Next Article in Journal
Selective CO2 Capture from CO2/N2 Gas Mixtures Utilizing Tetrabutylammonium Fluoride Hydrates
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced CH4/N2 Separation Efficiency of UiO-66-Br2 through Hybridization with Mesoporous Silica
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Synthesis of Novel Squaraine-Based Fluorescent Probe for Far-Red Detection of Chymotrypsin Enzyme
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 6
10.3390/molecules29061283
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physical Grinding of Prefabricated Co3O4 and MCM-22 Zeolite for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Impact of Pretreatment Procedure on the Dispersion and Catalytic Performance

by
Hua-Ping Ren
1,
Zhi-Xia Xie
2,
Shao-Peng Tian
1,
Si-Yi Ding
1,
Qiang Ma
1,
Yu-Zhen Zhao
1,
Zhe Zhang
1,
Jiao-Jiao Fu
1 and
Qing-Qing Hao
2,*
1
Technological Institute of Materials & Energy Science (TIMES), Xi’an Key Laboratory of Advanced Photo-Electronics Materials and Energy Conversion Device, School of Electronic Information, Xijing University, Xi’an 710123, China
2
School of Chemical Engineering, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(6), 1283; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061283
Submission received: 18 February 2024 / Revised: 10 March 2024 / Accepted: 12 March 2024 / Published: 14 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zeolite: A Strategic Materials for Sustainable Chemistry and Future Energy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To improve the mess-specific activity of Co supported on zeolite catalysts in Fischer–Tropsch (FT) synthesis, the Co-MCM-22 catalyst was prepared by simply grinding the MCM-22 with nanosized Co3O4 prefabricated by the thermal decomposition of the Co(II)-glycine complex. It is found that this novel strategy is effective for improving the mess-specific activity of Co catalysts in FT synthesis compared to the impregnation method. Moreover, the ion exchange and calcination sequence of MCM-22 has a significant influence on the dispersion, particle size distribution, and reduction degree of Co. The Co-MCM-22 prepared by the physical grinding of prefabricated Co3O4 and H+-type MCM-22 without a further calcination process exhibits a moderate interaction between Co3O4 and MCM-22, which results in the higher reduction degree, higher dispersion, and higher mess-specific activity of Co. Thus, the newly developed method is more controllable and promising for the synthesis of metal-supported catalysts.

1. Introduction

Fischer–Tropsch (FT) synthesis is an efficient process for converting syngas (CO + H2) to super clean fuels and high-value-added fine chemicals [1,2,3]. However, the product distribution of FT synthesis is very broad because of the Anderson–Schulz–Flory (ASF) polymerization mechanism [4,5]. Thus, controlling the product distribution is crucial for the direct synthesis of target products (diesel, gasoline, et al.) with high selectivity through the FT process [6,7]. Cobalt has been widely used as an effective catalyst for FT synthesis due to its high activity, high resistance to deactivation, low water–gas shift activity, and lower price compared with noble metals [1,5]. Consequently, bifunctional catalysts, that is, combinations of cobalt with various solid acids for cracking and isomerizing the FT hydrocarbons, have been extensively studied to circumvent the ASF distribution and produce gasoline or diesel-range hydrocarbons with high selectivity [4,8,9].
Cobalt supported on zeolites has proven to be very effective, and the traditional FT product distribution can be significantly changed with much-increased selectivity to liquid fuels [10,11,12]. A cobalt nitrate precursor is often used owing to its high solubility, which allows for high metal loading in a single impregnation step. However, due to the infiltration of cobalt species into the micropores of zeolite and the strong interaction between Co and zeolite, a poor reduction degree of cobalt is frequently obtained, which results in lower mass-specific activity [13,14,15,16,17]. Moreover, inhomogeneous size distributions of cobalt are frequently obtained because the Co is simultaneously located on the internal surface and external surface of the microporous channel, which results in a higher deactivation rate [18,19,20]. Thus, developing a novel method for the preparation of an efficient Co/zeolite catalyst with highly dispersed and reducible Co is crucial for the development of a bifunctional FT catalyst with higher mass-specific activity of Co.
In essence, bifunctional Co-zeolite-based catalysts are combinations of FT-active metal Co with zeolite for cracking and isomerizing the FT hydrocarbons. In fact, except for the direct deposition of Co on or in zeolite, the physical mixing of FT catalysts (Co/SiO2, Co/Al2O3) and zeolite has been extensively studied [21,22,23]. However, the distance between the two kinds of active sites, i.e., FT-active sites (Co/SiO2, Co/Al2O3) and acid sites, in zeolite is relatively far, which results in a weaker synergistic effect. Therefore, the physical mixing of prefabricated nanosized Co3O4 and zeolite is a prospective strategy for obtaining efficient bifunctional FT catalysts with higher mass-specific activity.
As reported in the literature [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33], the chelate-assisted method has been widely used to improve the dispersion of metal for supported catalysts. In our previous work, Co/SiO2 catalysts with nanosized and homogenous size distributions of Co can be prepared by the thermal decomposition of Co(II)-glycine complexes prepared by the reaction of glycine with cobalt hydroxide [34]. Based on this work, nanosized Co3O4 should be prefabricated by the thermal decomposition of Co(II)-glycine complexes in the absence of support. Consequently, the interaction between Co and zeolite over the physical mixing of prefabricated nanosized Co3O4 and zeolite may be decreased in comparison with Co/zeolite prepared by the incipient impregnation method. MCM-22 zeolite with MWW topology is one of the most investigated 2D zeolites due to its modifiable arrangement of thin layers (ca. 2.5 nm thick) and unique pore systems, which consist of two different pores [35,36], i.e., intralayer 10-member ring (MR) sinusoidal channels and interlayer 12MR supercages interconnected through 10MR windows. It has been reported that Co/MCM-22 is a promising catalyst for FT synthesis with narrowed product distributions [17,37].
In this work, using a newly developed method, the Co3O4 was prepared by the thermal decomposition of Co(II)-glycine complexes prepared by the reaction of glycine with cobalt hydroxide. Then, the FT bifunctional catalyst was obtained by the direct physical mixing of prefabricated nanosized Co3O4 and MCM-22 zeolite. Moreover, the impacts of the template removal order of MCM-22 on its structure, acidity, and particle size of Co3O4 were comparatively investigated. For comparison, the Co-supported catalyst was also prepared by co-impregnation with the impregnation solution containing cobalt nitrate. Significantly, the Co-MCM-22 catalyst prepared by the physical mixing of prefabricated nanosized Co3O4 and MCM-22 exhibited smaller Co particle size and narrower size distribution, which resulted in higher activity and stability in the FT reaction.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. The Effect of Ion Exchange and Calcination Sequence on the Structural and Acidic Properties of MCM-22

Generally, the as-synthesized zeolites have a structure-directing agent (SDA) in their framework. Thus, to convert the as-synthesized sample to H-type zeolite with acid sites, two-step calcination is needed. Typically, the first step of calcination is to remove the SDA and convert the as-synthesized sample to Na-type zeolite. Then, the Na-type zeolite is ion-exchanged with NH4+ to obtain the NH4+-type zeolite. Finally, after the second step of calcination, the H-type zeolite can be obtained. In this work, we attempt to eliminate the first calcination to remove the SDA, that is, the as-synthesized MCM-22 (including SDA) directly ion-exchanged with NH4+ to obtain the NH4+-type MCM-22 (including SDA). Then, removing SDA and converting NH4+ to H+ was achieved through only a one-step calcination procedure. As mentioned in the introduction, the infiltration of cobalt species into the micropores of zeolite will result in a strong interaction between Co and zeolite. Thus, it is expected that the interaction between Co species and NH4+-type MCM-22 without removing the SDA could be decreased because of the existence of HMI in the micropores of MCM-22. However, whether the ion exchange and calcination sequence have an effect on the physical and chemical properties of MCM-22 zeolites is unknown. Thus, the influence of the ion exchange and calcination sequence on the structure and acidic properties of MCM-22 was investigated first.
The XRD patterns of the MCM-22(P) and H-MCM-22 samples prepared by different ion exchange sequences are shown in Figure 1. The XRD pattern of MCM-22(P) shows clear (001) and (002) diffraction peaks at 2 theta of 3.2 and 6.5° corresponding to d-spacings of 2.70 and 1.35 nm, indicating the ordered layered structure of MCM-22(P) with the vertically aligned layers along the c-axis [16,34]. Before template removal, the diffraction peaks in the 2 theta range of 12–30° are broad and some of them overlap. Significantly, the diffraction peaks of two H-MCM-22 prepared by different ion exchange sequences are very similar, indicating that the ion exchange and calcination sequence method has less effect on the crystal structure of H-MCM-22.
Commonly, the acidic properties of zeolites can be characterized by using the NH3-TPD technique to estimate the amount and distribution of weak and strong acid sites and using traditional pyridine-IR or novel Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS) without molar extinction coefficients [38] to estimate the Lewis and Brønsted sites. In this work, the acidic properties of H-MCM-22 prepared by different ion exchange sequences are estimated by the NH3-TPD technique. As shown in Figure 2, two clear NH3 desorption peaks can be seen for both H-MCM-22, which correspond to the weak and strong acidic sites. Significantly, the NH3-TPD profiles of the two samples are almost identical with each other. This observation indicates that the ion exchange sequence and the calcination method have less effect on the acidic properties of H-MCM-22. These results may be related to the unique SDA of hexamethyleneimine (HMI). The presence of HMI in the framework of MCM-22 does not have a steric hindrance effect on the ion exchange of NH4+ to Na+ due to the smaller molecular size of HMI. Moreover, the thermal stability of MCM-22 was indirectly proved by the slight change in structure and acidity after calcining twice. Therefore, for the preparation of H+-type MCM-22 zeolite, the first calcination procedure for removing the SDA can be eliminated, which can lower the cost of the synthesis of H-MCM-22 zeolite.

2.2. The Crystal Structure of Co3O4 and Co-MCM-22 Catalyst

As described in Section 3, the Co(II)-glycine complex is prepared by the reaction of glycine and Co(OH)2. As shown in Figure 3, the diffraction peaks assigned to Co(OH)2 species cannot be seen over the Co(II)-glycine complex, indicating that the Co(OH)2 is fully coordinated by the glycine and giving the homogenous Co complex with stable and definite structure, namely, Co(glycine)2(H2O)2. After the calcination of the Co(II)-glycine complex and Co(NO3)2·6H2O at 400 °C, the diffraction peaks of cobalt species are assigned to Co3O4 without other crystalline phases. Significantly, the peak width at half the height of Co3O4 prepared by the thermal decomposition of the Co complex is bigger than that of Co3O4 prepared by the thermal decomposition of Co(NO3)2·6H2O. This result indicated that the particle size of Co3O4 derived from the Co(II)-glycine complex is smaller than that of Co3O4 derived from Co(NO3)2·6H2O. Therefore, the thermal decomposition of the Co(II)-glycine complex is an effective method for the preparation of nanosized and homogeneous Co3O4 crystals.
The Co-based catalysts were prepared by three different methods, i.e., Co/MCM-22 prepared by the incipient impregnation method, Co-MCM-22(1) prepared by the physical mixing of Co3O4 and H-MCM-22, and Co-MCM-22(2) prepared by the physical mixing of Co3O4 and NH4+-MCM-22 (including HMI in the micropores) followed by calcination at 550 °C to remove HMI and obtain the H-MCM-22. As shown in Figure 4, the preparation methods have influenced the particle size of Co3O4 over MCM-22 zeolite. Significantly, the Co-MCM-22(1) shows the smallest particle size of Co3O4, in which the Co3O4 particle size is similar to that of prefabricated Co3O4, indicating that the grinding process has a limited effect on the particle size of Co3O4. It should be noted that the diffraction peak intensity of MCM-22 in the Co/MCM-22 prepared by the impregnation method is lower than that of Co3O4-MCM-22. This observation can be reasonably attributed to the entrance of Co3O4 into the micropores of MCM-22, which results in crystal imperfection and a decrease in peak intensity. Because the Co3O4 is located on the internal and external micropores of MCM-22 for Co/MCM-22 simultaneously, the Co3O4 particle size estimated from the XRD is an average value, which is slightly larger than that of the Co-MCM-22(1). For the Co-MCM-22(2) prepared using a tentative strategy, the particle size of Co3O4 is larger than those of Co/MCM-22 and Co-MCM-22(1). Thus, the expected result was not achieved. The larger particle size of Co3O4 over Co-MCM-22(2) can be attributed to the calcination procedure for removing the SDA of MCM-22, which results in the sintering of Co3O4 at high temperatures of 550 °C [1,19]. This explanation can be certified by the increased Co3O4 particle size of Co-MCM-22(1)-500 prepared by treating the Co-MCM-22(1) at 550 °C for 2 h.

2.3. Reduction Behavior and the Dispersion of Co Catalysts

Our H2-TPR measurement was used to evaluate the reduction behavior of the catalysts (Figure 5). The Co supported on MCM-22 catalysts shows two discrete peaks in the range of 250–650 °C, which are assigned to the two-step reduction of Co3O4 to CoO and CoO to metallic Co, respectively. As shown in Figure 5, the temperature for the reduction of Co3O4 to CoO (the first reduction peak) over Co/MCM-22 is clearly lower than those of Co3O4-MCM-22 prepared by the physical mixing method, indicating the existence of external Co3O4 with a bigger particle size over Co/MCM-22 [17]. Significantly, the reduction peak of CoO to metallic Co over Co-MCM-22(1) is in the broader range of 350–600 °C, which can be attributed to the smaller and moderate interaction between the Co species and MCM-22 zeolite. In contrast, the sharp reduction peak at about 400 °C over Co-MCM-22(2) and Co-MCM-22(1)-500 can be reasonably attributed to the bigger Co3O4 particle size induced by the higher temperature treating procedure.
It should be noted that there are clear reduction peaks in the range of 650-850 °C, which are attributed to the reduction in Co2SiO4-like species [16,17]. However, it must be pointed out that the Co2SiO4-like species can be formed in the temperature-programmed process above 400 °C for the H2-TPR measurement, while the reduction process before the FT reaction used in this work is at 400 °C for 4 h. Therefore, to demonstrate the formation reasons and estimate the reduction degree of different catalysts, the H2-TPR measurements were tested after the in situ reduction at 400 °C for 4 h. As shown in Figure 6, the Co/MCM-22 exhibits a clear reduction peak in the range of 650–850 °C, while the reduction peak in this temperature range for those three Co3O4-MCM-22 catalysts is not very obvious. These observations indicate that the irreducible Co2SiO4-like species at 400 °C can be avoided to a certain extent by using the physical mixing method to prevent Co species from moving into the micropores of MCM-22 zeolite. Moreover, the reduction degrees of the four catalysts are summarized in Table 1. The reduction degree of Co3O4-MCM-22 is clearly higher than that of Co/MCM-22.
Commonly, the surface Co0 density (Co dispersion) of the catalyst is determined by the particle size and the reduction degree of Co. H2-chemisorption is an effective technique to obtain the actual surface Co0 density and the dispersion (normalized by the total moles of Co over the catalyst). As shown in Table 1, the Co/MCM-22 exhibits the lowest Co dispersion (about 3.0%) in the four catalysts in this work, which can be attributed to the lower reduction degree and large particle size of Co. Moreover, the Co-MCM-22(1) shows the highest Co dispersion in the three catalysts prepared by the physical mixing method. This result can be attributed to the moderate interaction between Co and MCM-22, which results in a higher reduction degree and smaller Co particle size.

2.4. FT Performance

The catalyst was evaluated for FT synthesis under the conditions of 250 °C, 1 MPa, H2/CO = 2, and W/F = 5.0 g h mol−1. As shown in Figure 7, the CO conversions at a steady state (at TOS = 10 h) over the catalysts are increased in the order of Co-MCM-22(1) > Co-MCM-22(1)-500 = Co-MCM-22(2) > Co/MCM-22, which is consistent with the changing trend of Co0 dispersion in Table 1. Moreover, the catalytic stability of Co-MCM-22(1) within the reaction time is obviously higher than that of others. In contrast, the deactivation rate of Co/MCM-22 is clearly higher than those of Co-MCM-22 catalysts prepared by the physical mixing method. Based on the theoretical calculation, the Ostwald ripening rate could be suppressed further by preparing the homogeneously distributed metal particles with identical sizes. [19] Therefore, the higher stability of Co-MCM-22(1) can be reasonably explained by the homogeneous size distribution of Co particles and moderate interaction between Co and MCM-22 zeolites. In addition, the Co/MCM-22 is prepared by the incipient impregnation method, which makes a major part of the Co species infiltrate into the micropores of zeolite. The coke deposition will be formed over acid sites in the micropores due to the second cracking reaction of FT products, which will result in the coverage of Co0 active sites and the deactivation of the Co/MCM-22 [11,12,39].
Figure 8 shows the product distribution of the FT synthesis at TOS of 5 h and 10 h over these catalysts. The product distribution at TOS of 5 h and 10 h are very similar due to the slight change in CO conversion in this period. The selectivity of CH4 and C2-C4 over the four catalysts is higher than in the previous report [16] due to the higher reaction temperature in this work. However, the product distribution over the four catalysts in this work is very similar. It must be pointed out that the particle size of Co0 in the range of 10–30 nm exhibits a slight influence on the product distribution [13,14,40]. As shown in Table 1, the particle size of Co0 in this work is in the range of 14–21 nm, which results in the selectivity of the FT primary product being very similar. The selectivity of C21+ is obviously restrained due to the second cracking reaction of the FT product over the acidic sites of MCM-22, while the selectivity of C5–C20 is significantly increased compared with that of Co/SiO2 catalysts without acidic sites. It should be noted that the selectivity of C21+ over Co-MCM-22(1) is slightly higher than that of the other three catalysts. This result can be reasonably attributed to the higher CO conversion and the not-covered acidic site in the micropores of MCM-22.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Hexamethyleneimine (HMI, 99%) and colloidal silica (Ludox, AS-40, 40%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China. Co(NO3)2·6H2O (98.5%), glycine (99%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 96%), sodium, aluminate (NaAlO2, 41% Al2O3), and ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3, 99%) were provided by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. All reagents were used directly without further treatment.

3.2. Preparation of Nanosized Co3O4

The nanosized Co3O4 was prepared by the thermal decomposition of Co(II)-glycine complexes. Typically, the Co(II)-glycine precursor was prepared by the reaction of glycine with Co(OH)2 (mole ratio of glycine/Co(OH)2 = 3). The Co(OH)2 was prepared by the reaction of Co(NO3)2 with NaOH using the molar ratio of OH−/Co2+ = 2. After the formation of Co(OH)2 precipitate, the Co(OH)2 was recovered by filtration and washing with deionized water thoroughly, and then the wet Co(OH)2 was dried at 80 °C for 12 h. For the preparation of the Co(II)-glycine complex, the Co(OH)2 powder was slowly added to the 0.2 mol/L glycine aqueous solution (in which the molar ratio of glycine to Co(OH)2 is 3) at 80 °C. After the addition of Co(OH)2 powder, the solution was still stirred for 2 h at 80 °C, and then most of the water was removed through rotary evaporation. Finally, the Co(II)-glycine complex was obtained after drying the samples overnight at 90 °C.

3.3. Preparation of MCM-22 Zeolite

MCM-22(P) was synthesized based on the reported method in the literature [35]. Typically, 0.15 g of NaAlO2 and 0.18 g of NaOH were dissolved in 25.2 mL of deionized water, and then 4.7 g of colloidal silica was added. The mixture was stirred for 0.5 h, and then 1.1 g of HMI was added. The final molar composition of the mixture was 0.07 Na2O/1 SiO2/0.02 Al2O3/0.35 HMI/ 45 H2O. The reaction mixture was transferred into 50 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclaves. The autoclaves were tumbled at 60 rpm in an oven at 150 °C. After 7 days, the autoclaves were fast-cooled in water, and the products were centrifuged and washed with deionized water until the pH = 8. MCM-22(P) was obtained after drying the samples overnight at 90 °C. A part of the MCM-22(P) was calcined at 550 °C for 6 h to obtain the Na-type MCM-22 zeolite. Consequently, the Na-type MCM-22 was ion-exchanged 3 times in a 1 mol/L NH4NO3 solution at 80 °C for 2 h. Finally, the NH4+-type MCM-22 was calcined at 500 °C for 2 h to obtain the H-type MCM-22 (H-MCM-22(1)). Another part of MCM-22(P) was directly ion-exchanged 3 times in a 1 mol/L NH4NO3 solution at 80 °C for 2 h to obtain the NH4+-type MCM-22 without removing the structure direct agent (HMI). Finally, the NH4+-type MCM-22 was calcined at 500 °C for 4 h to obtain the H-type MCM-22 (H-MCM-22(2)).

3.4. Preparation of Co-Based Catalyst

The Co-MCM-22 catalyst was prepared by the direct physical mixing of prefabricated nanosized Co3O4 and MCM-22. Typically, the nanosized Co3O4 and H-MCM-22 were mixed in an agate mortar for 10 min, which is denoted as Co-MCM-22(1). The nanosized Co3O4 and NH4+-type MCM-22 were mixed in an agate mortar for 10 min, and then the catalyst was calcined at 500 °C for 4 h to remove the structure direct agent (HMI) and convert the NH4+ to H+ of MCM-22, which is denoted as Co-MCM-22(2). The metallic Co loading for all the catalysts was 10 wt.%.
For comparison, the Co/MCM-22 was prepared by the incipient impregnation method. The cobalt nitrate (Co(NO3)2·6H2O, 99.0%) was used as the cobalt precursor. The catalysts were dried at 120 °C for 12 h, and then calcined at 200 °C for 2 h in air by programmed heating with a rate of 2 °C min−1.

3.5. Characterizations

The NH3-TPD measurements were performed with a BELCAT II (Microtrac BEL, Osaka, Japan) instrument. Typically, 0.05 g of the sample was preheated with flowing He at 550 °C for 1 h and then cooled to 120 °C. Subsequently, the sample was exposed to an NH3-He mixture (5 vol% NH3) for 0.5 h. After this, the system was purged for 1 h under a flow of He at the same temperature. After this, NH3-TPD was performed by raising the temperature to 600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a He flow of 30 cm3/min. XRD measurement was performed on an X-ray diffractometer (D8 Advance) with Cu Kα radiation operated at 40 kV and 40 mA. The speed of scanning is 4°/min with a step size of 0.02°. The average crystallite size of Co3O4 over the catalysts was estimated using (311) diffraction lines (2θ at about 37.0°) according to Scherrer’s equation. The H2-TPR was carried out on a BELCAT II (MicrotracBEL) instrument. Notably, 0.05 g of the catalysts was first purged in a flow of argon at 200 °C for 30 min. After the temperature decreased to 35 °C, the catalysts were heated to 900 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under 10 vol.% hydrogen–argon mixtures with a flow rate of 30 cm3/min. The reduction degree of cobalt was determined by the O2 pulse titration method. Firstly, about 0.1 g of catalyst was reduced in situ for 6 h at 500 °C using pure hydrogen. Afterwards, the temperature of the sample was decreased to 400 °C, and it was flushed with pure Ar for 1 h. At the same temperature, 3 vol. % O2 was injected with a pulse mode to oxidize the reduced catalyst. The reduction degree (RD, %) of the catalyst was estimated based on the consumption of oxygen assuming that metallic Co was converted to Co3O4. H2-chemisorption measurements were performed on a Micromeretics ASAP 2020C instrument to evaluate the Co dispersion. Before measurement, the sample was reduced on the analysis station in situ in flowing H2 at 500 °C for 6 h. Afterwards, the temperature was decreased to 100 °C and the H2-chemisorption was measured at this temperature. The H2 uptakes and Co dispersion (D, %) were determined using the method reported in the literature. Assuming the hemispherical geometry of the metallic Co, with a surface atomic density of 14.6 atoms/nm2, the particle sizes of Co0 were calculated using the d(Co)H = 96 × RD/D formula.

3.6. Catalytic Reactions

The catalytic performance of the catalysts in FT synthesis was tested in a fixed-bed reactor. Typically, 0.5 g of catalyst (40–60 mesh diluted with quartz sands) was firstly reduced in situ in a flow of pure H2 (50 cm3/min) at 400 °C for 6 h. And then, the temperature was decreased to 190 °C and the syngas (H2/CO = 2, 4% Ar as an internal standard) was fed into the reactor. The reaction conditions are at 250 °C, 1.0 MPa, and W/F = 5.0 g·h·mol−1. To prevent condensation of the products, the pipeline from the outlet of the reactor to the inlet of the gas chromatography (GC) was heated at 180 °C. The hydrocarbons in the effluent were online and were analyzed by a GC with an HP-PONA capillary column (0.20 mm × 50 m, 0.5 μm) and a flame ionization detector (FID) (SP-3420A, Beifen-Ruili Analytical Instrument (Group) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The CO, CH4, Ar, and CO2 in the effluent were online and were analyzed by a GC with a packed activated carbon column and a TCD detector (SP-3420A). The selectivity for hydrocarbons was calculated based on carbon number.

4. Conclusions

In summary, nanosized Co3O4 was prefabricated by the thermal decomposition of the Co(II)-glycine complex prepared by the reaction of glycine and Co(OH)2. MCM-22-supported Co catalysts were prepared by the physical mixing of prefabricated Co3O4 with H-MCM-22 and NH4+-MCM-22. This is an effective strategy for improving the dispersion of Co and the mess-specific activity of Co catalysts in FT synthesis compared to the impregnation method. It is found that the dispersion, particle size distribution, and reduction degree of Co were significantly influenced by the ion exchange sequence and calcination conditions, although the ion exchange sequence and calcination conditions have a limited impact on the structure and acidic properties of MCM-22 zeolite. In comparison to the Co/MCM-22 prepared by the traditional impregnation method, the Co-MCM-22(1) prepared by the newly developed method, i.e., simply mixing the nanosized Co3O4 and H-MCM-22, exhibited higher mess-specific activity of Co. Thus, the newly developed method is more controllable and promising for the synthesis of Co-based catalysts for FT synthesis.

Author Contributions

H.-P.R. conceived and designed the experiment; Z.-X.X., Z.Z. and J.-J.F. performed the experiments; S.-P.T., Q.M. and S.-Y.D. analyzed the data; Y.-Z.Z. contributed reagents/materials/analysis; H.-P.R. and Q.-Q.H. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21908182), the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Science and Technology Department (2024JC-YBMS-089 and 2020JM-643), the Scientific Research Foundation for the Youth Innovation Team of the Education Department of Shaanxi Provincial Government (21JP139 and 21JP136), and the Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

All individuals included in this section have consented to the acknowledgment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wolf, M.; Fischer, N.; Claeys, M. Formation of metal-support compounds in cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: A review. Chem Catal. 2021, 1, 1014–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rommens, K.T.; Saeys, M. Molecular views on Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 5798–5858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Platero, F.; Caballero, A.; Colón, G. Catalytic performance of cobalt supported onto APTES functionalized TiO2 for Fischer-Tropsch reaction. Fuel 2023, 340, 127528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, T.; An, Y.; Yu, F.; Gong, K.; Yu, H.; Wang, C.; Sun, Y.; Zhong, L. Advances in Selectivity Control for Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis to Fuels and Chemicals with High Carbon Efficiency. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 12092–12112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Q.P.; Tian, Y.; Lyu, S.S.; Zhao, N.; Ma, K.; Ding, T.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, L.H.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, L.R.; et al. Confined small-sized cobalt catalysts stimulate carbon-chain growth reversely by modifying ASF law of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3250–3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kang, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y. Ruthenium nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotubes as efficient catalysts for selective conversion of synthesis gas to diesel fuel. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2565–2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, X.; He, J.; Meng, M.; Yoneyama, Y.; Tsubaki, N. One-step synthesis of H-β zeolite-enwrapped Co/Al2O3 Fischer-Tropsch catalyst with high spatial selectivity. J. Catal. 2009, 265, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bao, J.; He, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yoneyama, Y.; Tsubaki, N. A core/shell catalyst produces a spatially confined effect and shape selectivity in a consecutive reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yao, M.; Yao, N.; Shao, Y.; Han, Q.; Ma, C.; Yuan, C.; Li, C.; Li, X. New insight into the activity of ZSM-5 supported Co and Co/Ru bifunctional Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 239, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pereira, A.L.C.; González-Carballo, J.M.; Pérez-Alonso, F.J.; Rojas, S.; Fierro, J.L.G.; do Carmo Rangel, M. Effect of the mesostructuration of the beta zeolite support on the properties of cobalt catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Top Catal. 2011, 54, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sartipi, S.; Alberts, M.; Meijerink, M.J.; Keller, T.C.; Pérez-Ramírez, J.; Gascon, J.; Kapteijn, F. Towards liquid fuels from biosyngas: Effect of zeolite structure in hierarchical-zeolite-supported cobalt catalysts. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 1646–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sartipi, S.; Parashar, K.; Valero-Romero, M.J.; Santos, V.P.; van der Linden, B.; Makkee, M.; Kapteijn, F.; Gascon, J. Hierarchical H-ZSM-5-supported cobalt for the direct synthesis of gasoline-range hydrocarbons from syngas: Advantages, limitations, and mechanistic insight. J. Catal. 2013, 305, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Martínez, A.; Prieto, G. Breaking the dispersion-reducibility dependence in oxide-supported cobalt nanoparticles. J. Catal. 2007, 245, 470–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Prieto, G.; Martínez, A.; Concepción, P.; Moreno-Tost, R. Cobalt particle size effects in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: Structural and in situ spectroscopic characterisation on reverse micelle-synthesised Co/ITQ-2 model catalysts. J. Catal. 2009, 266, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Ban, M.; Lee, D.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.; Ha, K.-S. Unravelling the effects of short pore on Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and its role as selectivity controller. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 475, 146039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hao, Q.-Q.; Liu, Z.-W.; Zhang, B.; Wang, G.-W.; Ma, C.; Frandsen, W.; Li, J.; Liu, Z.-T.; Hao, Z.; Su, D. Porous montmorillonite heterostructures directed by a single alkyl ammonium template for controlling the product distribution of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over cobalt. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 972–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hao, Q.-Q.; Lei, C.-Y.; Song, Y.-H.; Liu, Z.-T.; Liu, Z.-W. The delaminating and pillaring of MCM-22 for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over cobalt. Catal. Today 2016, 274, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Valero-Romero, M.J.; García-Mateos, F.J.; Kapteijn, F.; Rodríguez-Mirasol, J.; Cordero, T. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over lignin-derived cobalt-containing porous carbon fiber catalysts. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. Energy 2023, 321, 122078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ouyang, R.H.; Liu, J.X.; Li, W.X. Atomistic theory of ostwald ripening and disintegration of supported metal particles under reaction conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1760–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kistamurthy, D.; Saib, A.M.; Moodley, D.J.; Niemantsverdriet, J.W.; Weststrate, C.J. Ostwald ripening on a planar Co/SiO2 catalyst exposed to model Fischer-Tropsch synthesis conditions. J. Catal. 2015, 328, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Z.-W.; Li, X.; Asami, K.; Fujimoto, K. High performance Pd/beta catalyst for the production of gasoline-range iso-paraffins via a modified Fischer-Tropsch reaction. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2006, 300, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, X.; Luo, M.; Asami, K. Direct synthesis of middle iso-paraffins from synthesis gas on hybrid catalysts. Catal. Today 2004, 89, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, Z.-W.; Li, X.; Asami, K.; Fujimoto, K. Iso-paraffins Synthesis from Modified Fischer-Tropsch Reactions Insights into Pd/beta and Pt/ beta Catalysts. Catal. Today 2005, 104, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, Z.; Sun, B.; Qiao, M.; Wei, J.; Yue, Q.; Wang, C.; Deng, Y.; Kaliaguine, S.; Zhao, D. A general chelate-assisted co-assembly to metallic nanoparticles-incorporated ordered mesoporous carbon catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17653–17660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Koizumi, N.; Ibi, Y.; Hongo, D.; Hamabe, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Hayasaka, Y.; Shindo, T.; Yamada, M. Mechanistic aspects of the role of chelating agents in enhancing Fischer-Tropsch synthesis activity of Co/SiO2 catalyst: Importance of specific interaction of Co with chelate complex during calcination. J. Catal. 2012, 289, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shi, L.; Zeng, C.Y.; Lin, Q.H.; Lu, P.; Niu, W.Q.; Tsubaki, N. Citric acid assisted one-step synthesis of highly dispersed metallic Co/SiO2 without further reduction: As-prepared Co/SiO2 catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Catal. Today 2014, 228, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mochizuki, T.; Hara, T.; Koizumi, N.; Yamada, M. Surface structure and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis activity of highly active Co/SiO2 catalysts prepared from the impregnating solution modified with some chelating agents. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2007, 317, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mochizuki, T.; Hara, T.; Koizumi, N.; Yamada, M. Novel preparation method of highly active Co/SiO2 catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis with chelating agents. Catal. Lett. 2007, 113, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jos van Dillen, A.; Terörde, R.J.A.M.; Lensveld, D.J.; Geus, J.W.; de Jong, K.P. Synthesis of supported catalysts by impregnation and drying using aqueous chelated metal complexes. J. Catal. 2003, 216, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Villagran-Olivares, A.C.; Barroso, M.N.; López, C.A.; Llorca, J.; Abello, M.C. Chelating agent effects in the synthesis of supported Ni nanoparticles as catalysts for hydrogen production. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2021, 622, 118219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bambal, A.S.; Guggilla, V.S.; Kugler, E.L.; Gardner, T.H.; Dadyburjor, D.B. Poisoning of a silica-supported cobalt catalyst due to presence of sulfur impurities in syngas during Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: Effects of chelating agent. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 5846–5857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shi, L.; Tao, K.; Kawabata, T.; Shimamura, T.; Zhang, X.J.; Tsubaki, N. Surface impregnation combustion method to prepare nanostructured metallic catalysts without further reduction: As-burnt Co/SiO2 catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gorboletova, G.G.; Metlin, A.A. Standard Thermodynamic functions of Co2+ complexation with glycine and L-histidine in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. 2016, 90, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hao, Q.-Q.; Hu, M.; Xie, Z.-X.; Ma, X.; Wang, W.; Ren, H.-P. Impact of coordination features of Co(II)-glycine complex on the surface sites of Co/SiO2 for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, J.-Q.; Li, Y.-Z.; Hao, Q.-Q.; Chen, H.; Liu, Z.-T.; Dai, C.; Zhang, J.; Ma, X.; Liu, Z.-W. Controlled direct synthesis of single- to multiple-layer MWW zeolite. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2021, 8, nwaa236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yuan, M.-T.; Zhao, D.-Y.; Hao, Q.-Q.; Luo, Q.-X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, H.; Sun, M.; Xu, L.; Ma, X. Gemini surfactant-directed facile pillaring of two-dimensional zeolites with enhanced catalytic activity in Friedel-Crafts alkylation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 16312–16320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ravishankar, R.; Li, M.M.; Borgna, A. Novel utilization of MCM-22 molecular sieves as supports of cobalt catalysts in the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Catal. Today 2005, 106, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bräuer, P.; Situmorang, O.; Ng, P.L.; D’Agostino, C. Effect of Al content on the strength of terminal silanol species in ZSM-5 zeolite catalysts: A quantitative DRIFTS study without the use of molar extinction coefficients. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 4250–4262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Al-Khattaf, S.; D’Agostino, C.; Akhtar, M.N.; Al-Yassir, N.; Tan, N.Y.; Gladden, L.F. The effect of coke deposition on the activity and selectivity of the HZSM-5 zeolite during ethylbenzene alkylation reaction in the presence of ethanol. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 1017–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Luo, Q.-X.; Guo, L.-P.; Yao, S.-Y.; Bao, J.; Liu, Z.-T.; Liu, Z.-W. Cobalt nanoparticles confined in carbon matrix for probing the size dependence in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. J. Catal. 2019, 369, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 01283 g001
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the MCM-22 (P) (a), H-MCM-22(1) (b), and H-MCM-22(2) (c).
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the MCM-22 (P) (a), H-MCM-22(1) (b), and H-MCM-22(2) (c).
Molecules 29 01283 g001
Molecules 29 01283 g002
Figure 2. NH3-TPD profiles of H-MCM-22(1) (a) and H-MCM-22(2) (b).
Figure 2. NH3-TPD profiles of H-MCM-22(1) (a) and H-MCM-22(2) (b).
Molecules 29 01283 g002
Molecules 29 01283 g003
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the Co(NO3)2·6H2O (a), Co(II)-glycine complex (b), Co3O4 prepared using Co(NO3)2·6H2O as precursor (c), and Co3O4 prepared using Co(II)-glycine as precursor (d).
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the Co(NO3)2·6H2O (a), Co(II)-glycine complex (b), Co3O4 prepared using Co(NO3)2·6H2O as precursor (c), and Co3O4 prepared using Co(II)-glycine as precursor (d).
Molecules 29 01283 g003
Molecules 29 01283 g004
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the Co/MCM-22 (a), Co-MCM-22(1) (b), Co-MCM-22(2) (c), and Co-MCM-22(1)-500 (d).
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the Co/MCM-22 (a), Co-MCM-22(1) (b), Co-MCM-22(2) (c), and Co-MCM-22(1)-500 (d).
Molecules 29 01283 g004
Molecules 29 01283 g005
Figure 5. H2-TPR profiles of the Co/MCM-22 (a), Co-MCM-22(1) (b), Co-MCM-22(2) (c), and Co-MCM-22(1)-500 (d).
Figure 5. H2-TPR profiles of the Co/MCM-22 (a), Co-MCM-22(1) (b), Co-MCM-22(2) (c), and Co-MCM-22(1)-500 (d).
Molecules 29 01283 g005
Molecules 29 01283 g006
Figure 6. H2-TPR profiles of the Co/MCM-22 (a), Co-MCM-22(1) (b), Co-MCM-22(2) (c), and Co-MCM-22(1)-500 (d) after reduction at 400 °C for 4 h.
Figure 6. H2-TPR profiles of the Co/MCM-22 (a), Co-MCM-22(1) (b), Co-MCM-22(2) (c), and Co-MCM-22(1)-500 (d) after reduction at 400 °C for 4 h.
Molecules 29 01283 g006
Molecules 29 01283 g007
Figure 7. Time-on-stream CO conversion over Co/MCM-22 (a), Co-MCM-22(1) (b), Co-MCM-22(2) (c), and Co-MCM-22(1)-500 (d).
Figure 7. Time-on-stream CO conversion over Co/MCM-22 (a), Co-MCM-22(1) (b), Co-MCM-22(2) (c), and Co-MCM-22(1)-500 (d).
Molecules 29 01283 g007
Molecules 29 01283 g008
Figure 8. The carbon number distribution of FT hydrocarbons at TOS of 5 h (A) and 10 h (B) over Co/MCM-22 (a), Co-MCM-22(1) (b), Co-MCM-22(2) (c), and Co-MCM-22(1)-500 (d).
Figure 8. The carbon number distribution of FT hydrocarbons at TOS of 5 h (A) and 10 h (B) over Co/MCM-22 (a), Co-MCM-22(1) (b), Co-MCM-22(2) (c), and Co-MCM-22(1)-500 (d).
Molecules 29 01283 g008
Table 1. Crystal sizes and reduction degree of cobalt over different catalysts.
Table 1. Crystal sizes and reduction degree of cobalt over different catalysts.
CatalystsCo Size (nm)Reduction Degree b
(RD, %)		Co Dispersion c
(D, %)
d(Co3O4) ad(Co)H d
Co3O4(G)12.1---------
Co3O4(N)34.5---------
Co/MCM-2220.021.467.03.0
Co-MCM-22(1)13.414.982.15.3
Co-MCM-22(2)18.520.487.34.1
Co-MCM-22(1)-50019.519.786.24.2
a Estimation derived from Scherrer’s equation using (311) diffraction lines (2θ at about 37.0°). b The reduction degree (RD, %) was estimated based on the consumption of oxygen. c Co dispersion (D, %) was calculated using H2 uptakes in H2-chemisorption. d The particle sizes of Co0 were calculated using d(Co)H = 96 × RD/D formula.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, H.-P.; Xie, Z.-X.; Tian, S.-P.; Ding, S.-Y.; Ma, Q.; Zhao, Y.-Z.; Zhang, Z.; Fu, J.-J.; Hao, Q.-Q. Physical Grinding of Prefabricated Co3O4 and MCM-22 Zeolite for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Impact of Pretreatment Procedure on the Dispersion and Catalytic Performance. Molecules 2024, 29, 1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061283

AMA Style

Ren H-P, Xie Z-X, Tian S-P, Ding S-Y, Ma Q, Zhao Y-Z, Zhang Z, Fu J-J, Hao Q-Q. Physical Grinding of Prefabricated Co3O4 and MCM-22 Zeolite for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Impact of Pretreatment Procedure on the Dispersion and Catalytic Performance. Molecules. 2024; 29(6):1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061283

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Hua-Ping, Zhi-Xia Xie, Shao-Peng Tian, Si-Yi Ding, Qiang Ma, Yu-Zhen Zhao, Zhe Zhang, Jiao-Jiao Fu, and Qing-Qing Hao. 2024. "Physical Grinding of Prefabricated Co3O4 and MCM-22 Zeolite for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Impact of Pretreatment Procedure on the Dispersion and Catalytic Performance" Molecules 29, no. 6: 1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061283

APA Style

Ren, H. -P., Xie, Z. -X., Tian, S. -P., Ding, S. -Y., Ma, Q., Zhao, Y. -Z., Zhang, Z., Fu, J. -J., & Hao, Q. -Q. (2024). Physical Grinding of Prefabricated Co3O4 and MCM-22 Zeolite for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Impact of Pretreatment Procedure on the Dispersion and Catalytic Performance. Molecules, 29(6), 1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061283

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop