Next Article in Journal
Nur77 Serves as a Potential Prognostic Biomarker That Correlates with Immune Infiltration and May Act as a Good Target for Prostate adenocarcinoma
Next Article in Special Issue
2-Methyl-6-(4-aminophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-3(2H)-pyridazinone Synthon for Some New Annelated 1,2,3-Selena/Thiadiazoles and 2H-Diazaphospholes with Anticipated Biological Activity and Quantum Chemical Calculations
Previous Article in Journal
Curcumin and Andrographolide Co-Administration Safely Prevent Steatosis Induction and ROS Production in HepG2 Cell Line
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Hydrazone Derivatives of Isonicotinic Hydrazide and Their Evaluation for Antibacterial and Cytotoxic Potential
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules28031262
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Aluminum Salen Complexes Modified with Unsaturated Alcohol: Synthesis, Characterization, and Their Activity towards Ring-Opening Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone and D,L-Lactide

by
Kirill V. Zaitsev
1,*,
Andrey D. Trubachev
1,
Yuri F. Oprunenko
1,
Yuliya A. Piskun
2,
Irina V. Vasilenko
2,3,*,
Andrei V. Churakov
4 and
Sergei V. Kostjuk
2,3,5,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Moscow State University, Leninskye Gory 1, 3, Moscow 119991, Russia
2
Research Institute for Physical Chemical Problems of the Belarusian State University, Leningradskaya Str., 14, 220006 Minsk, Belarus
3
Faculty of Chemistry, Belarusian State University, Leningradskaya Str., 14, 220006 Minsk, Belarus
4
N.S. Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskii Pr., 31, Moscow 119991, Russia
5
Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 8-2, Trubetskaya Str., Moscow 119992, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(3), 1262; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031262
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 21 December 2022 / Accepted: 24 January 2023 / Published: 27 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Chemistry of Imines)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A highly efficient one-step approach to the macromonomer synthesis using modified aluminum complexes as catalysts of ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of ε-caprolactone and D,L-lactide was developed. The syntheses, structures, and catalytic activities of a wide range of aluminum salen complexes, 3a-c, functionalized with unsaturated alcohol (HO(CH2)4OCH=CH2) are reported. X-Ray diffraction studies revealed a tetragonal pyramidal structure for 3c. Among the complexes 3a-c, the highest activity in bulk ROP of ε-caprolactone and D,L-lactide was displayed by 3b, affording polyesters with controlled molecular weights at low monomer to initiator ratios (Mn up to 15,000 g mol−1), relatively high polydispersities (Ð~1.8) and high number-average functionalities (Fn up to 85%).

1. Introduction

Aluminum alkoxides, due to their low toxicity, high Lewis acidity, wide abundance, and low cost, find application in chemistry, material science, and related fields of science. Examples are numerous catalysts in organic synthesis [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], the activation of small molecules (such as carbon dioxide) [8,9,10,11], description of the synthesis of complexes with unusual structures [12,13], precursors for sol-gel technology [14] or OLED and optic materials [15,16,17] based on Al compounds. At the same time, there are many works concerning the application of aluminum alkoxides based on different ligands as initiators [18,19,20,21,22,23] in ring-opening polymerization (ROP) [24,25,26,27,28] of lactones and lactide for the synthesis of biodegradable polymers. This method of polymerization differs from an alternative way of preparing polyesters such as polycondensation [29,30] by a more controlled character of polymerization that allows obtaining (co)polymers with target molar mass and low polydispersity as well as high end-group fidelity. Beginning with works by Spassky [31], Al complexes based on salen (bis(salicylaldiimine)) type ligands [20,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54] found wide application in this field due to simple synthesis, various structures, and good polymerization control. Moreover, Atwood et al. [55] continue to apply Al salen complexes in organometallic and coordination chemistry. Despite a significant progress in this field of science, the development of new catalysts with precise structure, which may be used for construction of new materials, is a challenge for modern chemistry.
Furthermore, the construction of complex polymer architectures requires new methodologies for material synthesis. Elaboration of novel macromonomers may be regarded as one of such ways [56]. In this case, the macromonomer is a polymeric molecule suitable for subsequent polymerization by a different polymerization mechanism. Therefore, a macromonomer synthesized by ROP of lactones or lactide may be used in polymerization by a radical mechanism to yield graft-copolymers [57]. In general, this concept of catalysis enables the formation of polymer materials of different architectures (branched, star-shape, brushes, dendrimers, etc.) [57,58]. Furthermore, the working out of well-established ways for synthesis of macromonomers based on polyesters may be regarded as a significant challenge, especially in comparison with similar compounds based on polyolefins [59]. Due to the fact that the specific structures, properties and aggregation behavior due to the presence of hydrophobic and hydrophilic parts, these polymer architectures are suitable for a range of applications, for example, in such fields as drug delivery systems, coatings, optic materials, etc. [60,61,62,63].
To date, there are generally two main approaches to macromonomer synthesis (Scheme 1). The first includes the direct growth using a functionalized initiator, usually a simple organic compound (or more elaborate ways, i.e., atom transfer radical polymerization, ATRP; reversible addition−fragmentation chain transfer, RAFT; or catalytic chain transfer polymerization, CCTP) in the presence of a catalyst [64,65,66,67]. At the same time, it should be mentioned that the isolation of individual catalysts is more significant than the investigation of catalytically active metal systems based on modified reagents [68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75]. The second way is to use the post-polymerization modification of previously obtained polymers [76,77,78,79,80,81,82].
In accordance with the single-site catalyst theory, the “insertion—coordination” mechanism (compare with the “activated monomer mechanism”) [83] has been accepted for the ROP of lactones. In continuation of our research [84,85] in this field, we propose the directly controlled synthesis of macromonomers (Scheme 2). It should be noted that this synthesis strategy proposes the application of isolated and characterized metal initiators. This technique differs significantly from other ways of end-chain-modified macromonomer synthesis.
According to this mechanism, the alkoxide group initially present at the Al atom is transferred to the end of the polymer chain. Using this approach, we may obtain end-functionalized macromonomers if the initiator, L2M(O(CH2)4OCH=CH2) (where L is a polydentate ligand), possesses the fragment suitable for subsequent polymerization. The framework of vinyl ether may be regarded as such a fragment [85]. Furthermore, the application of vinyl ether-terminated macromonomers is suitable for further polymerization [86,87,88].
This research combines investigations in several related fields of chemistry including organometallic synthesis and polymer chemistry. We describe the synthesis of new Al salen complexes (3a-c) containing a fragment of unsaturated alcohol. These complexes were studied as initiators of ROP of lactones and lactide under different conditions resulting in macromonomers with controlled molar masses under solvent-free (bulk) polymerization conditions. Thus, the aim of this research is the application of available and cheap salen ligands for the synthesis of Al complexes and their use as initiators for macromonomer synthesis.

2. Results

2.1. Synthesis of Ligands and Complexes

The salen ligands 1a–c (Scheme 3) differ by the presence of alkyl substituents in phenolic and iminic parts. The simplicity of their synthesis [89] (the reaction of ethylenediamine with the corresponding carbonyl compound in a 1:2 molar ratio) and high yields (more than 90%) are the main advantages of applying salen compounds. Ligand 1b is a new compound.
The strategy including two stages was chosen for the synthesis of target-modified aluminum complexes. At the first stage, the corresponding methyl complexes, SalenAlMe, 2a–c, would be obtained. At the second stage, the methyl group would be substituted by unsaturated alcohol, giving the target 3a–c.
Complexes 2a-c were obtained by the interaction of the corresponding ligands with a solution of trimethylaluminum in equimolar amounts (Scheme 4). This reaction is performed in mild conditions giving the target compounds with high yields (more than 86%). It should be noted that only a gaseous by-product, methane, is produced in the reaction of alcohols and phenols with aluminum derivatives containing Al-Me bonds.
The NMR spectra of 2a–c are typical of alkyl aluminum salen complexes. In contrast to the ligand, protons of the NCH2 group in the complexes are diastereotopic, resulting in two multiplets at δ = 3.5–4.0 ppm. It should be noted that the Al-Me group is observed in the 1H NMR spectra (δ = −1.2–−1.0 ppm), but in the 13C NMR spectra the signal is observed only for 2b (δ = −10.31 ppm) (see Supporting Information for details). Compounds 2a and 2b are new ones.
At the second stage, the interaction of methyl complexes 2a–c with unsaturated alcohol HO(CH2)4OCH=CH2 was performed in dichloromethane giving the target compounds 3a–c in good yields (56–68%) after recrystallization (Scheme 5). These modified complexes are new compounds.
Compounds 3a-c represent yellow powders sensitive to traces of moisture. They can be stored in a solid state under an argon atmosphere without changing. These derivatives are soluble in chloroform, dichloromethane, and THF and are sparingly soluble in toluene, and insoluble in n-hexane. The structure and composition of 3a-c were established by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, X-ray analysis, and elemental analysis data.
In solution, complexes 3a-c have one set of signals, indicating a Cs-symmetry with two equivalent iminophenolic parts. Furthermore, there is only one CRN= signal, which means that in solution these compounds are monomeric and preserve the tetragonal pyramid structure (see below XRD data for 3c). In general, complexes 3a-c have a common structure. Characteristic signals appear in the 1H/13C spectra at 6.30–6.40/151.9–152.0 ppm (OCH=) (for further details, see Experimental Part and Supporting Information).

2.2. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

The molecular structure of complex 3c is given in Figure 1 (see Supporting Information, Table S1 for crystallographic information). In general, complex 3c is not planar and has a bowl [4,8] conformation, where aryl rings are bent. Complex 3c in a solid state is monomeric due to the presence of bulky tert-butyl groups (compare with dimeric methoxy substituted complexes, [(Salen)Al(μ-OMe)]2 [90] or [(MeSalen)Al(μ-OMe)]2 [91]). The aluminum atom has a geometry, which may be described as a distorted square pyramid, SP-5 (τ = 0.39; τ = 0 for an ideal square pyramid and τ = 1 for an ideal trigonal bipyramid, TBP-5) [92], where oxygen and nitrogen atoms of the salen ligand form the pyramid base. This polyhedron is typical of salen-type ligands based on ethylenediamine [93]. The oxygen atom of unsaturated alcoholate is in an axial position. The preference of tetragonal pyramidal geometry [16,21,89,93,94,95,96] in comparison with trigonal bipyramidal geometry is a common feature of tert-butyl substituted salen ligands. It should be noted that the Al-O bond lengths (between aluminum, salen, and unsaturated oxygen atoms) differed significantly [96,97], i.e., 1.790–1.812 vs. 1.744 Å. According to X-ray analysis, the substitution of a methyl group for unsaturated alcoholate (2c [94] vs. 3c) results in a more tetragonal coordination polyhedron (the τ value decreases from 0.47 to 0.39), but the bond lengths change insignificantly. The structure of the alkoxide group also weakly affects the geometric parameters. Indeed, in the case of related [Salen(t-Bu)AlOEt], the Al-Oax is very similar to 3c (1.737 vs. 1.744 Å) [93,98,99]. It is interesting to note that in the case of phenoxide substituted derivatives the aluminum polyhedron is more square bipyramidal with an increased Al-OAr bond length in comparison with Al-OAlk (compare with Salen(t-Bu)AlO-p-C6H4Ph, d(Al-O) 1.7609(16) Å, τ 0.61 [15]), and larger Al-O-C angle (compare 126.3–136.5° [16] in phenolate and 124.7° in alkoxy 3c).
The catalytic activity of complexes 3a-c in ROP of ε-caprolactone and D,L-lactide was then investigated under different conditions.

3. Discussion

In this section, we discuss in detail the catalytic activity of the complexes obtained as initiators in ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone and D,L-lactide.
In the initial step, the bulk ROP of ε-caprolactone was studied at different temperatures (60, 80, 100, 130 °C) using 3a as an initiator; several elevated temperature values were used to find the optimal temperature and to clarify the polymerization kinetics. Firstly, we focused on the determination of minimal temperature, at which we can reach the complete ε-caprolactone conversion in bulk at a reasonable rate. Secondly, we were keeping in mind the possible copolymerization of ε-caprolactone with lactide, which can be performed only at 130 °C due to the high melting point of polylactide. According to Figure 2a, the polymerization rate gradually increased with increasing reaction temperature. The increase in temperature would lead to a decrease in the viscosity of the system facilitating the ε-caprolactone diffusion to the growing polymer chain-catalyst complex, on the one hand. On the other hand, the polymerization was terminated at incomplete monomer conversion at 60 °C due to the crystallization of poly(ε-caprolactone) (melting point is about 60 °C) that makes difficult or even impossible the monomer diffusion to growing polymer chain-catalyst complex. It should be noted that all first-order plots are linear, indicating the absence of irreversible termination during bulk ROP polymerization of ε-caprolactone initiated by 3a. Construction of this plot is based on the assumption that the concentration of active species is constant (Vp = kp × [A*] × [M], where Vp is the rate of propagation, kp—rate constant for propagation, A*- active species, [M]—monomer). Taking into account that [A*] = constant for pseudo-living/controlled polymerization, we can write Vp = kp, app × [M], where kp, app—the apparent rate constant for propagation and kp, app = kp × [A*]). In other words, if irreversible termination will occur, the deviation from the linearity of first-order semi-logarithmic plots will be observed. Therefore, the linearity of first-order plots indicates the absence of a termination process. The number-average molecular weight of polymers obtained increased with the increase in monomer conversion, while some deviation of experimental values of Mn from the theoretical line was observed at a later stage of polymerization (Figure 2b). In addition, a rise in temperature resulted in an increase in the polydispersity of poly(ε-caprolactone)s synthesized with 3a as an initiator (Figure 2b). Based on these results, the optimal temperature for bulk ROP of ε-caprolactone was 80 °C. However, although the bulk ROP of ε-caprolactone initiated by 3a proceeded in a controlled fashion (Figure 2), the observed deviation of experimental Mn from the theoretical line (Figure 2b) in conjunction with a rather high polydispersity (Ð = 1.7–2.0) indicated that side reactions such as transesterification and/or formation of macrocycles occurred in the system. In order to suppress the side reactions, the steric bulkiness of catalyst 3a was gradually increased by introducing methyl and tert-butyl substituents in para- (Me, 3b) or ortho- and para- (t-Bu, 3c) positions, respectively, of the benzene ring. Furthermore, for 3b the effect of Me substituent at the iminic carbon, i.e., MeC=N, was studied.
As it can be seen from Figure 3a, the activity of investigated catalytic complexes in bulk ROP of ε-caprolactone increased in the following sequence: 3c (kp,app = 1.2 × 10−3 min−1) < 3a (kp,app = 1.4 × 10−2 min−1) < 3b (kp,app = 3.8 × 10−2 min−1). The observed increase in the rate of ROP of ε-caprolactone using 3b instead of 3a as a catalyst is surprising since the methyl substituents in the ortho-position of the phenyl ring and to imine nitrogen would lead to a decrease in the partial positive charge on the Al atom, which, in turn, should lead to a decrease in the reaction rate. Indeed, for related Al complexes bearing phenoxyimine ligands, the addition of electron-withdrawing substituents into aromatic ring/imine nitrogen results in an increase in the rate of ROP of ε-caprolactone in organic solvents [100,101]. However, for bulk ROP polymerization of ε-caprolactone initiated by iminophenolate aluminum complexes we observed an opposite tendency consisting of a decrease in the reaction rate upon the addition of electron-withdrawing substituents [85]. This inconsistency could be explained by the strong solvation of more electronically deficient Al atoms by the monomer under bulk polymerization conditions that may lead to the observed decrease in the reaction rate for a potentially more active catalytic complex. A much lower activity of complex 3c in ROP of ε-caprolactone (Figure 3a) is consistent with the low accessibility of the Al atom to monomer due to the presence of bulky tert-butyl groups (Scheme 5).
It should be noted that the most active catalyst (3b) results in less controlled polymerization displaying a significant deviation of experimental values of Mn from the theoretical line (Figure 3b). Moreover, the steric structure of the catalytic complex almost does not influence the polydispersity of synthesized polyesters: Ð lies in the range between 1.65 and 1.77 for all catalytic complexes studied (Figure 3b). This indicates that side reactions such as transesterification and/or macrocycles formation still occur in the system. Therefore, in order to confirm the controlled nature of ROP of ε-caprolactone initiated by complexes 3b and 3c, the polymerization was briefly investigated at different ε-caprolactone/catalyst ratios (Table 1). As it was mentioned above (vide supra), the Mn lower than the theoretical values were obtained for all catalysts studied at [ε-caprolactone]/[catalyst] = 300 due to a side reaction such as transesterification and/or macrocycles formation. In contrast, at a lower monomer-to-catalyst ratio ([ε-caprolactone]/[catalyst] = 100), we observed a good correlation between experimental and theoretical values of Mn, while the polydispersity was still relatively high (Table 1).
It should be noted that all synthesized poly(ε-caprolactone)s are characterized by reduced functionality on the vinyl ether end group calculated from the 1H NMR spectrum as the integral ratio of the signal of an olefinic proton (c) to methylene protons (k) of the hydroxymethyl end group (see Figure 4). The highest functionality of 79−86% was obtained for the bulk ROP of ε-caprolactone with catalytic complexes 3b and 3c at a lower monomer to initiator ratio (Table 1). Evidently, transesterification, which becomes significant at a high monomer-to-initiator ratio (vide supra), leads to diminishing functionality at the chain end. In addition, the cationic oligomerization of obtained macromonomers during the polymerization due to the relatively high acidity of catalysts used or owing to the generation of some traces of acid during the workup procedure, could also occur taking into account the high reactivity of vinyl ethers in cationic polymerization [102]. Indeed, the functionality on the vinyl ether end group calculated as the integral ratio of protons of −CH2O group (d) to methylene protons (k) of the hydroxymethyl end group is higher than the one calculated based on olefinic protons. This confirms that some consumption of olefinic double bonds did take place. To finally validate this hypothesis, the aim of our further work is to investigate similar aluminum salen complexes bearing other alkenylic substituents (such as the phenoxystyrene functional group), which should yield macromonomers with higher functionality.
Taking into account the higher activity of catalyst 3b in ROP of ε-caprolactone and better chain-end functionality for poly(ε-caprolactone)s obtained with 3b and 3c as initiators (vide supra), these two catalytic complexes were further tested in bulk ROP of D,L-lactide. Similar to the polymerization of ε-caprolactone, 3b induced a much faster polymerization than 3c due to the presence of bulky tert-butyl groups in the latter complex (compare Figure 3a and Figure 5a). On the other hand, first-order plots are linear and pass through zero (Figure 5a) indicating the absence of irreversible termination. In addition, the number-average molecular weight increases in direct proportion to monomer conversion, while the experimental values of Mn correlate well with the theoretical line for both catalytic complexes studied (Figure 5b). The polydispersity of synthesized poly(D,L-lactide)s is relatively low at the beginning of the polymerization and increases up to 1.8 at the end of the reaction, while for poly(ε-caprolactone) obtained using the same catalytic complexes the polydispersity is rather high even at the beginning of polymerization (compare Figure 2b and Figure 5b). This indicates that the polymerization of D,L-lactide is more controlled than that of ε-caprolactone under similar conditions, and side reactions such as transesterification and macrocyclization are significantly suppressed in the case of the ROP of D,L-lactide.
Since no significant difference in polydispersity for poly(D,L-lactide)s synthesized with 3b and 3c as catalysts was observed, the more active complex 3b was used in further investigations. To confirm the pseudo-living nature of bulk ROP of D,L-lactide initiated by 3b, the polymerization was investigated at two different monomer-to-catalyst ratios. As it is shown in Figure 6, the ROP of D,L-lactide initiated by 3b at different monomer-to-catalyst ratios proceeds in a pseudo-living fashion: first-order plots are linear, while the number-average molecular weight increases in direct proportion to monomer conversion. In addition, the experimental values of Mn are in good agreement with the theoretical line, while polydispersity becomes high only at the later steps of polymerization.
It should be noted that for poly(D,L-lactide)s synthesized with 3b and 3c, similar to poly(ε-caprolactone) prepared using the same catalysts, we observed a reduced functionality on the vinyl ether end group calculated from 1H NMR spectra (Fn = 75% − 85%, see Table S2, Figure S19). This reduced functionality, as we showed above, was consistent with the high activity of the vinyl ether end group in cationic polymerization. Therefore, highly electron-deficient aluminum atoms in 3a−c or tracers of acid generated during the workup procedure may initiate the cationic oligomerization of prepared macromonomers leading to the observed decrease in functionality.

4. Materials and Methods

General Methods and Instrumentation. All manipulations with aluminum compounds were carried out using standard Schlenk techniques under an argon atmosphere. Solvents were purified using the usual procedures. Diethyl ether and THF were stored under solid KOH and then distilled under sodium/benzophenone. Dichloromethane and ethanol were refluxed and distilled over CaH2. Benzene, and n-hexane were refluxed over sodium and distilled off. Toluene (reagent grade) was treated with H2SO4, washed with aqueous NaHCO3 and distilled water to a neutral reaction, dried with CaCl2, refluxed, and distilled with metallic sodium. Then, it was refluxed with Na/benzophenone to a blue color and distilled under an argon atmosphere. Deuterated solvent (CDCl3) was dried over CaH2, distilled and stored under argon. The 1H NMR (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) spectra were recorded with a Bruker 400 spectrometer (at 295 K). Chemical shifts are given in ppm relative to internal Me4Si. Elemental analyses were carried out by the Microanalytical Laboratory of the Chemistry Department, Moscow State University. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was performed on an Agilent 1200 apparatus with Nucleogel GPC LM-5, 300/7.7 column, and one precolumn (PL gel 5 μm guard) thermostatted at 30 °C. The detection was achieved by a differential refractometer. THF was eluted at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. The calculation of molar mass and polydispersity was based on polystyrene standards (“Polymer Laboratories GmbH”, Darmstadt, Germany). All compounds synthesized were fully characterized by NMR spectroscopy data; their identity was proven by elemental analysis data.
Starting Materials. Ethylenediamine (“Aldrich”), solution of AlMe3 (2.0 M in toluene, “Aldrich”), 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (“Aldrich”) were used as received. Salicylaldehyde (“Aldrich”), HO(CH2)4OCH=CH2 (“Aldrich”) were distilled before use. 3,5-Di-tert-butylsalicylaldehyde [103] and 2-hydroxy-5-methylacetophenone [104] were obtained using the known procedures. ε-Caprolactone (97%, “Aldrich”) was dried over CaH2, distilled from CaH2 under reduced pressure and stored under argon. D,L-Lactide (98%, “Aldrich”) was twice recrystallized from toluene and dried in a vacuum at 45 °C for 5 h.
Synthesis. Synthesis of the ligands. All ligands were obtained using the standard procedure. Ethylenediamine (40.00 mmol, 1.0 eq.) was added dropwise to a solution of the corresponding carbonyl compound (80.00 mmol, 2.0 eq.) in dry EtOH (60 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 8 h, and the solid formed was filtered off, washed with ethanol (2 × 10 mL), and dried in a vacuum.
Ligand 1a, SalenH2. Yellow powder, recrystallized from ethanol, m.p. 127–128 °C, m.p. 126 °C [105]. Yield 91%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 13.22 (s, 2H, OH), 8.33 (s, 2H, NCH=), 7.32–7.25 (m, 2H, aromatic protons), 7.21 (dd, JH-H = 7.6 Hz, JH-H = 1.5 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 6.94 (d, JH-H = 8.3 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 6.89–6.82 (m, 2H, aromatic protons), 3.89 (s, 4H, 2NCH2) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 166.37 (NCH=), 160.90, 132.27, 131.39, 118.57, 118.53, 116.82 (aromatic carbons), 59.59 (NCH2) ppm.
Ligand 1b, MeSalen(Me)H2. Yellow powder, recrystallized from toluene/n-heptane mixture, m.p. 204–205 °C. Yield 91%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 15.54 (br s, 2H, OH), 7.29 (d, JH-H = 1.5 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 7.09 (d, JH-H = 1.8 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 7.06 (d, JH-H = 1.8 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 3.94 (s, 4H, 2NCH2), 2.34 (s, 6H, Me), 2.27 (, 6H, Me) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 172.48 (NC=), 160.71, 133.22, 128.15, 126.17, 119.05, 118.05 (aromatic carbons), 50.22 (NCH2), 20.63 (MeC6H4), 14.65 (MeC=) ppm. C20H24N2O2 (324.4168): calcd. C 74.04, H 7.46, N 8.64; found C 74.21, H 7.56, N 8.67.
Ligand 1c, Salen(t-Bu)H2. Yellow powder, m.p. 187–188 °C, m.p. 186–187 °C [106]. Yield 90%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 13.66 (s, 2H, OH), 8.39 (s, 2H, NCH=), 7.37 (d, 2H, JH-H = 2.3 Hz, aromatic protons), 7.07 (d, 2H, JH-H = 2.3 Hz, aromatic protons), 3.92 (s, 4H, 2NCH2), 1.44 (s, 18H, t-Bu), 1.29 (s, 18H, t-Bu) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 167.57 (NCH=), 158.01, 140.03, 136.57, 126.99, 126.04, 117.79 (aromatic carbons), 59.59 (NCH2), 35.00 (CMe3), 34.08 (CMe3), 31.46 (CMe3), 29.41 (CMe3) ppm.
Synthesis of the aluminum salen complexes containing the methyl group at the Al atom. All complexes were obtained using the standard procedure. At −78 °C, a solution of AlMe3 in toluene (2.10 mL, 2.0 M, 7.00 mmol) was added dropwise to the solution of the corresponding ligand (7.00 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in CH2Cl2 (30 mL). The reaction mixture was slowly warmed to room temperature, then stirred overnight and refluxed for 2 h. All volatile materials were removed under reduced pressure; the residue was treated with n-hexane and a small amount of ether, and cooled to −30 °C. The powder formed was isolated by filtration and dried in a vacuum.
Complex 2a, (Salen)AlMe. Yellowish powder. Yield 85%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 8.20 (s, 2H, NCH=), 7.39–7.33 (m, 2H, aromatic protons), 7.13 (dd, JH-H = 7.8 Hz, JH-H = 1.4 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 7.06 (d, JH-H = 8.3 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 6.73–6.65 (m, 2H, aromatic protons), 3.98–3.91 (m, 2H, NCH2), 3.68–3.61 (m, 2H, NCH2) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 168.50 (NCH=), 165.82, 135.58, 133.03, 122.69, 118.76, 116.41 (aromatic carbons), 54.58 (NCH2) ppm. In the 13C NMR spectrum the signal of the AlMe group was not found. C17H17AlN2O2 (308.3106): calcd. C 66.23, H 5.56, N 9.09; found C 65.53, H 5.36, N 8.87.
Complex 2b, (MeSalen(Me))AlMe. Yellowish powder. Yield 85%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 7.24 (s, 2H, aromatic protons), 7.11, 6.95 (2d, JH-H = 8.6 Hz, each 2H, aromatic protons), 3.82–3.70 (m, 4H, 2NCH2), 2.42 (s, 6H, Me), 2.22 (s, 6H, Me), −1.18 (s, 3H, AlMe) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 174.85 (NC=), 162.93, 135.47, 128.81, 124.37, 123.45, 120.02 (aromatic carbons), 48.33 (NCH2), 20.54 (MeC6H4), 18.28 (MeC=), −10.31 (AlMe) ppm. C21H25AlN2O2 (364.4169): calcd. C 69.21, H 6.91, N 7.69; found C 68.78, H 6.77, N 7.73.
Complex 2c, (Salen(t-Bu))AlMe. Yellow powder. Yield 86%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 8.29 (s, 2H, NCH=), 7.51 (d, 2H, JH-H = 2.3 Hz, aromatic protons), 7.00 (d, 2H, JH-H = 2.3 Hz, aromatic protons), 3.98–3.91 (m, 2H, 2NCH2), 3.72–3.59 (m, 2H, 2NCH2), 1.54 (s, 18H, t-Bu), 1.30 (2s, each 18H, t-Bu), −1.10 (s, 3H, AlMe) ppm. 1H NMR corresponds to the literature data [94]. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 169.01 (NCH=), 163.54, 141.08, 137.48, 130.42, 126.94, 118.30 (aromatic carbons), 55.17 (NCH2), 35.58 (CMe3), 33.93 (CMe3), 31.39 (CMe3), 29.68 (CMe3) ppm. In the 13C NMR spectrum the signal of the AlMe group was not found.
Synthesis of the aluminum salen complexes containing a fragment of unsaturated alcohol. All complexes were obtained using the standard procedure. At −78 °C, HO(CH2)4OCH=CH2 (0.17 mL, 1.35 mmol) was added dropwise to the solution of the corresponding methyl aluminum complex (1.35 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in CH2Cl2 (30 mL). The reaction mixture was slowly warmed to room temperature and then stirred overnight. All volatile materials were removed under reduced pressure; the residue was treated with n-hexane and a small amount of ether, and cooled to −30 °C. The powder formed was isolated by filtration and dried in a vacuum.
Complex 3a, (Salen)Al(O(CH2)4OCH=CH2). Yellow powder. Yield 68%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 oC): δ = 8.29 (s, 2H, NCH=), 7.42–7.35 (m, 2H, aromatic protons), 7.16 (d, JH-H = 6.8 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 7.10 (d, JH-H = 7.8 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 6.73 (t, JH-H = 7.2 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 6.34 (dd, JH-H = 14.3 Hz, JH-H = 6.7 Hz, 1H, OCH=CH2), 4.10–4.03 (m, 3H, OCH2, OCH=CH(H)), 3.87 (br d, JH-H = 6.7 Hz, 1H, OCH=CH(H)), 3.71 (br s, 2H, OCH2), 3.51–3.44 (m, 4H, 2NCH2), 1.48 (t, JH-H = 6.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.36–1.32 (m, 2H, CH2) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 169.18 (NCH=), 151.99 (OCH=), 165.91, 135.78, 133.02, 122.50, 118.79, 116.84 (aromatic carbons), 85.97 (=CH2), 68.43, 62.38 (2OCH2), 54.70 (2NCH2), 30.96 (CH2), 25.94 (CH2) ppm. C22H25AlN2O4 (408.4264): calcd. C 64.70, H 6.17, N 6.86; found C 64.23, H 5.96, N 6.67.
Complex 3b, (MeSalen(Me))Al(O(CH2)4OCH=CH2). Yellow powder. Yield 56%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 7.27 (br s, 2H, NCH=), 7.14 (d, JH-H = 8.2 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 6.99 (d, JH-H = 8.2 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 6.35 (br s, 1H, OCH=), 4.08–4.02 (m, 1H, =CH(H)), 3.98–3.90 (m, 2H, OCH2), 3.88 (br s, 1H, =CH(H)), 3.82–3.76 (m, 2H, OCH2), 3.43 (br s, 4H, 2NCH2), 2.48 (s, 6H, 4Me), 2.23 (s, 6H, 4Me), 1.42 (br s, 2H, CH2), 1.32–1.24 (m, 2H, CH2) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 157.97 (NC=), 151.93 (OCH=), 163.06, 135.79, 128.88, 124.77, 123.27, 119.81 (aromatic carbons), 85.92 (OCH=CH2), 68.41 (OCH2), 62.24 (OCH2), 48.55 (2NCH2), 31.51 (CH2), 25.55 (CH2), 20.59 (MeC6H3), 18.41 (=CMe) ppm. C26H33AlN2O4 (464.5328): calcd. C 67.22, H 7.16, N 6.03; found C 66.56, H 6.87, N 5.87.
Complex 3c, (Salen(t-Bu)Al(O(CH2)4OCH=CH2). Yellow powder. Yield 64%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 8.36 (s, 2H, NCH=), 7.50 (d, JH-H = 2.3 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 7.00 (d, JH-H = 2.3 Hz, 2H, aromatic protons), 6.31 (dd, JH-H = 14.4 Hz, JH-H = 6.8 Hz, 1H, OCH=), 4.12–4.05 (m, 2H, OCH2), 4.00 (dd, 1H, JH-H = 14.4 Hz, JH-H = 1.4 Hz, OCH(H)=), 3.85 (dd, 1H, JH-H = 6.8 Hz, JH-H = 1.4 Hz, OCH(H)=), 3.72–3.66 (m, 2H, OCH2), 3.46–3.37 (m, 4H, 2NCH2), 1.51–1.42 (m, 2H, 2CH2), 1.34–1.29 (m, 2H, 2CH2), 1.54 (s, 18H, 2CMe3), 1.29 (s, 18H, 2CMe3) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C): δ = 169.60 (NCH=), 151.97 (OCH=), 163.49, 140.75, 138.00, 130.60, 127.07, 118.26 (aromatic carbons), 85.89 (OCH2=), 68.37 (OCH2), 61.94 (OCH2), 55.06 (NCH2) 35.60 (CMe3), 33.94 (CMe3), 31.36 (CMe3), 29.75 (CMe3), 30.94 (CH2), 25.57 (CH2) ppm. C38H57AlN2O4 (632.8517): calcd. C 72.12, H 9.08, N 4.43; found C 71.89, H 8.93, N 4.34.
X-Ray diffraction study. Experimental intensities were collected on a Bruker Smart Apex II diffractometer (graphite monochromatized Mo-Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å) using ω-scan mode. Absorption correction based on measurements of equivalent reflections (SADABS) was applied. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full- matrix least-squares on F2 (Shelxtl) with anisotropic thermal parameters for all non-hydrogen atoms. The solvent toluene molecule was found to be disordered over three positions with occupancy ratios 0.477(3)/0.290(3)/0.233(3). All H atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined using a riding model with freely rotating methyl groups. Details are listed in Table S1. Crystallographic data have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication no. CCDC-2220903.
Polymerization Procedures. Bulk ROPs of ε-caprolactone and D,L-lactide were carried out in Schlenk reactors equipped with magnetic stirring bars under an argon atmosphere. For kinetic studies, the reaction mixtures were regularly sampled throughout the polymerization. The samples were promptly cooled to ~20 °C to stop the polymerization. The conversion of the monomer was determined from 1H NMR spectra.
Polymerization of ε-caprolactone (CL). The bulk ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone was carried out as follows ([M]/[catalyst] = 300): a 10 mL reactor was charged with a 0.1 M solution of the catalyst in toluene (1.57 mL, 1.57 × 10–4 mol). The solvent was removed in a vacuum at ~20 °C for 5 min, and CL (5 mL, 0.047 mol) was added. The reactor was immersed in an oil bath preheated to the desired temperature to start the polymerization.
Polymerization of D,L-Lactide (LA). The bulk ring-opening polymerization of D,L-lactide was carried out as follows ([M]/[catalyst] = 300): a 10 mL reactor was charged with 5.00 g (0.035 mol) of D,L-lactide, then a 0.1 M solution of the catalyst in toluene (1.57 mL, 1.57 ×10–4 mol) was added. The solvent was removed in a vacuum at ~20 °C for 5 min. The reactor was immersed in an oil bath preheated to 130 °C to start the polymerization.

5. Conclusions

Here, we reported the first comprehensive investigation of the synthesis, structure, and ROP catalytic activity of a number of mononuclear well-defined aluminum salen complexes, 3a-c, containing unsaturated alcoholate as a coligand. Among complexes 3a−c, the highest catalytic activity in bulk ROP of ε-caprolactone and D,L-lactide was shown by complex 3b bearing methyl substituents in para-position of the phenyl ring and at the imine carbon atom. These electron donating substituents would lead to a decrease in the acidity of the complex’s Al atom that theoretically would decrease the activity of the catalyst in ROP. However, strong solvation of more electronically deficient Al atoms by the monomer under bulk polymerization conditions results in a retardation of polymerization for a potentially more active catalytic complex. The number-average functionality of polyesters on the vinyl ether end group synthesized with 3b and 3c as initiators is relatively high (up to 85%) and does not depend significantly on the molecular weight of macromonomers. The catalytic strategy developed in this work uses an effective, simple and robust approach to macromonomers based on biodegradable polymers. This opens huge prospects for synthesis of various polymeric materials with new properties.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28031262/s1, X-ray analysis data (Table S1), NMR spectra of the compounds obtained (Figures S1–S18), details of polymerization (Table S2, Figure S19): SI_Molecules_Zaitsev2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.V.Z., I.V.V. and S.V.K.; methodology, K.V.Z., I.V.V. and S.V.K.; organic and organometallic synthesis, K.V.Z. and A.D.T.; NMR spectroscopy, Y.F.O.; polymer investigation, Y.A.P., I.V.V. and S.V.K.; X-ray diffraction analysis, A.V.C.; data curation, K.V.Z. and S.V.K.; writing—original draft preparation, K.V.Z., I.V.V. and S.V.K.; writing—review and editing, K.V.Z., I.V.V. and S.V.K.; project administration, K.V.Z.; funding acquisition, K.V.Z., I.V.V. and S.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant 15-53-04044), a joint project between the Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grants X21PM-117 and 20-52-04013) and National Academy of Sciences of Belarus (project 28/58-82/22) for financial support of this research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The registration of NMR spectra in this work was supported in part by M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University Program of Development. Single crystal X-ray diffraction analyses were performed within the State Assignment on Fundamental Research to the N.S. Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sigman, M.S.; Jacobsen, E.N. Enantioselective Addition of Hydrogen Cyanide to Imines Catalyzed by a Chiral (Salen)Al(III) Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5315–5316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cozzi, P.G. Metal-Salen Schiff base complexes in catalysis: Practical aspects. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 410–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Taylor, M.S.; Zalatan, D.N.; Lerchner, A.M.; Jacobsen, E.N. Highly Enantioselective Conjugate Additions to α,β-Unsaturated Ketones Catalyzed by a (Salen)Al Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1313–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gualandi, A.; Calogero, F.; Potenti, S.; Cozzi, P.G. Al(Salen) Metal Complexes in Stereoselective Catalysis. Molecules 2019, 24, 1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Brodbeck, D.; Álvarez-Barcia, S.; Meisner, J.; Broghammer, F.; Klepp, J.; Garnier, D.; Frey, W.; Kästner, J.; Peters, R. Asymmetric Carboxycyanation of Aldehydes by Cooperative AlF/Onium Salt Catalysts: From Cyanoformate to KCN as Cyanide Source. Chem.–Eur. J. 2019, 25, 1515–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xia, Q.; Yuan, C.; Li, Y.; Cui, Y. Design and assembly of a chiral composite metal–organic framework for efficient asymmertric sequential transformation of alkenes to amino alcohols. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 9136–9139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lamb, J.R.; Hubbell, A.K.; MacMillan, S.N.; Coates, G.W. Carbonylative, Catalytic Deoxygenation of 2,3-Disubstituted Epoxides with Inversion of Stereochemistry: An Alternative Alkene Isomerization Method. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 8029–8035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fish, H.; Hart, S.; Lamb, K.J.; North, M.; Quek, S.C.Z.; Whitwood, A.C.; Woods, B.; Wu, X. Structural analysis of five-coordinate aluminium(salen) complexes and its relationship to their catalytic activity. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sengoden, M.; North, M.; Whitwood, A.C. Synthesis of Oxazolidinones by using Carbon Dioxide as a C1 Building Block and an Aluminium-Based Catalyst. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 3296–3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. North, M.; Quek, S.C.Z.; Pridmore, N.E.; Whitwood, A.C.; Wu, X. Aluminum(salen) Complexes as Catalysts for the Kinetic Resolution of Terminal Epoxides via CO2 Coupling. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 3398–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Laiwattanapaisarn, N.; Virachotikul, A.; Phomphrai, K. Cycloaddition of carbon dioxide to epoxides by highly active constrained aluminum chloride complexes. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 11039–11048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zaitsev, K.V.; Oprunenko, Y.F.; Churakov, A.V.; Zaitseva, G.S.; Karlov, S.S. The reaction of Al(O-i-Pr)3 with the SalenH2 ligand: An unexpected product. Polyhedron 2014, 81, 312–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mei, Y.; Borger, J.E.; Wu, D.-J.; Grützmacher, H. Salen supported Al–O–CP and Ga–PCO complexes. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 4370–4374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lichtenberger, R.; Schubert, U. Chemical modification of aluminium alkoxides for sol-gel processing. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 9287–9296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hwang, K.Y.; Lee, M.H.; Jang, H.; Sung, Y.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, S.H.; Do, Y. Aluminium-salen luminophores as new hole-blocking materials for phosphorescent OLEDs. Dalton Trans. 2008, 14, 1818–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hwang, K.Y.; Kim, H.; Lee, Y.S.; Lee, M.H.; Do, Y. Synthesis and Properties of Salen–Aluminum Complexes as a Novel Class of Color-Tunable Luminophores. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 6478–6487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kwak, S.W.; Jin, H.; Shin, H.; Lee, J.H.; Hwang, H.; Lee, J.; Kim, M.; Chung, Y.; Kim, Y.; Lee, K.M.; et al. A salen–Al/carbazole dyad-based guest–host assembly: Enhancement of luminescence efficiency via intramolecular energy transfer. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 4712–4715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kireenko, M.M.; Kuchuk, E.A.; Zaitsev, K.V.; Tafeenko, V.A.; Oprunenko, Y.F.; Churakov, A.V.; Lermontova, E.K.; Zaitseva, G.S.; Karlov, S.S. Aluminum complexes based on pyridine substituted alcohols: Synthesis, structure, and catalytic application in ROP. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 11963–11976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hormnirun, P.; Marshall, E.L.; Gibson, V.C.; White, A.J.P.; Williams, D.J. Remarkable Stereocontrol in the Polymerization of Racemic Lactide Using Aluminum Initiators Supported by Tetradentate Aminophenoxide Ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2688–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ovitt, T.M.; Coates, G.W. Stereoselective Ring-Opening Polymerization of meso-Lactide:  Synthesis of Syndiotactic Poly(lactic acid). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4072–4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Darensbourg, D.J.; Billodeaux, D.R. Aluminum Salen Complexes and Tetrabutylammonium Salts:  A Binary Catalytic System for Production of Polycarbonates from CO2 and Cyclohexene Oxide. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 1433–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Marlier, E.E.; Macaranas, J.A.; Marell, D.J.; Dunbar, C.R.; Johnson, M.A.; DePorre, Y.; Miranda, M.O.; Neisen, B.D.; Cramer, C.J.; Hillmyer, M.A.; et al. Mechanistic Studies of ε-Caprolactone Polymerization by (salen)AlOR Complexes and a Predictive Model for Cyclic Ester Polymerizations. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 1215–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zaitsev, K.V.; Kuchuk, E.A.; Mankaev, B.N.; Churakov, A.V.; Zaitseva, G.S.; Lemenovskii, D.A.; Karlov, S.S. Synthesis, structure, and catalytic activity of new aluminum complexes formed with sterically bulky ligands. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2014, 63, 2630–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Thomas, C.M. Stereocontrolled ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters: Synthesis of new polyester microstructures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dijkstra, P.J.; Du, H.; Feijen, J. Single site catalysts for stereoselective ring-opening polymerization of lactides. Polym. Chem. 2011, 2, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guillaume, S.M.; Kirillov, E.; Sarazin, Y.; Carpentier, J.-F. Beyond Stereoselectivity, Switchable Catalysis: Some of the Last Frontier Challenges in Ring-Opening Polymerization of Cyclic Esters. Chem.–Eur. J. 2015, 21, 7988–8003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zaitsev, K.V.; Cherepakhin, V.S.; Zherebker, A.; Kononikhin, A.; Nikolaev, E.; Churakov, A.V. Aluminum Complexes Based on Tridentate Amidoalkoxide NNO-Ligands: Synthesis, Structure, and Properties. J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 875, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fedulin, A.I.; Churakov, A.V.; Zaitsev, K.V. Methyl aluminum complexes based on tridentate 2,6-bis(mercapto)pyridinyl SNS-ligands. Mendeleev Commun. 2021, 31, 847–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moon, S.I.; Lee, C.W.; Miyamoto, M.; Kimura, Y. Melt polycondensation of L-lactic acid with Sn(II) catalysts activated by various proton acids: A direct manufacturing route to high molecular weight Poly(L-lactic acid). J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2000, 38, 1673–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marques, D.A.S.; Jarmelo, S.; G. Baptista, C.M.S.; Gil, M.H. Poly(lactic acid) Synthesis in Solution Polymerization. Macromol. Symp. 2010, 296, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Spassky, N.; Wisniewski, M.; Pluta, C.; Le Borgne, A. Highly stereoelective polymerization of rac-(D,L)-lactide with a chiral Schiff’s base/aluminium alkoxide initiator. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1996, 197, 2627–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Miranda, M.O.; DePorre, Y.; Vazquez-Lima, H.; Johnson, M.A.; Marell, D.J.; Cramer, C.J.; Tolman, W.B. Understanding the Mechanism of Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone Catalyzed by Aluminum Salen Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 13692–13701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chisholm, M.H.; Patmore, N.J.; Zhou, Z. Concerning the relative importance of enantiomorphic site vs. chain end control in the stereoselective polymerization of lactides: Reactions of (R,R-salen)- and (S,S-salen)-aluminium alkoxides LAlOCH2R complexes (R = CH3 and S-CHMeCl). Chem. Commun. 2005, 1, 127–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pepels, M.P.F.; Hermsen, I.; Noordzij, G.J.; Duchateau, R. Molecular Structure–Catalytic Activity Relationship in the Ring-Opening Polymerization of (Macro)lactones. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 796–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nomura, N.; Ishii, R.; Yamamoto, Y.; Kondo, T. Stereoselective Ring-Opening Polymerization of a Racemic Lactide by Using Achiral Salen– and Homosalen–Aluminum Complexes. Chem.–Eur. J. 2007, 13, 4433–4451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Majerska, K.; Duda, A. Stereocontrolled Polymerization of Racemic Lactide with Chiral Initiator:  Combining Stereoelection and Chiral Ligand-Exchange Mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1026–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Breteler, M.R.T.; Zhong, Z.; Dijkstra, P.J.; Palmans, A.R.A.; Peeters, J.; Feijen, J. Ring-opening polymerization of substituted ε-caprolactones with a chiral (salen) AlOiPr complex. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2007, 45, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhong, Z.; Dijkstra, P.J.; Feijen, J. Controlled and Stereoselective Polymerization of Lactide:  Kinetics, Selectivity, and Microstructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11291–11298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. van der Meulen, I.; Gubbels, E.; Huijser, S.; Sablong, R.; Koning, C.E.; Heise, A.; Duchateau, R. Catalytic Ring-Opening Polymerization of Renewable Macrolactones to High Molecular Weight Polyethylene-like Polymers. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 4301–4305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cross, E.D.; Allan, L.E.N.; Decken, A.; Shaver, M.P. Aluminum salen and salan complexes in the ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters: Controlled immortal and copolymerization of rac-β-butyrolactone and rac-lactide. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2013, 51, 1137–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pepels, M.P.F.; Bouyahyi, M.; Heise, A.; Duchateau, R. Kinetic Investigation on the Catalytic Ring-Opening (Co)Polymerization of (Macro)Lactones Using Aluminum Salen Catalysts. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 4324–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chisholm, M.H.; Gallucci, J.C.; Quisenberry, K.T.; Zhou, Z. Complexities in the Ring-Opening Polymerization of Lactide by Chiral Salen Aluminum Initiators. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 2613–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhong, Z.; Dijkstra, P.J.; Feijen, J. [(salen)Al]-Mediated, Controlled and Stereoselective Ring-Opening Polymerization of Lactide in Solution and without Solvent: Synthesis of Highly Isotactic Polylactide Stereocopolymers from Racemic D,L-Lactide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4510–4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pang, X.; Duan, R.; Li, X.; Hu, C.; Wang, X.; Chen, X. Breaking the Paradox between Catalytic Activity and Stereoselectivity: Rac-Lactide Polymerization by Trinuclear Salen–Al Complexes. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 906–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gaston, A.J.; Navickaite, G.; Nichol, G.S.; Shaver, M.P.; Garden, J.A. Electron rich salen-AlCl catalysts as efficient initiators for the ring-opening polymerisation of rac-lactide. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 119, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Macaranas, J.A.; Luke, A.M.; Mandal, M.; Neisen, B.D.; Marell, D.J.; Cramer, C.J.; Tolman, W.B. Sterically Induced Ligand Framework Distortion Effects on Catalytic Cyclic Ester Polymerizations. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 3451–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Darensbourg, D.J.; Karroonnirun, O. Stereoselective Ring-Opening Polymerization of rac-Lactides Catalyzed by Chiral and Achiral Aluminum Half-Salen Complexes. Organometallics 2010, 29, 5627–5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nomura, N.; Akita, A.; Ishii, R.; Mizuno, M. Random Copolymerization of ε-Caprolactone with Lactide Using a Homosalen−Al Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1750–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, H.-L.; Dutta, S.; Huang, P.-Y.; Lin, C.-C. Preparation and Characterization of Aluminum Alkoxides Coordinated on salen-Type Ligands: Highly Stereoselective Ring-Opening Polymerization of rac-Lactide. Organometallics 2012, 31, 2016–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jianming, R.; Anguo, X.; Hongwei, W.; Hailin, Y. Review–recent development of ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters using aluminum complexes. Des. Monomers Polym. 2014, 17, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gao, B.; Li, D.; Li, Y.; Duan, Q.; Duan, R.; Pang, X. Ring-opening polymerization of lactide using chiral salen aluminum complexes as initiators: High productivity and stereoselectivity. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 4670–4675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Strianese, M.; Pappalardo, D.; Mazzeo, M.; Lamberti, M.; Pellecchia, C. Salen-type aluminum and zinc complexes as two-faced Janus compounds: Contribution to molecular sensing and polymerization catalysis. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 16533–16550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lu, Y.; Swisher, J.H.; Meyer, T.Y.; Coates, G.W. Chirality-Directed Regioselectivity: An Approach for the Synthesis of Alternating Poly(Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 4119–4124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Haque, F.M.; Ishibashi, J.S.A.; Lidston, C.A.L.; Shao, H.; Bates, F.S.; Chang, A.B.; Coates, G.W.; Cramer, C.J.; Dauenhauer, P.J.; Dichtel, W.R.; et al. Defining the Macromolecules of Tomorrow through Synergistic Sustainable Polymer Research. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 6322–6373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Butala, R.R.; Parkin, S.; Walrod, J.H.; Atwood, D.A. Synthesis, Characterization, and Stability of Dealkylated Salen-Supported Aluminum Phosphates. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 4456–4462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Piskun, Y.A.; Vasilenko, I.V.; Zaitsev, K.V.; Oprunenko, Y.F.; Kostjuk, S.V. Synthesis of Functional Poly(ε-caprolactone)s via Living Ring-Opening Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone Using Functionalized Aluminum Alkoxides as Initiators. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2017, 218, 1600580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, M.; Müller, A.H.E. Cylindrical polymer brushes. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2005, 43, 3461–3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lee, H.-i.; Pietrasik, J.; Sheiko, S.S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Stimuli-responsive molecular brushes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 24–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ishizu, K.; Satoh, J. Synthesis of isopropenylbenzyl-terminated macromonomers and preparation of polymer brushes by anionic homopolymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 87, 1790–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hillmyer, M.A.; Tolman, W.B. Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymers: Renewable, Degradable, and Sustainable. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2390–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wang, C.; Li, G.; Guo, R. Multiple morphologies from amphiphilic graft copolymers based on chitooligosaccharides as backbones and polycaprolactones as branches. Chem. Commun. 2005, 28, 3591–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lemmouchi, Y.; Perry, M.C.; Amass, A.J.; Chakraborty, K.; Schacht, E. Novel synthesis of biodegradable amphiphilic linear and star block copolymers based on poly(ε-caprolactone) and poly(ethylene glycol). J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2007, 45, 3975–3985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, B.; Chen, G.; Meng, F.; Li, T.; Yue, J.; Jing, X.; Huang, Y. A novel amphiphilic copolymer poly(ethylene oxide-co-allyl glycidyl ether)-graft-poly(ε-caprolactone): Synthesis, self-assembly, and protein encapsulation behavior. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 2421–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nouri, S.; Dubois, C.; Lafleur, P.G. Synthesis and characterization of polylactides with different branched architectures. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2015, 53, 522–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, Y.; Schulze, M.; Albertsson, A.C. α-Methacryloyl-ω-Hydroxyl-Poly(ϵ-Caprolactone) Macromonomer: Synthesis, Characterization, and Copolymerization. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A 1998, 35, 207–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lang, M.; Chu, C.-C. Functionalized multiarm poly(ϵ-caprolactone)s: Synthesis, structure analysis, and network formation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 86, 2296–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fu, Q.; Ren, J.M.; Qiao, G.G. Synthesis of novel cylindrical bottlebrush polypseudorotaxane via inclusion complexation of high density poly(ε-caprolactone) bottlebrush polymer and [small alpha]-cyclodextrins. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Eguiburu, J.L.; Fernandez-Berridi, M.J.; Cossío, F.P.; Román, J.S. Ring-Opening Polymerization of l-Lactide Initiated by (2-Methacryloxy)ethyloxy−Aluminum Trialkoxides. 1. Kinetics. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 8252–8258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tian, D.; Dubois, P.; Jerome, R.; Teyssie, P. Macromolecular Engineering of Polylactones and Polylactides. 18. Synthesis of Star-Branched Aliphatic Polyesters Bearing Various Functional End Groups. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 4134–4144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dubois, P.; Ropson, N.; Jérôme, R.; Teyssié, P. Macromolecular Engineering of Polylactones and Polylactides. 19. Kinetics of Ring-Opening Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone Initiated with Functional Aluminum Alkoxides. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 1965–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rooney, T.R.; Monyatsi, O.; Hutchinson, R.A. Polyester Macromonomer Syntheses and Radical Copolymerization Kinetics with Styrene. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 784–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pearce, A.K.; Vasey, C.E.; Anane-Adjei, A.B.; Sodano, F.; Crucitti, V.C.; Irvine, D.J.; Howdle, S.M.; Alexander, C.; Taresco, V. Versatile, Highly Controlled Synthesis of Hybrid (Meth)acrylate–Polyester–Carbonates and their Exploitation in Tandem Post-Polymerization–Functionalization. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2019, 220, 1900270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Luo, S.H.; Xiao, Y.; Lin, J.Y.; Chen, Z.H.; Lin, S.T.; Wang, Z.Y. Preparation, characterization and application of maleic anhydride-modified polylactic acid macromonomer based on direct melt polymerization. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 25, 100986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fuoco, T.; Chen, M.; Jain, S.; Wang, X.V.; Wang, L.; Finne-Wistrand, A. Hydrogel Polyester Scaffolds via Direct-Ink-Writing of Ad Hoc Designed Photocurable Macromonomer. Polymers 2022, 14, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, X.; Wang, P.; Xu, Y.; Wang, J.; Shi, Y.; Niu, W.; Song, W.; Liu, R.; Yu, C.-Y.; Wei, H. Facile synthesis and self-assembly behaviors of biodegradable amphiphilic hyperbranched copolymers with reducible poly(caprolactone) grafts. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13, 6162–6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cao, X.; Zhang, C.; Wu, S.; An, Z. A highly efficient macromonomer approach to core cross-linked star (CCS) polymers via one-step RAFT emulsion polymerization. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 4277–4284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rooney, T.R.; Moscatelli, D.; Hutchinson, R.A. Polylactic acid macromonomer radical propagation kinetics and degradation behaviour. React. Chem. Eng. 2017, 2, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Fuoco, T.; Nguyen, T.T.; Kivijärvi, T.; Finne-Wistrand, A. Organocatalytic strategy to telechelic oligo(ε-caprolactone-co-p-dioxanone): Photocurable macromonomers for polyester networks. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 141, 110098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kongprayoon, A.; Ross, G.; Limpeanchob, N.; Mahasaranon, S.; Punyodom, W.; Topham, P.D.; Ross, S. Bio-derived and biocompatible poly(lactic acid)/silk sericin nanogels and their incorporation within poly(lactide-co-glycolide) electrospun nanofibers. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13, 3343–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ma, H.; Ha, S.; Jeong, J.; Wang, V.; Kim, K.T. Synthesis of discrete bottlebrush polymers via the iterative convergent growth technique and post-functionalization. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13, 3689–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ksendzov, E.A.; Nikishau, P.A.; Zurina, I.M.; Presniakova, V.S.; Timashev, P.; Rochev, Y.A.; Kotova, S.; Kostjuk, S.V. Graft Copolymers of N-Isopropylacrylamide with Poly(d,l-lactide) or Poly(ε-caprolactone) Macromonomers: A Promising Class of Thermoresponsive Polymers with a Tunable LCST. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4, 1344–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kocen, A.L.; Cui, S.; Lin, T.-W.; LaPointe, A.M.; Coates, G.W. Chemically Recyclable Ester-Linked Polypropylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 12613–12618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Dechy-Cabaret, O.; Martin-Vaca, B.; Bourissou, D. Controlled Ring-Opening Polymerization of Lactide and Glycolide. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 6147–6176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Piskun, Y.A.; Vasilenko, I.V.; Zaitsev, K.V.; Karlov, S.S.; Zaitseva, G.S.; Gaponik, L.V.; Kostjuk, S.V. Controlled homo- and copolymerization of ε-caprolactone and D,L-lactide in the presence of TiIV complexes. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2015, 64, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zaitsev, K.V.; Piskun, Y.A.; Oprunenko, Y.F.; Karlov, S.S.; Zaitseva, G.S.; Vasilenko, I.V.; Churakov, A.V.; Kostjuk, S.V. Controlled ring-opening homo- and copolymerization of ɛ-caprolactone and d,l-lactide by iminophenolate aluminum complexes: An efficient approach toward well-defined macromonomers. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2014, 52, 1237–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Iojoiu, C.; Cade, D.; Fessi, H.; Hamaide, T. Synthesis of oligocaprolactone vinyl ether macromonomers and their use for indomethacin encapsulation in polymer nanoparticles based on polycaprolactone macromonomer–maleic anhydride–N-vinyl pyrrolidone terpolymers. Polym. Int. 2006, 55, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, P.; Zerroukhi, A.; Chen, J.; Chalamet, Y.; Jeanmaire, T.; Xia, Z. Synthesis, kinetic study, and application of Ti[O(CH2)4OCH=CH2]4 in ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone and radical polymerization. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 7773–7784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pantiru, M.; Iojoiu, C.; Hamaide, T.; Delolme, F. Influence of the chemical structure of transfer agents in coordinated anionic ring-opening polymerization: Application to one-step functional oligomerization of ε-caprolactone. Polym. Int. 2004, 53, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Dzugan, S.J.; Goedken, V.L. Factors affecting aluminum-carbon bond reactivity of tetradentate Schiff-base organoaluminum complexes. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 2858–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Atwood, D.A.; Jegier, J.A.; Rutherford, D. The First Structurally Characterized Salen-Indium Complexes. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1997, 70, 2093–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Atwood, D.A.; Jegier, J.A.; Rutherford, D. A New Class of Aluminum Cations Based upon Tetradentate (N2O2) Chelating Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Addison, A.W.; Rao, T.N.; Reedijk, J.; van Rijn, J.; Verschoor, G.C. Synthesis, structure, and spectroscopic properties of copper(II) compounds containing nitrogen-sulphur donor ligands; the crystal and molecular structure of aqua[1,7-bis(N-methylbenzimidazol-2′-yl)-2,6-dithiaheptane]copper(II) perchlorate. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1984, 7, 1349–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Atwood, D.A.; Harvey, M.J. Group 13 Compounds Incorporating Salen Ligands. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Atwood, D.A.; Hill, M.S.; Jegier, J.A.; Rutherford, D. The Use of Five-Coordinate Aluminum Alkyls to Prepare Molecules Containing a Single Al−O−Si Linkage. Organometallics 1997, 16, 2659–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Munoz-Hernandez, M.-A.; Keizer, T.S.; Wei, P.; Parkin, S.; Atwood, D.A. Reactivity and Derivatization of Five-Coordinate, Chelated Aluminum. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 6782–6787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gurian, P.L.; Cheatham, L.K.; Ziller, J.W.; Barron, A.R. Aluminium complexes of N,N-ethylenebis(salicylideneimine)(H2salen). X-Ray crystal structures of [{Al(salen)}2(.mu.-O)]*MeCN and [Al(OC6H2Me3-2,4,6)(salen)]. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1991, 6, 1449–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zaitsev, K.V.; Kuchuk, E.A.; Karlov, S.S.; Zaitseva, G.S.; Churakov, A.V. {2,2′-[Ethane-1,2-diylbis(nitrilomethanylylidene)]diphenolato}(isopropanolato)aluminium dichloromethane hemisolvate. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E 2013, 69, m631–m632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Amgoune, A.; Lavanant, L.; Thomas, C.M.; Chi, Y.; Welter, R.; Dagorne, S.; Carpentier, J.F. An aluminum complex supported by a fluorous diamino-dialkoxide ligand for the highly productive ring-opening polymerization of epsilon-caprolactone. Organometallics 2005, 24, 6279–6282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Muñoz-Hernandez, M.-A.; Keizer, T.S.; Parkin, S.; Zhang, Y.; Atwood, D.A. Chelated aluminum alkoxides. J. Chem. Crystallogr. 2000, 30, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Pappalardo, D.; Annunziata, L.; Pellecchia, C. Living Ring-Opening Homo- and Copolymerization of ε-Caprolactone and L- and D,L-Lactides by Dimethyl(salicylaldiminato)aluminum Compounds. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 6056–6062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Iwasa, N.; Katao, S.; Liu, J.; Fujiki, M.; Furukawa, Y.; Nomura, K. Notable Effect of Fluoro Substituents in the Imino Group in Ring-Opening Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone by Al Complexes Containing Phenoxyimine Ligands. Organometallics 2009, 28, 2179–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Radchenko, A.V.; Kostjuk, S.V.; Ganachaud, F. Cationic polymerization of isobutyl vinyl ether in aqueous media: Physical chemistry tricks to fight against thermal runaway. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 1883–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Larrow, J.F.; Jacobsen, E.N.; Gao, Y.; Hong, Y.; Nie, X.; Zepp, C.M. A Practical Method for the Large-Scale Preparation of [N,N′-Bis(3,5-di-tertbutylsalicylidene)-1,2-cyclohexanediaminato(2-)]manganese(III) chloride, a Highly Enantioselective Epoxidation Catalyst. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1939–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kemp, D.S.; Hanson, G. New protective groups for peptide synthesis. 4. Chromone-derived protection for amine and carboxyl functions. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 4971–4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Koley, M.K.; Manoharan, P.T.; Koley, A.P. Synthesis and characterization of a stable paramagnetic hexacoordinated oxochromium(IV) complex with dianionic tetradentate Schiff base ligand salen. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2010, 363, 3798–3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Chen, F.-X.; Liu, X.; Qin, B.; Zhou, H.; Feng, X.; Zhang, G. Highly Efficient Double-Activation Catalysts for the Synthesis of Ketone Cyanohydrins. Synthesis 2004, 2004, 2266–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 01262 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Ways of macromonomer synthesis.
Scheme 1. Ways of macromonomer synthesis.
Molecules 28 01262 sch001
Molecules 28 01262 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Mechanism of macromonomer synthesis.
Scheme 2. Mechanism of macromonomer synthesis.
Molecules 28 01262 sch002
Molecules 28 01262 sch003 550
Scheme 3. The structures of ligands 1a-c.
Scheme 3. The structures of ligands 1a-c.
Molecules 28 01262 sch003
Molecules 28 01262 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Synthesis of methyl aluminum complexes 2a-c.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of methyl aluminum complexes 2a-c.
Molecules 28 01262 sch004
Molecules 28 01262 sch005 550
Scheme 5. Synthesis of aluminum complexes 3a-c containing a fragment of unsaturated alcohol.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of aluminum complexes 3a-c containing a fragment of unsaturated alcohol.
Molecules 28 01262 sch005
Molecules 28 01262 g001 550
Figure 1. The molecular structure of complex 3c. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at a 50% probability level. The solvated toluene molecule is omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): Al(1)-O(3) 1.7437(13), Al(1)-O(1) 1.7900(12), Al(1)-O(2) 1.8119(12), Al(1)-N(2) 2.0074(15), Al(1)-N(1) 2.0131(15) O(4)-C(56) 1.357(3), C(56)-C(57) 1.298(3); O(3)-Al(1)-O(1) 112.68(6), O(3)-Al(1)-O(2) 105.33(6), O(1)-Al(1)-O(2) 91.43(5), O(3)-Al(1)-N(2) 109.40(6), O(1)-Al(1)-N(2) 136.41(6), O(2)-Al(1)-N(2) 88.10(6), O(3)-Al(1)-N(1) 93.31(6), O(1)-Al(1)-N(1) 88.24(6), O(2)-Al(1)-N(1) 159.87(6), N(2)-Al(1)-N(1) 78.42(6), C(51)-O(3)-Al(1) 124.65(11), C(56)-O(4)-C(54) 116.44(17), C(57)-C(56)-O(4) 128.7(2).
Figure 1. The molecular structure of complex 3c. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at a 50% probability level. The solvated toluene molecule is omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): Al(1)-O(3) 1.7437(13), Al(1)-O(1) 1.7900(12), Al(1)-O(2) 1.8119(12), Al(1)-N(2) 2.0074(15), Al(1)-N(1) 2.0131(15) O(4)-C(56) 1.357(3), C(56)-C(57) 1.298(3); O(3)-Al(1)-O(1) 112.68(6), O(3)-Al(1)-O(2) 105.33(6), O(1)-Al(1)-O(2) 91.43(5), O(3)-Al(1)-N(2) 109.40(6), O(1)-Al(1)-N(2) 136.41(6), O(2)-Al(1)-N(2) 88.10(6), O(3)-Al(1)-N(1) 93.31(6), O(1)-Al(1)-N(1) 88.24(6), O(2)-Al(1)-N(1) 159.87(6), N(2)-Al(1)-N(1) 78.42(6), C(51)-O(3)-Al(1) 124.65(11), C(56)-O(4)-C(54) 116.44(17), C(57)-C(56)-O(4) 128.7(2).
Molecules 28 01262 g001
Molecules 28 01262 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) ln[M]0/[M] vs. time; (b) Mn, Ð vs. conversion dependences for the bulk ε-caprolactone polymerization for catalyst 3a at [M]/[3a] = 300 and at different temperatures. The straight line in Figure 2b corresponds to the theoretical molecular weight calculated as Mn(theor) = ([ε-caprolactone]/[3a]) × 114 × Conversion + 115. Experimental values of the molecular weight determined by SEC versus polystyrene standards were corrected by a factor of 0.52 [85].
Figure 2. (a) ln[M]0/[M] vs. time; (b) Mn, Ð vs. conversion dependences for the bulk ε-caprolactone polymerization for catalyst 3a at [M]/[3a] = 300 and at different temperatures. The straight line in Figure 2b corresponds to the theoretical molecular weight calculated as Mn(theor) = ([ε-caprolactone]/[3a]) × 114 × Conversion + 115. Experimental values of the molecular weight determined by SEC versus polystyrene standards were corrected by a factor of 0.52 [85].
Molecules 28 01262 g002
Molecules 28 01262 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) ln[M]0/[M] vs. time; (b) Mn, Ð vs. conversion dependences for the bulk ε-caprolactone polymerization in the presence of different catalytic complexes at [M]/[catalyst] = 300 and at 80 °C. The straight line in Figure 3b corresponds to the theoretical molecular weight calculated as Mn(theor) = ([ε-caprolactone]/[catalyst]) × 114 × Conversion + 115. Experimental values of the molecular weight determined by SEC versus polystyrene standards were corrected by a factor of 0.52 [85].
Figure 3. (a) ln[M]0/[M] vs. time; (b) Mn, Ð vs. conversion dependences for the bulk ε-caprolactone polymerization in the presence of different catalytic complexes at [M]/[catalyst] = 300 and at 80 °C. The straight line in Figure 3b corresponds to the theoretical molecular weight calculated as Mn(theor) = ([ε-caprolactone]/[catalyst]) × 114 × Conversion + 115. Experimental values of the molecular weight determined by SEC versus polystyrene standards were corrected by a factor of 0.52 [85].
Molecules 28 01262 g003
Molecules 28 01262 g004 550
Figure 4. 1H NMR spectrum of poly(ε-caprolactone) synthesized with 3b at 80 °C and at [ε-caprolactone]/[catalyst] = 100.
Figure 4. 1H NMR spectrum of poly(ε-caprolactone) synthesized with 3b at 80 °C and at [ε-caprolactone]/[catalyst] = 100.
Molecules 28 01262 g004
Molecules 28 01262 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) ln[M]0/[M] vs. time; (b) Mn, Ð vs. conversion dependences for the bulk D,L-lactide polymerization at 130 °C and [M]/[catalyst] = 100 for different catalytic complexes. The straight line in Figure 5b corresponds to the theoretical molecular weight calculated as Mn(theor)= ([D,L-lactide]/[catalyst]) × 144 × Conversion + 115. Experimental values of the molecular weight determined by SEC versus polystyrene standards were corrected by a factor of 0.58 [85].
Figure 5. (a) ln[M]0/[M] vs. time; (b) Mn, Ð vs. conversion dependences for the bulk D,L-lactide polymerization at 130 °C and [M]/[catalyst] = 100 for different catalytic complexes. The straight line in Figure 5b corresponds to the theoretical molecular weight calculated as Mn(theor)= ([D,L-lactide]/[catalyst]) × 144 × Conversion + 115. Experimental values of the molecular weight determined by SEC versus polystyrene standards were corrected by a factor of 0.58 [85].
Molecules 28 01262 g005
Molecules 28 01262 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) ln[M]0/[M] vs. time; (b) Mn, Ð vs. conversion dependences for the bulk D,L-lactide polymerization for complex 3b at 130 °C and at different [M]/[catalyst] ratios. The straight lines in Figure 6b correspond to the theoretical molecular weight calculated as Mn(theor) = ([D,L-lactide]/[catalyst]) × 144 × Conversion + 115. Experimental values of the molecular weight determined by SEC vs. polystyrene standards were corrected by a factor of 0.58 [85].
Figure 6. (a) ln[M]0/[M] vs. time; (b) Mn, Ð vs. conversion dependences for the bulk D,L-lactide polymerization for complex 3b at 130 °C and at different [M]/[catalyst] ratios. The straight lines in Figure 6b correspond to the theoretical molecular weight calculated as Mn(theor) = ([D,L-lactide]/[catalyst]) × 144 × Conversion + 115. Experimental values of the molecular weight determined by SEC vs. polystyrene standards were corrected by a factor of 0.58 [85].
Molecules 28 01262 g006
Table
Table 1. Bulk ROP of ε-caprolactone at different monomer to catalyst ratios 1.
Table 1. Bulk ROP of ε-caprolactone at different monomer to catalyst ratios 1.
Catalyst[M]/[cat]Time (h)Conversion (%)Mn (theor) (g mol−1) 2Mn (g mol−1) 3ÐFn (%) 4
3a3003.29432,15023,4001.7038
3b3001.710034,20019,6001.7763
1000.2510011,50010,5001.7179
3c300166923,60017,6001.7168
1003.210011,50013,1001.6586
1 Conditions: T = 80 °C; Conversion was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy of the reaction mixture by comparing integral intensities of signals of methylene protons on polymer and monomer, respectively. 2 Mn(theor) = ([ε-caprolactone]/[3a]) × 114 × Conversion + 115. 3 Calculated according to the following equation: Mn = 0.52 × Mn(SEC). 4 Calculated from the 1H NMR spectra as follows: Fn = 2 I(c)/I(k) × 100, see Figure 4 for assignments.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zaitsev, K.V.; Trubachev, A.D.; Oprunenko, Y.F.; Piskun, Y.A.; Vasilenko, I.V.; Churakov, A.V.; Kostjuk, S.V. Aluminum Salen Complexes Modified with Unsaturated Alcohol: Synthesis, Characterization, and Their Activity towards Ring-Opening Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone and D,L-Lactide. Molecules 2023, 28, 1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031262

AMA Style

Zaitsev KV, Trubachev AD, Oprunenko YF, Piskun YA, Vasilenko IV, Churakov AV, Kostjuk SV. Aluminum Salen Complexes Modified with Unsaturated Alcohol: Synthesis, Characterization, and Their Activity towards Ring-Opening Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone and D,L-Lactide. Molecules. 2023; 28(3):1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zaitsev, Kirill V., Andrey D. Trubachev, Yuri F. Oprunenko, Yuliya A. Piskun, Irina V. Vasilenko, Andrei V. Churakov, and Sergei V. Kostjuk. 2023. "Aluminum Salen Complexes Modified with Unsaturated Alcohol: Synthesis, Characterization, and Their Activity towards Ring-Opening Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone and D,L-Lactide" Molecules 28, no. 3: 1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031262

APA Style

Zaitsev, K. V., Trubachev, A. D., Oprunenko, Y. F., Piskun, Y. A., Vasilenko, I. V., Churakov, A. V., & Kostjuk, S. V. (2023). Aluminum Salen Complexes Modified with Unsaturated Alcohol: Synthesis, Characterization, and Their Activity towards Ring-Opening Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone and D,L-Lactide. Molecules, 28(3), 1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031262

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop