Next Article in Journal
A Systematic Methodology for the Identification of the Chemical Composition of the Mongolian Drug Erdun-Uril Compound Utilizing UHPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry
Next Article in Special Issue
First Principle Study on the Z-Type Characteristic Modulation of GaN/g-C3N4 Heterojunction
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Illite Treatment on Quality Characteristics and Antioxidant Activity of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) Sprouts
Previous Article in Special Issue
MgO Nanoparticles as a Promising Photocatalyst towards Rhodamine B and Rhodamine 6G Degradation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 18
10.3390/molecules29184348
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Influence of Heat Treatment on the Photoactivity of Amine-Modified Titanium Dioxide in the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide

by
Iwona Pełech
1,*,
Piotr Staciwa
1,
Daniel Sibera
1,2,
Konrad Sebastian Sobczuk
1,
Wiktoria Majewska
1,
Ewelina Kusiak-Nejman
1,
Antoni W. Morawski
1,
Kaiying Wang
3 and
Urszula Narkiewicz
1
1
Department of Inorganic Chemical Technology and Environment Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Pułaskiego 10, 70-322 Szczecin, Poland
2
Department of Construction and Road Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Piastów 50a, 70-311 Szczecin, Poland
3
Department of Microsystems, University of South-Eastern Norway, 3184 Horten, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(18), 4348; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184348
Submission received: 1 August 2024 / Revised: 9 September 2024 / Accepted: 11 September 2024 / Published: 13 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photocatalytic Materials and Photocatalytic Reactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Modification of titanium dioxide using ethylenediamine (EDA), diethylamine (DEA), and triethylamine (TEA) has been studied. As the reference material, titanium dioxide prepared by the sol–gel method using titanium(IV) isopropoxide as a precursor was applied. The preparation procedure involved heat treatment in the microwave reactor or in the high-temperature furnace. The obtained samples have been characterized in detail. The phase composition was determined through the X-ray diffraction method, and the average crystallite size was calculated based on it. Values for specific surface areas and the total pore volumes were calculated based on the isotherms obtained through the low-temperature nitrogen adsorption method. The bang gap energy was estimated based on Tauc’s plots. The influence of the type and content of amine, as well as heat treatment on the photocatalytic activity of modified titanium dioxide in the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide, was determined and discussed. It was clear that, regardless of the amount and content of amine introduced, the higher photoactivity characterized the samples prepared in the microwave reactor. The highest amounts of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane have been achieved using triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide.

1. Introduction

Air pollution is one of the most serious adverse effects of economic growth that affects everyday living. Burning fossil fuels leads to uncontrolled increases in greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. As a result, progressive global warming puts the global ecosystem out of order. Carbon dioxide emission, due to the tremendous amounts of this gas produced every year, is perceived to be one of the biggest concerns given climate change. Worldwide emission of this gas is constantly growing, i.e., in 2023, it reached 35.8 Gt [1], so the containment of CO2 emissions for years to come will be a difficult task.
Taking this into consideration, the scientific community struggles to find means to counter this effect. In order to mitigate the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, several solutions have been proposed. Among others, carbon capture and storage [2], electrochemical conversion [3], catalytic conversion [4] and photocatalytic reduction [5] can be distinguished. The latter solution is especially attractive due to the possibility of the use of solar energy and the possibility of acquiring useful products from CO2.
Photocatalytic CO2 reduction is a green, photo-induced process. Through the application of irradiation, carbon dioxide molecules can be transferred into useful products such as carbon monoxide, methane or hydrogen. An important component of photocatalytic CO2 reduction is a proper photocatalyst. In general, three steps can be distinguished in a photocatalytic process: (I) the generation of photogenerated carriers, (II) transferring the generated electrons and holes to the surface of the photocatalyst, (III) the catalytic reaction on the surface of the photocatalyst [6].
Research regarding the search for a proper semiconductor in order to enhance the effectiveness of photocatalytic CO2 reductions is in the pipeline. A suitable material must meet several requirements, i.e., a relatively narrow bandgap and a low recombination rate of charges strongly affect the photocatalysis efficiency. Finally, the photocatalyst should be cost-effective and stable during reaction [7]. There are several semiconductors that can be stated as promising photocatalysts, i.e., ZnO [8], Fe2O3 [9], Cu2O [10] or TiO2 [11]. However, none of the existing semiconductors meet the requirements for large-scale CCU (carbon capture and utilization) application, and further improvement of the efficiency of these materials is strongly advised.
Among existing photocatalysts, titanium dioxide is a very promising material because of its low cost, non-toxicity and availability. Moreover, many publications attest to the ease of its modification. It was proven that, through modification with Ag [12], Cu [13], I [14], Co [15], and N [16], titanium dioxide can become a highly efficient CO2-reducing photocatalyst.
In the available papers, it is reported that amines, as titania modifiers, increase their adsorptive properties towards CO2. Chen et al. [17] reported the increase in photocatalytic reduction of CO2 using amine-modified brookite TiO2 nanorods coupled with CuxS. Song et al. [18] prepared TiO2 nanotubes modified by three kinds of amines (ethylenediamine, polyetherimide and tetraethylenepentamine). TEPA-modified TiO2 nanotubes showed the highest CO2 adsorption capacity. Ota et al. [19] developed a synthesis method of new amorphous titanium dioxide nanoparticles with a diameter of 3 nm, a high surface area and a large amount of OH groups. Amorphous TiO2 nanoparticles were successfully modified with ethylenediamine and showed a higher CO2 adsorption capacity than conventional TiO2 and mesoporous SiO2. Jiang et al. [20] developed a new low-cost, highly selective and stable sorbent-based pre-combustion CO2 capture. Experimental results have shown that the selectivity of TiO2 for separation of CO2 from CO2/CH4 mixture can be significantly improved via amine modification. Ma et al. [21] modified TiO2 using different amines, including diethylenetriamine (DETA), triethylenetetramine (TETA), and tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA), for CO2 capture. Experimental results revealed that CO2 uptake capacities of the titania composite sorbents increase with amine loading but decrease with the size of impregnated amines. The same conclusion, that the amine-modified materials exhibited enhanced CO2 uptake compared to the initial titania, have been presented in our previous works [22,23].
As shown above, the amine modification of the photocatalyst has a positive effect on the enhancement of CO2 adsorption. The influence of this type of modification on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 was reported. Mendonça et al. [24] used the activated carbon modified with ethylenediamine and impregnated with TiO2 for improved photodegradation of sulfamethazine. Bao et al. [25] synthesized photocatalytically active N-doped TiO2 nanoparticles by a one-pot hydrothermal method without calcination using structurally different amine sources as dopants under soft-chemistry conditions. TiO2 modified with diethylamine was a suitable candidate due to its high visible-light absorption ability and having the highest efficiency in regard to the photodegradation of reactive brilliant red dye. Liao et al. [26] stated that amine functionalization of TiO2 nanoparticles substantially increases the affinity of CO2 on TiO2 surfaces for more effective CO2 activation. It also greatly enhances the photocatalytic rate of CO2 reduction into CH4 and CO. Karawek et al. [27] prepared a sandwich-type composite consisting of two 2-dimensional nanostructures (2D−2D) using the heterostructure of titanium dioxide nanosheets (TNS) and graphene oxide (GO). Alkanolamine MEA, DEA, and TEA were tested to promote the photoactivity of TNS in photoreducing CO2. The TEA−TNS performed better than DEA−TNS and MEA−TNS due to increased CO2 loading and faster CO2 desorption rates. The best results came from the TEA-[Cu-TNS/GO] composite, in which the TEA was grafted onto the Cu-TNS/GO, attracting CO2 for the photoreduction, and the copper ions enhanced the charge separation characteristics of the TNS. Jin et al. [28] demonstrated that surface modifications with primary amines on TiO2 increase the activity in Co or methane production, regardless of metalcocatalysts.
In the present work, amines with different boiling points, and featured different numbers of nitrogen and carbon atoms were used to modify TiO2: ethylenediamine (EDA, C2H8N2, 116.9 °C), diethylamine (DEA, C4H11N, 55.5 °C), and triethylamine (TEA, C6H15N, 89.8 °C). Two different methods were used for modification—a microwave oven operating under pressure and a thermal oven for high-temperature processing—to determine how these conditions affect the photoactivity of the samples.

2. Results and Discussion

The phase composition of the obtained materials was studied using the X-ray diffraction method. In Figure 1, the diffraction patterns of the EDA-modified titania heated in the microwave reactor (Figure 1a) and high-temperature furnace (Figure 1b) are presented. All the visible reflexes were assigned to the anatase phase (ICDD 01-073-1764), and no other phases were identified in the samples. Exactly the same results were obtained for DEA-modified titania (Figure 2) and TEA-modified titania (Figure 3).
Based on the reflex located at the 2 theta angle of approximately 25° and assigned to the anatase phase, the average crystallite size was calculated. The obtained values are presented in Table 1. It was found that the average crystallite size for the reference sample obtained in the microwave reactor (TTIP_R) was smaller (14.3 nm) than for the same material obtained in the high-temperature furnace (TTIP_F, 21.9 nm); this was probably related to the difference in heating temperatures (400 °C in the tubular furnace and 250 °C in the microwave reactor). Microwave heating is an in situ energy conversion mode and radically differs from traditional heating processes. According to the available literature [29,30,31,32], microwave heating has significant advantages over conventional heating procedures and can heat materials to high temperatures with ultra-fast heating rates in a short time with high energy efficiency. Using this method, low values of the anatase average crystallite size can be achieved, as was mentioned above and in [33,34]. Higher temperatures in the case of traditional heat treatment result in the formation of larger particles [35,36].
The materials modified with DEA and TEA and prepared in the microwave reactor had lower values of average crystallite size than the appropriate reference sample. For both DEA- and TEA-modified titania, the average crystallite size was very similar, and no significant differences were noted. All the calculated values ranged from ~7 nm to ~10 nm. In the case of ethylenediamine, the amine content does not have a significant impact on the average crystallite size as well, which ranged from 15.4 nm for TTIP_EDA_10%_R to 16.9 nm for TTIP_EDA_70%_R. Higher values of the average crystallite size were achieved for the materials modified with EDA in comparison with TTIP_R, and especially with the samples modified using DEA and TEA. A similar dependence was noticed at [37], where the authors calculated the crystallite size by the Sherrer’s formula and found that the crystallite sizes of the deposits in the case of 3-methoxypropylamine and dimethylamine, compared to ethanolamine, were approximately 17% and 24% less, respectively. Sun et al. [38] stated that, in low-pH conditions, the quantity of hydroxyl groups in hydrolysis is small, which prevents the crystallization of the samples and the growth of the TiO2 crystallites. With increasing pH, more hydroxyl groups are available for the hydrolysis, which leads to better crystallization of TiO2 and greater crystallite sizes [39,40]. Considering that EDA is the most basic amine among those used in studies, the above explanation may indicate why we obtained smaller crystallites of anatase using diethylamine and triethylamine.
All samples heated in the high-temperature furnace, regardless of the type of amine used for modification, were characterized by a lower average crystallite size than the reference sample, TTIP_F. For titania modified with EDA and heated in the tubular furnace, a slight decrease in the average crystallite size was noticed together with an increase in amine content in the sample. And so, for TTIP_EDA_10%_F, the average anatase crystallite size equalled 13.8 nm, whereas, for TTIP_EDA_70%_F, 9.0 nm was calculated. Similar to materials heated in the microwave reactor, the average crystallite size obtained for both DEA- and TEA-modified titanium dioxide, was not significantly different. However, it should be noted that these differences, although small, were greater than in the case of samples heated in the microwave reactor. The values ranged from 12.7 nm (TTIP_DEA_10%_F) to 17.0 nm (TTIP_DEA_50%_F) and from 10.3 nm (TTIP_TEA_10%_F) to 14.5 nm (TTIP_TEA_20%_F).
The obtained samples were also characterized using the low-temperature nitrogen adsorption method, and, based on the adsorption isotherms presented in Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6, different parameters have been calculated. The values of specific surface areas, the total pore volumes and the volumes of pores are presented in Table 1.
In Figure 4, the adsorption isotherms for EDA-modified titania prepared using a microwave reactor (Figure 5a) and high-temperature furnace (Figure 4b) are presented. For both the reference materials TTIP_R (Figure 4a) and TTIP_F (Figure 4b), the adsorption isotherms are of type II according to the IUPAC system, and their shape is characteristic of macroporous materials. For these samples, a H3 type of hysteresis loop is also observed [41,42], starting at a relative pressure of 0.45 p/p0 and ending at a relative pressure of approximately 1 p/p0, which indicates that the discussed materials are dominated by macropores not completely filled with pore condensate [41,42]. For the samples modified with EDA, regardless of the type of heat treatment, type II isotherms were obtained according to the IUPAC system, which is characteristic of macroporous materials. For the EDA-modified titania prepared using a microwave reactor, hysteresis loops of the H3 type were noticed, suggesting the presence of a pore network consisting of macropores [41,42]. On the contrary, in the case of EDA-modified titania prepared using a high-temperature furnace, hysteresis loops of the H4 type have been visible [41,42], and their presence indicates the existence of pores with the shape of narrow slits [41,42].
In Figure 5, the adsorption isotherms for diethylamine-modified titanium dioxide prepared using a microwave reactor (Figure 5a) and high-temperature furnace (Figure 5b) are shown. For DEA-modified titanium dioxide heated in the microwave reactor, similarly to the case of the reference material TTIP_R, the isotherms of type II were also obtained and the hysteresis loops of the H3 type were observed. For materials modified with an amine content of 10 wt.% and 20 wt.%, the hysteresis loop starts at a relative pressure of 0.5 p/p0 and ends at a relative pressure of approximately 1 p/p0. However, for the samples with an amine content of 50 wt.% and 70 wt.%, the hysteresis loop begins at a relative pressure of approximately 0.65 p/p0 and ends at a relative pressure of approximately 1 p/p0. This proves that, in samples with higher amine content (50 wt.% and 70 wt.%), the mesopores have a larger diameter than the mesopores in samples with lower amine content (10 wt.% and 20 wt.%); this was also true in the reference sample (TTIP_R).
In the case of the materials heated in the high-temperature furnace (Figure 5b), and exclusively in the case of materials with a higher content of amine (50 wt.% and 70 wt.%), type IVa isotherms were obtained according to the IUPAC system and hysteresis loops of the H2b type were observed. In contrast to this, for the samples modified with 10 wt.% and 20 wt.% of DEA obtained using a tubular furnace, type II isotherms were obtained, which are characteristic of macroporous materials. Hysteresis loops of the H4 type have also been observed [41,42], what indicates the presence of pores with the shape of narrow slits [41,42].
For triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide heated in the microwave reactor, the same as in the case of diethylamine-modified titanium dioxide, type II isotherms were obtained, and hysteresis loops of the H3 type were observed (Figure 6a). For the materials modified with an amine content of 10 wt.% and 20 wt.% hysteresis loop starts at a relative pressure of 0.4 p/p0 and ends at a relative pressure of approximately 1 p/p0. Whereas for samples with an amine content of 50 wt.% and 70 wt.%, H2b type isotherms were noticed with the hysteresis loops starting at a relative pressure of approximately 0.5 p/p0 and ending at a relative pressure of approximately 1 p/p0. It means that the samples with higher amine content (50 wt.% and 70 wt.%) possessed mesopores with larger diameters than the mesopores in samples with lower amine content (10 wt.% and 20 wt.%).
The same type of isotherm and hysteresis loop was noticed for the sample heated in the tubular furnace (Figure 6b), but only modified with amine content 50 wt.% and 70 wt.%. For the materials with lower amine content (10 wt.% and 20 wt.%) type II isotherms were obtained according to the IUPAC classification, which is characteristic of macroporous materials. Hysteresis loops of the H4 type have also been observed [41,42], which indicates the presence of pores in the shape of narrow slits [41,42].
Based on the adsorption isotherms, the textural parameters of the tested materials were calculated and presented in Table 1. Generally, all the samples heated in the microwave reactor characterized higher values of surface area and total pore volume in comparison with the materials heated in the tubular furnace. The common feature of all the samples was that they did not have micropores.
In the case of ethylenediamine-modified titanium dioxide prepared using a microwave reactor, it was found that the content of amine in the samples had no influence on the values of specific surface areas, which ranged from 96 m2/g for TTIP_EDA_10%_R to 100 m2/g for TTIP_EDA_70%_R. Also, the values of SBET did not differ significantly from the SBET value of the reference sample (TTIP_R, 98 m2/g). In the case of diethylamine- and triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide, higher values of surface area were achieved in comparison with the EDA-modified materials. The fact that the BET-specific surface areas increased might be due to the decrease in the crystallite size of titanium dioxide (Table 1). In both cases, there was no significant effect of DEA and TEA content on SBET values. For diethylamine-modified titanium dioxide, the SBET values equalled around 140 m2/g, and for triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide, they were within the range of 140–150 m2/g. Slightly higher values were recorded exclusively for the cases of samples modified with 10% of amine, namely TTIP_DEA_10_%_R and TTIP_TEA_10%_R, at 160 m2/g and 185 m2/g, respectively.
Ethylenediamine-modified titanium dioxide samples heated in the tubular furnace showed similar surface areas regardless of the amount of amine introduced. The values of SBET ranged from 8 m2/g for TTIP_EDA_20_%_F to 10 m2/g for TTIP_EDA_50_%_R and were close to the values obtained for the reference material (16 m2/g). In the case of diethylamine- and triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide, similar to the reference material, values of SBET were noticed only for the materials with the addition of 10% and 20% of amine. For materials modified with 50% and 70% of diethylamine, SBET equalled 32 m2/g and 68 m2/g, whereas for materials modified with 50% and 70% of triethylamine, the SBET equalled 36 m2/g and 48 m2/g, respectively.
In general, all of the obtained materials were meso/macroporous. The total pore volume for the reference material obtained in a microwave reactor reached 0.28 cm3/g. Regardless of the amine used and the content of amine, the data of the total pore volume for amine-modified materials were scattered and ranged from 0.21 cm3/g for TTIP_DEA_50%_R to 0.40 cm3/g for TTIP_EDA_50%. In the case of materials obtained using a tubular furnace, the values of the total pore volume were significantly lower and the total pore volume for the reference material TTIP_F equalled 0.05 cm3/g. The values for the EDA, DEA and TEA-modified materials were similar.
Table 1 presents calculated band gap energy values for titania samples modified with selected amines. It can be clearly stated that, for all modified samples fabricated with the use of a microwave reactor, slight changes in band gap energy values, and thus insignificant red-shifts of the absorption edges, are observed. Additionally, the microwave treatment did not cause the colour change, and all samples stayed white or pale beige. The white colour and the slight batochromic shift of the adsorption edge for synthesized samples under the experimental conditions presented can indicate that the microwave-assisted pressure method is insufficient for carrying out the doping of TiO2. However, all samples show high UV absorption due to the white colour, making them suitable for CO2 photoreduction with simultaneous hydrogen formation (from photocatalytic water splitting) using an excitation source with a maximum wavelength below 380 nm.
When thermal annealing at 400 °C of the samples was applied, all samples showed red-shifts in the absorption edges concerning the reference sample (TTIP_F), a consequence of narrowing the band gaps, thus decreasing Eg values, which proves the occurrence of TiO2 doping with nitrogen and/or carbon atoms. Regardless of the type of amine used, all samples showed high absorption of visible radiation due to their dark colour (from dark beige and grey to dark grey). Spadavecchia et al. [43] and Diker et al. [44] also stated that amines can be a source of nitrogen or carbon atoms, and the non-metal elements remaining after annealing in TiO2 can act as dopants and shift the absorption edge into the visible part of the light. From Table 1, it can be seen that the band gap energy values decrease as the amines’ theoretical concentration increases. For this preparation method, the dark colours of the synthesized samples are related to the boiling points of the amines used for modification (bpDEA = 55 °C and bpTEA = 89 °C). Even when the furnace is slowly heated to the required temperature (400 °C), DEA and TEA start boiling quickly and their vapours are removed with argon flow. This is also true for EDA, except that the boiling point for this amine is 117 °C, so the EDA evaporates more slowly, having a longer contact time with TiO2.
All the tested materials were used as photocatalysts in the photocatalytic reduction of the carbon dioxide process. Hydrogen, methane and carbon monoxide were detected in the gas phase. Although hydrogen is not a direct product of CO2 photoreduction, but rather a result of the water-splitting process, it is a valuable product and an essential component that is necessary for CO2 conversion. The content of individual gasses was expressed in μmol/gmaterial/dm3.
The hydrogen, carbon monoxide and methane contents in the gas phase during the 6 h process, obtained using ethylenediamine-, diethylamine-, and triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide heated in the microwave reactor, are presented in Figure 7a, Figure 7b, Figure 7c, respectively. Additionally, the hydrogen, carbon monoxide and methane contents in the gas phase for the reference material prepared with ammonia water (TTIP_R) have been marked in the same Figures. It is clearly visible that the photoactivity of the studied materials depended on the type of amine used for modification. The highest photoactivity in the photoreduction of carbon dioxide process showed TEA-modified titania, and the highest content of hydrogen (671 μmol/gmaterial/dm3), carbon monoxide (388 mol/gmaterial/dm3) and methane (136 μmol/gmaterial/dm3) was obtained in the gas phase using this photocatalyst. A lower content of appropriate products in the gas phase was noticed for ethylenediamine- and diethylamine-modified titanium dioxide. For ethylenediamine-modified titanium dioxide, 243 μmol/gmaterial/dm3 of hydrogen, 154 μmol/gmaterial/dm3 of CO and 41 μmol/gmaterial/dm3 of CH4 was achieved, while, for diethylamine-modified titanium dioxide, 431 μmol/gmaterial/dm3 of hydrogen, 297 μmol/gmaterial/dm3 of CO and 68 μmol/gmaterial/dm3 of CH4 was obtained. Based on these results, the sample modified with triethylamine has been selected for further studies.
In Figure 8, the comparison between the content of hydrogen (Figure 8a), carbon monoxide (Figure 8b) and methane (Figure 8c) in the gas phase is shown and the values obtained using titanium dioxide modified with different contents of triethylamine prepared in the high-temperature furnace are presented. It is clear that higher photoactivity for hydrogen production was characterized for the samples with an amine content of 70% (183 μmol/gmaterial/dm3). The remaining tested materials showed photoactivity at a similar level, what means that the hydrogen content in the gas phase for the sample modified with an amine content of 10% was practically the same as for the reference material. It should be noted that, in the case of carbon monoxide and methane, similar to what has been reported previously, the best results were achieved when titanium dioxide modified with an amine content of 70% was used. Generally, in the gas phase, the lowest values of the product were detected for methane. For the most photoactive material, triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide, 25 μmol/gmaterial/dm3 of CH4 was obtained.
Taking into account the results described above, the influence of amine content in triethylamine-modified materials prepared in the microwave reactor on the amount of hydrogen, carbon monoxide and methane (Figure 9a, Figure 9b, Figure 9c, respectively) produced in the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide process has been checked. It was found that the highest content of hydrogen in the gas phase was detected for the sample modified with 70% of amine and the amount equalled 671 μmol/gmaterial/dm3. Lower values were noticed for the sample modified with 50% and 10% of amine—231 μmol/gmaterial/dm3 and 111 μmol/gmaterial/dm3, respectively. It should also be noted that the sample TTIP_TEA_10%_R exhibited lower photoactivity than the reference material. In the case of carbon monoxide and methane production, a similar dependence was observed. What is important to note is that CO production decreased for the TTIP_TEA_10%_R and TTIP_TEA_50%_R in regard to what can be related to the occupation of active sites by products or unreacted CO2, which prevents the reaction from proceeding further. Hydrogen production only increased in the sample modified with 70% of triethylamine (TTIP_TEA_70%_R), which suggests that saturation of the active sites in this photocatalyst occurs more slowly than for the other samples.
As is known from the available literature [45,46], photocatalytic activity depends on many factors, especially in regard to phase composition, particle size and the values of surface area. In our case, the average crystallite size and the BET-specific surface areas depended mainly on the heat treatment temperature, hence a lower content of products in the gas phase was noted for samples obtained in the high-temperature furnace. It was also visible that the use of ethylenediamine, instead of diethylamine and triethylamine, to modify titanium dioxide resulted in the formation of larger anatase crystallites for materials obtained under the same experimental conditions. This was probably due to the basicity of the individual amines and the amount of hydroxyl groups available for hydrolysis. More hydroxyl groups leads to better crystallization of TiO2 and greater crystallite sizes, which was observed in the case of the samples modified using EDA. This is consistent with the literature data, which states that the crystallite size depends on many parameters, including temperature, process and precursors [47,48].

3. Experimental Part

3.1. Preparation of the Reference Material

To prepare the titanium dioxide, 50 mL of distilled water was added dropwise to the glass beaker containing 20 mL of titanium(IV) isopropoxide (TTIP) and 5 mL of ethyl alcohol. In order to change the pH, ammonia water (25% NH3∙H2O) was dropped until the pH value was equal to 10. The whole mixture was continuously stirred for 24 h and then was left to age for 24 h. Then, the suspension was placed into a Teflon vessel and transferred to a microwave-assisted solvothermal reactor (ERTEC MAGNUM II, Wrocław, Poland). The process was conducted for 15 min under a pressure of 40 bar. Finally, the material was dried in a forced-air dryer at 80 °C, washed with distilled water, dried in a forced-air dryer at 80 °C and finally grounded in an agate mortar to a uniform consistency. The obtained sample was denoted as TTIP_R. Simultaneously, the sample was also taken without microwave treatment. The procedure was similar, with the exception that, after the ageing step, the material was dried in a forced-air dryer at 80 °C, grounded in an agate mortar and subjected to the heat treatment, which was performed in a high-temperature furnace (HST 12/400 Carbolite, Derbyshire, UK). For this purpose, the obtained powder was transferred into a quartz boat, placed in a high-temperature furnace and heated under an argon atmosphere at a temperature rising from 20 to 400 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. When a temperature of 400 °C was reached, the heating process was continued for 1 h. Afterwards, the sample was cooled to room temperature under an argon atmosphere. The final product was washed with distilled water, dried in a forced-air dryer at 80 °C and finally grounded in an agate mortar to a uniform consistency. The obtained sample was denoted as TTIP_F.

3.2. Modification of Titanium Dioxide with Amines

To prepare amine-modified titanium dioxide, 50 mL of distilled water was added dropwise to the glass beaker containing 20 mL of titanium(IV) isopropoxide (TTIP) and 5 mL of ethyl alcohol. Then, the appropriate amine (ethylenediamine, diethylamine and triethylamine), in an amount of 10 wt.%, 20 wt.%, 50 wt.% and 70 wt.%, was added. The whole mixture was continuously stirred for 24 h, and was then left to age for 24 h. Then, the sample was placed into a Teflon vessel and transferred to a microwave reactor (ERTEC MAGNUM II). The process was conducted for 15 min under a pressure of 40 bar. Finally, the material was dried in a forced-air dryer at 80 °C, washed with distilled water, again dried in a forced-air dryer at 80 °C and finally grounded in an agate mortar to a uniform consistency. The obtained samples were denoted as TTIP_EDA_10%_R, TTIP_EDA_20%_R, TTIP_EDA_50%_R, TTIP_EDA_70%_R (ethylenediamine-modified titanium dioxide); TTIP_DEA_10%_R, TTIP_DEA_20%_R, TTIP_DEA_50%_R, TTIP_DEA_70%_R (diethylamine-modified titanium dioxide); and TTIP_TEA_10%_R, TTIP_TEA_20%_R, TTIP_TEA_50%_R, TTIP_TEA_70%_R (triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide).
Simultaneously, samples without microwave treatment were also made. The procedure was similar, with the exception that, after the ageing step, the material was dried in a forced-air dryer at 80 °C, grounded in an agate mortar and subjected to the heat treatment, which was performed in a high-temperature furnace (HST 12/400 Carbolite). For this purpose, the obtained powder was transferred into a quartz boat, placed in a high-temperature furnace and heated under an argon atmosphere, with the temperature rising from 20 to 400 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. When a temperature of 400 °C was reached, the heating process was continued for 1 h. Afterwards, the sample was cooled to room temperature under an argon atmosphere. The final product was washed with distilled water, dried in a forced-air dryer at 80 °C and finally grounded in an agate mortar to a uniform consistency. The obtained samples were denoted as TTIP_EDA_10%_F, TTIP_EDA_20%_F, TTIP_EDA_50%_F, TTIP_EDA_70%_F (ethylenediamine-modified titanium dioxide); TTIP_DEA_10%_F, TTIP_DEA_20%_F, TTIP_DEA_50%_F, TTIP_DEA_70%_F (diethylamine-modified titanium dioxide); TTIP_TEA_10%_F, TTIP_TEA_20%_F and TTIP_TEA_50%_F, TTIP_TEA_70%_F (triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide).

3.3. Photocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide

The processes were conducted in a gas phase bottle-shaped reactor made of glass. The working volume of the reactor was 766 cm3. A 150 W medium-pressure mercury lamp TQ150 Z3 (Heraeus, Hanau, Germany) was used in the photocatalytic tests. It was characterized by the wide range of both UV and visible light in the range of 250–600 nm, with the maximum at 365 nm. The lamp was placed in a quartz condenser. It was constantly cooled with water by a chiller equipped with a pump with a controlled temperature of 18 °C (Minichiller 280 OLÉ, Huber, Offenburg, Germany). The reactor was placed in a thermostatic chamber to maintain a stable temperature (20 °C) and exclude light sources. A measurement of 10 cm3 of distilled water and glass fibre with the tested photocatalyst were placed in the reactor. The reactor was purified with pure CO2 (Messer, Police, Poland) for 16 h to eliminate the air. During the whole process, the gas in the reactor was constantly mixed with the pump (flow rate of 1.6 dm3/h). The process was performed at 20 °C and tested for 6 h. The gas samples for analysis were collected every 1 h. The gas phase composition was analyzed using an SRI 310C gas chromatograph (SRI Instruments, Torrance, CA, USA) equipped with a column with a molecular sieve with a mesh size of 5Ä and a HID detector (Helium Ionization Detector). The carrier gas was helium. The analyses were performed under isothermal conditions at a temperature of 60 °C. The gas flow through the column was 60 cm3/min, and the volume of the test gas was 1 cm3. The content of the component in the gas phase was calculated in successive measurements based on the calibration curve.

3.4. Characterization Methods

The phase composition of the prepared samples was determined using the X-ray diffraction method Cu Kα radiation (λCu Kα = 0.1540 nm) on an Empyrean (Panalytical, Malvern, UK). The identification of the crystalline phases was performed using HighScore+ and the ICDD PDF-4+ 2015 database. The average crystallite size was calculated according to the following Scherrer equation based on obtained X-ray powder diffraction patterns:
D = (k∙λ)/(β·cosθ)
where D—the average crystallite size in the direction perpendicular to the (hkl) reflection plane; k—a constant close to unity, dependent on the shape of the crystallite; λ—the X-ray wavelength; β—the peak broadening; θ—the XRD peak position.
To perform the low-temperature nitrogen adsorption/desorption studies, the equipment QUADRASORB evoTM gas sorption automatic system (Quantachrome Instruments, Anton Paar, Austria) was used together with a MasterPrep multi-zone flow/vacuum outgassing system under a vacuum of 1 × 10−5 mbar from Quantachrome Instruments (Boynton Beach, FL, USA). On the basis of the obtained adsorption/desorption isotherms, the specific surface area (SBET) and pore volumes of the obtained materials were determined. Prior to analysis, 150 mg of the material was weighed and pre-dried at 90 °C in a laboratory dryer. The dried samples were transferred into measuring cells and degassed using MasterPrep (Ouantachrome Instruments, USA) at 100 °C for 12 h. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) equation was used to determine the surface areas (SBET), which were determined in the relative pressure range of 0.05–0.2. The total pore volume (Vtotal) was calculated from the volume of nitrogen held at the highest relative pressure (p/p0 = 0.99). The volume of micropores (Vmicro < 2 nm) with dimensions smaller than 2 nm was calculated as a result of integrating the pore volume distribution function using the DFT method; a mesopore volume (Vmeso) with dimensions from 2 to 50 nm was calculated from the difference in the total pore volume (Vtotal) and the volume of micropores (Vmicro < 2 nm).
The band gap of the reference and all amine-modified titania materials was determined from the optical absorption spectra by means of a Jasco V-650 spectrometer (JASCO International Co., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a PIV-756 integrating sphere accessory spectrometer (JASCO International Co., Tokyo, Japan) for diffuse reflectance measurements. Barium sulphate (BaSO4 pure p.a., Avantor Performance Materials Poland S.A., Gliwice, Poland) was used as a reference for determining the baseline. The Tauc plot was used to estimate the value of the semiconductor band gap energy.

4. Conclusions

Modification of titanium dioxide using ethylenediamine, diethylamine, and triethylamine heated in the microwave reactor or high-temperature furnace has been studied. Based on the X-ray diffraction method, it was found that, in all the tested materials, only the anatase phase was identified. The average crystallite size was higher for the raw material and materials modified with amines and heated in the high-temperature furnace instead of microwave reactor, due to the higher processing temperature. Regardless of the heating method, decrease of the average crystallite size after modification with amines in comparison with raw materials was noticed, apart from ethylenediamine-modified titanium dioxide heated in the microwave reactor, for which slightly higher values were noticed. Generally, all the samples heated in the microwave reactor were characterized with higher values of surface area, total pore volume and band gap energy in comparison with the materials heated in the tubular furnace. Modifying samples with amines utilizing microwave-assisted pressure treatment did not alter the Eg values, as can be indirectly evidenced by the white colour of the samples, making them capable of absorbing the UV radiation. On the other hand, thermal amine modification of titania at 400 °C using the high-temperature furnace leads to colour changes and the red-shift of the adsorption edge, which indicates the doping of TiO2 with carbon and/or nitrogen. The main product detected in the gas phase was hydrogen, and the highest content was achieved using triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide with 70% of amine content and heated using microwaves.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.P.; Methodology, I.P., P.S., D.S., K.S.S. and E.K.-N.; Validation, I.P.; Formal analysis, I.P., P.S., D.S. and E.K.-N.; Investigation, I.P., P.S., D.S., K.S.S., W.M. and E.K.-N.; Resources, I.P.; Data curation, I.P. and E.K.-N.; Writing—original draft, I.P., P.S., D.S. and E.K.-N.; Writing—review & editing, I.P., P.S., D.S., K.S.S., E.K.-N., A.W.M., K.W. and U.N.; Visualization, P.S., D.S., K.S.S. and E.K.-N.; Supervision, A.W.M., K.W. and U.N.; Project administration, I.P.; Funding acquisition, I.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the Initiative no FWD-Green-3, submitted within the call for proposals entitled “Synergistic metal/non-metal doping of titanium dioxide to produce hydrogen under UV and Vis light” financing within the framework of the Fund for Bilateral Relations, “FBR”, the European Economic Area Financial Mechanism 2014–2021 and Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2014–2021 via Ministry of Development Funds and Regional Policy (Poland).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhu, L.; Deng, Z.; Davis, S.J.; Ciais, P. Global carbon emissions in 2023. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2024, 5, 253–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Raganati, F.; Miccio, F.; Ammendola, P. Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide for Post-combustion Capture: A Review. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 12845–12868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Overa, S.; Ko, B.H.; Zhao, Y.; Jiao, F. Electrochemical Approaches for CO2 Conversion to Chemicals: A Journey toward Practical Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Garba, M.D.; Usman, M.; Khan, S.; Shehzad, F.; Galadima, A.; Ehsan, M.F.; Ghanem, A.S.; Humayun, M. CO2 towards fuels: A review of catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to hydrocarbons. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lingampalli, S.R.; Ayyub, M.M.; Rao, C.N.R. Recent Progress in the Photocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 2740–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, R.; Wang, X.; Xiong, Y.; Hou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ding, J.; Zhong, Q. Modulation of Trivalent/Tetravalent Metallic Elements in Ni-Based Layered Double Hydroxides for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 35654–35662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ahmad, I.; Zou, Y.; Yan, J.; Liu, Y.; Shukrullah, S.; Naz, M.Y.; Hussain, H.; Khan, W.Q.; Khalid, N.R. Semiconductor photocatalysts: A critical review highlighting the various strategies to boost the photocatalytic performances for diverse applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 311, 102830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liu, X.; Ye, L.; Liu, S.; Ji, X. Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 by ZnO Micro/nanomaterials with Different Morphologies and Ratios of {0001} Facets. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, H.; Gao, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Liao, C.; Shih, K. Enhanced selective photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CH4 over plasmonic Au modified g-C3N4 photocatalyst under UV–vis light irradiation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 439, 552–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, Y.A.; McNulty, I.; Liu, C.; Lau, K.C.; Liu, Q.; Paulikas, A.P.; Sun, C.J.; Cai, Z.; Guest, J.R.; Ren, Y.; et al. Facet-dependent active sites of a single Cu2O particle photocatalyst for CO2 reduction to methanol. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 957–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rehman, Z.U.; Bilal, M.; Hou, J.; Butt, F.K.; Ahmad, J.; Ali, S.; Hussain, A. Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Using TiO2-Based Photocatalysts and TiO2 Z-Scheme Heterojunction Composites: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Dong, P.; Huang, Z.; Nie, X.; Zhang, X. TiO2 Surfaces Self-Doped with Ag Nanoparticles Exhibit Efficient CO2 Photoreduction under Visible Light. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 15991–15998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tseng, I.-H.; Wu, J.C.S.; Chou, H.-Y. Effects of sol–gel procedures on the photocatalysis of Cu/TiO2 in CO2 photoreduction. J. Catal. 2004, 221, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Q.; Gao, T.; Andino, J.M.; Li, Y. Copper and iodine co-modified TiO2 nanoparticles for improved activity of CO2 photoreduction with water vapor. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 123–124, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lan, D.; Pang, F.; Ge, J. Enhanced Charge Separation in NiO and Pd Co-Modified TiO2 Photocatalysts for Efficient and Selective Photoreduction of CO2. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 6324–6332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Michalkiewicz, B.; Majewska, J.; Kądziołka, G.; Bubacz, K.; Mozia, S.; Morawski, A.W. Reduction of CO2 by adsorption and reaction on surface of TiO2-nitrogen modified photocatalyst. J. CO2 Util. 2014, 5, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Z.; Zhu, X.; Xiong, J.; Wen, Z.; Cheng, G. A p–n Junction by Coupling Amine-Enriched Brookite–TiO2 Nanorods with CuxS Nanoparticles for Improved Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Materials 2023, 16, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Song, F.; Zhao, Y.; Zhong, Q. Adsorption of carbon dioxide on amine-modified TiO2 nanotubes. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 25, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ota, M.; Hirota, Y.; Uchida, Y.; Nishiyama, N. CO2 Adsorption Property of Amine-Modified Amorphous TiO2 Nanoparticles with a High Surface Area. Colloids Interfaces 2018, 2, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, G.; Huang, Q.; Kenarsari, S.D.; Hu, X.; Russell, A.G.; Fan, M.; Shen, X. A new mesoporous amine-TiO2 based pre-combustion CO2 capture technology. Appl. Energy 2015, 147, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, L.; Bai, R.; Hu, G.; Chen, R.; Hu, X.; Dai, W.; Dacosta, H.; Fan, M. Capturing CO2 with amine-impregnated titanium oxides. Energy Fuels 2013, 27, 5433–5439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kapica-Kozar, J.; Piróg, E.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Wrobel, R.J.; Gesikiewicz-Puchalska, A.; Morawski, A.W.; Narkiewicz, U.; Michalkiewicz, B. Titanium dioxide modified with various amines used as sorbents of carbon dioxide. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 1549–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kapica-Kozar, J.; Michalkiewicz, B.; Wrobel, R.J.; Mozia, S.; Pirog, E.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Serafin, J.; Morawski, A.W.; Narkiewicz, U. Adsorption of carbon dioxide on TEPA-modified TiO2/titanate composite nanorods. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 7870–7885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mendonça, T.A.P.; Nascimento, J.P.C.; Casagrande, G.A.; Vieira, N.C.S.; Gonçalves, M. Ethylenediamine-modified activated carbon photocatalyst with the highest TiO2 attachment/dispersion for improved photodegradation of sulfamethazine. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2024, 318, 129203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bao, N.; Niu, J.J.; Li, Y.; Wu, G.L.; Yu, X.H. Low-temperature hydrothermal synthesis of N-doped TiO2 from small-molecule amine systems and their photocatalytic activity. Environ. Technol. 2012, 34, 2939–2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liao, Y.; Cao, S.-W.; Yuan, Y.; Gu, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Xue, C. Efficient CO2 Capture and Photoreduction by Amine-Functionalized TiO2. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 10220–10222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Karawek, A.; Kitjanukit, N.; Neamsung, W.; Kinkaew, C.; Phadungbut, P.; Seeharaj, P.; Kim-Lohsoontorn, P.; Srinives, S. Alkanolamine-Grafted and Copper-Doped Titanium Dioxide Nanosheets–Graphene Composite Heterostructure for CO2 Photoreduction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2023, 6, 10929–10942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jin, L.; Shaaban, E.; Bamonte, S.; Cintron, D.; Shuster, S.; Zhang, L.; Li, G.; He, J. Surface Basicity of Metal@TiO2 to Enhance Photocatalytic Efficiency for CO2 Reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 38595–38603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Z.; Shangguan, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, T.; Wang, L.; Liu, M.; Sui, Y. Investigation on Crystallization and Magnetic Properties of (Nd, Pr, Ce)2Fe14B/α-Fe Nanocomposite Magnets by Microwave Annealing Treatment. Materials 2021, 14, 2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cichoň, S.; Machác, P.; Fekete, L.; Lapcák, L. Direct microwave annealing of SiC substrate for rapid synthesis of quality epitaxial graphene. Carbon 2016, 98, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mirzaei, A.; Neri, G. Microwave-assisted synthesis of metal oxide nanostructures for gas sensing application: A review. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2016, 237, 749–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kustov, L.; Vikanova, K. Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles under Microwave Irradiation: Get Much with Less Energy. Metals 2023, 13, 1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Andrade-Guel, M.; Díaz-Jiménez, L.; Cortés-Hernández, D.; Cabello-Alvarado, C.; Ávila-Orta, C.; Bartolo-Pérez, P.; Gamero-Melo, P. Microwave assisted sol–gel synthesis of titanium dioxide using hydrochloric and acetic acid as catalysts. Boletín Soc. Española Cerámica Vidr. 2019, 58, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dufour, F.; Cassaignon, S.; Durupthy, O.; Colbeau-Justin, C.; Chanéac, C. Do TiO2 Nanoparticles Really Taste Better When Cooked in a Microwave Oven? Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 2012, 2707–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chang, C.; Rad, S.; Gan, L.; Li, Z.; Dai, J.; Shahab, A. Review of the sol–gel method in preparing nano TiO2 for advanced oxidation process. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2023, 12, 20230150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hafizah, N.; Sopyan, I. Nanosized TiO2 Photocatalyst Powder via Sol-Gel Method: Effect of Hydrolysis Degree on Powder Properties. Int. J. Photoenergy 2009, 2009, 962783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, Y.-B.; Lee, J.-M.; Hur, D.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Jeon, S.-H. Effects of Advanced Amines on Magnetite Deposition of Steam Generator Tubes in Secondary System. Coatings 2021, 11, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, H.; Bai, Y.; Liu, H.; Jin, W.; Xu, N.; Chen, G.; Xu, B. Mechanism of nitrogen-concentration dependence on pH value: Experimental and theoretical studies on nitrogen-doped TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 13304–13309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, J.; Su, Y.; Cheng, B.; Zhou, M. Effects of pH on the microstructures and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous nanocrystalline titania powders prepared via hydrothermal method. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2006, 258, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yin, S.; Aita, Y.; Komatsu, M.; Sato, T.J. One-Step Cohydrothermal Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Titanium Oxide Nanotubes with Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 26, 2735–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sing, K.S.W. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Provisional). Pure Appl. Chem. 1982, 54, 2201–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Spadavecchia, F.; Ardizzone, S.; Cappelletti, G.; Oliva, C.; Cappelli, S. Time effects on the stability of the induced defects in TiO2 nanoparticles doped by different nitrogen sources. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Diker, H.; Varlikli, C.; Mizrak, K.; Dana, A. Characterizations and photocatalytic activity comparisons of N-doped nc-TiO2 depending on synthetic conditions and structural differences of amine sources. Energy 2011, 36, 1243–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Akpan, U.G.; Hameed, B.H. Parameters affecting the photocatalytic degradation of dyes using TiO2-based photocatalysts: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hamidi, F.; Aslani, F. TiO2-based Photocatalytic Cementitious Composites: Materials, Properties, Influential Parameters, and Assessment Techniques. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gao, L.; Zhang, Q. Effects of amorphous contents and particle size on the photocatalytic properties of TiO2 nanoparticles. Scr. Mater. 2001, 44, 1195–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jang, H.D.; Kim, S.K.; Kim, S.J. Effect of Particle Size and Phase Composition of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on the Photocatalytic Properties. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2001, 3, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 04348 g001
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of EDA-modified titania samples heated in the microwave reactor (a) and high-temperature furnace (b). Reflexes attributed to anatase are marked as •.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of EDA-modified titania samples heated in the microwave reactor (a) and high-temperature furnace (b). Reflexes attributed to anatase are marked as •.
Molecules 29 04348 g001
Molecules 29 04348 g002
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of DEA-modified titania samples heated in the microwave reactor (a) and high-temperature furnace (b). Reflexes attributed to anatase are marked as •.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of DEA-modified titania samples heated in the microwave reactor (a) and high-temperature furnace (b). Reflexes attributed to anatase are marked as •.
Molecules 29 04348 g002
Molecules 29 04348 g003
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of TEA-modified titania samples heated in the microwave reactor (a) and high-temperature furnace (b). Reflexes attributed to anatase are marked as •.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of TEA-modified titania samples heated in the microwave reactor (a) and high-temperature furnace (b). Reflexes attributed to anatase are marked as •.
Molecules 29 04348 g003
Molecules 29 04348 g004
Figure 4. N2 sorption isotherms of the EDA-modified titania dioxide prepared using (a) a microwave reactor and (b) a high-temperature furnace.
Figure 4. N2 sorption isotherms of the EDA-modified titania dioxide prepared using (a) a microwave reactor and (b) a high-temperature furnace.
Molecules 29 04348 g004
Molecules 29 04348 g005
Figure 5. N2 sorption isotherms of the diethylamine-modified titanium dioxide prepared using (a) microwave reactor and (b) high-temperature furnace.
Figure 5. N2 sorption isotherms of the diethylamine-modified titanium dioxide prepared using (a) microwave reactor and (b) high-temperature furnace.
Molecules 29 04348 g005
Molecules 29 04348 g006
Figure 6. N2 sorption isotherms of the triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide prepared using (a) microwave reactor and (b) high-temperature furnace.
Figure 6. N2 sorption isotherms of the triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide prepared using (a) microwave reactor and (b) high-temperature furnace.
Molecules 29 04348 g006
Molecules 29 04348 g007aMolecules 29 04348 g007b
Figure 7. The content of hydrogen (a), carbon monoxide (b), and methane (c) in the gas phase obtained in the photocatalytic reduction of the carbon dioxide process using ethylenediamine-, diethylamine- and triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide heated in the microwave reactor.
Figure 7. The content of hydrogen (a), carbon monoxide (b), and methane (c) in the gas phase obtained in the photocatalytic reduction of the carbon dioxide process using ethylenediamine-, diethylamine- and triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide heated in the microwave reactor.
Molecules 29 04348 g007aMolecules 29 04348 g007b
Molecules 29 04348 g008
Figure 8. The content of (a) hydrogen, (b) carbon monoxide and (c) methane in the gas phase obtained in the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide process using triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide heated in the microwave reactor and high-temperature furnace.
Figure 8. The content of (a) hydrogen, (b) carbon monoxide and (c) methane in the gas phase obtained in the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide process using triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide heated in the microwave reactor and high-temperature furnace.
Molecules 29 04348 g008
Molecules 29 04348 g009aMolecules 29 04348 g009b
Figure 9. The content of (a) hydrogen, (b) carbon monoxide, (c) methane in the gas phase obtained in the photocatalytic reduction in the carbon dioxide process using triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide with different contents of amine and heated in the microwave reactor.
Figure 9. The content of (a) hydrogen, (b) carbon monoxide, (c) methane in the gas phase obtained in the photocatalytic reduction in the carbon dioxide process using triethylamine-modified titanium dioxide with different contents of amine and heated in the microwave reactor.
Molecules 29 04348 g009aMolecules 29 04348 g009b
Table 1. The average crystallite size calculated according to the Scherrer equation, textural properties of the amine-modified TiO2 calculated based on low-temperature nitrogen adsorption isotherms and band gap energy estimated from Tauc’s plots.
Table 1. The average crystallite size calculated according to the Scherrer equation, textural properties of the amine-modified TiO2 calculated based on low-temperature nitrogen adsorption isotherms and band gap energy estimated from Tauc’s plots.
Amine
Content 		Average
Crystallite
Size		SBET TPVVmicroVmesoEg
[wt.%][nm][m2/g][cm3/g][cm3/g][cm3/g][eV]
Microwave reactor
TTIP_R014.3980.280.010.273.22
TTIP_EDA_10%_R1015.4960.280.000.283.20
TTIP_EDA_20%_R2016.6930.300.000.303.17
TTIP_EDA_50%_R5016.0860.400.000.403.22
TTIP_EDA_70%_R7016.91000.340.010.333.20
TTIP_DEA_10%_R108.51600.270.010.263.23
TTIP_DEA_20%_R209.71460.250.010.243.20
TTIP_DEA_50%_R5010.21520.230.000.233.15
TTIP_DEA_70%_R709.31480.250.010.243.18
TTIP_TEA_10%_R107.11850.330.010.323.26
TTIP_TEA_20%_R2010.21430.220.010.213.16
TTIP_TEA_50%_R509.11520.270.010.263.23
TTIP_TEA_70%_R709.41380.250.010.243.23
High-temperature furnace
TTIP_F021.9160.050.000.053.25
TTIP_EDA_10%_F1013.8100.060.000.062.54
TTIP_EDA_20%_F2011.680.040.000.042.45
TTIP_EDA_50%_F5010.6120.020.000.022.37
TTIP_EDA_70%_F709.090.040.000.042.26
TTIP_DEA_10%_F1012.7150.120.000.122.92
TTIP_DEA_20%_F2015.190.030.000.032.92
TTIP_DEA_50%_F5017.0320.030.010.022.33
TTIP_DEA_70%_F7014.0680.060.010.052.59
TTIP_TEA_10%_F1010.3190.060.000.062.75
TTIP_TEA_20%_F2014.560.040.000.042.74
TTIP_TEA_50%_F5014.3360.030.010.022.56
TTIP_TEA_70%_F7013.8480.050.010.042.32
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pełech, I.; Staciwa, P.; Sibera, D.; Sobczuk, K.S.; Majewska, W.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Morawski, A.W.; Wang, K.; Narkiewicz, U. The Influence of Heat Treatment on the Photoactivity of Amine-Modified Titanium Dioxide in the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. Molecules 2024, 29, 4348. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184348

AMA Style

Pełech I, Staciwa P, Sibera D, Sobczuk KS, Majewska W, Kusiak-Nejman E, Morawski AW, Wang K, Narkiewicz U. The Influence of Heat Treatment on the Photoactivity of Amine-Modified Titanium Dioxide in the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. Molecules. 2024; 29(18):4348. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184348

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pełech, Iwona, Piotr Staciwa, Daniel Sibera, Konrad Sebastian Sobczuk, Wiktoria Majewska, Ewelina Kusiak-Nejman, Antoni W. Morawski, Kaiying Wang, and Urszula Narkiewicz. 2024. "The Influence of Heat Treatment on the Photoactivity of Amine-Modified Titanium Dioxide in the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide" Molecules 29, no. 18: 4348. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184348

APA Style

Pełech, I., Staciwa, P., Sibera, D., Sobczuk, K. S., Majewska, W., Kusiak-Nejman, E., Morawski, A. W., Wang, K., & Narkiewicz, U. (2024). The Influence of Heat Treatment on the Photoactivity of Amine-Modified Titanium Dioxide in the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. Molecules, 29(18), 4348. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184348

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop