Syntheses, Structures, and Electrochemical Properties of Metallacyclic Oxidovanadium(V) Complexes with Asymmetric Multidentate Linking Ligands

Abstract

Trinuclear metallacyclic oxidovanadium(V) complexes, [{VO(L³⁺²R)}₃] (1–3) with asymmetric multidentate linking ligands (H₃L³⁺²R: R = H, Me, Br), were synthesized. The molecular structure of 1 is characterized as a tripod structure, with each V(V) ion coordinated by ONO-atoms from a tridentate Schiff base site and ON-atoms from a bidentate benzoxazole site of two respective H₃L³⁺²H ligands. The intramolecular V⋯V distances range from 8.0683 to 8.1791 Å. Complex 4 is a mononuclear dioxidovanadium(V) complex, (Et₃NH)[VO₂(HL³⁺²H)]. Cyclic voltammograms of 1−3 in DMF revealed redox couples attributed to three single-electron transfer processes.

1. Introduction

The development of nanoscale molecular architectures featuring metallacycles is of significant interest in materials science and supramolecular chemistry due to their characteristic redox, magnetic, and mechanical functions, as well as their host–guest chemistry [1,2,3,4,5]. In any case, ligands with appropriate bridging abilities and directions are essential for organizing these complexes. For instance, many macrocyclic metal complexes are constructed using small anions like acetate and hydroxyl ions. In such cases, µ-acetato or µ-hydroxo bridges form small bending angles relative to the metal-to-metal direction, allowing for the preparation of macrocyclic metal arrangements of various sizes. However, since the preparation of such complexes often relies on chance, it is challenging to strategically advance scientific research. Hence, the careful design of linking ligands with multiple separate coordination sites is crucial for obtaining nano-molecular architectures and facilitating self-assembly [6,7]. Typically, using linking ligands oriented in a straight line, such as 4,4′-bipyridine or terephthalic acid, makes it easier to generate 1D, 2D, or 3D regular coordination polymers [8,9,10]. Therefore, it is essential for the coordination sites of linking ligands to not be aligned in a straight line in order to obtain discrete metallacyclic complexes.

In our study, we reported the synthesis of the linking ligand H₃L³⁺²H: 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-6-ol-5-(salicylideneamino)benzoxazole, which has separated [3 + 2] ONO-tridentate and ON-bidentate coordination sites [11]. This ligand was obtained through the oxidation of H₄L³⁺³H (4,6-bis[(2-hydroxybenzylidene)imino]benzene-1,3-diol) (Scheme 1), which features symmetrical [3 + 3] ONO-tridentate sites [12,13]. These linking ligands are expected to significantly facilitate the construction of cyclic molecules rather than coordination polymers, given the approximately 120-degree bending of the coordination directions of the separated binding sites. Indeed, the [3 + 2] asymmetric coordination sites in the H₃L³⁺²H ligand bound to different metal ions in different styles and formed a trinuclear metallacyclic manganese(III) complex, [{Mn(L³⁺²H)(MeOH)}₃], with a tripodal molecular structure [11]. Based on the reactivity of the ligand itself and the composition of the obtained Mn(III) complex, it is likely that this ligand readily forms complexes with redox-active metal ions in the +3 charge. Therefore, we focused on synthesizing VO³⁺ complexes, which are expected to find applications in catalysis development utilizing the high oxidation ability of V(V) [14,15,16]. Moreover, they are anticipated to serve as model complexes for metalloenzymes, contributing to our understanding of the role of vanadium ions in bioinorganic chemistry, including those present in the active sites of haloperoxidase [17,18,19] or the vanadium-containing anion amavadin, found in certain mushrooms [20].

In this study, we prepared new trinuclear metallacyclic oxidovanadium(V) complexes and a mononuclear dioxidovanadium(V) complex using these ligands. Herein, we describe the synthesis, X-ray structural characterization, and electrochemical properties of these newly obtained complexes.

2. Results and Discussion

The reactions of H₄L³⁺³R·HCl (R = H, Me, Br) with vanadium(III) chloride yielded trinuclear oxidovanadium(V) complexes 1–3. Elemental analysis data for all complexes indicated a 1:1 metal-to-ligand ratio. The ν(C=N) vibrations, which are observed at 1632~1634 cm⁻¹ for the free ligands, are shifted to 1602~1617 cm⁻¹ in all complexes, suggesting that each coordination site of the ligands acts as a chelate. It is presumed that each vanadium ion exists as VO³⁺, as indicated by the ν(V=O) vibrations observed at 967, 968, and 973 cm⁻¹, respectively. The reaction of H₃L³⁺²H with [VO(acac)₂] (vanadium(IV) bis(acetylacetonato)oxide) yielded mononuclear dioxidovanadium(V) complex 4. Elemental analysis data for 4 showed a 1:1 metal-to-ligand ratio. The IR spectrum of 4 exhibited two characteristic bands at 941 (weak) and 861 (strong) cm⁻¹, which are assigned to the symmetric and asymmetric ν(O=V=O) vibration of the cis-VO₂ group [21,22]. Additionally, two ν(C=N) vibrations similar to those of free H₃L³⁺²H were observed at 1634 and 1615 cm⁻¹. Even when using other metal sources such as VCl₃, the yield decreases, but all isolated complexes were dioxidovanadium(V) complexes. Therefore, it is presumed that in the reaction between the oxidized ligand H₃L³⁺²H and vanadium, the mononuclear dioxidovanadium(V) complex is preferentially formed because the oxidation of the ligand is not required. To obtain polynuclear vanadium complexes like complexes 1−3, it is necessary to start the synthesis with H₄L³⁺³R·HCl as the ligands.

2.1. Crystal Structures

The molecular structures of 1 and 4 were confirmed by single-crystal X-ray structure analyses. The crystallographic data and collection details for 1 and 4 are summarized in

Table 1. Crystallographic data and refinement parameters.

	1	4
Empirical formula	C60H33N6O15V3	C26H28N3O6V
Formula weight	1230.74	529.47
Temperature/K	113	301
Crystal system	triclinic	Monoclinic
Space group	P$\overline{1}$	P21/n
a/Å	12.465(5)	11.978(3)
b/Å	16.244(6)	7.5880(14)
c/Å	18.285(8)	28.042(5)
α/°	102.99(3)	90
β/°	98.16(3)	101.705(18)
γ/°	108.59(3)	90
V/Å3	3327(3)	2495.7(8)
Z	2	4
Dcalc/g cm−3	1.229	1.409
μ(MoKα)/mm−1	0.476	0.444
F(0 0 0)	1248.0	1104.0
Crystal dimensions/mm3	0.22 × 0.14 × 0.08	0.40 × 0.20 × 0.10
Radiation	MoKα (λ = 0.71075)	MoKα (λ = 0.71075)
2θ range for data collection/°	6.1 to 54.838	6.0 to 55.0
No. of reflections collected	26,785	5577
No. of independent reflections	14,423	5478
Data/Restraints/Params	144,23/0/758	5478/0/329
Goodness of fit indicator	0.949	0.947
R indices [I > 2.00σ(I)]	R1 = 0.0568	R1 = 0.0790
	wR2 = 0.1509	wR2 = 0.2160
R indices (all data)	R1 = 0.0852	R1 = 0.2748
	wR2 = 0.1766	wR2 = 0.3181
Largest diff. peak, hole/e Å−3	0.41, −0.61	0.64, −0.60
CCDC deposition number	2,338,377	2,338,378

.

The molecular structures of 1 are illustrated in Figure 1a,b, and the selected bond lengths and angles are listed in

Table 2. Selected bond distances and angles of 1.

Bond	Distance/Å	Angle	Angle/°
V–O1	1.897(2)	O1–V1–O2	154.33(9)
V1–O2	1.944(2)	O12–V1–N1	162.90(10)
V1–O12	1.847(3)	O13–V1–N6	172.12(10)
V1–O13	1.601(2)	O12–V1–N6	79.98(9)
V1–N1	2.121(3)	O1–V1–N1	83.27(10)
V1–N6	2.355(3)	O2–V1–N1	77.24(10)
V2–O4	1.820(2)	O5–V2–O6	156.00(10)
V2–O5	1.862(2)	O4–V2–N3	164.98(11)
V2–O6	1.941(2)	O14–V2–N2	177.48(10)
V2–O14	1.609(3)	O4–V2–N2	81.01(10)
V2–N2	2.436(3)	O5–V2–N3	85.17(10)
V2–N3	2.110(3)	O6–V2–N3	78.29(10)
V3–O8	1.838(2)	O9–V3–O10	154.56(9)
V3–O9	1.893(3)	O8–V3–N5	162.18(11)
V3–O10	1.943(2)	O15–V3–N4	174.62(12)
V3–O15	1.606(2)	O8–V3–N4	80.91(10)
V3–N4	2.312(3)	O9–V3–N5	83.70(10)
V3–N5	2.099(3)	O10–V3–N5	77.88(10)
V1⋯V2	8.464(5)
V1⋯V3	8.254(3)
V2⋯V3	8.262(4)

. Complex 1 consists of three sets of ligands and oxidovanadium(V) ions, forming an overall tripod structure. It has been confirmed that the ligand H₄L³⁺³H, used as the starting material, undergoes oxidation to H₃L³⁺²H, similar to the previously reported manganese complex [{Mn(L³⁺²H)(MeOH)}₃] [11]. The coordination geometry around each oxidovanadium(V) ion adopts a distorted octahedral structure, coordinated by two distinct ligands. The first donor set is the ONO-tridentate biding site of (L³⁺²H)³⁻. The N=C bond lengths (1.30—1.34 Å) in these tridentate sites closely resemble standard N(sp²)=C(sp²) double bonds. The sum of bond angles around N1, N3, and N5 is 359.3, 359.1, and 358.5°, respectively, suggesting that the tridentate site is bound in the Schiff base form. The second donor set consists of the ON-donor set from the bidentate benzoxazole site. The equatorial planes of V(V) centers are defined by the ONO-donors of the tridentate Schiff base site and a phenolic oxygen atom of the bidentate site, while the nitrogen atom of the benzoxazole moiety and the V=O bond form the axial axis. The bond lengths in the equatorial plane are 1.820–1.944 Å for V–O and 2.099–2.121 Å for V–N, falling within the expected range reported range reported for oxidovanadium(V) complexes with Schiff base ligands [15,21,22,23,24]. In the axial direction, the V=O bond lengths are 1.601(2), 1.609(3), and 1.606(2) Å, while the V–N_oxazole lengths are 2.325–2.415 Å, considerably longer due to the trans-influence exerted by the oxido ion as a strong π-donor. The three V(V) ions in the complex are isolated, reflected in the relatively long V⋯V distances [8.464(5), 8.254(3), and 8.262(4) Å], attributable to the characteristic ligand structure (Figure 1c).

The packing diagram of 1 is shown in Figure 1d. Enantiomer pairs loosely aggregate as dimers in the crystal lattices. In this arrangement, the phenyl rings (C36–C40) corresponding to the legs of the tripod-shaped molecule penetrate each other’s cavities. Additionally, three types of π-π stacking interactions between dimers play crucial roles in the crystal packing of the complex. Each trinuclear complex is stacked by weak π-π stacking interactions between π-conjugate systems of (L³⁺²H)³⁻ [C52…C55^k 3.62(2), C10…C20^l 3.62(2) Å, symmetry code k: 1 − x, −y, 1 − z, l: 1 − x, 1 − y, −z]. Consequently, the nearest intermolecular V⋯V distance [V2⋯V3ⁱ 7.142(3) Å] is shorter than intramolecular V⋯V distances. Since only poor-quality crystals of 2 could be obtained and X-ray analysis was insufficient, the data for 2 are provided in the Supporting Information (Figure S1, Table S1). Here, we will only state that it has a similar structure to Complex 1.

The molecular structure of 4 is depicted in Figure 2a, and the selected bond lengths and angles are listed in

Table 3. Selected bond distances and angles of 4.

Bond	Distance/Å	Angle	Angle/°
V1–O1	1.884(6)	O1–V1–O2	140.9(2)
V1–O2	1.941(6)	O1–V1–O5	95.8(2)
V1–O5	1.644(5)	O1–V1–O6	105.2(3)
V1–O6	1.632(6)	O1–V1–N1	81.6(2)
V1–N1	2.207(6)	O2–V1–O5	93.6(2)
		O2–V1–O6	108.5(3)
O4–H12⋯N2	2.660(9)	O2–V1–N1	75.5(2)
N3–H28⋯O5	2.900(9)	O5–V1–O6	105.8(3)
N3–H28⋯O6	2.983(9)	O5–V1–N1	157.3(3)
		O6–V1–N1	96.6(2)

. Complex 4 is a mononuclear dioxidovanadium(V) complex comprising the [VO₂(HL³⁺²H)]⁻ anion and the triethylammonium cation (Et₃NH⁺). The coordination environment of the vanadium is a distorted square pyramid with NO₄ coordination. Two oxide ions are in a cis-configuration, similar to previously reported VO₂⁺ complexes with tridentate ligands [21,22,23,24]. The V=O bond lengths are 1.642(4) and 1.634(5) Å, falling within the expected range for vanadium(V) complexes [21,22,23,24]. The V–O(phenol) bond lengths are 1.885(5) and 1.941(5) Å, and the V–N length is 2.208(5) Å. The V–N bond length is slightly longer than that of [VO(sap)(OEt)(EtOH)] (H₂sap = N-(2-hydroxyphenyl)salicylideneimine) (2.114(5) Å) [25], possibly influenced by the trans-influence arising from the oxido ion as a strong π-donor. The central vanadium atom deviates by 0.4719(32) Å from the basal plane defined by O1, O2, O5, and N1 atoms toward the apical atom O6. The geometry index τ for five-coordination system, proposed by Addison and Rao [26], is calculated as 0.31 for the V1 environment, indicating a distorted square pyramid.

The bidentate ON-donor set defined by O4 and N2 does not function as a coordination site in this complex. However, this complex can be expected to act as a complex ligand capable of forming metal-assembled complexes by combining with various types of metal ions at the ON-site. The deviation of the mean plane defined by all atoms of the (HL³⁺²H)²⁻ ligand in 4 is 0.0476 Å, indicating good coplanarity of the ligand and an advantage for forming π-π stacking interactions. Indeed, π-π stacking interactions play important roles in the crystal packing, as shown in Figure 2b. The distance between mean planes is 3.46 Å for the (2 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z) unit and 3.36 Å for the (−x, 1 − y, −z) unit, respectively. Additionally, hydrogen bonding interactions were observed between the oxygen atoms O5, O6, and the Et₃NH⁺ ion. The overall crystal structure of 4 closely resembles that of (Et₃NH)[VO₂L] (H₂L = 4-((E)-(2-hydroxy-5-nitrophenylimino)methyl)benzene-1,3-diol), not only in terms of complex ion structure but also in composition and hydrogen bonding aspects [21].

2.2. Electrochemical Properties

The electrochemical properties of trinuclear complexes were investigated using cyclic voltammetry (CV) in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) containing tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (TBAP) (0.1 M) as the supporting electrolyte. Figure 3a,b depict the cyclic voltammograms for Complex 1, measured within ranges from −1.5 to +0.9 V (vs. Ag/Ag⁺) (Figure 3a) and from −0.5 to +0.5 V (Figure 3b). Although somewhat indistinct, three consecutive redox couples were observed in the range of −0.2 V to 0.0 V. Since the ligand does not undergo redox reactions in this region (Figure S2), these waves are attributed to the participating redox process of the metal center. Additionally, the irreversible waves observed near +0.8 V and −1.0 V are attributed to the oxidation wave of the phenolic oxygen and the reduction wave of the azomethine in the ligand, respectively. In the voltammogram of 1, three redox processes were roughly identified at E_1/2 = −0.18, −0.09, and +0.01 V (vs. Ag/Ag⁺). These can be attributed to three one-electron transfer processes for the three vanadium centers, specifically V₃(IV,IV,IV)/V₃(IV,IV,V), V₃(IV,IV,V)/V₃(IV,V,V), and V₃(IV,V,V)/V₃(V,V,V) (

Table 4. Electrochemical data of metal-centered redox process for 1–3.

Complex	V3(IV,IV,IV)/V3(IV,IV,V) *			V3(IV,IV,V)/V3(IV,V,V) *			V3(IV,V,V)/V3(V,V,V) *
	Epc	Epa	E1/2	Epc	Epa	E1/2	Epc	Epa	E1/2
1	−0.208	−0.15 **	−0.18	−0.12 **	−0.06 **	−0.09	−0.02 **	+0.038	+0.01
2	−0.512	−0.44 **	−0.48	−0.39 **	−0.32 **	−0.36	−0.20 **	−0.262	−0.23
3	+0.091	+0.15 **	+0.12	+0.18 **	+0.25 **	+0.22	+0.27 **	+0.333	+0.30

* vs. Ag/Ag⁺; ** determined by numerical differentiation.

). The peak separation values, ΔE_p = |E_pa − E_pc|, for each redox pair are approximately 60–70 mV, and changing the scan rate makes it difficult to distinguish the shoulders. Therefore, these three redox processes are considered quasireversible electron transfer processes. Although oxidovanadium(V) complexes were obtained in the present studies, isolating oxidovanadium(IV) complexes is anticipated with the development of appropriate synthetic conditions. The potential differences (ΔE_1/2) between the three metal-centered redox potentials exceed 100 mV. This value is considerably larger than the 28 mV expected for a purely statistical treatment in a three-electron process [27]. Generally, large bridging ligands lead to long metal-to-metal distances, resulting in small ΔE_1/2 values close to the statistical case in multinuclear complexes formed by such ligands. However, in the case of the ligand H₃L³⁺²H, the two coordination sites are connected by a π-conjugated system. Despite the vanadium ions being separated by over 8 Å in the complex structure, the enhancement of electronic repulsion effects via the π-conjugated system resulted in large ΔE_1/2 values. Similar phenomena have been observed in other multinuclear complexes with long metal-to-metal distances, such as Complex 1 [28,29,30].

For complexes 2 and 3, the influence of electronic properties of substituents on their redox potentials was observed (Figure 4a). Three redox couples observed for 2 were shifted by about 0.3 V to the negative side compared to those of 1. Conversely, for Complex 3, the redox processes were observed at approximately 0.3 V on the positive side. The electrochemical data for complexes 1–3 are summarized in Table 4. The three obtained E_1/2 potentials were plotted against Hammett’s parameters σ_p for the substituents (Figure 4b). Good correlations (R² = 0.992, 0.998, and 0.999) were observed, as reported in many other redox-active complexes [31,32,33].

To investigate the stability of the reduced state of the trinuclear complexes, controlled-potential electrolysis of Complex 1 was conducted in DMF at −0.5 V, and the ESR spectra were measured after electrolysis. The ESR spectra of the obtained solutions are shown in Figure 5. Although Complex 1 typically exhibits no ESR signals due to their d⁰-configration, the reduced solution exhibited ESR signals (line A) at g = 1.985, with a hyperfine structure originating from the nuclear spin of the vanadium nucleus (I = 7/2). ESR simulation (line B) was performed based on the isotropic spin Hamiltonian.

H = gβHS + ΣA_iSI_i

(1)

The simulation was conducted using a Gaussian function. The half with parameter w for the Gaussian function was defined as w = w₁ + w₂ × |m_I| + w₃ × |m_I|², where m_I is the nuclear spin quantum number. The calculation was performed using HyperFine 2.8 ESR simulation software [34]. The obtained ESR parameters are as follows: g₀ = 1.983, A₀ = 90.00 × 10⁻⁴ cm⁻¹, w₁ = 1.2, w₂ = 0.14, w₃ = 0.08. It is presumed that the oxidovanadium(IV) ion is coordinated by an ONO-donor set because the obtained A₀ value is closer to the values for [VO(salen)] and [VO(acacen)] (H₂acacen = N,N′-ethylenebis(acetylacetoniminate)) than that for [VO(acac)₂] [35,36,37]. Although CV confirmed that 1 maintains its trinuclear structure in DMF, no signals comprising 15–22 lines, attributed to the total nuclear spin of the three vanadium ions or fine structure due to unpaired electrons, were observed in the ESR spectrum after electrochemical reduction. Instead, the obtained ESR signals comprised eight lines, indicating magnetically isolated vanadium ions. This suggests that the spin density of reduction species is localized on each V(IV) center after electrochemical reduction. Subsequently, electrochemical oxidation of the reduced sample was performed at +0.3 V. The intensity of the eight-lined signals noticeably diminished (line C). These results revealed that the origins of the three redox couples is the vanadium centers, with each unpaired electron localized on each vanadium ion.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

All common reagents and solvents were purchased and used as received unless stated otherwise. Methanol was purified by distillation over magnesium turnings, while acetonitrile was dehydrated with P₂O₅ and distilled before use. Tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (TBAP), used as the supporting electrolyte, was recrystallized three times from a mixed solvent of dichloromethane and hexane. (Caution: TBAP is explosive and should be handled with great care!).

3.2. Preparation

3.2.1. Ligands

The symmetric [3 + 3] ligand, H₄L³⁺³H·HCl, and the asymmetric [3 + 2] ligand, H₃L³⁺²H, were obtained using methods described in [11]. The other ligands, H₄L³⁺³Br·HCl and H₄L³⁺³Me·HCl, were synthesized similarly by employing 5-bromo- and 5-methylsalicylaldehyde. H₄L³⁺³Br·HCl·2H₂O: Yield 1.41 g, 61%. C₂₀H₁₉Br₂ClN₂O₆ (578.64): calcd. C 41.51, H 3.31 N 4.84; found C 41.27, H 3.23, N 4.91%. IR(KBr): $\tilde{\nu }$= 3338 and 3039 (OH), 1634 (C=N), 827 (phenyl) cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz; DMSO; TMS) δ = 9.08(s, 2H), 7.80(s, 1H), 7.10(s, 2H), 7.22(d, 2H), 6.88(d, 2H), 6.74(s, 1H), 2.25(s, 6H) ppm. H₄L³⁺³Me·HCl·2.5H₂O: Yield 0.860 g, 94%. C₂₂H₂₆ClN₂O_6.5 (457.9): calcd. C 57.71, H 5.72 N 6.12; found C 57.70, H 5.54, N 6.12%. IR(KBr): $\tilde{\nu }$ = 3370 and 3075 (OH), 1632 (C=N), 827 (phenyl) cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (300 MHz; DMSO; TMS) δ = 9.02(s, 2H), 7.78(s, 2H), 7.62(s, 1H), 7.50(d, 2H), 6.92(d, 2H), 6.66(s, 1H) ppm.

3.2.2. [{. VO(L³⁺²R)}₃] (R = H: 1, Me: 2, Br: 3)

Triethylamine (0.03 g, 0.3 mmol) was added dropwise to a mixture of vanadium(III) chloride (0.016 g, 0.1 mmol) and H₄L³⁺³H·HCl (0.042 g, 0.1 mmol) in 15 mL of acetonitrile with stirring. Subsequently, 3 mL of DMF was added to the resulting dark brown solution, followed by filtration. The filtrate was allowed to stand for one day at room temperature. Single crystals of 1 suitable for X-ray crystallography were obtained from the filtrate. Complexes 2 and 3 were obtained using the same synthetic method as 1, employing H₄L³⁺³Me·HCl and H₄L³⁺³Br·HCl as ligands, respectively. 1·0.5MeCN·2H₂O: Yield 55.9%. C₆₁H_38.5N_6.5O₁₇V₃ (1287.33): calcd. C 56.91, H 3.01, N 7.07, V 11.87; found C 56.88, H 3.11, N 6.98, V 11.97%. IR (KBr) [cm⁻¹]: $\tilde{\nu }$= 1602–1617 (C=N), 967 (V=O). 2·MeCN·H₂O: Yield 0.013 g, 28.4%. C₆₈H₅₀N₇O₁₆V₃ (1374.00): calcd. C 59.44, H 3.67, N 7.14, V 11.12; found C 59.02, H 3.73, N 6.82, V 11.53%. IR (KBr) [cm⁻¹]: $\tilde{\nu }$= 1604–1616 (C=N), 968 (V=O). 3·1.5DMF·H₂O: Yield 22.9%. C_64.5H_39.5Br₆N_7.5O_17.5V₃ (1831.79): calcd. C 42.29, H 2.17, N 5.73, V 8.34; found C 42.59, H 2.04, N 5.25, V 7.89% IR (KBr) [cm⁻¹]: $\tilde{\nu }$= 1608–1615 (C=N), 973 (V=O).

3.2.3. (. Et₃NH)[(VO₂)(HL³⁺²H)] (4)

Triethylamine (0.10 g, 1.0 mmol) was added dropwise to a mixture of vanadium(IV) bis(acetylacetonato)oxide (0.054 g, 0.2 mmol) and H₃L³⁺²H (0.084g, 0.2 mmol) in dichloromethane (15 mL) with stirring. The resulting dark brown solution was filtered, and the filtrate was allowed to stand for one week at room temperature. Orange microcrystals were filtered off, washed with dry acetonitrile, and dried in vacuo. Single crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography were obtained from the filtrate after three months. 4·0.2H₂O: Yield 0.015 g, 12.9%. C₂₆H_28.4N₃O_6.2V (533.06): calcd. C 58.58, H 5.37, N 7.88, V 9.56; found C 58.18, H 5.28, N 7.81, V 9.40%. IR (KBr): $\tilde{\nu }$= 1615, 1634 (C=N), 861, 941 (V=O) cm⁻¹.

3.3. Physical Measurements

Elemental analyses for C, H, and N were conducted at the Elemental analysis Service Center, Kyushu University. Analyses of vanadium were carried out using a titrimetric method [38]. Infrared spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer Spectrum 2000 FT-IR Spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) on KBr disks. The IR spectra for the newly synthesized compounds are presented in Figures S3–S8. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra were recorded on a Varian 400MHz NMR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a JNM-AL300 Spectrometer (JEOL, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in DMSO-d₆ using tetramethylsilane as the internal standard. The NMR spectra for the newly obtained ligands are shown in Figure S9. The cyclic voltammogram (CV) was obtained on a BAS CV-27 Electrochemical Voltammetric Analyzer (BAS, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The measurements of CV were carried out in DMF containing 0.1 M TBAP as the supporting electrolyte. A three-electrode cell was used, equipped with a glassy carbon (ϕ = 3 mm) working electrode, a platinum wire counter electrode, and an Ag/Ag⁺ electrode as the reference. X-band ESR spectra were recorded on a JEOL JES-TE300 ESR Spectrometer (JEOL, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature.

3.4. X-ray Crystallography

Diffraction data for 1 were measured on a Rigaku Vari-Max Saturn CCD 724 diffractometer (Rigaku Corp, Tokyo, Japan) with graphite monochromated Mo Ka radiation (λ = 0.71069 Å) at the Analytical Research Center for Experimental Sciences, Saga University. Data were collected and processed using CrystalClear [39]. The crystal was maintained at 113 K during data collection. Absorption correction was applied by the multi-scan method. The structures were solved by direct methods (ShelXT) and expanded using Fourier techniques [40]. Non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically, while hydrogen atoms were placed geometrically in calculated positions and refined using a riding model. The crystal contained a large number of highly disordered solvent molecules, making it difficult to determine their positions. Therefore, solvent masks were calculated for the disordered solvent molecules by PLATON/SQUEEZE [41]. For 1, 214 electrons were found in a volume of 2919 ų in 1 void per unit cell. These are consistent with the presence of 6[H₂O] and 8[CH₃OH] per molecular formula for 1. The final cycle of full-matrix least-squares refinement on F² using ShelXL [42] was conducted based on observed reflections and variable parameters, resulting in convergence with unweighted and weighted agreement factors of R and R_w. Olex2 [43] served as an interface to the ShelX program package. The molecular structures were drawn using Mercury [44].

The diffraction data of 2 and 4 were collected using a Rigaku AFC5S automated four-circle diffractometer (Rigaku Corp, Tokyo, Japan) with graphite-monochromated MoKα (λ = 0.71069 Å) radiation. Data collection was performed at room temperature using either the ω scan technique or the ω-2θ scan technique. Weak reflections (I < 10σ(I)) were rescanned (up to a maximum of 5 rescans) to ensure reliable counting statistics, with stationary background counts recorded on each side of the reflection. The peak counting time ratio was maintained at 2:1, and the intensities of three representative reflections were measured after every 150 reflections. Empirical absorption corrections, based on azimuthal scans of several reflections, were applied. The structures were solved using direct methods (SIR92) [45] and expanded using Fourier techniques. All hydrogen atoms were located on the calculated positions and refined using the riding model. The PLATON/SQUEEZE program was applied to 2 for the calculation of the disordered solvent contribution. For 2, 602 electrons were found in a volume of 3058 in 1 void per unit cell. The final cycle of full-matrix least-squares refinement on F² using SHELXL-2016 [40] was conducted based on observed reflections and variable parameters, resulting in convergence with unweighted and weighted agreement factors of R and R_w. All calculations were carried out using the Rigaku CrystalStructure crystallographic software package version 4.3 [46], employing SHELXL-2016. The crystallographic data and collection details for 1 and 4 are summarized in Table 1, while the data for 2 are compiled in Table S1.

4. Conclusions

It has been demonstrated that asymmetric linking ligands, H₃L³⁺²H, H₃L³⁺²Me, and H₃L³⁺²Br, facilitate the formation of metallacyclic trinuclear oxidovanadium(V) complexes 1−3, described as [{VO(L³⁺²R)}₃]. In these complexes, the vanadium atoms adopt six-coordinate geometries, and the molecular structures are characterized as tripodal pyramids with small cavities. The mononuclear complex (Et₃NH)[VO₂(HL³⁺²H)] (4) was obtained through the reaction of [VO(acac)₂] with H₃L³⁺²H, featuring a square pyramidal dioxidovanadium(V) configuration. The trinuclear complexes exhibit three consecutive redox waves, and a notable correlation has been observed between the redox potentials and Hammett parameters. The result suggests that the present ligands offer new applications for obtaining redox-active trinuclear complexes and advancing self-assembling chemistry.