Next Article in Journal
A Novel Glucosamine-Based Cannabidiol Complex Based on Intermolecular Bonding with Improved Water Solubility
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Proteomics Identified Proteins in Mung Bean Sprouts Under Different Concentrations of Urea
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential Use of Cefiderocol and Nanosilver in Wound Dressings to Control Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Extraction Methods of Microplastics in Environmental Matrices: A Comparative Review

by
Garbiñe Larrea
1,2,*,
David Elustondo
1,2 and
Adrián Durán
1,2,*
1
BIOMA Institute for Biodiversity and the Environment, University of Navarra, Irunlarrea 1, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
2
School of Sciences, Department of Chemistry, University of Navarra, Irunlarrea 1, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(15), 3178; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30153178
Submission received: 26 June 2025 / Revised: 21 July 2025 / Accepted: 25 July 2025 / Published: 29 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Chemistry in Europe)

Abstract

Due to the growing issue of plastic pollution over recent decades, it is essential to establish well-defined and appropriate methodologies for their extraction from diverse environmental samples. These particles can be found in complex agricultural matrices such as compost, sediments, agricultural soils, sludge, and wastewater, as well as in less complex samples like tap and bottled water. The general steps of MPs extraction typically include drying the sample, sieving to remove larger particles, removal of organic matter, density separation to isolate polymers, filtration using meshes of various sizes, oven drying of the filters, and polymer identification. Complex matrices with high organic matter content require specific removal steps. Most studies employ an initial drying process with temperature control to prevent polymer damage. For removal of organic matter, 30% H2O2 is the most commonly used reagent, and for density separation, saturated NaCl and ZnCl2 solutions are typically applied for low- and high-density polymers, respectively. Finally, filtration is carried out using meshes selected according to the identification technique. This review analyzes the advantages and limitations of the different methodologies to extract microplastics from different sources, aiming to provide in-depth insight for researchers dedicated to the study of environmental samples.
Keywords: environmental matrices; microplastics; extraction; organic matter; density separation environmental matrices; microplastics; extraction; organic matter; density separation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Larrea, G.; Elustondo, D.; Durán, A. Extraction Methods of Microplastics in Environmental Matrices: A Comparative Review. Molecules 2025, 30, 3178. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30153178

AMA Style

Larrea G, Elustondo D, Durán A. Extraction Methods of Microplastics in Environmental Matrices: A Comparative Review. Molecules. 2025; 30(15):3178. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30153178

Chicago/Turabian Style

Larrea, Garbiñe, David Elustondo, and Adrián Durán. 2025. "Extraction Methods of Microplastics in Environmental Matrices: A Comparative Review" Molecules 30, no. 15: 3178. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30153178

APA Style

Larrea, G., Elustondo, D., & Durán, A. (2025). Extraction Methods of Microplastics in Environmental Matrices: A Comparative Review. Molecules, 30(15), 3178. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30153178

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop