Next Article in Journal
A Chitosan-Based Flocculation Method for Efficient Recovery of High-Purity B-Phycoerythrin from a Low Concentration of Phycobilin in Wastewater
Next Article in Special Issue
Surface Modification of Bi2O3 Nanoparticles with Biotinylated β-Cyclodextrin as a Biocompatible Therapeutic Agent for Anticancer and Antimicrobial Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Morphological Electrical and Hardness Characterization of Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) Nanocomposite Plates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chitosan and Chitosan Nanoparticles: Parameters Enhancing Antifungal Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Classification, Molecular Structure and Biological Biosynthesis of Flavonoids, and Their Roles in Biotic and Abiotic Stresses

1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for the Research and Utilization of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences (Nanjing Botanical Garden Mem. Sun Yat-Sen), Nanjing 210014, China
2
College of Tea Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(8), 3599; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28083599
Submission received: 11 March 2023 / Revised: 8 April 2023 / Accepted: 11 April 2023 / Published: 20 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polysaccharide-Based Biopolymer: Recent Development and Applications)

Abstract

:
With the climate constantly changing, plants suffer more frequently from various abiotic and biotic stresses. However, they have evolved biosynthetic machinery to survive in stressful environmental conditions. Flavonoids are involved in a variety of biological activities in plants, which can protect plants from different biotic (plant-parasitic nematodes, fungi and bacteria) and abiotic stresses (salt stress, drought stress, UV, higher and lower temperatures). Flavonoids contain several subgroups, including anthocyanidins, flavonols, flavones, flavanols, flavanones, chalcones, dihydrochalcones and dihydroflavonols, which are widely distributed in various plants. As the pathway of flavonoid biosynthesis has been well studied, many researchers have applied transgenic technologies in order to explore the molecular mechanism of genes associated with flavonoid biosynthesis; as such, many transgenic plants have shown a higher stress tolerance through the regulation of flavonoid content. In the present review, the classification, molecular structure and biological biosynthesis of flavonoids were summarized, and the roles of flavonoids under various forms of biotic and abiotic stress in plants were also included. In addition, the effect of applying genes associated with flavonoid biosynthesis on the enhancement of plant tolerance under various biotic and abiotic stresses was also discussed.

1. Introduction

Flavonoid compounds, one of the main classes of plant secondary metabolites, are commonly present in plants [1,2]. Over 9000 flavonoid derivatives have been identified in various plants, which are further divided into different subfamilies depending on the modification of their basic structure [3,4]. Some plant flavonoids may be used as dietary compounds, which can improve human health and prevent many diseases [5,6]. Based on the epidemiological, clinical and animal studies, flavonoids may exert beneficial effects on human health when an individual is suffering from various diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and cancer [7,8,9].
Phenolic compounds are a group of metabolites derived from the secondary pathways of plants that contains flavonoids, phenolic acids, tannins, lignans, and coumarins [10,11]. Among them, flavonoid compounds are naturally distributed in fruits, seeds, flowers and the leaves of plants, and play important roles in regulating the growth and development of plants [12,13]. Plant flavonoids are involved in pollination, auxin transport inhibition, male fertility, allelopathy, seed development and flower coloring [14,15,16]. Moreover, flavonoids have also been reported to play protective roles against abiotic stresses through ROS detoxification, including UV-B radiation, low temperatures, salt, drought, and heavy metal stress [12,17,18,19,20]. In addition, flavonoids also offer protection against biotic stresses, and are capable of participating in plant–microbe interaction; they are also especially involved in the symbioses of plants with rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi, as well as in the interactions between pathogenic microorganisms and plants [21,22]. Some flavonoids (particularly anthocyanins) act as major flower pigments, which help plants attract pollinators [13].
Genetically modified (GM) plants are those whose genomes have been modified via the introduction of foreign DNA derived from bacteria, fungi, viruses, or animals; this process has been used to verify the gene function and generate GM plants [23,24]. Up to now, two common systems have been used for gene transfer in the generation of GM plants: the Agrobacterium-mediated system and the gene-gun-mediated system [25,26]. With the development of transgenic technology, genetic modification has been widely used to verify the gene functions in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway, and the roles of flavonoids in plant development and response to (a)biotic stresses [27,28,29].
Flavonoids have attracted significant attention in recent years. This review summarizes the recent progress made in the research of flavonoids, including their classification, biosynthesis and mechanisms of responding to adversity. Moreover, the application of flavonoids in modern biotechnologies and the prospects of flavonoids in response to various stresses are also reviewed here.

2. Flavonoids Classification

Flavonoids, a diverse group of natural substances with variable phenolic structures, are widely distributed in plants [30]. So far, over 9000 flavonoids have been identified, which are further classified into seven subgroups depending on the modification of their basic structure; these subgroups include flavones, flavanones, isoflavones, flavonols or catechins, and anthocyanins [31,32,33,34].

2.1. Flavones

Flavones, one of the important subgroups of flavonoids, contain the backbone of 2-phenylchromen-4-one (2-phenyl-1-benzopyran-4-one) (Figure 1A), and are widely distributed in leaves, flowers, and fruits of many plants, such as celery, parsley, red pepper, chamomile, mint, and ginkgo [35,36,37,38,39,40]. Flavones possess the C2′-C3′ double bond and C-ring, bearing a ketone at position C4′ [41]. Most flavones have an A-ring, bearing a hydroxyl group at position C5’, with hydroxylation usually occurring at position C7′ of the A-ring and positions C3′ and C4′ of the B-ring [42,43]. In addition, the glycosylation of flavones mainly occurs at positions C5′ and C7′ of the B-ring, and their methylation and acylation happens in the B-ring of the hydroxyl groups [42]. The major flavones are apigenin, luteolin, baicalein, chrysin and their derivatives [44].

2.2. Flavonols

Flavonols, known as 3-hydroxyflavone, process a hydroxyl group at position C3′ of the C-ring (Figure 1B) and are glycosylated to some extent [45]. Flavonols are the building blocks of proanthocyanidins, which are abundant in vegetables and fruits such as onions, lettuce, tomatoes, apples, grapes and so on [46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Glycosylation and methylation mainly contribute to the diversity of flavonol compounds [54]. O-glycoside, as the main substituent, occurs at position 7 of the A-ring and position 3 of the C-ring, and generates flavonol glycosides [55]; these mainly include kaempferol, quercetin, limocitrin, and isorhamnetin [56]. Over the past 15 years, the number of flavanones identified has significantly increased [57]. Dietary flavonols play important roles in human health due to their anti-oxidant, cardio-protective, anti-bacterial, anti-viral and anti-cancer activities [58].

2.3. Flavanones

Flavanones, also called dihydroflavones, have the saturated C-ring [59]. The unsaturated double bond between positions C2′ and C3′ of the C-ring is the only chemical structural difference between flavanones and other flavonoids (Figure 1C) [60]. Flavanones are mainly distributed in all citrus fruits [61,62], and have hydroxyl groups at positions C5′ and C7′ of the A-ring and have hydroxyl/methoxy substituents at positions C3′ or C4′ of the B-ring [63]. O-glycoside, as the main substituent, occurs at position 7 of the flavanone aglycone, and produces the flavanone glycosides [64]. The substituents of flavanone glycosides contain glucoside, rhamnoside, rutinoside, and neohesperidoside [65]. The flavanones can be divided into hesperitin, naringin, naringenin, eriodictyol, hesperidin, pinocembrin, and likvirtin based on their structural differences [66,67]. Among them, naringenin and hesperetin, as the main flavanones, are mainly present in lemons, oranges, limes, tangerines and grapefruit [61,68,69].

2.4. Isoflavonoids

Isoflavones contain a C-ring with a B-ring at position 3 (Figure 1D), which is the only chemical structural difference compared to other flavonoids [70]. Isoflavonoids are mainly distributed in leguminous plants [71], and play important roles in microbial signaling and nodule induction in legumes [72]. Isoflavones can be divided into two groups, genistein and daidzin, which exist in the chemical structures of aglycone, 7-O-glucoside, 6′-O-acetylglucoside, and 6′-O-malondialdehyde glucoside [73,74]. Isoflavones have strong antioxidant properties, which can reduce the damage caused by free radicals to plant cells and improve their resistance to UV-B radiation, salt stress and osmotic stress [75,76,77].

2.5. Neoflavonoids

There is a 4-phenyl coumarin backbone and no hydroxyl substitution at position C2′ in neoflavonoids (Figure 1E), which are rarely found in food plants [78]. Neoflavonoids are mainly divided into four substructure types based on their basic skeleton structure, namely dalbergia phenols, dalbergia quinones, dalbergia lactones, and benzoyl benzenes [79,80].

2.6. Flavanols, Flavan-3-ols or Catechins

Flavanols, known as dihydroflavonols/catechins, are the 3-hydroxy derivatives of flavanones (Figure 1F) [81] and are naturally occurring plant-based nutrients due to their antioxidant properties. Flavanols are also referred to flavan-3-ols, as the hydroxyl group is always bound to position 3 of the C-ring [82]. Unlike other flavonoids, flavanols have no double bond between positions C2′ and C3′ of the C-ring [83,84,85]. Flavanols are abundant in manly fruits, such as bananas, apples, blueberries, and pears [86,87,88,89], and are divided into several types: catechin, gallocatechin, catechin 3-gallat, gallocatechin 3-gallate, epicatechin, epicatechin 3-gallate, and epicatechin 3-gallate [90]. Flavanols and their metabolites play important roles in plant responses to various stresses due to their potent antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities [91,92].

2.7. Anthocyanins

Anthocyanins, the glycosylated polyphenolic compounds, are a group of soluble vacuolar pigments that generate a series of orange, red, purple and blue colors in vegetative and re-productive plant organs [93,94]. So far, over 650 anthocyanins have been identified in various plants [95] and grouped into the following six categories: cyanidin, delphinidin, malvidin, pelargonidin, peonidin, petunidin, and the corresponding derivatives [96,97]. Unlike other flavonoids, except flavanols, anthocyanins carry no ketone group at position 4 of the C-ring (Figure 1G). Anthocyanins are mainly found in the outer cell layer of various fruits and vegetables, such as black currants, grapes, and berries [98,99,100,101,102].

3. Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Plants

3.1. Regulation of Flavonoid Biosynthesis

The biosynthesis of flavonoids occurs at the convergence of the shikimate and acetate pathways, with the former producing p-coumaroyl-CoA and the latter involved in a C2 elongation reaction [103] (Figure 2). Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) catalyzes the deamination of phenylalanine into trans-cinnamic acid and ammonia; this is the first step of the phenylpropanoid pathway [104]. Next, cinnamic acid hydroxylase (C4H), a cytochrome P450-dependent hydroxylase, hydroxylates the trans-cinnamic acid to produce p-coumaric acid [105]. The 4-coumaric acid CoA ligase (4CL) catalyzes 4-coumaric acid to generate 4-coumaroyl CoA, which is a key intermediate in the biosynthesis of lignin and flavonoids [106]. Chalcone synthase (CHS) catalyzes the formation of naringenin chalcone from one p-coumaroyl CoA and three malonyl-CoA molecules [107]. Malonyl-CoA is the essential building block of natural products such as fatty acids, polyketides, and flavonoids [108]. Naringenin chalcone is converted to produce flavanones through chalcone isomerase (CHI), which is cyclized to produce naringenin under the catalytic action of CHI [109]. Naringenin, a general precursor of flavonoid compounds, is catalyzed by flavone synthase I and II (FNSI and II) and isoflavone synthase (IFS) to generate flavones and iso-flavones, respectively [110,111]. In addition, naringenin is also catalyzed by flavanone-3-hydroxylase (F3H), flavonol 3′-hydroxylase (F3′H), and flavonol 3′5′-hy-droxylase (F3′5′H) to produce dihy-drokaempferol, dihydroquercetin, and dihydromyricetin, respectively [112,113]. The dihydroflavonols are further converted to flavonols (kaempferol, quercetin, and myricetin) by flavonol synthase (FLS), which is also converted to leucoanthocyanidins under the catalysis of the dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR) [114]. Anthocyanidins are then formed from leucoanthocyanidins by leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX), and are further catalyzed by uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose flavonoid-3-O-glycosyltransferase (UFGT) [115]. Leucoanthocyanidins and anthocyanidins can also be converted to proanthocyanidins by leucoanthocyanidin reductase (LAR) and anthocyanidin reductase (ANR), respectively [116,117,118]. Finally, anthocyanins are stabilized via the modification of glycosylation, methylation, and acylation [119].

3.2. Transcription Factors (TFs) Regulate Flavonoid Biosynthesis

Genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis are classically divided into early biosynthetic genes (EBGs; CHI, CHS, F3′H and F3H) and late biosynthetic genes (LBGs; FLS, DFR, and ANS) [120,121,122]. Flavonoid biosynthesis is not only affected by plant hormones, but also regulated by various stresses [123]. These environmental or developmental regulations mostly rely on the regulatory effect of TFs on structural genes in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway (EBGs and LBGs) [124]. Based on the differences in the DNA-binding characteristics, several families of TFs have been described as regulators of flavonoid biosynthesis and metabolism in many plants; these include MYB, bHLH, WD40, bZIP, NAC, MADS box, Dof, and WRKY [125,126]. MYB proteins include highly conserved N-terminal MYB repeats (1R, R2R3, 3R, and atypical) [127,128]. The flavonoid pathway genes are predominantly regulated by the R2R3-MYB transcription factors [129]. The overexpression of NtMYB3 (an R2R3-MYB from narcissus) in transgenic tobacco inhibits flavonoid biosynthesis by decreasing the expression level of the FLS gene [130]. In Ginkgo biloba, GBMYBF2 significantly inhibits the expression of structural genes (GBPAL, GBFLS, GBANS, and GBCHI) and thus reduces the accumulation of flavonoids [131]. In soybean, GMMYB100 negatively regulates flavonoid biosynthesis by inhibiting the promoter activities of CHS and CHI [132]. Under light conditions, the overexpression of PPMYB17 in pear calli can activate the expression of genes associated with flavonoid biosynthesis (PPCHS, PPCHI, PPF3H, PPFLS and PPUFGT), especially the expression of FLS; this enhances the biosynthesis of flavonoids in pear fruit [133]. FTMYB31 has been isolated from Fagopyrum tataricum, the overexpression of which in tobacco enhances the expression level of CHS, F3H and FLS, and promotes the accumulation of flavonoid biosynthesis in plants [134]. The SbMYB8 protein from Scutellaria baicalensis can bind to the GmMYB92 BS3 sequence in the SbCHS promoter region, which positively regulates the expression of SbCHS, and increase the flavonoid content and antioxidant enzyme activity in transgenic tobacco [135]. The bHLH TFs play important roles in the regulation of many secondary metabolites, including flavonoids. In citrus, CsMYC2 is involved in the regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis through increasing the expression of UFGT [136]. The bHLH protein CmbHLH2 can directly bind to the promoter of CmDFR, which promotes the accumulation of flavonoids in chrysanthemum plants [137]. Interestingly, the R2R3-MYB TFs from subgroups 5, 6, and 15, bHLH from subgroup IIIf, and WD40 can interact with each other or orchestrate with others to regulate the expression of genes associated with flavonoid biosynthesis in many plants [138,139]. The TT2–TT8–TTG1 complex plays important roles in the regulation of LBGs (DFR, LDOX, TT19, TT12, AHA10, and BAN) [140]. Moreover, the MBW complex can also tissue-specifically regulate the expression of the genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis [141]. The MYB5–TT8–TTG1 complex can regulate the expression of genes associated with flavonoid biosynthesis, such as DFR, LDOX, and TT12, in the endothelium, whereas the TT2–EGL3/GL3–TTG1 complex can regulate the expression of genes associated with flavonoid biosynthesis, such as LDOX, BAN, AHA10, and DFR, in the chalaza [142].
In addition, the bZIP, NAC, Dof, and WRKY TFs have also been reported to regulate flavonoid biosynthesis [143]. SlHY5, a bZIP protein from tomato, is affected by Cry1A proteins under blue light irradiation, which binds to the promoters of genes associated with flavonoid biosynthesis, such as PAL, CHS1 and CHS2, and thereby promotes the accumulation of flavonoids [144,145]. VvibZIPC22 can activate the promoters of VviCHS and VviCHI, which increases the accumulation of flavonoids in plants [146]. The overexpression of NtHY5 in tobacco increases the expression level of genes associated with phenylpropanoid, which can regulate the biosynthesis of flavonoids and enhance plant tolerance to salt stress [147]. The Arabidopsis ANAC078 increases the expression level of CHS, F3’H, DFR, and LDO genes, thereby promoting the accumulation of flavonoids under strong light conditions [148]. MdNAC52, an apple NAC TF, increases the content of flavonoids, including anthocyanins and procyanidins, in plants by binding to the promoters of MdMYB9 and MdMYB11, or by binding directly to the LAR; both of these mechanisms further regulate the expression level of flavonoids [149]. The Arabidopsis AtDOF4 positively regulates the expression of late flavonoid genes (DFR, LDOX and TT19) and the MYB transcription factor PAP1 to promote the accumulation of flavonoids in plants [150]. In addition, the overexpression of MdWRKY11 in apple callus promotes the expression of F3H, FLS, DFR, ANS and UFGT, which increases the content of flavonoids and anthocyanins [151].

3.3. Non-Coding RNA Regulates Flavonoid Biosynthesis

In addition, flavonoid biosynthesis is also affected by non-coding RNA, such as lncRNA (long non-coding RNA) and microRNA [152]. lncRNA may act as a precursor and endogenous target mimic of miRNA in order to indirectly regulate protein-coding genes (PCgenes) [153]. lncRNA (MSTRG.9304 and XR_001591906) can regulate the expression of the CHS gene in peanut seed development [154]. miPEP858a-edited and miPEP858a-overexpressing lines can regulate flavonoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis, which also alters the growth and development of plants [155]. miR156 fine-tunes the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in poplar via the regulation of transcription factors, structural genes and other microRNAs [156].

4. The Roles of Flavonoid Compounds in Various Stresses

The dynamic changes in flavonoid compounds are not only regulated by plant growth and development, but are also affected by various environmental factors; these encompass both abiotic stresses, such as heavy metal stress, drought stress, UV, salt and low temperatures, and biotic stresses, including plant-parasitic nematodes, fungi and bacteria [157,158,159,160,161].

4.1. Biotic Stress

Various kinds of secondary metabolites that play important defense roles, including flavonoids, are produced when plants are infected with pathogens and pests and are suffering from biotic stresses [162]. Plants can be destroyed by various biotic stresses, such as bacteria, viruses, nematodes, fungi and insects [163]. Hypersensitive responses (HR) are a major element of plant disease resistance, and include the induction of lytic enzymes, the production of phytoalexins and the reinforcement of the cell wall [163,164,165]. Among these, phytoalexins are chemicals that play important roles in mediating plant responses to pests and pathogens [72]. Numerous studies have shown that some flavonoid compounds act as phytoalexins against pathogenic bacteria, fungi, and nematodes [72,166].

4.1.1. The Roles of Flavonoids in the Invasion of Nematodes

Plant-parasitic nematodes can destroy the host plant by causing wounds and infecting it with microbial diseases; this destruction leads to a massive yield loss and tremendous economic losses throughout the world [167,168]. When plant-parasitic nematodes damage plants, some brown spots, galls, spots, cysts, rotting or swelling is generally formed on the roots or on the aboveground tubers [169]. Flavonoids and their derivatives, for example, coumestrol and glyceollin, play a variety of roles in the interaction between plants and nematodes, and are stimulated by nematode invasion [170,171,172]. Coumestrol, an important phytoalexin, is an isoflavonoid-like compound that can be produced in the lima bean when it is suffering from Pratylenchus penetrans infection [173]. Moreover, the infection of soybean roots with the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) leads to an increase in the glyceollin content, which reduces the crop yield loss caused by nematodes [174]. In addition, the phytoalexin glyceollin is accumulated in the soybean root, and it has been found that there is an increase in its glyceollin content on the 2nd, 4th and 6th day after inoculation [72,175,176]. O-methyl-apigenin-C-deoxyhexoside-O-hexoside, a major phytoalexin in oat, has been extracted from the oat roots and shoots infected with nematodes; this was shown to reduce the invasion of cereal cyst nematodes significantly, including P. neglectus and H. avenae [72,177,178]. However, the defense mechanism of flavonoids against parasitic nematodes is still unclear.

4.1.2. The Roles of Flavonoids in the Invasion of Pathogenic Fungi

Tremendous crop yield losses occur in plants when they are invaded with several kinds of plant pathogenic fungi [179,180]. To escape from various kinds of biotic stresses, plants have evolved mechanisms to resist biotic stresses, and the production of phytoalexins is an effective method for defending against the invasion of pathogenic fungi [181,182,183]. The flavonol aglycone rhamnetin is a fungi-toxic phytoalexin that enhances the resistance of cucumber to a powdery mildew [72,184,185]. There is an increase in the content of nobiletin, heptamethoxyflavone, tangeretin and sinensetin in citrus fruits when they are infected with Phytophthora citrophthora, which is positively correlated with their antifungal effects [186,187]. Naringenin and hesperetin have been proven to be the best antifungal compounds in flavonoids [188]. An increase in the content of isoflavonoids in tangelo Nova fruits is detected when they are treated with 6-benzylaminopurine, and the fruit resistance is enhanced by 60% when suffering from the invasion of pathogenic fungus [72,189]. In addition, the content of several kinds of phytoalexin is increased in soybean cotyledons when they are treated with four Aspergillus species, and the content of coumestrol and phytoalexins glyceollin is the highest after infection with A. sojae and A. niger, respectively [190].

4.1.3. Antibacterial Effects of Flavonoids

Many researches have indicated that flavonoids can be used as antibacterial agents in plants to make them grow and develop better [191,192]. Plants can produce many kinds of phytoalexins, which are antimicrobial secondary metabolites, under various stresses, such as microbial attack [193,194]. Bean plants infected with Pseudomonas spp. produce antibacterial phytoalexins in bean leaves, which may enhance the plant’s resistance to Pseudomonas spp. [195]. It has been shown that there is an increase in coumestrol in the infected bean leaves, which blocks the bacterial colonization of P. mars-prunorum and P. phaseolicola [196]. There is also an increase in daidzein and coumestrol in soybean leaves when the plants are infected with non-pathogenic bacteria (P. lachrymans) and pathogenic bacteria (P. glycinea), indicating that coumestrol can inhibit pathogenic bacterial colonization and improve the plant’s resistance to P. glycinea [22,72]. Moreover, kievitone and phaseollinisoflavan also have antibacterial activity, which strongly inhibits the growth of Achromobacter and Xanthomonas species [72,197]. Recently, an isoflavonoid was proven to have a strong antagonistic effect on Staphylococcus aureus, which can be extracted from the roots of Erythrina poeppigiana [198,199].

4.2. Abiotic Stress

4.2.1. UV Stress

Plants can rapidly produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) when they suffer under high flux, long-term UV radiation and HL (high light), which cause oxidative damage to biomolecules (DNA, proteins, RNA and membranes) [200,201]. Under UV induction and HL, plants can produce flavonoids, mainly in their epidermal cells. As different flavonoid compounds have different UV absorption capacities, flavonoids can play important roles when plants suffer from UV induction and HL, being especially useful as a protective shield [202]. Previous studies have reported that flavonols, flavones, and anthocyanins are all involved in UV and high light stress protection in plants [203]. Under UV radiation, an increase in flavonoids, such as via the production of luteolin 7-O-glycosides and quercetin 3-O, improves their hydroxylation levels and strengthens their antioxidant activity, which contributes to the ROS-detoxification of the plant cell and relieves the oxidative damage caused by UV stress [204,205]. Compared with the content of kaempferol under UV-B radiation, there is a higher content of quercetin and a higher ratio of quercetin/kaempferol in the leaves of some plants, which indicate that UV-B radiation could induce the substitution of the orthodihydroxy B-ring in quercetin; this would increase their adaptive dissociation [203]. Compared with low-altitude plants, high-altitude plants are subjected to high UV-B exposure. There are higher levels of rhamnosylisoorientin and maysin in the leaves of high-altitude maize lines compared to those detected in the leaves of low-altitude maize lines, which indicates that these two flavones might play important protective roles against UV-B radiation via an adaptive response [206,207,208]. Moreover, UV radiation can cause the accumulation of anthocyanin in many plants, which improves the coloration in the fruit skin of apples and other fruits [209]. Coumaroyl and mustapoyl derivatives are formed by the acylation of anthocyanins and phenylpropanoid acids, which may increase UV absorption compared to anthocyanins alone. Therefore, coumaroyl and sinapoyl derivatives might play important roles under UV-B radiation stress [203,210]. As flavonoids contain phenolic hydroxyl groups, they also exhibit antioxidant activity in the development and growth of plants [211]. The abundant flavonoids in chloroplasts are mainly dihydroxy B-ring-substituted flavonoids, such as lignan and quercetin, which play important roles in the elimination of ROS [212,213]. Under excessive light stress, the H2O2 produced by chloroplasts can be accumulated in the vesicles, which can be further scavenged by flavonoid compounds [17,214]. The ROS can be generated in different cell types and subcellular regions, which can be scavenged by many kinds of flavonols [214,215].
Many genes associated with flavonoid biosynthesis could play important roles in plants under excessive light and UV stress, including structural genes (PAL, 4CL, CHS, DFR, CHI and F3’5’H) and transcription factors (MYB, bHLH, NAC, and bZIP) (Table 1). Under UV stress, the accumulation of photo-protectant flavonoids (e.g., flavones, isoflavonoids, neoflavonoids, flavanols, and anthocyanins) could absorb some harmful solar wave lengths (e.g., UV) in order to mitigate oxidative damage to cells, LDL or DNA [216,217].

4.2.2. Cold Stress

Cold stresses are common stresses during the process of growth and development in plants; these include chilling stress, with temperatures of 0–20 °C, and freezing stress, with temperatures of <0 °C [244,245], both of which can seriously affect plant growth and development and reduce crop productivity, especially for crops that are sensitive to low temperatures [246]. Chilling stress can affect plant growth from germination to maturity, and can also determine the distribution of plants around the world [247]. There are significant differences among various plants regarding when and how they suffer from chilling stress. Some plants can grow well at chilling temperatures, such as some overwintering cereals and Arabidopsis, while other plants struggle to survive at chilling temperatures, such as many tropical and subtropical plants (maize, rice and tobacco) [248,249]. Previous studies have reported that plants undergo a series of physiological and cellular changes under low-temperature conditions, including changes in calcium signal, photosynthesis, metabolism and membrane structure [248,250]. Freezing stress is much more harmful to plants than low-temperature stress, and may even lead to plant death. Under natural conditions, freezing damage starts from extracellular ice nucleation [251,252]. Once ice nuclei are formed, they gradually become larger and form ice crystals, which diffuse into the apoplast. In the apoplast, ice crystals can induce water outflow, which can lead to cell dehydration. When ice crystals diffuse into cells, irreversible damage occurs [252,253]. Flavonoids play an important role in coping with freezing stress. Schulz et al. [254] revealed that flavonoids are the determining factor in the freezing resistance and cold adaptation of Arabidopsis, which suggests that the complete loss or substantial reduction in flavonoids leads to the damage of the freezing resistance mechanism. Previous studies have reported that several flavonoids (flavones, flavonols, flavanols, and anthocyanins) display a strong resistance to cold stress. In Cryptomeria japonica, cold stress can enhance the production of anthocyanins, flavonoids and flavonols through the up-regulation of FLS, which provides a good basis for the molecular mechanism of response to cold stress in spruce [229]. In addition, an increase in anthocyanins in their epidermal cells can decrease the osmotic potential of cells and delay freezing through the surface nucleate [255]. When Fagopyrum tataricum was subjected to cold stress, the total content of anthocyanins in the epidermis and cortex cells of hypocotyl was twice those in cotyledons, which improved their cold resistance [233]. Moreover, many genes associated with flavonoid biosynthesis are up-regulated when suffering from cold stress, including structure genes (CHI, CHS, C4H, ANS, UFGT, F3H, and DFR) and TFs (MADS-box, bZIP, MYB, and bHLH), further confirming that flavonoids play a key role in enhancing cold resistance [233,234,235] (Table 1).

4.2.3. Salt Stress

Salinity stress is a major threat to global food production, which can inhibit plant growth and development through osmotic stress, cytotoxicity caused by the excessive absorption of Na+ and Cl, and nutritional deficiencies [256,257,258]. Research shows that 20% of the world’s irrigated land suffers from excess soluble salts [259]. The limiting effect of excess soluble salts in the soil on plant growth and development is mainly mediated through two mechanisms: osmotic stress and ion toxicity [260]. The increased ion concentration in soil causes a low solute/osmotic potential, reduces the ability of plant roots to uptake water, and eventually blocks plant growth and development [72]. Moreover, ion toxicity caused by sodium accumulation damages the cell membrane and disturbs various plant physiological processes, such as photosynthesis, respiration, transpiration and osmoregulation, which eventually cause plant necrosis or chlorosis [72,261]. Yan et al. [224] found that NaCl treatment significantly increases the content of flavonoid glycosides through the up-regulation of GMFNSII-1 and GMFNSII-2 in Glycine max, indicating that flavonoid glycosides play a positive role in enhancing salt tolerance. Salt stress also increases the luteolin content in Cajanus cajan by upregulating the expression level of CcPCL1 and CcF3′H-5, which greatly enhances the salt tolerance of plants [262]. Moreover, the content of flavonoids accumulates differentially between the roots and leaves of Solenostemma argel under salt stress; this improves the antioxidant capacity and osmoregulatory capacity of plants under salt stress [263]. Wang et al. [264] found that high salt stress (85 mmol/L) promotes anthocyanin biosynthesis in cultivated purple sweet potato, and that low salinity has a significant effect on the biosynthesis of phenolic acids and flavonols in the plant. Under low salt stress, plants can regulate genes to control the concentrations of cellular Na+ and K+ in plasma; however, they lose this ability under high salt stress. In addition, it has also been found that salt stress increases the content of isoflavones by regulating the expression of GMIFS1, which improves the antioxidant capacity and osmotic stress tolerance of soybean [228].

4.2.4. Drought Stress

Drought is a major environmental stress factor that affects various physiological and biochemical processes in plants [265,266]. To escape from environmental stresses, plants have evolved complex mechanisms to respond to stress at the physiological and biochemical levels, including the production of compatible osmolytes, endogenous hormonal changes, and molecular changes [267,268]. The plants mediate the balance between growth and resistance to stress by modulating the architecture of the root system and stomatal closure under moderate drought stress [269,270]. Plants can induce cellular protection against severe drought stress, modulate the antioxidant enzyme systems to remove ROS, and accumulate proteins to maintain cell turgor [271].
Flavonoids, including anthocyanins, flavonols, flavanols, and flavones, play a major role in the response to drought stress. Under drought stress conditions, plants can accumulate anthocyanins to protect them against excessive sunlight and prevent water loss by reducing stomatal transpiration and density; this allows them to survive in a severe drought environment [272]. The biosynthesis of catechin in the tea plant was shown to be induced under drought stress, increasing the plant’s ROS scavenging capacity and enhancing its drought stress tolerance [273]. There was an increase in cyanidin, delphinidin 3-O-glucoside, and cyanidin 3-O-glucoside in the calyx of Roselle Cultivars at physiological maturity under 35% water-loss stress [274]. There was an increase in the flavonoid content, total phenolic capacity and antioxidant capacity under water deficit stress in Peppermint [275]. Moreover, Mechri et al. [276] found that the concentrations of catechin, quercetin, luteolin 7-O-glucoside, and apigenin 7-O-glucoside in olive leaves increased after drought treatments, indicating that these phenolic compounds regulate the olive water status and reduce the oxidative damage caused by water deficit stress.
Numerous studies have shown that genes associated with flavonoid biosynthesis are regulated independently by drought stress, such as PAL, CHS, CHI, F3H, DFR, ANS, NAC, WRKY, bZIP, MYB, and bHLH (Table 1). For example, the expression level of TaCHS, TaCHI, TaF3H, TaFNS, TaFLS, TaDFR and TaANS in wheat has been shown to rapidly increase after drought stress, thus increasing the total contents of phenols, flavonoids, and anthocyanins [221,222,223]. Transcriptome analysis has indicated that several TFs (bHLH, NAC, MYB, and WRKY) play important roles in response to cold and drought stress during seed germination [242]. In addition, the transcriptome analysis of Cicer arietinum treated with drought stress was conducted, and the results showed that AP2-EREBP, bHLH, bZIP, MYB, NAC, WRKY and MADS were involved in the drought stress response [241].

4.2.5. Heavy Metal Stress

In recent decades, the rapid development of industry and the use of pesticides have caused heavy metal contamination in the soil [277]. Heavy metal stress has notable adverse effects on crop productivity and growth [278,279]. Heavy metals, including lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), zinc (Zn), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), arsenic (As), and silver (Ag), are present in dispersed form in rock formations, and are considered to be one of the potential threats to crop plant productivity [280,281]. Although all heavy metals are non-biodegradable and immobile, heavy metals can be absorbed by plant root systems via diffusion, endocytosis or through metal transporters [282]. Heavy metal stress causes the inactivation of enzymes and interferes with the substitution reactions of essential metal ions from biomolecules [279,283]. Heavy metal stress destroys the membrane integrity and alters the basic plant metabolic reactions, such as photosynthesis, respiration and homeostasis [284]. Moreover, heavy metal stress generates ROS, such as superoxide radical (O−2), hydroxyl radical (OH) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and the cytotoxic compound, which leads to lipid peroxidation; this damages biomolecules and destroys DNA strands [285].
In order to escape from environments containing heavy metals, plants have gradually evolved mechanisms to cope with these heavy metals. The functional roles of flavonoids in the response to heavy metal stress have received some attention [286]. For example, studies have shown that the contents of flavonols (quercetin and kaempferol) increases in Arabidopsis via the upregulation of FLS1 under lead stress (Pb) treatment, thus alleviating lead toxicity [230]. Cd stress has been shown to induce the accumulation of isoflavone compounds such as malonylolonin, medicarpin, coumestrol, formonetin, and medicarpin3-O-b-(60-malonylglucoside) in Medicago truncatula roots after Cd stress, thus alleviating Cd toxicity [287]. Moreover, Cd stress has been shown to increase the accumulation of anthocyanins via the upregulation of CHS and DFR in Azolla imbricata, thus improving their ROS scavenging ability and enhancing the tolerance of Azolla imbricata to Cd stress [288].

5. Transgenic Technologies Used in Enhancing Stress Resistance

In agricultural biotechnology, many techniques are used to alter the genetic structure of plants to produce genetically modified plants [289]. Transgenic technology can be used to improve plant traits (yield and quality), as well as to solve agricultural problems (biotic and abiotic stresses) [290,291].

5.1. Transgenic Technology Used in Enhancing UV and HL Resistance

Transgenic plants that carry structure genes and TFs for UV/HL tolerance are being developed, mainly by using Agrobacterium methods [292]. The overexpression of the CHS gene has been shown to enhances resistance to high levels of light in Arabidopsis leaves by increasing the content of anthocyanins [219]. The overexpression of the MnFNSI gene from Morus notabilis in tobacco has been shown to increase the content of flavones in leaves and enhance their tolerance to UV-B stress [293]. The heterologous expression of Pn2-ODD1 in Arabidopsis has also awarded plants tolerance to UV-B radiation and oxidative stress by increasing their antioxidant capacity [294]. Arabidopsis lacking ANS have been shown to be sensitive to high light levels due to the impairment of anthocyanin photoprotection [295]. Moreover, TFs involved in the flavonoid biosynthesis have been found to play important roles under UV stress. The overexpression of GmMYB12B2 in Arabidopsis promotes flavonoid biosynthesis and improves the tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis to salt and UV stress [236]. In transgenic apple, MdWRKY72 and MdBBX20 enhance the plant resistance to UV-B stress through the regulation of genes associated with anthocyanin biosynthesis (MdANS, MdDFR, MdUFGT, and MdMYB1) [243]. The overexpression of ANAC078 in Arabidopsis increases the content of anthocyanin, and enhances the tolerance of plants to HL stress, which is opposite to the ANAC078 mutant plants [148].

5.2. Transgenic Technology Used in Enhancing Salt Resistance

Transgenic plants that carry structure genes and TFs for salt tolerance are currently being developed. For example, the overexpression of EaCHS1 in tobacco has been shown to increase the production of downstream flavonoids and the expression of related genes in the phenylpropanoid pathway, and to maintain ROS homeostasis; this improves the plant’s resistance to salinity stress during seed germination and root development [220]. The overexpression of AtDFR in Brassica napus increases the content of anthocyanins, which enhances its salt tolerance in comparison with wild-type plants under high-salt stress conditions [231]. Moreover, transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing the wheat TaDFR-I gene augments the accumulation of anthocyanin and promotes the tolerance of plants to high salt penetration [232]. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing PnF3H significantly increase the expression level of resistance genes (AtSOS3, AtP5CS1, AtHKT1, AtCAT1 and AtAPX1), reduce the hydrogen peroxide content and enhance the salt and oxidative stress tolerance of plants [225]. Moreover, many TFs associated with flavonoid biosynthesis, such as WD40, MYB, bHLH, bZIP, NAC, WRKY, and MADS-box, played important roles in response to salt stress [223,296]. Transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing TaWD40 from Triticum aestivum significantly improves the tolerance of plants to salt osmotic stresses [240]. The overexpression of grapevine VvbHLH1 in Arabidopsis increases the flavonoid contents and enhances the salt tolerance of plants [237].

5.3. Transgenic Technology Used in Enhancing Drought Resistance

Transgenic plants carrying structure genes and TFs for drought tolerance have been reported [297]. For example, transgenic tobacco overexpressing the IbC4H gene from the purple sweet potato has been shown to significantly promote the biosynthesis of flavonoids such as anthocyanins and flavonols, enhance the ROS scavenging capacity of plants, and improve their drought resistance [218]. The overexpression of Lycium chinense LcF3H in tobacco also increases the flavan-3-ol content (including catechin and epicatechin) and improve the antioxidant system, which strengthens the drought stress tolerance of the plant [226]. In addition, the overexpression of EcbHLH57 from Eleusine coracana in tobacco leads to the accumulation of more flavonoids, such as flavonols and flavanols, and enhances the photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance; these factors significantly improve the tolerance of the plant to salt stress and drought stress [238]. The transgenic Arabidopsis that overexpresses ZmWRKY40 promotes the biosynthesis of flavonoids, increases POD and CAT activities, and reduces the ROS content, which improves the drought stress tolerance of the plant [298].

5.4. Transgenic Technology Used in Enhancing Low Temperature Resistance

Low temperatures significantly increase the content of flavonoids via the regulation of genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis [299]. The overexpression of SlF3H in tobacco plants strongly induces the expression of CHS, CHI, and FLS, and increases the contents of anthocyanins and other flavonoids; this improves the tolerance of the plant to cold stress [227]. Transgenic Arabidopsis that overexpress OrbHLH001 has been shown to increases the accumulation of flavonoids such as flavonols, anthocyanins, and flavanones through the regulation of CHS, CHI, F3H, and C4H, which enhance the tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis to freezing and salt stress [239]. The overexpression of SlNAM1 in tobacco plants accumulates many more anthocyanins and other flavonoids, thus improving the cold tolerance of the plants [300].

6. Conclusions and Future Prospects

The biosynthesis of flavonoids is the most studied pathway of secondary metabolism in plants. The defensive role of flavonoids in plants against various biotic and abiotic stresses was reviewed in Figure 3, and their significant contributions to plant resistance were also discussed. Flavonoids contain several subgroups, including anthocyanidins, flavonols, flavones, flavanols, flavanones, chalcones, dihydrochalcones and dihydroflavonols, which are widely distributed in various plants. However, the detailed functions of particular flavonoids are still not clear, and need to be explored. The roles of specialized flavonoids in response to various stresses are also worth evaluating. With the rapid advancements made in sequencing technology, there have been major achievements regarding the identification of candidate genes associated with flavonoid biosynthesis. Although many genes have been identified, some specific genes associated with certain important flavonoids are poorly understood, and need to be studied further. Although many researchers have explored the functions of genes associated with flavonoid biosynthesis through transgenic approaches, it may take a long time to verify their gene functions. It is evident that flavonoids play important protective roles against harmful biotic and abiotic stresses, but that the knowledge of flavonoids under various stresses is still incomplete and requires extensive research.

Author Contributions

T.W., Z.W., X.-C.S., Y.-H.L. and Y.-T.P. contributed equally in preparation of this manuscript. W.-B.Z. and X.-J.W. helped considerably in writing of this manuscript and made final corrections. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [32271916], Independent Scientific Research Project of Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province, and Chinese Academy of Sciences [JSPKLB202211].

Institutional Review Board Statement

All plants materials used in this study do not include any wild species at risk of extinction. No specific permits are required for sample collection in this study. We comply with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation for plant study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Santos, E.L.; Maia, B.; Ferriani, A.P.; Teixeira, S. Flavonoids: Classification, biosynthesis and chemical ecology. Flavonoids-Biosynth. Hum. Health 2017, 13, 78–94. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jakimiuk, K.; Wink, M.; Tomczyk, M. Flavonoids of the Caryophyllaceae. Phytochem. Rev. 2022, 21, 179–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Martens, S.; Mithöfer, A. Flavones and flavone synthases. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 2399–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yonekura-Sakakibara, K.; Higashi, Y.; Nakabayashi, R. The origin and evolution of plant flavonoid metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Middleton, E. Effect of plant flavonoids on immune and inflammatory cell function. Flavonoids Living Syst. 1998, 39, 175–182. [Google Scholar]
  6. Karak, P. Biological activities of flavonoids: An overview. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2019, 4, 1567–1574. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kozlowska, A.; Szostak-Wegierek, D. Flavonoids-food sources and health benefits. Rocz. Państwowego Zakładu Hig. 2014, 65, 53–78. [Google Scholar]
  8. García-Lafuente, A.; Guillamón, E.; Villares, A.; Rostagno, M.A.; Martínez, J.A. Flavonoids as anti-inflammatory agents: Implications in cancer and cardiovascular disease. Inflamm. Res. 2009, 58, 537–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. David, A.V.A.; Arulmoli, R.; Parasuraman, S. Overviews of biological importance of quercetin: A bioactive flavonoid. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2016, 10, 84. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sharma, A.; Shahzad, B.; Rehman, A.; Bhardwaj, R.; Landi, M.; Zheng, B. Response of phenylpropanoid pathway and the role of polyphenols in plants under abiotic stress. Molecules 2019, 24, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kisiriko, M.; Anastasiadi, M.; Terry, L.A.; Yasri, A.; Beale, M.H.; Ward, J.L. Phenolics from medicinal and aromatic plants: Characterisation and potential as biostimulants and bioprotectants. Molecules 2021, 26, 6343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Samanta, A.; Das, G.; Das, S.K. Roles of flavonoids in plants. Carbon 2011, 100, 12–35. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar, V.; Suman, U.; Yadav, S.K. Flavonoid secondary metabolite: Biosynthesis and role in growth and development in plants. In Recent Trends and Techniques in Plant Metabolic Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 19–45. [Google Scholar]
  14. Shirley, B.W. Flavonoid biosynthesis: ‘new’ functions for an ‘old’ pathway. Trends Plant Sci. 1996, 1, 377–382. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheynier, V.; Comte, G.; Davies, K.M.; Lattanzio, V.; Martens, S. Plant phenolics: Recent advances on their biosynthesis, genetics, and ecophysiology. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2013, 72, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Baskar, V.; Venkatesh, R.; Ramalingam, S. Flavonoids (antioxidants systems) in higher plants and their response to stresses. In Antioxidants and Antioxidant Enzymes in Higher Plants; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 253–268. [Google Scholar]
  17. Agati, G.; Azzarello, E.; Pollastri, S.; Tattini, M. Flavonoids as antioxidants in plants: Location and functional significance. Plant Sci. 2012, 196, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Agati, G.; Brunetti, C.; Di Ferdinando, M.; Ferrini, F.; Pollastri, S.; Tattini, M. Functional roles of flavonoids in photoprotection: New evidence, lessons from the past. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2013, 72, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Šamec, D.; Karalija, E.; Šola, I.; Vujčić Bok, V.; Sondi-Sondi, B. The role of polyphenols in abiotic stress response: The influence of molecular structure. Plants 2021, 10, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hussain, S.; Rao, M.J.; Anjum, M.A.; Ejaz, S.; Zakir, I.; Ali, M.A.; Niaz, A.; Shakeel, A. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense in plants under drought conditions. In Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 207–219. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mierziak, J.; Kostyn, K.; Kulma, A. Flavonoids as important molecules of plant interactions with the environment. Molecules 2014, 19, 16240–16265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bag, S.; Mondal, A.; Majumder, A.; Mondal, S.K.; Banik, A. Flavonoid mediated selective cross-talk between plants and beneficial soil microbiome. Phytochem. Rev. 2022, 21, 1739–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kaufman, P.B.; Chang, S.C.; Kirakosyan, A. Risks and benefits associated with genetically modified (GM) plants. In Recent Advances in Plant Biotechnology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 333–346. [Google Scholar]
  24. Van Esse, H.P.; Reuber, T.L.; Does, D. Genetic modification to improve disease resistance in crops. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mubeen, H.; Naqvi, R.Z.; Masood, A.; Shoaib, M.W.; Raza, S. Gene transformation: Methods, uses and applications. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2016, 4, 54. [Google Scholar]
  26. Niazian, M.; Noori, S.S.; Galuszka, P.; Mortazavian, S.M.M. Tissue culture-based Agrobacterium-mediated and in planta transformation methods. Soil Water Res. 2017, 53, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chownk, M.; Thakur, K.; Yadav, S.K. Retrospect and prospects of plant metabolic engineering. J. Plant Biochem. Biot. 2019, 28, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jan, R.; Asaf, S.; Numan, M.; Kim, K.M. Plant secondary metabolite biosynthesis and transcriptional regulation in response to biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chowdhury, S.; Basu, A.; Kundu, S. Overexpression of a new osmotin-like protein gene (SindOLP) confers tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses in sesame. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Panche, A.N.; Diwan, A.D.; Chandra, S.R. Flavonoids: An overview. J. Nutr. Sci. 2016, 5, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Upadhyay, S.K.; Singh, S.P. (Eds.) Plant Genome Engineering for Improved Flavonoids Production. In Plants as Bioreactors for Industrial Molecules; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 215–240. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shah, F.L.A.; Ramzi, A.B.; Baharum, S.N.; Noor, N.M.; Goh, H.H.; Leow, T.C.; Siti, N.O.; Suriana, S. Recent advancement of engineering microbial hosts for the biotechnological production of flavonoids. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 6647–6659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hussain, T.; Tan, B.; Murtaza, G.; Liu, G.; Rahu, N.; Kalhoro, M.S.; Hussain, K.D. Flavonoids and type 2 diabetes: Evidence of efficacy in clinical and animal studies and delivery strategies to enhance their therapeutic efficacy. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 152, 104629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dixon, R.A.; Achnine, L.; Kota, P.; Liu, C.J.; Reddy, M.S.; Wang, L. The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence—A genomics perspective. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2002, 3, 371–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zakaryan, H.; Arabyan, E.; Oo, A.; Zandi, K. Flavonoids: Promising natural compounds against viral infections. Arch. Virol. 2017, 162, 2539–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yan, J.; Yu, L.; Xu, S.; Gu, W.; Zhu, W. Apigenin accumulation and expression analysis of apigenin biosynthesis relative genes in celery. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 165, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meyer, H.; Bolarinwa, A.; Wolfram, G.; Linseisen, J. Bioavailability of apigenin from apiin-rich parsley in humans. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2006, 50, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Luca, S.V.; Macovei, I.; Bujor, A.; Miron, A.; Skalicka-Woźniak, K.; Aprotosoaie, A.C.; Trifan, A. Bioactivity of dietary polyphenols: The role of metabolites. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 626–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hostetler, G.L.; Ralston, R.A.; Schwartz, S.J. Flavones: Food sources, bioavailability, metabolism, and bioactivity. Adv. Nutr. 2017, 8, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Berim, A.; Gang, D.R. Methoxylated flavones: Occurrence, importance, biosynthesis. Phytochem. Rev. 2016, 15, 363–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bose, S.; Sarkar, D.; Bose, A.; Mandal, S.C. Natural flavonoids and its pharmaceutical importance. Pharmacol. Rev. 2018, 94, 61–75. [Google Scholar]
  42. Khan, J.; Deb, P.K.; Priya, S.; Medina, K.D.; Devi, R.; Walode, S.G.; Rudrapal, M. Dietary flavonoids: Cardioprotective potential with antioxidant effects and their pharmacokinetic, toxicological and therapeutic concerns. Molecules 2021, 26, 4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Khalid, M.; Bilal, M.; Huang, D.F. Role of flavonoids in plant interactions with the environment and against human pathogens—A review. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 211–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khoo, B.Y.; Chua, S.L.; Balaram, P. Apoptotic effects of chrysin in human cancer cell lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 2188–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Šeruga, M.; Tomac, I. Influence of chemical structure of some flavonols on their electrochemical behaviour. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2017, 12, 7616–7637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. de la Iglesia, R.; Milagro, F.I.; Campión, J.; Boqué, N.; Martínez, J.A. Healthy properties of proanthocyanidins. Biofactors 2010, 36, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. González-de-Peredo, A.V.; Vázquez-Espinosa, M.; Espada-Bellido, E.; Carrera, C.; Ferreiro-González, M.; Barbero, G.F.; Palma, M. Flavonol composition and antioxidant activity of onions (Allium cepa L.) based on the development of new analytical ultrasound-assisted extraction methods. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Proteggente, A.R.; Pannala, A.S.; Paganga, G.; Buren, L.V.; Wagner, E.; Wiseman, S.; Frans, P.; Dacombe, C.; Rice-Evans, C.A. The antioxidant activity of regularly consumed fruit and vegetables reflects their phenolic and vitamin C composition. Free Radic. Tes. 2002, 36, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Fiol, M.; Adermann, S.; Neugart, S.; Rohn, S.; Mügge, C.; Schreiner, M.; Krumbein, A.; Kroh, L.W. Highly glycosylated and acylated flavonols isolated from kale (Brassica oleracea var. sabellica)—Structure–antioxidant activity relationship. Food Res. Int. 2012, 47, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stewart, A.J.; Bozonnet, S.; Mullen, W.; Jenkins, G.I.; Lean, M.E.; Crozier, A. Occurrence of flavonols in tomatoes and tomato-based products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2663–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sekhon-Loodu, S.; Catalli, A.; Kulka, M.; Wang, Y.; Shahidi, F.; Rupasinghe, H.V. Apple flavonols and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid–rich fish oil lowers blood C-reactive protein in rats with hypercholesterolemia and acute inflammation. Nutr. Res. 2014, 34, 535–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Flamini, R.; Mattivi, F.; De, R.M.; Arapitsas, P.; Bavaresco, L. Advanced knowledge of three important classes of grape phenolics: Anthocyanins, stilbenes and flavonols. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 19651–19669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Larmo, P.S.; Yang, B.; Hurme, S.A.; Alin, J.A.; Kallio, H.P.; Salminen, E.K.; Tahvonen, R.L. Effect of a low dose of sea buckthorn berries on circulating concentrations of cholesterol, triacylglycerols, and flavonols in healthy adults. Eur. J. Nutr. 2009, 48, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xie, L.; Guo, Y.; Ren, C.; Cao, Y.; Li, J.; Lin, J.; Donald, G.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, B.; Sun, C.; et al. Unravelling the consecutive glycosylation and methylation of flavonols in peach in response to UV-B irradiation. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 2158–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rauter, A.P.; Ennis, M.; Hellwich, K.H.; Herold, B.J.; Horton, D.; Moss, G.P.; Schomburg, I. Nomenclature of flavonoids (IUPAC Recommendations 2017). Pure Appl. Chem. 2018, 90, 1429–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Colombo, P.S.; Flamini, G.; Christodoulou, M.S.; Rodondi, G.; Vitalini, S.; Passarella, D.; Fico, G. Farinose alpine Primula species: Phytochemical and morphological investigations. Phytochemistry 2014, 98, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kozłowska, A.; Szostak-Węgierek, D. Flavonoids–food sources, health benefits, and mechanisms involved. In Bioactive Molecules in Food; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 53–78. [Google Scholar]
  58. Barreca, D.; Trombetta, D.; Smeriglio, A.; Mandalari, G.; Romeo, O.; Felice, M.R.; Gattuso, G.; Nabavi, S.M. Food flavonols: Nutraceuticals with complex health benefits and functionalities. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 117, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pereira, A.M.; Cidade, H.; Tiritan, M.E. Stereoselective Synthesis of Flavonoids: A Brief Overview. Molecules 2023, 28, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Çetinkaya, S.; Akça, K.T.; Süntar, I. Flavonoids and anticancer activity: Structure–activity relationship. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2022, 74, 81–115. [Google Scholar]
  61. Peterson, J.J.; Dwyer, J.T.; Beecher, G.R.; Bhagwat, S.A.; Gebhardt, S.E.; Haytowitz, D.B.; Holden, J.M. Flavanones in oranges, tangerines (mandarins), tangors, and tangelos: A compilation and review of the data from the analytical literature. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, S66–S73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vandercook, C.E.; Stephenson, R.G. Lemon juice composition. Identification of major phenolic compounds and estimation by paper chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1966, 14, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, Y.; Liu, X.J.; Chen, J.B.; Cao, J.P.; Li, X.; Sun, C.D. Citrus flavonoids and their antioxidant evaluation. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 3833–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Najmanová, I.; Vopršalová, M.; Saso, L.; Mladěnka, P. The pharmacokinetics of flavanones. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 3155–3171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Abad-García, B.; Garmón-Lobato, S.; Berrueta, L.A.; Gallo, B.; Vicente, F. On line characterization of 58 phenolic compounds in Citrus fruit juices from Spanish cultivars by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode-array detection coupled to electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Talanta 2012, 99, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Patra, S.; Nayak, R.; Patro, S.; Pradhan, B.; Sahu, B.; Behera, C.; Bhutia, S.K.; Jena, M. Chemical diversity of dietary phytochemicals and their mode of chemoprevention. Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 30, e00633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Alam, M.A.; Subhan, N.; Rahman, M.M.; Uddin, S.J.; Reza, H.M.; Sarker, S.D. Effect of citrus flavonoids, naringin and naringenin, on metabolic syndrome and their mechanisms of action. Adv. Nutr. 2014, 5, 404–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Peterson, J.J.; Beecher, G.R.; Bhagwat, S.A.; Dwyer, J.T.; Gebhardt, S.E.; Haytowitz, D.B.; Holden, J.M. Flavanones in grapefruit, lemons, and limes: A compilation and review of the data from the analytical literature. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, S74–S80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Seyedrezazadeh, E.; Kolahian, S.; Shahbazfar, A.A.; Ansarin, K.; Pour Moghaddam, M.; Sakhinia, M.; Sakhinia, E.; Vafa, M. Effects of the flavanone combination Hesperetin-Naringenin, and orange and grapefruit juices, on airway inflammation and remodeling in a murine asthma model. Phytother. Res. 2015, 29, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Liu, Y.; Qian, J.; Li, J.; Xing, M.; Grierson, D.; Sun, C.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Chen, K. Hydroxylation decoration patterns of flavonoids in horticultural crops: Chemistry, bioactivity, and biosynthesis. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhab068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Chu, S.; Wang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, C.; Yang, W.; Tian, Z.; Cheng, H.; et al. An R2R3-type MYB transcription factor, GmMYB29, regulates isoflavone biosynthesis in soybean. PLoS Genet. 2017, 13, e1006770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Shah, A.; Smith, D.L. Flavonoids in agriculture: Chemistry and roles in, biotic and abiotic stress responses, and microbial associations. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kopečná-Zapletalová, M.; Krasulová, K.; Anzenbacher, P.; Hodek, P.; Anzenbacherová, E. Interaction of isoflavonoids with human liver microsomal cytochromes P450: Inhibition of CYP enzyme activities. Xenobiotica 2017, 47, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hummelova, J.; Rondevaldova, J.; Balastikova, A.; Lapcik, O.; Kokoska, L. The relationship between structure and in vitro antibacterial activity of selected isoflavones and their metabolites with special focus on antistaphylococcal effect of demethyltexasin. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 60, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lim, Y.J.; Jeong, H.Y.; Gil, C.S.; Kwon, S.J.; Na, J.K.; Lee, C.; Eom, S.H. Isoflavone accumulation and the metabolic gene expression in response to persistent UV-B irradiation in soybean sprouts. Food Chem. 2020, 303, 125376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hamayun, M.; Hussain, A.; Khan, S.A.; Irshad, M.; Khan, A.L.; Waqas, M.; Shahzad, R.; Iqbal, A.; Ullah, N.; Rehman, G.; et al. Kinetin modulates physio-hormonal attributes and isoflavone contents of soybean grown under salinity stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Meng, N.; Yu, B.J.; Guo, J.S. Ameliorative effects of inoculation with Bradyrhizobium japonicum on Glycine max and Glycine soja seedlings under salt stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 80, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Papuc, C.; Goran, G.V.; Predescu, C.N.; Nicorescu, V.; Stefan, G. Plant polyphenols as antioxidant and antibacterial agents for shelf-life extension of meat and meat products: Classification, structures, sources, and action mechanisms. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. F. 2017, 16, 1243–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mori-Yasumoto, K.; Hashimoto, Y.; Agatsuma, Y.; Fuchino, H.; Yasumoto, K.; Shirota, O.; Satake, M.; Sekita, S. Leishmanicidal phenolic compounds derived from Dalbergia cultrata. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 4907–4915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Yin, X.; Huang, A.; Zhang, S.; Liu, R.; Ma, F. Identification of three Dalbergia species based on differences in extractive components. Molecules 2018, 23, 2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lou, H.; Hu, L.; Lu, H.; Wei, T.; Chen, Q. Metabolic engineering of microbial cell factories for biosynthesis of flavonoids: A review. Molecules 2021, 26, 4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Aron, P.M.; Kennedy, J.A. Flavan-3-ols: Nature, occurrence and biological activity. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2008, 52, 79–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Yao, L.H.; Jiang, Y.M.; Shi, J.; Tomas-Barberan, F.A.; Datta, N.; Singanusong, R.; Chen, S.S. Flavonoids in food and their health benefits. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2004, 59, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dutta, M.S.; Mahapatra, P.; Ghosh, A.; Basu, S. Estimation of the reducing power and electrochemical behavior of few flavonoids and polyhydroxybenzophenones substantiated by bond dissociation energy: A comparative analysis. Mol. Divers. 2022, 26, 1101–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Krysa, M.; Szymańska-Chargot, M.; Zdunek, A. FT-IR and FT-Raman fingerprints of flavonoids—A review. Food Chem. 2022, 393, 133430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pico, J.; Xu, K.; Guo, M.; Mohamedshah, Z.; Ferruzzi, M.G.; Martinez, M.M. Manufacturing the ultimate green banana flour: Impact of drying and extrusion on phenolic profile and starch bioaccessibility. Food Chem. 2019, 297, 124990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, T.; Wei, X.; Miao, Z.; Hassan, H.; Song, Y.; Fan, M. Screening for antioxidant and antibacterial activities of phenolics from Golden Delicious apple pomace. Chem. Cent. J. 2016, 10, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pal, D.; Verma, P. Flavonoids: A powerful and abundant source of antioxidants. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 5, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  89. Ding, T.; Cao, K.; Fang, W.; Zhu, G.; Chen, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, L. Evaluation of phenolic components (anthocyanins, flavanols, phenolic acids, and flavonols) and their antioxidant properties of peach fruits. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 268, 109365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Awad, M.A.; Hadi, F.H. Effect of aqueous extract of green tea on gene expression of CYP17, CYP11A, LH beta subunit and LHr genes in males wistar rats exposed to oxidative stress by streptozotocin. J. Madenat Alelem Univ. Coll. 2019, 11, 6–15. [Google Scholar]
  91. Kumar, S.; Pandey, A.K. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: An overview. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 162750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Bartwal, A.; Mall, R.; Lohani, P.; Guru, S.K.; Arora, S. Role of secondary metabolites and brassinosteroids in plant defense against environmental stresses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 32, 216–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yang, S.; Mi, L.; Wu, J.; Liao, X.; Xu, Z. Strategy for anthocyanins production: From efficient green extraction to novel microbial biosynthesis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chen, B.H.; Stephen Inbaraj, B. Nanoemulsion and nanoliposome based strategies for improving anthocyanin stability and bioavailability. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Qaisar, U.; Afzal, M.; Tayyeb, A. Commercial Application of Plant pigments. Int. J. Biotech Trend. Technol. 2019, 9, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Fang, J. Classification of fruits based on anthocyanin types and relevance to their health effects. Nutrition 2015, 31, 1301–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Veberic, R.; Slatnar, A.; Bizjak, J.; Stampar, F.; Mikulic-Petkovsek, M. Anthocyanin composition of different wild and cultivated berry species. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Khoo, H.E.; Azlan, A.; Tang, S.T.; Lim, S.M. Anthocyanidins and anthocyanins: Colored pigments as food, pharmaceutical ingredients, and the potential health benefits. Food Nutr. Res. 2017, 61, 1361779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Mikulic-Petkovsek, M.; Slatnar, A.; Schmitzer, V.; Stampar, F.; Veberic, R.; Koron, D. Chemical profile of black currant fruit modified by different degree of infection with black currant leaf spot. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 150, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chaves-Silva, S.; Dos Santos, A.L.; Chalfun-Júnior, A.; Zhao, J.; Peres, L.E.; Benedito, V.A. Understanding the genetic regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in plants–tools for breeding purple varieties of fruits and vegetables. Phytochemistry 2018, 153, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Badhani, A.; Rawat, S.; Bhatt, I.D.; Rawal, R.S. Variation in Chemical Constituents and Antioxidant Activity in Y ellow H imalayan (R ubus ellipticus S mith) and Hill Raspberry (R ubus niveus T hunb.). J. Food Biochem. 2015, 39, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kim, A.N.; Lee, K.Y.; Jeong, E.J.; Cha, S.W.; Kim, B.G.; Kerr, W.L.; Choi, S.G. Effect of vacuum–grinding on the stability of anthocyanins, ascorbic acid, and oxidative enzyme activity of strawberry. Lwt 2021, 136, 110304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tohge, T.; de Souza, L.P.; Fernie, A.R. Current understanding of the pathways of flavonoid biosynthesis in model and crop plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 4013–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gho, Y.S.; Kim, S.; Jung, K.H. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase family is closely associated with response to phosphate deficiency in rice. Genes Genom. 2020, 42, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kim, J.I.; Hidalgo-Shrestha, C.; Bonawitz, N.D.; Franke, R.B.; Chapple, C. Spatio-temporal control of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis by inducible complementation of a cinnamate 4-hydroxylase mutant. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 3061–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Li, M.; Guo, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Jiang, X.; Liu, Y.; Xie, D.; Gao, L.; Xia, T. Molecular and biochemical characterization of two 4-coumarate: CoA ligase genes in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Plant Mol. Biol. 2022, 109, 579–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sun, T.; Li, S.; Song, X.; Pei, G.; Diao, J.; Cui, J.; Shi, M.; Chen, L.; Zhang, W. Re-direction of carbon flux to key precursor malonyl-CoA via artificial small RNAs in photosynthetic Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Wang, Y.; Chen, H.; Yu, O. A plant malonyl-CoA synthetase enhances lipid content and polyketide yield in yeast cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2014, 98, 5435–5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Zhao, C.; Liu, X.; Gong, Q.; Cao, J.; Shen, W.; Yin, X.; Grierson, D.; Zhang, B.; Xu, C.; Li, X. Three AP2/ERF family members modulate flavonoid synthesis by regulating type IV chalcone isomerase in citrus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 671–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Cheng, A.X.; Han, X.J.; Wu, Y.F.; Lou, H.X. The function and catalysis of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases involved in plant flavonoid biosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 1080–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Dastmalchi, M.; Dhaubhadel, S. Soybean chalcone isomerase: Evolution of the fold, and the differential expression and localization of the gene family. Planta 2015, 241, 507–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hacquard, S.; Wang, E.; Slater, H.; Martin, F. Impact of global change on the plant microbiome. Spec. Issue 2022, 234, 1907–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Baba, S.A.; Ashraf, N. Functional characterization of flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase, CsF3′ H, from Crocus sativus L: Insights into substrate specificity and role in abiotic stress. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2019, 667, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Roy, A.; Khan, A.; Ahmad, I.; Alghamdi, S.; Rajab, B.S.; Babalghith, A.O.; Alshahrani, M.Y.; Islam, S.; Islam, M. Flavonoids a bioactive compound from medicinal plants and its therapeutic applications. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 5445291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sun, L.; Fan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Sun, H.; Liu, C. Transcriptome analysis of genes involved in anthocyanins biosynthesis and transport in berries of black and white spine grapes (Vitis davidii). Hereditas 2016, 153, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Li, H.; Tian, J.; Yao, Y.Y.; Zhang, J.; Song, T.T.; Li, K.T.; Yao, Y.C. Identification of leucoanthocyanidin reductase and anthocyanidin reductase genes involved in proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Malus crabapple plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 139, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ma, S.; Hu, R.; Ma, J.; Fan, J.; Wu, F.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Feng, G.; Li, D.; Nei, G.; et al. Integrative analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome provides insights into the mechanisms of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins biosynthesis in Trifolium repens. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 187, 115529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Rauf, A.; Imran, M.; Abu-Izneid, T.; Iahtisham, U.H.; Patel, S.; Pan, X.; Naz, S.; Silva, A.S.; Saeed, F.; Suleria, H.A.R. Proanthocyanidins: A comprehensive review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 116, 108999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Dongbao, C.A.I.; Xusheng, L.I.; Jianxia, S.U.N.; Weibin, B.A.I. Advances in the Techniques of Stabilizing Anthocyanin. Future Food Sci. 2021, 1, 1. [Google Scholar]
  120. Guo, N.; Cheng, F.; Wu, J.; Liu, B.; Zheng, S.; Liang, J.; Wang, X. Anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in Brassica rapa. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Ni, J.; Zhao, Y.; Tao, R.; Yin, L.; Gao, L.; Strid, A.; Qian, M.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Shen, J.; et al. Ethylene mediates the branching of the jasmonate-induced flavonoid biosynthesis pathway by suppressing anthocyanin biosynthesis in red Chinese pear fruits. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1223–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Xu, W.; Dubos, C.; Lepiniec, L. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis by MYB–bHLH–WDR complexes. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Fenn, M.A.; Giovannoni, J.J. Phytohormones in fruit development and maturation. Plant J. 2021, 105, 446–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Corso, M.; Perreau, F.; Mouille, G.; Lepiniec, L. Specialized phenolic compounds in seeds: Structures, functions, and regulations. Plant Sci. 2020, 296, 110471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Guo, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhai, Z.; Huang, T.; Zhao, D.; Peng, X.; Feng, C.; Xiao, Y.; Li, T. Transcriptomic analysis of light-dependent anthocyanin accumulation in bicolored cherry fruits. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 130, 663–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sukumari Nath, V.; Kumar Mishra, A.; Kumar, A.; Matoušek, J.; Jakše, J. Revisiting the role of transcription factors in coordinating the defense response against citrus bark cracking viroid infection in commercial hop (Humulus Lupulus L.). Viruses 2019, 11, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Li, K.; Xing, C.; Yao, Z.; Huang, X. Pbr MYB 21, a novel MYB protein of Pyrus betulaefolia, functions in drought tolerance and modulates polyamine levels by regulating arginine decarboxylase gene. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1186–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Qin, W.; Xie, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Fu, X.; Chen, T.; Hassani, D.; Li, L.; Sun, X.; Tang, K. An R2R3-MYB transcription factor positively regulates the glandular secretory trichome initiation in Artemisia annua L. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 657156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Czemmel, S.; Heppel, S.C.; Bogs, J. R2R3 MYB transcription factors: Key regulators of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in grapevine. Protoplasma 2012, 249, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Anwar, M.; Yu, W.; Yao, H.; Zhou, P.; Allan, A.C.; Zeng, L. NtMYB3, an R2R3-MYB from narcissus, regulates flavonoid biosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Xu, F.; Ning, Y.; Zhang, W.; Liao, Y.; Li, L.; Cheng, H.; Cheng, S. An R2R3-MYB transcription factor as a negative regulator of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in Ginkgo biloba. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2014, 14, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Yan, J.; Wang, B.; Zhong, Y.; Yao, L.; Cheng, L.; Wu, T. The soybean R2R3 MYB transcription factor GmMYB100 negatively regulates plant flavonoid biosynthesis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 89, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Premathilake, A.T.; Ni, J.; Bai, S.; Tao, R.; Ahmad, M.; Teng, Y. R2R3-MYB transcription factor PpMYB17 positively regulates flavonoid biosynthesis in pear fruit. Planta 2020, 252, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Sun, Z.; Linghu, B.; Hou, S.; Liu, R.; Wang, L.; Hao, Y.; Han, Y.; Zhou, M.; Liu, L.; Li, H. Tartary buckwheat FtMYB31 gene encoding an R2R3-MYB transcription factor enhances flavonoid accumulation in Tobacco. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 564–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yuan, Y.; Qi, L.; Yang, J.; Wu, C.; Liu, Y.; Huang, L. A Scutellaria baicalensis R2R3-MYB gene, SbMYB8, regulates flavonoid biosynthesis and improves drought stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 120, 961–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Cultrone, A.; Cotroneo, P.S.; Reforgiato Recupero, G. Cloning and molecular characterization of R2R3-MYB and bHLH-MYC transcription factors from Citrus sinensis. Tree Genet. Genomes 2010, 6, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Qi, Y.; Zhou, L.; Han, L.; Zou, H.; Miao, K.; Wang, Y. PsbHLH1, a novel transcription factor involved in regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 154, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Li, S. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis: Fine-tuning of the MYB-bHLH-WD40 (MBW) complex. Plant Signal. Behav. 2014, 9, e27522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Mano, H.; Ogasawara, F.; Sato, K.; Higo, H.; Minobe, Y. Isolation of a regulatory gene of anthocyanin biosynthesis in tuberous roots of purple-fleshed sweet potato. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1252–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Zhao, L.; Gao, L.; Wang, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, H.; Wei, C.; Wan, X.; Xia, T. The R2R3-MYB, bHLH, WD40, and related transcription factors in flavonoid biosynthesis. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2013, 13, 75–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Ding, B.; Patterson, E.L.; Holalu, S.V.; Li, J.; Johnson, G.A.; Stanley, L.E.; Greenlee, A.B.; Peng, F.; Bradshaw, H.D., Jr.; Blinov, M.L.; et al. Two MYB proteins in a self-organizing activator-inhibitor system produce spotted pigmentation patterns. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, 802–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Qian, Y.; Zhang, T.; Yu, Y.; Gou, L.; Yang, J.; Xu, J.; Pi, E. Regulatory mechanisms of bHLH transcription factors in plant adaptive responses to various abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 677611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Li, C.F.; Zhu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Q.Y.; Wang, S.J.; Wang, X.C.; Yao, M.Z.; Luo, D.; Li, X.; Chen, L. Global transcriptome and gene regulation network for secondary metabolite biosynthesis of tea plant (Camellia sinensis). BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Qiu, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, D.; Yu, B.; Hui, Q.; Yan, S.; Huang, Z.; Cui, X.; Cao, B. Identification of candidate HY5-dependent and-independent regulators of anthocyanin biosynthesis in tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019, 60, 643–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Outchkourov, N.S.; Karlova, R.; Hölscher, M.; Schrama, X.; Blilou, I.; Jongedijk, E.; Simon, C.D.; van Dijk, A.D.J.; Bosch, D.; Hall, R.D. Transcription factor-mediated control of anthocyanin biosynthesis in vegetative tissues. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 1862–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Malacarne, G.; Coller, E.; Czemmel, S.; Vrhovsek, U.; Engelen, K.; Goremykin, V.; Bogs, J.; Moser, C. The grapevine VvibZIPC22 transcription factor is involved in the regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 3509–3522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Singh, D.; Singh, H.; Singh, N.; Dwivedi, S.; Trivedi, T.P. Tobacco HY5, NtHY5, positively regulates flavonoid biosynthesis and enhances salt stress tolerance. bioRxiv 2022, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Morishita, T.; Kojima, Y.; Maruta, T.; Nishizawa-Yokoi, A.; Yabuta, Y.; Shigeoka, S. Arabidopsis NAC transcription factor, ANAC078, regulates flavonoid biosynthesis under high-light. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 2210–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. An, X.H.; Tian, Y.; Chen, K.Q.; Liu, X.J.; Liu, D.D.; Xie, X.B.; Cheng, C.G.; Cong, P.H.; Hao, Y.J. MdMYB9 and MdMYB11 are involved in the regulation of the JA-induced biosynthesis of anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin in apples. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 650–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Skirycz, A.; Jozefczuk, S.; Stobiecki, M.; Muth, D.; Zanor, M.I.; Witt, I.; Mueller-Roeber, B. Transcription factor AtDOF4; 2 affects phenylpropanoid metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2007, 175, 425–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Wang, N.; Liu, W.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, S.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, C.; Chen, X. Transcriptomic analysis of red-fleshed apples reveals the novel role of MdWRKY11 in flavonoid and anthocyanin biosynthesis. J Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 7076–7086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Cao, M.; Pang, S.; Li, W.; Kato-Noguchi, H.; Jin, B. Identification and characterization of long non-coding RNAs regulating flavonoid biosynthesis in Ginkgo biloba leaves. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 158, 112980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Liu, X.; Tang, N.; Xu, F.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, X.; Ye, J.; Liao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Kim, S.; Wu, P.; et al. SMRT and Illumina RNA sequencing reveal the complexity of terpenoid biosynthesis in Zanthoxylum armatum. Tree Physiol. 2022, 42, 664–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ma, X.; Zhang, X.; Traore, S.M.; Xin, Z.; Yin, D. Genome-wide identification and analysis of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) during seed development in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sharma, A.; Badola, P.K.; Bhatia, C.; Sharma, D.; Trivedi, P.K. Primary transcript of miR858 encodes regulatory peptide and controls flavonoid biosynthesis and development in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 1262–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Shen, N.; Wang, T.; Gan, Q.; Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Jin, B. Plant flavonoids: Classification, distribution, biosynthesis, and antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2022, 383, 132531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. ul Haq, S.; Khan, A.; Ali, M.; Khattak, A.M.; Gai, W.X.; Zhang, H.X.; Wei, M.; Gong, Z.H. Heat shock proteins: Dynamic biomolecules to counter plant biotic and abiotic stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Bajaj, R.; Huang, Y.; Gebrechristos, S.; Mikolajczyk, B.; Brown, H.; Prasad, R.; Varma, A.; Kathryn, E.; Bushley. Transcriptional responses of soybean roots to colonization with the root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica reveals altered phenylpropanoid and secondary metabolism. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Rodziewicz, P.; Swarcewicz, B.; Chmielewska, K.; Wojakowska, A.; Stobiecki, M. Influence of abiotic stresses on plant proteome and metabolome changes. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014, 36, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ramakrishna, A.; Ravishankar, G.A. Role of plant metabolites in abiotic stress tolerance under changing climatic conditions with special reference to secondary compounds. Clim. Change Plant Abiotic Stress Toler. 2013, 26, 705–726. [Google Scholar]
  161. Mareri, L.; Parrotta, L.; Cai, G. Environmental Stress and Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ahmed, E.; Arshad, M.; Khan, M.Z.; Amjad, M.S.; Ahmad, S. Secondary metabolites and their multidimensional prospective in plant life. J. Pharm. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 205–214. [Google Scholar]
  163. Gupta, A.; Bano, A.; Rai, S.; Dubey, P.; Khan, F.; Pathak, N.; Sharma, S. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): A sustainable agriculture to rescue the vegetation from the effect of biotic stress: A Review. Lett. Appl. NanoBiosci. 2021, 10, 2459–2465. [Google Scholar]
  164. Singh, V.K.; Upadhyay, R.S. The hypersensitive response: A case of cell death induction in plants. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2013, 2, 1828–1832. [Google Scholar]
  165. Thakker, J.N.; Patel, S.; Dhandhukia, P.C. Induction of defense-related enzymes in banana plants: Effect of live and dead pathogenic strain of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. Int. Schol. Res. Not. 2013, 2013, 601303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Sindhu, S.S.; Sehrawat, A.; Sharma, R.; Dahiya, A. Biopesticides: Use of rhizosphere bacteria for biological control of plant pathogens. Def. Sci. J. 2016, 1, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Molinari, S. Natural genetic and induced plant resistance, as a control strategy to plant-parasitic nematodes alternative to pesticides. Plant Cell Rep. 2011, 30, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Tuncsoy, B. Nematicidal activity of silver nanomaterials against plant-parasitic nematodes. In Silver Nanomaterials for Agri-Food Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 527–548. [Google Scholar]
  169. Oka, Y.; Koltai, H.; Bar-Eyal, M.; Mor, M.; Sharon, E.; Chet, I.; Spiegel, Y. New strategies for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes. Pest Manag. Sci. 2000, 56, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Lindell, K.J.; Riley, I.T.; Davies, K.A.; Oldach, K.H. Characterization of resistance to Pratylenus thorni (Nematoda) in wheat (Triticum aestivum): Attraction, tension, utility, and reproduction. Phytopathology 2014, 104, 174–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Desmedt, W.; Mangelinckx, S.; Kyndt, T.; Vanholme, B. A phytochemical perspective on plant defense against nematodes. Front Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 602079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Makhwedzhana, M.M. Nematode Resistance and Resistance Mechanism in Sweet Potato Cultivars ‘Bophelo’, ‘Bosbok’ and Mvuvhelo’ to Meloidogyne incognita. Master’s Thesis, University of Limpopo, Mankweng, South Africa, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  173. Chin, S.; Behm, C.A.; Mathesius, U. Functions of flavonoids in plant–nematode interactions. Plants 2018, 7, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Lozano, J.; Smant, G. Survival of plant-parasitic nematodes inside the host. Mol. Physiol. Basis Nematode Surviv. 2011, 13, 697–701. [Google Scholar]
  175. Al-Muwayhi, M.A.R. Biotic stress as a defense mechanism in soybean (Glycine max L.) toward microbial pathogen: Biochemical and physiological pathways study. Life Sci. J. 2020, 17, 24–36. [Google Scholar]
  176. Hammerschmidt, R. How glyphosate affects plant disease development: It is more than enhanced susceptibility. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 1054–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Walters, D. Plant defense: Warding off attack by pathogens, herbivores and parasitic plants. Q. Rev. Biol. 2011, 86, 356–357. [Google Scholar]
  178. Smant, G.; Jones, J. Suppression of plant defences by nematodes. Genomics and Molecular Genetics of Plant-Nematode Interactions; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 273–286. [Google Scholar]
  179. González-Fernández, R.; Prats, E.; Jorrín-Novo, J.V. Proteomics of plant pathogenic fungi. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2010, 2010, 932527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Suprapta, D.N. Potential of microbial antagonists as biocontrol agents against plant fungal pathogens. J. ISSAAS 2012, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  181. Parmar, N.; Singh, K.H.; Sharma, D.; Singh, L.; Kumar, P.; Nanjundan, J.; Khan, Y.J.; Chauhan, D.K.; Thakur, A.K. Genetic engineering strategies for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance and quality enhancement in horticultural crops: A comprehensive review. 3 Biotech. 2017, 7, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Saddique, M.; Kamran, M.; Shahbaz, M. Differential responses of plants to biotic stress and the role of metabolites. In Plant Metabolites and Regulation under Environmental Stress; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 69–87. [Google Scholar]
  183. Meena, M.; Yadav, G.; Sonigra, P.; Nagda, A.; Mehta, T.; Swapnil, P.; Harish; Marwal, A. Role of elicitors to initiate the induction of systemic resistance in plants to biotic stress. Plant Stress 2022, 5, 100103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Alkahtani, M.; Omer, S.A.; El-Naggar, M.A.; Abdelkareem, E.M.; Mahmoud, M.A. Pathogenesis-related protein and phytoalexin induction against cucumber powdery mildew by elicitors. Int. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 2, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Farahat, G. Potential Impacts of Copper Sulfate and Sodium Silicate Salts of Maize Late Wilt Disease and Synthase of Anti-defense Compounds. Environ. Biodivers. Soil Secur. 2019, 3, 269–282. [Google Scholar]
  186. Ortuño, A.; Díaz, L.; Alvarez, N.; Porras, I.; Garcia-Lidon, A.; Del Rio, J.A. Comparative study of flavonoid and scoparone accumulation in different Citrus species and their susceptibility to Penicillium digitatum. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. François, G.A.; de Moraes Pontes, J.G.; Pereira, A.K.; Fill, T.P. Exploring the Citrus Sour Rot pathogen: Biochemical aspects, virulence factors, and strategies for disease management-a review. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2022, 41, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Del Río, J.A.; Gómez, P.; Baidez, A.G.; Arcas, M.C.; Botía, J.M.; Ortuño, A. Changes in the levels of polymethoxyflavones and flavanones as part of the defense mechanism of Citrussinensis (cv. Valencia Late) fruits against Phytophthora citrophthora. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 1913–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Ortuno, A.; Arcas, M.C.; Botia, J.M.; Fuster, M.D.; Del Río, J.A. Increasing resistance against Phytophthora citrophthora in tangelo Nova fruits by modulating polymethoxyflavones levels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2836–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Boué, S.M.; Carter, C.H.; Ehrlich, K.C.; Cleveland, T.E. Induction of the soybean phytoalexins coumestrol and glyceollin by Aspergillus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2167–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Xie, Y.; Yang, W.; Tang, F.; Chen, X.Q.; Ren, L.C. Antibacterial activities of flavonoids: Structure-activity relationship and mechanism. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 132–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Górniak, I.; Bartoszewski, R.; Króliczewski, J. Comprehensive review of antimicrobial activities of plant flavonoids. Phytochem. Rev. 2019, 18, 241–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Tiku, A.R. Antimicrobial compounds (phytoanticipins and phytoalexins) and their role in plant defense. In Co-Evolution of Secondary Metabolites; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 845–868. [Google Scholar]
  194. Sharma, I.; Thakur, A.; Sharma, A.; Singh, N.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, A. Phytoalexins: Implications in Plant Defense and Human Health. In Plant Secondary Metabolites; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2022; pp. 329–353. [Google Scholar]
  195. Gnanamanickam, S.S.; Smith, D.A. Selective toxicity of isoflavonoid phytoalexins to gram-positive bacteria. Phytopathology 1980, 70, 894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Lyon, F.M.; Wood, R.K.S. Production of phaseollin, coumestrol and related compounds in bean leaves inoculated with Pseudomonas spp. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1975, 6, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Li, P.; Ruan, Z.; Fei, Z.; Yan, J.; Tang, G. Integrated transcriptome and metabolome analysis revealed that flavonoid biosynthesis may dominate the resistance of Zanthoxylum bungeanum against stem canker. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 6360–6378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Sato, M.; Tanaka, H.; Tani, N.; Nagayama, M.; Yamaguchi, R. Different antibacterial actions of isoflavones isolated from Erythrina poeppigiana against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 43, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. de Barros, K.M.A.; Sardi, J.C.O.; Maria-Neto, S.; Macedo, A.J.; Ramalho, S.R. A new Kunitz trypsin inhibitor from Erythrina poeppigiana exhibits antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties against bacteria. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 144, 112198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Leney, A.C.; Heck, A.J.R. Native mass spectrometry: What is in the name? J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectr. 2016, 28, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Pisoschi, A.M.; Pop, A. The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative stress: A review. Eur. J. Medi. Chem. 2015, 97, 55–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Saewan, N.; Jimtaisong, A. Photoprotection of natural flavonoids. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 3, 129–141. [Google Scholar]
  203. Ferreyra, M.L.F.; Serra, P.; Casati, P. Recent advances on the roles of flavonoids as plant protective molecules after UV and high light exposure. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 736–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Brunetti, C.; Di Ferdinando, M.; Fini, A.; Pollastri, S.; Tattini, M. Flavonoids as antioxidants and developmental regulators: Relative significance in plants and humans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 3540–3555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Ferdinando, M.D.; Brunetti, C.; Fini, A.; Brunetti, C.; Di Ferdinando, M. Flavonoids as antioxidants in plants under abiotic stresses. In Abiotic Stress Responses Plants; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 159–179. [Google Scholar]
  206. Casati, P.; Walbot, V. Differential accumulation of maysin and rhamnosylisoorientin in leaves of high-altitude landraces of maize after UV-B exposure. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 788–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Casasa, M.I.; Falcone-Ferreyrac, M.L.; Nan, J.; Mejía-Guerra, M.K.; Rodríguez, E.; Wilson, T.; Engelmeier, J.; Casati, P.; Grotewold, E. Identification and characterization of maize salmon silks genes involved in 1 insecticidal maysin biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 1297–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Righini, S.; Rodriguez, E.J.; Berosich, C.; Grotewold, E.; Casati, P.; Ferreyra, M.L.F. Apigenin produced by maize flavone synthase I and II protects plants against UV-B-induced damage. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 495–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Honda, C.; Moriya, S. Anthocyanin biosynthesis in apple fruit. Horticult. J. 2018, 87, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Tohge, T.; de Souza, L.P.; Fernie, A.R. On the natural diversity of phenylacylated-flavonoid and their in planta function under conditions of stress. Phytochem. Rev. 2018, 17, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Benavente-Garcıa, O.; Castillo, J.; Lorente, J.; Ortuño, A.; Del Rio, J.A. Antioxidant activity of phenolics extracted from Olea europaea L. leaves. Food Chem. 2000, 68, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Galvez-Valdivesio, G.; Mullineaux, P. The role of reactive oxygen species in signalling from chloroplasts to the nucleus. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 138, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Pourcel, L.; Routaboul, J.M.; Cheynier, V.; Lepiniec, L.; Debeaujon, I. Debeaujon, Flavonoid oxidation in plants: From biochemical properties to physiological functions. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 12, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Laoué, J.; Fernandez, C.; Ormeño, E. Plant flavonoids in mediterranean species: A focus on flavonols as protective metabolites under climate stress. Plants 2022, 11, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Li, W.; Tan, L.; Zou, Y.; Tan, X.Q.; Huang, J.C.; Chen, W.; Tang, Q. The effects of ultraviolet A/B treatments on anthocyanin accumulation and gene expression in dark-purple tea cultivar ‘Ziyan’(Camellia sinensis). Molecules 2020, 25, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Dong, N.Q.; Lin, H.X. Contribution of phenylpropanoid metabolism to plant development and plant–environment interactions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 180–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Chinnusamy, V.; Zhu, J.K.; Sunkar, R. Gene regulation during cold stress acclimation in plants. In Plant Stress Tolerance: Methods and Protocols; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 39–55. [Google Scholar]
  218. Song, X.; Diao, J.; Ji, J.; Wang, G.; Guan, C.; Jin, C.; Wang, Y. Molecular cloning and identification of a flavanone 3-hydroxylase gene from Lycium chinense, and its overexpression enhances drought stress in tobacco. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 98, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Li, H.; Li, D.; Yang, Z.; Zeng, Q.; Luo, Y.; He, N. Flavones produced by mulberry flavone synthase type I constitute a defense line against the ultraviolet-B stress. Plants 2020, 9, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Kim, J.; Lee, W.J.; Vu, T.T.; Jeong, C.Y.; Hong, S.W.; Lee, H. High accumulation of anthocyanins via the ectopic expression of AtDFR confers significant salt stress tolerance in Brassica napus L. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 1215–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Ma, D.; Sun, D.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Guo, T. Expression of flavonoid biosynthesis genes and accumulation of flavonoid in wheat leaves in response to drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 80, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Meraj, T.A.; Fu, J.; Raza, M.A.; Zhu, C.; Shen, Q.; Xu, D.; Wang, Q. Transcriptional factors regulate plant stress responses through mediating secondary metabolism. Genes 2020, 11, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Li, H.; Yue, H.; Xie, J.; Bu, J.; Li, L.; Xin, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yang, L.; Wang, J.; et al. Transcriptomic profiling of the high-vigour maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid variety response to cold and drought stresses during seed germination. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Song, Z.; Yang, Q.; Dong, B.; Li, N.; Wang, M.; Du, T.; Liu, N.; Niu, L.; Jin, H.; Meng, D. Melatonin enhances stress tolerance in pigeon pea by promoting flavonoid enrichment, particularly luteolin in response to salt stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 5992–6008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Fang, H.; Qi, X.; Li, Y.; Yu, X.; Liu, X. De novo transcriptomic analysis of light-induced flavonoid pathway, transcription factors in the flower buds of Lonicera japonica. Trees 2020, 34, 267–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Babitha, K.C.; Vemanna, R.S.; Nataraja, K.N.; Udayakumar, M. Overexpression of EcbHLH57 transcription factor from Eleusine coracana L. in tobacco confers tolerance to salt, oxidative and drought stress. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0137098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Li, F.; Guo, S.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, D.; Chong, K.; Xu, Y. Overexpression of a homopeptide repeat-containing bHLH protein gene (OrbHLH001) from Dongxiang Wild Rice confers freezing and salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2010, 29, 977–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Salehi-Lisar, S.Y.; Bakhshayeshan-Agdam, H. Drought stress in plants: Causes, consequences, and tolerance. In Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  229. Chalker-Scott, L. Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress responses. Photochem. Photobiol. 1999, 70, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Aloui, A.; Dumas-Gaudot, E.; Daher, Z.; van Tuinen, D.; Aschi-Smit, S.; Morandi, D. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation on cadmium induced Medicago truncatula root isoflavonoid accumulation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 60, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Shin, D.H.; Choi, M.G.; Kang, C.S.; Par, C.S.; Choi, S.B.; Park, Y.I. Overexpressing the wheat dihydroflavonol 4-reductase gene TaDFR increases anthocyanin accumulation in an Arabidopsis dfr mutant. Genes Genom. 2016, 38, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Li, C.; Liu, S.; Yao, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, T.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, P.; Chen, K. PnF3H, a flavanone 3-hydroxylase from the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans, confers tolerance to salt stress and ABA treatment in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 83, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Jeon, J.; Kim, J.K.; Wu, Q.; Park, S.U. Effects of cold stress on transcripts and metabolites in tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 155, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Song, Y.; Feng, J.; Liu, D.; Long, C. Different Phenylalanine Pathway Responses to Cold Stress Based on Metabolomics and Transcriptomics in Tartary Buckwheat Landraces. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 687–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Seleiman, M.F.; Aslam, M.T.; Alhammad, B.A.; Hassan, M.U.; Maqbool, R.; Chattha, M.U.; Khan, I.; Gitari, H.I.; Uslu, O.S.; Roy, R. Salinity stress in wheat: Effects, mechanisms and management strategies. Phyton 2022, 91, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Hu, J.; Fang, H.; Wang, J.; Yue, X.; Chen, X. Ultraviolet B-induced MdWRKY72 expression promotes anthocyanin synthesis in apple. Plant Sci. 2020, 292, 110377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Hussain, S.S.; Kayani, M.A.; Amjad, M. Transcription factors as tools to engineer enhanced drought stress tolerance in plants. Biotechnol. Progr. 2011, 27, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Wang, C.T.; Ru, J.N.; Liu, Y.W.; Yang, J.F.; Li, M.; Xu, Z.S.; Fu, J.D. The maize WRKY transcription factor ZmWRKY40 confers drought resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Li, X.D.; Zhuang, K.Y.; Liu, Z.M.; Yang, D.Y.; Ma, N.N.; Meng, Q.W. Overexpression of a novel NAC-type tomato transcription factor, SlNAM1, enhances the chilling stress tolerance of transgenic tobacco. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 204, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Wang, F.; Zhu, H.; Chen, D.; Li, Z.; Peng, R.; Yao, Q. A grape bHLH transcription factor gene, VvbHLH1, increases the accumulation of flavonoids and enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cul. 2016, 125, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Jiao, X.; Teng, Y.; Zhan, Y.; Wu, J.; Lin, X. Soil heavy metal pollution and risk assessment in Shenyang industrial district, Northeast China. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Kumar, M.; Chauhan, A.S.; Yusuf, M.A.; Sanyal, I.; Chauhan, P. Transcriptome sequencing of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for identification of drought-responsive genes under drought stress condition. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 37, 186–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Lijuan, C.; Huiming, G.; Yi, L.; Hongmei, C. Chalcone synthase EaCHS1 from Eupatorium adenophorum functions in salt stress tolerance in tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 885–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Shi, H.; Chan, Z. The cysteine2/histidine2-type transcription factor ZINC FINGER of ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA 6-activated C-REPEAT-BINDING FACTOR pathway is essential for melatonin-mediated freezing stress resistance in Arabidopsis. J. Pineal Res. 2014, 57, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Thakur, P.; Kumar, S.; Malik, J.A.; Berger, J.D.; Nayyar, H. Cold stress effects on reproductive development in grain crops: An overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 67, 429–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Bhattacharya, A. Effect of low-temperature stress on germination, growth, and phenology of plants: A review. In Physiological Processes in Plants Under Low Temperature Stress; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 1–106. [Google Scholar]
  247. Liu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, J.; Bao, F. Effects of chilling on the structure, function and development of chloroplasts. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Wang, S.; Bai, G.; Wang, S.; Yang, L.Y.; Yang, F.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, J.K.; Hua, J. Chloroplast RNA-binding protein RBD1 promotes chilling tolerance through 23S rRNA processing in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Gan, P.; Liu, F.; Li, R.; Wang, S.; Luo, J.; Pearce, R.S. Plant freezing and damage. Ann. Bot. 2001, 87, 417–424. [Google Scholar]
  250. Puyaubert, J.; Baudouin, E. New clues for a cold case: Nitric oxide response to low temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 2623–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Ding, Y.; Shi, Y.; Yang, S. Advances and challenges in uncovering cold tolerance regulatory mechanisms in plants. New Phytol. 2019, 222, 1690–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Mayr, S.; Ameglio, T. Freezing stress in tree xylem. Prog. Bot. 2016, 77, 381–414. [Google Scholar]
  253. Schulz, E.; Tohge, T.; Zuther, E.; Fernie, A.R.; Hincha, D.K. Flavonoids are determinants of freezing tolerance and cold acclimation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Hu, H.; Yang, J.; Cui, J.; Wei, G.; Xu, J. Transcriptome and metabolome changes in Chinese cedar during cold acclimation reveal the roles of flavonoids in needle discoloration and cold resistance. Tree Physiol. 2022, 9, 1858–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Li, S.J.; Bai, Y.C.; Li, C.L.; Yao, H.P.; Chen, H.; Zhao, H.X.; Wu, Q. Anthocyanins accumulate in tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) sprout in response to cold stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Chen, H.; Jiang, J.G. Osmotic adjustment and plant adaptation to environmental changes related to drought and salinity. Environ. Rev. 2010, 18, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Raihan, M.R.H.; Masud, A.A.C.; Rahman, K.; Nowroz, F.; Rahman, M.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M. Regulation of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under salinity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. Qadir, M.; Tubeileh, A.; Akhtar, J.; Larbi, A.; Khan, M.A. Productivity enhancement of salt-affected environments through crop diversification. Land Degrad. Dev. 2008, 19, 429–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Shrivastava, P.; Kumar, R. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Safdar, H.; Amin, A.; Shafiq, Y.; Ali, A. A review: Impact of salinity on plant growth. Nat. Sci. 2019, 17, 34–40. [Google Scholar]
  261. Yan, J.; Wang, B.; Jiang, Y.; Cheng, L.; Wu, T. GmFNSII-controlled soybean flavone metabolism responds to abiotic stresses and regulates plant salt tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Ahmad, H.; Maher, M.; Abdel-Salam, E.M.; Li, Y.; Yang, C.; Elsafty, N.; Ewas, M.; Nishawy, E.; Luo, J. Integrated de novo analysis of transcriptional and metabolic variations in salt-treated Solenostemma argel desert plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 744699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Wang, X.; Dai, W.W.; Liu, C.; Yangchen, Y.C.; Gao, R.F.; Chen, Y.Y.; Yan, H. Evaluation of physiological coping strategies and quality substances in purple sweetpotato under different salinity levels. Genes 2022, 13, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Jia, T.; An, J.; Liu, Z.; Chen, J.; Yu, B. Salt stress induced soybean GmIFS1 expression and isoflavone accumulation and salt tolerance in transgenic soybean cotyledon hairy roots and tobacco. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cul. 2017, 128, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Farooq, M.; Wahid, A.; Kobayashi, N.; Fujita, D.; Basra, S.M.A. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. In Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 153–188. [Google Scholar]
  266. Nabi, R.B.S.; Tayade, R.; Hussain, A.; Kulkarni, K.P.; Imran, Q.M.; Mun, B.G.; Yun, B.W. Nitric oxide regulates plant responses to drought, salinity, and heavy metal stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Chaudhry, S.; Sidhu, G.P.S. Climate change regulated abiotic stress mechanisms in plants: A comprehensive review. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 41, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Martignago, D.; Rico-Medina, A.; Blasco-Escámez, D.; Fontanet-Manzaneque, J.B.; Cao-Delgado, A.I. Drought resistance by engineering plant tissue-specific responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Iqbal, A.; Fahad, S.; Iqbal, M.; Alamzeb, M.; Ahmad, A.; Anwar, S.; Khan, A.A.; Arif, M.; Saeed, M.; Song, M. Special adaptive features of plant species in response to drought. In Salt and Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 77–118. [Google Scholar]
  270. Amnan, M.A.M.; Aizat, W.M.; Khaidizar, F.D.; Tan, B.C. Drought stress induces morpho-physiological and proteome changes of Pandanus amaryllifolius. Plants 2022, 11, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Salsinha, Y.C.F.; Indradewa, D.; Purwestri, Y.A.; Rachmawati, D. Leaf physiological and anatomical characters contribute to drought tolerance of Nusa Tenggara Timur local rice cultivars. J. Crops Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 24, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Lv, Z.; Zhang, C.; Shao, C.; Liu, B.; Shen, C. Research progress on the response of tea catechins to drought stress. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 5305–5313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Hinojosa-Gómez, J.; Martín-Hernández, C.S.; Heredia, J.B.; León-Félix, J.; Osuna-Enciso, T.; Muy-Rangel, M.D. Anthocyanin induction by drought stress in the calyx of roselle cultivars. Molecules 2020, 25, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Gholamreza, A.; Shokrpour, M.; Karami, L.; Salami, S.A. Prolonged water deficit stress and methyl jasmonate-mediated changes in metabolite profile, flavonoid concentrations and antioxidant activity in peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). Not. Bot. Horti Agrobo. 2019, 47, 70–80. [Google Scholar]
  275. Mechri, B.; Tekaya, M.; Hammami, M.; Chehab, H. Effects of drought stress on phenolic accumulation in greenhouse-grown olive trees (Olea europaea). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2020, 92, 104112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, G.; Tang, Y.; Lv, J. The spike plays important roles in the drought tolerance as compared to the flag leaf through the phenylpropanoid pathway in wheat. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 152, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Kalaivanan, D.; Ganeshamurthy, A.N. Mechanisms of heavy metal toxicity in plants. In Abiotic Stress Physiology of Horticultural Crops; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2016; pp. 85–102. [Google Scholar]
  278. Ghori, N.H.; Ghori, T.; Hayat, M.Q.; Imadi, S.R.; Gul, A.; Altay, V.; Ozturk, M. Heavy metal stress and responses in plants. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 1807–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Nagajyoti, P.C.; Lee, K.D.; Sreekanth, T.V.M. Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2010, 8, 199–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Asati, A.; Pichhode, M.; Nikhil, K. Effect of heavy metals on plants: An overview. Int. J. Appl. Innov. Eng. Manag. 2016, 5, 56–66. [Google Scholar]
  281. Khan, M.; Aymen, U.; Mir, A.H.; Tiwari, A.; Prasad, S.M.; Singh, J.; Ramamurthy, P.C.; Singh, R.; Singh, S.; Parihar, P. Understanding Heavy Metal Stress in Plants Through Mineral Nutrients. In Heavy Metals in Plants Physiological to Molecular Approach; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 281–309. [Google Scholar]
  282. Bhaduri, A.M.; Fulekar, M.H. Antioxidant enzyme responses of plants to heavy metal stress. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2012, 11, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Mahmud, J.A.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.; Anee, T.I.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Reactive oxygen species metabolism and antioxidant defense in plants under metal/metalloid stress. In Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 221–257. [Google Scholar]
  284. Pisoschi, A.M.; Pop, A.; Iordache, F.; Stanca, L.; Predoi, G.; Serban, A.I. Oxidative stress mitigation by antioxidants-an overview on their chemistry and influences on health status. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 209, 112891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Jamla, M.; Khare, T.; Joshi, S.; Patil, S.; Kumar, V. Omics approaches for understanding heavy metal responses and tolerance in plants. Curr. Plant Biol. 2021, 27, 100213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Zhang, X.; Yang, H.; Schaufelberger, M.; Li, X.; Ren, Z. Role of flavonol synthesized by nucleus FLS1 in Arabidopsis resistance to Pb stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 9646–9653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Dai, L.P.; Dong, X.J.; Ma, H.H. Molecular mechanism for cadmium-induced anthocyanin accumulation in Azolla imbricata. Chemospher 2012, 87, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Barrows, G.; Sexton, S.; Zilberman, D. Agricultural biotechnology: The promise and prospects of genetically modified crops. J. Econ. Perspect. 2014, 28, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Sedeek, K.E.M.; Mahas, A.; Mahfouz, M. Plant genome engineering for targeted improvement of crop traits. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Basu, S.K.; Dutta, M.; Goyal, A.; Bhowmik, P.K.; Kumar, J.; Nandy, S.; Scagliusi, S.M.; Prasad, R. Is genetically modified crop the answer for the next green revolution? GM Crops 2010, 1, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Wani, S.H.; Sah, S.K.; Hossain, M.A.; Kumar, V.; Balachandran, S.M. Transgenic approaches for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. In Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Agronomic, Abiotic and Biotic Stress Traits; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 345–396. [Google Scholar]
  292. Zhang, X.H.; Zheng, X.T.; Sun, B.Y.; Peng, C.L.; Chow, W.S. Over-expression of the CHS gene enhances resistance of Arabidopsis leaves to high light. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 154, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Wang, H.; Liu, S.; Fan, F.; Yu, Q.; Zhang, P. A Moss 2-Oxoglutarate/Fe (II)-Dependent Dioxygenases (2-ODD) Gene of Flavonoids Biosynthesis Positively Regulates Plants Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 850062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  294. Zheng, X.T.; Chen, Y.-H.L.; Zhang, X.H.; Cai, M.L.; Yu, Z.C.; Peng, C.L. ANS-deficient Arabidopsis is sensitive to high light due to impaired anthocyanin photoprotection. Funct. Plant Biol. 2019, 46, 756–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Li, X.-J.W.; Wang, Y.; Yan, F.; Li, J.W.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhai, Y.; Wang, Q.Y. Overexpression of soybean R2R3-MYB transcription factor, GmMYB12B2, and tolerance to UV radiation and salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15, gmr.15026573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Chen, S.; Li, D.; Chen, S.; He, J.; Wang, Z.; Yang, G.; Lu, Z. Identifying and expression analysis of WD40 transcription factors in walnut. Plant Genom. 2022, 15, e20229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Wang, A.; Zhu, M.; Luo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Kou, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, X.; Zheng, Y.; et al. A sweet potato cinnamate 4-hydroxylase gene, IbC4H, increases phenolics content and enhances drought tolerance in tobacco. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2017, 39, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Ku, Y.S.; Ng, M.S.; Cheng, S.S.; Lo, A.W.Y.; Xiao, Z.; Shin, T.S.; Chung, G.; Lam, H.M. Understanding the composition, biosynthesis, accumulation and transport of flavonoids in crops for the promotion of crops as healthy sources of flavonoids for human consumption. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Meng, C.; Zhang, S.; Deng, Y.S.; Wang, G.D.; Kong, F.Y. Overexpression of a tomato flavanone 3-hydroxylase-like protein gene improves chilling tolerance in tobacco. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 96, 388–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Ai, T.N.; Naing, A.H.; Yun, B.W.; Lim, S.; Kim, C.K. Overexpression of RsMYB1 enhances anthocyanin accumulation and heavy metal stress tolerance in transgenic petunia. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of flavonoid compounds. (A) Flavones; (B) Flavonols; (C) Flavanones; (D) Isoflavonoids; (E) Neoflavonoids; (F) Flavanols; (G) Anthocyanins.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of flavonoid compounds. (A) Flavones; (B) Flavonols; (C) Flavanones; (D) Isoflavonoids; (E) Neoflavonoids; (F) Flavanols; (G) Anthocyanins.
Molecules 28 03599 g001
Figure 2. The pathway of flavonoid biosynthesis.
Figure 2. The pathway of flavonoid biosynthesis.
Molecules 28 03599 g002
Figure 3. Molecular mechanisms of flavonoids in response to biotic and abiotic stresses.
Figure 3. Molecular mechanisms of flavonoids in response to biotic and abiotic stresses.
Molecules 28 03599 g003
Table 1. The roles of genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis and the response of plants to various biotic and abiotic stresses.
Table 1. The roles of genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis and the response of plants to various biotic and abiotic stresses.
Gene NameExpression StatusRoles in BiosynthesisStress Resistance in PlantsReferences
Structural genes
PALHigh expression under stressInvolved in the biosynthesis of flavonoidsPlayed positive roles in response to abiotic stress[16,72,104,124]
C4HHigh expression under stressInvolved in the biosynthesis of flavonoidsPlayed positive roles in response to abiotic stress[105,216,217,218]
4CLHigh expression under stressInvolved in the biosynthesis of flavonoidsPlayed positive roles in response to abiotic stress[106,216,217]
CHSHigh expression under stressInvolved in the biosynthesis of flavonoidsPlayed positive roles in response to abiotic stress[108,219,220]
CHIHigh expression under stressInvolved in the biosynthesis of flavonoidsPlayed positive roles in response to abiotic stress[109,221,222,223]
FNSHigh expression under stressInvolved in the biosynthesis of flavonesPlayed positive roles in response to UV and salt stress[224]
F3HConstitutive of high expression in transgenic Arabidopsis and tobaccoInvolved in the biosynthesis of flavan-3-ol (catechin and epicatechin)Played positive roles in response to salt, drought and cold stress[225,226,227]
F3’HHigh expression under stressInvolved in the biosynthesis of flavonoidsPlayed positive roles in response to abiotic stress[112,113,114,120,121]
F3’5’HHigh expression under stressInvolved in the biosynthesis of flavonoidsPlayed positive roles in response to abiotic stress[112,113,114,115,216,217]
IFSHigh expression under stressInvolved in the biosynthesis of isoflavonesPlayed positive roles in response to salt osmotic stress[228]
FLSHigh expression under stressInvolved in the biosynthesis of flavonols (kaempferol, quercetin, and myricetin)Played positive roles in response to UV stress, salinity stress, drought stress, cold stress and heavy metal stress[114,133,215,229,230]
DFRConstitutive of high expression in transgenic ArabidopsisInvolved in the biosynthesis of leucoanthocyanidin and anthocyaninsPlayed positive roles in response to salt, cold and UV stress[114,231,232]
ANSHigh expression under stressInvolved in the biosynthesis of anthocyanidinPlayed positive roles in response to abiotic stress[151,203,233,234,235]
UFGTHigh expression under stressInvolved in synthesis of stable anthocyaninsPlayed positive roles in response to abiotic stress[120,121,151,233,234,235]
Transcription factors
MYBConstitutive of high expression in transgenic Arabidopsis and PetuniaRegulated of anthocyanins and other flavonoids biosynthesisPlayed positive roles in response to UV, salt and heavy metal stress[236]
bHLHConstitutive of high expression in transgenic Arabidopsis and tobaccoRegulated of flavonols, flavanols, anthocyanins, and flavanones biosynthesisPlayed positive roles in response to drought, freezing and salt stress[237,238,239]
WD40Constitutive of high expression in transgenic ArabidopsisRegulated of flavonoids biosynthesisPlayed positive roles in response to ABA and salt osmotic stress[240]
bZIPConstitutive of high expression in transgenic tobaccoRegulated of flavonoids biosynthesisPlayed positive roles in response to High light, UV and salt stress[147,216,217]
NAChigh expression; Constitutive of high expression in transgenic ArabidopsisRegulated of anthocyanins and procyanidins biosynthesisPlayed positive roles in response to High light and UV stress[143,148,149]
MADS-boxHigh expression under stressRegulated of flavonoids biosynthesisPlayed positive roles in response to cold, salt, and drought stress[223,233,234,235,241]
WRKYHigh expression under stress; Constitutive of high expression in transgenic appleRegulated of anthocyanins and other flavonoids biosynthesisPlayed positive roles in response to cold, drought, and UV stress[151,242,243]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhuang, W.-B.; Li, Y.-H.; Shu, X.-C.; Pu, Y.-T.; Wang, X.-J.; Wang, T.; Wang, Z. The Classification, Molecular Structure and Biological Biosynthesis of Flavonoids, and Their Roles in Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Molecules 2023, 28, 3599. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28083599

AMA Style

Zhuang W-B, Li Y-H, Shu X-C, Pu Y-T, Wang X-J, Wang T, Wang Z. The Classification, Molecular Structure and Biological Biosynthesis of Flavonoids, and Their Roles in Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Molecules. 2023; 28(8):3599. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28083599

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhuang, Wei-Bing, Yu-Hang Li, Xiao-Chun Shu, Yu-Ting Pu, Xiao-Jing Wang, Tao Wang, and Zhong Wang. 2023. "The Classification, Molecular Structure and Biological Biosynthesis of Flavonoids, and Their Roles in Biotic and Abiotic Stresses" Molecules 28, no. 8: 3599. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28083599

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop