Next Article in Journal
Microfluidic Diffusion Sizing Applied to the Study of Natural Products and Extracts That Modulate the SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD/ACE2 Interaction
Previous Article in Journal
Chia (Salvia hispanica L.), a Pre-Hispanic Food in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: Hypoglycemic, Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Inhibitory Properties of α-Glucosidase and α-Amylase, and in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Low-Valent-Tungsten-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling Reaction

1
School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, China
2
The Marine Biomedical Research Institute, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524023, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(24), 8071; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248071
Submission received: 24 October 2023 / Revised: 30 November 2023 / Accepted: 4 December 2023 / Published: 13 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Organic Chemistry)

Abstract

:
A straightforward and convenient protocol was established for the synthesis of thiophosphates and 3-sulfenylated indoles via low-valent-tungsten-catalyzed aerobic oxidative cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions. These reactions occur under mild conditions and simple operations with commercially available starting materials, processing the advantage of excellent atom and step economy, broad substrate scope, and good functional groups tolerance. Moreover, this transformation could be practiced on the gram scale, which exhibits great potential in the preparation of drug-derived or bioactive molecules.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Organosulfur molecules are an essential constituent of modern biological and pharmaceutical chemistry [1,2]. So far, a large portion of marketed drugs, which contain a thioethers structural motif, display incomparable anticancer, antibacterial, high blood pressure, diabetes, anti-inflammatory, anti-HIV, and so on, bioactivity (Figure 1) [3,4]. Moreover, organosulfur compounds also exhibit excellent mechanical properties in the field of materials science [5,6]. Therefore, much attention has been devoted to the construction of these sulfur-containing privileged structural fragments.
Due to the diverse remarkable chemical and biological properties of sulfur-containing motifs (such as thiophosphates and 3-sulfenylated indoles), these molecules featured broad utility in the field of pharmaceutical chemistry, organic synthesis, and materials science. Accordingly, several synthetic routes for the construction of thiophosphates have been well established in recent years (Scheme 1) [7,8,9]. These methods could be divided into four categories: (a) direct nucleophilic substitution of pre-functionalized S-X or P(O)-X reagents; [10,11,12] (b) the Atherton–Todd reaction with the utilization of polyhaloalkanes as both the reagent and solvent; [13,14,15,16] and (c) cross-dehydrogenative couplings of P-H bond and S-H bond [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Among these methods, the direct phosphorylation of thiols is atom- and step-economic, practical, and environmentally friendly. Recently, Han’s group reported direct Pd-catalyzed dehydrogenative cross-coupling reactions of the readily available P(O)-H molecules with thiols for the construction of phosphorothioates in excellent yields [17]. Subsequently, Wu and coworkers successfully applied a visible light photoredox catalytic system for the direct phosphorylation of thiols with excellent substrate scope [23]. Despite tremendous progress having been achieved, due to P-H and S-H being easily oxidized by stoichiometric oxidants, the transition-metal-catalyzed aerobic oxidative cross-dehydrogenative coupling of thiols with readily available P(O)-H substrates is still hard to achieve.
On the other hand, 3-arylthioindoles occur abundantly in biologically active compounds (Figure 1) [24,25]. Therefore, considerable methods, such as transition metal catalysis [26,27], hyper-valent iodine catalysis [28], organo-catalysis [29], photocatalysis [30,31,32], electrocatalysis [33], etc., have been exploited for the preparation of 3-arylthioindoles. For example, Liu and coworkers reported a visible-light-induced, graphene-oxide-promoted C3-chalcogenylation of indoles for the synthesis of 3-sulfenylindoles and 3-selenylindoles with the advantages of high yields and a simple operation. However, some of these works suffer from certain drawbacks like harsh reaction conditions, pre-functionalized reagents, or potentially dangerous oxidants. Therefore, the development of more optional coupling reactions for the synthesis of 3-arylthioindoles is in high demand. Moreover, Song’s group revealed that the transition metal tungsten catalytic system could realize the oxidative dehydrogenative coupling of anilines for the synthesis of azoaromatics and azoxyaromatics [34]. Herein, considering the significance of organosulfur molecules and our continuous interest in aerobic cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions for the construction of organosulfur compounds [35,36], we disclosed a tungsten-catalyzed aerobic oxidative cross-dehydrogenative coupling of thiols and phosphonates or indoles for the facile synthesis of organosulfur derivatives after exerting tremendous efforts.

2. Results and Discussion

In order to verify the feasibility of our hypothesis, we selected 4-methylbenzenethiol (1a) and diethyl phosphite (2a) as the model substrates to investigate the optimal reaction conditions of this transformation as in Table 1. To our delight, when this reaction was conducted in the presence of tungsten catalysts, such as W(CO)6, W(CH3CN)3(CO)3, and W(COD)2(CO)4 in MeCN at 80 °C, the product 3a was indeed generated as expected (entries 1–3). For the purpose of increasing the efficiency of this reaction, various solvents (such as MeCN, DMSO, DMF, DMA, DCE, toluene, dioxane, and THF) were screened under identical conditions; these experiments revealed that THF was the optimal choice among other solvents (entries 4–10). The yield of product 3a could be increased to 64%. Further optimization was focused on the examination of different types of oxidants, such as DDQ, NQ, TBHP, air, and O2. Fortunately, the utilization of quinone oxidants delivered higher yields of 3a (entries 10–12, respectively). Notably, when air or O2 was examined, comparable results were achieved (entries 15–16). Subsequently, increasing the temperature to 100 °C, the desired product 3a could be obtained in 90% yield (entry 18). Finally, controlled experiments indicated that tungsten catalysis and an oxidant were essential for this reaction (entries 20–21).
With the optimal reaction conditions established, we turned to explore the scope of thiols and phosphonates or diarylphosphine oxides. Firstly, substituted thiophenols were evaluated in this transformation, as shown in Scheme 2 (see Supplementary Materials for details). Delightfully, various aryl thiols could participate very well in this reaction to deliver the corresponding products in good yields (3a3k). The electron-donating groups methyl (3a) and methoxy (3b) and electron- withdrawing substituents halogens were all compatible in this reaction (3d3f). The halogen substituents are undoubtedly important for the further structural modification of thiophosphates. Moreover, aliphatic thiols such as 2-phenylethane-1-thiol(1i) and butane-1-thiol(1j) were well tolerated in this reaction system and converted into the products in good yields (3i3j). In addition, except for these thiol substrates, several phosphonates were tested. Likewise, the substituents had no significant effect on the yield of products (3l3m). Moreover, the diarylphosphine oxides only led to a slight decrease in the reaction yields (3n3p).
According to the above experiment results, we supposed that the electron-rich substrates are more suitable in this process. Therefore, the recognized electron-rich substrates, like indoles, were investigated subsequently. Pleasingly, indole could convert into the 3-sulfenylated indoles in good yields. Consequently, different indoles were examined without further conditions optimization. The corresponding results are summarized in Scheme 3. The substituents in the different positions of the indole ring were examined affording the corresponding products in moderate to good yields smoothly (5a5d). As expected, the introduction of electron-donating groups indeed increased the yields of the reaction (5c5d). Additionally, the halogen-substituted indole substrates were well tolerated in this reaction, which could allow for the further structural modification of functionalized 3-sulfenylated indoles. The substrates with electron-donating (alkyl groups, methoxy) and electron-withdrawing substituents on the specific positions of the ring had no obvious influence, providing the desired 3-sulfenylated indoles successfully (5g5j). On the other hand, a wide range of aryl thiols efficiently underwent the aerobic oxidative cross-dehydrogenative coupling reaction, leading to the formation of various 3-sulfenylated indoles with good to excellent yields. The result indicated that the position of the substituents only had a slight effect on the efficiency of this transformation (5k5s).
To further evaluate the practicality of this reaction, a gram-scale reaction was conducted under optimal conditions (Scheme 4). The bioactive molecules 3e could be obtained in high yields, which confirmed the potential application of this protocol. Moreover, product 5a could also be synthesized at the gram scale under optimal reaction conditions.
To elucidate the mechanism of this reaction, several controlled experiments were performed. Under the standard conditions without the addition of phosphonates or indoles, disulfide (6) was observed as the only product in a high yield (Scheme 5a). Subsequently, when phosphonates (2a) and 4-methylbenzenethiol (2a) were reacted in the presence of radical scavenger TEMPO, this reaction process was inhibited, and the expected byproduct 7 was detected in low yields (Scheme 5b). The radical trapping adducts were obtained in 36% yield. Likewise, the reaction of indole with 4-methylbenzenethiol (2a) could also be inhibited by the radical scavenger TEMPO, revealing that the radical pathway was involved in these two reactions (Scheme 5c).
Based on the mechanistic experiments and previous reports [34], the plausible mechanism of this aerobic oxidative cross-dehydrogenative coupling reaction is proposed in Scheme 6. Firstly, as shown in Scheme 6a, the thiol converts into the thiyl radical species, which underwent the homocoupling reaction to generate the disulfide product 6. On the other hand, the P-centered radical was formed from phosphonates 2 through a similar aerobic oxidative process. Finally, the P-centered radical coupled with the thiyl radical to deliver the desired product 3. (path A), or the disulfide product 6 was coupled with the starting materials 2 to generate the corresponding product 3 (path B). On the other hand, the thiyl radical species were generated under the O2 atmosphere. Subsequently, the thiyl radical species could react with 4 to give the radical intermediate 8. Next, the intermediate 9 was formed via the oxidation of the radical intermediate 8. Finally, the deprotonation of the intermediate 9 led to the generation of 3-sulfenylated indole products.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

All reagents were obtained from commercial sources and used directly without further purification unless otherwise noted. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AVANCE III 400 MHz or 500 MHz. 1H NMR and 13C NMR chemical shifts were determined relative to internal standard TMS at δ 0.0. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm, and coupling constants (J) are in Hertz (Hz).

3.2. General Methods for the Preparation of Thiophosphates

A 25 mL dried Schlenk tube was added to the mixture of thiols 1 (0.20 mmol) and phosphonates 2 (0.30 mmol), W(CO)6 (0.02 mmol) in anhydrous THF (2.0 mL). The gas in the Schlenk tube was replaced by O2 three times. The reaction was then allowed to stir at 100 °C for 24 h. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was washed by saturated NaCl aqueous solution (2 × 10 mL) and then extracted with ethyl acetate (2 × 10 mL), and the organic layers were combined, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was separated by column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate) to give the pure thiophosphates.

3.3. General Methods for the Preparation of Thiophosphates

A 25 mL dried Schlenk tube was added to the mixture of thiols 1 (0.20 mmol), indoles 4 (0.30 mmol), and W(CO)6 (0.02 mmol) in anhydrous THF (2.0 mL). The gas in the Schlenk tube was replaced by O2 three times. The reaction was then allowed to stir at 100 °C for 24 h. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was washed by saturated NaCl aqueous solution (2 × 10 mL) and then extracted with ethyl acetate (2 × 10 mL), and the organic layers were combined, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was separated by column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate) to give the pure 3-sulfenylated indoles.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have disclosed an efficient tungsten-catalyzed aerobic oxidative cross-dehydrogenative coupling reaction of thiols and phosphonates or indoles. Environmentally friendly molecular oxygen is the sole oxidant in this transformation. Furthermore, readily available reagents, mild reaction conditions, broad substrates scope, and good functional group tolerance makes this approach applicable in the facile synthesis and modification of bioactive molecules.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28248071/s1, the NMR data and spectra of the catalytic products. Additional references cited within the Supporting Information [19,22,23,27,28,31,32,37,38,39].

Author Contributions

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study, Writing—review and editing, C.L.; investigation and methodology, C.L. and Y.C.; data curation, F.Y.; J.C. and J.Z.; funding acquisition, C.L. and J.Z.; conceptualization, J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515111156, 2023A1515012657), Zhaoqing University Science Fund (QN202229), College Students’ innovation and entrepreneurship training program (NO. 202310580015), Scientific Research Project of General Universities in Guangdong Province (2022KTSCX046), Zhanjiang Ocean Young Talent Innovation Project (2022E05008).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Supuran, C.T. Carbonic anhydrases: Novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Horsman, G.P.; Zechel, D.L. Phosphonate Biochemistry. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 5704–5783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Olsen, J.V.; Blagoev, B.; Gnad, F.; Macek, B.; Kumar, C.; Mortensen, P.; Mann, M. Global, In Vivo, and Site-Specific Phosphorylation Dynamics in Signaling Networks. Cell 2006, 127, 635–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kumar, T.S.; Yang, T.; Mishra, S.; Cronin, C.; Chakraborty, S.; Shen, J.-B.; Liang, B.T.; Jacobson, K.A. 5′-Phosphate and 5′-Phosphonate Ester Derivatives of (N)-Methanocarba Adenosine with In Vivo Cardioprotective Activity. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 902–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Noro, M.; Fujita, S.; Wada, T. Stereoselective Synthesis of P-Modified α-Glycosyl Phosphates by the Oxazaphospholidine Approach. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 5948–5951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Howell, B.A.; Alrubayyi, A. 2-Dopyl-1,4-di(2-dopylpropanoyl)benzene, an effective phosphorus flame retardant. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2019, 162, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jones, D.J.; O’Leary, E.M.; O’Sullivan, T.P. Modern Synthetic Approaches to Phosphorus-Sulfur Bond Formation in Organophosphorus Compounds. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020, 362, 2801–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peng, S.K.; Dong, Z.-B. Recent Advances in Sulfur-Centered S-X (X = N, P, O) Bond Formation Catalyzed by Transition Metals. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 2020, 5488–5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Beletskaya, I.P.; Ananikov, V.P. Transition-Metal-Catalyzed C–S, C–Se, and C–Te Bond Formation via Cross-Coupling and Atom-Economic Addition Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1596–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Y.-C.; Lee, C.-F. N-Chlorosuccinimide-promoted synthesis of thiophosphates from thiols and phosphonates under mild conditions. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, W.-M.; Liu, L.-J.; Yao, L.; Meng, F.-J.; Sun, Y.-M.; Zhao, C.-Q.; Xu, Q.; Han, L.-B. Stereospecific Preparations of P-Stereogenic Phosphonothioates and Phosphonoselenoates. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 6843–6847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Moon, Y.; Moon, Y.; Choi, H.; Hong, S. Metal- and oxidant-free S–P(O) bond construction via direct coupling of P(O)H with sulfinic acids. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1005–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Atherton, F.; Todd, A. Studies on phosphorylation. Part III. Further observations on the reaction of phosphites with polyhalogen compounds in presence of bases and its application to the phosphorylation of alcohols. J. Chem. Soc. 1947, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, G.; Shen, R.; Xu, Q.; Goto, M.; Zhao, Y.; Han, L.-B. Stereospecific Coupling of H-Phosphinates and Secondary Phosphine Oxides with Amines and Alcohols: A General Method for the Preparation of Optically Active Organophosphorus Acid Derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 3890–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, W.S.; Chen, T.; Saga, Y.; Han, L.-B. Chloroform-based Atherton-Todd-type reactions of alcohols and thiols with secondary phosphine oxides generating phosphinothioates and phosphinates. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 71544–71546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Trofimov, B.A.; Gusarova, N.K.; Volkov, P.A.; Ivanova, N.I.; Khrapova, K.O. First Examples of the Atherton-Todd-Like Reaction in the Absence of Bases. Heteroat. Chem. 2016, 27, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, Y.; Chen, T.; Li, S.; Shimada, S.; Han, L.B. Efficient Pd-Catalyzed Dehydrogenative Coupling of P(O)H with RS-H: A Precise Construction of P(O)–S Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 5825–5828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, J.-G.; Weng, W.-Z.; Li, P.; Zhang, B. Dimethyl sulfoxide as a mild oxidant in S–P(O) bond construction: Simple and metal-free approaches to phosphinothioates. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yeerlan, A.; Zhu, B.; Liu, J.; Jiao, N. Cs2CO3-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling of Thiols with Phosphonates and Arenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 2487–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, H.; Ash, J.; Kang, J.Y. Base-controlled Fe(Pc)-catalyzed aerobic oxidation of thiols for the synthesis of S-S and S-P(O) bonds. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 4236–4242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xue, J.-W.; Zeng, M.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Z.; Yin, G. Lewis Acid Promoted Aerobic Oxidative Coupling of Thiols with Phosphonates by Simple Nickel(II) Catalyst: Substrate Scope and Mechanistic Studies. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 4179–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, H.; Zhan, Z.; Lin, Y.; Shi, Y.; Li, G.; Wang, Q.; Deng, Y.; Hai, L.; Wu, Y. Visible light photoredox catalyzed thiophosphate synthesis using methylene blue as a promoter. Org. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 1416–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shen, J.; Li, Q.-W.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Wang, X.; Li, G.-Z.; Li, W.-Z.; Yang, S.-D.; Yang, B. Tf2O/DMSO-Promoted P−O and P−S Bond Formation: A Scalable Synthesis of Multifarious Organophosphinates and Thiophosphates. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 1541–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nuth, M.; Guan, H.; Zhukovskaya, N.; Saw, Y.L.; Ricciardi, R.P. Design of Potent Poxvirus Inhibitors of the Heterodimeric Processivity Factor Required for Viral Replication. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 3235–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, M.-Z.; Chen, Q.; Yang, G.-F. A review on recent developments of indole-containing antiviral agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 89, 421–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yadav, J.S.; Subba Reddy, B.V.; Reddy, Y.J.; Praneeth, K. Iron(III) Chloride: A Versatile Catalyst for the Practical Synthesis of 3-Sulfenylindoles. Synthesis 2009, 9, 1520–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, J.; Li, C.; Yang, S.; An, Y.; Wu, W.; Jiang, H. Palladium-Catalyzed Oxidative Sulfenylation of Indoles and Related Electron-Rich Heteroarenes with Aryl Boronic Acids and Elemental Sulfur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 7771–7783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, W.; Wang, H.; Liu, S.; Feng, H.; Benassi, E.; Qian, B. Iodine/Manganese Catalyzed Sulfenylation of Indole via Dehydrogenative Oxidative Coupling in Anisole. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020, 362, 2666–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sang, P.; Chen, Z.; Zou, J.; Zhang, Y. K2CO3 promoted direct sulfenylation of indoles: A facile approach towards 3-sulfenylindoles. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 2096–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hazarika, S.; Barman, P. Visible-Light Cercosporin Catalyzed Sulfenylation of Electron-Rich Compounds with Thiols under Transition-Metal-Free Conditions. ChemistrySelect 2020, 5, 11583–11589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yuan, W.; Huang, J.; Xu, X.; Wang, L.; Tang, X.-Y. B(C6F5)3-Catalyzed Electron Donor–Acceptor Complex-Mediated Aerobic Sulfenylation of Indoles under Visible-Light Conditions. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 7139–7143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, Q.; Peng, X.; Li, H.; He, H.; Liu, L. Visible-Light-Induced, Graphene Oxide-Promoted C3-Chalcogenylation of Indoles Strategy under Transition-Metal-Free Conditions. Molecules 2022, 27, 772–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, P.; Tang, S.; Huang, P.P.; Lei, A. Electrocatalytic Oxidant-Free Dehydrogenative C−H/S−H Cross-Coupling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3009–3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cai, X.; Shen, Y.; Li, W.; Zhan, W.; Zhang, F.; Xu, C.; Song, H. Low-Valent Tungsten-Catalyzed Controllable Oxidative Dehydrogenative Coupling of Anilines. Org. Lett. 2023, 25, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, C.; Li, J.; Tan, C.; Wu, W.; Jiang, H. DDQ-mediated regioselective C-S bond formation: Efficient access to allylic sulfides. Org. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 3158–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, C.; Liao, M.; He, Z.; Chen, Y.; Mai, J.; Dong, R.; Chen, J.; Chen, L. Metal-Free Oxidative Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling of Alkenes with Thiophenols. ChemistrySelect 2023, 8, e202300845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Gao, Y.; Tang, G.; Zhao, Y. Phosphorothiolation of Aryl Boronic Acids Using P(O)H Compounds and Elemental Sulfur. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 1266–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xia, M.; Cheng, J. Catalyst- and oxidant-free coupling of disulfides with H-phosphine oxide: Construction of P–S bond leading to thiophosphinates. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 4702–4704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, Z.; Li, Y.-C.; Ding, W.-Z.; Zhu, T.; Liu, S.-Z.; Ren, X.; Zou, L.-H. Copper-Catalyzed Regioselective Sulfenylation of Indoles with Arylsulfonyl Chlorides. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2016, 5, 625–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Representative biologically active sulfur-containing molecules.
Figure 1. Representative biologically active sulfur-containing molecules.
Molecules 28 08071 g001
Scheme 1. Synthetic routes of thiophosphates.
Scheme 1. Synthetic routes of thiophosphates.
Molecules 28 08071 sch001
Scheme 2. Substrate scope of the aerobic dehydrogenative coupling of thiols with phosphonate. thiols 1 (0.2 mmol), phosphonate 2 (0.3 mmol), O2 (1 atm), W(CO)6 (10 mol%), THF (2 mL), 100 °C, 24 h.
Scheme 2. Substrate scope of the aerobic dehydrogenative coupling of thiols with phosphonate. thiols 1 (0.2 mmol), phosphonate 2 (0.3 mmol), O2 (1 atm), W(CO)6 (10 mol%), THF (2 mL), 100 °C, 24 h.
Molecules 28 08071 sch002
Scheme 3. Substrate scope of the aerobic dehydrogenative coupling of thiols with indoles. Thiols 1 (0.2 mmol), indoles 4 (0.3 mmol), O2 (1 atm), W(CO)6 (10 mol%), THF (2 mL), 100 °C, 24 h.
Scheme 3. Substrate scope of the aerobic dehydrogenative coupling of thiols with indoles. Thiols 1 (0.2 mmol), indoles 4 (0.3 mmol), O2 (1 atm), W(CO)6 (10 mol%), THF (2 mL), 100 °C, 24 h.
Molecules 28 08071 sch003
Scheme 4. Large-scale preparation.
Scheme 4. Large-scale preparation.
Molecules 28 08071 sch004
Scheme 5. Controlled experiments.
Scheme 5. Controlled experiments.
Molecules 28 08071 sch005
Scheme 6. Plausible mechanistic pathway.
Scheme 6. Plausible mechanistic pathway.
Molecules 28 08071 sch006
Table 1. Optimization of the reaction conditions a.
Table 1. Optimization of the reaction conditions a.
Molecules 28 08071 i001
EntryCatalystOxidantSolventYield (%) b
1W(CO)6BQMeCN29
2W(CO)3(CH3CN)3BQMeCN21
3W(COD)2(CO)4BQMeCN23
4W(CO)6BQDMSO30
5W(CO)6BQDMFtrace
6W(CO)6BQDMAtrace
7W(CO)6BQDCE32
8 cW(CO)6BQDioxanetrace
9W(CO)6BQToluene24
10W(CO)6BQTHF64
11W(CO)6DDQTHF72
12W(CO)6NQTHF61
13W(CO)6TBHPTHF10
14W(CO)6K2S2O8THF16
15W(CO)6airTHF70
16W(CO)6O2THF73
17W(CO)6O2THF50
18 dW(CO)6O2THF90
19 eW(CO)6O2THF85
20-O2THF10
21W(CO)6N2THFn.d.
a 4-methylbenzenethiol 1a (0.2 mmol), diethyl phosphonate 2a (0.3 mmol), oxidant (0.4 mmol), catalyst (10 mol%), solvent (2 mL), 80 °C, 24 h; b yields were determined by GC-MS, n.d. = not detected; c the reaction temperature was 60 °C; d the reaction temperature was 100 °C; e the reaction temperature was 120 °C.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Ye, F.; Chen, J.; Zheng, J. Low-Valent-Tungsten-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling Reaction. Molecules 2023, 28, 8071. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248071

AMA Style

Li C, Chen Y, Ye F, Chen J, Zheng J. Low-Valent-Tungsten-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling Reaction. Molecules. 2023; 28(24):8071. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248071

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Chunsheng, Yaoyang Chen, Feihua Ye, Junhua Chen, and Jia Zheng. 2023. "Low-Valent-Tungsten-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling Reaction" Molecules 28, no. 24: 8071. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248071

APA Style

Li, C., Chen, Y., Ye, F., Chen, J., & Zheng, J. (2023). Low-Valent-Tungsten-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling Reaction. Molecules, 28(24), 8071. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248071

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop