Next Article in Journal
Anti-Trypanosomal Bufadienolides from the Oocytes of the Toad Rhinella alata (Anura, Bufonidae)
Next Article in Special Issue
Siamese Networks for Clinically Relevant Bacteria Classification Based on Raman Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Potential Plant-Derived Pancreatic Beta-Cell-Directed Agents Using New Custom-Designed Screening Method: Gymnema sylvestre as an Example
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of the Kernel Gram Matrix Representation of Data in Order to Avoid the Alignment of Chromatographic Signals
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 1
10.3390/molecules29010195
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Lipase-Assisted Synthesis of Alkyl Stearates: Optimization by Taguchi Design of Experiments and Application as Defoamers

by
Enoch Olvera-Ureña
1,
Jorge Lopez-Tellez
1,
M. Monserrat Vizueto
2,
J. Guadalupe Hidalgo-Ledezma
2,
Baltazar Martinez-Quiroz
2,* and
Jose A. Rodriguez
1,*
1
Area Academica de Quimica, Instituto de Ciencias Basicas e Ingenieria, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Carr. Pachuca-Tulancingo Km. 4.5, Mineral de la Reforma 42184, Hidalgo, Mexico
2
Soluciones Quimicas Globales, S. de R.L.M.I., Rio Industrial 210, 47, Mineral de la Reforma 42186, Hidalgo, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(1), 195; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010195
Submission received: 11 December 2023 / Revised: 22 December 2023 / Accepted: 24 December 2023 / Published: 29 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemometrics Tools in Analytical Chemistry 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The present work proposes the optimization of enzymatic synthesis of alkyl stearates using stearic acid, alkyl alcohols (C1-OH, C2-OH, C4-OH, C8-OH and C16-OH) and Candida rugosa lipase by a L9 (34) Taguchi-type design of experiments. Four variables were evaluated (reaction time, temperature, kU of lipase and alcohol:stearic acid molar ratio), ensuring that all variables were critical. In optimal conditions, five stearates were obtained with conversions > 90%. The obtained products were characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Additionally, the defoaming capacity of the five stearates was evaluated, obtaining better performance for the compound synthesized from C8-OH alcohol.

1. Introduction

Fatty acid esters are an important group of compounds that are present as reaction intermediates in the formation of amides, sulfonates and long-chain alcohols used in polymer, textile and solvent industries [1,2,3]. Stearates (C17H35COOR, with R = metal ion, carbohydrates, polyols, or alkyl groups) are essential in the production of cosmetics, drugs, lubricants and surfactants [4,5,6,7,8].
The most popular method used for stearate synthesis is based on the Fisher reaction, which consists of a reaction between a carboxylic acid and an alcohol (in molar excess) in the presence of an acid catalyst such as sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid or p-toluensulfonic acid (Figure 1) [9,10,11]. The reaction is performed in conventional reflux conditions (1–4 h) using benzene as a solvent and achieves yields from 58% to 75% [12,13].
The use of aromatic solvents and homogeneous acid catalysis is associated with corrosion and environmental problems [14,15]. Alternatively, the use of metallic compounds as heterogeneous catalysts for the esterification reaction has been proposed, such as SnCl2·2H2O, SiO2/Al2O3, zeolites and ionic exchange resins. Nevertheless, those catalysts also show some limitations, as they still require the use of organic solvents for the reaction or need to be reactivated [14,15,16].
Current trends are looking to reduce the use of solvents and catalysts that are harmful to the environment and, therefore, the use of enzymatic catalysis has been proposed as an environmentally friendly alternative. Lipases are enzymes used in ester hydrolysis reactions in aqueous media, to form carboxylic acid and alcohols [17]. However, when lipase is added to the mixture of carboxylic acid and alcohol, the esterification reaction proceeds and, hence, it is considered as an alternative to synthesize alkyl stearates. Formation of lipase-catalyzed esters has increased in recent years, and lipases from A. niger, R. delemar, G. candidum and Penicillium cyclopium were described to synthesize esters using fatty acids and various primary and secondary alcohols [18], with variable experimental conditions being reported.
The objective of the design of experiments (DoE) is to reduce the necessary number of experiments in order to obtain an optimal value and provide information on the influence of the factors involved [19]. The use of DoE is a valuable option to reduce experimentation, it has been widely used in enzymatic esterification. Factorial design was used to evaluate the effect of variables in esterification reactions using Mucor miehei lipase [20], Novozym-435 [21] and Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase [22], 2–4 variables were evaluated (temperature, lipase amount, reaction time and alcohol:acid molar ratio) in factorial designs 4–16 experiments, followed by optimization by Central composite designs for two variables (13 additional experiments) [23]. Taguchi-type design is a robust tool to optimize processes with a minimum of experimentation, this strategy was described to optimize four variables (three levels for each one) with nine experiments, in the enzymatic synthesis of ethyl levulinate [24].
Defoamers are a group of compounds or mixtures that can break foam formation in a system, while antifoamers inhibit foam production [25]. Defoamers are composed of hydrophobic particles which reduce the foam stability [26]. They are classified into three types: oil-based defoamers (mineral and silica oils), alkoxylated copolymers, and emulsified hydrophobic compounds [27]. In all cases, they produce a physical, chemical, or mechanical change in surface tension, elasticity, viscosity, or electrostatic charge [28]. The most common compounds used as defoamers are vegetable oils, paraffinic and naphthalenic oils, fatty acids, esters and alcohols [29].
Considering the hydrophobic nature of alkyl stearates, they have similar characteristics to other compounds used in the defoamers industry and, so, they can be considered good candidates for applications in process control of different industries. The present work proposes the optimization of the enzymatic synthesis conditions for the production of alkyl stearates from stearic acid, alkyl alcohols and Candida rugosa lipase, using a Taguchi-type design of experiments followed by the application of alkyl stearates as defoamer agents.

2. Results

Synthesis conditions were evaluated using a Taguchi-type design of experiments, and the evaluated conditions were: alcohol:stearic acid molar ratio (5.0:1.0, 10.0:1.0 and 15.0:1.0), temperature (40, 50 and 60 °C), time (1, 3 and 5 days) and lipase units (7.0, 21.0 and 35.0 kU). All of these control variables are critical in transesterification and esterification reactions with enzymatic catalysis [12,30]. The addition of a molar excess of alcohol promotes product formation [31]. Rodrigues et al. evaluated alcohol molar ratios between 3:1 and 12:1 in biodiesel formation using Lipozyme TL-IM, Lipozyme RM-IM and Novozym 435, with methanol, ethanol, propanol and butanol. Yield value depends on the alkyl length, and a higher yield was observed for methanol in a molar ratio of 5:1, while for butanol the best ratio was 9:1 [32]. Temperature represents an important parameter for the correct functioning of the lipase, as enzyme denaturalization can be observed for temperatures higher than 60 °C. During the synthesis of octyl oleate using Lipozyme 10,000 from Rhizomucor miehei as a catalyst, temperatures from 20 to 60 °C were evaluated and a higher conversion was obtained for temperatures between 45 and 60 °C [33]. The reaction time may be modified depending on lipase type, and the activity differences between lipases from Candida rugosa and Candida antarctica were studied by Tsitsimpikou et al. [34]. Both lipases were used in the esterification of lauric acid and different types of carbohydrates. The lipase from Candida rugosa presented longer reaction times (3 to 5 days) than that of Candida antarctica (1 to 3 days), thus a larger amount of Candida rugosa lipase was required. Similar behavior was observed for octyl oleate synthesis using Candida antarctica lipase B [35].
Once the levels of the control variables were selected, alkyl stearates conversion (%) was defined as the output variable. In order to evaluate four variables at three levels, a Taguchi parameter design L9 (34) was used. The design matrix and average conversion (%) are shown in Table 1.
Syntheses were performed by triplicate and results were statistically analyzed by ANOVA TM-v2.5 program, to know the contributions of each variable and the subsequent selection of optimal values (Figure 2). In all cases, variables were critical if Fexp > Fcrit. For C1-OH, C2-OH and C16-OH, the variable that exerted the greatest contribution was alcohol:stearic acid molar ratio. For C4-OH and C8-OH, critical variables were lipase units and temperature, respectively. The obtained results are consistent with those described by Deng et al. [36], where methyl-, ethyl- and butyl-stearates were synthesized by enzymatic catalysis, using Candida sp. 99-125 lipase, and where alcohol:stearic acid molar ratio was found to be the most important variable in the process. On the other hand, it has been described that temperature and lipase units were the most important variables in cetyl esters synthesis [37].
From the obtained results, optimal reaction conditions were selected (Figure 3) using as the criteria “most is better”. Variables combination and the obtained conversions are shown in Table 2, confirming that conversion increases with alcohol hydrophobicity. It has been described that methanol and ethanol, in lipase-based esterification reactions, inhibit lipase enzymatic activity. Candida antarctica lipase B inhibition was evaluated in vinyl acetate esterification using methanol [38], and higher catalytic activity was found for lower methanol concentrations, while lipase inhibition was marked for higher methanol concentrations [39]. Similar behavior was described in ethyl butyrate synthesis using Candida cylindraceae as a catalyst, where the loss of lipase activity was marked for higher concentrations of ethanol [40]. Enzyme inhibition is also observed in the presence of long-chain alcohols; however, the yield is higher compared with methanol and ethanol reactions. Candida sp. 99-125 was evaluated in oleic acid reaction using cetyl alcohol, and the obtained yields were between 91% and 94%, despite observing enzymatic inhibition [41].
Products can be identified using the signal from methylene protons adjacent to oxygen bonded to carbonyl (D1 and D2, in yellow), which are shifted to lower frequencies than the ester signals. Stearate from C8-OH 1H NMR spectra (Figure 4B) was compared to stearic acid used as raw material (Figure 4A). A1 and A2 signals (in red) correspond to methyl protons from both compounds, B1 and B2 signals (in green) correspond to methylene alkyl chain, C1 and C2 peaks (in blue) represent the protons adjacent to carbons near the functional group, and D1 and D2 signals are from methylene from α-carbons adjacent to the carbonyl. F2 (in pink) signal confirms the C8-OH stearate formation because this peak corresponds to methylene protons adjacent to an oxygen atom from an ester group and it can be found at higher frequencies. However, E2 (Figure 4B), marked in purple, corresponds to methylene adjacent to -OH present in octanol, indicating its presence in the mixture.
From the 1H NMR spectra, a comparison was made between the raw material (stearic acid) and the synthesized product. The presence of alkyl stearates can be confirmed in different experiments from signals of displacement caused by hydrogens adjacent to carbonyl-bonded oxygen observed at 3.60–4.13 ppm which is not found in a carboxylic acid spectrum. This characteristic displacement can be observed in C1-OH to C16-OH synthetized esters and can be distinguished from the signals attributed to alcohols which are obtained at 3.48–3.62 ppm. In all cases, characteristic signals of alkyl stearates were observed.
In order to confirm the 1H NMR study, the products were characterized by FTIR. Figure 5 shows the spectrum of C8-OH stearate where the characteristic tension signals of methyl and methylene can be observed in an interval of 3000–2800 cm−1, at 1700 cm−1 tension signal of the carbonyl group is observed and, in the intervals of 1150–1400 and 850–1000 cm−1 there are the tension signals of the C-O-C bonds that corroborate the presence of an ester group. On the other hand, no signs of hydroxyl groups (from alcohol and carboxylic acid).
Under the optimized conditions previously described, defoaming evaluation was made in duplicate for each alkyl stearate (Figure 6). Mean results showed that the prepared mixtures can control the foam in a short period, compared to other developed defoamers such as carbohydrate esters, fatty acid alcohols, ethoxylates or nitrogen compounds [8,24,26]. On the other hand, alkyl stearates can control foam production if they are mixed with other defoamers to achieve better performance.
From total area calculation for the Simpson rule to numeric integration, the percentage (%) of foam elimination was calculated for each one of the prepared mixtures, using as a reference the volume reached over time (Figure 6). It was determined that the defoamer prepared from C8-OH stearate eliminated 26% of foam in water, while C1-OH stearate eliminated 18%, C16-OH eliminated 15%, and C2-OH and C4-OH only eliminated 9% of foam in water. This behavior is consistent with the definition of defoamer, due to the alkyl stearates control foam formation but they do not inhibit it [25]. Estimated log p value of each stearate were: C1-OH = 8.32, C2-OH = 8.56, C4-OH = 9.04, C8-OH = 9.58 and C16-OH = 10.18 [42]. C8-OH stearate presented better results due to its intermediate hydrophobicity, which promotes the interaction with both hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds. The defoaming capacity was compared to mineral oil emulsion (Figure 5), which is commonly employed for this purpose. It was found that mineral oil eliminated 28% of foam in water which was similar to C8-OH stearate emulsion (26%).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Instruments

Candida rugosa lipase (Type VII ≥ 700 units/mg) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MI, USA). Methanol (C1-OH), ethanol (C2-OH), butanol (C4-OH) and octanol (C8-OH) were obtained from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). Cetyl alcohol (C16-OH) was obtained from BASF (Ludwigshafen, Germany). Stearic acid (C17H35COOH) used throughout the work was technical grade. An incubator brand Boekel Scientific model 132000 (Boekel Scientific, Feasterville-Trevose, PA, USA) was used to maintain the temperature of the reaction, a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) 400 MHz Bruker equipment (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and a Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) Perkin-Elmer spectrum GX 59750 (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) were used to characterize the products.

3.2. Synthesis of Alkyl Stearates

In order to optimize the synthesis of alkyl stearates, the variables time, temperature, alcohol:stearic acid molar ratio and enzymatic units of Candida rugosa lipase were evaluated. In 5-mL glass ampoules, 1.0 g (3.51 mmol) of stearic acid, Candida rugosa lipase (7.0–35.0 kU) and the corresponding alkyl alcohol (R-OH:C17H35COOH) in a molar ratio of 5.0:1.0 to 15.0:1.0 [31] were added. Subsequently, the ampoules were sealed and kept at a constant temperature (40–60 °C) in an incubator to react for 1–5 days [12].
Once the reaction time was concluded, vials were heated in a water bath at 60 °C to maintain the products in liquid phases, with three phases being observed, namely a solid phase (lipase) and two liquid phases. The superior liquid phase was the non-reactive alcohol and the middle liquid phase was the alkyl stearate, which was aspirated (using a pipette) and stored in a vial to calculate the acidity index (AI) and the reaction conversion, by the following procedure: 40 mg of alkyl stearate was weighted and diluted in 10 mL of heated methanol (40 °C), and the solution was titrated with KOH (0.1 M) standardized solution, using phenolphthalein as indicator. The acidity of samples (mgKOH g−1) was calculated using Equation (1) and subsequently the alkyl stearate obtained conversion was calculated using Equation (2).
A I = ( 56.1 ) ( C K O H ) ( V K O H ) m
C o n v e r s i o n   % = ( A I i − A I f ) A I i × 100
where: AI = acidity index, CKOH = KOH molarity (mol/L), VKOH = KOH volume (mL) used for titration, m = analyte mass (g), AIi = Initial acidity index and AIf = Final acidity index [11].
Additionally, the obtained products were analyzed by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance, using CDCl3 as solvent and acquiring the spectra at room temperature and by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in KBr tablet with a range of 400–4000 cm−1.

3.3. Evaluation of Emulsion Performance

Synthetized stearates were dispersed in water (oil-in-water emulsion) for their application as defoamers. Stock emulsions of each alkyl stearate were prepared with a non-volatile content of 20.0% (w:w). The hydrophobic phase, composed of the alkyl stearate (20.0%) and Span 60 (1.0%), was prepared in a container while the hydrophilic phase was prepared in parallel, in a separated container, by mixing lauryl ether sodium sulfate (4.0%), Tween 80 (1.0%) and water (74.0%). Both phases were placed in a water bath at 60 °C for 10 min with constant stirring. The hydrophobic phase was added to the hydrophilic phase and the mixture was kept stirring in two steps, the first 5 min at 500 rpm followed by a second stirring at 10,000 rpm for 1 min (Turrax IKA T18 equipment, IKA, Staufen, Germany). Emulsions were cooled at constant stirring to achieve room temperature and left stored until use. The emulsions are stable at room temperature for six months without observing any phase separation.
Defoaming performance of each alkyl stearate emulsion was evaluated by the Ross-Miles model [43], using a foaming aqueous solution containing sodium dodecylbenzensulfonate (0.01% w:w) and xanthan gum (0.015% w:w). In a 500 mL cylinder, 250 mL of foaming solution and 5 mL of a 100-fold diluted emulsion were mixed. The mixture was homogenized, and an air flux (450 mL/min) was introduced through the lower part. The generated foam volume was measured at each 30 s, and the time vs. foam volume was plotted to determine the area under the curve. The defoaming performance was determined by comparing the areas obtained with and without alkyl stearate addition.

4. Conclusions

Alkyl stearates C1-OH, C2-OH, C4-OH, C8-OH and C16-OH were synthesized in optimal conditions from stearic acid and the corresponding alkyl alcohols, under enzymatic catalysis (Candida rugosa lipase) by Taguchi-type L9 (34) design of experiments. Critical variables were identified for each obtained product and their contributions were calculated. It was observed lipase inhibition using C1-OH and C2-OH alcohols, decreased the conversion. Additionally, characterization of the products was made by 1H NMR and FTIR to confirm the alkyl stearates formation. Subsequently, the defoamer properties of the five obtained products were evaluated, and the best performance was observed for the C8-OH compound since its log p is at a midpoint which allows it to interact with hydrophobic and hydrophilic compounds. The results showed that these compounds have limited performance as defoamers. Nevertheless, by using enzymatic catalysis, the implemented synthesis does not require the use of harmful organic solvents such as benzene or the use of complex methodologies. Moreover, the obtained alkyl stearates can be applied in the production of cosmetics or lubricants. The use of a design of experiments as L9 (34) Taguchi-type optimized the system in nine experiments is a useful alternative to evaluate systems for industrial processes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A.R. and B.M.-Q.; methodology, E.O.-U. and M.M.V.; validation, E.O.-U. and J.G.H.-L.; formal analysis, J.L.-T. and J.A.R.; investigation, E.O.-U. and M.M.V.; writing—original draft preparation, J.A.R. and E.O.-U.; writing—review and editing, J.L.-T. and J.A.R.; supervision, J.A.R. and J.G.H.-L.; project administration, J.G.H.-L.; funding acquisition, B.M.-Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CONAHCYT-EFIDT project number 330053.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that this study received funding from CONAHCYT-EFIDT 330053. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

References

  1. Vinod, N.; Tiwari, R.; Bhat, N.S.; Mal, S.S.; Dutta, S. High-yielding synthesis of alkyl stearates from stearic acid within a closed batch reactor using heteropolyacids as efficient and recyclable catalyst. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2225, 070004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xie, T.; Zeng, C.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L. Preparation of Methyl Ester Sulfonates Based on Sulfonation in a Falling Film Microreactor from Hydrogenated Palm Oil Methyl Esters with Gaseous SO3. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 3714–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yuan, P.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Sun, H.; Liu, S. Cu-Zn/Al2O3 Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Esters to Alcohols. Chin. J. Catal. 2010, 31, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baker, I.J.A.; Matthews, B.; Suares, H.; Krodkiewska, I.; Furlong, D.N.; Grieser, F.; Drummond, C.I. Sugar fatty acid ester surfactants: Structure and ultimate aerobic biodegradability. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2000, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aoshima, H.; Miyagisnima, A.; Nozawa, Y.; Sadzuka, Y.; Sonobe, T. Glycerin fatty acid esters as a new lubricant of tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 293, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cavalcanti, E.D.C.; Aguieiras, É.C.G.; da Silva, P.R.; Duarte, J.G.; Cipolatti, E.P.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R.; da Silva, J.A.C.; Freire, D.M.G. Improved production of biolubricants from soybean oil and different polyols via esterification reaction catalyzed by immobilized lipase from Candida rugosa. Fuel 2018, 215, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maag, H. Fatty acid derivatives: Important surfactants for household, cosmetic and industrial purposes. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1984, 61, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Allen, D.K.; Tao, B.Y. Carbohydrate-alkyl ester derivatives as biosurfactants. J. Surfactants Deterg. 1999, 2, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Koshima, H.; Miyazaki, K.; Ishii, S.; Asahi, T.; Koshima, H.; Miyazaki, K.; Ishii, S.; Asahi, T. Microwave Effect on Fischer Esterification. Chem. Lett. 2016, 45, 505–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Y.; Lotero, E.; Goodwin, J.G., Jr. Effect of carbon chain length on esterification of carboxylic acids with methanol using acid catalysis. J. Catal. 2006, 243, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pereira, G.N.; Holz, J.P.; Giovannini, P.P.; Oliveira, J.V.; de Oliveira, D.; Lerin, L.A. Enzymatic esterification for the synthesis of butyl stearate and ethyl stearate. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khan, Z.; Javed, F.; Shamair, Z.; Hafeez, A.; Fazal, T.; Aslam, A.; Zimmerman, W.B.; Rehman, F. Current developments in esterification reaction: A review on process and parameters. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2021, 103, 80–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Puterbaugh, W.H.; Vanselow, C.H.; Nelson, K.; Shrawder, E.J. Esterification for the introductory organic laboratory course: A modified Dean-Stark trap. J. Chem. Educ. 1963, 40, 349–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Da Silva, M.J.; Cardoso, A.L.; Natalino, R. Bioenergy II: Tin Catalysed Esterification of Free Fatty Acids. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 2010, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Reddy, C.R.; Iyengar, P.; Nagendrappa, G.; Jai Prakash, B.S. Esterification of succinic anhydride to di-(p-cresyl) succinate over Mn+ montmorillonite clay catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2005, 229, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kiss, A.A.; Dimian, A.C.; Rothenberg, G. Solid Acid Catalysts for Biodiesel Production—Towards Sustainable Energy. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Langrand, G.; Baratti, J.; Buono, G.; Triantaphylides, C. Lipase catalyzed reactions and strategy for alcohol resolution. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hari Krishna, S.; Karanth, N.G. Lipases and Lipase-Catalyzed Esterification Reactions in Nonaqueous Media. Cat. Rev. Sci. Eng. 2002, 44, 499–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tavizón-Pozos, J.A.; Ibarra, I.S.; Guevara-Lara, A.; Galán-Vidal, C.A. Application of Design of Experiments in Biofuel Production: A Review. In Design of Experiments for Chemical, Pharmaceutical, Food, and Industrial Applications, 1st ed.; Carrillo-Cedillo, E.G., Rodríguez-Ávila, J.A., Arredondo-Soto, K.C., Cornejo-Bravo, J.M., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; Volume 1, pp. 77–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. García, R.; Martínez, M.; Aracil, J. Enzymatic esterification of an acid with an epoxide using an immobilized lipase from Mucor miehei as catalyst: Optimization of the yield and isomeric excess of ester by statistical analysis. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 28, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. García, E.; Ferrari, F.; García, T.; Martínez, M.; Aracil, J. Optimization of the enzymatic esterification of diglycerol and lauric acid. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2001, 4, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mibielli, G.M.; Fagundes, A.P.; Bohn, L.R.; Cavali, M.; Bueno, A.; Bender, J.P.; Oliveira, J.V. Enzymatic production of methyl esters from low-cost feedstocks. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 24, 101558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, A.; Chaibakhsh, N.; Rahman, M.B.A.; Basri, M.; Tejo, B.A. Optimized enzymatic synthesis of levulinate ester in solvent-free system. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2010, 32, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mohd Hussin, F.N.N.; Attan, N.; Wahab, R.A. Taguchi design-assisted immobilization of Candida rugosa lipase onto a ternary alginate/nanocellulose/montmorillonite composite: Physicochemical characterization, thermal stability and reusability studies. Enzyme Microb. Techol. 2020, 136, 109506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Farn, R.J. Chemistry and Technology of Surfactants, 1st ed.; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2006; pp. 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Garrett, P.R. Defoaming: Antifoams and mechanical methods. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 20, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Joshi, K.S.; Jeelani, S.A.K.; Blickenstorfer, C.; Naegeli, I.; Windhab, E.J. Influence of fatty alcohol antifoam suspensions on foam stability. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2005, 263, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pugh, R.J. Foaming, foam films, antifoaming and defoaming. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 64, 67–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Owen, M.J. Defoamers, 1st ed.; Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 236–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Touqeer, T.; Mumtaz, M.W.; Mukthar, H.; Irfan, A.; Akram, S.; Shabbir, A.; Rashid, U.; Nehdi, I.A.; Choong, T.S.Y. Fe3O4-PDA-Lipase as Surface Functionalized Nano Biocatalyst for the Production of Biodiesel Using Waste Cooking oil as Feedstock: Characterization and Process Optimization. Energies 2020, 13, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stergiou, P.Y.; Foukis, A.; Filippou, M.; Koukouritaki, M.; Parapouli, M.; Theodorou, L.G.; Hatziloukas, E.; Afendra, A.; Pandey, A.; Papamichael, E.M. Advances in lipase-catalyzed esterification reactions. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 1846–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rodrigues, R.C.; Volpato, G.; Wada, K.; Ayub, M.A.Z. Enzymatic Synthesis of Biodiesel from Transesterification Reactions of Vegetable Oils and Short Chain Alcohols. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2008, 85, 925–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yong, Y.P.; Al-Duri, B. Kinetic Studies on Immobilised Lipase Esterification of Oleic Acid and Octanol. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1996, 65, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tsitsimpikou, C.; Daflos, H.; Kolisis, F.N. Comparative studies on the sugar esters synthesis catalysed by Candida antarctica and Candida rugosa lipases in hexane. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 1997, 3, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Boseley, J.A.; Peilow, A.D. Immobilization of Lipases on Porous Polypropylene: Reduction in Esterification Efficiency at Low Loading. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1997, 74, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Deng, L.; Tan, T.; Wang, F.; Xu, X. Enzymatic production of fatty acid alkyl esters with a lipase preparation from Candida sp. 99-125. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2003, 105, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Serrano-Arnaldos, M.; Máximo-Martín, M.F.; Montiel-Morte, M.C.; Ortega-Requena, S.; Gómez-Gómez, E.; Bastida-Rodríguez, J. Solvent-free enzymatic production of high quality cetyl esters. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2016, 39, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Foresti, M.L.; Galle, M.; Ferreira, M.L.; Briand, L.E. Enantioselective esterification of ibuprofen with ethanol as reactant and solvent catalyzed by immobilized lipase: Experimental and molecular modeling aspects. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 1461–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kulschewski, T.; Sasso, F.; Secundo, F.; Lotti, M.; Pleiss, J. Molecular mechanism of deactivation of C. antarctica lipase B by methanol. J. Biochem. 2013, 168, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Manjón, A.; Iborra, J.L.; Arocas, A. Short-chain flavour ester synthesis by immobilized lipase in organic media. Biotechnol. Lett. 1991, 13, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Deng, L.; Wang, X.; Nie, K.; Wang, F.; Liu, J.; Wang, P.; Tan, T. Synthesis of Wax Esters by Lipase-catalyzed Esterification with Immobilized Lipase from Candida sp. 99-125*. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 19, 978–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Molinspiration Cheminformatics. Available online: https://www.molinspiration.com (accessed on 31 October 2023).
  43. Denkov, N.D. Mechanisms of Foam Destruction by Oil-Based Antifoams. Langmuir 2004, 20, 9463–9505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 00195 g001
Figure 1. Stearic acid esterification reaction in the presence of alcohol using an acid catalyst.
Figure 1. Stearic acid esterification reaction in the presence of alcohol using an acid catalyst.
Molecules 29 00195 g001
Molecules 29 00195 g002
Figure 2. Contribution of the variables in the performed Taguchi-type L9 (34) design of experiments.
Figure 2. Contribution of the variables in the performed Taguchi-type L9 (34) design of experiments.
Molecules 29 00195 g002
Molecules 29 00195 g003
Figure 3. Mean graph obtained with the L9 (34) Taguchi-type design of experiments for the esterification reaction using C1-OH, C2-OH, C4-OH, C8-OH and C16-OH.
Figure 3. Mean graph obtained with the L9 (34) Taguchi-type design of experiments for the esterification reaction using C1-OH, C2-OH, C4-OH, C8-OH and C16-OH.
Molecules 29 00195 g003
Molecules 29 00195 g004
Figure 4. (A) 1H NMR spectrum obtained for stearic acid used as raw material. (B) 1H NMR spectrum obtained for C8-OH stearate, whose displacement adjacent to oxygen protons to ester group was found at 4.02 ppm.
Figure 4. (A) 1H NMR spectrum obtained for stearic acid used as raw material. (B) 1H NMR spectrum obtained for C8-OH stearate, whose displacement adjacent to oxygen protons to ester group was found at 4.02 ppm.
Molecules 29 00195 g004
Molecules 29 00195 g005
Figure 5. FTIR spectrum of C8-OH stearate and characteristic signals of the ester group.
Figure 5. FTIR spectrum of C8-OH stearate and characteristic signals of the ester group.
Molecules 29 00195 g005
Molecules 29 00195 g006
Figure 6. Defoaming capacity evaluation for the synthesized alkyl stearates and comparison to mineral oil.
Figure 6. Defoaming capacity evaluation for the synthesized alkyl stearates and comparison to mineral oil.
Molecules 29 00195 g006
Table 1. Levels and factors chosen for L9 (34) design optimization.
Table 1. Levels and factors chosen for L9 (34) design optimization.
ExperimentTime
(Days)		Temperature
(°C)		Lipase (kU)Alcohol:Stearic Acid Molar RatioMean Reaction Conversion (%RSD, n = 3)
C1-OHC2-OHC4-OHC8-OHC16-OH
11407.05:147.2 (2.2%)41.0 (2.4%)74.1 (1.4%)77.2 (0.8%)83.4 (1.5%)
215021.010:165.8 (1.6%)57.6 (1.8%)83.5 (1.2%)78.3 (2.7%)81.4 (1.3%)
316035.015:182.6 (0.5%)77.2 (1.4%)80.4 (0.8%)84.8 (0.9%)84.8 (0.8%)
434021.015:166.9 (0.6%)72.1(1.5%)89.6 (1.3%)89.6 (1.2%)93.8 (1.1%)
535035.05:138.9 (2.7%)61.7 (1.7%)76.2 (1.4%)79.3 (1.4%)82.4 (1.3%)
63607.010:158.7 (0.8%)74.1 (1.4%)75.2 (0.5%)84.5 (1.2%)80.3 (1.3%)
754035.010:170.0 (1.5%)78.3 (1.3%)88.6 (1.2%)92.8 (1.1%)87.6 (0.9%)
85507.015:158.6 (1.0%)70.0 (1.5%)65.8 (1.6%)79.3 (0.7%)89.7 (1.0%)
956021.05:155.4 (2.0%)68.5 (1.6%)75.0 (1.4%)81.5 (1.3%)84.8 (0.7%)
Table 2. Average conversion (%) of the alkyl stearates synthetized under optimal conditions.
Table 2. Average conversion (%) of the alkyl stearates synthetized under optimal conditions.
Alkyl
Stearate		Time (Days)Temperature (°C)Lipase (kU)Alcohol:Stearic Acid Molar Ratio Conversion
(%RSD n = 3)
C1-OH16035.015:190.5 (0.6%)
C2-OH56035.015:191.9 (0.7%)
C4-OH34021.010:194.7 (0.3%)
C8-OH34035.010:196.4 (0.3%)
C16-OH54021.015:196.8 (0.5%)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Olvera-Ureña, E.; Lopez-Tellez, J.; Vizueto, M.M.; Hidalgo-Ledezma, J.G.; Martinez-Quiroz, B.; Rodriguez, J.A. Lipase-Assisted Synthesis of Alkyl Stearates: Optimization by Taguchi Design of Experiments and Application as Defoamers. Molecules 2024, 29, 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010195

AMA Style

Olvera-Ureña E, Lopez-Tellez J, Vizueto MM, Hidalgo-Ledezma JG, Martinez-Quiroz B, Rodriguez JA. Lipase-Assisted Synthesis of Alkyl Stearates: Optimization by Taguchi Design of Experiments and Application as Defoamers. Molecules. 2024; 29(1):195. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010195

Chicago/Turabian Style

Olvera-Ureña, Enoch, Jorge Lopez-Tellez, M. Monserrat Vizueto, J. Guadalupe Hidalgo-Ledezma, Baltazar Martinez-Quiroz, and Jose A. Rodriguez. 2024. "Lipase-Assisted Synthesis of Alkyl Stearates: Optimization by Taguchi Design of Experiments and Application as Defoamers" Molecules 29, no. 1: 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010195

APA Style

Olvera-Ureña, E., Lopez-Tellez, J., Vizueto, M. M., Hidalgo-Ledezma, J. G., Martinez-Quiroz, B., & Rodriguez, J. A. (2024). Lipase-Assisted Synthesis of Alkyl Stearates: Optimization by Taguchi Design of Experiments and Application as Defoamers. Molecules, 29(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010195

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop