Next Article in Journal
Dyeing of Tussah Silk with Reactive Dyes: Dye Selection, Dyeing Conditions, Dye Fixation Characteristics, and Comparison with Mulberry Silk
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Eco-Friendly Hydrolyzed Ethylene–Maleic Anhydride Copolymer–Avermectin Nanoemulsion with High Stability, Adhesion Property, pH, and Temperature-Responsive Releasing Behaviors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 5
10.3390/molecules29051149
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ganoderma lucidum-Derived Meroterpenoids Show Anti-Inflammatory Activity In Vitro

by
Yun-Yun Liu
1,2,3,
Dan Cai
2,3,
Xin-Ping Tang
2,3 and
Yong-Xian Cheng
1,2,3,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China
2
Institute for Inheritance-Based Innovation of Chinese Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China
3
Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(5), 1149; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051149
Submission received: 5 February 2024 / Revised: 22 February 2024 / Accepted: 27 February 2024 / Published: 5 March 2024
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ganoderma lucidum, known as the “herb of spiritual potency”, is used for the treatment and prevention of various diseases, but the responsible constituents for its therapeutic effects are largely unknown. For the purpose of obtaining insight into the chemical and biological profiling of meroterpenoids in G. lucidum, various chromatographic approaches were utilized for the title fungus. As a result, six undescribed meroterpenoids, chizhienes A–F (1–6), containing two pairs of enantiomers (4 and 5), were isolated. Their structures were identified using spectroscopic and computational methods. In addition, the anti-inflammatory activities of all the isolates were evaluated by Western blot analysis in LPS-induced macrophage cells (RAW264.7), showing that 1 and 3 could dose dependently inhibit iNOS but not COX-2 expression. Further, 1 and 3 were found to inhibit nitric oxide (NO) production using the Greiss reagent test. The current study will aid in enriching the structural and biological diversity of Ganoderma-derived meroterpenoids.

1. Introduction

Ganoderma lucidum is distributed in all continents of the world, mostly growing in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions [1], and has been used as a functional food based on traditional medicine for health and longevity in China and Southeast Asia for thousands of years [2]. Daily diets are commonly supplemented with G. lucidum to enhance their nutritional value, providing benefits such as improved serum mineral composition and bone index [3]. The fungus, also known as the “herb of spiritual potency”, was recorded in Sheng Nong’s Herbal Classic for the treatment and prevention of various diseases, such as neurasthenia, insomnia, anorexia, dizziness, chronic hepatitis, bronchitis, arthritis, nephritis, coronary heart disease, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hypertension, and cancer [4,5,6,7]. Previous phytochemical studies on this fungus focused on its polysaccharide and triterpenoid content. In addition, some other constituents such as alkaloids and sterols were also revealed [2,5]. Ganoderma meroterpenoids (GMs), the third most studied component with over 680 meroterpenoids beyond polysaccharides and triterpenoids, were first obtained in 2000 and have gained further attention since 2013, when lingzhiols were reported [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The basic structure of GMs is formed of two units: (A) a p-dihydroxybenzene and (B) a terpene moiety. These basic structure moieties could be independent or attached to another GM or other categories of structures to form structurally diverse GMs [8]. According to the number of carbon atoms contained in their side chains and the combinations with different additional moieties, GMs are divided into six categories: (1) ones with two isoprene units as side chains; (2) ones with three isoprene units as side chains; (3) dimers; (4) meroterpenoid–p-coumaric acid hybrids; (5) meroterpenoid–triterpenoid hybrids; and (6) meroterpenoid alkaloids [8]. Some members of the GMs possess biological properties such as antimicrobial [9,16], anti-allergic [17], renal-protective [18], antioxidant [19,20,21,22], antidiabetic [23,24], obesity-inhibitory [25], T-type calcium channel-blocking [26], 3-hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase-inhibitory, α-glucosidase-inhibitory [27], acetylcholinesterase (AChE)-inhibitory [28], inflammation-suppressive [29,30], and tumor-suppressive activities [22], whereas the action mechanisms involved in GMs mainly focus on their inhibition of inflammation, tumors, and diabetes [31,32,33]. The current work is an in-depth investigation of G. lucidum, which led to the characterization of six meroterpenoids chizhienes A–F (1–6) (Figure 1). In addition, the anti-inflammatory effects of all the isolates were determined. All these efforts will be described below.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structure Elucidation of the Compounds

Chizhiene A (1) was obtained as a yellow oil. The 1H NMR spectrum (Table 1) of 1 contains a typical ABX spin system [δH 7.34 (1H, d, J = 2.9 Hz, H-3), δH 7.00 (1H, dd, J = 8.9, 2.9 Hz, H-5), and δH 6.80 (1H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-6)]. The 13C and DEPT NMR spectra (Table 1) of 1 show one methyl, three methylenes (two oxygenated), seven aromatic methines, and six nonprotonated carbons (five aromatic and one ketone carbonyl at δC 205.3). The 1D NMR signals (Table 1) show high similarity to those of petchiene E [34], except for the presence of two additional methylenes at δC 73.5 (C-9′) and δC 66.8 (C-10′), one methyl at δC 15.4 (C-11′), and the absence of one ketone at δC 170 (C-9′) in 1. These signals indicated that a methoxyethane group is located at C-7′ (δC 140.2) in 1 rather than a carboxylic acid group in petchiene E. The 1H-1H COSY correlation of H3-11′ (δH 1.20)/H2-10′ (δH 3.54) and the HMBC correlations of H2-10′, H-6′, and H-8′/C-9′ (Figure 2) supported the differences between 1 and petchiene E. Thus, the structure of 1 was identified.
Chizhiene B (2) was isolated as a yellow oil. Comparing the 1D and 2D NMR data (Table 1) of 2 and petchiene B [34] suggested that 2 is a structural analog of petchiene B. The difference between 2 and petchiene B is that the hydroxyl group at C-9′ in petchiene B is replaced by an ethoxy moiety in 2. The 1H-1H COSY correlation of H3-11′/H2-10′ and the HMBC correlations of H2-10′/C-9′ and H2-6′/C-7′, C-8′, and C-9′ (Figure 2) confirmed the aforementioned conclusion. Thus, the structure of 2 was identified.
Chizhiene E (3) was obtained as yellow solids. The 1H NMR spectrum of 3 (Table 1) contains three typical aromatic signals at δH 7.30 (1H, d, J = 2.9 Hz, H-3), 7.01 (1H, dd, J = 8.9, 2.9 Hz, H-5), and 6.79 (1H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-6), indicating the presence of a 1,2,4-trisubstituted benzene substructure. The 13C NMR and DEPT spectra (Table 1) display 17 carbons classified into one methyl, five methylenes, five olefinic methines, and six nonprotonated carbons (one ketone carbonyl at δC 206.0). These NMR signals resemble those of 2 indicating they are analogs. Compound 3 differs from 2 only in the position of two double bonds. The Δ3′(4′) and Δ6′(7′) double bonds in 3 rather than the Δ2′(3′) and Δ7′(8′) in 2 were observed by the 1H-1H COSY correlations of H-4′ (δH 5.62)/H2-5′/H-6′ (δH 5.70) and HMBC correlations of H2-2′/C-1′, C-3′, C-4′, and C-8′ and H2-9′/C-6′, C-7′, and C-8′ (Figure 2). Therefore, the structure of 3 was assigned.
Chizhiene F (4) was afforded as yellow solids. A careful comparison of the NMR data of 4 with those of baoslingzhine C [35] indicated they are almost identical. The only difference between them is that the ethoxy group at C-6′ in baoslingzhine C is replaced by one methylol group in 4, which was confirmed by 1H-1H COSY correlations of H2-4′/H2-5′/H-6′ (δH 3.86) and HMBC correlations of H3-9′/C-6′, C-7′, and C-8′ and H3-10′/C-6′ (Figure 2). Likewise, the Z-form of Δ2′(3′) double bond is secured by ROESY correlations (Figure 3) of H-2′/H2-4′/H-3. There is one chiral center in 4, and chiral HPLC analysis indicated that it is a racemate, whose chiral HPLC separation yielded (+)-4 and (–)-4 (Figure S49). To clarify the absolute configuration of each enantiomer, electronic circular diochroism (ECD) calculations were carried out and found that the calculated ECD spectrum of 6′R-4 correlates well with the experimental one of (+)-4, enabling assigning the absolute configurations of (+)-4 as 6′R and (–)-4 as 6′S (Figure 4). The structure of 4 was therefore identified.
Chizhiene C (5) was collected as yellow solids. A detailed comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR data (Table 2) for compound 5 and lingzhine E [36] found that their similarity, except for an additional signal of the oxygenated methyl proton appeared as “s” (δH 3.60) and the oxygenated methyl carbon (δC 51.7) in 5. It revealed that the former is the C-10′ methyl ester derivative of the latter. This hypothesis was verified by the key HMBC correlation of H3-11′/C-10′ (Figure 2). The observed coupling constant between H-3′/H-4′ (J = 5.9 Hz) enabled the assignment of 5 as the threo configurations [37]. 5 was subjected to chiral HPLC analysis followed by separation to yield its stereoisomers (Figure S50). Finally, the absolute configurations at the stereogenic centers of each isomer were, respectively, assigned as 3′R,4′R for (+)-5 and 3′S,4′S for (–)-5 using the same computational methods as that of 4 (Figure 4). The structure of 5 was therefore identified.
Chizhiene D (6) was obtained as yellow solids, presented the molecular formula C17H16O5 as inferred from the HRESIMS ion peak at m/z 323.0893 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C17H16O5Na+, 323.0890), 13C NMR, and DEPT spectra. The 1H NMR spectrum of 6 (Table 2) contains three typical aromatic signals at δH 6.47 (1H, d, J = 3.0 Hz, H-3), 7.00 (1H, dd, J = 8.9, 3.0 Hz, H-5), and 6.87 (1H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-6), indicating the presence of a 1,2,4-trisubstituted benzene substructure. The other three aromatic signals at δH 7.98 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-4′), 7.48 (1H, br d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), and 6.87 (1H, br s, H-7′) indicated the presence of the second 1,2,4-trisubstituted benzene substructure. The 13C NMR and DEPT spectra (Table 2) contain 17 resonances attributable to two methyls, one oxygenated methylene, six olefinic methines, and eight non-protonated carbons (one ester carbonyl at δC 167.0 and one ketone carbonyl at δC 204.2). The structure of 6 was mainly constructed assisted by 2D NMR data. The 1H-1H COSY correlation between H-5/H-6 and HMBC correlations between H-3/C-1 (δC 156.9), C-2, C-4 (δC 150.5), and C-1′ (δC 204.2) (Figure 2), considering the carbon chemical shifts of C-1 and C-4, suggested the presence of a 2,5-dihydroxybenzoyl moiety in 6. The 1H-1H COSY correlation between H-4′/H-5′, in conjunction with HMBC correlations between H3-8′/C-5′ (δC 131.6), C-6′ (δC 145.2), and C-7′ (δC 129.0), H-5′, and H-7′/C-3′ (δC 127.3), H-4′/C-2′ (δC 141.6) and H-7′/C-1′ (Figure 2) strongly support the presence of an additional 1,2,4-trisubstituted benzene ring containing a methyl group connected to C-1′. The ethoxycarbonyl group is linked to C-3′ was supported by 1H-1H COSY correlation of H2-10′/H3-11′ and the HMBC correlations between H-4′, and H2-10′/C-9′. The structure of 6 was thus identified.
Of note, compounds 1–3 and 6 were found to bear an ethyl group in the structure, forming an ethoxy group. Since the structure for 2 without the ethyl group was characterized, ref. [34] and ethanol was used for extraction under heat, we highly speculate that all these isolates with the ethyl group should be artifacts during extraction procedures, although no further efforts were made to detect whether they are natural products or artifacts due to the extremely low content in the material. Further literature search found that compounds 1, 3 and 6 and their ethyl products are undescribed, meaning that the structures of 1, 3 and 6 with a terminal “OH” group are new natural products which will add structure diversity for GMs family. Despite the possible artifact nature for these compounds, the following biological potency for 1 and 3 may arise from the presence of the additional ethyl group, although further comparison between “-OH” and “CH3CH2-” forms was not conducted due to the unavailable amounts of the samples.

2.2. Biological Activity toward Inflammation

Inflammation is an essential process that allows our bodies to fight against various pathogenic bacteria, viruses, and parasites [38]. The production of nitric oxide (NO) and the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) proteins are tightly associated with inflammation, indicating its occurrence to a certain extent. Ganoderma fungi have been reported to have anti-inflammatory effects [39]. Therefore, the anti-inflammatory activities of all the isolates were evaluated. Initially, the cytotoxic effects of compounds were assessed using the cell proliferation and toxicity detection kit (CCK8) assay. As shown in Figure 5, there was no cytotoxicity of compounds observed in RAW264.7 cells at 20 μM for 24 h.
Following this, the protein expression of iNOS and COX-2 was detected by the Western blotting assay in LPS-stimulated macrophage RAW264.7 cells. The results revealed that all compounds down regulated iNOS protein, particularly compounds 1 and 3 (Figure 5). Hence, a dose–response curve for compounds 1 and 3 was further performed. Similarly, the cytotoxic effects of compounds 1 and 3 were firstly detected. The results showed that no cytotoxicity for compound 1 and faint cytotoxicity for compound 3 at 40 μM (Figure S53). Then, the Western blotting assay revealed that the protein level of iNOS was down regulated by compounds 1 and 3 dose dependently in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells (Figure 6). Meanwhile, the NO production of compounds 1 and 3 was also examined. It was found that compounds 1 and 3 both could inhibit NO release in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells (Figure 7). Interestingly, compounds 1 and 3, rather than 2 and 4, are active toward inflammation inhibition. Upon inspecting their structures, we could conclude that the Δ2′(3′) double bond might have an influence on the biological activity. In detail, the presence of the Δ2′(3′) double bond is not advantageous for keeping the anti-inflammatory property. These findings may provide inspirations for structure optimization using these meroterpenoids as lead compounds against inflammation.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Procedures

Optical rotations were measured on an Anton Paar MCP 100 polarimeter. A JASCO J-815 CD spectrometer was employed for recording UV and CD spectra of 2, 4, and 5. UV spectra of 1, 3, and 6 were collected on a GENESYS 150 uv-visible spectrophotometer. The 1D and 2D NMR data of 1–6 were obtained on a Bruker AV-600 MHz spectrometer with TMS as an internal standard. The HRESIMS data of 1–6 were carried out on a SCIEX X500R QTOF MS spectrometer. Sephadex LH-20 (Amersham Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden), reversed-phase C-18 silica gel (40–60 μm; Daiso Co., Osaka, Japan) and MCI gel CHP 20P (75–150 μm, Mitsubishi Chemical Industries, Tokyo, Japan) were used for column chromatography (CC). For semi-preparative HPLC, a Saipuruisi (LC-52, SEP, Beijing, China) chromatograph with a COSMOSIL column (5C18-MS-II, 10 mm i.d. × 250 mm) was carried out. Chiral HPLC analysis were conducted on an Agilent technologies 1260 infinity II liquid chromatograph using Daicel Chiralpak IC (250 mm × 10 mm, i.d., 5 μm) chiral columns.

3.2. Fungal Material

The source and authentication of G. lucidum fruiting bodies were identical with our previous study [35] and the voucher specimen (CHYX-0619) of G. lucidum has been deposited in Inheritance-Based Innovation of Chinese Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

The initial extraction process of the dried fruiting bodies of G. lucidum (500.0 kg) and fractionation of the extract to yield 17 fractions (Fr.1–Fr.17) refers to a previous report [35].
Fr.11 (379.0 g) was cut into six parts (Fr.11.1–Fr.11.6) over an MCI gel CHP 20P column (aqueous MeOH, 30–100%). And then, Fr.11.1 (23.4 g) was separated by using Sephadex LH-20 to afford five portions (Fr.11.1.1–Fr.11.1.5). Among them, the second part of the fraction Fr.11.1 (1.6 g) was applied to RP-18 CC (MeOH/H2O, 55–100%) to give nine sub-fractions (Fr.11.1.2.1–Fr.11.1.2.9). Fr.11.1.2.6 (305.5 mg) was eluted on preparative TLC (CH2Cl2–acetone, 15:1) to obtain Fr.11.1.2.6.1–Fr.11.1.2.6.6 from their respective TLC bands. The third band Fr.11.1.2.6.3 (15.7 mg) and the fourth band Fr.11.1.2.6.4 (74.8 mg) were, respectively, purified by semi-preparative HPLC to yield 6 (0.94 mg, MeCN/H2O, 38%, 3.0 mL/min, tR = 54.28 min) and 1 (3.78 mg, MeCN/H2O, 43%, 3.0 mL/min, tR = 29.03 min). Fr.11.2 (67.2 g) was divided into four portions (Fr.11.2.1–Fr.11.2.4) by using Sephadex LH-20. Among them, the third part of the fraction Fr.11.1 (1.6 g) was further fractionated by using RP-18 CC (MeOH/H2O, 40–100%), yielding fifteen sub-fractions (Fr.11.2.3.1–Fr.11.2.3.15). And then Fr.11.2.3.6 (1.0 g) and Fr.11.2.3.7 (1.6 g) were, respectively, passed through Sephadex LH-20 to produce seven fractions (Fr.11.2.3.6.1–Fr.11.2.3.6.3 from the former and Fr.11.2.3.7.1–Fr.11.2.3.7.4 from the latter). Fr.11.2.3.6.2 was subjected to Sephadex LH-20 to produce four fractions Fr.11.2.3.6.2.1–Fr.11.2.3.6.2.4. And then, Fr.11.2.3.6.2.4 (84.0 mg), Fr.11.2.3.6.3 (62.5 mg), and Fr.11.2.3.7.2 (128.6 mg) were further refined by semi-preparative HPLC to afford 5 (4.67 mg, tR = 17.53 min, MeOH/H2O, 66%, 3.0 mL/min), 4 (1.26 mg, tR = 44.95 min, MeCN/H2O, 38%, 3.0 mL/min) and 3 (1.58 mg, tR = 15.82 min, MeOH/H2O, 67%, 3.0 mL/min), respectively.
Fr.13 (736.0 g) was submitted to MCI gel CHP 20P CC for further fractionation, eluted with aqueous MeOH (65–100%) to generate eight fractions (Fr.13.1–Fr.13.8). Among them, Fr.13.4 (116.3 g) was separated by means of Sephadex LH-20 to afford three portions (Fr.13.4.1–13.4.3). And then Fr.13.4.2 (1.9 g) was passed through Sephadex LH-20 gel to produce four fractions (Fr.13.4.2.1–Fr.13.4.2.4). Fr.13.4.2.2 (998.6 mg) was divided into twelve parts (Fr.13.4.2.2.1–Fr.13.4.2.2.12) by gradient elution of RP-18 CC (aqueous MeOH, 40–100%). Among them, the seventh sub-fraction (Fr.13.4.2.2.7, 135.8 mg) was further separated using semi-preparative HPLC to give 2 (4.69 mg, tR = 30.71 min, MeOH/H2O, 67%, 3.0 mL/min).
Compounds 4 and 5 were found to be racemic by analysis of chiral phase HPLC on Daicel Chiralpak IC column. Subsequently, two racemic mixtures were purified by chiral phase HPLC on same column (n-hexane/ethanol, 95:5), respectively, to give enantiomers (+)-4 (0.55 mg, tR = 20.48 min) and (–)-4 (0.50 mg, tR = 26.81 min); (+)-5 (2.1 mg, tR = 23.98 min) and (–)-5 (1.8 mg, tR = 26.18 min).

3.4. Compound Characterization Data

  • Chizhiene A (1): yellow oils. UV (MeOH) λmax (logε) 365 (3.41), 257 (3.71), 212 (4.10) nm; HRESIMS: m/z 309.1097 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C17H18O4Na+, 309.1097); 1H and 13C NMR data; see Table 1.
  • Chizhiene B (2): yellow oils. UV (MeOH) λmax (logε) 385 (3.50), 317 (4.02), 228 (3.78) nm; HRESIMS: m/z 289.1432 [M + H]+ (calcd for C17H21O4+, 289.1434); 1H and 13C NMR data; see Table 1.
  • Chizhiene E (3): yellow solids. UV (MeOH) λmax (logε) 365 (3.36), 257 (3.61), 213 (3.96) nm; HRESIMS: m/z 311.1254 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C17H20O4Na+, 311.1254); 1H and 13C NMR data; see Table 1.
  • Chizhiene F (4): yellow solids. [α]D20 +3.6 (c 0.28, MeOH), (+)-4; [α]D20 –14.3 (c 0.21, MeOH), (–)-4; UV (MeOH) λmax (logε) 319 (4.10), 227 (3.95) nm; HRESIMS: m/z 275.1278 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C16H19O4+, 275.1278); 1H and 13C NMR data; see Table 2.
  • Chizhiene C (5): yellow solids. [α]D25 +75.0 (c 0.32, MeOH), (+)-5; [α]D25 –57.7 (c 0.26, MeOH), (–)-5; UV (MeOH) λmax (logε) 364 (4.01), 256 (4.24), 227 (4.54) nm; HRESIMS: m/z 321.1331 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C17H21O6+, 321.1333); 1H and 13C NMR data; see Table 2.
  • Chizhiene D (6): yellow solids. UV (MeOH) λmax (logε) 368 (3.63), 231 (4.37), 205 (4.50) nm; HRESIMS: m/z 323.0893 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C17H16O5Na+, 323.0890); 1H and 13C NMR data; see Table 2.

3.5. ECD Calculations for Compounds 4 and 5

To confirm the absolute configurations of the enantiomers of 4 and 5, theoretical ECD spectra were calculated and compared with the corresponding experimental spectra. The predominant conformers of 4 and 5 were optimized with Gaussian 09 [40] at the B3LYP/6-311g(d,p) level. Subsequently, the optimized conformers were used for ECD calculations using the same method. Solvent effects were taken into account using the polarizable-conductor calculation model (PCM) with methanol as the solvent. The conclusion indicated that the ECD spectra of (6′S)-4, (6′R)-4, (3′R,4′R)-5, and (3′S,4′S)-5 agree well with the experimental data of (+)-4, (–)-4, (+)-5, and (–)-5 (Figure 4).

3.6. Cell Culture

The murine macrophage cell line RAW264.7 (Cell Bank of China Science Academy, Shanghai, China) was grown in DMEM medium (DMEM High Glucose, C3113-0500, 2350408, Viva Cell, Shanghai, China), containing 10% FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum, 2364724, Gibco, Shanghai, America), 1% penicillin, and 1% streptomycin at 37 °C under 5% CO2 condition.

3.7. Cell Viability Assay

The influence of the compounds on cell viability were evaluated by the CCK8 assay using a commercial kit (CCK-8, MA0218, MA0218-Jun-15I, MeilunBio, Dalian, China). The cells were seeded into 96-well culture plates (5 × 103 cells/well) overnight and treated with compounds 1–6 (20 μM) for 24 h. Subsequently, CCK8 solution was incubated with cells for another 1 h, and OD 450 nm values were detected by Cytation1 (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).

3.8. Measurement of NO Production

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded in a 24-well plate at 1 × 105 cells/well overnight and treated with compounds 1 and 3 (10 μM, 20 μM, and 40 μM) and LPS for 24 h. Cell culture medium was collected and mixed with equal volumes of Griess reagent (Nitric Oxide Assay Kit, S0021M, 042723230918 Beyotime, Shanghai, China) at room temperature in the dark [41]. The OD values were measured using Cytation1 (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) at 540 nm and NO production was detected using a sodium nitrite standard calibration curve.

3.9. Western Blotting Analysis

Western blotting assays were carried out as previous studies [42,43,44]. RAW264.7 cells were cultured with LPS (1 μg/mL) and indicated concentrations of compounds for 24 h, then, washed with pre-cold PBS and lysed using radio-immunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA, R6166S, 230330G02-01, US Everbright, Suzhou, China) containing proteinase (Protease Inhibitors, MIKX, DB612A-01, 23LB0817W, Shenzhen, China) and phosphatase inhibitors [Protein Phosphatase Inhibitor Complex (100×), MB12707, MeilunBio, Dalian, China]. Protein extracts were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. Anti-iNOS (iNOS (D6B6S) Rabbit mAb #13120S, CST, Boston, MA, USA), anti-COX-2 (COX2 (D5H5) XP® Rabbit mAb #12282S, CST, Boston, MA, USA), and anti-GAPDH (GAPDH (D16H11) XP® Rabbit mAb #5174S, CST, Boston, MA, USA) antibodies were incubated with the PVDF membranes at 4 °C overnight after blocking with 5% nonfat milk. The horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated corresponding secondary antibodies were incubated with the PVDF membranes and a chemiluminescence detection kit (Fort Pierce, FL, USA) was used for detecting the bands. The ImageJ software (1.52a) was used to detect the density of immunoblot results.

3.10. Statistical Analysis

All the experimental data were performed in three replicates. The results are represented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism 8 with Student’s t-test, and one-way ANOVA. Differences were considered significant with * p < 0.05 or # p < 0.05.

4. Conclusions

To conclude, the current study led to the characterization of six new meroterpenoids (1–6) from G. lucidum. The possible artificial nature of compounds 1–3 and 6 and their contribution to biological potential were briefly discussed. Biological evaluations revealed that compounds 1 and 3 could significantly attenuate the protein expression level of iNOS and NO production in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells, indicating their potential in inflammatory disease. In addition, the present findings are also beneficial for insights into GMs structure alterations in the context of trace content in the material. Last but not least, the hydroxy group on the benzene ring is more readily reacted with ethanol than a primary alcohol, contrary to our present observations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29051149/s1. Figures S1–S8: NMR and UV spectra and HRESIMS of 1. Figures S9–S17: NMR and UV spectra and HRESIMS of 2. Figures S18–S24: NMR and UV spectra and HRESIMS of 3. Figures S25–S31: NMR spectra and HRESIMS of 4. Figures S32–S33: UV and CD spectra of (±)-4. Figures S34–S39: NMR spectra and HRESIMS of 5. Figures S40–S41: UV and CD spectra of (±)-5. Figures S42–S48 NMR and UV spectra and HRESIMS of 6. Figure S49: Chiral HPLC separation of racemic 4. Figure S50: Chiral HPLC separation of racemic 5. Figure S51: The lowest-energy conformers of 4. Figure S52: The lowest-energy conformers of 5. Figure S53: The cytotoxic effects of compounds 1 and 3 in RAW264.7 cells. Table S1: Extracted heats and weighting factors of the optimized conformers of 4 and 5. Table S2: The Cartesian coordinates of the lowest-energy conformers for 4 and 5.

Author Contributions

Y.-X.C. conceived, designed the experiments the paper, D.C. carried out biological experiments. Y.-Y.L. and X.-P.T. performed chemical experiments. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82030115).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data in this research are presented in manuscript and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, S.J.; Zhang, S.Y.; Peng, B.; Tan, D.C.; Wu, M.Y.; Wei, J.C.; Wang, Y.T.; Luo, H. Ganoderma lucidum: A comprehensive review of phytochemistry, efficacy, safety and clinical study. Food Sci. Hum. Well. 2024, 13, 568–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guo, J.C.; Yang, L.; Ma, Q.Y.; Ge, Y.Z.; Kong, F.D.; Zhou, L.M.; Zhang, F.; Xie, Q.Y.; Yu, Z.F.; Dai, H.F.; et al. Triterpenoids and meroterpenoids with α-glucosidase inhibitory activities from the fruiting bodies of Ganoderma australe. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 117, 105448–105457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Elhassaneen, Y.A.; Ragab, S.S.; Salman, M.S. The potential effects of reishi mushroom (Ganoderma lucidum) consumption on bone health indices and serum minerals profile disorders induced by CCl4 on rats. Pyrx J. Med. Plant Res. 2016, 2, 001–007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Venkatesh, T.; Mainkar, P.S.; Chandrasekhar, S. Diastereoselective formal synthesis of polycyclic meroterpenoid (±)-cochlearol A. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 5412–5416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, X.Q.; Gao, X.X.; Long, G.Q.; Yang, Y.C.; Chen, G.; Hou, G.L.; Huo, X.T.; Jia, J.M.; Wang, A.H.; Hu, G.S. Lanostane-type triterpenoids from the mycelial mat of Ganoderma lucidum and their hepatoprotective activities. Phytochemistry 2022, 198, 113131–113141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, L.; Kong, D.X.; Xiao, N.; Ma, Q.Y.; Xie, Q.Y.; Guo, J.C.; Deng, C.Y.; Ma, H.X.; Hua, Y.; Dai, H.F.; et al. Antidiabetic lanostane triterpenoids from the fruiting bodies of Ganoderma weberianum. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 127, 106025–106034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baby, S.; Johnson, A.J.; Govindan, B. Secondary metabolites from Ganoderma. Phytochemistry 2015, 114, 66–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, J.J.; Qin, F.Y.; Cheng, Y.X. Insights into Ganoderma fungi meroterpenoids opening a new era of racemic natural products in mushrooms. Med. Res. Rev. 2024; early view. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mothana, R.A.; Jansen, R.; Julich, W.D.; Lindequist, U. Ganomycins A and B, new antimicrobial farnesyl hydroquinones from the basidiomycete Ganoderma pfeifferi. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 416–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, D.W.; Fan, H.L.; Zhang, W.; Li, C.J.; Luo, S.; Qin, H.B. Collective enantioselective total synthesis of (+)-sinensilactam A, (+)-lingzhilactone B and (–)-lingzhiol: Divergent reactivity of styrene. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 10066–10069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Riehl, P.S.; Richardson, A.D.; Sakamoto, T.; Schindler, C.S. Eight-step enantiodivergent synthesis of (+)- and (–)-Lingzhiol. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, X.Y.; Liu, X.Y.; Jiao, X.Z.; Yang, H.G.; Yao, Y.Y.; Xie, P. An approach to (±)-Lingzhiol. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 1944–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gautam, S.K.; Birman, V.B. Biogenetically inspired synthesis of lingzhiol. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 1499–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Long, R.; Huang, J.; Shao, W.B.; Liu, S.; Lan, Y.; Gong, J.X.; Yang, Z. Asymmetric total synthesis of (–)-lingzhiol via a Rh-catalysed [3+2] cycloaddition. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5707–5716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mehl, L.M.; Maier, M.E. A radical-based synthesis of lingzhiol. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 9844–9850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hu, L.L.; Ma, Q.Y.; Huang, S.Z.; Guo, Z.K.; Guo, J.C.; Dai, H.F.; Zhao, Y.X. Two new phenolic compounds from the fruiting bodies of Ganoderma tropicum. B. Korean Chem. Soc. 2013, 34, 884–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, S.Z.; Cheng, B.H.; Ma, Q.Y.; Wang, Q.; Kong, F.D.; Dai, H.F.; Qiu, S.Q.; Zheng, P.Y.; Liu, Z.Q.; Zhao, Y.X. Anti-allergic prenylated hydroquinones and alkaloids from the fruiting body of Ganoderma calidophilum. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 21139–21147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Richardson, A.D.; Vogel, T.R.; Traficante, E.F.; Glover, K.J.; Schindler, C.S. Total synthesis of (+)-cochlearol B by an approach based on a catellani reaction and visible-light-enabled [2+2] cycloaddition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202201213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, L.J.; Xie, Y.; Wang, Y.Q.; Xu, Y.Y.; Mei, R.Q. Triterpene-farnesyl hydroquinone conjugates from Ganoderma calidophilum. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 2199–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, C.F.; Liu, X.M.; Lian, C.L.; Ke, J.Y.; Liu, J.Q. Triterpenes and aromatic meroterpenoids with antioxidant activity and neuroprotective effects from Ganoderma lucidum. Molecules 2019, 24, 4353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, S.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, C.Y.; Bao, F.Y.; Li, H.; Chen, L.X. Meroterpenoids from Ganoderma sinense protect hepatocytes and cardiomyocytes from oxidative stress induced injuries. Fitoterapia 2018, 131, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Šimek, M.; Bártová, K.; Issad, S.; Hájek, M.; Císařová, I.; Jahn, U. Unified total synthesis of diverse meroterpenoids from Ganoderma Applanatum. Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 4552–4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Guo, J.C.; Kong, F.D.; Ma, Q.Y.; Xie, Q.Y.; Zhang, R.S.; Dai, H.F.; Wu, Y.G.; Zhao, Y.X. Meroterpenoids with protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitory activities from the fruiting bodies of Ganoderma ahmadii. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, K.; Bao, L.; Ma, K.; Zhang, J.J.; Chen, B.S.; Han, J.J.; Ren, J.W.; Luo, H.J.; Liu, H.W. A novel class of α-glucosidase and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors from Ganoderma leucocontextum and the anti-diabetic properties of ganomycin I in KK-Ay mice. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 127, 1035–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, K.; Bao, L.; Zhou, N.; Zhang, J.J.; Liao, M.F.; Zheng, Z.Y.; Wang, Y.J.; Liu, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.F.; et al. Structural modification of natural product ganomycin I leading to discovery of a α-Glucosidase and HMG-CoA reductase dual inhibitor improving obesity and metabolic dysfunction in vivo. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 3609–3625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, W.X.; Xiao, D.H.; Wang, B. A concise total synthesis of cochlearoid B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 3358–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, B.S.; Tian, J.; Zhang, J.J.; Wang, K.; Liu, L.; Yang, B.; Bao, L.; Liu, H.W. Triterpenes and meroterpenes from Ganoderma lucidum with inhibitory activity against HMGs reductase, aldose reductase and α-glucosidase. Fitoterapia 2017, 120, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yang, S.; Ma, Q.Y.; Kong, F.D.; Xie, Q.Y.; Huang, S.Z.; Zhou, L.M.; Dai, H.F.; Yu, Z.F.; Zhao, Y.X. Two new compounds from the fruiting bodies of Ganoderma philippii. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 20, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, M.; Wang, F.; Xu, F.; Ding, L.Q.; Zhang, Q.; Li, H.X.; Zhao, F.; Wang, L.Q.; Zhu, L.H.; Chen, L.X.; et al. Two pairs of farnesyl phenolic enantiomers asnatural nitric oxide inhibitors from Ganoderma sinense. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 3342–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, D.; Wang, Y.L.; Zhang, P.; Li, X.Z.; Li, H.; Chen, L.X. New sesquiterpenoid derivatives from Ganoderma sinense with nitric oxide inhibitory activity. Phytochem. Lett. 2020, 35, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Q.Z.; Chen, X.; Mao, P.W.; Jin, M.Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhou, X.W. N-Glycosylated Ganoderma lucidum immunomodulatory protein improved anti-inflammatory activity via inhibition of the p38 MAPK pathway. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 3393–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhu, L.P.; Wu, M.; Li, P.; Zhou, Y.F.; Zhong, J.Y.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Li, Y.; Yao, W.X.; Xu, J.H. High-pressure supercritical CO2 extracts of Ganoderma lucidum fruiting body and their anti-hepatoma effect associated with the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 602702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shaher, F.; Wang, S.Q.; Qiu, H.B.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.Q.; Al-Ward, H.; Abdulghani, M.A.M.; Baldi, S.; Zhou, S.B. Effect and mechanism of Ganoderma lucidum spores on alleviation of diabetic cardiomyopathy in a Pilot in vivo study. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2020, 13, 4809–4822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gao, Q.L.; Guo, P.X.; Luo, Q.; Yan, H.; Cheng, Y.X. Petchienes A–E, meroterpenoids from Ganoderma petchii. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 2019–2022. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, Y.X.; Peng, Y.L.; Qiu, B.; Lv, Q.; Huang, L.S.X.; Cheng, Y.X. Meroterpenoids with a large conjugated system from Ganoderma lucidum and their inhibitory activities against renal fibrosis. Fitoterapia 2022, 161, 105257–105264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yan, Y.M.; Wang, X.L.; Luo, Q.; Jiang, L.P.; Yang, C.P.; Hou, B.; Zuo, Z.L.; Chen, Y.B.; Cheng, Y.X. Metabolites from the mushroom Ganoderma lingzhi as stimulators of neural stem cell proliferation. Phytochemistry 2015, 114, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xu, K.; Yang, P.F.; Yang, Y.N.; Feng, Z.M.; Jiang, J.S.; Zhang, P.C. Direct assignment of the threo and erythro configurations in polyacetylene glycosides by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 686–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Antushevich, H. Interplays between inflammasomes and viruses, bacteria (pathogenic and probiotic), yeasts and parasites. Immunol. Lett. 2020, 228, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ryu, D.H.; Cho, J.Y.; Sadiq, N.B.; Kim, J.C.; Lee, B.; Hamayun, M.; Lee, T.S.; Kim, H.S.; Park, S.H.; Nho, C.W.; et al. Optimization of antioxidant, anti-diabetic, and anti-inflammatory activities and ganoderic acid content of differentially dried Ganoderma lucidum using response surface methodology. Food Chem. 2021, 335, 127645–127652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision B.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  41. Su, T.; Yu, H.; Kwan, H.Y.; Ma, X.Q.; Cao, H.H.; Cheng, C.Y.; Leung, A.K.; Chan, C.L.; Li, W.D.; Cao, H.; et al. Comparisons of the chemical profiles, cytotoxicities and anti-inflammatory effects of raw and rice wine-processed Herba Siegesbeckiae. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 156, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guan, X.Q.; Yang, J.; Wang, W.Y.; Zhao, B.; Hu, S.Y.; Yu, D.H.; Yuan, L.; Shi, Y.F.; Xu, J.L.; Dong, J.Y.; et al. Dual inhibition of MYC and SLC39A10 by a novel natural product STAT3 inhibitor derived from Chaetomium globosum suppresses tumor growth and metastasis in gastric cancer. Pharmacol. Res. 2023, 189, 106703–106714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, Y.L.; Han, F.; Luan, S.S.; Ai, R.; Zhang, P.; Li, H.; Chen, L.X. Triterpenoids from Ganoderma lucidum and their potential anti-inflammatory effects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 5147–5158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kou, R.W.; Gao, Y.Q.; Xia, B.; Wang, J.Y.; Liu, X.N.; Tang, J.J.; Yin, X.; Gao, J.M. Ganoderterpene A, a new triterpenoid from Ganoderma lucidum, attenuates LPS-Induced inflammation and apoptosis via suppressing MAPK and TLR-4/NF-κB pathways in BV-2 cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 12730–12740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 29 01149 g001
Figure 1. The structures of compounds 1–6.
Figure 1. The structures of compounds 1–6.
Molecules 29 01149 g001
Molecules 29 01149 g002
Figure 2. Key 1H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations for 1–6.
Figure 2. Key 1H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations for 1–6.
Molecules 29 01149 g002
Molecules 29 01149 g003
Figure 3. Key ROESY correlations for 2 and 4.
Figure 3. Key ROESY correlations for 2 and 4.
Molecules 29 01149 g003
Molecules 29 01149 g004
Figure 4. The calculated and experimental ECD spectra of 4 and 5.
Figure 4. The calculated and experimental ECD spectra of 4 and 5.
Molecules 29 01149 g004
Molecules 29 01149 g005
Figure 5. Anti-inflammatory effects of compounds 1–6 in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. (A) Cytotoxic effects of compounds 1–6 at 20 μM were examined in RAW264.7 cells. (B) Protein expression of iNOS and COX-2 at indicated concentrations of compounds and LPS for 24 h. ## p < 0.01 versus control group; ### p < 0.001 versus control group; * p < 0.05 versus LPS group; ** p < 0.01 versus LPS group; and *** p < 0.001 versus LPS group. One-way ANOVA. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. LPS: lipopolysaccharide. SA: sappanone A.
Figure 5. Anti-inflammatory effects of compounds 1–6 in LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. (A) Cytotoxic effects of compounds 1–6 at 20 μM were examined in RAW264.7 cells. (B) Protein expression of iNOS and COX-2 at indicated concentrations of compounds and LPS for 24 h. ## p < 0.01 versus control group; ### p < 0.001 versus control group; * p < 0.05 versus LPS group; ** p < 0.01 versus LPS group; and *** p < 0.001 versus LPS group. One-way ANOVA. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. LPS: lipopolysaccharide. SA: sappanone A.
Molecules 29 01149 g005
Molecules 29 01149 g006
Figure 6. Effects of compounds 1 and 3 on the protein levels of iNOS and COX-2. RAW 264.7 cells were treated with different concentrations of compounds 1 and 3 (10, 20 and 40 μM). (A,B) Compounds 1 and 3 down regulate protein expression of iNOS in a dose-dependent manner. ### p < 0.001 versus control group; * p < 0.05 versus LPS group; ** p < 0.01 versus LPS group; and *** p < 0.001 versus LPS group. One-way ANOVA. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. LPS: lipopolysaccharide. SA: sappanone A.
Figure 6. Effects of compounds 1 and 3 on the protein levels of iNOS and COX-2. RAW 264.7 cells were treated with different concentrations of compounds 1 and 3 (10, 20 and 40 μM). (A,B) Compounds 1 and 3 down regulate protein expression of iNOS in a dose-dependent manner. ### p < 0.001 versus control group; * p < 0.05 versus LPS group; ** p < 0.01 versus LPS group; and *** p < 0.001 versus LPS group. One-way ANOVA. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. LPS: lipopolysaccharide. SA: sappanone A.
Molecules 29 01149 g006
Molecules 29 01149 g007
Figure 7. The effect of NO release of compounds 1 and 3 in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. (A,B) NO production inhibition in RAW 264.7 cells, treated with compounds 1 and 3 (10, 20 and 40 μM). # p < 0.05 versus control group; ## p < 0.01 versus control group; ** p < 0.01 versus LPS group. LPS; *** p < 0.001 versus LPS group. One-way ANOVA. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. LPS: lipopolysaccharide.
Figure 7. The effect of NO release of compounds 1 and 3 in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. (A,B) NO production inhibition in RAW 264.7 cells, treated with compounds 1 and 3 (10, 20 and 40 μM). # p < 0.05 versus control group; ## p < 0.01 versus control group; ** p < 0.01 versus LPS group. LPS; *** p < 0.001 versus LPS group. One-way ANOVA. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. LPS: lipopolysaccharide.
Molecules 29 01149 g007
Table 1. 1H (600 MHz) and 13C (150 MHz) NMR data of 1–3 (δ in ppm, J in Hz, in methanol-d4).
Table 1. 1H (600 MHz) and 13C (150 MHz) NMR data of 1–3 (δ in ppm, J in Hz, in methanol-d4).
123
No.δHδCδHδCδHδC
1 157.1, C 157.3, C 156.9, C
2 120.2, C 122.2, C 120.4, C
37.34 (d, 2.9)116.2, CH7.25 (d, 2.9)115.2, CH7.30 (d, 2.9)116.1, CH
4 150.6, C 150.4, C 150.6, C
57.00 (dd, 8.9, 2.9)126.0, CH6.97 (dd, 8.9, 2.9)125.1, CH7.01 (dd, 8.9, 2.9)126.0, CH
66.80 (d, 8.9)119.8, CH6.77 (d, 8.9)119.5, CH6.79 (d, 8.9)119.7, CH
1′ 205.3, C 197.1, C 206.0, C
2′4.31 (s)46.2, CH26.76 (br s)119.6, CH3.68 (br s)47.9, CH2
3′ 136.2, C 157.3, C 130.7, C
4′7.22 (br d, 7.6)130.0, CH3.00 (t-like, 6.3)28.7, CH25.62 (m)124.1, CH
5′7.31 (t, 7.6)129.7, CH1.78 (p, 6.3)23.2, CH22.77 (m) 28.4, CH2
6′7.23 (br d, 7.6)127.5, CH2.21 (t, 6.3)27.3, CH25.70 (m)122.7, CH
7′ 140.2, C 151.3, C 133.4, C
8′7.28 (br s)129.9, CH6.36 (br s)127.5, CHHa: 2.66 (d, 8.0)31.2, CH2
Hb: 2.65 (d, 8.0)
9′4.49 (s)73.5, CH24.04 (br s)74.7, CH23.88 (br s)75.6, CH2
10′3.54 (q, 7.0)66.8, CH23.53 (q, 7.0) 67.1, CH23.45 (q, 7.0)66.2, CH2
11′1.20 (t, 7.0)15.4, CH31.23 (t, 7.0)15.5, CH31.17 (t, 7.0)15.4, CH3
Table 2. 1H (600 MHz) and 13C (150 MHz) NMR data of 4 and 6 (in methanol-d4) and 5 (in DMSO–d6) (δ in ppm, J in Hz).
Table 2. 1H (600 MHz) and 13C (150 MHz) NMR data of 4 and 6 (in methanol-d4) and 5 (in DMSO–d6) (δ in ppm, J in Hz).
456
No.δHδCδHδCδHδC
1 157.4, C 153.2, C 156.9, C
2 122.1, C 120.4, C 121.4, C
37.24 (d, 2.9)115.4, CH7.20 (d, 3.0)114.5, CH6.47 (d, 3.0)117.8, CH
4 150.4, C 149.5, C 150.5, C
56.97 (dd, 8.9, 2.9)125.2, CH6.98 (dd, 8.8, 3.0)124.2, CH7.00 (dd, 8.9, 3.0)125.9, CH
66.78 (d, 8.9)119.7, CH6.81 (d, 8.8)118.4, CH6.87 (d, 8.9)119.6, CH
1′ 196.6, C 203.0, C 204.2, C
2′6.64 (br s)117.1, CHa: 3.35 (dd, 18.4, 3.6)37.6, CH2 141.6, C
Hb: 3.44 (dd, 18.4, 10.3)
3′ 154.9, C3.03 (ddd, 10.3, 5.9, 3.6)44.9, CH 127.3, C
4′Ha: 2.66 (dddd, 15.4, 8.5, 4.0, 1.4)30.4, CH23.70 (ddd, 10.1, 5.9, 3.4)73.2, CH7.98 (d, 8.0)131.3, CH
Hb: 2.45 (dddd, 15.4, 8.9, 4.0, 1.4)
5′Ha: 2.06 (ddt, 12.9, 8.5, 4.0)28.4, CH2Ha: 2.09 (m)27.9, CH27.48 (br d, 8.0)131.6, CH
Hb: 1.90 (dddd, 12.9, 8.9, 6.4, 4.0) Hb: 1.91 (br d, 17.2)
6′3.86 (t-like, 5.3)78.9, CH5.47 (m)117.7, CH 145.2, C
7′ 150.7, C 132.6, C7.25 (br s)129.0, CH
8′7.41 (br s)125.4, CH3.96 (br s)68.7, CH22.47 (br s)21.5, CH3
9′1.97 (br s)21.6, CH31.56 (br s)18.2, CH3 167.0, C
10′3.44 (s)57.5, CH3 173.0, C4.11 (q, 7.1)62.5, CH2
11′ 3.60 (s)51.7, CH31.10 (t, 7.1)13.9, CH3
1-OH 10.91 (s)
4-OH 9.17 (s)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.-Y.; Cai, D.; Tang, X.-P.; Cheng, Y.-X. Ganoderma lucidum-Derived Meroterpenoids Show Anti-Inflammatory Activity In Vitro. Molecules 2024, 29, 1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051149

AMA Style

Liu Y-Y, Cai D, Tang X-P, Cheng Y-X. Ganoderma lucidum-Derived Meroterpenoids Show Anti-Inflammatory Activity In Vitro. Molecules. 2024; 29(5):1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051149

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yun-Yun, Dan Cai, Xin-Ping Tang, and Yong-Xian Cheng. 2024. "Ganoderma lucidum-Derived Meroterpenoids Show Anti-Inflammatory Activity In Vitro" Molecules 29, no. 5: 1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051149

APA Style

Liu, Y. -Y., Cai, D., Tang, X. -P., & Cheng, Y. -X. (2024). Ganoderma lucidum-Derived Meroterpenoids Show Anti-Inflammatory Activity In Vitro. Molecules, 29(5), 1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051149

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop