Next Article in Journal
From Origin to the Present: Establishment, Mechanism, Evolutions and Biomedical Applications of the CRISPR/Cas-Based Macromolecular System in Brief
Next Article in Special Issue
Goutweed (Aegopodium podagraria L.)—An Edible Weed with Health-Promoting Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Environmental Interactions Shape the Volatile Compounds of Agarwood Oils Extracted from Aquilaria sinensis Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Evaluation of Vasorelaxant and Antiplatelet Activity of Two Plant-Derived Benzoquinones: Rapanone and Embelin
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 30
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules30040946
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diplopterys pubipetala (Malpighiaceae): Insights into Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Antifungal Activities with Chemical Composition Analysis via UHPLC-MS/MS and GC/MS

by
Veronica de Melo Sacramento
1,
Vanessa de Andrade Royo
1,*,
Pedro Henrique Fonseca Veloso
1,
Kamila Soares Freitas Souto
1,
Alisson Samuel Portes Caldeira
2,
Carlos Henrique Gomes Martins
3,
Sara Lemes de Souza
3,
Ezequias Pessoa de Siqueira
2,
Fernando Ribeiro Cassiano
4,
Afrânio Farias de Melo Júnior
5,
Dario Alves de Oliveira
5,
Elytania Veiga Mnezes
5 and
Tânia Maria de Almeida Alves
2
1
Natural Products Laboratory, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros 39401-089, MG, Brazil
2
Laboratory of Bioactive Natural Products Chemistry, René Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Belo Horizonte 30190-002, MG, Brazil
3
Antimicrobial Testing Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38405-320, MG, Brazil
4
Department of Exact Sciences, Center for Exact and Technological Sciences, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros 39401-089, MG, Brazil
5
Bioprospecting and Genetic Resources Laboratory, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros 39401-089, MG, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(4), 946; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040946
Submission received: 16 December 2024 / Revised: 24 January 2025 / Accepted: 27 January 2025 / Published: 18 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phytochemistry and Biological Activity Perspectives of Medicinal Plants)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Diplopterys pubipetala (Malpighiaceae) is a liana native to the Brazilian Cerrado biome, traditionally used in Ayahuasca preparations. Despite its cultural importance, research on its chemical composition and biological activities, which may have therapeutic potential, is limited. This study investigated the volatile and non-volatile secondary metabolites of D. pubipetala leaves, their antioxidant capacity, and their antibacterial and antifungal activities. Volatile compounds were identified using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) coupled to solid-phase microextraction (SPME), while non-volatile compounds were annotated using UHPLC-MS/MS-ESI-Q-TOF. Antioxidant capacity was evaluated by DPPH assay, and antimicrobial activity was assessed in vitro against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida species (C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata). GC-MS analysis revealed 25 predominant volatile compounds, including ethyl dodecanoate, ethyl tetradecanoate, nonanoic acid, and 5-methylhexan-2-one, with documented antifungal, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activities. The crude extract and ethyl acetate fraction showed strong antioxidant capacity (EC50 9.83 µg/mL and 6.42 µg/mL, respectively), and antifungal effects were observed against Candida species. This study provides the first comprehensive investigation of the antioxidant capacity and antibacterial and antifungal activities of D. pubipetala, together with a detailed chemical profile of its volatile compounds.

1. Introduction

The extraction of bioactive compounds from plant species is one of the oldest and most established applications of biodiversity [1,2]. The richness of Brazilian flora and fauna, coupled with the severe as a driving force in the search for new bioactive substances with diverse applications, such as compounds in cosmetics, flavors, fragrances, dyes and pigments, general food additives, components in insecticides and pesticides [3], or as important ingredients in various formulations for the treatment of infectious diseases [4].
Natural products derived from plants have served as medicine, given the broad efficiency of bioactive compounds against infectious agents [1,5]. The use of therapeutic agents based on plant derivatives is justified by the advancement of scientific knowledge in this area [6]. The lack of accessibility, the inefficacy of available drugs, and the high cost of antibiotics, especially as the occurrence of multidrug-resistant bacteria becomes increasingly common [7,8], are significant challenges.
A large part of the therapeutic action of plants is related to the bioactive properties of secondary compounds such as polyphenols, flavonoids, phenolic acids, terpenoids, saponins, alkaloids and others [3,5,7,9].
The Malpighiaceae, which is part of the Cerrado biome, one of the largest in Brazil [10], is composed of 45 genera, includes the genus Banisteriopsis, considered a sister genus to the species of interest in this investigation: Diplopterys pubipetala (A. Juss.) W. R. Anderson & C. Davis, commonly known as “marvaquero” (in northern Minas Gerais, Brazil), “cipó preto” [11], or “tucunacá” [12].
Regarding the species D. pubipetala, there are documented findings related to the botanical, anatomical, and physiological aspects of this liana [13,14,15,16,17]. Other areas of interest have gained significance, including the diversity of secondary metabolites revealed through phytochemical and histochemical tests, as well as the quantification of phenolic compounds and flavonoids, which showed values comparable to or even better than those of biologically significant substances previously quantified in the family [18,19].
In an in vitro analysis of anticancer activity, the ethyl acetate fraction from leaves and stems reduced the viability of B16F10 cells by over 50% at a concentration of 125 µg.mL−1, whereas other species widely used as chemotherapeutic agents failed to achieve such reduction in different cancer cell lines at this concentration [20]. Additionally, in tests of anti-inflammatory potential using the dichloromethane and ethyl acetate fractions on 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells exposed to ethyl acetate fractions, there was a decrease in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) and an increase in the production of interleukin-10 and nitric oxide levels. These findings indicate the anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory actions that may be exerted by the explored fraction [21].
In a study conducted on seeds, chromatographic analysis confirmed the presence of unsaturated fatty acids such as oleic, linoleic, and eicosanoic acids, which, similar to other species in the family, are already exploited by the industry. Furthermore, the species was reported as having promising potential in the oilseed sector due to the high content of these substances extracted from the seeds [22].
Banisteriopsis and other genera belonging to the Cerrado biome, with more advanced studies based on biomonitoring [23,24,25,26], stand out through chromatographic and spectroscopic analyses.
Through ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS), secondary metabolites have been identified in stem and leaf extracts of D. pubipetala, with the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, saponins, and lactones documented in the literature [18,19]. However, there are still gaps, both in the study of non-volatile substances and in the investigation of possible volatile substances present in this species.
In this context, gas chromatography (GC) emerges as an essential technique due to its high precision and efficiency in identifying and quantifying classes of compounds such as terpenes, ketones, fatty acids, and other volatiles [27]. Knowledge of alternative methods related to the extraction of volatile components is essential, as each injection can vary depending on the type of sample analyzed. Therefore, liquid injection and solid-phase microextraction (SPME), with their specific characteristics, are widely used in volatile analyses [27,28].
The aim of this work is the characterization and evaluation of biologically active compounds from extracts and fractions of D. pubipetala leaves, focusing on antioxidant capacity, antibacterial and antifungal activities, as well as the annotation of substances in the EtOAc fraction by LC/MS and analyses using gas chromatography coupled to liquid injection mass spectrometry and SPME, including the analysis of fresh leaves. By characterizing its bioactive volatile compounds, this research highlights its relevant antifungal activity, contributing with valuable knowledge about future pharmacological applications of the species.

2. Results

2.1. Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC)

The presence of flavonoids was verified by observing bands in a dark chamber under UV light (254 at 366 nm), with the predominant color being yellow, the retention factors were calculated: 026; 0.35; 0.49 and 0.61 (Figure S1). No co-migration occurred between the components of the crude extract and the ethyl acetate and methanol fractions in relation to the reference substance. Chromatographic tests conducted to detect alkaloids were not positive.

2.2. Evaluation of Antioxidant Capacity

The antioxidant capacity value for the hydroethanolic crude extract of D. pubipetala leaves was EC50 9.83 ± 0.46 μg.mL⁻¹, indicating a high antioxidant capacity. In contrast, the effective concentration (EC50) obtained for the gallic acid standard was 2.10 ± 0.10 μg.mL⁻¹. Among the fractions, the lowest EC50 values were 6.46 ± 0.60 μg.mL⁻¹ for the ethyl acetate fraction (EtOAc) and 19.00 ± 3.58 μg.mL⁻¹ for the methanol fraction (MeOH). The fractions with the highest EC50 values, and thus the lowest antioxidant capacity, were the dichloromethane fraction (DCM) (52.90 ± 5.52 μg.mL⁻¹) and the n-hexane fraction (Hex) (84.50 ± 2.01 μg.mL⁻¹) (Table 1).

2.3. Antibacterial Activity

In this investigation, the best result for the biological inhibition assay of S. aureus was obtained with the ethyl acetate fraction minimum innibitory concentration (MIC 1000 µg.mL−1), which is considered weak. The other fractions, including the crude extract, exhibited MIC values equal to or greater than 2000 µg.mL−1.
The MIC values for all samples tested against E. coli and P. aeruginosa were equal to or greater than 2000 µg.mL−1, classifying them as inactive (Table 2).

2.4. Antifungal Activity

The results obtained for the extract and fractions of D. pubipetala showed fungistatic effects across all antifungal tests, with MIC < MFC, indicating that the minimum inhibitory concentrations were relatively low. This implies a very strong antimicrobial activity (<100 µg.mL−1) according to [30]. The highlights include the CE with a MIC of 3.9 µg.mL−1 against C. albicans and C. tropicalis, and the MeOH fraction with a MIC of 3.9 µg.mL−1 against C. glabrata.
Regarding the MIC/MFC ratio, the best result was observed for the EtOAc fraction, with MIC/MFC values of 31.25/500 µg.mL−1 for C. albicans, 7.81/500 µg.mL−1 for C. glabrata, and 15.6/1000 µg.mL−1 for C. tropicalis, followed by a promising result for the CE with a MIC/MFC ratio of 7.8/1000 µg.mL−1. These findings highlight a significantly superior antifungal activity compared to the antibacterial activity (Table 3).

2.5. LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS Analysis

In this research, substances from the EtOAc fraction were processed and identified based on exact masses and standard fragmentations using LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS in positive mode (Figure S2), following the previously described methodology. A total of 13 substances, including flavonoids and proanthocyanidins, were noted and are presented in Table 4.

2.6. GC/MS Analysis

The chromatographic analysis via liquid injection showed no significant differences among the samples. Some compounds detected in the less polar fractions (such as the hexane partition) were also present, albeit in smaller quantities, in the crude extract and the other fractions, with variations in their proportions. Therefore, the results presented in Table 5 pertain to the SPME analysis of the crude extract, fractions, and fresh leaf samples (Figures S3 and S7). The 25 substances detected correspond to the major peaks and include alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, acids, fatty acid esters, terpene derivatives, among others.

3. Discussion

3.1. Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC)

Initial characterization of secondary metabolite groups allowed for the estimation of the relevance of a species producing compounds that could potentially become bioactive candidates and drive further investigations [5,31].
With chemical revelation using UV light and natural product reagent/poly ethylene glycol (NP/PEG) spray, the bands became even more evident at a wavelength of 254 nm due to the fact that all flavonoids cause fluorescence. The different colors at 365 nm (yellow, green, or blue) were attributed to the different structures of the compounds, as stated by [32,33]. In the ethyl acetate partition, the four distinct yellow fluorescent bands suggest the presence of flavonol glycosides. The retention factor (Rf) value of 0.26 also matches bands observed in the crude and methanolic extracts, indicating the possible presence of glycosylated quercetin and/or kaempferol. The Rf value of 0.35 suggests the presence of the flavonol glycoside rutin. Orientin and vitexin could be the glycosylated flavones indicated by the Rf value of 0.49 in the ethyl acetate partition sample. An Rf value of 0.61 was observed for a blue fluorescent band, which remains uninterpreted. In the crude extract, a band with an Rf value of 0.31 was detected, which may correspond to quercetin or kaempferol. All suggested identifications of compounds in this chromatographic analysis were based on Wagner and Bladt [33].
Phytochemical analyses with the hydroethanolic extract of D. pubipetala leaves revealed the presence of relevant metabolites such as phenolic compounds [18]. Glycosylated flavonoids had already been reported in another study with D. pubipetala [19], as well as for the species Banisteriopsis argyrophylla (Malpighiaceae) [34].
Regarding alkaloids, the use of mobile phase 1(MP1) and mobile phase 2(MP2) was aimed at detecting alkaloids derived from amino acids, as explored in the literature, particularly β-carbonyls present in extracts [35] from Banisteriopsis caapi, and also the possibility of purine alkaloids or pseudo-alkaloids. The absence of alkaloids was indicated by the lack of color change in the plates, consistent with other Malpighiaceae species that do not contain alkaloid compounds in their structures [36], such as Heteropterys tomentosa, and nitrogenous compounds as seen in the phytochemical prospecting of hydroethanolic leaf extracts and fractions of various polarities from Banisteriopsis laevifolia [26]. The variability in the presence of alkaloids in Malpighiaceae is recurring; a study found that both young and older stems of B. caapi exhibited a weak reaction for alkaloid detection, even though this class of phytochemicals is more common in Banisteriopsis, Diplopterys, Tetrapterys, and Stigmaphyllon [12].
The species D. pubipetala is used analogously to B. caapi in the preparation of Ayahuasca tea, particularly due to its production of alkaloids [37]. It is involved in traditional indigenous rituals in the Western Amazon region, providing experienced individuals with sensations recognized as mystical and spiritual experiences due to the presence of β-carbonyl alkaloids: harmine, harmaline, tetrahydroharmine, and harmol [35], along with increased serotonin concentrations and availability of N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) facilitated by mixing with another species [12]. Investigations treat the components of this tea as responsible for aiding in recovery from Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease [38].
Psychotherapeutic results of this tea support improvements in behavioral health, emotional regulation, and cognitive flexibility [39].

3.2. Evaluation of Antioxidant Capacity

In the analysis of variance applied to the samples, the EC50 values obtained for each measurement of antioxidant capacity in each partition met the assumptions (with p = 0.05). At a 5% significance level, the analysis indicated significant differences in the EC50 behavior among the different partitions used in the study. The Tukey test was used for multiple comparisons.
The values for the crude extract and the ethyl acetate and n-butanol (the most polar) fractions obtained from the leaf extract of B. laevifolia [24] and B. argyrophylla [25] were compatible, with EC50 values of 4.5 ± 0.9 and 4.3 ± 0.8 μg.mL⁻¹ for the crude extract, respectively. Similarly, the previously mentioned fractions also had the lowest EC50 values, being 4.1 ± 0.5 and 8.4 ± 1.0 μg.mL⁻¹ for B. laevifolia and 4.1 ± 0.1 and 4.8 ± 0.1 μg.mL⁻¹ for B. argyrophylla. For Banisteriopsis oxyclada, the value of the crude extract was 25.90 ± 1.10 μg.mL⁻¹, and the best relative values for the fractions corresponded to the ethyl acetate fraction (EC50 = 6.50 ± 0.40 μg.mL⁻¹) and the n-butanol fraction (EC50 = 6.80 ± 0.80 μg.mL⁻¹) [29].
The calculated antioxidant activity index (AAI) values for the gallic acid standard (19.05), the CE (4.07), and the EtOAc (6.23) and MeOH (2.13) fractions were the best, indicating a very strong antioxidant activity they are greater than 2.0 [40,41]. The AAI values for the DCM (0.76) and Hex (0.48) fractions suggested moderate to poor antioxidant activity.
The AAI relates the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) concentration used in the experiment with the EC50 of the sample, the result is a constant for each analyzed material that if obtained under the same conditions, that is, same extraction procedures or collection sites, should yield similar or very close results [41]. In this study, it was observed that the fractions with the highest AAI values were the most polar ones, in which the most active and major compounds are phenolics, such as flavonoids. This highlights their ability to donate hydrogen to a free radical to mitigate potential damage [26]. The EC50 results, similar to the investigations of extracts and fractions of the leaves of the aforementioned Banisteriopsis, suggest that the best EC50 values are related to the clear discrepancies in the polarities of the fractions.

3.3. Antibacterial Activity

Extracts exhibiting MIC values below 100 µg.mL−1 are considered to have very strong antimicrobial activity; when MIC values are between 100 and 500 µg.mL−1, the antimicrobial activity is moderate; from 500 to 1000 µg.mL−1, the antimicrobial activity is weak; and above 1000 µg.mL−1, the extract is considered inactive [30,42].
Studies on volatile essential oils from B. campestris flowers and leaf extracts of B. laevifolia and B. oxyclada have demonstrated moderate to very strong antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, particularly for oral diseases like caries and periodontitis [43]. The ethanolic leaf extract of B. anisandra showed significant inhibition against S. aureus [23,44].
In contrast, investigations into inhibition activity against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa did not result in microbial growth inhibition for B. anisandra extracts [45]. Research on extracts from Byrsonima crassifolia fruit parts found that the greatest antimicrobial potential was observed against gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus), particularly in ethanolic extracts (pulp and peel), while ether extracts did not inhibit the same bacterial growth [46]. Additionally, methanolic extracts from stems and roots of Byrsonima species also demonstrated significant inhibition against S. aureus, E. coli, and other bacteria [47].
Considering that S. aureus is a gram-positive bacterium, this observation can be related to the structural characteristics of the bacterial types involved, since E. coli and P. aeruginosa are gram-negative. It is well known that the structural characteristics of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria provide differences in their antimicrobial activities in relation to plant extracts and other agents [48].
The absence of antibacterial activity, or the lower sensitivity of microorganisms, may also be due to the type of extract used and the quality of the plant material itself, which can be affected by seasonal conditions, soil, and bioactive content [48].

3.4. Antifungal Activity

To evaluate the MIC for C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. glabrata, a non-parametric data analysis was conducted, and the results indicated a significant difference (p = 0.00073) among the MIC across different samples.
This aligns with previous studies, such as the investigation on Heteropterys aphrodisiaca (Malpighiaceae) root extracts, which demonstrated stronger antifungal activity against Candida species with MIC values 125 to 250 µg.mL−1 (C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, C. tropicalis) than antibacterial activity against S. aureus where the minimal bactericidal concentration was between 250 and 500 µg.mL−1 [49].
Similarly, the aqueous leaf extracts of B. anisandra showed strong antifungal activity, particularly against C. tropicalis, with MIC values of 62.50 µg.mL−1 outperforming the standard antifungal agent fluconazole which exhibited a MIC > 64 µg.mL−1 [50]. Additionally, C. albicans displayed sensitivity to this plant’s extract in dilution tests [44].
Further studies involving the ethyl acetate fraction of B. argyrophylla indicated significant antifungal activity attributed to catechins, particularly against C. glabrata, with MIC values as low as 2.83 µg.mL−1. Other fractions containing quercetin and kaempferol demonstrated inhibitory activity against C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. tropicalis, with MIC values ranging from 5.86 to 46.87 µg.mL−1 [25].
For the extracts and fractions of B. laevifolia, the ethanolic extract exhibited strong antifungal activity against Candida species, with MIC values ranging from 31 to 63 μg.mL−1. The n-butanol fraction showed moderate to strong activity (MIC ranging from 94 to 375 μg.mL−1), while the ethyl acetate fraction also exhibited strong activity (MIC ranging from 188 to 375 μg.mL−1) [24], likely due to the presence of metabolites such as flavonoids, phenolics, and tannins.
Promising results were also obtained using hydroalcoholic extracts of Byrsonima crassifolia leaves as a therapeutic alternative for fungal infections. Recently, a topical cream with antifungal properties against C. parapsilosis (MIC of 1 mg.mL−1) was developed [51].
The strong antifungal activity observed, particularly in the ethyl acetate fraction, may be attributed to the presence of flavonoids, phenolic compounds, and tannins, which are known to interfere with fungal cell wall synthesis, disrupt membrane integrity, and inhibit key enzymes involved in fungal metabolism [8,52]. This could suggest a mechanism of action similar to existing antifungal agents, such as azoles, which target ergosterol synthesis in fungal membranes [53]. However, compared to standard treatments like fluconazole, the observed MIC values indicate a potent antifungal effect, possibly offering an alternative with fewer side effects or resistance issues [49]. Further investigation into the specific interactions of these bioactive compounds with fungal targets could enhance understanding of their therapeutic potential and support the development of plant-based antifungal treatments [4,52].

3.5. LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS Analysis

Although liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry is a powerful tool for the analysis and characterization of unknown compounds, reliable identification of chemical substances in plant material remains a challenge due to its complexity [54].

3.5.1. Putative Identification of Flavonoids

Rutin is formed by the flavonoid quercetin aglycone along with the disaccharide rutinose at position 3 of the carbon ring [55]. C27H30O16 was identified from the protonated peak [M + H]+ with m/z 611.1612 and the two main fragments m/z 465.1032, corresponding to the loss of the rhamnoside [56], and m/z 303.0501, corresponding to quercetin aglycone [57].
Rutin is present in studies involving methanolic extract of B. anisandra and ethanolic extracts of roots and leaves of some Heteropterys species, and in extracts of ripe and unripe fruits of Malpighia species, among others [58]. This substance is associated with excellent antioxidant activity and pharmacological properties such as anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, antidiabetic, and neuroprotective effects [55].
The molecule isoquercitrin (quercetin-3-O-glucoside) C21H20O12, identified with the protonated peak [M + H]+ m/z 465.1032, had as main fragments m/z 303.0509 [M + H-Glu]+, m/z 153.0188 [M + H-Glu-H2O-C8H6O2]+ produced from Retro Diels-Alder (RDA) rearrangement, and m/z 137.0238 [M + H-Glu-O-H2O-C8H6O-O]+ in accordance with [59]. Isoquercitrin isolated from the ethyl acetate extract of Byrsonima coccolobifolia Kunth was evaluated in studies for its inhibition of NS2B-NS3 proteases essential in the Dengue virus (DENV) replication cycle, being considered a promising substance for developing strategies against this infection [60].
These two flavonoids (rutin and isoquercitrin) present in the Byrsonima sericea leaf extract were attributed with gastroprotective effects [61] and protection against ethanol-induced gastric lesions.
Isoorientin and orientin were also noted, with the formula C21H20O11 and the molecular ion [M + H]+ m/z 449.1084, showing losses of 120 m/z and 150 m/z, characteristic of mono-C-hexosyl portions in MS/MS, resulting in fragmented ions m/z 329.0667 and 299.0559, respectively, as described in the literature [62]. The presence of these substances has been reported in investigations related to Malpighiaceae, in extracts of Bunchosia glandulifera leaves and Malpighia emarginata DC fruits, associated with antioxidant effects [58].
The presence of vitexin and isovitexin (apigenin-C-hexoside) is related to the molecular ion [M + H]+ m/z 433.1141, corresponding to the formula C21H20O10, with observed losses of 120 m/z and 150 m/z; the resulting fragmented ions were m/z 313.0711 and m/z 283.0605, respectively, indicating the presence of these substances [62].
These substances orientin, isoorientin, vitexin, and isovitexin are present in extracts of Bunchosia glandulifera and M. emarginata DC leaves and are associated with antioxidant activity [58]. For M. glabra L., it was found that the extract, rich in such flavonoids, possesses properties that protect the liver against damage induced by toxic substances [63].
In this study, the presence of miricetin-3-O-galactoside or miricetin-3-O-glucoside was noted with m/z 481.0982 and formula C21H20O13. The fragments were 319.0447 m/z, suggesting cleavage at position 3 where glycosylation is characteristic, and 273.0399 m/z referring to the aglycone, both typical of 3-O-monoglycosides [6].
In some Malpighiaceae, such as M. glabra and Byrsonima crassifolia (L) Kunt., antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and hepatoprotective effects related to substances like miricetin aglycone have been observed [58]. When comparing the antioxidant activity of miricetin-3-O-galactoside and miricetin aglycone [64], the EC50 is lower for miricetin aglycone, indicating greater oxidative power, implying that galactosylation negatively impacts the antioxidant process.
The putative identification of catechin and epicatechin was based on the ion [M + H]+ m/z 291.0864 and molecular formula C15H14O6. These compounds were considered isomers, corroborating with common fragmentations in the literature [65,66], such as m/z 165.0548, m/z 139.0390, and m/z 123.0440.
For the aerial parts extract of B. caapi, after decoction, considerable amounts of catechin and epicatechin were obtained, showing antimicrobial activity and action against pathogens [67]. Additionally, B. caapi extracts investigated for important chemical markers, including epicatechin and procyanidin B2, detected consistently in various parts of the plant across different seasons, were associated with high antioxidant value [68]. Epicatechin is also an inhibitor of the enzyme monoamine oxidase (MAO-B), and when combined with ß-carbolines, the potential synergistic effect may be valuable for neuroprotective activity.
The presence of catechins in leaves and stems of various Byrsonima species [58] has been associated with diverse activities including antileishmanial, antiulcer, antioxidant, antimicrobial, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and others mentioned in studies.
Recently, among the flavonoids identified in M. glabra fruits, it was found that the quantification of epicatechin significantly increases in ripe fruits compared to green fruits. This increase is directly related to free radical scavenging activity [69].
Gallocatechin or epigallocatechin was also noted in this study, with the positive ion [M + H]+ m/z 307.0809. The characteristic fragmentations observed in this study align with the literature [65], with major cleavages resulting in m/z 181.0500 and m/z 139.0390. Flavonoids, including gallocatechin, investigated in M. emarginata leaves, stand out for their antioxidant and antifungal activities [58].
Another identified flavonoid has the positive ion [M + H]+ m/z 585.1257 and formula C28H24O14, with characteristic fragments of vitexin O-gallate. These fragments include: m/z 415.1028, m/z 313.0708, and m/z 153.0183, possibly resulting from the loss of the galloyl group, cleavage of the cross-ring hexose portion, and the galloyl fragment, respectively, as reported in the literature [70].

3.5.2. Putative Identification of Procyanidins

Condensed tannins, known as proanthocyanidins, were noted in this study, specifically procyanidins (PAs), as the monomer units are solely (epi)catechins [71].
The putative identification of procyanidin B was carried out, with the observation of procyanidin dimers, where the prominent molecular cation was [M + H]+ at m/z 579.1502. The cleavage of interflavonoid bonds quinone methide (QM) allowed for the formation of the catechin monomer at m/z 289. Additional fragmentations were observed, producing the cation at m/z 427.1024, indicating the RDA cleavage of the flavonoid core (considered a standard fragmentation pattern for procyanidin B dimers), with subsequent loss of water (from ring C), resulting in the ion at m/z 409.0915 [71,72].
In this study, the m/z values of fragments obtained from positive ion electrospray ionization MS/MS were consistent with those reported in the literature. The most significant fragments were formed from the RDA reaction, QM cleavage, heterocyclic ring fission (HRF) and benzofuran formation (BFF) [71,73].
Similar to the literature [74], other m/z values of precursor ions for PA oligomers were noted, including m/z 867.2131 compatible with PA trimers, m/z 1157.2922 and m/z 1155.2775 compatible with PA tetramers, and m/z 1307.2887 compatible with gallic-acid-substituted PA tetramers. Additionally, pseudomolecular ions, common for large molecule fragmentations with low intensities, were observed throughout the analysis.
It is known that the mixed stereochemistry of PAs and their various degrees of polymerization promote different biological activities [72]. Among Malpighiaceae, PAs have been reported in B. argyrophylla, B. caapi, Byrsonima verbascifolia (L.) DC., M. glabra L. (Syn. Malpighia punicifolia L.), and M. emarginata DC. [58], generally associated with antioxidant potential, including free radical scavenging and subsequent preventive effects against possible diseases, including neurodegenerative conditions, as well as antibacterial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory effects [58,71].

3.6. GC/MS Analysis

The methanolic partition analysis by GC was not performed, as this partition is predominantly composed of substances with higher polarity, such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, and other secondary metabolites, which have a high affinity for polar solvents and low volatility [75].
Understanding alternative methods related to the extraction of volatile components is essential, as each injection can vary depending on the type of sample analyzed. Thus, SPME was chosen, as it is suitable for the detection of volatile compounds, which tend to be non-polar or of low polarity. It is a simple and rapid method that uses a small amount of sample, and is applicable in various fields including environmental, food, aroma, pharmaceutical, forensic, and toxicological analysis [76]. The accurate identification of both similar and dissimilar compounds among the samples enabled the characterization of the volatile chemical profile of the leaves of D. pubipetala, as shown in Table 6.
Among the major compounds selected, the following can be highlighted.
Ethyl hexadecanoate was detected in all partitions and in the crude extract, with the highest concentration in the ethyl acetate partition. The biological activities associated with this metabolite include antimicrobial, antioxidant, nematicidal, hypocholesterolemic, and pesticidal actions, in addition to being used as a flavor enhancer, lubricant, and antiandrogenic agent [78]. It also acts in plants by preventing water loss during drought periods [79].
The presence of S-methyl-2-propenethioate was detected in fresh leaves and represented the largest area in the crude extract sample. The thiol-ester group allows for fatty acid synthesis and acyl group transfer, which are essential in pharmaceuticals as they can alter absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME), and release of the active compound, thereby improving biological activity [77].
The ethyl esters, ethyl dodecanoate derived from lauric acid and ethyl tetradecanoate derived from myristic acid, as well as ethyl 3-hydroxy-2,2-dimethylbutanoate, possess antifungal potential, typical of natural fatty acids [80]. In the case of ethyl 3-hydroxy-2,2-dimethylbutanoate, its use as an excipient in pharmaceuticals has also been described in the literature to reduce unpleasant tastes, thereby improving flavor and palatability in medicine [81].
In general, several components detected and investigated also exhibit this biological activity: octanal [82], heneicosane [83], hex-3-en-2,5-diol [84], 5-methyl-hexan-2-one [85], all associated with antifungal activity. These compounds have potential applications in the agroindustrial and pharmaceutical sectors. Additionally, regarding potential applications in the agroindustrial sector, hexanoic acid is noteworthy for its inhibitory activity against fungi that spoil fruits [86], as well as the volatile 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, which not only exhibits antifungal activity [87], but also has reported antioxidant [88] and larvicidal [89] activities. Nonanoic acid is commonly used as a herbicide and is also characterized by its antifungal action [90], which is recurrent in 2-butoxyethanol [91], dodecanal [92], and 6,10-dimethyl-5,9-undecadien-2-one [93].
Other detected substances exhibit potential for aromas and flavors, with applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries. These include 2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-enecarboxaldehyde and nona-3,6-dien-1-ol, which are used in creating aromatic profiles [94]. Ethyl 3-methyl-cyclopentene-1-one, for example, enhances the flavor in sweeteners [95], while α-cis-3-hexenyl methylbutyrate is employed as a flavoring agent in pharmaceuticals [96].
The literature also points to the use of these substances in fragrance formulation for cosmetic products. 3-hexen-1-ol, found in high concentration in fresh leaves, is known for imparting a fresh aroma [97], and trans-β-ionone, which, in addition to its aroma, also exhibits antioxidant activity [98].
Additionally, 3-methyl-cyclopentano-1,2-dione shows limited inhibitory activity against the Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain [99], while tetradecano exhibits antioxidant activity [100].
Two substances, 4,5-dimethyl-hept-2-en-3-ol and acetate of 10,13,13-trimethyl-tetradec-11-en-1-ol, have not yet been described for biological activities.
Throughout this investigation, it was observed that the substances detected exhibit significant antifungal activity. This finding reinforces the potential of D. pubipetala as a promising source of bioactive compounds, potentially useful in the treatment and prevention of fungal infections, as well as in the control of phytopathogens. This is particularly relevant given that the most commonly used control methods involve agrochemical products, which in turn cause environmental damage and pose risks to human and animal health [101]. In humans, the high resistance capacity of fungi complicates treatment methods, and some medications exhibit toxicity, as is the case with those used to treat candidiasis [102].
The use of GC-MS-SPME enabled a comprehensive characterization of the volatile chemical profile of the extract, partitions, and fresh leaves of D. pubipetala, which had not been previously investigated. Chromatographic analyses contributed to the distinction of substances across partitions, enabling the identification of both similar and dissimilar compounds among the samples. The major secondary metabolites identified are reported in the literature as possessing biological activities that, in addition to promoting intra- and intercellular interactions in organisms, contribute broadly to sectors such as agroindustry, pharmaceuticals, food, and cosmetics.

3.7. Statistical Analysis

3.7.1. Antioxidant Capacity

The analysis of variance showed that there is a significant difference in absorbance behavior between at least two of the doses used. According to the Shapiro-Wilk test (at 5% significance), the residuals can be considered normal, and according to the Bartlett test (at 5% significance), they are homoscedastic. For this evaluation, the equations for the gallic acid standard, hydroethanolic extract, and the fractions of D. pubipetala leaves were used. The R2 values for all equations were greater than 0.98.

3.7.2. EC50

The analysis of variance was applied to the EC50 values obtained from each repetition of the antioxidant capacity measurement for each sample. Since not all assumptions of the analysis of variance were met, a new approach was required. A “log” transformation was applied to the data, and a new analysis of variance was conducted. In this new analysis of variance, all assumptions were satisfied (with p = 0.05), and at a 5% significance level, the analysis indicated that there was a significant difference in the EC50 behavior among the different fractions used in this investigation. The Tukey test was used for multiple comparisons, with EC50 values being statistically different among all samples.

3.7.3. Antimicrobial Activity

In the MIC assessment for bacterial species, the results of the triplicates involving all samples and microorganisms were identical, so there was no need to calculate the mean or standard deviation.
To evaluate the MIC for Candida species, a non-parametric analysis of the data was performed. Using α = 0.05, the Kruskal-Wallis test was applied. The results indicate a significant difference (p = 0.0073) between the MIC across the different fractions. In the subsequent multiple comparison test, Least Significant Difference (LSD), it was concluded that the sample with the lowest MIC was the crude extract for C. albicans and C. tropicalis, while for C. glabrata, the lowest MIC was found with the methanol fractions. In all cases, the results were significantly lower than those of the other samples.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals and Instruments

Reagents and chemicals used were analytical grade from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO, USA).
For the experiments, the following equipment was used: a Nova Ética forced air circulation oven, model 400 - 4ND, Brazil; a Willey-type knife mill, model SL30, Solab, Brazil; a Shimadzu UV-VIS 2550 spectrophotometer for absorbance measurements.
For the UHPLC-MS/MS analysis, a Nexera UHPLC system from Shimadzu (Kyoto/Japan) coupled with a MaXis ETD high-resolution mass spectrometer—Bruker (Billerica, MA, USA) was used. For the Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) on a Shimadzu (Kyoto/Japan) GCMS-QP2020NX.

4.2. Plant Material

Diplopterys pubipetala leaves were collected in the Nova Esperança District, municipality of Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil, in December 2021 (16°36′07.0″ S 43°55′12.7″ W; https://maps.app.goo.gl/4NibPT6woJB29KK56 (accessed on 4 December 2021)). Herbarium specimens of the plant material were deposited in the herbarium Montes Claros under the number 4033. The study was registered in the National System for the Management of Genetic Heritage (SisGen) under the number A822A14.

4.3. Preparation of Plant Material

The leaves, after being washed with running water, were dried in a forced-air circulation oven at temperatures between 35 °C and 40 °C for seven days. Following this, the leaves were pulverized using a Willey-type knife mill. The resulting powder (800 g) was stored in paper bags under refrigeration (4 °C).
The hydroethanolic extract (7:3 v/v) was prepared using the exhaustive maceration method (250 g.L−1) and was stored in the dark at room temperature for seven days, with occasional stirring [103]. The mixture was then filtered, evaporated, and the resulting material was refrigerated (4 °C). The entire extraction process was repeated with the residue three more times, yielding 7.75% w/w.
Subsequently, liquid-liquid extraction was performed according to [104] was performed on a portion of the CE (18.85 g) in a hydroethanolic solution (7:3 v/v). Fractionation was carried out using two equal volumes (2 × 500 mL) of sequential solvents: n-hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and methanol. Each fraction was dried in an oven at 38 °C with air circulation. The yield percentages for the respective fractions were 6.2% Hex, 13.0% for DCM, 15.3% for EtOAc, and 12.14% for MeOH. All samples were stored in a freezer until further use.
Healthy D. pubipetala leaves were stored in a Kraft paper bag and placed on ice, then kept in a freezer at −10 °C until chromatographic analysis.

4.4. Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC)

Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on the CE, Hex, DCM, EtOAc, and MeOH fractions. The stationary phase (SP) consisted of aluminum plates pre-coated with silica gel 60, 0.2 mm thick, with a fluorescent indicator F254 (Macherey-Nagel/Düren-Germany). The aim was to detect compounds belonging to the flavonoid and alkaloid classes. The mobile phases were selected [33], with the mobile phase for flavonoids consisting of ethyl acetate: glacial acetic acid: formic acid: water (100:11:11:26) and two different mobile phases for alkaloids. The MP1 was composed of toluene: ethyl acetate: diethylamine (70:20:10); the MP2 was composed of ethyl acetate: methanol: water (100:13.5:10).

4.5. Evaluation of the Antioxidant Capacity of the Crude Extract and Fractions

The antioxidant capacity was assessed using the spectrophotometric method for radical scavenging by DPPH [105]. The concentrations of the crude extract and fractions (2.0 mL) varied between 2.0 and 95.0 µg.mL−1 and were added to 3.0 mL of a 40.0 µg.mL−1 ethanolic DPPH solution. The mixtures were stirred and kept in the dark for 30 min. Absorbance measurements were taken using a Shimadzu UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Kyoto/Japan) at 517 nm. Gallic acid (Neon) was used as a positive control at concentrations ranging from 0.8 to 2.4 µg.mL−1. Additionally, the absorbance of the ethanolic DPPH solution (negative control) was measured. The antioxidant capacity was calculated [106] using the linear equation and EC50 value (the concentration required to inhibit 50% of the DPPH radical). The AAI was calculated based on the ratio between the efficient concentration (EC50) and the concentration of the DPPH standard solution (40.0 µg.mL−1), when the value obtained for AAI is greater than 2, the result is considered strong [40]. The assays were performed in triplicate.

4.6. In Vitro Biological Assays for Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of the crude extract and fractions of D. pubipetala was evaluated against the microorganisms: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538), Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853).
The MIC was determined using the broth microdilution method in 96-well microplates, performed in triplicate. The inoculum was adjusted for each bacterium to reach a cell concentration of 5 × 105 colony-forming units per mL (CFU.mL−1), according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [107].
Growth control (inoculated well) and sterility control (non-inoculated well free of antimicrobial agent) were included.
Tetracycline was used as a positive control (0.0115 to 5.9 μg.mL−1) and extract and fractions (0.98 μg.mL−1 to 2000 μg.mL−1). After sealing and incubation (24 h), 30 μL of a 0.02% aqueous resazurin solution was added to the microplates, which were then incubated for an additional 15 min at 37 °C. All tests were performed in triplicate.

4.7. In Vitro Biological Assays for Antifungal Activity

The antifungal activity of the crude extract and fractions of D. pubipetala was evaluated against the yeasts Candida albicans (ATCC 90028), Candida tropicalis (ATCC 13803) and Candida glabrata (ATCC 2001).
The assessment was conducted using the broth microdilution method according to the standards set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [108].
Stock solutions of the samples were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (192.000 µg.mL−1). Working solutions were prepared by diluting the stock solutions in RPMI culture medium buffered to pH 7.2 with 3-N-morpholinopropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) (12.000 µg.mL−1). The inoculum was prepared using a spectrophotometric method and adjusted to match a McFarland scale of 0.5 to achieve a concentration of 6.0 × 106 CFU.mL−1. Further dilutions in RPMI broth were made to reach a final inoculum concentration of 1.2 × 103 CFU.mL−1.
The MIC was determined in 96-well microdilution plates, with serial dilutions of the samples ranging from 0.9 to 2000 µg.mL−1. RPMI broth with MOPS at a final pH of 7.2 was used as the culture medium. Each well was inoculated with 100 µL of the prepared inoculum, resulting in a final volume of 200 µL per well.
Amphotericin B (AMB) was used as the positive control, with concentrations ranging from 0.015 to 8.0 µg.mL−1. DMSO was used as the negative control at concentrations ranging from 5% to 3% (v/v) and extract and fractions (0.98 μg.mL−1 to 2000 μg.mL−1). A growth control was prepared with culture medium and inoculum without antifungal agents.
After incubation, 30 µL of a 0.02% aqueous resazurin solution was added to each well. The microplate was reincubated for an additional 3 h. The results were read visually, with blue and red colors indicating the absence and presence of microbial growth, respectively [109]. All tests were performed in triplicate.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

4.8.1. Antioxidant Capacity

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to assess the effects of different concentrations on absorbance results. Normality tests (Shapiro-Wilk) and tests for variance homogeneity (Bartlett’s test) were performed to verify the assumptions of the analysis. For cases where ANOVA indicates a significant difference between treatments, regression analysis will be conducted to study the relationship between variables. The analyses of variance were performed for the EC50 values obtained for each sample, with the Tukey test used for multiple comparisons.

4.8.2. Antimicrobial Activity

For the evaluation of antimicrobial capacity, a non-parametric analysis of the data was performed. Using α = 0.05, the Kruskal-Wallis test was applied, followed by the LSD multiple comparison test.

4.9. Chemical Characterization by UHPLC-MS/MS

For the UHPLC-MS/MS analysis, the crude extract and fractions (5 mg) were prepared in safe-lock microtubes, solubilized in acetonitrile (HPLC grade). The samples were then placed in polypropylene vials at a final concentration of 5.0 mg.mL−1 (50 µL) in the automatic sampler rack for UHPLC-MS/MS analysis [110].
The UHPLC-MS/MS analysis was conducted using UHPLC system coupled with mass spectrometer equipped with electrospray ionization and quadrupole/time-of-flight (ESI-Q-TOF) detection, controlled by Compass 1.5 software (Bruker).
Aliquots of 2 µL were injected onto a Shimpack XR-ODSIII column (C18, 150 × 2.0 mm, 2.2 μm) (Shimadzu) at 40 °C with a flow rate of 400 μL.min−1. Mobile phases A and B (0.1% formic acid in water and acetonitrile, respectively) were used in a gradient elution, starting at 5% B for 5 min, followed by a linear ramp to 100% B over 45 min, and held at 100% B for 5 min. Mass spectra were acquired in positive ionization mode at a spectral rate of 5.0 Hz. Ion source parameters were set to 500 V end plate offset, 4500 V capillary voltage, 3.0 Bar nebulizer pressure, and drying gas flow and temperature of 8.0 L.min−1 and 200 °C, respectively. Fragmentation spectra were acquired in data-dependent mode (automated MS/MS) using a collision energy ramp between 15 and 60 eV. Ion cooler settings were optimized for a range of 100–1500 m/z using a sodium formate calibration solution (Sigma) at 1 mM in 50% 2-propanol (J. T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). Mass calibration was performed by initial infusion of the calibration solution (20 μL) into the ion source and recalibration post-acquisition of raw data. Compound detection was performed by analyzing chromatographic peaks, followed by formula determination based on exact mass and isotopic pattern (MS1). Putative identification was based on the comparison of compound fragment spectra (MS2) with reference spectra of an in-house database of standard compounds, the public spectra database MassBank [111], a list of targets specific to the plant’s family, genus and species as well as in silico fragment spectra generated from the Universal Natural Product Database—UNPD-ISDB [112]. Additionally, PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and Chemspider (http://www.chemspider.com/) databases were used to search for substance structures based on chemical formulas and fragment data, along with Sirius software 5.7.2.

4.10. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

The analyses were conducted using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) on a Shimadzu (Kyoto/Japan) GCMS-QP2020NX system equipped with an AOC 6000 auto-injector and a Restek SH-Rtx-5MS capillary column (30 m length, 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 µm film thickness). Liquid injection in hexane (1 µL) and SPME using a polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) fiber (Supelco, Germany) were performed for volatile analysis on crude extracts, solvent partitions, and fresh leaf samples.

4.10.1. Sample Preparation for Liquid Injection

Approximately 10 mg of dried samples from the hydroethanolic extraction phase were placed in a 12 mL vial, and 1 mL of HPLC-grade hexane (>96%) was added. The samples were dissolved, and 300 µL of the solution was transferred to the GC injection vial for analysis. Hexane served as a blank control.

4.10.2. Sample Preparation for SPME Analysis

For fresh leaf analysis, chopped fragments were placed at the bottom of the vial. An empty vial from the same batch was used as the blank control.

4.10.3. Experimental Conditions

For both liquid injection and SPME analyses, the column temperature program was set to an initial temperature of 40 °C, with a ramp of 10 °C/min up to 250 °C, which was held for one minute. The ion source temperature was set to 200 °C in the electron impact mass detector, with an interface temperature of 250 °C. Solvent cut-off occurred at 1 min, with data acquisition starting from 1 min and continuing to 22 min (total analysis time). The mass scan range was m/z 40 to 700 amu, with a scan speed of 3 scans/s. Helium gas (purity 5.0) was used at 100 kPa inlet pressure, a total flow of 4.8 mL/min, and the fiber was conditioned at 200 °C for 1 min prior to volatile adsorption [27].

5. Conclusions

The study highlighted the predominant antioxidant and antifungal activities of Diplopterys pubipetala and the identification of 25 volatile compounds through GC-MS, which may explain the observed antifungal action, as many of these compounds have been previously reported with such activity. The results reinforce the potential of this species for applications in pharmaceutical, agro-industrial, and cosmetic sectors. As a scientifically underexplored species, D. pubipetala presents promising opportunities for the isolation and characterization of individual bioactive compounds, as well as the evaluation of their mechanisms of action. Such efforts may lead to the development of new therapeutic agents and industrial applications, increasing the added value of this species in the context of health and biotechnology.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30040946/s1, Figure S1: Chromatoplate for detection of flavonoids; Figure S2: Chromatographic analysis LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS in the ethyl acetate partition of D. pubipetala.; Figure S3: Volatile compounds in the crude extract of D. pubipetala identified by GC-MS coupled to SPME.; Figure S4: Volatile compounds in the hexane partition of D. pubipetala identified by GC-MS coupled to SPME.; Figure S5: Volatile compounds in the dichloromethane partition of D. pubipetala identified by GC-MS coupled with SPME.; Figure S6: Volatile compounds in the ethyl acetate partition of D. pubipetala identified by GC-MS coupled with SPME.; Figure S7: Volatile compounds in fresh leaves of D. pubipetala identified by GC-MS coupled with SPME.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.d.M.S. and V.d.A.R.; methodology, V.d.M.S., V.d.A.R., T.M.d.A.A. and C.H.G.M.; software, A.S.P.C. and E.P.d.S.; validation, V.d.M.S., T.M.d.A.A. and C.H.G.M.; formal analysis, V.d.M.S., E.P.d.S., A.S.P.C. and S.L.d.S.; statistical analysis, F.R.C.; investigation, V.d.M.S., P.H.F.V. and K.S.F.S.; resources, V.d.M.S., V.d.A.R., E.V.M., A.F.d.M.J. and D.A.d.O.; data curation, V.d.M.S., E.P.d.S., A.S.P.C. and S.L.d.S.; writing—original draft preparation, V.d.M.S., P.H.F.V., K.S.F.S. and V.d.A.R.; writing—review and editing, V.d.A.R., T.M.d.A.A. and V.d.M.S.; visualization, D.A.d.O., A.F.d.M.J. and E.V.M.; supervision, V.d.A.R., T.M.d.A.A. and C.H.G.M.; project administration, V.d.A.R.; funding acquisition, V.d.A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FAPEMIG (Foundation of Support Research of the State of Minas Gerais), Process APQ 03057-22.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All research data are already available in the article itself and in the supplementary material. However, additional information can be provided if necessary via email by the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Graduate Program in Biotechnology—Laboratory of Bioactive Natural Products—State University of Montes Claros—Montes Claros—Brazil, and the Laboratory of Chemistry of Bioactive Natural Products—René Rachou Institute—Oswaldo Cruz Foundation—Belo Horizonte—Brazil and the CAPES (Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maciel, M.A.M.; Pinto, A.C.; Veiga, V.F., Jr.; Grynberg, N.F.; Echevarria, A. Plantas medicinais: A necessidade de estudos multidisciplinares. Quím. Nova 2002, 2, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Soares, A.J.S.; Cimbleris-Alkmim, A.; Ramalho-De-Oliveira, D.; Mendonça, S.A.M.; Rodrigues, I.V. Potencialidades da prática da atenção farmacêutica no uso de fitoterápicos e plantas medicinais. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 7, 10–21. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348975474 (accessed on 16 December 2024).
  3. Elshafie, H.S.; Camele, I.; Mohamed, A.A. A comprehensive review on the biological, agricultural and pharmaceutical properties of secondary metabolites based-plant origin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nigussie, D.; Davey, G.; Tufa, T.B.; Brewster, M.; Legesse, B.A.; Fekadu, A.; Makonnen, E. Antibacterial and Antifungal Activities of Ethiopian Medicinal Plants: A Systematic Review. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 633921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alemu, M.; Lulekal, E.; Asfaw, Z.; Warkineh, B.; Debella, A.; Abebe, A.; Degu, S.; Debebe, E. Antibacterial activity and phytochemical screening of traditional medicinal plants most preferred for treating infectious diseases in Habru District, North Wollo Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0300060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Buzgaia, N.; Lee, S.Y.; Rukayadi, Y.; Abas, F.; Shaari, K. Antioxidant Activity, α-Glucosidase Inhibition and UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS Profile of Shmar (Arbutus pavarii Pamp). Plants 2021, 10, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sisay, M.; Bussa, N.; Gashaw, T.; Mengistu, G. Investigating In Vitro Antibacterial Activities of Medicinal Plants Having Folkloric Repute in Ethiopian Traditional Medicine. J. Evid. Based Integr. Med. 2019, 24, 2515690X19886276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kebede, T.; Gadisa, E.; Tufa, A. Antimicrobial activities evaluation and phytochemical screening of some selected medicinal plants: A possible alternative in the treatment of multidrug-resistant microbes. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0249253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Twaij, B.M.; Hasan, M.N. Bioactive Secondary Metabolites from Plant Sources: Types, Synthesis, and Their Therapeutic Uses. Int. J. Plant Biol. 2022, 13, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Santos, L.; Viel, A.M.; Tarosso, L.F.; Momesso, L.d.S.; Palmieri, D.A.; Spera, K.D. Medicinal plants of the brazilian cerrado: Knowing to preserve. Biosci. J. 2020, 36, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gates, B. Banisteriopsis and Diplopterys (Malpighiaceae). Flora Neotrop. Monograph. 1982, 30, 1–237. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4393754 (accessed on 16 December 2024).
  12. Nagamine-Pinheiro, N.; Fagg, C.W.; Gomes, S.M.; Oliveira, R.C.; Sonsin-Oliveira, J. Vegetative anatomy, morphology and histochemistry of three species of Malpighiaceae used in analogues of the Amazonian psychoactive beverage Ayahuasca. Flora 2021, 275, e151760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Possobom, C.C.F.; Guimarães, E.; Machado, S.R. Leaf glands act as nectaries in Diplopterys pubipetala (Malpighiaceae). Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 863–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Possobom, C.C.F.; Guimarães, E.; Machado, S.R. Structure and secretion mechanisms of floral glands in Diplopterys pubipetala (Malpighiaceae), a neotropical species. Flora—Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2015, 211, 26–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Possobom, C.C.F.; Machado, S.R.; Guimarães, E. Reproductive system of Diplopterys pubipetala (Malpighiaceae) plants from a savanna ecosystem. Int. J. Plant Biol. 2016, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Souto, L.S.; Oliveira, D.M.T. Morfoanatomia e ontogênese das sementes de espécies de Banisteriopsis C.B. Robinson e Diplopterys A. Juss. (Malpighiaceae). Acta Bot. Bras. 2008, 22, 733–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Souto, L.S.; Oliveira, D.M.T. Estrutura do pericarpo de Banisteriopsis CB Rob. e Diplopterys A. Juss. (Malpighiaceae): Novos dados suportando a segregação genérica. Acta Bot. Bras. 2012, 26, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Costa, M.O.N.; Santos, K.T.; Almeida, C.A.; Fonseca, F.S.A.; Angolini, C.F.F.; Oliveira, D.A.; Melo Júnior, A.F.; Menezes, E.V.; Royo, V.A. Chemical Composition of Diplopterys pubipetala (Malpighiaceae). Eur. J. Med. Plants 2020, 31, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sacramento, V.M.; Santos, K.T.; Rocha, D.F.O.; Cabral, E.C.; Eberlin, M.N.; Mercadante-Simões, M.O.; da Fonseca, F.S.A.; Júnior, A.F.M.; Menezes, E.V.; de Oliveira, D.A.; et al. Chemical profile and antioxidant activity in Diplopterys pubipetala (Malpighiaceae). Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 36, 3450–3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Santos, K.T.; Souza, L.R.; Batista de Paula, A.M.; Avelar Almeida, C.; Alves de Oliveira, D.; de Melo Júnior, A.F.; Menezes, E.V.; Brandão, M.M.; Royo, V.d.A. In Vitro Antitumor Effect on Melanoma Cell Line and Chemical Composition of Diplopterys pubipetala (A. Juss) W.R. Anderson and C. Davis. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2020, 14, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Freitas, J.F.L.; França, F.D.; Chaves, M.M.; Menezes, E.V.; Melo Júnior, A.F.; Oliveira, D.A.; Almeida, C.A.; Teixeira, K.S.; Brandão, M.M.; Royo, V.A. Chromatographic Profiles, Anti inflammatory, and Cytotoxicity Potential of Extracts of Banisteriopsis pubipetala (A. Juss). Pharmacogn. Res. 2019, 11, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Prazeres, R.M.; Santos, K.T.; de Melo Junior, A.F.; Oliveira, D.A.; Menezes, E.V.; Junio, J.B.S.; Fonseca, F.S.A.; Royo, V.A. Perfil de ácidos graxos e propriedades físico químicas do óleo extraído das sementes de Banisteriopsis pubipetala (A. Juss.) Cuatrec. (Malpighiaceae). Periódico Tchê Química 2017, 14, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pádua, M.S.; Mendes-Costa, M.C.; Ferreira, J.M.S.; Magalhães, J.C.; Castro, A.H.F. Assessment of antimicrobial activity in vitro of ethanolic extracts of Banisteriopsis anisandra (A. Juss.) B. Gates (Malpighiaceae). Rev. Bras. Plantas Med. 2013, 15, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nunes, B.C.; Martins, M.M.; Chang, R.; Morais, S.A.L.; Nascimento, E.A.; de Oliveira, A.; Cunha, L.C.; da Silva, C.V.; Teixeira, T.L.; Ambrósio, M.A.; et al. Antimicrobial activity, cytotoxicity and selectivity index of Banisteriopsis laevifolia (A. Juss.) B. Gates leaves. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 92, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Quaresma, D.M.O.; Justino, A.B.; Sousa, R.M.F.; Munoz, R.A.A.; de Aquino, F.J.T.; Martins, M.M.; Goulart, L.R.; Pivatto, M.; Espindola, F.S.; de Oliveira, A. Antioxidant compounds from Banisteriopsis argyrophylla leaves as α-amylase, α-glucosidase, lipase, and glycation inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 105, 104335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alexandre, G.P.; Simão, J.L.S.; Tavares, M.O.A.; Zuffo, I.M.S.; Prado, S.V.; de Paiva, J.A.; Mustapha, A.N.; DE Oliveira, A.E.; Kato, L.; Severino, V.G.P. Dereplication by HPLC-ESI-MS and antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds from Banisteriopsis laevifolia (Malpighiaceae). An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2022, 94, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Siqueira, E.P.; Alves, T.M.A.; Zani, C.L. Fingerprint of volatiles from plant extracts based on SPME-GC-MS. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2007, 17, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nascimento, R.F.D.; de Lima, A.C.A.; Barbosa, G.A.; da Silva, V.P.A. Cromatografia Gasosa Aspectos Teóricos e Práticos; Imprensa Universitária: Fortaleza, Brazil, 2018; pp. 1–334. [Google Scholar]
  29. Martins, M. Estudo Fitoquímico e Atividades Antioxidante, Antimicrobiana, Antiprotozoária e Citotóxica da Espécie Banisteriopsis oxyclada (A. Juss.) B. Gates. Universidade Federal de Uberlândia: Uberlândia, Brazil, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Freires, I.; Denny, C.; Benso, B.; de Alencar, S.; Rosalen, P. Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils and Their Isolated Constituents against Cariogenic Bacteria: A Systematic Review. Molecules 2015, 20, 7329–7358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Simões, C.M.O.; Schenkel, E.P.; Gosmann, G.; Mello, J.C.P.; Mentz, L.A.; Petrovick, P.R.; Organizadores. Farmacognosia: Da Planta ao Medicamento, 6th ed.; Editora UFRGS: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  32. Brassuer, T.; Angenot, L. Le mélange diphénylborate d’aminoéthanol—PEG 400. J. Chromatogr. A 1986, 351, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wagner, H.; Bladt, S. Plant Drug Analysis, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996; 384p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oliveira, D.M.; Silva, T.F.R.; Martins, M.M.; de Morais, S.A.L.; Chang, R.; de Aquino, F.J.T.; da Silva, C.V.; Teixeira, T.L.; Martins, C.H.; Moraes, T.S.; et al. Antifungal and cytotoxicity activities of Banisteriopsis argyrophylla leaves. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2018, 70, 1541–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Santos, B.W.L.; Moreira, D.C.; Borges, T.K.D.S.; Caldas, E.D. Components of Banisteriopsis caapi, a Plant Used in the Preparation of the Psychoactive Ayahuasca, Induce Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Microglial Cells. Molecules 2022, 27, 2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Paula-Freire, L.I.G.; Mendes, F.R.; Molska, G.R.; Duarte-Almeida, J.M.; Carlini, E.A. Comparison of the chemical composition and biological effects of the roots, branches and leaves of Heteropterys tomentosa A. Juss. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 145, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Oliveira, R.C.; Behrens, C.S.B.; Nagamine-Pinheiro, N.; Fagg, C.W.; Silva, M.S.; Martins-Silva, T.; Sonsin-Oliveira, J. Ethnobotany and Wood Anatomy of Banisteriopsis caapi Ethnotaxa and Diplopterys cf. pubipetala, Components of Ayahuasca in Brazilian Rituals. Econ. Bot. 2023, 77, 18–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Maia, L.O.; Daldegan-Bueno, D.; Wiebner, I.; Araujo, D.B.; Tófoli, L.F. Ayahuasca’s therapeutic potential: What we know—And what not. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023, 66, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Perkins, D.; Opaleye, E.; Bouso, J.C.; Tófoli, L.F.; Sarris, J.; Schubert, V.; Ruffell, S.; Simonova, H. Insights, Life Changes and Lifestyle Changes Reported by Individuals Consuming Ayahuasca in Naturalistic Settings: Nature, Frequency and Associations with Mental Health and Wellbeing. Psychoactives 2023, 2, 256–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Scherer, R.; Godoy, H.T. Antioxidant activity index (AAI) by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl method. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 654–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oliveira, G.L.S. Determinação da capacidade antioxidante de produtos naturais in vitro pelo método do DPPH•: Estudo de revisão. Rev. Bras. Plantas Med. 2015, 17, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Holetz, F.B.; Pessini, G.L.; Sanches, N.R.; Cortez, D.A.G.; Nakamura, C.V.; Dias Filho, B.P. Screening of some plants used in the Brazilian folk medicine for the treatment of infectious diseases. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2002, 97, 1027–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rocha, E.O.; Cunha, L.C.S.; Silva, M.V.S.G.; Freitas, T.R.; Nascimento, E.A.; Silva, L.O.; Martins, C.H.G.; Aquino, F.J.T.; Chang, R.; Morais, S.A.L. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oil of flowers from Banisteriopsis campestris (A. Juss.) Little. Rev. Virtual Quím. 2018, 10, 1562–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ferreira, I.V.; Mendes-Costa, M.C. Antimicrobial activity of ethanol extracts of Banisteriopsis anisandra (Malpighiaceae) and drug interactions. RSBO 2019, 16, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Frias, U.A.; Mendes-Costa, M.; Takahashi, J. Caracterização fitoquímica e avaliação das atividades antibacteriana e anticolinesterásica de extratos de Banisteriopsis anisandra A. Juss. (Malpighiaceae). Rev. Cuba. Plantas Med. 2011, 16, 60–71. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284790325 (accessed on 16 December 2024).
  46. Carlos, N.; Loss, R.; Silva, S.; Guedes, S.; Carvalho, J. Avaliação físico-química e atividade antimicrobiana da casca, polpa e semente do murici (Byrsonima crassifolia). EnciBio 2017, 14, 232–243. Available online: https://www.conhecer.org.br/ojs/index.php/biosfera/article/view/841 (accessed on 16 December 2024). [CrossRef]
  47. Martínez-Vázquez, M.; González-Esquinca, A.R.; Cazares Luna, L.; Moreno Gutiérrez, M.N.; García-Argáez, A.N. Antimicrobial activity of Byrsonima crassifolia (L.) H.B.K. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1999, 66, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pinho, L.; Souza, P.N.S.; Macedo Sobrinho, E.; Almeida, A.C.; Martins, E.R. Atividade antimicrobiana de extratos hidroalcoolicos das folhas de alecrim- pimenta, aroeira, barbatimão, erva baleeira e do farelo da casca de pequi. Ciênc Rural. 2012, 42, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Roman Júnior, W.A.; Carvalho, M.L.C.; Vilegas, W.; Nakamura, C.V.; Filho, B.P.D.; Mello, J.C.P. 2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-(3-nitropropanoyl)-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, a New Antimicrobial from the Roots of Heteropteris aphrodisiaca. Acta Farm. Bon. 2005, 24, 543–545. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/68447 (accessed on 16 December 2024).
  50. Freitas, L.B.O.; Boaventura, M.A.D.; Santos, W.L.; Stehmann, J.R.; Junior, D.D.; Lopes, M.T.P.; Magalhães, T.F.; da Silva, D.L.; de Resende, M.A. Allelopathic, cytotoxic and antifungic activities of new dihydrophenanthrenes and other constituents of leaves and roots extracts of Banisteriopsis anisandra (Malpighiaceae). Phytochem Lett. 2015, 12, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. de Jesus, T.R.; Alves, L.G.S.; Lopes, S.A.; Mendes, S.J.F.; Serra, I.C.P.B. Desenvolvimento de uma formulação tópica à base de Byrsonima crassifolia para tratamento de candidíase cutânea. Rev. Foco 2023, 16, e2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, C.W.; Zhong, X.J.; Zhao, Y.S.; Rajoka, M.S.R.; Hashmi, M.H.; Zhai, P.; Song, X. Antifungal natural products and their derivatives: A review of their activity and mechanism of actions. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 7, 100262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Odds, F.C.; Brown, A.J.P.; Gow, N.A.R. Antifungal agents: Mechanisms of action. Trends Microbiol. 2003, 11, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhuang, B.; Bi, Z.M.; Wang, Z.Y.; Duan, L.; Lai, C.J.S.; Liu, E.H. Chemical profiling and quantitation of bioactive compounds in Platycladi Cacumen by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS and UPLC-DAD. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 154, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ma, X.; Wang, F.; Hang, T.; Dramou, P. Degradation study of rutin as template from magnetic composite molecularly imprinted polymer supernatant samples by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2022, 1673, 463199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ali, D.E.; Bassam, S.M.; Elatrebi, S.; Habiba, E.S.; Allam, E.A.; Omar, E.M.; Ghareeb, D.A.; Abdulmalek, S.A.; Abdel-Sattar, E. HR LC-MS/MS metabolomic profiling of Yucca aloifolia fruit and the potential neuroprotective effect on rotenone-induced Parkinson’s disease in rats. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0282246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Dong, Y.; Shachaf, N.; Feldberg, L.; Rogachev, I.; Heinig, U.; Aharoni, A. PICA: Pixel Intensity Correlation Analysis for Deconvolution and Metabolite Identification in Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 1652–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Abbas, H.; Tadros, S.; Eltomy, S.; Salama, A.; El Gedaily, R. A Review on Traditional uses, Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Potential of Family Malpighiaceae. Egypt. J. Chem. 2022, 65, 235–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, J.; Cheng, X.; Zheng, X.; Shi, Y.; Li, C.; He, Q.; Li, Y.; Chen, X. Integrated UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS and Network Pharmacology Approach to Investigating the Metabolic Profile of Marein of Coreopsis tinctoria Nutt. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 23, 6707811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Sousa, L.R.F.; Wu, H.; Nebo, L.; Fernandes, J.B.; das Graças Fernandes da Silva, M.F.; Kiefer, W.; Kanitz, M.; Bodem, J.; Diederich, W.E.; Schirmeister, T.; et al. Flavonoids as noncompetitive inhibitors of Dengue virus NS2B-NS3 protease: Inhibition kinetics and docking studies. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 466–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rodrigues, P.A.; Morais, S.M.; Souza, C.M.; Magalhães, D.V.; Vieira, Í.G.P.; Andrade, G.M.; Rao, V.S.; Santos, F.A. Gastroprotective effect of Byrsonima sericea DC leaf extract against ethanol-induced gastric injury and its possible mechanisms of action. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 2012, 84, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Carmo, P.L.; Mello, R.d.J.; Ramos, I.F.d.O.; de Jesus, C.C.M.; Pontes, R.G.M.d.S.; de Araújo, M.H.; Bonavita, A.G.C.; Pinto, S.C.; Muzitano, M.F.; Raimundo, J.M. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of ethyl acetate and butanol fractions from Vitex polygama hydroalcoholic leaf extract. Nat. Prod. Res. 2023, 37, 776–781. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14786419.2022.2083125 (accessed on 16 December 2024). [CrossRef]
  63. El-Hawary, S.S.; El-Fitiany, R.A.; Mousa, O.M.; Salama, A.A.A.; El Gedaily, R.A. Metabolic profiling and in vivo hepatoprotective activity of Malpighia glabra L. leaves. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 45, e13588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Li, X.; Ouyang, X.; Liang, M.; Chen, D. Comparative analysis of radical adduct formation (RAF) products and antioxidant pathways between myricetin-3-O-galactoside and myricetin aglycone. Molecules 2019, 24, 2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rawat, P.; Singh, Y.; Tiwari, S.; Mishra, D.K.; Kanojiya, S. The characterization and quantification of structures of Cajanus scarabaeoides phytochemicals and their seasonal variation analysis using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass. Spectrom. 2023, 37, e9440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Osuntokun, O.T.; Idowu, T.O.; Cristina, G.M. Bio-guided Isolation, Purification and Chemical Characterization of Epigallocatechin; Epicatechin, Stigmasterol, Phytosterol from of Ethyl Acetate Stem Bark Fraction of Spondias mombin (Linn.). Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gonçalves, J.; Luís, Â.; Gradillas, A.; García, A.; Restolho, J.; Fernández, N.; Domingues, F.; Gallardo, E.; Duarte, A.P. Ayahuasca Beverages: Phytochemical Analysis and Biological Properties. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wang, Y.H.; Samoylenko, V.; Tekwani, B.L.; Khan, I.A.; Miller, L.S.; Chaurasiya, N.D.; Rahman, M.M.; Tripathi, L.M.; Khan, S.I.; Joshi, V.C.; et al. Composition, standardization and chemical profiling of Banisteriopsis caapi, a plant for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders relevant to Parkinson’s disease. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 128, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Shreelakshmi, S.V.; Chaitrashree, N.; Nazareth, M.S.; Kumar, S.S.; Shetty, N.P.; Giridhar, P. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity during ripening of Malpighia glabra fruits. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 61, 717–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Yakubu, Y.; Ahmad, M.T.; Chong, C.M.; Ismail, I.S.; Shaari, K. Phenolic content of Terminalia catappa L. leaf and toxicity evaluation on red hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis sp.). J. Fish. Biol. 2023, 102, 358–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Rue, E.A.; Rush, M.D.; van Breemen, R.B. Procyanidins: A comprehensive review encompassing structure elucidation via mass spectrometry. Phytochem. Rev. 2018, 17, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Karonen, M.; Imran, I.B.; Engström, M.T.; Salminen, J.P. Characterization of Natural and Alkaline-Oxidized Proanthocyanidins in Plant Extracts by Ultrahigh-Resolution UHPLC-MS/MS. Molecules 2021, 26, 1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chang, M.; Sun, X.; Guo, X.; Bai, H.; Liu, R.; Jin, Q.; Wang, X. Composition and antioxidant study of procyanidins from peanut skins. Food Meas. 2020, 14, 2781–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lin, L.Z.; Sun, J.; Chen, P.; Monagas, M.J.; Harnly, J.M. UHPLC-PDA-ESI/HRMSn profiling method to identify and quantify oligomeric proanthocyanidins in plant products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 9382–9390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Vas, G.; Vékey, K. Solid-phase microextraction: A powerful sample preparation tool prior to mass spectrometric analysis. J. Mass. Spectrom. 2004, 39, 233–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Merkle, S.; Kleeberg, K.K.; Fritsche, J. Recent developments and applications of solid phase microextraction (SPME) in food and environmental analysis—A review. Chromatography 2015, 2, 293–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Aksakal, S.; Aksakal, R.; Becer, C.R. Thioester Functional Polymers. In Sulfur-Containing Polymers; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 235–263. [Google Scholar]
  78. Khatri, P.; Rana, J.S.; Jamdagni, P.; Sindhu, A. Phytochemical Screening, Gc-Ms And FT-IR Analysis of Methanolic Extract Leaves of Elettaria cardamomum. Int. J. Res. 2017, 5, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rahman, A.; Albadrani, G.M.; Ahmad, W.E.; Awan, T.H.; Yavas, İ.; Hussain, S. Plant Secondary Metabolites and Abiotic Stress Tolerance: Overview and Implications. In Plant Abiotic Stress Responses and Tolerance Mechanisms; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2023; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  80. Hanif, S.; Jabeen, K.; Akhtar, N.; Iqbal, S. GC-MS Analysis & Antifungal activity of Datura metel L. against Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2022, 94, e20200851. [Google Scholar]
  81. Saito, J.; Agrawal, A.; Patravale, V.; Pandya, A.; Orubu, S.; Zhao, M.; Andrews, G.P.; Petit-Turcotte, C.; Landry, H.; Croker, A.; et al. The Current States, Challenges, Ongoing Efforts, and Future Perspectives of Pharmaceutical Excipients in Pediatric Patients in Each Country and Region. Children 2022, 9, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Duan, B.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, Z.; Liu, Z.; Tao, N. Octanal enhances disease resistance in postharvest citrus fruit by the biosynthesis and metabolism of aromatic amino acids. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2024, 200, 105835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Vanitha, V.; Vijayakumar, S.; Nilavukkarasi, M.; Punitha, V.N.; Vidhya, E.; Praseetha, P.K. Heneicosane—A novel microbicidal bioactive alkane identified from Plumbago zeylanica L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 154, 112748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Felício, R.; de Albuquerque, S.; Young, M.C.M.; Yokoya, N.S.; Debonsi, H.M. Trypanocidal, leishmanicidal and antifungal potential from marine red alga Bostrychia tenella J. Agardh (Rhodomelaceae, Ceramiales). J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 52, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rocha, A.D.; de Oliveira, A.B.; de Souza Filho, J.D.; Lombardi, J.A.; Braga, F.C. Antifungal constituents of Clytostoma ramentaceum and Mansoa hirsuta. Phytother. Res. 2004, 18, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Aranega-Bou, P.; Leyva, M.O.; Finiti, I.; García-Agustín, P.; González-Bosch, C. Priming of plant resistance by natural compounds: Hexanoic acid as a model. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Dharni, S.; Sanchita, M.A.; Samad, A.; Srivastava, S.K.; Sharma, A.; Patra, D.D. Purification, Characterization, and in Vitro Activity of 2,4-Di- tert -butylphenol from Pseudomonas monteilii PsF84: Conformational and Molecular Docking Studies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 6138–6146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Amorim, C.; Alves Filho, E.G.; Rodrigues, T.H.S.; Bender, R.J.; Canuto, K.M.; Garruti, D.S.; Antoniolli, L.R. Volatile compounds associated to the loss of astringency in ‘Rama Forte’ persimmon fruit. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Dey, P.; Mandal, S.; Goyary, D.; Verma, A. Larvicidal property and active compound profiling of Annona squamosa leaf extracts against two species of diptera, Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2023, 60, 401–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rodrigues, A.R.S.P. Atividade antifúngica do óleo essencial de Mentha piperita (Lamiaceae: Labiatae)—Uma revisão. Conexão Ciência 2024, 19, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rizwana, H.; Alwhibi, M.S.; Khan, F.; Soliman, D.A. Chemical Composition And Antimicrobial Activity Of Eruca Sativa Seeds Against Pathogenic Bacteria And Fungi. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2016, 26, 1859–1871. [Google Scholar]
  92. Fatima, I.; Saleem, R.; Hafeez, A.; Anjum, I.; Khan, S.; Chaudhry, G.A. Green solvent-based extraction of three Fabaceae species: A potential antioxidant, anti-diabetic, and anti-leishmanial agents. Heliyon 2024, 10, e33668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sun, J.; Sun, B.G.; Ren, F.Z.; Chen, H.T.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, Y.Y. Characterization of key odorants in fried chili oil (Zanthoxylum bungeanum) Hanyuan e Hancheng. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 6403–6411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mostafa, S.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, W.; Jin, B. Floral Scents and Fruit Aromas: Functions, Compositions, Biosynthesis, and Regulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 856620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Huang, Y.; Tuo, S.; Zhao, Y.; Xiong, X.; Yang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Chen, B.; Yang, H. GC–MS Investigation of the Transfer Behavior of Alkalescent Flavors in Moderate/Low-Tar Cigarettes. Chromatographia 2014, 77, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Huang, C.; Sun, P.; Yu, S.; Fu, G.; Deng, Q.; Wang, Z.; Cheng, S. Analysis of Volatile Aroma Components and Regulatory Genes in Different Kinds and Development Stages of Pepper Fruits Based on Non-Targeted Metabolome Combined with Transcriptome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. War, A.R.; Sharma, H.C.; Paulraj, M.G.; War, M.Y.; Ignacimuthu, S. Herbivore induced plant volatiles: Their role in plant defense for pest management. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1973–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Patra, J.; Lee, S.W.; Kwon, Y.S.; Park, J.; Baek, K.H. Chemical characterization and antioxidant potential of the volatile oil of an edible seaweed Porphyra tenera (Kjellman, 1897). Chem. Cent. J. 2017, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Sandoval-Montemayor, N.E.; García, A.; Elizondo-Treviño, E.; Garza-González, E.; Alvarez, L.; Del Rayo, C.M. Chemical Composition of Hexane Extract of Citrus aurantifolia and Anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis Activity of Some of Its Constituents. Molecules 2012, 17, 11173–11184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ogundajo, A.L.; Ashafa, A.O.T. Chemical profiling, antioxidant and carbohydrate-metabolising enzymes inhibitory potential of fractions from the leaves of Macaranga bateri Mull-Arg. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 2019, 74, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Freire, A.F.d.N.; Silva, E.d.M.; Santos, T.T.; Figueira, F.S. Importance, challenges and perspectives of using fungi in the biological control of plant diseases for Brazilian agriculture. Concilium 2024, 24, 485–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Oliveira, A.V.; Pereira, E.A.; Leles, P.C.G.C.; Fernandes, J.D.L.; Brito, E.C.D.; Pedersoli, L.C.; Brito, E.D.C.D.; Fernandes, J.D.L.; Leles, P.C.G.C.; Pereira, E.A.; et al. Potencial Antifúngico De Plantas Do Cerrado No Tratamento De Candidíase Oral: Um Estudo Bibliográfico. Rev. CPAQV—Cent. Pesqui. Avançadas Qual. Vida. 2024, 16, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  103. Alvarenga, F.Q.; Royo, V.A.; Mota, B.F.C.; Laurentiz, R.S.; Menezes, E.V.; Melo Junior, A.F.; Oliveira, D. Atividade Antinociceptiva e Antimicrobiana da Casca do Caule de Psidium Cattleyanum Sabine. Rev. Bras. Plantas Med. 2015, 17, 1125–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Andreo, D.; Jorge, N. Antioxidantes Naturais: Técnicas De Extração. Bol. Cent. Pesqui. Process. Aliment. 2006, 24, 319–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT. Food Sci. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Mbaebie, B.; Edeoga, H.; Afolayan, A. Phytochemical analysis and antioxidants activities of aqueous stem bark extract of Schotia latifolia Jacq. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, Approved Standard, 9th ed.; CLSI document M07-A9; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  108. CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 4th ed.; CLSI standard M27; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  109. Goughenour, K.D.; Balada-Llasat, J.M.; Rappleye, C.A. Quantitative Microplate-Based Growth Assay for Determination of Antifungal Susceptibility of Histoplasma capsulatum Yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 3286–3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Soares-Bezerra, R.J.; Ferreira, N.C.S.; Alves, T.M.A.; Zani, C.L.; Rosa, L.H.; Faria, R.X.; Frutuoso, V.d.S.; Alves, L.A. A new insight into purinergic pharmacology: Three fungal species as natural P2X7R antagonists. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 2319–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Horai, H.; Arita, M.; Kanaya, S.; Nihei, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Suwa, K.; Ojima, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, S.; Aoshima, K.; et al. MassBank: A public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. J. Mass. Spectrom. 2010, 45, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Allard, P.M.; Péresse, T.; Bisson, J.; Gindro, K.; Marcourt, L.; Pham, V.C.; Roussi, F.; Litaudon, M.; Wolfender, J.-L. Integration of Molecular Networking and In-Silico MS/MS Fragmentation for Natural Products Dereplication. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 3317–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Comparison of the antioxidant capacity of D. pubipetala extracts and partitions with species from the genus Banisteriopsis.
Table 1. Comparison of the antioxidant capacity of D. pubipetala extracts and partitions with species from the genus Banisteriopsis.
EC50 (µg.mL−1)
Crude ExtractHexDCMEtOAcBuOH * or MeOHReferences
D. pubipetala9.83 ± 0.46 d84.50 ± 2.01 a52.90 ± 5.52 b6.46 ± 0.60 e19.00 ± 3.58 cAuthors
B. laevifolia4.5 ± 0.958.1 ± 1.49.1 ± 0.84.1 ± 0.58.4 ± 1.0[24]
B. argyophylla4.3 ± 0.812. 0 ± 2.017.0 ± 0.44.1 ± 0.14.8 ± 0.1[25]
B. oxyclada25.9 ± 1.10160.70 ± 3.40100.40 ± 3.906.50 ± 0.406.80 ± 0.80[29]
* The most polar partition is either in butanol (BuOH) or MeOH; EC50 for gallic acid (positive control) = 2.10 ± 0.10 µg.mL−1. a, b, c, d, e Different letters for each sample indicate a significant difference.
Table 2. Results of the in vitro biological assays against bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Table 2. Results of the in vitro biological assays against bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
SampleMIC/MBC
Results em µg.mL−1
Staphylococcus aureus
ATCC 6538		Escherichia coli
ATCC 8739		Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ATCC 27853
CE2000/>20002000/20002000/>2000
Hex2000/>2000>2000/>20002000/>2000
DCM>2000/>2000>2000/>20002000/>2000
EtOAc1000/2000>2000/>20002000/2000
MeOH2000/20002000/20002000/>2000
MIC (Minimum innibitory concentration); MBC (Minimum bactericidal concentration); Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213)—Gentamicin control 0.7375 µg.mL−1; Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922)—Gentamicin control 1.0 µg.mL−1 (used as technique control).
Table 3. Contains the results of the in vitro biological assays against fungi: Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata.
Table 3. Contains the results of the in vitro biological assays against fungi: Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata.
SampleMIC/MFC
Results em µg.mL−1
Candida albicans
ATCC 90028		Candida tropicalis
ATCC 13803		Candida glabrata
ATCC 2001
CE3.9 d/20003.9 d/20007.81 b/500
Hex31.25 b/200062.5 a/200015.6 a/2000
DCM15.6 c/200031.25 b/20007.81 b/2000
EtOAc31.25 b/50015.6 c/10007.81 b/500
MeOH62.5 a/200015.6 c/20003.9 c/2000
MIC (Minimum innibitory concentration); MFC (Minimum fungicidal concentration); a,b,c,d Different letters for each sample indicate a significant difference, as analyses were performed separately for each species; Candida krusei (ATCC 6258)—Amphotericin control 1.0 µg.mL−1; Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019)—Amphotericin control 0.5 µg.mL−1. (used as technique control).
Table 4. Compounds annotated by UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS in ethyl acetate fraction from leaves of Diplopterys pubipetala.
Table 4. Compounds annotated by UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS in ethyl acetate fraction from leaves of Diplopterys pubipetala.
Peak IdentificationCompound Annotaded
(Monoisotopic Mass)		RT (min)MS [M + H]+ (m/z)MS/MS Fragments
(m/z)		Molecular FormulaChemical
Class
17Epigallocatechin or Gallocatechin c (306.0740)9.0307.0809307.0809; 181.0500; 163.0386; 139.0390C15H14O7Flavonoid
25Procyanidin B1 a
(578.1424)		11.4579,1483579,1502; 409.0927; 287.0567; 10402 C30H26O12Proanthocyanidin
28Epicatechin or Catechin b (290.0790)11.7291.0864291.0864; 207.0655; 165.0548; 147.0441C15H14O6Flavonoid
30Procyanidin Trimer c
(866.2058)		12.2867.2126867.2126; 715.1665; 579.1498; 427.1024C45H38O18Proanthocyanidin
43Orientin or Isoorientin a (448.1006)13.9449.1084449.1084; 431.0990; 395.0775; 353.0667C21H20O11Flavonoid
44Myricetin-3-O-galactoside a (480.0904)14.1481.0982481.0982; 319.0447; 273.0399; 245.0450 C21H20O13Flavonoid
50Rutin b
(610.1534)		14.7611.1612611.1612; 465.1032; 303.0501 C27H30O16Flavonoid
51Vitexin or Isovitexin b (432.1056)14.9433.1141433.1141; 313.0711; 283.0605C21H20O10Flavonoid
52Quercetin-3-O-Glucoside or Isoquercitrin b (464.0955)15.1465.1032465.1032; 303.0509; 229.0499; 153.0188C21H20O12Flavonoid
58Vitexin-O-gallate c (584.1166)15.7585.1257585.1257; 415.1028; 313.0708C28H24O14Flavonoid
a Mass-Bank, precursor ion [M + H]+ and product ion mass spectrum matched with those recorded at “Mass-Bank” MS/MS library; b In-house, precursor ion [M + H]+ and product ion mass spectrum matched with those recorded at “In-house” MS/MS library. c Target list, precursor ion [M + H]+ mass spectrum matched with those recorded on a list of targets specific to the plant’s family, genus, and species.
Table 5. Major Chromatographic peaks identified in the crude extract, fractions, and fresh leaves via SPME chromatographic analysis.
Table 5. Major Chromatographic peaks identified in the crude extract, fractions, and fresh leaves via SPME chromatographic analysis.
SubstancesArea %tR (min)
Crude Extract
S-Methyl-2-propenethioate 35.028.126
Ethyl hexadecanoate 26.5719.301
Ethyl-3-hydroxy-2,2-dimethylbutanoate 4.709.571
Ethyl dodecanoate 4.0314.793
Ethyl tetradecanoate 2.1017.155
Partition Hexane
3-Methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one 20.865.682
Ethyl hexadecanoate 18.9219.308
Heneicosane 5.0414.846
Tetradecane 4.4712.226
3-Methyl-cyclopentane-1,2-dione 2.357.721
Partition Dichloromethane
Hex-3-ene-2,5-diol 16.676.224
Ethyl hexadecanoate 13.8319.311
5-Methylhexan-2-one 7.925.736
4,5-dimethylhept-2-en-3-ol 6.366.830
Nonanoic acid 4.6610.464
Partition Ethyl Acetate
Ethyl hexadecanoate 35.0019.303
2-Butoxyethanol 19.634.720
2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol 8.1913.818
10,13,13-trimethyl-tetradec-11-en-1-ol acetate 2.8513.300
Nonanoic acid 1.5210.326
Fresh Leave
3-Hexen-1-ol 47.984.002
Ethyl 3-hydroxy-2,2-dimethylbutanoate 4.059.558
Dodecanal 3.3912.386
Octanal 3.376.20
Nona-3,6-dien-1-ol 2.948.677
trans-β-ionone 2.6213.556
2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-enecarboxaldehyde 2.589.768
cis-3-hexenyl α-methylbutyrate 1.259.812
6,10-dimethyl-5,9-undecadien-2-one 1.1713.005
Hexanoic acid 1.105.781
S-Methyl-2-propenothioate 1.008.083
Table 6. Major volatile substances detected by GC-MS-SPME and their functions highlighted in the literature.
Table 6. Major volatile substances detected by GC-MS-SPME and their functions highlighted in the literature.
SubstanceFunctionReferences
S-Methyl-2-propenethioateFatty acid synthesis

Acyl group transfer

Influence on ADME parameters

Release of the active compound		[77]
Ethyl hexadecanoateAntimicrobial

Antioxidant

Flavor enhancer

Prevents water loss in plants		[78]





[79]
Ethyl dodecanoateAntifungal activity[80]
Ethyl tetradecanoateAntifungal activity[80]
Ethyl-3-hydroxy-2,2-dimethylbutanoateAntifungal activity[80]
Excipients in drugs[81]
OctanalAntifungal activity

Potential use in agroindustry and pharmaceuticals		[82]
HeneicosaneAntifungal activity

Potential use in agroindustry and pharmaceuticals		[83]
Hex-3-ene-2,5-diolAntifungal activityPotential use in agroindustry and pharmaceuticals[84]
5-Methyl-hexan-2-oneAntifungal activity

Potential use in agroindustry and pharmaceuticals		[85]
Hexanoic acidAntifungal activity[86]
2,4-Di-tert-butylphenolAntifungal activity[87]
Antioxidant[88]
Larvicidal[89]
Nonanoic acidHerbicidal

Antifungal activity		[90]
2-ButoxyethanolAntifungal action[91]
DodecanalAntifungal action[92]
6,10-dimethyl-5,9-undecadien-2-oneAntifungal action[93]
2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-enecarboxaldehydeAromas and flavors

Application in the food and pharmaceutical industries		[94]
Nona-3,6-dien-1-olAromas and flavors

Application in the food and pharmaceutical industries		[94]
3-Methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-oneFlavor enhancer[95]
cis-3-hexenyl α-methylbutyrateFlavoring in pharmaceuticals[96]
3-Hexen-1-olCosmetic formulation[97]
trans-β-IononeAroma
Antioxidant activity		[98]
3-Methyl-cyclopentane-1,2-dioneMycobactericidal activity[99]
TetradecaneAntioxidant activity[100]
4,5-dimethylhept-2-en-3-olNo described biological activity--
10,13,13-trimethyl-tetradec-11-en-1-ol acetateNo described biological activity--
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Melo Sacramento, V.; de Andrade Royo, V.; Fonseca Veloso, P.H.; Freitas Souto, K.S.; Portes Caldeira, A.S.; Gomes Martins, C.H.; de Souza, S.L.; de Siqueira, E.P.; Ribeiro Cassiano, F.; de Melo Júnior, A.F.; et al. Diplopterys pubipetala (Malpighiaceae): Insights into Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Antifungal Activities with Chemical Composition Analysis via UHPLC-MS/MS and GC/MS. Molecules 2025, 30, 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040946

AMA Style

de Melo Sacramento V, de Andrade Royo V, Fonseca Veloso PH, Freitas Souto KS, Portes Caldeira AS, Gomes Martins CH, de Souza SL, de Siqueira EP, Ribeiro Cassiano F, de Melo Júnior AF, et al. Diplopterys pubipetala (Malpighiaceae): Insights into Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Antifungal Activities with Chemical Composition Analysis via UHPLC-MS/MS and GC/MS. Molecules. 2025; 30(4):946. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040946

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Melo Sacramento, Veronica, Vanessa de Andrade Royo, Pedro Henrique Fonseca Veloso, Kamila Soares Freitas Souto, Alisson Samuel Portes Caldeira, Carlos Henrique Gomes Martins, Sara Lemes de Souza, Ezequias Pessoa de Siqueira, Fernando Ribeiro Cassiano, Afrânio Farias de Melo Júnior, and et al. 2025. "Diplopterys pubipetala (Malpighiaceae): Insights into Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Antifungal Activities with Chemical Composition Analysis via UHPLC-MS/MS and GC/MS" Molecules 30, no. 4: 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040946

APA Style

de Melo Sacramento, V., de Andrade Royo, V., Fonseca Veloso, P. H., Freitas Souto, K. S., Portes Caldeira, A. S., Gomes Martins, C. H., de Souza, S. L., de Siqueira, E. P., Ribeiro Cassiano, F., de Melo Júnior, A. F., Oliveira, D. A. d., Mnezes, E. V., & Alves, T. M. d. A. (2025). Diplopterys pubipetala (Malpighiaceae): Insights into Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Antifungal Activities with Chemical Composition Analysis via UHPLC-MS/MS and GC/MS. Molecules, 30(4), 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040946

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop