Next Article in Journal
An Aggregation-Induced Fluorescence Probe for Detection H2S and Its Application in Cell Imaging
Next Article in Special Issue
Antifungal Mechanism of Ruta graveolens Essential Oil: A Colombian Traditional Alternative against Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Previous Article in Journal
A Squaramide-Based Organocatalyst as a Novel Versatile Chiral Solvating Agent for Carboxylic Acids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical and Bioactive Properties of Red Rice with Potential Pharmaceutical Use
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Anticancer Potential of Indole Phytoalexins and Their Analogues

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(10), 2388; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102388
Submission received: 25 April 2024 / Revised: 15 May 2024 / Accepted: 17 May 2024 / Published: 19 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Bioactive Compounds in Pharmaceuticals)

Abstract

:
Indole phytoalexins, found in economically significant Cruciferae family plants, are synthesized in response to pathogen attacks or stress, serving as crucial components of plant defense mechanisms against bacterial and fungal infections. Furthermore, recent research indicates that these compounds hold promise for improving human health, particularly in terms of potential anticancer effects that have been observed in various studies. Since our last comprehensive overview in 2016 focusing on the antiproliferative effects of these substances, brassinin and camalexin have been the most extensively studied. This review analyses the multifaceted pharmacological effects of brassinin and camalexin, highlighting their anticancer potential. In this article, we also provide an overview of the antiproliferative activity of new synthetic analogs of indole phytoalexins, which were synthesized and tested at our university with the aim of enhancing efficacy compared to the parent compound.

1. Introduction

Cancer remains one of the most formidable challenges to human health, with its incidence continuing to rise globally [1]. Despite advancements in treatment modalities, the quest for novel and more effective anticancer agents persists. In recent years, natural compounds have garnered considerable attention due to their diverse pharmacological activities and potential as leads for drug development [2,3,4]. Among these, indole phytoalexins have emerged as intriguing candidates for exploration due to their diverse biological activities and potential as anticancer agents. Indole phytoalexins, produced by plants of the Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) family, are natural compounds formed in response to diverse stresses, including pathogen attacks. These low-molecular-weight antimicrobial secondary metabolites are generally synthesized de novo by plants facing various stressors like biological factors (bacteria, fungi, viruses), physical stressors (UV radiation, heat shock, injury), and chemical stressors (heavy metals) [5]. Their notability stems from the considerable attention they have garnered due to potential health benefits, particularly their recognized anticancer properties (Figure 1). Moreover, they display a broad spectrum of antifungal effects, antitrypanosomal properties [6], and modest antibacterial activity [7,8]. In addition, they have been found to have an antiaggregatory effect on the cerebrospinal fluid in multiple sclerosis patients [9]. Moreover, indole phytoalexins possess cancer chemopreventive attributes [10] and exhibit antiproliferative activity on several human cancer cell lines [11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
Our review, published in 2016, emphasized the essential characteristics of indole phytoalexins, with a specific focus on their significant antiproliferative effects [18]. Over the subsequent years, we have undertaken the synthesis and evaluation of numerous novel derivatives of indole phytoalexins, propelled by their outstanding antiproliferative characteristics. This article aims to offer an updated review encompassing the latest advancements, building upon our previous comprehensive analysis.

2. Origin and Structural Diversity of Indole Phytoalexins

An indole-based group of phytoalexins has been isolated from economically and nutritionally important vegetables, including cabbages, turnips, rapeseed, canola, Brussels sprouts, cauliflower, and others [19]. In addition to indole phytoalexins, plants from the Brassicaceae family are capable of producing various other sulfur-containing secondary metabolites known as glucosinolates. Interestingly, there is a strong likelihood that glucosinolates and indole phytoalexins, traditionally viewed as distinct compound groups, share a common evolutionary origin and are connected at the biosynthetic level. Indole glucosinolates are plausible direct precursors to a subset of indole phytoalexins, emphasizing their mutual biosynthetic pathway. Several labeling studies have demonstrated the de novo biosynthesis of indole phytoalexins from glucosinolates via isothiocyanates [20,21,22,23]. Furthermore, even in the case of camalexin biosynthesis, which is mostly independent of the indole glucosinolate pathway, a similar biochemical mechanism involving at least two identical enzymes is utilized to incorporate sulfur into the molecular structure. This evidence suggests a common underlying mechanism for sulfur integration in diverse phytoalexins within the Brassicaceae family. Unlike glucosinolates, which are present constitutively, indole phytoalexins are synthesized only in response to pathogen attack. This is a characteristic of the plant’s innate immune response, involving the transcriptional regulation of biosynthetic genes [24].
Since 1986, a total of 54 indole phytoalexins have been investigated and characterized chemically. The chemical structures of all cruciferous phytoalexins are illustrated in the review authored by Pedras and Abdoli in 2017 [25]. The basic structure of indole phytoalexins is an indole, oxindole, or indoline nucleus with a linear chain or annexed heterocycle. Certain indole phytoalexins exhibit distinct structural characteristics, including a thiazoline ring attached in a spiro arrangement. Most of the phytoalexins found in cruciferous plants have been identified as originating from (S)-tryptophan [21,25,26,27,28]. Subsequently, a new structural group derived from (S)-phenylalanine was discovered [29,30]. Notably, watercress is the sole crucifer species known to synthesize phytoalexins through two distinct pathways, originating from the primary precursors amino acids (S)-tryptophan and (S)-phenylalanine [26,27]. Among the indole phytoalexins derived from (S)-phenylalanine are nasturlexins and tridentatol C, which were isolated from winter cress and upland cress. Included in the category of nitrile-containing phytoalexins are tenualexin, indolyl-3-acetonitrile, caulilexin C, and arvelexin. Tenualexin is probably synthesized through the biosynthesis of corresponding indolyl acetaldoximes, while cyclonasturlexin is derived biosynthetically from brassinin through the indolyl glucosinolate glucobrassicin pathway [28]. Given the extensive number of crucifer species (exceeding 3700 species) and the relatively small number of species (<50) studied for phytoalexin production, it is probable that phytoalexin structures originating from phenylalanine/tyrosine and their homologs will exhibit a variety of functional groups similar to those derived from (S)-tryptophan. Isocyalexin A was the first isocyanide (or isonitrile, –NC) documented in the plant kingdom, despite the prevalence of cyanide (or nitriles, –CN)-containing metabolites in plants [25]. Brassinin, 1-methoxybrassinin, (S)-(−)-spirobrassinin, (R)-(+)-1-methoxyspirobrassinin, 1-methoxyspirobrassinol, trans-(2R,3R)-(−)-1-methoxyspirobrassinol methyl ether, cyclobrassinin, sinalbin B, and rutalexin are typical representatives of naturally occurring cruciferous phytoalexins of dithiocarbamate, spiroindoline[3,5′]thiazolidine, and thiazino[6,5-b]indole type. Camalexin, despite the shared indole core and presence of a sulfur atom in its structure, seems to constitute a separate structural subgroup among other Brassicaceae phytoalexins [5,20].
These indole compounds, isolated from various cabbage plants, exhibit intriguing pharmacological characteristics that deserve attention in the context of cancer research. These substances are characterized by significant antiproliferative effects, which we described in our previous review [18]. Since our last comprehensive overview, brassinin and camalexin have been the most extensively studied.

3. Brassinin

Brassinin is one of the first isolated indole phytoalexins ever, and it was extracted from Chinese cabbage after infection by the bacterium Pseudomonas cichorii [31]. It is suggested that more than 30 cruciferous phytoalexins originate from brassinin or its analogs [20,32]. This natural substance is recognized for its diverse pharmacological properties, including antibacterial, antifungal, antiobesity, anti-inflammatory, antimelanogenic, antidiabetic, antiatherosclerotic, and anticancer effects [7,8,33,34,35,36,37,38].

3.1. Anticancer Potential of Brassinin

Brassinin demonstrates anticancer potential in various cancers such as myelogenous leukemia [39], colon [40], prostate [41], breast [42], lung [43], and nasopharyngeal [44], hepatocellular carcinoma [17]. It shows great potential as a prospective anticancer agent due to its ability to induce apoptosis, inhibit angiogenesis, and modulate crucial signaling pathways involved in cancer development and progression, such as the NF-κB pathway, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (JAK-STAT3), pathway and Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) pathway. By interfering with these pathways, brassinin potentially impedes the survival and proliferation of cancer cells. The results of the study by Park et al. (2021) suggest that brassinin initiates apoptosis by inducing the expression of p53 and p21, depending on the dosage and duration of exposure. Interestingly, brassinin induces apoptosis in colon cancer cells with wild-type p53 (HCT116p53+/+) in a dose-dependent manner, while having no such effect on cancer cells lacking functional p53 (null-type). In addition to apoptosis, p53 activation promotes ferroptosis, senescence, and cell cycle arrest, while inhibiting migration and metastasis in cancer cells. Moreover, brassinin dose-dependently inhibits the expression of subunit of the Carbon catabolite repression 4–negative on TATA-less (CCR4-NOT) complex (CNOT2) in these cells [38]. CNOT2 acts as an oncogene in various types of cancer cells, contributing to processes such as apoptosis, metastasis, angiogenesis, and autophagy [45,46,47].
Generally, indole phytoalexins can induce cancer cell death by various mechanisms (Figure 2).
Among them, brassinin induces three distinct forms of cell death—apoptosis, autophagy, and paraptosis—in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cells through the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway [39]. The crucial role of the MAPK pathway in regulating both apoptosis (Figure 3) and autophagy has been widely acknowledged for an extended period [48,49]. In addition to activating this pathway, brassinin enhances the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and p38 in leukemia cells [39]. The activation of p-JNK and p-ERK within the MAPK pathway has been identified as crucial for paraptosis, while the p38 pathway in the MAPK pathway contributes to the formation of paraptosis vacuoles [50,51]. The results of this study indicated that paraptosis induced by brassinin was accompanied by increased production of ROS, mitochondrial damage, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and cytoplasmic vacuolation. Moreover, brassinin disrupted the glutathione/oxidized glutathione ratio (GSH/GSSG) balance and elevated the levels of ER stress-related proteins such as activating transcription factor (ATF4) and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP). Another sign that brassinin induced paraptosis was its reduction in Alix expression. The influence of brassinin on autophagy activation was affirmed by the expression of the microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3) and an acridine orange assay [39]. LC3 serves as a reliable marker for monitoring autophagy activity, indicating its presence during active autophagy in the cell [52]. In terms of inducing apoptosis in CML cells, brassinin activates caspase-8, caspase-9, and caspase-3, leading to PARP cleavage and an increase in the distribution of cells in the sub-G1 phase [39]. The induction of apoptosis by brassinin, through increased activity of caspase-3 and caspase-9, was observed in nasopharyngeal cancer cells (C666-1). Additionally, it elevated the expression of Bax and reduced Bcl-2. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that brassinin administration enhanced the G0/G1 ratio and decreased the proportion of cells in the ‘S’ and ‘G2/M’ phases in C666-1 cells [44]. The study by Kwon et al. (2023) also demonstrated the pro-apoptotic effects of brassinin, specifically on prostate cancer cells (PC-3, DU145, LNCaP). This research suggested that androgen-independent PC-3 cells exhibited higher susceptibility to brassinin compared to DU145 and androgen-dependent LNCaP cells while showing minimal impact on normal prostatic epithelial (RWPE-1) cells. Brassinin induced apoptosis in PC-3 cells by downregulating pro-PARP, pro-caspase 3, and Bcl2, indicating a caspase-dependent apoptotic effect. Notably, brassinin displayed potential in inducing apoptosis in PC-3 cells by increasing the sub-G1 population and TUNEL-positive cells. Furthermore, it demonstrated antiproliferative activity by reducing colony formation, highlighting its ability to impede cell survival and growth in vitro. Brassinin also exhibited anti-Warburg effects by suppressing glycolysis-related proteins like pyruvate kinase isoenzyme M2 (PKM2), glucose transporter 1 (Glut1), hexokinase 2 (HK2), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in PC-3 cells, indicating an impact on the tumor’s energy metabolism. Its inhibitory effects on key proteins involved in promoting glycolysis, such as cellular myelocytomatosis oncogene (c-Myc), sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), and β-catenin, were noted, further emphasizing its potential as an anti-Warburg agent. Brassinin disrupted the interaction between SIRT1 and β-catenin, suggesting the involvement of c-Myc/SIRT1/β-catenin in its anti-Warburg effect. Moreover, brassinin triggered ROS production in PC-3 cells, significantly contributing to its antitumor effects. The use of the ROS scavenger N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) reversed brassinin’s impact on the expressions of pro-PARP, pro-caspase 3, SIRT1, and β-catenin, highlighting the crucial role of ROS in brassinin’s antitumor properties [41]. Similar results were observed in the study by Hong et al. in 2021, where NAC effectively inhibited brassinin-induced ROS production in Huh7 cells (human hepatocellular carcinoma cells with mutated p53). It is interesting that this effect was not observed in Hep3B cells (human hepatocellular carcinoma cells, deleted P53) [17]. This variance in response to oxidant stimulus could be attributed to the differences in p53 phenotype and their respective reactions, as observed in studies on Huh7 and Hep3B cells [53,54]. Moreover, brassinin demonstrated regulatory effects on AKT and MAPK signaling pathways in both Huh7 and Hep3B cells. Additionally, the concurrent administration of brassinin with pharmaceutical inhibitors targeting JNK, ERK1/2, and P38 exhibited a more pronounced reduction in cell proliferation in both hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines compared to using the inhibitors alone [17].
Brassinin is identified as a potential antiangiogenic drug for future cancer treatment. Its potent antiangiogenic activity is attributed to its ability to stimulate Tie2 and FGFR1 degradation. Brassinin promotes the lysosomal degradation of Tie2 and both lysosomal and proteasomal degradation of FGFR1 in endothelial cells. This results in the down-regulation of the AKT and ERK pathways, ultimately inhibiting angiogenesis [42]. Tie2, a receptor tyrosine kinase primarily found in the endothelium, exhibits significant expression in the vascular system of tumors. Activation of Tie2 promotes endothelial cell survival, sprouting, migration, and the formation of capillary tubes [55]. Conversely, inhibiting Tie2 activity has demonstrated its ability to impede tumor angiogenesis and limit the growth of various cancer types, such as breast cancer, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma, in numerous mouse models [56,57,58,59]. FGFR1, another receptor tyrosine kinase within the FGFR family, is also notably expressed in endothelial cells. Due to its role in tumor angiogenesis, FGFR1 is considered a promising target for therapeutic intervention. Interestingly, it has been observed that Tie2 and FGFR1 can physically interact with each other, leading to the phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). The activation of STAT3 signaling is known to play a crucial role in regulating the formation of new blood vessels in various tumor types [60]. Considering the significant involvement of both Tie2 and FGFR1 in tumor angiogenesis, it is plausible to assume that the synergistic inhibition of these two pathways may contribute to the remarkable antiangiogenic efficacy of brassinin [42].
The research by Yang et al. in 2019 investigated the effects of brassinin on the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related cell signaling cascade. Their findings demonstrated that brassinin downregulates various mesenchymal markers while upregulating epithelial markers. It effectively suppresses the expression of TGF-β-induced fibronectin, vimentin, N-cadherin, the matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-9 and MMP-2), Twist, and Snail while increasing TGF-β-induced occludin and N-cadherin levels. Modulating these EMT-related factors leads to decreased proliferation and invasion in lung carcinoma cells, specifically A549 and H1299 cells. Brassinin also attenuates TGF-β-induced conversion into a spindle-shaped morphology and impedes cellular invasion and migration promoted by TGF-β. It can effectively inhibit the TGF-β-induced activation of oncogenic cascades, including those involving PI3K, Ras, and Rho GTPases. Furthermore, brassinin inhibits both constitutive and inducible phosphorylation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR/p70S6K/4E-BP1 in lung carcinoma cells [43]. The activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR/p70S6K/4E-BP1 pathway by TGF-β significantly contributes to encouraging cellular changes that support EMT, a crucial process in the advancement and spreading of cancer [61]. The insightful findings of this study contribute to the understanding of brassinin’s potential as a therapeutic agent in mitigating EMT-associated cell signaling cascade in lung carcinoma cells (Figure 4).
Brassinin has shown significant synergistic effects when combined with conventional chemotherapeutic agents. A study reported by Bakar-Ates and Ozkan in 2019 found that the combination of brassinin and imatinib exerted considerable anticancer effects by promoting the downregulation of MMP-9 mRNA expression in SW480 colon cancer cells [62]. In another study, Yang et al. (2021) discovered that combining brassinin therapy with a low dose of paclitaxel resulted in synergistic inhibition of cellular proliferation and promoted apoptosis in another type of colorectal cancer cells (HT-29 cells). By suppressing activation of the JAKs/STAT3 and PI3K/Akt/mTOR cascades, they demonstrated that brassinin enhanced the apoptotic and cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel [40]. Moreover, the combination of brassinin and doxorubicin, a drug used in colon cancer treatment, exhibited increased anticancer effects in HCT116 cells (human colorectal carcinoma). This combination prompted the activation of p53 and cleaved-PARP in HCT116 cells with the wild-type p53 gene [38].

3.2. Potential Impacts of Brassinin on Human Health

Brassinin has the potential to be employed as a depigmenting agent in medicinal or cosmetic products. Functioning as an inhibitor of melanin accumulation, brassinin achieves this by reducing the mRNA level of tyrosinase, which occurs through the inhibition of melanocyte-inducing transcription factor (MITF) translocation [35]. Tyrosinase serves as a critical enzyme in the initial stages of melanogenesis, while MITF acts as an essential transcription factor regulating tyrosinase [63,64].
Further research revealed brassinin’s effectiveness in inhibiting lipid accumulation during adipogenesis in a murine preadipocyte cell line (3T3-L1) and in suppressing obesity-induced inflammatory responses. This phytoalexin achieves inhibition of adipogenesis by modulating adipogenic factors differently. Specifically, it upregulates the expression of Kruppel-like factor 2 (KLF2), an anti-early adipogenic factor, and down-regulates CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein-β (C/EBPβ), an early adipogenic factor. Additionally, its inhibitory effect on obesity-induced inflammation operates through the activation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor–heme oxygenase-1 (Nrf2-HO-1) signaling pathway, suggesting its crucial role in the anti-inflammatory effects of brassinin [33]. Nrf2 and its target gene, HO-1, have been established as key players in obesity and insulin resistance etiology [65,66].
Brassinin may potentially reduce inflammatory processes through the suppression of monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation. It hampers this differentiation by reducing cell adhesion and the expression of differentiation markers C11β and CD36 in human monocytes. Additionally, it reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines or mediators in macrophages obtained from murine and human tissues, effectively suppressing LPS-induced inflammatory responses. The inhibitory effect of brassinin on the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines is associated with a reduction in nuclear translocation of Nu-clear factor kappa B (NF-κB) [34].
Results from the study by Han et al. (2017) suggest that brassinin could potentially exert an inhibitory effect on the inflammation of vascular endothelial cells [37]. In the context of vascular inflammation, oxidative stress plays a crucial role in initiating atherosclerosis, representing a vascular disorder [67]. The tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), identified as a critical mediator in the inflammatory pathway, is closely linked to the pathogenesis of numerous cardiovascular diseases, including atherosclerosis [68]. The remarkable effects of brassinin were observed, as pretreatment with brassinin significantly reduced TNF-α-induced intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Furthermore, brassinin exhibited a significant dose-dependent inhibition of U937 monocyte cell adhesion to TNF-α-induced HUVECs. Treatment with brassinin also led to reduced expression levels of cell adhesion molecules, such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and endothelial-selectin (E-selectin), following TNF-α stimulation in HUVECs. Moreover, pretreatment with brassinin demonstrated a reduction in the protein expression levels of nuclear factor NF-κB p65 in the nucleus, indicating a potential inhibition of NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation. The treatment with brassinin also substantially decreased the mRNA expression levels of interleukin-8 in a dose-dependent manner. Consequently, these findings suggest that brassinin holds promise as a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of atherosclerosis [37].
Except for its anti-inflammatory effect, brassinin also exhibits antihyperglycemic, antioxidant, and protective effects on the liver, kidney, and pancreas during the onset of diabetes. The study by Xu et al. (2023) aimed to investigate the effects of brassinin in the treatment of experimentally induced diabetes in rats. After intraperitoneal injection of 35 mg/kg streptozotocin (STZ) to induce diabetes, rats were treated with 25 mg/kg of brassinin, using glibenclamide as a positive control. The study revealed that treatment with brassinin and glibenclamide significantly reduced glucose and HbA1c levels in diabetic rats while elevating insulin levels. Additionally, AST, ALP, and ALT levels in the experimental rats were measured, showing a significant increase in enzyme activities in diabetic rats and a substantial decrease in those administered with brassinin. The assessment of hepatic carbohydrate metabolic enzymes, including HK, F16BP, and G6P, indicated a considerable decrease in HK activity and a significant increase in G6P and F16BP activities in the diabetic liver. Brassinin enhanced glucose homeostasis and promoted glucose metabolism by increasing hepatic HK activity. Treatment with brassinin and glibenclamide prevented the reduction in antioxidant levels, indicating their restorative potential. Furthermore, the impact of brassinin on inflammatory markers in the pancreas, including IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β, was determined. Diabetic rats exhibited a substantial elevation in inflammatory markers, while treatment with brassinin and glibenclamide significantly reduced these marker levels, suggesting anti-inflammatory potential. The histological examination of the pancreas, kidney, and liver revealed protective effects of brassinin against STZ-induced damage, supporting its potential therapeutic role in mitigating diabetes-related complications) [36]. The antidiabetic properties of brassinin are attributed to the presence of dithiocarbamate ester in its composition. This component has been demonstrated to have antihyperglycemic properties in previous studies [36,69,70].

4. Camalexin

Camalexin, initially discovered in Camelina sativa leaves infected with Alternaria brassicae, functions as the primary indole phytoalexin in Arabidopsis thaliana and other cruciferous plants [71]. Its role in plant defense has been extensively studied, revealing its involvement in chemical defense mechanisms. Moreover, research has demonstrated its cytotoxicity against Trypanosoma cruzi, a human protozoan pathogen [6].

4.1. Anticancer Potential of Camalexin

Camalexin has demonstrated its ability to inhibit the growth of different cancer cell lines [14,16,72,73]. Nonetheless, the precise mechanism through which camalexin inhibits cancer cell proliferation remains unresolved.
The anticancer potential of camalexin is evident in its ability to enhance the expression of the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) target genes, facilitate the nuclear translocation of AhR, and activate AhR-mediated transcription. Additionally, camalexin inhibited mammosphere formation in AhR-expressing breast cancer cells more than in the breast cancer cells that lacked AhR expression [74]. AhR is implicated in both breast cancer progression and drug resistance [75,76]. Studies indicate that AhR promotes breast cancer malignancy. However, it has also been observed that certain AhR agonists or activators can suppress various types of cancer. Therefore, AhR is believed to have a dual function in cancer [77,78]. The results of the study by Yamashita et al. (2022) indicate that the inhibition of cell proliferation, migration, and mammosphere formation by camalexin specifically depends on the activation of AhR in ER-negative, PgR-positive, and HER2-negative breast cancer cell lines, such as MCF-7 and T47D [74].
Camalexin also exhibited toxicity towards human myeloid leukemia cell lines (HL60 and NB4) with minimal toxicity to normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. It induced apoptosis (Figure 3) in those leukemia cells via the activation of caspase-3 and caspase-9 [16], consistent with previous findings in the human T lymphocyte (Jurkat) cell line [72]. After exposure to camalexin, ER stress markers such as the phosphorylated protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (phos-PERK), the phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha (phos-eIF2α), ATF4 and CHOP were significantly upregulated in the aforementioned leukemia cells. ER stress contributed to camalexin-induced apoptosis, as evidenced by the observed inhibition of apoptosis when an ER stress inhibitor and siRNA against PERK (Protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase) were applied. Camalexin also reduced Mcl-1 in leukemia cells. Mcl-1 is crucial in regulating the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis and is recognized for its role in promoting cell survival by inhibiting apoptosis. Additionally, following camalexin treatment, there was a notable increase in ROS levels, SOD activity, CAT activity, and GSSG levels, accompanied by a decrease in GSH levels. In xenograft models, camalexin effectively suppresses tumor growth in NB4 and HL-60 without significant side effects. Camalexin shows promising anti-leukemia activity by activating caspases, inducing ER stress, and generating ROS [16]. Notably, camalexin was found unable to induce ROS in erythrocytes in a recent study. This discrepancy might arise from variations in cell types. The author hypothesizes that camalexin could potentially trigger ROS in cancer cells while sparing normal cells [79].
Camalexin and brassinin synergistically targeted colorectal cancer cells (Caco-2) due to their multifaceted mechanisms and amplified cytotoxic effects. Both phytoalexins were cytotoxic to Caco-2 cells, with camalexin being more potent. The combination of brassinin and camalexin was the most effective against cancer cells (Caco-2), while non-cancer cells (CCD-Co18) were less sensitive to these compounds. The IC50 values for Caco-2 cells, when these phytoalexins were used alone, were relatively high, with 264.06 μM for brassinin and 139.27 μM for camalexin after 48 h. The mixture of brassinin and camalexin was more potent than each compound alone (IC50 85.81 μM). Both phytoalexins induced oxidative stress in cancer cells, leading to apoptosis and, at higher concentrations, necrosis. In addition, signs of pyroptosis were observed in cells exposed to camalexin, as indicated by the increased activity of caspase 1 [80]. This caspase serves as the primary effector protease, playing a key role in initiating the pyroptotic cell death pathway [81]. The simultaneous initiation of other types of cell death, such as pyroptosis, is intriguing, given that typical chemotherapy relies on inducing apoptosis in cancer cells, and chemoresistance involves evading apoptosis [80].
The overview of the potential anticancer effects of brassinin and camalexin are summarized in Table 1.

4.2. Potential Impacts of Camalexin on Human Health

The study conducted by Manasa and Chitra in 2020 suggested that camalexin possesses neuroprotective properties, which could be potentially beneficial in the context of Parkinson’s disease. The assessment of camalexin’s protective and antioxidant activity involved various assays, including ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP, revealing its effectiveness in scavenging free radicals in a concentration-dependent manner. These findings confirm the potential of camalexin in reducing oxidative stress-related damage, especially in the context of Parkinson’s disease [82].
In addition to its role in defense, camalexin exhibits intriguing effects on erythrocytes. It stimulates eryptosis, a process involving cell shrinkage and membrane scrambling with phosphatidylserine translocation on the erythrocyte surface. This effect is associated with increased cytosolic Ca2+ activity and requires Ca2+ entry from the extracellular space. Camalexin-induced cell membrane scrambling also involves protein kinase C and caspase activation. Notably, camalexin induces these effects without increasing ceramide levels or inducing oxidative stress [79], which are commonly associated with eryptosis triggers [83]. The potential clinical implications of camalexin use warrant careful consideration. While it demonstrates neuroprotective and antioxidant properties, its eryptotic effects on erythrocytes could lead to side effects such as anemia and an elevated risk of thrombosis if effective concentrations are achieved in patients’ plasma [79]. This complex interplay of beneficial and potentially adverse effects underscores the need for a thorough investigation before considering camalexin for therapeutic applications.

5. Antiproliferative Effects of Synthetic Analogues of Indole Phytoalexins

While natural compounds are a significant source of clinically used anticancer drugs, their properties, such as lower therapeutic efficacy, unfavorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, or unexpected toxicity, sometimes limit their direct use in therapeutic practice. Consequently, many drugs based on natural products are either derivatives of natural products or synthetic molecules inspired by the structure of natural products [84]. Another limitation of their direct use is the low yield from fresh plant tissues (for example, in the case of indole phytoalexins, it is 1–5 mg per 1 kg of fresh tissue from cruciferous plants) [26]. Synthetic analogs of natural compounds can offer several advantages over their parent compounds in cancer therapy. First, synthetic analogs can be designed to exhibit potent anticancer activity and selectivity to cancer cells, resulting in increased therapeutic efficacy and reduced risk of side effects commonly associated with traditional chemotherapy. Second, synthetic analogs can have optimized pharmacokinetic properties, which can result in better drug delivery to the tumor site and increased efficacy of the treatment. Third, through synthetic chemistry, it is possible to introduce structural modifications to parent natural compounds, allowing for the fine-tuning of their properties. These modifications may improve solubility, stability, cellular uptake, and target specificity, enhancing their therapeutic potential. These reasons prompted us to include a chapter on synthetic analogs of indole phytoalexins, as we have been intensively researching this area over the past two decades.
The majority of indole phytoalexins and their synthetic derivatives exhibit chirality [26,85]. Studies have demonstrated that chemically modifying the structure of indole phytoalexins results in increased antiproliferative activities compared to the original natural compounds [15,86,87,88,89,90].
In recent years, we have undertaken the synthesis and testing of numerous novel derivatives of indole phytoalexins. A study conducted by Tischlerova et al. (2017) aimed to investigate the antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effect of newly synthesized 2′-aminoanalogues of 1-methoxyspirobrassinol methyl ether on colorectal carcinoma cells (HCT116). Among the tested compounds, (±)-trans-1,2-dimethoxy-2′-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenylamino)spiro{indoline-3,5′ [4′,5′]dihydrothiazol} (substance K-453) exhibited the highest antiproliferative effect on HCT-116 cancer cells (32,2 μM). We found that K-453 suppressed the growth of HCT116 cells and induced apoptosis, as confirmed by various assays. Furthermore, K-453 caused an increase in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle and a corresponding increase in cells with sub-G1 DNA content, indicative of programmed cell death. The number of apoptotic HCT116 cells significantly increased over time, as demonstrated by annexin V/PI, AO/PI staining, and PARP cleavage. Mitochondrial dysfunction, a key aspect of apoptotic cell death, was observed following K-453 treatment, leading to the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and the release of cytochrome c into the cytosol with subsequent caspase-9 and caspase-3 activation. Moreover, K-453 also influenced the Bcl-2 family proteins, with an increase in Bcl-2 phosphorylation and BAD dephosphorylation. Additionally, the study examined the influence of K-453 on several signaling pathways, including p38 MAPK, ERK1/2, Akt, and NF-κB. Phosphorylation of p38 MAPK, linked to Bcl-2 inactivation, was observed, whereas phosphorylation of Akt and ERK1/2 decreased post-K-453 treatment. Lower levels of NF-κB/p65 and p50 were detected, indicating a disruption in the NF-κB pathway. In summary, K-453 induced caspase-dependent apoptosis in colon cancer cells through the mitochondrial pathway. Furthermore, it activated the p38 MAPK pathway while deactivating the ERK1/2, Akt, and NF-κB signaling pathways (Figure 4). These significant findings underscore the potential of spiro-indole derivatives as apoptotic agents in colon cancer treatment [89].
Within our research, we prepared new biologically active trifluoromethyl (CF3) containing indole derivatives. CF3 functional group holds significant importance in the field of pharmaceutical chemistry and is a component of drugs such as fluoxetine, celecoxib, and efavirenz. The antiproliferative activity of the new fluorinated 2,2′-diaminoanalogues of 1-methoxyspirobrassinol methyl ether was tested on multiple cell lines, including Jurkat, CEM (acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia); MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 (triple negative breast cancer); A-549, HeLa (cervical adenocarcinoma); HCT116, CaCo-2; and a non-malignant cell line NIH 3T3 (murine fibroblasts). The most effective was trans-(±)-1-Methoxy-2-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenylamino]-2′-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenylamino]spiro{indoline-3,5′-[4′,5′]dihydrothiazole} on CEM cell line (IC50 = 1 μM). This analog was even more effective than cisplatin, which is used as a reference antitumor compound. Additionally, the newly synthesized derivatives also exhibited certain selectivity with a lower antiproliferative effect on non-tumor cell lines compared to tumor cell lines [90].
Our researchers successfully synthesized the new cruciferous phytoalexin (S)-(−)-spirobrassinin and its (±)-2′-amino analogs using a convenient method. These newly synthesized compounds underwent in vitro screening to evaluate their antiproliferative/cytotoxic effects on six human cancer cell lines: Jurkat and CEM, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231, HeLa, and A-549 using the MTT assay. Among the tested compounds, ((±)-2′-[4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenylamino]spiro[indoline-3,5′-[4′,5′]dihydrothiazole]-2-one) showed the highest activity against Jurkat cells (IC50 = 26.1 µM). Additionally, it demonstrated notably lower toxicity compared to cisplatin on HUVEC cells. These results indicate the importance of the CF3 group for enhanced biological activity [91].
Furthermore, novel 5-bromo derivatives of indole phytoalexins were tested for their antiproliferative/cytotoxic effects on human cancer cell lines Jurkat, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, A-549, HeLa, HCT116, and CaCo-2 and a non-malignant cell line NIH 3T3. The strongest inhibitory effect was exhibited by N-[[5-bromo-1-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)indol-3-yl]methyl]-N’-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]thiourea on Jurkat cells with an IC50 of 5.1 µM. This analog also demonstrated lower toxicity on 3T3 cells compared to cisplatin [92].
The study by Budovská et al. (2021) focuses on the design and synthesis of new 2′-aminoanalogues of 5-fluorospirobrassinin. The design strategy involves replacing a hydrogen atom with a fluorine atom at the C-5 position of indole phytoalexins. The synthesized compounds were tested for their cytotoxic activity against various human cancer cell lines as well as noncancerous cells. Among the tested compounds, (±)-5-Fluoro-2′-(3,4-dichlorophenylamino)spiro{indoline-3,5′-[4′,5′]dihydrothiazole}-2-one exhibited the highest effectiveness against the cancer cell lines, particularly HCT116 and Jurkat (IC50 values 30.7 μM and 29.1 μM), while showing no cytotoxicity towards noncancerous HUVEC cells. However, overall, the novel 5-fluoro analogs did not demonstrate improved anticancer activity compared to the lead compounds. The presence and position of a fluorine atom in the indole portion of the molecules were not found to be critical factors in achieving anticancer activity, based on the preliminary structure–activity relationship study [93].
Moreover, a new series of bis-indole analogs incorporating a phenyl linker derived from the indole phytoalexin 1-methoxyspirobrassinol methyl ether were synthesized and designed. Remarkably, substance 49 (N,N′-(1,4-phenylene)bis{N′-[1-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)indol-3-yl]methyl (urea)}) exhibited significant growth inhibition in A549 cells (8.7 µM) while displaying minimal toxicity towards noncancerous cells (MCF10A and Cos-7). Surprisingly, investigations into its mechanism of action revealed that substance 49 did not affect the cell cycle or induce apoptosis. However, subsequent analyses indicated that substance 49 induced autophagy, as evidenced by increased phosphorylation or expression of various autophagy markers such as Beclin-1, AMPK, ULK1, p62, Atg7, and LC3A/B (Figure 5). Moreover, when combined with chloroquine, an autophagy inhibitor, substance 49 led to cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase and an elevated number of cells in late-stage apoptosis. Based on these findings, it is proposed that autophagy likely serves a defensive role and is not directly involved in the antiproliferative effects of substance 49. Furthermore, substance 49 was found to deplete GSH (glutathione) in cancer cells, increasing their sensitivity to cancer treatments. This was demonstrated by the potentiation of cisplatin cytotoxicity in indole phytoalexin-treated cells. These results provide intriguing and novel insights, suggesting that substance 49-induced GSH depletion could be utilized to enhance the effectiveness of anticancer drugs [94].
In our recent study, Zigová et al. (2024), the significant antiproliferative properties of 1-methoxyisobrassinin, a regioisomer of the natural indole phytoalexin 1-methoxybrassinin, were demonstrated in both sensitive and cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells (A2780) in vitro (IC50 3.62 µM and 7 µM, respectively). 1-methoxyisobrassinin induced ROS production in both cell lines, associated with apoptotic cell death machinery induction. ROS-induced DNA damage caused alterations in the cell cycle distribution, particularly affecting the S and G2/M phases. These changes were accompanied by modifications in key cell cycle regulatory proteins, such as proliferating cell nuclear antigens (PCNA). Additionally, there was activation of caspase-9, PARP cleavage, and mitochondrial dysfunction. The role of ROS in the antiproliferative effect of 1-methoxyisobrassinin was confirmed by experiments with NAC, which significantly suppressed ROS production and various apoptosis-related processes. Moreover, modulation of protein expression/phosphorylation, such as LC3A/B, ULK1, or phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), in resistant A2780cis cells suggested possible autophagy activation (Figure 5). The activation of autophagy could represent an attempt by resistant tumor cells to survive [95].
At our institution, we conducted an evaluation of amino analogs of 1-methoxyisobrassinin for their antiproliferative activities. Among them, N-[(1-methoxyindol-2-yl)methyl]-N′-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]thiourea, bearing two CF3 groups on the benzene ring, displayed the highest potency. It exhibited significant antiproliferative activities against Jurkat (IC50 = 7.6 μM) and MCF-7 cell lines (IC50 = 8.7 μM) in comparison to cisplatin (IC50 = 16.2 μM and 15.6 μM, respectively). Moreover, this particular compound showcased greater activity against cancer cells than non-cancer cells (IC50 = 26.7 μM in the murine fibroblast cell line NiH 3T3). Furthermore, this study specifically investigated the antiproliferative effect of erucalexin, which stands out among natural indole phytoalexins due to its unique C-2 carbon substituent, while other indole phytoalexins have carbon substituents at C-3. However, erucalexin generally exhibited poor antiproliferative effects on cancer cell lines. The screening of amino analogs of erucalexin revealed that they demonstrated good activity only against the Jurkat cell line. Comparatively, the (±)-erucalexin derivatives were less active than their parent regioisomers, except in the case of Jurkat cells. The findings of this study suggest that the replacement of the methylsulfanyl group with a phenylamino group in the structure of erucalexin results in an increase in antiproliferative activity [96].
The study by Csomos et al. (2017) investigated the growth inhibition effects of isobrassinin and isocyclobrassinin analogs containing an indole-2-carboxamide moiety on a panel of human cell lines, including HeLa, A431 (human squamous carcinoma), A2780, and MCF7. The cyclic analogs, characterized as ring-closed 4-arylimino-thiazines, demonstrated moderate inhibition of cell growth (up to 67.2% at 10 μM on the A431 cell line). Notably, indole analogs containing benzothiazole ring with methoxy groups also exhibited a relatively good inhibitory effect on the A2780 cell line (60.4% at 10 μM). The analog of isocyclobrassinin with the 1,3-thiazino[5,6-b]indol-4-one skeleton exhibited the highest antiproliferative activity (89.6% at 10 μM) on the A2780 cell line. The results indicated that this analog displayed growth inhibition comparable to that of cisplatin (83.6% at 10 μM) [97].
Within our research facility, we investigated the sensitizing effect of thiazine[6,5-b]indole, both alone and in combination with the heat shock protein (Hsp) 90 inhibitor 17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-DMAG), on cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells (A2780cis). 17-DMAG alone exhibited a weak impact on cell proliferation in A2780cis cells. However, its combination with thiazine[6,5-b]indole (2-(4′-fluorphenylamino)-4H-1,3-tiazino[6,5-b]indol) significantly enhanced the antiproliferative activity, reducing the IC50 from 30 µM to 8.6 µM. Additionally, this combination increased pro-apoptotic activity of 17-DMAG [98]. Numerous studies have highlighted the substantial involvement of the Hsp90 protein in contributing to cisplatin resistance in cancer cells. It has been established that Hsp90 inhibitors can effectively counteract resistance or amplify the sensitivity of cancer cells [99,100]. Particularly noteworthy is the discovery that combining Hsp90 inhibitors with conventional treatments or natural compounds further enhances their efficacy [100,101].
The chemical structures of the most effective synthetic analogs of indole phytoalexins tested at our institution, as well as their antiproliferative activity, are shown in Table 2.

6. Conclusions

Indole phytoalexins exhibit a diverse range of potential pharmacological properties, including antibacterial, antifungal, antiobesity, anti-inflammatory, antimelanogenic, antidiabetic, antiatherosclerotic, neuroprotective, and notably, anticancer effects. Brassinin, a prominent phytoalexin, has been found to induce apoptosis, autophagy, and paraptosis through the activation of the MAPK signaling pathway. Its ability to trigger ROS production significantly contributes to its antitumor effects. Furthermore, brassinin exhibits anti-Warburg effects by suppressing glycolysis-related proteins. This indole phytoalexin demonstrates antiangiogenic activity by stimulating the degradation of Tie2 and FGFR1. Additionally, brassinin modulates the epithelial–mesenchymal transition and inhibits TGF-β-induced oncogenic cascades, offering promising opportunities for carcinoma treatment. When combined with conventional chemotherapeutic agents, brassinin demonstrates significant synergistic effects, enhancing therapeutic efficacy against cancer. Similarly, camalexin displays anticancer potential through AhR activation, ER stress induction, and ROS generation, with promising outcomes observed in combination therapy. Its neuroprotective and antioxidant properties suggest potential applications in mitigating oxidative stress-related damage, although careful consideration is needed due to its eryptotic effects on erythrocytes. Chemical modifications of indole phytoalexins have been successful in enhancing their antiproliferative activities. Some derivatives show potency comparable to conventional chemotherapy drugs. Additionally, the selectivity of these derivatives toward cancer cells offers the potential for reducing systemic toxicity. Further research is warranted to elucidate their full therapeutic potential.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z., R.M. and J.M.; investigation, M.Z. and R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z. and R.M. writing—review and editing, J.M. visualization, R.M.; supervision, J.M.; funding acquisition, J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by the Grant Agency of the Ministry of the Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic VEGA 1/0539/21, VEGA 1/0446/22, and VEGA 1/0498/23 and the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-16-0446. Moreover, this publication is the result of the project implementation: “Open scientific community for modern interdisciplinary research in medicine (OPENMED)”, ITMS2014+: 313011V455, supported by the Operational Programme Integrated Infrastructure, funded by the ERDF. Furthermore, this publication is the result of the project implementation: “Medicínsky univerzitný vedecký park v Košiciach (MediPark, Košice—Fáza II.)”, kód ITMS2014 + 313011D103 supported by the Operational Programme Research and Innovation, funded by the ERDF.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lin, S.R.; Chang, C.H.; Hsu, C.F.; Tsai, M.J.; Cheng, H.; Leong, M.K.; Sung, P.J.; Chen, J.C.; Weng, C.F. Natural compounds as potential adjuvants to cancer therapy: Preclinical evidence. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 177, 1409–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Goel, A. Current understanding and future prospects on Berberine for anticancer therapy. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2023, 102, 177–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kalachaveedu, M.; Senthil, R.; Azhagiyamanavalan, S.; Ravi, R.; Meenakshisundaram, H.; Dharmarajan, A. Traditional medicine herbs as natural product matrices in cancer chemoprevention: A trans pharmacological perspective (scoping review). Phytother. Res. 2023, 37, 1539–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pedras, M.S.C.; Zheng, Q.A.; Sarma-Mamillapalle, V.K. The phytoalexins from Brassicaceae: Structure, biological activity, synthesis and biosynthesis. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2007, 2, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mezencev, R.; Galizzi, M.; Kutschy, P.; Docampo, R. Trypanosoma cruzi: Antiproliferative effect of indole phytoalexins on intracellular amastigotes. Exp. Parasitol. 2009, 122, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. N’guyen, G.Q.; Raulo, R.; Porquier, A.; Iacomi, B.; Pelletier, S.; Renou, J.-P.; Bataillé-Simoneau, N.; Campion, C.; Hamon, B.; Kwasiborski, A.; et al. Responses of the Necrotrophic Fungus Alternaria brassisicola to the Indolic Phytoalexin Brassinin. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 611643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Nguyen, N.H.; Trotel-Aziz, P.; Villaume, S.; Rabenoelina, F.; Clement, C.; Baillieul, F.; Aziz, A. Priming of camalexin accumulation in induced systemic resistance by beneficial bacteria against Botrytis cinerea and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 3743–3757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kristofikova, Z.; Gazova, Z.; Siposova, K.; Bartos, A.; Ricny, J.; Kotoucova, J.; Sirova, J.; Ripova, D. Effects of Ferrofluid and Phytoalexin Spirobrassinin on Thioflavin-T-Based Fluorescence in Cerebrospinal Fluid of the Elderly and Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Neurochem. Res. 2014, 39, 1502–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mehta, R.G.; Liu, J.; Constantinou, A.; Hawthorne, M.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Moon, R.C.; Moriarty, R.M. Structure-activity relationships of brassinin in preventing the development of carcinogen-induced mammary lesions in organ culture. Anticancer Res. 1994, 14, 1209–1213. [Google Scholar]
  11. Izutani, Y.; Yogosawa, S.; Sowa, Y.; Sakai, T. [Corrigendum] Brassinin induces G1 phase arrest through increase of p21 and p27 by inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling pathway in human colon cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 48, 1305. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Park, J.H.; Kim, K.D.; Nam, D.; Shim, B.S.; Kim, S.; Ahn, K.S.; Choi, S.; Ahn, K.S. Brassinin induces apoptosis in PC-3 human prostate cancer cells through the suppression of PI3K/Akt/mTOR/S6K1 signaling cascades. Phytother. Res. 2014, 28, 423–431. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee, J.H.; Kim, C.; Sethi, G.; Ahn, K.S. Brassinin inhibits STAT3 signaling pathway through modulation of PIAS-3 and SOCS-3 expression and sensitizes human lung cancer xenograft in nude mice to paclitaxel. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 6386–6405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pilatova, M.; Ivanova, L.; Kutschy, P.; Varinska, L.; Saxunova, L.; Repovska, M.; Sarissky, M.; Seliga, R.; Mirossay, L.; Mojzis, J. In vitro toxicity of camalexin derivatives in human cancer and non-cancer cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 2013, 27, 939–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chripkova, M.; Drutovic, D.; Pilatova, M.; Mikes, J.; Budovska, M.; Vaskova, J.; Broggini, M.; Mirossay, L.; Mojzis, J. Brassinin and its derivatives as potential anticancer agents. Toxicol. In Vitro 2014, 28, 909–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, Y.; Wang, G.; Wu, W.; Yao, S.; Han, X.; He, D.; He, J.; Zheng, G.; Zhao, Y.; Cai, Z.; et al. Camalexin Induces Apoptosis via the ROS-ER Stress-Mitochondrial Apoptosis Pathway in AML Cells. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 7426950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hong, T.; Ham, J.; Song, J.; Song, G.; Lim, W. Brassinin Inhibits Proliferation in Human Liver Cancer Cells via Mitochondrial Dysfunction. Cells 2021, 10, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chripkova, M.; Zigo, F.; Mojzis, J. Antiproliferative Effect of Indole Phytoalexins. Molecules 2016, 21, 1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kristal, A.R.; Lampe, J.W. Brassica vegetables and prostate cancer risk: A review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr. Cancer 2002, 42, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pedras, M.S.; Yaya, E.E.; Glawischnig, E. The phytoalexins from cultivated and wild crucifers: Chemistry and biology. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011, 28, 1381–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pedras, M.S.; Yaya, E.E. Dissecting metabolic puzzles through isotope feeding: A novel amino acid in the biosynthetic pathway of the cruciferous phytoalexins rapalexin A and isocyalexin A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 1149–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pedras, M.S.C.; To, Q.H. Interrogation of biosynthetic pathways of the cruciferous phytoalexins nasturlexins with isotopically labelled compounds. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 3625–3638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cárdenas, P.D.; Landtved, J.P.; Larsen, S.H.; Lindegaard, N.; Wøhlk, S.; Jensen, K.R.; Pattison, D.I.; Burow, M.; Bak, S.; Crocoll, C.; et al. Phytoalexins of the crucifer Barbarea vulgaris: Structural profile and correlation with glucosinolate turnover. Phytochemistry 2023, 213, 113742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bednarek, P. Sulfur-containing secondary metabolites from Arabidopsis thaliana and other Brassicaceae with function in plant immunity. Chembiochem 2012, 13, 1846–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Soledade, M.; Pedras, C.; Abdoli, A. Pathogen inactivation of cruciferous phytoalexins: Detoxification reactions, enzymes and inhibitors. Rsc Adv. 2017, 7, 23633–23646. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pedras, M.S.; Hossain, S. Interaction of cruciferous phytoanticipins with plant fungal pathogens: Indole glucosinolates are not metabolized but the corresponding desulfo-derivatives and nitriles are. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 2308–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pedras, M.S.; Yaya, E.E. Tenualexin, other phytoalexins and indole glucosinolates from wild cruciferous species. Chem. Biodivers. 2014, 11, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pedras, M.S.; To, Q.H. Unveiling the first indole-fused thiazepine: Structure, synthesis and biosynthesis of cyclonasturlexin, a remarkable cruciferous phytoalexin. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 5880–5883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Pedras, M.S.; To, Q.H. Non-indolyl cruciferous phytoalexins: Nasturlexins and tridentatols, a striking convergent evolution of defenses in terrestrial plants and marine animals? Phytochemistry 2015, 113, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pedras, M.S.; Alavi, M.; To, Q.H. Expanding the nasturlexin family: Nasturlexins C and D and their sulfoxides are phytoalexins of the crucifers Barbarea vulgaris and B. verna. Phytochemistry 2015, 118, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Takasugi, M.; Katsui, N.; Shirata, A. Isolation of three Novel Sulfur-Containing Phytoalexins from the Chinese-Cabbage Brassica campestris L. ssp pekinensis (Cruciferae). J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1986, 14, 1077–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Anarat-Cappillino, G.; Sattely, E.S. The chemical logic of plant natural product biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 19, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kang, B.; Kim, C.Y.; Hwang, J.; Suh, H.J.; Choi, H.S. Brassinin, a phytoalexin in cruciferous vegetables, suppresses obesity-induced inflammatory responses through the Nrf2-HO-1 signaling pathway in an adipocyte-macrophage co-culture system. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 1426–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kang, B.; Hwang, J.; Choi, H.S. Brassinin, a brassica-derived phytochemical, regulates monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and inflammatory responses in human monocytes and murine macrophages. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2020, 72, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, M.K.; Ryu, H.; Jeong, H.H.; Lee, B. Brassinin Abundant in Brassicaceae Suppresses Melanogenesis through Dual Mechanisms of Tyrosinase Inhibition. Foods 2022, 12, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xu, B.; Alarfaj, A.A.; Hirad, A.H.; Natarajan, N.; Iyappan, P.; Al Ali, S.H.H. Brassinin Exhibits Anti-Diabetic Activity against Streptozotocin-induced Diabetes Mellitus in Experimental Rats. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. 2023, 57, S701–S709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Han, B.H.; Yoon, J.J.; Choi, E.S.; Jeong, D.H.; Lee, Y.J.; Kang, D.G.; Lee, H.S. Inhibitory effect of brassinin on TNF-alpha-induced vascular inflammation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 6890–6895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Park, W.Y.; Park, J.E.; Jung, J.H. Apoptotic Effect of Brassinin via Inhibition of CNOT2 and Activation of p53 and Its Combination Effect with Doxorubicin. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, M.H.; Ha, I.J.; Lee, S.G.; Lee, J.; Um, J.Y.; Sethi, G.; Ahn, K.S. Brassinin Induces Apoptosis, Autophagy, and Paraptosis via MAPK Signaling Pathway Activation in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Cells. Biology 2023, 12, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, M.H.; Baek, S.H.; Ha, I.J.; Um, J.Y.; Ahn, K.S. Brassinin enhances the anticancer actions of paclitaxel by targeting multiple signaling pathways in colorectal cancer cells. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 3875–3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kwon, H.H.; Ahn, C.H.; Lee, H.J.; Sim, D.Y.; Park, J.E.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, B.; Shim, B.S.; Kim, S.H. The Apoptotic and Anti-Warburg Effects of Brassinin in PC-3 Cells via Reactive Oxygen Species Production and the Inhibition of the c-Myc, SIRT1, and beta-Catenin Signaling Axis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gu, Y.; Becker, V.; Qiu, M.; Tang, T.; Ampofo, E.; Menger, M.D.; Laschke, M.W. Brassinin Promotes the Degradation of Tie2 and FGFR1 in Endothelial Cells and Inhibits Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Angiogenesis. Cancers 2022, 14, 3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, M.H.; Lee, J.H.; Ko, J.H.; Jung, S.H.; Sethi, G.; Ahn, K.S. Brassinin Represses Invasive Potential of Lung Carcinoma Cells through Deactivation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Cascade. Molecules 2019, 24, 1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yin, W.M.; Cao, X.B.; Li, S.X.; Zhang, F.; Guan, Y.F. Brassinin inhibits proliferation and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in nasopharyngeal cancer C666-1 cells. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 104018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jung, J.H.; Lee, D.; Ko, H.M.; Jang, H.J. Inhibition of CNOT2 Induces Apoptosis via MID1IP1 in Colorectal Cancer Cells by Activating p53. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lee, J.; Jung, J.H.; Hwang, J.; Park, J.E.; Kim, J.H.; Park, W.Y.; Suh, J.Y.; Kim, S.H. CNOT2 Is Critically Involved in Atorvastatin Induced Apoptotic and Autophagic Cell Death in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers. Cancers 2019, 11, 1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sohn, E.J.; Jung, D.B.; Lee, H.; Han, I.; Lee, J.; Lee, H.; Kim, S.H. CNOT2 promotes proliferation and angiogenesis via VEGF signaling in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2018, 412, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sun, Y.; Liu, W.Z.; Liu, T.; Feng, X.; Yang, N.; Zhou, H.F. Signaling pathway of MAPK/ERK in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, senescence and apoptosis. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. Res. 2015, 35, 600–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhou, Y.Y.; Li, Y.; Jiang, W.Q.; Zhou, L.F. MAPK/JNK signalling: A potential autophagy regulation pathway. Biosci. Rep. 2015, 35, e00199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, D.; Kim, I.Y.; Saha, S.; Choi, K.S. Paraptosis in the anti-cancer arsenal of natural products. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 162, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fontana, F.; Moretti, R.M.; Raimondi, M.; Marzagalli, M.; Beretta, G.; Procacci, P.; Sartori, P.; Montagnani Marelli, M.; Limonta, P. delta-Tocotrienol induces apoptosis, involving endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy, and paraptosis in prostate cancer cells. Cell Prolif. 2019, 52, e12576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yoshii, S.R.; Mizushima, N. Monitoring and Measuring Autophagy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liou, A.T.; Chen, M.F.; Yang, C.W. Curcumin Induces p53-Null Hepatoma Cell Line Hep3B Apoptosis through the AKT-PTEN-FOXO4 Pathway. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 4063865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Trepiana, J.; Meijide, S.; Navarro, R.; Hernandez, M.L.; Ruiz-Sanz, J.I.; Ruiz-Larrea, M.B. Influence of oxygen partial pressure on the characteristics of human hepatocarcinoma cells. Redox Biol. 2017, 12, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Martin, V.; Liu, D.; Fueyo, J.; Gomez-Manzano, C. Tie2: A journey from normal angiogenesis to cancer and beyond. Histol. Histopathol. 2008, 23, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Lin, P.; Polverini, P.; Dewhirst, M.; Shan, S.; Rao, P.S.; Peters, K. Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis using a soluble receptor establishes a role for Tie2 in pathologic vascular growth. J. Clin. Investig. 1997, 100, 2072–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lin, P.; Buxton, J.A.; Acheson, A.; Radziejewski, C.; Maisonpierre, P.C.; Yancopoulos, G.D.; Channon, K.M.; Hale, L.P.; Dewhirst, M.W.; George, S.E.; et al. Antiangiogenic gene therapy targeting the endothelium-specific receptor tyrosine kinase Tie2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 8829–8834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Siemeister, G.; Schirner, M.; Weindel, K.; Reusch, P.; Menrad, A.; Marme, D.; Martiny-Baron, G. Two independent mechanisms essential for tumor angiogenesis: Inhibition of human melanoma xenograft growth by interfering with either the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor pathway or the Tie-2 pathway. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 3185–3191. [Google Scholar]
  59. Tanaka, S.; Sugimachi, K.; Yamashita Yi, Y.; Ohga, T.; Shirabe, K.; Shimada, M.; Wands, J.R.; Sugimachi, K. Tie2 vascular endothelial receptor expression and function in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2002, 35, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, X.L.; Martinez-Ledesma, E.; Zhang, C.; Gao, F.; Zheng, S.Y.; Ding, J.; Wu, S.F.; Nguyen, N.; Clifford, S.C.; Wen, P.Y.; et al. Tie2-FGFR1 Interaction Induces Adaptive PI3K Inhibitor Resistance by Upregulating Aurora A/PLK1/CDK1 Signaling in Glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 5088–5101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Baek, S.H.; Ko, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, C.; Lee, H.; Nam, D.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.G.; Yang, W.M.; Um, J.Y.; et al. Ginkgolic Acid Inhibits Invasion and Migration and TGF-beta-Induced EMT of Lung Cancer Cells Through PI3K/Akt/mTOR Inactivation. J. Cell Physiol. 2017, 232, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bakar-Ates, F.; Ozkan, E. The combined treatment of brassinin and imatinib synergistically downregulated the expression of MMP-9 in SW480 colon cancer cells. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Vachtenheim, J.; Borovansky, J. “Transcription physiology” of pigment formation in melanocytes: Central role of MITF. Exp. Dermatol. 2010, 19, 617–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lee, B.; Moon, K.M.; Lee, B.S.; Yang, J.H.; Park, K.I.; Cho, W.K.; Ma, J.Y. Swertiajaponin inhibits skin pigmentation by dual mechanisms to suppress tyrosinase. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 95530–95541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Seo, H.A.; Lee, I.K. The role of Nrf2: Adipocyte differentiation, obesity, and insulin resistance. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013, 184598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhang, Z.; Zhou, S.; Jiang, X.; Wang, Y.H.; Li, F.; Wang, Y.G.; Zheng, Y.; Cai, L. The role of the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway in obesity and metabolic syndrome. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2015, 16, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Victor, V.M.; Rocha, M.; Solá, E.; Bañuls, C.; Garcia-Malpartida, K.; Hernández-Mijares, A. Oxidative Stress, Endothelial Dysfunction and Atherosclerosis. Curr. Pharm. Design 2009, 15, 2988–3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Bradley, J.R. TNF-mediated inflammatory disease. J. Pathol. 2008, 214, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mollazadeh, M.; Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, M.; Valizadeh, Y.; Zonouzi, A.; Faramarzi, M.A.; Kiani, M.; Biglar, M.; Larijani, B.; Hamedifar, H.; Mahdavi, M.; et al. Novel Coumarin Containing Dithiocarbamate Derivatives as Potent alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitors for Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Med. Chem. 2021, 17, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Deshpande, T.A.; Martínez-Málaga, J.; Priefer, R. Dithiocarbamates as potential PTP1B inhibitors for diabetes management. Results Chem. 2022, 4, 100372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Glawischnig, E. Camalexin. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Mezencev, R.; Updegrove, T.; Kutschy, P.; Repovska, M.; McDonald, J.F. Camalexin induces apoptosis in T-leukemia Jurkat cells by increased concentration of reactive oxygen species and activation of caspase-8 and caspase-9. J. Nat. Med. 2011, 65, 488–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Smith, B.A.; Neal, C.L.; Chetram, M.; Vo, B.; Mezencev, R.; Hinton, C.; Odero-Marah, V.A. The phytoalexin camalexin mediates cytotoxicity towards aggressive prostate cancer cells via reactive oxygen species. J. Nat. Med. 2013, 67, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yamashita, N.; Taga, C.; Ozawa, M.; Kanno, Y.; Sanada, N.; Kizu, R. Camalexin, an indole phytoalexin, inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and mammosphere formation in breast cancer cells via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J. Nat. Med. 2022, 76, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Yamashita, N.; Saito, N.; Zhao, S.; Terai, K.; Hiruta, N.; Park, Y.; Bujo, H.; Nemoto, K.; Kanno, Y. Heregulin-induced cell migration is promoted by aryl hydrocarbon receptor in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2018, 366, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Yamashita, N.; Kanno, Y.; Saito, N.; Terai, K.; Sanada, N.; Kizu, R.; Hiruta, N.; Park, Y.; Bujo, H.; Nemoto, K. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor counteracts pharmacological efficacy of doxorubicin via enhanced AKR1C3 expression in triple negative breast cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 516, 693–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kawajiri, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Ohtake, F.; Ikuta, T.; Matsushima, Y.; Mimura, J.; Pettersson, S.; Pollenz, R.S.; Sakaki, T.; Hirokawa, T.; et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor suppresses intestinal carcinogenesis in ApcMin/+ mice with natural ligands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 13481–13486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Saito, N.; Kanno, Y.; Yamashita, N.; Degawa, M.; Yoshinari, K.; Nemoto, K. The Differential Selectivity of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AHR) Agonists towards AHR-Dependent Suppression of Mammosphere Formation and Gene Transcription in Human Breast Cancer Cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2021, 44, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Almasry, M.; Jemaa, M.; Mischitelli, M.; Lang, F.; Faggio, C. Camalexin-Induced Cell Membrane Scrambling and Cell Shrinkage in Human Erythrocytes. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 41, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sieroslawska, A.; Rymuszka, A. Combined effects of two phytoalexins, brassinin and camalexin, on the cells of colorectal origin. Toxicon 2023, 234, 107283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Miao, E.A.; Rajan, J.V.; Aderem, A. Caspase-1-induced pyroptotic cell death. Immunol. Rev. 2011, 243, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Manasa, K.; Chitra, V. Evaluation of in-vitro antioxidant activity of camalexin- A novel anti- parkinson’s agent. Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2020, 13, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lang, E.; Lang, F. Mechanisms and pathophysiological significance of eryptosis, the suicidal erythrocyte death. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 39, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Thomford, N.E.; Senthebane, D.A.; Rowe, A.; Munro, D.; Seele, P.; Maroyi, A.; Dzobo, K. Natural Products for Drug Discovery in the 21st Century: Innovations for Novel Drug Discovery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kozlov, O.; Kalíková, K.; Gondová, T.; Budovská, M.; Salayová, A.; Tesarová, E. Fast enantioseparation of indole phytoalexins in additive free supercritical fluid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2019, 1596, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Mezencev, R.; Kutschy, P.; Salayova, A.; Curillova, Z.; Mojzis, J.; Pilatova, M.; McDonald, J. Anticancer properties of 2-piperidyl analogues of the natural indole phytoalexin 1-methoxyspirobrassinol. Chemotherapy 2008, 54, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kutschy, P.; Sykora, A.; Curillová, Z.; Repovská, M.; Pilátová, M.; Mojzis, J.; Mezencev, R.; Pazdera, P.; Hromjáková, T. Glyoxyl Analogs of Indole Phytoalexins: Synthesis and Anticancer Activity. Collect. Czechoslov. Chem. C 2010, 75, 887–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Budovská, M.; Pilátová, M.; Varinská, L.; Mojzis, J.; Mezencev, R. The synthesis and anticancer activity of analogs of the indole phytoalexins brassinin, 1-methoxyspirobrassinol methyl ether and cyclobrassinin. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 6623–6633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Tischlerova, V.; Kello, M.; Budovska, M.; Mojzis, J. Indole phytoalexin derivatives induce mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis in human colorectal carcinoma cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 4341–4353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Budovska, M.; Balaz, M.; Mezencev, R.; Tischlerova, V.; Zigova, M.; Mojzis, J. Design, synthesis and anticancer activity of trifluoromethylphenylamino substituted spiroindoles. J. Fluor. Chem. 2018, 216, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Budovska, M.; Tischlerova, V.; Mojzis, J.; Kozlov, O.; Gondova, T. An alternative approach to the synthesis of anticancer molecule spirobrassinin and its 2′-amino analogues. Monatshefte Fuer Chem. Mon. 2020, 151, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Budovská, M.; Selesová, I.; Tischlerová, V.; Michalková, R.; Mojzis, J. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 5-bromo derivatives of indole phytoalexins. Monatshefte Fuer Chem. Mon. 2020, 151, 1737–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Budovska, M.; Krochtova, K.; Kuba, M.; Tischlerova, V.; Mojzis, J. Synthesis and cytotoxicity evaluation of novel 5-fluorinated indoles. J. Fluor. Chem. 2021, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Marianna, B.; Radka, M.; Martin, K.; Janka, V.; Jan, M. Design, Synthesis and Antiproliferative Evaluation of Bis-Indole Derivatives with a Phenyl Linker: Focus on Autophagy. Molecules 2022, 28, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zigová, M.; Miškufová, V.; Budovská, M.; Michalková, R.; Mojžiš, J. Exploring the Antiproliferative and Modulatory Effects of 1-Methoxyisobrassinin on Ovarian Cancer Cells: Insights into Cell Cycle Regulation, Apoptosis, Autophagy, and Its Interactions with NAC. Molecules 2024, 29, 1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Budovska, M.; Krochtova, K.; Michalkova, R.; Mojzis, J. Aminoanalogues of isobrassinin, erucalexin and isocyclobrassinin: Synthesis and evaluation of the antiproliferative and cytotoxic properties. Tetrahedron 2022, 120, 132898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Csomos, P.; Fodor, L.; Zupko, I.; Csampai, A.; Sohar, P. Synthesis and in vitro antiproliferative effect of isomeric analogs of cyclobrassinin phytoalexin possessing the 1,3-thiazino[5,6-b]indole-4-one skeleton. Arkivoc 2017, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Solarova, Z.; Kello, M.; Varinska, L.; Budovska, M.; Solar, P. Inhibition of heat shock protein (Hsp) 90 potentiates the antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of 2-(4′fluoro-phenylamino)-4H-1,3-thiazine[6,5-b]indole in A2780cis cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 85, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Solar, P.; Sytkowski, A.J. Differentially expressed genes associated with cisplatin resistance in human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line A2780. Cancer Lett. 2011, 309, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Solarova, Z.; Mojzis, J.; Solar, P. Hsp90 inhibitor as a sensitizer of cancer cells to different therapies (review). Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 46, 907–926. [Google Scholar]
  101. Li, Y.; Zhang, T.; Schwartz, S.J.; Sun, D. Sulforaphane potentiates the efficacy of 17-allylamino 17-demethoxygeldanamycin against pancreatic cancer through enhanced abrogation of Hsp90 chaperone function. Nutr. Cancer 2011, 63, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Biological effects of indole phytoalexins, brassinin and camalexin, produced in plants of the Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) family under stress conditions. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Biological effects of indole phytoalexins, brassinin and camalexin, produced in plants of the Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) family under stress conditions. Created with BioRender.com.
Molecules 29 02388 g001
Figure 2. Indole phytoalexins induce tumor cell death by different mechanisms. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2. Indole phytoalexins induce tumor cell death by different mechanisms. Created with BioRender.com.
Molecules 29 02388 g002
Figure 3. Induction of apoptosis and cell cycle blockade by indole phytoalexins and their derivatives. Green arrow—induction, red T bar—inhibition, Br—brassinin, Ca—camalexin, Der—derivatives. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 3. Induction of apoptosis and cell cycle blockade by indole phytoalexins and their derivatives. Green arrow—induction, red T bar—inhibition, Br—brassinin, Ca—camalexin, Der—derivatives. Created with BioRender.com.
Molecules 29 02388 g003
Figure 4. Indole phytoalexins as modulators of tumor signaling pathways. Green arrow—induction, red T bar—inhibition, Br—brassinin, Ca—camalexin, Der—derivatives. Adapted from “Signaling Pathways in Gastric Cancer” by BioRender.com (2024).
Figure 4. Indole phytoalexins as modulators of tumor signaling pathways. Green arrow—induction, red T bar—inhibition, Br—brassinin, Ca—camalexin, Der—derivatives. Adapted from “Signaling Pathways in Gastric Cancer” by BioRender.com (2024).
Molecules 29 02388 g004
Figure 5. Indole phytoalexins as modulators of autophagy induction. Green arrow—induction, red T bar—inhibition, Br—brassinin, Ca—camalexin, Der—derivatives. Adapted from “Autophagy in Cancer Pathways”, by BioRender.com (2024).
Figure 5. Indole phytoalexins as modulators of autophagy induction. Green arrow—induction, red T bar—inhibition, Br—brassinin, Ca—camalexin, Der—derivatives. Adapted from “Autophagy in Cancer Pathways”, by BioRender.com (2024).
Molecules 29 02388 g005
Table 1. The anticancer potential of brassinin and camalexin (update since 2016). Arrows indicate an increase (↑) or decrease (↓) in the levels/activity of the molecules.
Table 1. The anticancer potential of brassinin and camalexin (update since 2016). Arrows indicate an increase (↑) or decrease (↓) in the levels/activity of the molecules.
BrassininAnticancer PotentialMolecular TargetRelevant Reference(s)
The modulation of pathways involved in cell survival, proliferation, and growth↓ JAK-STAT3 pathway
↑ MAPK pathway
↓ PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway
[39,40,43]
Induction of cancer cell death↑ p53, ↑ p21
↑ caspase-8, caspase-9, and caspase-3
↑ PARP cleavage
↑ Sub-G1 phase distribution in cells,
↑ G0/G1 ratio, ↓ S, G2/M
↑ Bax expression, ↓ Bcl-2 expression
↑ Phosphorylation of JNK, ERK, and p38
↑ ROS production
↑ Mitochondrial damage
↑ ER stress-related proteins (ATF4 and CHOP)
↑ Cytoplasmic vacuolation
↑ GSH/GSSG ratio disruption
↓ Expression of CNOT2
↑ Expression of LC3
↓ Alix expression
[17,38,39,41,43,44]
Anti-Warburg effect↓ PK2, ↓ Glut1, ↓HK2, ↓LDH, ↓c-Myc, ↓SIRT1, ↓ β-catenin[41]
Inhibition of angiogenesis↓ Tie2, ↓ FGFR1[42]
EMT modulation↓ TGF-β-induced fibronectin, ↓ vimentin, ↓ N-cadherin, ↓ MMP-9, ↓ MMP-2, ↓Twist, ↓ Snail,
↑ TGF-β-induced occludin, ↑ N-cadherin
[43,62]
CamalexinModulation of AhR Pathway↑ Expression of AhR target genes
↑ Nuclear translocation of AhR
↑ AhR-mediated transcription
↓ Mammosphere formation in AhR-expressing breast cancer cells
[74]
Induction of cancer cell death↑ Caspase-3 and caspase-9 activity
↑ ER stress markers (phos-PERK, phos-eIF2α, ATF4, CHOP)
↓ Mcl-1 levels
↑ ROS levels
↑ SOD and CAT activity
↑ GSSG levels, ↓ GSH levels
↑ caspase 1 (pyroptosis)
[16,80]
Suppression of tumor growth in NB4 and HL-60 tumor xenograft models↓ tumor volume,
↑ caspase-3 and caspase-9
[16]
Table 2. Antiproliferative effects of synthetic analogs of indole phytoalexins.
Table 2. Antiproliferative effects of synthetic analogs of indole phytoalexins.
Group of AnalogsThe Most Effective AnalogCancer Cell LineIC50 (μM)Reference
2′-aminoanalogues of 1-methoxyspirobrassinol methyl etether(±)-trans-1,2-dimethoxy-2′-(3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenylamino)spiro{indoline-3,5′ [4′,5′]dihydrothiazol}
Molecules 29 02388 i001
HCT-11632.2[89]
2′-aminoanalogues of spirobrassinin(±)-2′-[4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenylamino]spiro[indoline-3,5′-[4′,5′]dihydrothiazole]-2-one
Molecules 29 02388 i002
Jurkat26.1[91]
2′-aminoanalogues of cyclobrassinin2-(4′-fluorphenylamino)-4H-1,3-tiazino[6,5-b]indol
Molecules 29 02388 i003
A2780cis30[98]
2′-aminoanalogues of 5-fluorospirobrassinin(±)-5-Fluoro-2′-(3,4-dichlorophenylamino)spiro{indoline-3,5′-[4′,5′]dihydrothiazole}-2-one
Molecules 29 02388 i004
Jurkat29.1[93]
2,2′-diaminoanalogues of 1-methoxyspirobrassinol methyl ethertrans-(±)-1-Methoxy-2-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenylamino]-2′-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenylamino]spiro{indoline-3,5′-[4′,5′]dihydrothiazole}
Molecules 29 02388 i005
CEM1[90]
Aminoanalogues of 1-methoxyisobrassinin
N-[(1-methoxyindol-2-yl)methyl]-N′-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]thiourea
Molecules 29 02388 i006
Jurkat7.6[96]
Aminoanalogues of 5-bromo-1-Boc-brassininN-[[5-Bromo-1-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)indol-3-yl]methyl]-N’-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]thiourea
Molecules 29 02388 i007
Jurkat5.1[92]
Bis-indole urea analogues with a phenyl linkerN,N′-(1,4-phenylene)bis{N′-[1-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)indol-3-yl]methyl (urea)}
Molecules 29 02388 i008
A5498.7[94]
Regioisomer of 1-methoxybrassinin1-methoxyisobrassinin
Molecules 29 02388 i009
A2780
A2780cis
3.62
7.00
[95]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zigová, M.; Michalková, R.; Mojžiš, J. Anticancer Potential of Indole Phytoalexins and Their Analogues. Molecules 2024, 29, 2388. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102388

AMA Style

Zigová M, Michalková R, Mojžiš J. Anticancer Potential of Indole Phytoalexins and Their Analogues. Molecules. 2024; 29(10):2388. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102388

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zigová, Martina, Radka Michalková, and Ján Mojžiš. 2024. "Anticancer Potential of Indole Phytoalexins and Their Analogues" Molecules 29, no. 10: 2388. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102388

APA Style

Zigová, M., Michalková, R., & Mojžiš, J. (2024). Anticancer Potential of Indole Phytoalexins and Their Analogues. Molecules, 29(10), 2388. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102388

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop