Next Article in Journal
Dry Reforming of Methane over Pyrochlore-Type La2Ce2O7-Supported Ni Catalyst: Effect of Particle Size of Support
Next Article in Special Issue
Theoretical Study of p-Block Metal Single-Atom-Loaded Carbon Nitride Catalyst for Photocatalytic Water Splitting
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization and Flame-Retardant Properties of Cobalt-Coordinated Cyclic Phosphonitrile in Thermoplastic Polyurethane Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Study of Al2O3 Mechanical Behavior Using Density Functional Theory and Molecular Dynamics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 8
10.3390/molecules29081870
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Revealing the Critical Role of Global Electron Density Transfer in the Reaction Rate of Polar Organic Reactions within Molecular Electron Density Theory

by
Luis R. Domingo
* and
Mar Ríos-Gutiérrez
*
Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Valencia, Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(8), 1870; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081870
Submission received: 27 March 2024 / Revised: 16 April 2024 / Accepted: 17 April 2024 / Published: 19 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Computational and Theoretical Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The critical role of global electron density transfer (GEDT) in increasing the reaction rate of polar organic reactions has been studied within the framework of Molecular Electron Density Theory (MEDT). To this end, the series of the polar Diels–Alder (P-DA) reactions of cyclopentadiene with cyanoethylene derivatives, for which experimental kinetic data are available, have been chosen. A complete linear correlation between the computed activation Gibbs free energies and the GEDT taking place at the polar transition state structures (TSs) is found; the higher the GEDT at the TS, the lower the activation Gibbs free energy. An interacting quantum atoms energy partitioning analysis allows for establishing a complete linear correlation between the electronic stabilization of the electrophilic ethylene frameworks and the GEDT taking place at the polar TSs. This finding supports Parr’s proposal for the definition of the electrophilicity ω index. The present MEDT study establishes the critical role of the GEDT in the acceleration of polar reactions, since the electronic stabilization of the electrophilic framework with the electron density gain is greater than the destabilization of the nucleophilic one, making a net favorable electronic contribution to the decrease in the activation energy.

1. Introduction

One of the most useful classifications of organic reactions is into non-polar and polar reactions. While non-polar reactions are experienced mainly by hydrocarbons, most polar reactions are characteristic of organic molecules presenting carbon-heteroatom functional groups. Unsaturated hydrocarbon compounds also experience polar reactions when they are adequately substituted by electron-withdrawing or electron-releasing groups. The polar character determines the rate of an organic reaction; while non-polar reactions have high activation energies, in general the more polar, the faster the reaction.
The idea of polar reactions in organic chemistry was introduced at the beginning of the last century. The introduction of the terms ‘nucleophile’ and ‘electrophile’ as chemists use them today is officially attributed to C. K. Ingold [1], who replaced the terms ‘anionoid’ and ‘cationoid’ proposed earlier by A. J. Lapworth in 1925 [2]. The nucleophilicity and electrophilicity concepts were further extended to reactions, and thus there are now so-known electrophilic and nucleophilic attacks, additions, substitutions, etc. [3].
From a theoretical point of view, the implementation in 1999 of the Parr’s electrophilicity ω index [4] within conceptual DFT [5,6] was a breakthrough in the theoretical understanding of polar reactions. Thus, in 2002, in an attempt to classify the Diels–Alder (DA) reactions within the polar organic reactions, the first scale of the Parr’s electrophilicity ω index of organic molecules was established, allowing to explain the substituent effects on the diene and the ethylene in the reaction rate [7]. The polar reactivity model of DA reactions was extended to [2+2], [3+2], [5+2], and so on, cycloaddition reactions. After the study of many organic reactions, the empirical nucleophilicity N index was proposed in 2008 [8] which, together with the electrophilicity ω index, have become powerful tools to study the polar reactivity in organic chemistry [9].
In 1964, Sauer et al. [10] experimentally reported the reactivity of Cp 1 with the cyanoethylene series 2 in DA reactions (see Scheme 1). The reported experimental reaction rate constants have been used in organic chemistry textbooks to show how the electron-withdrawing substitution on ethylene increases the reaction rates of DA reactions (see Table 1) [11].
The Sauer’s DA reactions of the cyanoethylene series have been theoretically studied [11,12]. A very good linear correlation between the global electron density transfer [13] (GEDT) taking place at the transition state structures (TSs) [11] and the logarithm of the experimental reaction rate constants [10] was established for the first time in 2009 [14], indicating that the GEDT could be one of the key factors in the activation energy (see Figure 1).
After many theoretical studies of experimental DA reactions, a very good linear correlation between the activation energies of DA reactions and the GEDT taking place at the TSs was recognized in 2009, thus establishing the general mechanism of polar Diels–Alder (P-DA) reactions [14], which are controlled by the nucleophilic and electrophilic interactions taking place at the TSs. In polar reactions, the increase in GEDT at the TSs causes a decrease in the activation energies, increasing the reaction rates [11,14]. This behavior has been found in many polar organic reactions such as [2+2] and [3+2] cycloaddition reactions, Lewis acid-catalyzed DA reactions, higher-order cycloaddition reactions, Michael reactions, Wittig reactions, and electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions.
In 2017, a comparative electron localization function [15] (ELF) and Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules [16,17] (QTAIM) topological analysis of the TSs of the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and with tetracyanoethylene 4CN [18] showed that in the polar reaction involving 4CN, the GEDT favors the bonding changes on the reagents demanded for the formation of the new C–C single bonds [13], allowing the TS to occur earlier [18]. However, the effects of the GEDT in the reduction in the activation energies could not be established.
In 2016, Domingo proposed the Molecular Electron Density Theory [19] (MEDT) for the study of chemical organic reactivity. MEDT establishes that changes in electron density along a reaction, and not molecular orbital interactions, are responsible for chemical reactivity. Accordingly, MEDT rejects any model based on molecular orbital analyses, such as the Frontier Molecular Orbital theory [20] and Morokuma-based energy decomposition schemes [21,22], all of which were developed in the last century.
In 2005, Blanco et al. developed a parameter-free and reference-free energy decomposition scheme based on QTAIM, called interacting quantum atoms [23] (IQA). IQA divides the total energy of a system into intra- and inter-atomic contributions, each of a different nature, which are related to chemical concepts of bonding. IQA analysis has very recently been used in MEDT studies of [3+2] cycloaddition reactions [24] and P-DA reactions [25].
Due to the relevance of the GEDT taking place at the TSs of polar reactions in organic chemistry [11], an MEDT/IQA study of the P-DA reactions of Cp 1 with the Sauer’s cyanoethylene series 2, as models of polar organic reactions, is herein performed in order to definitively establish the critical role of GEDT in the acceleration in polar processes both qualitatively and quantitatively. To this end, an IQA energy partitioning analysis at the TSs and reagents is carried out. The conclusions of this study can be extrapolated to any organic polar reaction.

2. Results and Discussion

This section has been divided in the following subsections: (i) first, the DFT-based reactivity indices of the reagents are analyzed; (ii) next, kinetic, thermodynamic, and geometrical parameters associated with the P-DA reactions of Cp 1 with the cyanoethylene series 2 are discussed, along with some correlations involving electrophilicities and GEDT values; and finally, (iii) a density-based IQA energy partitioning analysis is performed in order to establish, both quantitatively and qualitatively, the role of GEDT in increasing the reaction rates with the cyano substitution on the ethylene. Except for kinetic and thermodynamic data, which are analyzed in dioxane for comparison with the experiment, all other analyses are discussed in vacuo for coherence with the IQA analysis, which does not yet support the implicit effect of solvent in atomic integrations (see the Computational Details in Supplementary Materials).

2.1. Analysis of the Reactivity Indices at the Ground State of the Reagents

The reactivity indices [5,6] for Cp 1 and the cyanoethylene series 2 computed at the ground state are gathered in Table 2. Computational details are given in Supplementary Materials. The B3LYP/6-31G(d) computational method was used because the original reactivity scales were established at that level [5,6]. Analysis of the electronic chemical potentials [26] μ of the regents allows for establishing of the polar character of an organic reaction, as well as the unambiguous establishment of the direction of the flux of the electron density, which enables the classification of polar reactions [27,28]. The electronic chemical potential μ of Cp 1, −3.01 eV, is above those of the cyanoethylene series 2, between −4.70 (1CN) and −7.04 (4CN) eV, indicating that in these polar reactions the electron density will flux from Cp 1 towards these cyanoethylenes, being classified as P-DA reactions of forward electron density flux [27,28].
Cp 1 presents an electrophilicity ω index [4] of 0.83 eV and a nucleophilicity N index [8] of 3.37 eV, being classified as a moderate electrophile and a strong nucleophile. Consequently, Cp 1 will participate in P-DA reactions only as a good nucleophile. On the other hand, ethylene 4 presents an electrophilicity ω index of 0.73 eV and a nucleophilicity N index of 1.87 eV, being classified as a marginal electrophile and a marginal nucleophile. Consequently, ethylene 4 will never participate in a P-DA reaction. The non-polar Diels–Alder (N-DA) reaction of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 is classified within MEDT as a null electron density flux reaction [28].
The electrophilicity ω index of cyanoethylene series 2 ranges from 1.74 eV (1CN) to 5.95 eV (4CN), while the nucleophilicity N index ranges from 1.25 eV (1CN) to 0.00 eV (4CN). Note that the nucleophilicity N index for 4CN is exactly 0.00 eV because this molecule was chosen as the reference for the empirical nucleophilicity N scale [6,9]. Thus, while 1CN is located on the borderline between moderate electrophiles, the other cyanoethylenes are clearly classified as strong electrophiles; note that the tri- and tetracyanoethylenes 3CN and 4CN, with ω > 4.0 eV, are classified as superelectrophiles, a behavior that accounts for their high reactivity in polar processes [9] (see Table 1). On the other hand, all cyanoethylenes are classified as marginal nucleophiles. Consequently, this cyanoethylene series will participate towards Cp 1 in P-DA reactions of forward electron density flux [27,28]. Both electrophilic and nucleophilic properties of this series vary with the number of cyano groups on the ethylene.
Along a polar cycloaddition reaction involving non-symmetric species such as 1CN, 2CN or 3CN, the most favorable reaction path involves the two-center interaction with the most electrophilic center of these cyanoethylenes [11]. In this sense, the analysis of the electrophilic P k + Parr functions [29] of the cyanoethylene series is a valuable tool to characterize the most electrophilic center of these molecules (see Figure 2 and Table 3).
Analysis of the electrophilic P k + Parr functions at the C1 and C2 carbons of the cyanoethylene series 2 indicates that the two ethylene carbons gather more than 60% of the total amount of spin density in these molecules; i.e., the two carbons will accumulate more than 60% of the electron density transferred to these ethylene derivatives via the GEDT in these P-DA reactions. As expected, the symmetrically substituted ethylenes 2cCN, 2tCN, and 4CN present identical electrophilic P k + Parr functions at the two carbons, while the non-symmetrically substituted 1CN, 2CN, and 3CN present a non-symmetrical electrophilic activation; in the three cases, the less-substituted carbon present the higher electrophilic P k + Parr function (see Table 3).
Analysis of the local electrophilicity ωk indices [30] at the C1 and C2 carbons of these cyanoethylenes allows for obtaining some appealing conclusions (see Table 3): (i) while the symmetrically substituted ethylenes 2cCN, 2tCN and 4CN present identical electrophilic activation at the two ethylene carbons, predicting synchronous TSs, the non-symmetrically substituted 1CN, 2CN and 3CN present different electrophilic activation, predicting asynchronous TSs [11]; (ii) at the non-symmetrically substituted 1CN, 2CN and 3CN cyanoethylenes, the less-substituted C1 carbon presents the higher electrophilic activation, indicating that this carbon will be the preferred center to participate in the two-center interaction with the C6 carbon of the nucleophilic Cp 1 [11]; and finally, (iii) the local electrophilicity at the C1 carbon of 2CN, ωk = 2.28 eV, is higher than that at the C1 carbon of 3CN, ωk = 2.03 eV, despite the more electrophilic character of 3CN than 2CN. Note that the two C1 and C2 carbons of the symmetrically substituted 2cCN and 2tCN are electrophilically activated by ca. ωk = 1.0 eV, for each one.

2.2. Study of the P-DA Reactions of Cp 1 with the Cyanoethylene Series 2

For the non-symmetrically substituted cyanoethylenes 1CN, 2CN, and 3CN, two stereoisomeric reaction paths are feasible; only the endo approach mode was studied herein (see Scheme 1). A detailed analysis of the potential energy surfaces is found in [11]. The M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) relative Gibbs free energies of TSs and CAs in dioxane are given in Table 4, while complete thermodynamic data are given in Table S3 in Supplementary Materials.
The activation Gibbs free energies range from 25.9 (TS-1CN) to 12.7 (TS-4CN) kcal mol−1. Note that the N-DA reaction of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 displays a very high activation Gibbs free energy of 29.8 kcal mol−1 (see Table 4). These DA reactions are exergonic in the narrow range between –12.7 (CA-1CN) and –14.9 (CA-4CN) kcal mol−1.
A representation of the activation Gibbs free energies versus the number of cyano groups on the ethylene shows a very good linear correlation with a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.94 (see Figure S4 in Supplementary Materials). This graph shows that the presence of the cyano group on the ethylene is additive and has a marked effect on the kinetics of the reactions, in clear agreement with the experimental outcomes observed by Sauer et al. (see Table 1).
Using the Eyring–Polanyi equation [31], the relative reaction rate constants kr of the P-DA reactions between Cp 1 and the cyanoethylene series 2, with respect to that with ethylene 4, were computed (see Table 4). The relative reaction rate constants kr range from 8.09 × 102 (1CN) to 5.62 × 1012 (4CN). Thus, the P-DA reaction involving the superelectrophilic tetracyanoethylene 4CN is 1012 faster than the N-DA reaction of Cp 1 with ethylene 4. A representation of the logarithm of the experimental relative reaction rate constants log(krexp), with respect to the N-DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4, versus the logarithm of the computed relative reaction rate constants log(krcomp) shows a complete linear correlation with an R2 = 1.00 (see Figure S5 in Supplementary Materials).
The main geometrical parameters at the in vacuo TSs, i.e., the distances between the two pairs of C1–C6 and C2–C3 interacting centers, together with the geometrical asynchronicity, Δl, and the average of the two C–C distances, lm, are given in Table 5. Geometrical data in dioxane are gathered in Table S4 in Supplementary Materials; they show no significant changes compared to the in vacuo parameters. The geometries of two representative TSs are given in Figure 3, while the geometries of all TSs are given in Figure S6 in Supplementary Materials. Some appealing conclusions can be obtained from the geometrical data given in Table 5: (i) from a geometrical point of view, the TSs can be classified as synchronous and asynchronous TSs, depending on the evolution of the new C–C single bond formation; (ii) while the synchronous TSs, Δl = 0.0 Å, come from the symmetrically substituted ethylenes, asynchronous TSs, Δl > 0.2 Å, come from the non-symmetrically substituted ethylenes; (iii) interestingly, the average of the two C1–C6 and C2–C3 distances at all TS, including TS-Et, is 2.24 Å (see lm in Table 5). This behavior indicates that all TSs have a comparable advanced/early character. Considering that the C–C single bond formation takes place in the short range of 2.0–1.9 Å [13], these geometrical parameters indicate that formation of the first C–C single bond has not yet started in any of the TSs (see later). This behavior is consistent with Woodward’s 1942 proposal that electron transfer occurs before the formation of the new C-C single bonds [32].
As Figure 4 shows, a complete linear correlation between the geometrical asynchronicity, Δl, of the TSs and the difference of the local electrophilicity ωk indices of the C1 and C2 carbons of the cyanoethylenes, Δωk, is established for the first time, with R2 = 1.00. Thus, the symmetrically substituted cyanoethylenes 2cCN, 2tCN and 4CN with Δωk = 0.00 eV yield synchronous TSs, while non-symmetrically substituted cyanoethylenes 1CN, 2CN and 3CN with Δωk > 0.76 eV yield asynchronous TSs. This excellent relationship indicates that the different electrophilic activation of the two C1 and C2 carbons of the electrophilic ethylenes caused by the electron-withdrawing substitution controls the asynchronicity of the C–C single bond formation in these P-DA reactions.
Analysis of GEDT at the TSs permits to quantify the polar character of these DA reactions [14]. The GEDT values computed at the seven TSs in vacuo are given in Table 5. GEDT values in dioxane are displayed in Table S4 in Supplementary Materials and show no significant changes compared to the in vacuo values. As expected, the GEDT value at TS-Et is negligible, 0.03 e, as a consequence of the marginal electrophilic character of ethylene 4 (see Table 2). Consequently, the corresponding DA reaction has a non-polar character, being classified as null electron density flux [28]. The presence of a cyano group in 1CN notably increases the GEDT at TS-1CN to 0.14 e. The addition of cyano groups at the ethylene moiety markedly increases the GEDT at the corresponding TSs, reaching a maximum value at TS-4CN with a GEDT = 0.42 e. These P-DA reactions are classified as FEDF [27,28], in agreement with the previous reactivity indices prediction (see Section 2.1). The presence of at least two cyano groups makes the corresponding DA reaction very polar (see Table 5). It is worth mentioning that GEDT values obtained from an NPA analysis do not significantly vary with the charge partitioning method because of its formal definition (see Computational Details in Supplementary Materials). For instance, in vacuo GEDT values computed with Bader charges show no significant variation (see in Table S4 and the linear regression in Figure S7 in Supplementary Materials).
A representation of the activation Gibbs free energies of these P-DA reactions versus the computed GEDT values at the corresponding TSs also shows a very good linear correlation with an R2 = 0.98 (see Figure 5). This linear correlation, that has been found in numerous organic reactions, shows the significant role of the polar character of the reactions, measured by the computed GEDT values, in reaction rates.
It is worth noting that although geminal 2CN is less electrophilic than vicinal 2cCN and 2tCN, the reaction of 2CN is more polar and has a higher reaction rate (see Figure 5). This finding points out, once again, the relevant role of GEDT in reaction rates, and indicates that asynchronous processes are generally preferred over synchronous ones due to a more favorable two-center interaction (see later).
Finally, ELF and QTAIM topological analyses of the electronic structures of the reagents and TSs were performed. The corresponding analyses are given in Supplementary Materials. ELF analysis of the reagents indicates that the cyano substitution on the ethylene does not cause any remarkable changes in the C–C double bond region at the ground state of these substituted ethylenes. On the other hand, ELF analysis of the TSs indicates that while the low polar TS-1CN and TS-2cCN and TS-2tCN show a great similitude to the non-polar TS-Et, the highly polar TS-2CN, TS-3CN and TS-4CN show the presence of the pseudoradical centers demanded for the subsequent C–C single bond formation [13]. Both ELF and QTAIM analyses of the electron density at the TSs indicate that formation of the C–C single bonds has not started yet in any of them, thus rejecting the concept of concerted TSs.

2.3. IQA Analysis of the TSs of the P-DA Reactions of the Cyanoethylene Series 2

In order to determine the role of the GEDT caused by the cyano substitution on the ethylene in the experimental acceleration observed by Sauer et al. (see Table 1), a topological IQA [23] energy partitioning was carried out at the seven TSs in vacuo. For this purpose, an interacting quantum fragments approach [33] was adopted, considering relative IQA energies at both interacting frameworks as defined in Supplementary Materials. The relative total, intra- and inter-atomic IQA energies of each TS fragment are given in Table 6, while the total values are given in Table S5 in Supplementary Materials.
Table 6 shows that the stabilization of the ethylene framework with the number of cyano groups, ΔEtot(nCN) < 0, is stronger than the Cp destabilization, ΔEtot(Cp) > 0, justifying the decrease in the activation energies along this cyanoethylene series. In addition, while the increase in the cyano substitution in the ethylene generally increases Eintra(X) in the two interacting frameworks and Vinter(Cp), a huge decrease in the inter-atomic Vinter(nCN) energies, by between −16.0 (1CN) and −102.0 (4CN) kcal mol−1, is observed (see the differences between Vinter(nCN) and Vinter(Et)).
Figure 6 shows a graphical representation of the interacting quantum fragment Etot(X) energy of the Cp and Et frameworks at the seven TSs and the Etot(Cp+Et), which corresponds to the activation energies of these DA reactions. As can be observed, both Etot(X) are positive and unfavorable in the N-DA reaction with ethylene 4. However, along the cyanoethylene series 2, the interacting quantum fragment energies associated with the Cp framework increase while those of the ethylene derivatives become more negative, i.e., more stabilizing. This stabilization reaches such an extent that, in TS-4CN, the stabilization of the ethylene framework overcomes the destabilization of the Cp one, and the corresponding relative energy of TS-4CN becomes negative. These behaviors are a consequence of the GEDT that takes place at the TSs (see Figure 6), that while it destabilizes the nucleophile Cp for making it lose electron density, it stabilizes the electrophile nCN as it gains electron density.
Consequently, the strong stabilization of the cyanoethylene framework at the TSs with the cyano substitution, by between 14.7 (1CN) and 62.5 (4CN) kcal mol−1 with respect to the N-DA reaction of Cp 1 with ethylene 4, accounts for the decrease in the activation energies associated with the P-DA reactions between Cp 1 and the cyanoethylene series 2.
A representation of the logarithm of the experimental reaction rate constant k versus the stabilization of the ethylene frameworks at the TSs shows an excellent linear correlation with an R2 = 0.95 (see Figure S8 in Supplementary Materials). This figure shows the close relationship between the experimentally observed acceleration in this series of P-DA reactions and the decrease in activation energy resulting from the electronic stabilization of the ethylene framework. Furthermore, a representation of Etot(Et) versus the GEDT computed at the TSs shows an excellent linear correlation with an R2 = 0.99 (see Figure 7).
These linear correlations allow establishing, for the first time, that the electronic stabilization of the ethylene framework, resulting from the GEDT process taking place in polar reactions, is responsible for the increase in the reaction rate observed in these polar reactions [14]. Note that the N-DA reaction of ethylene 4, which presents a GEDT = 0.03 e, fits in the top left corner in the linear regression in Figure 7.
As the energy factor that changes the most with the cyano substitution is Vinter(Et), in order to gain a more detailed insight into the stabilization of the ethylene derivatives, the inter-atomic interactions between the Cp and ethylene frameworks, Vinter(Cp,Et), were considered separately from the interactions that take place within each of them, V’inter(X). The corresponding energies, together with the standard deviations with respect to the N-DA reaction of ethylene 4 as the reference, are given in Table 7.
The standard deviation values indicate that the most drastic changes with the cyano substitution take place in decreasing the inter-atomic interactions occurring inside the ethylene fragment (see the standard deviation of V′inter(Et) in Table 7). This effect overcomes the changes in the inter-atomic interactions between the fragments, Vinter(Cp,Et), which also become more stabilizing as the polar character of the reaction increases.
These findings confirm that the stabilization of the electrophilic reagent in P-DA reactions is the most relevant consequence of the GEDT, thus being responsible for the increase in reaction rates with the increase in the polar character [13].
Finally, in 1999, Parr proposed the electrophilicity ω index as a measure of the electronic stabilization of a species when it acquires a certai n amount of electron density from the environment [4]. Thus, when the sum of the relative intra-atomic Eintra(Et) and inter-atomic V′inter(Et) IQA energies, i.e., E′tot(Et), are represented versus the corresponding Parr’s electrophilicity ω indices (see Table 2), a very good linear correlation is obtained; R2 = 0.97 (see Figure 8). The E′tot(Et) in the N-DA reaction between Cp 1 and ethylene 4 is very unfavorable, 84.6 kcal mol−1. The inclusion of the cyano groups stabilizes the ethylene framework at the TSs by between 11.3 (1CN) and 45.7 (4CN) kcal mol−1 as a consequence of the GEDT taking place at the polar TSs (see Figure 8). Consequently, this graph supports Parr’s proposal [4,34]; the higher the electrophilicity ω index, the higher the ethylene stabilization at the polar TSs. Given that the ethylene stabilization via the GEDT is the main factor responsible for the decrease in activation energies, as shown above, this linear correlation also validates Parr’s electrophilicity ω index as a solid predictor of reactivity in polar cycloaddition reactions.

3. Computational Methods

The M06-2X functional [35], together with the standard 6-311G(d,p) basis set [36], which includes d-type polarization for second-row elements and p-type polarization functions for hydrogens, was used throughout this MEDT study. In general, a careful study of DA reactions calls for the adoption of higher-level wave function models, placing more emphasis on the electron correlation effects than single-determinantal wave function methods. However, the polar character of the DA reactions studied in the present manuscript enables the single-determinant level. The TSs were characterized by the presence of only one imaginary frequency.
The solvent effects of dioxane were taken into account in the thermodynamic calculations by full optimization of the in vacuo structures at the same computational level using the polarizable continuum model [37,38] in the framework of the self-consistent reaction field [39,40,41]. The values of M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) enthalpies, entropies, and Gibbs free energies in dioxane were calculated with standard statistical thermodynamics [36] at 293.15 °C and 1 atm by polarizable continuum model frequency calculations at the solvent-optimized structures. Except for the thermodynamic data, the rest of the results are obtained in in vacuo for an overall coherence in interpreting the results obtained using different quantum chemical tools.
DFT reactivity indices were calculated using the equations in [6]. The GEDT [13] values were computed using the equation GEDT(f) = Σqf, where q are the natural charges [42,43] of the atoms belonging to one of the two frameworks (f) at the TS geometries.
The Gaussian 16 suite of programs was used to perform the calculations [44]. Molecular geometries, ELF basin attractors, and the 3D representations of the Mulliken atomic spin densities were visualized by using the GaussView program [45]. ELF analyses [15] of the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) monodeterminantal wavefunctions were performed by using the TopMod [46] package with a cubical grid of step size of 0.1 Bohr. The Bader’s QTAIM [16,17] analyses were conducted using Multiwfn 3.7 software packages [47] The IQA [35] analysis was performed with the AIMAll package [48] using the corresponding M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) monodeterminantal wavefunctions.

4. Conclusions

An IQA energy partitioning analysis of the TSs associated with the P-DA reactions of Cp 1 with the cyanoethylene series 2 permits to establish the decisive role of GEDT in the acceleration found in polar reactions. The topological IQA energy partitioning allows establishing the complete linear correlation between the total IQA atomic energies of the electrophilic ethylene framework and the GEDT taking place at the TSs of these P-DA reactions. This finding establishes that the increase in GEDT at the TSs enhances the reaction rates of P-DA reactions through an electronic stabilization of the electrophilic framework.
The present MEDT study also shows that the asynchronicity in P-DA reactions depends on the non-symmetric electrophilic activation of the two interacting carbons of the ethylene caused by the electron-withdrawing substitution. A very good linear correlation between the geometric asynchronicity, Δl, at the TSs and the difference in the local electrophilicity ωk indices of the C1 and C2 carbons of the cyanoethylenes, Δωk, is found.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29081870/s1, ELF and QTAIM topological analysis of the TSs. References. Figure S1: with the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo ELF basin attractors together with the most relevant valence basin populations at Cp 1, ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2. Figure S2: with the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo the ELF basin attractors together with the most relevant valence basin populations at the TSs involved in the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2. Figure S3: with the representations of the contour-line maps of the Laplacian ∇2ρ(r) of the electron density at the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo optimized TS-Et, TS-2CN and TS-4CN. Figure S4: with the plot of the computed M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) activation Gibbs free energies versus the number of cyano groups on the ethylene for the DA reactions of Cp 1 with the cyanoethylene series 2. Figure S5: with the plot of the logarithm of the experimental relative reaction rate constants versus the logarithm of the computed M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) relative reaction rate constants for the DA reactions of Cp 1 with the cyanoethylene series 2. Figure S6: with the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo optimized geometries of the TSs involved in the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2. Figure S7: with the plot of the in vacuo GEDT obtained by using Bader charges with respect to in vacuo GEDT obtained by using NPA charges. Figure S8: with the plot of the logarithm of the experimental reaction rate constants versus relative total IQA atomic energies stabilization of the ethylene framework for the DA reactions of Cp 1 with the cyanoethylene series 2. Table S1: with the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo QTAIM parameters of the (3,-1) CPs, as well as the dimensionless |V(r)|/G(r) ratio, at the C1−C6 (CP1) and C2−C3 (CP2) interacting regions of the of the TSs involved in the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2. Table S2: with the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo total electronic energies of reagents, TSs and CAs involved in the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2. Table S3: with the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) enthalpies, entropies and Gibbs free energies, computed at 293.15 K and 1 atm in dioxane, for the stationary points involved in the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2. Table S4: with distances between the C1–C6 and C2–C3 interacting carbons at the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) optimized TSs in dioxane, geometrical asynchronicity, average of the two C–C interacting distances, and GEDT values. Table S5: with the total intra- and inter-atomic IQA energies at the diene and ethylene frameworks of the TSs and at the reagents involved in the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2. M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) g in vacuo computed total energies, single imaginary frequencies of TSs, and Cartesian coordinates of the stationary points involved in the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2 [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.R.D.; methodology, L.R.D. and M.R.-G.; software, validation, L.R.D. and M.R.-G.; formal analysis, L.R.D. and M.R.-G.; investigation L.R.D. and M.R.-G.; data curation, L.R.D. and M.R.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.R.D. and M.R.-G.; writing—review and editing, L.R.D. and M.R.-G.; visualization, L.R.D. and M.R.-G. supervision, L.R.D. and M.R.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ingold, C.K. Significance of tautomerism and of the reactions of aromatic compounds in the electronic theory of organic reactions. J. Chem. Soc. 1933, 1120–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lapworth, A. Replaceability of Halogen Atoms by Hydrogen Atoms. Nature 1925, 115, 625. [Google Scholar]
  3. Carey, F.A.; Sundberg, R.J. Advanced Organic Chemistry, Part A: Structure and Mechanisms; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. Parr, R.G.; Szentpaly, L.V.; Liu, S. Electrophilicity index. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1922–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Parr, R.G.; Yang, W. Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  6. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Pérez, P. Applications of the conceptual density functional indices to organic chemistry reactivity. Molecules 2016, 21, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Domingo, L.R.; Aurell, M.J.; Pérez, P.; Contreras, R. Quantitative characterization of the global electrophilicity power of common diene/dienophile pairs in Diels–Alder reactions. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 4417–4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Domingo, L.R.; Chamorro, E.; Pérez, P. Understanding the reactivity of captodative ethylenes in polar cycloaddition reactions. A theoretical study. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4615–4624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M. In Application of Reactivity Indices in the Study of Polar Diels–Alder Reactions. In Conceptual Density Functional Theory: Towards a New Chemical Reactivity Theory; Liu, S., Ed.; WILEY-VCH GmbH: Weinheim, Germany, 2022; Volume 2, pp. 481–502. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sauer, J.; Wiest, H.; Mielert, A. Eine Studie der Diels-Alder-Reaktion, I. Die Reaktivität von Dienophilen gegenüber Cyclopentadien und 9.10-Dimethyl-anthracen. Chem. Ber. 1964, 97, 3183–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Domingo, L.R.; Aurell, M.J.; Pérez, P.; Contreras, R. Origin of the synchronicity on the transition structures of polar Diels-Alder reactions. Are these reactions [4+2] processes? J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3884–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jones, G.O.; Guner, V.A.; Houk, K.N. Diels-Alder Reactions of Cyclopentadiene and 9,10-Dimethylanthracene with Cyanoalkenes: The Performance of Density Functional Theory and Hartree-Fock Calculations for the Prediction of Substituent Effects. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 1216–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Domingo, L.R. A new C-C bond formation model based on the quantum chemical topology of electron density. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 32415–32428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Domingo, L.R.; Sáez, J.A. Understanding the mechanism of polar Diels-Alder reactions. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 3576–3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Becke, A.D.; Edgecombe, K.E. A simple measure of electron localization n atomic and molecular-systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 5397–5403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bader, R.F.W.; Tang, Y.H.; Tal, Y.; Biegler-König, F.W. Properties of atoms and bonds in hydrocarbon molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 946–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bader, R.F.W. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory; Oxford University Press: Oxford, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  18. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Pérez, P. How does the global electron density transfer diminish activation energies in polar cycloaddition reactions? A Molecular Electron Density Theory study. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 1718–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Domingo, L.R. Molecular Electron Density Theory: A Modern View of Reactivity in Organic Chemistry. Molecules 2016, 21, 1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Fukui, K. Molecular Orbitals in Chemistry, Physics, and Biology; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kitaura, K.; Morokuma, K. A new energy decomposition scheme for molecular interactions within the Hartree-Fock approximation. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1976, 10, 325–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Morokuma, K.; Kitaura, K. Chemical Applications of Atomic and Molecular Electrostatic Potentials; Plenum: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 215–242. [Google Scholar]
  23. Blanco, M.A.; Martín Pendás, A.; Francisco, E. Interacting Quantum Atoms: A Correlated Energy Decomposition Scheme Based on the Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2005, 1, 1096–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Pérez, P. Why is Phenyl Azide so Unreactive in [3+2] Cycloaddition Reactions? Demystifying Sustmann’s Paradigmatic Parabola. Org. Chem. Front. 2023, 10, 5579–5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Domingo, L.R.; Pérez, P.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Aurell, M.J. A Molecular Electron Density Theory Study of Hydrogen Bond Catalysed Polar Diels–Alder Reactions of α, β-unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds. Tetrahedron Chem. 2024, 10, 100064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Parr, R.G.; Pearson, R.G. Absolute hardness: Companion parameter to absolute electronegativity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7512–7516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Pérez, P. A Molecular Electron Density Theory Study of the Reactivity of Tetrazines in Aza-Diels-Alder Reactions. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 15394–15405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M. A Useful Classification of Organic Reactions Bases on the Flux of the Electron Density. Sci. Rad. 2023, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Domingo, L.R.; Pérez, P.; Sáez, J.A. Understanding the local reactivity in polar organic reactions through electrophilic and nucleophilic Parr functions. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 1486–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Domingo, L.R.; Aurell, M.J.; Pérez, P.; Contreras, R. Quantitative characterization of the local electrophilicity of organic molecules. Understanding the regioselectivity on Diels-Alder reactions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 6871–6875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Evans, M.G.; Polanyi, M. Some applications of the transition state method to the calculation of reaction velocities, especially in solution. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1935, 31, 875–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Woodward, R.B. The mechanism of the Diels-Alder reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 64, 3058–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Triestram, L.; Falcioni, F.; Popelier, P.L.A. Interacting Quantum Atoms and Multipolar Electrostatic Study of XH···π Interactions. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 34844–34851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chattaraj, P.K.; Roy, D.R. Update 1 of: Electrophilicity Index. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, PR46–PR74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D.G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: Two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215–245. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hehre, M.J.; Radom, L.; Schleyer, P.V.R.; Pople, J. Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tomasi, J.; Persico, M. Molecular interactions in solution: And overview of methods based on continuous distributions of the solvent. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2027–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Simkin, B.Y.; Sheikhet, I.I. Quantum Chemical and Statistical Theory of Solutions–Computational Approach; Ellis Horwood: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cossi, M.; Barone, V.; Cammi, R.; Tomasi, J. Ab initio study of solvated molecules: A new implementation of the polarizable continuum model. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 255, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cances, E.; Mennucci, B.; Tomasi, J. A new integral equation formalism for the polarizable continuum model: Theoretical background and applications to isotropic and anisotropic dielectrics. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3032–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Tomasi, J. Geometry optimization of molecular structures in solution by the polarizable continuum model. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 404–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Reed, A.E.; Weinstock, R.B.; Weinhold, F. Natural population analysis. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 735–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Reed, A.E.; Curtiss, L.A.; Weinhold, F. Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor-acceptor viewpoint. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 899–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision A.03; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dennington, R.; Keith, T.A.; Millam, J.M. GaussView, 6th ed.; Semichem Inc.: Shawnee Mission, KS, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  46. Noury, S.; Krokidis, X.; Fuster, F.; Silvi, B. Computational tools for the electron localization function topological analysis. Comput. Chem. 1999, 23, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lu, T.; Chen, F. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comp. Chem. 2012, 33, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Keith, T.A. TK Gristmill Software, AIMAll (Version 19.10.12); Gristmill Software: Overland Park, KS, USA, 2019. Available online: www.aim.tkgristmill.com (accessed on 15 April 2024).
  49. Wilson, A.L.; Popelier, P.L.A. Exponential Relationships Capturing Atomistic Short-Range Repulsion from the Interacting Quantum Atoms (IQA) Method. J. Phys. Chem. A 2016, 120, 9647–9659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Popelier, P.L.A.; Kosov, D.S. Atom–atom partitioning of intramolecular and intermolecular Coulomb energy. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 6539–6547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Popelier, P.L.A.; Joubert, L.; Kosov, D.S. Convergence of the Electrostatic Interaction Based on Topological Atoms. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 8254–8261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Martín Pendás, A.; Francisco, E.; Blanco, M.A.; Gatti, C. Bond Paths as Privileged Exchange Channels. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 9362–9371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Berski, S.; Andrés, J.; Silvi, B.; Domingo, L.R. The joint use of catastrophe theory and electron localization function to characterize molecular mechanisms. A density functional study of the Diels-Alder reaction between ethylene and 1,3-butadiene. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 6014–6024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Silvi, B.; Pérez, P. The Mysticism of Pericyclic Reactions: A Contemporary Rationalisation of Organic Reactivity Based on Electron Density Analysis. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 2018, 1107–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Domingo, L.R.; Pérez, P.; Sáez, J.A. Origin of the synchronicity in bond formation in polar Diels-Alder reactions: An ELF analysis of the reaction between cyclopentadiene and tetracyanoethylene. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 3841–3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Domingo, L.R.; Sáez, J.A.; Zaragozá, R.J.; Arnó, M. Understanding the Participation of Quadricyclane as Nucleophile in Polar [2σ + 2σ + 2π] Cycloadditions toward Electrophilic π Molecules. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8791–8799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Woodward, R.B.; Hoffmann, R. The Conservation of Orbital Symmetry, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 781–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Houk, K.N.; González, J.; Li, Y. Pericyclic reaction transition states: Passions and punctilios, 1935–1995. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Chamorro, E.; Pérez, P. Aromaticity in Pericyclic Transition State Structures? A Critical Rationalisation Based on the Topological Analysis of Electron Density. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 6026–6039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Espinosa, E.; Alkorta, I.; Elguero, J.; Molins, E. From weak to strong interactions: A comprehensive analysis of the topological and energetic properties of the electron density distribution involving X–H⋯F–Y systems. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 5529–5542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 01870 sch001
Scheme 1. DA reactions between Cp 1 and the cyanoethylene series 2, reported in 1964 by Sauer et al. [10].
Scheme 1. DA reactions between Cp 1 and the cyanoethylene series 2, reported in 1964 by Sauer et al. [10].
Molecules 29 01870 sch001
Molecules 29 01870 g001
Figure 1. Plot of the logarithm of the experimental reaction rate constant k, in dioxane, vs. GEDT, in average number of electrons, e, for the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2.
Figure 1. Plot of the logarithm of the experimental reaction rate constant k, in dioxane, vs. GEDT, in average number of electrons, e, for the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2.
Molecules 29 01870 g001
Molecules 29 01870 g002
Figure 2. Three-dimensional representations of the Mulliken atomic spin densities of the radical anions of 2CN and 4CN.
Figure 2. Three-dimensional representations of the Mulliken atomic spin densities of the radical anions of 2CN and 4CN.
Molecules 29 01870 g002
Molecules 29 01870 g003
Figure 3. M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo optimized geometries of the highly asynchronous TS-2CN and the synchronous TS-4CN. The geometrical asynchronicity Δl and the average distances, given in angstroms, Å, are also included.
Figure 3. M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo optimized geometries of the highly asynchronous TS-2CN and the synchronous TS-4CN. The geometrical asynchronicity Δl and the average distances, given in angstroms, Å, are also included.
Molecules 29 01870 g003
Molecules 29 01870 g004
Figure 4. Plot of the in vacuo geometrical asynchronicity of the TSs, Δl in angstroms Å, with respect to the difference of the local electrophilicity ωk indices of the C1 and C2 carbons of the cyanoethylene series 2, Δωk in eV.
Figure 4. Plot of the in vacuo geometrical asynchronicity of the TSs, Δl in angstroms Å, with respect to the difference of the local electrophilicity ωk indices of the C1 and C2 carbons of the cyanoethylene series 2, Δωk in eV.
Molecules 29 01870 g004
Molecules 29 01870 g005
Figure 5. Plot of the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) activation Gibbs free energies, ΔG in kcal mol−1, vs. the GEDT, in average number of electrons e, R2 = 0.98, for the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4, and with the cyanoethylene series 2.
Figure 5. Plot of the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) activation Gibbs free energies, ΔG in kcal mol−1, vs. the GEDT, in average number of electrons e, R2 = 0.98, for the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4, and with the cyanoethylene series 2.
Molecules 29 01870 g005
Molecules 29 01870 g006
Figure 6. Graphical representation of the sets of Etot(Cp), Etot(Et), and Etot(Cp+Et) energies in that order for the TSs associated with the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylenes series 2. Etot(Cp+Et) corresponds to the activation energies of the reactions. The GEDT values at the TSs are given in pink. Etot(X) energies are given in kcal mol−1, and the GEDT in average number of electrons, e.
Figure 6. Graphical representation of the sets of Etot(Cp), Etot(Et), and Etot(Cp+Et) energies in that order for the TSs associated with the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylenes series 2. Etot(Cp+Et) corresponds to the activation energies of the reactions. The GEDT values at the TSs are given in pink. Etot(X) energies are given in kcal mol−1, and the GEDT in average number of electrons, e.
Molecules 29 01870 g006
Molecules 29 01870 g007
Figure 7. Plot of the in vacuo M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) relative total IQA atomic energies of the ethylene framework, Etot(Et) in kcal mol−1, vs. the GEDT, in average number of electrons e, for the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2.
Figure 7. Plot of the in vacuo M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) relative total IQA atomic energies of the ethylene framework, Etot(Et) in kcal mol−1, vs. the GEDT, in average number of electrons e, for the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2.
Molecules 29 01870 g007
Molecules 29 01870 g008
Figure 8. Plot of the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo relative total IQA energy at the ethylene framework, E′tot(Et), in kcal mol−1, vs. Parr’s electrophilicity ω indices, in eV, of the ethylenes involved in the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2. The scale of the energy differences with respect to the N-DA reaction of ethylene 4, which measures the TS stabilization, is given in red on the right side.
Figure 8. Plot of the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo relative total IQA energy at the ethylene framework, E′tot(Et), in kcal mol−1, vs. Parr’s electrophilicity ω indices, in eV, of the ethylenes involved in the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2. The scale of the energy differences with respect to the N-DA reaction of ethylene 4, which measures the TS stabilization, is given in red on the right side.
Molecules 29 01870 g008
Table 1. Reaction rate constants for the P-DA reactions of Cp 1 with the cyanoethylene series 2 a,b.
Table 1. Reaction rate constants for the P-DA reactions of Cp 1 with the cyanoethylene series 2 a,b.
Ethylene Derivative105 k [M−1s−1]
4CNtetracyoanoethylene4.3 × 107
3CNtricyoanoethylene4.8 × 105
2CN1,1-dicyoanoethylene4.5 × 104
2cCNmaleonitrile91
2tCNfumaronitrile81
1CNacrylonitrile1.04
a At 20 °C in dioxane. b The rate constant for the Cp 1 + ethylene 4 DA reaction has been estimated to be 10−5.
Table 2. In vacuo B3LYP/6-31G(d) global electronic chemical potential μ, chemical hardness η, electrophilicity ω, and nucleophilicity N, in eV, of Cp 1 and the cyanoethylene series 2.
Table 2. In vacuo B3LYP/6-31G(d) global electronic chemical potential μ, chemical hardness η, electrophilicity ω, and nucleophilicity N, in eV, of Cp 1 and the cyanoethylene series 2.
μηωN
4CN−7.044.165.950.00
3CN−6.434.714.390.33
2tCN−5.715.293.080.76
2cCN−5.665.323.010.80
2CN−5.645.652.820.65
1CN−4.706.341.741.25
Cp 1−3.015.490.833.37
Ethylene 4−3.377.770.731.87
Table 3. In vacuo B3LYP/6-31G(d) electrophilic P k + Parr functions and local electrophilicity ωk indices at the C1 and C2 carbons of the cyanoethylene series 2.
Table 3. In vacuo B3LYP/6-31G(d) electrophilic P k + Parr functions and local electrophilicity ωk indices at the C1 and C2 carbons of the cyanoethylene series 2.
P k + ωkΔωk
C1C2C1C2
1CN0.630.201.100.340.76
2cCN0.350.350.980.980.00
2tCN0.330.331.011.010.00
2CN0.740.102.280.301.98
3CN0.460.222.030.941.09
4CN0.320.321.911.910.00
Table 4. M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) relative Gibbs free energies, ΔG in kcal mol−1, computed at 293.15 K and 1 atm in dioxane, of TSs and CAs involved in the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2. The computed relative reaction rate constant kr, with respect to the reaction with ethylene 4, is also included.
Table 4. M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) relative Gibbs free energies, ΔG in kcal mol−1, computed at 293.15 K and 1 atm in dioxane, of TSs and CAs involved in the DA reactions of Cp 1 with ethylene 4 and the cyanoethylene series 2. The computed relative reaction rate constant kr, with respect to the reaction with ethylene 4, is also included.
ReagentTSΔGkrProductΔG
Ethylene 4TS-Et29.81.00 × 10CA-Et−12.8
1CNTS-1CN25.98.09 × 102CA-1CN−12.7
2cCNTS-2cCN22.33.91 × 105CA-2cCN−13.8
2tCNTS-2tCN22.06.54 × 105CA-2tCN−14.5
2CNTS-2CN18.24.45 × 108CA-2CN−13.0
3CNTS-3CN15.92.31 × 1010CA-3CN−14.9
4CNTS-4CN12.75.62 × 1012CA-4CN−14.9
Table 5. Distances between the C1–C6 and C2–C3 interacting carbons at the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo optimized TSs, geometrical asynchronicity Δl, and average of the two C–C interacting distances lm, in angstroms, Å, and GEDT values in average number of electrons, e.
Table 5. Distances between the C1–C6 and C2–C3 interacting carbons at the M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo optimized TSs, geometrical asynchronicity Δl, and average of the two C–C interacting distances lm, in angstroms, Å, and GEDT values in average number of electrons, e.
C1–C6C2–C3ΔllmGEDT
Et2.2232.2230.002.22 0.03
1CN2.1182.3420.222.23−0.14
2cCN2.2202.2200.002.22−0.23
2tCN2.2192.2330.012.23−0.23
2CN2.0252.5350.512.28−0.27
3CN2.0922.4170.322.25−0.34
4CN2.2252.2250.002.22−0.42
Table 6. M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo relative total Etot(X), intra- Eintra(X) and inter-atomic Vinter(X) IQA energies, in kcal mol−1, of the cyclopentadiene and ethylene frameworks at the TSs with respect to the separated reagents. The sum of the relative total IQA energies of the two interacting moieties, Etot(Cp+Et), yields the activation energy. Standard deviations are given with respect to the N-DA reaction of Cp 1 with ethylene 4, in kcal mol−1.
Table 6. M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo relative total Etot(X), intra- Eintra(X) and inter-atomic Vinter(X) IQA energies, in kcal mol−1, of the cyclopentadiene and ethylene frameworks at the TSs with respect to the separated reagents. The sum of the relative total IQA energies of the two interacting moieties, Etot(Cp+Et), yields the activation energy. Standard deviations are given with respect to the N-DA reaction of Cp 1 with ethylene 4, in kcal mol−1.
Eintra(X)Vinter(X)Etot(X)Etot(Cp+Et)
TS-EtCp34.6−26.87.815.6
Et33.1−25.37.8
TS-1CNCp37.8−19.917.911.0
1CN34.4−41.3−6.9
TS-2cCNCp42.3−13.628.78.1
2cCN49.4−70.0−20.6
TS-2tCNCp41.8−13.228.66.9
2tCN46.5−68.2−21.7
TS-2CNCp41.2−10.031.24.0
2CN29.3−56.5−27.2
TS-3CNCp46.1−4.441.71.9
3CN54.8−94.6−39.8
TS-4CNCp51.91.353.2−1.5
4CN72.6−127.3−54.7
Standard deviationCp10.018.228.1
nCN20.458.139.3
Table 7. M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo total inter-atomic interactions between the two Cp and Et fragments, Vinter(Cp,Et), and relative total inter-atomic energies within the two Cp and Et frameworks, V′inter(X), in kcal mol−1. Relative energies are given with respect to the separated reagents. Standard deviations are given with respect to the N-DA of Cp 1 with ethylene 4, in kcal mol−1.
Table 7. M06-2X/6-311G(d,p) in vacuo total inter-atomic interactions between the two Cp and Et fragments, Vinter(Cp,Et), and relative total inter-atomic energies within the two Cp and Et frameworks, V′inter(X), in kcal mol−1. Relative energies are given with respect to the separated reagents. Standard deviations are given with respect to the N-DA of Cp 1 with ethylene 4, in kcal mol−1.
Vinter(Cp,Et)V′inter(Cp)V′inter(Et)
TS-Et−153.750.051.5
TS-1CN−160.460.438.9
TS-2cCN−167.770.313.7
TS-2tCN−168.771.116.2
TS-2CN−165.572.826.3
TS-3CN−174.182.6−7.6
TS-4CN−187.394.8−33.6
Deviation18.927.548.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M. Revealing the Critical Role of Global Electron Density Transfer in the Reaction Rate of Polar Organic Reactions within Molecular Electron Density Theory. Molecules 2024, 29, 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081870

AMA Style

Domingo LR, Ríos-Gutiérrez M. Revealing the Critical Role of Global Electron Density Transfer in the Reaction Rate of Polar Organic Reactions within Molecular Electron Density Theory. Molecules. 2024; 29(8):1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081870

Chicago/Turabian Style

Domingo, Luis R., and Mar Ríos-Gutiérrez. 2024. "Revealing the Critical Role of Global Electron Density Transfer in the Reaction Rate of Polar Organic Reactions within Molecular Electron Density Theory" Molecules 29, no. 8: 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081870

APA Style

Domingo, L. R., & Ríos-Gutiérrez, M. (2024). Revealing the Critical Role of Global Electron Density Transfer in the Reaction Rate of Polar Organic Reactions within Molecular Electron Density Theory. Molecules, 29(8), 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081870

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop