47.9″ N; 127°31′28.3″ E). A 100 μL aliquot of the sediment suspension, prepared by suspending the sample in 1 × PBS solution, was spread onto potato dextrose agar (PDA, BD DifcoTM, Sparks, MD, USA) plates supplemented with 3.5% (w/v) NaCl, 0.01% (w/v) ampicillin, and 0.01% (w/v) streptomycin. The plates were incubated at 20 °C for 7 days. After incubation, the developed colonies were repeatedly transferred onto fresh media to obtain pure isolates. The isolates were preserved in 20% glycerol solution at −80 °C.

One of the isolates, designated SCH3-Sd2, was identified based on the nucleotide sequence of the β-tubulin gene marker (Figure S28). The strain was first inoculated into potato dextrose broth (PDB; BD, USA) and incubated at 25 °C for 3 days to obtain mycelia. Genomic DNA was extracted from the harvested mycelia using the phenol-chloroform method [26]. The β-tubulin fragment was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers Bt2a and Bt2b [27]. The resulting 415 bp PCR product was purified using a PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sequenced by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea).

The β-tubulin sequence of SCH3-Sd2 was used as a query for a BLAST search (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) (accessed on 10 October 2025) in the NCBI database to assess its homology with closely related fungal species. Based on the homology analysis, the β-tubulin sequence of SCH3-Sd2 showed 99.76% identity with that of the Penicillium caprifimosum strain MGS 2017. As a result, SCH3-Sd2 was identified as P. caprifimosum. This strain has been deposited in the Marine BioBank database of the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK), under accession number MABIK FU00001487.

3.3. Fermentation, Extraction, and Isolation

The strain SCH3-Sd2 underwent two distinct culturing procedures. First, it was cultivated under shaking conditions in 10 L of 2.5 L Ultra Yield^® flasks (Thomson Instrument Company, Oceanside, CA, USA) with 1 L of PDB SW medium (24 g/L of PDB and 37.8 g/L of sea salt in 1 L of distilled water), followed by shaking at 120 rpm and 27 °C. After 7 days of cultivation, the broth was extracted using ethyl acetate (EtOAc) to produce 10 L of extract, and the soluble fraction was further concentrated in vacuo to obtain 2.5 g of crude extract. The crude extract was subjected to flash column chromatography on a C18 resin eluted with H₂O/CH₃OH (80/20, 60/40, 50/50, 40/60, 30/70, 20/80, 0/100, 200 mL each) to obtain seven fractions (F1–F7). Then, fraction 4 (166.5 mg) underwent purification via reversed-phase HPLC (Phenomenex Luna C-18 (2), 100 Å, 250 × 10 mm, 2.0 mL/min, 5 μm, UV = 254 nm) using 30% aqueous CH₃CN containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), yielding spirotryprostatin H (1, 2.9 mg, t_R = 41.0 min).

In the subsequent culture, SCH3-Sd2 was statically cultured in 18 L of 2.5 L Ultra Yield^® flasks containing 1 L of PDB SW medium for 21 days at 27 °C. After cultivation and extraction using EtOAc (18 L extract overall), the soluble fraction was subsequently concentrated to yield 7.0 g of crude extract. Moreover, fraction 6 (214.5 mg) underwent further purification by reversed-phase HPLC (Phenomenex Luna C-18 (2), 100 Å, 250 × 10 mm, 2.0 mL/min, 5 μm, UV = 254 nm) under isocratic conditions using a 50% aqueous CH₃CN containing 0.1% TFA as the mobile phase. The procedure performed under either low-light or dark conditions led to the isolation of fumitremorgin O (2, 4.7 mg, t_R = 60.5 min) and fumitremorgin P (3, 11.2 mg, t_R = 52.5 min).

Spirotryprostatin H (1): pale-yellow powder; ${[\alpha ]}_{\mathrm{D}}^{21}$ = −97 (c 0.05, chloroform); UV (MeOH) max (log ε) 201 (3.17), 219 (3.16), and 298 (2.10) nm; IR (KBr) ν_max 3595, 2955, 2939, 1717, 1684, 1653, 1540, 1376 and 1061 cm⁻¹; ¹H and ¹³C NMR data (400 and 100 MHz, DMSO-d₆), Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 410.1726 [M−H]⁻ (calcd for C₂₂H₂₄N₃O₅, 411.1721).

Fumitremorgin O (2): pale-yellow amorphous powder; ${[\alpha ]}_{\mathrm{D}}^{21}$ = +128 (c 0.05, chloroform); UV (MeOH) max (log ε) 217 (3.26), 276 (1.78), and 295 (1.71) nm; IR (KBr) ν_max 2955, 2924, 1653, 1458, 1379, 1225, 1172, and 1083 cm⁻¹; ¹H and ¹³C NMR data (400 and 100 MHz, DMSO-d₆), Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 464.2542 [M+H]⁺ (calcd for C₂₇H₃₄N₃O₅, 464.2544).

Fumitremorgin P (3): pale-yellow amorphous powder; ${[\alpha ]}_{\mathrm{D}}^{21}$ = +128 (c 0.05, chloroform); UV (MeOH) max (log ε) 202 (3.20), 220 (3.17), and 298 (2.66) nm; IR (KBr) ν_max 3597, 2954, 1718, 1686, 1653, 1506, 1457, 1209 and 1079 cm⁻¹; ¹H and ¹³C NMR data (400 and 100 MHz, DMSO-d₆), Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 480.2495 [M+H]⁺ (calcd for C₂₇H₃₄N₃O₄, 480.2493).

3.4. Acid Hydrolysis and Advanced Marfey’s Analysis of Spirotryprostatin H

The absolute configurations of spirotryprostatin H (1), fumitremorgin O (2), and fumitremorgin P (3) were determined using the advanced Marfey’s method. Samples of compounds 1–3 (1 mg each) were dissolved in 100 μL of 2 N HCl and heated at 100 °C for 12 h. The resulting hydrolysate was evaporated to dryness under a stream of N₂ gas; the residue was subsequently redissolved in distilled H₂O and divided into two aliquots. After removing water under a continuous N₂ stream, each hydrolysate was dissolved in 100 μL of 1 N NaHCO₃ and derivatized with 100 μL of 1% _L-FDLA (1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrophenyl-5-_L-leucine amide) in acetone. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 65 °C for 1 h and subsequently quenched with 2 N HCl. A small volume of CH₃CN (100 μL) was added to the reaction products and injected into the LC-ESI-MS system with following chromatographic conditions: Phenomenex Luna C18 (2) 100 Å, 100 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, 1 mL/min flow, solvent A (0.01% formic acid in H₂O), solvent B (0.01% formic acid in CH₃CN), A/B = 95:5 → 50:50 (50 min) → 100:0 (70 min) → 0:100 (85 min) → 95:5 (90 min). The standard amino acids were prepared according to an established protocol and subsequently analyzed. The reaction products were analyzed using UV spectroscopy at 340 nm in positive ESIMS mode [28].

3.5. Antibacterial Activity Assay

Antibacterial susceptibility assays were conducted against six pathogenic bacterial strains: Escherichia coli (KCTC 2441), Salmonella typhimurium (KCTC 2515), Klebsiella pneumoniae (KCTC 2690), Bacillus subtilis (KCTC 1021), Kocuria rhizophila (KCTC 1915), and Staphylococcus aureus (KCTC 1621). Bacterial cultures were grown overnight in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) at 37 °C. The bacterial suspensions were subsequently adjusted to match the 0.5 McFarland standard (approximately 1.0 × 10⁸ CFU/mL) and further diluted to achieve a final inoculum concentration of 5.0 × 10⁵ CFU/mL.

The test compounds and positive controls (ampicillin and vancomycin) were initially dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to prepare stock solutions with a concentration of 10 mg/mL. These stock solutions were further diluted in MHB to achieve a working concentration of 256 μg/mL. A 100 μL aliquot of each prepared sample was added to the first column of a sterile 96-well microtiter plate, followed by twofold serial dilutions across the plate to achieve a concentration range of 128–0.25 μg/mL. Then, 50 μL of the standardized bacterial suspension was added to each well, resulting in final test concentrations of 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 0.5, and 0.25 μg/mL.

The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h under static conditions. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the compound that completely inhibited visible bacterial growth. Growth inhibition was confirmed by measuring the absorbance at 600 nm using a SpectraMax^® ABS Plus microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). All experiments were performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, three prenylated indole diketopiperazines, spirotryprostatin H (1), fumitremorgin O (2) and fumitremorgin P (3), were isolated from marine-derived Penicillium sp. SCH3-Sd2. Their planar structures and absolute configurations were established via a comprehensive spectroscopic analysis, including NOESY, ECD, and the advanced Marfey’s method. Although compounds 1–3 exhibited only weak and selective antibacterial activity, the uncommon oxidation pattern and distinct prenylation features observed in these DKPs expand the structural diversity of the spirotryprostatin or fumitremorgin family. This study highlights the potential of marine-derived fungi as a valuable source of structurally unique indole alkaloids and provides a basis for further studies of their structure–activity relationship.