Next Article in Journal
A Novel Polyacrylamide Film-Forming Agent for Maintaining Wellbore Stability
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Method of Coupling In Situ Time-Resolved FTIR and Microwave Irradiation: Application to the Monitoring of Quinoxaline Derivatives Synthesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design, Production and Quality Assessment of Antioxidant-Enriched Olive Paste Dips Using Agro-Food By-Products
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioactive Potential of Wild Plants from Gardunha Mountain: Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities

1
RISE-Health, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Av. Infante D. Henrique, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal
2
Laboratório de Fármaco-Toxicologia, UBIMedical, Universidade da Beira Interior, Estrada Municipal 506, 6200-284 Covilhã, Portugal
3
Grupo de Investigação Sobre Problemas Relacionados Com Toxicofilias, Centro Académico Clínico das Beiras (CACB), Universidade da Beira Interior, Av. Infante D. Henrique, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal
4
C-MAST—Center for Mechanical and Aerospace Science and Technologies, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(19), 3876; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30193876
Submission received: 29 July 2025 / Revised: 20 September 2025 / Accepted: 23 September 2025 / Published: 25 September 2025

Abstract

The plants used in folk medicine have been increasingly studied to identify their bioactive properties. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the bioactivity of the hydroethanolic extracts of plants collected in Gardunha Mountain, Portugal. Seven abundant and representative wild plants were studied: Cistus salviifolius, Clinopodium vulgare, Coincya monensis, Glandora prostrata, Helichrysum stoechas, Rubia peregrina, and Umbilicus rupestris. The phytochemical composition of the extracts was determined by UHPLC-timsTOF-MS and by spectrophotometric methods. The antioxidant, in vitro anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activity and the biocompatibility of the extracts were tested. The extracts were predominantly composed of flavonoids and phenolic acids, such as gallic acid, neochlorogenic acid and quercetin glycosides. The C. salviifolius extracts demonstrated very strong antioxidant activity related to scavenging free radicals (AAI = 2.84 and 2.93). Regarding antimicrobial activity, the H. stoechas extract exhibited inhibitory effects, particularly against Gram-positive bacteria and yeasts (MIC = 0.008–0.5 mg/mL). The C. monensis, R. peregrina, and U. rupestris extracts showed low cytotoxicity (viability > 70%) in the highest concentration tested. These findings highlight C. salviifolius and H. stoechas as promising sources of novel bioactive compounds, particularly antimicrobials in controlling microbial growth and promoting associated health benefits, and underscore the value of traditional medicinal plants as a guide for pharmacological studies.

1. Introduction

Since ancient times, plants have played a central role in traditional medicine and remain a primary source of therapeutic agents, especially in developing countries [1,2]. Due to several factors, including the growing demand for natural products, the rise in antibiotic resistance, and the ongoing search for new drugs, plants have increasingly attracted scientific interest, particularly those established in traditional medicine [3,4,5,6,7]. Among these, several plant families are well documented for their ethnobotanical applications and bioactive properties. Notable examples include: Boraginaceae (anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antidiabetic activities and neuroprotective effect) [8,9,10]; Brassicaceae (antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antiviral, antidiabetic, anticancer, and organ-protective activities) [11,12,13,14]; Cistaceae (antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antidiabetic activity) [15,16]; Crassulaceae (anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antimicrobial, insecticidal, anticancer, and antioxidant activity and wound healing properties) [17,18,19]; Lamiaceae (antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antimicrobial, and cardioprotective activities and wound-healing and anti-ageing potential) [20,21,22,23,24]; and Rubiaceae (antimicrobial, analgesic, antidiabetic, anti-diarrheal, anti-pyretic, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antiulcer, and antitumor activities) [25,26,27,28]. Different representative wild plants from these families can be found in the Gardunha Mountain, located in the central region of Portugal within the Iberian Massif, approximately 17 km west of Castelo Branco [29,30]. This mountain ridge separates the urban areas of Covilhã and Fundão. It is part of an extensive range of ridges stretching approximately 60 km in length, with a predominant NE-SW orientation [29,31]. The soil texture ranges from granular to silt loam, and the summers are extremely hot, with the region experiencing a water deficit of approximately 65%, where winters are mild and almost without snow cover [29,30]. These environmental conditions create a unique mountain ecosystem, where wild plants have adapted to local microclimates, soil composition, and seasonal water stress, factors that can influence their secondary metabolite profiles and biological activities. Despite their ecological and ethnobotanical relevance, many of these species remain poorly characterised. To address this gap, seven abundant and representative wild plants from Gardunha mountain were selected for further studies. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate their chemical composition and to provide a comprehensive understanding of their bioactive properties and biocompatibility, offering insights into their potential value for sustainable use and conservation.

2. Results and Discussion

A broad range of plants traditionally used in medicine have been studied by researchers for their health benefits, including antimicrobial and antioxidant activities [32]. Considering the potential of extracts, this work selected seven plants for study, based on their distribution in the Gardunha Mountain, traditional therapeutic uses, and their association with limited knowledge regarding their bioactivity.

2.1. Phytochemical Characterisation

The bioactive properties of the plant extracts are closely associated with their chemical composition [33]. Therefore, we started by determining the composition of the extracts, through a preliminary chemical analysis of their total phenolic and flavonoid content. The chemical composition of the extracts was obtained through the determination of total phenolic content using the Folin-Ciocalteu method, and the flavonoid content using the aluminium chloride method (Table 1).
The extract of Glandora prostrata (GP) exhibited the highest total phenolic content, followed by the extracts of Clinopodium vulgare (CV), and the stems and aerial parts of Cistus salviifolius (CSS and CSAP). Regarding total flavonoid content, the highest concentration was observed in the Helichrysum stoechas (HS) extract, followed by the extract obtained from the aerial parts of C. salviifolius (CSAP).
The hydroethanolic extract of C. vulgare showed a higher total phenolic content compared to ethanol, ethyl acetate, and acetone extracts studied in other works [34]. Among the analysed extracts by Todorova and collaborators (2016), the total aqueous extract of C. vulgare exhibited the highest total phenolic content, followed by the leaf aqueous extract, while the butanol extract showed the lowest total phenolic content [35]. Several studies have demonstrated that hydroethanolic extracts (e.g., 50–70% ethanol in water) exhibit significantly higher total phenolic content compared to extracts obtained with less polar solvents [36,37,38]. Therefore, the choice of plant part may account for the higher phenolic compound content observed when compared to the other plants.
Data on the extracts’ composition showed that C. salviifolius extracted with methanol acidified with 0.1% hydrochloric acid (HCl) was characterised by the presence of phenolic acids and their glycosides [39]. The ethanol and water extracts of the same plant had lower levels of total phenols (ranging from 46 to 50 mg GAE/g dry weight (DW)) and the total flavonoid content was lower than the values obtained in the present study but were expressed as catechin equivalents (mg CE/g DW), which may have an impact on the results obtained [40]. The ethanolic and aqueous extracts studied by Hitl and collaborators (2022) showed higher quantities of total phenols and lower total flavonoids as observed in the current investigation [41].
In line with this, when non-targeted metabolomic profiling of the extracts was analysed, it revealed a chemically diverse composition, predominantly comprising phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and coumarins. Compound annotation was performed using a three-tier approach: spectral library matching (SL), comparison with an in-house analyte list (AL), and elemental composition prediction via SmartFormula (SF), all processed using MetaboScape 7.0.1. Across all plant extracts, a total of 72 features were annotated with the highest level of confidence using the combined SL + AL + SF strategy, supported by accurate m/z, retention time, and collisional cross section (CCS) values. An additional 657 features were matched using the AL + SF combination, while 116 features were annotated via SL + SF. Furthermore, 2514 features were assigned based solely on SF, providing molecular formula predictions without spectral confirmation.
Comprehensive phytochemical screening of the studied plant extracts by UHPLC-timsTOF-MS enabled the tentative identification of numerous phenolic compounds, with notable variation across species and plant parts. Supplementary Figures S1 and S2 show the base peak chromatograms (BPC) of the samples acquired in positive and negative ionisation modes, respectively, providing complementary profiles of their chemical composition.
In Cistus salviifolius, the aerial parts showed a presence of flavonoids and phenolic acids, notably gallic acid, neochlorogenic acid, gallocatechin 3-O-gallate, and quercetin glycosides, including rutin and arabinoside forms. The stems also contained these compounds but with a slightly different profile, including kaempferol 3-O-glucosyl-rhamnosyl-galactoside and additional coumarins such as scopoletin and coumarin (Table S1).
The extract of Clinopodium vulgare featured abundant caffeic acid derivatives, rosmarinic acid, and flavonoid glycosides such as eriocitrin and luteolin derivatives. Noteworthy are also umbelliferone and esculin, suggesting coumarin-type compounds may be important contributors to its phytochemical fingerprint (Table S2).
Coincya monensis exhibited distinct profiles in its flowers and stems. Floral extracts were enriched in p-coumaric acid 4-O-glucoside, caffeic acid, apigenin 6,8-di-C-glucoside, and quercetin 3-O-arabinoside. The stems shared these compounds and additionally contained ellagic acid, dihydroquercetin 3-O-rhamnoside, and luteolin derivatives (Table S3).
In Glandora prostrata, the phytochemical profile was dominated by neochlorogenic acid, kaempferol 3-O-glucosyl-rhamnosyl-galactoside, and several flavones such as genistin and luteolin, as well as rosmarinic acid. Rhoifolin derivatives and umbelliferone were also identified (Table S4).
Helichrysum stoechas showed the presence of hydroxycinnamic acid esters, particularly 3-feruloylquinic acid and 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid, as well as chlorogenic and neochlorogenic acids. A range of flavonoids, including myricetin, quercetin, and luteolin glycosides, were also detected, along with scopoletin and usnic acid (Table S5).
The extract of Rubia peregrina was marked by a diverse flavonoid and phenolic acid profile, including di-O-methylbergenin, 3-feruloylquinic acid, quercetin and kaempferol derivatives, as well as anthraquinone-related structures suggested by the presence of emodin-like features (Table S6).
In Umbilicus rupestris, both flowers and leaves shared a core set of compounds such as gallocatechin, gallocatechin 3-O-gallate, quercetin 3-O-rutinoside, and rosmarinic acid. The flowers were additionally rich in esculetin, ellagic acid, and glycosylated flavones. The leaves contained sinapaldehyde, umbelliferone, and apigenin-C-glycosides, consistent with the plant’s use in topical formulations (Table S7).
Phenols and flavonoids are plant-derived compounds synthesised in response to various biotic and abiotic stresses. Their levels can vary depending on edaphoclimatic conditions such as light exposure, altitude, ultraviolet radiation, humidity, and temperature [42]. Thus, the differences observed across the various studies may be attributed to these factors, among others.

2.2. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

Inflammation is a response triggered by infectious agents (like bacteria, viruses, or fungi) or by non-infectious conditions such as tissue injury, cell death, cancer, ischemia, and degeneration, and the use of plants and their derivatives as anti-inflammatory agents dates back to ancient times [43].
Regarding the biological properties of the extracts, their anti-inflammatory activity was evaluated by assessing their ability to inhibit protein denaturation. Although this method is not a direct assay, it is commonly used to estimate the anti-inflammatory potential of plant samples [44].
Based on the results presented in Table 2, the samples with the lowest IC50 values—and thus the highest anti-inflammatory activity—were the Umbilicus rupestris leaves extract (URL), followed by the extracts of H. stoechas (HR) and U. rupestris flowers (URF).
Among the wild mountain plants harvested in the Serra da Gardunha region, U. rupestris, particularly its leaves (URL), proved to be the most promising in terms of anti-inflammatory properties. A quantitative comparison with the reference drug acetylsalicylic acid (IC50 = 4.20 μg/mL) indicates that, although URL (IC50 = 38.82 μg/mL) exhibits relevant anti-inflammatory activity, its potency is approximately 9 times lower than that of aspirin; thus, URL should not be regarded as a direct substitute for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, considering its natural origin and potentially reduced side effects, URL could serve as a promising natural source of bioactive compounds with potential for further development as complementary or alternative anti-inflammatory agents, particularly in cases where long-term NSAID use poses risks.
In folk medicine, U. rupestris is used against inflammation and irritation and diseases of the skin [46,47,48,49]. Regarding the anti-inflammatory activity, Benhouda and Yahia (2015) studied in vivo on Wistar rats the anti-inflammatory effects of methanolic extract of U. rupestris leaves by using several methods [49]. The methanolic extract induced a significant anti-inflammatory effect after the subcutaneous injection of the carrageenan solution. The effect of this extract on paw oedema induced by serotonin and histamine also showed a significant anti-inflammatory activity and dose dependent. This study confirmed the anti-inflammatory properties of U. rupestris methanolic extract from the leaves, supporting its traditional medicinal use [49]. These results agree with the ones of the present work, in which the plant U. rupestris has anti-inflammatory potential. Also, the anti-inflammatory activity of the H. stoechas extract was previously demonstrated, as reported by using different extracts and isolated compounds of H. stoechas [50,51,52,53]. Indeed, different compounds present in the U. rupestris and H. stoechas extracts have been shown to have anti-inflammatory activity, such as caffeic acid, coumarin, and rosmarinic acid [54,55,56,57]. Although these compounds are present in the other extracts analysed in our study, they did not show notable anti-inflammatory effects. Furthermore, the presence of apigenin and quercetin 3-O-rutinoside in the U. rupestris extracts, both compounds with previously reported anti-inflammatory activity [58,59], but not in those of H. stoechas, may account for the superior anti-inflammatory activity observed in U. rupestris, especially in the leaf extract.

2.3. Antioxidant Activity

The evaluation of the antioxidant activity in plant extracts is essential for identifying natural bioactive compounds that may contribute to the prevention of oxidative stress-related diseases and serve as safer alternatives to synthetic antioxidants in pharmaceutical and food applications [60,61,62].
The antioxidant properties of the extracts were evaluated using two different methodologies. The DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay was employed to determine whether the extracts exhibit antioxidant activity with respect to free radical scavenging. Additionally, the β-carotene-bleaching assay was used to assess the ability of the extracts to inhibit lipid peroxidation. The use of multiple methodologies allows for the evaluation of whether plant extracts possess various mechanisms of action related to antioxidant activity [63].
The DPPH methodology and Scherer and Godoy’s (2009) classification [45] showed that plants exhibiting the best antioxidant activity related to free radical scavenging were C. salviifolius, C. vulgare, and G. prostrata. Despite the fact that they display very strong antioxidant activity, their AAI values remain below that of gallic acid. In the study by Rebaya et al. [64], the aqueous extract (IC50 = 2.18 µg/mL) and the ethanolic extract (IC50 = 3.52 µg/mL) from C. salviifolius leaves exhibited activity comparable to the standard gallic acid (IC50 = 2.24 µg/mL), whereas the aqueous and ethanolic flower extracts showed lower activity (IC50 = 8.40 and 11.79 µg/mL, respectively), thus indicating that samples of these plants may exhibit activity similar to or slightly different from the gallic acid control. In terms of lipid peroxidation inhibition, although all exhibited weak activity (IC50 significantly greater compared to the BHT control), the U. rupestris showed a slightly better result (Table 2). It is worth noting that the different parts of these plants also influence their antioxidant activity, with the aerial parts of C. salviifolius and the flowers of U. rupestris showing the highest antioxidant activity. Petrova et al. (2023) evaluated the total polyphenol and flavonoid contents and antioxidant activity of freeze-dried aqueous extracts from different anatomical parts (leaves, flowers, and stems) of in vitro cultivated and wild-growing C. vulgare plants, demonstrating how the composition can vary between different parts of the plant and subsequently affect the bioactivity [42]. Several authors showed that different extracts and fractions of C. salviifolius may have high antioxidant properties through the radical scavenging activity, with possible correlations between the polyphenol composition and antioxidant activity of the extracts, with the polar extracts being more active than the non-polar ones [39,40,65,66]. In turn, the results reported herein and by other authors suggest that C. salviifolius is a weaker inhibitor of lipid peroxidation [41]. Also, in this work, the scavenging activity of the C. vulgare was demonstrated as strong, as previously reported [35,67,68,69,70].
The hydroethanolic extracts and decoction of U. rupestris demonstrated the ability to scavenge free radicals, inhibit lipid peroxidation, and prevent oxidative damage [71], consistent with the findings of this study on lipid peroxidation inhibition.
Comparing the extracts with the highest antioxidant activity—C. salviifolius, C. vulgare, and G. prostrata—the compounds (+)-gallocatechin 3-O-gallate and apigenin-7-glucoside were found in the C. salviifolius extracts but not in those of C. vulgare and G. prostrata. Previous studies have demonstrated the antioxidant activity of these compounds [72,73], suggesting that they may play a role in the slightly better antioxidant potential observed for C. salviifolius.

2.4. Antimicrobial Activity

Given the global rise in antimicrobial resistance, the investigation of plant extracts as potential sources of novel antimicrobial agents is crucial for the development of safer, more sustainable alternatives or complements to conventional antibiotics. In such a way, plants constitute an underexploited reservoir of antimicrobial agents, with potential applications in medicine, agriculture, and food preservation [74,75,76,77,78].
In the assays conducted to evaluate antimicrobial activity, several Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial species, as well as two yeast species, were studied using two different methodologies: disc diffusion susceptibility testing and determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the extracts.
The results of the disc diffusion assay (Table 3) showed that the extracts of C. vulgare (CV), Coincya monensis (CMS and CMF), Rubia peregrina (RP), and U. rupestris (URL and URF) presented no antimicrobial activity against the tested microorganisms using this methodology (Table S8). These findings are broadly consistent with the MIC values obtained (Table 4).
Among the evaluated extracts, the most promising antimicrobial activity was observed for the H. stoechas extract (HS), followed by the extracts of C. salviifolius (CSAP and CSS). These extracts exhibited greater activity against Gram-positive bacterial species, as indicated by lower MIC values for these organisms. The antimicrobial activity of C. salviifolius and H. stoechas extracts was higher to the MIC values obtained for the antibiotic tetracycline. Regarding the yeast species, the extract of the flowers of U. rupestris (URF), along with the extracts of H. stoechas (HS) and C. salviifolius (CSAP and CSS), showed higher antimicrobial activity. The MIC values of the antifungal amphotericin B were lower than those of the C. salviifolius, H. stoechas and U. rupestris extracts. Concerning the obtained minimum lethal concentrations (MLC) values, most samples exhibited a bacteriostatic effect, with only the CSS, CV, GP, and HS extracts showing a bactericidal activity, primarily against Gram-negative bacteria.
H. stoechas is the plant with the most promising results, exhibiting the largest inhibition zones and the lowest minimum inhibitory concentrations against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as yeasts. The obtained results for this extract are in accordance with the results previously reported, demonstrating that different extracts of H. stoechas exhibit antimicrobial activity against these microorganisms [79,80,81,82].
Regarding C. salviifolius, the work of Mastino and collaborators (2021) showed that the butanolic and ethyl acetate fractions of C. salviifolius extract demonstrated predominant antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, while the aqueous fraction exhibited activity against both S. aureus and Candida spp. The authors concluded that these findings indicate that the extraction and partitioning processes influenced both the biological activity and the chemical composition of the Cistus extracts [39]. In another study, the ethanolic extract from Cistus salviifolius leaves exhibited activity against L. monocytogenes [83]. Although the C. salviifolius ethanolic extracts studied by Mahmoudi and collaborators, showed higher MIC values, they still demonstrated a bacteriostatic effect [40]. A study on organic extracts of Cistus salviifolius identified 2-acetylbenzoic acid as comprising approximately 3.9% of the analysed sample and associated these extracts with antimicrobial activity against ESKAPE clinical isolates [84].
Caffeic acid is a naturally occurring hydroxycinnamic acid, that exhibits a broad spectrum of bioactive properties. This compound has potent antioxidant activity by scavenging free radicals and reducing oxidative stress; can inhibit pro-inflammatory enzymes and cytokines, showing anti-inflammatory activity; possesses antimicrobial activity against various pathogens; and has antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects in cancer cell lines, suggesting potential therapeutic applications in oncology [56,57,85,86]. This compound is present in the extracts obtained from the plants C. salviifolius, and H. stoechas such as also reported in several studies [41,71,81,87,88], suggesting a potential role in the bioactive properties observed. The proposed mechanisms of action for antimicrobial activity involve cell membrane damage, inhibition of DNA or protein synthesis, and induction of oxidative stress [56,86]. Additionally, kaempferol is also present in samples of C. salviifolius [89,90]. Kaempferol is a naturally occurring flavonol that exhibits a wide range of pharmacological effects, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anticancer, antidiabetic, neuroprotective, and cardioprotective properties [91,92,93,94]. Kaempferol can inhibit the DNA gyrase and DNA helicases in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [95,96]. In the case of H. stoechas, 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid (3,4-DCQA), present in its composition, can also be associated with its activity as isomers of caffeoylquinic acids can exhibit antimicrobial and efflux pump inhibitory activity against Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria [97]. A previous study has reported that 3,4-DCQA, also known as isochlorogenic acid C, can disrupt bacterial membranes by increasing permeability and causing leakage of intracellular contents, ultimately leading to cell death [98]. This mechanism is particularly effective against Gram-positive bacteria due to their simpler cell wall structure, which lacks the outer membrane found in Gram-negative bacteria [99]. Therefore, the strong antibacterial activity of HS may be associated, at least in part, with the membrane-damaging effects of 3,4-DCQA. Additionally, 4-hydroxyalternariol 9-methyl ether, also present in its composition, has been reported to also possess antibacterial activity [100]. These compounds are not present in the C. salviifolius extracts, which may suggest that they contribute to the enhanced antimicrobial activity of H. stoechas. Considering these, the antimicrobial activity of the C. salviifolius and H. stoechas extracts may possibly be attributed to the presence of these compounds or synergism among them.

2.5. Biocompatibility

Ensuring the safety of plant extracts for human consumption or application is crucial [32]. Thus, to evaluate the cytotoxic profile of the extracts on human cells, the current investigation was carried out by using a cultured Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts (NHDF) cell line.
The results showed that the extract obtained from the aerial parts of C. salviifolius (CSAP) and H. stoechas (HS) were the most cytotoxic, reducing cell viability at lower concentrations (Figure 1). NHDF cell viability remained above 75% when exposed to extract concentrations of 1 mg/mL or lower, except for the extracts from the aerial parts of C. salviifolius (CSAP) and H. stoechas (HS) (IC50 < 1 mg/mL).
NHDF cells demonstrated high viability (higher than 70%) when incubated with the extracts of C. monensis, R. peregrina, and U. rupestris. The low cytotoxicity of U. rupestris extracts was supported in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells [101] and in non-tumour primary cell culture from porcine liver [71]. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies evaluating the cytotoxicity of C. monensis and R. peregrina.
Despite the cytotoxicity of C. salviifolius aerial parts (CSAP) and H. stoechas (HS), they also demonstrated antimicrobial activity at concentrations below the IC50 found against NHDF cells, supporting their potential application as natural antimicrobial agents.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Collection of Plant Material

The wild plants Coincya monensis (flowers, CMF or stems, CMS), Cistus salviifolius (aerial parts, CSAP or stems, CSS), Clinopodium vulgare (aerial parts, CV), Glandora prostrata (aerial parts, GP), Helichrysum stoechas (leaves and stems, HS), Rubia peregrina (aerial parts, RP), and Umbilicus rupestris (flowers, URF or leaves, URL) were collected in the northern area of Serra da Gardunha, Portugal, during spring of 2023 or spring of 2024 (Figure 2). The plant species were identified by technicians at the Biotech Plant Lab of Beira Interior, Castelo Branco, Portugal, and a voucher specimen was deposited in our laboratory. The plant materials were air-dried at room temperature, subsequently milled using a blade disintegrator and stored under the same conditions until further analysis.

3.2. Extraction

Milled plant material (10 g) was extracted with an ethanol/water 80:20 (200 mL) in an ultrasonic bath (Bransonic Ultrasonic Bath, Model M3800H-E, Brookfield, CT, USA) running continuously for 1 h, at room temperature. During extraction, the mixture was intermittently stirred with a spatula to unsure uniformity. At the end of each hour, the extract was removed, and an additional 200 mL of hydroethanolic solution was added. This process was repeated three times. The extracts were combined and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed and the ethanolic part evaporated under reduced pressure at 37 °C, and the aqueous part was freezing dried. The extracts were weighed, and the extraction yields were determined gravimetrically. The extracts were stored at −20 °C until use.

3.3. Phytochemical Analysis

3.3.1. Determination of Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content of extracts was determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method according to Luís et al. [102]. Firstly, 450 µL of distilled water was added to 50 µL of each sample or gallic acid solution. Then, 2.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) (0.2 N) was added and incubated for 5 min before the addition of 2 mL of aqueous Na2CO3 (LabKem, Barcelona, Spain) (75 g/L). The samples, diluted with methanol (VWR, Rosny-sous-Bois, France), were then incubated for 90 min at 30 °C. After incubation, the content of total phenolic compounds was determined by colorimetry at 765 nm. A calibration curve was prepared with methanolic solutions of gallic acid (purity 98%, TCI, Tokyo, Japan) in a range from 50 to 500 mg/L (y = 0.0012x + 0.0257, R2 = 0.99). The total phenolics were expressed in mg of gallic acid equivalents per gram of extract (mg GAE/g extract), and the analyses were performed in triplicate.

3.3.2. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content

The total flavonoid content of extracts was determined by the aluminium chloride colorimetric method accordingly to Luís et al. [102]. A total of 1.5 mL of methanol, 0.1 mL of aluminium chloride (Scharlau, Barcelona, Spain, 10% w/v), 0.1 mL of 1 M potassium acetate (Fisher Chemical, Loughborough, UK) and 2.8 mL of distilled water were added to 500 µL of each extract diluted with methanol. Following a 30 min incubation at room temperature, the absorbance of the solutions was measured using a spectrophotometer (UV-6300PC, VWR, Lutterworth, Leicestershire, UK) at 415 nm. A calibration curve was made with methanolic solutions of quercetin (purity ≥ 95%, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in a range from 12.5 to 200 mg/L (y = 0.0084x + 0.0006, R2 = 0.9993). The total flavonoids were expressed in mg quercetin equivalents per gram of extract (mg QE/g extract), and the analyses were performed in triplicate.

3.3.3. Analysis of the Extracts Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (UHPLC timsTOF-MS)

To explore the phytochemical composition of the samples, a non-targeted metabolomics strategy was employed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) coupled with trapped ion mobility time-of-flight mass spectrometry (timsTOF-MS; Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). The system was equipped with a VIP-HESI electrospray ionisation source to ensure efficient ion generation. Sample extracts were previously reconstituted in the minimum volume of the designated solvent system (ethanol/water 8:2), and 5 µL aliquots were injected into a ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 rapid resolution HD column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 µm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
Chromatographic separation was achieved using a binary solvent system composed of 0.1% formic acid in water (solvent A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B). The gradient programme was as follows: the run began at 2% B (held for 1 min), increased gradually to 15% B by 7 min, and then ramped to 80% B over the next 8 min. Subsequently, the gradient rose to 100% B by 20 min and was maintained isocratically for 7 min. The system then returned to initial conditions, with a re-equilibration period of 2 min. The total runtime was 30 min, with a constant flow rate of 0.4 mL/min.
Mass spectrometric detection was performed in both positive and negative ionisation modes. Parameters included capillary voltages of ±4500 V and end plate offsets of ±500 V. Nitrogen was used as nebuliser gas (8 bar), drying gas (8 L/min at 240 °C), and sheath gas (4 L/min at 450 °C). Data acquisition ranged from m/z 20–1300, operating in both full-scan MS and MS/MS modes using Parallel Accumulation-Serial Fragmentation (PASEF). Ion mobility data were acquired within a 1/K0 range of 0.45–1.45 V·s/cm2 with a 100 ms ramp.
Raw data were processed using Bruker’s DataAnalysis (v6.1) and MetaboScape (v7.0.1). Feature extraction considered retention time (RT), m/z, and collisional cross section (CCS), with a signal intensity threshold of 10,000 counts. Tentative compound annotation was based on three strategies: spectral library matching (SL), comparison with an in-house analyte list (AL) of known phenolic compounds, and SmartFormula (SF) predictions constrained to CHNOPS atoms.

3.4. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

The in vitro anti-inflammatory activity was determined by evaluating the samples’ potential to inhibit protein denaturation according to a previous protocol [103]. Briefly, a solution of bovine serum albumin (BSA, 1% w/v, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was prepared in phosphate-buffer solution (PBS, pH 6.8). The samples were diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and 1 mL of each were preheated to 37 °C, and then, 9 mL of the BSA solution was added. The tubes were subsequently incubated for 10 min at 72 °C, followed by cooling on ice for another 10 min. Distilled water was used as a negative control and acetylsalicylic acid (purity > 99%, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) as a positive control. Finally, absorbance measurements were performed in triplicate using a spectrophotometer (Helios-Omega, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)) at 620 nm. The percentage of inhibition of protein denaturation was quantified using the equation below:
%   I n h i b i t i o n = 100 A b s s a m p l e × 100 / A b s c o n t r o l
where Abssample is the absorbance of each sample, and Abscontrol is the absorbance of the control.

3.5. Antioxidant Activity

3.5.1. DPPH Method

The free radical scavenging activity of the extracts was evaluated using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) method as previously reported [102]. The crude extracts (25–250 mg/L) were compared with gallic acid (10, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mg/L). A calibration curve was constructed with methanolic solutions of DPPH (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in a range from 4.25 to 85 mg/L (y = 0.0084x + 0.0006, R2 = 0.999). Absorbances were measured at 517 nm, and the antioxidant activity was expressed through the Antioxidant Activity Index (AAI), calculated from the following equation:
A A I = f i n a l   c o n c e n t r a t i o n   o f   D P P H   i n   t h e   c o n t r o l   s a m p l e / I C 50
The antioxidant activity of the samples was classified as poor (AAI < 0.5), moderate (0.5 ≤ AAI < 1.0), strong (1.0 ≤ AAI < 2.0) or very strong (AAI ≥ 2.0) according to Scherer and Godoy [45]. The analyses were performed in triplicate.

3.5.2. β-Carotene-Bleaching Assay

The ability of extracts to inhibit lipid peroxidation was evaluated by β-carotene bleaching assay [102,104]. For that, methanolic solutions of crude extracts were prepared with concentrations ranging 5 to 1000 mg/L. Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT, purity 99%, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) was used as positive control using the same concentration range. The analyses were performed in duplicate. After acquisition of the absorbance values at 470 nm, the percentage of inhibition was calculated:
%   I n h i b i t i o n = A b s s a m p l e t = 1 h A b s c o n t r o l t = 1 h / A b s c o n t r o l t = 0 h A b s c o n t r o l t = 1 h × 100

3.6. Antimicrobial Activity

3.6.1. Plant Extracts, Microorganisms and Culture Media

The extracts were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Fisher Chemical, UK) to a final concentration of 200 mg/mL and stored at −20 °C until use.
The Gram-positive bacteria used in this study included Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and the clinical isolate MRSA 12/08, Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, and Listeria monocytogenes LMG 16779. The Gram-negative bacteria panel comprised Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 13311, and Acinetobacter baumannii LMG 1025 and the clinical isolate AcB 13/10). In addition, two yeast species were tested: Candida albicans ATCC 90028 and C. tropicalis ATCC 750. The strains were obtained from American Type Culture Collection ATCC, USA) and the BCCM/LMG collection (Belgium), as indicated.
Müeller-Hinton agar (MHA, Biolife, Milan, Italy) and Müeller-Hinton broth (MHB, Biokar Diagnostics, Allonne, France) were used for growth and assays with the bacterial species, except for L. monocytogenes, for which Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB, VWR, Leuven, Belgium) and Tryptone Soy agar (TSA) were used. For yeasts, Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA, Biokar Diagnostics, France) and Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 (RPMI 1640, Biochrom AG, Berlin, Germany) supplemented with 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS, TCI, Japan) were utilised.
All microorganisms used were cryopreserved at −80 °C in an appropriate cryoprotective medium containing 20% glycerol (Labchem, Santo Antão do Tojal, Portugal) for long-term storage. For short-term storage during experimental procedures, culture plates were maintained at 4 °C. The cultures were subcultured onto an appropriate solid medium and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h.

3.6.2. Disc Diffusion Method

The disc diffusion method was performed to evaluate the susceptibility of the microorganisms to the extracts as described by Coimbra et al. [105]. Filter paper discs (6 mm) impregnated with 10 μL of each extract (2 mg/disc) or DMSO (100%, negative control) were placed on the surface of the inoculated plates. Inhibition zones were measured in millimetres, and the results are expressed as mean values ± standard deviations, based on a minimum of three independent assays.

3.6.3. Determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The susceptibility of the microorganisms to the extracts was evaluated through the microdilution method accordingly to Coimbra et al. [104]. Briefly, the inoculum prepared by direct suspension in NaCl 0.85% (w/v) was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland and diluted in medium to obtain a final cell concentration of approximately 1 × 106 colony-forming unit (CFU) per mL for bacteria and 1–5 × 103 CFU/mL for yeasts. The assays were performed with a maximum concentration of 2 mg/mL of the extracts. Growth (negative) controls consisted of culture medium microbial suspension. A solvent control was prepared using DMSO at a maximum concentration of 1% (v/v) in presence of microbial suspension. A medium sterility control was included to confirm the absence of contamination. Positive controls with tetracycline (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and amphotericin B (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were also performed.
The 96-well plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h for bacteria and 48 h for yeasts. Then, 30 μL of a 0.01% solution of resazurin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were added to the wells, followed by incubation for 2 h (bacteria) or 3 h (yeasts) at 37 °C. To establish minimum bactericidal concentrations (MLC), 10 µL of broth was removed from the well, inoculated on agar plates, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h for bacteria and 48 h for yeasts. Inhibition of the test microorganism was evidenced by the unchanged blue colour of resazurin. The MLC was defined as the concentration required to kill 99.9% or more of the original microbial population. At least three independent determinations were performed, and the results were presented as modal values.

3.7. Evaluation of Extracts Biocompatibility

The cytotoxicity of the extracts was evaluated using Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts (NHDF cells, ATCC PCS-201-012TM, Manassas, VA, USA), initially seeded in 96-well culture plates (100 µL) with 1 × 104 cells/well in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640, Gibco, Paisley, UK) supplemented with 10% FBS (PAN Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany) and 100 U/mL of penicillin G and 1 mg/mL of streptomycin, and grown with 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 24 h. Then, the culture medium was removed, and the cells were incubated with several concentrations of extracts for 24 h with RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS without antibiotics. Cells cultured with the well-established chemotherapy agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 500 µg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were used as a positive control, and those with only medium were used as a negative control. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) assay was used to evaluate cell metabolic function. For that, the medium was removed, and an RPMI solution with 0.5 mg/mL of MTT (100 µL in each well) was added to each sample. The plates were incubated in the same conditions for 3 h. Then, the pigmented formazan formed was dissolved with 100 µL of DMSO. Afterwards, the absorbance at 570 nm was read in a microplate spectrophotometer, Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA) xMark. Cells at passages 26–29 and 35–41 were used for experiments. At least three independent determinations were performed.

3.8. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis of the results was performed using the one-way ANOVA and Dunnett test using the GraphPad Prism v8.01 software, with a 95% confidence interval, considering the values of p < 0.05 as statistically significant.

4. Conclusions

The chemical analysis of the studied wild mountain plants from the Serra da Gardunha region revealed that flavonoids and phenolic acids are the predominant bioactive compounds in their extracts. Among the plants evaluated, Umbilicus rupestris, particularly its leaves, emerged as the most promising candidate for anti-inflammatory applications, exhibiting a notable IC50 value of 38.82 ± 2.72 µg/mL. In terms of antioxidant potential, Cistus salviifolius demonstrated strong free radical scavenging activity, while Umbilicus rupestris achieved the highest lipid peroxidation inhibition. The evaluation of antimicrobial properties highlighted Cistus salviifolius and Helichrysum stoechas as the most effective species, showing larger inhibition zones and lower minimum inhibitory concentrations against a range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as yeasts. Notably, H. stoechas exhibited an exceptionally low MIC of 0.008 mg/mL against Gram-positive bacteria, underscoring its potent antimicrobial capacity.
Overall, the extracts from these wild mountain plants demonstrated significant bioactive potential across anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial assays. These findings not only emphasise the value of C. salviifolius and H. stoechas as sources of novel bioactive compounds but also highlight the relevance of traditional medicinal plants in guiding pharmacological research. The study underscores the ecological and therapeutic importance of wild flora in the Serra da Gardunha and provides a strong foundation for future investigations into their chemical constituents and potential health applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30193876/s1, Table S1. Representative compounds identified in Cistus salviifolius extracts using UHPLC-timsTOF-MS, based on combined annotation by spectral library matching, in-house analyte list, and SmartFormula. Identification supported by accurate mass, retention time, and collisional cross section. Table S2. Representative compounds identified in Clinopodium vulgare extract. Table S3. Representative compounds identified in Coincya monensis extracts. Table S4. Representative compounds identified in Glandora prostrata extract. Table S5. Representative compounds identified in Helichrysum stoechas extract. Table S6. Representative compounds identified in Rubia peregrina extract. Table S7. Representative compounds identified in Umbilicus rupestris extracts. Table S8. Diameters of the inhibition halos (mm) in bacterial and yeast species are presented as mean ± standard deviation (at least three independent assays). Discs with a diameter of 6 mm were used. Figure S1. Base peak chromatogram (BPC) in positive ion mode of the analysed samples. Figure S2. Base peak chromatogram (BPC) in negative ion mode of the analysed samples.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Â.L., P.D.G., S.F. and A.P.D.; methodology, A.C., Â.L. and E.G.; formal analysis, A.C. and S.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.; writing—review and editing, A.C., Â.L., E.G., P.D.G., S.F. and A.P.D.; supervision, Â.L., S.F. and A.P.D.; funding acquisition, Â.L., P.D.G., S.F. and A.P.D.; project administration, P.D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is within the activities of the project “Montanha Viva-Sistema Previsional Inteligente de Suporte à Decisão em Sustentabilidade”, project PD21-00009, promoted by PROMOVE program funded by Fundação La Caixa and supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia and BPI. This work was developed within the scope of the CICS-UBI projects UIDB/00709/2020 and UIDP/00709/2020, financed by national funds through the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology/MCTES. Pedro Dinis Gaspar acknowledges the support of FCT-Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. and Centre for Mechanical and Aerospace Science and Technologies (C-MAST), under the project UIDB/00151/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00151/2020; https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/00151/2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the text.

Acknowledgments

Alexandra Coimbra is recipient of a research fellowship within the Research project titled “Montanha Viva-Sistema Previsional Inteligente de Suporte à Decisão em Sustentabilidade” (Ref. PD21-00009), funded by Fundação La Caixa. Authors would like to thank to the technicians from the Biotech Plant Lab of Beira Interior, Castelo Branco, Portugal for the identification and preparation of vouchers specimens of the plant species used in this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rahayu, Y.Y.S.; Araki, T.; Rosleine, D. Factors Affecting the Use of Herbal Medicines in the Universal Health Coverage System in Indonesia. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 260, 112974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, J.K.; Kim, K.H.; Shin, Y.C.; Jang, B.H.; Ko, S.G. Utilization of Traditional Medicine in Primary Health Care in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Health Policy Plan 2020, 35, 1070–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Olas, B.; Różański, W.; Urbańska, K.; Sławińska, N.; Bryś, M. New Light on Plants and Their Chemical Compounds Used in Polish Folk Medicine to Treat Urinary Diseases. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhou, P.; Hu, H.; Wu, X.; Feng, Z.; Li, X.; Tavakoli, S.; Wu, K.; Deng, L.; Luo, H. Botany, Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, Pharmacological Activities, and Toxicity of the Mangrove Plant Avicennia Marina: A Comprehensive Review. Phytochem. Rev. 2025, 74, 1061–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vazquez-Marquez, A.M.; Correa-Basurto, J.; Varela-Guerrero, V.; González-Pedroza, M.G.; Zepeda-Gómez, C.; Burrola-Aguilar, C.; Nieto-Trujillo, A.; Estrada-Zúñiga, M.E. Phytoremediation and Ethnomedicinal Potential of Buddleja, Eremophila, Scrophularia, and Verbascum Genera Belonging to the Scrophulariaceae Family: A Review. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2024, 10, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qin, Y.; Wang, N.; Pan, H.; Lei, X.; Li, X. Hellenia speciosa: A Comprehensive Review of Traditional Applications, Phytonutrients, Health Benefits and Safety. Food Chem. 2025, 465, 142003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yesilada, E. Scientific Evaluation of the Remedies Used in Turkish Folk Medicine to Treat Possible Viral Infections. Curr. Tradit. Med. 2022, 9, e271222212218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chrzanowska, E.; Denisow, B.; Ekiert, H.; Pietrzyk, Ł. Metabolites Obtained from Boraginaceae Plants as Potential Cosmetic Ingredients—A Review. Molecules 2024, 29, 5088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gautam, S.; Lapčík, L.; Lapčíková, B. Pharmacological Significance of Boraginaceae with Special Insights into Shikonin and Its Potential in the Food Industry. Foods 2024, 13, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Z.; Bai, J.; Zeng, Y.; Cai, M.; Yao, Y.; Wu, H.; You, L.; Dong, X.; Ni, J. Pharmacology, Toxicity and Pharmacokinetics of Acetylshikonin: A Review. Pharm. Biol. 2020, 58, 950–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cicio, A.; Serio, R.; Zizzo, M.G. Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Brassicaceae-Derived Phytochemicals: In Vitro and In Vivo Evidence for a Putative Role in the Prevention and Treatment of IBD. Nutrients 2023, 15, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mattosinhos, P.d.S.; Sarandy, M.M.; Novaes, R.D.; Esposito, D.; Gonçalves, R.V. Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Skin Regenerative Potential of Secondary Metabolites from Plants of the Brassicaceae Family: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Preclinical Evidence (Biological Activities Brassicaceae Skin Diseases). Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rahman, M.; Khatun, A.; Liu, L.; Barkla, B.J. Brassicaceae Mustards: Phytochemical Constituents, Pharmacological Effects, and Mechanisms of Action against Human Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, N.; Jing, P. Anthocyanins in Brassicaceae: Composition, Stability, Bioavailability, and Potential Health Benefits. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 2205–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bedoya, L.M.; Bermejo, P.; Abad, M.J. Anti-Infectious Activity in the Cistaceae Family in the Iberian Peninsula. Mini. Rev. Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tomou, E.M.; Lytra, K.; Rallis, S.; Tzakos, A.G.; Skaltsa, H. An Updated Review of Genus Cistus L. since 2014: Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, and Pharmacological Properties. Phytochem. Rev. 2022, 21, 2049–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Assis de Andrade, E.; Machinski, I.; Terso Ventura, A.C.; Barr, S.A.; Pereira, A.V.; Beltrame, F.L.; Strangman, W.K.; Williamson, R.T. A Review of the Popular Uses, Anatomical, Chemical, and Biological Aspects of Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae): A Genus of Plants Known as “Miracle Leaf”. Molecules 2023, 28, 5574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hassan, M.H.A.; Elwekeel, A.; Moawad, A.; Afifi, N.; Amin, E.; El Amir, D. Phytochemical Constituents and Biological Activity of Selected Genera of Family Crassulaceae: A Review. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 141, 383–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Salazar-Gómez, A.; Velo-Silvestre, A.A.; Alonso-Castro, A.J.; Hernández-Zimbrón, L.F. Medicinal Plants Used for Eye Conditions in Mexico—A Review. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Diab, F.; Zbeeb, H.; Baldini, F.; Portincasa, P.; Khalil, M.; Vergani, L. The Potential of Lamiaceae Herbs for Mitigation of Overweight, Obesity, and Fatty Liver: Studies and Perspectives. Molecules 2022, 27, 5043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Islam, A.K.M.M.; Suttiyut, T.; Anwar, M.P.; Juraimi, A.S.; Kato-Noguchi, H. Allelopathic Properties of Lamiaceae Species: Prospects and Challenges to Use in Agriculture. Plants 2022, 11, 1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kowalczyk, T.; Merecz-Sadowska, A.; Ghorbanpour, M.; Szemraj, J.; Piekarski, J.; Bijak, M.; Śliwiński, T.; Zajdel, R.; Sitarek, P. Enhanced Natural Strength: Lamiaceae Essential Oils and Nanotechnology in In Vitro and In Vivo Medical Research. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Michel, J.; Abd Rani, N.Z.; Husain, K. A Review on the Potential Use of Medicinal Plants From Asteraceae and Lamiaceae Plant Family in Cardiovascular Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ramos Da Silva, L.R.; Ferreira, O.O.; Cruz, J.N.; De Jesus Pereira Franco, C.; Oliveira Dos Anjos, T.; Cascaes, M.M.; Almeida Da Costa, W.; Helena De Aguiar Andrade, E.; Santana De Oliveira, M. Lamiaceae Essential Oils, Phytochemical Profile, Antioxidant, and Biological Activities. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 6748052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. González-Castelazo, F.; Soria-Jasso, L.E.; Torre-Villalvazo, I.; Cariño-Cortés, R.; Muñoz-Pérez, V.M.; Ortiz, M.I.; Fernández-Martínez, E. Plants of the Rubiaceae Family with Effect on Metabolic Syndrome: Constituents, Pharmacology, and Molecular Targets. Plants 2023, 12, 3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jaafar, A.; Zulkipli, M.A.; Mohd Hatta, F.H.; Jahidin, A.H.; Abdul Nasir, N.A.; Hazizul Hasan, M. Therapeutic Potentials of Iridoids Derived from Rubiaceae against In Vitro and In Vivo Inflammation: A Scoping Review. Saudi Pharm. J. 2024, 32, 101876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roy, D.; Brar, S.; Bhatia, R.; Rangra, N.K. An Insight into the Ethnopharmacological Importance of Indian Subcontinent Medicinal Plant Species of Rubiaceae Family. Adv. Tradit. Med. 2023, 24, 947–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Su, G.Y.; Chen, M.L.; Wang, K.W. Natural New Bioactive Anthraquinones from Rubiaceae. Mini Rev. Org. Chem. 2020, 17, 872–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pakpahan, O.P.; Moreira, L.; Camelo, A.; Karya, D.; Martins, A.C.; Gaspar, P.D.; Santo, C.E. Evaluation of Comparative Scenarios from Different Sites of Chestnut Production Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case Study in the Beira Interior Region of Portugal. Heliyon 2023, 9, e12847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carvalho, P.; Nogueira, A.J.A.; Soares, A.M.V.M.; Fonseca, C. Ranging Behaviour of Translocated Roe Deer in a Mediterranean Habitat: Seasonal and Altitudinal Influences on Home Range Size and Patterns of Range Use. Mammalia 2008, 72, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Teixeira, J.; Chaminé, H.I.; Carvalho, J.M.; Pérez-Alberti, A.; Rocha, F. Hydrogeomorphological Mapping as a Tool in Groundwater Exploration. J. Maps 2013, 9, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Silva, B.N.; Cadavez, V.; Ferreira-Santos, P.; Alves, M.J.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Barros, L.; Teixeira, J.A.; Gonzales-Barron, U. Chemical Profile and Bioactivities of Extracts from Edible Plants Readily Available in Portugal. Foods 2021, 10, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sytar, O.; Hemmerich, I.; Zivcak, M.; Rauh, C.; Brestic, M. Comparative Analysis of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds Composition from 26 Medicinal Plants. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Stefanovic, O.; Stankovic, M.S.; Comic, L. In Vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of Clinopodium vulgare L. Extracts and Their Synergistic Interaction with Antibiotics. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 4074–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Todorova, T.; Ventzislavov Bardarov, K.; Miteva, D.; Bardarov, V. DNA-Protective Activities of Clinopodium vulgare L. Extracts. Proc. Bulg. Acad. Sci. 2016, 69, 1019–1024. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nakilcioğlu-Taş, E.; Ötleş, S. Influence of Extraction Solvents on the Polyphenol Contents, Compositions, and Antioxidant Capacities of Fig (Ficus carica L.) Seeds. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2021, 93, e20190526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiang, Z.; Liu, L.; Xu, Z.; Kong, Q.; Feng, S.; Chen, T.; Zhou, L.; Yang, H.; Xiao, Y.; Ding, C. Solvent Effects on the Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity Associated with Camellia polyodonta Flower Extracts. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 27192–27203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tourabi, M.; Faiz, K.; Ezzouggari, R.; Louasté, B.; Merzouki, M.; Dauelbait, M.; Bourhia, M.; Almaary, K.S.; Siddique, F.; Lyoussi, B.; et al. Optimization of Extraction Process and Solvent Polarities to Enhance the Recovery of Phytochemical Compounds, Nutritional Content, and Biofunctional Properties of Mentha longifolia L. Extracts. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2025, 12, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mastino, P.M.; Marchetti, M.; Costa, J.; Juliano, C.; Usai, M. Analytical Profiling of Phenolic Compounds in Extracts of Three Cistus Species from Sardinia and Their Potential Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity. Chem. Biodivers 2021, 18, e2100053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mahmoudi, H.; Aouadhi, C.; Kaddour, R.; Gruber, M.; Zargouni, H.; Zaouali, W.; Ben Hamida, N.; Ben Nasri, M.; Ouerghi, Z.; Hosni, K. Comparison of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial activities of Two Cultivated Cistus Species from Tunisia. Biosci. J. 2016, 32, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hitl, M.; Bijelić, K.; Stilinović, N.; Božin, B.; Srđenović-Čonić, B.; Torović, L.; Kladar, N. Phytochemistry and Antihyperglycemic Potential of Cistus salviifolius L., Cistaceae. Molecules 2022, 27, 8003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Petrova, M.; Dimitrova, L.; Dimitrova, M.; Denev, P.; Teneva, D.; Georgieva, A.; Petkova-Kirova, P.; Lazarova, M.; Tasheva, K. Antitumor and Antioxidant Activities of In Vitro Cultivated and Wild-Growing Clinopodium vulgare L. Plants. Plants 2023, 12, 1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Azab, A.; Nassar, A.; Azab, A.N. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Natural Products. Molecules 2016, 21, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gunathilake, K.D.P.P.; Ranaweera, K.K.D.S.; Rupasinghe, H.P.V. In Vitro Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Selected Green Leafy Vegetables. Biomedicines 2018, 6, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Scherer, R.; Godoy, H.T. Antioxidant Activity Index (AAI) by the 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl Method. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 654–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Neves, J.M.; Matos, C.; Moutinho, C.; Queiroz, G.; Gomes, L.R. Ethnopharmacological Notes about Ancient Uses of Medicinal Plants in Trás-Os-Montes (Northern of Portugal). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 124, 270–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Novais, M.H.; Santos, I.; Mendes, S.; Pinto-Gomes, C. Studies on Pharmaceutical Ethnobotany in Arrabida Natural Park (Portugal). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 93, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Benhouda, A.; Benhouda, D.; Yahia, M. In Vivo Evaluation of Anticryptosporidiosis Activity of the Methanolic Extract of the Plant Umbilicus rupestris. Biodiversitas 2019, 20, 3478–3483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Benhouda, A.; Yahia, M. Toxicity and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Methanolic Extract of Umbilicus rupestris L. Leaves (Crassulaceae). Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci. 2015, 6, 395–408. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bremner, P.; Rivera, D.; Calzado, M.A.; Obón, C.; Inocencio, C.; Beckwith, C.; Fiebich, B.L.; Muñoz, E.; Heinrich, M. Assessing Medicinal Plants from South-Eastern Spain for Potential Anti-Inflammatory Effects Targeting Nuclear Factor-Kappa B and Other pro-Inflammatory Mediators. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 124, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hussain, M.S.; Azam, F.; Eldarrat, H.A.; Alkskas, I.; Mayoof, J.A.; Dammona, J.M.; Ismail, H.; Ali, M.; Arif, M.; Haque, A. Anti-Inflammatory, Analgesic and Molecular Docking Studies of Lanostanoic Acid 3-O-α-D-Glycopyranoside Isolated from Helichrysum stoechas. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 9196–9206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hussain, M.S.; Azam, F.; Ahmed Eldarrat, H.; Haque, A.; Khalid, M.; Zaheen Hassan, M.; Ali, M.; Arif, M.; Ahmad, I.; Zaman, G.; et al. Structural, Functional, Molecular, and Biological Evaluation of Novel Triterpenoids Isolated from Helichrysum stoechas (L.) Moench. Collected from Mediterranean Sea Bank: Misurata- Libya. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 103818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Recio, M.C.; Giner, R.; Terencio, M.C.; Sanz, M.J.; Rios, J.L. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Helichrysum stoechas. Planta Med. 1991, 57, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Noor, S.; Mohammad, T.; Rub, M.A.; Raza, A.; Azum, N.; Yadav, D.K.; Hassan, M.I.; Asiri, A.M. Biomedical Features and Therapeutic Potential of Rosmarinic Acid. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2022, 45, 205–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bansal, Y.; Sethi, P.; Bansal, G. Coumarin: A Potential Nucleus for Anti-Inflammatory Molecules. Med. Chem. Res. 2013, 22, 3049–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pavlíková, N. Caffeic Acid and Diseases—Mechanisms of Action. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Aijaz, M.; Keserwani, N.; Yusuf, M.; Ansari, N.H.; Ushal, R.; Kalia, P. Chemical, Biological, and Pharmacological Prospects of Caffeic Acid. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2023, 13, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Forouzanfar, F.; Sahranavard, T.; Tsatsakis, A.; Iranshahi, M.; Rezaee, R. Rutin: A Pain-Relieving Flavonoid. Inflammopharmacology 2025, 33, 1289–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ginwala, R.; Bhavsar, R.; Chigbu, D.G.I.; Jain, P.; Khan, Z.K. Potential Role of Flavonoids in Treating Chronic Inflammatory Diseases with a Special Focus on the Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Apigenin. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Proestos, C.; Lytoudi, K.; Mavromelanidou, O.K.; Zoumpoulakis, P.; Sinanoglou, V.J. Antioxidant Capacity of Selected Plant Extracts and Their Essential Oils. Antioxidants 2013, 2, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Krishnaiah, D.; Sarbatly, R.; Nithyanandam, R. A Review of the Antioxidant Potential of Medicinal Plant Species. Food Bioprod. Process. 2011, 89, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kasote, D.M.; Katyare, S.S.; Hegde, M.V.; Bae, H. Significance of Antioxidant Potential of Plants and Its Relevance to Therapeutic Applications. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 11, 982–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Amorati, R.; Valgimigli, L. Methods to Measure the Antioxidant Activity of Phytochemicals and Plant Extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 3324–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rebaya, A.; Belghith, S.I.; Cherif, J.K.; Trabelsi Ayadi, M. Total Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Potential of Rokrose (Cistus salviifolius) Leaves and Flowers Grown in Tunisia. Int. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. Res. 2016, 8, 327–331. [Google Scholar]
  65. Qa’dan, F.; Petereit, F.; Mansoor, K.; Nahrstedt, A. Antioxidant Oligomeric Proanthocyanidins from Cistus salvifolius. Nat. Prod. Res. 2006, 20, 1216–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. El Euch, S.K.; Cieśla, Ł.; Bouzouita, N. Free Radical Scavenging Fingerprints of Selected Aromatic and Medicinal Tunisian Plants Assessed by Means of TLC-DPPH Test and Image Processing. J. AOAC Int. 2014, 97, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Balkan, B.; Balkan, S.; Aydoğdu, H.; Güler, N.; Ersoy, H.; Aşkın, B. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activities and Antifungal Activity of Different Plants Species Against Pink Mold Rot-Causing Trichothecium roseum. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2017, 42, 2279–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Georgieva, L.; Mihaylova, D. Screening of Total Phenolic Content and Radical Scavenging Capacity of Bulgarian Plant Species. Int. Food Res. J. 2015, 22, 240–245. [Google Scholar]
  69. Nassar-Eddin, G.; Zheleva-Dimitrova, D.; Danchev, N.; Vitanska-Simeonova, R. Antioxidant and Enzyme-Inhibiting Activity of Lyophilized Extract from Clinopodium vulgare L. (Lamiaceae). Pharmacia 2021, 68, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sarikurkcu, C.; Ozer, M.S.; Tepe, B.; Dilek, E.; Ceylan, O. Phenolic Composition, Antioxidant and Enzyme Inhibitory Activities of Acetone, Methanol and Water Extracts of Clinopodium vulgare L. Subsp. Vulgare L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 76, 961–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Iyda, J.H.; Fernandes, Â.; Calhelha, R.C.; Alves, M.J.; Ferreira, F.D.; Barros, L.; Amaral, J.S.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Nutritional Composition and Bioactivity of Umbilicus rupestris (Salisb.) Dandy: An Underexploited Edible Wild Plant. Food Chem. 2019, 295, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, W.; Le, T.; Wang, W.W.; Yin, J.F.; Jiang, H.Y. The Effects of Structure and Oxidative Polymerization on Antioxidant Activity of Catechins and Polymers. Foods 2023, 12, 4207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, W.; Yue, R.F.; Jin, Z.; He, L.M.; Shen, R.; Du, D.; Tang, Y.Z. Efficiency Comparison of Apigenin-7-O-Glucoside and Trolox in Antioxidative Stress and Anti-Inflammatory Properties. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2020, 72, 1645–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Álvarez-Martínez, F.J.; Barrajón-Catalán, E.; Herranz-López, M.; Micol, V. Antibacterial Plant Compounds, Extracts and Essential Oils: An Updated Review on Their Effects and Putative Mechanisms of Action. Phytomedicine 2021, 90, 153626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Angelini, P. Plant-Derived Antimicrobials and Their Crucial Role in Combating Antimicrobial Resistance. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Oulahal, N.; Degraeve, P. Phenolic-Rich Plant Extracts With Antimicrobial Activity: An Alternative to Food Preservatives and Biocides? Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 753518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Salam, M.A.; Al-Amin, M.Y.; Salam, M.T.; Pawar, J.S.; Akhter, N.; Rabaan, A.A.; Alqumber, M.A.A. Antimicrobial Resistance: A Growing Serious Threat for Global Public Health. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zouine, N.; El Ghachtouli, N.; El Abed, S.; Koraichi, S.I. A Comprehensive Review on Medicinal Plant Extracts as Antibacterial Agents: Factors, Mechanism Insights and Future Prospects. Sci. Afr. 2024, 26, e02395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sánchez-Hernández, E.; Álvarez-Martínez, J.; González-García, V.; Casanova-Gascón, J.; Martín-Gil, J.; Martín-Ramos, P. Helichrysum stoechas (L.) Moench Inflorescence Extract for Tomato Disease Management. Molecules 2023, 28, 5861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kutluk, I.; Aslan, M.; Orhan, I.E.; Özçelik, B. Antibacterial, Antifungal and Antiviral Bioactivities of Selected Helichrysum Species. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018, 119, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Albayrak, S.; Aksoy, A.; Sagdic, O.; Hamzaoglu, E. Compositions, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Helichrysum (Asteraceae) Species Collected from Turkey. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bogdadi, H.A.A.; Kokoska, L.; Havlik, J.; Kloucek, P.; Rada, V.; Vorisek, K. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Some Libyan Medicinal Plant Extracts. Pharm. Biol. 2007, 45, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bayoub, K.; Baibai, T.; Mountassif, D.; Retmane, A.; Soukri, A. Antibacterial Activities of the Crude Ethanol Extracts of Medicinal Plants against Listeria monocytogenes and Some Other Pathogenic Strains. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 4251–4258. [Google Scholar]
  84. Zalegh, I.; Bourhia, M.; Zerouali, K.; Katfy, K.; Nayme, K.; Khallouki, F.; Benzaarate, I.; Mohammad Salamatullah, A.; Alzahrani, A.; Nafidi, H.A.; et al. Molecular Characterization of Gene-Mediated Resistance and Susceptibility of ESKAPE Clinical Isolates to Cistus monspeliensis L. and Cistus salviifolius L. Extracts. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 7467279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Alam, M.; Ahmed, S.; Elasbali, A.M.; Adnan, M.; Alam, S.; Hassan, M.I.; Pasupuleti, V.R. Therapeutic Implications of Caffeic Acid in Cancer and Neurological Diseases. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 860508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Khan, F.; Bamunuarachchi, N.I.; Tabassum, N.; Kim, Y.M. Caffeic Acid and Its Derivatives: Antimicrobial Drugs toward Microbial Pathogens. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 2979–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Barroso, M.R.; Barros, L.; Dueñas, M.; Carvalho, A.M.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Fernandes, I.P.; Barreiro, M.F.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Exploring the Antioxidant Potential of Helichrysum stoechas (L.) Moench Phenolic Compounds for Cosmetic Applications: Chemical Characterization, Microencapsulation and Incorporation into a Moisturizer. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 53, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kherbache, A.; Senator, A.; Laouicha, S.; Al-Zoubi, R.M.; Bouriche, H. Phytochemical Analysis, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Helichrysum stoechas (L.) Moench Extracts. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 101826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Carev, I.; Maravić, A.; Ilić, N.; Čulić, V.Č.; Politeo, O.; Zorić, Z.; Radan, M. UPLC-MS/MS Phytochemical Analysis of Two Croatian Cistus Species and Their Biological Activity. Life 2020, 10, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gürbüz, P.; Demirezer, L.Ö.; Güvenalp, Z.; Kuruüzüm-Uz, A.; Kazaz, C. Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Uncommon Secondary Metabolites from Cistus salviifolius L. Nat. Prod. 2015, 9, 175–183. [Google Scholar]
  91. Jin, S.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L. Kaempferol, a Potential Neuroprotective Agent in Neurodegenerative Diseases: From Chemistry to Medicine. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 165, 115215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Imran, M.; Salehi, B.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Gondal, T.A.; Saeed, F.; Imran, A.; Shahbaz, M.; Fokou, P.V.T.; Arshad, M.U.; Khan, H.; et al. Kaempferol: A Key Emphasis to Its Anticancer Potential. Molecules 2019, 24, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Periferakis, A.; Periferakis, K.; Badarau, I.A.; Petran, E.M.; Popa, D.C.; Caruntu, A.; Costache, R.S.; Scheau, C.; Caruntu, C.; Costache, D.O. Kaempferol: Antimicrobial Properties, Sources, Clinical, and Traditional Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bangar, S.P.; Chaudhary, V.; Sharma, N.; Bansal, V.; Ozogul, F.; Lorenzo, J.M. Kaempferol: A Flavonoid with Wider Biological Activities and Its Applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 9580–9604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liu, M.-H.; Otsuka, N.; Noyori, K.; Shiota, S.; Ogawa, W.; Kuroda, T.; Hatano, T.; Tsuchiya, T. Synergistic Effect of Kaempferol Glycosides Purified from Laurus nobilis and Fluoroquinolones on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 32, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Huang, Y.H.; Huang, C.C.; Chen, C.C.; Yang, K.J.; Huang, C.Y. Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus PriA Helicase by Flavonol Kaempferol. Protein J. 2015, 34, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Fiamegos, Y.C.; Kastritis, P.L.; Exarchou, V.; Han, H.; Bonvin, A.M.J.J.; Vervoort, J.; Lewis, K.; Hamblin, M.R.; Tegos, G.P. Antimicrobial and Efflux Pump Inhibitory Activity of Caffeoylquinic Acids from Artemisia absinthium against Gram-Positive Pathogenic Bacteria. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Chen, X.; Yi, L.K.; Bai, Y.B.; Cao, M.Z.; Wang, W.W.; Shang, Z.X.; Li, J.J.; Xu, M.L.; Wu, L.F.; Zhu, Z.; et al. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Stevia Extract against Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia coli by Interfering with the Permeability of the Cell Wall and the Membrane. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1397906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lobiuc, A.; Pavăl, N.E.; Mangalagiu, I.I.; Gheorghiță, R.; Teliban, G.C.; Amăriucăi-Mantu, D.; Stoleru, V. Future Antimicrobials: Natural and Functionalized Phenolics. Molecules 2023, 28, 1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tian, J.; Fu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, X.; Xu, D.; Mao, Z.; Liu, Y.; Lai, D.; Zhou, L. Dibenzo-α-Pyrones from the Endophytic Fungus Alternaria sp. Samif01: Isolation, Structure Elucidation, and Their Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bullitta, S.; Piluzza, G.; Manunta, M.D.I. Cell-Based and Chemical Assays of the Ability to Modulate the Production of Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species of Eleven Mediterranean Plant Species Related to Ethnobotanic Traditions. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2013, 60, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Luís, A.; Neiva, D.; Pereira, H.; Gominho, J.; Domingues, F.; Duarte, A.P. Stumps of Eucalyptus globulus as a Source of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Polyphenols. Molecules 2014, 19, 16428–16446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Gonçalves, J.; Luís, Â.; Gradillas, A.; García, A.; Restolho, J.; Fernández, N.; Domingues, F.; Gallardo, E.; Duarte, A.P. Ayahuasca Beverages: Phytochemical Analysis and Biological Properties. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Coimbra, A.T.; Luís, Â.F.S.; Batista, M.T.; Ferreira, S.M.P.; Duarte, A.P.C. Phytochemical Characterization, Bioactivities Evaluation and Synergistic Effect of Arbutus unedo and Crataegus monogyna Extracts with Amphotericin B. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 2143–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Coimbra, A.; Miguel, S.; Ribeiro, M.; Coutinho, P.; Silva, L.A.; Ferreira, S.; Duarte, A.P. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities of Six Commercial Essential Oils. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 76, ovac042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Biocompatibility of extracts for normal human dermal fibroblast (NHDF) cell line measured by MTT assay after 24 h of treatment. Negative control (NC) was performed using untreated cells and cells cultured with Fluorouracil (5-FU, 500 µg/mL) were used as positive control (PC). Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. The statistical analysis of the results was performed using the one-way ANOVA and Dunnett test, considering the values of p < 0.05 as statistically significant. * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); **** (p < 0.0001).
Figure 1. Biocompatibility of extracts for normal human dermal fibroblast (NHDF) cell line measured by MTT assay after 24 h of treatment. Negative control (NC) was performed using untreated cells and cells cultured with Fluorouracil (5-FU, 500 µg/mL) were used as positive control (PC). Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. The statistical analysis of the results was performed using the one-way ANOVA and Dunnett test, considering the values of p < 0.05 as statistically significant. * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); **** (p < 0.0001).
Molecules 30 03876 g001
Figure 2. Photos of the plants collected in the Gardunha Mountain. Coincya monensis (A), Cistus salviifolius (B), Clinopodium vulgare (C), Glandora prostrata (D), Helichrysum stoechas (E), Rubia peregrina (F), Umbilicus rupestris (G).
Figure 2. Photos of the plants collected in the Gardunha Mountain. Coincya monensis (A), Cistus salviifolius (B), Clinopodium vulgare (C), Glandora prostrata (D), Helichrysum stoechas (E), Rubia peregrina (F), Umbilicus rupestris (G).
Molecules 30 03876 g002
Table 1. Extraction yield and total phenolic and flavonoid contents in extracts. The results were expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents per gram of extract (mg GAE/g extract) and mg of quercetin equivalents per gram of extract (mg QE/g extract), respectively, as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Table 1. Extraction yield and total phenolic and flavonoid contents in extracts. The results were expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents per gram of extract (mg GAE/g extract) and mg of quercetin equivalents per gram of extract (mg QE/g extract), respectively, as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
ExtractsExtraction Yield
(%)
Total Phenolic Content
(mg GAE/g Extract)
Flavonoid Content
(mg QE/g Extract)
CMF38.956.60 ± 0.2415.97 ± 0.79
CMS7.6812.88 ± 0.8414.11 ± 0.7
CSAP3.4866.43 ± 1.4531.69 ± 1.16
CSS5.6362.10 ± 2.9615.16 ± 0.86
CV6.2364.77 ± 4.0419.07 ± 0.61
GP5.9886.88 ± 3.4718.50 ± 0.7
HS4.2857.88 ± 3.0250.62 ± 1.51
RP19.3024.21 ± 1.1715.53 ± 0.51
URF16.5048.43 ± 4.005.16 ± 0.68
URL23.6010.43 ± 1.156.57 ± 0.32
Table 2. Results of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity of extracts and standards (results expressed as mean ± standard deviation, n = 3). The statistical analysis of the results was performed using the one-way ANOVA and Dunnett test, considering the values of p < 0.05 as statistically significant.
Table 2. Results of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity of extracts and standards (results expressed as mean ± standard deviation, n = 3). The statistical analysis of the results was performed using the one-way ANOVA and Dunnett test, considering the values of p < 0.05 as statistically significant.
Anti-Inflammatory
Activity *
(µg/mL)
Antioxidant Activity
DPPH Methodβ-Carotene Bleaching Assay
SamplesIC50
(µg/mL)
AAI *Antioxidant Activity ClassificationIC50 *
(µg/mL)
CMF371.93 ± 1.55279.74 ± 57.570.21 ± 0.04Poor721.55 ± 9.03
CMS402.71 ± 6.04307.49 ± 57.570.20 ± 0.09Poor608.89 ± 9.39
CSAP745.34 ± 31.9619.18 ± 5.432.93 ± 0.12Very strong466.4 ± 10.71
CSS700.42 ± 14.8720.72 ± 5.732.84 ± 0.28Very strong342.82 ± 10.03
CV309.25 ± 6.8524.57 ± 7.522.32 ± 0.02Very strong696.49 ± 25.80
GP276.31 ± 8.0825.56 ± 7.802.21 ± 0.03Very strong352.72 ± 13.39
HS51.75 ± 3.7667.83 ± 18.870.83 ± 0.04Moderate433.09 ± 20.56
RP304.11 ± 4.91126.09 ± 78.590.55 ± 0.12Moderate621.47 ± 20.85
URF54.79 ± 2.3569.02 ± 25.720.81 ± 0.04Moderate335.57 ± 6.76
URL38.82 ± 2.72945.01 ± 393.370.29 ± 0.11No activity505.96 ± 16.77
Acetylsalicylic acid4.20 ± 1.41----
Gallic acid-3.92 ± 1.2613.00 ± 0.67Very strong-
BHT----99.63 ± 10.76
* Statistical differences (p < 0.0001) were observed for all extracts in relation to the control, with the exception of the HS, URF and URL extracts in the anti-inflammatory assay, where no statistical difference was observed. AAI—Antioxidant activity index; BHT—Butylated Hydroxytoluene. The antioxidant activity of the samples was classified as: poor (AAI < 0.5), moderate (0.5 ≤ AAI < 1.0), strong (1.0 ≤ AAI < 2.0) or very strong (AAI ≥ 2.0) accordingly to Scherer and Godoy [45].
Table 3. Diameters of the inhibition halos (mm) in bacterial and yeast species are presented as mean ± standard deviation (at least three independent assays). Discs with a diameter of 6 mm were used.
Table 3. Diameters of the inhibition halos (mm) in bacterial and yeast species are presented as mean ± standard deviation (at least three independent assays). Discs with a diameter of 6 mm were used.
Inhibition Zone (10 µL/Disc)
SpeciesCSAPCSSGPHS
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 2592312.67 ± 0.7811.72 ± 0.43-24.03 ± 2.21
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA 05/1510.05 ± 0.7810.77 ± 0.03-22.95 ± 0.92
Bacillus cereus ATCC 117788.52 ± 0.839.99 ± 0.42-21.01 ± 1.27
Listeria monocytogenes LMG 1677910.55 ± 0.3311.23 ± 0.57-28.91 ± 1.36
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922----
Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 138838.39 ± 1.249.49 ± 0.438.63 ± 1.328.71 ± 2.18
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853----
Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 13311----
Acinetobacter baumannii AcB 13/109.13 ± 0.117.67 ± 0.73-6.52 ± 0.75
Acinetobacter baumannii LMG 10259.11 ± 0.578.73 ± 0.53-6.3 ± 0.61
Candida albicans ATCC 90028---7.53 ± 2.64
Candida tropicalis ATCC 750----
“-“ No activity
Table 4. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, mg/mL) and minimum lethal concentration (MLC, mg/mL) of extracts on bacterial and yeast species presented as modal values.
Table 4. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, mg/mL) and minimum lethal concentration (MLC, mg/mL) of extracts on bacterial and yeast species presented as modal values.
MIC (MLC)
SpeciesCMFCMSCSAPCSSCVGPHSRPURFURLTETAMP B
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923>2>20.5 (2)0.5 (2)>220.008 (0.03)>2>2>21-
Staphylococcus aureus MRSA 05/15>2>20.25 (2)0.5>2>20.008 (0.03)>2>2>20.25-
Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778>2>20.250.5>2>20.008 (0.25)>2>2>20.06-
Listeria monocytogenes LMG 16779>2>20.5 (2)1>2>20.008 (0.125)>2>2>20.25-
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922>2>2>2>2>2>2>2>2>2>22-
Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883>2>21 12 (2)1 (1)2 (2)>2>224-
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853>2>2>2>2>2>2>2>2>2>216-
Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 13311>2>2>2>2>2>2>2>2>2>24-
Acinetobacter baumannii AcB 13/10>2>222 (2)>2>22>2>2>2512-
Acinetobacter baumannii LMG 1025>2>211 (1)>2>22 (2)>2>2>24-
Candida albicans ATCC 90028>2>20.03 (2)0.016>2>20.5 (2)>20.03>2-0.5
Candida tropicalis ATCC 750>2>20.25 (0.5)0.25 (1)1 (1)1 (2)0.5 (1)>20.25 (1)>2-1
When no MLC value is reported, it indicates that the value is greater than 2 mg/mL. TET—tetracycline (μg/mL); AMP B—amphotericin B (μg/mL).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Coimbra, A.; Gallardo, E.; Luís, Â.; Gaspar, P.D.; Ferreira, S.; Duarte, A.P. Bioactive Potential of Wild Plants from Gardunha Mountain: Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities. Molecules 2025, 30, 3876. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30193876

AMA Style

Coimbra A, Gallardo E, Luís Â, Gaspar PD, Ferreira S, Duarte AP. Bioactive Potential of Wild Plants from Gardunha Mountain: Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities. Molecules. 2025; 30(19):3876. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30193876

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coimbra, Alexandra, Eugenia Gallardo, Ângelo Luís, Pedro Dinis Gaspar, Susana Ferreira, and Ana Paula Duarte. 2025. "Bioactive Potential of Wild Plants from Gardunha Mountain: Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities" Molecules 30, no. 19: 3876. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30193876

APA Style

Coimbra, A., Gallardo, E., Luís, Â., Gaspar, P. D., Ferreira, S., & Duarte, A. P. (2025). Bioactive Potential of Wild Plants from Gardunha Mountain: Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities. Molecules, 30(19), 3876. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30193876

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop