Next Article in Journal
Cytotoxic and Antimicrobial Activity of the Ageratina Genus
Previous Article in Journal
A Core–Shell Pt–NiSe@NiFe-LDH Heterostructure for Bifunctional Alkaline Water Splitting
Previous Article in Special Issue
Controlled Copolymerization of Ethylene and Biosourced Comonomers Using Dibenzobarrelene-Based α-Diimine Nickel Catalyst
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nickel Phosphine Complexes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Behavior in the Polymerization of 1,3-Butadiene

1
Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università di Pisa, Via Moruzzi 13, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
2
Centro per l’Integrazione della Strumentazione Scientifica dell’Università di Pisa (C.I.S.U.P), Università di Pisa, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
3
Independent Researcher, I-56025 Pontedera, Italy
4
Independent Researcher, I-28100 Novara, Italy
5
Independent Researcher, I-26866 Sant’Angelo Lodigiano, Italy
6
CNR—Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche “Giulio Natta” (SCITEC), Via A. Corti 12, I-20133 Milano, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(23), 4655; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30234655
Submission received: 28 October 2025 / Revised: 1 December 2025 / Accepted: 2 December 2025 / Published: 4 December 2025

Abstract

Several nickel dichloride phosphine complexes have been synthesized, their crystalline structure determined, and their behavior, in combination with methylaluminoxane, in the polymerization of butadiene has been examined. High-cis polybutadienes were consistently obtained, regardless of the nature of the phosphine coordinated to the metal and the methylaluminoxane/Ni molar ratio used, contrary to what was previously observed in the polymerization of butadiene with analogous cobalt phosphine complexes, in which catalytic selectivity was found to be strongly influenced by these two factors. An interpretation for such different behavior is provided.

1. Introduction

Nickel- and cobalt-based catalysts are well known in the field of polymerization of butadiene and other substituted butadienes and are also characterized by very similar behavior [1]. For example, the Co(acac)2-AlEt2Cl-H2O [2] and AlEt3-Ni(carboxylate)-BF3·OEt2 [3,4] systems are of industrial interest for the production of cis-1,4 polybutadiene; systems obtained by combining Ni(acac)2 and Co(acac)2 with MAO provide highly cis-1,4 polymers from butadiene and syndiotactic cis-1,4 polymers from 1,3-pentadiene and 3-methyl-1,3-pentadiene [5,6,7]. Likewise, various catalytic systems based on nickel and cobalt complexes with various types of ligands containing nitrogen and oxygen atoms as donor atoms, in combination with MAO, provide polybutadiene with a high content of cis-1,4 units [8,9,10].
Previous work on the polymerization of butadiene with catalysts based on cobalt phosphine complexes has highlighted how catalytic selectivity is strongly affected by the nature of the phosphine ligand coordinated to the metal and by the MAO/Co molar ratio [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Given the similarity between cobalt and nickel, we sought to verify whether analogous results could be achieved with nickel phosphine complexes. To this end, we synthesized several nickel phosphine complexes, determined their crystalline structures, and studied their behavior in the polymerization of butadiene.
The results obtained are reported in this paper, along with a plausible interpretation.

2. Results

2.1. Synthesis of Nickel Complexes

To investigate the catalytic potential of phosphine complexes in diene polymerization reactions, two types of ligands were selected to obtain complexes with distinct structural features and varying degrees of steric bulk around the metal center: monodentate phosphines (Ph2PR) and chelating pyridyl-phosphines (R2P–(CH2)n–Py). Complexes of the general type, NiX2L2 (X = halide; L = tertiary phosphine or amine), have been known of for decades, and both tetrahedral (paramagnetic) and square-planar (diamagnetic) forms are well documented in early foundational studies [19,20,21,22,23,24]. The reaction of NiCl2·6H2O with two equivalents of Ph2PR in ethanol at room temperature yielded neutral, [NiCl2(Ph2PR)2] complexes (see Scheme 1) in high yields. Furthermore, compound Ni1 can also be synthesized using NiCl2 in toluene at 90 °C for 4 h (see Materials and Method section). Reacting NiCl2·6H2O with one equivalent of R2P–(CH2)n–Py under the same conditions as those described above led to the formation of compounds in which the phosphine acts as a chelating ligand (Scheme 1).
The attempts to isolate bis-substituted products using two equivalents of the ligand were unsuccessful. Complex Ni4 has already been reported in the literature [25,26] using slightly different conditions. Complexes Ni1Ni5 were characterized by elemental analysis, FT-IR (Figures S1–S5) and SCXRD (in the case of Ni1, Ni3, and Ni5). All isolated complexes displayed colors ranging from dark red to violet, except for Ni4, which appeared green in the solid state (Figure S6). In solution, however, Ni4 exhibits a red-violet color (Figure S7). This behavior is fully consistent with previous reports [25,26], where the green, solid-state form was identified as a dimeric species with bridging chloride atoms, while the red-violet solution form corresponds to the monomeric analog. All square-planar complexes (Ni1Ni3) were found to be diamagnetic, consistent with low-spin configurations in the solid state. However, in chloroform solution, they exhibited a reasonably fluxional behavior between square-planar and tetrahedral geometries, as indicated by the effective magnetic moments, which ranged from 1.97 to 2.09 μB [27,28].

2.2. Crystallographic Characterization

Complexes Ni1 and Ni3 exhibit an almost perfectly square-planar geometry (Figure 1), as indicated by Cl–Ni–P bond angles of 90.52° (Cl1–Ni–P2) and 91.30° (Cl1–Ni–P1), measured within the asymmetric units of Ni1 and Ni3, respectively (Table S1). The Ni–P bond lengths are in excellent agreement with values typically observed in related phosphine–nickel complexes [29] (Figure S8).
In contrast, complex Ni5 adopts a pseudo-tetrahedral geometry (Figure 1), with a τ4′ value of 0.86 [30]. However, its geometry can be more accurately described as a distorted trigonal pyramid, based on the low value of δ = 8.994, compared to the ideal tetrahedral reference (δ = 15.765), both computed using the Polynator 1.7.1 software [31]. Atomic deviations from ideal positions fall within the 20.0–41.4 pm range (Figure S9). The Ni–P bond lengths in Ni5 are slightly longer than those in Ni1 and Ni3, consistent with the structural rigidity imposed by the chelating ligand (Table S1). Within the lattice, a series of weak contacts are established involving the chlorine, oxygen, and hydrogen atoms of the phosphine ligands (Table S2 and Figures S10–S13).
To assess the steric hindrance of the phosphine ligands, the percentage buried volume (%Vbur) was calculated from the crystallographic data using the SambVca 2.1 web tool [32,33,34] (Figure 2). Complexes Ni1 and Ni3 exhibit comparable steric profiles, with %Vbur values of 64.7% and 64.0%, respectively. In contrast, complex Ni5 features a significantly lower buried volume (%Vbur = 52.0%), in line with the presence of a less sterically demanding phosphine (Table S3).

2.3. Polymerization of 1,3-Butadiene

The results obtained in the polymerization of 1,3-butadiene with the catalysts obtained by combining the nickel phosphine complexes with MAO are shown in Table 1 and can be summarized as follows.
All the catalytic systems used yield polybutadiene with an essentially cis structure (>92%), as is evident from the NMR (1H and 13C) (Figure 3 and Figure S14–S16) and FT-IR (Figure S17) spectra of the polymers themselves, regardless of the type of catalyst, i.e., the nature of the phosphine ligand and the MAO/Ni molar ratio.
The slight variations observed in the cis content of the polymers are insufficient to establish a correlation between the catalytic selectivity and the nature of the phosphine ligand or the MAO/Co molar ratio, as is possible in the case of similar cobalt-based catalytic systems.
The polymers obtained exhibit a rather low molecular weight (in the range 30,000–56,000 g·mol−1) and a narrow molecular weight distribution. The polymerization rate is not particularly high, even if complete monomer conversions are achieved within a few hours.

3. Discussion

As mentioned above, in the case of the polymerization of butadiene with completely analogous cobalt-based catalyst systems, a significant influence of the type of ligand and the MAO/Co molar ratio on the catalytic selectivity, but also on the catalytic activity, was observed [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
Depending on the type of phosphine coordinated to the metal (i.e., aliphatic, aromatic, or bidentate also containing a nitrogen atom as a donor atom) and the MAO/Co molar ratio, it was possible to obtain polybutadienes with essentially cis structures, mixed cis-1,4/1,2 structures, 1,2-, iso-, or syndiotactic structures.
Plausible mechanisms were hypothesized to explain the formation of cis-1,4, and 1,2, iso- and syndiotactic polymeric structures [35]. The phosphine ligand, depending on its steric hindrance, can influence the entrance of the new monomer onto the allylic unit by favoring the incoming at C1 or C3, with the formation of a 1,4 or 1,2 unit (Figure 4a); the phosphine ligand is also able to influence the mutual orientation of the incoming butadiene and of the allylic unit, thus favoring, through the insertion of the incoming butadiene at C3 of the allylic unit, the formation of an iso- or syndiotactic 1,2 polymer (Figure 4b). Furthermore, depending on the type of ligand and the value of the MAO/Co molar ratio, the ligand can be abstracted from the metal, leading to the formation of a catalytic center such as that deriving from the simple combination of MtCl2 and MAO, specifically forming an exclusively cis-1,4 polymer (Figure 4c).
The latter (Figure 4c) is likely what happens in the case of nickel-based systems, since they invariably yield a polymer with an essentially cis structure regardless of the catalytic structure: the ligand is transferred to methylaluminoxane, generating the active species responsible for cis polymer formation.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General Procedures and Materials

For the synthesis of the complexes, reactants and solvents were purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) or Strem Chemicals (Ascensus Specialties, Bellevue, WA, USA) and were of the highest purity available. Complexes Ni2 [36] and Ni4 [25,26] were synthesized with a slightly modified version of the procedure described in the literature. Reactions were conducted under N2 atmospheric conditions using standard Schlenk techniques, and all products were stored in air once isolated. Solvents were used as received unless otherwise stated. Toluene and diethyl ether were dried with the solvent purification system mBraun (Garching, Germany) MB SPS5. IR spectra of solid samples were recorded on Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) Cary630 FTIR spectrometer. Elemental analyses were performed on a Vario MICRO cube instrument (Elementar, Cheadle, UK).
For the synthesis and characterization of the polybutadienes, methylaluminoxane (MAO) (Merck, 10 wt% solution in toluene) and deuterated solvent for NMR measurements (C2D2Cl4) (Merck, >99.5% atom D) were used as received. Toluene (Merck, 99.8% pure) was refluxed over Na for ca. 8 h, then distilled and stored over a molecular sieve under dry dinitrogen. Prior to each run, 1,3-butadiene (Merck, ≥99%) was evaporated from the container, dried by passing it through a column packed with molecular sieves, and condensed into the reactor which had been precooled to −20 °C.

4.2. Synthesis of [NiCl2(ethyldiphenylphosphine)2] (Ni1)

(a) To a solution of NiCl2·6H2O (278 mg, 1.16 mmol) in degassed ethanol (20 mL), ethyldiphenylphosphine (500 µL, 2.32 mmol) was added. The resulting suspension was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The suspension was then filtered, and the resulting red solid was washed with diethyl ether (2 × 10 mL) and dried under vacuum at 40 °C, affording 599 mg (92% yield) of a red solid corresponding to C28H30Cl2NiP.
(b) To a suspension of NiCl2 (150 mg, 1.16 mmol) in toluene (10 mL), ethyldiphenylphosphine (500 µL, 2.32 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at 90 °C for 4 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the resulting red solid was washed with diethyl ether and dried under vacuum at 40 °C, yielding 534 mg (82% yield) of a red solid identical to that obtained in method (a). Single crystals suitable for SCXRD analysis were grown by slow vapor diffusion of hexane into a dichloromethane solution of the complex. Elemental analysis (%): Calcd. for C28H30Cl2NiP: C, 58.35; H, 4.08. Found: C, 58.23; H, 4.43. Selected IR data (solid state, cm−1): 1432 (m), 1101 (m), 1000 (m), 757 (m), 737 (s), 705 (s), and 692 (s) (Figure S1).

4.3. Synthesis of [NiCl2(benzyldiphenylphosphine)2] (Ni2)

To a solution of NiCl2·6H2O (108 mg, 0.45 mmol) in degassed ethanol (10 mL), benzyldiphenylphosphine (250 mg, 0.91 mmol) was added. The resulting suspension was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The mixture was filtered, and the resulting red solid was washed with diethyl ether (2 × 5 mL) and dried under vacuum at 40 °C, affording 188 mg (x% yield) of a red solid with composition C38H34Cl2NiP. Elemental analysis (%): Calcd. for C38H34Cl2NiP: C, 70.08; H, 5.26. Found: C, 69.83; H, 5.39. Selected IR data (solid state, cm−1): 1434 (m), 1000 (m), 836 (s), 776 (m), 740 (s), and 690 (s) (Figure S2).

4.4. Synthesis of [NiCl2(2-methoxyethyldiphenylphosphine)2] (Ni3)

To a solution of NiCl2·6H2O (198 mg, 0.83 mmol) in degassed ethanol (20 mL), 2-methoxyethyldiphenylphosphine (405 mg, 1.66 mmol) was added. The resulting suspension was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The solid was collected by filtration, washed with diethyl ether (2 × 5 mL), and dried under vacuum at 40 °C, affording 391 mg (76% yield) of a red solid corresponding to C30H34Cl2NiO2P2. Single crystals suitable for SCXRD analysis were grown via the slow vapor diffusion of hexane into a dichloromethane solution of the complex. Elemental analysis (%): Calcd. for C30H34Cl2NiO2P2: C, 58.29; H, 5.54. Found: C, 58.13; H, 5.62. Selected IR data (solid state, cm−1): 1484 (w), 1439 (m), 1186 (w), 1000 (s), 978 (m), 953 (m), 745 (s), and 700 (s) (Figure S3).

4.5. Synthesis of [NiCl2(k2-N,P-2-(2-(diphenylphosphino)ethyl)pyridine)] (Ni4)

To a solution of NiCl2·6H2O (204 mg, 0.86 mmol) in degassed ethanol (10 mL), 2-(2-(diphenylphosphino)ethyl)pyridine (250 mg, 0.86 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure; the resulting red solid was washed with diethyl ether and dried under vacuum to afford 319 mg (88% yield) of a green solid corresponding to C19H18Cl2NNiP. Elemental analysis (%): Calcd. for C19H18Cl2NNiP: C, 54.21; H, 4.31. Found: C, 53.99; H, 4.45. Selected IR data (solid state, cm−1): 1606 (m), 1485 (m), 1439(m), 1432 (m), 1160 (w), 1101 (w), 757 (s), 744 (s), 718 (s), and 698 (s) (Figure S4).

4.6. Synthesis of [NiCl2(k2-N,P-2-((di-tert-butylphosphino)methyl)pyridine)] (Ni5)

To a solution of NiCl2·6H2O (200 mg, 0.84 mmol) in degassed ethanol (10 mL), 2-((di-tert-butylphosphino)methyl)pyridine (200 mg, 0.84 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure; the resulting purple solid was washed with diethyl ether and dried under vacuum, affording 290 mg (94% yield) of a purple solid. Single crystals suitable for SCXRD analysis were grown via the slow vapor diffusion of hexane into a dichloromethane solution of the complex. Elemental analysis (%): Calcd. for C14H24Cl2NiP: C, 45.83; H, 6.59. Found: C, 45.66; H, 6.69. Selected IR data (solid state, cm−1): 1606 (m), 1485 (m), 1439(m), 1181 (w), 826 (s), 771 (s), and 761 (Figure S5).

4.7. SCXRD

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) was performed using a Bruker D8 Venture instrument equipped with a microfocus Mo source (Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å) and a 2D Photon III detector. The main experimental details regarding the determination of the structure of Ni1, Ni3, and Ni5 by SCXRD are reported in Table S4. The unit cells were identified and initially refined using APEX4 [37]. Successively, data were integrated and reduced using SAINT [38] and XPREP [39]. Absorption effects were corrected using SADABS [40]. Structure was solved and refined with the aid of SHELXL-2019/1 [41]. The oxygen atom O1 in Ni3 and the carbon atom C8 in Ni5 exhibited irregular anisotropic parameters due to disorder, and their electron density was modeled at multiple positions. The occupancies were freely refined to convergence using the FVAR command. All hydrogen atoms were fixed at calculated position and refined using a riding model. Crystallographic data of Ni1, Ni3, and Ni5 can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (CCDC number: 2496672 for Ni1, 2496673 for Ni3 and 2496674 for Ni5). The molecular structures of all complexes are depicted in Figure 1 and selected bond lengths and angles are listed in Table S4.

4.8. Polymerization of 1,3-Butadiene

Polymerizations were carried out in a 25 mL round-bottomed Schlenk flask. A standard procedure is reported. Prior to starting polymerization, the reactor was heated to 110 °C under vacuum for 1 h and backfilled with nitrogen. 1,3-Butadiene was condensed into the Schlenk flask kept at −20 °C, then toluene was added, and the solution was brought to the desired polymerization temperature. MAO and a toluene solution of the nickel complex were then added in that order. Polymerization was stopped with methanol containing a small amount of hydrochloric acid. The polymer obtained was then coagulated by adding 40 mL of a methanol solution containing 4% of Irganox® 1076 antioxidant and HCl, and repeatedly washed with fresh methanol, and finally dried in vacuum at room temperature to constant weight.

4.9. Polymer Characterization

Attenuated total reflectance (ATR)–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra were recorded at room temperature in the 4000–600 cm−1 range with a resolution of 4 cm−1 using a Perkin Elmer (Waltham, MA, USA) Spectrum Two spectrometer. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker (Billerica, MA, USA) Advance 400 MHz NMR Spectrometer operating at 400 MHz (1H) and 100.58 MHz (13C) working in the PFT mode at 103 °C. NMR samples were prepared dissolving from 60 to 80 mg of polymer in about 3 mL of C2D2Cl4 in 10mm probes and referred to as hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDS), as the internal standard. The relaxation delay was 16 s. The microstructure of the polymers was determined by 1H and 13C NMR, according to the literature [42,43].
The molecular weight average (Mw) and the molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn) were obtained by a high-temperature Waters (Milford, MA, USA) GPCV2000 size exclusion chromatography (SEC) system equipped with a refractometer detector. The experimental conditions consisted of three PL Gel Olexis columns, ortho-dichlorobenzene (DCB) as the mobile phase, a 0.8 mLmin−1 flow rate, and a temperature of 145 °C. The calibration of the SEC system was constructed using eighteen narrow Mw/Mn PS standards with molar weights ranging from 162 to 5.6·106 g mol−1. For the SEC analysis, about 12 mg of polymer was dissolved in 5 mL of DCB with 0.05% of BHT as antioxidant.

5. Conclusions

We synthesized and characterized several nickel dichloride complexes with various types of phosphine ligands. Given the similar behavior exhibited by nickel- and cobalt-based catalytic systems in the polymerization of butadiene, we wanted to verify whether, in the case of nickel, as happened in the case of cobalt, it was possible to control and vary the catalytic selectivity, i.e., the formation of polymers with cis-1,4, and 1,2, iso- and syn-diotctic structures, by varying the type of phosphine ligand on the nickel atom. However, this was not the case, as polybutadienes with a high cis content were consistently obtained, regardless of the nature of the phosphine ligand.
This result was interpreted by assuming that the ligand is removed from the metal, which results in the formation of an active center completely analogous to that obtained by simply combining NiCl2 or Ni(acac)2 with MAO, which, as it is well known, is specific to produce cis polybutadiene.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30234655/s1. Figures S1–S5: FT-IR spectra of the nickel complexes; Figure S6: vials with the five complexes Ni1Ni5; Figure S7: complex Ni4 in solid state (left) and dichloromethane solution (right); Figure S8: Ni-P bond length in Ni1 and Ni3 fall within the range 2.2378(5)–2.2483(9) Å, placing them near the mean value of the distance distribution; Figures S9–S13 and Tables S1–S4: further crystallographic details; Figures S14–S16: 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the polymers; and Figure S17: FT-IR spectra of the polymers.

Author Contributions

Synthesis and characterization of the ligands, A.S.; synthesis and characterization of the nickel complexes, M.G., G.B. and G.P.; polymerization and polymer characterization, S.L., B.P. and G.R.; supervision, F.M.; writing—original draft preparation, F.M., M.G. and G.R.; and writing—review and editing, M.G. and G.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Acknowledgments

Authors wish to thank Fulvia Greco, Daniele Piovani, and Alberto Giacometti Schieroni for their support in the FT-IR, NMR, and GPC, and FT-IR analyses of the polymers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Porri, L.; Giarrusso, A. Conjugated Diene Polymerization. In Comprehensive Polymer Science; Eastmond, G., Edwith, A., Russo, S., Sigwalt, P., Eds.; Pergamon Press Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 1989; pp. 53–108. [Google Scholar]
  2. Racanelli, P.; Porri, L. Cis-1,4-polybutadiene by cobalt catalysts. Some features of the catalysts prepared from alkyl aluminium compounds containing Al-O-Al bonds. Eur. Polym. J. 1970, 5, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yoshimoto, T.; Komatskii, K.; Sakata, R.; Yamamoto, K.; Takeuchi, Y.; Onishi, A.; Ueda, K. Kinetic study of cis-1.4 polymerization of butadiene with nickel carboxylate/boron trifluoride etherate/triethylaluminum catalyst. Makromol. Chem. 1970, 139, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Throckmorton, M.C.; Saltman, W.M. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. Germany Patent DE2257137A1, 24 October 1973. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ricci, G.; Italia, S.; Comitani, C.; Porri, L. Polymerization of conjugated dialkenes with transition metal catalysts. Influence of methylaluminoxane on catalyst activity and stereospecificity. Polym. Commun. 1991, 32, 514–517. [Google Scholar]
  6. Oliva, L.; Longo, P.; Grassi, A.; Ammendola, P.; Pellecchia, C. Polymerization of 1,3-alkadienes in the presence of Ni- and Ti-based catalytic systems containing methylalumoxane. Makromol. Chem. Rapid Commun. 1990, 11, 519–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ricci, G.; Zetta, L.; Porri, L.; Meille, S.V. Synthesis and characterization of isotactic cis-1,4 Poly(3-methyl-1,3-pentadiene). Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1995, 196, 2785–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ricci, G.; Sommazzi, A.; Masi, F.; Ricci, M.; Boglia, A.; Leone, G. Well Defined Transition Metal Complexes with Phosphorus and Nitrogen Ligands for 1,3-Dienes Polymerization. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 661–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ricci, G.; Leone, G. Recent progresses in the polymerization of butadiene over the last decade. Polyolefins J. 2014, 1, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ricci, G.; Pampaloni, G.; Sommazzi, A.; Masi, F. Dienes polymerization: Where we are and what lies ahead. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 5879–5914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Takeuchi, M.; Shiono, T.; Soga, K. Polymerization of 1,3-butadiene with the catalyst system composed of a cobalt compound and methylaluminoxane. Polym. Int. 1992, 29, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ricci, G.; Forni, A.; Boglia, A.; Motta, T.; Zannoni, G.; Canetti, M.; Bertini, F. Synthesis and X-Ray structure of CoCl2(PiPrPh2)2. A new highly active and stereospecific catalyst for 1,2 polymerization of conjugated dienes when used associated with MAO. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ricci, G.; Forni, A.; Boglia, A.; Sommazzi, A.; Masi, F. Synthesis, structure and butadiene polymerization behavior of CoCl2(PRxPh3−x)2 (R = methyl, ethyl, propyl, allyl, isopropyl, cyclohexyl; x = 1, 2). Influence of the phosphorous ligand on polymerization stereoselectivity. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 1845–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ricci, G.; Boccia, A.C.; Leone, G.; Forni, A. Novel Allyl Cobalt Phosphine Complexes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Behavior in the Polymerization of Allene and 1,3-Dienes. Catalysts 2017, 7, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ricci, G.; Leone, G.; Pierro, I.; Zanchin, G.; Forni, A. Novel Cobalt Dichloride Complexes with Hindered Diphenylphosphine Ligands: Synthesis, Characterization, and Behavior in the Polymerization of Butadiene. Molecules 2019, 24, 2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ricci, G.; Leone, G.; Zanchin, G.; Palucci, B.; Forni, A.; Sommazzi, A.; Masi, F.; Zacchini, S.; Guelfi, M.; Pampaloni, G. Some novel cobalt diphenylphosphine complexes: Synthesis, characterization, and behavior in the polymerization of 1,3-butadiene. Molecules 2021, 26, 4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ricci, G.; Leone, G.; Zanchin, G.; Sommazzi, A.; Masi, F.; Forni, A. Cobalt dichloride complexes with pyridyl-phosphine bidentate ligands: Synthesis, characterization, and behavior in the polymerization of 1,3-butadiene. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2023, 550, 121424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ricci, A.; Sommazzi, F.; Masi, A. Forni Polymerization of 1,3-Butadiene with Catalysts Based on Cobalt Dichloride Complexes with Aminophosphines: Switching the Regioselectivity by Varying the MAO/Co Molar Ratio. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2024, 42, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Venanzi, L.M. Tetrahedral nickel(II) complexes and the factor determining their formation. Part I. Bistriphenylphosphine nickel(II) compounds. J. Chem. Soc. 1958, 719–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Garton, G.; Henn, D.E.; Powell, H.M.; Venanzi, L.M. Tetrahedral nickel(II) complexes and the factor determining their formation. Part V. The tetrahedral co-ordination of nickel in dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine)nickel. J. Chem. Soc. 1963, 3625–3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. van Hecke, G.R.; Horrocks, W.D., Jr. Approximate Force Constants for Tetrahedral Metal Carbonyls and Nitrosyls. Inorg. Chem. 1966, 5, 1960–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barnett, K.W. Nickel Complexes with Organic and Phosphorus Ligands: An integrated set of inorganic experiments. J. Chem. Educ. 1974, 51, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brammer, L.; Stevens, E.D. Structure of dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine)nickel(II). Acta Crystallogr. C 1989, 45, 400–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Standley, E.A.; Smith, S.J.; Müller, P.; Jamison, T.F. A Broadly Applicable Strategy for Entry into Homogeneous Nickel(0) Catalysts from Air-Stable Nickel(II) Complexes. Organometallics 2014, 33, 2012–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Flapper, J.; Kooijman, H.; Lutz, M.; Spek, A.L.; van Leeuwen, P.W.N.M.; Elsevier, C.J.; Kamer, P.C.J. Nickel and Palladium Complexes of Pyridine−Phosphine Ligands as Ethene Oligomerization Catalysts. Organometallics 2009, 28, 1180–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kermagoret, A.; Braunstein, P. Mono- and Dinuclear Nickel Complexes with Phosphino-, Phosphinito-, and Phosphonitopyridine Ligands: Synthesis, Structures, and Catalytic Oligomerization of Ethylene. Organometallics 2008, 27, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Evans, D.F. The determination of the paramagnetic susceptibility of substances in solution by nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 2003–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bain, G.A.; Berry, J.F. Diamagnetic Corrections and Pascal’s Constants. J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85, 532–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Corain, B.; Longato, B.; Angeletti, R.; Valle, G. trans-[Dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine)nickel(II)]·(C2H4Cl2)2: A clathrate of the allogon of venanzi’s tetrahedral complex. In. Chim. Acta 1985, 104, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, L.; Powell, D.R.; Houser, R.P. Structural variation in copper(I) complexes with pyridylmethylamide ligands: Structural analysis with a new four-coordinate geometry index, τ4. Dalton Trans. 2007, 9, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Link, L.; Niewa, R. Polynator: A tool to identify and quantitatively evaluate polyhedra and other shapes in crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 56, 1855–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Falivene, L.; Cao, Z.; Petta, A.; Serra, L.; Poater, A.; Oliva, R.; Scarano, V.; Cavallo, L. Towards the online computer-aided design of catalytic pockets. Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 872–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Poater, A.; Ragone, F.; Giudice, S.; Costabile, C.; Dorta, R.; Nolan, S.P.; Cavallo, L. Thermodynamics of N-heterocyclic carbene dimerization: The balance of sterics and electronics. Organometallics 2008, 27, 2679–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Poater, A.; Ragone, F.; Mariz, R.; Dorta, R.; Cavallo, L. Comparing the Enantioselective Power of Steric and Electrostatic Effects in Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Asymmetric Synthesis. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 14348–14353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Porri, L.; Giarrusso, A.; Ricci, G. Recent views on the mechanism of diolefin polymeization with transition metal initiator systems. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1991, 16, 405–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Snook, J.H.; Foxman, B.H. CCDC 2171959: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination; CCDC: Cambridge, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bruker. APEX4 V2021.10-0, Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2021.
  38. Bruker. SAINT v8.30A, Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2012.
  39. Bruker. XPREP V2014/2, Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2014.
  40. Bruker. SADABS V2016/2, Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2016.
  41. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXL-2019/1, Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2019.
  42. Mochel, V.D. Carbon-13 NMR of polybutadiene. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 1972, 10, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Elgert, K.F.; Quack, G.; Stutzel, B. Zur struktur des polybutadiens, 2. Das 13C-NMR-Spektrum des 1,2-polybutadiens. Makromol. Chem. 1974, 175, 1955–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Synthesis conditions for Ni1Ni5 complexes.
Scheme 1. Synthesis conditions for Ni1Ni5 complexes.
Molecules 30 04655 sch001
Figure 1. Molecular structures of complexes (a) Ni1; (b) Ni3; and (c) Ni5. Ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Nickel atoms are shown in bluish green, chlorine in green, phosphorus in orange, nitrogen in light blue, and oxygen in red. Atom numbering is consistent with that reported in the CIF file; for clarity, symmetry-equivalent atom labels have been omitted.
Figure 1. Molecular structures of complexes (a) Ni1; (b) Ni3; and (c) Ni5. Ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Nickel atoms are shown in bluish green, chlorine in green, phosphorus in orange, nitrogen in light blue, and oxygen in red. Atom numbering is consistent with that reported in the CIF file; for clarity, symmetry-equivalent atom labels have been omitted.
Molecules 30 04655 g001
Figure 2. Topographic steric maps of the phosphine ligands in complexes (a) Ni1, (b) Ni3, and (c) Ni5. The nickel atom is placed at the center of a sphere with a radius of 5 Å, the Z-axis is defined along the Ni–P bond vector, and the projections are displayed in the XY plane. The default Bondi radii, scaled by 1.17, was left unchanged, as was the mesh spacing for numerical integration, which was set to 0.10.
Figure 2. Topographic steric maps of the phosphine ligands in complexes (a) Ni1, (b) Ni3, and (c) Ni5. The nickel atom is placed at the center of a sphere with a radius of 5 Å, the Z-axis is defined along the Ni–P bond vector, and the projections are displayed in the XY plane. The default Bondi radii, scaled by 1.17, was left unchanged, as was the mesh spacing for numerical integration, which was set to 0.10.
Molecules 30 04655 g002
Figure 3. 13C (up) and 1H (down) NMR of polybutadiene in Table 1, entry 2 (C2D2Cl4 as solvent, HMDS as internal standard, 103 °C).
Figure 3. 13C (up) and 1H (down) NMR of polybutadiene in Table 1, entry 2 (C2D2Cl4 as solvent, HMDS as internal standard, 103 °C).
Molecules 30 04655 g003
Figure 4. How the phosphine ligand can affect the formation of cis-1,4, and 1,2, iso- and syndiotactic polybutadienes: (a) by favoring the insertion of the incoming monomer at C1 or C3 of the butenyl group; (b) by influencing the mutual orientation (exo-exo or exo-endo) of incoming monomer and butenyl group; (c) by migrating from the metal to methylaluminoxane and thus causing a change in selectivity.
Figure 4. How the phosphine ligand can affect the formation of cis-1,4, and 1,2, iso- and syndiotactic polybutadienes: (a) by favoring the insertion of the incoming monomer at C1 or C3 of the butenyl group; (b) by influencing the mutual orientation (exo-exo or exo-endo) of incoming monomer and butenyl group; (c) by migrating from the metal to methylaluminoxane and thus causing a change in selectivity.
Molecules 30 04655 g004
Table 1. Polymerization of 1,3-butadiene with nickel catalysts a.
Table 1. Polymerization of 1,3-butadiene with nickel catalysts a.
EntryNi_ComplexMAO/Ni
(Molar Ratio)
Time
(h)
Yield
(g)
N b
(h−1)
cis-1,4 c
(%)
Mw d
(g/mol)
Mw/Mn d
entry 1Ni110031.486492.341,0002.5
entry 2Ni1100031.486494.244,0001.5
entry 3Ni210031.486492.032,0003.0
entry 4Ni2100031.486494.256,0002.1
entry 5Ni310041.1955095.346,0003.1
entry 6Ni3100041.464897.148,5002.8
entry 7Ni410031.1269196.030,0002.4
entry 8Ni4100031.3080296.435,0002.2
entry 9Ni510040.7735693.044,5002.0
entry 10Ni5100040.9041793.746,5001.8
a Polymerization conditions: butadiene, 2 mL, 1.4 g; toluene, total volume 16 mL; Ni, 10 μmol; temperature, 22 °C; b N = moles of butadiene polymerized per mol of Ni per hour; c determined by 1H NMR, the remaining units are 1,2; and d determined by GPC.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guelfi, M.; Bresciani, G.; Pampaloni, G.; Sommazzi, A.; Masi, F.; Palucci, B.; Losio, S.; Ricci, G. Nickel Phosphine Complexes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Behavior in the Polymerization of 1,3-Butadiene. Molecules 2025, 30, 4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30234655

AMA Style

Guelfi M, Bresciani G, Pampaloni G, Sommazzi A, Masi F, Palucci B, Losio S, Ricci G. Nickel Phosphine Complexes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Behavior in the Polymerization of 1,3-Butadiene. Molecules. 2025; 30(23):4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30234655

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guelfi, Massimo, Giulio Bresciani, Guido Pampaloni, Anna Sommazzi, Francesco Masi, Benedetta Palucci, Simona Losio, and Giovanni Ricci. 2025. "Nickel Phosphine Complexes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Behavior in the Polymerization of 1,3-Butadiene" Molecules 30, no. 23: 4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30234655

APA Style

Guelfi, M., Bresciani, G., Pampaloni, G., Sommazzi, A., Masi, F., Palucci, B., Losio, S., & Ricci, G. (2025). Nickel Phosphine Complexes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Behavior in the Polymerization of 1,3-Butadiene. Molecules, 30(23), 4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30234655

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop