Next Article in Journal
Determination and Disposition of the Aromatase Inhibitor Exemestane in CYP3A-Deficient Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Diffusion Coefficients and Activation Energies of Diffusion of Organic Molecules in Poly(lactic acid) Films
Previous Article in Journal
Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine Lipid Vesicles for Delivering HMB, NMN, and L-Leucine in Sarcopenia Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Release and Disintegration Properties of Poly(lactic Acid) Films with Allyl Isothiocyanate-β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes for Active Food Packaging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation of Quercetin/Copper Nanoparticles and Their Preservation Performance on Shine Muscat Grapes

1
College of Life Science, Zhuhai College of Science and Technology, Zhuhai 519040, China
2
College of Life Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130015, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2025, 30(7), 1438; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071438
Submission received: 19 February 2025 / Revised: 18 March 2025 / Accepted: 19 March 2025 / Published: 24 March 2025

Abstract

:
Deterioration in fruits represent a significant challenge to food safety, which has prompted our investigation into sustainable fruit preservation technologies. This paper presents the synthesis of quercetin/copper nanoparticles (QC NPs) and their application in the preservation of Shine Muscat grapes. The QC NPs, prepared through quercetin/copper complexation, exhibited stability with a particle size of 79.4 ± 3.2 nm and a zeta potential of −34.00 ± 4.98 mV. The nanoparticles exhibited robust antioxidant activity and 100% bactericidal effect against E. coli and S. aureus at 0.05 mg/mL, thereby underscoring their potential for use in fruit preservation. The application of a sodium alginate (SA) + QC NP coating to Shine Muscat grapes resulted in an 8.08% reduction in weight loss in comparison to the control, which exhibited a 10.40% reduction. The coating maintained firmness and preserved titratable acid content, thereby extending the storage life of the grapes. These findings position QC NPs as a promising material in eco-friendly and effective fruit preservation, and offer a viable solution to postharvest fruit preservation.

1. Introduction

Conducted in 1988, the cultivar ‘Shine Muscat’ was derived from a cross between Akitsu-21 (Vitis labruscana Bailey) and ‘Hakunan’ (Vitis vinifera L.). Akitsu-21 is a hybrid of ‘Steuben’ (Vitis labruscana) × ‘Muscat of Alexandria’ (Vitis vinifera) [1]. The fruit is characterized by its distinct rose aroma coupled with an excellent sweetness and taste profile, low acidity, and a range of other favorable attributes [2]. These attributes have contributed to its popularity among consumers in East Asia, China, Japan, and other countries. As a result, the fruit is now widely cultivated in China, where it is undergoing a period of rapid development [3]. It is noteworthy that China loses over 20% of its postharvest grapes to rot each year, which has an adverse effect on the development of industries related to grapes [4]. The Shine Muscat grape is a non-climacteric fruit, meaning that it can only be picked after reaching full ripeness on the plant, as it lacks the ability to ripen independently. Following harvest, Shine Muscat grapes are susceptible to moisture transfer, browning, degranulation, and rotting during storage and transportation due to their characteristic thin skin, soft texture, and juiciness, which provide conducive conditions for the growth and reproduction of bacteria [5]. Consequently, the pursuit of environmentally benign and effective techniques for the preservation of fruits remain a pivotal area of investigation.
Copper-based systems have emerged as promising candidates for food preservation due to their inherent dual functionality as both an antioxidant and antimicrobial agent. Green-synthesized copper nanoparticles (Cu NPs) exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity through mechanisms involving reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and membrane depolarization, while plant-derived polyphenols in these systems retain their intrinsic antioxidant capacity [6]. Notably, catechin/copper complexes demonstrate retained free radical scavenging activity, coupled with enhanced antimicrobial efficacy, through synergistic interactions between polyphenolic ligands and copper ions [7]. The biocidal action of copper species is attributed to nascent Cu2+ ions released from nanoparticle surfaces, which induce lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA degradation in microbial cells [8]. These properties collectively address the requirements for postharvest protection while mitigating environmental impact.
Quercetin is a naturally occurring polyhydroxy dietary flavonoid that is widely found in vegetables and fruits and has been demonstrated to possess antioxidant and antibacterial activity [9]. Nevertheless, the restricted antibacterial activity of quercetin as a natural plant extract necessitates the utilization of exceedingly high concentrations to attain the desired antibacterial activity, which may potentially impair the flavor and quality of the food product. Additionally, the poor water solubility of quercetin, which impedes its dispersion in polymer matrices, further constrains its application in the food industry [10].
In recent years, metal/phenolic networks formed by coordination interactions between multivalent metal ions and polyphenols have received much attention due to their synergistic effect with properties of metal ions and polyphenols, as well as their effective dispersion in water and good bioavailability [11]. Yueying Xu et al. used dihydroartemisinin complexed with Fe2O3 to form nanoparticles that could effectively inhibit the growth of E. coli and S. aureus [12]. Rongxin Yu et al. assembled nanoparticles using (−)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) with copper ions and diethyldithiocarbamate. Their findings demonstrated a notable inhibitory effect on methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and the nanoparticles were confirmed to exhibit minimal toxicity across a range of models, from cellular to blood, zebrafish, nematode, and mouse [13]. Haijing Qu et al. prepared a quercetin and tannic acid nanoparticle coordinated with trivalent iron (Fe3+), which has a strong antioxidant capacity. This nanoparticle is capable of purging ROS, repairing mitochondrial damage, and upregulating Nrf2/HO-1, thereby effectively alleviating oxidative stress and regulating the redox balance. Additionally, this nanoparticle can induce M1 macrophage polarization in an anti-inflammatory M2 subtype, which improves the inflammatory microenvironment [14].
The experimental design incorporated SA as the polymeric matrix due to its generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status and exceptional oxygen barrier properties. Potassium sorbate was selected as the positive control based on its established efficacy as a broad-spectrum food preservative. This conventional preservative provides a benchmark for the evaluation of the preservation effects of QC NPs within an SA matrix.
In light of the aforementioned issues, this study utilized quercetin complexed with copper ions to form nanoparticles (QC NPs) that were then dispersed in sodium alginate to create a coating to preserve the freshness of Shine Muscat grapes. This preservation coating exhibited antioxidant properties and demonstrated the capacity to effectively inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms. Furthermore, it extended the storage period of Shine Muscat grapes.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of QC NPs

2.1.1. Particle Size, Zeta Potential, and PDI of QC NPs

According to Figure 1A,B, the particle size of the QC NPs was 79.4 ± 3.2 nm, which can be also observed by TEM. The findings are consistent with the fundamental characteristics of nanomaterials ranging from 1 to 100 nm. Colloidal stability exhibits a direct correlation with absolute zeta potential magnitude, where elevated values impart colloidal stabilization through electrostatic repulsion forces that effectively prevent particle aggregation. Conversely, lower zeta potential magnitudes result in insufficient interparticle repulsion, leading to colloidal instability through aggregation phenomena. The zeta potential value of the QC NPs is −34.00 ± 4.98 mV. The absolute value of the zeta potential is greater than that of several quercetin microemulsions and nanoparticles [15,16]. This finding suggests that QC NPs can maintain good dispersion stability in a solution by electrostatic interaction. In addition, PDI represents the uniformity of the particle size distribution; a smaller PDI represents a more uniform distribution of molecular weight. The PDI value of the QC NPs was lower than 0.3, which represents the homogeneous or monodispersed particle population of the system [16].

2.1.2. UV–Vis Spectroscopy and FTIR Spectroscopy of QC NPs

According to Figure 1C, the characteristic absorption peak of quercetin occurs at approximately 370 nm, which can be attributed to the presence of aromatic rings and conjugated double bonds. The characteristic absorption peak of the QC NPs occurs at approximately 289 nm. This spectral blue shift indicates the occurrence of a coordination interaction between quercetin and copper.
According to Figure 1D, the broad absorption band at 3200–3500 cm−1 corresponds to -OH stretching vibrations [17], while the peaks at ~2900 cm−1 and ~1450 cm−1 are assigned to CH stretching and bending modes, respectively. Distinctive vibrations include C=O stretching of the ketone group (~1650 cm−1) and CO stretching of the ether group (~1100 cm−1) [14]. The split peaks near 750 cm−1, characteristic of out-of-plane CH bending in the ortho–dihydroxy-substituted benzene ring, disappear in the QC NPs, indicating coordination between copper ions and the catechol–hydroxyl groups of quercetin.

2.1.3. XPS of QC NPs and Quercetin

According to Figure 2A,B, the O 1s spectral deconvolution of quercetin revealed two distinct binding energy components at 531.0 eV and 533.0 eV. The higher-energy component (533.0 eV) corresponds to the C=O group, showing negligible low-energy shift compared to the characteristic ligand coordination shifts (0.3–0.8 eV) observed in the QC NPs. This absence of chemical shift indicates non-participation of the carbonyl group in copper ion coordination. Conversely, the CO-associated peak at 531.0 eV demonstrates a 0.5 eV positive binding energy shift relative to the corresponding peak (531.5 eV) of the QC NPs. This energetic displacement suggests reduced electron density on hydroxyl oxygen atoms due to coordination with copper ions. Collectively, these observations substantiate that QC NPs formation involves selective coordination between copper ions and quercetin’s hydroxyl groups while the carbonyl moiety remains non-coordinated, consistent with the proposed structure in Figure 2C.
According to Figure 2D, the diagnostic features of Cu2+ comprise a characteristic peak at 963 eV with characteristic shake-up satellite signatures spanning 939–945 eV. This spectral fingerprint provides conclusive evidence of both the effective formation of QC NPs and the retention of divalent copper species within QC NPs.

2.2. Pharmacological Activity of QC NPs

2.2.1. The Antioxidant Activity and Antibacterial Activity of QC NPs

Oxidative processes cause the chemical degradation of the nutrients present in fruits, including ascorbic acid (vitamin C, VC) and carotenoids. This results in a significant alteration to the appearance and flavor of fruits, which are perceived as less appetizing as a result. Therefore, the antioxidant efficacy of QC NPs was evaluated using ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging assays, commonly employed to assess the antioxidant potential of compounds. (Figure 3A,B) The results of the ABTS radical scavenging assay demonstrate that the ABTS radical scavenging rate of the QC NPs exhibits a notable increase with an elevation in the concentration of QC NPs from 26% to 88% (EC50 = 0.3814 mg/mL). In the DPPH radical scavenging assay, the QC NPs demonstrate notable antioxidant activity, with the DPPH radical scavenging rate increasing from 67% to 78% (EC50 = 0.0219 mg/mL) with an increase in QC NP concentration. Notably, QC NPs outperformed natural antioxidants such as bee pollen nano/microparticles (EC50 = 5.4 ± 0.07 mg/mL) and mango kernel marc extracts (EC50 = 0.20–0.22 mg/mL) in efficacy [18,19]. These concentration-dependent profiles confirm preserved antioxidant functionality of quercetin’s phenolic hydroxyl groups despite their participation in copper coordination, which is of significant value for the preservation of fruits and can effectively mitigate oxidation and degradation in fruits, thereby prolonging their shelf life [20,21].
Antibacterial activity can reduce or prevent food spoilage caused by harmful pathogens; the antibacterial activity of the QC NPs was evaluated against Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli) and Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus) (Figure 3C,D and Figure 4). At 0.05 mg/mL (50 µg/mL), the QC NPs demonstrate complete bacterial eradication (99.99% reduction) of both pathogens, outperforming not only individual quercetin and Cu2+ components, but also the reported antibacterial efficacy of TA-Fe/Cu NPs (200 µg/mL) [22]. This study demonstrates that QC NPs exhibit remarkable bacteriostatic activity.

2.2.2. Mechanism of Antibacterial Activity by QC NPs

According to Figure 5, SEM micrographs reveal pronounced membrane disruption in both E. coli and S. aureus, as evidenced by their collapsed cellular morphology and cytoplasmic content leakage. Mechanistic studies through nucleic acid and protein leakage assays in Figure 6 demonstrate concentration-dependent and time-dependent release kinetics of intracellular components. Notably, distinct leakage patterns exhibit significantly higher absorbance at 260 nm (nucleic acid-specific) than at 280 nm (protein-specific) resulting from the following two factors:
Extinction coefficient difference: nucleic acids display stronger UV absorption owing to π-conjugated aromatic systems in purine/pyrimidine bases, yielding enhanced detection sensitivity (1 OD260 = 50 μg/mL dsDNA vs. 1 OD280 = 1 mg/mL protein).
Size-dependent permeabilization: the lower molecular mass of nucleic acids facilitates their preferential efflux through nanoparticle-generated membrane pores.
These findings collectively demonstrate that QC NPs compromise bacterial membrane integrity, inducing content leakage.
Copper ions, as a redox-active metal, have been demonstrated to generate substantial quantities of ROS within cells through the Fenton reaction [23]. High levels of ROS attack the cell membrane and induce cell death [24]. The fluorescent probe 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA) and flow cytometry were employed to detect the production of ROS within the bacteria, with the fluorescence intensity serving as an indicator of ROS levels in bacterial cells. In E. coli, treatment with QC NPs resulted in a significant increase in fluorescence intensity, indicating a substantial rise in intracellular ROS (Figure 7A,B). This increase in ROS is crucial for the disruption of bacterial cellular functions, which ultimately leads to membrane damage and potential cell death. Similarly, in the case of S. aureus, the fluorescence intensity also increased markedly upon treatment with QC NPs (Figure 7C,D). These findings are consistent with the current understanding that an elevated ROS level can overwhelm bacterial antioxidant defenses, leading to oxidative damage and cell death. The data on ROS from both E. coli and S. aureus provide evidence for the antimicrobial mechanism of QC NPs.

2.2.3. Biofilm Degradation Activity of QC NPs

ROS can damage biofilms by directly reacting with the extracellular polymeric substances matrix and the microorganisms that are embedded within the biofilm [25]. Given that QC NPs are capable of generating a substantial amount of ROS in bacterial cells, the influence of their inhibition ability on the rate of bacterial biofilm formation was further explored by a crystal violet staining experiment. Figure 8A illustrates that, even at the lowest concentration tested (0.05 mg/mL), QC NPs induce over 70% biofilm degradation in E. coli, thereby demonstrating the potency of their degradation activity against established biofilms. Similarly, Figure 8B illustrates that QC NPs effectively degrade S. aureus biofilms in a concentration-dependent manner. At concentrations of 0.1 mg/mL and 0.2 mg/mL, QC NPs achieve over 80% biofilm degradation. Furthermore, these figures demonstrate the concentration-dependent effect of QC NPs on biofilm degradation, with significant implications for their potential use in antimicrobial strategies.

2.3. Biosafety of QC NPs

The biosafety of QC NPs was evaluated with a cytotoxicity assay and a hemolysis assay. The cytotoxicity assay was conducted using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) with the L929 cell as the cell model and the cell proliferation rate serving as an indicator for cytotoxicity analysis (Figure 8C). The graph illustrates a concentration-dependent decline in cell proliferation rate. Notably, low concentrations of QC NPs (0.05 mg/mL to 0.4 mg/mL) have the potential to surpass the control group (>100%) in terms of cell proliferation rate. From a biosafety perspective, these doses are deemed to be relatively safe. This suggests that QC NPs do not exert a detrimental impact on cell proliferation within a specific concentration range, indicating a low level of cytotoxicity.
The hemolysis assay employs the hemolysis rate as an analytical index, with the hemolysis rate determined by measuring the absorbance value of the supernatant (Figure 8D). The graph illustrates a concentration-dependent increase in hemolysis, with low concentrations of QC NPs (0.05 mg/mL to 0.1 mg/mL) exhibiting minimal hemolysis, less than 5%. This suggests that these doses are highly safe from a biosafety perspective. It indicates that QC NPs, within a certain concentration range, do not adversely affect red blood cell integrity, which is a key consideration for their potential use in biological systems. As the concentration of QC NPs increases, there is a corresponding rise in the hemolysis rate, with the highest concentration tested (1 mg/mL) demonstrating a more pronounced effect.

2.4. Coating Preservation of Shine Muscat Grapes

2.4.1. The Appearance of Shine Muscat Grapes

Appearance is a significant indicator in the measurement of the quality of fruits, as it allows consumers to make rapid and intuitive assessments [5]. The Shine Muscat grape is susceptible to browning when stored for extended periods, which is an outward indicator of spoilage [26]. This characteristic can be identified through apparent picture analysis (Figure 9). The control group exhibited visible browning with decay on day 5. In contrast, the SA group demonstrated browning on day 9 without any accompanying decay. The positive group did not display either browning or rotting, but exhibited multiple brown spots on the epidermis, suggesting compromised epidermal integrity. In comparison, the SA + QC NP group retained its initial appearance until day 11. The top view on day 11 corroborated the presence of rot in the control and SA groups. Additionally, it was observed that the grapes in all groups exhibited a range of epidermal folds.

2.4.2. The Weight Loss and Firmness of Shine Muscat Grapes

In storage, weight loss is an invaluable indicator of dehydration and deterioration in quality of fruits and vegetables. The primary cause of weight loss is the loss of water through transpiration [27]. A preservation coating can serve as a physical barrier, preventing the loss of water from fruits and thereby reducing weight loss [28]. According to Figure 10A, the weight loss of each group of grapes exhibited a gradual decline over time. On day 11 of storage, the rate of weight loss was found to be positive (11.42%) > control (10.40%) > SA (8.71%) > SA + QC (8.08%), where the uncoated group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of weight loss than the coated group. The results show that the preservation coating method is the most effective treatment to minimize weight loss, thereby preserving the freshness and quality of Shine Muscat grapes.
The firmness of a fruit is dependent upon the cellular structure of the fruit, which can be indicative of its freshness, ripeness, and age [29]. It is typical for fruits to undergo a ripening and ageing process when stored for an extended period of time. This process results in a loss of internal water and the degradation of cell walls by enzymes, which leads to a loss of firmness [30,31]. According to Figure 10B, all experimental groups exhibited a progressive loss of firmness attributable to postharvest metabolic activity and cellular senescence. However, the rate and extent of this decline differed significantly between the treatment groups. The control group exhibited the most pronounced reduction in firmness, indicating a rapid loss of structural integrity associated with cell wall degradation and dehydration. In contrast, the SA + QC NP group exhibited the slowest loss of firmness rate, retaining the highest firmness values throughout the storage period. These results demonstrate that the SA + QC NP coating effectively maintains cellular turgor pressure through moisture retention while preventing structural damage induced by microbial colonization. The enhanced preservation of firmness by the SA + QC NP coating primarily arises from the dual mechanism of effective microbial growth suppression coupled with a nanocomposite barrier that minimizes moisture loss.

2.4.3. The Titratable Acid (TA) Content of Shine Muscat Grapes

Titratable acid (TA) is a pivotal parameter in the evaluation of grape quality, as it exerts a substantial influence on organoleptic characteristics, including taste and preservation status. TA, which is primarily constituted by organic acids such as tartaric and malic acid, not only contributes to the distinctive flavor profile of grapes but also serves as a crucial substrate in respiratory metabolism [32,33,34]. According to Figure 11, the TA content demonstrates a gradual decline across all treatment groups, which is consistent with the natural metabolic processes that occur during fruit storage. The control group exhibited the most rapid decrease in TA content. In contrast, the SA + QC NP group exhibited a markedly slower rate of decline in TA content compared to the other groups. These observations indicate that the SA + QC NP coating effectively retards the respiration and metabolic processes of the grapes, thereby preserving the organic acids and contributing to overall quality maintenance.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Reagents

Quercetin, cupric chloride dihydrate (CuCl2·2H2O), glutaraldehyde and paraformaldehyde were obtained from Macklin Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Potassium persulfate and crystal violet were obtained from Xilong Co., Ltd. (Shantou, China). ABTS diammonium salt, DPPH, and Triton X-100 were obtained from Yuanye Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Nutrient broth and TTC nutrient agar were obtained from HuanKai Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). E. coli and S. aureus were obtained from Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC). L929 was obtained from Procell Co., Ltd. (Taoyuan, China). Solvents, including methanol, ethanol, and acetic acid, were analytical grade and used without further purification.

3.2. Preparation and Characterization of QC NPs

Preparation of the QC NPs was optimized using the following synthetic method [35]: A total of 6 mL quercetin solution (0.03 M in 0.1 M NaOH) was mixed with 32.2 mL deionized water. Then, 1.8 mL CuCl₂ solution (0.1 M in deionized water) was slowly added and stirred, the molar ratio of quercetin––to–copper ions being 1:1. The pH of the mixture was then adjusted 7.6 with 0.1 M HCl solution and 0.1 M NaOH solution and stirred for 30 min. The product was separated by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm, washed three times with deionized water, and resuspended in deionized water. Thus, the QC NPs were prepared.
Particle size, zeta potential, and polymer dispersity index (PDI) of the QC NPs were obtained using a Zeta/Nano Particle Analyzer (NanoPlus-3, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). The morphology of the QC–NPs was examined using a Transmission Electron Microscope (Talos F200S, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) absorption spectrum and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of the QC NPs were obtained using a UV–vis Spectrophotometer (UV-2600, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) and an FTIR Spectrometer (IR Prestige-21, Shimadzu, Japan). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the QC NPs and quercetin was examined using a X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer (K-ALPHA, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The concentration of copper ions in the QC NPs was determined by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. (AA-7000, Shimadzu, Japan).

3.3. Analysis of Antioxidant Activities of QC NPs

3.3.1. ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity

The ABTS radical scavenging assay method was adapted based on its use in reference number [36]. ABTS (7.4 mM) was mixed with 2.45 mM potassium persulfate for 12–24 h in the dark and the absorbance of the reaction mixture was adjusted with ethanol to 0.70  ±  0.02 at 732 nm of ABTS solution. An aliquot (20 µL) of a sample was reacted with 180 µL ABTS (A732 nm  =  0.70  ±  0.02) for one minute and the absorbance of the reaction mixture was measured at 732 nm. Percentage of antioxidant activity was compared against the positive control, a standard solution of ascorbic acid, and calculated using the following equation [37]:
A B T S   r a d i c a l   s c a v e n g i n g   a c t i v i t y = 1 A B S s a m p l e A B S c o n t r o l .

3.3.2. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

The DPPH radical scavenging assay method was adapted based on its use in reference number [38]. A total of 0.05 mL of a sample was added to 2.5 mL of a methanolic solution of DPPH (absorbance was approx. 1.2). The samples were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. Absorbance of solutions was measured at λ = 517 nm against water as a reference. Percentage of antioxidant activity was compared against the positive control, a standard solution of ascorbic acid, and calculated using the following equation [39]:
D P P H   r a d i c a l   s c a v e n g i n g   a c t i v i t y   ( % ) = 1 A B S s a m p l e A B S c o n t r o l .

3.4. Analysis of Antibacterial Activity and Antibacterial Mechanism of QC NPs

3.4.1. Culture Conditions of Strains

The activated E. coli was diluted in a nutrient broth medium to an optical density of 0.5 at a wavelength of 600 nm (OD 600 nm), corresponding to approximately 109 CFU/mL. Subsequently, the E. coli cell culture was prepared by mixing E. coli with QC NPs, quercetin, and copper ions, respectively, and incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. Additionally, the S. aureus cell culture was prepared in accordance with the aforementioned methodology.

3.4.2. Antibacterial Activity Analysis

The antibacterial activity of QC NPs was analyzed using the plate counting method. Serial dilutions of the E. coli cell culture (106 CFU/mL) and S. aureus cell culture (106 CFU/mL) were prepared and an aliquot was plated onto TTC nutrient agar plates. The plates were then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, after which the number of colonies was counted.

3.4.3. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) Observation

The FESEM observation method was adapted based on its use in reference number [40]. The E. coli cell culture (107 CFU/mL) and S. aureus cell culture (107 CFU/mL) were collected (6000× g, 5 min) and fixed overnight at 4 °C with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde. The samples were dehydrated with graded ethanol (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, and 100%). Finally, the samples were dried and sprayed with gold for observation by FESEM (MIRA, TESCAN, Brno, The Czech Republic).

3.4.4. ROS Content Analysis and Flow Cytometry Analysis

To determine the burst of intracellular ROS induced by QC NPs in bacteria, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA) was applied. A reactive oxygen species assay kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was applied to measure ROS as follows: DCFH-DA at a final concentration of 10 μmol L−1 was injected into the E. coli cell culture (106 CFU/mL) and S. aureus cell culture (106 CFU/mL), incubated in the dark for 2 h, and analyzed by flow cytometry (CytoFLEX, Beckman, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The data were analyzed using FlowJo_v10.8.1 software [41,42].

3.4.5. Nucleic Acid and Protein Leakage Analysis

The method used for nucleic acid and protein leakage analysis was that of reference [43]. The E. coli cell suspension (106 CFU/mL)- and S. aureus cell suspension (106 CFU/mL)-treated samples (QC NPs, quercetin, and copper) were incubated at 37 °C in intervals of 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min. Afterward, they were pelleted by centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 4 °C, 10 min) and absorbance of the cell-free supernatant was measured at 260 nm and 280 nm on a microplate reader (Epoch, BioTek, Oviedo, FL, USA) to determine the leakage of nucleic acid and protein.

3.4.6. Biofilm Degradation Activity Analysis

Biofilm degradation activity analysis of QC NPs was optimized based on the methods reported in references [44,45]. The E. coli cell culture (107 CFU/mL) and S. aureus cell culture (107 CFU/mL) were added separately into 48-well flat-bottomed microplates, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 72 h, where the medium was changed every 24 h during the culture process. Once the incubation period had elapsed, the contents of each well were removed and washed three times with PBS in order to remove any residual bacteria. The biofilm in the wells was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for a period of 15 min. Following the removal of the fixative, the biofilm was stained with 0.2% crystal violet for a period of 30 min. Thereafter, the microplates were rinsed with PBS to remove any excess staining and 200 μL of 33% acetic acid was added to each well. The optical density (OD) of each well was then measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader.

3.5. Biosafety Analysis

3.5.1. Cytotoxicity Assay

The cytotoxicity assay of the QC NPs was optimized based on the methods reported in reference [46]. The concentration of L929 cells was adjusted to 104 cells/mL and 100 μL of cell suspension was transferred to a 96-well plate and incubated at 37 °C in a CO₂ incubator. The next day, following the adhesion of cells, varying concentrations of QC NPs were added. Following a 24-h period, CCK-8 assay solution was added and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The OD values were then measured at 450 nm.

3.5.2. Hemolysis Rates Assay

The hemolysis rates assay of the QC NPs was optimized based on the methods reported in reference [47]. A 5% mouse erythrocyte solution was combined with an equal volume of the sample and incubated for one hour at 37 °C. Following this, the sample was subjected to centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 10 min, after which the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader.

3.6. Application to Shine Muscat Grapes

3.6.1. Coating Treatment of Grapes

Fresh Shine Muscat grapes were carefully selected and checked for mechanical defects and pests, then soaked in 3% sodium alginate (SA) solution [48]. The grapes in the control group were coated with water only, while the grapes in the positive group were coated with potassium sorbate (0.02% potassium sorbate in water) only. The sample grapes were classified into the SA group and the SA + QC NP (3% SA + 0.1 mg/mL QC NPs) group. Subsequently, the grapes were dried in a ventilated room and stored at 25 °C. Grapes in the different groups were recorded with a camera every 2 days.

3.6.2. Weight Loss

The grapes were weighed every 4 days. The following equation was employed to calculate the weight loss of the grapes:
W e i g h t   L o s s   ( % ) = ( W 1 W 0 ) W 0 ,
where W0 is the initial weight and W1 is the weight during storage.

3.6.3. Firmness

The firmness of the grapes in the different groups were measured using a texture analyzer (TA. TOUCH, Bosin Tech, Shanghai, China).

3.6.4. Titratable Acid (TA) Content

The titratable acid content assay was conducted according to reference [49]. A total of 2 g of grape homogenate was placed in a 25 mL volumetric flask containing distilled water. After standing for 30 min, the volumetric flask was filtered and 20 mL of the filtrate was taken and titrated with 0.01 mol/L NaOH using 1% phenolphthalein solution as an indicator. The volume of NaOH consumed was recorded when the solution turned pink and remained unchanged for 30 s. Three measurements were taken to calculate the average value. The following equation was employed to calculate the TA Content of the grapes:
T A   %   c i t r i c   a c i d = V 2 × C 2 × V 0 × 0.064 m × V 1
where V2 is the volume of NaOH solution consumed by titration, C2 is the concentration of NaOH solution, 0.064 is the conversion factor of citric acid, V0 is the volume of diluted grape homogenate, V1 is the volume of grape homogenate used for titration, and m is the weight of the sample.

3.7. Statistical Analysis

The experiment was conducted in triplicate and the data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed using Origin 2021, GraphPad Prism 8, and SPSS Statistics 24.0.

4. Conclusions

This study successfully prepared quercetin/copper nanoparticles (QC NPs) via self-assembly, yielding monodisperse nanoparticles (79.4 ± 3.2 nm) with high colloidal stability (zeta potential: −34.00 ± 4.98 mV). The QC NPs demonstrated potent dual functionality, exhibiting concentration-dependent antioxidant activity (ABTS: EC50 = 0.3814 mg/mL; DPPH: EC50 = 0.0219 mg/mL) and complete bactericidal efficacy (99.99% reduction) against E. coli and S. aureus at 0.05 mg/mL. Mechanistic studies revealed that QC NPs induced bacterial membrane disruption, intracellular ROS accumulation, and subsequent leakage of nucleic acids and proteins. Biosafety assessments confirmed low cytotoxicity (>95% cell proliferation rate at ≤0.4 mg/mL) and biocompatibility (<5% hemolysis rate at ≤0.1 mg/mL).
When applied as a sodium alginate-based coating, QC NPs + SA significantly reduced weight loss (8.08% vs. 10.40% in controls), preserved firmness, and maintained titratable acidity in Shine Muscat grapes, extending shelf life by up to 11 days. These findings highlight the QC NPs + SA coating as an eco-friendly, multifunctional preservative in postharvest fruit protection, combining antioxidant, antimicrobial, and moisture-barrier properties. Future research should focus on scaling production and exploring broader agricultural applications.

Author Contributions

K.C.: conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, writing—original draft, and visualization. Z.C.: conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, and visualization. L.W.: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, and visualization. B.Z.: validation, investigation, and writing—review and editing. W.G.: validation, investigation, and writing—review and editing. R.L.: validation, investigation, and writing–review and editing. J.Y.: validation, investigation, and writing—review and editing. H.L.: validation, investigation, and writing—review and editing. W.H.: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing—review and editing, project administration, and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the “Thirteenth Five-Year Plan” for the National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2016YFD0400903), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31471923 and No. 32202120), and the Zhuhai College of Science and Technology “Three Levels” Talent Construction Project.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yamada, M.; Yamane, H.; Sato, A.; Hirakawa, N.; Iwanami, H.; Yoshinaga, K.; Ozawa, T.; Mitani, N.; Shiraishi, M.; Yoshioka, M. New grape cultivar ‘Shine muscat’. Bull. Natl. Inst. Fruit Tree Sci. 2008, 7, 21–38. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, J.; Ma, T.; Bao, S.; Yin, D.; Ge, Q.; Li, C.; Fang, Y.; Sun, X. Suitable crop loading: An effective method to improve “Shine muscat” grape quality. Food Chem. 2023, 424, 136451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gao, W.; Yang, L.; Ben, H.; Yao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, P. First Report of Black Spot of Shine muscat Fruit Caused by Cladosporium allicinum in China. Plant Dis. 2023, 107, 2847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shimizu, T.; Kono, A.; Suzaki, K. Transcriptional analysis of defense-related genes induced by infection with the causal agent of downy mildew, Plasmopara viticola, in grapevine cultivar Shine muscat. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2019, 85, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, K.; Jiang, J.; Tian, R.; Kuang, Y.; Wu, K.; Xiao, M.; Liu, Y.; Qian, H.; Jiang, F. Properties of konjac glucomannan/curdlan-based emulsion films incorporating camellia oil and the preservation effect as coatings on ‘Kyoho’ grapes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 258, 128836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Banger, A.; Kumari, A.; Jangid, N.K.; Jadoun, S.; Srivastava, A.; Srivastava, M. A review on green synthesis and characterisation of copper nanoparticles using plant extracts for biological applications. Environ. Technol. Rev. 2025, 14, 94–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lungu, I.I.; Cioanca, O.; Mircea, C.; Tuchilus, C.; Stefanache, A.; Huzum, R.; Hancianu, M. Insights into Catechin–Copper Complex Structure and Biologic Activity Modulation. Molecules 2024, 29, 4969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chatterjee, A.K.; Chakraborty, R.; Basu, T. Mechanism of antibacterial activity of copper nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2014, 25, 135101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zymone, K.; Benetis, R.; Trumbeckas, D.; Baseviciene, I.; Trumbeckaite, S. Different Effects of Quercetin Glycosides and Quercetin on Kidney Mitochondrial Function—Uncoupling, Cytochrome C Reducing and Antioxidant Activity. Molecules 2022, 27, 6377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Du, T.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; Su, Z.; Sun, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W. Phytochemicals-based edible coating for photodynamic preservation of fresh-cut apples. Food Res. Int. 2023, 163, 112293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shi, S.; Lan, X.; Ding, X.; Han, X.; Sun, J.; Wang, J.; Duan, J. Metal-phenolic networks spontaneously reinforced carrageenan-based packaging films with antibacterial and antioxidant properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 135143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, Y.; Xiao, L.; Chen, J.; Wu, Q.; Yu, W.; Zeng, W.; Shi, Y.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Y. α-Fe2O3 based nanotherapeutics for near-infrared/dihydroartemisinin dual-augmented chemodynamic antibacterial therapy. Acta Biomater. 2022, 150, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yu, R.; Chen, H.; He, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, J.; Zheng, Q.; Fu, Z.; Lu, C.; Lin, Z.; Caruso, F.; et al. Engineering Antimicrobial Metal–Phenolic Network Nanoparticles with High Biocompatibility for Wound Healing. Adv. Mater. 2023, 36, e2307680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Qu, H.; Wu, J.; Pan, Y.; Abdulla, A.; Duan, Z.; Cheng, W.; Wang, N.; Chen, H.; Wang, C.; Yang, J.; et al. Biomimetic Nanomodulator Regulates Oxidative and Inflammatory Stresses to Treat Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 28228–28245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, T.; Ma, M.; Ali, A.; Liu, Q.; Bai, R.; Zhang, K.; Guan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhou, H. Self-assembled copper tannic acid nanoparticles: A powerful nano-bactericide by valence shift of copper. Nano Today 2024, 54, 102071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ma, R.-H.; Wang, W.; Hou, C.-P.; Man, Y.-F.; Ni, Z.-J.; Thakur, K.; Zhang, J.-G.; Wei, Z.-J. Structural characterization and stability of glycated bovine serum albumin-kaempferol nanocomplexes. Food Chem. 2023, 415, 135778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, D.; Zhang, C.; Pu, Y.; Chen, S.; Li, H.; Zhong, Y. Novel colorimetric films based on polyvinyl alcohol/sodium carboxymethyl cellulose doped with anthocyanins and betacyanins to monitor pork freshness. Food Chem. 2023, 404, 134426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mashhadi, Z.; Davati, N.; Emamifar, A.; Karami, M. The effect of nano/microparticles of bee pollen on the shelf life of high-fat cooked sausage during refrigerated storage. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 4269–4283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nguyen, A.T.; Akanbi, T.O.; Tawiah, N.A.; Aryee, A.N. Valorization of seed and kernel marcs and evaluation of their antioxidant potential. Food Chem. 2022, 390, 133168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chang, L.; Xu, L.; Yang, Z.; Liu, L.; Qiu, D. Antibacterial and antioxidative biogenic films for room-temperature strawberry preservation. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zheng, N.; Liu, J.; Liu, T. Preparation and characterization of chitosan-based corn protein composites constructed with TG enzyme and their preservation performance on strawberries. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 270, 132190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Qin, X.; Tian, R.; Wang, B.; Yang, H.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Zhou, J.; Chen, Q.; Tian, J.; Yang, Y. Metal-Phenolic Nanocapsules with Photothermal Antibacterial and Ros Scavenging Ability for Diabetic Wound Healing. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024, 13, e2303604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ma, B.; Wang, S.; Liu, F.; Zhang, S.; Duan, J.; Li, Z.; Kong, Y.; Sang, Y.; Liu, H.; Bu, W.; et al. Self-Assembled Copper–Amino Acid Nanoparticles for in Situ Glutathione “AND” H2O2 Sequentially Triggered Chemodynamic Therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 141, 849–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Su, L.-J.; Zhang, J.-H.; Gomez, H.; Murugan, R.; Hong, X.; Xu, D.; Jiang, F.; Peng, Z.-Y. Reactive Oxygen Species-Induced Lipid Peroxidation in Apoptosis, Autophagy, and Ferroptosis. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 5080843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, J.; Li, J.; Sun, M.; Sun, M.; Tang, X.; Tang, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ou, C.; Ou, C.; et al. Acidic biofilm microenvironment-responsive ROS generation via a protein nanoassembly with hypoxia-relieving and GSH-depleting capabilities for efficient elimination of biofilm bacteria. Acta Biomater. 2024, 186, 439–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, Y.; Xu, F.; Zhao, H.; Wu, H.; Sun, C.; Li, Q. Furoic acid-mediated konjac glucomannan/flaxseed gum based green biodegradable antibacterial film for Shine-Muscat grape preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 126883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khalid, S.; Malik, A.U.; Khan, A.S.; Khan, M.N.; Ullah, M.I.; Abbas, T.; Khalid, M.S. Tree age and fruit size in relation to postharvest respiration and quality changes in ‘Kinnow’ mandarin fruit under ambient storage. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 220, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Luo, J.; Yu, W.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, F. Strawberry FaSnRK1α Regulates Anaerobic Respiratory Metabolism under Waterlogging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, H.; Zhao, X.; Tan, Y.; Li, P.; Li, D.; Tao, Y.; Liu, D. Fruit softening correlates with enzymatic activities and compositional changes in fruit cell wall during growing in Lycium barbarum L. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 3044–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, M.; Li, G.; Sun, W.; Li, H.; Fu, J.; Zong, W.; Han, W. Effect of ultrasonic treatment on water-soluble pectin and degrading enzymes in cell wall of persimmon fruit during storage. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2023, 121, 105341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jiang, Y.; Yu, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhuang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zhong, Y. Electrostatic spraying of chitosan coating with different deacetylation degree for strawberry preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 139, 1232–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Duan, N.; Li, Q.; Meng, X.; Wang, Z.; Wu, S. Preparation and characterization of k-carrageenan/konjac glucomannan/TiO2 nanocomposite film with efficient anti-fungal activity and its application in strawberry preservation. Food Chem. 2021, 364, 130441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, X.; Cheng, R.; Wang, B.; Zeng, J.; Xu, J.; Li, J.; Kang, L.; Cheng, Z.; Gao, W.; Chen, K. Biodegradable sandwich-architectured films derived from pea starch and polylactic acid with enhanced shelf-life for fruit preservation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 251, 117117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yan, Y.; Duan, S.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, C.; Hu, B.; Liu, A.; Wu, D.; He, J.; Wu, W. Preparation and characterization of Konjac glucomannan and pullulan composite films for strawberry preservation. 2020, 243, 116446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cheng, J.; Zhang, H.; Lu, K.; Zou, Y.; Jia, D.; Yang, H.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Q. Bi-functional quercetin/copper nanoparticles integrating bactericidal and anti-quorum sensing properties for preventing the formation of biofilms. Biomater. Sci. 2024, 12, 1788–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jo, Y.-J.; Cho, H.-S.; Chun, J.-Y. Antioxidant activity of β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes containing trans-cinnamaldehyde by DPPH, ABTS and FRAP. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 30, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Samsonowicz, M.; Regulska, E.; Karpowicz, D.; Leśniewska, B. Antioxidant properties of coffee substitutes rich in polyphenols and minerals. Food Chem. 2019, 278, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, H.; Song, L.; Sun, P.; Su, R.; Wang, S.; Cheng, S.; Zhan, X.; Lü, X.; Xia, X.; Shi, C. Synergistic bactericidal effect of ultrasound combined with citral nanoemulsion on Salmonella and its application in the preservation of purple kale. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2023, 92, 106269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, C.; Hei, R.; Song, X.; Fan, Z.; Guo, D.; Luo, J.; Ma, Y. Metal oxide nanoparticles inhibit nitrogen fixation and rhizosphere colonization by inducing ROS in associative nitrogen-fixing bacteria Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501. Chemosphere 2023, 336, 139223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hong, Y.; Zeng, J.; Wang, X.; Drlica, K.; Zhao, X. Post-stress bacterial cell death mediated by reactive oxygen species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 10064–10071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Majumder, A.; Sarkar, C.; Das, I.; Sk, S.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Mandal, S.; Bera, M. Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of a Series of Zinc(II) Complexes of Anthracene-Affixed Multifunctional Organic Assembly as Potential Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Agents against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 22781–22804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ridha, D.M.; Al-Awady, M.J.; Al-Zwaid, A.J.A.; Balakit, A.A.; Al-Dahmoshi, H.O.; Alotaibi, M.H.; El-Hiti, G.A. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of selenium nanoparticles-antibiotic conjugates against anti-multidrug-resistant bacteria. Int. J. Pharm. 2024, 658, 124214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Singh, S.; Mishra, P. Bacitracin and isothiocyanate functionalized silver nanoparticles for synergistic and broad spectrum antibacterial and antibiofilm activity with selective toxicity to bacteria over mammalian cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2022, 133, 112649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cao, S.; Li, Q.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z.; Lv, X.; Chen, J. Preparation of biodegradable carboxymethyl cellulose/dopamine/Ag NPs cryogel for rapid hemostasis and bacteria-infected wound repair. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, W.; Zhang, S.; Yuan, Z.; Yang, S.; Li, T.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, F.; Dong, W. pH responsive THPS crosslinked injectable hydrogel with Cu-metformin sustained-release for accelerating wound healing. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 492, 152373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Su, Q.; Su, W.; Xing, S.; Tan, M. Enhanced stability of anthocyanins by cyclodextrin–metal organic frameworks: Encapsulation mechanism and application as protecting agent for grape preservation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 326, 121645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Q.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, H. Preparation and characterization of carvacrol/soybean protein isolate composite film with efficient antimicrobial and antioxidant activities and its application in grape preservation. Food Chem. 2025, 464, 141572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Particle size, zeta potential, and PDI of QC NPs, (B) TEM micrographs of QC NPs, (C) UV–vis spectroscopy of quercetin and QC NPs, and (D) FTIR spectroscopy of quercetin and QC NPs.
Figure 1. (A) Particle size, zeta potential, and PDI of QC NPs, (B) TEM micrographs of QC NPs, (C) UV–vis spectroscopy of quercetin and QC NPs, and (D) FTIR spectroscopy of quercetin and QC NPs.
Molecules 30 01438 g001
Figure 2. (A) O 1s XPS spectral deconvolution of QC NPs, (B) O 1s XPS spectral deconvolution of quercetin, (C) proposed coordination architecture of QC NPs, and (D) Cu 2p XPS fingerprint of QC NPs. The red line in the picture is the Background Intensity (a.u.).
Figure 2. (A) O 1s XPS spectral deconvolution of QC NPs, (B) O 1s XPS spectral deconvolution of quercetin, (C) proposed coordination architecture of QC NPs, and (D) Cu 2p XPS fingerprint of QC NPs. The red line in the picture is the Background Intensity (a.u.).
Molecules 30 01438 g002
Figure 3. (A) ABTS radical scavenging rate of ascorbic acid (Vc) and QC NPs, (B) DPPH radical scavenging rate of Vc and QC NPs, (C) E. coli CFU among treatment groups, and (D) S. aureus CFU among treatment groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni test. Significant differences are denoted by lowercase and capital letters (a, b, c, d, A, B, C, D, E; p < 0.05). Quercetin concentration was 0.047 mg/mL and Cu2+ concentration was 0.003 mg/mL, both of which were consistent with their concentrations in 0.05 mg/mL QC NPs.
Figure 3. (A) ABTS radical scavenging rate of ascorbic acid (Vc) and QC NPs, (B) DPPH radical scavenging rate of Vc and QC NPs, (C) E. coli CFU among treatment groups, and (D) S. aureus CFU among treatment groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni test. Significant differences are denoted by lowercase and capital letters (a, b, c, d, A, B, C, D, E; p < 0.05). Quercetin concentration was 0.047 mg/mL and Cu2+ concentration was 0.003 mg/mL, both of which were consistent with their concentrations in 0.05 mg/mL QC NPs.
Molecules 30 01438 g003
Figure 4. Representative photographs of E. coli and S. aureus colonies formed on agar plates among treatment groups.
Figure 4. Representative photographs of E. coli and S. aureus colonies formed on agar plates among treatment groups.
Molecules 30 01438 g004
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of E. coli and S. aureus among treatment groups.
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of E. coli and S. aureus among treatment groups.
Molecules 30 01438 g005
Figure 6. The leakage of nucleic acids and proteins from E. coli and S. aureus among the treatment groups. E. coli nucleic acids (A), E. coli proteins (B), S. aureus nucleic acids (C), and S. aureus proteins (D). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni test. The quercetin concentration was 0.047 mg/mL and Cu2+ concentration was 0.003 mg/mL, both of which were consistent with their concentrations in 0.05 mg/mL QC NPs.
Figure 6. The leakage of nucleic acids and proteins from E. coli and S. aureus among the treatment groups. E. coli nucleic acids (A), E. coli proteins (B), S. aureus nucleic acids (C), and S. aureus proteins (D). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni test. The quercetin concentration was 0.047 mg/mL and Cu2+ concentration was 0.003 mg/mL, both of which were consistent with their concentrations in 0.05 mg/mL QC NPs.
Molecules 30 01438 g006
Figure 7. ROS content (fluorescence intensity) of E. coli and S. aureus in control and QC NP groups. E. coli in control group (A), E. coli in QC NP group (B), S. aureus in control group (C), and S. aureus in QC NP group (D). QC NP concentration was 0.05 mg/mL.
Figure 7. ROS content (fluorescence intensity) of E. coli and S. aureus in control and QC NP groups. E. coli in control group (A), E. coli in QC NP group (B), S. aureus in control group (C), and S. aureus in QC NP group (D). QC NP concentration was 0.05 mg/mL.
Molecules 30 01438 g007
Figure 8. (A) Biofilm degradation rate of E. coli among treatment groups, (B) biofilm degradation rate of S. aureus among treatment groups, (C) cell proliferation rate among treatment groups, and (D) hemolysis rate among treatment groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni test. Significant differences are denoted by lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f and p < 0.05). Quercetin concentration was 0.047 mg/mL and Cu2+ concentration was 0.003 mg/mL, both of which were consistent with their concentrations in 0.05 mg/mL QC NPs.
Figure 8. (A) Biofilm degradation rate of E. coli among treatment groups, (B) biofilm degradation rate of S. aureus among treatment groups, (C) cell proliferation rate among treatment groups, and (D) hemolysis rate among treatment groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni test. Significant differences are denoted by lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f and p < 0.05). Quercetin concentration was 0.047 mg/mL and Cu2+ concentration was 0.003 mg/mL, both of which were consistent with their concentrations in 0.05 mg/mL QC NPs.
Molecules 30 01438 g008
Figure 9. Photographs of Shine Muscat grapes among treatment groups during storage.
Figure 9. Photographs of Shine Muscat grapes among treatment groups during storage.
Molecules 30 01438 g009
Figure 10. (A) Weight loss of Shine Muscat grapes among treatment groups and (B) firmness of Shine Muscat grapes among treatment groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni test. Significant differences are denoted by lowercase letters (a, b, c, and p < 0.05).
Figure 10. (A) Weight loss of Shine Muscat grapes among treatment groups and (B) firmness of Shine Muscat grapes among treatment groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni test. Significant differences are denoted by lowercase letters (a, b, c, and p < 0.05).
Molecules 30 01438 g010
Figure 11. TA of Shine Muscat grapes among treatment groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni test. Significant differences are denoted by lowercase letters (a, b, c, and p < 0.05).
Figure 11. TA of Shine Muscat grapes among treatment groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni test. Significant differences are denoted by lowercase letters (a, b, c, and p < 0.05).
Molecules 30 01438 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Che, K.; Chen, Z.; Weng, L.; Zhou, B.; Gao, W.; Liu, R.; Yang, J.; Luo, H.; Hu, W. Preparation of Quercetin/Copper Nanoparticles and Their Preservation Performance on Shine Muscat Grapes. Molecules 2025, 30, 1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071438

AMA Style

Che K, Chen Z, Weng L, Zhou B, Gao W, Liu R, Yang J, Luo H, Hu W. Preparation of Quercetin/Copper Nanoparticles and Their Preservation Performance on Shine Muscat Grapes. Molecules. 2025; 30(7):1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071438

Chicago/Turabian Style

Che, Kundian, Zhanjun Chen, Luo Weng, Baogang Zhou, Wei Gao, Ran Liu, Jialin Yang, Haoyuan Luo, and Wenzhong Hu. 2025. "Preparation of Quercetin/Copper Nanoparticles and Their Preservation Performance on Shine Muscat Grapes" Molecules 30, no. 7: 1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071438

APA Style

Che, K., Chen, Z., Weng, L., Zhou, B., Gao, W., Liu, R., Yang, J., Luo, H., & Hu, W. (2025). Preparation of Quercetin/Copper Nanoparticles and Their Preservation Performance on Shine Muscat Grapes. Molecules, 30(7), 1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071438

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop